Daily Archives: February 5, 2022

Posted on 02/01/2022 by EraOfLight Leave a reply

Payback is a bitch. The Rockefeller clan, the greatest mass murderers in human history, are finally facing justice. Mass demonstrations across occupied Europe and now action by truckers in North America is a sign their satanic rule is collapsing.

Today is January 31st, a payment deadline the Rockefellers have to make. All signs indicate their check has bounced. They now have until February 18th to come up with the money or be bankrupted.

What money are we talking about? The Rockefeller proxy fake Biden regime ran up a record $1.08 trillion trade deficit in 2021 and added more than $2 trillion to US federal debt to bring the total to $30 trillion. That means they need to come up with $3 trillion or their entire fake regime collapses.

Remember, their clan, -headed by the fugitive criminal David Rockefeller Jr,- control what they call the rules based world order. Whose rules? Their rules. Their servants run the UN, the World Bank, NATO, the Fortune 500 companies etc. Remember the heads of these organizations were appointed, not elected. So, when the Rockefellers are bankrupted, it will mean all of these power centers will revert to the control of the people.

Even if they manage to get their Chinese Communist Party servants to hand over the Chinese peoples money; that still will not save them. That is because the Chinese Communist Party, reeling under $118 trillion of debt, worth 833% of their GDP, is also bankrupt.

Even if they use fiat money and fake accounting to pretend they are still solvent, that will not help because they are being hunted. The Rockefellers murdered the Tsar of Russia and his family after he refused to grant them oil concessions. The Khazarian mafia then started a reign of terror that killed over 50 million Russians. Russian patriots are now getting their justice and have begun systematically hunting down the entire extended Rockefeller clan and their servants, according to FSB sources.

Speaking about servants, let us talk about their fascist/communist servant Justin Castro of Canada. Thanks to the patriotic truckers who descended on Ottawa, he is the first Prime Minister in Canadian history to run into hiding from his own people.

This is a message to David McGuinty, who I went to high school with and who heads Canadas secret services: If you do not want to face a Nuremberg-style tribunal for war crimes, then you need to grow a pair and arrest Castro. Just like Adolf Hitler, Castro only got 33% of the popular vote and yet he is using that to try to turn Canada into a fascist dictatorship. The Canadian military did not win at Vimy ridge just to see Canada taken over by a brother murdering fascist foreign agent. Here is my advice to the Canadian military: take Castro up on his bluff and follow the science. Send military police into hospitals around the country and check facts with front-line doctors. You will find Castro and his fellow fascist/communist agents have been using a renamed common cold (which is a coronavirus) to destroy democracy in Canada and vaccinate Canadians with dangerous substances. You can start your fact-checking here:

Military Vax Data Rocks DC: Catastrophic Injury Toll Exposed At Sen. Johnson Hearing

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/01/military-vax-data-rocks-dc-catastrophic-injury-toll-exposed-at-sen-johnson-hearing/?utm_source=home-headline

Remember, Canadians who support vaccinations do so only because the controlled media has told them lies about the so-called pandemic. Also, ask yourselves why your top generals were removed based on lies and innuendos, and replaced with puppets. Do not trust anyone who has not personally seen combat. Whatever you do, refuse to take action against your fellow patriot truckers and farmers now fighting to liberate Canada. Here is a message from one of the protesters in Ottawa: Canada just woke the fuck up!! Long live free Canada.

OK, now let us look at how Khazarian mafia rule is collapsing around the world.

The first thing we notice is that truckers around the world are now emulating Canada and preparing to stop economic activity until the Khazarian criminal puppet regimes are removed.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/truckers-across-planet-unite-convoys-against-medical-tyranny

There are also huge, demonstrations going on all over Europe. Here is just one example from Belgium where a million-person protest is being held in a country of 11 million people.

The scale of the protests means many former top members of the Khazarian mafia are now surrendering and agreeing to a peace and reconciliation process. For example, Nathaniel Rothschild contacted us again to sayhe is working with [US President Donald] Trump directly. He is spending most of his time at the Thule US Space Force Center. There is a massive underground base there. (Also the underground prison is located nearby). Nat has made a deal with the Alliance and turned his fortune over to them. He has already given $50 billion for use in the project in the region. His fortune is estimated at several trillion dollars. The exact amount is classified. Nat distanced himself from the British side of the family and was nearly taken out because he wanted out of the family business. He has a body double who attends most meetings regarding his new company Volex. Take a look at the 2 attached photos. One is Nat a year ago when he went to Sri Lanka. The other photo is fairly current and is his double.

The French side of the family is called De Rothschild. They were behind the attempted coup in Kazakhstan. Their mercenaries were eliminated thanks to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Russia is now fighting to liberate Europe from Rockefeller and NATO control. The battle over Ukraine is really a war to liberate Europe, according to the Russians and their British allies.

Over 80% of Russian gas exports to Europe go through Ukraine.

The Rockefellers and their French De Rothschild allies have installed a puppet regime there to stop the flow of gas and force Europeans to buy expensive gas controlled by the Rockefellers.

Yevgeny Fedorov, a well-known Russian politician, explains the situation in the interview linked below.

https://thesaker.is/the-other-side-of-the-story-russias-view-on-geopolitics-war-and-energy-racketeering/embed/#?secret=ZJ0psBDvf5

He explains that the Rockefellers fight to keep gas from flowing directly to Germany via the Nordstream II pipeline is a fight for European independence.

If the Europeans were to buy gas from Russia, they would pay $300 per cubic meter in long-term, stable contracts. Instead, the Rockefellers are trying to force them,

$1,000 per cubic meter of gas they control. Now that Ukraine is liberated, France and Germany, both of which have existed as independent countries for over 1000 years, will become independent again, Russian FSB sources say.

According to Fyodorov, Russia plans to: reannex Ukraine to Russia, restore the Soviet Union, restore Yugoslavia, and nationalize the Russian Central Bank. Fedorov explains that the current central bank is a subsidiary of the IMF.

According to MI6 and CIA sources, the arrest of Klaus Schwab, head of the Swiss Rothschild family, and Christine Lagarde, head of the EU Central Bank, means that the IMF is now ready to work with Russia to replace the EU with the 47-member Council of Europe. This is how Russia sees the fake pandemic.

The arms, slavery and drug business known as NATO is being replaced under this agreement with something that actually concerns European security, the sources say. MI6 is doing its part by eliminating agents of the Khazarian mafia in the United Kingdom and the rest of Europe.

A senior MI6 agent states that removing Angela Hitler (Merkel) from power in Germany is the key. If Merkel is gone, then [French President Emmanuelle] Macron is gone, the source says. Thats why the French De Rothschilds were trying to create a new home outside France with their failed attempt to take over Kazakhstan.

In the UK, according to MI6, former cabinet minister (and secret ruler) Simon Case was executed Also, former MI6/Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) chief John Scarlett was assassinated last week, the source says.

They tried to capture the state secretly, they committed treason. The whole thing is imploding on itself.

Its a bit like dealing with an amateur Nazi force, MI6 explains. Its about asserting personal sovereignty. You have to stand up to bullies. Dont let Pfizer go around telling you lies. They are bullies, and paid bullies at that, it continues.

The crackdown on Pfizer and other Khazarian pharmaceutical lackeys continues worldwide, according to several sources in agreement. For example, Anthony Fauci, the top pandemic pusher in the U.S., was executed at Gitmo, according to CIA sources.

The man now surfacing is a lookalike, the source said. The following photo was submitted as proof. The fake Trump pushing vaccines has also been exposed, as this CIA photo shows. As for the CIA, the Rockefellers have let former CIA chief Mike Pompeo have his say:

Chinese leader Xi Jinping wants world domination for the Chinese Communist Party and warns that the rise of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) could destroy the rules-based international order that has existed since the end of World War II.

The problem is that, according to CIA sources, this Pompeo is undoubtedly a double, as the photos below make clear.

The double is wearing a boot (with a GPS monitor). The real Pompeo is completely out of the picture. He has accepted the Alliances offer of truth and reconciliation. He has turned over to the Alliance all the files and USB drives he acquired as Director of the Agency and as Secretary of State.

He is currently in a very secure location supporting the Alliance, according to the CIA. We have also received information from Australian intelligence about the situation in their region. First, the Prime Minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern, has gone into self-isolation.

Looks like the grin is off his face. Its time to decide whether to cooperate or go to Gitmo, that looks a lot like Jack Ardern to me, the source said.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/29/new-zealand-jacinda-ardern-isolates-after-possible-covid-exposure

The battle to liberate Australia is also in full swing. Australian intelligence reports the situation there as follows: Melbourne is the dragons head for pedophilia and child trafficking in Australia. There is a very large underground base under the city. With a submarine base that leads into the sea.

Melbourne and Victoria are 100% controlled by the satanic cabal, as is all of Australia. Prime Minister Scott Morrison is also under the control of the cabal. He will soon resign for health reasons.

Prime Minister Dan Andrews now has a double. The real Andrews has disappeared. Speaking of gone, we also note that pop megastar Elton John on Tuesday postponed two concerts in Dallas part of what is expected to be a long farewell tour after testing positive for Covid-19.

https://insiderpaper.com/elton-john-tests-positive-for-covid-19-postpones-dallas-concerts/embed/#?secret=8UiojnSXTS#?secret=wuicZQBXg8

He was also arrested. He is a known pedophile, a CIA source explained. China is also on the case, as this news story shows:

BEIJING: Chinese authorities have summoned officials from AstraZeneca China to investigate suspected health insurance fraud by company employees, the National Healthcare Security Administration (NHSA) announced Saturday (Jan. 29).

Employees in the southern city of Shenzhen had altered or participated in altering patients audit reports and were suspected of health insurance fraud.

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/astrazeneca-china-summoned-suspected-fraud-2468051

A similar series of arrests has also taken place in Japan, where foreign agents and their lackeys have been arrested for falsifying positive test results and murdering people in hospitals, according to Japanese police.

We also note that Rockefeller associate and WHO chief Tedros Ghebreyesus now says publicly that vaccines are used to kill children. Clearly, he has been turned around. Rest assured that it is only a matter of time before all pandemic perpetrators are either arrested or turned over.

With the pandemic attempt to create global fascism fizzling out before their eyes, there are growing signs that space opera is next. As evidence, here are videos of some recent UFO sightings.

Project Blue Ray Full Steam Ahead?

End

**Source

01/25/2022

In Disclosure

Events are unfolding at a blistering pace now with huge changes in Europe, Japan, China and elsewhere. This should lead to the liberation of the United States before too long. The most earth-shattering event was shots fired by the Belarus military against the Polish military at the two countries border.10/12/2021

In Disclosure

08/24/2021

In Disclosure This entry was posted in Disclosure, News by EraOfLight. Bookmark the permalink.

See more here:
saintandrewstwinflame | Eternal life and Immortality from ...

What if you could live forever? It's a question long pondered by fictional supervillains and Silicon Valley billionaires alike.

Now researchers in Japan say they may have taken a step toward boosting human longevity with successful trials of a vaccine against the cells that contribute to the ageing process.

In laboratory trials, a drug targeting a protein contained in senescent cells - those which have naturally stopped reproducing themselves - slowed the progression of frailty in older mice, the researchers from Tokyo's Juntendo University said.

The vaccine also successfully targeted the senescent cells in fatty tissue and blood vessels, suggesting it could have a positive impact on other medical conditions linked to ageing.

"We can expect that (the vaccine) will be applied to the treatment of arterial stiffening, diabetes and other ageing-related diseases," Juntendo professor Toru Minamino told Japan's Jiji news agency.

Cells become senescent when they stop duplicating themselves, often in response to naturally-occurring damage to their DNA. Cellular senescence is thought to contribute to the ageing process itself, as well as ageing-related diseases like Alzheimer's and some cancers.

"Senescent cells secrete a series of factors that disrupt the function of the tissue," Dr Salvador Macip, head of the University of Leicester's Mechanisms of Cancer and Ageing Lab, told Euronews Next.

"They 'call' cells from the immune system, in theory to be cleared by them (but that eventually fails) and create a chronic low level inflammation, mixed with fibrosis," Macip said.

Macip was part of an international team of academics from universities in the UK, Spain, Nigeria and Saudi Arabia that published research on another method of tackling senescent cells in October this year.

"The biological process of ageing is very complex, therefore it is unlikely that one single strategy will completely stop it or reverse it. However, there are probably many ways to slow it down, and clearing senescent cells seems to be one of the easiest and potentially more effective," he said.

In laboratory tests, preventing the build-up of senescent cells extended the lifespan of mice by 15 per cent, Macip told Euronews Next. Other, similar experiments have achieved as much as a 35 per cent increase, he said.

But before you get too excited, it's worth bearing in mind that researchers still don't know how much a living creature's lifespan can be extended.

"This is a very interesting question, and one that we still have not agreed upon. Some believe there is a 'hard' limit for human lifespan (around 130 years is the current estimate), while others think that, on paper, immortality should be feasible," Macip said.

"It's still early to know how much life can be extended and whether there's a limit or not".

We may not have to wait too long for an answer, though.

"The field of anti-ageing research is advancing very fast. In the last decade, there have been many key discoveries," Macip said.

"The person that will take the first anti-ageing pill has probably already been born".

Read more:
Can we live forever? New anti-ageing vaccine could bring ...

In the summer of 2018, a baby albino chimpanzee was spotted in the Budongo Forest Reserve in Uganda, the first to be seen in the wild. With his white fur and pale skin, the chimpanzee provoked an immediate rousing in the rest of the group. Other chimps made alarm calls and waa barks, noises that usually signal an encounter with a potentially dangerous animal.

On July 19, adult chimpanzees killed the baby. It was a tragic incident, recalled Susana Mons, a philosopher at the Universidad Nacional de Educacin a Distancia in Madrid and the author of Schrdinger's Possum. But what she found most striking was how the chimps behaved after the baby had died.

Though the primates had exhibited fear calls when the albino was alive, once he died, they stopped. Then they readily approached him, inspected his fur and body, and groomed his back.

For Mons, who has been studying whether animals have a concept of death, this incident provides a clue that animals have some notion that death means, at the very least, he's not going to move anymore.

When they first saw the baby, they expected something scary to happen, she said. Then, at the moment it died, they weren't scared by it at all. This means their expectations have shifted.

We know that animals often behave in particular ways toward dead members of their own species. Ravens and crows gather and make loud calling noises. Chimpanzees in the Ta Forest in Africa have been seen covering dead bodies with leafy branches. In 2015, when a wild female chimpanzee died, the male she had been in a relationship with for three and a half years prevented young individuals from approaching her while he performed several close-contact and caretaking behaviors. Some primate mothers carry the body of their dead infant for days or weeks, or eat parts of the mummified corpse. Elephants have been seen gathering around, interacting with, or carrying the bodies of their babies. Dolphins sometimes keep dead bodies afloat, and in 2011 a beluga whale mother carried her dead calf for around a week.

A field called comparative thanatology documents these practices, and compares how different species interact with death and the dying. Hanging over this research are more philosophical questions: What do these behaviors really mean? Are animals acting in instinctive, hormonal, and unaware ways? Or, when they interact with their dead, do they have some level of understanding of the concept of death?

When interpreting animal behavior, there's always the risk of anthropomorphism, or projecting human-like emotions and thoughts onto nonhuman animals. But there could still be ways to probe whether animals have a concept of death with philosophy's help, by defining what a concept of death is at a bare minimum, and combining observations of animals in the wild with experiments in the lab.

Learning whether animals can grasp such concepts will help us to better understand their minds, and it could have important implications for the ways we treat them. But grappling with the concept of death is a trait long considered to belong to humans alone. Showing that animals can grasp it tooeven on a smaller scalewould mean were not alone in engaging with our mortality.

There is nothing more human than being anguished by deathor asking, as Leo Tolstoy did, Is there any meaning in my life that wouldnt be destroyed by the death that inevitably awaits me?

But from the ancient world to the Enlightenment and onward, philosophers and scientists have had mixed views on whether we share this trait with nonhuman animals, since having a concept of death is tied up with larger questions around animal consciousness.

Aristotle thought that humans were different from other animals because we have a rational soul, whereas animals had sensitive souls, which could respond to sensory impressions but not have the capacity for rational thought. Ren Descartes was less generous: He believed that animals were just mechanisms or automata, not much different than a complex cuckoo clock. There is none that leads weak minds further from the straight path of virtue than that of imagining that the souls of beasts are of the same nature as our own, he wrote.

Watch more from VICE:

Italian philosopher Giambattista Vico wrote that a human custom that separates humans from animals is burial of the dead, Baron de Montesquieu wrote animals can suffer from death but dont know what it is, and Arthur Schopenhauer claimed animals live in the present and only "know" of death when it happens to them, while humans reminisce about the past and anticipate the future with the knowledge of their own mortality. As Jean-Jacques Rousseau wrote, An animal will never know what it is to die, and the knowledge of death and its terrors is one of the first acquisitions that man has made in moving away from the animal condition.

The list goes on into the 20th century with philosophers such as Martin Heidegger, anthropologists like Ernest Becker, or biologists like Theodosius Dobzhansky making similar claims, said Andr Gonalves, a researcher at the Primate Research Institute at Kyoto University in Inuyama, Japan. The history of how animals respond to death is a long one, albeit scattered and mostly confined to footnotes, from Aristotle to Darwin to the present.

This history likely influenced those who later observed animals responding to death. For most of the 20th century, behaviors like dead-infant carrying were viewed as animals not being able to tell the difference between the living and the dead, and not worth investigating. Monkeys and apes do not recognize death, for they react to their companions as if the latter were alive but passive, wrote the primatologist Solly Zuckerman in 1932.

Because of this view, there was little attention paid to what animals did with their dead until 2010, when a publication described the death of an elder female chimpanzee. Humans observed pre-death care of the chimpanzee, other chimps testing for signs of life at the moment of death, the female chimpanzees adult daughter staying by her all night, her corpse being cleaned, and, later, the place where she died being avoided.

Without death-related symbols or rituals, chimpanzees show several behaviors that recall human responses to the death of a close relative, wrote professor of psychology James Anderson and his colleagues at Kyoto University. Are humans uniquely aware of mortality? We propose that chimpanzees awareness of death has been underestimated.

For the past 15 years, the field of comparative thanatology has taken up this investigation in earnest. (In Greek mythology, Thanatos was the personification of death.) It has focused on cataloging exactly how animals respond to death, and comparing between species, and being open to the idea that these responses arent just automata.

A paper from 2019 described how humans removed a dead infant bonnet macaque from its mother, who then regularly visited its burial spot for at least two days. Chimpanzees have been observed in whats called stunned silence, when their usual calling noises stop after the death of a chimp.

After the death of the adult female chimp that Anderson observed, he wrote, The next day, the three surviving chimpanzees were profoundly subdued. From the day area they watched silently as two keepers lowered Pansy from the platform, carried her into the exit corridor, placed her in a body bag, and loaded her into a vehicle that was then driven away. They remained subdued the following day as the night area was cleaned.

Many agree that great apes and also monkeys show compassionate care for the dying, but whether they have an understanding of death is uncertain. Plenty of thanatologists have instead come to the opposite conclusion: that the animals they observe do not have a concept of death. As Charles Darwin wondered in The Descent of Man, Who can say what cows feel, when they surround and stare intently on a dying or dead companion?

I hold a semi-agnostic position in relation to other species having a concept of death, Gonalves said. Nonhuman social animals are not always wholly indifferent to death; they have reactions and perform all sorts of behaviors surrounding it, and I think these merits further investigation.

Understanding the concept of death is different from being able to classify or distinguish the dead from the living. Ants perform necrophoresis, which is when they remove dead ants from their nestsmeaning they can tell which ones are dead and which are alive. What the ants are detecting is not the concept of death but a chemical called oleic acid that dead ants produce. Its been shown that if you put oleic acid on any object in the nest, other ants will remove it.

Other animals have similar discrimination skills, which are not a conceptual understanding. This is where philosophy can provide guidance, according to Mons. To ask whether animals have a concept of death, it first requires defining what a minimal concept of death would beor what are the minimum requirements an animal would need to meet for us to conclude they know what it is.

Humans have a complex concept of death, weighed down by cultural baggage and myriad emotional responses. This is part of why many academics may not believe that animals can understand the concept of death, said Jennifer Vonk, a comparative psychologist at Oakland University. There hasnt been much evidence that nonhuman animals can represent abstract, unobservable constructs.

But just like when we try to assess whether animals possess some sort of language or communication skill, we dont start by asking whether they can write sonnets. We break language down into its fundamental parts and ask if animals have a cognitive grasp on those first.

Mons started with building blocks of death that come from developmental psychology studies where human children are interviewed about death. Those subcomponents of death are: non-functionality, irreversibility, universality, personal mortality, inevitability, causality, and unpredictability. Some elements, like inevitability and personal mortality, are certainly part of a humans concept of death, but Mons argued that the essence of a rudimentary concept of death doesnt need to include them. At its core, Mons proposed, just non-functionality and irreversibility are fundamental. This would mean that an animal understands that death makes an individual not functional, and that its non-functioning is permanent.

Proposing a definition for exactly what a minimal concept of death is from a philosophical perspective could help those who do comparative thanatology be specific about what theyre looking for, she said. Mons thinks its likely that this bare minimum could be achieved in many species. After all, death is common in nature, and there could be evolutionary advantages to understanding what it means to die, or to know another is dead.

But this is far from agreed upon. In a paper from last year on the behavior of animal mothers toward the body of their dead offspring, research scientist Arianna de Marco and her co-authors pushed back against the animals having a concept of death per se, instead suggesting that animals like great apes can understand something more vague: that something serious has happened.

They wrote that a great ape could understand that another animal has entered a state of dormancy, or is unlikely to regain wakefulness. Recognizing that another animal is dormant and wont wake up can still elicit a powerful emotional response or behavior.

However, there is no evidence that any nonhuman primates are aware of mortality, they wrote.

Gonalves and Vonk agreed that non-functionality and irreversibility are important components of the human concepts of death, and also that the concept of death is likely a continuum, with nonhuman animals finding themselves somewhere along it. But just because death is everywhere doesnt mean its necessarily an advantage for animals to recognize it. In fact, humans recognition of their own mortality has led to psychological coping strategies, called Terror Management Theory.

Nonhumans may recognize when an individual is no longer a functioning agent interacting with the world, but I would be surprised if they appreciated an end of consciousness or mental life in the same way that adult humans do, or if they recognize that all living beings die and that death is irreversible, Vonk said. That does not mean that they do not have a concept of death; it simply means that their concept of death may be more limited and less abstract than the human concept.

If a mother chimp finally leaves her babys body behind, does that mean she understands irreversibility? If a group of elephants leaves their dead behind, does it mean they understand that it is dead forever and wont be coming back? Or is it just that theyre frustrated and giving up?

Like chimpanzees, elephants will often return to the corpse; how do we interpret this? Gonalves said. Do they realize their group member is dead? Were they just passing by and happened on it by chance? Are they paying respects, not unlike humans do in funerals? Are they checking in to see if their group member recovered? While I'm more inclined to believe the last explanation, the truth is we can only guess what's going on in their minds.

Outside of guessing, there are ways to try to test for a minimal concept of death. One is by observational studies: watching what animals do in response to the dead and making interpretations. The other is in the lab: setting up experiments that test how they either respond to the dead, or looking for cognitive abilities that might imply that could understand the concept of deathlike the ability to recognize non-functionality and irreversibility.

Some studies like this have been done before. In 1973, an experiment showed mother squirrel monkeys with the dead bodies of their own and other infants. The mothers who had offspring that had died at an older age reacted more to the corpses. One study from 1964 tested the reaction of Rhesus monkeys to fear-provoking stimuli, including live snakes; an awake and alive monkey of their species; an anesthetized monkey; and a dead monkey that had been decapitated, holding its head in its hands. The results were unclear: The decapitated monkey did get more looks than the live one, but the overall looking time was higher for the live monkey. Since the study design didn't allow touching either the dead or alive monkey, its hard to make sense of it. There are obvious ethical dilemmas around such experiments, and Mons said she wouldn't encourage such studies being done today.

Instead, Mons proposed testing animals for being able to understand non-functionality and irreversibility through stand-ins like tools or machines that break irreversibility. One such study has just started using Goffins cockatoos at the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna, said Alice Auersperg, a cognitive biologist who heads the cockatoo lab.

They are highly intelligent and have strong social bonds between individuals that can last for multiple years or even decades, Auersperg said. Moreover, they are able to use several types of tools which are very rare in animals yet important for our test setups. In recent work, they showed that the cockatoos could use composite tools in an experimental setup inspired by the game of golf. The experiments wont test for the concept of death directly but rather for the cognitive capacities that Mons theorized are necessary to understand death.

Not everyone is convinced that this kind of study can tell us much about death. David Pea-Guzmn, a philosopher at San Francisco State University, agreed that non-invasive studies should be done, but he doesnt think that animals would respond to machine or tool stand-ins in the same way as other animals.

Animals dont develop emotional attachments to the machines they are exposed to in a laboratory; they dont incorporate them into their social dynamics or care economy; neither do they treat them as purposive social agents, he said. In short, animals are not confused about the difference between the [mechanical] and the living.

Mons agreed that something needs to be alive before you can conceive of it to be dead, so a tool doesnt fall into that category. But if combined with observational evidence of animals in the wild, it could make for a compelling case.

Even if we're not talking about living functions, we are still in the neighborhood of the cognition you would need for the concept of death, Mons said.

Mons believes that an outright assumption that animals cant have even a minimum concept of death at all is a byproduct of anthropocentrism, or the centering of human thoughts and feelings and experience. She thinks theres been too much of a focus on grief as a reaction to death, and that it clouds our interpretation of animals behavior.

When the research chimpanzee Washoes baby died, its body was removed. Washoe then signed to a researcher, Baby? The researcher signed back, Baby dead, baby gone, baby finished. According to the researcher, Washoe dropped her cradled arms to her lap. She moved over to a far corner and looked away, her eyes vacant.

Its hard not to project feelings onto a scene like this. For humans, death is often paired with grief, and grief is distracting. Additionally, a fear of death and dying has led humans to ruminate on complex metaphysical themes, said Pea-Guzmn, like the directionality of time, the immortality of the soul, and reincarnation.

Because of this, we tend to assume that only creatures who engage in such fancy philosophizing possess a death concept, Pea-Guzmn said. It is almost as if in thinking about death we automatically conjure up an image of a dejected human pondering the meaning of life, as in Vesaliuss sketch of a human skeleton gazing at a skull in De humani corporis fabrica.

Pea-Guzmn agreed that researchers should try to look for the core of the concept of death, since the concept as we know it could include components that make sense to us as humans but are not essential.

If we are interested in animals relationship to death as a topic on its own, and not only in relation to humans, we have to also look way beyond practices that we can identify with. One example is when pets feed on their owners after they die. This is an extremely common phenomenon, much more common than we want it to be, Mons said. Even with dogs, who have strong bonds with their owners, weve seen examples of dogs eating their owners 45 minutes after the owner died and with food in their bowl.

Mons said the pattern of eating is also different than when a dog would be scavenging; when dogs scavenge, they usually eat the abdomen area first, but in these cases dogs focus on the face. Its a very disturbing behavior, but I think it's a super interesting one, Mons said. But it's only discussed in forensic science papers. I think one of the reasons may be why it hasn't been deemed relevant until now has to do with the fact that it's not a behavior that we can really relate to.

Gonalves doesnt agree that comparative thanatologists are conflating grief with the concept of death. In 2013, Barbara King wrote in her book How Animals Grieve that grief does not presuppose a concept of death and has been reiterated many times since, Gonalves said. He said we shouldnt look away from interesting phenomena out of a fear for anthropomorphism either, just as we shouldnt ignore behaviors that dont look or feel like grief to us.

Still, Gonalves has seen articles that describe animals as having mourning rituals and understanding death (and said the Wikipedia page on animal grief is absolutely dreadful), and he thinks there's reason to be careful.

There's no evidence currently that they do have anything that counts as a ritual, he said. If you ask any researcher dedicated towards the study of cultural aspects in nonhuman animals, I don't think you'll find any saying they do have so-called mourning rituals.

Gonalves advocated for field researchers using cameras to more objectively record entire interactions around death, and then making interpretations after the fact. Vonk and Georgia State University psychologist Sarah Brosnan, have proposed that a data repository be created where all responses to death could be recorded, and in 2020 anthropologist Alecia Carter created the ThanatoBase, where researchers can add their observations on primate death.

While Gonalves doesnt agree with many of Monss claims, he does think she explored more thoroughly the question of the concept of death in nonhuman animals than anyone that came before, and in doing so has perhaps uncovered a need for more careful delineations into what should count or not as good evidence for said concept.

What if animals do know what it means to die? Does it change the way we should treat them? It might shift some of our responsibilities with the animals under our care. For instance, we could ask what are the cases when we should allow them to learn about death, and when we should give them an opportunity to understand what happens when another animal has died.

Perhaps we have an ethical obligation to at least prevent animals in factory farms and laboratories from seeing or hearing other animals being killed, seeing dead bodies lying around, or experiencing markers of death, Pea-Guzmn said.

Mons also thinks we should allow animals their full reactions without interference. I think that monkey mothers who want to cling to their babies should be allowed to do so for as long as they need, she said. This might conflict with the interest of a zoo, for instance, because it might be disturbing for the visitors to see the mother holding onto a decomposing corpse. But I think that the interests of the monkey should be weighed here.

For the pets in our homes, it could mean we have a moral duty to show up for animals when they experience death, to help them mourn when they are bereaved and to be at their side to reassure them when their own time has come, Pea-Guzmn said.

Ben Bradley, a philosopher at Syracuse University, said there have been some philosophers who argue that the concept of death is necessary in order for death to be bad for you. As long as an animals life is painless, killing them is no harm since they dont know what death means.

If you cant conceptualize something, then you cant care about it, and so it cant be bad for you, he explained. If this is right, then if animals dont have a concept of death, their deaths arent bad for them. This would have important implications for how we treat animals, because it would imply that it is morally permissible to kill them for food, unless it were wrong for some reason other than being bad for the animals.

Bradley thinks we should reject the claim that nothing can be bad for you unless you care about it. He wrote a book chapter on this called Death Is Bad for a Cow, and also a song of the same name, with the lyrics:

Listen to me and I will tell you how

When you take that cow to the butcher's knife

You deprive the cow of the goods the goods of her future life

Don't need to have a sense of self over time

Or know what it means to reach the end of the line

Death is a serious harm

Even if, even if you live on a farm.

Gonalves said we shouldnt wait until the concept of death is proven to try to treat animals in ethical ways. We should prevent the infliction of unnecessary pain and suffering regardless of them having a concept of death or not, Gonalves said.

On a larger level, Mons sees this work, and question, as continuing to chip away at the idea of human cognitive superiority over animals in all domains. Whenever we can prove that there is continuity in a particular aspect of our mental lives in the mental lives of other animals, she said, it undermines any claims of human superiority that we use to justify our boundless exploitation of nature.

Follow Shayla Love onTwitter.

More:
Do Animals Understand What It Means to Die? - VICE