Daily Archives: April 13, 2022

Norway ‘Accused’ of Killing Confiscated Wildlife Animals to Curb Smuggling – Nature World News

Posted: April 13, 2022 at 6:15 pm

Wildlife smuggling is rampant worldwide, and it is characterized by the unauthorized transfer of an exotic animal from one location to the other, but mostly between two or more countries.

Government by international laws and respective border authorities have their own measures in dealing with this crime.

However, recent anecdotal evidence and empirical research suggest that Norway allegedly practices the killing of smuggled wildlife after confiscating them.

Regardless, the potential issue is within a larger context of international laws that govern either the moral or legal legitimacy of handling wildlife trafficking.

(Photo : Photo credit should read BAY ISMOYO/AFP via Getty Images)

According to the non-profit and independent online publication UNDARK, the Norwegian government has been killing confiscated smuggled wildlife animals through the so-called process of systematic euthanasia.

The organization claims that in 2010, a traveler by name of Bjorn Avik traveled from Sweden and was carrying alcohol, tobacco, and 14 African gray parrots.

However, Bjorn was not caught by Swedish customs as he did not declare his items.

Upon entry to Norway, its border customs inspected Bjorn's vehicle after its plate has been registered by a camera detector at the border.

The local authorities confiscated the traveler's items, including the wildlife birds, claiming they have no permit from the Norwegian Environment Agency.

Bjorn was convicted of attempted smuggling of endangered species and was sentenced to 30 days in prison with two years of probation.

The said traveler was reportedly "expecting" the authorities would transfer the confiscated birds to a zoo.

Instead, a veterinarian killed the parrots purportedly under the direction of the Norwegian Environment Agency, said UNDARK.

Also Read:Wildlife Trafficking Plummeted Amidst the Pandemic, Giving Perfect Opportunity for Long-Term Solutions

In a book about wildlife trafficking published by Routledgein September 2020, the author Ragnhild Aslaug Sollund from the University of Oslo highlights the empirical research from Norway and Colombia regarding the dangers of illegal trade of wildlife and the existing measures against them.

In the past 15 years, the research claimed that the Norwegian government has seized smuggled animals at least 30 times.

A number of instances showed that some of these wildlife animals were killed, as cited by UNDARK.

These activities have raised questions about a country's handling of animal trafficking, which led to Norway and Colombia being the subject of such scrutiny in the book.

In Norway, the Norwegian Environment Agency is responsible for overseeing and implementing the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).

It is a multinational agreement that aims to protect both wild animals and plants.

Under CITES, countries are required to send back confiscated animals to the exporting country or to a government-recognized rescue center or other facilities that the respective government deems credible.

First enforced in 1975, the agreement came into effect as a result of its first adoption in 1963 by members of the International Union for Conservation of Nature in Geneva, Switzerland.

The main proposition of the multilateral treaty is for governments worldwide to regulate or ban international trade for species under threat, as per the World Wildlife Fund.

Although the general provisions of the agreement are clear, there are no specific guidelines on how each country will interpret and enforce its own measures against wildlife trafficking.

Related Article:Cartels are Turning Into Illegal Wildlife Trade

2022 NatureWorldNews.com All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.

See the article here:

Norway 'Accused' of Killing Confiscated Wildlife Animals to Curb Smuggling - Nature World News

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Norway ‘Accused’ of Killing Confiscated Wildlife Animals to Curb Smuggling – Nature World News

For Galion nonprofit Rescued Rollers, Mila’s birthday celebration a way to say thanks – Telegraph-Forum

Posted: at 6:15 pm

GALION The party had everything you'd expect for a pretty little girl celebrating her first birthday party decorations, a big cake and lots of friends stopping in to help celebrate. She even got to smoosh her face into a special treat.

But Mila's birthday was special: The golden retriever originally was diagnosed with hydrocephalus, and the first veterinarian who treated her suggested euthanasia. The puppy couldn't even hold up her head.

The birthday celebration was a way for Galion nonprofit Rescued Rollers to thank the many people who have helped make it possible for Mila and other special needs dogs thrive.

John Lizotte, who operates the rescue from his Galion home,estimated 70 to 75 people stopped by during the four-hour celebration event atHistoric Grace Church in Galion. People traveled from the Baltimore area, eastern Pennsylvania and southern Ohio to attend.

"The feedback I have gotten is amazing from everybody," he said. "If you imagine 70 really nice people in one room, that's exactly what we had."

Two other Rescued Rollers dogs were on hand to help celebrate Ginny, who has seizures; and Iris, a puppy who's blind and deaf. But Mila, with a birthday banner strapped across the back of her four-wheeled, blue wheelchair, was the center of attention, rolling around the room to greet her guests.

In February, an MRI revealed Mila's original diagnosis was incorrect, Lizotte said. Mila actually has a birth defect; her brain is deformed, with the left side smaller than the right. She also has some lesions on her brain.

"The vets say she's not going to improve; we've already proved them wrong," Lizotte said. He has been working regularly with her to stimulate neuroplasticity, "and it's working. She continues to improve to this day. Her improvement is amazing.

"This dog, she's the most work-intensive dog we've ever had at our rescue in six years. She's amazingly work-intensive. But her will to fight and her determination is amazing. ... The fact that she continues to improve is a miracle. She's got the right name."

One of Mila's very special guests was her first human,Cheryl Mohn, who lives near Baltimore, Maryland. Mohn said Mila was the smallest pup in a litter of three.

"I noticed she wasn't nursing as well, so I would make sure that she nursed to keep her growing," Mohn said. "And she always seemed to be on her side."

After a week or so, Mohn was concerned enough to made an appointment with the vet.

"The first thing he thought it was vertigo and that she would be able to live with it; learn to adapt and she'd be OK," Mohn said. But as days passed, she became convinced that wasn't the problem. Mila went back to the vet, and that's when she was diagnosed with hydrocephalus.

"They evaluated her and recommended that I put her down," Mohn said. "I couldn't do it. I'd spent a lot of time with this dog. I could not do it. Even with her deficit, she still was affectionate. She still had intent if she wanted to get from Point A to Point B, even on her side, she would do it. She just had incredible will."

The veterinarian referred Mohn to a neurologist, who made the same recommendation.

Unconvinced, Mohn reached out to the owner of a nearby pet store who also was involved in a rescue organization. After meeting Mila, the woman agreed, and helped get Mohn in touch with Rescued Rollers.

Mohn sentLizotte medical reports and videos of Mila; he said he thought Rescued Rollers could help. In June, Lizotte was able to arrange for Southwest Airlines to fly Mila to Cleveland, where he picked her up.

"If it weren't for him, her life would be on her side," Mohn said. "Shecouldn't hold her head up."

Since then, Mila's progress has been chronicled on the Rescued Rollers Facebook page, which last week posted a video of a jubilant Mila greeting Mohn, who drove in to attend the birthday celebration.

"I was a puddle," Mohn said.

ggoble@gannett.com

419-559-7263

See the original post here:

For Galion nonprofit Rescued Rollers, Mila's birthday celebration a way to say thanks - Telegraph-Forum

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on For Galion nonprofit Rescued Rollers, Mila’s birthday celebration a way to say thanks – Telegraph-Forum

Houellebecq’s Omelette by Theodore Dalrymple | Articles – First Things

Posted: at 6:15 pm

Anantirby michel houellebecqflammarion, 736 pages, $29

As Chekhov conveyed boredom without being boring, so Michel Houellebecq conveys meaninglessness without being meaningless. Indeed, his particular subject is the spiritual, intellectual, and political vacuity of life in a modern consumer societyFrance in this case, but it could be any Western country. One gets the point early on in his oeuvre, but his observations are so acute and pointed that his variations on the theme are always worth reading. Houellebecq reveals the absurdity that often lurks behind the commonplace.

He is so acute an observer of social trends that he sometimes appears almost prophetic: He foresaw the terrorist attack in Bali and the advent of the gilets jaunes in France. He has long held that the threat of Islamism to the West comes not so much from Islamism itself, with its nugatory intellectual resources, but from the weakness, the doubts, the cowardice, and the venality of Western societys response, itself the result of the spiritual vacuity from which the West suffers and which he describes so well, withoutof courseoffering a solution (it is not the place of novelists to be constructive, except in the sense that criticism is the first stage of taking thought for the morrow).

His latest book, Anantirnot published in English until the second half of 2022is by far his longest: too long, in fact, its 734 pages more than the content justifies. The first print run was of 300,000 copies, which is remarkable for a serious work of fiction and suggests that the author is now so great a literary phenomenon that he is quite beyond editing. All the same, he is never less than readable, and in this book he has somewhat controlled, though not altogether, his tendency to pornographic descriptions of what are clearly his own sexual fantasies. Perhaps his levels of testosterone are declining.

It is not for his plots that one reads Houellebecq, nor for his characterizations. His protagonists are always the same or similar: men approaching or in middle age who are intelligent and well educated and who, from a materialistic point of view, have no problems; they do not suffer the sordid anxiety that arises from having to make ends meet. Their only problem is that they dont know how to live or what to live for. They are not disillusioned, because they have never had any illusions. They are without religion, without political belief, even without culture, at least in the sense of its being a vital force of their lives rather than an ornament or a pastime. Their human, familial, and sexual relations are shallow, based on the feelings of the moment, without any adherence to or control by traditional values. In a sense they are free, but only in the way that a particle in Brownian motion is free. Loneliness is their fate, and it is, one may infer, the natural consequence of the kind of freedom promoted by the revolutionaries of May 1968. The revolutionaries sowed the wind and reaped nihilism; and so there is a strong element of nostalgia running through Houellebecqs work, without any consolatory suggestion that the omelette could be returned to its eggs. Never before in history, suggests Houellebecq, have we been so prosperous, and never before so incompetent in the matter of knowing how to live.

Anantir (Annihilation) is a polyphonic work, with several themes interwoven. It is set five years after its publication date, in the election year 2027. The protagonist, Paul, is a civil servant and the confidant of a successful technocratic Minister of the Economy, Bruno, who re-establishes the French economy on the path of growth. Bruno, a highly capable man, is a possible candidate for the presidency, which gives Houellebecq the opportunity to describe the auto-satirizing nature of modern politics, in which communication is all and substance practically nothing. Those who coach the candidates in the arts of communication are all young women, the world having become both feminized and masculinized: feminized in the sense that more leading roles are taken by women, masculinized in the sense that those women have taken on a typically male set of ambitions and attitudes toward work.

Interwoven with this political theme is a mystery story. A rash of strange messages, including digitized film of Bruno being executed by guillotine, appears on the internet worldwide; container ships are blown up; the worlds largest sperm bank, in Denmark, is burnt down. The secret services try but fail to discover who is behind this activity, and by the end of the book we still dont know. This is unsatisfactory: it is like reading a whodunit without ever discovering whodunit. It gives the author license to roam freely in his imagination without the disciplining need for plausibility.

The personal lives of the characters occupy most of the book. They are, as is to be expected in Houellebecq, unsatisfactory, to say the least. For example, Pauls weak and ineffectual younger brother, Aurlien, whose only interest in life is the restoration of medieval tapestries, is married to a minor journalist of vicious character who has a child by artificial insemination, though Aurlien is not himself sterile. She choses a black sperm donor to maximize her husbands humiliation, publicly demonstrating that the son is not his, and at the same time claiming liberal virtue for herself, her son being living proof that she is not racially prejudiced. Houellebecq is here suggesting that what in the modern world counts as political virtue is often compatible with, or even the product of, extremely unpleasant personal character.

Another theme of the book is our societys treatment of the old. Pauls father, who was a senior officer in the French secret service, has a devastating stroke and is admitted to a special unit for people in the vegetative state, but for vindictive administrative reasons this humanely run unit is closed down soon thereafter and Pauls father is transferred to a home that is, in effect, an institution for euthanasia by neglect.

Under French law, in the case of a patient who cannot communicate, the treating doctor has the right and duty to determine what is in the patients best interest. So Paul and the rest of his family contact a group, supposedly linked to the far right, that rescues old people from the clutches of the institutions that will, de facto, kill them. Is this the next social movement to arise? The intrigue and its consequences, the bureaucratic indifference, cruelty, and incompetence of the modern state, are very plausibly depicted. Houellebecq, incidentally, has been a consistent and ferocious opponent of the drive to legalize euthanasia in France, which once again sets him at odds with the bien pensant intelligentsia of his country. When a countrya society, a civilizationgets to the point of legalising euthanasia, he wrote last year in Le Figaro, it loses in my eyes all right to respect. It becomes henceforth not only legitimate, but desirable, to destroy it; so that something elseanother country, another society, another civilizationmight have a chance to arise.

Anantir implies that individuals, no less than civilizations, destroy themselves. Modern people, in Houellebecqs stories, have a will to self-destruction: They seek out misery when there is no external, or objective, cause for it. Toward the end of the book, Paul, aged fifty, suffers from a cancer of the mouth that will soon kill himhence the title of the book. In the meantime, he and his wife have rekindled their love after years of estrangement. They have continued to live together, though without any real contact between them. Their estrangement seems to have been the result of self-destruction, since neither of them changes essentially when they rediscover their love for each other.

Love redeems life and gives it a meaning, we may infer from this book. But unfortunately, love is especially difficult to find in the contemporary world, where money, power, success, and Brownian-motion-type freedom are valued much more. We value limitless possibilities, whereas love necessitates commitment and self-limitation.

For me, however, the pleasure of reading Houellebecq is in his laser-like observations. Here, for example, is his description of a huge modern office complex for the secret service, through the eyes of one of the characters:

Has there ever been a better summary of the efforts of such architects as Frank Gehry, Renzo Piano, Jean Nouvel or Zaha Hadid? They build in genuflection to Martians.

Over and over again, Houellebecq makes observations that are as sharp as the maxims of La Rochefoucauld. Here, again, he describes how any conversation in France may either be restarted if it stalls, or diverted from its previous course:

Such brilliant passages are to be found throughout the book.

Notwithstanding literary faults (from which, after all, no author is entirely free), there is no contemporary writer known to me who is a finer dissector than Houellebecq of the cultural, psychological, and spiritual predicament of the West in the present day. His palette is restricted, perhaps, but his canvas is large.

Theodore Dalrympleis the author, most recently, ofAround the World in the Cinemas of Paris.

Image by ActuaLitte viaCreative Commons. Image cropped.

See the original post:

Houellebecq's Omelette by Theodore Dalrymple | Articles - First Things

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Houellebecq’s Omelette by Theodore Dalrymple | Articles – First Things

SC Supreme Court to hear motion ahead of first SC execution in more than a decade – WYFF4 Greenville

Posted: at 6:15 pm

South Carolina's first execution in more than a decade could face another delay.An attorney for Richard Moore -- an Upstate man sentenced to death for killing a convenience store employee in 1999 -- filed a motion Thursday ahead of Moore's April 29 execution. Moore was sentenced to death in 2001 after he was convicted of murdering 42-year-old James Mahoney, a convenience store employee in Spartanburg County. In the motion, Moore's attorney, in part, calls for a review of the firing squad and its legality.The South Carolina Supreme Court has to take up the motion before Moore's scheduled execution at the end of the month, said Greenville attorney John Reckenbeil."There's no question that they're going to come up with some sort of answer, either to stay pending further deliberations by the Supreme Court or further argument, or the fact if there is going to be a ruling and then ultimately an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court there could be some sort of issuance of a stay."Last May, the firing squad officially became an option for death penalty executions, joining the electric chair and lethal injection -- which the state hasn't had in years. Lawmakers opted for a firing squad option, in large part, because the state hasn't been able to get lethal injection drugs. Over the weekend, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston called the death penalty modern-day barbarism. The Catholic Church stands firmly in opposition to the Supreme Courts decision and the use of the death penalty in South Carolina. Mr. Moore must choose his means of execution between the firing squad and electric chair. This is modern-day barbarism.The tragedy caused by Mr. Moores actions is not justified by killing another human being. Justice is not restored when another person is killed. Capital punishment, along with abortion and euthanasia, is an attack on the inviolability and fundamental dignity of human life. Respect for life is, and must remain, unconditional. This principle applies to all, even the perpetrators of terrible acts. The Catholic Church will continue to stand for the inherent value of all life. We beseech the state of South Carolina to commute Moores death sentence and conduct a meaningful review of his case. The Church prays for the day when the state reverses its decision to end the cruel and unjust practice of capital punishment.Before the motion, Moore would have had to choose an execution method by Friday.

South Carolina's first execution in more than a decade could face another delay.

An attorney for Richard Moore -- an Upstate man sentenced to death for killing a convenience store employee in 1999 -- filed a motion Thursday ahead of Moore's April 29 execution.

Moore was sentenced to death in 2001 after he was convicted of murdering 42-year-old James Mahoney, a convenience store employee in Spartanburg County.

In the motion, Moore's attorney, in part, calls for a review of the firing squad and its legality.

The South Carolina Supreme Court has to take up the motion before Moore's scheduled execution at the end of the month, said Greenville attorney John Reckenbeil.

"There's no question that they're going to come up with some sort of answer, either to stay pending further deliberations by the Supreme Court or further argument, or the fact if there is going to be a ruling and then ultimately an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court there could be some sort of issuance of a stay."

Last May, the firing squad officially became an option for death penalty executions, joining the electric chair and lethal injection -- which the state hasn't had in years. Lawmakers opted for a firing squad option, in large part, because the state hasn't been able to get lethal injection drugs.

Over the weekend, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Charleston called the death penalty modern-day barbarism.

The Catholic Church stands firmly in opposition to the Supreme Courts decision and the use of the death penalty in South Carolina. Mr. Moore must choose his means of execution between the firing squad and electric chair. This is modern-day barbarism.

The tragedy caused by Mr. Moores actions is not justified by killing another human being. Justice is not restored when another person is killed. Capital punishment, along with abortion and euthanasia, is an attack on the inviolability and fundamental dignity of human life. Respect for life is, and must remain, unconditional. This principle applies to all, even the perpetrators of terrible acts.

The Catholic Church will continue to stand for the inherent value of all life. We beseech the state of South Carolina to commute Moores death sentence and conduct a meaningful review of his case. The Church prays for the day when the state reverses its decision to end the cruel and unjust practice of capital punishment.

Before the motion, Moore would have had to choose an execution method by Friday.

Read the original:

SC Supreme Court to hear motion ahead of first SC execution in more than a decade - WYFF4 Greenville

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on SC Supreme Court to hear motion ahead of first SC execution in more than a decade – WYFF4 Greenville

Governor Signs Bills to Protect Research Dogs and Cats – Virginia Connection Newspapers

Posted: at 6:15 pm

Governor Glenn Youngkin (seated) signs animal protection bills into law, with Del. Buddy Fowler (R-55th), Del. Rob Bell (R-58th), Sen. Bill Stanley (R-20th), and Sen. Jennifer Boysko (D-33rd)

Known as the beagle bills, the bills specifically protect the research dog breed of choice, beagles, and cats, bred for medical and scientific research and testing. Previously, research breeders were exempt from many of Virginias animal welfare laws. The newly enacted bills will place commercial research breeders under the same requirements as other regulated commercial breeders. The new laws cover cats as well as dogs; and require new record keeping, an opportunity for adoption consideration before euthanasia for unneeded animals, coverage under companion animal cruelty penalties; and prohibition of continued sales if found guilty of a certain number and type of welfare violations, after July 2023. Several of the beagles rescued from a life of research and allowed to be put up for adoption attended the signing ceremony with their new owners or foster parents.

In past years the hot advocacy for animal legislative action in Virginia was pet shop puppy mill sales. This year the focus of the majority of animal bills moved to protections for research dogs and cats. Members of both parties sponsored bills to address protection of dogs and cats being bred for research. Five of those 11 similar bills survived and received unanimous votes to go to the desk of the Governor, and were signed into law on April 4th.

Many of the aspects of the similar bills sponsored by Democrats were amended into the language of those final signed bills for which Republicans Senator Bill Stanley (R-20th) and Delegate Rob Bell (R-58th) were the Chief Patrons. By working to compromise, Sen. Jennifer Boysko (D-33rd) became Chief Co-patron to the Stanley bills, and Delegate Kaye Kory (D-38th), Chair of the General Assembly Animal Caucus, became House Patron to three of the bills, assuring that all provisions of the protections were included.

Virginias only commercial breeder of research grade dogs, Envigo, located in Cumberland, fell afoul of federal inspectors of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Over the period of nine months, USDA inspectors found 73 violations of the Animal Welfare Act, nearly half of which were classified as the most serious category. Documented violations included withholding food from lactating females, euthanasia without the required anesthesia, over 300 puppy deaths, injured dogs, and poor housing and sanitary conditions.

Original House bills sought to close the offending Cumberland operation, while Senate bills, after subcommittee amendment, allowed a one-last-chance philosophy. The subcommittee chairman, Sen. Dave Marsden (D-37th) took the position that Virginia should deal with the poor breeder operation rather than chasing them out of the state to become the problem of another.

Envigos abuses also came under scrutiny of United States Senators Mark Warner and Tim Kaine. In a letter dated March 31, 2022 to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, the Senators urged aggressive enforcement actions and set an April 20 due date for response to a list of questions related to the case.

Companion animal issues often represent a significant portion of the bills considered by the agriculture committees each session at the state and federal levels. Interest in animal welfare is high, given that 68 percent of American households had a companion animal in 2021, according to the Animal Legal Defense Fund.

Read more:

Governor Signs Bills to Protect Research Dogs and Cats - Virginia Connection Newspapers

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Governor Signs Bills to Protect Research Dogs and Cats – Virginia Connection Newspapers

Shelby Humane’s no-kill shelter found ‘forever homes’ for more than 1,400 cats and dogs in 2021 – Alabama NewsCenter

Posted: at 6:15 pm

A couple of cats can produce a litter that, over the course of the next six years, can balloon to 70,000 offspring if none of them are ever spayed or neutered. Its part of the battle facing animal shelters across Alabama, including Shelby Humane in Columbiana.

The staff of 43 is awaiting the annual spring influx of puppies and kittens, when the facility may swell to 600 animals needing health care and boarding until they are adopted. Shelby Humane is a no-kill shelter, with a 97% live release rate in 2021.

On a recent day, about 30 feral cats and kittens were brought in by Shelby County Animal Control officers who seized the animals from a near-hoarding situation, which is a fairly common occurrence, said Bill Rowley, director of operations at Shelby Humane. When owners fail to have their pets spayed or neutered, a few cats can quickly grow out of hand. In the past, the only option for these animals was euthanasia, but now confiscated cats can be altered and returned outdoors for rodent control.

It costs more than $6,100 per day to operate Shelby Humane, where on an average day employees and volunteers take care of between 100 and 300 animals. The puppies, dogs, kittens and cats eat an average of more than 250 pounds of food each day. Many of the boarders need medical treatment, ranging from vaccinations to flea preventatives to treatment for respiratory infections, ringworm, scabies and emergency injuries. Spaying/neutering requires frequent transports to and from veterinarian clinics. (Alabama is the only state that doesnt allow shelters to hire veterinarians to work on staff; veterinarians can only work for licensed veterinarian practices.)

Its a challenge, said Rowley, who took the director job in 2021 after years heading educational and church organizations. The failure of pet owners to spay and neuter their animals is a huge, continuing problem.

A visitor to the 8,523-square-foot shelter across the street from the Shelby County Jail will find wall-to-wall animals of every size, age, sex and breed, most of them rushing to the front of their pens clamoring for attention. There are isolation rooms for new arrivals to avoid the spread of disease. There are special rooms for kittens and puppies, where they are often kept with litter mates for comfort. There is a room for small dogs, where some pens have blue tags to show they have already been adopted.

The largest area in the 21-year-old shelter is for larger dogs who live inside 3-by-5-foot and 3-by-6-foot fenced pens, each with a bed and bowls for water and food. Containers holding treats hang outside the pens, and the quiet is frequently broken as employees approach each area and dogs rise for a special handout. Pens lining the outside walls have sliding doors that open to larger run areas. Each employee walks at least one dog daily some walk as many as 10.

Under a tall outdoor shed, playpens await the dogs while their inside pens are cleaned each morning. A large, fenced area provides a place for recreation, where dogs can run and play with others. The area is also used for behavioral training. Farther out on the facility grounds are three smaller covered enclosed areas, each with a picnic table and benches where employees and potential adopters can interact with animals.

Adoptions are very fluid around the holidays, when we have our biggest influx of visitors, Rowley said. Other days we will have almost no one show up.

Rowley said Shelby Humane makes financial ends meet through funding from Shelby County, by being awarded grants and with donations from people in the community. Nearly 200 volunteers, about 70 of them active, provide additional support for the staff that would otherwise be costly. The volunteers do laundry, post photos to social media, walk dogs, feed animals, work at fundraisers and aid adoptions, among other efforts.

We have a great staff here, so Im actually able to focus on how we make the shelter better, rather than focusing on individual animal welfare issues, he said.

Rowley would like to keep the number of animals at Shelby Humane to around 100, rather than seeing it reach current or seasonal levels that stress the staff, animals and facility. He understands that there may always be a few pets like Velvet, who has been there terminally ill for two years, after veterinarians expected her to have only a few months to live. In such cases, the staff is always looking for an adopter who can provide a healthy, loving environment for a dying dogs or cats last days. Otherwise, employees want to find a forever home for every animal in the shelter.

Other programs at Shelby Humane are lowering the number of strays in the county and increasing the rate of dog and cat adoptions. In March, the shelter transport program had its most successful trip ever, moving 87 animals overnight in two vans to New Jersey and New York. Those states have a shortage of adoptable animals, and all from Shelby Humane were immediately adopted. More than 400 pets were adopted in 2021 through the transport program, which is seeking more drivers.

Working with Alabama Spay Neuter Clinic of Irondale and local veterinarians, Shelby Humane operates public clinics for vaccinations and alteration surgeries. Rabies shots are $15; spaying is $45 for cats, $75 for dogs; neutering $45 for cats and $60 for dogs. About 50 animals are treated through the project each week. (Contact [emailprotected] for appointments or information.)

In 2021, the Shelby Humane foster program placed in private homes 1,419 animals, newborn puppies and kittens, medical cases and some requiring behavioral training. Rowley said fostering is a major need in maintaining the shelters no-kill status.

Shelby Humane is the only shelter in Alabama offering the Safe Pet program that helps victims of domestic violence keep their dogs and cats through free, anonymous boarding beyond the animal shelter. Funded through a national grant, people in Shelby, Blount, Clay, Coosa, Jefferson, St. Clair and Walker counties are being aided, Rowley said. The program is being expanded next year to other counties to provide veterinary and pet care for up to 60 days.

Our goal is to help the survivors get the help they need without them worrying about the safety and care of the family pet, Rowley said. Victims who can keep their pets have a higher chance of not returning to a domestic violence situation. Typically, the aggressor will go after the animal if they cannot get to their domestic victim.

Meanwhile, inside Shelby Humane, employees and volunteers are continually touched physically and emotionally by the animals under their care.

I think everyone here has either fostered or adopted a dog or cat, Rowley said. It really is common to take your work home with you.

Adoption hours are Tuesday through Saturday from noon until 4 p.m. at 381 McDow Road, Columbiana 35051. Animals available for adoption can be viewed on the website at http://www.shelbyhumane.org. Call 205-669-3916 to adopt, donate, volunteer or for information.

See original here:

Shelby Humane's no-kill shelter found 'forever homes' for more than 1,400 cats and dogs in 2021 - Alabama NewsCenter

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Shelby Humane’s no-kill shelter found ‘forever homes’ for more than 1,400 cats and dogs in 2021 – Alabama NewsCenter

Donald Trump says he is ‘perhaps the most honest human’ ever

Posted: at 6:14 pm

Donald Trump has suggested that he is perhaps the most honest human being ever created.

The former POTUS naturally didnt hold back when speaking of his character, prompting laughter from his followers.

At a rally in Selma, NC on Saturday the former president defended himself from the multiple investigations probing his tax affairs and his attempts to overturn the 2020 election.

You know, youve been investigated years and years, millions and millions of pages of documents, they found nothing,' Mr. Trump said, supposedly quoting private remarks from a friend. You are the cleanest on Earth when you think about it.'

He continued: I think Im the most honest human being, perhaps, that God ever created. As laughter broke out from his supporters, Mr. Trump added: Perhaps.

His comments come hot on the heels of prosecutors in New York asking a court to hold Mr. Trump in contempt, claiming he is refusing to comply with an order to turn over documentsin her probe ofhis companys business dealings.

New York Attorney General Letitia James also requested that Manhattan Supreme Court Judge Arthur Engoron fine the former president $10,000 for each day he allegedly fails to respect the ruling.

Trump was ordered by a judge in February to comply with subpoenas for documents, but James office says that rather than meet the March 31 deadline, he instead raised new objections.

The ship has long since sailed on Mr. Trumps ability to raise any such objections, AG lawyers said in papers filed in Manhattan Supreme Court Thursday.

Mr. Trumps purported response violates the courts order; it is not full compliance or any degree of compliance, but simply more delay and obfuscation, the filing alleges. Mr. Trump should now be held in civil contempt and fined in an amount sufficient to coerce his compliance with the courts order and compensate [The Office of the Attorney General] for its fees and costs associated with this motion.

In a statement, James said the judges order for Trump to comply with her offices subpoena and hand over relevant documents had been crystal clear.

Instead of obeying a court order, Mr. Trump is trying to evade it, she said. We are seeking the courts immediate intervention because no one is above the law.

Trumps lawyer Alina Habba said, We are prepared to adamantly oppose the frivolous and baseless motion filed by the Attorney Generals office today.

Our client has consistently complied with the many discovery requests served by the Attorney Generals office over the years.

The former president also issued a lengthy statement, blasting James probe as a witch hunt and accusing her of serving as an operative for the Democrat Party in a political prosecution.

This Democrat prosecutorial misconduct began the second I came down the escalator in Trump Tower, and has continued in an attempt to silence a President who is leading in every single poll, Donald Trump said. Never before has this happened to another President, and it is an absolute violation of my civil rights.

Continued here:

Donald Trump says he is 'perhaps the most honest human' ever

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Donald Trump says he is ‘perhaps the most honest human’ ever

Is Donald Trump a Lock for the 2024 Nomination? – Bloomberg

Posted: at 6:14 pm

I expected to discuss all sorts of things with political scientists in Chicago last week, but Ill be honest: When it came to current politics, people were mostly talking about the 2024 presidential nominations especially the Republican one. And folks I spoke with were split right down the middle: About half thought that former President Donald Trump would be the Republican nominee, and half threw up their hands and said they had no idea what would happen.

Im in that second group.

The argument that Trump has the nominationlocked up is pretty straightforward. No, we dont know for sure that hell be running in 2024, but he certainly is running for 2024 right now. That is, hes doing all the things that candidates for president do holding rallies, campaigning,raising moneyand, in his own fashion, putting together a policy platform. Sure, the platform begins and ends with complaining that people are unfair to Donald Trump, but thats pretty much all he did as presidentanyway.

Trump, the case continues, has strong support from primary votersand is liked by almost all of them. Thats usually a winning combination. Yes, a significant group of party actors, including many elected officials, appear to oppose him at least in theory. But only a very small subset of those who tell reporters off the record that Trump is a disaster for the party are willing to say sopublicly. Theres no reason to think that theyllbe any better at coordinating against him than they were in 2016, or that theyll be any better at convincing Republican voters to follow their lead.

Thats not all. In 2016, Trumps big vulnerability was that he had no apparent commitment to the normal Republican policy agenda. That shouldnt be a problem for him after four years in the White House. The first time around, Christian conservatives were skeptical; now, theyre among his strongest supporters. The most notable difference he had with Republican orthodoxy while in the White House was on foreign policy, and in 2024 a lot more party actors are on his side and few voters care about itanyway.

So why wouldnt he win?

I cant speak for everyonewho took thisposition. But for me, its less one big thing than many, many small ones. To begin with: I was wrong about 2016, and while I thinkI understand what happened, Id hesitatebefore making confident predictions aboutRepublican nomination politics again.

Beyond that? Ill note that while Republican voters by all accounts like Trump, thats not actually saying that much; most voters like politicians from their own party once they get to know them. Theres just no way to know how strong their attachment is to Trump how strong any voters attachment is to any politician until its put to the test. Well learn a little more about this when primaries resume in coming weeks. Should the candidates Trump endorsed do badly, its possible that the fear of opposing him will dissipate.

Then theres Trump himself. Yes, he certainly seems to want to be president again. But the idea that hes invincible among Republicans is far from proven. His 2016 nomination was a narrow one, aided by all sorts of odd events includinga fair amount of luck. He also has an electoral record now, and its not exactly an impressive one; after all, he lost re-election, and Republicans lost the House (in 2018) and the Senate (in 2020) while he was in office. His tantrum over losing the presidency and his false claims about fraud have widely been credited for the loss of two Senate seats in Georgia. Republicans may trust Trump more on policy than they once did, but they should have even less confidence that hell be a team player now. That could mean more opposition from party actors than last time.

That leaves the question of whether voters would listen if party actors tried to oppose Trump. They certainly didnt in 2016. Would it be different this time? It might depend on which party actors; if Fox News hosts and talk radio turned against Trump (or, perhaps, just strongly supported some other candidate) I could imagine it mattering.

And thats without getting into the possibility that Trumps various legal entanglements catch up to him. Or that hes less interested in being president again than he is in extracting money from Republican donors, a process that might be disrupted if he formally declared a run for office. Right now the nomination looks extremely valuable, given President Joe Bidens low approval ratings. Butthat could change, and if so Trump might shy away from the risk of a worse loss than he had in 2020.

Besides, were still almost two years from the first caucus or primary. At this point in the 1992 election cycle, incumbent president George H.W. Bush was so overwhelmingly popular that most high-profile Democrats passed on the race; by the time of the New Hampshire primary, Bush was so unpopular that a fringe candidate took 37% of the vote against him.

None of this is to say that Trump wont be the nominee. Its just a case for uncertainty. Perhaps Trumps triumph against all odds (and most expert opinion) in 2016 really does mean that the party is his as long as he wants it to be. Or perhaps it means that the party,the process or both are just a lot less predictable than I and others once believed. Which is true? Sorry. I have no idea.

Read the original:

Is Donald Trump a Lock for the 2024 Nomination? - Bloomberg

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Is Donald Trump a Lock for the 2024 Nomination? – Bloomberg

Capitol riot defendant blames actions on Trump and false election claims – The Guardian

Posted: at 6:14 pm

Mentions of Donald Trump have been rare at the first few trials for people charged with storming the US Capitol, but that has changed: the latest Capitol riot defendant to go on trial is blaming his actions on the former president and his false claims about a stolen election.

Dustin Byron Thompson, an Ohio man charged with stealing a coat rack from the Capitol, doesnt deny that he joined the mob on 6 January 2021. But his lawyer vowed Tuesday to show that Trump abused his power to authorize the attack.

Describing Trump as a man without scruples or integrity, defense attorney Samuel Shamansky said the former president engaged in a sinister plot to encourage Thompson and other supporters to do his dirty work.

Its Donald Trump himself spewing the lies and using his position to authorize this assault, Shamansky told jurors Tuesday during the trials opening statements.Justice department prosecutor Jennifer Rozzoni said Thompson knew he was breaking the law that day.

He chose to be a part of the mayhem and chaos, she said.

Thompsons lawyer sought subpoenas to call Trump and Rudolph Giuliani as witnesses at his trial this week. A judge rejected that request but ruled that jurors can hear recordings of speeches that Trump and Giuliani delivered at a rally before the riot.

Thompsons jury trial is the third among hundreds of Capitol riot prosecutions. The first two ended with jurors convicting both defendants on all counts with which they were charged.

In a February court filing, Shamansky said he wanted to argue at trial that Thompson was acting at the direction of Trump and his various conspirators. The lawyer asked to subpoena others from Trumps inner circle, including former White House strategist Steve Bannon, former White House senior adviser Stephen Miller and former Trump lawyers John Eastman and Sidney Powell.

Prosecutors said Thompson cant show that Trump or Giuliani had the authority to empower him to break the law. They also noted that video of the rally speeches perfectly captures the tone, delivery and context of the statements to the extent they are marginally relevant to proof of Thompsons intent on 6 January.

Thompsons lawyer argued that Trump would testify that he and others orchestrated a carefully crafted plot to call into question the integrity of the 2020 presidential election. Shamansky claimed that Giuliani incited rioters by encouraging them to engage in trial by combat and that Trump provoked the mob by saying that if you dont fight like hell, youre not going to have a country anymore.

Shamansky said Thompson, who lost his job during the pandemic, became an avid consumer of the conspiracy theories and lies about a stolen election.This is the garbage that Dustin Thompson is listening to day after day after day, Shamansky said. He goes down this rabbit hole. He listens to this echo chamber. And he acts accordingly.

US district Judge Reggie Walton ruled in March that any in-person testimony by Trump or Giuliani could confuse and mislead jurors.

More than 770 people have been charged with federal crimes arising from 6 January. Over 250 of them have pleaded guilty, mostly to misdemeanors. Thompson is the fifth person to be tried on riot-related charges.

Thompson has a co-defendant, Robert Lyon, who pleaded guilty to riot-related charges in March.

Thompson, then 36, and Lyon, then 27, drove from Columbus, Ohio, to Silver Spring, Maryland, stayed overnight at a hotel and then took an Uber ride into Washington DC on the morning of 6 January. After Donald Trumps speech, Thompson and Lyon headed over to the Capitol.

Thompson was wearing a Trump 2020 winter hat and a bulletproof vest when he entered the Capitol and went to the Senate parliamentarians office, where he stole two bottles of liquor and a coat rack worth up to $500, according to prosecutors.

Thompson is charged with six counts: obstructing Congress joint session to certify the electoral college vote, theft of government property, entering or remaining in a restricted building or grounds, disorderly or disruptive conduct in a restricted building or grounds, disorderly or disruptive conduct in a Capitol building, and parading, demonstrating or picketing in a Capitol building.

Lyon pleaded guilty to theft of government property and disorderly conduct. Both counts are misdemeanors punishable by a maximum of one year imprisonment. Walton is scheduled to sentence Lyon on 3 June.

Read more from the original source:

Capitol riot defendant blames actions on Trump and false election claims - The Guardian

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Capitol riot defendant blames actions on Trump and false election claims – The Guardian

Trump should be charged for Jan 6. Don’t let the House pass the buck. – MSNBC

Posted: at 6:14 pm

Members of the Houses Jan. 6 committee are apparently split over whether to refer Donald Trump to the Justice Department, even though many if not all of the committee members appear to have concluded that the former president engaged in a criminal conspiracy.

Its absolutely clear that what President Trump was doing what a number of people around him were doing that they knew it was unlawful, Vice Chair Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., said last weekend. They did it anyway. (Trump of course denies he has done anything wrong.)

There doesnt seem to be much doubt among the committee members about whether Trump committed federal crimes.

Indeed, the committee made that case in federal court recently, when it argued in a filing that it has a good-faith basis for concluding that the President and members of his Campaign engaged in a criminal conspiracy to defraud the United States.

The evidence was enough to convince U.S. District Judge David Carter, who wrote that the Court finds it more likely than not that President Trump corruptly attempted to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021.

Referring to Trumps legal henchman John Eastman as part of a civil lawsuit seeking to block the House committee from obtaining big lie-related emails sent from and to Eastman, Carter wrote: Dr. Eastman and President Trump launched a campaign to overturn a democratic election, an action unprecedented in American history.

Their campaign was not confined to the ivory tower it was a coup in search of a legal theory, the judge continued. The plan spurred violent attacks on the seat of our nations government, led to the deaths of several law enforcement officers, and deepened public distrust in our political process.

Despite all of this, members of the select committee probing the Capitol insurrection are reportedly worried that actually making a criminal referral might not be prudent. According to The New York Times, some members worry that even a largely symbolic referral would backfire by politically tainting the Justice Departments expanding investigation into the Jan. 6 assault and what led up to it.

You may have seen this movie before. Again and again during Trumps campaign, his presidency and now his post-presidency weve seen responsible figures determine that something must be done about Trumps behavior. And then, inevitably, they decide to let someone else do it.

Theyve rationalized their timidity as political prudence, but the result has been a pandemic of buck-passing.

In the 2016 campaign, Trumps Republican rivals mostly refused to take him on until it was too late, all the while hoping that someone else would do the hard work for them. After his election, congressional Republicans fell into line. They rationalized that appeasement as a matter of tactical savvy. I told myself I gotta have a relationship with this guy to help him get his mind right, former House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., told political reporter Tim Alberta.

And we saw the same pattern with Roberts Mueller probe, which documented Trumps obstruction of justice at great length but declined to recommend either impeachment or criminal indictment.

To the end, though, Mueller hoped that someone else would take action. During congressional hearings, he was asked point-blank by lawmakers, "Could you charge the president with a crime after he left office?"

And Mueller responded with an unequivocal "yes." He also specifically affirmed that the president could be charged with obstruction of justice after leaving office.

But that never happened.

Like other establishment figures who were rolled over by Trump, Mueller was held hostage by his excessive faith in guardrails.

In the end, as Andrew Weissmann, a member of Muellers team, wrote in his inside account, Where Law Ends, Mueller was so worried about overstepping his role that he opted instead to issue a mealy-mouthed report that documented all the ways Trump had obstructed justice but refused to do much of anything about it.

Like other establishment figures who were rolled over by Trump, Mueller was held hostage by his excessive faith in guardrails, institutional integrity and the virtues of staying in ones lane.

They brought cucumber sandwiches to a gunfight, and the outcome was never in doubt.

Even after Jan. 6, members of Trumps own party continued to engage in wish-casting. Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky declared: "There is no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day.

"A mob was assaulting the Capitol in his name," he said. "These criminals were carrying his banners, hanging his flags and screaming their loyalty to him."

But McConnell voted against a Senate impeachment conviction, because, he argued, Congress had no power to convict and disqualify a former officeholder who is now a private citizen.

Once again, he held out hope somebody else might hold Trump accountable. President Trump, insisted McConnell, is still liable for everything he did while he was in office, as an ordinary citizen, unless the statute of limitations is run, still liable for everything he did while in office, didn't get away with anything yet yet. But that was more than a year ago, and no one else has taken action.

So now it is up the select committee and the Justice Department, which both seem to be caught in a cycle of hand-wringing. They worry about the taint of a referral and agonize over fears that Trump and the GOP will discredit any investigation as a partisan witch hunt.

But heres a reality check: No matter what they do, no matter how cautiously they act, Trump will react with bad faith and demagoguery.

The Justice Department could hire an avatar of respectability and integrity to handle the prosecution (see: Robert Mueller) and it wouldnt matter. Whatever it does, Trump will let loose the dogs of disinformation, deceit and obstruction.

Knowing it cant control the reaction, maybe the select committee should just do the right thing and finally, finally end the cycle of timidity, self-deterrence and buck-passing.

Originally posted here:

Trump should be charged for Jan 6. Don't let the House pass the buck. - MSNBC

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on Trump should be charged for Jan 6. Don’t let the House pass the buck. – MSNBC