Daily Archives: December 10, 2021

Ever Thought You Could Change Someone’s Mind? – Discovery Institute

Posted: December 10, 2021 at 7:16 pm

Photo credit: Thomas Lipke via Unsplash.

Iain was a diehard atheist from the United Kingdom.I absolutely knew that I would never believe in a creator. It was inconceivable to me, he recalls.

The orca whale (breathtaking) sometimes gave Iain pause about his atheism. But it wasnt enough to change his mind.

Then he encountered Stephen Meyer and other proponents of intelligent design. Their work convinced him he was horribly wrong, opening his mind to a new reality: I see the natural world now through completely different eyes. I see that this experience I am living is no accident.

Your support of Discovery Institutes videos, books, and educational outreach programs made this transformation possible.

Today, Iain shares resources from Discovery Institute with his friends, hoping to persuade them about thetruth of intelligent design. Just last month, he shared some of our materials with a colleague at work. The colleague responded that he never imaginedI could have presented anything that would dent his belief in evolution, but he was wrong.

You can make more stories like Iains possible through your generous support.

When Steve Meyer and I founded Discovery Institutes Center for Science & Culture 25 years ago, we couldnt have predicted the worldwide impact. But through partnership with people like you, we are reaching millions of people a year through science research, book publishing, education programs, YouTube channels, and online platforms likeEvolution News.

As we move into 2022, we have plans to focus on humanitys incredible uniqueness through books one by geneticistMichael Denton,and another by engineerSteve Laufmannand medical doctorHoward Glicksman.HistorianRichard Weikartwill publish an expos of what happens when humans are regarded as mere animals.

Our plans are ambitious and far reaching, butwe cant make them a reality without your support.

There are more people out there like Iain who need to be exposed to the truth of intelligent design and human uniqueness.Will you join us to make a difference together in 2022?

Follow this link:

Ever Thought You Could Change Someone's Mind? - Discovery Institute

Posted in Atheist | Comments Off on Ever Thought You Could Change Someone’s Mind? – Discovery Institute

The 12 steps may not work for everyone, but can transform lives – The Guardian

Posted: at 7:16 pm

As co-chair of the all-party parliamentary group (APPG) for the 12-step programme for recovery from addictions, I am disappointed that Oscar Quine had been told that the 12 steps would cure his addiction (I was told the 12 steps would cure my addiction. Why did I end up feeling more broken?, 4 December). We do not claim that. The steps do not work for everyone, but they certainly do for many.

The original 12-step programme for alcoholism has been successfully adapted over the years for drugs, food, gambling and many other addictions. The 12 steps are not a religious programme, but they are spiritually based. Addicts need to connect with a power in their lives greater than whatever has led to their addiction.

Many addiction-free atheists and non-believers are among our fellows. They embrace, alongside those of many faiths, the simple spiritual principles of honesty, open-mindedness and a willingness to help others who suffer. Achieving change is most effective with daily diligent and disciplined practice of the steps. This can be challenging.

Anyone can get recovery for free if they are willing to work for it to the best of their ability. There are hundreds of 12-step live and Zoom meetings running across the UK and worldwide on a daily basis.

The APPG brings these facts to the attention of parliamentarians, government and public bodies, so that in turn those who suffer can find awareness of 12-step recovery. With public funding for addiction services so severely constrained, the entirely free and voluntary nature of 12-step recovery makes this work all the more important, particularly for addicts who cannot access private rehabilitation centres.Clive BrookeLabour, House of Lords

Oscar Quine is right that the 12-step model doesnt work for everyone. It didnt work for my sister, who died recently from a cancer related to prolonged alcohol abuse. But it does work for many others. I worked for five years at the Rehabilitation for Addicted Prisoners Trust, now the Forward Trust, which ran programmes based on the 12 steps. I met hundreds of people whose lives and the lives of their families were transformed by the programme. Its not a panacea, it clearly takes hard work and commitment, but there was definitely nothing joyless about the people I met.

As I havent been through the 12 steps, I dont want to talk as though I know more about it than I do, but the impression I got was that the reference to a higher power was based on individual choice, not formalised religion. What I do know is that the people I met who were helped by it seemed to be not just clean and sober, but somehow more alive than the rest of us.Claire WildLondon

Oscar Quines experience of working a 12-step programme for addiction is not unheard of but, in my experience, is by no means common.

I am an atheist, and nearly 27 years sober as a reasonably regular attendee of AA meetings. I chose to attend meetings where there is neither a religious overtone nor prescriptive way of following the steps. Instead, I chose meetings where there is genuine kindness, empathy and fellowship. There are many such meetings.

The 12-step programme works, as far as I can see, by bringing together people who share a common problem and are at various stages of recovering. The groups experience of recovery is generally wiser than the individuals. That is the power. People find new friends with a common cause.

The disease model of addiction is widely and internationally accepted. As is the success of the 12-step model in helping numerous people worldwide recover from substance addiction to lead clean, sober and contented lives. Inevitably, while it works for many people, 12-step recovery does not suit everyone. Outside professional help can often provide additional necessary support to resolve mental health and other issues, particularly associated with early-life trauma.

I wish Oscar the same contentment, self-acceptance and happiness in his recovery that I have found on my journey in 12-step recovery.Peter NorthWinchester, Hampshire

Have an opinion on anything youve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.

Read more:

The 12 steps may not work for everyone, but can transform lives - The Guardian

Posted in Atheist | Comments Off on The 12 steps may not work for everyone, but can transform lives – The Guardian

Pearce’s Potshots #56: Paul & Jesus’ Resurrection | Dave Armstrong – Patheos

Posted: at 7:16 pm

Atheist anti-theist Jonathan M. S. Pearce is the main writer on the blog,A Tippling Philosopher.HisAbout pagestates: Pearce is a philosopher, author, blogger, public speaker and teacher from Hampshire in the UK. He specialises in philosophy of religion, but likes to turnhis hand to science, psychology, politics and anything involved in investigating reality.

This is a reply to his post,A Spiritual Body Resurrection vs Corporeal Resurrection (12-9-21). His words will be in blue.

*****

I have had another interview with Derek Lambert of MythVision in the series where we are working through my bookThe Resurrection: A Critical Examination of the Easter Story[UK]. This latest episode (8) concentrated on the conflict between Paul, who believed in a two-body spiritual resurrection thesis, as opposed to the Gospels, who argue against Paul for a re-animated corpse resurrection. Of course, Pauls claims from 1 Corinthians and elsewhere explain why he doesnt mention an empty tomb anywhere because there would be no empty tomb as the earthly body would remain in situ.

The Gospels fundamentally contradict Paul precisely because they are an overt counter-argument against Pauls theology, and the related Gnostic position of a full-on spiritual resurrection.

Jonathan seems to maintain (from what I can tell in his brief statements) that Pauls reference to a spiritual body is to a pure spirit, with no physical body. This is immediately absurd, since spirit cannot have an additional description of body. A body is physical, and spirits arent physical; they are immaterial.

Evangelical G. Shane Morris gives a good refutation of this Gnostic-influenced thinking in his article,Jesus Has a Physical Body Forever (And So Will We):

Theres a common misconception in the Christian rank and file that Jesus resurrected body was something other than a real, physical body with flesh and bones, and that our resurrected bodies will likewise be something other than or somehow less solid than our bodies are now. . . .

Christians enduring hope has always been what Paul said the creation itself groans for: the redemption of our bodies. (Romans 8:23) This is what it means to swallow up death in victory. A spiritual resurrection of any kind isnt resurrection. Its a euphemistic redescription of death.

Second, the term spiritual body in 1 Corinthians 15:44 does not, in Pauls original use, mean what the phrase seems to imply in English. [N. T.] Wright points out that to the original audience, a spiritual body understood as an immaterial body would be a contradiction in terms. There is no such thing. You might as well talk about solid mist or dry water. What Paul is doing, in context, is contrasting a body of flesh (which is the most common New Testament metonym for fallen humanity) with the body of the Spiritthat is, a body empowered and animated by the Holy Spirit. The Jews and Greeks had words for immaterial beings.

If Paul had meant for us to expect a non-physical resurrection, he could have spoken of ghosts, or spirits. He did not. For a man of his background, resurrection meant only one thing: To get up out of the grave, body and all, and walk again.Jesus left behind an empty grave devoid of flesh and bones. He took them with Him. And so will we. (1 John 3:2)

James Bishopadds:

Paul was, prior to his conversion, a Pharisee. Pharisees held to a physicalresurrection (see: Jewish War 3.374, 2.163; 4Q521; 1QH 14.34; 4Q 385-391; Genesis Rabbah 14.5; Leviticus Rabbah 14.9). For instance, one leading scholar by the name of NT Wright, in his 700 page volume, argues that the resurrection in pagan, Jewish, and Christian cultures meant a physical and bodily resurrection (2). Paul held the same view (cf. 1 Corinthians 6:14; Romans 8:11; Philippians 3:20-21). . . .

As [N. T.] Wright articulates: Until second century Christianity, the language of resurrection had been thought by pagan, Jew, and Christian as some kind of return to bodily and this-worldly life [The Resurrection of the Son of God, 2003, p. 83].

The context of 1 Corinthians 15 further bolsters this view:

1 Corinthians 15:35-44(RSV) But some one will ask, How are the dead raised? With what kind of body do they come? [36] You foolish man! What you sow does not come to life unless it dies. [37] And what you sow is not the body which is to be, but a bare kernel, perhaps of wheat or of some other grain. [38] But God gives it a body as he has chosen, and to each kind of seed its own body. [39] For not all flesh is alike, but there is one kind for men, another for animals, another for birds, and another for fish. [40] There are celestial bodies and there are terrestrial bodies; but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another. [41] There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars; for star differs from star in glory. [42] So is it with the resurrection of the dead. What is sown is perishable, what is raised is imperishable. [43] It is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory. It is sown in weakness, it is raised in power.[44] It is sown a physical body, it is raised a spiritual body. If there is a physical body, there is also a spiritual body.

1 Corinthians 15:53-54For this perishable nature must put on the imperishable, and this mortal nature must put on immortality.[54] When the perishable puts on the imperishable, and the mortal puts on immortality, then shall come to pass the saying that is written: Death is swallowed up in victory.

Does Jonathan think that Paul thought the moon was a spirit and not physical? Its absurd.In 1 Corinthians 15 Paul uses the Greek wordegiro (usually raised in English) 19 times, referring to resurrection, either of Jesus (15:4, 12-17, 20) or of the general resurrection of human beings (15:29, 32, 35, 42-44, 52). The same word is used in the gospels of the raising of the young girl who had died. Sheremained human, with her body, after being raised. Jesus held her hand when she was raised:

Matthew 9:18, 23-25While he was thus speaking to them, behold, a ruler came in and knelt before him, saying, My daughter has just died; but come and lay your hand on her, and she will live. . . .[23] And when Jesus came to the rulers house, and saw the flute players, and the crowd making a tumult,[24] he said, Depart; for the girl is not dead but sleeping. And they laughed at him.[25] But when the crowd had been put outside, he went in and took her by the hand, and the girlarose[egiro].

In John 12, the word is applied to Lazarus three times (12:1, 9, 17: raised from the dead and raised him from the dead: RSV). In John 12:2, the risen Lazarus is referred to, sitting at the table, eating supper with Jesus: obviously a physical being. This is what the wordmeans: a body being physically raised and restored after it had died.

Jesus was obviously also still in a physical body after He was resurrected, but it was a spiritual body, and so He could walk through walls (which modern physics tells us is actually physicallypossible, in additional dimensions and what-not). He ate fish with His disciples, told Thomas to put his hand in His wounds, which were still visible; was touched by Mary Magdalene, broke bread with the two disciples on the way to Emmaus, etc.

Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe offer further explanation inthe following excerpttheir book,When Critics Ask: A Popular Handbook on Bible Difficulties(Wheaton, Illinois: Victor Books, 1992):

[N]otice the parallelism mentioned by Paul:

The complete context indicates that spiritual (pneumatikos) could be translated supernatural in contrast to natural. This is made clear by the parallels of perishable and imperishable and corruptible and incorruptible. In fact, this same Greek word (pneumatikos) is translated supernatural in1 Corinthians 10:4when it speaks of the supernatural rock that followed them in the wilderness (RSV).

Second, the word spiritual (pneumatikos) in 1 Corinthians refers to material objects. Paul spoke of the spiritual rock that followed Israel in the wilderness from which they got spiritual drink (1 Cor. 10:4). But the OT story (Ex. 17;Num. 20) reveals that it was a physical rock from which they got literal water to drink. But the actual water they drank from that material rock was produced supernaturally. When Jesus supernaturally made bread for the five thousand (John 6), He made literal bread. However, this literal, material bread could have been called spiritual bread (because of its supernatural source) in the same way that the literal manna given to Israel is called spiritual food (1 Cor. 10:3).

Further, when Paul spoke about a spiritual man (1 Cor. 2:15) he obviously did not mean an invisible, immaterial man with no corporeal body. He was, as a matter of fact, speaking of a flesh and blood human being whose life was lived by the supernatural power of God. He was referring to a literal person whose life was Spirit directed. A spiritual man is one who is taught by the Spirit and who receives the things that come from the Spirit of God (1 Cor. 2:1314).

To summarize Pauls doctrine of the general resurrection, I cite the section on that topic in the entry,Resurrectionin theInternational Standard Bible Encyclopedia:

As the believer then passes into a condition of glory, his body must be altered for the new conditions (1Corinthians 15:50;Philippians 3:21); it becomes a spiritual body, belonging to the realm of the spirit (not spiritual in opposition to material). Nature shows us how different bodies can befrom the body of the sun to the bodies of the lowest animals the kind depends merely on the creative will of God (1Corinthians 15:38-41). Nor is the idea of a change in the body of the same thing unfamiliar: look at the difference in the body of a grain of wheat at its sowing and after it is grown! (1Corinthians 15:37).

Just so, I am sown or sent into the world (probably not buried) with one kind of body, but my resurrection will see me with a body adapted to my life with Christ and God (1Corinthians 15:42-44). If I am still alive at the Parousia, this new body shall be clothed upon my present body (1Corinthians 15:53,54;2Corinthians 5:2-4) otherwise I shall be raised in it (1Corinthians 15:52). This body exists already in the heavens (2Corinthians 5:1,2), and when it is clothed upon me the natural functions of the present body will be abolished (1Corinthians 6:13). Yet a motive for refraining from impurity is to keep undefiled the body that is to rise (1Corinthians 6:13,14).

Moreover, Paul describes our own resurrected bodies as like that of Jesus:

Romans 6:5 For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his.

Philippians 3:20-21. . .a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ,[21] who will change our lowly body to be like his glorious body, by the power which enables him even to subject all things to himself.

Paul talks about our resurrection bodies, which we put on being imperishable. In other words, hes saying that according to natural law, physical bodies perish and die, but spiritual, resurrected bodies do not. Hes not talking about spirits. If it were a transformation of a physical body into a spirit, he wouldnt use the terminology of raised either: because that refers to physical bodies, which died, and are now raised.

Nor would he refer to a spiritual body: he would have simply referred to a spirit (which the New Testamentdoes many times). The two are not at all identical. The whole point was Jesus conquering physical death, which applies to physical bodies, not spirits.The Gospel of Matthew exhibits the same understanding of resurrected bodies of the dead:

Matthew 27:52the tombs also were opened, and manybodiesof the saints who had fallen asleep were raised,

Here is another passage from Paul that plainly refer to bodily resurrection:

Romans 8:22-23We know that the whole creation has been groaning in travail together until now;[23] and not only the creation, but we ourselves, who have the first fruits of the Spirit, groan inwardly as we wait for adoption as sons, the redemption of ourbodies.

Case closed. Jonathan is wrong yet again about what the Bible (agree or disagree)teaches. Its amazing how often that happens.

***

*

*

*

*

***

*

***

*

Summary: Atheist Jonathan MS Pearce wrongly contends that Paul denied that Jesus Resurrection entailed His having a glorified physical body after He rose from the dead.

Read more:

Pearce's Potshots #56: Paul & Jesus' Resurrection | Dave Armstrong - Patheos

Posted in Atheist | Comments Off on Pearce’s Potshots #56: Paul & Jesus’ Resurrection | Dave Armstrong – Patheos

African immigrants in U.S. more religious than other Black Americans, and more likely to be Catholic – Pew Research Center

Posted: at 7:16 pm

In many ways, Black people in the United States are more religiousthan Americans of other races. This is especially true for immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa, who tend to be more religious than U.S.-born Black adults or immigrants from the Caribbean, according to a Pew Research Center survey.

For example, around half of African immigrants in the U.S. (54%) say they attend religious services at least weekly, compared with about three-in-ten U.S.-born (32%) and Caribbean-born (30%) Black adults. And about seven-in-ten African immigrants (72%) say religion is very important to them, compared with 59% of U.S.- and Caribbean-born Black adults who say this.

This post examining the religious affiliations, practices and beliefs of Black immigrants in the United States draws from Pew Research Centers landmark study, Faith Among Black Americans, published in February 2021. That study was based on a nationally representative survey of 8,660 Black adults (ages 18 and older) who identify as Black or African American, including some who identify as both Black and Hispanic or Black and another race (such as Black and White, or Black and Asian).

Survey respondents were recruited from four nationally representative sources: the Centers American Trends Panel (conducted online), NORCs AmeriSpeak panel (conducted online or by phone), Ipsos KnowledgePanel (conducted online) and a national cross-sectional survey by Pew Research Center (conducted online and by mail). Responses were collected from Nov. 19, 2019, to June 3, 2020, but most respondents completed the survey between Jan. 21 and Feb. 10, 2020.

Here are the questions used for the Faith Among Black Americans report, along with responses, and its methodology.

Statistics in the post about the number of Black immigrants in the U.S. come from a Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data.

In addition, immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa are much less likely than other U.S. Black adults to be religiously unaffiliated (that is, to identify as atheist, agnostic or nothing in particular). Just 6% of African immigrants identify in one of these ways, compared with 22% of U.S.-born Black adults and 23% of Black immigrants from the Caribbean.

The religious profiles of immigrant groups differ in other ways, too. Both African and Caribbean immigrants are somewhat less likely to be Protestant, and more likely to be Catholic, than U.S.-born Black adults. And African immigrants are more likely than other Black Americans to identify with other Christian faiths such as Orthodox Christianity, or with non-Christian faiths such as Islam.

While the vast majority of the 47 million Black Americans were born in the U.S., the Black immigrant population has roughly doubled over the last two decades to 4.6 million in 2019, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of U.S. Census Bureau data. In 2019, roughly one-in-ten Black Americans were born outside of the U.S., including 4% who were born in sub-Saharan Africa and 5% who were born in the Caribbean. More Black Americans come from Jamaica, Haiti, Nigeria and Ethiopia than from any other African or Caribbean countries, according to Pew Research Center tabulations of the Census Bureaus 2019 American Community Survey.

Some Black Christian immigrants go to churches associated with historically Black Protestant denominations based in the U.S., such as the Progressive National Baptist Convention, while others go to congregations of Haitian Baptists, Pentecostals and Catholics, or those associated with African denominations such as the Presbyterian Church of Ghana and the Nigeria-based Church of the Lord.

African immigrants also distinguish themselves in the survey through their beliefs about scripture and conversion. Immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa are more likely to say they believe in God as described in their religions holy scripture such as the Bible for Christians or the Quran for Muslims than are U.S.-born Black adults. About eight-in-ten African immigrants (84%) say they believe this, compared with around three-quarters in the other groups. And roughly seven-in-ten African immigrants (68%) say people of faith have a duty to convert nonbelievers, compared with approximately half of U.S.-born and Caribbean-born adults who feel this way.

African immigrants also stand out on certain social and cultural issues. Fewer than half of African-born Americans (38%) say homosexuality should be accepted by society, compared with 63% of U.S.-born Black adults. Caribbean-born immigrants fall between the other two groups, with roughly half (52%) saying that homosexuality should be accepted by society. (In general, opposition to homosexuality is far more common in sub-Saharan Africa than it is in the U.S.)

And African immigrants tend to be more supportive of traditional gender norms, in some ways, than U.S.-born Black adults. For example, those born in sub-Saharan Africa differ from other Black Americans on questions about how men and women should share duties in households that have both a mother and father. African immigrants are more likely than other Black adults to say the father should be mostly responsible for providing for the family financially, and that the mother should be mostly responsible for taking care of the children. However, the most common view in all groups is that both parents should divide these responsibilities equally.

Link:

African immigrants in U.S. more religious than other Black Americans, and more likely to be Catholic - Pew Research Center

Posted in Atheist | Comments Off on African immigrants in U.S. more religious than other Black Americans, and more likely to be Catholic – Pew Research Center

SLICE of LIFE – Newport This Week

Posted: at 7:16 pm

Nothing is simple during the holiday season. If it is, its an illusion, which you will surely learn at the most inopportune time.

Consider the sadistic words assembly required that accompany 99.9 percent of gifts for children under 12. Despite a cornucopia of gift options for this age group, constructing them with a directional leaflet that consists of three images for an 860-piece contraption is the penance for this plethora. Two out of five marriages end because of differing interpretations of these instructions.

As parents move out of the assembly required phase of gifting, we move into the phase of teaching the value of a dollar. At that point, less shopping is required for teens, because each item they hope to receive costs more than a semester of my college tuition. Hence, fewer packages are under the tree with each passing year. Parents with multiple children explain this to older siblings. Yet, despite the teenager intellectually knowing that their small pile of gifts costs the same amount as their younger siblings hefty, assembly required pile, emotionally, the child will still be in therapy for decades because of it.

Im Italian and thus was raised Catholic. This is a lethal combination for unjustifiable mom guilt, which rears its ugly head when I wrap gifts and witness the glaringly obvious pile disparity. To the untrained eye, it could be interpreted that I have a favorite child. I do, but it changes by the minute. My attempt to distort this imbalance is the reason why my 18-year-old gets a six-pack of underwear, each individually wrapped in six separate extra-large sweater boxes.

The supply chain shortage has put all items, from undies to gift cards, in jeopardy this year, so shopping early is highly encouraged to ensure that the coveted gifts arrive by next Christmas. But todays holiday shortages are nothing compared to the riots that broke out in 1983 when parents were trying to secure a Cabbage Patch Kid. Nothing represents Christmas spirit like adults armed with baseball bats in the check-out line to protect the toy they slidetackled a grandmother for.

But whether its 1983 or 2021, all stores share the same distinct smell that fills us with yule: evergreen and burning plastic. This smell says, Good tidings to you, and your credit card interest is blowing up with every swipe.

But no longer are we beholden to just swiping and signing. Technology is trying to con us into our deficits by eliminating our barriers to spending, all in the name of convenience. Now, we can tap our credit cards, hover our watches or converse with the most deceitful vixen in the world, Alexa. Opening a wallet, using a pen, slow check-out lines; these were the last of the consumer defenses against plummeting credit scores. We may smell less burning plastic thanks to our contactless payment options, but the odor is still eau debt toilette. And it stinks.

Although more convenient payment alternatives exist, lines at the register remain. Line jockeying, especially during the holidays, is the highest form of competition since Cabbage Patch Dolls debuted. Its kill or be killed.

For example, when an additional register opens at any store, there is a current of energy that simultaneously flows through every waiting customer in line. The collective mood instantly shifts from numb to predator, and there exist only three reactions: the commando, ninja-style beeline by those that just shuffled in from a car emblazoned with a handicap parking sticker (they wielded the bats in 83), those who move in a nonchalant, yet highly strategic manner to go undetected, and those who know they missed the opportunity because they were too far away, and are silently swearing, while smiling.

Speaking of foul language, nothing brings out my Jersey vernacular like decking the halls with boughs of holly. The frustration that accompanies incessantly moving a ladder to and fro, while the bough on the opposite side continually falls down, elicits a tirade of blasphemy that would religiously offend an atheist.

Unfortunately, our mischievous dog isnt intimidated and prefers to escalate dcor frustrations into a simultaneous game of keep-away and steal the pin. My wily beagle runs around the house like a festive rhythmic gymnast, leaving a trail of glitter and fake berries, which I seem to vacuum up until July.

But hey, if the holiday was simple, parents would actually go to sleep the night before Christmas, like in that story. Wheres the magic in that?

Read the rest here:

SLICE of LIFE - Newport This Week

Posted in Atheist | Comments Off on SLICE of LIFE – Newport This Week

9 Health Benefits of Probiotics from Supplements and Foods – Greatist

Posted: at 7:15 pm

You can consume probiotics naturally through certain foods, but theyre also available as a supplement. That said, science is still iffy on whether taking probiotic supplements is helpful for already-healthy adults.

Lets dive into the deets on why your body might love these friendly bacteria.

A healthy microbiome the world of live microorganisms in your body requires a delicate balance of different types of bacteria. When you get an overgrowth of bad bacteria, things can go a little sideways. Probiotics to the rescue!

Balancing your gut microbiome is probiotics main claim to fame. And thats a big deal because research shows that your gut health may influence the health of other areas from your brain and heart to your skin and teeth.

It makes sense that a healthy gut = healthy poop. But scientists have found that probiotics specifically reduce your risk of getting the runs.

A 2017 research review suggests that probiotics may prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Since antibiotics kill off bad *and* good bacteria while fighting infections, probiotics top up the good guys. This could potentially help you avoid those extra-urgent trips to the toilet.

Some research has also found that probiotic supplements could put the kibosh on travelers diarrhea.

The jurys still out on this one, but some studies have linked probiotics to improvements in mood disorders.

One small 2015 study of 20 people found that the group given probiotic-rich foods and probiotic supplements for 4 weeks reported less sadness than the group given a placebo.

Other research from 2016 also suggests that taking supplements containing several strains of probiotics could dial down symptoms of depression, anxiety, and other mental health disorders.

But we still need more studies to find out more about this possible link.

Got high cholesterol? How about stratospheric blood pressure? These two health probs are major clues that its time to take better care of your ticker.

Research has linked a probiotic-rich diet with lower levels of LDL (bad) cholesterol, lower blood pressure, and even less body fat.

Bottom line: That probiotic yogurt and kombucha in your fridge may help improve your heart health.

Maybe youve even heard that rubbing yogurt on your hands will help with your eczema?

Heres the scoop: Some research suggests that topical probiotics (meaning you apply them to your skin, not ingest them) seem to improve some skin conditions, including eczema. But scientists are still studying how and why this could happen, so stay tuned before you open up the Chobani.

A 2012 study also found that when women with eczema took specific probiotic supplements while pregnant, their babies were significantly less likely to get eczema.

The research is still slim, and more studies are needed to explore the link between probiotics and skin disorders.

While theres no cure for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), probiotics may be a treatment option for IBD symptoms.

Some probiotic strains have helped soothe symptoms in folks with mild ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, and even necrotizing enterocolitis, a deadly bowel condition in some premature newborns.

It might seem obvious that good gut bacteria could help with gastrointestinal issues. But we need more research to fully understand the *exact* strains of probiotics that could help, how often to take them, and which IBD or IBS symptoms they could prevent.

We know boosting your immune system isnt really a thing, but that doesnt mean you cant give your body the best conditions to thrive. Probiotics can help keep your gut healthy, contributing to overall wellness.

These bad boys have also been linked to lower rates of respiratory infections and urinary tract infections. But that research is more than 10 years old, and we need more current studies to find out more about these effects.

Want the expert take from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services? Probiotics might influence your bodys immune response. But also, Possible harmful effects of probiotics include infections.

(But the HHS also notes that those harmful effects are more likely to happen in people who have serious illnesses or weakened immune systems.)

Bottom line: Talk with your doc before trying probiotic supplements to ward off illness. If you have an underlying medical condition, they *might* tell you to opt for probiotics from food instead.

If your goal is to lose weight, stocking up on probiotics but not just any probiotics might help. Research suggests some strains may contribute to fat loss, while others may be linked to weight gain.

One 2013 study linked 12-week supplementation of the probiotic Lactobacillus gasseri with an 8.5 percent belly fat reduction.

A 2014 study also found that women with obesity who took Lactobacillus rhamnosus supplements for 12 weeks lost significantly more weight than those who didnt take a probiotic. But the supplement didnt have a notable effect on the weight of the men in the study.

In a 2015 study, participants who drank fermented milk supplemented with the probiotic strain Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 for 1 week seemed to absorb less fat and excrete more fat in their poop than those who drank plain fermented milk.

But some 2012 research also found that Lactobacillus acidophilus led to weight gain.

The TL;DR: We need more research to explore the role of probiotics in weight loss, but there seems to be a link.

If probiotics keep bad gut bacteria in check, can they do the same thing for the bacteria in your mouth? Maybe!

Research is limited, but some older studies suggest that you could prevent cavities by noshing on probiotic-rich foods regularly. Whether science eventually confirms this or not, noshing on unsweetened kefir and yogurt wont hurt.

Read the original:

9 Health Benefits of Probiotics from Supplements and Foods - Greatist

Posted in Food Supplements | Comments Off on 9 Health Benefits of Probiotics from Supplements and Foods – Greatist

Omega-3: Facts and myths about its health benefits – Medical News Today

Posted: at 7:15 pm

Omega-3 fatty acids are a type of polyunsaturated fat also referred to as healthy fats praised for their potential protective roles in several chronic diseases, such as heart disease and dementia.

They are one of the key building blocks for cell membranes and remain a subject of interest in the scientific community.

The family of omega-3 fatty acids includes:

DHA and EPA are the primary polyunsaturated fats in brain cell membranes and have been popularized and successfully marketed as dietary supplements.

Omega-3 fatty acids are essential, meaning the human body is incapable of creating them on its own the fatty acids or their precursors must be obtained from the diet.

For instance, ALA from plant seeds can be converted in the body to all the other types of omega-3 fats: EPA, SDA, DHA, DPA.

However, this conversion is quite inefficient, with rates of less than 3% of ALA being converted to DHA or EPA in males and less than 10% in females warranting adequate dietary intakes of DHA and EPA themselves.

DHA, EPA, and DPA omega-3 fatty acids are synthesized by marine organisms such as algae and phytoplankton.

When consumed by fish, aquatic mammals, and crustaceans, the fatty acids enter the food chain and are stored in body fat, liver, and blubber. They are then later consumed by humans.

Food sources of DHA, EPA, and DPA include:

ALA, on the other hand, is concentrated in plant sources and is the most frequent omega-3 fatty acid used by the body to create all other types of omega-3 fatty acids.

Sources of ALA include nuts and seeds, such as flaxseed, chia seeds, and walnuts as well as oils, such as echium seed oil, canola, and soybean oils.

According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), most adults in the United States consume the recommended amount of omega-3 1.1 grams (g) for adult females and 1.6 g for adult males in the form of ALA.

However, given that the conversion of ALA to DHA and EPA is poor, dietary intake of a combination of foods rich in ALA, EPA, and DHA is recommended.

Furthermore, a myriad of DHA and EPA omega-3 supplements are available and contribute significantly to daily omega-3 intake. Fish oil is the most common omega-3 supplement used by adults and children.

Decades of research on the health impacts of omega-3 fatty acids have provided controversial findings. Here are some evidence-backed benefits of consuming omega-3 fatty acids.

Chronic inflammation also called low-grade inflammation is linked to the development of obesity, heart disease, and cancers.

Omega-3 fatty acids have been shown to exert anti-inflammatory effects in the human body and may aid in lowering markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein and interleukin-6.

In fact, omega-3 fatty acids are regarded as one of the most potent lipids capable of reducing oxidative stress and inflammation. It also potentially guards against the development of chronic diseases.

In a 6-week study, daily supplementation with at least 1.2 g of DHA significantly reduced triglyceride levels and increased good cholesterol, or high-density lipoprotein.

In addition, omega-3 fatty acids lowered the bad cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins (LDL), when dietary saturated fats were replaced with polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acids found in plants foods such as nuts and avocados.

Elevated triglycerides and LDL cholesterol are linked to an increased risk for metabolic syndrome and heart disease.

However, a recent evidence-based practice summary has shown no impact on a range of cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes from the use of omega-3 fatty acid supplements in patients with established CVD or raised risk factors for CVD.

On the other hand, omega-3 fatty acids have been shown to improve vascular health the health of the blood vessels by increasing the bioavailability of nitric oxide.

In a phase 2 scientific study, nitric oxide induced dilation (relaxation) of the blood vessels and led to a significant reduction in blood pressure.

By reducing markers associated with an increased risk of developing heart disease high triglycerides, cholesterol, and blood pressure omega-3 fatty acids may reduce the risk of heart disease, according to a review analyzing existing studies.

The same review concluded that high-dose daily supplementation with 4 g of purified EPA in people with elevated triglycerides levels led to a 25% reduction in cardiovascular events.

In their 2018 review, Prof. Fereidoon Shahidi, professor of biochemistry at Memorial University, Canada, and Prof. Priyatharini Ambigaipalan, currently at the School of Science and Engineering Technology at Durham College, also in Canada, identified evidence of health benefits from omega-3 in noncardiovascular health conditions.

Omega-3 fatty acids may improve the efficacy and tolerance of chemotherapy and is a potential supportive treatment to people undergoing cancer treatment.

More specifically, daily supplementation with EPA and DHA helped patients with head and neck cancers and breast cancer to maintain body weight and reduce cancer-related muscle loss.

A 2019 review study of over 2,000 participants showed a beneficial impact of EPA omega-3 fatty acids on depression, with DHA showing little benefits.

This finding is supported by other studies included in Prof. Shahidis and Prof. Ambigaipalans review, indicating that fish oil supplementation helps protect against major depressive disorder in people between the ages of 15 and 25 years.

Furthermore, moderate intakes of fatty fish and seafood were associated with fewer occurrences of depression.

Omega-3 fatty acids have been successfully marketed as heart-friendly and reported to reduce the risk of adverse heart disease-related outcomes.

However, its role and health benefits for some conditions have been challenged and discredited. This Cochrane report review found no evidence of the benefit of omega-3 supplements on heart disease, stroke, or death.

Here are some conditions that omega-3 fatty acids may not prevent or improve, based on the latest scientific evidence.

Prof. Shahidi and Prof. Ambigaipalan also found that the consumption of omega-3 fatty acids does not reduce the risk of adverse heart disease-related outcomes, such as sudden cardiac death, heart attack, or stroke, even in individuals without a history of disease.

Although omega-3 fats lower the risk of developing heart disease by lowering triglyceride, the bad cholesterol LDL, and blood pressure, a meta-analysis of over 80,000 individuals found that their supplementation neither prevented death from all causes nor heart disease.

Anti-clotting effects of omega-3 fatty acids have been proposed by reducing platelet aggregation. However, this finding has been controversial, and the evidence in this regard is weak typical doses of omega-3 fats from foods and supplements have a mild effect.

Evidence suggests that increasing omega-3 intake does not prevent or treat diabetes.

It does not affect fasting blood sugar, insulin resistance, or glycosylated hemoglobin in those with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome.

Omega-3 fatty acids have been reported to reduce the complications of some cancer patients, and early findings look promising. However, there is no evidence of any action of omega-3s preventing the development of cancers.

In a meta-analysis of over one million people, a particularly high intake of omega-3 fats 515 g per day did not significantly reduce lung cancer risk, and in some cases, increased the risk of developing lung cancer.

Therefore, too low or too high omega-3 intake may be harmful.

Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids are essential compounds that are key building blocks for cell membranes, particularly in the brain.

For decades, they have been the subject of scientific interest, but findings have been controversial and inconsistent.

The evidence shows that omega-3 fatty acids have anti-inflammatory properties and may lower cholesterol, blood pressure, depressive episodes, weight loss during cancer treatment, and the risk for heart disease.

However, omega-3 intake does not reduce the risk of adverse and severe heart disease-related outcomes, including sudden death and stroke. Additionally, it cannot prevent or treat diabetes or prevent blood clots.

This is an emerging area of evidence, and further results will continue to inform health recommendations.

View original post here:

Omega-3: Facts and myths about its health benefits - Medical News Today

Posted in Food Supplements | Comments Off on Omega-3: Facts and myths about its health benefits – Medical News Today

Inner Workings: Can feeding the gut microbiome treat malnutrition? – pnas.org

Posted: at 7:15 pm

When children suffer malnutrition, their gut microbiomes suffer as well. Although malnourished children gain some weight and grow better when fed a nutrient-rich supplement, they fail to catch up to their well-fed counterparts. Their gut microbiomes also fail to recover.

This conundrum weighed on microbiologist Jeffrey Gordon, who for more than a decade has tracked how a poor diet affects childrens health in Bangladesh, Malawi, and other parts of the world. So Gordon and his team at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO, began to gauge the precise role that the microbiome might play in the connections between diet and health.

Ensuring that malnourished children and their microbiomes recover requires more than just dietary supplements. Image credit: Shutterstock/Dana Ward.

Over time, the team started to home in on food as the link between the microbiome and human health. In April, they reported that a unique mix of foods such as peanuts, bananas, and more that supported the growth of age-appropriate microbes helped restore the health of malnourished toddlersand was more effective at improving their health than standard supplements used to treat malnutrition (1). Their food blend worked not just by feeding the kids but by feeding their microbes too.

The teams work is helping to find better ways to define a healthy microbiome, Gordon says, potentially using diet to help the malnourished microbiomes recover. Its not the only approach aiming to treat ailments by targeting microbiotaother studies are looking to treat diabetes and other metabolic conditions.

Changes in the gut microbiome have been correlated with allergies in babies, Alzheimers disease, cancers, and several other diseases, making our bacteria an appealing target to treat a variety of conditions. But attempts to apply these data to fix the microbiome have had limited success. Thats in part attributable to a long struggle to define exactly what a healthy microbiome looks like, says Justin Sonnenburg, a microbiologist at Stanford University in Palo Alto, CA. Researchers have consistently found that individuals have a core microbiome, the activities of which remain consistent over long periods of time, but the composition of this core community differs based on a persons lifestyle, habits, or health.

Gut microbes associated with a Western-style diet have been linked to inflammatory disorders, diabetes, and other diseases. But the microbiomes of healthy people in developed countries are also starkly different from those of people in huntergatherer communities. And within an individual, diet, exercise, sleep, and many other factors can shift the proportions and activity of various species greatly from one day to the next, or even over the course of a single day. Theres just such a huge array of species, Sonnenburg says. To promote overall health, its not quite clear what facets of the microbiome we would be trying to maintain or change.

Discerning this answer was part of Gordons aim. Through a series of studies, his team mapped out how the microbial community develops in a healthy child and how that process is disrupted in malnutrition.

In 2014, the researchers sampled gut bacteria from children up to age 2 with and without malnutrition and found consistent differences in the proportions and species of bacteria present (2). Microbial communities in children with malnutrition appeared more similar to those from well-fed children who were younger. Even after children in the former group were fed standard supplements, their microbiomes failed to recover from malnutrition.

The researchers transplanted microbial samples from under-nourished infants and their healthy counterparts into germ-free mice to test whether these differences could account for differences in the childrens health. The mice responded much like the children: Despite eating the same foods, those mice with under-developed microbiomes failed to gain weight and thrive as well as those with age-appropriate microbes. Transplanting bacteria from healthy animals into malnourished ones improved their microbiome and helped the animals thrive.

Diet has a big impact on microbiome function, potentially pointing to ways to improve long-term health. Image credit: Reprinted from ref. 3, with permission from Elsevier.

For children in resource-poor regions, though, such transplants wouldnt be a practical solution. These microbes only grow in the absence of oxygen, making them expensive to culture, store, and turn into probiotic pills, which are the most common way to deliver beneficial bacteria to the gut. The question was, what could we do to repair the microbiota of these kids that was both culturally acceptable and scalable? says Gordon.

In recent years, efforts to repair the gut microbiome have focused on two approaches: probiotic supplements that aim to deliver beneficial gut bacteria, and fecal microbial transplants (FMT), which aim to supplant a disease-linked microbiome with a healthy one. Neither one offers a clear path forward for treating malnutrition. Probiotic pills could prove not only expensive to manufacture and distribute on a large scale, but also less than effective. There's still scant evidence of long-term benefit from adding what are presumed to be beneficial bacteria. FMT has not been tested in the context of malnutrition and would pose cultural and logistical challenges in resource-poor regions where malnutrition is common. And the procedure has only proven effective in very limited conditions, such as gut infections caused by Clostridium difficile. FMT is like restarting a computer to fix a problem, says gastroenterologist Purna Kashyap of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesnt.

Difficulties with modifying the microbiome arise, in part, because an established gut community is simultaneously in constant fluxchanging with food, sleep, or jet lagand resistant to long-term change. If you change diet, you see this very short-term perturbation where the community changes in response to the chemicals in food, Sonnenburg says. But over time, it will rebound back to something similar to its starting state.

That starting state likely reflects an individuals core microbiome. But Sonnenburg and others have begun to find hints of how to use microbiome-directed foods to drive long-term changes in both the gut community and human health. He and his colleagues tested two dietary changes thought to benefit gut bacteria: plant-based diets high in fiber, and diets high in fermented foods such as kombucha and kefir (3). The researchers monitored changes in the participants microbiomes as well as their health after several weeks of the diets.

Those who consumed high-fiber plant-based meals rich in fruits, vegetables, and legumes showed an increase in certain carbohydrate-digesting enzymes produced by gut microbes but no changes in the proportion of different species. Fermented foods, however, were kind of the food equivalent of probiotics, Sonnenburg says. Those who ate more of these foods showed an increase in their gut microbial diversity and a decrease in inflammatory immune markers, perhaps because these foods are rich in so-called prebiotic chemicals that feed beneficial gut bacteria (see ref. 4). Still, neither group showed long-term effects on weight loss, fatigue, stress, or other general markers of well-being.

To understand those links, epidemiologist Tim Spector and nutrition researcher Sarah Berry, both at Kings College in London, UK, and their team, homed in on a long-overlooked aspect of human metabolism: our response to meals. Most research on glucose or fat metabolism has focused on the levels of these chemicals after a long period of not eating. Typically, doctors will request a fasting blood test to gauge a persons metabolic health. But most people eat two or three meals a day interspersed with snacksand every bite contributes to short, sharp rises in circulating sugars and fats. If we were to map blood levels of these metabolites into a typical eating pattern, you actually see that we spend most of our time not fasting, Berry says. The long-term effects of diets, certain foods, or nutrients arise because of their short-term impacts on circulating metabolites, according to Berry.

The researchers also found that peoples genetics showed only a weak correlation to their metabolic responses to food; rather, the microbiome composition was much more strongly associated with how certain metabolites changed after meals. In follow-up studies, the team identified specific groups of microbes associated with metabolic responses to different foods. Then the team developed a machine-learning model to predict how a person might respond to food, based on several factors including their microbiomes (5). Nearly 1,100 study participants had their microbial composition, blood glucose levels, and lipid levels assessed after eating a specific set of foods (6). They then received a set of personalized diet recommendations aimed at health outcomes such as weight loss or improving blood sugar levels in participants with diabetes.

The researchers are still studying whether the recommended dietary changes alter gut microbes as well. But the data so far suggest that different foods promote a change in the microbiome composition, Berry says. The more data that emerge, the more well start to see this symbiotic relationship: Its not enough to just consume beneficial bacteria, but we also need to ensure were giving them the appropriate food.

Gordon and his team wanted to find the appropriate foods for children with severe malnutrition. They designed dietary supplements using different proportions of bananas, peanuts, chickpeas, and other common foods that in laboratory tests in mice appeared to support a healthy microbiome. In mice carrying microbiomes of malnourished children, one specific cocktail helped transform these microbiomes to resemble those found in healthy children. When the researchers fed malnourished toddlers in Dhaka this particular supplement twice a day for three months, their health improved: The children gained height and weight in patterns similar to healthy peersan effect not seen with the standard treatments used for malnutrition. Blood tests also showed that, compared with current remedies, children who received the microbiome-targeting supplement had higher levels of circulating proteins linked to bone growth and brain development (1). Its a nutrient substrate that benefits both the microbes and the host, Gordon says. We have to think of their development together.

In future studies, the group plans to test how long the benefits last and the mechanisms linking host and bacterial metabolism. They emphasize that the work does not try to define a single normal microbiome. Instead, their goal is to identify a community that most benefits a persons health in the context of their individual circumstances.

The results could also help parents seeking ways to optimize childrens nutrition as they shift from infant diets of milk or formula to solid foods. If were able to connect the dots between food and the development of microbiota that drive human growth, we could have a microbiome-informed sequence of foods [to improve childrens health], Gordon says.

Their approach could also extend to other disorders where the microbiome has been implicated, he and others on the team add. What were trying to emphasize with our studies is that we have to change the way we think about food in many ways, says Robert Chen, Gordons doctoral student at Washington University who co-authored the new study. The supplement, Chen adds, is a food designed with a specific purpose and specific targets. And in that way, he says, it is more like a bridge between food and medicine.

Read the original post:

Inner Workings: Can feeding the gut microbiome treat malnutrition? - pnas.org

Posted in Food Supplements | Comments Off on Inner Workings: Can feeding the gut microbiome treat malnutrition? – pnas.org

Nutritional Outlook Reveals Its 2021 Best of the Industry Award Winners – Yahoo Finance

Posted: at 7:15 pm

Annual editors' choice awards program recognizes top industry leaders, suppliers, service providers and retail brands in the natural products industry.

CRANBURY, N.J., Dec. 7, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Nutritional Outlook, the industry's leading multimedia resource for manufacturers of dietary supplements, healthy foods and beverages, is proud to announce the winners of its 2021 Best of the Industry Awards, which recognizes individuals, groups and companies whose initiatives in 2021 set a new standard for excellence and positively influence the natural product, dietary supplement, and food and beverage industries.

Nutritional Outlook logo.

"Congratulations to all the 2021 Best of the Industry Award winners," said Mike Hennessy Jr., president and CEO of MJH Life Sciences, the parent company of Nutritional Outlook. "Thanks to their trailblazing achievements in 2021, this year's winners will help shape for the better the state of the natural product, dietary supplement, and food and beverage industries for years to come."

Best of the Industry Award winners are selected by Nutritional Outlook's esteemed editors based on their survey of market achievements. This year, the editors recognized companies across four different categories for their contributions in promoting the state of the natural products industry.

The 2021 winners are:

Industry leader: NOW, whose testing of dietary supplement products sold on Amazon.com showed how a supplement company can raise awareness about the presence of low-quality products and also share that information freely with the entire industry, regulators, and Amazon itself in an effort to clean up the market.

Retail brand/product: Good Catch, for its leadership in mainstreaming the plant-based seafood category through its retail and food service partnerships.

Ingredient supplier: Seraphina Therapeutics, for the company's groundbreaking work in odd-chain fatty acids, specifically pentadecanoic acid, and in launching its FA15 ingredient in the form of the Fatty15 supplement brand, bringing awareness and ultimately good health to consumers.

Service provider: Botanical Adulterants Prevention Program, now celebrating its 10th anniversary and whose critical information has warned the botanicals industry about ongoing adulteration, improving the quality and safety of botanical products on the market.

Read exclusive stories about each of our award winners here.

Story continues

To hear from our winners, listen to the latest episode of "The Nutritional Outlook Podcast" here.

About Nutritional OutlookAn award-winning media-content provider in the dietary supplement and natural products market, Nutritional Outlook, an MJH Life Sciences brand, provides insights and industry updates critical to manufacturers of dietary supplements, healthy foods, nutritious beverages, and natural products. Nutritional Outlook keeps industry abreast of current market trends, research updates, news, and regulatory developments. Nutritional Outlook goes beyond the 24-hour news cycle and provides in-depth analysis to help industry players navigate the challenges and changes in the near- and long-term. Nutritional Outlook is a brand of MJH Life Sciences, the largest privately held, independent, full-service medical media company in North America, dedicated to delivering trusted health care news across multiple channels.

Media ContactAlyssa Scarpaci609-716-7777ascarpaci@mjhlifesciences.com

Cision

View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nutritional-outlook-reveals-its-2021-best-of-the-industry-award-winners-301439336.html

SOURCE Nutritional Outlook

See the article here:

Nutritional Outlook Reveals Its 2021 Best of the Industry Award Winners - Yahoo Finance

Posted in Food Supplements | Comments Off on Nutritional Outlook Reveals Its 2021 Best of the Industry Award Winners – Yahoo Finance

Having this food can help reduce nausea and vomiting during pregnancy – Hindustan Times

Posted: at 7:15 pm

The researchers at the UC Davis School of Medicine have found that probiotics significantly improve the symptoms of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy.

The study has been published in the 'Nutrients Journal'.

Nausea and vomiting affect about 85 per cent of pregnancies and can significantly impact the quality of life, particularly during early pregnancy.

"The cause of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy is unknown to this date. Various theories have been proposed, but none of them is conclusive," said Albert T. Liu, lead author for the study and a professor of obstetrics and gynaecology.

SEE PICS: Foods to eat during high-risk pregnancy

"Nausea, vomiting and constipation during pregnancy can significantly diminish the quality of patients' lives. Once nausea and vomiting during pregnancy progress, they can become difficult to control, and sometimes the patient even needs to be hospitalized," Liu said.

Probiotics are referred to as "beneficial bacteria." They can be found in foods like yogurt, kimchi, kefir, sauerkraut and tempeh. Probiotics are also available as food supplements. According to the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, other than vitamins, probiotics or prebiotics were the third most commonly used dietary supplement for adults.

Probiotics are thought to support the community of different microbes, often referred to as the "gut microbiome," found in the gastrointestinal tract.

During pregnancy, hormones like estrogen and progesterone increase, bringing about many physical changes. These increases can also change the gut microbiome, which likely affects the digestive system functions and cause unwanted symptoms like nausea, vomiting and constipation.

The researchers set out to determine whether supplementing with a probiotic could be beneficial for gastrointestinal function during pregnancy.

The study lasted for 16 days. A total of 32 participants took a probiotic capsule twice a day for six days and then took two days off. They then repeated the cycle.

The probiotics were available over-the-counter and mainly contained Lactobacillus, a type of good bacteria. Each capsule contained approximately 10 billion live cultures at the time of manufacture.

Participants kept 17 daily observations of their symptoms during the duration of the study, for a total of 535 observations for the researchers to statistically assess.

What the researchers found was that taking the probiotic significantly reduced nausea and vomiting. Nausea hours (the number of hours participants felt nauseous) were reduced by 16 per cent, and the number of times they vomited was reduced by 33 per cent. Probiotic intake also significantly improved symptoms related to the quality of life, such as fatigue, poor appetite and difficulty maintaining normal social activities, as scored by questionnaires.

Probiotics were also found to reduce constipation significantly.

"Over the years, I've observed that probiotics can reduce nausea and vomiting and ease constipation. It's very encouraging that the study proved this to be true," said Liu.

"Probiotics have also benefited many of my other patients who weren't in the study," Liu added.

Participants also contributed faecal specimens before and during the study. The samples were analyzed to identify the type and number of microbes and the different byproducts of digestion.

This allowed the researchers to examine whether biomarkers in the faecal specimens corresponded with more severe nausea and assess how the probiotics affected participants who began the study with different baseline biomarkers.

One finding was that a low amount of bacteria that carried an enzyme named bile salt hydrolase, which generated bile acid to absorb nutrients, was associated with more pregnancy-related vomiting. Probiotics increase bile salt hydrolase-producing bacteria, which may explain why the supplements decreased levels of nausea and vomiting.

Another finding was that high levels of the gut microbes Akkermansia and A. muciniphila at the beginning of the study were associated with more vomiting. The probiotic significantly reduced the amount of those particular microbes and also reduced vomiting. This suggested Akkermansia and A. muciniphila may be reliable biomarkers that can predict vomiting in pregnancy.

Another finding was that vitamin E levels increased after taking probiotics. Higher levels of vitamin E were associated with low vomiting scores.

"This research provides key insights about the impact of gut microbes on gastrointestinal function during pregnancy. Our gut microbiota explains why we are what we eat, and why bacteria-generated metabolites and products have a huge impact on our health," said Wan.

"They affect the gastrointestinal tract as well as skin health and neurological function," Wan added.

Although the findings are intriguing, the researchers cautioned that due to the small sample size, further studies will be needed to confirm the effects of the probiotics.

"Our previous work showed the benefits of probiotics in preventing liver inflammation. The current study might be one of the first to show the benefits of probiotics in pregnancy," said Wan.

"It would be interesting and important to further test whether probiotics can reduce nausea and vomiting caused by chemotherapy in cancer patients," Wan concluded.

Additional authors on this study include Shuai Chen from the Department of Public Health Sciences, and Prasant Kumar Jena, Lili Sheng and Ying Hu from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at the University of California, Davis.

Follow more stories on Facebook & Twitter

Continued here:

Having this food can help reduce nausea and vomiting during pregnancy - Hindustan Times

Posted in Food Supplements | Comments Off on Having this food can help reduce nausea and vomiting during pregnancy – Hindustan Times