Daily Archives: January 3, 2022

We attempted to write a letter in support of Dr. Craig Doc PJ Perrinjaquet and Jeff Bergeron, but upon reading letters from Sandi Bruns and Jane Hamilton, we felt humbled. Thank you for stating the obvious of what most longtime residents know about these guys much more eloquently than we would have!

PJ is a beloved, giving doctor to many of us who always works toward the greater good. Though Jeffrey may have a filter that frequently lets only the boulders through, he has taken more positive actions for the community than most. Hes an entertaining writer who also feels strongly about issues challenging our unique town and, along with the Breckenridge Town Council, has the fortitude to work for improvement.

As for the Ullr event itself, it has gone through many iterations since the first event in 1963, and I dont think any of them are family friendly. As it was, and hopefully continues, the Ullr parade (typically in January) allowed us to blow off steam after a crazy holiday season, pass bottles of Schnapps with town friends (pre-COVID), woot at humping sled dog floats and fur bikinis, and watch old Christmas trees blow up.

Condoms have been a ritual for years (and are still fun to blow up to float above the bonfire). Ullr has the reputation of fun, debauchery and questionable political correctness, so why not let the unvaccinated be included in the fun! And if thats you, you took a stance against whatever and will have to put up with the verbal jabs from those of us trying to support the move to stop this pandemic.

Live and let live, laugh when you can and just relax.

As a Summit Daily News reader, you make our work possible.

Now more than ever, your financial support is critical to help us keep our communities informed about the evolving coronavirus pandemic and the impact it is having on our residents and businesses. Every contribution, no matter the size, will make a difference.

Your donation will be used exclusively to support quality, local journalism.

Here is the original post:

Letter to the editor: Ullr has the reputation of fun and questionable political correctness - Summit Daily

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.

As usual, the staff ofMother Jonesis rounding up theheroes and monstersof the past year. Find all of 2021s heroes and monstershere.

Not since the days of watching Comedy Centrals Crank Yankers as a teen have I enjoyed the simple art of the prank call as I didin 2021.Every week this year, the Canadian comedian Chris James streamed The Not Even a Show and I watched him put a thumb to the eye of the most revered figures within MAGA-land.

James is a stand-up comedian who lives in Vancouver. Making a living doing shows is difficult in Canada, and James didnt want to move to the states, so he had the idea to host a show online. But it wasnt untilhe came across the radio show of former Boston Red Sox Ace turned Breitbart hack Curt Schilling, found his calling. From there, the prank calls became an art.Instead of the hapless unknown targets we chose as teens, James victims are a whos who of grifters, bigots and liars of the right wing political scene.

In the four years since Schilling, hes pranked Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ben Shapiro, Brian Kilmeade, Mike Lindell, Sebastian Gorka, Dennis Prager, Nigel Farage,and Rudy Guiliani, among many others. He has a few particularly entertaining ongoing bits with lesser known radio cranks like JJ McCartney and Ed Tyll. If McCartney hears the word shirt, it triggers a full-blown meltdown, and Tyll is locked in a blood-feud with a character James plays named Roy, who at some point called to start a fight with Tyll. Both predate my watching of the show, and its fun to go back through the catalog and track the evolution of James claiming real estate in his victims brains.

While James has signature digs, like making fun of the size of Gorkas head or asking Guiliani about his cousin, this year James took his show to a new level. He began to appear on video programs, or hosted his own fake talk-shows booking guests like Roger Stone, Richard Spencer, Joe Arpaio, who he either torments until they leave the call, or breaks the fourth wall and outright tells them theyre a piece of shit to their face.

But his most brilliant bits are when he portrays characters that are able to push the sycophancy and dishonesty of the right to its most hilarious limits.

Officer Steve, a law enforcement officer, expects the utmost deference from the hosts and misconstrues everything they say as evidence of their insufficient respect for police. Patriot Pete demands that every self-identified Patriot immediately commit to move to Washington D.C and challenges hosts to turn up their shirt tags to prove they only buy clothing manufactured in the U.S.A. Darryl Craft is a comedian who cant get any gigs anymore because of cancel culture and political correctness, and then shows how far people will go along with a bit if its supposedly being suppressed by social justice warriors.

There is a sobering fact hovering in the background of The Not Even a Show. These people have big audiencesbigger than Jameswhich gives the show a laugh-to-keep-from-crying quality that feels right at home in 2021. James targets may have a depressing amount of money, power and influence on the state of majoritarian Democracy, but at least he can make them look like absolute idiots on a regular basis.

See the original post here:

Hero: Chris James, the Canadian Comedian Triggering Right-Wing Talk Radio Hosts Mother Jones - Mother Jones

California's population stagnation is tied to its ever-higher housing costs, driven by years of not ... [+] building new housing.

Myprevious blog documented Californias 2020 population loss, the first time thats happened since the state was founded.Billionaire Elon Musk has moved to Texas, but the biggest worry for the state is the loss of lower and middle-income residents, likely driven by Californias high housing costs.The state must fix its housing affordability problem for a more secure future.

Some media coverage claims the losses are among the wealthy.AYahoo finance storyclaimed millionaires and billionaires have fled California in droves, driven not only by high taxes but political correctness.

But thePublic Policy Institute of Californiashows thats not the real problem.Rather, the Institute finds thatCalifornia has been losing lower- and middle-income residents to other states for some time while continuing to gain higher-income adults.

The Institute, like other analysts, sees the states high cost of living, driven almost solely by comparatively high housing costs as a major culprit in the outmigration story.Without a bigger supply of more affordable housing, moderate income families will continue to be pushed out while new immigrants wont be able to afford life in California.

Californias demographic troubles were highlighted by the 2020 loss of a House seat, based on the Census, although the states delegation of 53 Representatives remains the nations largest.We had become accustomed to California gaining seats because of population growthfrom 1950 onwards the state added 29 seats as it grew to be the largest state.

But as the Institute shows, population growth had been slowing for several decades, especially after 2000.Although births and international migration kept the population growing, the state began to see net outmigration, with a net outmigration of around 1.2 million people during the 2010s.

The state also has gained higher educated adults.Between 2010 and 2019, California had a gain of 154,600 adults with a college degree, while 777,400 with less than a B.A. moved out.

A primary culprit?High housing costs.Economists have puzzled for years how parts of California, especially the Bay Area, Silicon Valley, and Southern California continued growing while their housing prices rose inexorably.

Between October 2012 and October 2021, theall-transactions house price index for Californiamore than doubled, rising by 105%.The Case-Shiller index for Los Angeles rose by 73% in that period, while the index for San Francisco skyrocketed by 140%.

And those housing costs are driven by a lack of supply.California (like many other jurisdictions) has made it progressively harder to construct new housing, through a combination of single-family zoning, homeowner opposition to new development, and suburban resistance to allowing multi-family housing.

All of this happened while the economy was growing and jobs were being created. But new housing supply, especially multi-family and affordable housing, is essential for working families to live in a region. California, like other places, has fostered job growth while not producing enough housing to accommodate working families.

By analyzing building permits relative to job growth,analysts at Stessaranked states on their housing production.And between 2010 and 2020, California was the nations worst on this measure.The state added 2.54 new jobs per new housing unit, so even as the economy expanded, housing prices rose faster.

Economists puzzle over how regions can grow even in the face of ever-higher housing prices.In places like Silicon Valley,Enrico Moretti found that the continuing in-migration of highly skilled technical labor creates what he calls a brain hub.

Firms need highly skilled workers, while workers seeking tech jobs are drawn to the region, allowing firms to grow, specialize, and keep expanding, luring in new workers, etc. Meanwhile, support services like research and venture capital lure entrepreneurs. Rising incomes and wealth can, for a time, support ever-rising home prices.

But that process cant continue indefinitely, especially for lower and middle-income households.And Californias population troubles reflect Californias years of inadequate housing development, which has disproportionately harmed people of color and lower-paid workers. But the lack of adequate housing supply may now be hamstringing the states entire economy.

See the original post here:

Californias Housing Costs Threaten The States Future - Forbes

Leave it to Americans to spoof their scary disease du jour.

Several viral videos have satirized the coronavirus and the vaccines and other woke adaptations in dark if also hilarious ways. But the one that made me laugh out loud was Coming Next Year, by comedian and viral-content creator (yes, there is such a thing) Tyler Fischer.

I recommend it for your sanity and edification. What better way to wrap up another dreary year than with a humorous look at our increasingly absurd expressions of political correctness or, in todays vernacular, wokeness?

The coronavirus vaccine is just one of Fischers targets. In brief, a guy trying to earn passage into an unidentified building must provide proof that he has submitted to a laundry list of government mandates. His proof of having received numerous booster shots consists of multiple Band-Aids crossing his arms and torso.

Suffice to say, Fischers view of our future is full of busyness attending to socially approved and government-enforced commandments and an inevitable loss of freedom. This slide into servitude began with the vaccine and escalated with the various employment-based mandates that followed. Some people feel so strongly about not requiring a vaccine that the Supreme Court plans to hold a special hearing Jan. 7 to consider the legality of two White House initiatives to curb the pandemic.

The court has promised to move quickly on the two questions a vaccine-or-testing mandate for larger employers of more than 100 people and a vaccination requirement for health care workers in institutions that receive federal funding. Government projections are that 22 million people would get vaccinated and prevent 250,000 hospitalizations if both are allowed to stand. Mores the haste given recent predictions that 60% of Americans will be infected with the dominant omicron variant by March.

For the record, Im all shot up two vaccines and a booster. The first injection gave me a sore arm; the second kept me in bed for 10 hours. When my body aches suddenly ceased close to cocktail hour, I popped out of bed, said, That was weird, and poured myself a glass of wine. The booster? Nada.

Its abundantly clear that vaccines at the very least help reduce the intensity of covid-19. The booster helps even more. Most vaccinated people evade infection entirely, probably in part because they also take other precautions, such as distancing and masking. Those whove died of covid over the past several months were almost exclusively unvaccinated.

All of this is known to nearly everyone by now and the scientific evidence has been convincing enough for me to endure a few hours of inconvenience. Beats dying. Yet, only 62% of Americans are fully vaccinated, and many are rabidly opposed to getting a shot. This is war, Ive heard people say on both sides of the issue.

Sensibly speaking, are you people insane?

Still, I do understand the revulsion toward government mandates. Were all a bit anti-establishment, arent we? Americans didnt become obstreperous just recently. Our warring spirit and a predilection to oppose authority precedes our arrival to these shores. Were all rebels by virtue of most of us having crossed the pond, so to speak. Saying no may not be wise in some circumstances, but as a countercultural posture, we customarily view dissent as a basic right.

To the anti-vaccine contingent, a vaccine mandate is tantamount to a violation of ones autonomy. Our bodies, ourselves is more than a book title. No one is entitled to enter my temple without my permission. Case closed. And yet: How can some people see the vaccine as a gift and others view it as a toxin contrived for dubious purposes? How do we bridge this gap?

It appears that we need a new tack. Convincing others to follow the majoritys lead requires diplomacy and empathy rather than finger-pointing and shaming. President Joe Bidens recent warning to the unvaccinated as more or less deserving to get sick is hardly helpful.

The challenge for 2022 is how to reconcile these two opposing views. One requires a united front against a potentially deadly disease (which could be with us forever), the other demands respect for individual rights. Philosophically, I support both views, but practically, I come down on the side of unity for the common good. Voluntary vaccination seems to me the only avenue for reconciliation.

Whether we can be a unified country again on any subject is a coin toss. But one thing we can agree upon is that laughter is good for body and soul. To that end, Tyler Fischer for one has provided a public service. Laughing at oneself, after all, is a sign of intelligence. Sort of like voluntarily getting vaccinated against a disease nobody wants to get.

Link:

Please get the vaccine. And try to understand those who won't. - Bowling Green Daily News

E.O. Wilson was an extraordinary scholar in every sense of the word. Back in the 1980s, Milton Stetson, the chair of the biology department at the University of Delaware, told me that a scientist who makes a single seminal contribution to his or her field has been a success. By the time I met Edward O. Wilson in 1982, he had already made at least five such contributions to science.

Wilson, who died Dec. 26, 2021 at the age of 92, discovered the chemical means by which ants communicate. He worked out the importance of habitat size and position within the landscape in sustaining animal populations. And he was the first to understand the evolutionary basis of both animal and human societies.

Each of his seminal contributions fundamentally changed the way scientists approached these disciplines, and explained why E.O. as he was fondly known was an academic god for many young scientists like me. This astonishing record of achievement may have been due to his phenomenal ability to piece together new ideas using information garnered from disparate fields of study.

Big insights from small subjectsIn 1982 I cautiously sat down next to the great man during a break at a small conference on social insects. He turned, extended his hand and said, Hi, Im Ed Wilson. I dont believe weve met. Then we talked until it was time to get back to business.

Three hours later I approached him again, this time without trepidation because surely now we were the best of friends. He turned, extended his hand, and said Hi, Im Ed Wilson. I dont believe weve met.

Wilson forgetting me, but remaining kind and interested anyway, showed that beneath his many layers of brilliance was a real person and a compassionate one. I was fresh out of graduate school, and doubt that another person at that conference knew less than I something Im sure Wilson discovered as soon as I opened my mouth. Yet he didnt hesitate to extend himself to me, not once but twice.

Thirty-two years later, in 2014, we met again. I had been invited to speak in a ceremony honoring his receipt of the Franklin Institutes Benjamin Franklin Medal for Earth and Environmental Science. The award honored Wilsons lifetime achievements in science, but particularly his many efforts to save life on Earth.

My work studying native plants and insects, and how crucial they are to food webs, was inspired by Wilsons eloquent descriptions of biodiversity and how the myriad interactions among species create the conditions that enable the very existence of such species.

I spent the first decades of my career studying the evolution of insect parental care, and Wilsons early writings provided a number of testable hypotheses that guided that research. But his 1992 book, The Diversity of Life, resonated deeply with me and became the basis for an eventual turn in my career path.

Though I am an entomologist, I did not realize that insects were the little things that run the world until Wilson explained why this is so in 1987. Like nearly all scientists and nonscientists alike, my understanding of how biodiversity sustains humans was embarrassingly cursory. Fortunately, Wilson opened our eyes.

Throughout his career Wilson flatly rejected the notion held by many scholars that natural history the study of the natural world through observation rather than experimentation was unimportant. He proudly labeled himself a naturalist, and communicated the urgent need to study and preserve the natural world. Decades before it was in vogue, he recognized that our refusal to acknowledge the Earths limits, coupled with the unsustainability of perpetual economic growth, had set humans well on their way to ecological oblivion.

Wilson understood that humans reckless treatment of the ecosystems that support us was not only a recipe for our own demise. It was forcing the biodiversity he so cherished into the sixth mass extinction in Earths history, and the first one caused by an animal: us.

A broad vision for conservationAnd so, to his lifelong fascination with ants, E. O. Wilson added a second passion: guiding humanity toward a more sustainable existence. To do that, he knew he had to reach beyond the towers of academia and write for the public, and that one book would not suffice. Learning requires repeated exposure, and that is what Wilson delivered in The Diversity of Life, Biophilia, The Future of Life, The Creation and his final plea in 2016, Half-Earth: Our Planets Fight for Life.

As Wilson aged, desperation and urgency replaced political correctness in his writings. He boldly exposed ecological destruction caused by fundamentalist religions and unrestricted population growth, and challenged the central dogma of conservation biology, demonstrating that conservation could not succeed if restricted to tiny, isolated habitat patches.

In Half Earth, he distilled a lifetime of ecological knowledge into one simple tenet: Life as we know it can be sustained only if we preserve functioning ecosystems on at least half of planet Earth.

But is this possible? Nearly half of the planet is used for some form of agriculture, and 7.9 billion people and their vast network of infrastructure occupy the other half.

As I see it, the only way to realize E.O.s lifelong wish is learn to coexist with nature, in the same place, at the same time. It is essential to bury forever the notion that humans are here and nature is someplace else. Providing a blueprint for this radical cultural transformation has been my goal for the last 20 years, and I am honored that it melds with E.O. Wilsons dream.

There is no time to waste in this effort. Wilson himself once said, Conservation is a discipline with a deadline. Whether humans have the wisdom to meet that deadline remains to be seen.

Read the rest here:

E.O. Wilson's lifelong passion for ants helped him teach humans about how to live sustainably with nature - Longview News-Journal

As we balance the ledger for 2021, it seems assured that a handful of the years most memorable moments will have impact that extends far beyond the confines of the calendar.

Like Hideki Matsuyamas Masters win, and its promise of inspiring a generation of Asian talent. Or Phil Mickelsons improbable major championship victory at age 50, setting a new benchmark for elderly excellence. Or Tiger Woods car wreck, which cast in stark relief the impermanence of lives and careers, and which summoned a raw appreciation both for what he has gifted us and for whatever his battered body will permit henceforth.

But 2021 was also a year in which even the most stubborn of ostriches had to lift their heads and concede that golf doesnt exist in a vacuum, that like every sport it is inextricably entwined with the wider world, and that reminders of this fact are often jarring. The painful lessons we learned in 21 will not conclude with the demise of December.

First came a reckoning with language. The year was nine days old when Justin Thomas missed a short putt in Maui and berated himself with a homophobic slur. His response was swifthe owned it with an immediate and fulsome apologybut swifter still were the factions who rallied around the controversy, one too quick to declare it a capital offense, the other contemptuously eager to dismiss any hurt as mere political correctness. The ugly episode served notice that the standards of speech and conduct demanded by todays corporations and consumers (an entirely flexible measure) also apply to this most hidebound of sports.

A few weeks later, the PGA Tour faced a reckoning with its new reality, even if the organization shows no outward sign of having grasped the importance of what happened that Sunday afternoon at Torrey Pines. It was hardly shocking that Patrick Reed acted as his own rules official on the way to winning the Farmers Insurance Open, lifting a ball he claimed was embedded before an actual rules official could arrive to deliver a verdict. Video evidence was inconclusive, but far from exculpatory, so PointsBetan official gaming partner of the Tourrefunded wagers.

The scrutiny that comes with legalized sports betting is at odds with the Tours generous attitude to questionable on-course conduct by its members, a benevolence long personified by the now-departed rules honcho Slugger White, the Mrs. Doubtfire of the nanny state. An insistence that concerned parties are gentlemen, or a reliance on artful wording about intent, is no defense against punters who are convinced that video evidence tells a different story. When it happens againand it willthe Tour is woefully ill-equipped for the firestorm. Reeds ball drop will have ramifications that linger well beyond that other ball drop next week in Times Square.

We also saw a reckoning with golfs shameful past. Lee Elders presence at the ceremonial tee shot opening the Masters was as close to an apology as well ever see from Augusta National. It was crudely symbolic that even the lone moment accorded Elder was soiled by Wayne Player, an opportunistic waster who, unlike Elder, owed his place on the tee solely to inheritance and parental indulgence.

Elders death seven months later was a glum reminder of how little real redress he was granted for what he endured, and how few honors he received for what he accomplished. There were tributes aplenty, but words are cheap. Elder died without being honored by the World Golf Hall of Fame, the Memorial Tournament or sundry other back-slapping bodies that are forever congratulating themselves on how far golf has come.

Elders legacythat it is necessary to take a moral stand against those who dehumanize othersis hardly less relevant with his passing. It lies at the heart of golfs reckoning with its future, the specter of which loomed large before 2021 and which will likely continue into 22 and beyond.

One thing changed this year with the Saudi Arabian governments effort to hijack professional golf. They recruited a front man, Greg Norman, who drops vapid jargon and false equivalencies as freely as his employer does missiles on Yemeni civilians. But two things havent changed: the proposed Super Golf League still hasnt signed any players, and the scheme is still solely about normalizing the image of a regime that exhibits contempt for human rights.

This reckoning will continue in 2022 and beyond. Oil grants the specter enviable staying power. If nothing else, the Saudis are offering a reminder that the values on which golf prides itselfintegrity, honor, respectabilityare not immutable, but must be defended against charlatans and chiselers, some of whom are card-carrying members of the PGA Tour.

Read more:

Golf's memorable moments in 2021 certain to have impact on future - usatoday.com

Aid to the Church in Need reports a rise in religious persecution worldwide in the past year, but points to a ray of hope for Christians and Muslims in the Arab world.

By Linda Bordoni

Expressing gratitude for the support that allows the Pontifical Foundation to continue to fulfill its mission drawing attention to victims of religious persecution and provide economic and humanitarian assistance, the Executive President of Aid to the Church in Need (ACN) said Pope Francis visit to Iraq in March gave solace and hope to local Christians and drew attention to the plight of so many Christians in the Middle East.

Although the Christians are a constituent part of their native countries, far too often they are treated as second-class citizens. In Iraq, Syria and Lebanon, they are also suffering from the after-effects of the war and desperate economic situations. The exodus of the Christians continues unchecked, he said.

Thomas Heine-Geldern also pointed to this months consecration of the Cathedral of Our Lady of Arabia, whose construction was sponsored by ACN. He described it as a ray of hope for the coexistence of Christians and Muslims in the Arab world.

Unfortunately, Heine-Geldern said, violence against Christians is on the rise as demonstrated by weekly reports of violence. Priests, religious and laypeople are being killed, kidnapped or abused as they carry out their service. In particular, the current situation in India and Nigeria fills us with deep concern and we are standing by should our assistance be needed.

He also raised the alarm for Christians in the African Sahel region and in Mozambique where terrorism is spreading, not only killing and kidnapping people but also preventing the Church from carrying out its pastoral and social work.

Heine-Geldern noted an increase in the number of subtle acts of violence against religious organisations in the West, a phenomenon that is leading to the gradual eradication of religious beliefs from public life under the cloak of supposed tolerance.

He recalled that Pope Francis has described it as polite persecution, which involves legislation that purports to implement political correctness by recommending the use of language which avoids Christian terminology and symbols.

ACNs head expressed satisfaction for an overwhelming response to the foundations Religious Freedom in the World Report 2021, released in collaboration with international journalists and experts.

The report not only covers religious persecution in many countries of the world, but is also a sign and proof that all of us Churches and religious communities, NGOs, politicians and public figures have to stand up together for the human right to religious freedom, which is deeply rooted in human dignity. The freedom of religious denomination is a gauge of our humanity, he said.

The ACN executive also mentioned the foundations initiative November Red Wednesday/Red Week that, he said, has become a worldwide symbol for the plight of Christians, with tens of thousands of people participating with initiatives to raise awareness and to pray for our beleaguered brothers and sisters.

Heine-Geldern concluded by commemorating the victims of the COVID-19 pandemic, whom he said, include many religious sisters, bishops, priests and catechists who have died from the disease while carrying out their service.

They sacrificed their lives to be close to the people who had been entrusted to their care, in spite of the dangers to their own health," he said. "A remarkable witness of their devotion.

Continue reading here:

Religious persecution on the rise in 2021 amid signs of hope - Vatican News

After a failed pilot starring Greta Gerwig,How I Met Your Fatheris finally a feasible reality. Set in the same fictional universe (the MotherVerse!? No? Okay), its essentially a gender-swapped version of its beloved predecessor, How I Met Your Mother. While Greta Gerwig has gone on to greater things (including directing the 2019 remake of Little Women), Hillary Duff is taking center stage as the protagonist looking for her soulmate.

That said, with all the excitement surrounding this impending release, what better time is there to look back at the cast ofHIMYM? The iconic sitcom is host to an array of memorable characters, both quirky and heartfelt. It made Neil Patrick Harris a household name and showed us Allison Hannigan was far more than Buffys Willoworthe girl from Bandcamp.

With that said, let us rank the characters of How I Met Your Mother in terms of likeability. Sit down, kids, and let us take you back to the years 2005-2014

Oh man, oh man, oh man. What can be said of HIMYMs protagonist? Not much, because lets face it, hes kind of a bore. Teds Norman Rockefeller-esque white-picket-fence dream feels tediously dated even back in 2005 when the show initially aired. However, his character adds detestable to his resume once you think about him for a few minutes. He spends the series narcissistically prioritizing his own needs before his various romantic partners. How he stalks on-off-again love interest Robin Scherbatsky is also ominous, pressurizing her to consummate a relationship she isnt sure about. Ted is forever lost in flights of fantasy that can never be truly realized. This, alongside his lacking character development, ranks Ted the least likable character in How I Met Your Mothers main cast.

Robin is a compelling character for a sitcom, at least. She is a Canadian who was brought up to be masculine by herverymasculine father. Because of this, Robin often subverts traditional romantic tropes in her relationships, being the masculine to her boyfriends feminine. As a result of this unique interplay, Robin ends up being very endearing, her peculiar interests in guns and dogs making her a novel character. That said, she is often brought down by her Ross-Rachel dynamic with Ted Moseby. The pair are frequently presented as incompatible due to their highly differing values (Ted wants to settle down and have kids. Robin doesnt). This makes their season finale romantic reunion feel forced and unnatural. Especially so, given the show built up her relationship with Barney, only to nix it at the last minute. If not for this, she may have ranked higher in our list ofHow I Met Your Mothercharacters.

If one thing can be said of Barney Stinson, its that he was a sign of the times. Following the exposure of Harvey Weinsteins antics in 2017, its hard to watch some of Barneys scenes without cringing. That said, Barneyisa very fun, outgoing character, championing some of HIMYMs most iconic lines (Haaave you met Ted?) and his obsession with suits as endearing as it is strange. Barney is redeemed greatly by his character development in the series he eventually gives up his womanizing ways to be with Robin. And while this development is swiftly nixed in Season 9s last few minutes, his story for the series majority earns him a high spot on this ranking. There is no doubt after all, despite his lack of political correctness, that Barney is responsible for the gangs most memorable misadventures.

Lily is smart, quirky, and fun. She is Marshalls series-long partner and you can see why. The pair of them have seamless chemistry due to their similar sense of humor (she is the Lily-Pad to Marshalls Marshmellow) as well as genuine trust in one another. However, one thing that distinguishes her from Marshall is her role as Teds girlfriend-overseer. Thus quirky characteristic has her put Teds various girlfriends through the Front Porsche test to see if she can picture the woman gelling with the gang as elderly people. While her amusing inability to understand boundaries can be her curse, Lily is still an endearing sitcom icon who ranks among How I Met Your Mothers best characters.

Who can deny the manchild lawyer Marshall Erikson? While poor Jason Segel tired of his antics later in the show, we simply couldnt get enough of him. He and Lily bounce off each other so naturally, not merely because of their shared humor (for example, nicknaming her Lily-pad while she calls him Marshmellow), but also because of his genuine affection for her. Despite his silliness, Marshall is also there to support his friends (i.e. Ted) when they need him. This appealing combination of humor and compassion makes Marshall the second most likable character in How I Met Your Mother.

Despite only being part of the main cast in the shows final season, the Mother herself, Tracy, is easily the most likable character of the cast. This is truly amazing since the cast was around eight years before her full appearance and somehow somehow she outshines them all. What makes Tracy so likable (nay, lovable) are numerous. From her musical abilities, her humor, her unshakeable charm despite her past tragedy as well as her compassion, Tracy rules. Additionally, her strength and independence are the cherry-on-top of a woman who lets face it deserves better than Ted Mosby. For us, its a no-brainer that Tracy ranks top among How I Met Your Mothers characters.

That said, this is just our take. Do you agree or disagree with our ranking ofHow I Met Your Mothers main cast? Who is the most likable out of the gang? And given the controversial season 9 finale, how would you change the conclusion to the story? Be sure to check out our article on why How I Met Your Mother is a great sitcom here.

Go here to see the original:

How I Met Your Mother Main Characters Ranked By Likeability - The Nerd Stash

Love it or hate it, the new 'Sex and the City' (SATC) reboot is here to stay. By killing Chris Noth's character in its opening episode, the show has certainly got fans hooked right from day 1, and now there's plenty more drama making its way out. In a new interview, Cynthia Nixon, who starred in the original series came out to call it "tone deaf" on race and gender issues, something she was clear she wanted to change.

Nixon's "woke agenda" certainly hasn't gone down well with fans, who claimed after episode 4 of the 10-episode series it "wasn't working". The forced inclusion of more diverse characters has left many unhappy with the reboot. Even non-fans are taking a dig at the show, with Peloton releasing an ad trolling the show after the death of Mr Big. Needless to say, things aren't that great right now for a show that's struggled to get out amidst the Covid-19 pandemic.

RELATED ARTICLES

'And Just Like That' Episode 4 Review: A cringe and disappointing watch

'And Just Like That': Why isn't Kim Cattrall part of 'Sex and The City' revival?

Now, Nixon has rubbed some salt on the wounds of producers by slamming the old show and appearing to take credit for some of the changes in the reboot. While not everyone may enjoy the super woke reboot of SATC, Nixon doesn't appear to be shying away from it.

Speaking to The Herald Sun, the 55-year-old said she was "reluctant" to return, saying, "I couldnt go back without a real sea change in terms of the lack of diversity in the original series." She even admitted "I really didnt think I was going to do it," but changed her mind after speaking to Michael Patrick King, and Kristin Davis. But, despite not being as "woke" as the reboot, Nixon said she was "very proud" of the original series.

"Im very proud of the original series despite it being occasionally tone-deaf on race and gender... Sex and the City gave me an adult career. And Ill always be grateful for that." It appears that the feelings were what ultimately caused her to return, but only after she was promised some changes. "I was floored by how hard everybody listened, and how collaboratively we worked together to, not just redecorate the house, but to build a whole new house that had us in it but new characters, too," she said.

Of course, Nixon stopped short of claiming full credit for the changes in the reboot, but from the interview, she makes it clear she played a key role. Some of those changes include nods to the political correctness of the post-Trumpian world, with the characters discussing racial microaggressions, gender identity, and sexuality. Other changes include a more diverse cast, such as the addition of Sarita Choudhury and Sara Ramirez to the cast.

While Nixon may back the changes, it's clear fans don't. Many have been let down by the reboot's focus on political correctness, but there's little that can change now. Maybe next season, if there is one.

The rest is here:

'And Just Like That': Was Cynthia Nixon behind panned super woke reboot of SATC? - MEAWW

Cobra Kai spoilers follow.

There have been four films, a remake and four seasons of a reboot series, but it's time to admit it the Karate Kid franchise has a girl problem.

The beloved collection of kickass karate champions and underdogs remains a staple of 80s nostalgia. From the moment Daniel LaRusso (Ralph Macchio) was taken under the wing of Mr Miyagi (the late Pat Morita), fans everywhere became devoted quicker than you can say "Wax on, wax off".

Now, in its own underdog tale, Cobra Kai has proven able to stand on its own foot, crane kicking its way into becoming a trusted and enjoyable progression of the story.

Back in 1984, The Karate Kid was unashamedly a boys' club kind of movie, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. The tale of finding your inner strength and overcoming obstacles was universal regardless. It made karate cool. It gave the bullied viewers aspirations of overcoming their tormentors.

37 years on, it's remained that way, and it's time to do better.

There's no denying the fourth film, the gender-swapped The Next Karate Kid in 1994, ground the franchise to a halt. To date, it has a gut-wrenching score of 7% on Rotten Tomatoes, with People's reviewer labelling the film "a desperate attempt to keep the franchise alive and kicking" using "backhanded political correctness".

This was somewhat echoed by Entertainment Weekly, who commented in a passive-aggressive dismissal of the movie: "There is something bitchin' about seeing a babe give a bully a good thwack. Not that girls will go see this or boys will care."

The Next Karate Kid's only real achievement was giving Hilary Swank her first leading role as Julie Pierce, who Mr Miyagi decides to train in order to curb her anger issues.

But it seems the film has left The Karate Kid franchise with a bit of a war wound, and in a "once bitten, twice shy" move, it's reverted back to leaving women with one of three jobs: a) a love interest, b) a damsel in distress or c) a combination of the two.

This happened in Karate Kid with Johnny and Daniel over Ali Mills (Elisabeth Shue), and in Karate Kid II with Kumiko, who was kidnapped and held at ransom by Chozen to lure Daniel to him. In Karate Kid III, it's Jessica Andrews (Robin Lively), who has a will they/won't they friendship with Daniel until she's dragged into the karate feud.

But The Next Karate Kid didn't fail because it was a girl in the lead role, it failed because it was forcing a female character into a boys' franchise in a way that felt unnatural. Where's LaRusso gone? Why is there no one we recognise apart from Miyagi? The emotional tie was cut, and so too was the franchise's lifespan. That is, until Cobra Kai came along in 2018.

Cobra Kai, which was bought from YouTube Red by Netflix after season two, works because the heart of the movie remains strong, and it's just self-aware enough of its own ludicrousness to get away with it. Rather than start from scratch, the show reangled itself, taking on the point of view of Johnny Lawrence (William Zabka), the original villain who, as it turns out, has his own perspective on how the original film's plot played out.

Phillip Caruso/Columbia/Kobal/Shutterstock

Over the course of four seasons, it's developed a unique style of storytelling that is faithful to the teachings of Miyagi himself. There are two sides to every story. There's always a yin to your yang.

Cobra Kai's plot has also allowed the reintroduction of more old faces, giving old enemies a shot at redemption, old friends the goodbye they deserved, and the All-Valley tournament the battle they craved. In the modern day, it also allows for more diversity.

However, while former foes such as Chozen who literally almost killed Daniel in a deathmatch fight back in Karate Kid II are given a shot at being a good guy, sadly, even after four seasons, Swank's Julie Pierce is yet to be offered the same.

And once again, the women have been relegated to the sidelines.

As it stands, the new generation of Cobra Kai and Miyagi-Do dojos have a grand total of one (1) major female character each Tory Nichols (Peyton List) and Samantha LaRusso (Mary Mouser). Their initial introductions seemed promising, perhaps a little complicated, tales of who they're assumed to be by their peers, over who they want to be.

But by season four their arcs have become stale, with their only main conflict now being with each other, over their romantic entanglements with the two lead boys, Robbie (Tanner Buchanan) and Miguel (Xolo Mariduea).

Tory's troubled backstory is there, but has been stretched out now for three seasons, and only seems to be mentioned when she has done, or is about to do, something potentially irredeemable. This girl has threatened flat-out murder on Samantha over the course of the show, and brought spiked knuckle dusters to a school brawl. Yet we're actually no closer to finding out that much about her history than when we first heard about it, other than the stony sensei Kreese feeling some sympathy and protectiveness towards her.

In turn, Samantha lived in her father Daniel's shadow as a karate champion, and after finding herself dragged back into that world, became more headstrong for it. But this has somehow morphed into a character who believes she can do no wrong and, like Tory rightly points out, doesn't understand the word no.

With the exception of 'mom' roles Carmen and Amanda, who are there to provide exposition and a quippy comment about how ridiculous karate battles are respectively, that's pretty much it. Others have been cut out. Samantha's gal pals practically don't exist any more.

Actress Nichole Brown, who played fan favourite Aisha, had to take to Instagram to confirm she'd been dropped from the show, seemingly without explanation, between the second and third seasons. The outcry this caused no doubt played a hand in her season four cameo, which explained her parents had decided to move them away following a school fight that left one kid in hospital with a broken back. To be fair, that's a great real-life parenting decision, but a flimsy excuse in the world of Cobra Kai.

Somehow Cobra Kai, instead of finally giving girls the platform in the Miyagi-verse they deserve, and one boys will actually pay attention to, has fallen back to their old format.

It's a shame to see Tory and Samantha being led down the same path when they weren't initially set up to.

It's 2022. Time for the girls to fight their own battles and be more than a subplot.

Cobra Kai is available now on Netflix.

Shop for Netflix e-gift cards

Netflixamazon.co.uk

Orange is the New Black - Seasons 1-6

Netflix/Lionsgate/Tilted ProductionsAmazon

The Crown season 3 with Amazon exclusive box artwork

22.83

Star Trek Discovery Season 2 [DVD] [2019]

17.19

The Good Place - Season 3

11.49

Marriage Story

14.99

The Crown - Seasons 1 & 2

15.42

Star Trek: Discovery - Season 1

18.99

House of Cards - Season 6

Daredevil - Season 2

6.84

Grace and Frankie - Seasons 1-2

15.99

The Irishman

25.99

Black Mirror - Series 3

10.99

Jessica Jones - Season 1

7.83

Luke Cage - Season 1

12.99

Narcos - Seasons 1-3

28.83

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

More here:

Cobra Kai has a major problem that needs to be fixed - digitalspy.com