Daily Archives: April 11, 2022

Coastal Commission Votes to Move Forward with Humboldt Offshore Wind Exploration – North Coast Journal

Posted: April 11, 2022 at 6:39 am

The California Coastal Commission voted unanimously today to conditionally concur with a federal determination that allowing energy companies and organizations to study a proposed offshore wind farm area on the Humboldt County Coast is consistent with the California Coastal Management Program.

The highly technical and bureaucratic vote clears the way for companies interested in purchasing federal leases to erect large, floating offshore wind turbines to generate renewable electricity off the coast to begin studying and assessing the project site. Known as the Humboldt Wind Energy Area, that site spans 132,000 acres 21 miles off Humboldt Bay, in which the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management plans to sell up to three leases in an auction process slated to begin in the fall.

The commissions vote today does not approve the wind farms or the start of any construction activities all of which would come back before the commission in the future for further review just the potential effects of lease exploration activities, like site characterization and assessment. Those activities will likely include additional boat trips out to the area nearly 500 estimated over a three-year period and the installation of up to three buoys outfitted with scientific sampling equipment.

But commission staff made clear in its report and presentation to the commission that while BOEM believes it is premature to analyze the full scope of environmental impacts of turning a swath of ocean waters off Humboldt Bay into a wind farm, such a transformation is a reasonably foreseeable result of todays vote, so should be considered to the extent possible. Further, commission staff explained this consistency determination was a chance to lay a foundation for the commissions role in the process moving forward as the state and federal governments continue to push for a more sustainable energy grid.

Specifically, the commission approved the following seven conditions:

Condition 1 requires BOEM to work with commission staff to ensure that lessees survey, sampling and analysis plans are coordinated to minimize impacts to coastal resources.

Condition 2 requires lessees to avoid intentional contact with hard substrate, rock outcroppings, seamounts of deep-sea coral/sponge habitats, all of which are critical for the region's biodiversity.

Condition 3 requires vessels conducting site research not exceed a speed of 10 knots to avoid unintentional strikes of sea mammals.

Condition 4 requires BOEM to ensure commercial fishing vessels safe navigation through the lease areas.

Conditions 5 and 6 require engagement with environmental justice communities and Native communities on site assessment and construction and operations plans.

Condition 7 requires lessees to have an independent fisheries liaison to work with the commercial fishing community to make sure site assessment activities dont conflict with local fisheries.

The overwhelming sentiment of the commissioners was that staff had done an excellent job of working with stakeholders and across state and federal agencies to produce a report and recommendations that both properly assessed impacts of the site exploration activities and also set the table for future conversations, all while working under very tight timelines.

California is not only a leader in clean energy in the world, we are a leader in our coastal, wildlife and marine protection, particularly for biodiversity, Commission Chair Donne Brownsey said. I think that this is a good start in show that those two really important goals can be balanced and really work together. I do think thats where were starting and I hope thats where can end.

During her staff report on the subject, Commission Deputy Director of Energy, Ocean resources and Federal Consistency Kate Huckelbridge noted there are a lot of unknowns with deep-water, floating offshore wind farms but made clear there will be environmental impacts.

Theres no free lunch, she said, explaining there will be tradeoffs as the state works to triple its clean energy production in the coming decades to achieve the goal of carbon neutrality by 2045.

Moving forward in the process, Huckelbridge said data collection and adaptive management will be crucial components, saying plainly the full-scale impacts of an offshore wind farm on the Pacific Coast wont be clear until projects are in the water and we are able to monitor and measure the effects.

In his comments at the meeting, Humboldt County Fifth District Supervisor and Commissioner Mike Wilson underscored that this project could have profound impacts on Humboldt County.

"We have a community leaning into this we feel a community and a global responsibility to be a part of this effort to address climate change," Wilson said, quickly adding that the community's feet are also "firmly planted" in working to minimize potential negative impacts. "No one is going to roll over us on this. We are taking this really serious."

Check out commission staffs full staff report and supporting documents here and check next weeks Journal for a more thorough report on todays meeting.

Read the rest here:

Coastal Commission Votes to Move Forward with Humboldt Offshore Wind Exploration - North Coast Journal

Posted in Intentional Communities | Comments Off on Coastal Commission Votes to Move Forward with Humboldt Offshore Wind Exploration – North Coast Journal

The Evolution of ESG in 2022 | Maron Marvel Bradley Anderson & Tardy LLC – JDSupra – JD Supra

Posted: at 6:39 am

For several years, there has been a growing expectation that all types of business organizations must pursue sustainability, address environmental risks such as climate change, and commit to diversity, inclusion, and equity. Not just to their employees but as members of local, national, and global communities. And, the time has passed when an organization, large or small, can passively address these concerns.

In response to these considerations has been the rapid maturation of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) strategies as part of an organizations principles and practices. In its most simple form, ESG is a snapshot of an organizations impacts and strategies in these three crucial areas for investors, regulators, potential clients, and upstream and downstream customers. In more complex settings, such as publicly-traded companies, ESG reporting is evolving into a regulatory must that even asks organizations to account for ESG considerations of suppliers and consumers.

This article is designed to provide its own snapshot of the ESG landscape in 2022. Future articles will provide a more in-depth discussion of certain segments within that landscape, including the evolving regulatory and litigation concerns. To start, what is ESG and why should businesses, large and small, care?

What is ESG

ESG criteria are a set of guiding principles for an organizations operations that customers, consumers, and even investors can use to screen an organization and how it fits with their own goals or even reporting requirements. ESG generally includes the following considerations:

With so many factors in play, ESG can mean different things to different organizations, and not all the discreet items will apply or need to be addressed by every organization. Although there is no standard approach to the measuringand reporting of ESG data, there are several reporting frameworks available to companies of all sizes. Knowing the requirements for your organization (are you required to report?) is a first step in determining how your organization may approach its ESG analysis and statements to highlight awareness and action on each of the elements.

ESG is an Issue for your Legal Team

The ESG agenda is being driven not only by community consciousness but by the rapid development of laws and regulations at the state and federal levels. Accordingly, organizations legal teams and counsel are taking on critical roles in advancing the implementation of the ESG agenda and strategies. This is in part due to the Securities Exchange Commissions (SEC) growing scrutiny of ESG reporting and the introduction of new proposed rules that will make elements of ESG required reporting. However, more requirements are coming to businesses of all sizes as organizations are asking their supply chain partners for disclosures on sustainability and ESG frameworks to integrate into their own reporting.

Regulatory Considerations

Regulation based on ESG is here and is growing in scope. Consider that in March 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced the creation of a Climate and ESG Task Force division in the Division of Enforcement. Since then, it has become increasingly clear that ESG disclosure regulations for public companies are expected to increase. This is evidenced most recently by the SEC meeting of March 21, 2022, where a proposed rule was issued that would enhance and standardize the climate-related disclosures provided by public companies. The proposed rule would require disclosure about greenhouse gas emissions by the organization reporting, as well as consideration of Scope 3 emissions, which are the indirect upstream and downstream activities in the organizations supply chain and of its consumers. While these regulations are still in the public comment period, heightened scrutiny is coming to public companies and by extension, their suppliers.

Litigation Risks and Greenwashing

As with any developing business practice and regulation, litigation inherently follows, and this is no different in the ESG space. In fact, the litigation arising from ESG considerations even has its own name, Greenwashing.Greenwashing is when a business creates the impression through branding or marketing, or an erroneous or misleading ESG statement, that it and its products are environmentally friendly.Greenwashing may come from an intentional act or simply arise from poor wording or over-stating an organizations capabilities. Suits in this space may come from a variety of sources: consumer groups; consumer class actions; private actions where a company or investor relies on an inaccurate ESG statement of an organization; or even state or federal regulators. A future article will take a deeper dive into the rise in Greenwashing claims and the different actions that an organization may need to be aware of. For now, its worth considering that, just like other areas of business strategy, the best defense often begins with an active review by counsel as ESG strategies are developed and implemented.

What to Take Away

For many organizations, ESG is a strategic move to keep pace as the social consciousness in business organizations continues to evolve. For others, ESG reporting is a move to promote compliance with evolving laws and regulations.Or it could be that your business falls somewhere between the two ends of the spectrum.Wherever your organization falls and whatever the motivations, actively engaging your understanding of ESG has quickly become an essential element of operating in todays environmentally and socially conscious business environment.

View post:

The Evolution of ESG in 2022 | Maron Marvel Bradley Anderson & Tardy LLC - JDSupra - JD Supra

Posted in Intentional Communities | Comments Off on The Evolution of ESG in 2022 | Maron Marvel Bradley Anderson & Tardy LLC – JDSupra – JD Supra

Mass Attorney General Hosts Virtual Call-To-Action To Address Hate & Bias in School Athletics – framinghamsource.com

Posted: at 6:39 am

In full transparency, the following is a press release from the Massachusetts Attorney Generals office submitted to SOURCE media. (stock photo)

***

BOSTON In effort to foster diversity, equity, and inclusion in both academic and sports settings, Attorney General Maura Healey today announced she is partnering with state leaders to help prevent and address hate and bias incidents in school athletic programs in Massachusetts.

AG Healey announced the partnership today during avirtual event called Addressing Hate & Bias in School Athletics: A Call to Action,that her office hosted in collaboration with the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents, Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association, and Massachusetts School Administrators Association. The event provided a robust discussion and resources for school administrators, athletic directors, coaches, and referees.

In recent months, a rise in reported hate-based incidents across Massachusetts has presented an acute need and a clear opportunity for school and state leaders to come together and redouble efforts to ensure that schools and athletic programs provide a safe and healthy environment for young people.

As part of the event, AG Healey announced anew collaborative projectto expand programming around preventing and addressing hate and bias incidents in school sports, including an in-person conference planned for the start of the 2022-2023 school year, and regional trainings to be conducted by Northeastern Universitys Center for the Study of Sport in Society.

Sports can be a powerful tool for bringing people together, but in recent months weve seen too many examples where the hate and bias that infects so much of our culture has made its way into our locker rooms and onto our playing fields, saidAG Healey. At the end of the day, there is nothing more important than investing in the health and well-being of our young people. I want to thank our partner organizations and school leaders who are ready to build positive change throughout the state.

School sports are important to students physical and mental health and are a great way to build a sense of community, but only when teams, locker rooms and competitions are safe and welcoming places for everyone, saidElementary and Secondary Education Commissioner Jeffrey C. Riley.This has been a challenging year in many ways, and Im glad to see so many leaders convene around this important issue.

There is no more important responsibility of our schools than providing a safe and supportive environment for our students to grow as responsible citizens, saidTim Piwowar, President of the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents. Hate and bias have no place in our schools and community, and it is our collective responsibility to set appropriate expectations for our students.

The Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association is positioned to play a significant role in growing the courageous leaders of tomorrow, saidRobert Baldwin, Executive Director of the Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association. Utilizing interscholastic athletics as a platform that proactively promotes behaviors that instill respect for self, team, opponents, officials, rules and the game itself prioritizes our core responsibility particularly educational athletics, which includes sportsmanship and diversity, equity, and inclusion.

Todays event provided attendees with information on current resources available to schools, including the AGs newSchool Sports Guidance. Following todays event, the AGs Office and its partnering organizations will host an in-person conference for school administrators, athletic directors, coaches, and referees, including panel discussions and workshops on best practices around creating a positive school environment and reporting hate and bias incidents. In addition, regional trainings across the state will beconducted by Northeastern Universitys Center for the Study of Sport in Societyto provide more in-depth training and equip school and athletic program leaders with the tools they need to empower and support their students and to prevent and address hate.

We, at the Northeastern Universitys Center for the Study of Sport in Society, applaud Attorney General Maura Healey for her leadership and unwavering commitment to stop the promulgation and proliferation of hate wherever it exists in our Commonwealth and beyond, saidDan Lebowitz, Executive Director of The Center for the Study of Sport in Society at Northeastern University. Sport is an impact engine of inclusion. It has the power to elevate conversation, inspire individual and collective change agency, and create true, sustainable change. AG Healey, her office, and all the committed stakeholders in this initiative, see and embrace sport as a pathway to positive youth engagement, social-emotional development, and the collective community inherent in teamwork. Hate and hurt have no place in sport, and we remain grateful to AG Healey for her responsive proactivity in creating such an intentional program of hope and healing. We are honored to contribute and be part of the team.

For more information on the AGs project on addressing hate and bias in sports and to sign your school up for upcoming programs and trainings,click here.

Senator Jason Lewis, Senate Chair of the Joint Committee on Education: Every student athlete in the Commonwealth should feel safe and supported on their team and in their school, and there should be zero tolerance for any incidents of hate or bias. I appreciate the leadership of Attorney General Healey, Commissioner Riley, and others who have joined together to help amplify this important message.

Representative Alice H. Peisch, House Chair of the Joint Committee on Education: The Commonwealth and the rest of the nation have seen a noticeable increase of racist, homophobic, and antisemitic incidents in school athletics over the last few years. Recent school-based incidents involving hate and bias, both on and off the field, demonstrate that there is still work to be done in strengthening diversity, equity, and inclusion in our education system. Addressing this issue has been a consistent goal of the Legislature, as evidenced by the recent passage of legislation pertaining to genocide education. I am fully supportive of the efforts being undertaken by school administrators, athletic directors, and coaches from across the state, and I look forward to working closely with my legislative colleagues on continuing to prioritize actions to eliminate hate and bias from our schools.

Tanisha Sullivan, President of NAACP Boston: When the NAACP Boston launched Take the Lead with our professional sports teams in 2017, it was with the belief that athletes and the sports community have an important role to play in stomping out hate and bias and promoting the American values of justice and equality. Following that lead, and to build stronger school communities, it is critically important that we invest in education and supports to ensure that our youth athletes and programs are also serving as champions of anti-hate and bias in our school communities.

Ivn Espinoza-Madrigal, Executive Director of Lawyers for Civil Rights: We are grateful for the Attorney Generals leadership in ensuring equity and fairness in school athletic programs. Hate and bias have no place in sports.

Robert Trestan, Anti-Defamation League New England Regional Director: The need for a statewide call to action to end hate, bias and hazing in youth sports could not be greater. Leadership and education remain the pathway to eliminating hate from the locker rooms, fields, gyms and arenas.

Patience Crozier, GLBTQ Legal Advocates and Defenders Senior Staff Attorney: Everyone should have a place in school athletics.Through sports, youth learnessentiallife skills like teamwork and collaboration and, most importantly, they have fun.LGBTQ students experience high rates of bullying in schools, and this bias-based bullyingleads tohigher rates of anxiety and depression.Our school communities coaches, teachers, administrators, adult caregivers, and student-athletes- must work together to foster inclusion and safety in athletics.Too often lately, weve heard disturbing reports of anti-LGBTQand racialbias and bullying in local locker rooms.Were grateful to see this initiative.Together, we can do better, raise awareness, and send a collective message that hate and bias have no place in Massachusetts school sports.

Kimm Topping, The Safe Schools Program for LGBTQ Students Program Manager: We are proud that Massachusetts is a leader in creating safe and supportive school communities for all students, and yetLGBTQ students in our state continue to experience disproportionate risk. We must be intentional in upholding the anti-discriminationpolicies and best practices that our state has created to protect all students, particularly those experiencing marginalization. We hope that todays collaboration will ultimately create new resources that will allow districts to be even more proactive in protecting students through training, technical assistance, and ongoing education.

Anh Vu Sawyer, The Southeast Asian Coalition of Massachusetts Executive Director: Hate and bias against members of our communities too often spills into our schools and even our school sports teams. We are grateful for the work of the Attorney Generals Office to provide resources to schools and athletic programs to address hate incidents and ensure a supportive and inclusive environment for all kids.

View post:

Mass Attorney General Hosts Virtual Call-To-Action To Address Hate & Bias in School Athletics - framinghamsource.com

Posted in Intentional Communities | Comments Off on Mass Attorney General Hosts Virtual Call-To-Action To Address Hate & Bias in School Athletics – framinghamsource.com

Neal Opening Statement at Hearing on Overcoming Racism to Advance Economic Opportunity – Ways and Means Committee

Posted: at 6:39 am

(As prepared for delivery)

In declaring our nations independence nearly 350 years ago, our founders affirmed the belief that all men are created equal. But as our nation evolved, that founding principle did not result in equal opportunity or equal outcomes for all Americans. When I became Ways and Means Chairman, I made it a priority that our Committee would explore why thats the case and what Congress can do to level the playing field for everyone.

For more than three years now, examining the health and economic inequities engrained in our systems has been central to our work. Our hearings on these issues have looked at a range of topics, from the maternal mortality crisis to the ways the tax code subsidizes hate, to the need for trade policies to include workforce protections.

Our experience with COVID-19, in particular, has heightened the Committees focus on the overlapping issues of health and economic disparities. Early in the pandemic, Ways and Means held the first virtual hearing in the history of the House of Representatives to examine the disparate impact COVID-19 has had on communities of color.

Throughout the pandemic, this Committee has led Congress in crafting policies that promote an equitable recovery, so that all Americans can see their lives improve.

Todays hearing is our next step in this continuing equity work. From health to tax to trade to worker and family support programs, today, we will seek to understand how racial biases have been baked into our policy choices and resulted in stark inequities for communities of color.

In the 20th century, Congress passed several socially transformative pieces of legislation that we all know well. Landmark policy initiatives like the New Deal, the G.I. bill, and the Great Society built out our middle class in unprecedented ways, but they did so unequally. Simply because of skin color, some Americans were left standing on the sidelines without access to the supports that brought the American Dream within reach for many White Americans.

The repercussions of decades-old policy decisions that intentionally excluded communities of color reverberate through our society today. We still see significant gaps in income and wealth accumulation that have compounded over generations.

For example:

There is no denying that the American economy does not work for everyone.

Just as these inequities have stemmed from policy choices made decades ago, we now have the opportunity to make different choices.

Enhancing the EITC and closing the Medicaid coverage gap are examples of policy decisions that can help change our nations trajectory and improve outcomes for everyone.

The zero-sum mindset that the advancement of some people holds others back is false. Fuller participation in our economy means a stronger economy for everyone.

We have an opportunity and a responsibility to address racism to build the inclusive and equitable benefits and shared prosperity that all of us deserve.

This is not an easy conversation, but it is one we need to have. I am reminded of the words of our dear friend, the north star of the Committee, John Lewis. He said:

When you see something that is not right, you must say something. You must do something. Democracy is not a state. It is an act, and each generation must do its part to help build what we called the Beloved Community, a nation and world society at peace with itself.

With an honest dialogue and intentional policies, we can improve our laws and public programs to truly deliver on the promise of the American Dream so that all Americans have the opportunity to experience economic advancement and live healthy lives.

And with that, I would like to yield the balance of my time to the co-chairs of the Committees Racial Equity Initiative. Representatives Terri Sewell, Steven Horsford, and Jimmy Gomez have spent considerable time focusing on these issues and spearheading this important work and I think their brief remarks can help us frame todays discussion.

###

Read more:

Neal Opening Statement at Hearing on Overcoming Racism to Advance Economic Opportunity - Ways and Means Committee

Posted in Intentional Communities | Comments Off on Neal Opening Statement at Hearing on Overcoming Racism to Advance Economic Opportunity – Ways and Means Committee

PNC Chief Diversity Officer: Inclusion Is Key Factor in Shaping Business – Yahoo Finance

Posted: at 6:39 am

Gina Coleman shares her thoughts on challenges in the D&I space and PNC objectives.

Northampton, MA --News Direct-- PNC Financial Services Group

PNC Chief Diversity Officer Gina Coleman believes the banks commitment to inclusion shapes how people lead, interact with their colleagues and deliver on business strategies. A former PNC client and community relations director in the Detroit markets office of the regional president, she returned to the bank after nearly two years most recently serving as chief sales officer for MassMutual Great Lakes. Coleman officially began her role as chief diversity officer Jan. 1, 2022 and is looking forward to elevating and strengthening Diversity and Inclusion at PNC.

During her previous tenure at PNC, she not only participated in PNCs Employee Business Resource Groups (EBRG), but she co-founded one the Womens Connect EBRG. Coleman also became a PNC-certified Womens Business Advocate to use her expertise in helping women thrive in their businesses and has worked to drive engagement in PNCs market-level diversity and inclusion initiatives.

Today, Coleman spends her time building strategies and programs that allow PNC to grow and sustain a talented, diverse workforce and works to further advance a culture of inclusion among PNCs stakeholders. She shares her thoughts on some of PNCs D&I objectives and the challenges corporations face in the space.

What do you think are the greatest challenges facing corporate diversity and inclusion?

I see the greatest corporate challenges being centered on the slow progress of diverse representation in senior-level roles, effective measurements of impact within D&I programs, deeper embedding of D&I into talent, recruitment and retention and the drive for inclusion during this current remote and flexible environment. The effects of the pandemic, the great reshuffling of talent and a wave of state legislation impacting segments of diverse populations add to these challenges.

Story continues

D&I is one of PNCs core values, can you share its importance from a business perspective?

D&I is a business imperative, and we must approach it and manage it like any other business strategy. Its not just a nice thing to do, but something that has a tangible impact on business success and should be viewed as a strategic necessity.

As we continue to navigate operating in this flexible work environment and with talent being top of mind, I believe now more than ever that fostering inclusion and embracing diversity is an integral component for PNCs success. Even with present-day challenges, I'm excited about the critical role that D&I plays.

Our commitment to inclusion really shapes how we lead, how we interact with our colleagues, how we deliver on our business objectives and how we serve our customers, communities and all PNC stakeholders.

What are your key priorities as PNC's Chief Diversity Officer?

For more than a decade, PNC has been on a progressive D&I journey led by our first chief diversity officer, Marsha Jones. Our focus has been and continues to be centered on our greatest asset, our employees, while being intentional in building diverse, high-performing teams.

We are committed to fostering a culture where every employee is respected, valued, and has a sense of belonging and confidence to bring their authentic selves to work and pursue equitable opportunities for growth. We will continue driving inclusion and increasing engagement of our D&I initiatives through our core pillars of Workforce, Workplace and Marketplace.

Increasing diverse representation within all ranks of our workforce will continue to be a priority. We know that talented teams, with varied experiences, skills and perspectives help us to better innovate, create solutions to help meet the needs of our growing and increasingly diverse customer base.

We look to further embed inclusion and mitigate bias in our policies and practices and advance the integration of D&I with our culture, customer experience and community. And we will continue to strengthen accountability measures across PNC for all employees, especially our people leaders. Advancing our efforts will require more transparency around workforce demographics and sharing measures of progress.

How will you measure D&I success at PNC?

Our success relies on objectives that are measurable, where employees and managers, at all levels, are being held accountable in living our values and meeting PNC leadership standards.

We leverage clear and transparent metrics around workforce demographics. We track engagement in D&I learning and development and survey our employees at least twice a year to garner feedback that informs action and meaningful progress.

Senior leaders are responsible for identifying opportunities to increase diverse representation and develop and execute plans to drive change.

We set an example from the top of the house through PNCs corporate diversity council. This council comprises senior executives across a wide range of busines lines. I serve as co-chair alongside PNC CEO Bill Demchak on the council, which helps define accountability measures, strategizes how we attract, retain and develop a talented and diverse workforce. Council members serve as sponsors and champions for targeted D&I initiatives throughout the enterprise.

In the spirit of accountability, we have an equity and inclusion subcommittee of the PNC board of directors. As the chief diversity officer, I work closely with the corporate responsibility officer, the chief human resources officer and our CEO to oversee these collective D&I efforts at PNC.

What areas of diversity and inclusion will be under the spotlight in the year ahead?

I think its important to continue our D&I work through our three main pillars of Workforce, Workplace and Marketplace, but well also be working to elevate how we deliver and measure the impact of our programs.

Workforce objectives will be to engage more employees and managers by expanding our Employee Business Resource Groups (EBRGs), especially in our expanded markets. We currently have 12 EBRGs, with over 100 chapters and over 14,000 participants throughout our footprint. We will support retention efforts by growing participation of our D&I mentoring program.

All efforts within the Workplace pillar contribute to fostering inclusive skills and behaviors. We want to drive a best-in-class, inclusive culture that will help to build diverse representation and give all employees a sense of belonging. D&I learning, and development will be centered on building self-awareness and leadership skills.

We will continue to focus on our Listen, Learn and Act framework to keep employee needs, front and center while providing actionable D&I tools and resources for all to participate. Our 20 D&I line of business councils work to further D&I objectives through their respective verticals.

In Marketplace, we want to continue enabling diverse customer and business growth. This allows us to create a compelling and competitive brand within the communities we are a part of and serve. This work will be delivered through the lens of the three tenets of our Corporate Responsibility Group education, economic empowerment and entrepreneurship with our 40-plus D&I regional councils, that align with our Main Street bank model, D&I business roundtables, history and heritage and thought leadership programs.

Those Corporate Responsibility tenets are captured in PNCs $88 billion Community Benefits Plan, which commits to providing better economic opportunities for the communities and people we serve. Its our hope that we can better offer access to capital and resources to traditionally underrepresented individuals and communities specifically low- and moderate-income individuals and neighborhoods, as well as women, veterans, members of the LGBTQ+ population and people from underrepresented racial and ethnic backgrounds. That attention to inclusivity will put us on top.

It's important to note that D&I at PNC does not operate in a silo. We have strategic alignment with key internal partners throughout the enterprise, including multiple areas within human resources, supplier diversity, marketing, legal and many more. Everyone in the company plays a vital role in advancing our efforts and meeting key performance objectives.

Its going to take engagement with all our stakeholders to get there. This work is important in our efforts to be a better colleague, a better company, a better community and a better investment.

View additional multimedia and more ESG storytelling from PNC Financial Services Group on 3blmedia.com

View source version on newsdirect.com: https://newsdirect.com/news/pnc-chief-diversity-officer-inclusion-is-key-factor-in-shaping-business-195302226

See original here:

PNC Chief Diversity Officer: Inclusion Is Key Factor in Shaping Business - Yahoo Finance

Posted in Intentional Communities | Comments Off on PNC Chief Diversity Officer: Inclusion Is Key Factor in Shaping Business – Yahoo Finance

In The Midst Of Election Night Success, There Are Concerns For November – Wisconsin Right Now

Posted: at 6:37 am

The Spring election cycle proved to be a resounding red wave for Wisconsin Conservatives. April 6th, 2022 could go down in history as the moment when Wisconsin turned the tide against the draconian Left-wing, WOKE indoctrination of our public schools and local governments.

While we should be elated, its time for a reality check.

Yes, ordinary people engaged, ran for office, and fought back. Southeast Wisconsin elected a Conservative to the State Court of Appeals and even saw Kenosha County elect their first woman and Republican County Executive, ever.

We saw cities like Cedarburg, Brookfield, New Berlin, Menomonee Falls, and Waukesha rip their school boards right out of the very clutches of the WOKE left, and in most cases, it wasnt even close.

In Waukesha County, the WisRed initiative led by Terry Dittrich and Chris Slinker won over 150 of their 173 endorsed races.

All this success last night and things look amazing for the November elections. Right?

WRONG!

We reclaimed what was ours, we did not gain anywhere new, except in Kenosha.

There remains a dismal cloud of failure over Milwaukee County by producing some of the worst numbers in the state.

While WisRed and the Waukesha GOP surely set the standard for success, the Milwaukee County GOP showed us the precise recipe for failure. The county party did nearly NOTHING to recruit, engage with, and help local candidates.

Sure, there were some shining moments when the city of West Allis shot down another boondoggle school referendum, and at the county level, incumbent Milwaukee County Supervisor, Patti Logsdon, won but came dangerously close to losing.

The Milwaukee County GOP barely sent out one email and made one Facebook post on who to vote forand there were only eight people on that list, eight!

Obviously, Bob Donovan was at the top of that list, but barely got any help from the Milwaukee County GOP. They donated $1500, thats all. In a real campaign, the local party would have provided the infrastructure for the campaign, like the Democrats did with Chevy Johnson.

This was a squandered opportunity to find new or disgruntled voters, especially in the City of Milwaukee where crime is running rampant and people are longing for leadership.

At the county level, Patti Logsdon, the only conservative on the Milwaukee County Board, was begging for help with her campaign. She got nothing. To make things worse, they didnt say a word about Deanna Alexanders write-in campaign.

The City of Wauwatosa saw significant losses to several WOKE candidates, and in some cases, it was very close. Even a little bit of help from the Milwaukee County GOP could have helped tip the scales in several races.

I lay these losses directly at the feet of the Milwaukee County GOPs feckless leader, County Chairman, David Karst.

In a conversation I had with some prominent people, I mentioned I was writing this op-ed talking about David Karst, and their response was LITERALLY, Who is David Karst?

That speaks volumes.

Sadly, this is not even close in comparison to the Who is John Galt? of Atlas Shrugged fame.

You see, losing is nothing new to David Karst, he has a long history of doing nothing and snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Last night was just the icing on the cake.

In a nutshell, the Milwaukee County GOP has no infrastructure to recruit local candidates, raise money, assist campaigns with volunteers, or even coach them on what to do. To make things worse, the Milwaukee County GOP office on S. 108th St in West Allis is only open from 11 am to 2 pm on Wednesday and Saturday, if you are lucky.

For years now, the state party has refused to hold David Karst accountable for his lack of leadership and failure to help the Get out the vote in Milwaukee County. Not once have they pushed David Karst to resign.

This is not without precedent, the state party has gotten involved when they forced then St. Croix GOP Chairman, John Kraft, out of his position after he casually told his Facebook friends to prepare for war with the left, a few days after January 6. He was a very active Chairman and had the largest Trump rallies in the state. The state party turned his board against him, and he was forced to resign.

But in the case of David Karst, we got crickets, saying they do not interfere at the county level.

The state GOP literally went after an active GOP member because they were afraid of bad news coverage, yet they allowed a consistently incompetent Chairman to continue in the most populated county in the state.

To add salt to the many wounds, David Karst now wants a promotion. He is running for State Assembly in a newly drawn district. With his lack of progress, he is surely undeserving of it.

Years ago, Conservatives like Scott Walker and David Clarke could win the entire county, and now we barely get over 30%. For comparison, on election night in 2020, Trump only got about 31%.

The reality is if we do not get 38% or better in Milwaukee County, WE LOSE! End of story. David Karst remaining will likely cost us 2022 and maybe even 2024. We must get more votes out of Milwaukee County if the Republican Gubernatorial candidate and Sen. Johnson are to win.

There is more to being a county chairman than just having a fancy title and getting to sit at the head table at Lincoln Day dinners. There is real work required and with hard work come victories. Just look at Waukesha County, they work hard and win.

David Karst must resign and be immediately replaced before its too late. We have too much at stake and with republicans like Karst, who needs Democrats?

Ask yourself this, what would John Galt do?

See original here:

In The Midst Of Election Night Success, There Are Concerns For November - Wisconsin Right Now

Posted in Atlas Shrugged | Comments Off on In The Midst Of Election Night Success, There Are Concerns For November – Wisconsin Right Now

Wisconsin Conservation Voters: Gov. Evers once again protects the freedom of Wisconsin voters with his veto – WisPolitics.com

Posted: at 6:36 am

MADISON Today Gov. Tony Evers once again protected Wisconsins freedom to vote by vetoing a package of anti-voter bills passed by the Wisconsin Legislature.

BillsSB 935,SB 939,SB 941, andSB 943would have created barriers to the ballot box for voters with disabilities, older voters, communities of color, and voters in nursing homes. Additionally, these bills would have made it harder for nonpartisan election officials to administer our elections.

Rather than limiting our voting rights, our elected officials should put their efforts into pro-voter initiatives like automatic voter registration that would improve the accessibility of our elections and make voter registration easier a win-win for everyone.

Executive Director Kerry Schumann had this to say about the vetoes:

Gov. Evers has proven time and again that he believes democracy should be for all people, and will continue to work for fair and accessible elections that everyone can participate in. The constant attacks on our freedom to vote by many politicians in our legislature are damaging our state and undermining the voices of our residents.

Wisconsin Conservation Voters applauds Gov. Evers veto because we know that our democracy is stronger when everyone has a voice.

See the rest here:

Wisconsin Conservation Voters: Gov. Evers once again protects the freedom of Wisconsin voters with his veto - WisPolitics.com

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Wisconsin Conservation Voters: Gov. Evers once again protects the freedom of Wisconsin voters with his veto – WisPolitics.com

Letters to the editor: Backing Barrick; flag isn’t all about freedom – VC Star

Posted: at 6:36 am

Supporting Barrick for DA

We are the presidents of all of the peace officers associations of Ventura County. We represent hundreds of active sworn peace officers who work daily to provide safety and security to the residents of this county. John Barrick is the only candidate for District Attorney whom we believe shares our dedication toward public safety.

It is critically important to support a candidate for District Attorney who grew up here and has proven that true public service means putting the needs of the community first. Only John Barrick has done that.

John Barrick is not a career politician. He is a 17-year prosecutor who has worked in the trenches alongside us fighting against not only criminals, but harmful criminal laws passed in Sacramento that only serve to re-victimize those who have suffered the most.

The District Attorney must be supported by law enforcement. It is the only way people can be assured that their welfare and personal safety will always be placed first. As the last line of defense for crime victims, the peace officers associations of this county and their 900 active members loudly and proudly support John Barrick. Working so diligently and unselfishly for crime victims, Mr. Barrick has earned our respect. There simply is no other candidate who can say that, and there is no other candidate we trust to do what is necessary to protect everyone and keep them safe. On June 7, please join us in voting for John Barrick as our next District Attorney.

Mike Aranda, National Latino Police Officers Association Advocacy; Rick Marquez, Oxnard Peace Officers Association; Joe Metz, Ventura Police Officers Association; Tim Wedemeyer, Simi Valley Police Officers Association; Kris Acebo, Ventura County Professional Peace Officers Association; Dan McCarthy, Santa Paula Police Officers Association; Mike Hamrick, Port Hueneme Police Officers Association

Re: Judi Kroegers April 6 letter, Leave our flag alone:

The writer refers to our flag, but seems to want to choose those it represents. Her handwringing over what people do with the flag, or alternate flag designs, is a recycled issue from the 1960-70s. Shecites Websters definition of a patriot as, A person who loves his country. Supporting it and defending it and its interests. It is her interpretation that this includes symbols like flags.

Those who respect Americas best morals, high intentions, and our legal traditions, and consider the flag a symbol of such, should be commended. But since the 1960s, the Stars & Stripes have been showing up in fashions and posters in all manner of configurations.

Today, it isnt possible to determine the political affiliation of someone dressed in a flag hat, shirt, shorts, and sneakers.

Part of Americas story is that we are free to agree or disagree with how to support or defend the U.S and define its interests. America has achieved great things and held lofty ideals, but there have been other things, like slavery, denying the vote to Blacks/women, Japanese internment camps, etc. When she calls for honoring the flag, there was a time when much of the country flew a Confederate flag. Is that flag a sacred symbol?

One of our precious rights and privileges is to protest and to disagree. The Supreme Court has always protected that right, even when it involves the flag and what we are allowed to do with it. That freedom is our true symbol. Beware of recent self-proclaimed patriots, because that title is misapplied to those who disrespect democracy and the rule of law.

Stuart Wing, Moorpark

Read the original:

Letters to the editor: Backing Barrick; flag isn't all about freedom - VC Star

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Letters to the editor: Backing Barrick; flag isn’t all about freedom – VC Star

Convoy protesters talked a lot about freedom. But heres the real threat to Canadians being free – Toronto Star

Posted: at 6:36 am

Lets talk about freedom

Freedom has been in the public conversation a lot these days. Especially issues of freedom of speech and in the convoy movement. Its no accident those occupations and blockades grounded their protest in appeals to freedom. Early into the pandemic, anti-vaccination activists found that theories about nano-chips and side effects hidden by evil governments, were not mainstream ideas.

But arguing the choice to resist vaccination was a human rights issue, an issue of human freedom that had a lot more traction. Because human rights and freedom thank God are mainstream ideas in Canada.

Freedom is also a trending topic due to the very real struggle for freedom going on in Ukraine. As many have noted, the war in Ukraine helps crystallize the difference between a government that clumsily has tried to protect us from a generational crisis with some limits on civil liberties, and the reality of facing down an actual dictator.

Canada, despite what the detractors say, remains a place with an extremely high level of political and civil freedom. But a disturbingly large amount of Canada thinks otherwise. A recent Nanos polls showed 8.3 per cent of respondents believed threats to our freedoms are the nations biggest issue, the second-largest issue in the poll.

Now I want to be clear: I may not share the concerns some have about us losing our freedom of speech or individual liberties due to COVID-19 controls. But I think its a totally legitimate opinion for someone to have. And despite evidence to the contrary, I believe its still essential in 2022 for people with different ideas to engage in open discussion and mutual learning. Especially about an idea like freedom.

But the problem is our public discourse is dominated by a singular, limited view of freedom. Focused on our individual civil rights such as: the right to vote or freedom of religion. Rights regarding an individuals ability to receive fair and equal treatment under the law, and not have government or others restrict their ability to make their own decisions.

But a free society is about everyone having a real ability to make their own life choices. Freedoms that only exist on paper, that you cant use, are dead in the water. Its like a having a car but no gas. And for many, economic and social circumstances restrict them from living truly free lives.

Which means freedom includes making a living wage, so you can spend time with your kids every day, not be forced to hustle between survival jobs. Freedom is being able to afford housing, without having to sacrifice groceries to make rent. Or being able to access the therapy you need to escape the cage of depression and anxiety.

Dont consider this part of freedom? Well, lets look at history. Immediately after Americans achieved a degree of equality under the law with the Civil Rights Act in 1964, civil rights leaders shifted their focus to amplifying work around fighting poverty. They knew Black Americans would never be truly free without economic freedom.

A few years later in 1966 the United Nations drafted a covenant on economic, social and cultural rights, outlining the other rights needed to have a free society, like the right to health care, labour rights and a basic standard of living.

And in Canada in 1964 Emmett Hall drafted a report that laid the foundations for Medicare in Canada, arguing that universal public health care including dental, pharma, mental-health and home care were critical components to a free society.

Freedom is more than just an ability to say whatever you want on social media or give government the finger if they ask you to do something youre uncomfortable with.

But the political left has let populists and libertarians define our debates on freedom recently. And in truth within the Western tradition there has always been more consensus around a limited definition of freedom, focused on individual civil liberties.

Yet if we step back from our current context, its possible to imagine other ways to organize and achieve a free society.

David Graeber and David Wengrow in their landmark publication The Dawn of Everything, write in depth about the role Indigenous peoples of Eastern Canada had in shaping European ideas on freedom during the Enlightenment. Their intriguing (and controversial) theories argue that accounts of Jesuits debating Indigenous intellectuals during the 1700s set off formative debates in the salons and cultural institutions across continental Europe.

They argue that these Indigenous thinkers looked on in horror at Europe, where life seemed incredibly oppressive. People in their societies worked less, were healthier, had higher degrees of womens rights, leaders who ruled by consent and there was almost no ability for someone to use economic/political power to force a person to do something they didnt want to do.

But as Graeber and Wengrow write, these freedoms could only exist because Indigenous people built a society based on mutual aid and economic sharing. People had freedom to chose how they would live their lives because food, land and shelter were shared by default. No one could be forced to work from fear of starving and leaders had to rely on competence to get people to follow them.

Obviously, our current society is different from pre-colonial peoples like the Huron-Wendat. But if we drop the cultural superiority, we can recognize we are not the first free people to walk these lands. Indigenous societies are just one example of the different ways human beings have linked civil and economic rights to build a free society.

So lets talk about freedom. On the left we need to hear peoples concerns on freedom of speech and individual autonomy. And on the right, there must be openness to talk about how true freedom is contingent on everyone having the basics needed to make a real go at life.

We can wave our flags and fight for our causes but lets also step up to the moment and have real dialogue about what freedom truly means.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

Anyone can read Conversations, but to contribute, you should be registered Torstar account holder. If you do not yet have a Torstar account, you can create one now (it is free)

Sign In

Register

Read more here:

Convoy protesters talked a lot about freedom. But heres the real threat to Canadians being free - Toronto Star

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Convoy protesters talked a lot about freedom. But heres the real threat to Canadians being free – Toronto Star

Zelensky shares photographs of cities liberated from Russian invaders: Freedom must win – Ukrinform

Posted: at 6:36 am

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky believes freedom must win in Ukraine first, and then wherever tyranny will try to raise its head.

The relevant statement was made by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Telegram, an Ukrinform correspondent reports.

Hatred must lose. Freedom must win. First in Ukraine, and then wherever tyranny will try to raise its head, Zelensky wrote.

Traditionally, the President of Ukraine posted some photographs, depicting the effects of the Russian aggression. This time he shared the images of the Ukrainian cities liberated from Russian invaders.

A reminder that, on February 24, 2022, Russian President Vladimir Putin initiated a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, starting a war. Russian troops are shelling and destroying the key infrastructure facilities, launching missile and air strikes on residential areas in Ukrainian cities and villages, torturing and murdering civilians.

Photo: Volodymyr Zelensky, Telegram

mk

Read more from the original source:

Zelensky shares photographs of cities liberated from Russian invaders: Freedom must win - Ukrinform

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Zelensky shares photographs of cities liberated from Russian invaders: Freedom must win – Ukrinform