The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: February 5, 2022
The Mystery of Metastasis: Can a Tumors Genetic Mutations Predict Whether and Where Cancer Will Spread? – On Cancer – Memorial Sloan Kettering
Posted: February 5, 2022 at 5:13 am
Several years ago, in a lab meeting, one of Nikolaus Schultzs postdoctoral fellows posed a question: Do you think its possible to predict, based on the genomic profile of an individual tumor, which organs it might metastasize to?
And just like that, a research project was born.
Dr. Schultz is a computational oncologist in the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. He also serves as Head of Knowledge Systems in the Marie-Jose and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology. In these dual roles, he has gained a wealth of experience sequencing the DNA in patients tumors and using this information to help physicians guide treatment.
MSK computational oncologists Francisco Sanchez-Vega and Nikolaus Schultz
Every person with advanced cancer who is treated at MSK undergoes genetic sequencing of their tumor with MSK-IMPACT, a tool that looks for mutations in 400-plus cancer-associated genes. Since sequencing started in 2014, MSK has compiled genetic tumor profiles from more than 50,000 patients. This vast repository represents a goldmine for biologists interested in asking questions about the relationships between tumor mutations and cancer progression.
Dr. Schultz and Francisco Sanchez-Vega the curious postdoc who originally posed the question about metastasis and who is now an Assistant Attending Computational Oncologist at MSK realized that they could use computational techniques to search this mountain of data for clues. Specifically, they could ask whether particular mutations (or groups of mutations) correlate with the spread of cancer to particular organs, across many different types of cancer.
That was six years ago. Now, in a paper published February 3, 2022, in the journal Cell, Drs. Schultz and Sanchez-Vega and their team, including postdoctoral researchers Bastien Nguyen and Christopher Fong, and 71 other MSK scientists present the results of their investigation.
To the question of whether its possible to look at an individual tumor and, based on its genomic profile alone, predict its precise future metastatic trajectory, the answer is clearly no.
VIDEO | 01:38
Learn about metastasis, which is the spreading of cancer from its original location to a new location. Memorial Sloan Kettering researchers are making advances in understanding the three stages of metastasis.
While we found some gene mutations to be slightly more common in tumor samples with specific metastatic transitions, we found no single gene that, when mutated, will predict with absolute certainty whether or not a tumor will metastasize to a particular organ, Dr. Schultz says.
The study was revealing in other ways: At a very high level, what the data are telling us is that metastatic disease is genomically different from primary disease, Dr. Schultz says.
For example, in many cancer types, metastatic tumors have more of what geneticists call DNA copy-number changes compared with primary tumors. A DNA copy-number change is when a particular segment of DNA is present in greater or fewer than the normal number of copies. These copy-number changes, when observed in primary tumors, were an indicator of metastatic potential, Dr. Schultz points out.
In addition, he notes, some cancer-driving mutations were detected at different frequencies in metastases compared with primary tumors across a variety of cancer types.
Dr. Schultz likens the extensive dataset his team has curated to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, in which he was also involved. An important goal of TCGA was to assemble a valuable dataset and get it out into the world so that others could mine it, he says.
To help researchers mine these new data for insights, the team is making them publicly available through the cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics as MSK-MET (Memorial Sloan Kettering Metastatic Events and Tropisms).
The dataset includes information on genetic changes and clinical outcomes from 25,000 patients across 50 different cancer types.
Because no single mutation or set of mutations stood out as reliable predictors of metastatic behavior across tumor types, the new study may add support to an emerging framework in cancer science that views metastasis the cause of 90% of cancer deaths as not primarily driven by genetic mutations. Rather, epigenetic changes that occur in cancer cells as a consequence of their interactions with normal cells in the surrounding environment could be more to blame. (Epigenetic changes are ones that alter what genes are turned on or off in a cell without altering the DNA sequence as a mutation would.) These changes may underlie the ability of metastatic cells to adapt to otherwise hostile tissue environments.
To the question of whether its possible to look at an individual tumor and, based on its genomic profile alone, predict its precise future metastatic trajectory, the answer is clearly no.
Recent discoveries from other investigators at MSK including Joan Massagu, Karuna Ganesh, Charles Sawyers, Kat Hadjantonakis, and Dana Peer have pointed to a kind of epigenetically driven identity switching that enables cancer cells to assume more developmentally primitive states and thereby grow in new parts of the body.
Exploring the ramifications of these and other findings will be the focus of MSKs new Marie-Jose and Henry R. Kravis Cancer Ecosystems Project, which launches today.
Currently, genetic sequencing of tumors with MSK-IMPACT can inform whether or not a specific patient should receive a specific drug based on a single genomic alteration. For example, if someone is found to have a mutation in the BRAF gene, they might be a good candidate for a targeted drug called vemurafenib.
But Dr. Schultz points out that there is potentially much more information to be found in the mass of sequencing data and associated patient clinical data that could inform treatment decisions.
When properly mined, this data could tell us a lot more about prognosis of these patients, whether or not their tumors will metastasize, maybe even to what tissues, he says. This information might determine how these patients get monitored in the future. We can learn about what treatments they might be more sensitive to or less sensitive to. I think that theres enormous potential for personalized medicine that goes beyond the single biomarker, and therefore justification to keep sequencing more patients with broader sequencing panels to increase our power to make new discoveries.
Key Takeaways
See the article here:
The Mystery of Metastasis: Can a Tumors Genetic Mutations Predict Whether and Where Cancer Will Spread? - On Cancer - Memorial Sloan Kettering
Posted in Gene Medicine
Comments Off on The Mystery of Metastasis: Can a Tumors Genetic Mutations Predict Whether and Where Cancer Will Spread? – On Cancer – Memorial Sloan Kettering
Global Cell & Gene Therapy Market Research Report 2022: Expanding Application for Cell & Gene Therapies & Growing Demand for CAR T- Cell…
Posted: at 5:13 am
DUBLIN, Feb. 1, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Cell & Gene Therapy Market - Global Outlook & Forecast 2022-2027" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.
The cell and gene therapy market size was valued at USD 4.99 billion in 2021 and is expected to reach USD 36.92 billion by 2027, growing at a CAGR of 39.62 % during the forecast period
In the cell and gene therapy field, gene therapy gathered the pace last from 2 decades because of the discovery of several genes responsible for mutation in various diseases. The advancement in the cell & gene therapy field and innovative technologies give the new era for biological therapeutics. Also, PRIME Designation and marketing authorization for products provide a new opportunity for the manufacturer's financing and revenue generation.
KEY HIGHLIGHTS
As per the American Society of Cell + Gene Therapy report in 2021, increasing the number of cellular and gene therapy products, application rate and products in clinical trials drive the market growth.
As per the Dive Biopharma report 2021, biotech companies who actively engaged in regenerative medicines and therapies reported USD 14 billion funding only in six months of 2021 which was reported to be USD 19.9 billion for the overall year.
CELL AND GENE THERAPY MARKET SEGMENTATION
Increasing application of gene therapies in diseases diagnosis and rapidly growing new drugs applications will give new market space in upcoming years. In 2020, around USD 2.3 billion funding was reported only from private companies for gene therapies. By 2025, the FDA is expected to approve 10?20 products each year, driving the global cell and gene therapy manufacturing market.
In 2020, Medicine in Development Report 2020, around 176 products were reported in cancer therapies in development procedures.
GEOGRAPHICAL OUTLOOK
North America: High economic status and high expenditure on healthcare services drive the cell and gene therapy market in North America. National Health Institutes, industries, academic institutes, and hospitals are the significant contributors of sponsorship and financial funding for cell and gene therapy products.
Europe: The increasing funding for cell and gene therapy drives the cell and gene therapy market growth consistently in Europe. Around USD 2.6 billion financings were reported in Europe for CGTs in 2020, which increased by 103% compared to previous years. In the cell therapy segment, USD 1.8 billion and in gene therapy, USD 2.3 billion funding accounted in 2020, which increased by 196% and 111% growth respectively
VENDOR LANDSCAPE
The key players in the cell and gene therapy market are Gilead Sciences, Novartis, Smith Nephew, Amgen, Organogenesis, Roche (Spark Therapeutics), Dendreon, Vericel, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
An increasing number of mergers and acquisitions gives new potential to market growth. Gilead Sciences acquired Kite Pharma in 2020. Also, Novartis acquired Avexis in 2018, and Smith & Nephew acquired Osiris Therapeutics.
MAJOR GROWTH FACTORS
KEY VENDORS
OTHER PROMINENT VENDORS
UPCOMING VENDORS
Key Topics Covered:
1 Research Methodology
2 Research Objectives
3 Research Process
4 Scope & Coverage4.1 Market Definition4.2 Base Year4.3 Scope of The Study
5 Report Assumptions & Caveats5.1 Key Caveats5.2 Currency Conversion5.3 Market Derivation
6 Market at a Glance
7 Introduction7.1 Overview7.1.1 Cell & Gene Therapy Approved Products 2020-20217.2 Cell & Gene Therapy Phase-III Products7.3 Road Map of Cell & Gene Therapy
8 Market Opportunities & Trends8.1 Rising Number of Mergers & Acquisitions8.2 Expansion of CGT Manufacturing Plants8.3 Expanding Applications for Cell & Gene Therapies8.4 Growing Demand for Car T-Cell Therapies
9 Market Growth Enablers9.1 New Product Approvals & Increasing Pipeline of Products9.2 Prime Designation & Funding Support For CGT9.3 Rising Use of CGT Products for Disease Care9.4 Increasing Use of CGT Products for Disease Treatment
10 Market Restraints10.1 High Cost of Cell & Gene Therapies10.2 Ethical Issues Regarding Genetical Material10.3 Stringent Regulation for CGT Approvals
11 Market Landscape11.1 Market Overview11.2 Market Size & Forecast11.3 Five Forces Analysis
12 Therapy12.1 Market Snapshot & Growth Engine12.2 Market Overview12.3 Gene Therapy12.4 Cell Therapy
13 Application13.1 Market Snapshot & Growth Engine13.2 Market Overview13.3 Oncology13.4 Genetic Disorders13.5 Dermatology13.6 Musculoskeletal Diseases13.7 Other Diseases
14 End-User14.1 Market Snapshot & Growth Engine14.2 Market Overview14.3 Hospitals14.4 Cancer Care Centers14.5 Wound Care Centers14.6 Other End-Users
15 Geography15.1 Market Snapshot & Growth Engine15.2 Geographic Overview15.2.1 Global Cell & Gene Therapy Market by Geography
For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/z7gm5
Media Contact:
Research and Markets Laura Wood, Senior Manager [emailprotected]
For E.S.T Office Hours Call +1-917-300-0470 For U.S./CAN Toll Free Call +1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900
U.S. Fax: 646-607-1904 Fax (outside U.S.): +353-1-481-1716
SOURCE Research and Markets
Here is the original post:
Global Cell & Gene Therapy Market Research Report 2022: Expanding Application for Cell & Gene Therapies & Growing Demand for CAR T- Cell...
Posted in Gene Medicine
Comments Off on Global Cell & Gene Therapy Market Research Report 2022: Expanding Application for Cell & Gene Therapies & Growing Demand for CAR T- Cell…
Genetically proxied therapeutic inhibition of antihypertensive drug targets and risk of common cancers: A mendelian randomization analysis – PLoS…
Posted: at 5:13 am
The authors would like to thank the participants of the individual studies contributing to the BCAC, GECCO, CORECT, CCFR, INTEGRAL-ILCCO, PRACTICAL, Finngen, BioBank Japan, Asia Colorectal Cancer Consortium, ICBP, DIAGRAM, CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, and MEGASTROKE consortia and the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health, UK Biobank, and the Korean National Cancer Center CRC Study 2. The authors would also like to acknowledge the investigators of these consortia and studies for generating the data used for this analysis. The authors would like to acknowledge the following investigators of the OncoArray and GAME-ON1KG INTEGRAL-ILCCO analyses: Maria Teresa Landi, Victoria Stevens, Ying Wang, Demetrios Albanes, Neil Caporaso, Paul Brennan, Christopher I Amos, Sanjay Shete, Rayjean J Hung, Heike Bickebller, Angela Risch, Richard Houlston, Stephen Lam, Adonina Tardon, Chu Chen, Stig E Bojesen, Mattias Johansson, H-Erich Wichmann, David Christiani, Gadi Rennert, Susanne Arnold, John K. Field, Loic Le Marchand, Olle Melander, Hans Brunnstrm, Geoffrey Liu, Angeline Andrew, Lambertus A Kiemeney, Hongbing Shen, Shan Zienolddiny, Kjell Grankvist, Mikael Johansson, M Dawn Teare, Yun-Chul Hong, Jian-Min Yuan, Philip Lazarus, Matthew B Schabath, Melinda C Aldrich. Cancer consortia-specific funding and acknowledgments is presented in S1 Text.
Rosalind A. Eeles1,2, Christopher A. Haiman3, Zsofia Kote-Jarai1, Fredrick R. Schumacher4,5, Sara Benlloch6,1, Ali Amin Al Olama6,7, Kenneth Muir8,9, Sonja I. Berndt10, David V. Conti3, Fredrik Wiklund11, Stephen Chanock10, Ying Wang12, Victoria L. Stevens12, Catherine M. Tangen13, Jyotsna Batra14,15, Judith A. Clements14,15, APCB BioResource (Australian Prostate Cancer BioResource)14,15, Henrik Grnberg11, Nora Pashayan16,17, Johanna Schleutker18,19, Demetrius Albanes10, Stephanie Weinstein10, Alicja Wolk20, Catharine M. L. West21, Lorelei A. Mucci22, Graldine Cancel-Tassin23,24, Stella Koutros10, Karina Dalsgaard Srensen25,26, Eli Marie Grindedal27, David E. Neal28,29,30, Freddie C. Hamdy31,32, Jenny L. Donovan33, Ruth C. Travis34, Robert J. Hamilton35,36, Sue Ann Ingles37, Barry S. Rosenstein38,39, Yong-Jie Lu40, Graham G. Giles41,42,43, Adam S. Kibel44, Ana Vega45,46,47, Manolis Kogevinas48,49,50,51, Kathryn L. Penney52, Jong Y. Park53, Janet L. Stanford54,55, Cezary Cybulski56, Brge G. Nordestgaard57,58, Sune F. Nielsen57,58, Hermann Brenner59,60,61, Christiane Maier62, Jeri Kim63, Esther M. John64, Manuel R. Teixeira65,66,67, Susan L. Neuhausen68, Kim De Ruyck69, Azad Razack70, Lisa F. Newcomb54,71, Davor Lessel72, Radka Kaneva73, Nawaid Usmani74,75, Frank Claessens76, Paul A. Townsend77,78, Jose Esteban Castelao79, Monique J. Roobol80, Florence Menegaux81, Kay-Tee Khaw82, Lisa Cannon-Albright83,84, Hardev Pandha78, Stephen N. Thibodeau85, David J. Hunter86, Peter Kraft87, William J. Blot88,89, Elio Riboli90
1 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SM2 5NG, UK
2 Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SW3 6JJ, UK
3 Center for Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA
4 Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 441067219, USA
5 Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
6 Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK
7 University of Cambridge, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Stroke Research Group, R3, Box 83, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
8 Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
9 Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
10 Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA
11 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
12 Department of Population Science, American Cancer Society, 250 Williams Street, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA
13 SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
14 Australian Prostate Cancer Research Centre-Qld, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation and School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane QLD 4059, Australia
15 Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland 4102, Australia
16 Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, WC1E 7HB, UK
17 Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Strangeways Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
18Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Finland
19 Department of Medical Genetics, Genomics, Laboratory Division, Turku University Hospital, PO Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
20 Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, 75185 Uppsala, Sweden
21 Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
22 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA
23 CeRePP, Tenon Hospital, F-75020 Paris, France
24 Sorbonne Universite, GRC n5, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, 4 rue de la Chine, F-75020 Paris, France
25 Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensen Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
26 Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, DK-8200 Aarhus N
27 Department of Medical Genetics, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway
28 Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Room 6603, Level 6, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
29 University of Cambridge, Department of Oncology, Box 279, Addenbrookes Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
30 Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Research Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, CB2 0RE, UK
31 Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 2JD, UK
32 Faculty of Medical Science, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
33 Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
34 Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
35 Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto ON M5G 2M9, Canada
36 Dept. of Surgery (Urology), University of Toronto, Canada
37 Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90015, USA
38 Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Box 1236, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
39 Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 100295674, USA
40 Centre for Cancer Biomarker and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, John Vane Science Centre, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
41 Cancer Epidemiology Division, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
42 Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
43 Precision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
44 Division of Urologic Surgery, Brigham and Womens Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
45 Fundacin Pblica Galega Medicina Xenmica, Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Spain
46 Instituto de Investigacin Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago De Compostela, 15706, Spain
47 Centro de Investigacin en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Spain
48 ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
49 IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain
50 CIBER Epidemiologa y Salud Pblica (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
51 Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
52 Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
53 Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
54 Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, 981091024, USA
55 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
56 International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70115 Szczecin, Poland
57 Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
58 Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
59 Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), D-69120, Heidelberg, Germany
60 German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
61 Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
62 Humangenetik Tuebingen, Paul-Ehrlich-Str 23, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany
63 The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA
64 Departments of Epidemiology & Population Health and of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94304 USA
65 Department of Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), 4200072 Porto, Portugal
66 Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto, 4050313 Porto, Portugal
67 Cancer Genetics Group, IPO-Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO-Porto), 4200072 Porto, Portugal
68 Department of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of the City of Hope, 1500 East Duarte Road, Duarte, CA 91010, 626-256-HOPE (4673)
69 Ghent University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Basic Medical Sciences, Proeftuinstraat 86, B-9000 Gent
70 Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
71 Department of Urology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356510, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
72 Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
73 Molecular Medicine Center, Department of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, 2 Zdrave Str., 1431 Sofia, Bulgaria
74 Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 1Z2
75 Division of Radiation Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, 11560 University Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 1Z2
76 Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, BE-3000, Belgium
77 Division of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Health Innovation Manchester, Univeristy of Manchester, M13 9WL
78 The University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UK
79 Genetic Oncology Unit, CHUVI Hospital, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Instituto de Investigacin Biomdica Galicia Sur (IISGS), 36204, Vigo (Pontevedra), Spain
80 Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, 3015 CE Rotterdam, The Netherlands
81 "Exposome and Heredity", CESP (UMR 1018), Facult de Mdecine, Universit Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
82 Clinical Gerontology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 2QQ, UK
83 Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA
84 George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84148, USA
85 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
86 Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom
87 Program in Genetic Epidemiology and Statistical Genetics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
88 Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 2525 West End Avenue, Suite 800, Nashville, TN 37232 USA
89 International Epidemiology Institute, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
90 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ, UK
Rainer Malik 1, Ganesh Chauhan 2, Matthew Traylor 3, Muralidharan Sargurupremraj 4,5, Yukinori Okada 6,7,8, Aniket Mishra 4,5, Loes Rutten-Jacobs 3, Anne-Katrin Giese 9, Sander W van der Laan 10, Solveig Gretarsdottir 11, Christopher D Anderson 12,13,14,14, Michael Chong 15, Hieab HH Adams 16,17, Tetsuro Ago 18, Peter Almgren 19, Philippe Amouyel 20,21, Hakan Ay 22,13, Traci M Bartz 23, Oscar R Benavente 24, Steve Bevan 25, Giorgio B Boncoraglio 26, Robert D Brown, Jr. 27, Adam S Butterworth 28,29, Caty Carrera 30,31, Cara L Carty 32,33, Daniel I Chasman 34,35, Wei-Min Chen 36, John W Cole 37, Adolfo Correa 38, Ioana Cotlarciuc 39, Carlos Cruchaga 40,41, John Danesh 28,42,43,44, Paul IW de Bakker 45,46, Anita L DeStefano 47,48, Marcel den Hoed 49, Qing Duan 50, Stefan T Engelter 51,52, Guido J Falcone 53,54, Rebecca F Gottesman 55, Raji P Grewal 56, Vilmundur Gudnason 57,58, Stefan Gustafsson 59, Jeffrey Haessler 60, Tamara B Harris 61, Ahamad Hassan 62, Aki S Havulinna 63,64, Susan R Heckbert 65, Elizabeth G Holliday 66,67, George Howard 68, Fang-Chi Hsu 69, Hyacinth I Hyacinth 70, M Arfan Ikram 16, Erik Ingelsson 71,72, Marguerite R Irvin 73, Xueqiu Jian 74, Jordi Jimnez-Conde 75, Julie A Johnson 76,77, J Wouter Jukema 78, Masahiro Kanai 6,7,79, Keith L Keene 80,81, Brett M Kissela 82, Dawn O Kleindorfer 82, Charles Kooperberg 60, Michiaki Kubo 83, Leslie A Lange 84, Carl D Langefeld 85, Claudia Langenberg 86, Lenore J Launer 87, Jin-Moo Lee 88, Robin Lemmens 89,90, Didier Leys 91, Cathryn M Lewis 92,93, Wei-Yu Lin 28,94, Arne G Lindgren 95,96, Erik Lorentzen 97, Patrik K Magnusson 98, Jane Maguire 99, Ani Manichaikul 36, Patrick F McArdle 100, James F Meschia 101, Braxton D Mitchell 100,102, Thomas H Mosley 103,104, Michael A Nalls 105,106, Toshiharu Ninomiya 107, Martin J ODonnell 15,108, Bruce M Psaty 109,110,111,112, Sara L Pulit 113,45, Kristiina Rannikme 114,115, Alexander P Reiner 65,116, Kathryn M Rexrode 117, Kenneth Rice 118, Stephen S Rich 36, Paul M Ridker 34,35, Natalia S Rost 9,13, Peter M Rothwell 119, Jerome I Rotter 120,121, Tatjana Rundek 122, Ralph L Sacco 122, Saori Sakaue 7,123, Michele M Sale 124, Veikko Salomaa 63, Bishwa R Sapkota 125, Reinhold Schmidt 126, Carsten O Schmidt 127, Ulf Schminke 128, Pankaj Sharma 39, Agnieszka Slowik 129, Cathie LM Sudlow 114,115, Christian Tanislav 130, Turgut Tatlisumak 131,132, Kent D Taylor 120,121, Vincent NS Thijs 133,134, Gudmar Thorleifsson 11, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir 11, Steffen Tiedt 1, Stella Trompet 135, Christophe Tzourio 5,136,137, Cornelia M van Duijn 138,139, Matthew Walters 140, Nicholas J Wareham 86, Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller 141, James G Wilson 142, Kerri L Wiggins 109, Qiong Yang 47, Salim Yusuf 15, Najaf Amin 16, Hugo S Aparicio 185,48, Donna K Arnett 186, John Attia 187, Alexa S Beiser 47,48, Claudine Berr 188, Julie E Buring 34,35, Mariana Bustamante 189, Valeria Caso 190, Yu-Ching Cheng 191, Seung Hoan Choi 192,48, Ayesha Chowhan 185,48, Natalia Cullell 31, Jean-Franois Dartigues 193,194, Hossein Delavaran 95,96, Pilar Delgado 195, Marcus Drr 196,197, Gunnar Engstrm 19, Ian Ford 198, Wander S Gurpreet 199, Anders Hamsten 200,201, Laura Heitsch 202, Atsushi Hozawa 203, Laura Ibanez 204, Andreea Ilinca 95,96, Martin Ingelsson 205, Motoki Iwasaki 206, Rebecca D Jackson 207, Katarina Jood 208, Pekka Jousilahti 63, Sara Kaffashian 4,5, Lalit Kalra 209, Masahiro Kamouchi 210, Takanari Kitazono 211, Olafur Kjartansson 212, Manja Kloss 213, Peter J Koudstaal 214, Jerzy Krupinski 215, Daniel L Labovitz 216, Cathy C Laurie 118, Christopher R Levi 217, Linxin Li 218, Lars Lind 219, Cecilia M Lindgren 220,221, Vasileios Lioutas 222,48, Yong Mei Liu 223, Oscar L Lopez 224, Hirata Makoto 225, Nicolas Martinez-Majander 172, Koichi Matsuda 225, Naoko Minegishi 203, Joan Montaner 226, Andrew P Morris 227,228, Elena Muio 31, Martina Mller-Nurasyid 229,230,231, Bo Norrving 95,96, Soichi Ogishima 203, Eugenio A Parati 232, Leema Reddy Peddareddygari 56, Nancy L Pedersen 98,233, Joanna Pera 129, Markus Perola 63,234, Alessandro Pezzini 235, Silvana Pileggi 236, Raquel Rabionet 237, Iolanda Riba-Llena 30, Marta Ribass 238, Jose R Romero 185,48, Jaume Roquer 239,240, Anthony G Rudd 241,242, Antti-Pekka Sarin 243,244, Ralhan Sarju 199, Chloe Sarnowski 47,48, Makoto Sasaki 245, Claudia L Satizabal 185,48, Mamoru Satoh 245, Naveed Sattar 246, Norie Sawada 206, Gerli Sibolt 172, sgeir Sigurdsson 247, Albert Smith 248, Kenji Sobue 245, Carolina Soriano-Trraga 240, Tara Stanne 249, O Colin Stine 250, David J Stott 251, Konstantin Strauch 229,252, Takako Takai 203, Hideo Tanaka 253,254, Kozo Tanno 245, Alexander Teumer 255, Liisa Tomppo 172, Nuria P Torres-Aguila 31, Emmanuel Touze 256,257, Shoichiro Tsugane 206, Andre G Uitterlinden 258, Einar M Valdimarsson 259, Sven J van der Lee 16, Henry Vlzke 255, Kenji Wakai 253, David Weir 260, Stephen R Williams 261, Charles DA Wolfe 241,242, Quenna Wong 118, Huichun Xu 191, Taiki Yamaji 206, Dharambir K Sanghera 125,169,170, Olle Melander 19, Christina Jern 171, Daniel Strbian 172,173, Israel Fernandez-Cadenas 31,30, W T Longstreth, Jr 174,65, Arndt Rolfs 175, Jun Hata 107, Daniel Woo 82, Jonathan Rosand 12,13,14, Guillaume Pare 15, Jemma C Hopewell 176, Danish Saleheen 177, Kari Stefansson 11,178, Bradford B Worrall 179, Steven J Kittner 37, Sudha Seshadri 180,48, Myriam Fornage 74,181, Hugh S Markus 3, Joanna MM Howson 28, Yoichiro Kamatani 6,182, Stephanie Debette 4,5, Martin Dichgans 1,183,184.
1 Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
2 Centre for Brain Research, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
3 Stroke Research Group, Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK
4 INSERM U1219 Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, Bordeaux, France
5 University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
6 Laboratory for Statistical Analysis, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
See the rest here:
Genetically proxied therapeutic inhibition of antihypertensive drug targets and risk of common cancers: A mendelian randomization analysis - PLoS...
Posted in Gene Medicine
Comments Off on Genetically proxied therapeutic inhibition of antihypertensive drug targets and risk of common cancers: A mendelian randomization analysis – PLoS…
IOC honours Tracey Holmes for her journalism and leadership – About the ABC
Posted: at 5:13 am
Tracey Holmes
Friday4 February 2022
The International Olympic Committee has awarded ABC sports journalist Tracey Holmes the 2021 Women and Sports Award for Oceania.
Holmes is the first journalist to win the prestigious award, which theIOC said recognises hercontribution to reporting on womens sport and mentorship for the next generation of women sports journalists.
In 1989 I started a weekly segment on the ABC called Women in Sport, now the ABC has a 50:50 project for its coverage and the sports department is the standout performer, Holmes said.
This award is a tribute to all those women athletes and women sports administrators who persevered without money, coverage or recognition to create a world today where women in many countries can do and can be whatever they so choose.
It is also a tribute to my mother and father,from whom I learned we are all equal, and it is a tribute to all those many of them men who freely offered their mentorship and guidance throughout my career.
A trailblazer for 30 years, Holmes was the first woman to be appointed as a sports broadcast trainee at the ABC and went on to become the first female reporter in its national sports department and the first host, male or female, of a national sports program,ABC Grandstand. The Women in Sport program was influential in increasing coverage of womens sport in Australia.
As well as her broadcast and digital reporting Holmes hosts award-winning weekly sports show and podcast The Ticket. She is currently in Beijing reporting for the ABC on the Winter Olympics.
Kevan Gosper, honorary IOC member from Australia, said Holmess commitment to gender equality and the promotion of women in sports administration was integral to her professional work.
This is also an important acknowledgement by the IOC and the Women in Sport Commission recognising and rewarding the essential role the media play in how women in sport are portrayed and ensuring the equal coverage of womens sport and sportswomen by the media, he said.
More information is here.
Media contact: Sally Jackson | ABC Communications
See the article here:
IOC honours Tracey Holmes for her journalism and leadership - About the ABC
Posted in Oceania
Comments Off on IOC honours Tracey Holmes for her journalism and leadership – About the ABC
UTMB World Series ready to run into inaugural year, with addition of three events to confirmed 2022 calendar – Endurance Sportswire
Posted: at 5:13 am
February 2, 2022 -- Transvulcania by UTMB in Spain, Kullamannen by UTMB in Sweden, and Ultra-Trail Kosciuszko by UTMB in Australia join previously announced events for 2022 racing calendar --
(Chamonix, France) 2 February 2022/ENDURANCE SPORTSWIRE/ Just eight months after the concept was first launched, UTMB Group and The IRONMAN Group, organizers of the UTMB World Series have today confirmed a final calendar of 25 events across 16 different countries in Asia, Oceania, Europe, and the Americas for 2022. And, with the addition of three new events of Transvulcania by UTMB in Spain, Kullamannen by UTMB in Sweden, and Ultra-Trail Kosciuszko by UTMB in Australia, the countdown to the first event of the year is officially on. Watch the video here.
The UTMB World Series will officially get underway with Croatias biggest trail running race, Istria 100 by UTMB, from the 7-10 April. Over 2,000 runners are expected to line up at the first ever UTMB World Series Event, for what will also be the first chance to qualify for the UTMB World Series Finals in the OCC, CCC and UTMB races at UTMB Mont-Blanc 2023.
The top three male and female finishers in the 50K, 100K and 100M categories will win automatic entry into the corresponding final, while regular runners will be able to collect Running Stones which can be used as entries into the UTMB Mont-Blanc lottery. UTMB World Series Events are now the only place where participants can collect Running Stones in favour of the former points system and begin their journey to Chamonix, France. Find out more about registration for UTMB Mont-Blanc 2023, here.
Marie Sammons, UTMB World Series Sport and Regeneration Director, commented: The calendar for 2022 is exceptional and we are really excited to be working with such dedicated race organizers around the world who share our vision for excellence, inclusivity, comradery and accessibility. With 25 events in 2022, both amateur and elite runners around the world will be able to find a UTMB World Series Event closer to them, which for many will be the start of the journey to UTMB Mont-Blanc and the Finals. We look forward to welcoming athletes from across the globe to an event soon, and to delivering an unforgettable experience at the best races and in the most striking locations.
Three new events added, as calendar is revealed
Two of Europes leading events Transvulcania by UTMB in Spain and Kullamannen by UTMB in Sweden will further bolster the offering in the region with 16 events now confirmed across Europe. And runners in Australia will have more chances to live the UTMB experience Down Under with the confirmation of a second event in Australia, Ultra-Trail Kosciuszko by UTMB.
Transvulcania by UTMB prepares for a remarkable return to the trails
The 273-square-mile island of La Palma, the westernmost island of Spains Canary Islands, will host the renowned Transvulcania by UTMB from 20-23 October 2022.
Celebrating its 12th edition in 2022 the first since 2019 the event is set to return stronger than ever for what is expected to be a particularly poignant edition following a significant volcano eruption on the island in 2021.
With around 2,500 participants and a deep elite field expected, the pinnacle 74km race starts from the south tip of the island at El Faro de Fuencaliente before runners race for the sky and the islands highest point at 2,420-meters. Runners can expect a variety of dramatic volcanic landscapes interspersed with pine groves, before finishing with the infamous descent to city of Los Llanos de Aridane.
Distances of 44km, 22km and a 7.6km vertical challenge are also on offer. Registrations for this sell-out event will be open from the 1-28 March on the official website, with the results of the lottery announced on 4 April.
A technical test of true trail running grit at Kullamannen by UTMB
Kullamannen by UTMB is more than just a trail race. Described as heaven, sea and hell, it consists of several distances from 22km to 100-miles on the wild and beautiful peninsulas Bjre and Kullaberg situated on the south of Sweden by the sea.
A technical test of true trail running grit, the course takes runners through fantastic nature reserves, before finishing at the magical Kullaberg. The adventurous track runs through narrow winding mountain trails, beautiful beech forests, and coastal paths, where runners can hear the waves crashing even under the darkness of night.
A pure Swedish trail adventure, the 2022 edition will take place on 4-6 November 2022. Entries open on 4 February on the event website.
A brand-new adventure at Ultra-Trail Kosciuszko by UTMB
Runners will discover new heights Down Under at Ultra-Trail Kosciuszko by UTMB Australias newest trail running event that has the countrys highest peak at its centre.
Hosted by the ski resort of Thredbo in New South Wales, the event will showcase the very best of the Snowy Mountains, as runners traverse through the scenic Kosciuszko National Park across 100-mile, 100km, 50km and 20km distances. Alpine meadows, snow gum forests and crystal-clear streams will showcase local nature at its best while runners ascend to the highest point in Australia.
Developed by the team behind Ultra-Trail Australia by UTMB and New Zealands Tarawera Ultramarathon by UTMB, the inaugural Ultra-Trail Kosciuszko by UTMB will take place from 15-18 December 2022 and is expected to welcome 1,500 runners to experience Oceanias newest, premium trail running event. Visit the official website here for more information.
Runners can plan their season and choose their next UTMB World Series adventure here.
UTMB World Series 2022 calendar of events*
*Tarawera Ultramarathon by UTMB (NZ) and Gaoligong by UTMB (China) cancelled in 2022
QUOTES:
Xavier Pocino Mogo, CEO UTMB Iberia, Transvulcania by UTMB
We didnt have any doubts that Transvulcania by UTMB had to become part of the UTMB World Series. Its a high standard race that has its own magic thanks to its volcanic terrain from sea level to 2,500-metre-high peaks and thanks to its people. Transvulcania by UTMB is an exciting race and runners from all over the world highlight the passion that the local people project into this great event.
Per Sjgren, Co-founder, Kullamannen by UTMB
The spirit of Kullamannen is rooted in adventure, this is not just a trail run its a challenge that will push your soul and body to your limits. We are adventure-loving runners. Kullaberg on the west coast of southern Sweden has been our playground for training and adventure since we came here the first time on a school excursion in third grade. We are thrilled to be able to showcase the incredible location and race to the world as part of the UTMB World Series in 2022.
Geoff Meyer, Managing Director of Oceania for The IRONMAN Group, Ultra-Trail Kosciusko by UTMB
The UTMB World Series is the pinnacle of global trail running and were thrilled that Ultra-Trail Kosciuszko by UTMB has been selected to be a part of the inaugural series. Only the worlds best trail running events are a part of the UTMB World Series and we look forward to being a part of the series. Ultra-Trail Kosciuszko by UTMB has been designed with our entire trail running community in mind, with unrivalled support crew access, unique spectator points, and of course an unmistakeable trail running vibe. At the core of an event like this is providing the best possible running experience for participants and to ensure that weve left no stone unturned, the courses have been expertly crafted by Ultra-Trail Australia by UTMB founder Tom Landon-Smith, who is not only the countrys trail running expert but also lives in the region.
UTMB World Series
UTMB World Series is the worlds ultimate trail-running circuit that unites the sports biggest stars and amateur runners through the best, leading international events in the most stunning locations. Built on a passion for the mountains with sustainability at its heart, UTMB World Series gives all trail runners the chance to experience the UTMB adventure across the world, with events taking place across Asia, Oceania, Europe and the Americas in 2022. It is the only place where runners can begin their quest to UTMB Mont-Blanc, France, where the prestigious UTMB World Series Finals will be held. For more information, visit http://www.utmb.world.
UTMB Group
Over the last 18 years, and since the creation of UTMB Mont-Blanc in 2003 by a group of passionate friends, UTMB Group has been the driving force behind the development of trail running. The UTMB Mont-Blanc is the sports pinnacle event, and every year, 10,000 runners earn their place on the start line. UTMB Group also pioneered the LiveTrail technology, an innovative digital service that supports the management of endurance races. Revered by hundreds of thousands of athletes, UTMB has become a global, premium, and leading brand. In May 2021, UTMB Group partnered with The IRONMAN Group to launch the UTMB World Series, which from 2022, will bring together many of the best international events on the planet to provide exclusive access to the sports pinnacle event, UTMB Mont-Blanc. The UTMB World Series is built on the founding principles of UTMB Mont-Blanc: surpassing oneself; fair-play; respect for people and the environment; and solidarity. Find out more at http://www.utmb.world.
About The IRONMAN Group
The IRONMAN Group operates a global portfolio of events that includes the IRONMAN Triathlon Series, the IRONMAN 70.3 Triathlon Series, the IRONMAN Virtual Racing (VR) Series, 5150 Triathlon Series, the Rock n Roll Running Series, the Rock n Roll Virtual Running Series, IRONKIDS, World Triathlon Championship Series, premier running events including the Standard Chartered Singapore Marathon and The Sun-Herald City2Surf, UTMB World Series events including Tarawera Ultramarathon and Ultra-Trail Australia, mountain bike races including the Absa Cape Epic, road cycling events including Haute Route, and gravel racing like Gravel Epic, and other multisport races. The IRONMAN Group is the largest operator of mass participation sports in the world and provides more than a million participants annually the benefits of endurance sports through the companys vast offerings. Since the inception of the iconic IRONMAN brand and its first event in 1978, athletes have proven that ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE by crossing finish lines around the world. Beginning as a single race, The IRONMAN Group has grown to become a global sensation with hundreds of events across 55+ countries. The IRONMAN Group is owned by Advance, a private, family-owned business. For more information, visit http://www.ironman.com/about-ironman-group
CONTACT
UTMB World Series French & Swiss media enquiries:
presse@utmb.worldHugo Joyeux UTMB World Series Press Officer+33 4 50 53 47 51
UTMB World Series international media enquiries:
presse@utmb.worldSabina Mollart Rogerson International Press Officert: +44 7922 140148
nicola.dawson@utmb.worldNicola Dawson UTMB World Series Media & PR ManagerT: +44 7919051417
The IRONMAN Group media enquiries:
press@ironman.comDan Berglund
Read more from the original source:
Posted in Oceania
Comments Off on UTMB World Series ready to run into inaugural year, with addition of three events to confirmed 2022 calendar – Endurance Sportswire
Caslick and Hutchison claim 2021 Shawn Mackay player of the year awards | Latest Rugby News | RUGBY.com.au – Rugby.com.au
Posted: at 5:13 am
Charlotte Caslick and Henry Hutchison have been named the 2021 Shawn Mackay Womens and Mens Sevens Players of the Year awards.
Named in memory of Shawn Mackays life and his contribution to Rugby, this award recipient is representative of both a mens and womens player who has demonstrated an outstanding commitment to their respective Sevens program, and whose level of sportsmanship and leadership upholds the values of Rugby.
Both players were standouts during the Australian Sevens 2021 campaign, most notably leading the charge at the Olympic Games in Tokyo.
Caslick kicked off Australias Olympic campaign, scoring the opening try on day one of competition and remained true to form the remainder of the campaign, finding the line against Japan, China and bronze medallists Fiji.
Following the Olympics, Caslick has since led the Australian Women to back-to-back titles in Dubai, accumulating 65 points in the opening two rounds.
Similarly, mens vice-captain Hutchison also returned to the Olympic stage following impressive performances in the lead up to the pinnacle event. Hutchison was instrumental in Australias success during the PacificAus Sport Oceania sevens in Townsville and has gone on to steer the Australians to a second-place finish on the World Series in Dubai.
Australian Sevens Performance Manager Scott Bowen said: Shawn represented everything we hope our program members can be both on and off the field, and this award holds a special place in the program.
Both Charlotte and Henry are leaders in every aspect of their game, from how they prepare, train and play and it is an example our younger squad members look up to.
Australian Womens Sevens player Charlotte Caslick said: Its an honour to be chosen for this award given all it represents.
While we didnt have the campaign we wanted in 2021, towards the end of the year we started to come together as a team and Im excited to play with such an incredible group as we progress through the World Series.
Rugby isnt a game of individual awards, but Im certainly honoured to be recognised by my peers and know Ill have a hard time retaining this honour next year.
Australian Mens Sevens player Henry Hutchison said: I am delighted to receive the Shawn Mackay award. To be recognised by your teammates for your contribution to the team is very humbling and is the greatest honour a player can receive.
Shawn typified what it meant to be an Australian 7s player and my father actually taught him at Waverley. So, the award is extra special to my family and myself.
2021 was a tough year and it didnt play out the way we wanted it to. However, there were so many learnings for our group, and this has added to our hunger as we look to make Rugby Australia, our fans and the country proud of this program moving forward.
There has been a massive attitude shift in this area of our group, and I cant wait to see where it takes us.
Their recognition is part of a week-long celebration of the Rugby Australia Awards which will culminate in the 2021 John Eales Medal being announced on Sunday morning (AEDT).
See the rest here:
Posted in Oceania
Comments Off on Caslick and Hutchison claim 2021 Shawn Mackay player of the year awards | Latest Rugby News | RUGBY.com.au – Rugby.com.au
Interactive: Natural Disasters Around the World Since 1900 – Visual Capitalist
Posted: at 5:13 am
Global Deforestation and Forest Growth over 30 Years
Forests are the great carbon capturers of our planet, and they are a key source of wildlife habitats and vital resources for people around the world.
But deforestation is threatening this natural infrastructure, releasing carbon into the atmosphere while simultaneously reducing wildlife diversity and making our environment more susceptible to environmental disasters.
This graphic looks at global deforestation and forest growth over the past 30 years, mapping out the net forest change by country and region using data from the UNs Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
Today, forests make up around 31% of the Earths total land area, spanning 15.68 million square miles (40.6 million km). Over the past three decades, the world lost a bit more than 4% (685,300 square miles) of its forests, which equates to an area about half the size of India.
Europe and Asia were the only two regions which had significant overall forest growth during this time period, while Oceania saw no significant change and North and Central America saw a slight reduction.
Source: UN Food and Agriculture Organization
Africa along with South America and the Caribbean were the regions with the greatest amount of net forest loss, both losing more than 13% of their forests over the past 30 years. This is largely because these two regions have large amounts of forest area available, with the underlying land in high demand for agriculture and cattle-raising.
Although the overall forest loss around the world is massive, the rate of forest loss has slowed down over the past three decades. While an average of 30,116 square miles were lost each year between 1990 to 2000, between 2010 to 2020 that number has dropped to 18,146 square miles, showing that the rate of overall loss has fallen by almost 40%.
Despite an overall slowing down of forest loss, certain countries in South America along with the entirety of Africa are still showing an increase in the rate of forest loss. Its in these regions where most of the countries with the largest reduction in forest area are located:
Source: UN Food and Agriculture Organization
Brazil, home to most of the Amazon rainforest, saw 356,287 square miles of net forest loss, largely fueled by farmers using the land to raise cattle for beef. Its estimated that 80% of the deforested land area of the Amazon has been replaced with pastures, with the resulting beef production known to be among the worst meats for the environment in terms of carbon emissions.
The other great driver of deforestation is seed and palm oil agriculture. These oils account for about 20% of the worlds deforestation carbon emissions, and their production concentrated in Indonesia and Malaysia is now expanding to other Asian countries along with Africa.
While the demand for beef and palm oils drives deforestation, initiatives like the Central African Forest Initiative (CAFI) are providing incentives to protect forest land.
Select countries in the European Union along with the United Kingdom and South Korea have committed $494.7 million to six central African nations (Cameroon, Gabon, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, and the Republic of Congo) for them to preserve their forests and pursue low emission pathways for sustainable development. The initiative has seen $202 million transferred thus far and an anticipated reduction of 75 million tons of CO2 emissions.
Its estimated that forests absorb around 30% of the worlds carbon emissions each year, making them the greatest and most important carbon sinks we have on land. When you pair this with the fact that deforestation contributes around 12% of annual greenhouse gas emissions, the importance of forest preservation becomes even more clear.
But we often forget how much forests protect our environment by acting as natural buffers against extreme weather. Forests increase and ensure rainfall security, making nearby land areas significantly less susceptible to wildfires and natural droughts in hot and dry seasons along with flooding and landslides in wet seasons.
With every dollar invested in landscape restoration yielding up to $30 in benefits, reducing deforestation and investing in reforestation is considered an effective way to reduce the difficulty and costs of meeting climate and environmental protection goals. This is without even considering the benefits of maintaining the worlds largest wildlife habitat and source of species diversity, the home of the nearly 70 million indigenous people who live in forests, and the livelihood of 1.6 billion people who rely on forests every day.
Despite the short-term acceleration in forest loss seen in 2020, there have been positive signs about forest regrowth coming to light. A recent study found that previously deforested land can recuperate its soil fertility in about a decade, and layered plants, trees, and species diversity can recover in around 25-60 years.
Along with this, in some instances these regrowing secondary forests can absorb more carbon dioxide than primary forests, giving hope that a global reforestation effort can absorb more emissions than previously thought possible.
From better financial incentives for local farmers and ranchers to preserve forest area to larger scale policies and initiatives like CAFI, curbing deforestation and promoting reforestation requires a global effort. Reversing forest loss in the coming decades is a daunting but necessary step towards stabilizing the climate and preserving the environment that billions of animals and people rely on.
Read this article:
Interactive: Natural Disasters Around the World Since 1900 - Visual Capitalist
Posted in Oceania
Comments Off on Interactive: Natural Disasters Around the World Since 1900 – Visual Capitalist
U.S. Court Of Appeals and Bankruptcy Appellate Panel …
Posted: at 5:11 am
U.S. Court Of Appeals and Bankruptcy Appellate Panel - Ninth Circuit
SYSTEM DOWNTIMECM/ECF may be unavailable from midnight until 5:00 AM Pacific Time every Saturday for system maintenance.
IMPORTANT: Sharing your PACER and/or CM/ECF account credentials with a third-party service provider will provide access to sealed case information and documents in violation of applicable rules, statutes and/or orders of this court. It is your responsibility to ensure that sealed documents to which you have access are not improperly disclosed. Fee exempt users may not share the documents they obtain from PACER and/or CM/ECF under the exemption, unless expressly authorized by the court.
As of May 1, 2021, the court is processing all new petitions for review in immigration cases through the court's new Appellate Case Management System (ACMS). Filings in immigration petitions for review submitted on or before April 30, 2021 will be processed via CM/ECF unless the Court directs otherwise.
As of January 1, 2022, the court is processing all new Applications for Permission to File a Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petition/Motion (SOS Applications) through the courts Appellate Case Management System (ACMS). Filings in SOS Applications submitted on or before December 31, 2021 will be processed via CM/ECF unless the Court directs otherwise.
To view documents, log in to PACER.
E-Filing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitE-Filing in CM/ECFE-Filing in ACMS
Log in to Electronic Case Filing
To view documents using your PACER login, log in to PACER.
U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit Electronic Case Filing
PACER Frequently Asked QuestionsRegister for an Account
Read more here:
Posted in Bankruptcy
Comments Off on U.S. Court Of Appeals and Bankruptcy Appellate Panel …
Brian Serpone takes the Fifth at Levee Breaks bankruptcy hearing – Cape Cod Times
Posted: at 5:11 am
YARMOUTHIf investors were hoping for clarity during a Jan. 19, telephone hearing in the bankruptcy case of Levee Breaks Investment Group, they didnt get it.
The purpose of the hearing, called a341 Meeting, is to establish the debtors, assets, liabilities, income, expenses, and other relevant financial circumstances in a bankruptcy case.
Bankruptcy Trustee David Madoff asked Brian Serpone,who owns Levee Breaks, a series of questionsto find out what happened to investors money, how and where it was spent, and even where he lived. Investors were allowed to ask their own questions.
Serpone didnt answer a single one, according to investor Nancy Marble. Hetook the Fifth to each and every question he was asked, she said.
The Fifth Amendment gives a person the right to refuse to answer questions that might incriminate them.
Levee Breaks bankruptcy: 5 properties for sale, 3 to be abandoned
Serpone even refused to answerwhen asked if 14 Rainbow Road, West Yarmouth, is his current address. The address is listed on the Secretary of States website for several of Serpones limited liability companies, including Headley Grange Investments LLC, Brian Serpone Productions LLC, Hope Music Foundation LLC, and The Residences at Woodcrest LLC.
The property at 14 Rainbow Road is assessed at $308,400, according to town records. The owner is listed as Mary Katherine Harmon who bought it from Richard and the lateKathleen Serpone, for $210,000 in 2015.
A technical glitch?: Yarmouth selectmen to discuss Music Room liquor license expiration
Levee Breaks, a Yarmouth-based limited liability corporation, filed for bankruptcy Oct. 22, 2021 in U.S Bankruptcy Court in Boston. Founded by Brian Serpone in 2015, Levee Breaks' business involved the construction, development, rehabilitation and sale of properties for the benefit of its members.
Members, or investors, were sold $10,000 and $20,000 promissory notes with a promised10% annualreturn on their investment. But those promissory notes turned out to be unregistered securities, andLevee Breaks was not registered with the state's Securities Division, as required by Massachusetts law, according to state regulators.
Brian Serpone: Music Room entertainment, liquor licenses suspended for violations
Since the October bankruptcy filing, more than 70 creditors, about 55 of whom are investors,have filed claims against the corporation. Some of those creditors are investors, and some are banks holding mortgages on the properties.
There have been $4.5 million in total claims filed in the bankruptcy case, of which $1.4 million are secured claims, Madoff said. The investors' claims are unsecured.
Madoff is still reviewing each claim to determine if the records are accurate.He has asked the bankruptcy court forpermission to hire a forensic accountant to review Levee Breaks' books and accounts to see if there was co-mingling of funds, or wrongful transfers made.
Cape Cod's labor woes: Affordable housing remains a roadblock to economic recovery in 2022
Thecourt has the authority to make sure that anything that should not have left the estate comes back into the estate, according to Professor Emeritus Michael Hillinger, who teaches consumer bankruptcy at the University of Massachusetts Law School. A trustees job is looking for all possible things a company did that can be recaptured for the benefit of the estate, he said.
There was a lot of money invested and a lot of money not accounted for, Madoff said about the Levee Breaks bankruptcy.
Storm damage: Sandwich Boardwalk takes a big hit, Bass Hole survives
Madoff was also appointed the trustee for Headley Grange LLCwhen that corporation filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in October 2021. Brian Serpone is the resident agent for Headley Grange. His address is listed as 14 Rainbow Roadin the LLCs certificate of organization in 2017.
The company was engaged in commercial and residential real estate development, acquisition, renovation, and sale.
Eight claims totaling $245,500 were filed in the Headley Grange bankruptcy case.
Contact Denise Coffey at dcoffey@capecodonline.com. Follow her on Twitter: @DeniseCoffeyCCT.
Original post:
Brian Serpone takes the Fifth at Levee Breaks bankruptcy hearing - Cape Cod Times
Posted in Bankruptcy
Comments Off on Brian Serpone takes the Fifth at Levee Breaks bankruptcy hearing – Cape Cod Times
Amid bankruptcy, breakfast remains off the table at Wilmington K&W – Greater Wilmington Business Journal
Posted: at 5:11 am
With seniors making up a good portion of its customer base, COVID-19 has had an outsized impact on K&W Cafeterias Inc., resulting in the Winston-Salem-based chain declaring Chapter 11 bankruptcy six months after the virus first emerged in North Carolina. Chapter 11 allows the restaurant to stay in business as it tries to reduce expenses and debt, which has led to corporate downsizing.
When the 1980s and 1990s saw the closing of many once-popular cafeterias, K&W was an outlier, growing its business across North Carolina and into Virginia.
At its height, the longtime purveyor of Southern comfort food and other cafeteria classics operated 35 restaurants, but that number had fallen to 18 when the pandemic emerged. It now stands at 11, including Wilmingtons K&W, at Hanover Center, which remains open but for fewer hours than in pre-COVID days.
A once-popular place for early morning business-, church- and civic-group meetings, the Wilmington K&W stopped serving breakfast in the early days of the pandemic, the receptionist on duty Tuesday said. K&W officials have not said if they plan to bring back breakfast post-pandemic and post-bankruptcy nor have they commented on the future of the 11 locations still open.
Shortly after K&W filed bankruptcy, an economics professor told the Winston-Salem Journal that the outlook for cafeterias and buffet restaurants was challenging, at best.
Unfortunately, it is likely that cafeteria-style and buffet-style meals will be much harder to sustain in the post-COVID-19 era, said Zagros Madjd-Sadjadi, of Winston-Salem State University. There are unique issues with such restaurant themes during a time when more health-conscious consumers are demanding better information about their dining choice.
The very nature of this form of dining makes it difficult to comply with such requests, Madjd-Sadjadi said.
Meanwhile, Wilmington customers can take heart that the local K&W remains open for now. (The Greater Wilmington Business Journal reached out to the cafeteria manager but had not heard back by 2 p.m. Tuesday.)
Although breakfast is off the menu, K&W fans should be pleased that the cafeteria no longer is closed in the late afternoon. The Wilmington location is open daily from 11 a.m.-8 p.m., the cafeteria receptionist said.
Read more here:
Posted in Bankruptcy
Comments Off on Amid bankruptcy, breakfast remains off the table at Wilmington K&W – Greater Wilmington Business Journal