Daily Archives: December 7, 2021

Most roads in the city have become unfit for travel: they are either untarred or filled with potholes and dust.

While the recent incessant rains did have an impact on the roads, much of the damage has been caused by their reckless and repeated digging by various government agencies and/or privatetelecom companies.

And now we have data that shows just how bad the roads have become. Consider this: in the last two years, municipal authorities have givenpermission for digging a staggering 6,571 km of roads for the purpose of laying underground pipelines or cables.

The Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) accounts for the bulk of these road-digging expeditions: it received permission for laying underground water and drainage pipelines on 3,500 kilometres of roads. While the BWSSB had completed about 90% of the work, the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) says it hasnt been able to restore the dug-up roads due to a lack of funds.

The BBMP recently allowed the Bangalore Electricity Supply Company(Bescom) to dig roads for laying1,561 km of underground cables. The electricity board, which previously laid cables for 4,500 km, plans to take up fresh works mostly in the citys outer areas.

GAIL India has received approvals for laying gas pipelines along 1,510 km of road. Of this, 110 km will be covered by the mainlinewhile the remaining 1,400 km is for distribution lines.

The BBMP has also been generously approving private companies requestsfor laying optical fibre cables.

A senior BBMP official defended the approval of such requests, sayingthese utilities are very much needed for the city. Once an asphalted road is dug up, it loses its binding, and fixing it does not entirely help. Approvals are given only after a joint inspection of the road. If the road has been asphalted recently, the requestsare denied, the official said.

Better days ahead?

With the BBMP council elections to be held soon, officials are planning to asphalt all the bad roads in the next two to three months. About 3,500 km of the roads dug up by the BWSSB mainly in the outer areas are likely to be restored by December-end.

We have finalised the tenders. Once the state government gives the approval, we will start the work,said B S Prahlad, chief engineer in the BBMPs road infrastructure division. He conceded that roads in the outer zones Mahadevapura, Yelahanka, Bommanahalli and Dasarahalli are in the worst condition.

Bescom and GAIL India have been paying the BBMP for restoring the roads dug up by them. We have laid about 80% of the underground cables. Only the last phase is pending,said Rajendra Cholan, Managing Director, Bescom.

BWSSBChairman N Jayaram said the water board had already handed over 2,800 km of roads to the BBMP for undertaking the restoration work after laying water and sewage pipelines. Only about 10% of the underground drainage work is pending. We will complete it by March, he said.

V K Srivatsa, a resident of Balaji Layout in Hemmigepura, an outer ward, said the roads dug up by the BWSSB two years ago hadnt been restored as yet. About 90% of the roads in our localitydo not have any tar left. We only hope the BWSSB or any other agency does not dig up the roads once the BBMP restores them, he said.

Who dug up our roads?

* BWSSB:3,500 km

*Bescom:1,561 km

* GAIL India: 1,510 km

* Total:6,571 km

Check out the latest videos fromDH:

View original post here:

Why are our roads so bad? Blame it on BBMP's liberal digging approvals - Deccan Herald

Rupert Murdoch's News Corp will shift allegiance to Labor in the event of a 2022 Election win and claim some responsibility for the victory, writes Andrew P Street.

ONE THING everyone knows is that News Corp's papers and cable news have an editorial slant that could be playfully described as spanning the range from "conservative" to "hyperbolically conspiratorial".

For the record, that seldom extends to the actual news coverage there. There are many excellent journalists at News and Sky doing genuinely important work, even if their stories are occasionally given horrendously misleading headlines by subeditors with axes to grind.

And because of that worldview, it is widely assumed that the majority media conglomerate are acting in lockstep with the Liberal-National Coalition to ensure their re-election. However, there are signs that love might get a smidgen more conditional in the immediate future.

See, the Murdochracy has a greater priority even than seeing a pliantly right-wing leader installed.

It's to be on the winning team.

The media arm of News has been a money pit for years. The thing that's making the Murdoch clan money these days is online betting and the second that Logan sorry, Rupert pops his clogs, it's speculated that Shiv and Roman will get the hell out of the media biz and go where the real money is.

But the power of News especially The Australian and Sky News is in its political clout. Being seen as a Kingmaker gives the organisation and the Sith Lord at its head enormous influence in Canberra, which helps keep the wheezing empire alive.

And so what happens when Labor is getting traction? Well, first, they attempt to help their natural allies by running puff pieces on the Coalition and decrying Labor for being economically profligate, especially in policies they haven't enacted.

But if the needle stubbornly doesn't move right and there's an election in the wings, what you see is the Murdoch press hedging their bets and starting to run less aggressively anti-Labor pieces while getting a little more critical of their mates in the Coalition.

And thus, it's worth noting that the piece on a no-tender quarantine going to a DPG Advisory Servicesgot oddly brutal coverage on Sky.

Specifically, the report focused on the fact that the company is headed up by a couple of Prime Minister Scott Morrison's closest pals:NSW Liberal Party Deputy Leader and president of Morrison's federal electorate conferenceScott Briggs and ex-Liberal staffer andfailed Liberal candidateDavid Gazard.

Sky's Andrew Clennell spent ten excoriating minutes on the issue, emphasising the links between the PM and the lobbyists he calls friends, including photos of Briggs and Morrison looking pally at a Cronulla Sharks game. Calling out corruption is bad enough, but dragging Scotty's ostensibly-beloved team into it? That'spersonal.

Certainly, it's newsworthy that the PM would be handing his mates public money to investigate a private quarantine program. Then again, by Morrison Government standards, $80,000 is one of the cheaper bits of rortery.

Also, this isn't the first rodeo of the people involved. Gazard, for example, was involved in the deal with Naval Group to secure French non-nuclear Australia's submarines, while Briggs made a punt on the (eventually scuppered) deal to privatise Australia's visa system, so these are remoras who've been attaching themselves to Morrison's shark(ies) for some time.

What's surprising, therefore, is that they've suddenly gotten Sky News' attention and that the story isn't merely about yet more Coalition graft but specifically targets Morrison himself.

This story also happened to break at the same time that Newspoll found the Coalition still lagging and Labor leader Anthony Albanese's approval growing, as per the trend of the last year. Hence, it wouldn't be a shock for the company to figure that maybe it was time to start quietly putting a bob each way.

After all, there's precedent for this. The company's papers threw their weight behind Kevin Rudd once it became clear that he was likely to win, running editorials and front pages declaring that John Howard had done his dash and it was time for some rebirth and renewal.

And it was an investment which one could argue would have paid off handsomely had the former-PM-then-Foreign Minister been successful inhis attempt to hand the Australia Network overseas broadcasting tender to Sky News. And when that didn't work, how well-disposed to Julia Gillard did the Murdochracy become?

Albanese tugged the metaphorical forelock to News Corp last year by declining to back the calls by Rudd and former Liberal PM Malcolm Turnbull for a royal commission into News Corp's influence on Australia's democracy.

At the time, he demurred that:

"It's a bit like complaining about the referee in a footy game. It might make you feel okay; it doesn't change the outcome or change the result."

And as undeserved flattery goes, has anyone done better than calling Murdoch the nation's umpire?

Thus, it's not hard to imagine that if the polls stay trending thusly or if new scandals emerge around Morrison's remaining frontbench, that a few more generous pieces about Albanese will start to get published.

Perhaps some editorials will explain how Labor had learned the lessons of the disastrous Rudd/Gillard/Shorten years and that they've abandoned their nutty leftism and are finally behaving like economically-responsible grown-ups. Whatever threadbare excuse they use to justify switching their support, it'll be a placeholder for "because they're going to win and we want to make them think we were responsible for that".

And when that happens, it'll be all over bar the belligerent Morrisonian shouting not because News anoints our leader, but because the team at News are masters of jumping on the winning horse and pretending to have been riding it all along.

Andrew P Streetis an Adelaide-based, Sydney-built journalist, author, editor and broadcaster and an Independent Australia columnist. You can follow Andrew on Twitter@AndrewPStreet.

Support independent journalism Subscribeto IA.

View post:

Liberal or Labor, News Corp will back the winning team - Independent Australia

The birth of a party

The United and Reform parties had first formed a coalition in 1931 to see off a challenge from the Labour Party, and won that year's general election. But in 1935 the coalition lost to Labour, leading to the formal merger as National.

United's predecessor, the Liberal Party, dominated New Zealand politics up to the first world war, and was the country's first organised political party. The Liberals enjoyed support from urban liberals and workers, but the formation of the Reform Party in 1909 and Labour in 1916 saw a steady decline in the party's fortunes.

For its part, the Reform Party was the first consolidation of conservative politicians in New Zealand, coming to power for the first time in 1912 and staying in government until 1928.

It's establishment went back to the Liberal government's land and welfare reforms, which were branded as "socialism" and an attack on farmers. Support from social conservatives and rural communities continued to be core components of the Reform Party until the 1936 merger.

Meanwhile, a group of Liberal members had formed the United Party in 1927, supplanting the Liberals as the main challenger to the Reform Party. United gained support from urban centres, the business community and socially liberal (in the 1920s sense) interest groups.

If this all seems oddly familiar, that's because many aspects of the United and Reform parties still exist within National today.

Under the First Past the Post (FPP) electoral system, the merger of those two parties made sense. Forming a single block that represented the centre-right in New Zealand allowed them to build a well-supported political apparatus.

More importantly, the merger allowed the two parties to stop fighting each other, and instead counter Labour.

Under MMP (which replaced FPP in 1996), however, the need for single parties that dominate whole sides of the political spectrum has decreased. Instead, there's an opportunity for parties to have more refined policy platforms based on clear ideologies, rather than broad-based appeal.

This doesn't mean socially conservative or liberal parties can't work together - MMP allows for this as part of governing coalition negotiations, rather than the tensions playing out as internal party machinations.

Proportional representation systems tend to increase diversity within political systems - not just in terms of gender or ethnicity, but also by providing more specific political channels for different ideological perspectives, and encouraging open collaboration and compromise between those various groups.

Looked at this way, the obvious outcome is for a devolution of major "one size fits all" parties into smaller ones that take clearer policy and ideological positions. To some extent this has already happened on the left, with the advent of New Labour, and subsequently the Alliance (which contained the Green Party), splitting out of Labour in the early 1990s.

Here is the original post:

Analysis: History made National a 'broad church' - can the party hold up in the MMP era? - Newshub

WASHINGTON, D.C. U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.), Ranking Member of the Environment and Public Works (EPW) Committee, today led all of her Republican colleagues on the committee in introducing the Section 401 Certification Act, legislation codifying the Trump administrations 2020 Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 401 Certification Rule (401 Rule). Specifically, the legislation would ensure infrastructure projects are not denied permits because of political motives rather than actually protecting water quality.

Section 401 of the Clean Water Act is designed to provide states and authorized Indian tribes an important tool to help protect the water quality of federally regulated waters within their borders. Congress did not intend for it to be used to address political interests that do not relate to water quality, such as blanket opposition to certain electric transmission, pipeline, road construction, agricultural, and other projects. States abuse of this process has negatively impacted interstate commerce, particularly as it relates to energy commodities.

Section 401 is meant to protect water quality. It is not a broad license for states to block economic activity or infrastructure based upon political factors. We see the consequences of Section 401 misuse playing out across the country: The lack of sufficient infrastructure to transport natural gas contributes to higher energy prices. At a time when Americans are projected to pay 30% more for their heating bills this winter, states should be encouraging energy infrastructure buildout, not twisting federal water regulation to fit their vendetta against fossil fuels and pipelines, Ranking Member Capito said.

Under the Obama administration, we saw an uptick in liberal states determined to needlessly delay, and even block, pipeline and other infrastructure projects they deemed politically unsavory, not for legitimate objections allowed by law, Senator Inhofe said. Radical states have abused the Clean Water Act Section 401 water quality certification process to delay needed interstate projects from railroads and pipelines to hydropower projects for far too long. Under the leadership and careful direction of President Trump, we were able to streamline and clarify the water quality certification process to ensure projects important to economic development and energy independence are assessed solely on impacts to water quality as intended. I am glad to join Ranking Member Capito to introduce this bill that would make the Trump-era rule permanent by codifying it into law.

Its troubling to see the Biden administration use the 401 certification process as a means to delay or cancel important energy infrastructure projects. The current rule is able to curb abuses of the Clean Water Act without holding critical projects hostage. This legislation will ensure we can maintain an efficient permitting process and promote energy independence, Senator Boozman said.

For far too long Section 401 of the Clean Water Act has been used by liberal, activist states to hijack energy infrastructure and sabotage energy producing states, like North Dakota, without legitimate cause. With energy prices skyrocketing, its high time we provide much needed regulatory certainty and guardrails to prevent future abuses. Our bill codifies President Trumps rule to protect against the weaponization of Section 401, Senator Cramer said.

For far too long, federal Clean Water Act regulations have been weaponized to hold back important projects, Senator Wicker said. The Trump Administration reined in this abuse by ensuring issues unrelated to water quality are no longer used to deny or slow-walk energy infrastructure.I am glad to cosponsor an effort to make this sensible rule permanent. At a time when inflation is running rampant and energy costs are rising, the last thing the American people need is for projects that would create jobs and promote economic growth to be hindered.

Now more than ever, hardworking Alabamians and Americans are facing rising prices in energy commodities. By codifying Section 401 of the Clean Water Act to its intended scope to protect water quality this legislation would support the checkbooks of American households and properly safeguard infrastructure projects in our energy and development sectors. As such,I am proud to join my EPW colleagues to ensure that Section 404 project permits are issued in a timely manner and in accordance with the law, Senator Shelby said.

Under President Trump, the EPA focused its efforts on actually protecting our water instead of finding petty reasons to stop new construction,Senator Lummis said. President Biden is again turning the EPA into a weapon of the far left to halt American advancement and infrastructure under the moniker of environmentalism. This harms my constituents in Wyoming, and doesnt really help the environment. The Section 401 Certification Act would get politics out of the Clean Water Act, and allow for much-needed Wyoming and American infrastructure updates. Im proud to join Senator Shelley Moore Capito in supporting this bill.

Too often, we have seen critical infrastructure projects delayed or blocked due to the abuse of the regulatory process under Section 401 at the request of far left radical environmentalists, Senator Sullivan said. This legislation will codify into law needed permitting reforms that were promulgated during the Trump administration to ensure we are developing our economy, infrastructure and energy projects to utilize Americas energy abundance, create good-paying jobs, and lower costs for hard-working Americans.

I completely support this effort to curtail the bureaucratic abuse of our clean water laws, Senator Graham said. Im all for reasonable regulation of federal waters, but it is clear the Biden administration is taking the concept of clean water regulation outside any reasonable definition.Its a complete power-grab.

Click here to read the bill text.

Click here to read the one pager.

# # #

Go here to read the rest:

Capito, EPW Republicans Bill Would Prevent Liberal States from Misusing Section 401 to Deny Infrastructure Buildout - Shelley Moore Capito

Anika Gauja, professor of politics at the University of Sydney, believes this is quite a distinctive episode.

She puts this down to the increasing number of independents declaring their candidacies earlier, evidence of a significant mobilisation in their electorates against the government and the major parties on progressive issues such as climate change. She also attributes this to the high number of women candidates.

Given the findings of the Jenkins report, this isnt terribly surprising, she said.

Australian political parties have been known for quite some time for their fairly masculine cultures, and it has been quite hostile to women and women candidates. Running as an independent offers many women an opportunity to enter politics and to do so outside that culture of mainstream party politics.

But she said this election, theres a key difference.

We have a lot of very competent, talented women running for parliament this time, but I think this is a more significant episode because they have announced their candidatures early [and] they have a well-resourced, and well-organised support group behind them.

Part of that support is donations from Climate 200, which is subject to the same disclosure regulations as the major parties. Mr Holmes Court said the group had intended to have at least 200 donors coming into the next election. At time of writing, it is set to pass 6,000 donors and $5 million in funds.

We are small fry [compared to the major parties] but we are going to focus our attention on helping these independents who are stepping up. They have their own fundraising - our job is to turbocharge them.

When asked about being surrounded by mostly women candidates, Ms Tink said she found it intriguing and exciting.

I think at the moment, we are probably the focus of attention because there are a few of us that have stepped up in quick succession. So it does look like there is this real wave, this momentum.

There is clearly no doubt that women are still very severely underrepresented when it comes to leadership roles in this country, and that includes our parliamentary roles. The reality is there is more room to step up because we haven't been there in the first place.

Showing up probably means we stand out because we are unusual in what we've seen in the past.

Read the original post:

The female independents vying for the seats of high-profile Liberal men at the next federal election - SBS

As one analyst wrote: Lawrence was a state premier whose federal career was dogged by ghosts of her state past.

Lawrence did go on to become federal president of the ALP, just as former NSW premier Nick Greiner became federal president of his party, although he was the first major victim of the states Independent Commission Against Corruption.

Longstanding allegations followed Carmen Lawrence into federal parliament.Credit:Robert Pearce

He won the dubious title of first as he was the one who set up the ICAC. The NSW Court of Appeal later overturned its findings against him. But the ICAC went on to fell other Liberal premiers including Barry OFarrell and most recently Berejiklian.

One who did escape the curse was Mike Baird whose only appearance before the ICAC was in October, as a witness, to criticise his successor for not disclosing her Maguire romance.

That might make it a tad difficult for him to endorse Berejiklian in the northern suburbs seat for which only a few months ago he himself was being touted as a candidate.

Not to worry, though. There have been plenty of federal Libs keen to endorse the Gladys-for-Canberra push from Simon Birmingham to Katie Allen and now former PM and ex Warringah MP Tony Abbott.

Polls show St Gladys also still enjoys strong support among women from the ordinary voter to many in the powerful womens business lobby who seem content to overlook their usual dismay at the lack of integrity in politics in this particular case.

Apparently, simply being perceived as competent is enough to offset any misconduct allegations, which shows just how low the bar is for our political class these days.

Being an equal opportunity kangaroo court, as Prime Minister Morrison so ludicrously labelled it last week, the ICAC has also claimed plenty of powerful ALP scalps not the least being the odious Eddie Obeid.

It was the watchdogs lengthy examinations into everyone in Obeids orbit and the question of how successive governments enabled his corruption, that led former premier Keneally into the ICAC witness box.

Loading

Keneally was never the subject of any ICAC criticism as the sensitive Senator constantly reminds any journalist who dares raise the issue.

Keneally is being parachuted into the federal lower house seat of Fowler at the upcoming election. Imagine the irony if the ambitious former Labor premier were to one day run for PM against the woman currently being touted as a future federal Liberal leader, Gladys Berejiklian. Hopefully, the question of a Federal Integrity Commission would not be an election issue by then.

The Opinion newsletter is a weekly wrap of views that will challenge, champion and inform your own. Sign up here.

More here:

Why wouldnt the Liberals run a candidate with ICAC baggage - the ALP did - The Sydney Morning Herald

The Liberal Party's position has strengthened further following the Sutherland Shire Council election.

While the makeup of the council won't be certain for another two weeks, the latest vote count indicates the Liberals are likely to have eight of the 15 positions, Labor five with two independents.

Of the independents, Laura Cowell is assured of victory in E Ward, while Leanne Farmer in A Ward is in an extremely strong position and Pam Brown in B Ward has a lesser chance.

Labor lost votes to independent candidates and the group's leader Michael Forshaw (A Ward) is expected to lose his position to Ms Farmer.

Preferences won't be distributed until December 21, due to an extension of time for postal votes to be received. The new council will be sworn in on January 10.

Sports minded: Shire Sports Independents team, Laura Cowell, Matt Brady and Giulio Di Stefano monitored results while watching Sydney FC play at Kogarah. Picture: supplied

Projections based on the counting of votes up till Monday night:

A Ward: The Liberals led by Carol Provan have two positions, with independent Leanne Farmer favoured to take the third spot ahead of Labor's Michael Forshaw.

B Ward: Louise Sullivan (Liberal) and Jack Boyd (Labor) have won, and the third spot is likely to go to Liberal Kent Johns, with independent Pam Brown having some chance.

C Ward: The Liberals, led by Hassan Awada, have two positions, and Labor's Jen Armstrong the other.

D Ward: The status-quo, with Labor's Diedree Steinwall and Greg McLean, and Liberal Carmelo Pesce re-elected.

E Ward: The winners are Stephen Nikolovski (Liberals), Peter Scaysbrook (Labor) and Laura Cowell (Shire Sports Independents).

POSTERS DISAPPEAR

Meanwhile, Liberal team leader Carmelo Pesce says "someone really did a job on me" on election day.

Mr Pesce's campaign volunteers arrived at polling booths in D Ward to find the former mayor's posters had been removed.

"Five of the 17 booths were stripped bare," he said. "I put them up on Friday night and they were gone by morning."

Mr Pesce said he was sure rival candidates Diedree Steinwall (Labor) and Dominique Passmore (independent) knew nothing about it. "They were shocked when I told them," he said.

Other candidates in various wards also reported their posters being removed or destroyed during the election campaign.

WANT MORE LOCAL NEWS?

SIGN UP FOR YOUR FREE WEEKLY NEWSLETTER

Read more from the original source:

Liberal Party likely to win eight of 15 positions on Sutherland Shire Council - St George and Sutherland Shire Leader

Treasurer Josh Frydenberg during Question Time in the House of Representatives at Parliament House, Canberra, Wednesday, August 25, 2021. (AAP Image/Mick Tsikas) NO ARCHIVING

Does the Liberal Partys claim to be superior economic managers stack up? No. We dig back to Harold Holt, through 60 years of Australias Treasurers, to find the best and worst. A Callum Foote investigation.

Its not for me to tell the Australian people how they should spend their money. That was Josh Frydenberg as Australias pre-Pandemic economy spluttered towards recession in 2019.

Last week though, remarking on the build-up in household savings, the Treasurer was urging Australians to spend their money. There is more than a mite of self-interest in this call to shopping action. Money in the bank does nothing for economic growth. Money spent with shop-owners flows mostly to the Liberal Party small business base, as well as GDP.

Moreover, Josh Frydenberg is racing up the ranks of Australias worst-ever Federal treasurers, admittedly stung like no others by the most devastating external shock to world economies since World War Two but also stung by his own management of the economy. Australia was already veering towards recession before the Pandemic as his crusade for a Budget surplus effectively strangled economic growth.

He has one more set of National Accounts to announce before the Election next year.

Heading into the Election, we will be hearing a lot about the Liberal governments claim to be superior economic managers. They wheel it out every cycle, and it works. The majority of Australians actually believe it. Even Labor seems to believe it. They are still shy, despite the evidence, to claim otherwise. Shy too to use the I word it seems incompetent despite the $40bn in JobKeeper waste and other things.

Last week, the National Accounts were revealed for the September quarter. They were ugly, as anticipated, with Sydney and Melbourne smothered by lockdowns for much of the time between June and September.

So it was that negative growth came in at a quarterly -1.9%. Better than the calamitous -6.8% recorded last June but bad nonetheless. In this, the first in our series on Election tactics, we examine the assertion that will be a centrepiece of Liberal electioneering, the claim of superior economic management.

Weve run the updated Australian Bureau of Statistics numbers from this weeks National Accounts, going back to 1959 when ABS records started.

When we did this a couple of years ago, we discovered John Howard was Australias worst treasurer.

Howard had the 1st, 2nd and 4th worst growth numbers in any quarter with a personal worst of -2.9%. Harold Holt (another Liberal treasurer turned PM) had the 3rd and 5th worst. And Paul Keating (Labors treasurer turned PM) came in with the 6th and a worst of -1.1%. Josh Frydenberg would win this time if we just took the worst number ever but thats hardly fair. The Pandemic was well and truly beyond his control.

Last time we also looked at who scored a pair. A pair is two quarters of negative growth in a row (commonly accepted as a recession).John Howard scored worst again on this metric.

To be fair to John Howard too, Malcolm Fraser sacked his first Treasurer Phillip Lynch after he had 3 negative quarters out of 8 (strike rate of 38%) and replaced him with John Howard who immediately scored a negative. Who owns that one? Phillip or John? Either way, it was certainly Malcolm Frasers treasurer. Paul Keating had the same problem he got hit with the last of John Howards negatives.

We let them lie where they fall. That gives John Howard 7 negative out of 22 (strike rate 32%). And a personal worst negative of 2.9%.

Now to update our Treasurer Measurer with the new ABS numbers. Weve decided to add the pairs to the strike rate: 10 points for a pair plus your strike rate (strike rate = negative quarters as % of all quarters in your term as treasurer).

Which ever way you cut it, the Liberals are the worst economic managers with the top five worst treasurers, even when you take in to account that the Liberals have been in office for twice the time of Labor administrations.

Liberals total score: 255 (41 years in office).

Labor total score:49 (21 years in office).

Circumstance has much to do with it. It is rarely brought up in the debate over economic management but, as an export nation, Australia is exposed more than most to trade and external factors.

So it is that the stewardship of Peter Costello and Wayne Swan, two of the best ranking treasurers, enjoyed the undeniable benefits of the China super-cycle. Unprecedented and massive demand from China for Australias coal, gas and iron ore buoyed their performance. So much so that this country was able to sail through the Global Financial Crisis during Labors tenure.

We were one of the only countries to dodge a recession, thanks to the commodities we dig out of the ground and drill from the sea-beds.

Nevertheless, these numbers are compelling and beg the question of why Labor is so reticent to combat the superior economic managers claim. Well, most of them.

Shadow treasurer Jim Chalmers did have the audacity to call the government incompetent.But we are yet to hear it as a constant from Labor leader Anthony Albanese and others.

This despite Malcom Fraser selecting the 1st and 3rd worst treasurers: John Howard and Phillip Lynch with John Howard (over 5 years in office) being the worst treasurer by a country mile.

As Australia bounces back from lockdown, there is one seriously worrying aspect of this countrys economic recovery. Inequality. This is a recovery for the haves, but not the have-nots.

It is an economy whose resilience is masked by the dual boom in the sharemarket and the property market. Those with assets have done very well. Those without assets, particularly those with poorly paying jobs and especially those struggling below the poverty line on JobSeeker, are steadfastly locked out of the asset price boom.

Approximately 6.6 million Australian adults, or 35 per cent of the population, now hold listed investments, according to the ASX Australian Investor Study 2020 while 66% of Australian households owned their own home with or without a mortgage according to the ABS.

A devotee of Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, Josh Frydenberg had imagined himself as the CEO of a freewheeling economy. Small government, free markets, all that.

The reality however could not be further from the truth. Record debt, record cost of government, record $310bn in Reserve Bank money printing and record subsidies for large corporations are the reality.

So it is that the Treasurer has backflipped from his calls for fiscal prudence to a call for Australians to go shopping. If they heed this call, it will make his December quarter numbers (which come out in March ahead of the slated May Election) look good.

This is a grand departure from his former recommendation, a grand departure from his previous view that people should do what they like with their money; that they spend their savings rather than build up a deposit for a house, or pay down debt and increase the equity on their home.

He is hoping that all the money Australians saved during the pandemic, which saw the household saving ratio increase from 11.8% in March this year to 19.8% is going to be spent as soon as possible at retail stores:

There is good news for our economy, in that consumer spending has lifted sharply since the end of lockdowns, he told the National Press Club last week. Retail trade up 14.9% More than $5 billion spent on last Fridays Black Friday sales, up 50% on the previous year.

During the pandemic, household savings have risen by $28390m, thats $1,100 saved for every Australian.

The irony of Joshs change of heart is that he wants us to delegate the decision on where our money goes to someone else.

In July 2019, when he was facing the worst economic decline in Australian history at -6.8%, he informed The Guardian, Its not for me to tell the Australian people how they should spend their money, thats for them to determine their priorities Theres an expectation that as household incomes are boosted, so is household consumption, but people have their own priorities.

To the extent that punters heed his call, they will transfer both their savings and the decision about what to do with it, to shopkeepers.This is where Josh wants the money to go; the Liberal small business base. A bonus for Frydenberg is that every dollar spent adds to GDP too.

Once the shopkeepers have it, they will decide who gets how much. In fact, business owners have already decided how much goes to wages and suppliers (variable costs) and how much goes to landlords and their banks (fixed costs).

Its really a simple plan. Shopkeepers need the money and they are far wiser than you at deciding where it should go.Spend your savings and Joshs accounts will look great when they next come out on 1 March 2022.

Money that goes to the bank does not help GDP. It produces few goods or services; it doesnt turn up in Joshs Treasurer Measurer scoresheet.

The favours have been made for the Liberal Party funders, the big businesses which make donations. The Election war chest is in. Some $40bn in JobKeeper waste, billions in liquidity for the banks, that all helped on the corporate welfare front to deliver money to buy votes, along of course with another government record, the record amounts spent pork-barrelling.

So, with big business onside, small business that represents the Partys voting base has been rewarded with low wages and a gig economy for cheap and flexible labour. It only remains now for Australians to get out there are spend their savings.

To that end we might expect to hear little about inequality that doesnt sell or low wage growth and soaring debt but plenty about retail sales and a December quarter bounce-back in economic growth. And jobs, jobs, jobs. The labour market is tight. The scene is set. Over the coming weeks we will examine the other planks of Coalition election tactics.

See the original post here:

Treasurer Measurer: exploding the Liberal election myth of superior economic managers - Michael West News

Senior Liberals say the pending findings of a corruption inquiry into Gladys Berejiklian will have no bearing on whether the former NSW premier decides to run federally in Warringah.

Ms Berejiklian is weighing up the possibility of running in the northern Sydney seat two months after resigning from the top job when the Independent Commission Against Corruption revealed she was being investigated over whether she breached the public trust or encouraged the occurrence of corrupt conduct during her secret relationship with disgraced former MP Daryl Maguire.

Former NSW premier Gladys Berejiklian is considering a tilt at federal politics. Credit:Nick Moir

The Herald reported that nominations for the seat had been pushed back to January 14 specifically to give Ms Berejiklian more time to weigh up her options.

The ICAC will not report back publicly before the January date but on Sunday a senior Liberal who did not wish to be identified due to the sensitive nature of the talks said the corruption watchdogs inquiry was not a consideration for Ms Berejiklian in whether she runs.

Loading

The feds clearly dont care and I dont think the public cares either, the Liberal Party source said. The ICAC has clearly made up its mind, everyone knows what its going to say.

The main question is does she really want to throw her life back into politics after a massive five years [as premier]. What does she want for this next chapter?

Ms Berejiklian had told those in the party two weeks ago that she was not prepared to take on independent Zali Steggall in a bid to win back a once safe Liberal seat. But another Liberal source said she has walked it back considerably in recent days.

I have no idea why, they said. But two weeks ago it was, not doing this, no way.

More:

ICAC not a consideration as Liberals say Berejiklian shifts thinking on federal tilt - The Sydney Morning Herald