Daily Archives: February 3, 2022

What the Constitution Doesn’t Say – The Atlantic

Posted: February 3, 2022 at 3:33 pm

During oral argument at the Supreme Court in December over Mississippis abortion ban, Justice Sonia Sotomayor laid bare a fundamental truth: Theres so much thats not in the Constitution.

Her point is a deep one, and salient to the abortion debate: The text of the Constitution does not explicitly affirm the right to abortion; no one disagrees with that. But the Constitution protects far more than what it literally describes. Unwritten ideas necessarily guide even the strictest readings of the text, despite what some originalist jurists like to believe.

Adrian Vermeule: Beyond originalism

This can be seen in just about every major constitutional debate, as I explore in my new book, The (Un)Written Constitution. Take, for example, the recent decision by the Courts six conservatives to strike down the Biden administrations COVID-vaccine mandate. The ruling was based on the idea that Congress cannot delegate major questions to administrative agencies, in this case the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. The major-questions doctrine may be justified by a certain understanding of the separation of powers, as Justice Neil Gorsuch argued in his concurring opinion, but it is not found in constitutional text. Even the Courts power to strike down laws as unconstitutional is not specified by constitutional text. Indeed, the overhwelming majority of constitutional disputes that come before the Courtincluding abortion and free speech and the right to bear armsdepend on ideas and understandings that cant be found in the Constitution.

The arguments put forward in the Mississippi abortion case (Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization) are a perfect study in how unwritten ideas drive our readings of the text. The dispute over abortion revolves around the due-process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which stipulates that no state can deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law. While Mississippi insists that a womans right to abortion has no basis in the Constitution, Elizabeth Prelogar, the solicitor general for the United States, maintains that the right is contained in the word liberty. How do we determine whether liberty includes the right of a woman to terminate her pregnancy?

It requires, in short, going beyond the text. This is inescapable because the text alone doesnt specify the meaning of enumerated rights such as the freedom of speech and the free exercise of religion, let alone the meaning of abstract rights such as liberty and the privileges or immunities of citizens. Whats more, going beyond the text is practically demanded by the Ninth Amendment, which explicitly acknowledges that there are specific, inviolable rights not named in the Constitution: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. But how do we determine the scope of abstract rights or which unenumerated rights, if any, should be constitutionally protected?

An exchange between Justice Clarence Thomas and Solicitor General Prelogar highlights this difficulty. Justice Thomas wanted to know just what right Prelogar was rooting abortion in. Was it liberty? Autonomy? Privacy? And just where did she find this right in the Constitution? The problem, Thomas asserted, was that the right she was defending was too abstract. When we talk about the Second Amendment or the Fourth Amendment, he said, we know what were talking about because its written. Its there.

But the liberty that Prelogar was referring to is written; it is there in the text. And the fact that liberty is more abstract than the rights found in the Second or Fourth Amendments doesnt obviate the Courts obligation to define its proper scope, just as the Court does with any other constitutional right.

Consider the First Amendments prohibition against abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. What does that freedom entail, exactly? Does it prohibit Congress from preemptively blocking speech that it deems unprotected? What about punishing such speech after the fact? Does it allow an opposition party or private citizen to criticize the sitting government? This last question was the subject of a heated debate in the 1790s, less than a decade after the First Amendment was ratified. While there was ready agreement that the text protected the freedom of speech and of the press, there was profound disagreement on the scope of these freedoms.

At the time, most sitting Supreme Court justices held that the First Amendment allowed the government to punish speech that brought public officials or the government into disrepute. Presiding over the trial of a critic of President John Adams, Justice Samuel Chase argued that any political minority must surrender up their judgment once a government was selected, and that private opinion must give way to public judgment, or there must be the end of government. In contrast, James Madison argued that interpretations like Chases prohibited the right of freely examining public characters and measures, and of free communication among the people which has ever been justly deemed the only effectual guardian of every other right. The disagreement between figures like Chase and Madison lay primarily in their disparate understanding of the logic of popular government, not in their literal reading of constitutional text. Their debate required using unwritten ideas to outline the substance and scope of the freedom of speech, or of the press, just as we have to outline the scope of liberty in the Fourteenth Amendment.

Originalists insist that we can accomplish this only by reading the text as it was understood by those who framed and ratified it. They turn to history and linguistic conventions from the period under investigation to retrieve the original public meaning of the Constitutions words. What would they have meant to an ordinary reader at the time of the texts ratification? As Justice Amy Coney Barrett has argued, the original public meaning of the Constitutions text, and it alone, is law. Yet this argument depends on unwritten ideas about the nature of the Constitutionon a disputed theory of what the Constitution isnot on the text.

Harry Litman: Originalism, divided

Even if we follow the original public meaning, how do we know whether we should be governed by the expectations of those who ratified the Fourteenth Amendment or by the general principles they brought into being? The text doesnt tell us. Does the Fourteenth Amendment apply only to rights that were clearly protected when the amendment was ratified, or does it apply more generally? Does it apply to marriage only as it was understood in 1868? What about interracial marriage? Same-sex marriage? A right to make decisions about procreation? A womans right to terminate her pregnancy? Even among originalists, debate persists on all of these issues.

Some originalists claim that we are bound by the concrete expectations of those who framed and ratified the Constitution. Justice Samuel Alito took something like this position during oral argument in Dobbs, when he asked whether abortion was a right, liberty, or immunity in 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted. If the people who ratified the amendment in 1868 did not expect liberty to include a womans right to terminate her pregnancy, this logic goes, then that right is not protected.

If we follow the expected application of the amendment, it would almost certainly not protect interracial marriagewhich wasnt federally legalized until a century after the amendments ratificationlet alone same-sex marriage. Similar questions come up with regard to gender. Should women be entitled to the privileges or immunities of citizenship, including the right to make choices about their occupation, despite the fact that many of those who framed and ratified the Fourteenth Amendment did not necessarily expect it to apply to women in this way? (A few years after the amendment was ratified, the Supreme Court suggested that the answer was no. It upheld an Illinois law that denied the suffragist Myra Bradwell the right to practice law precisely because she was a woman: The natural and proper timidity and delicacy which belongs to the female sex evidently unfits it for many of the occupations of civil life.)

If we follow the general principles that the text brought into beingas opposed to their original applicationthey may entail obligations that those who framed and ratified the amendment did not understand or even consider. Steven Calabresi, a leading originalist and former clerk to Justice Antonin Scalia, argues that this isnt our problem. We should not be concerned, he says, with how those who ratified the Fourteenth Amendment applied it in particular cases; nor should we be concerned with how they expected it to apply. We should be concerned instead with the principle or concept that they brought into being.

Scalia himself was skeptical of this approach. He contended that the word liberty in the Fourteenth Amendment protects only what is enumerated in the Bill of Rights, as well as rights that have historically been protected by American law. In Dobbs, the Mississippi solicitor general followed Scalias reasoning, arguing that because the right to abortion is not specified in constitutional text, nor supported by history, it is not constitutionally protected. In doing so, he drew on Scalias dissenting opinion in the 1992 case that reaffirmed the central logic of Roe v. Wade, where the justice asserted that abortion was not protected by the Constitution because of two simple facts: (1) the Constitution says absolutely nothing about it, and (2) the longstanding traditions of American society have permitted it to be legally proscribed.

What looks like an indisputable claim firmly grounded in constitutional text is, in fact, a particular reading of the text driven by Scalias desire to confine its more open-ended termssuch as liberty in the Fourteenth Amendmentto specifically enumerated rights. Otherwise, Scalia feared, such terms would become a boundless source of additional, unnamed, unhinted-at rights, definable and enforceable by us, through reasoned judgment.

In his attempt to limit the Constitutions more abstract clauses, Scalia was following the New Deal jurist Hugo Black, who referred to himself as a constitutional literalist. Black famously argued that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights, applying themand no othersto the states. Accordingly, the liberty protected by the Fourteenth Amendment refers to rights articulated in the first eight amendments. Black pointed to his historical research to justify this argument, but even more important to his thinking was the belief that reading the text in this manner provided a salutary limit on judicial discretion. Like Scalia, Black worried that open-ended and abstract constitutional clauses invited judges to read their political preferences into the Constitution.

Yet the Fourteenth Amendment does not say that the liberty protected by due process refers only to what is articulated in the Bill of Rights. Those who framed the Fourteenth Amendment could have easily said as much, but they didnt. Some scholars have reasonably argued that this is the best reading of the amendment, but those arguments inescapably depend on unwritten ideas about how to interpret liberty in the Fourteenth Amendment.

How we determine the scope of libertywhether we root it in particular historical understandings, limit it to rights enumerated elsewhere, or take it as a more general principleis not dictated by constitutional text. This is just as true when we turn to supposedly concrete rights such as freedom of speech. It is true of numerous cases currently before the Court: Does religious liberty require states that fund nonsectarian private education to also fund religious education? Does the right to bear arms include a right to concealed carry? These cases all turn on the justices unwritten ideas.

My point is not to argue for or against any particular method of constitutional interpretation; it is, rather, to insist that a large majority of the issues faced by the Court cannot be resolved simply by appealing to constitutional text. There is no avoiding this. All approaches to constitutional interpretation rely on unwritten understandings. Going outside of the text is essential to reading the Constitution. This does not mean that anything goes; it means that we have the burden of giving our reasons for the constitutional judgments we must make.

Excerpt from:
What the Constitution Doesn't Say - The Atlantic

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on What the Constitution Doesn’t Say – The Atlantic

Ross: Have we already lost the fight against gun violence? – MyNorthwest.com

Posted: at 3:33 pm

Theres a big push to fight gun violence. But if the idea is to stop the violence by going after guns, I think the fight is already lost.

Extraordinary rise in gun violence in King County in 2021

CBS News correspondent Jeff Pegues reported this week that anybody with a 3D printer and easily-available software can make their own gun in as little as 45 minutes.

You can also print a gun part called a receiver, and use it to assemble a gun with no serial number. That makes it untraceable, and therefore very popular with bad guys. Its whats called a ghost gun.

FiveThirtyEight reported that, in 2019, police in Philadelphia recovered 95 ghost guns. By 2020, it was 250. Last year, the numbers were on track to double again, and thats just one city.

It is legal to make your own guns the good guys do it all the time. Some of them are highly-skilled gunsmiths. But pretty soon, you wont have to be highly-skilled.

The ATF is clearly worried, and theyre looking for ways to regulate ghost guns. But how?

Once everybody can make their own weapons and that day is coming even if the government did want to grab your guns, it would be physically impossible. And in a world where anybody can make a new one in under an hour, it wouldnt be worth the trouble anyway.

The whole Second Amendment debate is over. The Second Amendment won!

But Dave, you might say, we could regulate gunpowder! Yeah, good luck with that.

Bad guys will always get loaded weapons. Which means all thats left is universal anger management training.

And we thought getting everybody vaccinated was tough.

Listen to Seattles Morning News with Dave Ross and Colleen OBrien weekday mornings from 5 9 a.m. on KIRO Newsradio, 97.3 FM. Subscribe to thepodcast here.

Visit link:
Ross: Have we already lost the fight against gun violence? - MyNorthwest.com

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Ross: Have we already lost the fight against gun violence? – MyNorthwest.com

Oregon: Anti-Gun Legislation Introduced as the 2022 Legislative Session Convenes – NRA ILA

Posted: at 3:33 pm

Today, February 1st, theOregon Legislature begins the 2022legislative session.With the start of session, anti-gun legislators have again begun pushing policies that do nothing to prevent crime and only target law-abiding gun owners. NRA Members and Second Amendment supporters are encouraged to stay alert and contact their legislators in opposition to Senate Bill 1577.

Senate Bill 1577 would ban 3-D printed guns, however the billis so poorly written that it confuses undetectable firearms with 3D printed guns. This bill is the ultimate solution in search of a problem. Undetectable firearms have been banned under federal law for 30 years.This is nothing more than political theater. However, because of poor bill drafting, this bill could have serious unintended consequences for hobbyists who engage in the lawful home manufacture of firearms.

As in 2021, thelegislaturecan expect to see both pro and anti-gun agendas this year.Gun owners and sportsmen throughout the state must stay actively involved to defend freedom.

Your NRA will continue to fight to promote and protect your right to keep and bear arms and hunting heritage.Our members remain the most powerful political force in American history, and together, we will secure the Second Amendment for present and future generations.

Please continue to checkwww.NRAILA.organd your email inbox for NRA-ILA alerts on the latest action items. NRA-ILA will keep you updated on Second Amendment and hunting-related legislation.

More here:
Oregon: Anti-Gun Legislation Introduced as the 2022 Legislative Session Convenes - NRA ILA

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Oregon: Anti-Gun Legislation Introduced as the 2022 Legislative Session Convenes – NRA ILA

Art Beat: Art that resists – WMUK

Posted: at 3:33 pm

Vicki VanAmeyden views her role as an artist as a responsibility to express her view of what is right and good in our world. Art is also, she says, a sanity keeper for her. Often incorporating text in her art, VanAmeyden uses non-traditional materials to make strong statements and shake the viewer to attention. With a masters in fine arts from Western Michigan University, VanAmeyden, now retired, has taught art at the Kalamazoo Institute of Arts and Kellogg Community College.

This is the second time Ive felt compelled [in a way] that is maybe a little more political, VanAmeyden says. I did it after 9/11, too, created a body of work. Just around everything that was happening then. And then around 2015, I felt compelled to do it again with the rise of Trump I felt like I had a platform and, for whatever reason, that I have a responsibility as an artist with that platform.

A conversation with Vicki VanAmeyden

VanAmeyden often incorporates text along with nontraditional materials in her artwork to make her statement. One powerful work, called American Hero, makes a statement about the misuse of the Second Amendment by using nails, resting books, including the Bible and two volumes about the Second Amendment atop the nails, then topped with bullets from an assault weaponas if a hero sandwich to illustrate the American diet.

That piece was kicking around in my head for quite a while, VanAmeyden says. The books connected for me with the American system and beliefs surrounding guns. Its almost an inalienable right in this country to own a gun. I think its gotten out of balance. Those nails, theyre old nails, and they reminded me of coffin nails. The bullets on top are for an AR-15 it was quite a process, learning about guns and bullets and knowing the AR-15 is the most popular gun in the United States, which I dont think people use for hunting.

VanAmeydens work often stops viewers in their tracks, forcing sometimes uncomfortable contemplation, provoking emotion and thought. She has been acknowledged with awards at both the regional and national levels and includes a Lila Acheson Wallace Award for Illustration. Additional grants and awards include the KCC Outstanding Adjunct Award for Excellence in Teaching; WMU Teaching Effectiveness Award; Teacher Ambassador Appointment to Takasaki, Japan; West Michigan Merit Scholarship; WMU Faculty Development Grant; and Creative Industries Development Grant. VanAmeydens work can currently be viewed at the Ninth Wave Studio in Kalamazoo.

See original here:
Art Beat: Art that resists - WMUK

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Art Beat: Art that resists – WMUK

Initiative 82 on track to end the sub-minimum wage for DC tipped restaurant staff – The Georgetown Voice

Posted: at 3:33 pm

After a long series of setbacks, restaurant workers rejoice as a new effort is slated to abolish an exception to D.C. minimum wage laws. Formally titled the District of Columbia Tip Credit Elimination Act of 2021, the new ballot initiative would require employers to pay tipped workers the minimum wage of $15.20 instead of their current $5.05 wage. According to Ryan OLeary, one of the key advocates for the initiative, it is slated to gain the signatures necessary to be put up as a city-wide referendum along with either the primary or general mayoral election in June or November of this year respectively.

Initiative 82, the shorthand for the Act, is not the first attempt to eliminate the sub-minimum wage in D.C. In 2018, a nearly identical proposal named Initiative 77 was put up to referendum. Initiative 77 passed by a 10-point margin in the city, with the most resistance coming from restaurant owners and the whiter and richer residents of Wards 2 and 3 in northwest D.C. Although the campaign amounted to a resounding victory, the D.C. Council repealed Initiative 77 a few months after it was passed. While the council included in the repeal bill several provisions to try to assuage the concerns of frustrated restaurant workers, such as a hotline to report wage theft and mandatory sexual harassment training, these measures were never funded and did not take effect.

Despite the repeal, D.C. leadership now appears willing to consider the new initiative, according to OLeary. New council members who support the initiative, including Christina Henderson, an at-large council member, and Janeese Lewis George from Ward 4, have replaced members who voted to overturn Initiative 77. In addition to a more favorable council, OLeary noted that the restaurant industry responsible for an aggressive astro-turf campaign in 2018 has put up far less resistance now.

Covid happened. Not only have servers recognized what their worth is and what theyre willing to take or put up with on the job, not only have restaurants individually started noticing how much wage shortage there is and how difficult it is to hire, OLeary said, but also the restaurant industry itself, RAMW (Restaurant Association of Metropolitan Washington), has come to us basically saying we dont want to fight this again.

Advocates for Initiative 82 describe how instituting minimum wage is vital to improving the welfare of restaurant workers in D.C. Aiai Price-Smith (COL 24), who worked a sub-minimum wage tipped job in the Georgetown area, described her experience in the industry. I dont know my coworkers situation, but I cant imagine paying for anything near D.C., Price-Smith said.

Tipping culture was born out of a legacy of racism and still makes marginalized communities vulnerable, according to community activists. The practice of tipping, adopted from European tradition, was popularized by white employers seeking to avoid paying Black workers following the end of slavery. The national sub-minimum wage was later codified into law and last raised by congress in 1996 to $2.13, where it remains today. While D.C. has a somewhat higher sub-minimum wage at $5.05, it is still less than a third of the minimum wage. Initiative 82 is extraordinarily popular among restaurant workers, 88 percent of whom support the initiative.

Today tipping culture continues to put marginalized communities at a disadvantage. Women, people of color [and] trans women and men routinely make less money than someone who looks like me in tips, OLeary, who is a white man, said. At the very heart of this is wage discrimination. He also noted how dependence on tips can lead to situations where servers endure harassment from customers just to ensure a tip is given.

Critics of the initiative have warned that the new rules would disincentivize tipping in general. Others have claimed that paying the minimum wage would cause restaurant prices, which are already under inflationary pressure, to skyrocket and cause small restaurant owners to suffer. Initiative 82, I believe, will increase the operational cost of running a restaurant. As a result, small operators will be forced out in favor of large corporate chains, Greg Casten, one restaurant owner, said in an opinion piece. One study calculated that while any menu price increases would vary depending on the current wages paid to workers, most increases would be modest and at most 20 percent.

According to OLeary, most research shows that many of these concerns are not founded in reality. States that have phased out the sub-minimum wage are practically devoid of any of the alleged consequences described above. Data shows that tipping is generally unaffected by changes in the sub-minimum wage and is fairly consistent throughout the country. In fact, these states actually have reduced both poverty and wealth inequality.

The practical reality of our tipping culture says otherwise: ask yourself, have you ever asked your server what her base hourly wage was to determine the amount that you plan to tip her? Of course not, Mary Cheh, Ward 3 city council member, wrote after the campaign to repeal Initiative 77 in 2018.

OLeary added that restaurants in the eight states that dont have a sub-minimum wage fared better during the pandemic, experiencing fewer closures than in places such as D.C. One Fair Wage, a national advocacy organization, has published a list of 85 restaurant employers in D.C. that are able to successfully provide their employees with at least the minimum wage, demonstrating that eliminating the sub-minimum wage is more than possible.

Weve sat at the current sub-minimum wage for 30 years, prices have gone up annually for 30 years in restaurants, and so I always feel a little sus when a business tells me when they wont be able to afford something, OLeary said. Your employees can be some of your best customers if they could afford to eat there.

OLeary also spoke about how Georgetown students could help support the law by simply registering to vote in D.C. He also noted that if students wanted to get more involved, they could sign up to become ballot petition signature collectors and get paid for each signature.

Continue reading here:

Initiative 82 on track to end the sub-minimum wage for DC tipped restaurant staff - The Georgetown Voice

Posted in Wage Slavery | Comments Off on Initiative 82 on track to end the sub-minimum wage for DC tipped restaurant staff – The Georgetown Voice

5 Things Black Workers Need to Know About BBB – The Center for Law and Social Policy

Posted: at 3:33 pm

By Nat Baldino

Policymakers have praised the trillion-dollar investments of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act that passed in November, noting it will create a new generation of high-quality, high-paying jobs, and investments in American infrastructure. Those jobs will be important. But as the Senate considers what working families need in the Build Back Better (BBB) Act, many are left wondering what building back better really means for them.

Black workers in particular have historically been denied opportunities and forced into high-risk, low-wage industriesespecially during the COVID-19 pandemic. An investment in American jobs must address both present and historical harm. True investment must create high-quality jobs and a commitment to Black communities. As the scope of BBB is negotiated, heres what Black workers should pay attention to.

If passed, BBB is expected to create over 3.2 million jobs a year. Many will be through industry partnership grants in high-poverty areas. BBB also reinvests in the Civilian Conservation Corps to create green jobs to fight climate change. This will spawn over 300,000 jobs that prioritize workers who have been historically marginalized.

Why these jobs matter for Black workers: Discrimination has pushed Black workers into low-paying, poor-quality jobs that have little opportunity for growth. Jobs funded by BBB will pay high wages, provide good benefits, and offer room for growth in massive new industries of the green economy. By assigning specific dollar amounts to initiatives aimed at hiring workers who have been underrepresented, Black workers can join the new wave of green jobs.

Dont think youre qualified for these types of jobs? BBB also creates career pathways for workers who have been historically marginalized to enter new fields. Many of these green jobs will be available through subsidized employment: government-funded initiatives to create jobs in new sectors through things like Job Corps, apprenticeships, and specific job opportunities for people who were formerly incarcerated.

Why career pathways matter for Black workers: Programs like theseallow participants to be paid living wages while being trained. This meansthat rather than going into debt to get industry experience, you will be able tosupport yourself even while in training. Subsidized employment programs often support workers in finding full-time employment after the program ends through mentorship and industry connections.

BBB has specific funds to invest in in-home care. An investment in the field itself will mean higher wages and a better standard of living for in-home health care workers. Grocery store workers and essential agriculture workers will also see investments in their industries that will increase their wages. Some of the money going out to each state is set aside for improving wages across the board, raising the standards for the nation. BBB will also strengthen the jobs of child care providers and pre-K teachers by increasing pay to a living wage equal to K-12 teachers with similar credentials and experience.

Why these jobs matter for Black workers: Over half of home health aides are women of color, the majority of whom are Black women. 15 percent of the early child care workforce is Black and paid below the federal poverty rate. Black women in particular have long been forced to do care work. Care workers have been perennially overworked and underpaid, especially as frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, continuing a trend that began during slavery.

If kept in the package, four weeks of paid leave could allow Black workers to take paid time off to care for themselves and their loved ones during times of illness. BBB also includes funding for pregnant women, young parents and families, sexual assault and domestic violence prevention and support services, and care for older individuals from marginalized backgrounds. In addition, BBB provides a child care guarantee that will provide access to affordable, high-quality child care for children and families.

Why these investments matter for Black workers: Compared to white workers,Black workers are 83 percent more likely to be unable to take leave when needed.And, with the historically high cost of child care and discrimination trapping Black workers in low-paying jobs, more than one in four Black parents relied on family members to either help pay for child care or provide child care directly during the pandemic. Investment in paid leave and child care is essential to keeping Black workers in the workforce.

BBB increases the maximum federal Pell Grant by $550 annually, making it easier for workers with low incomes to afford college. HBCUs will also see more funding, allowing these institutions to support more students with low incomes to attend college. In addition, BBB will provide funding for adult education through programs like English, math, digital skills, and GED programs, as well as community college-based short-term workforce training.

Of course, investing in Black futures means investing in Black workers now. To do so, Congress needs to pass the strongest possible version of Build Back Better.

Originally posted here:

5 Things Black Workers Need to Know About BBB - The Center for Law and Social Policy

Posted in Wage Slavery | Comments Off on 5 Things Black Workers Need to Know About BBB – The Center for Law and Social Policy

Thousands of parcel deliveries to be delayed as Sydney couriers go on strike – 7NEWS

Posted: at 3:33 pm

Thousands of parcels are likely to be delayed in Sydney as couriers strike over their pay rates.

About 100 franchisees of Aramex couriers (formerly Fastway couriers), representing the majority of the companys greater Sydney delivery drivers, are striking for 24 hours on Friday.

The Transport Workers Union says the couriers are fed up with outrageously unfair pay rates that earn them an average of $2.10 per parcel they deliver.

Central to the dispute is Aramexs franchise model, which requires couriers to use their own vehicles and pay the associated expenses.

Aramex describes its couriers as independent business owners.

This means our couriers have a vested interest in getting your parcel to you safely and as fast as possible, the company says on its Australian website.

TWU NSW president Tony Matthews says the companys model is nothing short of modern slavery on wheels, with some couriers working more than 50 hours a week and taking home just a few hundred dollars after costs.

It should go without saying that its unacceptable for couriers to be working for less than half the minimum wage in some cases - but thats the reality for Aramex couriers under these extremely unfair franchise contracts, Mr Matthews said.

Aramex says it takes a zero-tolerance approach to any form of modern slavery in its operations or supply chains.

Its modern slavery statement, intended to meet Aramexs obligations under the applicable Global Modern Slavery legislation including laws in NSW, identifies the risk of modern slavery in its operations and supply chains as low.

Risks that may arise include migrant labour exploitation, equality, fair pay, excessive hours, safety and human trafficking, the statement reads.

Couriers are also protesting what they say are exorbitant deductions for parcels that are not delivered.

One courier who had COVID-19 was unable to deliver parcels and penalised more than three times what they would have been paid if they had been able to deliver the parcels, the TWU says.

All that does is creates enormous pressure on couriers to continue working while theyre sick, and thats not good for them or the community, Mr Matthews said.

Aramex also runs Blu Couriers, an Amazon Flex style delivery network providing individuals the opportunity to work on their own terms delivering parcels in their own cars.

Aramex has been contacted for comment.

Fridays strike is the latest industrial action in the parcel delivery business in recent months, with unions staging strikes and other stop-work action against AusPost, StarTrack, and FedEx in the lead-up to Christmas.

Here is the original post:

Thousands of parcel deliveries to be delayed as Sydney couriers go on strike - 7NEWS

Posted in Wage Slavery | Comments Off on Thousands of parcel deliveries to be delayed as Sydney couriers go on strike – 7NEWS

Who was the ISIS leader killed during the US raid in Syria? – WYFF Greenville

Posted: at 3:33 pm

The leader of the Islamic State group killed in a U.S. raid overnight in northwest Syria was largely a mystery, with almost no known photos, never appearing in public or in the groups videos.He met his end in the same rebel-held Idlib province where his predecessor, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, was hunted down by the Americans more than two years ago, some distance from the main theaters in eastern Syria and Iraq where the group once held vast swaths of territory in a self-declared caliphate.A veteran militant since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, he took the name Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi when he took over command of IS after al-Baghdadi was killed in the October 2019 raid. It was up to him to lead the groups remnants as they regrouped following the downfall of their caliphate and shifted underground to wage an insurgency in Iraq and Syria.His death comes as IS militants, after years of low-level hit-and-run ambushes, had begun to carry out bolder, higher profile attacks. Last month, IS attacked a prison in northeast Syria to free jailed comrades, leading to a 10 day battle with Kurdish-led forces that left some 500 dead. President Joe Biden said al-Qurayshi was directly responsible for the prison strike, as well as the mass killings of the Yazidi people in Iraq in 2014.He was responsible for the recent brutal attack on a prison in northeast Syria ... He was the driving force behind the genocide of the Yazidi people," Biden said Thursday. We all remember the gut-wrenching stories, mass slaughters that wiped out entire villages, thousands of women and young girls sold into slavery, rape used as a weapon of war."It is unclear whether al-Qurayshi's death will break the groups momentum.His real name was Amir Mohammed Saeed Abdul-Rahman al-Mawla, an Iraqi in his mid-40s, born in 1976 and believed to be an ethnic Turkman from the northern Iraqi town of Tel Afar. He held a degree in Islamic law from the University of Mosul.His adoption of the nickname al-Qurayshi when he became ISs caliph, suggested that he, like his predecessor, claimed links to the tribe of Islams Prophet Muhammad.Like his predecessor who was killed in the village of Barisha only about 15 miles away al-Qurayshi spent his last days in Idlib province, an area held by insurgent groups hostile to IS.He was staying in a three-story house in the town of Atmeh, near the border with Turkey. The early Thursday raid on the house killed him and 12 other people, including four women and six children, according to first responders.After the raid, few people in Atmeh knew who the family renting the house was. Journalists at the site quoted neighbors as saying that the man who lived on the top floor with his family had earlier identified himself as Abu Ahmad, a Syrian who was displaced by war from Aleppo province. Children's toys, a crib and religious books, including a biography of Prophet Mohammad, were found in the bombed house. Idlib province, the last major rebel stronghold in Syria, is home to 3 million people, many of them displaced by the civil war, making it easy for strangers to blend in. The house, surrounded by olive trees, appears to have been chosen by al-Qurayshi to be as far away as possible from the eyes of onlookers.Around midnight Wednesday helicopters landed in the area carrying U.S. special forces and closed on the house.If you dont leave, we have orders. We will fire missiles toward the house. There are drones overhead, a man speaking with Iraqi dialect could be heard saying through a loudspeaker. An audio was circulated on social media.An explosion shook the area later and knocked out much of the top floor.Videos released by the oppositions Syrian Civil Defense, also known as White Helmets, showed a paramedic rushing a little girl from the house into an ambulance. A photo of a girl circulated on social media later showing a girl who appeared to be about five with blood on her face.They killed my mother and father, the girl was quoted as telling paramedics who rescued her.It was not clear if the girl was al-Qurayshis daughter.Al-Arabiya TV said three of the four women who were killed in the raid might have been the wives of the extremist leader. It is common for members of extremists group to be married to up to four women, which is allowed under Muslim tradition.Since taking command of IS, al-Qurayshi has topped the wanted list of the U.S. and other regional governments fighting the extremists. He did not appear in public, and rarely released any audio recordings. His influence and day-to-day involvement in the groups operations is not known, and he has no known successor.On March 18, 2020, the State Department listed al-Qurayshi as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. A few months later, the U.S. doubled its reward to $10 million for information leading to his identification or location. Al-Qurayshi was also known by the two other noms de guerre, Abu Omar al-Turkmani and Abdullah Qaradash.The U.S. Treasury Department said al-Qurayshi helped drive and justify the abduction, slaughter and trafficking of members of Iraqs Yazidi religious minority and that he oversees the groups global operations. Thousands of Yazidi men were killed from the group, and thousands of women taken as slaves in what rights groups say amounts to a crime of genocide.Al-Qurayshi began his militant work shortly after former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was removed from power. A year after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, al-Qurayshi joined al-Qaida in Iraq, run by Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.Al-Qurayshi was arrested by U.S. troops in Mosul in 2004, where he was held for two years. During his imprisonment, he became al-Baghdadis top security henchman.Following al-Zarqawis death in a U.S. strike in 2006, al-Qurayshi became a senior official with the al-Qaida affiliate's successor group, the Islamic State in Iraq, which under al-Baghdadi transformed into the Islamic State group.When IS overran much of northern and eastern Syria and northern Iraq and declared its caliphate in 2014, al-Qurayshi became a senior official in the leadership. As the groups caliphate crumbled in the years-long war with a U.S.-led coalition in both Iraq and Syria, he went into hiding.

The leader of the Islamic State group killed in a U.S. raid overnight in northwest Syria was largely a mystery, with almost no known photos, never appearing in public or in the groups videos.

He met his end in the same rebel-held Idlib province where his predecessor, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, was hunted down by the Americans more than two years ago, some distance from the main theaters in eastern Syria and Iraq where the group once held vast swaths of territory in a self-declared caliphate.

A veteran militant since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, he took the name Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi when he took over command of IS after al-Baghdadi was killed in the October 2019 raid. It was up to him to lead the groups remnants as they regrouped following the downfall of their caliphate and shifted underground to wage an insurgency in Iraq and Syria.

His death comes as IS militants, after years of low-level hit-and-run ambushes, had begun to carry out bolder, higher profile attacks. Last month, IS attacked a prison in northeast Syria to free jailed comrades, leading to a 10 day battle with Kurdish-led forces that left some 500 dead.

President Joe Biden said al-Qurayshi was directly responsible for the prison strike, as well as the mass killings of the Yazidi people in Iraq in 2014.

He was responsible for the recent brutal attack on a prison in northeast Syria ... He was the driving force behind the genocide of the Yazidi people," Biden said Thursday. We all remember the gut-wrenching stories, mass slaughters that wiped out entire villages, thousands of women and young girls sold into slavery, rape used as a weapon of war."

It is unclear whether al-Qurayshi's death will break the groups momentum.

His real name was Amir Mohammed Saeed Abdul-Rahman al-Mawla, an Iraqi in his mid-40s, born in 1976 and believed to be an ethnic Turkman from the northern Iraqi town of Tel Afar. He held a degree in Islamic law from the University of Mosul.

His adoption of the nickname al-Qurayshi when he became ISs caliph, suggested that he, like his predecessor, claimed links to the tribe of Islams Prophet Muhammad.

Like his predecessor who was killed in the village of Barisha only about 15 miles away al-Qurayshi spent his last days in Idlib province, an area held by insurgent groups hostile to IS.

He was staying in a three-story house in the town of Atmeh, near the border with Turkey. The early Thursday raid on the house killed him and 12 other people, including four women and six children, according to first responders.

After the raid, few people in Atmeh knew who the family renting the house was. Journalists at the site quoted neighbors as saying that the man who lived on the top floor with his family had earlier identified himself as Abu Ahmad, a Syrian who was displaced by war from Aleppo province. Children's toys, a crib and religious books, including a biography of Prophet Mohammad, were found in the bombed house.

Idlib province, the last major rebel stronghold in Syria, is home to 3 million people, many of them displaced by the civil war, making it easy for strangers to blend in. The house, surrounded by olive trees, appears to have been chosen by al-Qurayshi to be as far away as possible from the eyes of onlookers.

Around midnight Wednesday helicopters landed in the area carrying U.S. special forces and closed on the house.

If you dont leave, we have orders. We will fire missiles toward the house. There are drones overhead, a man speaking with Iraqi dialect could be heard saying through a loudspeaker. An audio was circulated on social media.

An explosion shook the area later and knocked out much of the top floor.

Videos released by the oppositions Syrian Civil Defense, also known as White Helmets, showed a paramedic rushing a little girl from the house into an ambulance. A photo of a girl circulated on social media later showing a girl who appeared to be about five with blood on her face.

They killed my mother and father, the girl was quoted as telling paramedics who rescued her.

It was not clear if the girl was al-Qurayshis daughter.

Al-Arabiya TV said three of the four women who were killed in the raid might have been the wives of the extremist leader. It is common for members of extremists group to be married to up to four women, which is allowed under Muslim tradition.

Since taking command of IS, al-Qurayshi has topped the wanted list of the U.S. and other regional governments fighting the extremists. He did not appear in public, and rarely released any audio recordings. His influence and day-to-day involvement in the groups operations is not known, and he has no known successor.

On March 18, 2020, the State Department listed al-Qurayshi as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. A few months later, the U.S. doubled its reward to $10 million for information leading to his identification or location. Al-Qurayshi was also known by the two other noms de guerre, Abu Omar al-Turkmani and Abdullah Qaradash.

The U.S. Treasury Department said al-Qurayshi helped drive and justify the abduction, slaughter and trafficking of members of Iraqs Yazidi religious minority and that he oversees the groups global operations. Thousands of Yazidi men were killed from the group, and thousands of women taken as slaves in what rights groups say amounts to a crime of genocide.

Al-Qurayshi began his militant work shortly after former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was removed from power. A year after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, al-Qurayshi joined al-Qaida in Iraq, run by Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.

Al-Qurayshi was arrested by U.S. troops in Mosul in 2004, where he was held for two years. During his imprisonment, he became al-Baghdadis top security henchman.

Following al-Zarqawis death in a U.S. strike in 2006, al-Qurayshi became a senior official with the al-Qaida affiliate's successor group, the Islamic State in Iraq, which under al-Baghdadi transformed into the Islamic State group.

When IS overran much of northern and eastern Syria and northern Iraq and declared its caliphate in 2014, al-Qurayshi became a senior official in the leadership. As the groups caliphate crumbled in the years-long war with a U.S.-led coalition in both Iraq and Syria, he went into hiding.

See the rest here:

Who was the ISIS leader killed during the US raid in Syria? - WYFF Greenville

Posted in Wage Slavery | Comments Off on Who was the ISIS leader killed during the US raid in Syria? – WYFF Greenville

Happy birthday to the great Ayn Rand – OCRegister

Posted: at 3:32 pm

Today marks the birthdate of one Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum, best known to the world as Ayn Rand.

Rand was born in St. Petersburg, Russia in 1905, witnessing the tremendous upheaval caused by war and communist revolution firsthand,

In 1926, she immigrated to the United States and pursued the classic American dream of becoming a screenwriter in Hollywood. Though she had limited success on the film and theatrical scene, she found her calling as a novelist.

In her early novels like We The Living, Anthem and The Fountainhead, she explored themes that would come to define her: the tyranny of the state against the individual, the menace of collectivistic philosophies and the will of individuals to triumph over oppression.

Her magnum opus Atlas Shrugged was published in 1957. The more than 1,000-page book tells the story of heroic, productive individuals and entrepreneurs suppressed by meddling bureaucrats. It was through this novel that Rand extensively spelled out her core philosophy celebrating rational self-interest, reason and individualism.

Its an approach perhaps best summarized by a key line in the novel, I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.

Atlas Shrugged would go on to become an international success and a major influence on free market-minded conservatives and libertarians.

Until her death in 1982, Rand continued to write and appear on television programs valiantly defending individualism and capitalism, which she understood was essential to freeing individuals to put their creative energies to use.

Capitalism was the only system in history where wealth was not acquired by looting, but by production, not by force, but by trade, the only system that stood for mans right to his own mind, to his work, to his life, to his happiness, to himself, she wrote in Capitalism: The New Ideal.

While Rand is certainly a polarizing figure, with collectivistic progressives who usually havent read a single page of her work seemingly the most bothered by her, Rands personal story and extensive intellectual contributions to the cause of liberty are worthy of respect and critical engagement.

Read more from the original source:

Happy birthday to the great Ayn Rand - OCRegister

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Happy birthday to the great Ayn Rand – OCRegister

Letter to the editor about Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right. – Fillmore County Journal

Posted: at 3:32 pm

To the Editor,

Weve got the Democrats, who are saying youre just going to have to suffer because you should have recognized that they were right and done whatever they say; and you have the Republicans, who are saying you should suffer because you deserve to because if you didnt deserve to suffer you wouldnt be suffering, you dumb cluck.

How did we get here?

You see, ever since Reagan theres been this weird philosophy thats crept into almost every nook and cranny of American life. Its called Objectivism, and it was started by doorstop-sized-book-writer Ayn Rand, who literally wrote that selfishness was a virtue. She believed that there should only be one rule, that you do what is best for you and to heck with everyone else.

Somehow, this person became the person we decided to base our society around. Not Jesus, not George Washington, not even Johnny Appleseed. Why? Because it tells the rich people that they deserve to be rich, and its okay that they literally had to destroy millions of lives to get there. This way of thinking is sick, but thankfully we dont have to let it rule us any longer. We must look out for each other, take care of each other, and most of all pursue systems and government that will do the same, instead of continuing down this path of every person for themselves.

Eric Leitzen

Hokah, Minn.

Here is the original post:

Letter to the editor about Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right. - Fillmore County Journal

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Letter to the editor about Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right. – Fillmore County Journal