Daily Archives: February 9, 2022

You’re invited to the ‘Board Meeting’ – Wavescape Surf & Ocean Festival by Vans – CapeTown ETC

Posted: February 9, 2022 at 1:30 am

You're invited to the 'Board Meeting' - Wavescape Surf & Ocean Festival by Vans

Surfers and ocean lovers, get ready for the ultimate Board Meeting a multi-day festival beaming with events surrounding the seascape.

The Wavescape Surf & Ocean Festival presented by Vans will be held from 1-11 March 2022, and will comprise a diverse lineup of ocean-minded events, including film screenings, talks, art exhibitions, a charity auction, a lecture, community upliftment days, ocean expo, live music, a photographic competition and a public mural.

Festival Director Shani Judes said: We are excited to announce that we have moved from December 2021 to March 2022. Our reasons are to mitigate against the continued threat posed by COVID-19, to grow festival attendance during a less busy time of the year, and of course, the weather in Cape Town is generally kinder to us late in the summer!

We are pleased that all our core events will return, with an outdoor screening at The Galileo Open Air Cinema to replace Clifton, which is the only casualty to COVID. We have a bumper lineup, with cool new additions such as The Board Meeting expo, surfboard swop and surf party, the Ocean Photographic Competition, and two new venues for film screenings: one up the West Coast and one in the deep south of the Cape Peninsula, she said.

The Film Festival component includes five days of film screenings at four venues the Shred in Paarden Eiland, the Labia Theatre in town, the Galileo at Kirstenbosch and one in Kommetjie.

The Board Meeting takes place at Jack Blacks Taproom, and will feature an exhibition by leading sustainable ocean eco-brands and conservation organisations, a surfboard swop and childrens activities, topped off by a DJ and band.

Wavescape has teamed up with Orms, Canon and SJ Artists to curate the Ocean Photographic Exhibition, which features the best ocean photographs in South Africa. The competition opens for submissions in early December and runs until 15 January 2022. Judges will choose 20 images for an exhibition along the Sea Point Promenade from 1 March. There will be a NSRI panel with information and donation information for people to easily donate to the NSRI.

Wavescape returns with the famous Artboard Project, when handcrafted surfboards are the canvas for SAs top artists that go on exhibition and are auctioned for ocean organisations and youth development program 9Miles. Wavescape will also run the Wesgro Blue Ocean Master Class for aspirant environmental filmmakers, the Save Our Seas Foundation Beach Reach on Dalebrook beach in front of the SOSF-Shark Education Center in Kalk Bay, and Spikes Swell Course, an evening of surf forecasting and wave science.

Slide Night returns to the Centre for the Book with some of the worlds best creative and scientific minds advocating social and environmental change, from scientists to artists, authors to activists, as well as salty tales of adventure and scientific curiosity from the high seas.

Wavescape again hosts Oceans Alive at the Two Oceans Aquarium, an evening of surfing, activism and conservation. This year, they join Cape Town-based NPO Protect the West Coast to shed light on the effects of illegal heavy mineral sand mining along this pristine wilderness to the North.

With the support of the Wesgro Film and Promotion Unit, the Blue Ocean Masterclass focuses on film techniques in and on the ocean, and includes top cinematographers and underwater camera experts sharing thoughts and expertise on the technology and skill of this burgeoning area.

Wavescape welcomes its partners on board for another epic year together. Vans takes the title, with the following partners: the Save Our Seas Foundation, The PET Recycling Company NPC (PETCO), Jack Black Beer, Wesgro, Cefas (UK Government), WILDOCEANS & Gone. Born from a love for the ocean, Wavescape is proud of the work done by its amazing partners who work so tirelessly to protect the worlds oceans and their creatures.

2022: Line Up

Also read:

NSRI rescues three men on the Karbonkelberg hiking trail

Picture: Supplied

See the article here:

You're invited to the 'Board Meeting' - Wavescape Surf & Ocean Festival by Vans - CapeTown ETC

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on You’re invited to the ‘Board Meeting’ – Wavescape Surf & Ocean Festival by Vans – CapeTown ETC

Cruise: Aida vacationer is suddenly alone before the start of the journey desperation is spreading – Then24.com

Posted: at 1:30 am

Cruises: Holidays on the high seas

Cruises: Holidays on the high seas

Every year more tourists set sail. Cruises are becoming increasingly popular around the world. More and more Germans are also vacationing on the high seas.

show description

Not dreamy cruise

Huge trouble for Aida vacationers! Because instead of anticipation and tingling in the stomach, there is one cruise suddenly on the brink and the holidaymakers there all alone! Our partner portal MOIN.de reports on this.

On Facebook, an Aida vacationer reports on her terrible shock experience. She had been looking forward to the cruise so much, imagining how nice it would be on deck and how delicious the food in the restaurants would be.

This is the Aida:

But then her partner cancels shortly before the start of the trip! What should she do? rebook? Cancel? Or just start the cruise alone?

articlebody:textmodule) >

Aida vacationers are suddenly alone!

Photo: picture alliance/dpa/dpa-Zentralbild | Soren Stache

As MOIN.de reports, the answer among Aida fans is quite divided. One side thinks that you should drive anyway. The other, on the other hand, that instead of cruising, you might have to fight for the relationship first.

More cruise news:

But the majority is of the opinion that if your partner has health problems, you should rather stay with him.

Other top topics:

You can read about what the Aida vacationer finally decides on and how THAT is received by the community at MOIN.de. (mg)

Source

See the rest here:

Cruise: Aida vacationer is suddenly alone before the start of the journey desperation is spreading - Then24.com

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on Cruise: Aida vacationer is suddenly alone before the start of the journey desperation is spreading – Then24.com

Damien Enright: The thrill of krill and the fight for survival in Antarctica – Irish Examiner

Posted: at 1:30 am

The wonders of the Weddell Sea in Antarctica are multiple and awe inspiring. Its depth averages 500m, its clarity is that of distilled water. The temperature is zero degrees on the sea floor but it teems with life. Outweighing all other is krill, its biomass being far greater than any other: Antarctic krill are thought to have the largest population of any species on the planet.

The US passed legislation to conserve Pacific krill in 1976, soon after Japan and Russia began exploratory fishing in Antarctica. Since then, krill harvesting has become a huge industry and, while conservation measures have been put in place in some sea areas krill are a transglobal species the quantities harvested are increasing and, in some regions, threatening other creatures in the ecosystems. An example is the Adlie penguins, which along with Emperor penguins live farther south than any others.

Most marine species in the Southern Ocean including whales, seals, penguins, albatrosses, petrels, squid and many others feed on this small shrimp-like organism. The great pity is, of course, that while the krill shoals are the staff of life for these and numerous other, less iconic species, the humans who harvest them do not use them (or rely on them) for human food but to feed farmed fish, or create nutritional and fish oil supplements, currently a vexed issue for conservationists, and rightly so. Not for essential nutritional needs but for convenience and vanity, the krill-fishing competes with creatures upon which one of the last undamaged ecologies on earth depends.

Krill famously feeds whales, ironically the mammoths of the ocean being sustained by the mice. Now that whales in most marine jurisdictions are no longer targets for explosive harpoons, they face the hazard of entanglement in nets and death by drowning. That a 60ft-long whale can be entangled gives us some idea of the size and weight of nets.

A recent example was a juvenile humpback spotted in Antarctic waters entangled in fishing gear. Its dorsal fin was missing, and it was trailing nets, ropes and buoys that had wrapped around the tail cutting deep into the skin. It was probably a youngster on its first solo migration and had likely carried the gear thousands of kilometres down the South American coast. It was labouring to swim and was likely to drown as it lost the power to enable it to forage, and starved. Conservationists are demanding better protections as changing sea temperatures bring migrating whales nearer to intensely-fished areas.

A recently observed high-seas incident revealed orca behaviour rarely, if ever before, seen. A humpback in bad condition was spotted so entangled in heavy nets that it couldnt surface to breathe. Then, a pod of orcas, killer whales, happened along. Instead of attacking and killing the whale, they moseyed about until the Mother Orca arrived and investigated the entangling ropes. Her family followed. Observers noted that they appeared to drag the hawsers from the humpbacks body so that, freed of the weight, it could more easily reach the surface to breathe. The rescuers then left.

Orcas are wary of attacking adult baleen whales for fear of a lethal blow from their tails. However, part of an orca pod will distract the mother of an infant calf so that companions can drown it. Also, a teenage humpback separated from its mother is in danger of orcas grabbing its flukes to roll it onto its back and keep it there long enough to drown. Killers are killers. It may have been sheer chance rather than cetacean solidarity that the orcas freed the ailing whale.

To end, I consider again the wonders of the Antarctic ocean as unbeknown to and unimagined by our intrepid Kildare-born explorer Ernest Shackleton. Last year, a colony of approximately 60 million Jonahs icefish nests were found on the floor of the crystal clear waters of the Wendell Sea he and his brave companions crossed in 1908. The colony covers some 240sq km with 60m nests, each containing 1,500 to 2,000 eggs guarded by the parent fish. The total biomass comprises 60,000 tonnes (132,000,000 lb) of fish, average length 50cm. The largest icefish colony previously observed numbered fewer than 100 nests.

Now that weve found this wealth, should we not seek licences to extract it? After all, apart from feeding Adlie penguins, also useless to humans, what good are icefish? Theyre unpalatable for our species and presently of no commercial interest but surely some use can be found for them? Fishmeal fertiliser? Also, they do eat krill and, hey!, sooner or later may compete with krill harvesting. Meanwhile, theyve converted a wasteland into a living ecosystem. Unfortunately, uncontrolled fishing would soon turn it into a wasteland again.

Read the original here:

Damien Enright: The thrill of krill and the fight for survival in Antarctica - Irish Examiner

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on Damien Enright: The thrill of krill and the fight for survival in Antarctica – Irish Examiner

This Russian oil barons’ 160-feet superyacht with a glistening gold exterior is the shiniest vessel on the high seas – The cruiser comes with a…

Posted: at 1:30 am

Whats bold and gold? Not a piece of jewelry, but a superyacht thats no less. With nearly 160 feet, this carbon composite-built Palmer Johnson is a head-turning, statement-making masterpiece gliding on the open seas. Its not every day even yacht owners come across something this glamorous, which is why we want to delve deep into the majestic marvel. What makes this sparkling gold supersport Khalilah an exceptional cruising vessel thats undoubtedly a lot more than an eye-catching color? Read on to find out :All that glitters is the Khalilah Superyacht:The Russians sure love to indulge in ultra-luxury yachts. They have them all from an ultra-extravagant superyacht, as seen with Russian billionaire Roman Abramovichs $610M megayacht Solaris or Dmitry Rybolovlevs $250 million modern masterpiece, the 361 ft long superyacht Anna; they truly have the best examples. Joining the ranks of some exceptional water vessels is oil tycoon Alexei Gulobovichs glistening stunner Khailiah. Dont let the opulent exterior fool you. This pretty thing is rated very high on performance.

Khalilah is the largest private yacht built entirely in carbon composite, lighter than its counterparts. It also gives her an impressive top speed of 30 knots. Part of the SuperSport series, the ship is sleek and sporty, with a long foredeck ending in what appears to be a reverse bow.

On the broadest part of the hull sits the 110 square meters aft main deck. The 11m beam provides extraordinary interior volume that accommodates a magnificent master suite sprawling full-beam forward on the main deck. It looks incredibly inviting with a lovely circular table for al fresco dining and many seating arrangements.

The lower deck is where you will find guest cabins, including a comfortable VIP, each with a unique color scheme and providing enough room for 11 guests. What also stands out in Khalilah superyacht is its brilliant use of color. From the striking gold exterior to the collection of eclectic artwork and kaleidoscopic fabrics and even the colorful mosaics spotted in the showers of the cabins, there is no shortage of spunk onboard. In addition to colors, there is an evident use of glass almost everywhere.

This abundant use of the material ensures the view is never out f your sight, whether seated or sleeping. They are the biggest glass panels aside from Steve Jobss boat, said Timur Mohamed, owner of the iconic American boatbuilder Palmer Johnson. They are the largest windows installed on a superyacht in the United States, said Andrew Forrest, who heads the Glasshape North America office in Fort Lauderdale, Florida to Boat International.

Khalilah boasts a matching gold tender, in addition to a wide selection of water toys, kept inside two garages one with a fueling station. Amongst her excellent crew of nine is a two-star Michelin-trained chef. With all these niceties, it wouldnt be easy for Russian millionaire Alexei Gulobovich to part ways with this ship, even for a whopping $32 million.

His ex-wife Nataliya GolubovichThe Russian oil baron came into the limelight for a divorce battle with his business tycoon ex-wife over their $9 million former marital home in London. His ex-wife is chairman of Russki Product, Russias most significant domestic producer of grocery goods.

Read this article:

This Russian oil barons' 160-feet superyacht with a glistening gold exterior is the shiniest vessel on the high seas - The cruiser comes with a...

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on This Russian oil barons’ 160-feet superyacht with a glistening gold exterior is the shiniest vessel on the high seas – The cruiser comes with a…

The warship which changed British history – Kent Online

Posted: at 1:30 am

This will not sit comfortably with many. But there is a powerful argument to say Admiral Nelson's victory at Trafalgar was due, at least in part, by French design.

Because more than half of the fleet of warships he led to attack the Spanish and French in his remarkable victory of 1805, were modelled on a vessel created by our Continental near neighbours.

L'Invincible was a new breed of French warship - designed and crafted to not only out-gun its rivals but out manoeuvre them both in terms of speed and agility on the high seas too.

And her remarkable story - and premature, chaotic demise - will be told at a special exhibition opening at Chatham Historic Dockyard this month which provides a fascinating insight into one of the most historically significant vessels in the Royal Navy's long history.

She has, for more than 260 years, lay on the floor of the Channel - after being accidentally rediscovered by a fisherman near Portsmouth in 1979.

Yet her story is remarkable and one which genuinely altered the course of history.

First launched by the French in 1744, three years later L'Invincible took part in the First Battle of Cape Finisterre during the War of the Austrian Succession.

But as she escorted a convoy of merchant ships, the British fleet gave chase. After attempting to hold off the attacking forces she was forced to surrender and captured by the British.

And the Navy's top brass were in for a surprise.

Because after 50 years of naval supremacy, the British had become somewhat complacent. Its fleet had developed little over the decades. The French, on the other hand, with a need to combat the British might, had gone back to the drawing board.

Using the latest scientific principles to their designs, they embarked on building the next generation of warships where speed and fighting ability were key.

L'Invincible was wider at the front and narrower in the stern, allowing her to cut through the water quicker, her rudder was designed to allow her to turn without slowing and more accurately.

She was more heavily armed too - boasting 74 guns; more than any British vessel. Its main gun deck was six foot above the waterline - allowing it to defeat bigger ships where lower gun ports could be submerged in rough seas. In short, it was revolutionary. And the British knew it.

Explains Nick Ball, collections, galleries and interpretation manager at the Chatham Historic Dockyard Trust: "Originally, a nippy French warship, when LInvincible was captured by the Royal Navy every inch of her hull and form were studied and then replicated to form a new fleet that would go on to defeat the French.

"She was a game-changer who even influenced the subsequent design of the worlds most famous warship - Admiral Nelson's HMS Victory, built here at Chatham.

When Nelson defeated the French and Spanish fleets at Trafalgar, nearly two-thirds of his ships had been based on the design of the vessel seized 58 years earlier.

After her capture, the Navy took L'Invincible, sailed her into Portsmouth, and improved upon her. They enhanced her guns - swapping out the 18-pound guns for 24-pounders capable of firing larger, slower shot which, rather than just passing through its target would crash into it, sending lethal wooden splinters flying inside.

The British also tried out 'gunlocks' on her - effectively a trigger to fire the guns which was both quicker and more accurate - while gun ports were enlarged to provide a wider range of sight.

But for all its advances - and the inspiration for those which came after her - its pioneering presence within the Navy's ranks would be shortlived.

On February 19, 1758, a decade after its capture, it was to be one of the key vessels sailing to North America to help repel, ironically, the French, from the early settler colonies. It would fail to even leave British waters.

The captain on that fateful morning was Deal-born John Bentley. He had spent his life climbing up the rigging of the Navy's pyramid of power.

Having joined the Navy as a 14-year-old, he had moved up through the ranks eventually laying claim to the rank of captain. February 19 was not a day that would he would look back on with any affection.

At around 2.30am, as the crew of 700 readied the vessel for its long journey - its hold packed with ammunition, army supplies, food and spirits - the signal was given to raise anchor from Portsmouth and head across the Atlantic.

However, the crew struggled to lift the anchor and it took 90 minutes to finally free it - only for it then to get caught up under the ship. As efforts were made to raise it out of the water, the boat started to drift dangerous towards the shallow waters of the Solent.

The rudder becomes jammed and despite frantic attempts to save them from humiliation the boat found itself grounded on a sandbank.

Water started flooding into the vessel prompting desperate efforts to unload her in order for her to be refloated. All, however, was in vain, and as she toppled on to her side, the Invincible's life on the ocean came to a rather ignominious end.

She still sits on the sandbank today on which she became stranded all those years ago.

How the HMS Invincible sank in 1758

Captain Bentley was court marshalled by a fuming Royal Navy who had been left red-faced after news of the ship's calamity had been widely reported on.

He would be acquitted - much to the frustration of the Admiralty. It didn't damage his career too much, however, as he would go on to become Vice Admiral Sir John Bentley before his death in 1772. He is buried in St Andrew's Church near Dover. His epitaph reads "esteemed and favoured by his King, beloved and honoured by his country".

It would not be until 1979 that the Invincible would be headline news again.

On May 5, Arthur Mack, from Portsmouth, and his friend were out fishing in the Solent when their net snagged on something below the surface. Hauling up the nets, they found large pieces of timber with wooden pegs.

Returning with a couple of friends who were divers, they realised they had stumbled upon something - although, at first, they thought it the remains of an old pier. Alerting the authorities, archaeologists took over and, eventually, discovered that the remains were those of the Invincible - untouched since 1758. Obscured by the sands in which it had floundered all those years before.

In 1980, a team of experienced marine archaeological volunteers set about excavating the underwater site with a second taking place between 2017-2019, led by Dr Daniel Pascoe and Professor Dave Parham at Bournemouth University.

Explains Dr Pascoe: "Shipwrecks provide a brilliant opportunity to travel back in time - they enable us to learn about the people, and when you find objects in their original context, we can learn something of their lives and how they operated. We can form a connection with the people who were on board those ships. We try to understand the naval culture; the details on the objects tell us about the people who made them - and thats whats interesting.

Ive worked on shipwrecks from the Mary Rose period upwards and I can see how the culture of the navy has changed. The Invincible was a lot more organised than the century before.

"The gun equipment on the Invincible are standard, and unlike the modified equipment of the century before, means that everything was made for purpose. Everything is labelled, the gun carriage axels have the calibre of the gun and whether theyre front or rear axel and the inside of the ship is clad with reverse clinker pine cladding - on purpose - so that any moisture thats leaking in, goes behind the cladding and keeps the inside of the ship dry.

"Its clear the Invincible was part of a new navy - a more reliable and invincible organisation. "The Invincible provides the physical evidence of this progression and change in history. "Historical documents describe these artefacts but the physical objects and their position on board ship is the evidence of the challenges the people had to overcome - these things were so normal to the shipmen and they wouldnt have been written down, so the archaeology forms this connection with the individuals.

"By understanding the problems they overcome, you being to think about the broader culture of the navy and how they overcame obstacles and challenges.

"With Invincible, its so big and so much of it had survived. When we opened it up we could swim along the deck and some areas of the ship were completely untouched so we saw the artefacts in the original places when she went down. Youre able to interpret what youre seeing and that provides an insight into exactly what it was like at the time when the ship was wrecked.

"The master gunner had a store - this was emptied in the 1980s - but we learned that there was a hatchway in the very bow of the ship and this led to the overflow of the gunners store where he kept bulkier items like junk rope and gun wads made from junk, used in the loading process of the guns to keep a seal around the charge and stop the round shot rolling out of the barrel of the gun.

"It hadnt moved. It was untouched and unexcavated and showed something of the gunners life and his equipment.

"The rope was in great condition and when we brought it to the surface we could smell the tar. When we took away the junk rope we could see the white lime wash on the beams - paint doesnt normally survive."

The exhibition at Chatham - Diving Deep: HMS Invincible 1744 - is on loan to the Historic Dockyard from the National Museum of the Royal Navy and runs until November. It provides a fascinating insight - not only allowing visitors to see items recovered from the wreck, but also extensive video footage filmed by divers exploring the remains of the vessel

Jane Maddocks was a volunteer diver and marine archaeologist who dived on both the 20th and 21st century excavations.

She explained: "It was the early '80s and we used a motorised fishing vessel with dredges and lifts, and we went down and drew the items we found.

"The very first time I dived I found trays of grenades packed 12 to a tray and underneath the tray were little flints so you could strike the fuse and it was all there. I think that was the thing that excited me the most at the time. The downside was that it was gun powder and very smelly after so much time underwater. On the last day of the dive I tried to get a taxi home and I had to put my jacket in the boot because the smell of rotten eggs was too much.

"The big difference between the 1980s and now, is the variety of techniques available to the professional team from the Maritime Archaeology Sea Trust."

Key to that is using what is known as photogrammetry which allows 3D images to be built up by taking a number of images of the wreck.

Adds Jane: "It allows so much of the detail to be recorded very quickly and with the utmost accuracy. It can take an age to draw accurately to scale underwater, but photogrammetry delivers excellent results over a large area."

Nick Ball at the dockyard adds: The maritime archaeology project to excavate the famous ship was probably one of the most important of its kind since the raising of the Mary Rose. The story of the excavation itself is extraordinary as it was a race against time and tides.

And the dockyard has been involved since the wreck was first discovered.

Explains Bournemouth University's Dr Pascoe: Chatham has been involved with Invincible since the 1980s since the first excavation where they took artefacts and held part of the collection. To have them involved in the second dive added extra strength to the project.

For me, it was always a dream to share it wider. When I first took over the licence for the wreck (it is a protected site), my aim was to investigate the wreck, excavate it and display it for everyone to see. I was determined that we would do something and continue John Bingemans work (Bingeman had held the original licence in the 1980s). We managed to do it in good time from 2010, raising the funding, and achieving what we set out to do.

"The exhibition is an opportunity to share what we were seeing on the seabed with the wider world and it makes me feel proud for everyone who has been involved - they can see that all their efforts have contributed to this incredible exhibition.

"The project has been a huge effort from everyone involved from the person who drove the boat, divers, the people who filmed it, the volunteers who researched the stories behind the artefacts, the curators.

The exhibition has travelled from Portsmouth to Chatham and the project was made possible by a collaboration with the Maritime Archaeology Sea Trust (MAST), Bournemouth University, the National Museum of the Royal Navy and Chatham Historic Dockyard Trust, with funding from the National Lottery Heritage Fund.

After a year at its initial site in Portsmouth Historic Dockyard, the immersive experience goes live to the public in Chatham on Saturday, February 12, and runs until November.

Read the original:

The warship which changed British history - Kent Online

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on The warship which changed British history – Kent Online

Texas Democratic group helping opponents of two House incumbents – The Texas Tribune

Posted: at 1:28 am

Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

A new coalition that wants to install "better" Democrats in the Texas Legislature is endorsing primary opponents to two House members who were central in intraparty disputes last year.

The Texans for Better Democrats Coalition is throwing its weight behind Candis Houston, who is running against Rep. Harold Dutton of Houston, and Rep. Claudia Ordaz Perez, who is competing against Rep. Art Fierro after she was drawn her out of her El Paso district during redistricting.

The Democratic group is also endorsing Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo in her reelection bid as she faces a group of primary challengers including Erica Davis, the top staffer for a Harris County constable.

The coalition launched in October, and it is made up of three progressive groups tied to organized labor: the Texas Organizing Project, Communications Workers of America and Working Families Party. They are prepared to spend about $250,000 across the three primaries, funding field and mail programs in each one, said Pedro Lira, co-director of the Texas WFP.

"We're in it to win it," he said.

The battles within the party come after a year of contentious legislative sessions in which GOP leaders pushed the state firmly to the right and Democrats sometimes splintered on how hard to fight. Nowhere was that more apparent than House Democrats' quorum break over the GOP's priority elections bill, which ground the chamber to a halt for weeks but ended after a slow trickle of their members, including Fierro, began returning to the floor.

Texans need elected leaders who will stand with them, not ones who back down at the first sign of a fight," Derrick Osobase, administrator director for CWA District 6, said in a statement.

Dutton is well known as an occasional outlier in his party. He irked fellow Democrats last year when, as head of the House Public Education Committee, he helped revive legislation placing restrictions on transgender student athletes. He has long broken from some fellow Democrats when it comes to education supporting more charter schools, for example.

Houston is the president of the Aldine chapter of the American Federation of Teachers. She has been endorsed by the statewide AFT, as well as the Texas AFL-CIO and Annie's List, which works to elect Democratic women who support abortion rights to state office.

Dutton shrugged off the coalition's endorsement.

"This organization is free to do as they wish and I expect to work with them again in the future," he said in a statement, "but otherwise I will remain focused on getting things done to improve our neighborhood public schools, create more local jobs, expand access to healthcare, and ensure justice and voting rights for all."

Dutton has the backing of the House Democratic Campaign Committee, which works to reelect incumbents and gave his campaign $2,500 last month. The committee has not taken sides in the matchup between Fierro and Ordaz Perez and does not plan to.

Ordaz Perez chose to run against Fierro after the Republican-led redistricting process forced her into the same district as a fellow Latina Democrat, Rep. Lina Ortega. In announcing her campaign against Fierro, Ordaz Perez criticized him for being one of the first House Democrats to return from the quorum break. A number of other House Democrats who remained in Washington, D.C., longer are backing her against Fierro.

In an interview, Fierro defended his decision to return along with two other El Paso-area Democrats, saying they had achieved their three goals from the start: staying off the floor for the remainder of the first special session, bringing national attention to the bill and "light[ing] a fire under Congress" to pass federal legislation protecting voting rights.

"I was on the bad-election-bill battle from day one," he said, pointing to his efforts to fight it as a member of the House Elections Committee.

Unlike Fierro, Dutton was not among the core 57 Democrats who had broken quorum. He did join them in Washington, but returned to Texas several days later, citing family medical reasons.

Campaign fundraising has been light across the two primaries, so the coalition's involvement could be significant. Ordaz Perez had $50,000 cash on hand as of Jan. 31, to just $6,000 for Fierro as of Jan. 20. Dutton had $73,000 in the bank as of Jan. 20, while Houston had $19,000.

Disclosure: Texas AFT and Annie's List have been financial supporters of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune's journalism. Find a complete list of them here.

Read more:

Texas Democratic group helping opponents of two House incumbents - The Texas Tribune

Posted in Democrat | Comments Off on Texas Democratic group helping opponents of two House incumbents – The Texas Tribune

How Democrats Turned the Tables in the Gerrymandering Wars – The New Republic

Posted: at 1:28 am

Not to worry, the editorial board opined, because alternative routes to reform still exist. There are also political remedies for political gerrymanders, they argued. Politicians can elevate extreme redistricting as a campaign issue and offer solutions that dont rely on judges. Florida added a fair districts amendment to its constitution. Some states have given the task of drawing lines to a neutral commission or a demographer. Congress could even pass a law forcing such changes.

Those suggestions may not have been completely sincere. Congressional Democrats, as it happens, have consistently proposed a federal ban on partisan gerrymandering over the last few years. But the editorial board has derided that proposal by claiming that no one should want to give Washington a veto over redistricting maps. And what about the state-level solutions that the board touted? When Californias independent commission produced a favorable map for Democrats this cycle, as noted earlier, it drew a furious response from the editorial board precisely for not creating enough safe Republican seats. The same outcry arose after Virginias anti-gerrymandering redistricting process went awry last year, at which time the board took the opportunity to declare that the progressive fiction of apolitical maps in a time of polarization may be on its last legs.

But Matt, you might ask yourself, youre also against gerrymandering, so doesnt this make you a hypocrite, as well? I have often written in support of the elementary principle that voters should choose their elected officials and not the other way around. Anti-gerrymandering reforms seemed like the best solution to this problem, and the federal courts had made earnest attempts to remedy them. But five Republican appointees to the Supreme Court closed the federal courts to opponents of partisan gerrymandering in Rucho, and Republicans in Congress arent interested in reopening those doors through federal legislation, despite having been given many opportunities to take yes for an answer.

So Ive come around to the same conclusion as many conservatives: Gerrymandering is an inescapable feature of single-member districts, and it can never be fully extirpated from the redistricting process. Where I part ways with the right is on what comes next. For them, its nothing. This is the way its always been, and this is the way itll always be. National Reviews Kevin D. Williamson recently claimed that gerrymandering is normal and bipartisan and that the solution for Democrats is just to win the election anyway. I suggest he try doing so as a Democrat in Wisconsin, where the GOP wins two-thirds of state legislature seats with just half of the statewide vote.

Continue reading here:

How Democrats Turned the Tables in the Gerrymandering Wars - The New Republic

Posted in Democrat | Comments Off on How Democrats Turned the Tables in the Gerrymandering Wars – The New Republic

Will Trumps Obsession with His Big Lie Save Biden and the Democrats? – The New Yorker

Posted: at 1:28 am

In modern American politics, there are no eternal winnersonly two unpopular major parties that take turns losing. According to the latest Economist/YouGov polling data, forty-one per cent of Americans have a favorable opinion of the Democratic Party and thirty-six per cent have a favorable opinion of the Republican Party. The ratings for individual politicians are often even worse, particularly for those who have been around for a long time. According to the Economist/YouGov data, only thirty-two per cent of Americans have a favorable opinion of Chuck Schumer, the Senate Majority Leader. Just twenty-one per cent have a favorable opinion of his Republican counterpart, Mitch McConnell.

Arguments can be had about what led to this lamentable situation. Was it social media? Negative advertising? Partisan media coverage? Or are the elected officials responsible? Is the great American public right to suspect that most politicians are irredeemably corruptor, at least, that they are trapped in a broken system?

One thing is clear: in such a poisonous environment, the key to success isnt being overwhelmingly popularfor all but a few transcendent figures, that is an impossibilitybut being less unpopular than your opponent. Joe Bidens 2020 victory is a prime example of someone who succeeded in this strategy. After four years of Trump madness, a majority of voters plumped for a moderate, sane alternative. From January to August of last year, Bidens approval rating remained safely above fifty per cent. Then came the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan, Joe Manchins Senate roadblock of Bidens domestic agenda, a resurgent pandemic, and rising inflation. With Trump off Twitter and out of the headlines, Bidens ratings plummeted. Democrats looked fearfully to the midterms. After the November gubernatorial elections in Virginia and New Jersey, Republicans looked to them with great anticipation.

Now comes Trump again, speculating about another Presidential bid and reminding people what a monumental threat he representsnot just to American democracy and the rule of law but to the sense of relief that has reigned since he left office. If I run and if I win, we will treat those people from January 6th fairly, he told a crowd in Texas a couple of weeks ago. And, if it requires pardons, we will give them pardons. Days later, he turned on Mike Pence, falsely claiming that the former Vice-President had failed to use his power to abrogate an election result that courts across the country had affirmed. Unfortunately, he didnt exercise that power, he could have overturned the Election, Trump said in a statement that, intentionally or not, confirmed beyond all doubt his own nefarious intent.

Of course, Trumps remergence doesnt relieve the White House and the Democrats of the many policy challenges that they faceincluding inflation, the pandemic, and the Senate filibuster. Ultimately, they will be judged on their record in office, and an anti-Trump message wont necessarily provide a political panacea. Terry McAuliffes defeat in Virginia illustrated the danger for Democrats of overly relying on the spectre of Trump when he is no longer in power. But Trumps return to the headlines is an important development because it shifts some of the focus back to the G.O.P. and highlights the simple but defining question that the Party cannot avoid, as much as the Republican leaders McConnell and Kevin McCarthy, the House Minority Leader, may want to. Does the G.O.P. still support democracy? Or is it now Trumps sock puppetan authoritarian populist movement eager to run roughshod over anyone or anything that gets in its way, including the votes that eighty-one million Americans cast for Biden?

When Pence stood up at a meeting of the conservative Federalist Society, in Florida, on February 4th, and said, President Trump is wrong; I had no right to overturn the election, he was effectively claiming that the old G.O.P. is still alive and well, and so is its commitment to democracy. But, on that very day, at a meeting in Salt Lake City, the Republican National Committee sent the opposite message by passing a resolution that said the January 6th protesters were engaged in legitimate political discourse and censured two G.O.P. Representatives, Liz Cheney, of Wyoming, and Adam Kinzinger, of Illinois, for joining the House Select Committee that is investigating the attack on the Capitol. The formal motion of censure accused Cheney and Kinzinger of participating in a Democrat-led persecution of ordinary citizens.

According to a recent CBS News poll, eighty-three per cent of Americans disapprove of the actions of the Trump supporters who forced their way into the Capitol, and fifty-four per cent think it was an insurrection. In defeating McAuliffe in November, Glenn Youngkin, a leveraged-buyout tycoon who hails from the traditional Wall Street wing of the G.O.P., successfully avoided being dragged into the January 6th morass. He accepted Trumps endorsement but didnt invite the former President to campaign for him. Youngkin called for an audit of Virginias voting machines, but, finally, after repeatedly ducking the issue, said that he would have voted to certify the 2020 election result. He kept Trump at arms length without alienating him or his supporters.

With Trump back on the national stage railing about a stolen election, this straddle will be increasingly difficult for any Republican candidate to maintain. Constitutionally incapable of admitting defeat, he is clearly intent on making fealty to his Big Lie a litmus test, and any Republican who questions any part of it risks incurring his wrath. Last week, he even attacked Lindsey Graham, his longtime toady and golfing partner. After Graham said he didnt favor issuing pardons to the January 6th participants who were being prosecuted, Trump called him a RINO, adding, Lindsey Graham doesnt know what the hell hes talking about if he says that.

Trumps remergence doesnt guarantee anything. The antiquated American political system favors minority rule. Opposition parties usually do well in midterms, and this years electoral map favors Republicans. But the past week has highlighted the cancer that is still eating at the G.O.P. and reminded anti-Trump voters why it is so vital for them to get out and exercise their democratic dutyan important factor in a year in which Democratic strategists fear a decline in turnout. Coming in the same week that Omicron cases kept falling sharply and the January job figures came in unexpectedly strong, this has given Biden and other Democrats reason to hope that they can eventually get their ship back on course.

Read more:

Will Trumps Obsession with His Big Lie Save Biden and the Democrats? - The New Yorker

Posted in Democrat | Comments Off on Will Trumps Obsession with His Big Lie Save Biden and the Democrats? – The New Yorker

‘Dismantling Democracy’ to save it: How Democrats rediscovered the joys of rigging elections | TheHill – The Hill

Posted: at 1:28 am

"Voters should choose their representatives not the other way around." Withthose words late Friday night, President BidenJoe BidenFox News host Brian Kilmeade hits Trump on Arizona election claim: 'That's an outright lie' Putin says proposals made in Macron talks are possible as 'basis' for further steps Biden to appoint son of late Sen. John McCain to Naval Academy board MORE celebrated a decision by North Carolinas supreme court rejecting new state legislative districts that favored Republicans. The ruling was used to support Biden's past portrayals of Republicans as the enemies of democracy, including their use of gerrymandering.

Biden is not alone. Former President ObamaBarack Hussein ObamaWhite House record boxes recovered at Trump's Mar-a-Lago: report 'Dismantling Democracy' to save it: How Democrats rediscovered the joys of rigging elections Lisa Cook is perfect for the Federal Reserve MOREcondemnedRepublican gerrymandering efforts as threatening democracy. The liberal Brennan Center hasdeclaredthat "gerrymandering is deeply undemocratic."Liberal commentators insistthe choice is simple: "Its restricting gerrymandering or being complicit in the dismantling of democracy.

Biden was careful to keep his focus on North Carolina in stating that "for too long, partisan gerrymandering has allowed politicians to rig the political process and draw districts in their favor." Indeed, it required an impressive act of myopia to avoid noting that Democrats have engaged in raw gerrymandering in various states, too.But the North Carolina decision could seriously undermine Democratic plans in other states to rig elections and gain seats in Congress.

For example, in New York Democrats want to add four new seats through gerrymandering, to try to retain control of the U.S. House. One district is designed to guarantee the reelection of Rep. Jerry NadlerJerrold (Jerry) Lewis Nadler'Dismantling Democracy' to save it: How Democrats rediscovered the joys of rigging elections Democrats ask for information on specialized Border Patrol teams Andrew Cuomo attorney says AG investigation was 'shoddy,' outcome was 'predetermined' MORE (D-N.Y.), the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, which has heldhearings on the evil of you guessed it gerrymandering.

Gerrymandering is to politics what doping is to sports. It is universally viewed as a cheat, an effort to manipulate districts to guarantee electoral victories. Drafting coherent districts evenly and logically to divide populations is not particularly difficult. School districts usuallyare designed to evenly distribute populations with schools as center points; those school districts often serve as voting locations. Once you depart from such logical divisions, however, political pressures produce a grotesque progeny of malformed districts.

The Nadler district would make Elbridge Gerry blush. In 1812, Gerry a Founding Father, vice president and governor of Massachusetts signed off on a district designed to guarantee a seat for the precursor of today's Democratic Party. The district resembled a salamander, so the Boston Gazette deemed it the Gerry-mander.

Notably, the original gerrymandered district looks a lot like what is now being dubbed the "Jerrymander."

To cite Biden, Rep. Nadler did not simply"choose his voters. His contorted district virtually selects them individually, weaving throughneighborhoodsin search of support.

Nadler's district is not the only monstrous creature dwelling on the map. Republicans currently hold eight of New Yorks 27 seats in Congress. Despite being a state in which roughly 38 percent of voters went for Trump in 2020, Republicans would have an advantage only in four districts under the redrawn map, allowing Democrats to pick up the other four. For example, Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis previously beat an incumbent, Democrat Max RoseMax Rose'Dismantling Democracy' to save it: How Democrats rediscovered the joys of rigging elections De Blasio reportedly considering run for House seat New York redistricting panel surrenders over impasse MORE, in the 11th District. To guarantee that Rose will now win, Democrats stretched the district to include the liberal area of Park Slope in Brooklyn.

This was not supposed to happen.

In 2014, New Yorkers took the extraordinary step of amending Sections 4 and 5 of Article III of their states constitution. They created the New York Independent Redistricting Commission to prohibit drawing maps for the purpose of favoring or disfavoring incumbents or other particular candidates or political parties. (N.Y. Const. art. III, 4(c)(5)).

However, the fix was in. After proclaiming a new day of fair and honest elections, the commission was set at ten members divided evenly. Senate Deputy Majority Leader Michael Gianaris, a Queens Democrat, admitted that the commission was designed to fail: "Of course it was. When you have an equal amount of people from either side, you are inevitably going to get a deadlock or a tie. And thats exactly what happened here. In other words, all the democracy stuff was a lie. When the commission inevitably deadlocked, the Democratic-controlled legislature went on a gerrymandering frenzy.

Nevertheless, President Biden and Democrats like Nadler are seeking to take control over state election laws in the name of democracy. It does not matter if they are using the same anti-democratic measures as they accuse Republicans of wielding, because their motivations are purportedly pure even if their means manifestly are not.

There will be challenges this year to gerrymandered districts by both parties.While the Supreme Court said in 2019 that politicalgerrymandering is constitutionalinRucho v. Common Cause,such changes can be struck down when they result in the dilution or suppression of minority voters. The Supreme Court isexpected to rule soonon one such race-based challenge to new districts in Alabama.A similarchallenge in Illinois faileddespite districts that rival Nadler's infantastical, illogical shapes to gain Democratic seats.

TheNorth Carolina opinioncould complicate things for Democrats, however, if it is applied to other states with anti-gerrymandering laws. The law was notably a gerrymandering case based on partisan rather than racial impacts. The North Carolina court acknowledged the holding inRuchobut voted 4-3 that it could strike down excessive partisan gerrymandering on state constitutional grounds. It found thatRepublican lawmakers drew maps that deprived voters of their substantially equal voting power on the basis of partisan affiliation.

The New York districts also are the subject ofa lawsuitunder the state constitution.

The intent of the voters could not be more clear: While the commission was rigged to fail, voters clearly wanted to end the practice.

Both parties have engaged in gerrymandering this year but the blinkered outrage of President Biden to Republican gerrymandering only highlights the hypocrisy of our times. We are left, yet again, with a gang of arsonists espousing fire safety in our political system. Despite voters calling for an end to gerrymandering, their leaders continue to lie to them and frustrate efforts to end this insidious practice.

While the National Democratic Redistricting Committee called for a Fair Districts Pledge to commit to restoring fairness to our democracy, these politicians have instead followed Oscar Wilde's rule that the only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.

Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. You can find his updates on Twitter@JonathanTurley.

See original here:

'Dismantling Democracy' to save it: How Democrats rediscovered the joys of rigging elections | TheHill - The Hill

Posted in Democrat | Comments Off on ‘Dismantling Democracy’ to save it: How Democrats rediscovered the joys of rigging elections | TheHill – The Hill

Opinion | Do Democrats Win When They Talk About Race? – The New York Times

Posted: at 1:28 am

Produced by The Argument

With the midterm elections just nine months away, the Democrats face some hefty existential questions that need answers: Who are they in this post- and possibly pre-Trump era of American politics? Are they simply the anti-Trump party? Or are they the party of progress? Who are the voters they need to turn out in November? Should they excite the base by building a coalition united against white supremacy, or should they moderate their message to win over Republican defectors?

This week on The Argument, Jane Coaston brings together two voices that represent the factions in the Democratic Partys existential struggle. Lanae Erickson is the senior vice president of social policy, education and politics at the center-left think tank Third Way. She argues that Democrats need to make their platform as broadly popular as possible in order to bring more voters under the partys big tent. Thats the way to win and then enact progressive policies.

Steve Phillips disagrees. Hes the founder of the political media organization Democracy in Color and author of the book Brown Is the New White: How the Demographic Revolution Has Created a New American Majority. He argues that the Democrats must run and win as the party united around a vision of a multiracial, just society, unapologetically calling out racism on the other side of the ticket.

The two political strategists strongly disagree on what the party needs to do to win in November, but they agree on one thing: Democrats are afraid and need to answer the question of who they are, fast.

Thoughts? Email us at argument@nytimes.com or leave us a voice mail message at (347) 915-4324. We want to hear what youre arguing about with your family, your friends and your frenemies. (We may use excerpts from your message in a future episode.)

By leaving us a message, you are agreeing to be governed by our reader submission terms and agreeing that we may use and allow others to use your name, voice and message.

The Argument is produced by Phoebe Lett, Elisa Gutierrez and Vishakha Darbha, and edited by Anabel Bacon and Alison Bruzek; fact-checking by Mary Marge Locker and Kate Sinclair; music and sound design by Isaac Jones; engineering by Carole Sabouraud; and audience strategy by Shannon Busta. Our executive producer is Irene Noguchi. Special thanks to Kristin Lin, Pat McCusker and Kristina Samulewski.

Read this article:

Opinion | Do Democrats Win When They Talk About Race? - The New York Times

Posted in Democrat | Comments Off on Opinion | Do Democrats Win When They Talk About Race? – The New York Times