The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: November 19, 2021
The thought police have arrived with ‘trigger warning’ alarm that goes off at every offensive remark – Telegraph.co.uk
Posted: November 19, 2021 at 5:59 pm
Trigger warnings have been built into a new device developed for classrooms and social gatherings that sounds an alarm when it detects offensive language and jokes.
The lamp-sized gadget is an attempt to manifest political correctness as an ideology into a product, developers have said, and it is being trialled for potential use as a tool to moderate debate in settings like UK schools and universities.
Branded the Themis, the device is intended to be placed amid a debate setting and to emit a warning when it is triggered by the sound of banned language, racial terms and comments about body image.
Dinner parties and family gatherings could be also policed by the product, its designer has said, as the device could speak up for those at the table offended by certain topics of conversation and encourage self-critique in others.
Zinah Issa, who unveiled the product at Dubai Design Week, told The Telegraph: Through the use of speech recognition and sound sensors, we were able to program Themis to detect offensive terms and sentences - racial slurs, offensive jokes - through the microphone.
She added that extremely bothersome alarms triggered by such language last approximately two minutes, after which Themis turns off, allowing then an open understanding discussion among people on the possible trigger matter and the potential reasons behind Themis's activation.
Research is ongoing to see what terminology buyers would wish to have trigger the alarm on the Themis, which shares its name with a Greek goddess of justice and social order.
Research is also being conducted to assess the best market for the device, with an aim to explore its application in educational settings like universities, which faced calls for lecturers to issue trigger warnings ahead of teaching potentially offensive material.
Ms Issa, based in the UAE, said: Themis was designed to be placed in intimate social settings, such as dinner parties or family gatherings, because based on our research people are less likely to speak up when they get offended, unlike settings where people could be held accountable.
However, after exhibiting in GGS (Global Grad Show at Dubai Design Week) a lot of people were interested in having it in workspaces and even classrooms, so this is something that we want to develop Themis around.
Well plan on sending out more surveys to further understand Themiss target market and the audience it could reach and potentially testing it out within educational and work settings such as universities, schools and offices.
Remarks deemed offensive in educational settings have been a course of increasing controversy, with Prof Kathleen Stock recently subjected to a campaign calling for her sacking from Sussex University over her comments on gender.
Designers of the Themis are hoping to market the market product alongside hundreds of inventions and innovations unveiled at the annual Dubai Design Week, at which more than 500 companies have exhibited new work.
See the rest here:
Posted in Political Correctness
Comments Off on The thought police have arrived with ‘trigger warning’ alarm that goes off at every offensive remark – Telegraph.co.uk
‘The Sex Lives of College Girls’ on HBO Max is a hilarious, sexy treat from Mindy Kaling – Mashable
Posted: at 5:59 pm
College is supposed to be the best years of your life which may or may not be true (it's okay to peak later), but it's undeniably an exciting new chapter. For many, college is their first time away from home and family, a chance for reinvention and independence, no matter what you choose to do with it. College stories, a dime a dozen in Hollywood, tend to be fairly formulaic, but HBO Max's The Sex Lives of College Girls promises the rich, raunchy storytelling that this unique stage of life deserves.
Created by Mindy Kaling and Justin Noble, The Sex Lives of College Girls follows four first years at a prestigious Vermont college: Student athlete Whitney (Alyah Chanelle Scott), aspiring comedy writer Bela (Amrit Kaur), legacy brat Leighton (Rene Rapp), and the kind but naive Kimberly (Pauline Chalamet). They find each other the way so many college soulmates do: Randomly, in this case thanks to a dormitory assignment.
Despite a somewhat reductive title, The Sex Lives of College Girls is a rollicking good time and a rare TV show that really delves into the multifaceted and endlessly entertaining world of undergraduate shenanigans. Scott, Kaur, Rapp, and Chalamet have the kind of chemistry that lights up a scene and invites you in. Kaur's raucous energy and Chalamet's meticulous delivery run away with most of their scenes. Any combination of two or three of the girls works just as well as the full squad, like a Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants where the focus is also on other people's pants.
Female friendship :')Credit: HBO
Fans of the Kaling oeuvre will recognize her comic rhythms, on display here with a knack for subverting our first impressions of these characters. Demure Kimberly doesn't hesitate to stand up for herself, while prim and proper Leighton loves a good expletive. Bela is the most forward about her horny determination, but how it will manifest from a naked party to a library meet cute to a concerning power move to get a writing job will never be what you expect. There are pockets where the comedic tone shifts without warning, but the characters are at least at the same party (literally and figuratively) which sells those scenes instead of disorienting the viewer.
HBO provided critics with the first six episodes, during which the show is still uneven in handling the girls' individual journeys. Some are romantic or sexual, some academic, some socioeconomic or familial, but no one is written out fully enough to have it all. Whitney feels the most underwritten for the first half of the season, where the focus is on a predictable relationship more than her athletics, academics, or the pressure of being a Senator's daughter.
The show gets a little tenuous when it comes to such serious subjects: Whitneys life beyond romance, Kimberly's financial struggles, Leighton's journey to accept herself. The bones are there, but so is the modern comedy reflex to speak to progressive ideas but still comfort those who fear political correctness. Leighton's hours working at a women's center provide stereotypical hypersensitive depictions of LGBTQIA+ students that never really go away, even as she immerses herself in their world.
But Sex Lives is, simply put, a whole lot of fun. After a one-hour premiere the 30-minute episodes fly by in a whirl of frat parties, one-liners, and deeply relatable subplots like obsessing over an Instagram comment or corroborating lies to please parents. It might look exactly like your college experience or not resemble it at all, but anyone who was ever that age can relate to the infinite, terrifying possibility of newfound maturity or lack thereof.
The Sex Lives of College Girls is now streaming on HBO Max, with three weekly episodes Nov. 25 and Dec. 2, and the final two on Dec. 9.
Read the rest here:
'The Sex Lives of College Girls' on HBO Max is a hilarious, sexy treat from Mindy Kaling - Mashable
Posted in Political Correctness
Comments Off on ‘The Sex Lives of College Girls’ on HBO Max is a hilarious, sexy treat from Mindy Kaling – Mashable
The Every by Dave Eggers review big tech is watching you – The Guardian
Posted: at 5:59 pm
Earlier this year Dave Eggers announced that the US hardback of his latest novel, The Every, would not be distributed via Amazon, presumably recognising that it would be absurd to boost the fortunes of the omnipotent online retailer while at the same time setting out to satirise it mercilessly. I dont like bullies, he told the New York Times. Amazon has been kicking sand in the face of independent bookstores for decades now. But no novelist who actually wants their book to sell can avoid Amazon for long, and Eggerss boycott contained some fine print: unlike the hardback, the US paperback and ebook versions of The Every will be available on the US website, and there will be no restrictions on selling the UK editions. The Everys thesis is that big tech represents a 21st-century form of totalitarianism to which resistance can only ever be symbolic, and therefore futile. One might well wonder whether this half-hearted boycott was designed to prove that point.
Sign up to our Inside Saturday newsletter for an exclusive behind the scenes look at the making of the magazines biggest features, as well as a curated list of our weekly highlights
The novel is a follow-up to Eggerss 2013 dystopian satire, The Circle, in which Mae Holland joined the eponymous social media company, a mashup of Facebook and Google, and rose through its ranks. It opens after the Circle has acquired an e-commerce behemoth named after a South American jungle and rebranded itself as the Every hinting as it did at ubiquity and equality. This time, our heroine is Delaney Wells, who joins the company with the goal of finishing its malignant reign on earth. She plans to destroy it from the inside by seeding ideas so repellent that rational people will surely turn away in droves. Humanity, she reasons, will finally turn away from the endless violations of decency, privacy, monopoly, the consolidation of wealth and power and control.
One of Delaneys most diabolical suggestions is Friendy, an app that measures the trustworthiness of ones friends by analysing facial expressions, eye contact and vocal intonations, assigning a numerical value to the quality of the friendship: Think of how much more genuine and authentic our friendships could be if we just apply the right metrics to them. But other ideas begin to proliferate, among them the introduction of a beauty metric for paintings, music, poetry or any art form and an app called HappyNow? designed to answer, in real time, whether the user was happy. Not even the development of sinister surveillance technology, HereMe (a Big Brother version of Alexa), designed to pre-empt abusive behaviour in the home by eavesdropping for key words, is considered a step too far.
Eggers sets out an Orwellian vision of a near future in which big tech has transformed proud and free animals humans and made them into endlessly acquiescent dots on screens. The Every is housed on a California campus with the look of a hastily assembled film set. The wholesale adoption of Lycra (every curve and bulge articulated) is a running gag that symbolises the abandonment of individuality. Large screens propagate Every ideology: Sharing Is Caring; Secrets Are Lies; The World Wants to Be Watched. Employees, known as Everyones, are burned out from unrelenting surveillance in the guise of self-improvement apps that monitor everything from physical activity to political correctness. Consumers sacrifice privacy on the altar of an endless accumulation of apps.
All of this should paint a terrifying picture, but it doesnt (though I will concede that the possibility of eye-tracking technology that prevents you skimming War and Peace is genuinely scary). The problem is that none of the characters is given anything resembling a personality, let alone an arc except for the purpose of tracking when they start to give in to the Everys ethos. There seem to be no inner lives. Not only are the characters subordinated to the plot, but they are subsumed entirely by the novels polemic, so theres nothing at stake. The Everys other problem is that in the wake of big techs own self-parodying behaviour Amazons anti-union scandals, the Elon Musk-Jeff Bezos space race, Facebooks rebranding as Meta and launch of the Metaverse satire begins to feel redundant. (Meta surely proved this with those October launch videos that launched a thousand memes.)
Eggers is a gifted writer who couldnt write a bad novel; even if this isnt a great one, it contains several funny sequences threaded together with skewer-sharp sentences: Everything God offered answers, clarity, miracles, baby names the internet does better The one question that could not be answered, until now, is Am I good? And it does administer a sharp Juvenalian lampooning of big-tech venality, though this would be far more successful were it not also so lengthy. During Delaneys probation period, an Everyone says: No book should be over 500 pages, and if it is over 500 pages, we found the absolute limit to anyones tolerance is 577. This kind of self-conscious metafictional wink is an Eggers hallmark, but here it had the distracting effect of reminding me that there were still 370 pages to go to reach his self-allotted 577, which made the novel feel 370 pages too long.
The result of all this is that The Every is often entertaining, but not effective. It issues an urgent injunction to save humanity without ever really evoking the kind of humanity that youd remember after turning the final page the kind that may be the only weapon we have in the fight against big-tech totalitarianism. Early on, when Delaney ponders possible ways to destroy the Every from the outside, her friend Wes deadpans: Maybe one of us writes a novel. What a shame, then, that this novel feels like a damp squib.
The Every is published by Hamish Hamilton (12.99). To support the Guardian and the Observer, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.
See the original post here:
The Every by Dave Eggers review big tech is watching you - The Guardian
Posted in Political Correctness
Comments Off on The Every by Dave Eggers review big tech is watching you – The Guardian
An Archconservative Magazine Discovers Afrofuturism at the Met and Is Not Pleased – Hyperallergic
Posted: at 5:59 pm
Afrofuturism and the decline of our art museums nice use of the pronoun blares the headline of Gilbert T. Sewalls October 26 review in Spectator World, the international edition of the archconservative British magazine The Spectator. That imperious our gives the game away: The lesser breeds are desecrating the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the Capitoline Hill of high (read: White) culture.
Sewall is a conservative chronicler of American decline. He tut-tuts, in all the usual outlets (The American Conservative, The American Spectator, National Review), about the dire state of the nation, affecting that rueful but knowing tone every patrician right-winger aspires to. Imagine William F. Buckley in a toga, channeling Edward Gibbon in the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, and youve got the general idea:
The hill of the Capitol, on which we sit, was formerly the head of the Roman Empire, the citadel of the earth, the terror of kings . This spectacle of the world, how is it fallen! how changed! how defaced! The path of victory is obliterated by vines, and the benches of the senators are concealed by a dunghill.
Seventy-five and still fulminating, Sewall cranks out jeremiads like theres no tomorrow which there wont be, he assures us, if schools using children as critical race theory guinea pigs and Woke California (which is banning boys and girls toy sections in a monstrous scheme to erase gender) have their way. Now, hes spotted another sign of the end times: Afrofuturism in our Metropolitan Museum, of all places.
Before Yesterday We Could Fly: An Afrofuturist Period Room (2021) is a collaboration between the production designer Hannah Beachler, best known for her Oscar-winning vision of Black Panthers Wakanda; consulting curator Dr. Michelle Commander, associate director and curator of the Lapidus Center for the Historical Analysis of Transatlantic Slavery at the Schomburg Center for Research in Black Culture; and Met curators Ian Alteveer and Sarah E. Lawrence. The title alludes to African-American folktales about slaves who fled lives of bondage by (literally) taking flight. Beachler, Commander, and their collaborators use Afrofuturisms faith in the radical power of speculative fictions as their launch pad. Inspired by the 19th-century Black settlement of Seneca Village, which thrived a few hundred yards to the west of the Met until the city razed it in 1857, invoking eminent domain, to create Central Park, the installation imagines an alternate future for Senecas residents.
Its a magical-realist domestic interior where 19th-century household items from the Mets American wing, African objects from the same period, and works by contemporary African-American artists coexist in what the cultural theorist Saidiya Hartman calls a state of temporal entanglement the Afro-diasporic experience of historical time, in the world after slavery, as one in which the past, the present, and the future are not discrete and cut off from one another. As the curators note in their essay for the Mets quarterly Bulletin, the Afrofuturist period room invites museumgoers to recollect a disrupted past and reclaim an alternate future.
Sewall isnt having any of it. Before Yesterday We Could Fly comes from nowhere and no time and is therefore not really a period room, he grouses, with the irascible bafflement of Abe Simpson in an Oculus headset. Apparently, he didnt get the memo posted on the Mets website: Unlike these other spaces, this room rejects the notion of one historical period and embraces the African and African diasporic belief that the past, present, and future are interconnected Hes scandalized by what he sees as the curators flagrant disregard for historicism, denouncing them for abandoning their trust and abusing their artifacts. None of the objects I saw in the Afrofuturist period room, from the Dahomean royals staff, to the 19th-century Venetian glassware, to the nail-studded Kongo power figure, to William Coles Shine(2007), a witty exercise in Afro-surrealist bricolage that jigsaws a pile of shiny black high-heeled shoes into the uncanny likeness of a Cameroon mask, seemed especially abused. Of course, for Sewall any use other than the reverent display of worthy artifacts in context is abusive.
No surprise there: Conservatives want to conserve. If the dingy period room recreating the 18th-century bedroom from the Sagredo Palace, with its putti frolicking in the gloom, is the hill you want to die on, be my guest. But if you value history, shouldnt you value all histories? Yet Sewall begins his review with an eye-roll at the (for him) farcical notion of an Afrofuturist period room that transforms a 19th-century interior into a speculative future home of historically oppressed blacks and pours scorn, a few paragraphs later, on the rooms weepy, semi-fictional backstory of historical injustice.
He doesnt put historically oppressed and historical injustice in ironizing quotes; he doesnt have to. His readers will supply them. Far to the right and, if I know the Spectator, overwhelmingly White, they share Sewalls indignant contempt for the spirit of the times, as he calls it, when some in White America are beginning to confront the racism, personal and institutional, that is part of this nations DNA. For Sewall and his readers, the very idea of historically oppressed blacks, in this best-of-all-possible post-racial worlds, is just so much weepy, semi-fictional liberal bunkum.
Ceding one square inch of the culture-war battlefield say, a small room at the Met to a hopeful myth that rewinds the demolition of a Black community and imagines a more radically empowered future for its inhabitants is mere pander[ing] to the current vogue for racial justice. From that pinched, parochial perspective, an Afrofuturist period room cant be anything more than a scheme to provide a racial learning moment for a maximum number of museumgoers clearly a bad thing or, better yet, an anti-historical fantasy in the Disneyland of social justice, like, you know, the Jungle Cruise, with its spear-chucking, headhunting Africans.
But what really winds him up is the curators reckless shift from preservation to political messaging. This is pretty rich, coming from the Antonin Scalia of cultural commentary. Sewall is nothing if not a rank ideologue, from his media appearances as the expert face of the American Textbook Council an innocuous-sounding independent, non-profit, research organization launched in the Reagan 80s and funded by ultraconservative foundations as part of a far-right strategy to beat back multiculturalism and any reckoning with the historical legacy of white supremacism to decades of paleoconservative diatribes about the LGBT lobby, trannies (who are, he implies, mentally ill), the calculated and cynical outrage of Black student race hustlers mau-mauing the administration at UCSD, and the trauma of white Americans, badgered ceaselessly, told to renounce their heritage and confess ancestral sins by diversitys inquisitors.
Sewall wants to make the Met great again. Under the new director, Max Hollein, activism and anti-European prejudices are alarmingly ascendant. In a gauntlet-throwing break with the historical lily-whiteness of the Mets curatorial staff, Hollein hired Denise Murrell, who is African American, for the position of associate curator for 19th- and 20th-century art. (That makes three full-time curators who identify as African American out of approximately 200 yet more evidence of Holleins brazen anti-European prejudice, no doubt.) Even more alarmingly, hes commissioning works by artists of color: Wangechi Mutus imposing bronze sculptures of Afro-alien women with lip plates and cyberpunk headgear, The NewOnes, will free Us (2019); the Cree artist Kent Monkmans Resurgence of the People (2019), a high-camp send-up of Emanuel Leutzes Washington Crossing the Delaware (1851) that replaces Washingtons soldiers with a boatload of Indigenous people and displaced migrants and the general himself with the artists gender-fluid, high-heel-wearing alter ego, Miss Chief Eagle Testickle, whose name alone is enough to give Sewall fits.
Sewall yearns for the days when the Napoleonic director Philippe de Montebello kept an aristocratic eye peeled for outbreaks of political correctness and postmodernist trespassing across the border between high and low culture, worthy artifacts and now-art. But those days are behind us, and the mau maus and the trannies terms that mark the user, at this late date, as a dotard or a troll are inside the gates.
Right-wingers like Sewall will have to take courage in the Churchillian stoicism theyre always extoling and resign themselves to the decline of the Met another White Mans Burden, heroically borne.
Visit link:
An Archconservative Magazine Discovers Afrofuturism at the Met and Is Not Pleased - Hyperallergic
Posted in Political Correctness
Comments Off on An Archconservative Magazine Discovers Afrofuturism at the Met and Is Not Pleased – Hyperallergic
10 of the best Netflix new release series available this November – The Scotsman
Posted: at 5:59 pm
Theres never been more choice about what to watch, from TV shows and documentaries to films and original series.
With the start of a new month, and Christmas just around the corner, the new additions to Netflix in November promise to be binge-worthy.
Each month, Netflix introduces a wide range of new title to the platform.
Here are 10 of the best new shows and films on Netflix this month. In the UK, new shows and films will be available to stream at 8:01am on day of release.
This list is in no particular order.
Big Mouth has been a huge hit on Netflix, and season five is set to drop on bonfire net. Expect fireworks.
Photo: Netflix
Joe Exotic vs Carole Baskin - the biggest personal grudge of century. Wondering what has happened to Joe since his imprisonment? You'll be able to find out on November 17. Tiger King 2 is sure to be wacky and bizarre as ever.
Photo: Netflix
The fifth season of popular animation F is For Family see comedian Bill Burr and Emmy award-winner Michael Price, transport back to the 1970s, a time when political correctness, helicopter parenting and indoor smoking bans werent part of the character's vocabulary.
Photo: Netflix
Sure to be another Netflix hit, Hellbound is a story about otherworldly beings who appear out of nowhere to issue a decree and condemn individuals to hell.
Photo: Jung Jaegu | Netflix
Read this article:
10 of the best Netflix new release series available this November - The Scotsman
Posted in Political Correctness
Comments Off on 10 of the best Netflix new release series available this November – The Scotsman
Foundation episode 10 recap: clone wars and family reunions – TechRadar
Posted: at 5:58 pm
Huge spoilers follow for Foundation episodes 1 to 10. Youve been warned.
Its been more than three years since Apple took a gamble and announced its TV adaptation of Isaac Asimovs Foundation book series. The complex nature of Asimovs seminal works led many to believe it was unadaptable and, given how much Apple TV Plus latest big-budget show has diverged from its source material, you could argue that those initial beliefs were correct.
About this episode
- Episode 10 (of 10), 'The Leap'
- Written by David S. Goyer
- Directed by David S. Goyer
The Leap Foundation episode 10s actual title seems allegorical, then, given the leap of faith that Apple took in greenlighting David S. Goyers small-screen adaptation. But its been justified, with Foundation growing stronger with each passing week.
Wrapping up a seasons worth of plot threads while also laying the groundwork for season 2 may have been difficult for Goyer and company to pull off. After all, plenty has happened across its multiple storylines. However, Foundation episode 10 does a great job at both, delivering last-minute shocks and glimpses into the shows future narrative arcs.
So whats the state of play on Trantor? The Leap picks up where episode 9 left off, with Brother Day, having returned from Maiden, meeting with Brother Dusk to discuss the fate of Brother Dawn and Azura.
The conversation is tense, with Dusk strongly advising that the pair should be killed for their crimes. He goads Day for leaving, too, but Day bats away Dusks thorny comments with relative ease.
Days mettle is tested more when he meets Dawn afterward. Playing the good and bad cop, Day removes Dawns handcuffs before chastising him for conspiring with the enemy. Dawn bites back saying its Cleon Is fault that is, his desire to create a clone army to rule the Galactic Empire long after his death for originally putting them in this unsolicited position.
Its a valid point. The themes of choice and fate have been revisited time and again throughout Foundation. While Dawn and Day wouldnt exist if they hadnt been created by Cleon Is cloning program, they clearly question their place in the universe based on what theyve experienced in season 1. They appear to be going through an existential crisis, which is unexpected for clones that dont possess free will or a soul.
All of this makes for a pretty emotional scene and, given that their shared screen time has been limited so far, its also enjoyable to see Lee Pace and Cassian Bilton trade barbs. It feels like an argument a father and son would have a point forced home by Dawns claim that hes longed to call Day his father, even though theyre both clones of the same man. If thats not an unsettlingly warped relationship, we dont know what is.
Instead of taking his frustrations out on Dawn or Dusk, its Azura who bears the brunt of Days pent-up anger later on.
Initially, Day walks a similar good cop, bad cop line with Azura as he did with Dawn, but it doesnt last. Mocking her about the so-called legacy shell leave behind, Day eventually reveals how hell punish her for her crimes: every person that Azura has ever known, including her family, friends, former lover and colleagues, will be killed. That amounts to 1551 innocent people! With a flick of Days wrist, the horrifying deed is done. Everyone Azura loved is wiped out in an instant upon her own death, then, her legacy dies with her.
Its an incredibly ruthless decision. Does the punishment fit the crime? In Days eyes, yes. And, as viewers, you can kind of understand his stance from a preserving the status quo perspective. Still, its extremely harsh and is a reminder of the totalitarian attitude of the Empires rulers.
As for Azura? Shes locked away, constrained by shackles to stop her from committing suicide, and sensory shrouded for the rest of her days. Oh, and shell be kept alive by an intravenous drip. So thats the last well see of her.
And yet that isnt even the biggest jaw-dropping moment to occur on Trantor. Two more big shocks arrive in this narratives last main sequence, both setting up some tantalizing plot threads to be explored in the future.
With Azuras fate sealed, its Dawns turn to face the music. Brought before his elder brothers, Dawn is told by Dusk that, due to his differences and transgressions, hed already be dead if it was up to Dusk. With Day presiding over the Empires key middle throne, though, itll be him that decides Dawns fate.
Astonishingly, Day reveals that Dawn will be allowed to live. Delivering his verdict, Day suggests that his Great Spiral walk and meeting with other pilgrims on Maiden (which we saw in episode 8) did leave a lasting impression on him. He also explains that Halimas doctrine a soul incapable of change is a soul doomed to stagnation and Hari Seldons take on a similar belief system earlier in season 1 have reshaped how he views the Cleonic dynasty. Change, as Day puts it, is a good thing and its time for the clones to embrace it.
Furious, Dusk blasts Day for destroying Cleons legacy, and egotistically claims that history should bow to them. The duo fight as Dawn cowers in Eto Demerzels arms. Its clear that Day, who was Brother Dawn in episodes 1 and 2, was deeply affected by events he saw in those entries, hence his empathetic stance towards Dawn.
Its a courageous stance to take but, ultimately, one that doesnt matter. As Day and Dusk row, Demerzel snaps Dawns neck, killing him instantly. As a stunned Day and Dusk watch on, she tells them that shes loyal to the Cleonic dynasty and, as such, their pure bloodline must be maintained. Dawn, then, had to die.
Shocking as it is, its the culmination of events that have festered for some time. Ironically, its Demerzels programming, rewired so that shes loyal to the Empire, that condemned Dawn to death. It also speaks to how much faith shes lost in Day after their Maiden trip. Symbolically, its representative of a father losing his son, too: we saw how familial Day and Dawns relationship was earlier in episode 10 and Days distress at Dawns death is further evidence of this.
Distraught, Day burns Dawns body using the Empires disintegration device, before Shadow Master Obrecht arrives with more bleak news.
As it happens, Azuras gang didnt just change Dawns genetic makeup they altered every clones DNA, meaning that Day and Dusk could also be impure. Enraged, Day destroys the original Cleons glass tomb, symbolizing the start of the Cleonic dynastys destruction. Meanwhile, Dusk wrecks Dawns part of the Empires mural, and Demerzel rips off her human face in anguish for what shes done, revealing her subsurface robotic makeup. Fault lines have formed in the Empires usually tight-knit group and they may never be the same again.
By contrast, things on Terminus couldnt be more harmonious. Following his release from the Vault, Hari Seldons digital construct tells the assembled Terminus, Thespis and Anacreon crowd (and viewers by extension) why the latter two have been at odds for thousands of years. Simply put, Cleons first clone Cleon II killed Anacreons grand huntress millennia ago and blamed it on Thespis king to pit the planets against one another. That, Hari explains, prevented both kingdoms from leading a revolution against the Empire, which maintained the latters hold on everyone they continue to rule.
Next, Hari explains why hes an AI construct of his former self. Its a pretty convoluted explanation but, basically, the night before Raych murdered him, he swallowed a pill that contained millions of tiny self-replicating machines (we see Hari ingest the pill in episode 2). Upon his death and ejection from the Foundations main ship, these machines rebuilt his body with synthetic and natural materials to turn him into a digital construct.
Foundation spoiler-filled recaps
Its a lengthy exposition dump, but its necessary to understand Haris master plan. He adds it was always his plan to unite Terminus, Thespis and Anacreon. Now that they have the Invictus, they can use it to trick the Empire into thinking that the planets wiped each other out. This means that theyll no longer concern themselves with whats actually happening on all three worlds. That, Hari says, means that the trio of planets are free of Imperial rule and they can start building a fleet of battleships to go to war with the Empire in the distant future.
Admittedly, its all a bit fanciful from a plot perspective. Clearly, Hari is a very intelligent man with the ability to foresee things: its psychohistory, after all, which hes studied extensively.
Not for the first time, though, Foundation installs him as some messianic figure whos 10 steps ahead of the Empire and, as such, his plan cant fail. That reduces the stakes somewhat leading into season 2 and beyond, then, as we know everything has already been mapped out by Hari. Of course, any future Seldon Crises could throw a wrench in the works. But, for now, its slightly absurd that one mans predictions hold the key to overthrowing a tyrannical dynasty thats ruled for centuries.
Regardless, inspired by Hari, the three races band together and, over the next few months, set his plan in motion.
For Salvor Hardin, though, questions remain. Having asked Hari about why hes been guiding her in her dreams before he returns to the Vault he has no answers for her Salvor is none the wiser about why shes special.
That is, until she has another vision months later. Salvor deduces that the two children shes seen in her visions are Raych and Gaal and, following a conversation with her mother Mari, realizes that she must be Raych and Gaals child. Back in episode 2, we watched Gaal put her embryo in cryostasis. After Gaal is jettisoned from the Foundations main ship during episode 2s finale, Mari ends up being a surrogate for Gaals embryo i.e. Salvor.
Salvor decides to search for Gaal to get answers about her abilities, but not before she has touching goodbyes with Mari and Hugo. Based on these farewells, you get the sense that Salvor may never see them again. And thats definitely the case, based on how Foundations season 1 finale ends.
Episode 10s final sequence reunites us with Gaal. Her stasis pod, which left the Raven spaceship in episode 7, touches down on Synnax and she uses a self-assembling canoe to sail back home.
Tragically, though, her entire village has been destroyed. As Gaal had predicted earlier in the season, Synnaxs rising oceans would destroy its inhabitants if they didnt change their habits, and thats what plays out. Its a poignant moment: much like Demerzel, it seems that Gaal is the last of her kind.
Or so she thinks. A light catches her eye beneath the surface and, swimming down, Gaal discovers another stasis pod with someone inside. Rescuing the unknown individual, she takes them topside with the view of waking them up.
The following night, the individual wakes up and recognizes Gaal. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the person who was in the pod is none other than Salvor, who explains that shes been asleep for over a century waiting for Gaal. She reveals that shes Gaals daughter and then, removing her blanket, that shes in possession of Haris Prime Radiant. She goes to hand it to Gaal but, after the camera switches to a wide shot, the screen cuts to black. If nothing else, its exciting to see two of Foundations main characters finally meet. And we suspect that their journey together will form a major part of Foundation season 2.
The Leap is an enthralling final entry in Foundations first season. It simultaneously puts a cap on the series most tantalizing storylines and lays the foundations for plot points still to come. For a show that makes a big deal about some of its characters abilities to see into the future, that latter aspect will only become increasingly more important in season 2 and beyond.
If the past 10 entries have taught us anything, its that every word uttered or action taken has a purpose to it. And, as a culmination of everything thats come before, Foundation episode 10 proves this to be the case. Everything in this show has a consequence, or a cause and effect, and thatll continue to be a key strength of Apples adaptation moving forward.
Itll be interesting to see where season 2 takes these characters and the direction that its plot goes in. Aside from a few key story elements, Foundation has fully diverged from the source material so much so that itll be difficult to relate back to Asimovs works in the future. Apple's adaptation has become its own thing at this point but, as it charts its own path forward, it remains to be seen whether thatll be a good or bad thing.
For now, Apple can take comfort in the fact that Foundations first season was an overall success. Lacking Hari and Gaals foresight, its impossible for us to determine where Foundation goes from here. And that, whichever way you look at it, is exciting.
Foundation will return on Apple TV Plus for its second season. No release date has been confirmed as yet.
Read more:
Foundation episode 10 recap: clone wars and family reunions - TechRadar
Posted in Cloning
Comments Off on Foundation episode 10 recap: clone wars and family reunions – TechRadar
Student government seeking 1/3 student body vote for Constitution amendments The Stute – The Stute
Posted: at 5:56 pm
The Student Government Association (SGA) is proposing two amendments to their Constitution, requiring 1/3 of the student body to vote on them in order to pass.
The first amendment aims to allow members of the Cabinet to hold or retain officer positions in any other formally constituted campus organization, meaning that students would be able to simultaneously hold an e-board position in a student organization while also serving as an SGA Cabinet member.
Reasons for this change include a lot of the best candidates for the SGA Cabinet are students who are very involved on campus and know a lot about how Stevens student organizations run and since our terms align with the calendar year and most other organizations align with the academic year, this often creates an issue that there are students who would like to join the SGA Cabinet, but in order to do that would need to resign from their e-boards in the middle of their term.
The second amendment aims to change the quorum requirement for referendums of proposed amendments to the SGA Constitution from one-third of the Student Body to five percent of the Student Body. Currently, 1/3 of the student body at a population of 3,791 is 1,263 students. At 5%, only 190 students would be needed to pass amendments.
In an email to undergraduate students, the SGA stated that with the current quorum, it is nearly impossible to make any changes. By decreasing the quorum we are hoping to allow future SGA officers to be able to make necessary and appropriate changes. Five percent of the undergraduate student body is the current number of nominations a presidential ticket needs to receive in order to move to the voting stage of elections. We feel as though it is an appropriate number of votes for constitutional changes as well.
In January 2021, the SGA went through a similar process of seeking 1/3 of the student body to vote on a completely new Constitution, which failed to pass after lack of student participation in the voting process. With the current voting portal only being open until November 22, it is unclear if the amendments will be passed.
Students can vote for the constitutional amendments at this link.
Here is the original post:
Student government seeking 1/3 student body vote for Constitution amendments The Stute - The Stute
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on Student government seeking 1/3 student body vote for Constitution amendments The Stute – The Stute
The GOP Is Just Loving the Kyle Rittenhouse Verdict – VICE
Posted: at 5:56 pm
GOP elected officials like Rep. Matt Gaetz (L) and Madison Cawthorn (R) celebrated the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse (C) of all charges. (Photos:Paul Hennessy,Sean Krajacic-Pool/Getty Images, Republican National Committee)
Within minutes of the news breaking that Kyle Rittenhouse, a teenager who shot and killed two people last summer in Wisconsin, had been found not guilty, Republicans were flocking to the internet to celebrate.
Kyle Rittenhouse is not guilty, my friends! You have a right to defend yourself, a grinning Rep. Madison Cawthorn, a North Carolina Republican, cheered on an Instagram Story. Be armed, be dangerous, and be moral.
Kyle, if you want an internship, reach out to me, Cawthorn added in a caption at the bottom.
A Rittenhouse internship might turn out to be a hot commodity among the Capitol Hill GOP. Before the verdict was reached, Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz suggested that Rittenhouse could become his intern. On Friday, Arizona Rep. Paul Gosarthe guy whose staff made an anime that depicted him killing New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Corteztweeted, I will arm wrestle @mattgaetz to get dibs for Kyle as an intern.
Justice was served for #KyleRittenhouse and he is fully exonerated, Gosar added. As I said last year, obviously self-defense.
Gaetz also reaffirmed his support for Rittenhouse on Friday, in a tweet from his official Twitter account. Kyle Rittenhouse committed no crimes, he wrote, before adding the nonsensical suggestion, Now do BLM
Rittenhouse had faced charges of first-degree reckless homicide, two counts of first-degree intentional homicide, and two counts of reckless endangerment of safety. In August 2020, he killed two men and maimed another during protests against police brutality in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
In the months since, Rittenhouse has become a cause clbre among conservatives, who have portrayed him as a hero, who did what was necessary to protect himself, and as a potential martyr for gun rights. During the protests, Rittenhouse was trying to protect a car dealership.
Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, meanwhile, saluted Rittenhouse as one of the good guys.
Colorado Rep. Lauren Boebert, who loves to show off her own gun collection, called Friday a great day for the Second Amendment and the right to self-defense, adding, Glory to God!
The Twitter account for Republicans on the House Committee on the Judiciary took a simpler tack. After the verdict, it tweeted, Justice.
But Florida state Rep. Anthony Sabatini, whos running for Congress, might have done the most: He proposed turning Nov. 19 into the federal holiday Kyle Rittenhouse Day.
View original post here:
The GOP Is Just Loving the Kyle Rittenhouse Verdict - VICE
Posted in Second Amendment
Comments Off on The GOP Is Just Loving the Kyle Rittenhouse Verdict – VICE
Ending the War on Drugs – Center for American Progress
Posted: at 5:55 pm
Nationwide, communities face an unprecedented rise in substance misuse fatalities. A record 63,600 overdose deaths were recorded in 2016, two-thirds of which involved opioids.1 To stem the tide of this crisis, some communities are doubling down on the war on drugs, despite clear evidence that increasing arrests and incarceration does not lower drug use. But an increasing number of cities are bucking the trend and adopting models that treat substance misuse as a disease, not a crime. Instead of criminalizing substance use disorders, communities are focusing on saving lives and reducing the harmful effects of drug use.
The idea of harm reduction may seem like common sense today, but it signifies a radical departure from traditional U.S. responses to drug use, which relied heavily on the criminal justice system. More and more cities are expanding access to clean syringes, launching safe-injection facilities, and decriminalizing possession of controlled substances. Public acceptance of these approaches was unthinkable just a few years ago. Today, however, they are filtering into the mainstream. In fact, support for harm reduction spans the ideological spectrum. These strategies are underway in red and blue states alike, representing promising steps toward dismantling the countrys failed drug policy agenda.
The rise of public support for harm reduction strategies cannot be separated from the fact that white Americans have been hardest hit by the opioid epidemic, though black communities are increasingly experiencing its effects.2 The modern war on drugs, launched by former President Richard Nixon in 1971, did not provide harm reduction alternatives for black Americans dealing with substance misuse issues.3 Instead, drug use was criminalized, and black Americans were locked up en masse. Four decades later, the number of Americans behind bars has grown by 350 percent. By 2017, more than 2.2 million Americans were in prison or jail, and nearly 60 percent were black or Latino.4 Today, 1 in 9 black children has an incarcerated parent, as does 1 in 28 Latino children.5
The disproportionate impact on communities of color is no coincidence. President Nixon waged the war on drugs in response to public demonstrations led by civil rights activists and Vietnam War opponents, pushing a narrative that linked black communities and protesters with drug use.6 John Ehrlichman, a prominent official in the Nixon White House, owned up to this agenda years later. We knew we couldnt make it illegal to be either against the war or black, Ehrlichman said in an interview in 1994, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities.7
Nixons policy agenda took hold across all levels of government, leading to exponential growth in incarceration without any discernible health or safety benefits. Since then, increased incarceration has had essentially no effect on violent crime rates; at best, it has yielded marginal decreases in property crime.8 Criminalizing substance misuse has also failed to improve health outcomes. A state-by-state comparison found that increasing incarceration for drug offenses did not yield any reductions in substance misuse, overdose fatalities, or drug arrests.9
States are increasingly decriminalizing marijuana. To date, 30 states and the District of Columbia have liberalized their marijuana laws to some degree, and a majority of states have recognized marijuanas medicinal benefits and legalized marijuana for medical reasons.10 A recent poll by the Center for American Progress showed that 68 percent of Americans support the legalization of marijuana.11
Marijuana is often treated as separate from other controlled substances based on a growing body of research that supports its use in medical settings and suggests that it is not susceptible to abuse.12 In order to fully understand the public health consequences of marijuana use, however, more research needs to be done on the drug. So far, research has been limited by federal prohibitions on marijuana, which impede funding for research in this area. Thus, advocates and legislators are calling for marijuana legalization at the federal level, a strategy that has the added benefit of keeping people from becoming entrapped in the criminal justice system. In 2016, more than half a million people were arrested for marijuana violations.13 Black Americans are nearly four times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession than their white counterparts, despite comparable usage rates across groups.14 States that have liberalized their marijuana laws have done so to close these racial disparities, as well as to save on associated criminal justice costs. Legalizing substance use is one consideration to begin treating drug misuse as a public health issue rather than a criminal justice one.
Today, more and more Americans are acknowledging the failure of the war on drugs. As early as the late 1980s, justice system professionals began searching for a more effective approach.15 In 1989, Miami-Dade County launched the countrys first drug court, a specialized program to divert defendants with substance use disorders away from incarceration.16 More than 3,100 jurisdictions have established drug courts, which pair intensive recovery services and case management with rigorous accountability mechanisms for participants.17 Mayor Karen Freeman-Wilson of Gary, Indiana, an early champion of the drug courts movement, touts the model as a more effective and cost-efficient alternative to the revolving door of recidivism.18 [U]nless you address the underlying issue of addiction, which is what drug courts do, then youre likely to offend, Freeman-Wilson explained in a 2014 interview.19
Drug courts were an important first step away from the status quo. As the name implies, however, they are still part of the criminal justice system, and participants who do not successfully complete the program could face lengthy sentences of incarceration.20 There is robust debate about how to reduce the punitive aspects of drug courts, but today, policymakers and the public alike are increasingly adopting approaches that treat substance misuse as a health issue rather than a criminal justice one.
Unlike the justice system, which tends to place more emphasis on punishment than on treatment, harm reduction approaches focus on improving the well-being of all individuals and aim to reduce the risks associated with substance misuse. Harm reduction is based on the understanding that abstinence is not a realistic option for everyone. Instead of giving up on such individuals, harm reduction strategies meet people where they are. These interventions focus on preventing fatalities, disease, and other harms by promoting safer substance use behaviors. Three promising strategiessyringe access programs, safe-injection facilities, and Law Enforcement Assisted Diversionare working in conjunction with local justice systems to reduce the harmful impact of substance misuse in a smart, fair, and effective manner.
Syringe access programs are one example of harm reduction programming that has gained traction in recent years. Sometimes referred to as needle exchanges, syringe access services provide people with sterile injection equipment to reduce the incidence of syringe sharinga risky practice linked to transmission of bloodborne infections. By ensuring that people have access to clean injection equipment, these programs can significantly reduce the incidence of new HIV and hepatitis C diagnoses. In Washington, D.C., for example, a syringe access program reduced new HIV cases by 70 percent over two years, saving the city an estimated $44.3 million in averted health care costs.21
Syringe access sites have demonstrated success as a path to treatment and supportive services. Dayton, Ohio, Mayor Nan Whaley explains that syringe access is an opportunity for us to open the door so we have a relationship [with clients] That way, when theyre ready for treatment, we can get them into treatment very quickly.22 Daytons syringe access program, CarePoint, connected more than one-fifth of clients to substance misuse treatment in its first year of operation, and referred another 10 percent of clients to medical and mental health services.23
Twenty years ago, syringe access was so controversial that the U.S. Congress banned the use of federal funds to support these programs, pending an evaluation of their efficacy.24 Today, syringe access programs currently operate in 40 states,25 more than half of which have Republican governors.26 The rapid adoption of the syringe access model is a testament to its success at improving health outcomes.
A number of U.S. cities are now planning to take harm reduction one step further by adopting a strategy known as supervised injection facilities (SIFs). Sometimes called safe-injection sites or supervised consumption facilities, these sites are staffed by medical professionals who are trained to recognize and respond to fatal dosages, mitigating the risks associated with substance misuse. Like syringe access services, SIFs offer sterile injection equipment and safe disposal options for used needles. Critically, SIFs also provide clients with a hygienic place to inject preobtained drugs under medical supervision. Furthermore, SIFs are an avenue to treatment as people build vital connections with health care providers who are on hand to provide immediate referrals to social services and treatment options.
On all measures, the model has yielded promising results. With staff available to administer naloxone at the first sign of overdose, SIFs have been shown to reduce fatalities associated with substance misuse. In Vancouver, British Columbia, the arrival of a SIF reduced overdose deaths by 35 percent in the surrounding area. A similar facility in Sydney, Australia, averts an estimated 25 overdose fatalities every year.27 SIFs also improve health outcomes by promoting safer injection behaviors. SIF users in Vancouver were 70 percent less likely to share syringes, a practice linked to transmission of bloodborne diseases.28 On average, estimates suggest that Vancouvers SIF prevents 35 new HIV diagnoses each year.29
Concerns that SIFs will increase drug-related crime have been shown to be unfounded. In Vancouver, neighborhood crime rates remained stable following the launch of the SIF.30 In fact, vehicle theft and vehicle break-ins actually declined in the vicinity of the SIF.31 SIFs have also been shown to improve public order by keeping used needles off the streets and reducing incidence of public drug use.32 Most notably, SIFs have proven effective as a tool for engaging a traditionally hard-to-reach population. By providing connections to vital resources, SIFs reduce the barriers to entry into treatment. In Vancouver, the SIF model has increased the number of people entering treatment by 30 percent, and roughly half of participants successfully complete the program.33
More than 100 SIFs are currently operating in cities across Europe, Canada, and Australia. But as recently as 2016, the SIF model was considered radical in the United States. That year, The New York Times called SIFs an unorthodox idea and unheard-of in the United States.34 Two years later, The New York Times Editorial Board penned an op-ed urging state and local leaders to implement SIFs in their communities.35 Although no legally sanctioned SIFs exist in the United States, many American cities are moving forward with plans to launch SIFs based on the models success internationally.
The road to SIFs in the United States is not without obstacles. In particular, the laws around safe-injection sites remain murky. States have clear authority to authorize SIFs, though localities would not necessarily need explicit state authorization to implement SIFs.45 American SIFs, however, would be vulnerable to challenges from federal law enforcement officials. In response to a safe-injection proposal in Vermont, the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney threatened criminal prosecution for both SIF clients and staff. It is a crime, not only to use illicit narcotics, but to manage and maintain sites on which such drugs are used and distributed,46 the U.S. attorneys office concluded, referring to a provision of the federal Controlled Substances Act that prohibits property owners from knowingly allowing the use or distribution of illegal substances onsite.47 But as the federal government continues to resurrect the war on drugs, cities are following the evidence and pressing forward with promising harm reduction strategies.
Notably, harm reduction strategies have found support among law enforcement officers through programs such as Law Enforcement Assisted Diversion (LEAD). Through LEAD, law enforcement officers are empowered to redirect individuals with substance use disorders to social services, rather than making low-level arrests. The program is founded on the understanding that incarceration can lead to unnecessary harmor even deathfor people with substance use disorders. Overdoses are the leading cause of death among individuals recently released from prison, who are 129 percent more likely to die from an overdose during that period than is the general public.48
Instead, LEAD directs participants to a continuum of community-based care options, which can include treatmentbut is not mandated to do so. Importantly, LEAD serves even those clients who are not yet ready for recovery. Through LEAD, officers make immediate referrals to case managers, who meet the client in the field to discuss their needs and preferred next steps. Case managers focus on addressing clients self-identified needs and building their capacity from the point of entry, regardless of their readiness to enter treatment.49
The program, pioneered in Seattle, has proven successful at improving individual and community-level outcomes. On average, individuals diverted through LEAD were 58 percent less likely than nonparticipants to be rearrested and spent 39 fewer days in jail per year.50 Participants also showed significant improvements in housing and economic stability after referral to the program.51 Based on the successes in Seattle, LEAD has been replicated in 16 jurisdictions nationwide, with dozens more working to launch LEAD in their communities.52
Naloxone
Naloxone is a lifesaving drug that reverses the symptoms of opioid overdose. By expanding access to naloxone, communities nationwide are preventing unnecessary overdose fatalities. In Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for example, emergency services personnel saved more than 600 lives with naloxone in 2017 alone.53 Distributing naloxone to laypeopleparticularly the families and friends of individuals at high risk of overdosehas also proven effective at preventing fatalities.54 A pilot program sponsored by the University of Alabama at Birmingham provided training and naloxone to roughly 100 individuals with close ties to substance misusers, saving nine lives in less than a year.55 Other jurisdictions are providing naloxone directly to individuals at high risk of overdose, another distribution strategy shown to reduce fatalities. In Los Angeles County jails, for example, incarcerated people at high risk of opioid misuse are trained to recognize and respond to the signs of an overdose and are given naloxone kits prior to release.56 Additionally, many syringe access sites offer free naloxone kits and overdose education programming for clients and their loved ones.57
Medication-assisted treatment
Medication-assisted treatment (MAT) treats opioid use disorder through behavioral health therapy and medications, such as buprenorphine, that alleviate the symptoms of withdrawal and block opiate cravings.58 MATs dual program of counseling and medication has proven more effective than either intervention on its own, increasing the likelihood that patients adhere to treatment and abstain from opioid misuse.59 Hospitals can serve as an important link to MAT for individuals with opioid use disorder, who tend to be frequent utilizers of emergency departments or urgent care centers.60 In a randomized clinical trial, an emergency room treated eligible patients with buprenorphine and sent them home with enough doses to last until a follow-up appointment, when they would begin a 10-week MAT program. After 30 days, nearly 80 percent of MAT patients were engaged in treatment, compared with only 37 percent of patients who were discharged with a referral to recovery services.61 In Boston, Massachusetts General Hospital has recently implemented a similar MAT initiative in its emergency department. The Boston program is one of only a handful nationwide that offers MAT services 24/7, ensuring that a MAT-certified doctor is always present in the emergency room.62
In a departure from the failed policies of the war on drugs, local leaders are now rallying around strategies that reduce the harm of substance misuse. Gripped by the devastation of the opioid crisis, cities are bringing once-fringe policy solutions into the mainstream, citing their successful track records at saving lives and preventing disease. The strategies detailed in this issue brief represent promising progress toward ending a decades-old policy agenda of criminalizing substance misuse. But importantly, approaches that are limited to addressing opioid misusea primarily white phenomenonrisk perpetuating racial disparities in the justice system. Cities must develop inclusive approaches that treat all substance use disordersnot just opioid misuseas a disease, not a crime.
Betsy Pearl is the campaign manager for Criminal Justice Reform at the Center for American Progress. Maritza Perez is the senior policy analyst for Criminal Justice Reform at the Center.
Read the rest here:
Posted in War On Drugs
Comments Off on Ending the War on Drugs – Center for American Progress
Indiecast: The War On Drugs, Lana Del Rey, And More
Posted: at 5:55 pm
The first new album from The War On Drugs in four years has finally arrived. Steve considers The War On Drugs his favorite band of the last decade, while Ian considers them in a similar lane as Tame Impala or Beach House, where the music is enjoyable but does little more for him than establish vibe. Musically, I Dont Live Here Anymore is a refinement of the craft the band explored on 2017s A Deeper Understanding, which itself was a refinement of 2014s Lost In The Dream. Will this finally be the record that wins Ian over?
In this weeks Recommendation Corner, Ian is plugging the new book Sellout, as well as Another Kill For The Highlight Reel, the new record from New Jersey band Save Face, which sounds like a lot of the bands covered in the book Sellout. Steve, on the other hand, wants to spread the good word about Myriam Gendrons new album Ma Dlire that was released earlier this month, a collection of reimagined folk standards that gives the songs new life.
New episodes of Indiecast drop every Friday. Listen to Episode 63 on Spotify below, and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts here. You can submit questions for Steve and Ian at indiecastmailbag@gmail.com, and make sure to follow us on Instagram and Twitter for all the latest news. We also recently launched a visualizer for our favorite Indiecast moments. Check those out here.
The War On Drugs is a Warner Music artist. Uproxx is an independent subsidiary of Warner Music Group.
Here is the original post:
Posted in War On Drugs
Comments Off on Indiecast: The War On Drugs, Lana Del Rey, And More