Daily Archives: March 13, 2022

Tolerating COVID Misinformation Is Better Than the Alternative – The Atlantic

Posted: March 13, 2022 at 8:21 am

On December 30, 2019, Li Wenliang, an ophthalmologist at Wuhan Central Hospital in Hubei, China, began to warn friends and colleagues about the outbreak of a novel respiratory illness. Four days later, he was summoned to appear before local authorities, who reprimanded him for making false comments that severely disturbed the social order.

In hindsight, Li was the first person accused of disseminating medical misinformation during the coronavirus pandemic, despite the fact that he was telling the truth. And as the virus spread, many other countries decided that the emergence of a deadly new disease warranted new restrictions on what people say. Human Rights Watch reports that at least 83 governments used the pandemic to justify violating the exercise of free speech.

The United States has avoided the worst excesses of this global authoritarian turn. The First Amendment constrains its government from infringing on freedom of speech. And many Americans reliably object to nongovernmental attempts to suppress ideas, favoring the liberal notion that the remedy for speech that is false is speech that is true, as Justice Anthony Kennedy once put it.

But like wars, terrorist attacks, and other events that confront us with mass death, pandemics cause some people to doubt the liberal project and to clamor for an alternative that feels safer. So a growing faction in the U.S. feels that, when it comes to medical misinformation, liberal remedies for false, unreasoned, or uninformed speech are insufficient to our new pandemic realityas if being wrong on most subjects is permissible, but being wrong on COVID-19 is too costly to tolerate.

Read: Whats the harm in medical misinformation?

The First Amendment hasnt kept public officials from calling upon Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and other tech platforms to restrict false or misleading claims about vaccination and other COVID-related issues. The White House has urged tech companies to censor individuals engaged in protected speech. Senator Amy Klobuchar introduced legislation in hopes of pressuring social-media companies to do more to prevent the spread of deadly vaccine misinformation. And the government can apply pressure on private speech in other ways: The Department of Homeland Security, for example, is characterizing misinformation as a terrorism threat. All of these efforts reflect a judgment that, at least on pandemic matters, the liberal approach to dissent has greater costs than benefits.

But that judgment is mistaken. During past crises, even wars, the case for liberal speech norms remained so strong that Americans look back on departures from them with regret. Likewise, I can think of at least four reasons why neither government officials nor corporate bosses should try to protect the public by newly restricting the expression of ideas, even during a pandemic.

Proponents of aggressive measures to restrict misinformation imagine that by preventing others from being exposed to falsehoods about vaccines, they will only increase trust in science. But my early confidence in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines and my willingness to urge others to get vaccinated was inextricably tied to my confidence that all relevant information, including dissenting perspectives, was making its way into public discourse where countless people could interrogate it, rather than being suppressed by public or private actors with unknown motives. The author Jonathan Rauch calls that process of unconstrained public deliberation liberal science, and I suspect that faith in it was especially important for vaccine uptake in the U.S., as Americans report having low trust in government relative to citizens in other wealthy countries.

If youre vaccinated, think back to before you got the jab and ask yourself: If the Trump administration had announced that federal employees werent allowed to spread misinformation about any of the vaccines supported by Operation Warp Speed, or if Facebook had suppressed all personal stories of vaccine side effects, would that have caused you to trust the vaccines more or less?

As a general matter, no person or group or office is capable of assessing what facts or viewpoints constitute misinformation so reliably as to justify censorship based on their conclusions. A concept as malleable as misinformation tends to be interpreted in biased or self-serving waysand not only by the Chinese government. After Puerto Rico enacted a prohibition on spreading false information about emergencies in 2020, the ACLU filed a challenge on behalf of two journalists who feared the laws would stifle legitimate reporting on the governments COVID response.

Even if a reliable judge of misinformation did exist in a given jurisdiction, that person likely wouldnt be the one who decides which ideas are restricted. And even if, for the first time in history, an infallible judge of misinformation was identified and put in charge of restricting ideas, they would still lack popular legitimacy. Many people would disagree and rebel against that judges decisions.

Restricting misinformation during this pandemic is especially unlikely to be viable because the scientific consensus continues to evolve, as does the virus itself. So far, the prevailing advice to get vaccinated has served those who took it extremely well, but variants could emerge that pose a greater challenge to existing vaccines. If efficacy drops off, people should be able to discuss that in real time, without having those discussions labeled as misinformation.

The free-speech advocate Nadine Strossen is among those tracking real-life situations in which public- or private-sector authorities have wrongly accused people of spreading misinformation. The Puerto Rican government charged a prominent clergyman with allegedly disseminating false information on WhatsApp about a rumored executive order to close all businesses, she reported in Tablet last year. In fact, only a short time later, the governor did issue such an order.

Strossen also notes that YouTube took down a video in which Nicole Malliotakis, then a New York State legislator, announced that she was suing thenNew York City Mayor Bill de Blasio over his vaccine-passport directive. Malliotakis declared the policy an invasion of privacy. That, Strossen writes, is a position that the Supreme Court might well end up sharing. YouTube initially deemed the video a violation of its misinformation policy, though the service ultimately restored the clip. Whether or not YouTube actually had a good-faith health reason for its initial removal, Strossen notes, the vague policy can easily be invoked as a pretext, masking other motives.

Read: When your doctor is on TikTok

The backlash against Americans who try to cancel others or to shut down conversations rather than engage in them is so widespread that many attempts to deplatform a person inspire others to rally around the target, increasing their fame and reach as well as support for their views.

I suspect that this happens again and again partly for psychological reasons that the political psychologist Karen Stenner describes in The Authoritarian Dynamic. As she explains it, people with authoritarian predispositions want to suppress difference and achieve uniformity, a project that requires autocratic social arrangements in which individual autonomy yields to group authority.

But when they try to force everyone to adopt a social consensus for the greater good (for example, Vaccines are good; everyone must get one, and no one must speak ill of them) the people who are most averse to uniformity and protective of difference and diversity suddenly rebel.

These rebels have little concern for the uses of collective authority until other peoples ambitions for its usage suggest that they ought to take an interest in its limits, Stenner writes. But when autonomy and diversity seem to be in jeopardy, deemed by those with less stomach for public discord and partisan strife to be too risky for the collective, they bolster their commitment to tolerance of difference and opposition to social conformity. I recognize that psychology in myself. When liberal free-speech norms are secure, I focus on the substance of debates, such as the overwhelming evidence that getting vaccinated reduces ones risk of death. But once liberal norms are threatened, as when anti-vaxxers are deplatformed, Im less interested in the substance of what people are saying than in defending their ability to say it.

Andy Carvin and Graham Brookie: Heres how to fight coronavirus misinformation

The podcaster Joe Rogan has attracted criticism for interviews with vaccine-skeptical guests who made false or misleading claims. Accuracy is worth defending for its own sake, so I wish Rogan would do more to probe dubious claims by guests and to flag and correct statements that prove false. And I dont dismiss the possibility that his podcast influenced some to forgo jabs or the possibility that some unvaccinated listeners died. The hundreds of medical professionals and scientists who signed an open letter urging Spotify, which carries Rogans show, to adopt an anti-misinformation policy are clearly hoping that more assertive content moderation will save lives.

But the evidence for that conclusion is insufficient. As my colleague Daniel Engber has written:

Vaccine refusal, in its broadest sense, has taken a catastrophic toll in the United States But the claim that pandemic falsehoods aired on Rogans show are substantially responsible ignores the sticky facts of our predicament. Surveys now suggest that roughly one in six American adults says they wont get vaccinated for COVID-19. Thats roughly what the surveys showed over the summer; its also roughly what the surveys showed in the summer of 2020, when the pandemic was still young. One in six adults, some 45 million Americans in all, is seemingly immune to any change of context or information. One in six adultsa solid tumor on our public health that doesnt grow or shrink.

Perhaps Americas pandemic performance would be better in a world without The Joe Rogan Experience. But it could be that the vaccination rate would be unchanged in that alternate reality, because podcasts arent an important driver of attitudes toward vaccination, or because vaccine skeptics tend to find voices who question the mainstream regardless. Maybe the shows theyd seek out but for Rogan would be less responsible than he is. Maybe Rogans pro-vaccine guests were uniquely able to reach skeptics via his podcast, while Rogan listeners who found vaccine-skeptical guests persuasive were already anti-vax and unlikely to change.

Admittedly, if I were forced to bet on the proposition that COVID-19 misinformation on a popular podcast or cable-news show did some harm, Id bet yes. But restricting discourse based on mere circumstantial evidence of harm is an authoritarian standard.

Thats not to say that private companies must never engage in censorship in the name of avoiding harm. If someone posted a recipe with poisonous ingredients, or a message directing another person to commit suicide or violence against others, I would not object if Facebook removed it.

But any speech limitationpublic or privateneeds a clear limiting principle. The Supreme Court set a useful standard in defining illegal incitement: to qualify, statements must be directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and likely to incite or produce such action. Any standards for taking down alleged misinformation online should be similarly demanding. A free society should not attempt to shut down speakers whom millions of people want to hear based on speculative claims that some of their viewpoints cause unquantifiable harm.

It would be nice if everyone agreed about how to fight COVID-19. But normally, Americans understand that this is a huge, populous, multicultural, pluralistic country where diversity and difference are inescapable. In almost every dispute of consequence, tens of millions of us are right and tens of millions of us are wrong. Yet when it comes to COVID-19 vaccines, the fact that a minority of Americans have refused to get a shot is being treated as evidence of a misinformation crisis for which media and tech companies are responsible. The presumption is that if not for a dysfunctional information environment, uptake would be universal.

In fact, vaccine skepticism is a phenomenon as old as vaccines, manifesting across centuries of outbreaks that took place in wildly different information-technology environments. More broadly, the unfortunate truth is that all of us are misinformed and incorrect about many important matters, not because of technology-driven misinformation but because of enduring human fallibility.

Americans need only look abroadfor instance, to Li Wenliangs experienceto verify that abusive actors invoke the need to fight pandemic misinformation specifically to increase their own power and infringe on liberty. While much harm might be avoided if any misinformation a human was about to utter was magically muted, there is no way, in a world without such magic, to suppress misinformation without stymieing difference and debate on every matter of consequence.

Go here to read the rest:
Tolerating COVID Misinformation Is Better Than the Alternative - The Atlantic

Posted in Freedom of Speech | Comments Off on Tolerating COVID Misinformation Is Better Than the Alternative – The Atlantic

Texas A&M vs Tennessee SEC Championship odds, tips and betting trends – USA TODAY Sportsbook Wire

Posted: at 8:19 am

The SEC conference title and an automatic spot in the NCAA Tournament bracket are on the line when the No. 2 seed Tennessee Volunteers (25-7, 14-4 SEC) and the No. 8 Texas A&M Aggies (23-11, 9-9 SEC) meet on Sunday at 1:00 PM. Tennessee is favored by 6.5 points for this pivotal matchup.

Rankings courtesy of the Ferris Mowers Coaches Poll powered by USA TODAY Sports.

Get ready for this SEC matchup with everything you need to know about Sundays college basketball action.

Odds provided by Tipico Sportsbook; access USA TODAY Sports Scores and Sports Betting Odds hub for a full list.

Lets Make This Interesting Place your legal sports bets online in New Jersey and Colorado with Tipico Sportsbook, a trusted, global sports-betting leader. Iowa, get ready, Tipico is coming to your state soon! New customer offer: Deposit $10 or more, get $100 in instant bet credits! 21+, see Tipico.com for Terms and Conditions. Bet now!

PLAY: Free, daily sports pickem contests and win prizes. Play now!

Bet legally online with a trusted partner: Tipico Sportsbook, our official sportsbook partner in CO, NJ and, soon, IA. Bet now!

If youre looking for more sports betting picks and tips, access all of our content at SportsbookWire.com and BetFTW. Please gamble responsibly.

Follow SportsbookWire on Twitter and like us on Facebook.

Gannett may earn revenue from Tipico for audience referrals to betting services. Tipico has no influence over nor are any such revenues in any way dependent on or linked to the newsrooms or news coverage. See Tipico.com for Terms and Conditions. 21+ only. Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ), 1-800-522-4700 (CO), 1-800-BETS-OFF (IA).

Read this article:

Texas A&M vs Tennessee SEC Championship odds, tips and betting trends - USA TODAY Sportsbook Wire

Posted in Sports Betting | Comments Off on Texas A&M vs Tennessee SEC Championship odds, tips and betting trends – USA TODAY Sportsbook Wire

Jeen-Yuhs Act Three brings the Kanye trilogy to a close, shining a harsh light on the icon’s fall from grace – Epigram

Posted: at 8:18 am

By Mathilda O'Neill, Third Year, Film & Television with Innovation

Following a time skip of six years, Act III Awakening deals with the Kanye we know today. The new difficult, offensive and unfortunately unstable Kanye. In footage that feels increasingly hard to watch, the reality of Yes existence is exposed with brutal honesty.

So here we are at the end. What was once a joyous capturing of Yes rise ends - as T.S. Elliot put it not with a bang, but with a whimper. Theres a kind of sick irony in this final act, with three hours dedicated essentially to the thrill and excitement of his rise, now that his utter faith in himself has come to fruition, the victory is hollow and only seems to bring him alienation.

Kanyes controversies have finally come into focus, with the inclusion of footage from his 2020 pep rally and backed up with his own words during Coodies filming, these topics are at last up for discussion. In this act, Ye makes a number of statements that are morally abhorrent and politically dangerous. At multiple points he rambles incoherently about his relationship with God, and somehow connects this with abortion and the moral failure he believes it to be.

In fact, incoherent doesnt do these moments justice: they are troubling, not the leapfrogging political nonsense of a Jordan Peterson or Ben Shapiro but genuinely difficult to watch because of the display of mental instability they truly are. His controversial views are expressed as blind ramblings, propped up by a circle of blind lemmings whod never dream of saying anything against him. This is not to condone his words but rather convey the genuinely difficult experience of watching them be expressed.

The causes for this arent dissected and spelled plainly out for the audience, but are rather gestured to and for this directors Simmons and Oozah deserve a great deal of praise. In this acts opening moments, were taken back to 2002 to see Rhymefest take Ye to task for describing himself as a genius saying: Who are you to call yourself a genius For you to feel disrespected, cause somebody dont think youre something, you gotta get yourself together man. Ye replies I just feel like it was really funny for me to even get offended by you not calling me genius. Like how arrogant is that?

His days as a rising star are long gone, Ye is now, undoubtedly, on the mountaintop and no longer has to trouble himself being around people who wont tell him exactly what he wants to hear. The tragedy here is that this clip shows he welcomes it, and now the uninterrupted ramblings of the more recent footage seem a desperate attempt for someone to simply tell him no.

Aside from aspects of the time spent in Japan, this means the final act is missing warmth, humanity and excitement, attributes the previous two acts had in spades. I dont mean this to be disparaging; of course this tonal gap lays bare the hollowness of his current existence. The capturing of lightning in a bottle quality of Coodies filming has been replaced with a sense of desperation, as this long-time friend can seemingly think of no other way of helping Ye than fostering an understanding of how he became this way.

Kanyes current wellbeing and moral character are inescapable in reviewing this conclusion and seemingly in any discussions of Kanye West currently. The concurrence between the arrival of this documentary and yet another of his controversies feels almost inevitable now. Watching this final act, I realised that his infamous pep rally has basically fallen out of public memory, and wondered when the same could be said for his current obsession with Pete Davidson.

The portrayal of Yes mental health makes it feel doomed to deteriorate and as a result so will the controversies. It illustrated just how unlikely it is for things to get better and at the end of this I didnt feel the same way about being an avid fan of his music.

Act III sits you down and takes the shine off of the apple of being a Ye fan, and thats (unfortunately) a good thing.

Featured Image: Netflix/IMDB

How do you feel about Kanye's place in popular culture?

Excerpt from:

Jeen-Yuhs Act Three brings the Kanye trilogy to a close, shining a harsh light on the icon's fall from grace - Epigram

Posted in Jordan Peterson | Comments Off on Jeen-Yuhs Act Three brings the Kanye trilogy to a close, shining a harsh light on the icon’s fall from grace – Epigram

Joe Rogan and the Search for Transcendence – The Gospel Coalition | Canada – The Gospel Coalition Africa

Posted: at 8:18 am

Living in Montreal, I am used to encountering deeply secular people. No heaven above, no hell below, no God at all. Can you even show me one solid piece of evidence for your God? Why would you believe in old debunked myths? These are the kinds of questions they ask. How does one share the hope of the gospel with such people?

Depending on the particular stripe of unbelief, it may be to poke holes in the materialist fortress, to point out self-evident echoes of eternity in their own beliefs, to show the moral implications of atheism, or any number of similar approaches. All of these are types of pre-evangelism: tilling up the hard ground of unbelief so that the seeds of faith in Jesus might have a chance to grow.

Over the last few years, however, Ive been bumping into another kind of person who is asking very different kinds of questions: Are the spiritual beings around us benevolent or malevolent? How can we more deeply connect to the spiritual realm? Or, like one young man asked me: Can I ever be free from the spiritual forces I opened myself up to by engaging in occult practices?

In another case, a new convert at my church shared with me how, soon before coming to Christ, she had travelled to Brazil to experience a shaman-guided experience with the psychedelic Ayahuasca. Thankfully the ceremony was cancelled at the last minute. These are people with a very different set of beliefs than the typical secular young person, and they lead to very different conversations.

What is going on here? It seemed to me that I was encountering a new wave of the New Age.

Growing up, the people I knew of who were into New Age beliefs and practices were generally middle-aged women. In high school, the mother of one of my friends had a room in their house where she spoke to angels. For a few bucks, she could even tell you what they had to say.I avoided that room there were lots of strange things hanging from the ceiling.

Then there was Oprah, who symbolized the smiling non-threatening face of New Age spirituality.All of this seemed to me far more like wishful thinking, scams, and mushy sentimentality than anything engaged with serious spiritual forces.

So my assumption was that the appeal of the New Age was mostly for that demographic. The young people I encountered were either deeply secular or, if their families had not had a decisive break from organized religion, mildly theistic.

While New Age beliefs never went away, they certainly fell off my radar for a few years. Around the time of Jordan Petersons rise to fame, I became aware, like many others, of an online world where serious conversations were taking place in long-form podcasts and YouTube interviews. The format seemed to foster nuanced, open, and surprisingly deep conversations at a time when the content of primetime news shows was devolving into 90-second shouting matches between talking heads.

One strange little corner of that online world was Joe Rogans podcast. With marathon 3-hour episodes of shall we say wildly varying quality, no one (least of all Joe) expected it to become so popular. Rogan is vulgar and blunt, but he has a winsome personality, a good dollop of common sense, and perhaps his most dynamic qualities: an insatiable curiosity and a capacity for wonder. Listen to him and his guests talk about grizzly bears or ancient Egypt and youll quickly find your own curiosity and wonder awakened.

Recent controversies have continued to polarize opinion about him and, ironically, broaden his reach. To some he is a dangerous purveyor of misinformation who platforms discredited and dangerous fringe thinkers (and to be fair, he certainly talks to some strange folks); to others he is a voice of sanity and one of the few remaining spaces where free speech is defended. But one thing is for sure: his audience is massive, easily eclipsing other podcasts and cable news shows. And the lions share of that audience seems to be young men millions of them.

These are the men facing the meaning crisis the existential inheritance of postmodernism. Or, more simply, the meaning crisis is what happens to a soul when you teach it that everything is a cosmic accident and therefore nothing has any real or ultimate meaning. They have no interest in organized religion, but they love the masculine competence and self-respect that the podcast exudes.

To these young people, Rogan offers not only entertainment through interesting interviews but also a taste of re-enchantment through his curiosity and wonder, the promises of technology, and his experiences and endorsements of psychedelic substances as gateways to wisdom and knowledge. This is where I see a connection between Joe Rogans massive popularity and influence and the unexpected reappearance of New Age spirituality in young people.

In this article, I want to focus on aspects of Rogans project that I think the church should take note of because they are illustrative of much broader societal trends which present Christians with both challenges and opportunities. But first, lets see how this fits within the broader cultural narrative.

In his book Return of the Strong Gods, R.R. Reno, editor of First Things magazine, shows how the disenchantment a kind of spiritual malaise that has spread across the West is not simply a byproduct of secularization but the result of a specific strategy adopted in the aftermath of the two World Wars.

Traumatized by the horrors of Auschwitz, Western intellectuals embraced what Reno calls the post-war consensus, the idea that strong beliefs, convictions, and claims to truth are what give rise to the passions that caused such atrocities. In order to ensure that such things never happen again, these strong gods were cast out and replaced with weak ones: pillars of objective truth gave way to plastic values, solid moral virtues dissolved into liquid cultural preferences.

If this is the case and I found the argument of Renos book to be, on the whole, persuasive then the intentional suppression of the human hunger for transcendence in the West since the end of the second World War dovetailed with the natural effects of secularization to create a situation where souls have been starved for a taste of eternity as never before.

This dual process of secularization and suppression brought low the ceiling of the world and drained the vibrant colors of life to a paltry grey, leaving young people with a gnawing hunger to come into contact with something beyond what they can see and touch, to be swept up into something bigger than themselves.

Like a mighty river held back by a hastily-built dam, this God-given hunger was artificially restrained. But now it seems to be breaking forth as that dam comes apart in pieces. The wave of re-enchantment washing across the West manifests itself in various ways. In what follows, I select just three streams that have struck me as particularly relevant to Christians, the third of which will bring us back to Joe Rogan.

Many seek and find an echo of transcendence in the crusader-like pursuit of political and cultural goals.[1]Invariably these beliefs take the shape of grand narratives that mimic the Biblical story, including some pristine Edenic state, a fall into sin, a path of righteousness, and an eschatological hope. Radical environmentalism, the LGBTQ activist movement, and the progressive Left all fit this pattern and hold increasing cultural and institutional influence in our day.

Some movements on the far-Right such as white nationalism take the same general shape and likewise require a whole-life commitment. Many have noted the religious even fundamentalist ethos of these movements, and that those who join them tend to be not only irreligious but also to come from fatherless or broken homes. Those who are without the nourishing roots of faith and family cast about for a cause to live for and a family to join.[2]

Many in our day are irreligious but dissatisfied with the cold cavern that is staunch atheism. Nothing beautiful grows there. So where do they turn? Some thanks be to God respond to the faithful apologetics and evangelism of genuine believers. Others take more circuitous routes back towards Christianity, such as those influenced by the work of Canadian psychologist and public intellectual Jordan Peterson. Speaking in the idiom of psychology and in explicitly evolutionary terms, he has been able to get a hearing with a whole swath of people who for one reason or another would not look to a Bible-believing church for the answers to their spiritual malaise.

And yet, as many have pointed out, Peterson has served as a kind of gateway-drug such that some of these people have become genuine believers, entering the Kingdom ahead of their teacher. We baptized one such young man in our church not too long ago. The challenge for such converts may be learning to move beyond YouTube videos and integrating fully into healthy local churches.

This third form of re-enchantment brings us back to Joe Rogan. Raised vaguely Catholic in an abusive home, he has no interest in the Bible or Christianity. And despite the almost dizzying array of guests he has had on his podcast, I am not aware of a single solid Christian among them, a fact which makes one suspect a certain avoidance.

Rogan represents this third subset of those who are groping for the transcendent. They seem to intuit that ideology-driven utopias are wrong-headed an instinct which inoculates them to the appeal of the first stream above but see any kind of return to organized religion as a step backwards. And so they turn to things which promise at least a taste of re-enchantment in our late-modern world. Among them, we now consider two which come up perennially in Rogans endless hours of conversation: technology and psychedelics.

Technology advances our mastery over the material world and the limitations of our bodies. It amazes us even as it reshapes us in subtle ways. For those without the hope of eternity or the expectation of a future Kingdom, the hope offered by technological advance can have an incredible pull.

For example, Joe Rogan is very excited about Elon Musks Neuralink, an embedded brain-machine interface that promises you the ability to control computers and machines with just your thoughts as soon as you let a robot-surgeon implant the microchip directly in your brain. (Its like a Fitbit in your skull with tiny wires, says Musk. Ill pass). The first human trials are due to start this year.

There is a messianic flavor to the hope such people place in technology, but also a readiness to treat the human body like merely a biological machine that can be tampered with at will. At the heart of this approach is the imposition of the human will on nature, something very much akin to the practice of magic both ancient and modern. C.S. Lewis explains:

There is something which unites magic and applied science while separating both from the wisdom of earlier ages. For the wise men of old the cardinal problem had been how to conform the soul to reality, and the solution had been knowledge, self-discipline, and virtue. For magic and applied science alike the problem is how to subdue reality to the wishes of men: the solution is a technique; and both, in the practice of this technique, are ready to do things hitherto regarded as disgusting and impioussuch as digging up and mutilating the dead.[3]

Or such as splicing microchips into peoples brains.

But the idea that technology can elicit wonder and amazement what we would call worship is not a new idea. Historian Davie Nye refers to the technological sublime and Ross Douthat picks up on this in his recent book, The Decadent Society, noting how technological achievements can give people the same sense of awe that natural beauty does and even bring them together in a profound shared experience. Skyscrapers, the Hoover Dam, and the Apollo space program are some examples that come to mind. In a similar vein, John Piper has repeatedly made the point throughout his ministry that there is something innate about the human soul that seeks grandeur, majesty, glory we go to the Grand Canyon to feel small in the presence of something big.

These concepts flow together and help explain why people are so drawn to every new technological development. There is something transcendent, a kind of gravitational pull of glory, drawing their souls in whether they recognize it or not. For those young people today who are blinded to the soul-satisfying Lord of Glory (1 Cor. 2:8, James 2:1), technology can provide a pale imitation. But for parched souls, even a few drops is welcome.

We now turn to the last but most foreboding thing I have noticed on Joe Rogans podcast. For years he has been openly advocating for the use of various psychedelic and mind-altering substances as pathways to mental, emotional, and spiritual growth. He not only shares his own experiences but often has guests on his show who discuss and encourage them as well.

The promise that ingesting the right food might unlock hidden knowledge should strike the Christian ear with a dark echo where have we heard this before? Our first parents were told a version of this very same promise in the garden. Milton put that temptation memorably in the words of the serpent:

And what are Gods that Man may not become

As they, participating God-like food?[4]

It is for this reason that Terrence McKenna, one of the early proponents of psychedelics, titled his book Food of the Gods and, building on that legacy, Graham Hancock one of Rogans favourite repeat guests has written Fingerprints of the Gods and Magicians of the Gods. Hancock gives a wholehearted endorsement of psychedelics as a pathway to ancient knowledge and wisdom.

What is not often said up front is that such knowledge and wisdom is mediated through mysterious entities and intelligences that one encounters during these experiences. While some believe these entities to be constructions of their own subconscious minds, many others are certain that they are coming in contact with non-human beings.

We are now well into the territory of the New Age movement and even the occult. Christians have categories for such beings, and it should be clear that any entity making contact through an activity that is explicitly forbidden in the Scriptures is not in submission to God.

But I can see why people would be drawn to these beliefs and practices. They offer what seems like a meaningful connection to the spiritual realm. They also work much like conspiracy theories, appealing to ones pride by promising a secret insider knowledge of the world. People engaged in the New Age can and do make contact with personal spiritual forces, and aside from the thrill of that experience, there is the added buzz that comes from knowing something that so much of society seems oblivious to.

New Age beliefs and practices also make no personal moral demands. There are no ten commandments, no golden rule, no ultimate moral Judge. This makes it particularly compatible with the moral relativism of our age and the ongoing sexual revolution. Lastly, there is no creed or structure of authority like in a church. This resonates with our current cultural suspicion of authority and institutions.

Rogan is emblematic of a broader movement of otherwise respectable people intellectuals, celebrities,[5] journalists, scientists who are increasingly looking to psychedelics for revelations, wisdom, and to quiet the incessant inner dialogue of the restless self. The dark cloud of opprobrium that hung over the whole psychedelic project in the age of the 60s counter-culture and Timothy Leary has largely dissipated.

A new generation has come of age. This movement seems poised to continue as mainstream academic and medical institutions begin taking the therapeutic potential of these substances more seriously through clinical trials and research. In Canada, for example, the government has begun the process of approving psychedelics for certain cases and making them available for doctors to try.[6]

The Biblical prohibitions and numerous testimonies from users of these drugs make it clear that this is spiritually dangerous. I would never advise anyone to take them. And yet what many people may not know is that there is a growing body of evidence that these substances, used in controlled environments and with low dosages, can be helpful in alleviating various ailments such as depression, OCD, PTSD, and compulsive addictions.

Frankly I am not sure what to do with that, not being any kind of expert on these things. But given our cultures unquestioning adoption of therapeutic categories, it is hard to see how the general public, and probably some professing Christians, will be able to resist the purported benefits of psychedelics.[7] After all, spiritual harm is no longer a meaningful category.

One need not be a prophet to see that the use of psychedelics will be on the rise for some time to come, and by all indications Canada will be on the leading edge. How long before pastors in this country are facing questions about the use of psychedelics to treat mental health problems?

Is it possible that some will come to see a distinction between responsible medical use of such substances and purely recreational use? I dont pretend to know. We do know however from church history that theological and ethical clarity comes when the church is forced to confront new challenges. We will have to think carefully and biblically about how to navigate such questions.

When that young man I mentioned at the beginning asked me if he could be free from spiritual oppression, it was a wide-open door for me to share with him about how Jesus Christ is Lord and King of all creation, with absolute unquestioned authority over every spiritual being. Christs death on the cross and glorious resurrection disarmed and defeated those spirits who live in rebellion against Him. It was amazing to me to be speaking about these profound truths without having to first argue about theism or the supposed conflict between reason and faith.

As the process of re-enchantment continues, I believe we will see more and more people dissatisfied with the hollow cave of materialistic atheism and seeking experiences of the transcendent. Will the church be ready to offer compelling answers to their questions? And will the worship and fellowship of the church be so imbued with the presence and power of God that visitors stop and say God is really among you (1 Cor. 14:25)?

May God move in mighty ways to not only draw the lost to Himself but to revive our churches to be vibrant outposts of Kingdom life. Will you notrevive us again, that your people mayrejoice in you? (Psalm 85:6). By Gods good design, many people are searching, seeking in politics, psychology, or psychedelics what they can only truly find in Him life eternal and union with the holy and Transcendent One.

[1] Although numerous thinkers have pointed this out, Im indebted to an essay by Joseph Bottum from 2014 called The Spiritual Shape of Political Ideas found here: https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/weekly-standard/the-spiritual-shape-of-political-ideas.

[2] See the work of Mary Eberstadt for an exploration of this connection between broken families and the loss of faith.

[3] C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man, 77.

[4] John Milton, Paradise Lost, Book 9, Lines 716-717.

[5] For example, the recent Netflix documentary Have a Good Trip. Which, apparently, is a collection of celebrities recounting their psychedelic experiences.

[6] Some doctors, therapists get Health Canada permission to use magic mushrooms as noted here: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/london/some-doctors-therapists-get-health-canada-permission-to-use-magic-mushrooms-1.5834485

[7] There is already some evidence of this happening. Rav Arora, a Canadian writer and journalist whose influence is on the rise, writes on his Substack about convincing a conservative Christian friend of his to try psychedelics and about how positive the experience was. https://ravarora.substack.com/p/a-wondrous-psilocybin-microdose

See the original post here:

Joe Rogan and the Search for Transcendence - The Gospel Coalition | Canada - The Gospel Coalition Africa

Posted in Jordan Peterson | Comments Off on Joe Rogan and the Search for Transcendence – The Gospel Coalition | Canada – The Gospel Coalition Africa

Vikings have little space to spend with big holes on defense – KFGO

Posted: at 8:18 am

MINNESOTA VIKINGS (8-9)

UNRESTRICTED FREE AGENTS: CB Patrick Peterson, LB Anthony Barr, DE Everson Griffen, S Xavier Woods, DT Sheldon Richardson, TE Tyler Conklin, CB Mackensie Alexander, LB Nick Vigil, C Mason Cole, P Jordan Berry, T Rashod Hill, WR Dede Westbrook, G Dakota Dozier, QB Sean Mannion, DE Eddie Yarbrough, TE Chris Herndon, TE Luke Stocker, WR Chad Beebe, RB Wayne Gallman, DE Tashawn Bower.

RESTRICTED FREE AGENTS: K Greg Joseph.

NEEDS: The defense again has significant holes at all three levels, as new coach Kevin OConnell takes over and veteran defensive coordinator Ed Donatell installs a new system for a unit that gave up the third-most yards and ninth-most points in the NFL last season. Eight of their 14 most-used defensive players in 2021 were signed as free agents just last year, and of those only DT Dalvin Tomlinson is still under contract for 2022. The most pressing need is again at CB, with Cameron Dantzler (17 career games started) currently the most experienced player at the position. Peterson and Barr would be difficult to replace but just as tricky to afford given the teams tight salary-cap situation. The greatest need on offense is at right guard, but affording a proven starter in free agency would be a challenge.

AVAILABLE SALARY CAP SPACE (approximately): $19 million over.

*Associated Press

Read more here:

Vikings have little space to spend with big holes on defense - KFGO

Posted in Jordan Peterson | Comments Off on Vikings have little space to spend with big holes on defense – KFGO

Mets Acquire Starting Pitcher Chris Bassitt In Trade With Oakland Athletics – Sports Illustrated

Posted: at 8:18 am

The 2022 New York Mets are officially going all-in.

The Mets have acquired right-handed starting pitcher Chris Bassitt from the Oakland Athletics, as a source confirmed to Inside the Mets.

New York is sending two of their top pitching prospects in J.T. Ginn (2020 second-round pick, No. 7 ranked prospect in Mets' system) and Adam Oller (Acquired in 2019 Rule 5 Draft from Giants) to Oakland in exchange for Bassitt.

ESPN's Jeff Passan was first to report the news of the trade, while The New York Post's Joel Sherman mentioned the assets that the Mets gave up.

Bassitt is entering his final year of arbitration, and is projected to earn $8.8 million this season.

The 33-year-old has overcome prior injury woes, including Tommy John surgery, from earlier in his career to emerge as one of the American League's top hurlers since the start of 2019. Bassitt, who made the All-Star team for the first time in in 2021, has finished in the top 10 in the A.L. Cy Young race in each of the past two seasons.

Bassitt went 12-4 with a 3.15 ERA, 130 ERA+, 3.34 FIP, 1.055 WHIP and 9.1 K/9 across 157.1 innings (27 starts) a season ago. The righty missed a month down the stretch of his 2021 campaign after being struck in the face with a line drive on August 17th.

The Mets' rotation will now feature three Cy Young caliber arms in Jacob deGrom, Max Scherzer and Bassitt. Behind this talented trio, Carlos Carrasco and Taijuan Walker will makeup the backend of this unit.

Although the Mets' major-league rotation will not feature a lefty, David Peterson is on the 40-man roster as a depth starter, and will likely begin the season in Triple-A. Tylor Megill, Trevor Williams and Jordan Yamamoto are also expected to serve as depth pieces in the Triple-A rotation in Syracuse to start the year.

Visit link:

Mets Acquire Starting Pitcher Chris Bassitt In Trade With Oakland Athletics - Sports Illustrated

Posted in Jordan Peterson | Comments Off on Mets Acquire Starting Pitcher Chris Bassitt In Trade With Oakland Athletics – Sports Illustrated

Liverpool news: Mohamed Salah injury update as contract warning issued by former Red – The Mirror

Posted: at 8:17 am

Mohamed Salah hobbled out of Liverpool's win over Brighton on Saturday in the Premier League, while Peter Crouch has urged the Reds to be careful over what kind of contract they offer the Egyptian

Video Unavailable

Play now

Brighton v Liverpool: Match in pictures

Liverpool took another step towards potential football immortality on Saturday, winning 2-0 at Brighton & Hove Albion.

Goals from Luis Diaz and Mohamed Salah saw the Reds coast to victory against their toothless hosts, moving to within three points of Premier League leaders Manchester City in the process.

The win also keeps alive the team's hopes of winning what would be an unprecedented quadruple. Jurgen Klopp's side already have the Carabao Cup and are now chasing the Premier League, Champions League and FA Cup.

Here are your latest Liverpool headlines, as they got their weekend off to an ideal start on the south coast.

Should Liverpool break their wage structure to extend Salah's contract? Tell us in the comments section!

Klopp has admitted that he is a little concerned over the fitness of Salah.

The Egyptian netted a penalty to make the game safe for Liverpool, although he did snatch at a number of other chances in the game. He also hobbled out of the action in the second half, prompting some fears among the Liverpool fans.

Afterwards, the Reds boss offered an initial assessment on the knock the 29-year-old accrued.

"We will see," he said. "He thinks it's not serious but we will see when he is sitting down. Something is not 100 per cent right. We think it was the situation before when he hit the ball and got blocked, he went to shoot and got blocked.

"The foot got slightly over-stretched. We'll see."

Read the story in full HERE.

Former Liverpool striker Peter Crouch has said he would be concerned about the precedent set if the club were to yield to Salah's contract demands.

The forward's deal will expire at Anfield at the end of next season. Ahead of the clash against Brighton, Klopp conceded there had been an impasse in recent talks, with Salah reported to have turned down Liverpool's initial offer.

Crouch said he can see why Liverpool are hesitant about meeting the amount the forward wants, despite his obvious incredible talent.

"You give him what he wants, Van Dijk's almost as important, Alisson, where does it end? It then becomes a problem, Crouch said.

"We all want to keep Mohamed Salah 100 per cent but he has to fall in line with what they're prepared to pay."

Read the story in full HERE.

Brighton goalkeeper Robert Sanchez was fortunate not to be red-carded on Saturday, as his reckless challenge took out Diaz as the Colombian opened the scoring.

A VAR review looked at the incident, although after the goal was given it was determined that no action was required.

It was a decision that left many onlookers baffled, including Sky Sports punditry pair Jamie Carragher and Gary Neville.

"Got to be a red card!" wrote Neville on Twitter. "I'm convinced the red card wasn't given because it was a goal," added Carragher. "That header goes past the post and it's a red card. It's almost like, a goal is enough."

Read the story in full HERE.

Read More

Read More

Read more:

Liverpool news: Mohamed Salah injury update as contract warning issued by former Red - The Mirror

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Liverpool news: Mohamed Salah injury update as contract warning issued by former Red – The Mirror

Studs Terkel’s Working, 50 Years On – newgeography.com

Posted: at 8:17 am

As I prepared to teach my module on work this year, I realised that Studs Terkels book Working celebrates its fiftieth anniversary in 2022. Its a book that both reflects and helps to explain working-class life. I first encountered it as a student, and in the passing years Working or to give it its rarely used full title Working: People Talk About What they Do All Day and How They Feel About What They Do has shaped profoundly the way I think and teach about work.

First published in January 1972, Working is a baggy collection of over seven-hundred and sixty pages, most devoted to the reflections of ordinary Americans about their economic lives. From the Terkel archive, its clear that his interest in work was long standing and went well beyond the USA.

I know the book well, but in writing this piece I leafed through it again to think about the changing nature of work across that half a century. I thought it might really be showing its age after all, fifty years is a long career. Instead, I was reminded how vital Working is. To my surprize, many of the jobs and occupations Terkel asked about in his interviews still exist: receptionists and police officers, spot welders and carpenters, factory owners to waitresses and so on. For sure, the technology that workers use in their jobs has changed. Few of the people in the pages of Working in 1972 would have seen a computer, less likely used one. But its harder than you might think to see obsolescence here.

Working remains fresh because Terkels humanity and warmth comes through on virtually every page. His character as well as his approach to the art of interviewing are artfully captured in his introduction. Just seventeen pages long, the essay sums up for me what is most important about work people. As he puts it beautifully:

Its about a search, too, for daily meaning as well as daily bread, for recognition as well as cash, for astonishment rather than torpor; in short, for a sort of life rather than a Monday through Friday sort of dying. Perhaps immortality, too, is part of the quest. To be remembered was the wish, spoken and unspoken, of the heroes and heroines of this book.

Terkel captures the timeless quality of the profound contradictions of work, especially a workers sense of loving and hating work in the same moment. This may be true of all kinds of work, but it seems especially important in working-class labour. In an interview about Working, Terkel described how a meter reader he talked to spoke about the reality and fantasy of his work. While reality demanded that he be constantly vigilant for dogs, he also fantasized about female encounters on his rounds. As Terkel puts it, it makes the day go faster.

Read the rest of this piece at Working-Class Perspectives.

Tim Strangleman, Professor of Sociology at the University of Kent, is a Contributor to Working-Class Perspectives.

Photo credit: Newberry Library, via Wikimedia under CC 4.0 License.

Go here to read the rest:

Studs Terkel's Working, 50 Years On - newgeography.com

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Studs Terkel’s Working, 50 Years On – newgeography.com

Review: ‘Jackass Forever’ is the funniest film I’ve never wanted to watch The Bradley Scout – The Scout

Posted: at 8:17 am

Last week, my childhood best friend asked if I wanted to go to the movies. Before COVID-19, our jaunts to the Pekin movie theater were almost a weekly event, and I was eager to restart the tradition.

But when she suggested Jackass Forever, I was a little lost.

I love comedy; its a great genre. That said, I find cheap physical comedy and phallic humor quite distasteful.

Given that the movie started off with a penis Godzilla, I was immediately less than impressed; however, I changed my tune throughout the course of the movie.

Today, prank and comedy YouTube channels make their money by punking random pedestrians and borderline traumatizing their loved ones and significant others. It was a nice change of pace to see a group of friends beating the hell out of each other with consent.

Despite the gut-wrenching nature of many of the stunts, everyone was a willing participant. Most of the stunts were done in remote locations with trained professionals.

It was also wonderful to see how the group has grown over the years. Even though most of the original cast are well beyond the feelings of haphazard teenage immortality, they still retain a boylike charm.

Its also nice to see some new faces, as many of the new cast members were fans who grew up watching Johnny Knoxville and Steve-Os shenanigans.

Jackass Forever is more than just slapstick comedy; its a documentary about family, which is especially true considering that some of the cast members brought their actual family members to the set.

In a world where TikTok stars and so-called famous YouTubers frequently come under fire for disrespecting other cultures and violating laws that protect the public, this film was a much needed breath of fresh air.

Though it certainly isnt my favorite movie, I do recommend giving the movie a try you just might find something you like.

Read the rest here:

Review: 'Jackass Forever' is the funniest film I've never wanted to watch The Bradley Scout - The Scout

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Review: ‘Jackass Forever’ is the funniest film I’ve never wanted to watch The Bradley Scout – The Scout

Top Boy to WeCrashed: the seven best shows to stream this week – The Guardian

Posted: at 8:17 am

Pick of the weekTop BoyMicheal Ward as Jamie in Top Boy. Photograph: Chris Harris/Netflix

Im stepping back from the roads now, says Dushane (Ashley Walters) as season four of the London crime drama begins. By next year, I want to be completely legit. Its the hardest gangster move to accomplish can he manage it? And who will step into the vacuum he leaves behind? Might it be Jamie (Micheal Ward) who is out of jail and tentatively exploring a collaboration with Dushane? Possibly, but their truce seems fragile. The biggest strength of this series is its air of melancholy theres rarely any sense of glamour about these gangsters activities. Instead, as we see Jamie primly telling his little brother off for swearing, theyre breadwinners. Its a living; a precarious one. Excellent. Netflix, from Friday 18 March

Hot on the heels of The Dropout and Severance comes another drama about a US business misadventure: this time, the true story of the rise and fall of workspace contractors WeWork. Jared Leto plays co-founder Adam Neumann as infuriating and flaky but wildly ambitious and overflowing with energy. Along with his long-suffering wife Rebekah (Anne Hathaway), they built a global brand worth $47bn in under a decade and then overreached, disastrously. Neither Neumann is quite what they seem WeCrashed is a slick, stylish cautionary tale about the gap between dreams and reality. Apple TV+, from Friday 18 March

Season one was slightly slept-on given its creators pedigree (its the brainchild of The US Offices Greg Daniels) and it probably suffered in comparison with the thematically comparable The Good Place. But Upload offers its own distinct, witty, slightly dystopian vision of the afterlife: Nathan (Robbie Amell) finds himself in an imperfect VR heaven, paid for by his ex Ingrid (Allegra Edwards), but yearning for Andy Allos coding operative Nora. As we rejoin him, Nathan is at a crossroads as Ingrid arrives, Nora departs and bliss remains frustratingly out of reach.Amazon Prime Video, out now

The Texas comedian who might be familiar to you from her turns in TV shows Broad City and Search Party gets a Netflix special, filmed live at Joes Pub in New York. Expect a mixture of straight standup and musical interludes as Cohen explores topics such as relationships and modern feminism. However, her style is nowhere near as dry as that sounds Cohen is a committed performer rather than a simple gag-merchant, and there are no half-measures about her songs, which are performed along with keyboardist Henry Koperski. Netflix, from Tuesday 15 March

If I tell you to take all your money out of the bank and light it on fire do it. Its a decent simulation of the experience of consuming high-end cuisine but, ironically, said by fraudster Anthony Strangis (AKA Shane Fox) to Sarma Melngailis, a celebrated vegan restaurateur who fell under his spell. This latest of Netflixs raft of outlandish documentaries about cons and scams tells the story of a bizarre relationship that began on Twitter (among other things, Strangis promised immortality for Melngailiss dog), spiralled out into real life and ended in jail. Netflix, from Wednesday 16 March

Imagine if you could give your emotions anthropomorphised form? What would shame look like? How about anxiety? This amusingly crude animation a spin-off from coming-of-age cartoon Big Mouth does exactly that, reimagining the workings of the human brain as a sort of office space of psychological entities; competing, falling out, getting drunk and enjoying inopportune one-night stands. Its garrulously entertaining stuff and brought to life by a stellar voice cast that includes Maya Rudolph, David Thewlis and Lupita Nyongo. Netflix, from Friday 18 March

My boyfriend always says I seem like Im 100. Beth (Amy Schumer) is having a midlife crisis. Her boyfriend isnt worth hanging on to and shes hit a confused, forlorn moment, where nights out with the girls and working as a wine distributor just arent cutting it. Cue a voyage of discovery and the possibility of fresh romance with John (Michael Cera), a wispily bearded rabbit breeder. Schumers comedy-drama is full of her trademark near-the-knuckle humour but shes obviously aiming for something more mature and emotionally convincing. Hulu, from Friday 18 March

View post:

Top Boy to WeCrashed: the seven best shows to stream this week - The Guardian

Posted in Immortality | Comments Off on Top Boy to WeCrashed: the seven best shows to stream this week – The Guardian