Daily Archives: February 3, 2022

One reason the New York Times has become insufferable for readers outside of the activist left is that the former newspaper of record demands an increasingly costly and unrealistic agenda for managing American lifestyles and livelihoods. Two stories today suggest the Times cant bear it any more easily than most readers can.

Times food coverage is often served with a generous portion of anti-business rage. The effect is to shame consumers into forgoing enjoyable meals and searching for items they can consume without leaving an economic or environmental trace. Take todays unappetizing offering, Were Cooked, an opinion video series introduced in an email to Times readers by Adam Ellick. Mr. Ellick at first confesses to his own politically incorrect indulgences, writing that despite years of reading about our malignant food system and the harm that its doing to animals, the natural ecosystem and us, I have been unable to change my wide-ranging diet. He then attempts to make the case for an ideological menu:

Read this article:
New York Times Loves UnionsExcept at the New York Times - The Wall Street Journal

Its Groundhog Day! OK, technically this uniquely American holiday is observed tomorrow the day when Punxsutawney Phil grabs the groundhog spotlight back from TVs annoying lottery hawker, Gus. But with COVID-19, Donald Trumps non-stop blather, and an endlessly frigid winter, Im feel like Im hearing Sonny and Chers I Got You, Babe on the clock radio every day at 6 a.m. How about you?

Did someone forward you this email? Sign up to receive this newsletter weekly at inquirer.com/bunch, and we promise you a different tune every Tuesday morning.

Referring to the vast rural and industrial American Heartland as flyover country has become politically incorrect reeking of coastal elite condescension yet the phrase aptly describes the life journey of Philadelphia-area native Ro Khanna.

Raised by his Indian immigrant parents in suburban Bucks County, the Council Rock High School grad got his precocious teen political letters published in the Courier Times before flying west as a young man to make a career in Silicon Valley as a lawyer. Then, he flew back over Middle America for Washington when his Northern California district sent the progressive Democrat to Congress in 2016, where he still serves.

Khanna, a 2020 presidential campaign adviser to Sen. Bernie Sanders, is arguably the last member of Congress youd expect to become an advocate for the economic revival of the rust-bitten Midwest or the rural South. But he experienced a lightbulb moment when he joined a GOP colleague on a fact-finding trip to the rolling hills of Kentucky during his first term. He saw how the giants of Big Tech many of them his constituents or campaign donors back in Silicon Valley could power job growth in Americas forgotten counties. And this sparked an even bigger idea about how rural and Rust Belt development could save democracy.

Khanna has turned his Big Idea into a book Dignity in a Digital Age: Making Tech Work For All of Us, officially out today that seeks to flip todays big debates the growing power of tech giants like Amazon or Meta/Facebook and address the political resentment held by rural voters who feel disrespected by coastal elites. Speaking to me Monday by phone from New York where he was about to tape Late Night With Stephen Colbert, this congressman for one of Americas most affluent and educated districts in America, explained his ideas for growth in the regions where access to learning and wealth have lagged.

READ MORE: From Council Rock to Congress: Philly-born Ro Khanna is saving U.S. foreign policy from itself | Will Bunch

Khanna explained that most Americans crave what he calls pride of place. Its what he felt in his close-knit and striving middle-class neighborhood growing up in Holland, Pa. but has been robbed from communities with shuttered factories, empty church pews, and rising deaths of despair. Its not just lost jobs, Khanna said, talking about the resentment in these counties that voted heavily for Donald Trump in the last two elections. And its not just telling their kids to move to where the jobs are, but that its done in the most condescending and insulting way.

Not surprisingly for Silicon Valleys man in D.C., Khanna calls himself a progressive capitalist, and the path he envisions in Dignity in a Digital Age not only for the stereotypical Trump Country but also for nonwhite blue-collar swaths of the South and Southwest involves a partnership of tech firms, government, and higher ed. That means he supports ideas such as the federal government requiring its tech contractors to guarantee new jobs in rural areas, and colleges and universities inventing new kinds of programs that target todays labor market yet may not require the massive expense of a four-year diploma.

This is not some charade of, Lets turn everybody into a coder, Khanna said, even as his book notes that new technologies and the work-from-home-ethos thats arisen during the long pandemic has made it possible for software engineers to now thrive in places like the Kentucky areas that he visited (which bills itself, only half-jokingly, as Silicon Holler). He sees last months announcement by Intel of a $20 billion investment to build two large silicon plants in central Ohio with 3,000 permanent jobs and 7,000 more in construction as an example of what can be done if tech CEOs take a broader view of economic development.

In writing about Big Techs role in modern America, Khanna dances close to an overheated third rail, at a fraught moment when politicians on all sides talk about breaking up, regulating, or somehow clamping down on these too-powerful platforms. Khanna told me there needs to be more competition and more rights for consumers. But he also thinks a smarter, more egalitarian vision from the Mark Zuckerbergs of the world could draw the internet back to its original dream of connecting communities and peoples best ideas, rather than spreading misinformation and political venom.

For Khanna, the real goal of both a World Wide Web working for citizens and creating good jobs outside of elite coastal enclaves is the same: a renewed sense of community. That, he believes, can in turn can fulfill the deferred U.S. promise of the worlds first true multi-racial and multi-ethnic democracy where a child of Indian migrants can thrive, but so can a deep-rooted Kentuckian.

We have to have an aspirational, patriotic vision for America, Khanna said. It cant all be doomer-ish. The question, of course, is whether those bleak views of an ever-deteriorating culture war in which many in so-called Trump Country are well past the point of trusting educated outsiders like Khanna can supersede the once-universal faith in the power of economic development. His new book seems an incredibly timely read. Hopefully its not too late.

Do you want to know even more about Rep. Ro Khanna and his new book, Dignity In a Digital Age? Then I have good news for you: You can participate in a special Inquirer LIVE online forum with Khanna moderated by The Inquirers ace political reporter Jonathan Tamari exactly one week from today, on February 8 at 4:15 p.m. You can register in advance at this link.

Is there another Beatles: Get Back-style documentary out there, hiding in plain sight? Yes and no. In 1968, the Rolling Stones hooked up with legendary filmmaker Jean-Luc Godard (Breathless) to record for posterity the making of one of their greatest numbers, Sympathy for the Devil. Yet Godard was high on Maoist agitprop in the wake of Frances May 1968 uprisings. The remarkable studio scenes the Stones last with doomed founder Brian Jones are interspersed with some bizarre-yet-banal revolutionary theatre. But if youre a 1960s completist like me, Sympathy for the Devil is still worth the $4.99 rental on Amazon Prime.

Question: Why isnt the media freaking out over Trumps statement last night about overturning the election? Why arent lawmakers? Via Heather Cox Richardson (@HC_Richardson) on Twitter

Answer: Its not every week I get a question from such a luminary Richardson, the Boston College historian and author, writes the uber-popular Letters from an American newsletter. Shes referring to the 45th presidents own news release in which he confessed to asking his veep Mike Pence to overturn the election at the January 6, 2021 certification, which Pence refused to do. Its the latest in a series of overt acts that sure seem criminal in nature whether confessing his role in a January 6 conspiracy, obstructing justice, or trying to intimidate prosecutors that Trump carries out in broad daylight. He seeks to numb journalists or lawmakers into complacency how could it be a crime if he admits it in public? and its worked his entire life. Its past time for our milquetoast Attorney General Merrick Garland to act, and prove our presidents are not above the law.

They say its lonely at the top, but President Biden must have been a tad taken aback last week with the icy welcome he almost received from Pennsylvania Democrats on his infrastructure-plan-boosting trip to Pittsburgh. With the 46th presidents approval numbers taking a big hit over everything from inflation to lingering COVID-19 to general malaise two of the Keystone States best-known Democrats with big 2022 ambitions initially claimed scheduling conflicts prevented them from being seen with Biden. While attorney general and lone Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Josh Shapiro stayed away Friday (although he did release a tweet of shooting a basketball called by retired 76ers voice Marc Zumoff), lieutenant governor and Senate hopeful John Fetterman had an abrupt change of plans. When a major bridge over Pittsburghs Frick Park collapsed, Fetterman raced to the scene in his trademark winter shorts, where he met Biden who also diverted to the scene and exchanged some kind words with POTUS.

READ MORE: If Dems want to save American democracy, they need to do these 4 things ASAP | Will Bunch

And thats what Fetterman should have been doing all along! The reality is that there are two competing narratives about both Biden and the Democratic Party right now. The first embraced not just by the presidents Republican foes but also by much of the mainstream media eager to prove its toughness toward a president not named Trump is the glass half-empty storyline. The glass-half-full saga is the booming job market and overall economy aided by Bidens $1.9 trillion on COVID-19 relief as well as the passage of the bipartisan infrastructure bill and the restoration of decency and ethics to the Oval Office after The Former Guy. When fearful, deer-in-the-headlines Dems like Shapiro or pre-bridge-collapse Fetterman make headlines for avoiding Biden, they are confirming the Biden is a failure narrative, and making it likely that they will lose in November in a GOP tidal wave. It may be the dumbest political strategy Ive ever seen.

Something horrible has been unleashed in the American Heartland: a flurry of bills in red-state legislatures around gag orders about what teachers can or cannot say in the classroom, especially on the subjects of race or sexuality. Great books like Maus or The Bluest Eye are getting yanked from library shelves. In my latest Sunday column, I looked at whats behind the new McCarthyism a frenzy of book banning and classroom interference that undermines our kids from learning American historical truths.

Over the weekend, I poured my shock and outrage into the news that Donald Trump has dangerously escalated his rhetoric on the road to a 2024 comeback. In a big rally with his cult members in Conroe, Texas, on Saturday night, Trump first promised pardons for the criminals of the January 6 insurrection and then all but threatened a new civil war if prosecutors indict him for his past crimes. Then he tossed the gasoline of racism onto this fire. History shows that lovers of American democracy must act quickly to contain Trump, before his insurrection is too far gone.

Nothing stops The Inquirers indefatigable foreign affairs columnist, Trudy Rubin. With her passport already stamped everywhere from Iraq to Afghanistan, Trudy left late last week for the only country that matters right now: Ukraine. With her nose for behind-the-scenes policy voices and everyday folks caught in the crossfire sometimes literally Trudys columns (twice a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize) will offer her readers in Philadelphia insights that others simply wont get. Her curtain-raiser on her Ukraine adventure is a great overview of the crisis. Theres only one way to read every new dispatch from Trudy and from me, for that matter. Subscribe to The Inquirer today.

See original here:
Can Rep. Ro Khanna child of the Philly 'burbs rescue rural America, with tech? | Will Bunch - The Philadelphia Inquirer

The Gallagher character played by five different actors was little Liam, the youngest of the rambunctious South Side clan. And if you're wondering why the character was played by so many different actors, it's not because of poor acting or any behind the scenes kerfuffles with producers. Rather, the character was aged-up at different points in the series' run for narrative purposes. This is, of course, a regular occurrence in television, particularly on a long-running series where a character is introduced as an infant or younger.

Such was the case with Liam Gallagherwho, as Vulture explains, was but a toddler of questionable paternity when "Shameless" premiered back in 2011. During the early days of "Shameless," the series' casting team wisely did what many shows have done before with young characters. They gave the gig to twins Brennan Kane Johnson and Blake Alexander Johnson. Those two actors traded turns as Liam for the first two seasons of "Shameless' before ceding the role to another pair of twins in Brenden and Brandon Sims, who would go on to play Liam for the next five seasons of "Shameless."

As any fan can tell you, Liam did some serious growing up in those five seasons too. Apparently not quite enough, as the slightly olderChristian Isiah was brought in to handle Liam's significantly beefed-up role in the show's final four seasons. And yes, kudos are clearly due to the "Shameless" casting team for making those Liam transitions all but unnoticeable even to diehard fans.

Originally posted here:
The Shameless Character You Probably Didn't Realize Was Played By Five Different Actors - Looper

Obviously, incarceration affects ones mental health for several reasons, namely, they are no longer said to be a productive members of society, their sense of self is stripped, and theyre no longer with loved ones. In addition, the physical environment could add to their stress, and they may see or experience violence. Thats the consequence of being convicted of a crime. And, based upon the lawyers motion before the court, the fact that his client has been placed in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day for his own safety (as being a former police officer and sheriff), can also take a serious toll on a persons well-being. Put aside the fact that his client had choices, and his bad choices placed him where he currently resides.

Read more from the original source:
Letters for Feb. 2: Virginia schools are in the top 5 of the U.S. What is Youngkin doing? - The Virginian-Pilot

I am a sophomore in high school, and my generation is a key part of "woke" activism. Collectively, our social actions are digitally combustible and their reach instantly global. Call us arrogant and narrow-minded, I think that we are the symptom of a deeper problem.

In the past year, we have seen the country gripped by cancel culture, which seeks to diminish a person's public standing for something that they did or said. While some targets of cancel culture are at fault, many are guilty simply of being politically incorrect. When public discourse is debased, it isn't just political values that are twisted beyond recognition. Moral principles can be, too.

Let's look at Kyrie Irving, the Brooklyn Nets star who refuses to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Many have taken their disagreement with Irving's political decisions as a license to attack his moral integrity. Disagree with him all you like on vaccinations, but you won't change the fact that Irving secretly bought a house for George Floyd's family.

Judging and canceling a person based on a single decision is unreasonable. But it's becoming increasingly prevalent. An emotionally charged mode of conveying information has created a generation unaccustomed to critical thinking. Our loss of logic gives way to a mob mentality.

How do we fix this? I'm not calling for social media platforms to restrict political speech. Instead, we should all take active steps to resist the temptation to indulge in "woke" activism.

As we begin the new year, reason should guide us. We must resist the urge to make quick judgments on important issues. If we don't, how will we ever make constructive decisions later in life?

Winston Chu

Glenview

Read the original:
Calling out my generation on the cancel culture - Chicago Daily Herald

For a while now the generation gap has been making a comeback in politics in a way not seen since the youthquake of the 1960s. Dont trust anyone over 30 has become OK Boomer. Oldsters have been demonised for everything from Brexit to Covid. Personally, at 62, looking at the lives todays teenagers can expect, I thank my lucky stars that I was young in the 1970s and 80s, when you could say what you liked and go where you wanted. But this dwindling of fun and freedom has as much to do with the stifling nature of woke culture as it does with the other virus.

So I wouldnt blame teenagers if they were cross. But those doing the most to promote the alienation of young and old arent hot-blooded bright young things. They are old men who appear to identify as young, despite sharing the same unsavoury grey whiskers. Of course, if someone with a penis can be a woman, a greybeard can be a teenager. Theyre the Grumpy Old Woke Bros.

We can trace this unhappy breed from the then 68-years-young Ian McEwan spluttering at an anti-Brexit rally in 2017: A gang of angry old men, irritable even in victory, are shaping the future of the country against the inclinations of its youth. By 2019 the country could be in a receptive mood: 2.5million over-18-year-olds, freshly franchised and mostly Remainers; 1.5 million oldsters, mostly Brexiters, freshly in their graves. Since then the likes of Alexei Sayle, Billy Bragg and Stewart Lee have joined in from the monstrous regiment of woke entertainers, adding Damon Albarn (a youthful 53 and an OBE, the rebel!) to their rankled ranks last week when he said of Taylor Swift She doesnt write her own songs. (This isnt the first time Albarn has had beef with young female pop stars. He said of Adele in 2015: Shes very insecure, to which she replied It ended up being one of those Dont meet your idol moments I was such a big Blur fan growing up. But it was sad, and I regret hanging out with him.)

Though we think of grumpiness as being an English trait, lets not forget Neil Young (76) who spat his dummy out last week over sharing Spotify with Joe Rogan. Young is a latecomer to the wonderful world of wokeness, whose welcome to the spotless ranks was somewhat marred by the emergence of a 1985 interview in which he backed Ronald Reagans gun control policy and added for good measure, AIDS having recently been discovered, You go to a supermarket and you see a faggot behind the cash register you dont want him to handle your potatoes.

But enough of our American cousins this is largely a domestic problem, featuring Englishmen of a certain age who are highly indignant about basically everything, from the masses giving Brussels the boot to those nasty old feminists being dinosaurs who want to hoard rights (David Lammy) just like their lost leader Jeremy Pronouns Corbyn (The Absolute Boy cringe!). But the more they chase the youth market by identifying as young (that isnt an exaggeration I had a social-media scrap with a Remoaner who told me that my generation was done and his was about to take over, and when I checked his age he was a year older than me), the older and grumpier they seem; more Victor Meldrew than Venceremos!. Sulking in children is unattractive; in males approaching pensionable age, its pathetic. Theres an actual online dictionary crediting me for my phrase (The) Big Sulk (La Grande Bouderie): A phrase originated by Julie Burchill used to describe those who refused to accept the result of the 2016 UK Brexit referendum and who have refused to engage with its outcome in any constructive way.

The joke is that regular old people many of whom were Brexiteers arent at all the angry, irritable mopers McEwan derided. Theyre more likely to be what I coined YOLOAPs those pensioners showing up at A&E after overdoing the coke or driving up the STD rate while the young generation is more likely to abstain. They benefit from the much-documented Happiness Curve which sees sexagenarians find a new joy in life that starts waning in ones thirties. They might have had some dodgy views, but those archetypal Grumpy Old Men of the right, Kingsley Amis and Philip Larkin, had a whale of a time, boozing and womanising. No, from where Im standing it appears that extreme grumpiness now affects more old, left-wing men than any other cohort.

Getting old is hard for men. Though they have an actual physical menopause to deal with, women frequently come out the other side feeling a new sense of freedom from male approval. As females find it easy to get sex, theyll have had as much as they wanted, if not more, having been pestered by men since they were schoolgirls. But ageing brings no benefits for men, who will see a drastic drop in their virility and will probably not have had as many offers of sex as they hoped. Once, they might have gone in for the male mid-life crisis clichs the flash car, the flashy young girlfriend and now they use the culture wars to make them feel young again. But a bitter old man is a bitter old man, no matter if he does see a young stud when he looks into his Magic Mirror.

And as if the Grumpy Old Woke Bros dont have enough reasons to be fearful, theres a new dance craze coming over the horizon, one they might well be too stiff in all the wrong places to learn. An American survey last year inspired a piece by Daniel Roman entitled, Has the woke wave peaked? Shock poll reveals Generation Z rejects cancel culture.

When it came to cancel culture the breakdown was staggering. Overall, no one liked it. The only group for whom more respondents viewed it positively (19 per cent) or neutrally (22 per cent) than negatively (36 per cent) was millennials. Predictably, more members of Gen X (1965-1980) and Boomers (1946-64) viewed it negatively (46 per cent for Gen X, 50 per cent for Boomers) than positively or neutrally (29 per cent for Gen X, 27 per cent for Boomers). The real shock [in] the Morning Consult poll came from those born between 1997 and 2008. Only eight per cent viewed cancel culture favourably, while 55 per cent had a negative view. That was higher than for Gen X or Boomers.

Looks like us ancient libertarian reprobates may have the last politically incorrect laugh after all.

Julie Burchill is a spiked columnist. Her book, Welcome To The Woke Trials: How #Identity Killed Progressive Politics, is published Academica Press.

View original post here:
Meet the Grumpy Old Woke Bros - Spiked

When Louise Richardson announced last November that she will step down as University of Oxford vice-chancellor at the end of this year, senior managers tempted by the hallowed cloisters of Oxbridge could have been forgiven for feeling a little giddy. Richardsons announcement came just two months after University of Cambridge vice-chancellor Stephen Toope announced that he, too, will depart in September. Hence, in a rare alignment, both of the star jobs in UKacademia are up for grabs at the same time.

Or are they? Is the opportunity to lead either of these world-leading institutions, first and equal fifth in Times Higher Educations latest World University Rankings, really as alluring as it seems? With powerful collegiate systems and internal governance acting as a brake on institutional change, is the honour of Oxbridge leadership outweighed by the considerable difficulties of actually getting anything done in the job? And does the unparalleled media scrutiny that comes with heading institutions of such mystique make it an impossible job in such febrile times?

Richardsons seven-year tenure as Oxfords first female vice-chancellor arguably shows that the job can be done successfully. When the Irish-born political scientist flies to the US next January to become president of the Carnegie Corporation, a New York-based philanthropic association, she is likely to leave on a high thanks to Oxfords Covid-19 vaccine development, in addition to significant achievements on charitable fundraising and student access.

Toopes time at Cambridge has been less smooth in recent years, marked by rows over free speech and accusations of kowtowing to China. He will leave after only five years in the role (his past four predecessors each served seven), stating that pandemic-era restrictions on travel had made him reassess my own years ahead from a personal perspective and his need to be closer to family and friends.

Behind the scenes, the cogs are turning to replace both figures. Oxfords search for Richardsons successor is said to be well advanced and its nominating committee is expected to submit a sole candidate for approval by the academic-led Congregation in the summer term. Cambridge appointed its advisory committee for nominations lastOctober, which includes a student and a postdoctoral researcher for the first time, alongside external members. It is expecting to submit a name to a vote of its academic assembly, the Regent House, by the end of September.

Given the power of such bodies, one question likely to preoccupy selection panels is whether recruiting someone more acquainted with Oxbridge practices might be a safer bet than reaching for a heavy-hitter from a big international university. Indeed, for centuries, the vice-chancellorships rotated between college heads every few years. That practice only ended at Cambridge in 1992, when external candidates became eligible to apply. At Oxford, the change didnt occur until 2004.

In theory, outsiders bring a greater readiness to challenge institutional complacency and present new perspectives, but their arrival can be problematic, says Laurence Brockliss, who wrote the official history of the University of Oxford, published in 2014. In the eyes of many dons, the externally appointed v-c is no longer one of us, says Brockliss, emeritus fellow at Magdalen College, Oxford.

Before Oxford, Richardson spent nearly 30 years at Harvard University, rising to executive dean of theRadcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, before heading back across the Atlantic to become principal and vice-chancellorof theUniversity of St Andrews. Toope spent all of his previous career in his native Canada, having been president and vice-chancellorof theUniversity of British Columbiaand thendirector of theUniversity of TorontosMunk School of Global Affairs, before becoming the first non-Briton to lead Cambridge. His appointment could be seen aspart of a trend for importing seasoned international university leaders to top posts, but some observers sense that the tide may be turning: Theres a bit of a sense in some of the higher echelons of UK higher education that if youre a homegrown talent, its been very hard to get one of the very top jobs, reflects Nick Hillman, director of the Higher Education Policy Institute.

Whoever is appointed will need to be comfortable with levels of media scrutiny faced by no other university leader. Coverage of Oxford and Cambridge dwarfs that of all other universities combined in the UK national press.Dame Alison Richard, who led Cambridge from 2003 to 2010, tellsTimes Higher Educationthat she could wake up in the morning and read the headlines and grimace.

Every time someone blows their nose in Cambridge, its headline news, she says. But Oxfords Richardson has not shied away from media controversy. For instance, in 2017 she hit backat mendacious media and tawdry politicians who criticised her 350,000 salary by arguing thather pay was a very high salary compared to our academics, but compared to a footballer, it looks very different.By contrast, Toope has been less voluble, with an anonymous source telling The Times that he was very rattled by the reporting of his clashes with academics in particular, a skirmish over his introduction of software to allow students anonymously to accuse faculty members of racism, discrimination and microaggressions, which was swiftly dropped.

Toope also faced criticism in 2019 for backing a university decision to rescind a research fellowship to Jordan Peterson after the controversial University of Toronto psychology professor was pictured next to a man wearing an anti-Islam T-shirt on a speaking tour. That cancellation, dubbed a disgraceful chapter in the history of this university by one Cambridge academic, was widely condemned as signalling Cambridges unwillingness to defend scholars who hold contentious or politically incorrect opinions, pulling it centre-stage into the national debate on free speech.

Toope also faced national controversy when academics decried the implications for academic freedom of a proposal from the university council, which Toope chairs, to introduce guidelinesrequiring opinions to be respectful of others. Academics eventually voted, in a December 2020 Regent House meeting, to tolerate other views.

Indeed, several Oxbridge academics who spoke to THE about what they would like from a new vice-chancellor put commitment to academic freedom at the top of the list. Selina Todd, professor of modern history at Oxford, who was provided with security protection in 2020 after facing threats from transgender activists, says she hopes a new vice-chancellor will be someone whos really committed to democracy and academic freedom, freedom of debate, at all levels.

This unflinching commitment to academic freedom would send an important message to the scholarly community, says Todd, who explains that she has been frustrated by the panic and fear among academics and university managers alike when she and others have intervened in the debate about sex and gender. Its not even that they disagree with me its just that they absolutely panic about their public image, about what students will think instead of thinking...what are the principles that make us a world-class institution? or what do we want to uphold here?

Another challenge for Oxford and Cambridges new vice-chancellors will be to maintain their global standing.Brexit, Covid-19 and the rapid rise of Chinese universities could see revenue from international students and funders diminish, while the ongoing freeze on domestic tuition fees is also damaging the universities attempts to build up endowments comparable to those of their US competitors.

Indeed, rumours that the government might adopt theAugar reviews proposalto cut annual tuition fees to 7,500 may even push Oxford and Cambridge to sever ties with the student loans system altogether, some observers predict, allowing them to charge closer to the reported 18,000-a-head cost of undergraduate tuition at both institutions. Peter Mandler, professor of modern cultural history at Cambridge, suspects that the issue of both universities going private will rear its head again if the measure is adopted though, in practice, going private would not be as easy as it sounds.

Access to domestic research funding could also be a problem. Although the UK has committed to near-doubling research spending to 20 billion a year by 2024, there are clear signals that extra cash may go outside the so-called golden triangle of Oxbridge and London into northern universities or research centres, as part of the governments levelling-up agenda.

But Brexit is likely to present a far bigger problem, with roughly 10 per cent of Oxbridges combined annual 1.2 billion funding for research coming from the EU (Oxford took 62 million in EU-related funds in 2019-20, while the sum was 52 million for Cambridge in 2020-21). Even if the UK is allowed to join Horizon Europe, international academics have already distanced themselves from joint projects with UK scholars, while many universities have found it harder to recruit postdocs (Cambridge has more than 4,200) from Europe post-Brexit.

Research projects done by people in more than one country are more influential and more impactful. But its now getting harder to do this because of Brexit, says Hillman, who believes that any spanners thrown into those works by Brexit may damage Oxford and Cambridges ability to compete with Ivy League institutions. Unless were very careful indeed, we could be at the start of a gradual decline, he says.

However, the task that may tax any new Oxbridge vice-chancellor more than dealing with the government or the media is negotiating with their own academics. Indeed, Oxfords job advert specifically calls for someone who can bring judgement and sensitivity to the leadership of the universitys governance and decision-making structures.

Oxbridge vice-chancellors are not the CEO-type figures found leading other universities in the UK and around the world. Instead, they are not only accountable to their respective congregations of scholars,who ultimately have a power of veto, but mustalso negotiate with the constituent colleges, which are independent and self-governing, with their own sources of income.

The autonomy of the colleges means that its really difficult to exercise central, steering, strategic capacity, one Oxford insider says. Youve got 30 or so colleges, each of which has some assets, have their own finances, have their own strategies, have their own alumni stakeholders, student body and governing bodies. Its really difficult to steer that compared with other universities, where there is much more of a pyramidical structure, he adds.

Arif Ahmed, a reader in philosophy at Gonville and Caius College who led the opposition to the universitys proposed respect guidelines, says that the next vice-chancellor should be someone who is prepared to give ground because the vice-chancellor doesnt run the university. They must recognise that the Regent House is the supreme body, and not treat that body as an inconvenience to be got out of the way, but rather as an essential and precious part of our governance. Ahmed hopes for someone who doesnt mind a fight: who is willing to take on people on matters of principle and wont take the path of least resistance.

Respecting the college system will also be crucial, says David Abulafia, a professor of Mediterranean history at Cambridge, who describes Sir Leszek Borysiewicz, Toopes predecessor, as a remarkably successful v-c because he respected the opinions of the wider community and the place of the colleges within the structure of the university.

That decentralised system can be frustrating for academics who want to get things done, says Oxfords Mandler, who hopes for a leader whos very good at managing that essential tension talking, consulting, sharing, but also providing some sense of direction.

Keeping dons happy is, however, only part of the job. The global status of Oxford and Cambridge means that the role of leading them is more outward- than inward-facing. Your job is to represent the institution and fundraising is unbelievably important, according to one Oxbridge academic. Its not so much about managing an institution because the management is done really significantly at the college level.

The difficulties of negotiating the decentralised system loomed large during Richards tenure at Cambridge, she admits. However, she still saw her role as keeping everybody marching more or less under the same flagreminding people of that from time to time, and keeping everybody feeling part of this larger endeavour. Its a mighty task.There are layers of consultation and collaboration that are even more extensive than in a university that is without a collegiate system. That said, she adds, any university worth the name, in my view, is a place of deep anarchy.

Gill Evans, emeritus professor of medieval theology and intellectual history at Cambridge, who also has close ties with Oxford, says many new vice-chancellors are not fully aware of the impact of the decentralised systems. An awful lot of these highly famous, senior people whove been top of all sorts of things have found that they have no power they dont know how to run a democracy of argumentative people with strong opinions who can always vote them down, she says.

Is there a case for governance reform, then? Several vice-chancellors have tried and been frustrated. Sir John Hood, the first appointed external candidate at Oxford, who served from 2004 to 2009, sought to introduce a board of directors with a majority of externally appointed members to approve the budget and oversee the running of the university. His proposals were defeated, however. Evans describes Hoods tenure as an absolute disaster. Within weeks of taking up the role, the New Zealander was demanding to reform the governance and was voted down after 18 months of fighting and debate and then left after five years, she says.

Similarly, Alec Broers, in post at Cambridge from 1996 to 2003, tried to reform governance and was broadly defeated. Broers wanted the vice-chancellor to be Cambridges principal academic and administrative officer, responsible for the overall direction and management of the university and its finances, The Timesreported in 2003. But the only reform he managed to push through was to increase the number of pro vice-chancellors at Cambridge from two to five.

Nevertheless, many at Cambridge and Oxford insist that non-academics have gained power over recent decades. Economist Peter Oppenheimer wrote in a recent issue of Oxford Magazine that reforms carried out in 1999 unwittingly abolished the academic communitys control over the size and activities of the central administration. The administration responded by grossly over-expanding its own staff numbers and by proceeding largely to eliminate participation of the academic body in the universitys governance, he claims.

For her part, Richard, who took office after Broers, describes her predecessors attempts at reform as heroic. But reforming governance structures alone is not enough, she insists. The truth of the matter is that the best governance arrangements dont save you if you dont have a group of people across the face of the university who are working and collaborating together, she says, adding: Good governance is not trivial or irrelevant, but it is far from the only key to being able to forge your way towards the future.

Looking back, Richard described the job of leading Cambridge as intensely interesting and wonderful, and intensely hard work. It also requires a high level of physical resilience, she adds. Being able to get off the plane in Hong Kong after a night on the plane and function intelligently after almost no sleepthese are things that require a certain robustness.

No doubt there is no shortage of candidates to take over from Toope and Richardson. But it is equally clear that whoever ultimately get the academics nod is in for an eventful and gruelling few years.

rosa.ellis@timeshighereducation.com

Excerpt from:
Heavy lies the Oxbridge crown - Times Higher Education (THE)

PUNE During the winter of 2005, when the Grape Growers Association held its annual general meeting at Gultekdi in Pune, none in the media had expected that they will get a big story out of the event. The National Congress Party (NCP) chief Sharad Pawar was delivering the speech, and by five minutes he was to finish it, not much had transpired.

Finally, before he concluded the speech, Pawar said if the grape growers have to raise their income, they should grow the variety that can be sent to wineries. His next comment: And the wine made of it should be allowed to be sold in grocery shop Let wine flow like cola. When the news appeared in media, it stirred up a storm as opposition including Shiv Sena, which was then the main position party with Ramdas Kadam being the leader of the opposition, launched a caustic attack against Pawar and his party. It was a different matter that Kadam owned a bar at Kandivali in Mumbai, and, after latest government decision, allegations are made by BJPs Kirit Somaiya that the new policy will benefit Shiv Sena leaders like Sanjay Raut as his family has stakes in the wine business owned by prominent industrialist. Raut has refuted the charges though.

More than 15 years later when the state government has allowed the wine to be sold in supermarkets and walk-in stores across Maharashtra, we know that its seeds were sown in 2005.

These shops, once the new policy is implemented, will be able to sell wine at a flat annual licensing fee of 5,000. The decision has predictably invited criticism from opposition Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), which has called the Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) governments move to turn Maharashtra into a liquor capital.

Whether one supports the government decision or not, wine has always been close to those in power. Its formal introduction into government policy was made 21 years ago when the Congress-NCP government was then headed by Vilasrao Deshmukh who introduced the Maharashtra State Grape Processing Policy 2001. Wary of being politically incorrect, the Vilasrao Deshmukh government at that time avoided using wine into its title and instead restricted it to grapes, which the farmers related with more.

The policy was introduced to give a fillip to the nascent industry growing around the Pune-Nashik belt. The policy offered a tax holiday for the wine produced in Maharashtra for two decades that ended this month. It also offered a slew of other concessions to the wine sector, including no stamp duty and registration and land at concessional rates. While the policy helped wine production in Maharashtra from 712 kL in 2002-03 to over 20 million litres in 2008-09, with the number of wineries jumping to over 75 in the same period.

Those were the heydays of wine production in Maharashtra as many among those connected to political leaders saw wine as a vehicle to add value to their crop. After all, the reasoning went that wine grapes fetched only 25 a kilogram, while wine was selling for 300 per bottle, and if there was no excise duty involved, one would be able to make a tidy profit.

If Vijay Mallyas father Vittal Mallya collaborated with Dr Rossi to start producing Cinzano vermouths at Baramati, his son as the chairman of UB Group, too saw the same logic when he strived to launch wine tourism in Baramati, Pawars pocket borough, through Four Season winery in 2007-08. The winery had a 51 per cent stake of United Spirits and 49 per cent of local grape growers backed by Pawar.

In neighbouring Akluj village in Solapur district, the two Mohite-Patil brothers NCP leader Vijaysinh Mohite Patils sons Ranjitsinh and Arjunsinh who are currently with BJP - joined hands with Delhis Sekhri brothers and an Italian family to produce Fratelli. But it was Sham Chougule of Indage who pioneered the first genuine wine and set up a winery at Narayangaon although Sula wine from Nashik became the countrys top brand as the founder Rajeev Samant understood the Indian market better.

However, the falling demand due to global recession and higher taxes in key markets played havoc in 2009-10 and 2010-11 as it led to a glut in the wine market, eventually resulting in Maharashtras big bang wine story going sour. The market flooded with an oversupply of wine amid demand not picking up forced many wineries to stop producing wine in 2009-10. Another reason that adversely affected the market was farmers were encouraged to cultivate wine grapes like table grapes which increased their yield. However, wine requires the opposite approach, with relentless pruning and discarding of grapes to focus only on the best. Most of the vineyards ended up producing poor wine, which would have no chance in the export market and even falls short in the developing domestic.

Today, if the country has over 110 wineries, around 75 of them are in Maharashtra although only 40 to 45 are operational currently. Of these, just around 15 to 20 units are into direct marketing, while the rest are involved in contract manufacturing.

If the MVA wants to promote wine to help grape cultivators, the BJP too has its share in it even as it is opposing the latest decision currently.

In a bid to promote wines made in the 40-odd vineyards and wineries in Nashik district in north Maharashtra, the Maharashtra government, then headed by Devendra Fadnavis, had organised its first wine festival India Grape Harvest, Wine Festival during February 2018. The festival, aimed at promoting agro and wine tourism, was an initiative of the Maharashtra Tourism Development Corporation (MTDC), a government subsidiary that works for tourism development in the state.

Despite all promotional measures, wine consumption in the state during the financial year for 2020-21 was just around 70 lakh litres. The beer consumption on the other hand stood at 30 crore litres, country liquor 32 crore litres and Indian Made Foreign Liquor (IMFL) at 20 crore litres. The wineries hope that with the government allowing the sale of wine at departmental stores, its consumption will increase.

Yogesh Joshi is Assistant Editor at Hindustan Times. He covers politics, security, development and human rights from Western Maharashtra....view detail

See the original post:
Monday Musings: The politics of wine in Maharashtra - Hindustan Times

Murtagh is the only person to have been charged in WA with publication of material to incite racial hatred, which carries a five-year maximum jail term.

He also is the first to test Australias powers to police racist social media posts.

Jason Murtagh, now clean-shaven, outside court. Credit:Aja Styles

WA introduced racial vilification laws, under which Mr Murtagh was charged, in 2004.

While other states have comparable laws, WA is the only state to detail conduct likely to incite racial animosity or racist harassment which in this case was the publication of online material.

New South Wales, South Australia, Queensland and Tasmania have recorded no convictions for inciting racial hatred, so far, with two cases currently before NSW courts. Queensland legislation that covers racial vilification is currently being examined by a Parliamentary inquiry.

The Australian National University College of Law senior lecturer Dr Faith Gordon said cyber-racism was incredibly difficult to prosecute but had become more prevalent with the rise of social media.

More people are looking into its effects and how it relates to the law because right now it is challenging to advocate on behalf of victims when the perpetrators are anonymous online, she said.

It is extremely difficult to provide victims with adequate redress after the damage is already done.

Murtagh was found guilty, with the court accepting he didnt have to be racist or intend to racially vilify to have committed a crime that was utterly deplorable. But he did not have to serve jail time.

In light of the unusualness of the case and Murtagh not being in the league of an entrenched Nazi sympathiser or white supremacist, with no prior record of such behaviour, Fremantle Magistrate Adam Hills-Wright last Monday deemed a $4000 fine appropriate.

Jason Murtagh said he created the Gab profile as research for a novel. Credit:Gab

After losing his job, the 51-year-old bar manager admitted to spending COVID-19 lockdown in early 2020 posing online as a white supremacist.

He created Woden the Bogan, a man of a similar age to himself but an ex-con, living rurally, who had supposedly served in the military and married three times, with five sons and two daughters.

However, Murtagh told his arresting officers that he was gay and he created the Woden profile to do research for a fantasy novel or game about an extremist father who goes on a journey of redemption upon discovering his son is homosexual.

Murtaghs defence lawyer Ken Robson told the court that while ill-advised, his clients posts were designed to engage with and get into the minds of racists for a genuine artistic purpose.

There is a loophole in the law regarding artistic purposes.

Senior Constable Day said Murtaghs writings after posting on Gab were bizarre.

For 17 years Murtagh worked at the Fly By Night, but his indecision over his lifes direction after failing to complete a fine arts degree at university, a spiralling prescription drug addiction and alcoholism meant his shifts dwindled.

Mr Murtaghs online persona posted to Gab.Credit:Gab

He told the court late last year that he felt incredibly stupid and ashamed over the racist social media posts but denied he was a racist.

To my shame I became fascinated by the amount of followers it accrued, he said.

Murtagh also described being brought up with appreciation for other cultures.

His 43-year-old sister, Niomi Rebecca Hunt, said he got along with the Indigenous boys she dated from the age of 14 to 17.

Jasons definitely not a racist, she said.

Ms Hunt admitted she hadnt seen her brothers posts but said they didnt change her opinion of her brother.

Witness Kelvin Blundell, whose wife is Filipino, didnt believe his friend of 25 years was racist despite the posts because he was one of the most accepting, non-judgemental and caring people he knew.

Mr Robson said his client wasnt a racist but someone who struggled with opiates and alcohol while living a lonely and solitary existence since losing his job.

Magistrate Hills-Wright said the multitude of references from people who knew Murtagh not to hold racist views made his behaviour all the more curious.

Loading

Mr Hills-Wright noted creative storytelling and not telling the truth as factors to your offending and called Murtagh an unusual accused.

He was also sentenced for making 34 false reports to police about non-existent violent crimes, while drunk, in the years leading up to his online posts.

Murtagh was ordered to undergo alcohol and substance abuse programs, while checking in with police, for two years to avoid his 15-month jail sentence.

Read more:
Woden the Bogan tests Australian power to police online racism - WAtoday

Unraveling viral disinformation and explaining where it came from, the harm it's causing, and what we should do about it.

When Ron Watkins announced he was running for Congress in Arizona in the middle of October, he was full of hope and bravado.

I am going to raise at least a million dollars, and Im going to win so that the people have a real voice in Washington, D.C., he told VICE News at the time.

Three months later, however, Watkins campaign appears dead in the water after his first campaign finance report reveals the former administrator of 8kun, the fringe message board where QAnon flourished, has raised just over $30,000 in donations.

Watkins filed his first campaign finance report just before the deadline passed at midnight on Monday, revealing that in the three months to the end of December, he raised just $30,588.22 in small donations from supporters.

His campaign received an additional cash injection of $2,354 in the form of a loan from his father Jim Watkins, who owns 8kun.

Watkins opponents had a substantial fundraising lead on him coming into the final three months of 2021, and that has now increased dramatically. Incumbent Democratic Rep. Tom OHalleran raised over $435,000 in the last quarter of 2021, meaning he has raised $1.8 million to date.

The leading candidate for the GOP nomination is former Navy SEAL Eli Crane, who has raised over $800,000 to date, half of which was raised in the final three months of 2021 alone.

Watkins paltry fundraising efforts show how difficult it will be to translate his QAnon fame into votes. Add the lack of funds to an unorthodox campaigning approach conducted primarily on Telegram, the absence of a much sought-after Trump endorsement, and a campaign manager who sees UFOs wherever he goes, and its clear that Watkins is facing an uphill climb to make any impact on the Congressional race in Arizonas second district.

The campaign

Watkins announced in November 2020, on the day of the presidential election, that he was quitting as administrator of 8kun. Within days he had transformed himself into a self-declared election security expert, and within weeks hed been boosted by right-wing outlets like OAN, to the point where former President Donald Trump was retweeting him.

Over the course of the next year, his star within the election truther movement and the wider MAGA community continued to rise, and he was among the firstand loudestvoices promoting the bogus recount that took place over the course of six months in Maricopa County, Arizona, last year.

Despite the fact the recount showed no evidence of widespread voter fraud, Watkins believed he had established enough of a profile to move to the state in early October and declare his intention to run.

Watkins is also having no luck getting support from the Republican Party. He has so far failed to get Trumps endorsement, and told VICE News that the local GOP party in Arizona didnt respond when he contacted them about this campaign.

Without any network of allies in Arizona, Watkins has tried to drum up interest by staging increasingly unhinged stunts. Last month he traveled to Trumps border wall in the middle of the night, trying to find immigrants crossing the border.

I am out here at Trump's big beautiful wall on the southern border of the United States. I am driving up and down the wall looking to see if there is any human trafficking going on, he said in a video posted to his 400,000 Telegram followers.

A week later, Watkins attended a meeting of the Scottsdale Unified School District board. During his two-minute speech, he was told to stop speaking because he was electioneering, but he persisted, shouting over officials to spread a new conspiracy theory that the board members could be removed simply by serving them with some bogus documents.

Watkins also visited the Trump rally in Florence, Arizona last month, handing out merchandise and glad-handing with the QAnon cult members who believe that John F. Kennedy is about to be resurrected.

Watkins told VICE News that while at the rally he had tried to speak to Arizona state Rep. Mark Finchem, who has promoted QAnon conspiracies, and who is seeking election in November as secretary of state.

Watkins said that when he met Finchem, the lawmaker wasn't so friendly to me and told Watkins he should step aside because other candidates, like Crane, with whom Finchem has shared a stage at Stop the Steal events, are better suited to the role.

I told him Im running and he, like, said, Why are you running when this other guys better? Watkins told VICE News.

Fundraising

A fundraising haul of just $30,000 wont go very far toward mounting a credible congressional campaign, but Watkins campaign manager Tony Teora told VICE News that the reason for the shortfall is a delay in accepting donations.

We really only started fundraising in Decemberwe had a lot of challenges getting funding solutions online, we built two solutions internally, Teora said, claiming that mainstream platforms had refused to allow Watkins use their services.

Of the $32,000 raised, less than half remains in the coffers after expenses. The vast majority of those expenses are Teoras salary, which amounts to $13,500 over the three-month period.

The one other major expense Watkins incurred was a $1,000 charge for a booth he rented at the conspiracy-laden Health and Freedom conference that took place in Phoenix last month.

When asked about the small sums Watkins campaign had raised so far, Teora was bullish, claiming the QAnon influencer would be able to suddenly and radically increase his fundraising power when neededthough he didnt say how.

We are confident we can mount a credible campaign because all our donors are small donors, the average donation was around I think $53, Teora told VICE News on Tuesday.It shows Ron has real support from working class people (voters), not rich lobbyist donors.

Teora also said he plans on ramping up the fundraising effort. So far, however, theres just a single event on Watkins diary, and its not even taking place in Arizona.

Called Digital Disclosure, the fundraiser is a $750-a-plate event featuring Watkins in conversation with NSA whistleblower Kirk Weibe at the Ahern Hotel in Las Vegas, the location of a major QAnon conference last October.

Numbers are limited to 25, but it doesnt appear that the event is sold out, despite it being advertised for almost a month already.

The campaign manager

Watkins brought Teora on as campaign manager soon after announcing his decision to run.

Teora, who lived and worked in Japan for years and is also a science fiction author, does have some election experience: In 2014, and again in 2016, he ran for State Assembly in California. On both occasions he lost, but it was slightly more embarrassing in 2016 as he came in third in what was effectively a two-horse race.

During the 2016 campaign, Teora outed one of his opponents, Leo Hamels, as a Scientologist. As a result Hamels withdrew from the race, but because the ballots had already been printed, Hamels name still appeared and he came in second, with more than twice as many votes as Teora.

Teora first collaborated with Watkins on the latters AlienLeaks project, which was set up as a sort of WikiLeaks for top-secret UFO information.

That project went nowhereeven when Watkins luckily captured a UFO flying over his apartment in Hokkaido, Japan, weeks after the project launchedbut the pair have continued to work together on a podcast, initially called Alien Agenda but now called NerveCenter-Pulse of the Nation.

The podcast began life as a UFO-focused project, but as Watkins campaign for Congress began, it switched to a more all-encompassing space to air grievances and conspiracy theories about pretty much all aspects of U.S. society.

Recent guests have included the conspiracy-peddling doctor Vladimir Zelenko, and director of the Plandemic films, Mikki Willis.

The blurb for the podcast claims Watkins and Teora aren't afraid to ask politically incorrect questions or investigate what the MSM might want to label as conspiracy theories.

One person who has known Teora for years, and who spoke to VICE News on the condition of anonymity because they fear backlash for speaking openly, summed him up like this:

On a personal level, the man is deeply paranoid and a raging narcissist. He sees UFOs everywhere, all the time. He truly believes he has special powers such as telepathy and remote viewing. He has long believed that vaccines cause autism. He's a 911 truther. He sees chem spray every time he looks up at the sky. It was scary being around him at times, given his volatile temper and bizarre beliefs.

In an email statement responding to these allegations about his beliefs, Teora confirmed the claims made by his acquaintance.

Want the best of VICE News straight to your inbox?Sign up here.

The rest is here:
QAnon Thought Leader Ron Watkins Is Running for Congress. Its Going Terribly. - VICE