Daily Archives: November 3, 2021

OPINION: School Boards and Local Elections Are Ground Zero for Our Values – southseattleemerald.com

Posted: November 3, 2021 at 10:15 am

by Shasti Conrad

Local elections dont just matter: They are a matter of life and death for far too many in our communities.

About a month ago, I learned that my hometown of Newberg, Oregon, became the center of attention for all the wrong reasons. The local school board voted to ban symbols such as Pride flags and signs declaring that Black Lives Matter, calling them political statements and therefore inappropriate for school. What they really did was politicize humanity and, in the name of neutrality, help the oppressor.

As someone who also had to navigate predominantly white spaces as a student of color, my heart went out to students who, in that vote, witnessed representatives of the community invalidate their entire existence as a mere political statement that didnt belong in a classroom setting.

The fact that Newberg is my hometown galvanized me to take action. And I am now working with people in Newberg to hold school board members accountable for this, by supporting recall efforts for Brian Shannon, and making the Newberg School District more welcoming and equitable. And while the story of Newberg is deeply personal to me, it is also far from unique. These incidents are happening in schools all around the nation and in our own backyard.

In Bellevue, candidate Faye Yang peddled dangerous misinformation straight from the eugenics campaigns of the early 20th century including claims that certain races have lower IQs. In Kent, there is a school board candidate amplifying the dog whistles of QAnon candidates an action harmful in and of itself as Kent is one of the most diverse cities in the entire nation. Constituents of Kristiana de Leon, councilmember for Black Diamond, Washington, have told her horror stories. She and I work together at my consulting firm.

In Enumclaw, a lone school board director resigned after less than a year into her appointment during fall of 2020. While her official statement claimed she resigned because this last year, particularly the last 6 months, has been incredibly difficult for all of [my family] and ultimately I need to do what is best for [them], the full story is that this director was harassed at work, including in her neighborhood, namely for wearing a mask and defending the school districts practice of acknowledging Indigenous land and peoples, an agreement reached in partnership with the Muckleshoot people.

This director brought her husband to school board meetings because parents followed her to her car, verbally abusing her. De Leon recalls attending one of these meetings, saying The vitriol during the board meeting was overwhelming. The amount of anger directed at masking, which rolled directly into tension over the acknowledgement of Indigenous communities, was palpable.

PTA volunteers and teachers in the Tahoma School District, including community members of color, have also been doxxed, harassed, and threatened over everything from masking to using pronouns to attending trainings on equitable teaching practices. The teacher union president also received threatening and abusive voicemails over a comment she made about her choice to discontinue patronizing a local establishment as a result of the owners political actions.

From conversations with constituents, educators, and neighbors, it was clear that this was a coordinated attack from the QAnon school board candidate. Much of this organizing happened on the private Facebook page, of which Kyle Meyers is an admin, said de Leon who went on to explain that much of this reaction is traced back to controversy of critical race theory (CRT) in schools. She added that she had seen screenshots from coordinated online efforts to get rid of any educator seen to support CRT. Its absolutely shameful that instead of putting forth policies, these people are running on a platform of terrorizing PTA parents and educators.

There are countless more stories throughout King County alone, to say nothing of the national narrative that echoes similar themes. A recent Salon article described how the GOP and the QAnon movement as a whole are regrouping to make school board narratives the new battleground. If this feels coordinated, its because it is; it is the newest chapter in the playbooks of the Heritage Foundation, ALEC, and beyond. Indeed, while the Koch brothers claim to disavow anti-CRT movements on paper, their long-standing history of antagonism against desegregation and basic safety measures such as masks in public schools, as well as ongoing contributions to conservative organizations, suggest otherwise. This is the monster that was decades in the making.

This toxicity is nothing short of an ongoing insurrection to terrorize people particularly Communities of Color who are working to increase equity and inclusion whether in schools or local elections. While some mobs build gallows and draw guns, others chase down teachers and threaten school board directors lives. Rather than taking responsibility to regroup their members, the Republican Party openly embraces this violent hostility while hoping that burned-out liberals and moderates will shrug off the dog whistles blowing louder and more fervently.

So, what can we do?

We can take what happened to King County Councilmember Kathy Lambert as an example of how we can organize to tell both ourselves and our elected officials that this is where we draw the line. Lambert signed off on her campaigns blatantly racist, sexist, and anti-Semitic mailer that sought to demonize her opponent by villifying King Countys only Black councilmember, Girmay Zahilay, as well as two additional People of Color and Bernie Sanders, who is Jewish.

The literature lit a fire under voters, elected officials, and activists alike, and the maelstrom of outrage was channeled into one central focus of demanding Lambert to apologize, and when that didnt happen, asking those supporting her to decide if they stood by her actions and words. While I was part of that effort to hold Lambert accountable resulting in her losing not only campaign endorsements but committee assignments the final say on accountability rests with voters.

Do not sit out this election. Vote like your lives depend on it, because they do. Defy the projections that voter turnout is predicted to be abysmally low. The future of healthy democratic institutions depends on us defying those odds and defying the rising tides of violent extremism that seek to silence us.

Editors Note: Identifying information about community members facing harassment and intimidation was removed to protect their privacy and keep them from further harm.

Featured Image: Photo by Element5 Digital on Unsplash.

Like Loading...

Originally posted here:

OPINION: School Boards and Local Elections Are Ground Zero for Our Values - southseattleemerald.com

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off

Opinion | The Problem With the Supreme Courts Shadow Docket – The New York Times

Posted: at 10:14 am

But when a justice issues an opinion in connection with a dispute that the court has expressly declined to decide, the justice is acting outside this narrow constitutional mandate and using his or her position to influence social issues in just the way the framers thought should be left to the people and their elected representatives to resolve.

When the court declined in 2019 to accept an appeal of an Indiana law prohibiting abortions motivated by the sex, race or disability status of the fetus, Justice Thomas attached a long opinion indirectly arguing in favor of such laws by linking abortion to early-20th-century eugenics practices. Later that year, Justice Brett Kavanaugh strongly signaled that with his appointment to the court, there were a majority of conservative justices receptive to overturning old rulings giving Congress wide latitude to delegate lawmaking powers to administrative agencies. Far from acting as the dispassionate umpire of legal disputes the framers envisioned, Justice Kavanaugh was basically suggesting that new lawsuits seeking profound changes to our current system of government would be favorably received.

The issuance of cert-denial opinions also creates impartiality problems for justices obligated to resolve cases in as neutral, unbiased and fair-minded a manner as possible. To enable them to do this, the Constitution gives justices a strong position of independence from political pressures. Moreover, a federal statute reinforces this constitutional norm by requiring any justice or other federal judge to disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.

And it has become routine for nominees to the court, in their Senate confirmation hearings, to refuse to answer questions about controversial legal issues like abortion and gun rights on the grounds that they might be prejudging an issue that could come before the court.

In cert-denial opinions, however, justices frequently prejudge legal questions in ways that create serious impartiality problems in cases the court later accepts for review. A stark example of this is the challenge to New Yorks requirement that people demonstrate a special self-defense need for carrying concealed firearms in public that the court is hearing on Wednesday. In a cert-denial opinion issued by Justice Thomas last year, when the court denied review of a ruling upholding a New Jersey concealed-carry requirement similar to New Yorks, he made a lengthy historical argument concluding that the Second Amendment protects some form of public carrying of firearms.

Perhaps not surprisingly, this is the argument now being made by the gun rights plaintiffs in the New York case. Just as troubling, in a portion of Justice Thomass opinion that Justice Kavanaugh joined, they criticized the main lower court ruling upholding New Yorks concealed-carry requirement. How can anyone seriously contend that the impartiality of these justices cannot reasonably be questioned in the New York case?

Some might argue that justices also create future impartiality problems when they issue unnecessary separate opinions or make gratuitous comments in cases the court actually does decide. These practices are not ideal and have been criticized, but in these situations at least the justices are issuing them in connection with deciding cases or controversies as authorized by the Constitution.

Read the original here:

Opinion | The Problem With the Supreme Courts Shadow Docket - The New York Times

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off

Bankruptcy Alert for New England States, NY, RI, and DE – The National Law Review

Posted: at 10:12 am

DebtorName

OtherNamesDebtorsUsed

BusinessType

BankruptcyCourt

Assets

Liabilities

FilingDate

Grupo PosadasS.A.B. de C.V.(Mexico City,Mexico)

GrupoPosadas,Posadas,GPO

TravelerAccomm-odations

ManhattanNY

$500,000,001to$1,000,000,000

10/26/21

Operadora delGolfo de MexicoS.A. de C.V.(Mexico City,Mexico)

OGM

TravelerAccomm-odations

ManhattanNY

$10,000,001to$50,000,000

$100,000,001to$500,000,000

10/26/21

GTTCommunications,Inc.(McLean, VA)

GlobalTelecom &Technology,Inc.

Telecom-munications

ManhattanNY