Daily Archives: April 11, 2022

Hey guys, I'm back again amd like I promised the day before, I'm going to share a tutorial on how to make money without carding knowledge and initial capital. All you need for this method to work is just good old social engineering skills.

For those who missed Method 1 - 3 click on my profile to see them all https://www.reddit.com/user/strobya/ I decided to do this tutorial because over the past few days, I've received messages from people who have been asking me to send them some startup capital. First of all, I have to let you guys know you need money to make money even in fraud. The only thing I can do is to teach you how to make money, I'm trying to help the community so stop stressing me by trying to guilt me into sending you money. If you need some bread, you have to work for it. I'm already doing too much by sharing these tutorials for free.

So this tutorial is targeted at those who don't have enough capital to start carding, you can easily use these methods to make from $1000 to $3000 every few weeks or more depending on how much effort you put.

I must reiterate, if you really serious from making money from fraud, you have to know you have to spend some money on some things like cc, rdp, and many more but this particular tutorial does not need any of those things.

Carding and fraud is an art to me, this is my life, this is what I live for. I'm not your average carder, I take this serious and the way people invest time into their jobs that's how I invest time into research and my fraud. I remember last year when my US stripe accounts were getting burnt easily by stripe I moved to Europe briefly just to try my hand on European stripe because US stripe became saturated on Alphabay and my sojourn to Europe paid in 5 figures. So I take this serious and if you want to make money from fraud, you have to take it serious too.

Let's get down to business,

This tutorial focuses on scamming using instagram or facebook. No carding skills required and everyone can easily make some good money from this with no prior knowledge just this tutorial.

Right now I only card institutions and do victimless scams but when I was building up my startup capital for carding payment processors, this was what gave me money and here it is.

This method is fairly simple so here it goes.

I came up with this method when I read a news online about how a couple bought a rare breed A Tibetan Mastiff for over $120,000 from an Instagram seller then I sat and thought about this and figured out with some tweaking I could really start hitting hard.

Here are the step by step guide.

1, Create an Instagram account for dogs or cats, example catloversden, catsarebeautiful, cutedogsofig. etc

2, find picture of cute dogs or cats on Google and upload to your new page daily and build the page up by following cat lovers on Instagram especially old couples. Don't buy followers, you have to build your page by following genuine animal lovers, Your target should be to get up to a thousand or more followers in your first week.

3, after the first week of posting pictures of cute dogs or cats and getting your followers up to a thousand or 2. From the second week, find a picture of a cute rare and expensive cat or dog then post on your IG that it is for sell. You will get up to 5 interested persons who want to buy. You can also say the dog or cat is up for adoption and needs any home and when you get messages from many people, ask them to send you some money for transporting the cat or dog and some other money for insurance etc

4, Send them your paypal or bankdrop or a and tell them to pay by cash deposit or transfer into your account. Once 3-10 people pay you block them from your page and turn your page to private for a week then resume again after they move on.

I know this might be little confusing but when I was doing this I was cashing out over $5k each week and I have lots of IG accounts I've built up and cash out from every week. I stopped doing this because I got into bigger fraud like carding stripe and venmo which are victimless crimes.

I have over 5 accounts on IG with lots of followers that I built up over the past year.They are properly aged and I haven't used them to cashout since last year because I shifted my focus to stripe.

This method is really easy and no way you not going to make at least $3k before the month ends. Ask me any questions if you are confused about something.

The hard part is always building the followers on IG or getting likes.

For those that want the easy way out and don't have the time to build up IG pages. I have 5 IG accounts that I aged last year that I stopped using because I moved to other things. I can sell this accounts to anyone interested. I do not know how much so make me an offer for any of them if you're interested. Of course I'll send proof I own any account I'm selling.

Once you get the logins, change the password, I'll send you a picture of an expensive cat worth around $3,000 and you'll make a post and say it's for sell. You'll get interested buyers immediately and then you use your drop or paypal to cash out some times you can get 5 people to pay for the same means more money for you.

I'm currently not doing this method right now for those that might ask, because I moved on to stripe which is victimless cos stripe, paypal and all those big corporations will be fine no matter how hard we hit them

Watch out for part 5. Paypal method. Many people have been asking for a paypal method, so watch out for part 5 of my tutorial soon, how to make clean funds that don't chargeback into your paypal or venmo.

Message me on wickr with questions and offers for the IG account.

Wickr strobya.

You can also setup a new fresh IG and build it up but getting this established cats account I have would guarantee you a big cashout before the month ends.

I promise everyone, as long as you're not lazy and willing to put in some effort, there is no way you wonT start making good money from fraud after my 10 tutorials is up. So keep reading and dont forget you cant make money if you just read these methods and dont start. The time to start is now.

Read the original post:

Method 4 How to make $1k-$3k without any carding ... - reddit

Organized retail crime costs retailers $700,000 for every $1 billion in sales, on average, according to NRFs 2021 National Retail Security Survey, and 57 percent of respondents indicated a rise in ORC during the previous year.

These are not victimless crimes; they jeopardize employee and customer safety and disrupt store operations.Theyre also not non-violent customers, employees and community members are traumatized by these incidents. News headlines around smash and grab thefts at national retailers in major cities show that organized retail crime continues to be a serious problem. ORC continues to be a gateway crime to more serious crimes and often has ties to transnational crime rings.

And its not a new problem: NRF surveys show that organized retail theft has been a growing problem over the past five years. The brazen, targeted and coordinated activity occurs in communities across the United States.

Over the past eight years, several states have worked to keep non-violent criminals, or those with minor misdemeanor offenses, out of the U.S. criminal justice system. Diversion programs and other job and economic development programs encourage these individuals to become productive members of society.

NRF PROTECT 2022

Join us for the most important retail security event of 2022 as NRF PROTECT returns in-person.

States have also changed laws regarding the amount of bail assessed to minor offenses, increased felony theft thresholds and worked to remove non-violent offenders from the prison system in the hopes they do not become career criminals or fall into a life of more violent crime.

Some district attorneys, law enforcement officers and state legislators even communicated that they would no longer be tough on non-violent, victimless or seemingly minor offenses. In an effort to help locales meet criminal justice reform goals and free resources to go after more violent and serious offenders, those apprehended were often quickly released due to the non-violent and unimportant nature of these property crimes.

The result is that criminals can recruit people to steal inexpensive items in great quantities with no fear of retribution or prosecution.

Incidents of organized retail crime were rising before 2020, but the pandemic upended peoples lives in countless ways. Many lost their jobs. Communities restructured how we lived, shopped and worked. Retailers raced to safely stay open and serve customers by increasing innovations like delivery, curbside fulfilment and buy online, pick up in store. Customers flocked to these convenient and safe ways to shop, wearing face coverings as required in stores and shopping centers.

Unfortunately, these innovations also attracted enterprising criminals looking to exploit gaps in security and take advantage of opportunities to quickly resell merchandise online, on street corners, in black markets and even back to the retail supply chains and stores they stole from. Criminals organized flash mobs or smash-and-grab incidents through social media and apps, which spawned more copycat incidents.

A perfect storm for organized retail crime emerged and the results of that storm are being captured on mobile devices and shared via social media and news stories across the country.

While ORCs financial impact is considerable, the impact on employee and customer safety is even more important. These crimes not only affect retailers bottom lines with asset loss and store operation disruptions; they have become increasingly violent jeopardizing the safety of employees and customers.

The costs for security budgets for retailers have grown significantly in recent years partly due to these retail crimes. Retailers continue to revisit their policies and shift strategies to fight and prevent ORC-related incidents. NRF supports their efforts through advocacy and opportunities to convene the retail industrys leading professionals in loss prevention, asset protection and cybersecurity.

NRF encourages states to update the definition of organized retail crime with sufficiently serious criminal penalties. States should act to define the crime of "organized retail theft" in criminal law to specify those thefts involving two or more participants, an intention of resale, and include increased penalties for those specific violations.

Go here to see the original:

Meeting the challenge of organized retail crime - NRF News

Every year, Canadians contribute to their communities by paying taxes.

Public tax dollars pay for critical investments in our schools and hospitals and for a host of other benefits for both the elderly and our children.

The money we pay builds the neighbourhoods we live in and takes care of the people around us. However, every year many construction contractors and builders selfishly and criminally refuse to pay their fair share. Does that seem right to you?

According to the Ontario Construction Secretariat, our governments lose up to $3.1 billion in revenue due to construction contractors not paying their fair share of taxes. They lose an estimated $1.1 billion in general taxes, $656 million in CPP contributions, $18 million in Employer Health Tax, $119 million in employment insurance, $340 million in WSIB payments and $832 million in HST revenues.

For governments at every level, finding the required financial resources is key to our ongoing ability to deliver much-needed health care, education and infrastructure investments. Stamping out tax fraud in construction is a crucial tool in enabling us to collect such financial resources. Just think of the services and investments which could be paid for with the extra $3.1 billion that would be available each and every year if everyone paid their fair share.

Tax fraud within the construction industry takes many forms.

It can be as simple as people paying cash for home renovations or, as is extremely common now, the misclassification of workers as independent contractors.

These practices lower the general contractors income and payroll tax responsibilities and allows them to avoid tax and CPP/EI/WSIB contributions. This goes on with every trade across the entire industry, including floor covering installers, tile setters, painters and decorators and carpenters. Unfortunately, the underground economy is growing.

It is sometimes assumed that practices like paying cash or misclassifying workers are victimless crimes but workers vanishing into the grey economy has led, in the worst cases, to human trafficking and serious disregard for the basic health and safety of workers, resulting in deaths in some cases.

We have seen examples of all of these phenomena in recent years and, in fact, one of the biggest human trafficking cases in Canadian history, the Domotor Case, was a result of these practices right here in Ontario.

We at the Carpenters Union are determined to do something about this.

Construction companies engaging in tax fraud, such as by not classifying their workers properly to avoid their tax obligations, result in two severe consequences, economic inequity and worker vulnerability.

Economic inequity results from the unfair advantage gained by employers who do not play by the rules by improperly avoiding taxes. This hurts industry competitors but it also hurts the general public as well.

Now, when governments collect taxes to pay for infrastructure or social security, the average citizen has to contribute more to make-up for the amounts not contributed by the construction companies.

This means that as spending increases with our economy bouncing back from the COVID-19 pandemic, honest and hardworking taxpayers are hurt the most.

Additionally, by committing tax fraud, contractors are putting the lives of their workers at risk. Paying construction workers off the books or as independent contractors makes employers less accountable and jeopardizes basic safety standards on jobsites.

Workers can often be cheated out of their pay and forced to work long hours, under horrendous conditions, at jobsites that simply are not safe.

This can include, not being paid overtime or other required premiums or not even being paid at all in the worst cases. These are just a few examples of what is going on in Ontario right now.

This underground economy is large in size and broad in scope.

However, whether someone is being paid under the table to paint the inside of a house or human trafficking is taking place, both are crimes and should not be tolerated in Ontarios construction industry. Quite simply, all forms of tax fraud are theft and when contractors engage in tax fraud they are stealing from the rest of us.

While tax fraud is not an issue that can be resolved overnight, there are tangible steps that can be taken to begin eliminating these toxic practices on our jobsites.

The implementation and enforcement of a fair wage policy by both the Ontario and the federal government needs to happen now and these policies need to be applied universally to all builders.

This is a solution that the City of Toronto adopted over 100 years ago to ensure their workers were not discriminated against by contractors failing to pay fair hourly wages, vacation and holiday pay, along with certain basic benefits.

Torontos Fair Wage Policy ensures the ethical treatment of workers and holds employers accountable through oversight and enforcement by the citys fair wage office.

If the federal and provincial governments adopted these practices it would greatly reduce the employment vulnerability that many workers face and help eliminate unfair competition between contractors. We need to take a stand against tax fraud and show our support for those who build our province.

The Carpenters District Council of Ontario is leading the way against tax fraud in the construction industry and will be promoting Tax Fraud Days of Action from April 11 to 16, as seen on our website http://www.notaxfraud.com.

With a long economic recovery and large levels of uncertainty ahead, it is important that contractors pay their fair share, to ensure critical infrastructure can continue to be built and our economy makes a strong comeback.

For more information also see http://www.stoptaxfraud.net.

Mike Yorke is president of the Carpenters District Council of Ontario. Send Industry Perspectives comments and column ideas to editor@dailycommercialnews.com.

Read the original post:

Industry Perspectives Op-Ed: When contractors engage in tax fraud they are stealing from the rest of us - constructconnect.com - Daily Commercial News

True feminism is the belief that all people should have equal rights, equal opportunity, and equal command of their own destiny. Unfortunately, there are factions of the feminist movement that do not truly hold to that definition but rather hate men, see them as inferiors, or even wish to see them hold fewer rights than women.

Just as the feminist movement has two sides to itone valid and one vile, Id argueso too does whats known as the mens rights movement, which is sort of a parallel advocacy movement for men.

I recently decided to tackle this movement on an episode of my show, BASED.

According to one of the largest advocacy groups within this sector, MensGroup:

Activists (in this movement) argue that society has become biased and sexist against men. They also argue that men face discrimination from the media, government, and Supreme Court for being male. Mens rights groups fight against custody laws that favor mothers over fathers, violence against men, false rape allegations, disproportionate male prison sentencing, and conscription. These are some of the inequalities mens rights groups strive to address.

Anyone who cares about individual liberty, equality before the law, and limited government could surely find much in that paragraph to agree with. But admittedly, this feminist had a hard time giving the mens rights movement the time of day for many years.

The reason is simple: large swaths of this movement have been co-opted by men who really do just hate women, want to bring back the oppressive societal structures of the past, and even excuse horrors like rape and domestice abuse. These subgroups of the movement include the incel community, components of the alt-right and white nationalists, trads that want to force their social conservatism on others, the pick-up artist community, and the Men Going Their Own Way movement.

These groups do not believe in equality and their members are often consumed with bitterness and resentment. Its a shame that theyve been able to co-opt the mens rights movement to an extentbut as a libertarianI know the feeling. Our movement is no stranger to liberty-despising people trying to co-opt it and corrupt our message.

So, lets get back to the valid side of the mens rights movement and the concerns they elevate.

As a woman, it can be hard to feel sympathy for men sometimes. Im just keeping it real. It often feels like there is so much we have to overcome even to this day, and a lot of the talking points used by the mens rights movement can sound like an excuse for sexism or thinly veiled desires to oppress women.

But when you step back and take a look around, it actually becomes pretty clear that while women may still have a lot to overcome, men really arent doing well in our society lately.

In fact, recent research has found that in 91 of the 134 countries evaluated, women faced fewer net disadvantages than men based on metrics that included literacy, primary and secondary school enrollment, years one could expect a healthy lifestyle, and life satisfaction.

Women are now more likely to go to college, more likely to graduate college, and more likely to obtain a graduate degree. Men, on the other hand, are 3.88 times more likely to die by suicide than women. They have higher rates of substance abuse. They are substantially more likely to have a dangerous job and to die on the job. Their average life expectancy is five years less than women. 19 percent of men are classified as having a gaming addiction. Porn addictions are up. 34 percent are overweight.

The list could go on, but you get the picture. As a whole, there are a lot of men facing very serious issues in our society right now, and when they talk about them, theyre often met with derision.

While there are always elements of self-responsibility that must be emphasized when it comes to these matters, anyone who cares about liberty should care deeply if the state is putting policies into place that hurt peopleespecially when those policies disproportionately hurt one group of people more than others.

You should care about people when theyre hurting. You should especially care when the government is hurting people in your name and with your resources. And you should also recognize that hurt people often hurt people.

The growth of the alt-right and some of these hate groups within the mens rights movement is evidence of that. The fact that single white men are the most likely demographic to be a mass murderer shows that. The fact that men make up the majority of murders and murderers in general, shows that.

So if we want to actually stop misogyny, sexism, and the growth of malicious groups that are preying on hurting, disaffected people, the best thing we can do is start to show up and show sympathy and, hopefully, even free-market solutions for their problems.

Lets break down some of the top issues the mens rights movement is trying to elevate.

Men make up almost 80 percent of all murders worldwide. In the US, their homicide rate is almost 10 times that of females. Theyre also more likely to be victims of other crimes too, like drug-related crimes and gang-related crimes. And though they experience far lower rates of violence for things like domestic abuse and rape, they do experience that kind of violence too.

In response to these crime statistics many will point out that men are also far more likely to be perpetrators of violence than women, leading to their involvement in more violence against them. And this isnt incorrect. Men commit 90 plus percent of murders based on one global study, and intimate partner violence remains the biggest health threat to women. But I want to reiterate what I said earlier: hurt people hurt people.

The dichotomy you have in your mind of victim and perpetrator as mutually exclusive categories rarely exists. They are almost always one in the same because violence is cyclical in nature. Most people are first victims of violence many times over before they themselves become violent, and then they are met with more violence from our system.

And no one is ever safer for it. If we want to get serious about violence we have to get serious about trauma interventions and violence disruptions, programs that largely take place outside of policing and do the real work of stopping cycles of violence. These are serious criminal justice reforms that we should all be supporting. And the best thing about them is theyre local, often less costly than our bloated policing system, and take a more limited government approach to crime. Thats the policy change that needs to take place.

But theres a societal change that needs to take place here too. Namely, we need to stop diminishing violence against men. It is not ok for your partner to harm you - physically, verbally, or emotionally. Abuse is abuse. And men who find themselves on the receiving end of it should get the same sympathy and support from their community as women do.actually thats not even saying much. Women also often do not get all that much sympathy either.

Our society needs to be better on this all around. Stop asking people why they didnt leave and instead ask how you can help. Stop laughing at the antics of abusers and instead intervene, speak up, let them know others are watching them and wont excuse their behavior.

These two issues are somewhat intertwined if you think about it, so well combine them here.

The US has a massive over-incarceration problem driven by wrongful convictions, prosecutors pushing everyone into plea deals, and a whole litany of actions being made into crimes by our lawmakers that are victimless, non-violent offenses no one should be in jail over.

Despite making up close to 5 percent of the global population, the US has more than 20 percent of the world's prison population. And since 1970, our incarcerated population has increased by 500 percent.

Under this system, men are over 8 times more likely than women to be incarcerated in prison at least once during their lifetime. Now, some of that is correlation given the violence rates among men we discussed above. But certainly, they are also more likely to go to jail or prison for things no one should be locked up for as well.

They are also more likely to be victims of wrongful convictions, which is a pervasive problem in our system.

Weve discovered over 2,500 wrongful convictions in recent years, and thats just the people whove been able to get the external resources they need to plead their case. Of those, men are far more likely to be wrongfully convicted, and black men, in particular, are the most impacted, with a rate that is 7 times higher than that of white people wrongfully convicted.

But while men are more likely to be incarcerated and more likely to be wrongfully incarcerated, it is not because women are falsely accusing men of crimes left and right.

More than half of all wrongful convictions are due to government misconduct. Shocker. That would include police misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, judicial misconduct, corruption in the labs, and general mistakes.

The misapplication of forensic science is responsible for 45 percent of wrongful convictions, false eyewitness identification in 70 percent, false confessions in 25 percent of cases, and jailhouse informants in 19 percent. (The percentages add up to more than 100 because wrongful convictions often have multiple causes).

For these reasons and more, it can be difficult to garner an accurate understanding of crime data. But when it comes to false accusations of rape, experts believe the range is between two to ten percent of reported rapes. Most rapes are never reported. In fact, some studies show as many as 60 percent of sexual assaults are not reported.

While wrongful convictions and false accusations are terrible, some use this data to say that rape isn't a real problem. But this is the wrong conclusion.

The truth is, rape is an under-reported problem. Why? For one, because cops arent going to do anything about it. We have thousands of untested rape kits theyre literally running out the clock on. Two, given the fact they're unlikely to even get their rape kit tested, the downsides to reporting rape and abuse often far outweigh the positives.

The mens rights movement is 100 percent correct here.

Throughout most of our history, only men have been eligible for the draft and its wrong. And this isnt to say that women should be drafted in the name of equality. The draft is wrong full-stop. Conscription is immoral. No one should be forced to go fight, kill other innocent people, lose their limbs, risk their lives, and potentially lose their sanity to fight in the banal, vile wars governments create.

The draft should be eliminated. This is a no-brainer. No one should be subjected to it, ever. But the fact that theyve done it to men and not to women is a clear violation of the 14th Amendments equal application of the law. Abolish it.

Having a strong father is one of the greatest gifts Ive ever been given. My dad has always made me feel secure, provided for, and deeply loved. He is entirely irreplaceable in my life. I would be a drastically different person without him. I truly cant fathom moving through the world without the security of knowing he is behind me. And yet, this relationship is something our courts rob children of every day in this country.

Women initiate close to 70 percent of all divorces. And while there is no single reason divorce happens (there are many societal struggles we can currently point to that make women more likely to leave), there is one big governmental incentive we can point to that may also contribute: which is that, when women initiate divorce, the odds are stacked in their favor.

Currently, only a handful of states encourage family judges to set custodial standards for parenting at 50/50. Though, encouragingly, there are many states currently considering legislation to make this the norm.

In many places, fathers have to beg the courts to give them custody, even when the kids or the other partner wants it. Family courts routinely consign one parent, usually the father, to mere visitor status in their childrens lives. Typically, non-custodial parents see their kids four days per month, plus a few hours one night per week, plus a few weeks during the summer. That usually works out to between 14 percent and 20 percent of the time. That sounds traumatizing.

Keep in mind that the loss of a parent is one of the most horrific events a child can suffer. And there are multiple ways to lose a parent.

It is really creepy, weird, and sexist to assume that one parent has innately better parenting skills because of their gender or that kids are somehow okay with less exposure to one parent because of their gender. How is that okay? What science is that based on? None in the psychology field.

In fact, statistics show that kids with two parents are more likely to do well in school, stay out of jail, stay away from drugs and alcohol, avoid teen pregnancy, avoid depression, and, as adults, be gainfully employed than are their peers with a single parent.

It cant be emphasized enough that this system doesnt just hurt men. It really hurts kids. A study that examined 150,000 arrangements conclusively found that children in joint physical custody suffered from less psychosomatic problems than those living mostly or only with one parent. Those kinds of mental health impacts have life-long consequences and yet we continue to let our courts operate recklessly in this regard.

The consequences of these decisions also weigh heavily on men. Non-custodial fathers are eight times as likely to commit suicide as are fathers with children. As leading authority Edward Kruk of the University of British Columbia has written, parents with equal parental responsibility post-divorce have better physical and emotional health, and less stress, resulting from the sense of purpose and personal gratification associated with active parenting; the highest levels of depression occur among adults who have a child . . . with whom they are not living.

Barring any incidents of abuse of neglect (with ample supportive evidence prior to the divorce) kids should be split 50/50. This is a no-brainer that states should immediately seek to rectify. Anything less is inhumane and has long-term, harmful consequences for all parties involved and therefore society.

Furthermore, once the custody split is agreed upon it should be permanent to create stability for the child and for the parents, barring, again, some evidence of abuse or some other unforeseen major life events that would necessitate one parent to take on more of the burden.

Ultimately, we need public policies that prioritize co-parenting and that put the financial burden for divorce on the shoulders of those who initiate it while ensuring the childrens needs are met.

To the men in my audience who are suffering one of the injustices or societal shortcomings we discussed today, I want to extend my sympathy. I want you to know you are valued and you are needed in our society, and Im so sorry for the voices in our culture that seek to strip away your humanity or diminish you to a caricature.

Know that this feminist is fighting for equality and justice under the law for you just as I am for women. My hope is that we can see each other's mutual goals, come together, and form an alliance that will create a better society for all of us.

Read the original:

A Woman's Take On the Men's Rights Movement | Hannah Cox - Foundation for Economic Education