Daily Archives: December 7, 2021

Christmas Is Almost Here, and | Jonathan MS Pearce – Patheos

Posted: December 7, 2021 at 5:43 am

its all about commercialism. Specifically, buying my books. Especially the one on the Nativity. Please help to support my work!

I have written a number of books over the last few years. Here they are listed with links to Amazon; below you will find more detail:

Lets start with a few of my latest ones.

The first book to exhibit is my case for atheism and against theism: Why I Am Atheist and Not a Theist: How to Do Knowledge, Meaning, and Morality in a Godless World. If you want to know what I believe and what I dont and why, and why you should too, this is the book for you.

While Jonathan MS Pearce has written a whole suite of books that have produced a barrage against theism, in this book, he pulls a number of threads together that build up a case for his own entire worldview. This book is not just about why atheism is a more rational position than its counterparts, but it also builds the foundations for a sound epistemology (theories about knowledge and truth) and morality from the bottom up. Pearces account for reality has far-reaching consequences that cover many bases, from God to guns, personhood and abortion to racism, and why he thinks his positions on these subjects are rational.

InWhy I am Atheist and Not a Theist, Pearce tackles all of reality in an accessible manner, presenting a cogent case for why he concludes as he does, and why you should too.

Pearces clear writing and charming wit allow even those unfamiliar with philosophy to enjoy this deep dive into a non-theistic worldview. He lays out a humanistic, naturalistic philosophy that is not only epistemologically sound and logically coherent, but enjoyable to read. This book serves as a wonderful introduction to the philosophy of irreligion, where ones ideology is not just defined by an absence of beliefs, but instead by the presence of better beliefs. Dr Caleb Lack, author ofCritical Thinking, Science, and Pseudoscience: Why We Cant Trust Our Brains

This collection of essays is the best introduction to the debate between atheists and theists in the market today. With both gentle humor and admirable rigor, Pearce makes technical philosophical terminology clearly understandable to the uninitiated reader, and then persuasively lays out a very convincing case for his clearly defined concept of naturalism. A must for anyone just starting to engage with the philosophy of religion! Gunther Laird,The Unnecessary Science: A Critical Analysis of Natural Law Theory

Pearce has written an engrossing treatment of some of the most compelling questions of human existence. This book skillfully builds a worldview that is based on scientific naturalism in a way that is highly accessible to the non-philosopher. Virtually every page will make you think. Dr. Joseph Berger, author ofScience and Spirituality.

The Resurrection: A Critical Examination of the Easter Story is a part of a trilogy of books eviscerating the foundations upon which Christianity is built, together withThe Nativity: A Critical Examination and a forthcoming book on the Exodus. Here is the description and a few of the fantastic reviews it has garnered:

The Resurrection story is integral to the Christian faith; its truth has been crucial for Christians since the inception of the belief system. But did the events reported in the Christian Bible actually happen? How do the claims made by the authors look in light of careful historical analysis? Are the Gospel claims internally coherent? Do Christian believers have justification in believing the chapter and verse of this most famous of miraculous stories?

Jonathan MS Pearce looks at all of the problems with the Easter story in the same way he analysed the Nativity accounts in the sister bookThe Nativity: A Critical Examination.This later book is a diligent examination of the Easter story, the claims, the likelihood of truth, and what may have been the original events that inspired the biblical writers and believers to write and believe what they did. And still do. Historical, philosophical, and biblical exegetical analysis are woven together to form a terminal case against the accuracy, and ultimately truth, of the Easter story.

[I]f you want to take such a belief seriously, read this thoroughly documented terminal case against the resurrection based on the latest research! This is the only book youll need. Pearce is your expert guide on all the essential issues. John W. Loftus, author, and editor ofThe Case against Miracles

Jonathan MS Pearce puts the resurrection genie back in the bottle (and the body back in the grave). If you are digging for truth, this book is a goldmine! Dan Barker, author ofGodless

This book is the definitive starting point for anyone intent on questioning or defending the resurrection of Jesus. Introductory and aimed at a broad audience, but thoroughly researched, all the key works are here cited and arguments addressed, and with sound reasoning. If this book cannot be answered, belief in the resurrection cannot be defended. Dr. Richard Carrier, author ofJesus from Outer Space: What the Earliest Christians Really Believed about Christ.

My second book remained within the philosophical realm, but this time concentrating on philosophy of religion, namely the characteristics of God.The Little Book of Unholy Questionsis described as follows on the cover:

Jonathan M.S. Pearces second book (after Free Will?) continues along the same philosophical and theological vein, aiming to provide a cumulative case against the existence of God, and more specifically, Gods triple characteristics of omniscience, omnipotence and omnibenevolence. Split into useful categories with an introduction to each category, these are questions that demand to be answered adequately and plausibly in order for the believer to retain a rationally-based faith. Pearces easy writing style and explanation of philosophy, theology and science on the popular level make this book as enjoyable to read as it is thought-provoking. Does God change his mind when prayed to, and why has he never produced a miracle since biblical times that couldnt have occurred naturally anyway, like re-growing an amputees leg? God only knows.

Pearce demands from God a rational explanation to all of the problems that seem illogical or incoherent. These are damningly challenging inconsistencies in the Christian narrative that necessarily antagonize any rational reader. If you are still or used to be Christian, The Little Book of Unholy Questions is an overview of the critical questions you need to be asking yourself. Derek Murphy, Jesus Potter Harry Christ

And a review selected from the great reviews on amazon:

Easy reading with a profound content

by S.P. Sider

I met Jonathan in a couple of forums over the internet. When the subject is religion and philosophy you surely expect passion and hot debates. But Jonathan stood apart for his calmness and patience, probably due to his teaching background.

When I learned he wrote this book, I decided to give it a try.

And it was worth it! Dont be fooled by his philosophy background. Thankfully you will not see any logic equation that would be pretty boring. Its all in plain English. The format is very interesting: Questions and comments well mixed. You may find some questions very funny, but very often the funnier are the most profound.

Its a book for the believer and non-believer. And thats very difficult to achieve, a definitive plus. Jonathans intention is thought provoking and its a must for believers who dare to ask questions, and I am sure I made dozens of them when I was a believer. And non-believers will find a bunch of questions they never thought about.

My suggestion: read it slowly, taste every question for a couple of minutes. You wont regret it.

My third book moved towards a different discipline: historical analysis and biblical exegesis, being a synthesis of the work analysing the historicity of the nativity accounts of Jesus birth in the Bible.The Nativity: A Critical Examinationis described as follows:

The nativity of Jesus is an event that carries much cultural recognition. However, is it a narrative which commands much support in the academic world? Is it a story which holds much historical truth? Or were the two biblical accounts of the birth of Jesus an opportunity for the authors to impart a theological truth or otherwise? These are the sort of questions that are often asked of the nativity accounts and questions which are answered in this concise and yet well-researched and informative book. Some twenty arguments are looked at and presented in a clear and detailed manner, building a cumulative case for the objection to the historical nature of the Gospel accounts. The author also questions what purpose these stories do serve if indeed they do carry little or no historical truth. With reference to a wide array of contemporary and iconic works on the subject, Pearce has created a compendium of critical arguments against the historicity of a story which still remains a vital piece of our collective cultural and religious tapestry.

For anyone beginning to doubt the reliability of the gospels as eyewitness accounts, Pearces The Nativity will teach you everything you need to know to move past the limitations of biblical infallibility and explore the complicated process that went into the gospel narratives of Jesus Christ. Derek Murphy, author of Jesus Potter Harry Christ

And a review from amazon:

Did you think you knew the nativity story

By ungodly

When was Jesus born? What was his birth date? Where was he born and why was he born there? Who knew of his birth? How is Jesus related to biblical characters past? Who thought that baby Jesus was the messiah and why? What important historical events do you expect we should have records of if the bible accounts were accurate?

If you think you know the answers to these questions, think again.

Jonathan Pearce points out how, despite the heartwarming Christmas pageants we are all familiar with, there is no real cohesive narrative regarding the birth of Jesus. It appears that when they originally calculated the year of the nativity in the 6th century, they were averaging two different years as estimated by the two very different accounts of Jesus birth given in the bible both of which seem purposefully manufactured to make Jesus birth match the description of the messiah foretold in Jewish prophesy.

Step by step, Pearce shows us how it is impossible for both biblical accounts (Luke and Matthew) to be true, and, as we delve into the finer details of each account, it become increasingly obvious that neither account comports with historical facts.(How can a star guide the three wise men towards the birth site when a star would move across the sky as the earth rotates and disappears during the day? Why do people think there were three wise men anyway when that is not mentioned in the bible?)

If the Christian would not accept specious reasoning to suffice as an explanation for another religions miraculous claims, this book should give a clear understanding as to why an outsider rejects the bibles miraculous claims. The Jesus story doesnt make sense from the get go.

This little book is a must-read for Christians brave enough to consider whether their beliefs could be as mythological as conflicting faiths. Its also a gem for those outside the Christian faith who want to know whether Christianity is built upon a coherent narrative. This, however, is most definitely is not a book for those afraid that their god will damn them to hell unless they believe in the inerrancy of the bible. Before you read this book, ask yourself, If the nativity story is a myth, would I want to know?

Next isBeyond an Absence of Faith:Stories About the Loss of Faith and the Discovery of Self.

Leaving ones religion behind, walking away from faith, is never an easy journey. With family, friends, jobs, and every aspect of ones life to consider, the decision is not to be taken lightly. This anthology is made up of sixteen fascinating, and at times moving, accounts of such decisions, and the consequences they entail. Whether it be Christianity, Islam or any other life-impacting worldview, leaving it can be a difficult ordeal. This collection details the trials and tribulations, the joy and liberation involved, by people from various walks of life and corners of the globe.

Heartfelt, it offers hope to those equally questioning, and understanding to those who themselves question the motivations of these often brave people.

Here is a review:

Pearce and Vick have brought together a diverse group of voices with one thing in common they have moved beyond being former believers into being active participants in humanity. Each of the stories shared is unique, but former believers will find something they can identify with in every one. From the pain of separation from friends and family, to the joy of being liberated from a sexist mindset, to the harsh reality of having to find a new career in the middle of your life because you have embraced reason, these personal stories help to reinforce for the non-believer that you are not alone in your journey. Instead, you are walking a path many have gone down before, and you can take solace in knowing that these authors have been there as well.

For13 Reasons to Doubt, I took on an editing role as well as contributing a chapter on free will. This is a great book because it offers a great variety to the skeptical reader.

Extraordinary claims and extraordinary evidence.

The mainstream and social media feed our minds a diet of fringe science and outright pseudoscience. They relentlessly stream paranormal, supernatural, and otherwise extraordinary claims. Where do all these come from? Theyre spread by shysters and charlatans, by corporate propagandists with cynical eyes on the bottom line, by priests and preachers of all kinds, by axe-grinding cranks and ideologues, and frequently by well-meaning dupes.

This may be a scientific age, but all too often, science, well-grounded scholarship, evidence, and logic are ignoredor even denied.

Scientific skepticism offers a corrective: skeptics defend science and reason, while demanding the evidence for extraordinary claims.

In this volume, we offer you thirteen ways to scientific skepticism: thirteen reasons to doubt extraordinary claims. The authors discuss groupthink and cognitive biases, science denialism, weird archeology, claims about religion and free will, and many other topics. Within these pages, there is something for anyone who wants to avoid biases and fallacies, cut through the masses of misinformation, and push back against fakers and propagandists.

This review sums it up nicely:

Informed skepticism is one of the most important ways of looking at the world, and Thirteen Reasons to Doubt does a wonderful job of illustrating the need and the challenge of this intellectual virtue.

The essays contained in this short, accessible, charming read challenge some of our dearest notionsfor examples, free will, the prevailing attitudes of the groups with which we identify, the trustworthiness of our own abilities to work out problems, and moreand ask us to look at them without simply taking them at face value. As philosopher and skeptic Russell Blackford articulates in his essay, which is written with his usual eloquence and care, we have a heavy burden of intellectual honesty in our current age, one in which propaganda runs rampant in favor of ideologies and faith still stands strong. It is to save ourselves from ourselves when it comes to this peril that informed skepticism proves its worth, and the collaborators on this enjoyable book illustrate clearly what it means, how to cultivate and guard it, what it implies, and how to use it even upon ourselves for self-correction when our biases start to lead us astray.

Each of the contributors, not only Blackford, does a superb job writing with clarity and passion in their areas of expertise, presenting a thought-provoking contribution to several important conversations at once. Thirteen Reasons to Doubt is ambitious and unpretentious, a friendly and welcoming guide of sorts to spotting bull, doubting yourself, and becoming the better thinker for it.

I found Thirteen Reasons to Doubt to be a pleasurable, accessible, quick, and edifying read on the position of informed skepticism, and I heartily recommend it to any who wish to push the clarity of their thinking and their intellectual integrity.

Although there are some books to be released early this year, I have also released a reasonably priced ebook:

This book sets out a cumulative case that puts classical theism, the belief in an all-powerful, -knowing and -loving God, under the spotlight. God is left wanting as Pearce brings together previous blog writing, adapted pieces and original writing to hammer home the point: classical theism is incoherent. This ebook is perfect for armchair philosophers, Christian apologists, and interested atheists and theists everywhere, as well as packing a solid philosophical punch suitable for the more philosophically inclined reader. Something for everyone.

The Problem with God intends to put classical theism under the spotlight and on the rack, and that is a goal that it achieves in one concise essay after another. It constitutes a welcome addition to any library of philosophical challenges to the classical, philosophical conception of God, and for that purpose and all need remaining to it, it is pleasantly recommended. James A. Lindsay, author of Dot, Dot, Dot: Infinity Plus God Equals Folly.

A review reads:

Think of this as Jonathan Pearces greatest hits all compiled together. He is one of the most interesting and convincing philosophers of modern times. Some of my favorite posts are here, which I have at my fingertips when I need its resource.

It was somewhat difficult to read this on my phone, I dont usually read kindle books, I prefer old school books, but I managed to just finish it.

These blogs are fascinating, deep and well written and persuasively convincing of why theism fails on several accounts. The choice of topics are amazing, and no one can deliver this as good as Pearce can.

If you are a Christian, you wont find this book rude or obnoxious, it is fair, well balanced and I encourage you to give it a chance. Challenge yourself, for no one will challenge you better than Johnny can.

Excellent selection and content, and Johnny hits another home run

in 2016, I releasedDid God Create the Universe from Nothing? Countering William Lane Craigs Kalam Cosmological Argument,which is a critical look at the Kalam Cosmological Argument and how it supposedly concludes that the universe had a cause (i.e. God).

The Kalam Cosmological Argument is a simple argument:

Everything that begins to exist has a cause for its existence;The universe began to exist;Therefore, the universe has a cause.

Apologists love to use these three short lines to argue that God is the cause of our universe. Jonathan MS Pearce takes the argument to task and finds it seriously lacking, despite its common appeal. Sounding the death knell for the Kalam, this is a must-have counter to the well-worn religious argument advocated by famous Christian thinkers such as William Lane Craig.

This is a beautifully crisp and clear introduction to, and discussion of, the Cosmological Argument. Suitable for beginners but also those who want a more insightful and detailed discussion. This is an ideal book for students, and indeed anyone who is interested in what remains one of the most popular arguments for the existence of God. Stephen Law, Reader in Philosophy at Heythrop College, University of London and head of Centre for Inquiry UK.

Pearce has again delivered, treating the important topic, the notorious (and bad) Kalam Cosmological Argument, in a concise and erudite way. James A. Lindsay, Ph.D., author of Dot,Dot Dot: Infinity Plus God Equals FollyandEverybody Is Wrong About God

If youve read enough about Kalam to be intrigued and want the thorough takedown, this book is for you. Bob Seidensticker, author ofCross Examined: An Unconventional Spiritual Journeyand theCross Examinedblog at Patheos.com

...remarkable. He has written an accessible, yet philosophically sophisticated, critique of the Kalam Cosmological Argument. he makes some novel contributions to this literature in the course of his analysis. If you have teethed yourself on popular discussions of atheism and religion, and now want to feast on something a little bit meatier, this is the book for you. John Danaher, PhD, Lecturer in Law, NUI Galway (Ireland), and author of the blogPhilosophical Disquisitions.

With his latest bookDid God Create the Universe from Nothing?,Jonathan Pearce has collected a vast array of the most powerful academic and popular-level responses to one of the most well-known cosmological arguments for the existence of God. Theists will be surely challenged by this wide-ranging book which seeks to put an end to this theistic argument about the beginning of the universe. Justin Schieber, public debater on the philosophy of religion, creator of the channelReal Atheology

The Kalam argument enjoys much respect that it doesnt deserve, and Did God Create the Universe from Nothing? gives the unsparing rebuttal that it does deserve. Pearce is a capable and confident Virgil, guiding us through the philosophical and scientific fine points of the response. If youve read enough about Kalam to be intrigued and want the thorough takedown, this book is for you. Bob Seidensticker, author ofCross Examined: An Unconventional Spiritual Journeyand the Cross Examined blog at Patheos.com

The first book I wrote is called Free Will? An investigation into whether we have free will or whether I was always going to write this book. As the annotation reads:

This book is a fine introduction into the age-old philosophical debate as to whether we have free will, or whether we live determined lives. Pearce approaches the subject in a lively manner, explaining terms clearly and using anecdotes to break down some of the heavier philosophy so that it is available to the popular philosophy reader. Now that we are understanding our genetic heritage and our neurology better, can we account for all our characteristics and decisions? The author also looks at how theories of free will and determinism integrate with religion, particularly Christianity. If we live under the illusion of free will, do religions need reassessing? How does free will work when God knows what we are doing in advance? Does God have free will? How does prophecy interfere with free will?How is our justice system affected if we know exactly why people commit crimes?These and other crucial questions are investigated with a deft touch, and the author uses recent and important scientific findings to support the text supplying a valuable overview to the subject.

It has received good reviews, such as this one:

Great, thought-provoking read

by Frances book lover

I recommend this entertaining and well-argued, mind-blowing book in which the author examines a notion we all seem to take for granted in the West, i.e., our dearly beloved notion of free will. In this book we learn that in spite of the overwhelming dominance of this cherished notion deeply embedded in our cultural, legal and religious belief systems, it is clearly scientifically and demonstratively false and does not exist. First, the author gives us the basic definitions of terms, then examples, philosophical and historical arguments, important religious positions and rebuttals. One of the authors early hypothetical examples is about a couple going out to dinner and trying to decide what to eat. To choose to have pizza, the couple has to rely on many reasons determined by a variety of known and unknown facts concerning their biology, psychology, economic status, childhood and the environment causing their preferences and showing their overriding susceptibility to these kinds of influences that leave no room for a free choice on their part. After the author brought up this couple for the third time, I had to put my Kindle down and go to the kitchen and heat up a pizza! I was falling under the discussions suggestion that pizza would taste pretty good right now and I realized I was demonstrating the authors point about human susceptibility to suggestion and lack of free will by my own spontaneous behavior!

The author convincingly shows that determinism is borne out in countless recent scientific discoveries in neuroscience, psychology, biochemistry, physics and genetics which new findings are important and have wide application in all aspects of our lives. There is a new dawn of knowledge exploding around us and our lives depend upon our absorbing many new scientific discoveries in many complex fields. We cannot blame a god or a devil for our circumstances; the author deftly dispatches them from the new matrix. We have to get with the new paradigm and look at how we can improve our critical thinking, how we can make better economic decisions, how we can use our new scientific knowledge to create new art, how we can see one another in a more compassionate light and how we may reform education and the criminal justice system. I recommend this book because we need to make a lot of informed decisions every day and we need all the rational help we can get to understand our common humanity and to develop the full power and beauty of our finite being.

Check it out using the link above or click on the book cover.

And finally, for now, is my first foray into fiction:Survival of the Fittest: Metamorphosis. The description is as follows:

No one seems to know where it started. Or exactly when. And certainly not how. But it is here, and everything that everyone holds dear falls prey to the ravages of the virus. Some are unaffected, and they must quickly come to terms with their new world a dystopian Britain in the early convulsions of collapse.

Follow a disparate collection of people as they fight for their lives in this first installment of the Survival of the Fittest series.

Where the journey will take them is anyones guess.

A frightening and credible zombie apocalypse. This is the way the world would endnot with a bang or a whimper, but with a snarl and the gnashing of teeth Rebecca Bradley, author of Cadon, Hunter and From Hades With Love

Pearces rollicking suburban adventure begs to be consumed and it wont let go until life is sucked from the final pages. Glenn Andrew Barr, author of Skin of Them

Johnny Pearce has written a shockingly good zombie story with a literary quality unfamiliar to the genre. Dont let the slow build fool youthe growing tension plays a vital role in allowing everything to snap with a most satisfying sort of frayed devastation. Once all hell breaks loose its a no holds barred gore fest! Tristan Vick, author of BITTEN: Resurrection and BITTEN 2: Land of the Rising Dead

The sequel is now out!Survival of the Fittest: Adaptation[UK] follows on from where the last left off.

Set immediately after the events ofSurvival of the Fittest: Metamorphosis, and as the global pandemic has ravaged society, the disparate survivors are gradually brought closer together as they fight for their lives or seek out family and help. Ordinary citizens are thrust together and forced to make choices that they are not used to as they evade the viral victims of the outbreak.

Pearce writes dystopian horror not just with a punch but with thought as well, interweaving philosophy and thought-provoking moments into the genre.

Adaptationbegins whereMetamorphosisleft off, with a scattered cast of characters gradually finding each other-and finding ways to adapt to the terrifying metamorphosis of the world. As the storylines merge, we see how the good and the bad, the bright and the feckless, the brave and the cowardly, begin to change to meet the new challenges, or fall victim to their own inflexibility. An absorbing read, with glimpses of light and hope through the dark clouds of the new reality. Rebecca Bradley, author ofCadon HunterandFrom Hades With Love

And

Eerily prescient, breathlessly paced and wonderfully written, this is a sublime story of survival and friendship in the face of unrelenting horror. Its the human heart that sets this tale of a post pandemic apocalypse apart from others in the genre. The characters never feel falsetheyre endearingly flawed, reacting to the unfolding terror in ways you can genuinely relate to and sympathise with.

The writing, too, is a cut above much other fare in the genre. Pearce expertly weaves themes as diverse as the loss of parents and the existence of God in between scenes of suspense and creatures with a craving for human flesh.

The undead may be the propulsion, but the characters and their interactions are the engine of the story. You find yourself rooting for them, bemoaning each moment of peril and cheering each narrow escape.

If the first book was a slow burn of suspense, this sequel is a raging inferno of terror, burnin

g through the pages with a ferocity that doesnt let up from the first page to the last.

The greatest compliment to any book in a series is how eager you are to find out what happens next. When Id finishedMetamorphosis, I put the book down, took a deep breath, and asked when I could read the next installment.

If you like your horror well written with characters and situations you can believe and invest in, and a story that will have chewing your nails down to the quick, do yourself a favour and dive in. Andy Logan, Creative Director, FavOURite Productions.

Go here to see the original:

Christmas Is Almost Here, and | Jonathan MS Pearce - Patheos

Posted in Atheist | Comments Off on Christmas Is Almost Here, and | Jonathan MS Pearce – Patheos

Raised by Wolves S2 teaser reminds us why we loved the seriesuntil the S1 finale – Ars Technica

Posted: at 5:43 am

The second season of HBO's new original sci-fi series, Raised by Wolves is coming in February.

The first teaser for S2 of Raised by Wolves is here, and our feelings are mixed. On the one hand, once again, the visuals are amazing, and we're thrilled that the strikingly androgynous Danish actress Amanda Collinis returning to star as Mother. Her extraordinary performance anchored the first season's narrative arc and spooky, otherworldly vibe, and that same moody, disquieting vibe is present in the teaser.

On the other hand, we were seriously disappointed in the S1 finale, which has shaken our confidence that S2 will rebound from that fiasco to become the genuinely original and visionary series it initially promised to be.

(Major spoilers for the S1 finale below.)

The series was created by Aaron Guzikowski, with Ridley Scott serving as executive producer and directingthe first two episodes. As I've written previously, the story involves two androids serving as Mother (Amanda Collin) and Father (Abubakar Salim) figures on a strange virgin planet, Kepler-22b(an actual observed extrasolar planet), after Earth has been destroyed by the outbreak of a religious war. They are programmed to incubate, birth, and raise human children to rebuild the population and set up an atheist civilization to keep the human race from going extinct. It's a harsh, dangerous environment, even for androids, and only one of their original six children survived: Campion (Winta McGrath).

Then the remnants of an extreme religious sect from Earth found their way to the same planet. Known as the Mithraic, they worship Sol and came to 22b aboard a spaceship, or ark, called Heaven. The reconnaissance team tried to abduct Campion and kill Mother.

That's when we discovered that Mother has special abilities: she's actually a reprogrammed weaponized android called The Necromancer, who once slaughtered atheists back on Earth. Her deadly sonic screamswhich can disintegrate humans in secondswere turned on the Mithraic, and she crashed their ark into the planet. Her new maternal instincts led her to bring the surviving Mithraic children into her fold.

That did not go over well with the few surviving Mithraic, especially Marcus (Travis Fimmel) and his partner, Sue (Niamh Algar). They were determined to rescue their (technically adopted) son Paul (Felix Jamieson) from Mother and Father, against the orders of Mithraic leader Ambrose (Awissi Lakou). The various conflicts inevitably escalated, and the planet itself has its own mysterious secrets and hidden dangers, withthe fate of the human race ultimately in the balance.

YouTube/HBO Max

Some viewers found the pacing of Raised by Wolves S1 to be too slow, but I genuinely found it atmospheric and weird in interesting waysuntil the finale. Mother became pregnant after having virtual sex with her VR creator, "downloading" the required information. Except instead of giving birth to a baby as she'd hoped, Mother literally vomited up a creepy, sucker-coated snake thatI kid you notcan fly with no obvious means of generating lift. In my review, Icalled it"a jarring, over-the-top ploy that simply wasn't sufficient payoff for the viewer, and clashed mightily with the original set-up."

Apparently the flying alien sucker snake (FASS)which had rapidly grown to an alarming size in the final sceneis going to be a major part of the overall narrative arc for S2. This was not welcome news, especially since the ultimate fates of Mother and Father remained ambiguous. Fortunately, this teaser confirms that the pair will be back in full force for the second season, and there's barely a hint of the FASS to be seen, apart from a brief glimpse of a snake figure painted on a rock.

YouTube/HBO Max

It's not clear what's happening in terms of plot, but the teaser opens with a shot of a badly injured Mother. "Androids can change, just like human beings," her voice tells us. Father also has survived, along with the children and Sue.Marcus appears to be devolving into the strange creatures Mother and Father first encountered on the alien planet, and he hasn't become any less zealous and violent. He still has some minion survivors to boss around and is still intent on "bringing purity to this planet."

Something violent seems to be reawakening in Mother as well, although her primary purpose is still to keep her children safe and find them a new home. The teaser ends ominously. "Perhaps we are becoming too human," Mother muses, covered in what might just be blood. Will she reappear in her full Necromancer glory? That would be a sight to see.

The second season of Raised by Wolves will premiere on February 3, 2022, on HBO Max.

Listing image by YouTube/HBO Max

View original post here:

Raised by Wolves S2 teaser reminds us why we loved the seriesuntil the S1 finale - Ars Technica

Posted in Atheist | Comments Off on Raised by Wolves S2 teaser reminds us why we loved the seriesuntil the S1 finale – Ars Technica

A horrible truth behind today’s big abortion case – WORLD News Group

Posted: at 5:42 am

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization today. Its a landmark Supreme Court case, one that challenges and could potentially result in the overturning of Roe v. Wade, thus restoring the ability of states to regulate abortion as they see fit.

However, Dobbs is not only about protecting unborn babies in the womb or empowering states to make their own laws on abortion; it also presents an opportunity to challenge the unchecked racism of the abortion industry.

That industrys history of racism should be well-known to the Supreme Court. Justice Clarence Thomas, the Supreme Courts only black justice, has repeatedly pointed out abortions deadly impact on black lives. In his concurring opinion in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., Thomas stated the dark truth behind the abortion industry quite clearly: Margaret Sanger started Planned Parenthood to eliminate black lives.

Thomas was right. In a letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble, Sanger outright admitted that we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population. For Sanger, abortion was a tool, a means to an end; Planned Parenthood was created to stop black families from reproducingeven if that meant killing black lives in the womb.

But Planned Parenthood didnt emerge in a vacuum; it was part of a broader culture of racism and eugenics in America. Around the turn of the 20th century, states across the country started passing laws encouraging those believed to possess superior genes to reproduce and those with inferior genes not to reproduce, sometimes by coercion. It was clearly racist, but several states developed targeted eugenics programs. These included such practices as forced sterilization of the disabled and of people of certain ethnicities. When the Supreme Court infamously ruled these programs were constitutional in Buck v. Bell, they began to proliferateespecially in the South.

Eugenics programs became so common that they acquired folk names. Mississippi, in particular, is infamous for the Mississippi Appendectomy, a form of routine, forced sterilization performed on black women without their consent, and often without their knowledge. Given Americas struggles with racism and segregation, it should come as no surprise that Americas eugenics programs disproportionately targeted and impacted black men and women.

The abortion industry continues that legacy today. Abortion is the leading cause of death for black Americans. And that is by design; nearly 80 percent of Planned Parenthoods clinics are within walking distance of poor black and minority communities. Despite making up just 13 percent of the population, black women undergo around 40 percent of the nations abortions.

This is what makes the Dobbs case so important. Challenging Roe v. Wade, and the pro-abortion judicial regime it created, this case is our opportunity to reckon with the racism built into the abortion industry. By asking the Supreme Court to reconsider the judicial precedent set by Roe v. Wade, Mississippis Attorney General Lynn Fitch is giving us an opportunity to fix the wrong of eugenics and combat the systemic racism still prevalent in the abortion industry today.

We cant afford to wait. The judicial regime established by Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey gives legal cover to the abortion industrys systematic campaign to eliminate black lives. Millions of black babies have died from abortion. And unless Dobbs is successful in challenging the Roe/Casey regime, millions more will die in the years to come.

The stakes couldnt be higher. Thats why nearly 80 amicus briefs have been filed in support of Mississippi in Dobbs v. Jackson. And thats also why I was immensely proud to lend the voice of the Frederick Douglass Foundation, my own organization, to the dozens of other organizations submitting briefs in defense of a pro-life ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson.

So much of the contemporary conversation around abortion focuses on unhelpful euphemisms like reproductive autonomy or reproductive rights. We need to be more direct than that; we have to call the abortion industry for what it is: a racist institution that targets and harms black lives and black communities. Ending the ability of that industry to operate largely unchecked is one of the most important civil rights issues of today.

Original post:

A horrible truth behind today's big abortion case - WORLD News Group

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on A horrible truth behind today’s big abortion case – WORLD News Group

CU’s Spiro announces he is retiring | Local News | rutlandherald.com – Rutland Herald

Posted: at 5:42 am

CASTLETON The Vermont State Colleges System Board of Directors announced Monday that Jonathan Spiro, interim president of Castleton University, will be stepping down in just over a month.

Spiros departure has been called a retirement effective Jan. 3, 2022.

According to a news release issued by the college late Monday, Spiro has given nearly 20 years of service to Castleton University and the Vermont State Colleges system as a faculty member, administrator, and most recently as Castleton University interim president since May 2020.

In the release, Chancellor Sophie Zdatny noted, President Spiro is known for his collaborative approach, his thoughtfulness, and his sense of humor. ... Spiro dedicated the majority of his professional career to Castleton as a faculty member, administrator, and leader. We are grateful for his service, professional expertise and contributions, and his community engagement, and we wish him well in his very deserved retirement.

Castleton Universitys provost, Thomas Mauhs-Pugh, has accepted the position of interim president. He spent 22 years at Green Mountain College, where he served as provost and vice president of academic affairs, interim president, dean of the faculty, education department chair, and as a professor of education.

In the release, VSCS Board Chair Lynn Dickinson stated, I offer my sincerest thanks to President Spiro for his many years of service to Castleton University and the Vermont State Colleges system.

She said Spiro led Castleton through a tremendously challenging time as it navigated the challenges of the pandemic and the resulting impacts on students and employees. She said he established the Center for Teaching and Learning at Castleton; fostered a rise in student retention; and steered Castleton through their 10-year accreditation visit from the New England Commission on Higher Education, among many other accomplishments.

When I reflect on President Spiros long career at Castleton, his time in the classroom as a professor of history, his notable research on eugenics, race, and American history, and his many successful endeavors as an academic dean and department chair particularly stand out. While we will certainly feel the loss of President Spiro at Castleton, we wish him the best in his retirement, she said.

According to the release, Mauhs-Pugh offered congratulations to Spiro on his coming retirement and stated, I am honored to serve Castleton University and its outstanding students. Our campus is positioned to thrive well into the future with strong enrollment, immense gains in first- to second-year student retention, and many new initiatives on the horizon. Adding its strengths to the proposed Vermont State University will expand access to Castletons programs and open new opportunities to our students from our sister institutions.

Read more:

CU's Spiro announces he is retiring | Local News | rutlandherald.com - Rutland Herald

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on CU’s Spiro announces he is retiring | Local News | rutlandherald.com – Rutland Herald

Resisting The Gatekeepers Of Hell: Gandhi, ‘Vaccine Passports’ And The Great Reset OpEd – Eurasia Review

Posted: at 5:42 am

In 1906, in response to the British Administration in the Transvaal, South Africa passing the Asiatic Law Amendment Act designed to enforce registration of the colonys male Asian population, Mohandas K. Gandhi led a group of fellow satyagrahis (nonviolent activists) to defy the just-introduced pass law: they publicly burned their passes. In the seven year campaign that followed, thousands of Indians were jailed (including Gandhi himself) and activists were flogged or even shot for striking, refusing to register, burning their registration cards, or engaging in other forms of nonviolent resistance. Nevertheless, the campaign was eventually won.

More than 100 years later, citizens the world over (not just in one country or region) are already being required, or will be shortly, to carry a pass, this one ostensibly signifying vaccine status but, beyond this, to be used as part of a sequence of measures designed to track movements and control behaviours. Given its role in the package of measures launched as part of theWorld Economic Forums Great Reset, including those critical to implementation of the fourth industrial revolution along with the associated measures in relation to transhumanism, cyber polygon and eugenics, the vaccine passport threatens an intrusion into the lives of citizens vastly more heinous than the passes the Transvaal government intended and to which Gandhi objected so strenuously.

Hence, national societies and the international community currently lurch rapidly towards a world in which individual identity, freedom, rights, privacy and even volition are destroyed as the Global Elite implements its long-standing plan to create a New World Order in which the very meaning of the word human is under threat. Moreover, we have been promised that, by 2030, we will own nothing and we will be happy about it! SeeYoull own nothing, and youll be happy.

So why isnt everyone vigorously resisting the World Economic Forums Great Reset and its related measures?

Misunderstanding what is happening around the world at the moment is understandable. Misrepresenting what is happening through misunderstanding it is also understandable.

However, it certainly makes it difficult to get the truth out there when blatant and persistent lying is being used by relevant international organizations (notably including the World Economic Forum, the United Nations and the World Health Organization), national governments, the pharmaceutical and medical industries, and the corporate media to terrorize people into believing that a virus that has never been isolated and proven to exist seeCOVID-19: The virus does not exist it is confirmed!,Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)andNo Record Found:FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (137 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever is killing substantial numbers of people and that we need several experimental gene-altering injections (that are, in fact, killing substantial numbers of people), for the rest to survive! See, for example,The Truth about the Covid-19 Vaccine,A Final Warning to Humanity,COVID Shots to Decimate World Population, Warns Dr. Bhakdi,Finally! Medical Proof the Covid Jab is MurderandAbstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning.

As Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Minister of Propaganda from 1933 to 1945 noted: If you tell a lie, tell a big one.

Of course, on the surface it may appear that it is simply ignorance of the evidence and relevant data that has most people unaware of what is really happening. But this is only true in the most superficial sense.

After all, given the monumental nature of what has taken place over the past two years with virtually everyones life profoundly upended, ostensibly because this was necessary to combat a virus claiming that people submitted to government direction out of ignorance and/or trust in the relevant authorities is to miss something fundamental.

People who are being deceived by the elite-driven narrative almost two years into this crisis are, in fact, terrified. This terror is invariably unconscious: that is, it is suppressed below conscious awareness. But it is the true explanation of why a narrative that is so fundamentally flawed, with extensive evidence available to those who seek it, continues to maintain its dominance over the truth.

So why are so many people so terrified of investigating what is really happening, and responding accordingly?

Because each human being is unique, the individual is born with a powerful evolutionary gift: Self-will. This means that the individual has an incredible range of tools, including the capacity to apply sensory perception (sight, sound, touch) to observe what is happening, the emotional capacity to feel what this means (is it satisfying, enjoyable, frightening, infuriating), to consider evidence and think for themself about the significance of it, to compare and contrast it with relevant memories, to gauge it against ones conscience and so on until an integrated sense of how to behave in response is formulated and then acted on.

If a person is doing this then we might describe them as Self-aware. And they are, truly, an individual.

However, in the name of socialization, parents terrorize children into obedient submission to those people identified as authorities and this ranges from the parents themselves as well as teachers and religious figures in the childs life to those institutions that will later play vital, if largely invisible, roles in profoundly shaping the adult life of every individual: international organizations, governments and corporations (including corporate medicine and the corporate media), as well as legal systems, all of which are controlled by the global elite.

As just one outcome of this terrorization which I have elsewhere labeled, with comprehensive explanations, visible, invisible and utterly invisible violence: seeWhy Violence? the individual who can genuinely think and investigate for themselves, critique society in any meaningful way, engage emotionally with the ramifications of what they learn, and then act to resist injustice courageously and strategically is all too rare.

In fact, because of the experience of childhood terrorization, virtually all children are compelled to surrender the essence of these various capacities, and hence their Self-will, by a very young age. In these circumstances, the child becomes a malleable instrument, easily transformed into a victim who is now devoid of the capacity to look deeply within themselves to make sound judgments about what is taking place and to behave powerfully in response.

Instead, they simply obey the will of another: parent, teacher, religious figure, employer, corporate executive, political leader. and act more out of habit than consideration. Given the endless violence (usually labeled punishment) that is inflicted to ensure that children are obedient to others, rather than allowed to follow their own self-will, it takes an extraordinary child to survive with even a semblance of the potential with which they were born. As a result, most human behavior lacks consideration, conviction, courage and strategy, and is simply driven compulsively by the predominant fear in each context.

For elaboration of this explanation, seeThe Disintegrated Mind: The Greatest Threat to Human Survival on Earth,The Psychology of Victimhood: Obama, Cameron, Netanyahu, Clinton, KissingerandFearless Psychology and Fearful Psychology: Principles and Practice.

A primary outcome of this childhood terrorization experience in materialist cultures is that the child learns to suppress their awareness of how they feel by using food and material items to distract themself. By doing this, the child rapidly loses their emerging self-awareness and learns to consume as the substitute for this awareness. Clearly, this has catastrophic consequences for the child, their society and for nature (although it is immensely profitable for elites and their agents whose Self-awareness is non-existent). For a fuller explanation, seeLove Denied: The Psychology of Materialism, Violence and War.

In essence, a victim is utterly terrified and powerless. These feelings are unconscious to the victim, which is why they are incapable of intelligently seeking out and personally assessing evidence (such as that in relation to Covid-19 and how it is being used) and they simply submit without protest once told to obey.

An equally important outcome for the victim is that they have little, if any, capacity to see beyond themselves or their immediate concerns (which might include an activist preoccupation). They are incapable of perceiving and considering the wider ramifications of what is taking place the big picture such as the impact on those millions of people who are experiencing mental health problems, sexual and/or other forms of violence, unemployment, poverty, homelessness, starvation or even being killed outright by official responses to the non-existent pandemic. Any sense of a wider self, of human solidarity beyond the most superficial kind, is incomprehensible to them.

Moreover, among those who can penetrate the elite-driven delusion in relation to the injectables, the most significant effort is dissipated in petitioning and lobbying governments as well as protesting against governments, as the elite intends. Of course, governments, elected or otherwise, are simply the tools the elite uses to control the various national populations (either by deluding most people into believing that they live in a democracy or simply by subjecting them to dictatorship) so effort directed at governments is the equivalent of treating the puppet as the puppetmaster: virtually always, a complete waste of time, as the historical record demonstrates. SeeKilling Democracy Once and for All: The Global Elites Coup dtat That Is Destroying Life as We Know It.

Of course, it is this terrified submission to authority that the elite is relying on to compel the bulk of the human population to submit to the death needle, given its crucial role in implementing their depopulation agenda. SeeKilling Off Humanity: How the Global Elite is using Eugenics and Transhumanism to Shape Our Future.

However, for those left alive, the intention is to use their submission to turn them into transhuman slaves who are even more readily monitored and controlled. SeeBeware the Transhumanists: How Being Human is being Re-engineered by the Elites Covid-19 Coup.

Hence, as the global elite progressively implements its agenda to kill off a substantial proportion of the human population and turn the bulk of those left alive into transhuman slaves, it can rely on those who are submissively obedient to act as its agents against those who are not. And this is crucial for its agenda to be achieved.

Simply because, in the end, it is not just the technological measures at its disposal now or in the future that will enable the comprehensive surveillance and behavioural control they desire to be achieved. It is because the Global Elite can rely on those too terrified to critique what is happening, and to act powerfully in response, to monitor and try to control the behaviour of those around them. Whether by requiring businesses to have us wear masks, register QR codes, prove vaccine status, pay with plastic cards and not cash, and so on, governments are effectively using certain sections of the population to control the others. And, often, unwillingness to do so is neutralized by threat of financial penalty or imprisonment for non-compliance.

Even more deeply, governments are requiring members of families to discriminate against each other on the basis of vaccine status.

And this is how it has always been. Just ask the Nazis in Germany in World War II whose relative lack of technological means was no impediment to social control. Managing how peoples fear is projected is always the key, just as elite propaganda is used to project peoples fear to support deployment of the US/NATO war machine against an endless sequence of enemies.

Jews, Gooks, Muslims, a virus, unvaccinated it doesnt really matter what. Just identify where the fear is to be projected and use propaganda to focus it. There are plenty of unconsciously terrified people out there who wont challenge the narrative.

Unfortunately, then, those around us, ranging from family members and friends to our employers and the businesses we visit, become the gatekeepers, effectively deciding who can visit whom, and who can or cant go about their daily routine. Aldous Huxley and George Orwell would be impressed with how easily their dystopian visions have been realized.

And this will jump a giant notch upwards with the introduction of vaccine passports, far more intrusive and controlling than the passes that Gandhi found so objectionable more than a century ago. Hence, ever more draconian measures by governments will ensure greater levels of submission by those who are terrified: The gatekeepers of hell.

Fortunately, among those who are more courageous, there is considerable resistance already. However, we need to expand this and also get it onto a more strategic footing so that it functionally undermines the power of the Global Elite to conduct this coup. And dont assume that the Global Elite will back off. It is criminally insane. SeeThe Global Elite is Insane Revisited.

So, once again, our liberation strategy must thwart those key measures of their coup that would give them the control they want. This will not be easy because we must mobilize millions to act strategically. Mass mobilizations, like most of those that have been conducted so far, can have no impact against the Global Elite unless they are used to identify and inspire strategically-focused acts of nonviolent resistance that are ongoing.

For an integrated strategy to defeat the elite coup, see theWe Are Human, We Are Freecampaign, which has 29 strategic goals for defeating the coup including meaningful engagement with police, military forces and mercenaries to assist them to understand and resist, rather than support, the elite agenda. If you want to read more detail, you can do so atNonviolent Defense/Liberation Strategy.

But for a simpler presentation, see theWe Are Human, We Are Free 7 Days Campaign to Resist The Great Reset. One-page flyers in English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Italian and Spanish, outlining essential nonviolent actions that we must undertake, can be downloaded from this link. Other languages are being added as they become available.

The Telegram group ishere.

In addition, it will be invaluable if you make yourself increasingly self-reliant as the mechanisms that you have been seduced into becoming dependent upon are progressively and rapidly being taken away. SeeThe Flame Tree Project to Save Life on Earth.

And if you have the chance to talk to someone about what they think is going on, try listening! SeeNisteling: The Art of Deep Listening.

We have a choice. We can choose to resist, strategically, now, while we can still make choices.

Or we can watch as homo sapiens continues to be decimated and those left alive lose those very qualities that define humanity.

There is no third option.

Gandhi and his fellow activists resisted passes far less intrusive more than a century ago. Are you going to resist these now?

This article was also published at Transcend Media Service (TMS)

Read the original post:

Resisting The Gatekeepers Of Hell: Gandhi, 'Vaccine Passports' And The Great Reset OpEd - Eurasia Review

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on Resisting The Gatekeepers Of Hell: Gandhi, ‘Vaccine Passports’ And The Great Reset OpEd – Eurasia Review

Opinion: As Lara Logan’s former producer, I was stunned by her recent comments – The Globe and Mail

Posted: at 5:42 am

Fox commentator Lara Logan.Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images

Peter Klein is the executive director of the Global Reporting Centre and professor at the University of British Columbia.

This week, Fox News commentator Lara Logan went on the air to criticize the U.S. response toward the COVID-19 pandemic, which is being led by President Bidens chief medical adviser, Dr. Anthony Fauci. Fair enough we should certainly be debating those policies in an open forum.

She then shared this gem: What you see on Dr. Fauci this is what people say to me, that he doesnt represent science to them. He represents Josef Mengele, referring to the Nazi doctor who experimented on Jews during the Second World War.

As the child of Holocaust survivors, whose cousins, aunt and uncle died in Auschwitz the camp where Dr. Mengele worked I cant help but take offence to such a comparison. The notion that a physician who has helped millions through his role as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as well as adviser to seven U.S. presidents, would bear any resemblance to a torturer who peddled eugenics and pseudoscience is, of course, ridiculous.

But I also come to this as Laras former producer at 60 Minutes, where we worked on stories about national security and war, and my first response, after eye-popping disbelief, is what I often said to her in the newsroom: show me the facts. She said on the Fox program, I am talking about people all across the world are saying this. Who are these sources who are widely comparing Dr. Fauci to Dr. Mengele?

Of course, there are no such sources, beyond perhaps a small circle of far-right activists she may be associating with these days.

My phone and inbox have been overflowing with questions from friends, colleagues and strangers, asking if Lara was always this way. Let me set the record straight: no.

Its true that Lara tried to push the envelope sometimes, but theres a system in place at reputable news organizations that keeps journalists in check. I remember a heated argument with her in the edit room, in which she insisted on calling the Iraq-based terrorist group Tanzim Qaidat al-Jihad fi Bilad al-Rafidayn by the shorthand Al Qaeda. I pointed out that this group, often referred to as Al Qaeda in Iraq, is not the group founded by Osama bin Laden. The conflation of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan with Sunni terrorists in Iraq is precisely what we, as journalists, had the responsibility to set straight with the public and policy makers. While the groups founder did pledge allegiance to Al Qaeda in 2004, I said that calling them the same thing would be akin to saying the Beatles and Wings were the same band. She changed the script.

The Lara I worked with was a good reporter. She was brave and curious, she listened during interviews and she knew how to tell a good story. While she did her share of pieces that glorified the U.S. military, she was also open to critiques, as in our 2007 story Dissension in the Ranks, which looked at service members refusing to redeploy to Iraq over their concerns about how the war was being run by the Bush administration.

Thats not the Lara we saw emerge two years ago. After she was put on leave by CBS News over a discredited report on the Benghazi attack, she went on an obscure right-wing podcast run by a retired Navy SEAL she had previously profiled, to excoriate the media for what she perceived as liberal bias. I called her out in private over the comments, and she listened respectfully but, nevertheless, she persisted. She has gone on to host a streaming show with the ironic title Lara Logan Has No Agenda, and she pops up occasionally with controversial comments that keep her relevant.

The risks of these comments go beyond destroying her reputation. It fosters skepticism in scientifically sound health policies, and it feeds the attacks on Dr. Fauci, whose life is in constant danger because of this kind of propaganda.

The other question I get is does Lara really believe the drivel she peddles? These days, she strikes me more like Sacha Baron Cohen playing the character Borat, when he got a bar in Arizona to sing along with the refrain Throw the Jew down the well. Or like in his recent film, when he got the crowd at a pro-Trump rally to sing Dr. Fauci, what we gonna do? Inject him with the Wuhan flu! Playing to a gullible audience.

Thats the sort of radical populism that has kept Laras crowd stirring, and has kept her career alive. But when it comes to her credibility as a fact-based journalist thats dead.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

View post:

Opinion: As Lara Logan's former producer, I was stunned by her recent comments - The Globe and Mail

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on Opinion: As Lara Logan’s former producer, I was stunned by her recent comments – The Globe and Mail

The History Of Science Fiction utterly fails to live up to its title – The A.V. Club

Posted: at 5:42 am

Illustration: Djibril Morrissette-Phan

The setup to The History Of Science Fiction is fairly straightforward: Guides, most of them fictionalized versions of significant white men from science fictions past, elaborate on the history of the genre for two robots in a futuristic museum. As comics are the art of sequentiality, a graphic novel purporting to be the sequential history of science fictionput out by the publisher of so much seminal sci-fi, no lessis likely an intriguing prospect for many comics readers. Presented with an index and a list of principal art sources, the book is clearly attempting to be of some academic or referential use, on top of its wider appeal. But the English translation of Histoire De La Science Fiction fails utterly as a proper historic workand worse, ends up functioning as weak hagiography.

D-

D-

Djibril Morrissette-Phan

Mark Waid and Amanda Lucido

Bruno Lecigne and Eric Marcelin

Which is a shame, because the art shines throughout the book. Its especially wonderful when recreating the angles of famous shots from sci-fi films. In fact, in terms of visuals alone, The History Of Science Fiction would be a commendable work. There is a literal timeline that runs through the bottom of some pages and highlights various sci-fi works, usually relevant to the content on the rest of the page.

Unfortunately, the book also claims to be the history of science fiction; but it only really presents the history of Western science fictionand a skewed version, at that. More precisely, it primarily functions as a history of science fiction from France, the U.K., and the United States. The notable writers and editors to which the comic team gives literal voice are primarily from those locations, with writers from other countries serving as little more than window dressing. For example, though objects and ideas from Japanese sci-fi litter the futuristic museum, no Japanese author is given anywhere near the depth as writers from the aforementioned countries. Considering that one of the primary sources for this book is able to be precise about its purview (La Science-Fiction En France Dans Les Annes 50, or Science Fiction In France In The 50s), its a baffling decision on the part of everyone involved here to not specify thisespecially while calling itself history.

Additionally, there is an ugly tendency in the book to gloss over the more reprehensible aspects of the writers featured. At one point, a fictionalized version of British author Michael Moorcock updates a fictionalized H.G. Wells on the state of science fiction after his death. The book has Moorcock say, Although the Huxley family didnt always agree on everything, Julian (a renowned biologist who later popularized the term transhumanism), Aldous, and you, Herbert, were all staunch supporters of Darwinism and eugenics that would be of benefit to the human race. In contrast to the extremist eugenic ideas of the Nazis, for example. This statement is nonsensical; even if one accepts the possibility that the creative team wholly disagrees with eugenics but feels that Moorcockgiven the opportunity to speak with Wellswould say this, its presented without question, when in actuality there is no eugenics of benefit to the human race. It literally generates inequality.

G/O Media may get a commission

43% off

75" TCL Mini LED TV

Normally $2,300, the TCL 6-Series boasts a 4K QLED screen with Dolby Vision and HDR10+ and access to thousands of apps on Google TV.

Illustration: Djibril Morrissette-Phan and Xavier Dollo

Illustration: Djibril Morrissette-Phan and Xavier Dollo

Illustration: Djibril Morrissette-Phan and Xavier Dollo

Illustration: Djibril Morrissette-Phan and Xavier Dollo

There is brief mention of how the closed-mindedness of some lionized writers affected science fiction. For example, John W. Campbell is described as being marred by racism and rather questionable stances, particularly on pseudo-sciences such as scientology. However, while the book imagines and renders Campbells moments of brilliance in illuminating flashbacks, it does nothing of the sort with his racism, even though those noxious beliefs equally shaped the science fiction of his time and place. Choices like these make The History Of Science Fiction seem absurd as a serious historical work.

Finally, the book comes off as confused about how the history of science fiction has resulted in its present. It quotes Rebecca F. Kuangs Hugo acceptance speech, outlining what she would tell a new writer of science fiction: The chances are very high that you will be sexually harassed at conventions, or the target of racist microaggressions, or very often just overt racism. Yet six pages earlier, it features a hagiography of Harlan Ellison that omits his very public 2006 groping of fellow Hugo winner Connie Willis (there is literally footage of the incident).

By not mentioning this, the book itself contributes to how the larger culture of science fictionthat results in sexual harassment at conventionsis maintained, permitting acts of sexual harassment and assault. The Kuang quote continues, with her saying, the way people talk about you and your literature will be tied to your identity and your personal trauma instead of the stories you are actually trying to tell. By including this specific comment by Kuang, who is only mentioned in this instance, and whose work is never discussed, is The History Of Science Fiction not doing exactly what she is decrying?

Go here to see the original:

The History Of Science Fiction utterly fails to live up to its title - The A.V. Club

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on The History Of Science Fiction utterly fails to live up to its title – The A.V. Club

13 Jordan Peterson Quotes that Will Help You Conquer the …

Posted: at 5:42 am

Considered by many to be the modern mans Virtual Father, Dr. Jordan Peterson jumped into the public light almost overnight.

His opinions on feminism, free speech, masculinity, and philosophy have garnered both praise and ridicule and turned the formerly quiet Professor of Psychology from the University of Toronto into one of the most divisive characters in public discourse.

He stands out because he not only has thought-provoking ideas that challenge the status quo but is highly educated and works with some of the top universities in the world which serves to further solidifies his arguments.

Whatever your beliefs about Dr. Peterson, the fact remainsthe man has wisdom to share and value to offer.

And today, I want to break down what I believe to be some of the best Jordan Peterson quotes on the internet.

These quotes from Dr. Jordan Peterson will provide insights into the realities of modern life and force you to analyze yourself and your challenges in a new light.

Andif you take them to heart, they might just change your life.

So without further ado, here are the 13 Jordan Peterson quotes that will make you a stronger, wiser and more grounded man.

The Antidote to Chaos: 13 Jordan Peterson Quotes that Will Make You a More Grounded Man

Of all the poignant and incisive Jordan Peterson quotes, this is one of my favorites. Because all too often we live our lives for the present moment. This is not to say that we are present in the moment, rather that we focus on the pain and pleasure caused by our actions today instead of considering the long term ramifications of our decisions.

Little decisions made to experience pleasure in the presentthings like skipping the gym, smoking a cigarette, staying home to play video games, or forgoing date night to stay late at the officedont seem consequential.

You know you shouldnt do them. But the instant gratification outweighs the far off consequences of your decision.

But when you consider the compound effect stretched out over a decade, youll begin to see the true cost of your lust for instant gratification. When you ask yourself, Where will my life be a decade from today if I continue with this pattern or behavior?, youll quickly realize the hidden dangers of doing what it easy over doing what is right.

Each day, you should seek to bargain with the future. To sacrifice a modicum of pleasure or comfort in the present moment for a plethora of pleasure in the future. Because it is the small decisions, repeated over the years, that determine the quality of your life.

In the famous words of Mark Manson, Everything is fucked.

The political landscape in the United States becomes more volatile, divisive, and crazy with every passing second. Our planet is placed under an ever-growing strain as greedy corporations pillage our resources for the sake of a quick dollar. Crime, corruption, and the degradation of the publics mental health serve as a steadfast reminder that, no matter how far weve come since our hunter-gatherer dayswe still have a long way to go.

Because of the problems in the world (and the promulgation of negative news), many of us are quick to criticize and lambast the world and its leaders. But one of Jordan Petersons more insightful quotes reminds us that, no matter how bad the world might be, we are in no position to criticize it until we have set our own lives in order.

We complain about the national deficit while ignoring the $30,000 in credit card debt weve racked up with frivolous spending.

We criticize corporations and leaders for their apathy toward the environment while we ourselves continue to engage in destructive activities that pollute and destroy the planet.

We criticize others for lying, cheating, and greedfailing to notice the hypocrisy as we too lie, cheat, and chase the almighty dollar.

Before you criticize the world or any other man, tend first to your own house. Set your world in order physically, financially, professionally, and emotionally and then you will have the requisite experience and wisdom to provide cogent criticisms of the outside world.

We live in a world of unprecedented ease and comfort. In the Western world, we no longer have to face the elements, contend with hunger, physically fight against animals or other humans for resources, or hike for miles on end to find clean water.

Everything we need (and most of the things we want) are available with the click of a button or the flick of a switch.

And its made us weak.

Our world is rife with men (and women) without spines. Men who are not only incapable of defending or providing for themselves but incapable of suffering the mildest of inconveniences.

To be a strong mana resilient mana grounded man capable of exerting his will on the world and achieving his deepest desiresyou must immunize yourself against discomfort. As Jordan prescribes, you must voluntarily expose yourself to your fears and discomforts.

Take cold showers. Get in the gym. Sign up for a boxing class and get punched in the face. Go to a wilderness survival retreat. Do things that scare you and cause discomfort and youll be a better, stronger, and more capable man as a result.

With the proliferation of social media, its easier today than ever before to allow the successes (real or imagined) of other people to paralyze us and decimate our self-esteem.

The second we feel like weve made it or finally achieved a big goal, a quick scroll through Instagram will remind us on no uncertain terms that we are a tiny fish in a very big pond. And the simple truth of the matter is that someone, somewhere will always be better, smarter, richer, or better looking than you are.

But heres the part most people miss.

Social media provides nothing more than a snapshot of ones success. And comparing yourself to another person without context serves no purpose. More often than not, youre comparing your Chapter 1 to someone elses Chapter 20.

You dont know their storyyou dont know the advantages with which they startedor the price that they paid to get to where they are.

So, instead of comparing yourself to others, compare yourself to the man you were yesterday. Are you kinder, stronger, more courageous, and grounded today than you were yesterday? That is the only question that matters.

Few men understand the true meaning of hard work. Im not referring to physical labor but rather to the experience of giving everything you have to a project or passion.

The simple fact is most men are dabblers. We pathologically half-ass our way from one career, business, or pursuit to the next, failing to go all out and risk everything in pursuit of our ambitions.

But at least once in his life, every man should shun this way of being and commit to something with his entire being. Whether met with failure or success, the experience of leaving nothing on the tableof exerting yourself to your fullest capacityof adopting the mindset I will either make this work or diewill leave you a stronger man who knows from experience what he is truly capable of.

All too often, we predicate our success on the attainment of some externalitya certain number in our bank accounta house in a specific neighborhooda stunning girlfriend with a perfect body

But we forget that success is not about someone outside of ourselvesits about who we become through the process of pursuing our goals.

I know countless men who seem to be winning. They have enough money to buy an NFL teama harem of beautiful women at the beck and callsix-pack abs and arms big enough to give Arnold a run for his moneybut they arent fulfilled.

Their success bred stagnation and they abandoned the pursuit of personal, professional, and spiritual growth long ago.

If you arent growing as a man (emotionally, spiritually, mentally, physically and professionally), you arent winning.

When its all said and done, growth is the only thing that matters. So commit to growth and trust that the rest will take care of itself.

As a species, we are quick to underestimate our capacity for evil, whatever form it takes.

We like to imagine ourselves as paragons of goodness and virtue and assume that whatever were doing is good because were the ones doing it (and can rationalize any action given enough time).

But the truth is, all of us, you, me, and everyone you know are capable of more evil than we possibly realize. The world can (and often will) break us all. And as Jordan points out, its only once we recognize and have firsthand experience with our capacity for evil, that we can fully appreciate and understand our capacity for good.

For example, the man who believes himself immune to addiction will be far more likely to experiment with narcotics (and put himself on a dangerous path) than the man who has suffered the pain of addiction firsthand and knows hes only one misstep away from drug-induced destitution.

Knowing your capacity for both good and evil causes you to be more temperedmore conscientiousand more aware of the influences in your life and the effect they can have on your future.

When you know the darkness that dwells inside of you, youll be more strongly drawn toward the light.

Most men live their lives as incurable ingrates. We bitch and moan about the traffic, slow Wi-Fi, cold food, and lackluster service without ever stopping to consider the millennias worth of effort that went into everything we take for granted on a daily basis.

To get to where we are today, humans fought, innovated, bled, and suffered for more than 200,000 years. Yet in our modern lives, we are quick to forget the price that was paid to bring us 4G, Chipotle burrito bowls, and yearly installments of Call of Duty.

Instead of complaining about the challenges of modern life, be grateful. You no longer have to fear death at the hands of once-common diseases like mumps, measles, or yellow fever. You dont have to spend days on end trecking through violent terrain to find your next meal. You dont have to worry about returning home to find your village pillaged and razed by a rivaling tribe.

Instead, you enjoy a life of relative safety and unprecedented ease. And when tempted to bemoan the challenges of life in the 21st century, take a moment to reflect and be grateful for everything that brought you here.

A little gratitude might just change your life.

This is perhaps my favorite Jordan Peterson quote of all time. And the reason is simple

Men today have lost their backbone, theyve lost the fire in their belly and the passion in their soul. Most men today arent living, theyre merely existing (and bleakly existing at that). Every day, they are given an opportunity to speak their truth, to stand their ground, to authentically express themselves and share with the world who and what they really are.

But they rarely take it. Through years of subconscious social conditioning, weve been taught to bite our tongues. To avoid rocking the boat. To play it safe and try to please everyone around useven when those around us need to be called out and held accountable for their words or actions.

Dr. Petersons quote that when you have something to say, silence is a lie, serves as a helpful reminder that it is your duty and obligation to speak up when necessary.

While others ignore injustice and bury their heads in the sand, it is your duty to speak up. To stand for your values and ethics. To make it known when boundaries have been crossed.

Anything else is a lie. And over the long term, those little lies will castrate and corrode your masculine spirit.

If you asked ten strangers the purpose of life, their response would likely be Happiness. And while happiness is something we all can and should pursue and choose (because make no mistake, happiness is a choice), it is not the end goal of life.

The true purpose of our lives, of all human life, is to do good. And the only way to do good is to find the greatest burden you can carry and then carry it.

While the particular manifestations of this purpose will vary from man to man (for example, not all of us can or should carry Elon Musks purported burden of saving the world), we all have a burden we have been called to carry. We all have a mission to achieve during our brief existence.

And the only way to achieve lasting fulfillment and a true and unshakable sense of peace is to carry our burdens and pursue our missions.

Your purpose is to be useful to your fellow man. To be the change you wish to see in this world. To right the wrongs to which you are subjected and to serve others with unrequited effort.

And if you will do thisif you will take up the mantle of servanthood and purpose, your life will be more magnificent and inspiring than you can possibly imagine.

Of the innumerable fallacies into which us silly humans fall, none is more egregious than the belief that anything in this life comes without a price.

No matter what decision you make, you are always paying a pricewhether youre conscious of it or not.

The decision to play small, stay safe, and stick to the status quo comes with the price of unrealized potential, boredom, and stagnant life.

The decision to go all out, take bold risks, and challenge the status quo comes with the price of being misunderstood, of suffering for years (possibly decades) in pursuit of the uncommon, and of facing judgment and ridicule from the very people who should support us.

No matter what you do, youre paying a price.

And the only decision that matters is what price you want to pay. You must pick your poison in this lifeto either suffer the pain of disciplineor suffer the pain of regret. There is no middle ground and there is no free lunch.

You must chooseso choose wisely.

Happiness, success, and lasting fulfillment are the province of those with clarity. A life lived haphazardly, without direction, without purpose, will always lead to disappointment, anxiety, and regret.

As such, every man must, at some point in his life, commit to a course of action. He must pick a goal, an ideal for his life, a path and a purpose, and stick to it no matter what.

A man without purpose, a man who has no direction in his life and no destination he is trying to reach, is like a leaf in the wind. He will be blown to and fro in the slightest gust and his lack of vision will derail his success and lead to unnecessary pain.

But when you know your purposewhen you have a clear direction for your life and a specific outcome you are trying to achieve, everything becomes easier.

You no longer have to labor over important decisions or spend each day wondering Whats next? Instead, you can wake up with clarity, knowing the purpose of each action and the end game of each pursuit.

Get clear on your purpose and your life will change forever.

Men today, more than ever before, are feeling the sting of obsolescence. With the unprecedented rise in gender equality (which is a good thing), men are no longer needed as providers and protectors the way they once were. And while feminism has served to confuse and confound men the world overno one has done more damage to modern masculinity than men themselves.

We no longer treat ourselves as if we matterwhether this has been caused by the rise in secular nihilism or the economic shifts following the feminist movement, the fact remains that men no longer treat themselves as if they matterbecause they feel as if they dont.

But the truth is you do matter. As cliche as it may seem, you are a vessel of limitless potential with the power to transform the very fabric of reality of forever change the course of human existence.

But the only way to reach your potential and fulfill your mission on this planet is to treat yourself like you matterto care for yourselfto prioritize yourselfto be selfish enough to give yourself what you need while realizing that it is only from a place of self love and care that you can love and care for others.

Wherever you are in your life today, I challenge you to prioritize yourself. To do the things youve always wanted to do, to treat yourself to the things you enjoy, and prioritize your own health, performance, and happiness as if they are the only things that matterbecause in your world, they are.

Self-love is the only antidote to the chaos of existence. And if you dont love and care for yourself and your own needs, you will cause unnecessary suffering both for yourself and others.

Do you want my help?

Thenclick here to watch my new client orientation to learn more about becoming a stronger Grounded Man, breaking free from nice guy behaviors, and creating a powerful social circle of likeminded men and a high quality romantic relationship.

Not only will you get tapped into your own band of brothers in my elite community of men, but youll also have access to the best damn course training available for men as well as weekly group calls with my team of transformative coaches. No whiny boys, complainers or dabblers, for serious men only.

If youre ready to push the boundaries of whats possible in your life and become the man youve always wanted to be. This is the fastest way to do it.

Visit link:

13 Jordan Peterson Quotes that Will Help You Conquer the ...

Posted in Jordan Peterson | Comments Off on 13 Jordan Peterson Quotes that Will Help You Conquer the …

Jordan Peterson to appear in Birmingham on Beyond Order tour – al.com

Posted: at 5:42 am

Jordan Peterson, a sometimes controversial author and social commentator, will appear at Birminghams Alabama Theatre as part of his 2022 tour.

The March 28 appearance, announced Wednesday by Red Mountain Entertainment and the venue, appears to be the only Alabama stop on Petersons Beyond Order tour. He will appear March 27 at the Saenger Theatre in Pensacola.

General public ticket sales begin at 10 a.m. Friday, Dec. 3, though Ticketmaster indicates that tour presales have begun.

The full title of the tour, Beyond Order: 12 More Rules for Life, refers to a 2021 book that is a followup to Petersons 2018 bestseller 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos.

Peterson, a Canadian academic and clinical psychologist turned social media star, has positioned himself as an opponent of political correctness and identity-based politics. This has fueled an ardent, largely right-wing fan base but has also led to accusations that Peterson at times merely puts a scholarly sheen on reactionary ideas, legitimizing misogyny and other discriminatory behavior.

For more information visit https://alabamatheatre.com/.

View original post here:

Jordan Peterson to appear in Birmingham on Beyond Order tour - al.com

Posted in Jordan Peterson | Comments Off on Jordan Peterson to appear in Birmingham on Beyond Order tour – al.com

The Tim, Jeremy, and Rajat Experience – Vulture

Posted: at 5:42 am

Just three galaxy brains. Photo-Illustration: Vulture; Photos by Tim Heidecker/YouTube

While half-checking your phone on Thanksgiving, you may have noticed that Tim Heideckers podcast Office Hours Live was on the air, but this was not an ordinary week for the talk show. In the special episode, Heidecker moderates a meandering marathon interview with comedians Jeremy Levick and Rajat Suresh. Wearing a ball cap with the logo for Elon Musks SpaceX, Heidecker serves up stoner-friendly questions like, How much can the brain absorb when it comes to new information?, and Levick replies simply by listing different parts of the brain in pulse-slowing monotone. Elsewhere, Suresh describes an Unsolved Mysterieslevel news story about the discovery of one of the devils horns, a topic that all three agree the New York Times would be too scared to pursue (Follow the money, Levick murmurs knowingly). Heidecker reads ad copy for Quad Core, a pyramid-scheme-seeming lifestyle health system that you can sign up for with the discount code Fuddruckers, which may draw your eye to a neon sign for the burger chain green-screened behind him.

If this reminds you of another podcast hosted by a certain UFC commentator and former Fear Factor host, youre right. Though hes booked interviewees as relatively innocuous as Neil deGrasse Tyson and Jay Leno, Joe Rogans hands-off style draws in guests who like that he wont push back on their rsums and responses, whether alt-right figureheads like Alex Jones or conspiracy-prone tech magnates like Musk, whose 2018 weed-toking appearance is invoked by Heideckers hat. But this hangout vibe also means that many Joe Rogan Experience episodes clock in at three hours or more, which is a long time to listen to anyone shoot the shit. This dull endlessness is the starting point for the Office Hours version: Heidecker, Levick, and Sureshs stream lasted for nearly 12 hours, an amazing stunt to witness in real time. While digesting turkey or a meat alternative, you could drop into the eighth hour of the show and hear Suresh explaining that humans can be considered animals on a cellular level.

In reality, the special loops an hour-long base video, but this feeling that they could go on forever makes the episode such a compelling (and funny) satire of Rogan. As the three comedians nail the lethargic tone of the Experience, everything that they actually discuss is patently ridiculous, spun from smart-sounding but meaningless buzzwords Levick says to Heidecker at one point, Im glad you said countercurrent, because its a sea change (whatever it is). Even if everything resembles the real JRE, each flimsy metaphor makes it harder to ignore the void at the conversations center. Theres a scene from Surrealist filmmaker Luis Buuels The Phantom of Liberty with a similar atmosphere: Characters attend a dinner party where toilets surround the table instead of chairs, but no one in the film views this as unusual. Instead of a visual gag, Office Hours punch line is conceptual; the joke might be on you if youre willing to listen to three weirdos talk for 12 hours about The Rock ruling the U.S. as a benevolent monarch.

That kind of obsession with formal detail, but with one major screw loose, is Levick and Sureshs trademark as a comedy duo. Theyre best known for their 2020 viral-video spoof conservative lecturer DESTROYS sjw college student: Levick plays a writer who pedantically eviscerates an audience question from Suresh about the moral compass of his book called Mr. Mouse Goes on a Fun Little Adventure to Happy Town (Define special mouse, Levick snaps repeatedly). Levicks pompous character was inspired by reactionaries like Ben Shapiro and Jordan Peterson, but instead of mimicking anything heinous that these people might say, the video lowers the stakes to the ground. Whats left is the underlying aggression that these particular exchanges share, now hilariously displaced into a heated argument over a cartoon mouse or, in a parody of an anti-masker bystander video, the message of When Harry Met Sally. Newly-minted SNL cast member James Austin Johnson does something comparable in his Donald Trump impression videos, in which he embarks on all sorts of free-associative tangents, like how Weird Al was mean to Coolio. Since he so closely replicates the real mans bizarre speech patterns, Johnsons videos feel like staring into Trumps erratic id, which gets at something less obvious than Alec Baldwins topical caricature. These comedians are more interested in unleashing toxic energy with pitch-perfect accuracy, a better fit for an absurd political reality that cant be rationally described.

Heidecker is the perfect partner in crime for this super-dry, committed brand of satire. Across all of his series with Eric Wareheim, hes made laser-precise parodies of infomercials, sitcoms, and, for the 2013 pilot of their horror anthology Bedtime Stories (20132017), a useless aftershow in the style of Talking Bad. The closest of his projects to the Rogan takeoff might be his epically scaled The Trial of Tim Heidecker from 2017, in which his character from On Cinema at the Cinema is on trial for murder. Directed by Eric Notarnicola, The Trial is nearly five hours long and stylized exactly like a live feed of court TV, but that aesthetic only makes its core psychodrama more perverse. At its heart, On Cinema is a soap opera about the power struggles of two incompetent film critics (Heidecker and Gregg Turkington), and in The Trial, their feuds look especially pathetic when they collide with the real world. The judge, lawyers, and jury have no frame of reference for a petty argument over which Star Trek movie was set in San Francisco, but they also seem powerless to stop this bizarre lore from swallowing up the legal process. As much as Heidecker has absorbed Trumps and Alex Joness mannerisms into his QAnon-prone, alternative-medicine-hocking On Cinema character, The Trial is more focused on the total inability of conventional systems to deal with his character and, in the end, he gets away with negligent homicide for selling faulty vape pens at a terrible EDM festival.

When Office Hours drains the center of The Joe Rogan Experience, whats left behind is a soup of directionless anecdotes and lamentations about cancel culture. Suresh worries that his stand-up jokes about Einstein in antifa might attract controversy, but Levick reassures him that this hour is valid and fucking funny. This also seems to be the premise of Rogans podcast: the possibility that each guests perspective could have a kernel of validity, and listeners are free to come to their own conclusions. By following Rogans format, Heidecker, Levick, and Suresh highlight something related: JRE episodes are mainly about unchecked rambling. Topics on deck could be as banal as Rogan and Musk vaguely spitballing about the future of AI, or as potentially harmful as misinformation about ivermectin and COVID vaccines. Whatever it is, its all delivered in the same casual, conversational tone. So when Heidecker talks about the therapeutic power of crab salts crystallized DNA from decomposed crabs which, if taken in capsule form, could provide complete immunity from disease and irreparably disrupt the pharmaceutical industry its important that this idea can jump out of the shows ASMR rhythm enough to make you laugh, jolting you awake from a multi-hour galaxy-brain session. If a perfect imitation of JRE can tap into its essence, Office Hours finds three men desperate to talk, but with nothing of value to say. And if that seems laughable, then its hard to see what might make it valid.

Original post:

The Tim, Jeremy, and Rajat Experience - Vulture

Posted in Jordan Peterson | Comments Off on The Tim, Jeremy, and Rajat Experience – Vulture