Daily Archives: February 7, 2022

Student Sues High School Principal for Violating His First Amendment Rights to Free Speech and Religion | – The Paradise News

Posted: February 7, 2022 at 7:01 am

syahrir maulana/iStock/Getty Images Plus

David Stout, a junior at Plainwell High School in Michigan, was suspended for three days last fall as punishment for expressing his religious beliefs in a private conversation with a friend. When his parents learned about his suspension, and the details behind the schools action, they enlisted the assistance of the Great Lakes Justice Center.

After reviewing the background, which extends back to April 2021, the attorneys took on the case and filed suit last Thursday, claiming that the schools principal, assistant principal, and band director all violated Stouts First Amendment right to express his beliefs:

A foundational core of our Constitutional Republic is that the State cannot punish its citizens for engaging in speech that is protected by the First Amendment.

The 29-page complaint provided the court with all the details. Last April, Stout, a self-proclaimed Christian who is active as a football player and band leader at the school, responded to a question texted to him by a Christian friend about the Bibles teaching on homosexuality.

From the complaint:

On or about April 28, 2021, Plaintiff [Stout], using his own smartphone, participated in a series of private group chat/text sessions with these friends from school.

At one point during this group session, one of these children asked to speak with Plaintiff in a private text.

Once Plaintiff began texting with this other child, Plaintiff was surprised that this friend, who was not homosexual, asked Plaintiffs opinions and beliefs about this other childs friends being gay.

Plaintiff stated that the Bible teaches that homosexual conduct is a sin and in the Christian context that God created only two biological genders man and woman.

Plaintiff stated that while homosexual conduct is a sin, however, everyone is a sinner due to freewill choices, and he would pray for them to repent and follow Jesus. He also shared that he would extend love toward them because God commands it, as Jesus died on the cross for them and extends His love toward them, and all they have to do is accept it.

Plaintiff continued that the Bible says at the end of days all will know the truth, every knee will bow, and every tongue confess that Jesus is Lord.

Stouts response offended his friend, and the text conversation ended.

However, the next day Stout reached out to his friend in an attempt at reconciliation:

Although Plaintiff felt his friend was discriminatory, selfish, and unkind, Plaintiff did not want to lose his friendship. Thus, on April 29, 2021, Plaintiff contacted this child for another private chat/text session.

Plaintiff began by expressing that he still held his Christian opinions, but he respected his friends opinions as well.

Further, Plaintiff did not want to end his friendship with this other student because of a disagreement, and he wanted to respect everyones opinions even if they disagreed so they could remain friends.

At no time was this conversation made public. It was private, occurred off campus, and was well within Stouts First Amendment rights. Said the complaint: Plaintiff never posted or otherwise distributed any of the content of this private chat/text to any public social media site, to the school, to other band members, to the student body, or to any other person.

When school officials learned about the conversation (probably from Stouts friend), they called Stout in for several conversations, which ultimately led to his being suspended for three days in October.

Following the filing of the complaint on Thursday, Stouts lawyer, David Kallman, issued a statement to the media:

My clients religious speech and beliefs should be treated with tolerance and respect. Public schools may not violate the Constitution and enforce a hecklers veto of student speech.

Nothing David did caused any disruption or problem at the school. He has the right to express his opinion in accordance with his sincerely held religious beliefs, without vilification or punishment from the government for holding to those beliefs.

Kallman expanded on the case:

David was suspended for three days last fall for stating his Christian beliefs in a private text conversation and in a hallway at school. He is also being punished for not policing and reporting the inappropriate jokes of fellow students.

He was instructed to stop posting his religious comments on all his social media platforms, and was disciplined for the offensive behavior of some other students; something he was unaware of and did not participate in.

David is a good student with a clean record. Nothing he did caused a disruption or any problem at the school. He has the right to express his opinion in accordance with his religious beliefs without vilification or punishment from the government.

Kallmans lawsuit is asking the court to declare the schools principal, assistant principal, and band directors actions unconstitutional and that [they] violated [Stouts] fundamental constitutional rights, and to find that [they] acted outside the scope of their authority.

The suit also demands that the school expunge Stouts school records of any mention of the incident, pay all of his attorneys fees and court costs, and grant such other and further relief as is just and appropriate.

That would include exacting promises from the schools officials not to punish Stout as retribution during his remaining year for bringing them to task for their unconscionable, illegal, and unconstitutional acts.

Excerpt from:
Student Sues High School Principal for Violating His First Amendment Rights to Free Speech and Religion | - The Paradise News

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Student Sues High School Principal for Violating His First Amendment Rights to Free Speech and Religion | – The Paradise News

Alaska House Democrats are trying to take away First Amendment rights of Republican members, starting with Rep. David Eastman – Must Read Alaska

Posted: at 7:01 am

The group known as Oath Keepers is a loose network of organizations made up of former military, police, fire, and first responders people who have taken oaths at some point in their lives to defend the Republic.

Rep. David Eastman is a member of the Oath Keepers, and for this, he is being hunted and hounded by Alaska House Democrats.

The Democrat majority members have for weeks been acting to remove Eastman from all of his committee assignments because of his association with the group, whose leaders await trial for their activities leading up to and on Jan. 6, 2021 in the nations capital.

The charges against Yale University graduate and Oath Keeper founder Elmer Stewart Rhodes are serious, but as of yet unproven, as his trial does not begin until April 19.

The Department of Justice charges say Oath Keeper defendants were not just engaged in mere disorderly conduct on Jan. 6 at the U.S. Capitol, but that they organized militarily well in advance to stop the peaceful transfer of power from President Donald Trump to President Joe Biden.

On Wednesday, Rhodes is scheduled to appear before the U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol. The committee, formed on a party-line vote on July 1, 2021, has been subpoenaing citizens and documents ever since to testify about what they knew and in what manner they participated in the Jan. 6 surge into the Capitol. The committee has even subpoenaed numerous Trump Administration members and advisers, and people associated with other patriotic nonprofit groups, including Women For America First and Moms for America.

Among the dozens of Alaskans who also went to Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021 to attend a Trump rally and participate in a protest was Rep. Eastman of Wasilla, who stayed a good distance from the halls of Congress the entire time.

For months, socialist organizers in Alaska political circles and their Democrat surrogates in the House have been on Eastmans trail, to try to get him removed from office altogether, due to his membership in Oath Keepers.

But there just are not enough votes for him to be expelled by the House, and Plan B is to redline him from all of his committees.

That failed on Monday because there were evidently not enough votes, but the Democrats plan to take the matter up again when Rep. Sara Rasmussen returns. Although she is a registered Republican, the Democrats are counting on her vote to punish Eastman, who is somewhat of his own caucus most of the time. Rasmussen is said to be out due to quarantine and votes with the Democrat majority frequently.

If the House does act against Eastman, it will set a precedent for the Legislature to punish members for their associations with various legally recognized groups groups such as the Democrat Socialists, or Black Lives Matter.

Oath Keepers is not only a legal organization, it enjoys protection by the Internal Revenue Service as a charitable, non-taxable entity. The IRS recognizes several Oath Keeper affiliates as 501(c) groups, including:

But politically motivated groups like the Democratic Party and Southern Poverty Law Center view Oath Keepers as one of the largest far-right antigovernment groups in the U.S. today.

In a court of law, what a nonprofit political group calls another nonprofit political group is one thing, but when a group is protected by the federal government as a charitable group, its quite another.

The Alaska House Committee on Committees was planning to meet at noon Tuesday to try again to remove Eastman from committees on its roster, but abruptly canceled its meeting, which had not even been advertised on the legislative calendar. That means its likely no floor action will be taken against Eastman on Wednesday.

The dispute is spinning the wheels of the House of Representatives, which is on Day 15 of its current 90- to 120-day session. Although Speaker Louise Stutes said this session was going to be more harmonious, she chairs the Committee on Committees, and she has verbally sneered at those defending Eastman.

Democrat Majority Leader Rep. Chris Tuck on the House floor on Monday said that some rights are simply not allowed. Tuck, who has not served in the military but has sworn an oath as a lawmaker, said there are distinct curbs on peoples free speech rights.

We really dont have the right to do whatever you want. It really is the right to do whats best, Tuck said.

But Rep. Kevin McCabe said that military men and women, when they take an oath, its for life, to defend against enemies foreign and domestic.

Notice there is no expiration on that oath, Madam Speaker, he said, saying that would be important for people to remember in coming days.

Rep. Ben Carpenter, also a veteran, spoke to the importance of defending the First Amendment rights of all Americans.

One of the lessons I learned in the military, after I took my oath to defend this nation, is that the Marxist that sits in the tank next to me has the same rights that I do, Carpenter said. First among those are the right to free speech and to freely associate with the organizations that I choose.

Carpenter continued: If you can remove somebody from a position because you dont like what they say or what they think, its only a matter of time before somebody else gets removed, for some other topic.

Like Loading...

Visit link:
Alaska House Democrats are trying to take away First Amendment rights of Republican members, starting with Rep. David Eastman - Must Read Alaska

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Alaska House Democrats are trying to take away First Amendment rights of Republican members, starting with Rep. David Eastman – Must Read Alaska

Where Language Policing Leads in Education – The Atlantic

Posted: at 7:01 am

Humans of all political persuasions have a tendency to lose sight of why taboos exist and to enforce them rigidly rather than thoughtfully. In two recent cases, American educators chose quality instructional material for their students, only to be stymied by illiberal authority figures who apparently believe that, whenever objectionable words are mentioned, context doesnt matter.

The first example comes from red America: School-board officials in McMinn County, Tennessee, voted to remove Maus, Art Spiegelmans Pulitzer Prizewinning graphic novel about Holocaust survivors, from its eighth-grade curriculum, largely because of eight curse words, including goddamn, in its text. School-board members felt that it was wrong to assign reading with words their students arent allowed to say. I understand that on TV and maybe at home these kids hear worse, school-board member Tony Allman said, according to a transcript of a meeting last month, but we are talking about things that if a student went down the hallway and said this, our disciplinary policy says they can be disciplined, and rightfully so.

Another board member, Jonathan Pierce, acknowledged using crude language himself, but asked, Can I lay that in front of a child and say read it, or this is part of your reading assignment?

Conor Friedersdorf: Banning bad ideas wont make them go away

The second example comes from blue America: Administrators at the University of Illinois at Chicago suspended, investigated, and punished Jason Kilborn, a law professor, over an exam question meant to test students knowledge of civil procedure in a race- and gender-discrimination lawsuit. The relevant material is quoted verbatim in a complaint the professor filed against the university:

One question asked students to analyze a piece of evidence, an account from a former manager that the manager had quit her job at Employer after she attended a meeting in which other managers expressed their anger at Plaintiff, calling her a n and b (profane expressions for African Americans and women) and vowed to get rid of her.

The complaint goes on to clarify, The question appeared exactly like this, with respectfully expurgated references to the racial and gender slurs. All of Kilborns classes were canceled. He was barred from campus and from interacting with anyone in the university community.

In the culture wars, theres a lot of debate about whether the red tribe or the blue tribe poses the greater threat to liberal norms in education. But is that the question we should be asking? The Tennessee school-board officials and the Chicago law-school administrators made the same mistake: Both acted to bolster preexisting community taboos against nasty words, but in doing so, they failed to distinguish between using nasty words in order to wound, profane, or disparage, and mentioning nasty words in order to teach about the problems they represent.

That differenceknown as the use-mention distinction to educators still brave enough to teach itis a key bulwark against anti-intellectual attacks on art, literature, philosophy, and more.

These recent acts of illiberal language policingcoinciding with a racial reckoning on the left and a backlash against its excesses on the rightthreatens to degrade the education of all young people. Disregard for context or intent will serve students poorly in a world where survivors of genocide do curse while conveying their experiences and where lawyers do grapple with fact patterns that include racial slurs. And ignoring the use-mention distinctionor acculturating students to reject itvests the mere mention of nasty language with more power to disconcert or wound, not less. In the University of Illinois controversy, Kilborn reported that he used that same exam question for 10 years without incident. Norms change over time, of course. But the newer norms seem to invite students to evaluate course content in superficial terms.

Whats more, the mere absence of nasty words would not even protect anyone from reprehensible ideas. Hateful sentiments worthy of our scorn can be conveyed via non-taboo diction. Thats why we should teach young people to direct their ire toward objectionable intent.

John McWhorter: Even trigger warning is now off-limits

The law professors punishment violates core values of higher education. As his lawsuit puts it, The University of Illinois Systems Guiding Principles at the very beginning explicitly ensure an unyielding allegiance to freedom of speech even controversial, contentious, and unpopular speech and pledge that protected speech cannot be prohibited or punished. Yet they transgressed against both academic freedom and the First Amendment.

School boards are legally entitled to set curriculum, and all public schools draw arbitrary lines around what is age-appropriate. Yet in the Tennessee district, the effect of stripping the curriculum of curse words that are already ubiquitous in American culture was to deprive eighth graders of an encounter with a powerful graphic novel. The school boards move prompted a host of social-media testimonials to the power of Spiegelmans book. I read Maus when I was nine years old and it changed my life, the writer Jane Coaston of The New York Times recalled. It made me a better person, a more empathetic and compassionate person.

The McMinn County School Board might well be depriving multiple students of similarly edifying or transformative experiences, and its difficult to imagine how this censoriousnesscouched as protecting kids from foul language they likely have heard many timeswould help any students.

Decide for yourself about which of these illiberal actions is more worrisome. So long as significant factions on the right and left fail to embrace core liberal insights and values about language in education, students will be ill-served by whichever strain of illiberalism happens to wield power.

View post:
Where Language Policing Leads in Education - The Atlantic

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Where Language Policing Leads in Education – The Atlantic

New Public Access to Court Records – The Regulatory Review

Posted: at 7:01 am

The Supreme Court of Oklahoma allows access to records as a matter of public policy.

Recently, the Oklahoma Supreme Court decided a case on the confidentiality of judicial and administrative records. The State of Oklahoma v. Dennis Rivero decision is unique for many reasons, not the least of which is that the Oklahoma Supreme Court recognizedbut did not applythe presumption of public access to public records. Instead, the court held that public policy embodied by the states Open Records Act required it to overturn a blanket ban on disclosure. In this groundbreaking decision, the Oklahoma Supreme Court reached the same result as other courts have, but on new grounds that may now be followed in other courts across the nation.

Many courts decide similar cases on the basis of the presumption of public access to court records under the U.S. Constitution. The Oklahoma Supreme Court recognized this First Amendment presumption, and even pointed out that it follows that presumption in other cases. Yet it did not decide according to that constitutional presumption in this particular case.

Alternatively, many courts decide these cases on the basis of contract law. The courts in these other cases construe the agreed protective order or confidentiality agreement as a contract and interpret it accordingly. This issue, too, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma recognized but declined to address.

Instead, the court took a new approach to the facts presented in the recent case. Dennis Rivero, a physician, had defended a disciplinary proceeding before the State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision. He agreed to a blanket protective order in that proceedingmaking everything confidential and limited to use in that proceeding, and in that proceeding only.

Rivero won the disciplinary proceeding. With that administrative proceeding at an end, he filed a lawsuit against the person whom he thought complained about him. Rivero asked the Board for copies of two depositions, and copies of his own motion for summary judgment and exhibits in the disciplinary proceeding. The Board refused, citing the agreed protective order that the doctor had signed, which make everything confidential and limited to use only in that disciplinary proceeding.

Rivero appealed the Boards order denying him access to these materials. On appeal, the Oklahoma Supreme Court ruled on the basis of public policy expressed in the Oklahoma Open Records Act and the Oklahoma Discovery Code. The Code, which the Board adopted for its proceedings, is similar to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Supreme Court ordered the depositions and the motion for summary judgment with its exhibits to be redacted and released.

Many states have public records lawsor, as in Oklahoma, open records laws like the federal Freedom of Information Act. The Supreme Court of Oklahoma ruled that just like the constitutional presumption of public access, the public policy embodied by the state Open Records Act and the Discovery Code in the Rules of Civil Procedure bars the use of blanket confidentiality orders. The court sent the matter back to the Board with directions to allow the doctor access to the documents after limited redactions and to allow him to use the redacted documents in other proceedings.

The court in this ruling made several unique moves that courts in other states could follow. The court ruled on the basis of public policy embedded in state statutes, not on constitutional requirements. And, state open records laws like those that influenced the Oklahoma Supreme Court are found throughout jurisdictions in the United States. They embody the same public policy favoring disclosure to the public as the Oklahoma Open Records Act, which the Oklahoma Supreme Court relied on in its opinion.

Furthermore, the court rested its decision on the fact that the State Board in question adopted the Oklahoma Discovery Act which has requirements for making documents and information confidential. As the Supreme Court described them, these statutory requirements have their conceptual origins in their counterparts found in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 26 and Rule 29.

All jurisdictions in the United States have rules of civil procedure. The effect of the Oklahoma Supreme Court reaching out to the public policy embodied in the Oklahoma Discovery Act is the legal equivalent of reaching out to the public policy embodied in the applicable rules of civil procedure. Under these rules, there is a presumption of public access to court files which must be accommodated, even in cases that contain case documents with public access restrictions.

An important aspect of this ruling is that it arises from a case involving a state administrative agency. So, the presumption of public access to court files was extended to public access to administrative agency files. Previously, disclosure was not mandated in all proceedings. The impact of the Oklahoma Supreme Courts ruling in this case could be universal: Public access to the records of courts and of administrative agencies is now presumed.

In Oklahoma, the new default is that the public has access to government materials. To restrict the publics access will be an exception, not the rule. Parties can agree, stipulate, or contract as they wish. But the parties cannot restrict public access in any proceeding simply because the parties wish it so.

Dennis Wall is a litigator and a member of the American Law Institute.

Here is the original post:
New Public Access to Court Records - The Regulatory Review

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on New Public Access to Court Records – The Regulatory Review

J&J tried to get federal judge to block publication of Reuters story – Reuters

Posted: at 7:01 am

Feb 4 (Reuters) - Johnson & Johnson tried to get a U.S. judge to block Reuters from publishing a story based on what it said were confidential company documents about the healthcare giant's legal maneuvers to fight lawsuits claiming its Baby Powder caused cancer.

"The First Amendment is not a license to knowingly violate the law," said the company in a filing late Thursday in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New Jersey, where a unit of J&J had sought bankruptcy protection while defending the Baby Powder lawsuits. The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects freedom of the press.

On Friday, Reuters reported that J&J secretly launched "Project Plato" last year to shift liability from about 38,000 pending Baby Powder talc lawsuits to a newly created subsidiary, which was then to be put into bankruptcy. By doing so, J&J could limit its financial exposure to the lawsuits.

Register

After the publication of the story, Reuters asked U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Michael Kaplan to deny J&J's motion, claiming it was moot. Less than an hour after Reuters submitted its letter, J&J said in a filing that it was withdrawing a request for an immediate hearing on the matter but was "not prepared to agree" that its request regarding the documents was moot.

J&J said in its filing after the publication of the story that it intends to continue discussions with Reuters and said it was "heartened that publication of confidential documents may no longer be imminent."

J&J's request to block publication was "among the most extraordinary remedies a litigant can request under the law," attorneys for Reuters, a unit of Thomson Reuters , said in a Friday court filing. The news agency's lawyers called J&J's request a "prior restraint of speech on a matter of public interest."

J&J said Reuters had obtained documents that were protected from public disclosure by an order from Kaplan. The company demanded that Reuters return the documents and refrain from publishing information gleaned from the documents.

"This is a complex matter that should be heard by the court in a forum where both sides present their cases in an appropriate setting and not argued through the media," a J&J spokesperson said in a statement on Friday.

Reuters denied that it has confidential information, saying in court papers that the confidentiality of one of the documents was lifted in January and that the second is not in the possession of Reuters.

J&J's (JNJ.N) LTL unit filed for bankruptcy in October to resolve the claims alleging J&J's talc-based products contained asbestos and caused mesothelioma and ovarian cancer. read more

J&J maintains that its consumer talc products are safe and have been confirmed to be asbestos-free.

The company has said it placed LTL into bankruptcy to settle those claims rather than litigating them individually. It has said resolving these claims through Chapter 11 is a legitimate use of the restructuring process.

Talc plaintiff committees argue that J&J should not be permitted to use bankruptcy to address the talc litigation and that by doing so, it is depriving plaintiffs their day in court.

Register

Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware and Maria Chutchian in New York; editing by Amy Stevens and Rosalba O'Brien

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read more here:
J&J tried to get federal judge to block publication of Reuters story - Reuters

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on J&J tried to get federal judge to block publication of Reuters story – Reuters

The Emerging Plot to Defend Trumps Next Coup – The New Republic

Posted: at 7:01 am

But there may yet be a flaw in reformers designs. House Democrats are pushing to make it harder for members of Congress to reject any slates of electors provided by state governors by requiring a two-thirds supermajority, rather than a simple majority, in both the House and Senate. Had this been in place in 2020, much of the drama that ensued among lawmakers during the certification process would have been avoided.

However, as Judd Legum points out in a recent edition of Popular Information, Democrats may not be thinking ahead. The next crisis may not come from challenges to legitimate slates of electors. Citing a new paper from Yale Laws Matthew Seligman, Legum warns that a future Congress may have to deal with a Trump-supporting Republican Governor in a swing state ignoring the results and submitting a phony certification to Congress.

In this scenario, a supermajority built to protect the integrity of the election becomes the means by which the plot to overturn the election is furthered. As Insiders Grace Panetta has written, Georgia gubernatorial candidate David Purdue is one governor who might consider carrying out such a plot; Legum points to Republicans running for statehouses in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin who also fit the bill.

All of which goes to show that no matter how exposed Trumps band of miscreants might be, the former president is still adding powerful allies to his corrupt cause. And the next coup, if it comes, will look very different from the last one. It wont be a ragtag mob trying to sack the Capitol or flailing efforts to enlist the Department of Homeland Security to swipe voting machines off the streets. Strong protections were already in place before Trump took those desperate measures. Rather, the next plot against the Republic would be much more subtle, painted with a sheen of lawfulness and mounted against more vulnerable spots, where democracy is held together only by long-standing norms and gentlemens agreements. But what happens when those gentlemen are replaced by rogues?

See the original post here:

The Emerging Plot to Defend Trumps Next Coup - The New Republic

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on The Emerging Plot to Defend Trumps Next Coup – The New Republic

I never thought ‘New Atheism’ would become a tool of the Christian Right – Flux.community

Posted: at 6:59 am

As an ex-Muslim woman, I once sought refuge in a vocal online atheist movement that began developing in the early 2000s, but after a few years in what became known as the New Atheist scene, I realized that many of the people I had thought were dedicated to values like enlightenment and tolerance had a lot more in common with the religious bigots they claimed to oppose.

Online vocal atheist communities seemed like a great fit for me, at first. As someone who grew up in a theocracy, it was cathartic to find a place to vent my frustrations on the topic of religion. Finding community is certainly not easy as an ex-Muslim; and when youre an immigrant and a minority like I am in Canada, where I live now, that adds a few more obstacles.

Religion was never something I was fond of, even as a child. I questioned everything and the stories in scripture didnt make sense to me. You can imagine the challenges that posed while living in a theocracy. As a result, I never really fit in and always felt like an outsiderespecially growing up as a Third Culture Kid, a Pakistani expat in Saudi Arabia.

Over time, Ive come to realize that there were several reasons I felt that way, not just my lack of belief. Identity and being an immigrant in a place where you cant even call yourself an immigrant even if you are born there (Saudi Arabia) had a lot to do with it, too.

Both countries were still very affected by problems stemming from religion, however. Especially religion interfering in government. There were so many things that ran counter to my own progressive values. Dissent was not tolerated, women were treated like second-class citizens, minorities were treated unfairly, and anti-LGBTQ bigotry was commonplace. Encountering New Atheism seemed like a release of so much pent up anger about these things. It was wonderful to be involved with a community that seemed to be actively concerned with the same issues that I was.

I jumped right in with my newfound friends, most of whom seemed to be huge fans of evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins; Christopher Hitchens, the late Vanity Fair columnist; and Sam Harris, author of the book The End of Faith. Their in-your-face godlessness seemed to be just what I was looking for. It was unapologetic, caustic, and most important of all, concerned with spreading the good word. It was a welcome contrast to holding your tongue, as one must in theocracy for self-preservation.

These NewAtheists wanted to spread the gospel of secularism, unlike their predecessors whose atheism was more incidental to their identities. It wasnt an overnight change, but once I became involved in the online atheist scene, I too, posted frequently on the internet about religion and my dislike for it.

My online content generating days began In 2010 after I had recently returned to Canada after living in Pakistan for a few years. I decided to start a blog called Nice Mangos based on my observations and some interviews I did while I was there. I primarily wrote about sexuality in Pakistan back thenthe site was the first and only blog of its kind at the time. Of course, it was hard to completely disentangle religion from sexuality and societal restrictions around it in Pakistan, so I did touch upon it occasionally.

A few years later, I wrote and illustrated a childrens picture book called My Chacha is Gay which used simple illustrations to address the subject of homophobia in a specifically Pakistani context.

Most of the money I raised via crowd-funding for the book came from fellow Pakistanis, which was such a pleasant surprise and in stark contrast to the attitudes I had generally experienced in Pakistan. The homophobia in Pakistan always struck me as very odd & hypocritical considering that same-sex experimentation was not uncommon among men who lacked access to women because of gender segregation. Pakistan is a place where two men walking down the street holding hands would be perfectly acceptable and commonplace, but any mention of gay rights elicits howls of anger. My childrens book was the target of such anger, and I continue to receive death threats about it to this day.

I wrote my blog and childrens book under my current pseudonymand Im glad I did! Being a woman who discusses sexuality, religion and apostasy from Islam specifically put me in real danger and made me a target of intolerant religious extremists. I received all kinds of hate mail, rape, and death threats too.

I still get plenty of threatening messages nowadays, but the hate mail I currently receive comes mostly from Western far-right types who say Islam is barbaric, and call me a dirty immigrant. Having been the target of abuse from extremist Christians, Muslims, and atheists, its easy to see that they have a lot in common.

Sadly, the abuse Ive faced is part of a larger dilemma that Muslim and ex-Muslim women face. At home, we deal with constant oppression from Islamic authoritarians; in the West, were beset by bigotry and tokenism from people who want to exploit our struggles in the service of their own narratives.

After several years as a blogger, I decided to expand my online voice in February of 2016 by starting a podcast called Polite Conversations. The show started off with a bang by getting banned from YouTube twice for posting our first episode, an interview with Iranian-British atheist Maryam Namazie. Since then, Ive done scores of shows and met many wonderful people.

But as I got further into New Atheism, I began seeing troubling indications that many of the people in the movement seemed to be motivated by anti-Muslim bigotry rather than a desire to oppose intolerance and superstition. This wasnt a realization I came to easily or quickly since I too had personally had been falsely accused of Islamophobia because of my criticism of religion, so that obscured things for me for a while.

At the time, it was harder to see who was criticizing in good faith (no pun intended) and who was motivated by anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant views. But after Donald Trump emerged as a political figure in the United States, the truth became much easier to spot, as bigots were emboldened and dog whistles turned into blaring sirens.

My concerns about movement atheism really escalated in 2015, when the reactions to the European migrant crisis I saw around me were more in line with the far-right than the compassionate, secular humanism I had been expecting. I was appalled as I saw prominent New Atheist figures sharing anti-migrant propaganda. One popular atheist publication even began publishing articles from notorious bigots like Katie Hopkins and supposedly satirical covers that depicted migrants in dehumanizing ways as insects or through racist caricatures. I was disturbed when I saw people like Sam Harris sharing and endorsing anti-migrant interviews with far-right figures like Anne Marie Waterswho was too extreme for UKIP (a far-right party in the United Kingdom).

Instead of welcoming refugees fleeing Islamic fundamentalism, many within New Atheism were joining the reactionary effort to close Europes doors. This moment was what really began to open my eyes to the hollowness and hypocrisy of this movement.

Despite my worries, however, I still had some hope that perhaps the disgusting behavior I was observing was merely the product of misunderstanding, rather than a turn by some atheists toward the far right.

In pursuit of that thesis, I decided to voice my concerns publicly through an open letter to Harris about a podcast discussion (horrendously titled On the Maintenance of Civilization) hed had with Douglas Murray, a far-right anti-immigrant English commentator who had once lamented the declining levels of whiteness in London, had a friendly conversation with a white nationalist like Stefan Molyneux, and had generally allied with many extreme figures on the right in their advocacy against refugees.

I expressed concern to Harris that, during his Murray interview, he had proclaimed that he would rather vote for Ben Carson, a man he proclaimed to be a dangerously deluded religious imbecile, over the atheist socialist Noam Chomsky because at least Carson knew that the real enemy of American society was jihadists.

At the end of my letter, I invited Harris to come onto my own podcast to discuss the topic further. Several months later, I was delighted that Harris accepted my offer to appear on Polite Conversations. Our interview took place in November of 2016, just before Donald Trump was elected as president of the United States.

Ahead of my discussion with Harris, I hoped that he would be able to address my concerns. But as our conversation progressed, it became increasingly evident that he was unwilling to budge in his positions, regardless of the amount of evidence and examples I provided. Instead of responding to the specific points I made, Harris responded with generalities and hand-waving as he doubled- and tripled-down in his support for people like Douglas Murray and YouTuber Dave Rubin, whose supposedly deeply journalistic agenda I was unable to perceive.

While I appreciated his courtesy in appearing on my show, the more I thought about our exchanges afterward, the more I realized how evasive Harris had beenand eventually through this exchange and other observations, I came to the conclusion that my concerns about New Atheism merging with the far-right were true. I now do a miniseries documenting my journey into and out of New Atheism called Woking Up. Im still very much an atheist, but not that kind of atheist.

Once Trump took office in 2017, the trends I had noticed before became glaringly obvious. Rubin, who had risen to prominence thanks to Harriss help (he not only appeared on his first episode to assist in launching Rubins show, he also regularly promoted his episodes and funded him on Patreon) began making paid videos for PragerU, a propaganda network started by Dan and Farris Wilks, Christian supremacist brothers who are big donors to Texas Republican Ted Cruz and many other extremist causes.

After building a career as a professional atheist, Rubin told a Religious Right YouTube channel that he now believed in a god, thanks to the ministrations of Jordan Peterson, a Canadian psychologist whose first claim to fame was his transphobia and deliberate misinterpretations of Canadas Gender Identity Rights Bill C-16.

Since his emergence in 2016, Peterson has worked diligently to flatter his far-right Christian audience with interminable lectures that mostly amount to justifying Bronze Age theological pronouncements. Ditto for Bret Weinstein, a former biology professor who presents himself as a sciencey secular type while frequently shilling forivermectin, the anti-parasitic drug beloved by the Christian right that Weinsteinfalsely insiststo be a miracle cure for Covid-19. He has now openly embraced the anti-vaccine movement as well.

Harris himself has also carefully cultivated a right-wing audience, endlessly ranting against wokeness, critical race theory and leftist identity politics. While the coronavirus pandemic has pushed his obsession about Islam out of the news cycle, he still sometimes goes out of his way to throw a little jihadism-fearmongering into other subjects. Just recently on an Ask Me Anything episode he warned, given how disruptive Covid has been, I would bet that the threat of bio-terrorism has increased significantly and if youre a nihilist, or youre insane, or youre a jihadist, or youre a fanatic of some other stripe, well then, bio-terrorism just got its Super Bowl commercial.

Even as far-right movements around the globe have come to power thanks to inspiration from Trump, Harris has continued to use his platform to focus on petty grievances with college students, anti-racists, Black Lives Matter, and the political left in general. Instead of highlighting the alarming growth of right-wing extremism, Harris has downplayed it as irrelevant, a mere fringe of the fringe.

Despite his reputation as an advocate for atheism, Harriss content has barely examined the violence-glorifying Christian supremacism that metastasized into the murderous chaos of the Jan. 6 invasion of the U.S. Capitol.Within the year after the attack took place, Harris published only two podcast episodes about itaccording to his website search. Even then, the event was portrayed as some sort of response to wokeness.

A few days after the first anniversary of Jan. 6, Harris did mention Trump and the Capitol putsch, but instead of putting the attack in its proper theocratic context, he framed the ex-president being a mere cult leader. While Trump certainly does inspire adoration in some supporters, its an incomplete picture, like most of Harriss Trump criticism. Thats becauseTrump alone did not create the manic hatred we all saw on Jan. 6, he merely took advantage of it. According to his website and Google, Harris has never even used the term Christian nationalism on his site, even as numerous journalists and scholars have published hundreds of articles, research papers, and books on the subject.

Everyone has their own priorities, but its certainly interesting to see that one of the original four horsemen of New Atheism evinces little to no concern about a growing and malignant Christian supremacist movement in his own country which was nourished by one of its major political parties to conduct the first violent invasion of the American Capitol since the War of 1812.

A key part of the far rights strategy to radicalize theologically conservative Christians has been the spreading of lurid and often false tales about Muslim immigrants and migrants. Unfortunately, Harris and many others in the former New Atheist movement have been more than happy to oblige. But in promoting and defending hatred against Islam, right-wing atheists are doing more than just enabling their fellow ideologues, however. They are also undermining the position of atheism in society. Trump and his underlings have been crystal-clear that their goal is Christian supremacyhaving government explicitly promote Christianity while giving non-Christians fewer rights and forcing them to be silent in public.

Christianity is under tremendous siege, Trump said in a 2016 campaign speech to an extremist evangelical group. We dont exert the power that we should have.

Christianity will have power, he promised. If Im there, youre going to have plenty of power, you dont need anybody else. Youre going to have somebody representing you very, very well. Remember that.

Unlike so many of the promises hes made over the decades, this was one that Trump actually kept. He appointed hundreds of Christian nationalist judges intent on throwing out abortion rights rulings, he gave them unparalleled access to his staff, he appointed many of them to the highest echelons of power. He catered obsessively to their authoritarian policy demands. And after four disastrous years, Trumps strategy of unlawfully clinging to power was conceived and executed by Christian Right activists.

Despite everything Trump and his fellow Republicans have done to promote and enforce Christian supremacism, right-wing atheists are still continuing their quixotic obsessions with random left-wing activists and college students, while also cozying up to theocrats. Figures like James Lindsay who emerged from the New Atheist scene are now prominent allies of the Religious Right with close ties to Christian nationalist organizations like Sovereign Nations. Richard Dawkins, meanwhile, is praising church bells and denouncing the aggressive-sounding Allahu Akbar, and Douglas Murray is making videos about the supposed god-shaped hole in the human psyche.

You simply cant make this stuff up. It is beyond parody.

Nowadays, no one wants to be called a New Atheist anymore, because of the baggage and connotations the term carries, but the evangelical right-wing atheists still continue doing the same things. Whether they call themselves the Intellectual Dark Web or heterodox, their anti-left sentiment remains. Its very different from the vast majority of atheistswho actually do embrace pluralism, science, and human rights.

I left Islam because my skepticism was prompted by progressive values. I did not expect to see the same bigotries and conservative biases in the atheist scene that claimed to oppose these things. I learned the hard way, however, that bigotry and discrimination were not what my former associates opposed, it was Islam, it was minorities, immigrants and brown people.

Joining hands with Christian nationalists to own the libs makes a certain kind of sense by this twisted logic. But its definitely not atheist activism.

Original post:
I never thought 'New Atheism' would become a tool of the Christian Right - Flux.community

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on I never thought ‘New Atheism’ would become a tool of the Christian Right – Flux.community

What is alternative medicine? – Lancashire Business View

Posted: at 6:59 am

Opinion LBV Hub Health and wellbeing

First of all, let me put it out there - alternative medicine is an alternative way of thinking, not an alternative to seeing your doctor!

Now I know if you look up the phrase alternative medicine in thedictionary, it probably wont say that.It will reflect the common belief that alternative medicine is a raft of therapies, techniques and practices that are used instead of conventional medicine.

For some people they are.But they dont have to be.And thats not how I see them.Especially when you have a chronic, long-term illness such as endometriosis.

I have worked with many people over the years, from people with injuries and mild illnesses to those with chronic and terminal illness.These days I specialise in endometriosis because this is where my heart and soul lie; I have endometriosis myself and I am passionate about role alternative medicine can play in this care pathway.

I learnt a long time ago that alternative medicine can work very well alongside conventional medicine, especially when the conventional medicine youre undergoing is particularly harsh or cannot help with all of your symptoms.(You may also haveheard the term 'complimentary therapies'- this refers to the same range of treatments but using them in a way that supports orthodoxmedicine.)

For many people, they see what I do as dangerous and irresponsible because they feel as though I am trying to persuade people to move away from conventional medicine or preaching in the old evangelical street pastor way that My Way is the Only Way.

It isnt.

I mean, it can be if you want it to be but that has to your personal choice and in order to make an informed choice you need to know all the facts: Both the limitations and benefits of all the treatment options you have.

A lot of people think that alternative medicine is just for people without symptoms. Or that the more chronic your illness is, the less you need alternative medicine.

The trouble is that when you have a chronic condition, your body is going through so much that it can struggle to cope with the normal processes of just getting through life.The emotional and physical strain of the illness as well as whatever medication or surgery youre going through can be debilitating in itself.And this, especially, is where alternative medicine can help.

Alternative medicine can help on as many levels as you want it to.

At its most basic, it can help you relax, manage pain and get better sleep.Sleep in itself is one of the two greatest kindnesses we can give our bodies.Its our natural way of rejuvenating and reenergising our physical and emotional bodies, which is why sleep deprivation impacts on us so much and why we feel so much better after a good sleep.

Alternative medicine works really well with our natural rhythms to calm us down in ways we dont even notice.(More about this in future articles!)

Perhaps the most fundamental belief of this alternative way of viewing medicine is that our bodies, when everything is working well and in synergy, has the capacity to heal itself.

We see this every day on a basic level.We cut a finger opening a tin can and mostly, within a day, a scab has formed and the skin below is already well on the way to healing and repairing.

The alternative medicine theory is that this can be perpetuated on a greater scale, so we can use alternative medicine to promote that natural healing.

When you have a chronic condition like endometriosis of course it isnt quite that simple.But we can use these different techniques to maximise our natural resilience and maximise our ability to recover from intense and invasive conventional treatments. We can also delay our need for those intensive treatments if we know which alternative medicines to use.

So many of the issues we face can be put down to stress, anxiety and tension. Even when you have a chronic condition, its amazing how many of the symptoms are actually due to a secondary issue, like anxiety or depression.This is where alternative medicine comes into its own.

One of the most-commonly used reasons for people using alternative medicine is simply to feel a bit more relaxed.Sometimes, just taking an hour out for a message, a meditation session or a gong bath (seriously - try it!) can feel the same as having a weeks holiday.And who doesnt love that feeling!

There are so many techniques that aim to relax and calm you, youre spoiled for choice.Over the coming weeks I will be writing more about some of the different therapies that are out there, but the best advice I can give you is to try what youre drawn to.

There are so many different therapies that fall under the umbrella of alternative medicine that its impossible to list all of the benefits - but here are the most common ones:

I have lost count of the amount of times I have had people doubt what I do because theyve come across people who think that alternative medicine is just people like me telling them things like breathe through the pain and youll be OK, just cut out dairy and your endometriosis will be better in 3 months or a morning routine of juice and yoga will sort out your endometriosis.

There are grains of truth in these things but it isnt that simple.After all - if it was wed all be running round healthy and happy all the time.

A properbreathing techniquecan help you manage your pain with incredible results, but it needs to be done properly and we need to get to the heart of whats causing you the pain.

A gooddietis essential in being as well as you can be, but restrictions need to be done with proper (qualified) advice because cutting out vital nutrients will do more harm than good.Plus, everyones endometriosis is different so for some people wheat could be a trigger, for others that trigger could be onions and for some its stress and anxiety that causes the IBS-type symptoms.

Apositivemorningroutinecan set you up well for the day ahead and yoga and juice can have their place in any routine.But this really is a personal thing and if youre in pain or so tired you can barely stand up, then trying to do a daily Downward Dog is just going to add more pain, frustration and despair.

We need to take acoordinated approachto deal with endometriosis; an approach that looks at all areas of your life and addresses all of your endo triggers (and causes, once we know them.)

You see, thats the thing.Some alternative therapies wont work as well as others for you, in the exact same way that some medicines work better than others.The style of the therapist can play a role.The expectations that you have going into the treatment session, as well, plays a massive role.

The stories of the power of alternative medicine can be mind-blowing and this can lead people to think that they are going to walk out of their first session feeling incredible.

If youre planning on trying out alternative medicine then have a chat to your therapist first.Talk to them about realistic goals and how the pathway to that goal will look like.Talk about timeframes.Treat it as you would a course of medicine.

Of course, if all you want to do is to use alternative medicine to get some much-needed rest and relaxation then these conversations wont take up much time.But its still worth having them.Because as we all giving you a clearer idea of the therapy youre signing up to, it also gives you a good idea of thetherapistyoure signing up to.If you two dont gel, then chances are it wont give you the results youre looking for.

So if youre someone who has tried some of these hollow promises, these get-well-quick schemes, then try if you can to look beyond the disappointment that it didnt work for you (because Im guessing it didnt).Reset your take on alternative medicine.Consider it as an alternative way of viewing your health and start your journey with it again.

If youre totally new to this World but fancy giving it a go, then take some time to find out what options are out there for you.Talk to your GP/consultant.Talk to your friends.Talk to me!A good therapist will offer to have a chat with you and will be open and honest about what they feel you need.And they wont shy away from recommended other people if they feel its a better fit for you.

Sarah has run her own alternative therapy business Halcyon since 2008, initially alongside a 9-5 career in health and social care commissioning and charity management.

She has been full-time with Halcyon since 2018 and is now recognised as Your Natural Endometriosis Expert helping people with endometriosis delay, prevent or recover well from surgery. Though she still helps others who are struggling with chronic and terminal illness. You can read more about her business athttps://naturalendometriosisexpert.com

Read the original post:

What is alternative medicine? - Lancashire Business View

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on What is alternative medicine? – Lancashire Business View

Serving the homeless a Christian ethos, but others involved, too – Denver Gazette

Posted: at 6:59 am

Feb. 6Christian organizations and affiliated churches operate Colorado Springs' primary emergency shelters, soup kitchens and support programs for people who are homeless or otherwise in need.

Some clients say they appreciate the opportunity to pray or seek spiritual guidance. Others say they'd prefer to encounter no religious overtones while accepting a free meal or an overnight cot.

The old model of preaching to people who are down on their luck but not necessarily looking for proselytizing has given way to optional and voluntary choice for clients to hear Christian messages, say leaders of the city's largest homeless providers.

Though their locations may display crosses, have chaplains or clergy on site and offer worship services and Bible studies, Springs Rescue Mission, the Salvation Army of El Paso County and Catholic Charities of Central Colorado do not require participation in religious activities to receive meals, secure a place to sleep and get help with housing, employment, health care and addiction.

"We are a come-as-you-are, low-barrier shelter and meet everybody at their point of need," said Travis Williams, chief development officer.

The organization runs Colorado Springs' largest homeless campus, with 450 shelter beds, three free meals served daily, a 65-unit apartment building with support staff, employment programs and others.

"There's no witness test for anybody on what their beliefs are," Williams said. "We see in the Bible how Jesus consistently met people where they were at, regardless of their circumstances ... and that's the same philosophy we take."

But a common misperception prevails, he said, that clients are required to profess their faith, attend chapel or listen to sermons.

That was the format when Christians began outreach to the poor centuries ago. "A message and a meal" had been the standard for rescue missions since their inception in Glasgow, Scotland, in 1826, with Pentecostal leanings.

Springs Rescue Mission had used that format, said former President and CEO Larry Yonker, until he took over in 2013.

"I didn't feel like that was the best model for showing compassion for the guests, so I eliminated that," he said.

Yonker retired in 2020, after leading the organization through a $22 million renovation and expansion to build a 14-acre campus. The project started with securing a Community Development Block Grant from the city. Using federal money for a capital project was a relatively new move for a religious organization in Colorado Springs, he said, although such arrangements are becoming more prevalent.

"The state and the city are looking for people with vision to solve major social problems, and it takes a pretty good-sized organization to be able to sustain something like that," Yonker said.

Yonker said he strived to counterbalance city leaders' changing direction to manage the homeless by enacting municipal ordinances on camping, loitering and panhandling. Yonker wanted the city's approach to be tempered with a profusion of services to not warehouse the homeless but help them get off the streets.

"I am in favor of breaking up encampments around waterways because they're dangerous," he said, "but ordinances are just a tool to manage your city."

After visiting a rescue mission in San Antonio, Yonker said eliminating barriers of any kind, such as making room for pets, adding lockers to store belongings, and providing showers and laundry facilities, became a local focus to help the chronically homeless, who often have mental illnesses or substance issues, get re-housed.

Now, 20 to 25 chronically homeless clients of Springs Rescue Mission step up into housing each month, Williams, the chief development officer, said.

"In the past, we'd have 20 to 25 a year," he said.

One program at Springs Rescue Mission is Christian-based, a one-year residential addiction recovery course.

But planting seeds of the Christian faith is more likely to look like a volunteer sitting down at a table and eating a meal with diners, Williams said.

"If we're going to share our faith it's not typically from any pulpit," he said. "It's by doing the work, forming relationships and getting to know the people."

'We serve anyone'

The Salvation Army in El Paso County, which runs a 232-bed shelter for men, women and families and provides meals, senior housing, afterschool care and other programs, also has dealt with inaccurate perceptions, said Capt. Doug Hanson, who oversees local operations.

"Rumors have shrouded us the last handful of years that we don't serve everyone, and that's not true," he said. "We serve anyone and everyone that's the heart of why faith-based groups do this work."

Since the first day the Salvation Army opened soup kitchens in London, England in 1865, Hanson said the organization has been serving the poor, needy and destitute.

"While they ate, they heard the Gospel message," Hanson said.

Early organizers had "no intention of being a church, but rather a Christian movement that organized many churches to serve the homeless," he said. The Salvation Army church grew out of that.

Catholics also have a long history of responding to the Christian call to serve the common good by founding hospitals, schools, soup kitchens and social justice programs, said Rochelle Schlortt, spokeswoman for Catholic Charities of Central Colorado.

The organization is part of a nationwide network founded in 1910 and runs Colorado Springs' oldest soup kitchen, the Marian House, as well as homeless outreach, employment aid, immigration services, and assistance to pregnant moms and babies.

A priest, a spiritual care group and a nurse from Penrose-St. Francis Health Services are available at the Marian House for anyone desiring to pray, talk or have questions answered, she said.

"If people want spiritual guidance, we are more than happy to partner with them to help fulfill that spiritual need," Schlortt said. "But we don't force that on anybody or proselytize or require anybody to do anything to get help."

Seth Martin, a Colorado Springs native who has worked at a carnival, as a truck driver and at fast-food restaurants and has been homeless off and on for 21 years, has used homeless services at all three organizations.

"They don't push religion on you," he said.

Although Martin identifies as a lifelong Christian, he said he likes that there's no hard sell about Jesus when getting help.

The approach is more covert than overt, said Kristen Viers, who lives in the Greenway Flats supportive apartment complex on Springs Rescue Mission's campus.

"They imply just as many people who try to force their will in our society do what makes a good Christian to them and how I don't fit the bill," she said.

"My sentiment is, 'I'm sorry. There are plenty of people on this planet. Go and find one that will play with you then.'"

Compassion to fellow human beings

Working with the homeless population falls under the guiding Christian light that every person is a child of God who has value and should not be discriminated against, said Yonker.

Christians supply the majority of nongovernmental assistance for the homeless nationwide, according to a Baylor University Institute for Studies of Religion survey released in February 2017.

Faith-based organizations provided 58% of emergency shelter beds in 11 sample cities surveyed, including Denver, in addition to related services such as education, job training, health care, education and addiction recovery, according to the study.

As a result, the study estimates faith-based organizations create $9.42 in taxpayer savings for every $1 of government funding for homeless services.

More than 200 churches donate money to Springs Rescue Mission, and also clothing, food and volunteer hours, Williams said.

However, churches contribute less than 5% of the organization's $12 million annual revenue stream, he said. The majority is from individual donations and foundations, with less than 10% from local, state and federal funding.

While churches and faith-based organizations have tenets of belief and proven records of service to the poor behind them, they don't corner the market on charitable acts.

"There's a negative connotation that all these people who help are Christian, but Christians don't have a monopoly on serving and helping people," Schlortt of Catholic Charities said. "People of all backgrounds are compassionate to fellow human beings."

That's why Michelle Popejoy, a member of the Atheist Community of Colorado Springs, is a regular presence in a collective monthly effort to hand out food, clothes and other goods at Dorchester Park, where homeless people congregate.

"I didn't want to do it in a proselytizing environment," she said.

Popejoy started helping the homeless about 30 years ago in Phoenix, when her daughter asked her about volunteering. Popejoy has been connected to the local atheists' group, one of several in town, since she moved to Colorado Springs in 2013.

Popejoy usually wears an atheist T-shirt while manning one of many tables that stretch in a long line in Dorchester Park during the "Spreading Smiles and Sandwiches" event.

Lugging her table with water and food that goes on top, Popejoy joins other event organizers, who are from local churches and other organizations.

"I like being here to represent the non-Christians and destigmatize and normalize atheism," she said at a recent distribution. "We're a community of and for atheists, trying to serve the community."

Homeless people said they appreciate the effort.

"It takes everybody Christians, Jews, Catholics and many organizations," said Tim Davis, a reformed heroin addict who's known on the streets as "Bama."

"There are far more people that have mental issues and don't have the ability to turn their lives around than people who do," he said. "Some have been kicked out of the shelter because they have personality disorders or Tourette's or extra food."

For years, Popejoy has fashioned sleeping mats out of plastic bags for the homeless, participated in parks cleanups, sewn warm hats and scarves, and more recently part of the giveaway.

"I don't like it to be assumed that only Christians do this," said Popejoy, describing herself as never having been religious. "No, not only Christians do this.

"I've just always enjoyed doing stuff like this, and I'm obviously not doing it to fill pews."

'A church with working gloves'

That's not the goal of Christian organizations, either, their leaders say.

In the month of December, Springs Rescue Mission logged 53 attendees at chaplain meetings, 77 people at four weekly chapel services, 246 people at15 Bible studies and 667 people at 44 Bible classes, the agency's statistics show.

Such attendance represents a small percentage of clients; the shelter averages around 325 to 350 people a night in the winter.

Chapel services are provided by an outside church, Williams said, not rescue mission itself.

Christian organizations are more visible than other groups involved in homeless services, said Kayla Farris, co-founder of Because We Choose To, a nonprofit organization she and a friend started in 2015 to give away donated clothing to needy folks.

"Christian-based organizations get a lot of the recognition because they tend to get more funding from churches and government funds, so they're able to help on a larger scale," she said.

"But if you really get out on the streets, you'll you see there are other a lot of groups, too, that do meals and whatever they can every week."

Hanson said big organizations are needed to handle today's demands for the homeless population.

"We need large institutions that can be of one mind when it comes to making decisions, sheltering and taking care of people's needs on a large scale," he said. "In response to pushback on faith communities and the way we serve, I say, 'If Jesus did not walk the earth more than 2,000 years ago, we would not be here serving.'"

The Salvation Army shelter's on-site chapel offers a 20-minute morning devotional, full church services on Wednesdays and Sundays, Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous meetings and a house chaplain.

Of the 220 or so homeless people who spend the night each evening, an average of 30 attend a religious gathering, Hanson said.

"We do this not to make a profit because we don't but it's clearly a faith component," he said. "We believe that everybody has value, and therefore we must take care of other people."

Some homeless people say they don't see workers at organizations subscribing to the Christian principles that leadership says employees and volunteers follow.

A homeless man who gave his name as Michael said staff target disabled people, those with criminal records or homeless who have medically implanted devices with seemingly unfair practices.

"What they do doesn't jive with their Christian morals," he said.

Organizations have rules to "minimize the risks" in an environment that brings together hundreds of people, many of whom might be high on drugs, are known to steal from others or display other negative behavior, Yonker said.

"Most of the complaints are because people generally don't understand the chaos and how quickly things can get out of control if you don't have simple rules," he said.

Having said that, Yonker said he understands how some clients "don't feel like they're quickly given enough grace."

People can be permanently banned from Springs Rescue Mission, primarily for violent acts, which Yonker said was one of his hardest challenges in leading the organization because "there's no safety net below the rescue mission."

The Salvation Army's R.J. Montgomery Center also enforces rules pertaining to behavior but doesn't ban people permanently, Hanson said. People can be kicked out for a day, a week or a month but then can return, he said, even if they've been turned away from other places.

"There has to be recourse and accountability to poor actions," Hanson said. "But we don't want them to die on the streets just because they made a bad life decision that day.

"We're a church with its working gloves on," he said. "It's the role we play in Christendom."

(c)2022 The Gazette (Colorado Springs, Colo.)

Visit The Gazette (Colorado Springs, Colo.) at http://www.gazette.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

The rest is here:
Serving the homeless a Christian ethos, but others involved, too - Denver Gazette

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on Serving the homeless a Christian ethos, but others involved, too – Denver Gazette

Prince Charles and Alternative Medicine A Royal Lost Cause? – Medscape

Posted: at 6:59 am

Twelve years ago, at a conference in St Jamess Palace, Prince Charles mused to an audience that he "felt proud" of having once been called "the enemy of the Enlightenment".

Edzard Ernst

Revisiting traditional thinking before around 1650 clearly appealed to the heir to the throne rolling back to a time before the likes of Locke, Voltaire, Descartes, and Hume espoused reason over traditional practices.

During thatspeech, Charles spoke of his philosophy of "being a part of nature, understanding the need to blend the best of the ancient with the best of the modern".

A belief that 'nature's order' should be trusted above science and evidence underlines the Prince of Wales' foray into the world of medicine, arguesProf Edzard ErnstMD, in a new book, "Charles, The Alternative Prince An Unauthorised Biography".

As the world's first professor of complementary and alternative medicine, based at the University of Exeter, Ernst has earned the credentials to assess what he calls "Charles' 'love affair' with alternative medicine".

Ernst explained toMedscape UK: "I have dedicated my professional life for the last 30 years to researching alternative medicine. Prince Charles is probably worldwide the strongest advocate for this part of health care, so it was for me a very obvious choice."

The author argues that, instead of building on his privileged position and realising a personal vision of integrating conventional and alternative medicine, the Prince, "pursued a largely anti-science agenda and promoted the uncritical integration of unproven treatments into the NHS", with the result that "he became an obstacle to progress in healthcare and generated more harm than good".

The omens were not good when, newly elected as a fleeting president of the British Medical Association for its 150thanniversary, the Prince of Wales came not to praise the assembled medical luminaries with "customary niceties", but to launch "an all-out frontal attack", Ernst says, in which he lectured them that, "the whole imposing edifice of modern medicine, for all its breath-taking success, is like the celebrated Tower of Pisa, out of balance".

Rather than persuading his audience of the benefits of integrating alternative and modern medicine, his speech had the opposite effect. "Getting lectured like first-year medical students by a young man who evidently was ill-informed can hardly have amused the seasoned physicians," Ernst comments.

"Charles' outburst, therefore, risked a counterproductive step backwards reinforcing barriers that had all but vanished," he writes. "The affront prompted a reluctance of the UK medical establishment to look benevolently at alternative medicine."

It should be noted that the author of "Charles, The Alternative Prince", has a long history of publicly disagreeing with the Prince's views on integrative medicine. In fact, he holds Charles responsible for undermining his position at Exeter, leading to his early retirement.

The spat dated back to 2005 when Charles personally commissioned Christopher Smallwood, a former chief economics adviser to Barclays Bank, to examine the effectiveness of some complementary therapies with the aim of persuading the Government to offer more of them on the NHS.

Edzard Ernst

The report, which was never peer-reviewed, concluded that there was sufficient evidence that some complementary therapies could be more effective than conventional approaches in treating certain conditions, and called for an assessment by NICE.

Ernst had sight of the draft document which he said contained "many serious errors". He later argued that Charles "might have been over-stepping the boundaries of his constitutional role by trying to influence UK health politics".

Writing in theBritish Journal of General Practicein 2006, Ernst said of the Smallwood report: "One gets the impression that its conclusions were written before the authors had searched for evidence that might match them."

An official complaint by Charles' first private secretary to Exeter University "alleging that I had violated the rules of confidentiality, led to the closure of my research unit", according to Ernst.

Is Ernst's book payback time for Charles and his circle? "No, this is this is one of the main reasons why I hesitated for years to write this book, that it might be seen as an act of revenge for what happened then," he says. "I think anybody who reads the book will realise that I mention these two or three disagreeable encounters with Prince Charles and his supporters for the sake of completeness."

Ernst was by no means the only critic of the Smallwood report. In a letter toThe Guardian, Dr Richard Horton, editor ofThe Lancet, wrote: "We are losing our grip on a rational scientific medicine that has brought benefits to millions, and which is now being eroded by the complicity of doctors who should know better and a prince who seems to know nothing at all."

The book delves into how the Prince of Wales developed his views on alternative medicine, focusing on the influential role played by the South African-born writer Sir Laurens van der Post.

Ernst tells us that "as a young man he fell under the spell of van der Post who introduced him to very odd ideas: mystical thinking, Jung, and psychoanalysis, etc, etc, and that set him on a path to follow his intuition, rather than his rational brain".

In the book, he writes: "Charles was looking for the meaning of life and Laurens was skilled at offering him a 'missing dimension'. Ernst argues that "Charles' degree in arts left him ill-equipped to comprehend science or medicine, so Laurens convinced him that his royal intuitions came 'from a far deeper source than conscious thought'".

The author points out that van der Post's reputation imploded after his death. His biographer, JDF Jones, described him as a "compulsive fantasist" whose "capacity to present a false image to others was coupled with a tendency to overestimate his own abilities".

We also learn that the royal family had a long history of believing in homeopathy dating back to the 1830s, culminating in Prince Charles being appointed patron of the Faculty of Homeopathy in 2019.

Areport by the House of Commons Science & Technology Committeein 2010, concluded that homeopathic remedies performed no better than placebos.

In 2017, NHS England said it would no longer fund homeopathy on the NHS as the lack of any evidence for its effectiveness did not justify the cost. The decision was backed by a High Court judgement in 2018.

For Prof Ernst the move was further evidence that success in promoting alternative medicine has evaded him. "When Charles first sided with homeopathy, the UK had five homeopathic NHS hospitals; today, there are none that carry the name", he says. While the Prince's attempts at achieving statutory regulatory status for UK homeopaths, herbalists, and acupuncturists came to nought, as did as his vision for a model hospital of integrated medicine.

Among other themes in the book, he analyses Charles' promotion of osteopathy and chiropractic, herbal medicine, Gerson therapy, and the Foundation for Integrated Health, set up to promote the Prince's views, and which was replaced by the College of Medicine.

For Ernst, "Charles acts on his intuition, his beliefs, his convictions" and "seems entirely immune to evidence that does not confirm his creed. In that, he can become a true enemy of the age of reason.

"He has no competence in science or medicine and takes advice only from people who are of his opinion in the first place".

He concludes: "When Charles contradicts the consensus, when he uses his influence to interfere with our healthcare, and when he pretends his opinion amounts to evidence, he stands in the way of progress."

What might happen when the longest-serving Prince of Wales becomes King?

"He has answered that question himself," Ernst tells us. "He was asked whether he would continue lobbying, and he said, 'certainly not, I'm not that stupid'."

He adds: "I suspect that visibly it will stop, and covertly it will continue."

"Charles, The Alternative Prince" is published February 1, 2022, by Imprint Academic.

Here is the original post:

Prince Charles and Alternative Medicine A Royal Lost Cause? - Medscape

Posted in Alternative Medicine | Comments Off on Prince Charles and Alternative Medicine A Royal Lost Cause? – Medscape