Monthly Archives: March 2022

Two servings of fatty fruit per week can reduce risk of heart attack, study says – WAPT Jackson

Posted: March 31, 2022 at 2:47 am

unwinding at the end of the day, with a nice hot bath may have more benefits than you think. A new study published in the medical journal Heart found that taking a hot bath may lower your risk of death from heart disease or stroke. Researchers collected data from more than 61,000 adults ages 40 to 59 with no history of cancer or cardiovascular disease. In japan, they found a lower risk of heart disease and lower risk of stroke among men and women who took a hot bath daily compared with participants who took a hot bath once or twice a week or none at all. Typical Japanese baths involved people soaking up to their necks in water that is up to 107 F, according to Market Watch. This helps because you're forced to take deeper breaths when you're immersed up to your neck. Plus hot water can increase body temperature. Heart rate and blood flow like exercise can hot baths also relieve muscle aches and soreness. That said, this isn't for everyone. Hot baths or saunas can cause heat strokes and are also dangerous for pregnant women, especially during their first trimester, according to health line. Before you try heat therapy, you should consult your doctor

Two servings of fatty fruit per week can reduce risk of heart attack, study says

Updated: 6:28 AM CDT Mar 30, 2022

Eating avocados reduced the risk of heart attacks in both men and women, including when eaten in place of butter, cheese or processed meats, a new study found.Cardiovascular disease is a leading killer worldwide, taking nearly 18 million lives every year, according to the World Health Organization. In the United States alone, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says heart disease takes a life every 36 seconds.Eating at least two servings of avocado a week reduced the risk of having a heart attack by 21% when compared to avoiding or rarely eating avocados. However, there was not an equivalent benefit in reducing the risk for stroke, according to the study published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Heart Association.A serving of avocado, which is a fruit, was defined as " avocado or cup of avocado, which roughly weighs 80 grams," said study author Lorena Pacheco, a postdoctoral research fellow in the department of nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston."Although no one food is the solution to routinely eating a healthy diet, this study is evidence that avocados have possible health benefits," said Cheryl Anderson, chair of the American Heart Association's Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, in a statement. Anderson was not involved in the study."We desperately need strategies to improve intake of AHA-recommended healthy diets such as the Mediterranean diet that are rich in vegetables and fruits," said Anderson, who is also professor and dean of the Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science at University of California San Diego.Long-term studyThe study followed more than 68,000 women and 41,000 men who were enrolled in two long-term government studies on risk factors for chronic disease: the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study. All participants were free of cancer, coronary heart disease and stroke at the start of the studies and completed dietary questionnaires every four years over a 30-year period.In addition to looking at the overall impact of eating avocados, researchers did statistical modeling and found consuming half a serving of avocado ( cup) a day instead of the same amount of eggs, yogurt, cheese, margarine, butter or processed meats (such as bacon) lowered the risk of heart attacks by 16% to 22%."The full benefit of routine avocado consumption observed here derives from swapping avocado into the diet, and less healthful foods out," said Dr. David Katz, a specialist in preventive and lifestyle medicine and nutrition, who was not involved in the study.However, the study did not find a difference in risk reduction when a half-serving of avocado was replaced with an equivalent serving of nuts, olive and other plant oils. That makes sense, Katz said, because the health benefits are dependent on what food is replaced."If, for instance, the common swap were between avocado and walnuts or almonds, the health effects would likely be negligible since the foods have similar nutritional properties and expected health effects," said Katz, the president and founder of the nonprofit True Health Initiative, a global coalition of experts dedicated to evidence-based lifestyle medicine.But if the avocado replaced butter and margarine as a spread, or was eaten instead of processed meats or cheese on a sandwich, "the nutritional distinctions are sizable" and would be expected to change the health outcome, he added.Although avocados are "particularly rich sources of monounsaturated fat, polyunsaturated fat and fiber," they can also be pricey and therefore not readily available to all, Katz said. Similar substitutes could include walnuts, almonds, olives, olive oil and a variety of seeds such as pumpkin and flax, he said.Other foods to include that have major health benefits at "much lower price points," include beans, chickpeas and lentils, "and perhaps whole grains and related seeds like quinoa," Katz said.Preventing heart diseasePreventing heart disease means keeping your weight, blood pressure and cholesterol under control, getting plenty of good-quality sleep and regular exercise, managing stress, limiting alcohol and avoiding tobacco use, and eating a healthy diet lower in sugar, processed foods and saturated fats, according to the National Library of Medicine.The American Heart Association says your body needs fat to boost energy, protect organs, produce hormones and help with nutrient absorption. However, fats like monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats are the heart-healthy choices. Olive oil, canola oil, peanut oil, safflower oil and sesame oil are sources of monounsaturated fats, along with avocados, peanut butter and many nuts and seeds.Saturated fat and trans fats raise levels of LDL, known as "bad cholesterol," the AHA said. Saturated fats, such as butter, are typically solid at room temperature and are found in full-fat dairy products, eggs, coconut and palm oils, and fatty cuts of beef, pork and skin-on poultry.Artificially made trans fats, also called partially hydrogenated oils, raise bad LDL cholesterol and lower good HDL cholesterol, which can increase the risk of heart disease, stroke and Type 2 diabetes. Those can often be found in "fried foods like doughnuts, and baked goods including cakes, pie crusts, biscuits, frozen pizza, cookies, crackers, stick margarines and other spreads," according to the AHA.

Eating avocados reduced the risk of heart attacks in both men and women, including when eaten in place of butter, cheese or processed meats, a new study found.

Cardiovascular disease is a leading killer worldwide, taking nearly 18 million lives every year, according to the World Health Organization. In the United States alone, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says heart disease takes a life every 36 seconds.

Eating at least two servings of avocado a week reduced the risk of having a heart attack by 21% when compared to avoiding or rarely eating avocados. However, there was not an equivalent benefit in reducing the risk for stroke, according to the study published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Heart Association.

A serving of avocado, which is a fruit, was defined as " avocado or cup of avocado, which roughly weighs 80 grams," said study author Lorena Pacheco, a postdoctoral research fellow in the department of nutrition at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston.

"Although no one food is the solution to routinely eating a healthy diet, this study is evidence that avocados have possible health benefits," said Cheryl Anderson, chair of the American Heart Association's Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, in a statement. Anderson was not involved in the study.

"We desperately need strategies to improve intake of AHA-recommended healthy diets such as the Mediterranean diet that are rich in vegetables and fruits," said Anderson, who is also professor and dean of the Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science at University of California San Diego.

The study followed more than 68,000 women and 41,000 men who were enrolled in two long-term government studies on risk factors for chronic disease: the Nurses' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study. All participants were free of cancer, coronary heart disease and stroke at the start of the studies and completed dietary questionnaires every four years over a 30-year period.

In addition to looking at the overall impact of eating avocados, researchers did statistical modeling and found consuming half a serving of avocado ( cup) a day instead of the same amount of eggs, yogurt, cheese, margarine, butter or processed meats (such as bacon) lowered the risk of heart attacks by 16% to 22%.

"The full benefit of routine avocado consumption observed here derives from swapping avocado into the diet, and less healthful foods out," said Dr. David Katz, a specialist in preventive and lifestyle medicine and nutrition, who was not involved in the study.

However, the study did not find a difference in risk reduction when a half-serving of avocado was replaced with an equivalent serving of nuts, olive and other plant oils. That makes sense, Katz said, because the health benefits are dependent on what food is replaced.

"If, for instance, the common swap were between avocado and walnuts or almonds, the health effects would likely be negligible since the foods have similar nutritional properties and expected health effects," said Katz, the president and founder of the nonprofit True Health Initiative, a global coalition of experts dedicated to evidence-based lifestyle medicine.

But if the avocado replaced butter and margarine as a spread, or was eaten instead of processed meats or cheese on a sandwich, "the nutritional distinctions are sizable" and would be expected to change the health outcome, he added.

Although avocados are "particularly rich sources of monounsaturated fat, polyunsaturated fat and fiber," they can also be pricey and therefore not readily available to all, Katz said. Similar substitutes could include walnuts, almonds, olives, olive oil and a variety of seeds such as pumpkin and flax, he said.

Other foods to include that have major health benefits at "much lower price points," include beans, chickpeas and lentils, "and perhaps whole grains and related seeds like quinoa," Katz said.

Preventing heart disease means keeping your weight, blood pressure and cholesterol under control, getting plenty of good-quality sleep and regular exercise, managing stress, limiting alcohol and avoiding tobacco use, and eating a healthy diet lower in sugar, processed foods and saturated fats, according to the National Library of Medicine.

The American Heart Association says your body needs fat to boost energy, protect organs, produce hormones and help with nutrient absorption. However, fats like monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats are the heart-healthy choices. Olive oil, canola oil, peanut oil, safflower oil and sesame oil are sources of monounsaturated fats, along with avocados, peanut butter and many nuts and seeds.

Saturated fat and trans fats raise levels of LDL, known as "bad cholesterol," the AHA said. Saturated fats, such as butter, are typically solid at room temperature and are found in full-fat dairy products, eggs, coconut and palm oils, and fatty cuts of beef, pork and skin-on poultry.

Artificially made trans fats, also called partially hydrogenated oils, raise bad LDL cholesterol and lower good HDL cholesterol, which can increase the risk of heart disease, stroke and Type 2 diabetes. Those can often be found in "fried foods like doughnuts, and baked goods including cakes, pie crusts, biscuits, frozen pizza, cookies, crackers, stick margarines and other spreads," according to the AHA.

Continue reading here:
Two servings of fatty fruit per week can reduce risk of heart attack, study says - WAPT Jackson

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on Two servings of fatty fruit per week can reduce risk of heart attack, study says – WAPT Jackson

The Institute for Mobility and Longevity Partners with Indo-US Collaboration to Pioneer Orthopedic Research and Education – PR Newswire

Posted: at 2:47 am

Our mission is to improve mobility and quality of life through research, education and clinical excellence.

Gardner Orthopedics and Shalby Advanced Technologies recently announced an Indo-US collaboration to form Advanced Orthopedic Centers of Excellence at Shelby Hospitals in India and Shalby Orthopedic Centers of Excellence in Fort Myers and across India.

The team will conduct educational seminars for medical engineering professionals to advance knowledge transfer between India and the US. Short-term traveling fellowships between the two countries will provide direct experience at the surgical centers pioneering new learning and training tools.

IML research findings will be presented in November 2022 at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Annual Meeting in Dallas, Texas.

About The Institute for Mobility and Longevity: Established in 1987 by Dr. W. Andrew Hodge, IML is a world-wide not-for-profit 501(c)(3) organization based in Fort Myers, FL dedicated to improving mobility and the quality of life through orthopedic research, injury prevention, human motion studies, education and patient centered treatment.

About Gardner Orthopedics: Gardner Orthopedics in Fort Myers, Florida, is dedicated to educating and treating adult patients with orthopedic needs. The medical staff is led by Ronald Gardner, MD, a board-certified orthopedic surgeon specializing in orthopedic surgeries and sports medicine.

About Shalby Advanced Technologies:Shalby Advanced Technologies is a subsidiary of Shalby Limited, established by Dr. Vikram Shah in 1994 in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, which operates 11 multispecialty hospitals across India with more than 2,000 hospital beds. Shalby commands 15 percent market share of organized joint replacement surgeries in India.

URL:https://institute-mobility-longevity.org

SOURCE The Institute for Mobility and Longevity

See the original post here:
The Institute for Mobility and Longevity Partners with Indo-US Collaboration to Pioneer Orthopedic Research and Education - PR Newswire

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on The Institute for Mobility and Longevity Partners with Indo-US Collaboration to Pioneer Orthopedic Research and Education – PR Newswire

New NPG Forum Paper Chronicles the Ebb and Flow of Life Expectancy – 69News WFMZ-TV

Posted: at 2:47 am

ALEXANDRIA, Va., March 29, 2022 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- Homicide, opioid overdose, and suicide contribute to the widening life expectancy gap between the U.S. and other wealthy countries. Negative Population Growth, Inc's newly published Forum paper, titled: Life Expectancy Drives U.S. and World Population Growth, by Edwin S. Rubenstein, explains the nuances of population growth in tandem with life expectancy. With such a large scope at hand, Rubenstein starts with comparisons between the 1918 flu and the COVID-19 pandemic before discussing the many contributing factors that tie into the world's Total Fertility Rate, the history of life expectancy, and possible outcomes in the future.

Beginning his narrative with data covering the 1918 influenza pandemic, Rubenstein compels readers to look critically at the differences between the 1918 flu and the COVID-19 pandemic, starting with how many deaths occurred during each worldwide scenario. "The best estimates," he shares, "suggest as many as 100 million people died from the Spanish Flu that eventually circled the world. To put that in context, as of January 14th, 2022, 5.5 million people have died from all COVID variants, on a planet with four times as many people." During the 1918 flu life-expectancy "plunged by 12 years, from 51 in 1917 to 39 in 1918," before returning to pre-pandemic life-expectancy estimates in 1919.

Rubenstein then zeros in on the different factors that play into life expectancy in the U.S., sharing that opioid overdoses, suicide, homicide, and infant mortality are causes of death that affect young people (which, in turn, dramatically affect life expectancy trends). Expanding to include the world in his analysis, Rubenstein highlights another part of the life expectancy equation: the impact of the Total Fertility Rate (TFR). He illustrates the significance of its impact with an example, sharing: "Even slight changes per woman translates to around 500 million more individuals on the planet in 2100." Rubenstein tells readers the population will peak, decline, and stabilize in the future, noting: "World population will likely peak at 9.7 billion in 2064, and then decline to about 8.8 billion by 2100 about 2 billion lower than the latest UN projection."

Touching on life expectancy history, Rubenstein notes that data was not collected on the subject until the 1600s, fueled by the curious elite. Then, the smallpox vaccine allows everyone to live longer lives until industrialization develops and negatively affects human health. Along with industrialization came the prevalence of another lethal blow to young lives: milk. It would take decades for widespread acceptance of pasteurized milk to take hold in the early 1920s. Soon after the advancement of milk processing, science confirms that chlorine (in microscopic doses) in water eliminates water-borne diseases. By the 1950s, there was safe milk, clean water, and vaccines for the most lethal diseases all positive gains for human health and longevity.

At this point, another critical medicine was added to our collective human arsenal: penicillin. "This antibiotic," Rubenstein states, "triggered a revolution in human healthThe mass production of antibiotics, the Green Revolution, the rise of international health organizations lifted global life expectancy especially in the world's poorest countries." Given this wide birth of positive outcomes (longer life expectancy) over the last 100 years, Rubenstein points to what can only be called the elephant in the room, saying: "the last century was marked by nearly unbroken increases in life expectancy. This century may not be as kind. The problem is human population growth." Rubenstein ends with a concise quote from journalist Steven Johnson: "All those brilliant solutions we engineered to reduce or eliminate threats like smallpox created a new, higher-level threat: ourselves. Many of the key problems we now face as a species are second-order effects of reduced mortalityRunaway population growth and the environmental crisis it has helped produce should remind us that continued advances in life expectancy are not inevitable."

Founded in 1972, NPG is a national nonprofit membership organization dedicated to educating the American public and political leaders regarding the damaging effects of population growth. We believe that our nation is already vastly overpopulated in terms of the long-range carrying capacity of its resources and environment. NPG advocates the adoption of its Proposed National Population Policy, with the goal of eventually stabilizing U.S. population at a sustainable level far lower than today's. We do not simply identify the problems we propose solutions. For more information, visit our website at NPG.org, follow us on Facebook @NegativePopulationGrowth or follow us on Twitter @npg_org.

Media Contact

Craig Lewis, Negative Population Growth, 703-370-9510, media@npg.org

SOURCE Negative Population Growth

View post:
New NPG Forum Paper Chronicles the Ebb and Flow of Life Expectancy - 69News WFMZ-TV

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on New NPG Forum Paper Chronicles the Ebb and Flow of Life Expectancy – 69News WFMZ-TV

Why the arrival of retail investors in VC market is the next big thing – Coin Rivet

Posted: at 2:47 am

From trading floor to digital finances

According to the World Bank, in 1979 the total volume of securities trading was just over $600 billion. Ten years later, in 1989, it was ten times higher. The absolute record was set in 2015, when the stock market turnover exceeded $100 trillion.

The advent of the age of finance was spurred by tech solutions. The digitalization of this industry started somewhere in the early 1970s, when the Nasdaq stock exchange began operations in the United States, running entirely on a computer network. By the early 1990s, more than 40% of all transactions were made using online tools.

Thats when the first trading platforms popular among investors appeared, such as Globex or E-Trade. They provided access to stock market data and had all the instruments required for trading. However, registration with them proved a convoluted process, and serious skills were required to use them effectively.

Stock trading was still the turf of a relatively small percentage of people. However, the number of users on trading platforms grew at a rate comparable to the spread of the Internet. Though the 2000s came with two hard hitting financial crises, they demonstrated that the interest in stock investments among ordinary people would only grow.

Mobile app the main portal to stock market

The breakthrough for investment technologies came after the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown in 2020, with a staggering and unprecedented amount of liquidity inflows into the U.S. stock market. Stock prices soared, as did the popularity of investments themselves.

Reuters feature sums up the results of 2020 for the stock market. According to the agency, the share of retail investors in the total volume of securities trading increased to more than 25%, from 17%. The total number of accounts of the six largest brokerage firms in the U.S. (Fidelity, Vanguard, Schwab, Webull, Robinhood, Interactive Brokers) exceeded 100 million.

One of the above companies, Robinhood, should be grabbing your attention now. The company was founded in 2014 and, unlike the old brokers, its business model targeted retail investors from the outset. Not surprisingly, Robinhood got a fair share of the market pie after the massive influx of retail investors.

Robinhoods flagship product is an app with the simplest possible interface. It takes all the hassle out of the stock trading process and is made easy even for those who had no previous trading experience at all.

The companys bet on the growing retail trading segment proved the right strategy. If Robinhood had nearly 500,000 users in 2015, its customer base swelled to 13 million and 22.5 million by 2020 and 2021 respectively. This is how just one mobile app led a revolution in stock trading.

Why venture investments are not about startups anymore

But the stock markets cheerful statistics makes the equally important sphere, the private equity market, take a back seat. In recent years it has also transformed from a narrow segment into a large-scale phenomenon. Lets take, for example, the VC space.

The VC activity is many times higher than before. According to Pitchbook, the number of deals with VC involved increased to 15,500 in 2021, from 3,400 in 2006. The total amount of funding raised by companies from VC funds in 2021 reached a record of $330 billion. The previous record was set in 2020 ($166.6 billion).

By 2021, the share of mega-deals, rounds totaling more than $50 million, had increased significantly, to 83% of the total volume of VC investments. In 2006, this number was only 26.8%. Also in 2021, the number of deals with later-stage private companies grew by 47%, accounting mostly for these mega-deals

The US now has many more unicorns private companies valued at $1 billion or more 340 in 2021 versus 100 in 2020. That same year Crunchbase for the first time recorded more than 1,000 unicorn companies in the world.

What does this tell you? The perception of VC as risky investments in unreliable startups is outdated. Today, VC investments are more often investments in stable and mature businesses.

And, as practice demonstrates, sooner or later such companies go public. Massive interest in private companies that go public is indicated by the number of IPOs: in 2020, according to Nasdaq, companies held 464 initial public offerings, leveling with 2000. And in 2021, the United States saw an all-time record for the number of IPOs: 958.

Portfolio from private companies on your smartphone

The private equity market has become larger and more dynamic, and retail investors are no longer afraid of investing in private companies. This trend is supported by the growing popularity of equity crowdfunding, which has changed the approach to innovation funding. Mobile services have already emerged in this segment, allowing businesses to raise funds from private investors.

According to Pitchbook, investments in large private companies, such as Chime, SpaceX, and Impossible Foods, are gaining popularity at a much slower pace. The traditions of venture capital funds are still strong here that have individual capitalists assemble their small funds and invite a narrow circle of private investors to invest.

However, this market will soon be swept by new technologies capable of making private equity investments as easy and accessible to ordinary investors as possible. Apparently, it will again take the form of a mobile app. B2B platform Forge Global has already announced its intentions to create such a product. In August 2021, Y Combinator financed Aqua, a young platform for venture investments. And in early March 2022, Dizraptor, one of the first private equity mobile apps, became available on AppStore and Google Play. v

According to Dmitry Belousov, CEO of Dizraptor, private disruptive companies are key to investors today:

Weve been trading on the stock market for 15 years and investing in technologies that will be trending tomorrow. A few years ago we changed our focus from stock markets to private markets, and its already paying off.

We are seeing huge interest from investors in getting private equity recently. But the services through which they can invest are so complex they are basically accessible only to professionals. This is a false limitation: today, regulations allow at least accredited investors to invest in private equity only in the US alone, according to the SEC, their number exceeded 16 million in 2019.

So we created a mobile app where you can build a portfolio from stocks in such companies as Impossible Foods, Calm, Neuralink or StoreDot. We select companies from approximately 30 disruptive industries.

We estimate the total market size for industries such as foodtech, edtech, space, synbio, remote jobs, cancer diagnostics, human longevity, creator economy and metaverse will increase by 7.5x between 2021 and 2030. According to Ark Invests Big Ideas for 2030, the overall Disruptive Innovation Technologies market will grow from $14T today to $210T in 2030 a growth of 15x in 10 years.

VC is still the engine of innovative companies. Previously, VC interests were limited to the IT sector, but today they invest in companies introducing new technologies in medicine, engineering, robotics, biology and even space. These companies remain private for longer, and it is increasingly easier for them to raise large capital, as shown by the rising number of unicorns.

The activity on the private equity market will continue to grow. Granted, those who will be among the first to get a handle on new investment services will win. Now it is important to try and compare whats out there: Dizraptor app can be downloaded already now, while you should also be looking at other apps to come. If you are investor, dont miss the coming trend.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed by the author should not be considered as financial advice. We do not give advice on financial products.

Read more from the original source:
Why the arrival of retail investors in VC market is the next big thing - Coin Rivet

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on Why the arrival of retail investors in VC market is the next big thing – Coin Rivet

Who Drives the Food Delivery Bot When Something Goes Wrong? – Government Technology

Posted: at 2:47 am

(TNS) In a low-light Culver City, Calif., control room, Lily Shaw is getting her pilot mood on.

A can of mint Guayaki Yerba Mate sits near her carefully manicured fingers. Good jams to get pumped from alt rock band Slothrust blast on her earbuds. Horn-rimmed, blue-light filtering glasses protect her eyes. Her favored chartreuse Xbox controller stands ready to command her laptop.

Shaw is set for her mission: piloting an order of burritos and doughnuts along Santa Monica sidewalks to a hungry customer.

For all their AI and other advanced technology, such sidewalk robots suddenly all over certain neighborhoods and college campuses are backed by armies of human minders who track the last-mile delivery vehicles the way parents hover over toddlers taking their first steps. These behind-the-scenes workers monitor, drive, troubleshoot, rescue and when things go terribly wrong may hop on a bike or scooter to complete the delivery themselves.

California has become a proving ground for several sidewalk delivery robot startups like Coco, which was born two years ago in the living room of UCLA alumni Zach Rash and Brad Squicciarini, both now 24 and riding a pandemic-related desire for contact-free delivery. A recent partnership with Segway is promising to unleash thousands of the pink vehicles in multiple cities.

This off-road race to compete with Uber Eats, DoorDash and other delivery companies that rely on gig workers is hindered by currently available self-driving technology, not to mention gaping sidewalk cracks. But its getting a big assist from the shortage of people willing to take gig-delivery work for the money offered.

Theres a huge demand for delivery to peoples homes. Unfortunately there is a shortage of drivers for most types of delivery, says Satyandra K. Gupta, director of USCs Center for Advanced Manufacturing.

The demand for drivers cannot be met at a cost that businesses are willing to pay. So the only option out of this is basically doing delivery by robots, Gupta says.

Building a truly autonomous vehicle is definitely a work in progress.

The U.S. Department of Transportation has adopted a six-point standard for driving autonomy that applies to self-driving cars on public roads as well as 2-foot-tall delivery robots on sidewalks.

The scale starts at zero, where the vehicle must be human-controlled at all times, like Cocos delivery bots. The scale tops out at level 5, where the vehicle drives itself and can go anywhere under all conditions. Thats what carmakers and Alphabets Waymo are striving for with self-driving passenger vehicles and freight delivery trucks.

Starship Technologies bots land at level 4. Chief Executive Alastair Westgarth says the robots can find their way along most routes and can even climb curbs. Human intervention comes into play only when the bot finds something it doesnt expect or when mayhem ensues.

Despite the Internets collection of bots getting into hilarious trouble, the delivery companies all note that the low-mass, low-speed vehicles are designed with safety in mind and have operated without serious harm to people or property.

Say it finds a piece of construction equipment that wasnt there before. Its not on the maps. The robot doesnt recognize it, Westgarth says.

At first, the bot will assess the situation on its own.

If it knows a way around that obstruction, even if it doesnt know what the obstruction is, it will do that by itself, Westgarth says. If it cannot figure that out, it calls home. A human, who had been watching the bot remotely, takes over.

Still, some obstacles take a long time to master. Trains, for instance. Starships bots were completely flummoxed by things first blocking the way and then suddenly gone.

A train could be half a mile long and to the robot, it looks like a wall, Westgarth says.

We had to figure out algorithms for the radar to give us a continuous velocity read, also allow us to identify the wheels. Then we could build the logic: Its a train. Youre going to be waiting for a while. Wait for an indication that the train is gone, see if anything else is in the way and then, it can cross. The system learns.

Each Starship bot comes equipped with six wheels, an AMD Ryzen processor, radar, cameras, lights, speakers that allow the bot to talk and an illuminated flag on a pole, which makes the vehicle more visible as it navigates across roads and among pedestrians. The bot voice and flag also help amplify the cute factor, like a cartoon character crossed with a grade-schoolers souped-up bike.

Being adorable isnt just a marketing tactic, its an integral part of the companies efforts to increase acceptance and ensure the little vehicles safety from human ire. Robot designers have added features that allow the vehicles to communicate with pedestrians using LED screens, pre-recorded messages and emoji-like eyes.

Online videos show robot rescuers having emotional reactions when Starship bots respond with a chipper Thank you. Have a nice day! People wave. Children follow them down the street.

Although the robots friendly appearance is what customers recall, their creation involves serious science.

You have a mixture of artists, engineers, operations people, businesspeople working in tandem, just so you can see a robot deliver a burrito, which I think is pretty fascinating, says Kiwibot co-founder David Rodriguez, 28, who first tested the companys remote piloting technology in 2017 at the UC Berkeley Sky Deck Acceleration Program using a Hot Wheels-size vehicle.

Although sidewalk delivery was boosted by pandemic lockdown orders, the businesses like to highlight how bots help reduce pollution and climate change.

Rash and his Coco co-founder are avid surfers who, tired of all the trash theyd see on the water, wanted to do something that might help the environment.

It was a little depressing to think that the future was going to involve 4,000-pound, 3,000-pound cars driving in circles a couple blocks all day, every day just to deliver food, Rash says.

Back at Cocos Culver City office, Lily Shaw is piloting a delivery from Alfalfa, a Santa Monica restaurant. Co-owner Dan Londono says he was attracted by the time savings.

One of the key benefits is speed, as we are able to send the food out to our nearby customers in the Coco robots as soon as the order is ready and not wait for drivers to arrive, he says.

Despite the pandemics Great Resignation and resulting worker shortage, Coco has managed to create enthusiasm within a largely untapped workforce: Generation Z. The companys young squadron of about 150 pilots dubbed Coconauts offers something parents around the world have told their teens not to expect in real life: a paying job with experience playing racing video games listed as a requirement.

As a Coconaut, youll join an elite team: the pilots of our remotely-operated robot fleet, Cocos standard pilot job listing says. Once youve completed a brief training, you can enter your virtual robot cockpit, accept jobs, and deliver items to our customers. Get paid to drive robots!

But theres a catch. Leave your urban mayhem Grand Theft Auto techniques at the door. Coconauts must drive their robots carefully and responsibly.

Cocos remote pilots earn more than U.S. minimum wage, Rash says, declining to be more specific.

Kiwibots drivers might work in foreign countries, earning less than U.S. minimum wage. That ignited a brief controversy at UC Berkeley, the Daily Californian reported in 2019, because students were concerned Kiwibot pilots in Colombia were earning the equivalent of $2 an hour, which a company representative said was higher than Colombias minimum wage.

One trick to piloting is getting used to the viewpoint about the height of a small dog. Shaws four video cameras show humans as giants and bigger canines as hippo-size. People rushing past look as if they are going to run right over the bot. Sidewalk signs appear as tank barricades. Swinging doors look like a glass building is suddenly coming at you.

Ive driven through worse, shrugs Shaw, untroubled, except, maybe, for those doors. Someone will open them just as Im passing by and they could get me, she says, speaking as if she were the bot. Youve got to be careful.

Before they start piloting, Coco workers receive 30 hours of paid training, something that was essential for Shaw, who is one of the few pilots without a console gaming background. She was a little nervous at first but began playing video games in her off hours and when I did that, I noticed that I was definitely becoming more skilled at piloting bots.

Most of the other pilots are like Cole Green, 21, a gamer who rivals Tom Brady for sport longevity. Green, who is studying sociology at Santa Monica College, has been playing on XBox since he was 7. In effect, hes had an apprenticeship for bot controlling that has lasted two-thirds of his life.

The gaming made it much easier for me, I already knew about how to handle lags in the timing and how to react and what to do, Green says. The gaming is definitely harder than piloting the bots.

Coco pilot trainer Max Lopez drills in the basics: Always stop at driveways. Always defer to pedestrians. If there is a crowd approaching, just back off to the side and let them pass. And be prepared when children and dogs take a keen interest in the bot.

Sometimes, its more than a keen interest.

The biggest obstructions are people trying to take selfies with the bots, says Carl Hansen, Cocos vice president of government relations.

YouTube brims with videos of people trying to prank or harm bots. One shows kids on scooters zooming ahead of a bot and laying down the scooters in its path, just to see the bot maneuver around the obstacle.

Ive had that happen to me, Shaw says, doing the bot meld thing again.

Shaw likes that its a job she is allowed to do from anywhere. The pay is enough to be comfortable, especially for a student.

Thats really nice, she says. My parents are thrilled that Im earning money doing this.

2022 Los Angeles Times. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Here is the original post:
Who Drives the Food Delivery Bot When Something Goes Wrong? - Government Technology

Posted in Human Longevity | Comments Off on Who Drives the Food Delivery Bot When Something Goes Wrong? – Government Technology

How Google and Amazon bankrolled a ‘grassroots’ activist group of small business owners to lobby against Big Tech oversight – CNBC

Posted: at 2:47 am

The logo of Google is seen on a building at La Defense business and financial district in Courbevoie near Paris, France, September 1, 2020.

Charles Platiau | Reuters

Clay Montgomery owns a small blacksmith shop called "Arrow M Enterprises" outside of Mingus, Texas, where he manufactures hand-forged metal works and grilling tools. He also sells a spicy barbeque sauce and a meat rub called "Bite My Butt."

In recent years, Montgomery's blacksmith shop has been listed as a member of a Washington, D.C.-based trade group called the "Connected Commerce Council" that claims to lobby on behalf of small businesses. On its website, the council describes itself as a non-profit membership organization with a single goal: "to promote small businesses' access to essential digital technologies and tools."

The group, which campaigns against aggressive regulation of big tech companies, also says it wants to ensure "policymakers understand the essential intersection of technology and small business," according to its website.

But there's just one problem: Montgomery says he's not a member and, in fact, has never heard of the Connected Commerce Council. The blacksmith told CNBC he would never join a tech lobbying group in Washington. "Technology is not exactly my forte," he said.

Montgomery isn't the only small business owner bewildered to find their names listed as a member of the Connected Commerce Council, which also goes by "3C." More than 20 other "members" contacted by CNBC said they similarly had never heard of the council and did not know why they were on their membership list.

The council, which pitches itself as a grassroots movement representing small business owners, is actually a well-financed advocacy group funded by tech heavy hitters Google and Amazon. The two tech companies are listed as "partners" on the organization's website. They are also currently the council's sole financial support, 3C spokesman Chris Grimm confirmed to CNBC.

Lobbying watchdog group the Campaign for Accountability called 3C an "Astroturf" lobbying organization, thanks to the tech giants' financial support. That's a bit of Washington slang for a group that claims to represent grassroots entities, but in reality serves as an advocate for big industry. It's a tactic used in Washington to push for specific legislative or regulatory goals using the sympathetic face of mom and pop organizations. The Campaign for Accountability described 3C in a 2019 report as an "Astroturf-style front group for the nation's largest technology companies."

"Big Tech knows that voters and their representatives aren't hugely sympathetic toward the complaints of trillion-dollar corporations, so they've decided to paint small businesses as the real victims of antitrust legislation," said Michelle Kuppersmith, executive director of the Campaign for Accountability.

To be sure, the group does have some active small business members, several of whom told CNBC they value 3C's offerings and agree with its issue advocacy in Washington.

Small business owners like Michelle Thom, owner of and a stylist at "A Wild Hair by Michelle" salon in St. Clair, Minnesota, are considerably more sympathetic to members of Congress than wealthy technology executives. The Connected Commerce Council listed her company on its website as a member, but Thom told CNBC she had never heard of the group and her business should not be on its roster.

The owner of Bud's Barbershop in Wylie, Texas, who declined to give his name, was similarly listed as a member even though he said he has never heard of the group.

Christine Little, whose company, 1058 Auto and Towing in Swansea, South Carolina, was also listed as a member, said she didn't know anything about the council either. "I'm pretty sure I'd probably remember" joining the group, she told CNBC. "We just tow."

And it's not just small firms that told CNBC they aren't sure why they were listed on the 3C website. Until this week, the council also had a page on its website listing its "partners" companies that the website suggested support the council's efforts. That page featured the logos of three tech giants: Amazon, Google and payment processor Square, which recently changed its name to Block.

But Block, which was created by Twitter founder Jack Dorsey, told CNBC it was not actually a partner of the Connected Commerce Council, despite the listing on 3C's website. The Connected Commerce Council pulled Square's logo from its website on Monday after CNBC contacted Block, which said it asked 3C to remove its name.

Grimm said 3C removed Square's logo Monday after CNBC's inquiry because Square is "no longer an active partner of the Connected Commerce Council."

In a statement to CNBC, Connected Commerce Council Executive Director Rob Retzlaff said all of the group's members "affirmatively sign up at events, online, or through a personal connection and thousands have opened emails, responded to surveys, attended meetings and events, and communicated with legislators."

Retzlaff said, "I sincerely hope you do not (a) mischaracterize our efforts or the views of small businesses by suggesting we are an astroturf organization that puts words in people's mouths, or (b) use outdated membership information to distract readers from legitimate concerns of small businesses and their engagement with policymakers."

In February, the group also quietly removed a list of thousands of grassroots members from its website. Grimm, the council's spokesman, said it pulled the list because it fell behind in updating its member list. He said the group has more than 16,000 current members but did not provide a current list of them.

The Connected Commerce Council does not charge fees to its members or bill them for services, Grimm said. It is not clear whether the group has any sources of revenue beyond donations from the large technology companies. Documents filed with the IRS show the group received more than $1.6 million in revenue in 2018. That year, it spent more than $100,000 on a strategic communications firm in Washington.

Spokespeople for Google and Amazon both confirmed that the companies are affiliated with the Connected Commerce Council. They declined to say how much the companies donate, but they did not deny donating.

Facebook was also listed as a partner of 3C as recently as 2020, according to The Washington Post, but has since discontinued its involvement, according to a person familiar with the decision who requested anonymity to speak more candidly. A spokesman for Facebook's parent company, Meta, declined to comment or answer questions about how much money the company has previously given to 3C.

The Connected Commerce Council has been active in shaping the debate around antitrust regulation in Washington. It's worked with an outside lobbying firm, called the Majority Group, for several years to advocate on small business and technology issues on Capitol Hill. In 2021, the group spent $400,000 on lobbying, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. In 2018, the Connected Commerce Council offered public comment to the Federal Trade Commission on antitrust issues, arguing that large technology platforms such as Amazon and others provide benefits to small businesses.

Google spokesman Jose Castaneda sent a statement when asked about the company's involvement in 3C. He said many small businesses are concerned "that Congress's controversial bills could harm the digital tools that they have relied on to adapt, recover and reach new customers throughout the pandemic. We encourage concerned businesses and the organizations that represent them to ask Congress to consider the unintended consequences of these bills for small businesses across the country."

The Connected Commerce Council, which has just 304 followers on Facebook, has been an active advertiser on the platform since its page was created in 2018. Since then, it's spent more than $600,000 on advertising in that time, including more than $9,000 in the last week, according to the company's advertising library, which discloses the sponsors and advertisements in such campaigns.

The ads sponsored by the Connected Commerce Council often support the same positions as the large tech companies that bankroll the group. The tech giants have also been advocating against several bills on Capitol Hill that would impose antitrust rules on the tech firms or make it easier to break them up altogether. One bill, for example, would block companies, including Amazon and Google, from pushing their own products in online marketplaces at the expense of their own competitors.

"Don't let Congress give away America's technological edge. Send a letter," reads one ad sponsored by the Connected Commerce Council in March that's been viewed more than 125,000 times, according to Facebook. A message in the same ad reads, "Harmful legislation in Congress will weaken America's economy and threaten our small businesses."

Another ad running in March refers directly to Amazon, which is one of the companies that finances the Connected Commerce Council. "Amazon Marketplace is at risk," the ad says. "Take this survey and stand up to Congress." The advertisement, which Facebook says has been viewed more than 8,000 times, also asks: "Are you a small business seller? We're counting on your experience to help fight harmful legislation in Congress."

An online survey run on Facebook by the council tells Amazon Marketplace users, "As you may be aware, some elected officials think Amazon is too big, and that is dangerous because we know Amazon helps our members and millions of small businesses sell more products and make more money!"

The council runs like a well-oiled advocacy group. By 2019, 3C's lobbyists had met with 50 members of Congress, filed seven official comments at regulatory agencies and sent two representatives to testify before Congress, according the Campaign for Accountability's 2019 report. The council also "published a raft of materials painting a rosy picture of the tech giants, complete with quotes from small business owners heaping praise on them," the report said.

"For the Connected Commerce Council to succeed, it needs to convince legislators that it's truly advocating on behalf of the more than 10,000 small businesses it claims to represent," said Kuppersmith, executive director of the watchdog group. "However, when you start to peel back the curtain on the organization just a bit, it's clear that this image of enthusiastic antitrust opposition is fueled by Big Tech cash."

The group pointed to plenty of small business owners who are legitimate members. Former 3C board member Mimi Striplin founded the Tiny Tassel in Charleston, South Carolina, which sells jewelry and accessories.

"They're a great resource as a small business to get access to digital tools," she says of the group. 3C "keeps me informed about new bills being passed." Striplin said new antitrust laws could negatively impact the affordability of the digital tools she depends on, such as social media and software to make her products more visible on Google.

Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg speaks during an event on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland January 23, 2019.

Reuters

Striplin's small shop caught the attention of Sheryl Sandberg, chief operating officer of Meta. In 2020, Sandberg designated the Tiny Tassel's earrings as one of her personal picks for Facebook's #BuyBlack Friday gift guide, which encouraged users to support Black-owned businesses. Striplin said the selection of her products by Sandberg was not connected to her membership in 3C.

Current board member Salil Gandhi operates a social media and digital marketing company called SBO Buzz in Chicago. He said the group provided a valuable platform for small business leaders during the Covid pandemic, including offering a regular Zoom happy hour for 15 to 30 small business owners to check in on each other.

"We would get together and have a cocktail and talk about problems we were having, PPP issues, or other problems we were having as small business owners," Gandhi said. "I'm still friends with a lot of the people I met through there."

Gandhi said he doesn't mind that the small business advocacy group is largely funded by big tech companies because small businesses already depend on Google and other firms for free tools to run their operations, including Gmail accounts. "When I look at issues, I look at them from my perspective," he said. "It's not like anybody's ever telling me what to say or what's going on."

Council member Alfred Mai, who founded ASM Games with his wife in 2017, said he relies on Amazon to sell his products and agrees with the group's push against antitrust initiatives in Washington. The company sells card games for social gatherings, including games called "These Cards will Get You Drunk" and "Do You Really Know Your Family?" He says Amazon has been crucial to the success of his business.

"These antitrust, quote unquote, 'break up Big Tech' bills can critically affect my business," Mai said. "This really isn't just about Big Tech it's also about small business."

He said he worries about unintended consequences of congressional action and the possibility that Amazon might be forced to shut down its third-party marketplace site, where he sells his card games.

"I'm not sitting here being brainwashed by an Amazon lobbyist telling me 'this is what you should believe,'" Mai said. "I truly believe it."

CNBC's Bria Cousins and Paige Tortorelli contributed to this report.

Originally posted here:

How Google and Amazon bankrolled a 'grassroots' activist group of small business owners to lobby against Big Tech oversight - CNBC

Posted in Big Tech | Comments Off on How Google and Amazon bankrolled a ‘grassroots’ activist group of small business owners to lobby against Big Tech oversight – CNBC

DOJ backs bills that could kneecap Big Tech – Axios

Posted: at 2:47 am

The Justice Department endorsed House and Senate bills Monday that would keep the biggest digital platforms like Meta, Google, Apple and Amazon from giving preferential treatment to their own products.

Why it matters: Support from the Biden Administration's DOJ gives the bipartisan bills a boost, and shows that the department thinks they can be enforced and help boost tech competition in the U.S.

The big picture: "The fact that the DOJs regulatory goals are consistent with the Hill show the seriousness of the DOJs antitrust concerns in the technology sector," Jeffrey Jacobovitz, senior counsel at law firm Arnall Golden Gregory LLP and former Federal Trade Commission attorney, told Axios.

Driving the news: The Senate Judiciary Committee approved its bill, the American Competition and Innovation Act, in January. A companion bill awaits full House approval.

Yes, but: The bills still have to pass the full Senate and House, and face a packed congressional agenda along with bitter partisanship.

What they're saying: "The Department views the rise of dominant platforms as presenting a threat to open markets and competition, with risks for consumers, business, innovation, resiliency, global competitiveness, and our democracy," the letter, signed by acting assistant attorney general Peter Hyun, reads.

The other side: Tech companies and their defenders have called the bills discriminatory and argued that they would hurt privacy and security, along with taking away services consumers enjoy.

Meanwhile: Last week, Europe pushed ahead with a proposal, the Digital Markets Act, that would ban many of the Big Tech behaviors outlined in the U.S. bills.

Visit link:

DOJ backs bills that could kneecap Big Tech - Axios

Posted in Big Tech | Comments Off on DOJ backs bills that could kneecap Big Tech – Axios

Watchdog Group Publishes Encyclopedia of All the Nasty Things Big Tech Has Done – Gizmodo

Posted: at 2:47 am

Photo: Chip Somodevilla (Getty Images)

If youre reading Gizmodo, odds are youre aware Big Techs gotten itself into trouble before. But between brutal antitrust battles, a lengthening laundry list of lawsuits, and persistent privacy problems, even the most dogged observer can find it difficult to remember the contours of a specific scandal or pinpoint when, exactly, we started thinking about that specific problem with that social network. To that end, the newly formed Tech Oversight Project has devised a one-stop Wiki filled with enough Big Tech badness to clog up a Congressional hearing.

At its launch, the Big Tech Wiki features around 90 separate links to pages on a diverse assortment of topics and issues. Viewers, for example, can find entries explaining Metas lobbying efforts against antitrust legislation listed alongside a breakdown of Googles fraught relationship with the U.S. military. The Wiki also features pages dedicated to Big Tech Lying to Congress and Big Tech as The New Big Tobacco. Many of the titles sound like the Google searches of a worked-up tech critic.

Sacha Haworth, The Oversight Projects Executive Director, spoke exclusively with Gizmodo over the phone to explain the groups reasons for creating the Wiki.

The goal is to provide an encyclopedic reference for those who are trying to learn a bit more about the context and history of Big Tech. We also wanted to remind folks of their [Big Techs] behavior as monopoly powers, Haworth said.

Those spheres of influence include famous jockeying among social media companies and emerging tech but also includes lesser-known areas like fintech and the automotive industry, Haworth said. The organization hopes the Wiki will serve as a useful starting point of information for journalists, staffers working on legislation or general consumers looking to learn more about general Big Tech malfeasance.

In addition to the pages for broader topics and arguments, the Wiki features dozens of handy entries on tech terms, products, and legislative efforts. The creators included the names of lesser-known Big Tech lobbying groups like American Edge, which the Oversight Project describes as a dark-money astroturf group formed by Facebook in 2020 designed to combat potential federal regulations. The Wiki also features a listing calling out the group NetChoice for consistently speaking out against lawsuits potentially threatening Google, one of its clients. Those lesser-known players in Silicon Valleys orbit are poised to take on a more important role in the years to come now that the Internet Association, once the Big Techs primary unified lobbying arm, is officially dead.

The Tech Oversight Project launched earlier this year with the aim of using campaign-style initiatives to hold Big Tech accountable. So far, those efforts have included several reports detailing tech giants hypocrisy on issues like support for an open internet and others that criticized Alphabet, Apple, and Meta for reluctance to work with the U.S. military in developing next-generation artificial intelligence.

The group receives funding from eBay founder Pierre Omidyars left-of-center Omidyar Network and the Economic Security Project. Supporting new antitrust legislation making its way through the U.S. House and Senate sits at the top of the Oversight Projects list of policy goals, an agenda that shines through in the Wiki, with its repeated entries highlighting techs anti-competitive practices.

The Wiki also highlights four featured pages for anyone uninterested in clicking through the entire collection. Those featured pages, which can be interpreted as the Oversight Projects primary areas of interest include Google is a Monopoly, Facebook is a Monopoly, Big Tech and National Security, and Big Tech spreading Anti-Vax.

Haworth said the Wiki, though lengthy, is still far from exhaustive and that the organization plans to continue updating the Wiki with more entries and new information moving forward.

We tried to present this information in a straightforward manner so anyone learning about this for the first or hundredth time could use it as a resource, Haworth said. No matter what your issue with Big Tech is, theres something for everyone here.

See the original post:

Watchdog Group Publishes Encyclopedia of All the Nasty Things Big Tech Has Done - Gizmodo

Posted in Big Tech | Comments Off on Watchdog Group Publishes Encyclopedia of All the Nasty Things Big Tech Has Done – Gizmodo

Local Tennessee officials need to regulate big tech and protect our small businesses | Opinion – Tennessean

Posted: at 2:47 am

Consumers recognize the negative impact Big Tech companies have on the main street shops and businesses that our country was built around.

Raul Lopez| Guest Columnist

Tennessee Voices: A conversation with Raul Lopez

Men of Valor Executive Director Raul Lopez spoke with Tennessean Opinion Editor David Plazas.

Nashville Tennessean

Americans have become increasingly concerned about the monopolistic tendencies of big tech companies. Many of these large tech firms have taken unobstructed action to control our search platforms, limit consumer choice and restrict third-party access to leading digital marketplaces.

Americans are beginning to take notice.

Recent polling by the Washington Post found that 72% of internet users do not trust Facebook to responsibly handle their personal information. Another poll found that 68% of American adults say major tech companies have too much power and influence in todays economy.

Hear more Tennessee Voices: Get the weekly opinion newsletter for insightful and thought provoking columns.

One way to restore trust between big tech and the general public is for Congress to beef up our countrys anti-competition laws, consumer data regulations and the ability for tech companies to suppress information, dictate consumer spending and search habits.

Big Tech has deliberately maneuvered themselves into monopolistic positions. Their rise to the top has left many in their wake, including many of Americas small businesses and the everyday consumer. In addition, big tech and social media platforms regularly silence or de-platform voices they disagree withincluding conservatives and people of faith.

Thankfully a bipartisan coalition of voices in Congress have finally decided enough is enough. The American Innovation and Choice Online Act is now in front of lawmakers.

Tennessee's very own Senator Marsha Blackburn who serves on both the Judiciary Committee and the Commerce, Science & Transportation Committee has been a trusted advocate on addressing big tech overreach.

More: Marsha Blackburn: Whats the key to keeping kids safe online? Big Tech bipartisanship. | Opinion

If enacted, this bill would create a series of updated rules and enforcement mechanisms to effectively regulate big techs anti-competitive practices;like unfair personal preference for a platforms products or services and obvious discrimination against other businesses and products.

The hope is that these common-sense regulations would act as a deterrent to big techs monopolistic behavior while also allowing small businesses to gain back a portion of the market share that has been taken from them.

Americas small business community is made up of a diverse, driven and resilient population of citizens. Citizens have relied on the prospect of the American Dream to support their families and communities.

Hear from Tennessee's Black Voices: Get the weekly newsletter for powerful and critical thinking columns.

Big Techs actions have had a direct impact on the opportunity and viability to achieve success as a small business ownerespecially within Latino and other minority communities.

It is also no secret to the American consumer that these corporations have harmed the opportunity for the small business community to thrive. Consumers recognize the negative impact big tech companies have on the main street shops and businesses that our country was built around.

Many rural and small towns that used to be the hub of American innovation and the entrepreneurial spirit now appear desolate, having suffered from anti-competitive practices and unfair treatment by big tech.

For the good of the American small business community, the American consumer, the livelihood of millions and for the continued prospect of the American dream, it is now more urgent than ever for our leaders in Congress to address the monopolistic tendencies and overreach of big tech. The rules and regulations that govern big tech must be rewritten to provide actual protections for consumers and business owners alike.

Raul Lopez is the executive director for Latinos for Tennessee, an organization committed to promoting faith, family, freedom and fiscal responsibility.

Follow this link:

Local Tennessee officials need to regulate big tech and protect our small businesses | Opinion - Tennessean

Posted in Big Tech | Comments Off on Local Tennessee officials need to regulate big tech and protect our small businesses | Opinion – Tennessean

In a Climate Crisis, the Future Relies Alarmingly on Big Tech – The New York Times

Posted: at 2:47 am

A HOUSE BETWEEN THE EARTH AND THE MOONBy Rebecca Scherm

Rebecca Scherms second novel, A House Between the Earth and the Moon, centers on Parallaxis, a space station designed by the tech corporation Sensus as an orbital luxury condo for billionaires. Sensus has hired a team of world-class scientists to construct the station and make it habitable long-term. In return, they are told, they and their families can live there, safe from the catastrophic climate change that is devastating society below. They are not told they will also be experimental subjects; Sensus is using the station to test Views, its new, top-secret surveillance and behavioral modification system.

The novel makes us feel the terror of a 2030s Earth where extreme weather events are so common that whole cities routinely burn to the ground and even the affluent have become nomadic, always one step ahead of natural disasters. Mass deaths are a staple of daily news, and privacy is a thing of the past, available only by going off the grid and doing without the evacuation alerts that would warn of approaching floods or wildfires. We share the desperation of Alex, whose work on carbon-extracting algae has become a race against time: He wanted to save his planet, and with each disastrous year, his work became more necessary and less possible.

Just as frightening is the depiction of space-station life, where all necessities must be flown in from a dying Earth, and weight restrictions mean that everyone wears combo clothes that come in packets the size of a deck of cards. The fake sky has a glitching panel; walls meant to have a pearlescent glow look like packing material; the air is kept safe by technology still in the process of development. The inhabitants also live at the mercy of Sensus, and the reader never loses the sense of how precarious this existence is, and how terrifying it is to depend on the whims of corporate bosses for ones survival. In that regard, it feels a lot like life on Earth in 2022.

The authors clear, relatable voice and close personal focus make the book compulsively readable. Scherm spends as much time on the questions of whether Alex will be able to heal his marriage and how his teenage daughter will deal with a cyber-bullying incident as she does on global catastrophe. Plotlines proliferate at all levels. One of the most absorbing sections concerns Rachel Son, one of the co-founders (with her sister, Katherine) of Sensus, who is sent to the space station by her dominating sibling despite her abject terror, and rapidly disintegrates from anxiety and alienation.

The approach does have pitfalls, however. It ultimately feels peculiar that the Son sisters are treated primarily as people with ordinary problems, even as they test and implement Views, their mass mind-control project. The Views plotline, meanwhile, is shown from the perspective of a lonely data scientist, Tess, who is given access to the visual feeds of Parallaxis employees and their families and becomes consumed by voyeurism, living vicariously through her subjects to the point of stalking. Scherm manages the difficult trick of making us care about these essentially unsympathetic characters, but neglects to explain how Views is meant to work, or why hiring Tess to watch their subjects go to the bathroom would be of use. Similar weaknesses undercut the novels ending, which focuses on individual emotions in a way that feels increasingly trivial, while failing to offer a convincing resolution to the political and environmental crises.

But in general, A House Between the Earth and the Moon is a thought-provoking and absorbing read. By deftly combining the subjects of big tech and climate change, Scherm has created a world that fully embodies the anxiety and indignity of our times.

Read this article:

In a Climate Crisis, the Future Relies Alarmingly on Big Tech - The New York Times

Posted in Big Tech | Comments Off on In a Climate Crisis, the Future Relies Alarmingly on Big Tech – The New York Times