Daily Archives: April 9, 2022

MoCaFi Partners with FinLocker and TransUnion to Empower Black Americans to Build Credit and Wealth Through Homeownership – Yahoo Finance

Posted: April 9, 2022 at 4:08 am

The Blueprint by MoCaFi is a personal finance app that helps aspiring wealth-builders improve their spending, budgeting, credit health, financial knowledge, and opportunities to access capital.

NEW YORK and ST. LOUIS, April 4, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Homeownership is the primary source of household and generational wealth for most Americans. Yet there is a disproportionate homeownership gap between Black and White Americans. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in the fourth quarter of 2021, the homeownership rate of White households was 74.4%, while the homeownership rate in Black households was only 43.1%.

Mobility Capital Finance (MoCaFi), a fintech platform for economic empowerment, has partnered with FinLocker, a leading next-generation, consumer-permissioned financial fitness platform, to provide the Blueprint app to its underbanked and thin credit-file customers. The app empowers users with a complete view of their financial position including assets, liabilities, net worth, and credit profile. The Credit Compass by TransUnion integration allows users to simulate credit building tactics and the Housing Calculators help estimate mortgage affordability, interest rates, and local housing values. Users can store essential financial documents like tax returns, financial statements, and paystubs in the app for easy sharing with trusted financial advisors and lenders in the MoCaFi partner network.

"We are pleased to partner with leading institutions like FinLocker and TransUnion to present the Blueprint by MoCaFi app, a tool that furthers our mission to close the wealth gap," said Wole Coaxum, Founder and CEO of MoCaFi. "Through our partnership, we will empower customers with the financial tools and educational resources to improve consumers' financial literacy and prepare them to qualify for a mortgage. As a result, we are giving all Americans an opportunity to achieve the dream of homeownership."

Consumers will use the MoCaFi personal financial well-being app to build credit, connect their MoCaFi bank account to manage their finances, reduce debt, create budgets and goals to save for their down payment and closing costs, and track their progress towards mortgage readiness. More information and sign-up are available at http://www.theblueprintapp.com.

Story continues

MoCaFi is partnering with leading mortgage lenders to provide first-time home mortgage assistance to eligible Blueprint by MoCaFi customers. After closing on their home, the new homeowners can continue to use the app to monitor their home's value and equity and maintain their credit and positive financial habits to become successful homeowners.

"FinLocker is committed to providing a financially inclusive way for more Americans to improve their credit eligibility and build personal and generational wealth through homeownership," said Brian Vieaux, President and COO, FinLocker. "FinLocker and TransUnion's partnership with MoCaFi aims to address the disparity in wealth and access to financial services of underserved consumers with the convenience of a mobile app that will guide them on a personalized path to become successful homeowners. MoCaFi customers can use the tools and educational resources to show them how to responsibly build credit, improve their finances and track their progress towards mortgage readiness so they will know when they can qualify for a mortgage."

TransUnion has an ongoing commitment to supporting financial inclusion initiatives. Through the partnership with FinLocker, consumers are empowered to collect and permission the financial information and documentation needed over the course of the home buying process. As a result, underserved consumers whom the mortgage industry may have traditionally overlooked will have better access to tools that will help them navigate the process of securing a mortgage. MoCaFi was connected to FinLocker through their relationship with TransUnion.

"Homeownership is a key step to building generational wealth but there are many consumers within underserved communities that may not realize they can qualify for a mortgage," said Joe Mellman, senior vice president and mortgage business leader at TransUnion. "By providing more transparency around the conditions typically required by loan originators, better financial literacy on building credit and offering access to tools that share greater insight into individual mortgage readiness, together we can better assist more consumers on their path to successfully buying a home."

Media Contact:

Marjorie Fields-Harris

(917) 719-0348

333383@email4pr.com

Cision

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/mocafi-partners-with-finlocker-and-transunion-to-empower-black-americans-to-build-credit-and-wealth-through-homeownership-301517032.html

SOURCE MoCaFi

Read this article:

MoCaFi Partners with FinLocker and TransUnion to Empower Black Americans to Build Credit and Wealth Through Homeownership - Yahoo Finance

Posted in Personal Empowerment | Comments Off on MoCaFi Partners with FinLocker and TransUnion to Empower Black Americans to Build Credit and Wealth Through Homeownership – Yahoo Finance

‘I’ve been a strong advocate of women empowerment and wealth creation’ – Guardian Nigeria

Posted: at 4:08 am

Adeola Rachael Agbana is the CEO, Allured By Ruby Online Crafts Academy birthed to fill a skill gap amongst fashion creatives. Agbana is a graduate of Adeniran Ogunsanya College of Education, an alumnus of the Leading Ladies Business Institute (LLBI) and also an undergraduate of Psychology at the Lagos State University, Ojo. With a strong drive to impart knowledge, her creative skills, has enabled her train and mentor over 13,000 women through this platform. She is a fashionpreneur on a mission to provide women in Africa and beyond with millinery products and headwear training, help master the skill and transit them into generating sustainable income from their products, expertise and experience. In this interview with IJEOMA THOMAS-ODIA, she shares her passion for impacting women.

What inspired your passion for craft?CRAFT has always been innate for me. Though I didnt have the opportunity very early to express it, there came a time after marriage that I was bored and the only thing I could think of was to decorate the entire house with wall paintings and DIY interior decoration fittings.

Afterwards, I began making fabric flowers, bowties, lapel pins and hair ruffles. At some point, I wanted more and decided to try out headwear making by watching YouTube videos and taking foreign online courses.

At what point did you decide to set up the academy? I actually began with a Facebook group in 2019, where I usually post pictorial illustrations of how to make different types of headwears. As time progressed and the group membership rose to over 30,000 creatives, I began to get requests for tutorial videos, this was how I began the Allured by Ruby Headwear academy online via WhatsApp.

Due to increasing requests of some categories of people who preferred the physical learning option, setting up a physical academy became inevitable and this was realised in June 2020, shortly after the government lifted COVID-19 lockdown.

Are there experiences during your growing up years that influenced your decision to embrace craft? Growing up, I recall seeing women around me struggling to balance their time in paid jobs and family life. I disliked it and I knew from that time it wouldnt be a thing for me. Also, Ive always wanted to be an entrepreneur, working with my hands and being in control of my earnings and life generally.

What has been the impact of the academy so far? It has been good so far by the grace of God. In just a year, despite the harsh economic conditions, we have successfully graduated four batches and over 20 students. The online academy has been more impactful due to its ease of accessibility from anywhere in the world.

In an economy where white-collar jobs do not come by easily, how are you motivating women to embrace this craft? I have been a very strong advocate of women empowerment and wealth creation, so through the academy, we have been at the forefront of encouraging and inspiring women between the ages of 18 to 55 to take up interest in headwear making, because it enables them generate income right from the comfort of their homes with very little startup capital.

All you need to start is the skill acquisition, which we provide on many fronts via our free and paid classes physically and online at a very affordable fee. I also try as much as I can to reassure enthusiasts who want to consider the headwear making business that it has an appreciable profit margin if you are ready to put in the work and master the craft by constantly upgrading yourself.

How have you been able to combine work and running family, and how supportive have they been? The role a solid support system plays in the self-actualisation of your dreams, especially family women, cannot be over-emphasised. It has been one of the critical success factors that have brought me this far. My ability to combine business, running my family and a full time study has been solely because I have a very supportive spouse who is patient, understanding, and believes in my dreams and my vision as well.

A lot of women battle with combining family life and career, what is your advice to them? I strongly advice seeking the support of your spouse, because it plays a vital role in solidifying your support system, because without that in place, the journey will be a very stressful one. When starting out, I faced several challenges, but over time, I was able to learn effective time management and work-life balance strategies which led to putting together a very dedicated team of tutors, employing a personal assistant and a social media manager such that Im able to delegate certain critical tasks. So, my advice to women out there is to seek help early, learn to delegate because you alone cannot do everything.

Financial independence is one thing a lot of women still battle with, how would you encourage them to live above this? Attaining financial independence for most Nigerians is a near impossible task considering the high rate of poverty in the country. However, it is a feat worth trying to accomplish. Even if you are starting small, the important thing is to get started.

One of the paths I usually propose women pursue towards this is getting legitimate multiple streams of income and this is where headwear making comes in. It is craft that is both lucrative and scalable; you can generate money from several aspects of the business.

What is your life philosophy? Go hard or go home! It is one thing to desire something; it is also another thing to be willing to do what it takes to get it done. One of the reasons I have come this far is by not giving excuses even though sometimes they may be legitimate, I still choose to find a way around it because where there is a will, there is way.

Read more:

'I've been a strong advocate of women empowerment and wealth creation' - Guardian Nigeria

Posted in Personal Empowerment | Comments Off on ‘I’ve been a strong advocate of women empowerment and wealth creation’ – Guardian Nigeria

BLOG: When it comes to the job market, the times are a-changin’ – The Business Journal

Posted: at 4:08 am

Is your company prepared for the long-lasting and far-reaching effects of The Great Resignation? The question was the opener in a mis-guided solicitation letter (I am not in HR) from a company selling Human Resource solutions: Better Workplaces, Better World.

A top story still very much in the headlines, The Great Resignation began when record numbers of employees quit their jobs while in the throes of the hellacious past year (the pandemic, gun violence, racial tensions, the wrath of mother nature, the brutal economy, the destruction of the planet, increased UFO sightings, and, and, and) in search of something else: living their best lives.

The latest research on this subject, released just last month, showed that some 4.5 million people voluntarily left jobs in November 2021 alone, which the Bureau of Labor Statistics called an all-time high. Since April 2021, nearly 33 million people have left jobs, amounting to more than one fifth of the total U.S. workforce.

What is interesting, besides the fact that our nation has finally begun to scrutinize the percentage of our lives given over to work for pay, is the list of reasons for this long-overdue reckoning. A recent report (Stillman, J. January 18, 2022. Top 5 Reasons People Are Quitting During the Great ResignationHint: None of Them is Pay), contends that the top reasons are based on employee feelings and emotion. Stillman found that the desire for higher pay did not even make the top five:

In addition, the lack of nonwage benefits, like work-related social events after hours, has caused employee loyalty and company culture to decline

In contrast to Americas traditional work till you drop ethic, many of the disillusioned are now lauding those idlers or minimalist colleagues who do the least amount of work needed to collect a paycheck. These neer-do-wells who were previously considered annoying at best, have become a kind of anti-hero. It is perhaps they who have had the right idea all along. Is it the personal and financial satisfaction we derive from giving all our energy to our jobs, or the pursuit and pleasure of our personal interests that matter most in a balanced and happy life?

Doreen Ford, who works for Reddit and monitors Anti-work social media pages, says: Everyone has had their limit with COVID, overwork, mortgages, rent payments, and so many things with capitalism. Theres nothing wrong with wanting to take a break from that and do less of it. Ford says she sees a major snub towards capitalism afoot.

While some blamed the rash of quittings on Generation Z known in general for their slower, less ambitious outlooks on life many quitters span the age and career-stage spectrum. Could the examples set by other forward-thinking countries (like in Europe) where the work-life balance is honored as an important aspect of personal happiness, finally be coming to America?

We are experiencing a moment of worker empowerment, says Anthony Klotz, the Texas A&M University professor and organizational psychologist who coined the phrase Great Resignation. Klotz predicts that around 23%, one-quarter of the American workforce, will seek new jobs in 2022. The tighter labor market is forcing companies of all kinds to offer employees more: higher salaries, better benefits, and flexible schedules/work locations.

A surprising side-effect of the pandemic for many workers was the freedom to work from anywhere, but especially from home. According to polls by ResumeBuilder.com, this flexibility is highly valued by workers, even more than higher pay. With remote work now offered as a perk of employment, the cursed commute to and from work could become obsolete.

As opportunists peddle would-be solutions to our beleaguered society, we must acknowledge that the sign of these times is change. In the solicitation letter (Better Workplaces, Better World), the HR company promised to ease the burden on employers to find new workers, and relieve the stress, anxiety and burnout (caused) by employee turnover. While acknowledging that todays workers want: new positions more aligned with their revised personal and professional needs.

Eternally relevant but especially today, Bob Dylan is still correct: the times are indeed a-changin. A progressive group in Congress very recently proposed a bill to change the standard work week from five days and 40 hours to four days and 32 hours.

Whether it happens sooner or later, it seems clear that big changes in our work culture are on the way. Hopefully the Great Resignation will finally usher in more authentic and evenly balanced life choices for us all.

Diane Skouti is a resident of Fresno and has a Masters degree in Higher Education Administration and Leadership from Fresno State. She works at San Joaquin College of Law as the Alumni Coordinator and is a freelance writer in her free time.

Read more from the original source:

BLOG: When it comes to the job market, the times are a-changin' - The Business Journal

Posted in Personal Empowerment | Comments Off on BLOG: When it comes to the job market, the times are a-changin’ – The Business Journal

The Fiji Times ‘NFP has existed to empower the people’ – Fiji Times

Posted: at 4:08 am

The National Federation Party is not a party of people who believe that being in the government entitles them to privileges and empowerment for self-gain, says National Federation Party member of Parliament Pio Tikoduadua.

This is not a party of people who assume unlimited dictatorial powers or think they are the Messiah and look down upon the people of this country as subservient nobodies, he said.

During the partys national convention last Saturday, Mr Tikoduadua said NFP was not a party where people like wearing $10,000 suits, riding around in darkly tinted four-wheel drive convoys, and being non-responsive to the plight of the common people.

NFP is not a party of people who believe that the words of one man are more powerful than the opinions of all the peoples of this nation, and the plight of its needy.

This is not a party where people believe that all power should rest in the hands of two-men, thereby compromising governance, breeding arrogance, and ruling through fear and division. This is not a party of people who forget that the power is with the people of this country.

This is not a party of people who will treat the government like their personal property.

No, NFP is not a party of, and a party for such people. However, he said, NFP was born out of the need to empower the people of Fiji. NFP has existed to empower the people of Fiji in unity.

And the NFP will fight these elections to restore power to the people. It will be a party that forms a government that is of the people, for the people, and by the people.

Because those who believe in self-interest instead of national interest or my way or the highway kind of rule have ruled over us and driven the country to the edge of the cliff.

Mr Tikoduadua said the only way to guarantee the removal of the current Government was to vote in large numbers to boot out a regime and government that believed the people could be bought.

They think that our people are gullible and will fall for freebies and succumb to fear-mongering.

Make no mistake this is now a thing of the past.

See the rest here:

The Fiji Times 'NFP has existed to empower the people' - Fiji Times

Posted in Personal Empowerment | Comments Off on The Fiji Times ‘NFP has existed to empower the people’ – Fiji Times

Thrivership Coaching – Helping to facilitate empowerment from trauma and abuse FE News – FE News

Posted: at 4:08 am

I can always remember one of the incidences of intimate partner violence or domestic abuse that I experienced that was related to the workplace. I was 19 years old, and I had organised the work Christmas party. It was a lavish affair and it had taken months of effort, organising and planning. My partner did not want me to attend, and all hell had broken loose at my home, where I lived alone. He wouldnt let me go. The details are quite fuzzy now, but I remember three of my work colleagues turning up at my front door on the way to the party, to try and convince me to attend. I sat there on the steps of my flat telling them there was no way I could go whilst sobbing my heart out. There was also some altercation between my partner and the colleagues, as he came out to tell me to come back inside.

It is funny that 24 years later this is one of the memories of this relationship that stands out, of course, there were many more incidences. I dont recall whether there was any violence on this occasion, or whether it was more the emotional abuse or fear of the repercussions if I had gone to the party. When I went back to work the following day, full of feelings that I couldnt or even know how to process at the time; feelings of shame, guilt, and embarrassment, I dont really remember anyone sitting down with me to check if I was okay, if I was safe, or asking me if I wanted to talk. Maybe they did try, and I just brushed it off, in my naivety, all relationships were difficult, werent they? I also wonder if two decades later would we know how to handle that conversation with the girl I was back then, any differently from how my colleagues approached the situation? I would like to say yes, but in all honesty, when it comes to a form of abuse, I am not so sure. It is a tricky one to navigate and to support someone in this scenario, particularly if they are not ready or too afraid to confront the problem, which took me another two years to find the courage to leave this relationship.

What is Domestic Abuse and Violence?

The term domestic violence or abuse (DVA) conjures up for many a heterosexual couple who live together, with the scenario of a male physically assaulting the female, in any case, it is used to refer to intimate partner violence, but the term is not limited to partner violence (World Health Organization, 2012). You might not be aware that it can refer to abuse on and by any member of the family. DVA is terrorising patterns of behaviour between any two people who are or have been intimate partners or family members, notwithstanding their sex or age (Sohal, Feder & Johnson, 2012). The ONS has established that almost one in three women aged 16-59 will experience domestic abuse in her lifetime.

Domestic abuse can come in many forms as listed here by the charity Womens Aid

If you are worried about someone simply start by approaching them and checking in to see how they are feeling. You can point out changes to their behaviour that you have noticed, for example, if they have withdrawn from social work events or a change in their mood.

Someone may not want to share straight away, and trust can take time to build. Not only that, it is the recognition that someone needs that they need to get professional support or help to move out of the situation they have found themselves in. Refuge highlight how two women a week are killed by a current or former partner in England and Wales alone, so the risks can be extremely high for someone to even dare to speak out even in confidence, especially if they are protecting children.

CHAMPS for Change CIC

Sharing my own story with you is the first time I have publicly shared my lived experience of DVA, and it was the catalyst for me to start CHAMPS for Change my Community Interest Company in August 2019. The purpose initially was to establish a centre for post-traumatic growth research, my research area having completed my MSc in Applied Positive Psychology and Coaching Psychology at the University of East London. Whilst writing my paper on coaching and post-traumatic growth I came across a piece of research called A qualitative exploration of thrivership among women who have experienced domestic violence and abuse: Development of a new model by Heywood et al (2019). I loved this concept because it was the first time, I had considered that someone could thrive having experienced a form of abuse. This paper demonstrated how women who had experienced a form of abuse had got to a place of personal and psychological safety and moved into a phase of thrivership.

The Coaching Thrivership Programme is Born

I reached out to the Birmingham charity that had been involved in this research, a charity called WE:ARE and asked if I could meet with them. WE:ARE delivers a range of awareness, empowerment and parenting programmes for women affected by domestic abuse. Having researched and experienced how coaching could support the process of post-traumatic growth, I got the idea of providing coaching to these women. These women who now wanted to empower themselves, curate their own lives with the freedom they had fought so hard for, and in many cases against insurmountable barriers and obstacles.

April 2020, right in the middle of lockdown one we had a pool of women interested in the coaching who had been with WE:ARE for some time and had undergone their programmes. Through a coaching readiness questionnaire, I paired these women with a volunteer coach. Most of my coaches had come from the same MSc programme as myself and had been involved in volunteering with a womens charity as part of our studies. The premise was simple, for the coach to support the woman on a 6-month journey. There was no set requirement of what the coaching would entail or structure, a 90-minute initial discovery session, followed by five one-hour sessions.

The results of the pilot were incredible. The feedback that the women gave was that they were able to understand the importance of wellbeing, it allowed them to take back control, to create self-acceptance. Not only did the women feel they had more clarity on their goals and future, but they were also able to look to the future by creating plans with strengths and resources, plan for both themselves and their families, which meant achievement and growth.

The women experienced growth and learning, but also the feedback from the coaches is that they too have taken so much learning and experience from the process as individuals and as professionals.

Next Steps

With the success of the pilot coaching programme, we delivered our second coaching programme in 2021 to establish the results of the programme. Now in 2022, we are in our third year, and we have launched our programme beyond the charity to allow any woman who has experienced abuse to find their way to thrive in their life in their own unique way.

The team has grown to create more volunteer coaches and we have begun to provide the women with optional developmental sessions.

As the programme has evidenced the richness of experience, I have started to write up our findings in an academic paper with a university partner, to share more formally the impact of our Thrivership Coaching across our coaching community, the women, and the coaches.

For me, this coaching programme has given me the greatest opportunity to heal. It has enabled my own growth, it has also pushed me out of my comfort zone as I have expanded a social enterprise, an area I knew relatively little about. Most importantly it has provided the opportunity for women who have experienced the trauma of abuse, the support to move into thrivership and enable them to discover a new journey and path in life that belongs to them.

By Ruth Cooper-Dickson, Award-winning Mental Wealth Entrepreneur, Speaker, & Chief Executive Officer CHAMPS

References:

Understanding and addressing violence against women: Intimate partner violence. World Health Organization. (2012).

Domestic violence and abuse. Sohal, A., Feder, G., & Johnson, M. (2012). InnovAiT.

A qualitative exploration of thrivership among women who have experienced domestic violence and abuse: Development of a new model Isobel Heywood, Dana Sammut and Caroline Bradbury-Jones (2019) BMC Womens Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0789-z.

Read the original:

Thrivership Coaching - Helping to facilitate empowerment from trauma and abuse FE News - FE News

Posted in Personal Empowerment | Comments Off on Thrivership Coaching – Helping to facilitate empowerment from trauma and abuse FE News – FE News

Lambda Theta Alpha Latin Sorority ‘Takes Back The Night’ With Love & Light On Campus – Onward State

Posted: at 4:08 am

With more than 40,000 students at University Park, its easy to get lost in thrashing waves from all directions. Yet, for the nine sisters and siblings of Lambda Theta Alpha Latin Sorority, Inc., action for change serves as a single drop in this vast ocean.

Little little sparks start big forest fires, said sister and mental health chair Jahnia Kytana Marimon.

Adapting the popular quote, Marimon speaks to the nature of Lambda Theta Alpha, the nations first Latina sorority. While the current Beta Lambda chapter at Penn State holds just nine active members, the organizations impact is felt far beyond University Park.

A sorority of philanthropy, professional development, and sisterhood, Lambda Theta Alpha represents a commitment to diversity for possibility, championing inclusion in similar fashion to Penn States We Are tradition.

I am Penn State, too, said Marimon. Im prideful in that I can represent a community back home that people typically look down on sometimesIm prideful of the fact that I can go back home and [say,] Ive got a Penn State degree. Thats my goal: to go back and help my community.

The organization serves the community with a commitment to the betterment of all people. Todays members remain especially grateful for the leadership that brought Lambda Theta Alpha to Penn State over 20 years ago.

Our founders wanted to create a group to support those communities, said Marimon. It was new, so they didnt have those resources or opportunities to grow within college because it was the first.

Established nationally in December 1975, Lambda Theta Alpha created a different kind of Greek life. Founded at a time when the Latinx community was first gaining access to higher education, the sorority originated as a space for opportunity and representation.

Today, the sorority remains rooted in this initial founding. Embracing change, the sisterhood has grown by accepting members regardless of age, race, creed, or sexual orientation.

We like to say Latin by tradition, not by definition, said Marimon. We were established as a Latina sorority, but that doesnt mean we are not going to historically growWere very open to everyone.

Welcoming a recent addition of non-binary siblings, Lambda Theta Alpha recently celebrated another milestone by inducting its 20th line into the organization. Through intention, philanthropy, and purpose, this new class joined the sorority by learning about the organizations core values of unity, love, and respect in the sacred space of the organization.

Its very beautiful because when people hear about Greek life, they hear about all these crazy things that happen during the process, said Marimon. But in our organization, we dont just do anything just because. Everything we do is with a purpose.

All members are encouraged to grow both personally and professionally. By providing support, academic resources, and genuine connection, Lamba Theta Alpha inspires members and interests to become the best version of themselves, specifically through its message of the universal woman.

Yet even within this concept, a commitment to inclusion adapts the terminology, pushing the conversation forward towards acceptance.

That doesnt mean that you have to be a woman in order to have those traits and uphold the values that we stand for, said Marimon. Its just someone who isnt afraid to step out of their comfort zone, get what they want, and encourage not only themselves but othersSo, its really a universal person.

Updating standards to include non-identifying and non-binary individuals, the sisters and siblings build upon legacy by carrying values closely. Continuing innovation for inclusion, President Audre Montero explained the importance of tradition displayed on campus.

When you see the universal woman represented on our flyers, its always a figure, she said. Its never an actual person because it doesnt matter what you look like, or your race, or where you come from.

Its already within you and you just have to find it, said Vice President Dominique Solano, who also serves as Lamba Theta Alphas academic chair. And thats what the organization helped us do: find the universal woman within ourselves.

Solano explained the sisterhood as an exquisite culmination of connected humanity. By Lamba Theta Alphas standards, it is a place in which individuals can thrive on unique paths, all while sticking together in the navigation of collegiate life.

Sisterhood is kind of like a home away from home. You always have your family at Penn State, so anywhere you go, youre always going to have that support, she said.

Even as sisters, its not always beautiful, Solano continued. Sometimes, we have our strugglesThats when you appreciate the good times because you had those other obstacles that you had to go past.

Continuing themes of sisterhood for personal growth, Chapter Recruitment and Retention Advisor Nicole Pinto shared her origin story in crossing with her line in 2020.

I felt like no one on campus felt the way that I felt. I felt like I was in too big of a space to make an impact, said Pinto. But thenI learned a sister had the exact same story.

Grateful for growth as an individual starting within Lamba Theta Alpha, Pinto now also holds the role of public relations chair as well as president of the Multicultural Greek Council.

No matter where you start, you can 100% end where you want to be, said Pinto.

Inspired by similar encouragement in Lamba Theta Alpha, MGC Executive Vice President Audre Montero explained her journey to success.

When I think about who I was before I was an LTA, I would have never thought I would be the person I am now, said Montero. Ive just been given the opportunities and the platform to become the person who I wanted to be three years ago, and I couldnt imagine not being here.

With gratitude, Montero elaborated on her perspective of possibility when coming to campus.

Knowing where I come from and that a lot of kids where I come from wouldnt be able to come to Penn State, I want to be able to take any opportunity Penn State gives me and give it my 100%, she said.

Committed to taking every chance as a first-generation student, Montero has advocated for Lamba Theta Alpha and led the organization to stand tall as ever. In addition to a collection of charity events and public programs, Lamba Theta Alpha furthers this expression of inclusivity with allyship for other organizations on campus.

As much as we are called the First and Only, we also have to pay respects to people who came before us, said Nicole Pinto. We wouldnt be a Greek community without them.

Despite a jam-packed schedule of events, the nine active members prioritize uplifting other MGC organizations both on campus and online.

As Public Relations Chair, Pinto elaborated on the balancing act of advertising LTA events while also drawing eyes to other organizations on social media, a subtle but not unfelt testament to Lamba Theta Alphas commitment to giving back.

There are people who are deserving of space and recognition that we can serve, said Pinto. Our following will get that information as well, and maybe start following other organizations.

Additionally, Lambda Theta Alpha creates active opportunities for change on campus, partaking in philanthropic efforts to make a tangible impact. Each day, the sisters and siblings work to improve life for all people, proving once again that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

For Lamba Theta Alphas national philanthropy of Saint Judes Research Hospital, one golden example includes its semester empanada sale. Through it, the organization gives back with an undeniably personal feel, as members prepare the food together and handwrite customer names on each bag. In the past, the event found great success with more than 400 empanadas sold.

At the same time, it kind of gives us that sense of home, said Montero. Were all together at one time, playing some music, making empanadas.

In another event returning in-person for the first time in three years on April 24, Lamba Theta Alpha hosts Mr. Burgundy and Grey, a male pageant offering a scholarship to the winner.A nod to the sororitys colors and commitment to empowerment, the event serves as an interactive opportunity to showcase male leaders on campus as well as connect during rehearsals.

During that time, sisters really take their time to get to know our contestants, said Montero. As well as allow our contestants to get to know us.

Upon winning the award through questionnaire portions and dance performances, recipients gain the opportunity to host an event with Lamba Theta Alpha in support of Saint Judes Research Hospital.

Building upon its national philanthropy, Beta Lambda at Penn State also supports the National Coalition Against Domestic Violence as a chapter initiative, most publicly through their popular event entitled Take Back The Night.

When considering the impact and attendance at this event, its hard to believe that the entire program is run by only nine active members. In a community-wide gathering of students, faculty, and survivors, individuals unite to march against sexual violence. Walking the campus to common locations of reports, sharing stories from victims, and providing an overarching message of understanding, Take Back The Night establishes a renowned sense of support for survivors, often missing as outlets of empowerment in addition to basic acknowledgment.

In simple terms, President Audre Montero synthesized the understanding provided at the event as the ultimate safe space for survivors, just in time for Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month and SVAP Week through the Penn State Gender Equity Center.

There is no fear of judgment. Theres no fear of someone not believing you. Theres no fear of someone calling you a liar, she said. Its just that safe place that, especially victims of sexual violence, dont always get to experience.

Due to the pandemic, the event was held virtually last year. Despite the limited format, Take Back The Night 2021 had more than 500 attendees online, a massive success for both Lamba Theta Alpha and the Penn State community.

It wasnt only students, it was faculty and staff, said Marimon, and the beauty of it was that people were comfortable enough to share their personal stories with 500 people listening.

Once one person does have the courage to say something, thats giving everyone else the power to speak up for themselves, Solano added. And thats why its so impactful because one person makes this huge change.

Providing a space made both emotionally safe and physically safe by the presence of campus police, the return of this in-person event this evening, Thursday, April 7 at 6 p.m., promises honesty, community, and perseverance. Symbolizing Lamba Theta Alphas commitment to changing perspectives on campus, Take Back The Night brings love and light from darkness, extending hands beyond the bounds of membership within the actual organization.

A common practice of the siblings and sisters, reaching out remains important as a key differentiator of Lamba Theta Alpha once again. In an eternal drive for open-mindedness as champions for change, Lamba Theta Alpha ensures that at least one member shows solidarity with other causes on campus by showing up and standing up, wearing their letters proudly, and making their presence known at community events.

LTA stands with you and we are here to speak up when other people cant, said Marimon. We have that confidence, that voice to use that platform for the better good.

Transforming words to real action, Marimon recently represented Lambda Theta Alpha as a living sign of support at Love is Louder, as well as served in another previous role as vice president of QTPOC, Queer and Trans People of Color, at the event. With her community directly affected, Marimon stepped up to speak up in true bold and beautiful fashion.

Its necessary to fuel any time of negative energy with positive energy, said Solano. So, yes, Milo [a provocative speaker] was coming onto campus, and if you heard about it as an LGBTQ person, you feel unsafe in that sort of way.

Within this threat felt by sisters and siblings, taking positive action was the only response considered. Once again, Marimon stood proudly as a voice of Lamba Theta Alpha at the event, uplifted by her sisters who remarked on their admiration for her actions.

Thats something that we are proud of her for because instead of ignoring it, we made sure to push away anything where anyone could get harmed and make sure were in a positive environment, said Solano.

Championing causes on campus to facilitate real change, Lambda Theta Alpha shines brightly as a pillar of Penn State pride. Within this pride held uniquely in a relationship of mutual value between sorority and university, Solano shared her interpretation of blue and white values as a current sister while also honoring tradition.

Latinas in education is still something that needs to be worked on, so all of us here are making sure that theres that support, she said. For me, Penn State pride is starting your own storyYou can start it yourself and be that personthat role model for anyone that is to come after you.

A cultivation of opportunities taken and challenges conquered, Lambda Theta Alpha illuminates campus through even dark times. Lighting a fire from a single spark, the sisters and siblings bring unique perspectives to the Penn State community small in number, but never in spirit.

Read more:

Lambda Theta Alpha Latin Sorority 'Takes Back The Night' With Love & Light On Campus - Onward State

Posted in Personal Empowerment | Comments Off on Lambda Theta Alpha Latin Sorority ‘Takes Back The Night’ With Love & Light On Campus – Onward State

The Problem with Political Correctness Life Lessons

Posted: at 4:07 am

But does the average Kiwi or the NZ media talk about Maori crime and violence? No. Maybe only behind closed doors. Why? Because its not politically correct.Even though almost every Kiwi has seen and/or experienced Maori violence, no one wants to talk about it because its not politically correct and no one wants to be called a racist.

This is the problem with PC culture:Instead of encouraging an honest examination of the facts, it simply takes a totalitarian attitude and censors any opinion it doesnt like which might offend and calls it racism, sexism or hate speech.

Facebook censors posts.

Google censors searches.

Twitter censors tweets.

YouTube censors videos.

Political correctness is an insidious cancer which silences people and forces them to deny reality, and it also introduces a lot of bullshit words and concepts:

Cultural appropriation.

Trigger warnings.

Safe spaces.

Manspreading.

Mansplaining.

Theres a creepy PC thing out there that really bothers me. Jerry Seinfeld

Our college campuses have become places where people are afraid of ideas. They think they know the truth and everything they need to know, about race, about gender, about rape, about you name it. They dont want to hear opposing points of view. Opposing points of view just offend them. They want to be kept safe from ideas they disagree with. People today when they enter college want to leave with exactly the same ideas as when they entered. They do not want their ideas to be challenged. Alan Dershowitz, Harvard Law Professor

Obviously Im not the only one who feels this way. Millions of people do.

According to a 2016Angus Reid Institutesurvey, 76% per cent of Canadians (widely regarded as the friendliest people in the world) think political correctnesshas gone too far, as do the majority of Americans, English, Australians and New Zealanders. Theyre not wrong.

In fact, I think the main reasonshows like Family Guy and South Park are so popular is precisely because theyre so politically incorrect. I also think thats one of the main reasons Donald Trump got into the White House. People are just sick and tired of PC bullshit.

In summary: We can either have free speech or political correctness but not both.

No culture, gender, group, ideology, race, religion, tradition etc. should be off limits or protected from criticism if/when its in the wrong.

The truth doesnt need defending. Wrong is wrong. No matter who says or does it.

You maybe forced to speak in a politically correct way in your school or in your workplace, but dont let the PC thought police or SJWs censor your thinking, and tell you what you can and cant think or whats appropriate.

If youre thinking: I want to live in a world with free speech but not hate speech, let me ask you something:If normal words like: boy, girl, man, woman, ladies, gentleman, mother, father etc. are now considered offensive and politically incorrect what words are going to be offensive next?

Where do we draw the line?

SJWs are some of the biggest hypocrites on earth:

They want to be heard but they dont want to listen.

They talk about tolerance and respect yet they have zero tolerance or respect for anyone that disagrees with them.

They demand safe spaces and trigger warnings, yet they have no problem yelling, screaming, swearing, protesting, rioting, destroying property and committing acts of violence etc. the moment they dont get their own way.

Why should a small group of constantly unhappy people who love to bitch and moan and complain about everything, be able to tell the rest of the world what they can and cant say?

To the constantly offended I say this:

Who cares if youre offended? Fuck your feelings. Get over yourself.

Just because youre offended that doesnt mean youre right.

Ive heard it said:Id rather be correct than politically correct

And:Being politically correct doesnt make you correct

I agree.

OK, lets lighten things up a bit

If everyoneisthinking alike thensomebody isntthinking. George S. Patton

Groupthinkis a psychological phenomenon that occurs within agroup of peoplein which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctionaldecision-makingoutcome. Group members try to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision withoutcritical evaluationof alternative viewpoints by actively suppressing dissenting viewpoints, and by isolating themselves from outside influences. Wikipedia

In other words: Groupthink is when people in a group seek consensus and unanimity, even if it results in an irrational decision being made.

Groupthink is a major problem. You see it everywhere: In schools, social circles, the corporate world, the military, and especially in political parties and religions.

Its amazing how common Groupthink and conformity is:

Soloman Aschs Conformity Experiments in 1951 people will deny their own eyes:

How do you avoid Groupthink?

Stop thinking what everyone thinks.

Stop believing what everyone believes.

Think for yourself. You have a brain so use it.

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, its time to pause and reflect. Mark Twain

Its better to walk alone, than with the crowd going in the wrong direction. Diane Grant

The fact that millions of people share the same vices does not make these vices virtues, the fact that they share so many errors does not make the errors to be truths, and the fact that millions of people share the same form of mental pathology does not make these people sane. Erich Fromm, The Sane Society

Think for yourself. Unplug yourself from follow-the-follower groupthink, and virtually ignore what everyone else in your industry is saying (except the ones everyone agrees is crazy). Do your own research, draw your own conclusions, set your own course, and stick to your guns. When youre just starting out, people will tell you youre wrong. After youve blown past them, theyll tell you youre crazy. A few years after that, theyll (privately) ask you to mentor them. Steve Pavlina

People who think with their epidermis or their genitalia or their clan are the problem. If I would not vote against someone on the grounds of race or gender alone, then by the exact same token I would not cast a vote in his or her favor for the identical reason. Christopher Hitchens

Similar to Groupthink is tribalism, which is when people have loyalty to their country, culture, gender, group, political party, race, religion etc. above all else no matter what.

You see this all the time.

Catholic priests covering up the molestation and sexual abuse of children when its done by other priests.

Church (tribe) first morals second.

Christians, Jews, Muslims etc. standing up for people in their religion even when they know theyre in the wrong simply because they belong to the same religion.

Women standing up for other women in an argument with a man even when they know theyre in the wrong simply because theyre women.

Their allegiance is to the tribe not to the truth.

Tribalism is an us vs them, we are the good guys and they are the bad guys mentality. Its a primitive shit brained black and whitetype of thinking that only leads to conflict, fighting, racism, sexism, prejudice and war.

Ill be honest, personally Ive never really understood tribalism.

My loyalty is to the truth. To the facts. To whats right. To what I consider the best.

I wouldnt take the side of my family, friends, girlfriend, parents etc. if I thought they were in the wrong and Im an extremely loyal person. That doesnt mean that I would take the side of the stranger anddisagree with them in publicif I thought they would lose face, but it does mean that I would definitely say to my friend/girlfriend/parent etc. in private that I thought the other person was right.

Tribalism seems to be far too common in American politics and race relations. There are far too many people sticking up for their own gender, race, religion, political party etc. even when they know theyre wrong simply because that person, party, group etc. is part of their tribe.

Sam Harris perfectly sums up the problems with tribalism and identity politics in this video:

The bottom line is:

You will either have an allegiance to your tribe or to the truth. You cannot have both.

You maybe part of a tribe (almost everyone is) but dont let the tribe do your thinking for you, and dont take the side of your tribe over the truth.

Think for yourself.

I think tribalism is a mental prisonand pride of identity coupled with arrogance is one of the leading factors that limit ones ability to abandon it. Duop Chak Wuol

I think the biggest threat to America is tribalism. I think that tribalism has broken out on the left and the right. People dont seem to care about the truth anymore, they seem to care about whether it helps my side or it helps your side, and that is really, really, dangerous, because then we can no longer have a conversation. If we cant agree on a common basis of facts, we cant have a conversation in the first place, if youre just going to assume that Im evil on the basis of my political perspective, then we cant have a conversation. Ben Shapiro

The Bandwagon effect

Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one. Charles Mackay,Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, 1841

You should also be aware of the bandwagon effect.

The bandwagon effect in a nutshell:

The more people do something the more other people will do it too.

Its why people will stand in line for a crowded restaurant instead of going to an empty one.

Its why if everyone is talking about a movie, well likely check it out too.

The bandwagon effect is the reason for stock market and housing bubbles and trends.

Most people arent leaders theyre followers.

Most people are sheep they love to conform and fit in.

Most people have adesire to keep up with the Joneses

FOMO: Fear Of Missing Out.

The bandwagon effect can (and is) used against you

Advertisers and marketers will often try to convince you to buy their product by trying to make you believe that everyone else has their product, or that people are lining up to buy it, and you should too. This is known as social proof.

Clickbait bloggers and journalists try to get us to read their articles by telling us that Twitter is angry (Translation: 5 people complained about something)

Dont follow the crowd, let the crowd follow you. Margaret Thatcher

Most people arent happy.

Most people arent smart.

Most people arent successful.

Most people are examples of what not to do.

Following the crowd kills your creativity, because youre forced to dumb yourself down in order to fit in, in order to do what everyone else is doing.

Its better to walk alone than with a crowd going in the wrong direction. Gandhi

The dumbest reasonin the world tobuy a stock is because its going up. Warren Buffett

The person who follows the crowd will usually go no further than the crowd. The person who walks alone is likely to find himself in places no one has ever seen before. Albert Einstein

Footnote:

Read the original here:

The Problem with Political Correctness Life Lessons

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on The Problem with Political Correctness Life Lessons

Has political correctness gone too far? | The Economist

Posted: at 4:07 am

Sep 10th 2018

by JULIA SYMONS

This essay is the winner of The Economists Open Future essay competition in the category of Open Society, responding to the question: Has political correctness gone too far? The winner is Julia Symons, 25 years old, from Australia.

* * *

Drunk on virtue. Thus did Lionel Shriver, an American author, damn a commitment made by the British arm of Penguin Random House, a publisher, that its new hires and the books it acquires reflect UK society by 2025. A conscious effort to ensure diversity is, says Ms Shriver, wholly incompatible with the publishers raison dtre of acquiring and publishing good works of literature. If an agent were to receive a manuscript from a gay transgender Caribbean who dropped out of school at seven and powers around town on a mobility scooter it would be published, even if its quality were execrable, warned Ms Shriver.

Her screed suggests that the unthinking application of political correctness (PC), in this case in the form of a diversity target, will threaten liberal, Western culture and produce small-minded individuals. Like some of Ms Shrivers previous interventions on this topic, this one was met with outrage online, with thousands of tweets and column-inches devoted to criticising the author.

Welcome to the culture wars. Welcome to political correctness gone too far.

The notion that political correctness has gone mad is familiar to anyone who follows even vaguely any aspect of modern political or cultural life. The phrase, ostensibly referring to language or action that is designed to avoid offence or harm to protected groups, has become a sharp criticism. It is synonymous with a sort of cultural McCarthyism, usually committed by the left.

In its modern iteration, it pops up in a couple of different forms. First, there is the use of the word snowflake to criticise younger generationsthose more likely to be in favour of affirmative action and gender-neutral bathrooms, for instance, who are perceived as thin-skinned and less resilient than their forebears. The second invocation of PC gone mad is freedom of speech: specifically the idea that the use and enforcement of politically correct language will endanger it and by extension freedom of thought.

Regardless of how it is labelled, its underlying idea is the same: that measures to increase tolerance threaten the liberal, Enlightenment values that have forged the West. Self-styled opponents of political correctness and proponents of free speech may find themselves (mis)quoting Voltaire: I disapprove what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

When framed like this, it seems utterly reasonable to think that political correctness has the potential to be a menace. Moreover, some aspects of tolerance culture, particularly the actions of studentswho frequently draw the ire of such culture warriorsare, in many cases, cloying and precious.

Britains National Union of Students, and campus politics generally, is rife with such examples: at one conference, it urged its delegates to use the jazz hands motion to express their appreciation, lest the noises made by clapping trigger other delegates. Meanwhile Facebook, in its own efforts at tolerance, has made a list of 71 genders from which its users may choose to identify, including genderqueer neutrois and bi-gender. This is farcical and arguably trivialises the very real struggles that transgender individuals face.

However, some easily-dismissed examples aside, the notion that political correctness has gone too far is absurd. That a man who boasts gleefully about grabbing women by their genitals, mocks disabled reporters and stereotypes Muslims as terrorists and Mexicans as rapists was able to become the leader of the free world should disabuse anyone of that notion. Indeed those who invoke political correctness often use it for more cynical means. It is a smoke screen for regressivism.

Let us return to Ms Shrivers argument. It is untethered from reality. If a gay transgender Caribbean primary school dropout were able to gain a book deal with such ease, then where are all of the books by such people? Worse yet, the dichotomy she draws between demographic diversity on the one hand and worthwhile literature on the other implies that writers who are not white and heterosexual produce inferior literature. Moreover, Ms Shriver seems not to have considered that drawing upon the full spectrum of the human experience, particularly by seeking out voices and stories that have been hitherto silenced or under-represented, can only enrich our literature.

It is an illiberal argument masquerading as the opposite. This is common whenever the term political correctness is bandied about. Another example comes from Australias pugilistic former prime minister, Tony Abbott. During that countrys 2017 plebiscite on marriage equality, Mr Abbotta devout Catholic, social conservative and ardent No campaignerurged the Australian public: If you're worried about...freedom of speech, vote no [to single-sex marriage.] If you don't like political correctness, vote no because voting no will help to stop political correctness in its tracks.

By wilfully conflating several unrelated issues, Abbott managed to frame depriving same-sex couples of the right to marry (and of the rights that accompany it) as a bold and defiant declaration of freedom. That stopping political correctness was, for him, not only synonymous with but contingent upon the continued subjugation of certain minorities, indicates the illiberalism in which anti-PC reactionaries are steeped.

Not only is political correctness invoked to reinforce prejudices, it is often simplistic and reductive. A 22% increase in knife-crime in England and Wales, largely concentrated in London, has seen alarmist headlines about Londons murder rate eclipsing that of New Yorks (true only if one squints hard enough at very particular statistics.) The reasons for this are complicated, but largely to do with significant cuts to the police (whose numbers have fallen by nearly 20% since 2010) and also other social services: in the absence of youth services and clubs, for example, children are more vulnerable to recruitment from gangs. Many experts, including Metropolitan Police chief Cressida Dick, see this through the lens of public health, in which strategies for prevention are needed, not just enforcement.

For opponents of political correctness this is another consequence of political correctness run amokand another convenient excuse to attack the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan. During her tenure as Home Secretary, Theresa May (hardly a bleeding heart) rightfully placed significant restrictions on the use of the policing tactic known as stop and search, which disproportionately targeted ethnic minorities. There was no evidence that it reduced crime in any statistically significant way. However, the reactionaries ploughed on, impervious to facts, with right-wing media outlets such as the Sun and the Daily Telegraph calling for the return of stop-and-search to restore order on London streets.

These phenomenainvoking political correctness as a fig-leaf for naked prejudice, and in spite of evidence to the contraryfind their most troubling embodiment in political figures like Donald Trump and Nigel Farage. Mr Trump once stated that the problem [America] has is being politically correct, and sees himself as a corrective to that. Mr Farage, too, sees himself as a crusader against political correctness.

Both consider themselves to be taking back their respective countries from a varied cast of bogeymen: among them elitists, social justice warriors, Muslims and immigrants. Both seem to want to undermine the very institutions that preserve our rights and liberties.

At best, the notion of political correctness having gone too far is intellectually dishonest; a fallacy similar to a straw-man argument or an ad hominem attack. At worst, it serves as a rallying cry to cover up the excesses of the most illiberal in our society.

__________

Julia Symons is an MSc candidate in Global Health at the London School of Economics.

Go here to read the rest:

Has political correctness gone too far? | The Economist

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Has political correctness gone too far? | The Economist

‘Politically Correct’: The Phrase Has Gone From Wisdom To …

Posted: at 4:07 am

Rewind to August 2015: Then-candidate Donald Trump is on stage in Cleveland at the first Republican presidential debate.

"I think the big problem this country has is being politically correct," Trump tells the moderator, Fox News' Megyn Kelly. "I've been challenged by so many people and I don't, frankly, have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn't have time, either."

Now president-elect, Trump has denounced "political correctness" many, many, times since his campaign began. At a rally a year ago in South Carolina, he called for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States." He told a cheering crowd that his statement on the subject was "very, very salient, very important and probably not politically correct."

Politically correct. Political correctness. Using the biggest bully pulpit there is, Trump has wielded the phrase and its variants like a club some days and a shield on others. And he's hardly alone.

Since as far back as 1793, when the term appeared in a U.S. Supreme Court decision about the boundaries of federal jurisdiction, "politically correct" has had an array of definitions. It has been used to describe what is politically wise, and it has been employed as ironic self-mockery. The phrase has driven contentious debates in which free speech and free choice are pitted against civility and inclusion. But it hasn't just changed meaning, it has changed targets. What the November election has made clear is that these words, especially when they're related to matters of multiculturalism and diversity, carry consequences.

Fairleigh Dickinson University and the Pew Research Center released two polls in the past year, each finding that, like Trump, a majority of Americans thought people were too easily offended and that "political correctness" was one of the country's biggest problems. But what exactly is it?

People of all political stripes have used the phrase with varying, even contradictory meanings. In 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson used it to simply describe the correct (and incorrect) way to do politics when he said that he would enact policies "not because they are politically correct, but because they are right." Washington Post reporter Caitlin Gibson cited the quote in a January story headlined, "How 'politically correct' went from compliment to insult." In academic debates this year, people have used the words to dismiss the validity of those who advocate for "safe spaces" on college campuses and trigger warnings in classrooms.

The author Lionel Shriver riled up literary circles this fall with a controversial speech at the Brisbane Writers Festival. Some called her intolerant and out of touch. Then others accused Shriver's critics of being too politically correct, another way of saying "hypersensitive."

Comedian Bill Maher, whose aptly named TV show Politically Incorrect ran for nearly a decade, regularly skewers American politics and assails "political correctness" with commentary and satire on Real Time with Bill Maher, his HBO talk show. In a contentious piece for the Hollywood Reporter in February in which he announced his support for Sen. Bernie Sanders, Maher said Americans "have been choking on political correctness and overly careful politicians for the last generation or two and are sick of it." In that essay, Maher used the phrase as a synonym for cultural cowardice.

So, to review: "Politically correct" means politically wise or invalid or hypersensitive or cowardice.

Ruth Perry, a professor of literature at MIT, has written about the moment she thinks the phrase took a turn toward its most common contemporary usage: a rebuttal to the ideals or practice of diversity. That history, she says, starts in the 1960s, when Black Power advocates, along with what she called the New Left movement, used "politically incorrect" to mean people were out of step with the movement's orthodoxy. Perry, who founded MIT's women's studies program, wrote a widely cited 1992 essay in The Women's Review of Books to make the case that the phrase had been co-opted by political conservatives.

At the time, people were battling over language that seemed to serve as proxy for deeper disagreements about how Americans should handle ideas of equality and equity. Mixed in with debates about whether or not "manhole cover" should include the word "man," were more divisive arguments about whether things like affirmative action and multiculturalism were destroying liberal education.

In her essay, Perry talked about the countless times she had come across articles, op-eds and books that used the phrase "politically correct" to assail people like her. It was a phrase she and her friends, all civil rights activists, used all the time, but not the way it was being used in her readings.

"The attack on the 'politically correct,' " Perry wrote, "in the universities is an attack on the theory and practice of affirmative actiona legacy of the sixties and seventiesdefined as the recruitment to an institution of students and faculty who do not conform to what has always constituted the population of academic institutions: usually white, middle-class, straight, male."

It was our shorthand, and it was always used ironically. ... So that you would say, 'I know it's not politically correct, but I'm going to go get a hamburger anyway,' or, 'I know it's not politically correct, but I shave my legs.'

Ruth Perry

The emerging definition was "confusing to us, me and my buddies," Perry said in a recent interview. "It was our shorthand, and it was always used ironically. It was always used as a joke. It was, I think, one of the ways we distinguished ourselves as the New Left from the Old Left. It was about not being dogmatic. So that you would say, 'I know it's not politically correct, but I'm going to go get a hamburger anyway,' or, 'I know it's not politically correct, but I shave my legs.' "

But the meaning had already started to shift to the right.

In 1987, conservative philosopher Allan Bloom wrote the book The Closing of the American Mind, which a New York Times writer described as having "wildfire success." In the book, he railed against the so-called "open minds" in academia that he said had instead offered students narrow, liberal perspectives. To make his case, he pointed to the Black Power movement:

"The Black Power movement that supplanted the older civil rights movementleaving aside both its excesses and its very understandable emphasis on self-respect and refusal to beg for acceptancehad at its core the view that the Constitutional tradition was always corrupt and was constructed as a defense of slavery. Its demand was for black identity, not universal rights. ....

"The upshot of all this for the education of young Americans is that they know much less about American history and those who were held to be its heroes. This was one of the few things that they used to come to college with that had something to do with their lives. Nothing has taken its place except a smattering of facts learned about other nations or cultures and a few social science formulas."

Bloom, who died in 1992, is cited regularly by conservative academics and writers. While he didn't use the phrase "political correctness," his writing stoked the view that people were overly concerned with multiculturalism and diversity at the expense of rigorous education and free thinking.

In a 1991 commencement speech at the University of Michigan, then-president George H.W. Bush took note of the conversation that was preoccupying the country.

"The notion of political correctness has ignited controversy across the land," he said. "And although the movement arises from the laudable desire to sweep away the debris of racism and sexism and hatred, it replaces old prejudice with new ones."

Perry said that she and her colleagues "all believed in consensus and discussion and so on, so we used the term to signify an idealistic belief in something, but the inability of the frail flesh to actually manage always to live up to it. And that's how we used it."

Victor Davis Hanson, a senior fellow at Stanford's Hoover Institution, said that language is being manipulated for political purposes all the time by the left and the right. But liberals, he suggested in an interview, are more concerned with being politically right than being factually correct. Conservatives, he said, prefer to "say whatever you want and let it fall where it is, and we'll make the argument as it is."

"Now," Hanson said, "the left has destroyed the idea of absolute truth and legitimate ends. ... I think it's really dangerous what the left has done. They've created this effort to distort reality through vocabulary and they thought their agenda was enhanced by it."

It is the case that words are weapons in political discourse, and they always have been.

Vincent Hutchings

Today, "politically correct" is being used as a "kind of linguistic jujitsu" to disable an opponent's diversity argument, said Vincent Hutchings, a professor of American politics at the University of Michigan. "It is the case that words are weapons in political discourse, and they always have been," Hutchings said.

Trump has blamed "political correctness" for the Orlando shootings, for NBC's decision in 2015 to sever its ties with him over the speech announcing his candidacy, and for a Scottish university's decision to strip him of an honorary degree.

Last month, the writer and academic Moira Weigel wrote for The Guardian that Trump hasn't just rejected "political correctness"; he has reveled in being incorrect.

"Trump did not simply criticise the idea of political correctness he actually said and did the kind of outrageous things that PC culture supposedly prohibited. The first wave of conservative critics of political correctness claimed they were defending the status quo, but Trump's mission was to destroy it. In 1991, when George HW Bush warned that political correctness was a threat to free speech, he did not choose to exercise his free speech rights by publicly mocking a man with a disability or characterising Mexican immigrants as rapists. Trump did. Having elevated the powers of PC to mythic status, the draft-dodging billionaire, son of a slumlord, taunted the parents of a fallen soldier and claimed that his cruelty and malice was, in fact, courage."

So, to review again: "Politically correct" means cowardly and courageous; invalid or hypersensitive; in step with the orthodoxy; distortion and linguistic jujitsu.

The writer Lindy West offers a way out of this semantic loop: People who think the phrase is used to demonize things like social justice and diversity should drop it altogether and call things what they are.

For years, she said in an interview, "I've had to write the same piece about how being 'politically correct' is good. Letting terms just sit there and calcify and normalize just makes it more difficult to dismantle those concepts that ... language props up."

A tweet recently captured her view about the decades-long debate in fewer than 140 characters:

See the original post here:

'Politically Correct': The Phrase Has Gone From Wisdom To ...

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on ‘Politically Correct’: The Phrase Has Gone From Wisdom To …

Political Correctness Run Amok – The Post & Email

Posted: at 4:07 am

by Bob Russell, 2022

(Mar. 25, 2022) I remember in my younger days in the 1960s and 1970s, when everything had to be done by quotas so blacks could be represented in everything according to their proportion of the population. This led to much discrimination against whites in job placement as well as in other areas. I very nearly lost a job opportunity because I am white. My aptitude test scores were well above the black applicant but skin color was the most important factor considered after the racial unrest scam that came after the Voting Rights and Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1965 were signed into law. As it turned out, my being a veteran put the test scores back into play and I got the job based on the aptitude tests.

Today blacks make up about 12% of the population, but 90% of the commercials I see on television are either all or majority black and every mixed-race couple is black man-white woman. When a white man is shown he is less than typical, usually pot-bellied and a dork. I wonder why there is such a push to portray families and white men this way. I have nothing against anyone based on skin color, as I was brought up in a very diverse area where whites, blacks, American Indians, Asians, and every other group interacted quite a lot. I grew up just outside the slum area of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and spent many years playing baseball with and against the poorest and most ethnically diverse of residents. There were never any problems because we all looked at content of character, not skin color.

As a member of Army Special Forces I served with a variety of people. The A team I was on had one black, one American Indian, and two Hispanics among the 12 of us, and one was of Greek or Turkish descent. We never paid any attention to ethnicity because we were all American soldiers, patriots who believed in our way of life, had to depend on each other every minute of every day, and we all bled red when wounded. We were simply Americans, non-hyphenated American soldiers who needed each other in times of battle.

Today the satanic liberal elitists want We the People separated by ethnicity and at each others throats to keep us divided so we cant effectively oppose the tyranny they are forcing on us daily. The Black Lives Matter idiots dont care about black lives or they would be screaming about the number of blacks being murdered by other blacks in cities run by race-baiting, racist devildemocommiecrats. BLM is a scam designed to enrich the organizers instead of helping poor inner-city residents. BLM head patrice cullors has spent a little under $5 million of the funds buying several lavish houses in predominantly white areas while local groups havent received any money at all to help them. Some local organizers have openly criticized the use of funds collected by cullors and her cohort in the scam.

I find it very interesting that black conservatives are vilified by the race hustlers just as much as I am because they dont bow to massa and stay on the plantation. The true racists in American society are the liberals who vilify everyone who challenges them. Larry Elder, a black conservative who ran against liberal tyrant gavin newsom in California in the recall election, was heavily vilified by the Pravda/Goebbels fake news propagandists as the black face of white supremacy because he dared oppose the racists in control of the government and their narrative. Every black who stands on Martin Luther Kings idea of judging people by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin is considered to be less than human by liberals. During the 2020 campaign joe dementia said, If you vote for President Trump rather than me you aint black. If a conservative said that, the liberal propagandists heads would have exploded and that would be all they talked about for weeks, but since it was a very racist devildemocommiecrat it was totally ignored by the propagandists in the lamestream media.

The way liberals treat conservative blacks shows they are not the inclusive people they claim to be. Skin color isnt the important thing to them; ideology is. A black conservative is just as hated by liberals as a white conservative.

The satanic left demands what they call equity, which is far from equality. Equality calls for equal opportunity but equity calls for a rigged outcome that suits the satanic left. Until We the People get control of the government we are going to see the satanic left in America continue to drive the nation into the oblivion of tyranny, resulting in the nation becoming a mere puppet state of the satanic new world order global dictatorship they have such an insatiable lust to establish.

Sadly, both political parties have more interest in personal wealth and power than in what is in the best interests of We the People. There are a few republicans who honor their oath of office and represent We the People but they are too few and are kept on the outside by the gop establishment, including the rnc, mitch mcconnell, kevin mccarthy and their minions in both houses of Congress.

As long as the deep state can keep We the People focused away from their despotic and TREASONOUS plans they can do whatever they want until they have the totalitarian control they want. They have used the pandemic scam to the maximum advantage to keep people off-balance and distracted from their evil plans of subjugating all of us under their tyrannical thumbs.

Fortunately citizens, even many who have been their minions for years, are tiring of the nonsense and beginning to wake up. The convoy which made its way to Washington, D.C. received a great deal of support from people along the route. People are rallying to a group actively opposing unconstitutional mandates from corrupt politicians and bureaucrats. The worst nightmare of the corrupt left is a citizenry united against tyranny and people have tired of the agenda/narrative and are beginning to fight back, uniting against the divisive tactics of the political ruling class and their propagandists. People are now taking a hard look at the tactics of shutdowns, mask mandates, and the push to get everyone vaccinated with untested and unproven vaccines to the exclusion of treatments that have been used for decades and proven effective. The long-used treatments are much cheaper than the vaccines that big pharma and the establishment are pushing. I have seen reports that nine executives of big pharma have become billionaires since covid hit and have retired. I dont trust the too cozy relationship between the pharma companies and the politicians and bureaucrats who demand everyone accept the vaccines without question. I WILL NOT, under any circumstances, take their poison into my body. I have been exposed to the virus several times but have yet to have any symptoms of having contracted it. The people pushing the follow the science narrative dont follow the science nor obey the mandates they impose on citizens, nor do they have anything to say about the millions of illegal-alien invaders who have flooded across the border in the last year. It is Do as I say, not as I do and Rules for thee but not for me.

If the political ruling class, the bureaucrats, and the Pravda/Goebbels fake news propagandists really cared about health they would actually follow the science rather than impose selective arbitrary dictates. Elementary school children are almost totally immune from the virus but mask mandates have been imposed on them in areas run by devildemocommiecrats where parents are told they have no right to question restrictions imposed on their children, have been labeled as domestic terrorists and hounded by the federal Gestapo for daring to speak out in defense of civil and human rights being violated by the ruling class.

I submit this in the name of the Most Holy Trinity, in faith, with the responsibility given to me by Almighty God to honor His work and not let it die from neglect.

See the article here:

Political Correctness Run Amok - The Post & Email

Posted in Political Correctness | Comments Off on Political Correctness Run Amok – The Post & Email