Daily Archives: May 3, 2022

How physical reading spaces are vital for keeping childrens imagination alive – wknd.

Posted: May 3, 2022 at 9:53 pm

Memories that shape us

By Saba Karim Khan

Published: Thu 28 Apr 2022, 8:43 PM

In my recent book talks, a question that inevitably came up was about childhood and the imagery early memories evoke. Each time, I found myself offering the same reply: I grew up in a home filled with hand-written letters, books, ghazals and dreams; where a lot would be traded for a creative or spiritually uplifting experience. So, in a strange way, we were misfits because we never really learnt how material things can buy happiness.

Its true, I did grow up in a sort of secular-Sufi home, if there is such a thing, and Saturday afternoons were spent at the British Council Library in Karachi. The library, of course, was about books, stacked in white shelves rolling on wheels, overlooking a verdant lawn with vintage trees, where we would buy samosas afterwards and watch our first Charlie Chaplin performance. But the library was so much more: it was about experiencing the first whiffs of freedom, of unleashing the imagination, about ideas and escape, about entertainment and socialising, too. It was where I fan-girled around the world of Enid Blyton at six (long before her stories were labelled politically incorrect by some), immersing in fairytales that refused to leave me; it was a safe space where one could belong, without breaking the bank. In many ways, much like reading, the library was an equaliser.

They say, Everything changes when we read, perhaps because reading is a ladder, or a window, to other abilities and occasions. As you climb each rung of the reading ladder, you inch towards literacy, but also towards imagination, picturing what might have been; and therein lies the true potential of stories. Enid Blyton did precisely that to me and once I discovered her world, the imagination was unstoppable: sitting in Karachis library, wed visualise the midnight feast at Malory Towers or the slippery slope and night markets in the Faraway Tree, the leaves rustling in the Enchanted Wood and what the Five Find-Outers might be up to. I was no longer satisfied; I wanted to know more, imagine more, do things differently.

I remember getting flak for reading just about anywhere at the dining table, in the car, at home time in school; but it was in the library that it struck me what it meant to read stories just for pleasure. In a space surrounded by books and like-minded children and adults, which granted me the freedom to choose what I wanted to read, in the absence of grades and competition and at that time mobile phones, I stumbled upon the power of books. I now realise that was the only way to fall in love with reading; to be allowed to do it without the fear of failure and judgment and the library enabled just that.

Going to the library turned reading into a social activity for us forging friendships with librarians, read-alouds which turned books into performances and co-creation, but also a kind of escape. We often think of escapism in derogatory, confused, cowardly terms; it doesnt have to be. The library, as a place of escapism, offered solace, a slowing down of the mind, body, soul, with wings to transport us elsewhere, even amidst Karachis frenzied city life.

But our girls today inhabit a markedly different world from the one I grew up in, and as a parent, I worry about some of these changes. I worry about the speed at which libraries are disappearing and the dearth of reading cafs to take them to. I worry about the first sight that hits you at a bookshop more toys than books. I worry that our girls may be part of a generation that finds libraries and reading cafs, uncool and wearisome. I worry because I know no matter how avidly they cram phonics or spellings at school, or how much we consolidate learning at home, occupying physical space in a reading room or library opens up different experiences and possibilities.

Around the world, budgetary constraints or simply labeling libraries extinct, are becoming grounds to get rid of them and to stop creating new ones. By doing so, we are shutting down portals that are vital for our children, for their future and well-being. Without places that enable them to meditate and imagine, which offer bandwidth in their over-flowing schedules, we run the risk of producing atomised beings, rather than curious, stimulated children, those who are physically, emotionally, imaginatively alive and equipped to participate in the act of creation.

When Albert Einstein was asked about ways to make children smarter, he unequivocally trusted the value of reading: If you want your children to be intelligent, he responded, read them fairytales. If you want them to be more intelligent, read them more fairytales. To his mind, the vision of creativity and the power of books was crystalised. For us, however, libraries, reading and reading spaces, whilst attractive in theory, appear incompatible with our brisk, explosive online lives, where if youre not constantly busy, you arent seen as productive enough. Who has time to while away in a reading caf; whats there to show for it at the end of the hour spent?

With our children, I hope this fashion of jam-packed minds and routines comes to a halt; I hope, instead, that they allow themselves to pause and reflect, sometimes be bored, other times listen and tell stories, to know what it means to speak softly in a reading space, to daydream and for some of those fantasies to eventually take flight. For far too long, we have convinced ourselves that society, its problems, are too sprawling and in our singular capacity, we cant change much. I hope we can raise a generation where individuals believe they can imagine things differently and that no difference is too small, where they arent reduced to products off an assembly line or statistics on a report card. For us to get there, having places to read, to imagine and feel free, is a non-negotiable starting point.

My reading recommendation for children is The Book with No Pictures by B.J. Novak.

wknd@khaleejtimes.com

Saba Karim Khan is the author of Skyfall, released by Bloomsbury and works at NYU Abu Dhabi

Link:
How physical reading spaces are vital for keeping childrens imagination alive - wknd.

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on How physical reading spaces are vital for keeping childrens imagination alive – wknd.

WATCH: Neuralink, mind uploading and the AI apocalypse – Hamilton Spectator

Posted: at 9:52 pm

Eight years ago, a little-known researcher named Stephen Hawking predicted that artificial intelligence would either be the single greatest invention of humankindor kick start the apocalypse.

The question remains: how can humans control an AI that has us beat in intelligence and virtually every other field?

We cant, argues a growing number of scientists and entrepreneurs, including Tesla techno-king Elon Muskat least not as we are now.

Welcome to Kevins Science Korner, a video series diving into the strange and fantastic corners of science and technology.

Lets start with the end of humanity.

The paper clip problem: how AI might accidentally kill all humans

The paper clip maximizer thought experiment was first coined by Oxford philosopher Nick Bostrom in 2003. His influential theory describes how a superintelligent AI might make the very unintelligent decision to drown Earth in stationary.

According to Bostrom, a superintelligence is any intellect that vastly outperforms the best human brains in practically every field, including scientific creativity, general wisdom, and social skills.

This AI is so smart, it could improve itself by building better hardware than any human could, or by rewriting its own source code. The updates would come faster and faster as the AI grows smarter, eventually leading to an intelligence explosion. At this point, it might see humans as humans see ants, Bostrom wrote.

This could be a very good thing if were careful. AI could revolutionize space travel, medicine and computing. Depending on the phrasing of its programming, it could also (theoretically) kill all humans.

An AI programmed to make as many paper clips as possible might realize it could finish its mission way more efficiently without any humans getting in its way. Eventually, it might turn all of earth and then increasing portions of space into paper clip manufacturing facilities, Bostrom said.

Neuralink: If you cant beat em, join em

So we learned its hard to stop an AI hell-bent on flooding the world with paper clips, at least with our current puny monkey brains. But what if there was a way to make us smarter?

The worlds richest man has a plan to do just that, and it involves drilling a hole through your skull and putting electrodes in your brain. Enter Neuralink, Musks mysterious brain-machine-interface company.

For now, Neuralink aims to let you control a computer with your mind, bypassing any need to type on a keyboard or move a mouse. But Musks plans are far more ambitious; he aims to eventually merge the human brain with AI.

In time, neuralink would unlock a tertiary level of the brain that can be linked with AI, Musk claims. This could improve our computing power and give us new abilities like being able to save and replay memories, like that one Black Mirror episode, Musk said in 2020.

Musk has long been vocal on the topic, saying in 2016 humans will end up the house cats of AI. In 2020, he slammed Googles DeepMind AI project for flying too close to the sun.

Meanwhile, some experts doubt that a symbiosis with artificial intelligence" is even possible.

Mind uploading: could we live forever online?

Sure brain-machine-interfaces are fun and all, but were still trapped in these fleshy bodies. This doesnt have to be the case, say researchers in the field of whole brain emulation.

These researchers argue that consciousness and everything else that makes us human results from the billions of neurons in your brain, the trillions of connections between them and the countless neurotransmitters passing through.

Assuming theyre right, and consciousness isnt the result of some intangible spirit, we could theoretically make an exact model of the brain and all its connections using software. This model would then be a sentient, exact replica of the original brain.

Brain-machine-interfaces like Neuralinks have been seen as the first step toward full brain uploading. But in order to actually scan all that gunk in your head and make it make sense, some scientists believe wed need the help of a superintelligent AI.

With tech giants in silicon valley throwing billions into AI research, this future could arrive sooner than youd expect.

Read the original:

WATCH: Neuralink, mind uploading and the AI apocalypse - Hamilton Spectator

Posted in Superintelligence | Comments Off on WATCH: Neuralink, mind uploading and the AI apocalypse – Hamilton Spectator

Artificial Intelligence And the Human Context of War – The National Interest Online

Posted: at 9:52 pm

Excitement and fear about artificial intelligence (AI) have been building for years. Many believe that AI is poised to transform war as profoundly as it has business. There is a burgeoning literature on the AI revolution in war, and even Henry Kissinger has weighed in on The Age of AI And Our Human Future.

Governments around the world seem to agree. Chinas AI development plan states that AI has become a new focus of international competition and is a strategic technology that will lead in the future. The U.S. National Security Commission on AI warns that AI is deepening the threat posed by cyber attacks and disinformation campaigns that Russia, China, and others are using to infiltrate our society, steal our data, and interfere in our democracy. China and the United States are in a race for AI supremacy, and both nations are investing huge sums into lethal autonomous weapons to gain an edge in great power competition.

Scholars expect that authoritarians and democracies alike will embrace AI to improve military effectiveness and limit their domestic costs. Military AI systems will be able to sense, respond, and swarm faster than humans. Speed and lethality would encourage preemption, leading to strategic deterrence failures. Unaccountable killing would be an ethical catastrophe. Taken to an extreme, a superintelligence could eliminate humanity altogether.

The Economics of Prediction

These worrisome scenarios assume that AI can and will replace human warriors. Yet the literature on the economics of technology suggests that this assumption is mistaken. Technologies that replace some human tasks typically create demand for other tasks. In general, the economic impact of technology is determined by its complements. This suggests that the complements of AI may have a bigger impact on international politics than AI technology alone.

Technological substitution typically increases the value of complements. When automobiles replaced horse-carts, this also created demand for people who could build roads, repair cars, and keep them fueled. A drop in the price of mobility increased the value of transportation infrastructure. Something similar is happening with AI.

The AI technology that has received all the media attention is machine learning. Machine learning is a form of prediction, which is the process of filling in missing information. Notable AI achievements in automated translation, image recognition, video game playing, and route navigation are all examples of automated prediction. Technological trends in computing, memory, and bandwidth are making large-scale prediction commercially feasible.

Yet prediction is only part of decisionmaking. The other parts are data, judgment, and action. Data makes prediction possible. Judgment is about values; it determines what to predict and what actions to take after a prediction is made. An AI may be able to predict whether rain is likely by drawing on data about previous weather, but a human must decide whether the risk of getting wet merits the hassle of carrying an umbrella.

Studies of AI in the commercial world demonstrate that AI performance depends on having a lot of good data and clear judgment. Firms like Amazon, Uber, Facebook, and FedEx have benefitted from AI because they have invested in data collection and have made deliberate choices about what to predict and what to do with AI predictions. Once again, the economic impact of new technology is determined by its complements. As innovation in AI makes prediction cheaper, data and judgment become more valuable.

The Complexity of Automated War

In a new study we explore the implications of the economic perspective for military power. Organizational and strategic context shapes the performance of all military information systems. AI should be no different in this regard. The question is how the unique context of war shapes the critical AI complements of data and judgment.

While decisionmaking is similar in military and business organizations, they operate in radically different circumstances. Commercial organizations benefit from institutionalized environments and common standards. Military systems, by contrast, operate in a more anarchic and unpredictable environment. It is easier to meet the conditions of quality data and clear judgment in peacetime commerce than in violent combat.

An important implication is that military organizations that rely on AI will tend to become more complex. Militaries that invest in AI will become preoccupied with the quality of their data and judgment, as well as the ways in which teams of humans and machines make decisions. Junior personnel will have more responsibility for managing the alignment of AI systems and military objectives. Assessments of the relative power of AI-enabled militaries will thus turn on the quality of their human capital and managerial choices.

Anything that is a source of strength in war also becomes an attractive target. Adversaries of AI-enabled militaries will have more incentives to target the quality of data and the coherence of judgment. As AI enables organizations to act more efficiently, they will have to invest more in coordinating and protecting everything that they do. Rather than making military operations faster and more decisive, we expect the resulting organizational and strategic complexity to create more delays and confusion.

Emerging Lessons from Ukraine

The ongoing war in Ukraine features conventional forces in pitched combat over territorial control. This is exactly the kind of scenario that appears in a lot of AI futurism. Yet this same conflict may hold important lessons about AI might be used very differently in war, or not used at all.

Many AI applications already play a supporting role. Ukraine has been dominating the information war as social media platforms, news feeds, media outlets, and even Russian restaurant reviews convey news of Ukrainian suffering and heroism. These platforms all rely on AI, while sympathetic hacktivists attempt to influence the content that AI serves up. Financial analysts use AI as they assess the effects of crushing economic sanctions on Russia, whether to better target them or protect capital from them. AI systems also support the commercial logistics networks that are funneling humanitarian supplies to Ukraine from donors around the world.

Western intelligence agencies also use data analytics to wade through a vast quantity of datasatellite imagery, airborne collection, signals intelligence, open-source chatteras they track the battlefield situation. These agencies are sharing intelligence with Kyiv, which is used to support Ukrainian forces in the field. This means AI is already an indirect input to battlefield events. Another more operational application of AI is in commercial cybersecurity. For instance, Microsofts proactive defense against Russian wipers, has likely relied on AI to detect malware.

Importantly, these AI applications work because they are grounded in peaceful institutions beyond the battlefield. The war in Ukraine is embedded in a globalized economy that both shapes and is shaped by the war. Because AI is already an important part of that economy, it is already a part of this war. Because AI helps to enable global interdependence, it is also helps to weaponize interdependence. While futurist visions of AI focus on direct battlefield applications, AI may end up playing a more important role in the indirect economic and informational context of war.

Futurist visions generally emphasize the offensive potency of AI. Yet the AI applications in use today are marginally empowering Ukraine in its defense against the Russian offensive. Instead of making war faster, AI is helping to prolong it by increasing the ability of Ukraine to resist. In this case, time works against the exposed and harried Russian military.

We expect that the most promising military applications of AI are those with analogues in commercial organizations, such as administration, personnel, and logistics. Yet even these activities are full of friction. Just-in-time resupply would not be able to compensate for Russias abject failure to plan for determined resistance. Efficient personnel management systems would not have informed Russian personnel about the true nature of their mission.

Almost everyone overestimated Russia and underestimated Ukraine based on the best data and assessments available. The intelligence failures in Russia had little to do with the quality of data and analysis, moreover, and more with the insularity of Russian leadership. AI cannot fix, and may worsen, the information pathologies of authoritarian regimes. AI-enabled cyber warfare capabilities would likewise be of little use if leaders failed to include a cyber warfare plan.

The Human Future of Automated War

It is folly to expect the same conditions that have enabled AI success in commerce to be replicated in war. The wartime conditions of violent uncertainty, unforeseen turbulence, and political controversy will tend to undermine the key AI conditions of good data and clear judgment. Indeed, strategy and leadership cannot be automated.

The questions that matter most about the causes, conduct, and conclusion of the war in Ukraine (or any war) are not really about prediction at all. Questions about the strategic aims, political resolve, and risk tolerances of leaders like Vladimir Putin, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, and Joseph Biden turn on judgments of values, goals, and priorities. Only humans can provide the answers.

AI will provide many tactical improvements in the years to come. Yet fancy tactics are no substitute for bad strategy. Wars are caused by miscalculation and confusion, and artificial intelligence cannot offset natural stupidity.

See original here:

Artificial Intelligence And the Human Context of War - The National Interest Online

Posted in Superintelligence | Comments Off on Artificial Intelligence And the Human Context of War – The National Interest Online

Elon Musk and the Posthumanist Threat | John Waters – First Things

Posted: at 9:52 pm

Elon Musk is typically the object of considerable masculine envy, and so, in the interests of avoiding accusations of green-eye, it would be nice to be able to declare him unequivocally as on the side of the angels. But, for all his legendary space-adventuring, this is by no means clear.

For one thing, he is a longtime friend of Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, which hints that, despite all the talk about Musk's Twitter being a haven for freedom of expression, his reign as supremo of the worlds leading wittering platform must be subject to a probationary period. For another thing, Twitter is, in its essence, not a platform for the free thinker. Free speech tends to be an individual thing. But Twitter has been, remains, and will endure only as an instrument of mob-speak. I mean this in the sense that the French psychologist Gustave Le Bon spoke ofthe psychological crowd, in which individual personality disappears to be replaced by a new beingexactly, he said, as the cells in the human body unite to create a single entity which displays characteristics very different from each of the cells singularly.

This is what Dorsey and Twitter stumbled upon: not merely the possibility of a global electronic megaphone for the voices of useful mobs, but an evolutionary device with which to attack public discourse more or less unrestrained. Where Twitter is concerned, once the mob has been blooded and loosed, free speech can only mean turning up the volume.

Two years ago, while foolishly running for election to the national parliament of my country, Ireland, I briefly had a Twitter account wholly administered by others. This was against my better judgment, since for many years I had been saying that, when the issue of blame for the ending of civilization would in the not too distant future be investigated by anthropologists (if there were any anthropologists) these worthy surveyors would in jig time emerge from the ruins with a piece of paper bearing just one word:Twitter.

Nevertheless, Twitter, for good ormore likelyill, has become, as Musk says, thede factotown square. The nature of the platform, being defined by loudness and rudeness, offers a ready justification for enforcing restraint or civilityhere the last refuges of scoundrels. For related reasons, the very conditions that characterize the Twittersphere have become repressive, because they invite a moulding of commentary to skewed notions of truth-telling as a requirement for basic continuity of access. Twitter has become the perfect medium for deniable censorship.

Elon Musk may understand all this. He describes social media asgiant cybernautic collectives, which he must know are not the same as open conduits of free speecha concept he defines as when someone you dont like says something you dont like. He has already begun to move the Twitter furniture about in a manner suggesting good intentions. But the problem is a deeper one, as we may soon get the chance to observe.

When one watches and listens to him, itis not hard to like Elon Musk. He seems to speak tentatively like a shy child who does not want to invite a wave of effusive praise from an indulgent aunt or neighbor. He knows how smart he is, but would like to keep it as something understood rather than talked about. He seems all the time to be amazed by himself and his existence in the world. In this sense, he is the perfect antidote to a world jaded by taking itself for granted.

But Musk is not any kind of conservative, and so the tentative cheers from such quarters that have greeted leftist dismay over his apparent routing of the Twitter board might more wisely have been postponed to see what the new Twitter may look and sound like.

He is no fan of wokeness, for sure, and it may well emerge that the Musk supremacy will mark the ending of Twitters thus far lifelong association with that agenda, though this, while a welcome relief, would proffer insufficient justification for his dramatic intervention. Wokeness, after all, is on its last legs, the adults of the world having at last begun to awake to the evils of transgenderism and Drag Queen Story Hour. Moreover, woke Twitter has already fulfilled its deeper purpose in the agenda of the Cultural Marxist revolution: the sowing of unprecedented intellectual discord in Western society and the demoralization of conservative opinion.

It is where this might be taken next that ought to concern the world, and where Musks influence may prove most critical. Assuming the world finds a way of side-stepping the looming prospect of World War III,the next phase of the agenda will be posthumanism, when the focus of both woke and conservative attentions should pivot from the recent fixations on sexual anthropology to the metaphysical. The issue of Twitters undemocratic aspect, and detrimental effects on freedoms of various kinds, is dwarfed by another longtime concern articulated by Musk: the failure to regulate the evolution of digital superintelligence, a form of AI that promises to change not merely the environments and cultures we inhabit but our own minds and souls.

Musk is an ambivalent figure in this context, and his charger is not white, nor even a horse, but something like a zebra, either black with hopeful white stripes or white with worrying black ones. He has many critics who look with suspicion at his 2,000+ Starlink satellites and mutter how conveniently they appear to fit with the new age of surveillance andsocial credit systems. Then there is his Neuralink venture, for developing implantable brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), which essentially enable the brain to connect remotely with robotic and smart devices. It is, in short, another way of creating a mob-compliant mind, and human trials are scheduled to begin this year.

The circumstantial evidence, then, points to Musk as a tech poacher turned gamekeeper. He claims that for years he tried to persuade the world to slow down AI, but eventually admitted defeat and decided if you cant beat them, join them. He is conscious of the potential for dystopian outcomes arising from the supplanting of human relationships with robotic ones, but ominously adds: Itll be whatever people want, really. I am really quite close to the cutting edge in AI, and it scares the hell out of me, he has said. Its capable of vastly more than anyone knows, and the rate of improvement is exponential.

His thinking becomes worrisome when he hints that implanted neural circuitry is just the next step from smartphones: We all of us alreadyarecyborgs. You have a machine extension of yourself in the form of our phone and your computer, and all your applications. You are already superhuman.

Sure, Musk defuses much of the concern when he talks about democratizing AI technology to render it safer, but what is ominous right now is that, thanks to the COVID project, the democratic processes are more weak and tender than they have been in perhaps 75 years. A key contributor to social media lawlessness has been the wholesale failure of democratic representatives to confront the high-handed and quasi-criminal practices promoted and justified by self-serving tech moguls rabbiting on about free speech.

Musk is now not merely the richest man in the world but the richest human being in history. Worth $24.6 billion pre-pandemic, by February last he had added another $200 billion, less small change.It is a measure of our desperation that we now find ourselves hoping, as though praying to some monied god, that Elon will do something about the sequestration of our democracy by other unelected, unmandated moguls, and then graciously undo the damage done to liberty and truth before riding off into the sunset. In a certain sense, even his succeeding in this would amount to an added insult to the egregious offense already delivered. In the final analysis, it would be fatuous were the free world to now wait with bated breath to see what a billionaire might do to face down this next looming tyranny.

For all that Elon Musk might be a hero of our times, we remain on the cusp of the final transfer of the numinous freedom of humanity from the metaphysical to the material realms: freedoms no longer deriving from God or even gods, but from the bank balances of the oligarchs who aspire and machinate to supplant all deities.

Elon Musk is, apart from being the richest, perhaps the most likeable mogul on the planet. But that does not mean he would be a more congenial or sympathetic god. We should mark those black stripes carefully as his zebra comes over the hill.

John Watersis an Irish writer and commentator, the author of ten books, and a playwright.

First Thingsdepends on its subscribers and supporters. Join the conversation and make a contribution today.

Clickhereto make a donation.

Clickhereto subscribe toFirst Things.

Photo by Steven JurvetsonviaCreative Commons. Image cropped.

Read this article:

Elon Musk and the Posthumanist Threat | John Waters - First Things

Posted in Superintelligence | Comments Off on Elon Musk and the Posthumanist Threat | John Waters – First Things

Judge Jackson Affirms Second Amendment Rights But …

Posted: at 9:51 pm

Anyone expecting Judge Ketanji Brown Jacksons confirmation hearing to be a firework show when it came to gun rights was disappointed. President Joe Bidens nominee answered questions posed by probing U.S. senators, but some of those answers gave reason for pause.

Although Judge Jackson noted the U.S. Supreme Court in Heller affirmed the Second Amendment is an individual right, her full testimony was revealing. Judge Jackson demurred on questions surrounding concealed carry, spoke of the importance of Court precedent and refused to define her judicial philosophy.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) started off the three-days of marathon questioning of Judge Jackson getting to the heart of the matter.

Do you believe the individual right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right? Sen. Grassley asked.

Judge Jackson answered, Senator, the Supreme Court has established that the individual right to keep and bear arms is a fundamental right.

Sen. Grassley pressed further asking the judge to describe how she would decide what a fundamental right is under the Constitution. Judge Jackson pointed to Court precedent that serves as a guide for how justices would discern fundamental rights. She added that those precedents set the standards for determining if rights are fundamental, including the 14th Amendments Due Process Clause as it applies to liberty and personal autonomy.

Thats the tradition of the Court for determining if something is fundamental in that way, she added.

Click here to read the entire article at NSSF.org.

Read more here:
Judge Jackson Affirms Second Amendment Rights But ...

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Judge Jackson Affirms Second Amendment Rights But …

Countering Biden’s push to erode Second Amendment rights – The Highland County Press

Posted: at 9:51 pm

By U.S. Sen. Mike CrapoR-IdahoPresident Biden and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco recently announced the nomination of Steve Dettelbach to serve as Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF).

They also used the opportunity to reiterate the administrations hard stance against so-called ghost guns and its efforts to extend firearms record-keeping requirements that risk establishing an unlawful gun registry.

The administration is using all of its tools, including circumventing the legislative process, to go after law-abiding gun owners and firearms vendors. I do not support more gun control.

Burdening law-abiding citizens of this country with additional gun restrictions is not the answer to safeguarding the public. I continue to oppose all efforts to weaken Second Amendment rights.

ATF Nomination Steve Dettelbachs nomination to lead the ATF is rightly concerning, as it would put a person who has voiced support for eroding Second Amendment rights in charge of the federal law enforcement agency responsible for enforcing gun laws. At President Bidens direction, the ATF has begun broadening restrictions, including returning to the outrageous practice of repressing firearms licensees for de minimis (trivial) grammatical errors in their record keeping.

Ghost Guns The Biden administration has taken a hard stance against so-called ghost guns, or guns built from unserialized gun assembly kits. The ATF finalized rule 2021R-05, Definition of Frame or Receiver and Identification of Firearms, that would redefine firearm receivers in order to require them to have serial numbers. Additionally, President Biden created a National Ghost Gun Enforcement Initiative focused on prosecuting criminals who use ghost guns in crimes.

However, data concerning the use of ghost guns in crimes is limited, and reported numbers on confiscated guns are not limited to those used to commit crimes. The administration should focus its resources on pursuing dangerous criminals, not scapegoating hobbyists.

Firearms Record Keeping I am also deeply concerned by the ATFs admission it is cataloguing and digitizing business records from shuttered federal firearms licensees (FFLs).

Current federal law requires FFLs to keep their records of firearm transfers for 20 years, at which point they can be destroyed. Should an FFL close its business, it must turn its records over to the ATF, which maintains them at the National Tracing Center.

The final rule 2021R-05 would extend record-keeping requirements by requiring FFLs to retain key records until they shut down their business or licensed activity. The Firearms Owners Protection Act prohibits the federal government from creating a national gun registry. The ATF must adhere to this law and cease any efforts to create a de facto gun registry.

The ATFs excessive rulemaking is deeply troubling, and I am countering its bureaucratic overreach:

I am an original co-sponsor of S. 1920, the ATF Accountability Act, that would ensure firearms manufacturers and lawful gun owners are not subject to unchecked bureaucratic ATF rulings;

I joined in pressing the ATF on its use of secret internal guidance to enforce regulations not openly published; and

I joined in demanding the ATF provide answers on recent actions to prevent law-abiding citizens from creating and owning suppressors.

These are just some of the recent efforts underway to protect and preserve our constitutional right to bear arms.

Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) characterized the Administrations push for more gun restrictions as a distraction from the reality that the explosion of crime in blue cities is directly attributable to those same cities implementing de-policing, installing progressive prosecutors, and enacting disastrous bail reform policies.

I agree and will continue to press for policies that truly get at the root cause of the violent crime problem without compromising law-abiding citizens constitutional rights.

Read more from the original source:
Countering Biden's push to erode Second Amendment rights - The Highland County Press

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Countering Biden’s push to erode Second Amendment rights – The Highland County Press

The Politics of Hunting in Pennsylvania – PoliticsPA

Posted: at 9:51 pm

Written by Steve Ulrich, Managing Editor

In the past week, Pennsylvania residents have been subjected to TV ads featuring U.S. Senate candidate Dave McCormick firing a series of weapons, showing his experience as a teenage hunter, a West Point cadet and a solider in Iraq.

Im Dave McCormick and I approve this message to protect the second amendment because thats what guarantees the rest.

Today, Mehmet Oz released a new ad showing the celebrity doctor from New Jersey handling a rifle, explaining how his father taught him about how to handle a rifle and that he is passing along the same lesson to his son.

Its about our constitutional right to protect ourselves from intruders or an overly intrusive government, said Oz in his ad.

Four years ago, Conor Lamb introduced himself to the Commonwealth with a video that stated he served four years in the Marines. Still loves to shoot.

In 2020, the Pennsylvania Game Commission reported over 887,000 general hunting licenses for residents of the Commonwealth. The Commission estimated hunters took 435,180 deer during the 2020-21 seasons.

No other state in the Northeast can match those numbers, not even when taking landmass into account, the Game Commission wrote highlighting the season.

Pennsylvania by the numbers Percent of residents with paid hunting licenses: 7.3% (24th out of 50 states) Total paid hunting license holders: 930,815 Total hunting license, tags, permits and stamps: 2,646,720 Gross cost of all hunting licenses: $36,873,199

But this appears to be more than just about hunting for sport.

A little over a decade ago, the Supreme Court redefined the Second Amendment. Before then, in the eyes of the federal courts, the amendment protected the rights of state militias to bear arms not the rights of individual Americans. That all changed in 2008 with the stroke of a pen.

The scale of Second Amendment arms puts firearms into context. To be sure, Americans possess hundreds ofmillions of guns. But researchers trace most firearms tomultiple-gun owners, and about half to super-owners the three percent of the adult population that owns 17 guns on average.

Most eligible Americans do not possess firearms, and the percentage of households that do has dropped in recent decades, according to onecommonly cited survey, from 47 percent in 1980 to 31 percent in 2014.On an individual level, that survey found that only 22 percent of American adults own a firearm; 78 percent do not.Far more people own knives for the basic reason that they have broader utility in day-to-day life. Some Second Amendment scholars havecalled knives the most common arm in the United States.

Politicians supported by gun rights groups similarly assume that the Second Amendment is just about guns. In fact, the Republican Partys official platform conflates gun rights and SecondAmendment rights:

We uphold the right of individuals to keep and bear arms, a natural inalienable right that predates theConstitution and is secured by the Second Amendment. Lawful gun ownership enables Americans toexercise their God-given right of self-defense for the safety of their homes, their loved ones, and their communities.

As the days count down to the primary election on May 17, we will continue to see candidates utilizing hunting and firearms to make their case for who is the most Pennsylvanian.

April 29th, 2022 | Posted in Front Page Stories, Senate, Top Stories, Video | 12 Comments

Continue reading here:
The Politics of Hunting in Pennsylvania - PoliticsPA

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on The Politics of Hunting in Pennsylvania – PoliticsPA

The French election and the international revolt against the ruling ‘elites’ – The knoxville focus

Posted: at 9:51 pm

By Dr. Harold A. Black

blackh@knoxfocus.com

haroldblackphd.com

The latest French election shows voter discontent with the establishment. The incumbent was primarily challenged by the same far right candidate that was soundly vanquished in the last election. However, this year, the election was closer than predicted with the ruling party garnering less than 50% of the vote dictating a second round runoff. The challengers party was openly racist and pro-Nazi when it was founded with its sole issue being the massive immigration of Muslims into France. Today its rhetoric is softer. The party now speaks of independence from the European Union, the removal of French forces from the command of NATO and amending the French constitution to limit immigration.

In last weeks runoff, the opposition party ended up with less than 50 percent of the vote but the French discontentment was still evident. It is almost identical to the discontentment with the Biden Administration. The Wall Street Journal called the discontent a cultural alienation from a progressive hegemony in the Wests academic, media and artistic institutions and resistance to the new religion of universal climate change compliance with its costly implications for energy customers and seething fury with the little autocrats in government and health bureaucracies decreeing lockdowns, masks and vaccine mandates. underlying it all, righteous indignation at the arrogance of unaccountable elites who dismiss opposition to their authority as the product of bigotry and ignorance and denounce anyone displaying it as a traitor or a domestic terrorist. Sound familiar?

The incumbent, Emmanuel Macron won but acknowledged that many voted for him as the lesser of two evils. A few on the American Left have said that if Macron could be re-elected with his low popularity, then there is hope for Biden. I am no expert on the sagacity of French leadership but Macron is no Joe Biden. Here our problems are compounded by the ineptitude of our leadership. We, too, must endure the lefts obsession over climate change, open borders and Covid mandates. Add to that Afghanistan, gender identity, transgender athletes, Critical Race Theory, the woke military, inflation, shutting down pipelines, shackling oil and gas, the Build Back Better fiasco, the surge in crime and the war on parents where the attorney general was investigating parents attending PTA meetings as domestic terrorists.

The difference between the French election and our forthcoming election is that the opposition is projected to win. If Republicans win both the House and the Senate, then Biden will try to enact his changes through edict something that the progressives in Congress have been urging all along. No Biden budget would pass both Houses. No radical progressive would be confirmed by the Senate. Republicans would have the power to effectively shut down the Biden agenda and throttle back actions taken by those in the administration who think that climate change is the existential crisis of our time. I find it remarkable that so much damage has been done to our economy and our national psyche in so short a time.

We are confronted with elected officials who want to severely curtail our freedoms, re-write the Constitution, pack the Supreme Court, eliminate the Electoral College, abolish the Senate, cancel our culture, muzzle free speech and annul the second amendment. We take to heart the words of Abraham Lincoln: Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution of the United States as our fathers made it inviolate. The people of the United States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. Amen.

See the original post here:
The French election and the international revolt against the ruling 'elites' - The knoxville focus

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on The French election and the international revolt against the ruling ‘elites’ – The knoxville focus

There’s a new sheriff in town: How the local elections could have constitutional implications – Blue Ridge Public Radio

Posted: at 9:51 pm

In the Western North Carolina region, eight long-time sheriffs arent seeking reelection. Voters in Avery, Cherokee, Clay, Haywood, Jackson, Macon, Transylvania and Rutherford counties will elect a new sheriff in the midterm election.

BPR talked with retiring sheriffs and reformers about what this turnover means for the region and the future of law enforcement.

Macon County Sheriff Robert Holland has been sheriff since 2002 - now hes retiring.

In his office there is a picture of Holland as juvenile officer shaking hands with Former President George Bush when Bush was campaigning for his son in 2000.

Courtesy of Robert Holland

/

I was in my early twenties. I was a baby. That was a long time ago, said Holland.

Hes says that he has seen the job grow in his three decades in law enforcement.

Gosh, looking back at, you know, through my career, there's been lots of changes. I can remember a time where when your patrol car broke down, you used your personal vehicle to get through the week until you could have your patrol car fixed. Computers I was one of the first ones to have a computer in the agency as an officer, said Holland.

Professionalization, and more technology have been increasingly a part of law enforcement reform.

For example, in 2020, the North Carolina Sheriffs Association recommended reforms such as recruitment, certification, use of force procedures and the creation of an employment database meant to weed out officers with performance issues before they move to a new department was also implemented. They issued an updated report on reforms this year.

Every day things change. What might work yesterday may not work today, and you've got to look at different ways to handle those things. I think that the standards that they're coming up with, they're good, said Holland.

While some things change, the position of sheriff has always been political.That side of the sheriffs role was highlighted in 2020 when the Second Amendment sanctuary movement hit North Carolina.

The resolutions were put forward across the South in part because of gun control legislation moving through the Virginia General Assembly. Cherokee County was one of the first counties to become a sanctuary in 2019. The designation is largely symbolic and promises to uphold the Second Amendment rights of citizens.

In Macon County, the debate lasted three months. Holland calls it an important moment in his career. He provided the county commissioners with a version of the resolution from the N.C. Sheriffs Association which he said did not conflict with the Constitution.

I've already taken an oath to uphold the Constitution, which includes the Second Amendment. One of the major issues that I had with signing this oath for the Second Amendment ... it wasn't the oath that I take for office. It was only a portion of that oath, Holland. And so I had legal advisors outside of Macon County that were giving me advice that you need to understand that if you're signing an oath, a new oath, then you could be null and voiding your oath that you've already taken.

Macon County ultimately passed a resolution protecting the U.S. Constitution, N.C. Constitution and all other laws.

In Haywood County, Sheriff Greg Christopher took a similar stance.

I lean on the North Carolina Sheriff's association to help guide myself as well as our other sheriffs here in North Carolina when it comes to anything constitutional, said Christopher. But especially that second amendment, which is very valid for a lot of people, they do have some valid concerns.

Haywood ultimately passed a similar Constitutional protection resolution.

Christopher, a Democrat, is also retiring after more than four decades in law enforcement.

Two Democrats and three Republicans will run their own Primary Election campaigns in hopes of replacing him. Of the five, two are current employees of the HCSO, one is a former employee and former interim sheriff, and the other two have significant law enforcement experience in Buncombe County. He has this advice for those running:

Our motto here, when it comes to community relations has been, we want to know our communities before we need to know our communities, said Christopher.

Meanwhile in Macon, all five candidates are Republicans. No Democrats filed for the seat, making the Primary Election all-important. Three out of the five candidates in Macon Countys Primary Election are current officers at the sheriffs office. Holland says he will be happy if any of those three are elected.

The Second Amendment is a key issue for candidates and groups who want local law enforcement to have more power.

One national group, the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, wants local sheriffs to assert constitutional powers even over those of the president.

The group believes in zero gun control, no federally-owned land in states and more. This is founded in the CSPOAs contention that The vertical separation of powers in the Constitution makes it clear that the power of the sheriff even supersedes the powers of the President.

Christopher says there are reasons for gun permitting laws despite Second Amendment rights.

One of the things that sheriffs across our state are dealing with constantly is people who want to carry a pistol or to buy a pistol or to have a conceal pistol. And then we have to determine, whether from a mental health standpoint, if they need to do that - or not - for the safety of all of our citizens, said Christopher.

We have to protect our citizens and mental health is a huge issue for us, especially here in North Carolina, with the lack of mental health facilities that we have, he said.

Christophers point that sheriffs must consider mental health is a part of an opposing view to the constitutional association.

These conversations about other law enforcement reform spread across the county in 2020 and continue to be an important political topic.

During last months State of the Union, President Joe Biden explained that he wants to fully fund police.

"We should all agree: The answer is not to defund the police. The answer is to fund the police. Fund them with resources and training they need to protect our communities, said Biden.

Biden proposed federal budget for 2023 includes more than $24 billion for law enforcement centered programs and even more for research on gun violence, mental health services and other services.

These reforms are currently being hashed out by local governments like Buncombe County.

Rob Thomas of the Racial Justice Coalition in Asheville has been working on law enforcement reform since 2019. He says the organization advocates to re- invest some police funding into community services.

The one sentence that I would try to use is: Would you try to build an entire house with just a hammer. We try to look at law enforcement as a blanket solution for a lot of our social problems in America, said Thomas.

Thomas says that it feels like the momentum of change in 2020 has stalled.

I think people have forgotten what inspired the attention and focus on law enforcement in the first place and the individuals that didnt appreciate the changes that we made are gaining their platform back, said Thomas.

I think the thing that made so much change in 2020 is that people were able to see the injustice and the deaths and see how this has been happening for a while and it hasnt been personalized. I think that the only way we are going to get back where we were is if we are able to specific stories about how specific policies, specific things and specific power held by specific individuals creates massive ripples in individual lives within the community, said Thomas.

Law enforcement reform will be the ballot this year. Voters turning out will be able to vote for eight new sheriffs in Western North Carolina.

Another version of this story was also published in the Smoky Mountain News.

Read more:
There's a new sheriff in town: How the local elections could have constitutional implications - Blue Ridge Public Radio

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on There’s a new sheriff in town: How the local elections could have constitutional implications – Blue Ridge Public Radio

So Who Is Lobbying The NFL To Play The Bucs In Munich? – JoeBucsFan.com

Posted: at 9:51 pm

Who wants to play the Bucs in Deutschland?

It seems one team is lobbying the NFL to play a road game in London against the Packers. And it got Joe thinking about what teams, if any, are pushing NFL warden Roger Goodell to play the Bucs in Munich?

The Bucs will make NFL history hosting the first NFL regular season game on German soil this fall. Rumors arethe Bucs will play on Sunday, Nov. 13. Later this week, the NFL is expected to announce dates and matchups for all the international games scheduled for England, Mexico and Germany.

That news came from Daylight-Savings-Time-scared, crossword-puzzle-puzzled, Elon-Musk-peeved, Barstool-Sports-triggered, almond-milk-sipping, hot-dog-eating-contest-protesting, mock-draft-scowling,L.L.-Bean-wearing, tennis fans advocate, Second Amendment abolitionist,Mike-Florio-arguing,parrot-insensitive,chewing-with-his-mouth-open,soup-gulping,California-train-romancing, anti-football proliferation,outhouse-admiring,airline-napping,steerage-flying,Yogi Berra-worshiping,urinal-picture-taking,video-game-playing,Taylor-Swift-listening,pickpocket-thwarting,Bucs-uniform-frowning, Allie LaForce-smitten, Big-Ten-Network-hating,pedestrian-bumping,olive oil-lapping,popcorn-munching,coffee-slurping,fried-chicken-eating,oatmeal-loving,circle-jerking, craft-beer-chugging, cricket-watching,scone-loathing,college football-nave,baseball-box-score-reading,NPR-honk,filthy-hotel-staying,fight-instigating,barista-training, Budweiser-tolerant,baseball-scorecard-keeping, pasta-feasting, vomit-dodging scrooge, Kay-Adams-following, Coors-Light-souring, pineapple-upside-down-cake-eating social activist and NFL insider Peter King of NBC Sports fame in his weekly Football Morning in America column.

However, there was another juicy bit of intel from King about international games and scheduling. It seems, per King, the Rams volunteered to play the Packers in London, so long as the game will be played in the second half of the season.

Joes first thought was the NFL rarely puts marquee games on international soil. In 2018, however, the Rams and Chiefs were expected to play in Mexico City but that got moved to Los Angeles because the field in Mexico was not in playing condition.

It turned out to be a game for the ages on Monday Night Football with the Rams winning 54-51. But the vast majority of the international matchups are garbage.

So why in the world would the Rams want to travel halfway across the globe to play the Packers instead of just two time zones away in Green Bay? Well, King said the Rams want to take advantage of a neutral site and avoid Lambeau Field.

The second reason? The weather.

England in November isnt that awful (40s or 50s). In Green Bay? It could be 20 degrees at night and a foot of snow. So by playing in England, Los Angeles dodges potential frigid temperatures or freezing rain or snow, or all three that can easily happen in East-Central Wisconsin in November.

Smart!

So that got Joe thinking: If the Packers opponents are trying to play Green Bay in England to avoid wintry weather and a road-field disadvantage, how many Bucs home opponents are begging the NFL to play Tampa Bay in Munich to avoid roasting in the brutal Florida September or October sun?

Average temperatures in Munich are about the same as in England, 40s in November in Bavaria. The Seahawks are probably begging the NFL to play the Bucs in Munich, which seems to have a Seattle-like climate. (The Packers are another far-northern team on the Bucs home schedule, but Joe doubts they want to travel to Europe twice).

The rest of the Bucs home opponents are more accustomed to the heat.

King also noted that the NFL is trying to get half the league to play an international game instead instead of a ninth home game. Thats fair to Joe. Its been eight home games for decades.

Just FYI, Bucs home opponents this year: Atlanta, Carolina, New Orleans, Baltimore, Cincinnati, Green Bay, Kansas City, Los Angeles (Rams) and Seattle.

Enjoy The Ira Kaufman Podcast Dissecting The Draft, And More.

See the rest here:
So Who Is Lobbying The NFL To Play The Bucs In Munich? - JoeBucsFan.com

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on So Who Is Lobbying The NFL To Play The Bucs In Munich? – JoeBucsFan.com