Daily Archives: October 11, 2021

The problem with Microsofts massive expansion in Israel – Haaretz

Posted: October 11, 2021 at 11:06 am

Last Tuesday, tech giant Microsoft announced massive expansion plans for its operations in Israel, doubling the number of employees over the next four years and opening new development centers in Beer Sheva and Jerusalem.

The company has set a goal of hiring 2,500 new workers over this time frame, adding to the 2,000 workers already employed by Microsoft in Israel. In fact, the plan is part of ongoing expansion efforts with the company having doubled its Israeli payroll in the past three years.

How Netanyahus Polish pandering paved the way for the restitution crisis

Microsofts plan is highly ambitious in light of the severe shortage in employees currently operating in the field. In the past decade alone, the tech giants have grown their Israeli workforces tenfold they currently employ over 6,000 employees. Microsofts plan may further harm Israeli companies ability to grow locally, since they wont be able to compete with the deep pockets of Microsoft and other behemoths. Over this period, the general rate of workers in high-tech (not limited to tech positions) grew by only 25 percent.

The multinationals take over

The past decade was not just one in which Israeli high-tech matured and managed to produce relatively large Israeli firms, but also the decade in which foreign research and development centers began to occupy a more central place on the map. In this time, the number of R&D centers grew from 150 to almost 400. True, some of these are small, but some are centers owned by major companies such as Microsoft, Intel, Apple and Amazon.

Accordingly, the rate of workers employed at foreign R&D centers, out of all workers in the field, has risen: According to Central Bureau of Statistics data processed by the Israel Innovation Authority, from 2005 to 2018 the percentage of workers employed by multinational companies rose from 7 to 19 percent.

The expansion of the tech giants should come as no surprise. In recent years, they have grown richer and more powerful, and to maintain that lead they invest even more in research and development. This process has a wide impact on the local high-tech sector as well.

For instance, when Amazon expanded its activities in Israel several years ago, voices were heard from other employers in the field that they were finding it difficult to match the e-commerce giants generous offers. This problem is present today as well and even applies to other major companies.

They also compete with each other, by the way. This can be observed in the field of microchip manufacturing, among others. At the same time, Israeli companies that held large funding rounds last year still have the ability to attract workers as well.

In fact, the major question is whether Microsoft and other giants can help enlarge the employment pie or whether they simply plan on drawing workers from other companies. Its a free market, so theres potential for positive competition over talent that will lead to rising salaries. But on the employers side, Microsofts announcement may reflect a broad trend and is therefore not necessarily an encouraging sign.

For Israeli companies to be able to develop, they need access to workers. True, they can recruit them from overseas. But for Israeli high-tech to be at its best, it is better that there be a balanced mixture of workers in foreign R&D centers and at Israeli companies, and of companies large and small. The reason for this is that foreign R&D centers are based mostly on tech workers, while Israeli companies also have marketing and sales activity, customer support, etc. A good balance between the two will allow for an increase in non-tech workers in high-tech.

I think theres a proper mix of startups and multinational companies; they receive value from working with us and with other companies, said Microsoft R&D General Manager Michal Braverman-Blumenstyk.

The mixture in Israel is very unique and everyone benefits from it. Im all for competition, she added. Its not a bad thing, and I think it keeps all of us much sharper. I agree that we have an obligation to get as many people into high-tech as possible, and were doing a lot of work to make that happen for instance, working with youth.

She said her company holds professional retraining for workers to allow them to enter the high-tech industry, though Microsoft declined to provide relevant data.

Generally speaking, large companies especially multinationals employ more inexperienced workers and workers from underrepresented communities compared to other companies. The reason is that their budgets are sufficiently large to train workers over time. At startups, money is tighter and every employee counts, so they seek more experienced workers.

It is probable that Microsoft wont be able to recruit 2,500 new workers without contributing to an expansion of the employment pie in the field, but with rapid expansion its easier to whip out the wallet and compete for seasoned workers rather than invest in training. According to the company, it will also expand through acquisitions, as has happened in the past.

A challenge and an opportunity

Microsoft Israel is voicing confidence in its ability to meet that 2,500 target. To this end, the company said it will build five new development centers. Two will be in cities where the company is already active, Herzliya and Tel Aviv. Each of those will house 1,000 new employees, which means 80 percent of the new hires will be situated in central Israel. Centers will also be established in Beer Sheva and Jerusalem. The location of the fifth center is yet to be determined.

The decision to open new R&D centers at such a rate is surprising in light of the recent switch to a hybrid work model (i.e., working both onsite and offsite), which could enable the company to employ workers in outlying areas without building large research facilities there. Microsoft has examined the effects of the hybrid work model on its workers, and the findings show that the companys employees wish to split their time between working remotely and working from the office, a company press release stated. Further, the findings show that workers ability to choose between the various options and combine them leads to greater satisfaction and organizational flexibility.

The company rightly stressed that opening centers in outlying areas increases exposure to the high-tech industry as a whole. Microsoft also noted that its presence in the these more remote areas doesnt end with employing workers, but also includes encouraging youngsters to enter the technological fields.

This is an important statement by Microsoft, especially at a time when there is widespread discussion regarding the need to open the gates of high-tech to more communities. Increasing awareness and creating role models will aid this goal.

And yet, Microsofts activity also shows the daunting challenge of expanding to outlying areas: Jerusalem, Beer Sheva and the fifth center will employ a combined total of only 500 workers. The same challenge can be seen in the companys operations in the predominantly Arab city of Nazareth, in the Galilee. The Nazareth center was established five years ago and today employs several dozen workers. Microsoft says the center has led to the employment of Arab employees in some of its other centers as well, but their numbers are modest.

The company refused to provide that data, but according to industry estimates, Microsoft employs about 100 Arab workers in Israel, or some 5 percent of its workforce in the country. This is a significant increase and a positive figure compared to the industry average, but lower than the average at multinational corporations. According to a 2018 report by the Innovation Authority and Startup Nation Central, the major companies including multinationals draw only 8 percent of their workers from the Arab community.

Excerpt from:

The problem with Microsofts massive expansion in Israel - Haaretz

Comments Off on The problem with Microsofts massive expansion in Israel – Haaretz

136 countries sign up to Biden’s tax reforms aimed at taming tech giants – Telegraph.co.uk

Posted: at 11:06 am

Joe Biden has succeeded in ramming through a deal to overhaul global corporation tax as the West turns decisively against big tech.

The US President has convinced 136 countries to agree they will enforce a minimum tax rate of 15pc on major multinationals in a bid to tame some of the worlds largest corporations.

The group includes all countries in the G20, the European Union and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

However, Switzerlands finance minister said it will not be possible for the country to implement the new rules by 2023, as envisaged by the OECD, in an early sign that the transition will not be a smooth one.

Chancellor Rishi Sunak hailed the landmark deal, saying the tax reform represents "a clear path to a fairer tax system".

It comes after years of wrangling by world leaders about how to handle global tech giants such as Facebook and Apple, which typically book their profits in low-tax countries like Ireland.

Alongside the minimum 15pc headline levy, the new rules will also give countries the right to slap taxes on large companies based on where they make their sales.

Tech companies are increasingly facing a backlash over their global power and reach. Amazon has been accused by critics of destroying the high street, while Facebook has faced sharp criticism over claims that its social media services are breeding radicalism and harming users' mental health.

Ireland was one of the last major holdouts, as the country's economic model is built around attracting foreign multinationals with a favourable tax rate. Dublin caved to pressure from the Biden administration at the eleventh hour on Thursday, reversing its decision to hold out against the move.

Critics argue that the deal will hold back the post-Covid recovery, make the international system less competitive and reduce countries' room for manoeuvre.

Matthew Lesh, head of research at the Adam Smith Institute, said: The minimum tax rate is a historic tragedy that will inflict significant economic damage.

"A cabal has agreed to suppress fruitful economic competition and policy diversity. If businesses came together like this, to conspire to keep prices high, it would be unlawful.

This deal locks in higher and inflexible corporate taxes that significantly reduce investment, entrepreneurial activity and economic growth. It also threatens key UK Government policies such as the super deduction and free ports by limiting corporate tax carve outs."

The deal will also put an end to arguments between global powers about introducing new digital taxes for the time being, which the US government has deemed discriminatory.

It gives the US room to ratify the agreement, saying that no newly enacted digital services taxes or other relevant similar measures will be imposed on any company from 8 October 2021 for two years.

The minimum corporate tax rate will apply to companies with revenue above 750m (636m) and will generate around $150bn in additional global tax revenues annually for governments, according to the OECD.

Of the countries involved in the talks, only Kenya, Nigeria, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka have not signed the deal, the Paris-based body added.

Hungary and China secured last minute concessions, with the former being granted a longer transition period and the latter getting a dispensation for companies that are starting to expand internationally.

Mr Sunak hailed an initial breakthrough among G7 nations at a UK-hosted summit in July. The change will not greatly impact the UK compared to other nations as the Chancellor is already raising headline corporate tax rates from 19pc to 25pc.

On Friday, Mr Sunak added: "I am proud that the UK has taken a leading role in the worlds efforts to upgrade the global tax system for the modern age - a key priority of our G7 presidency.

"We now have a clear path to a fairer tax system, where large global players pay their fair share wherever they do business."

More here:

136 countries sign up to Biden's tax reforms aimed at taming tech giants - Telegraph.co.uk

Comments Off on 136 countries sign up to Biden’s tax reforms aimed at taming tech giants – Telegraph.co.uk

Microsoft to take active measures for ‘Right to Repair’, first among tech giants – Republic World

Posted: at 11:06 am

Redmond-based Microsoft has agreed that it will take steps towards consumers' right to repair. A third-party organization will study the potential effect of the company making it easy to repair devices and make changes by the end of 2022. By doing so, the company has become the first major technology giant to take an initiative towards the ongoing concern. The decision comes after a shareholder advocacy group called As You Sowfiled a resolution requesting the company to analyze and consider the social and environmental benefits of making Microsoft devices that are easy to repair.

As mentioned in the official press release uploaded on As You Know's website, Kelly McBee, waste program coordinator at the organization says "Microsoft positions itself as a leader on climate and the environment, yet facilitates premature landfilling of its devices by restricting consumer access to device reparability." Adding to it, McBee also says that "To take genuine action on sustainability and ease pressure on the extraction of limited resources including precious metals, the company must extend the useful life of its devices by facilitating widespread access to repair."

In recent times, the right to repair movement has gained traction in the tech community. The movement talks about how companies manufacture their products in a way that makes it too difficult to get repaired, leaving the consumer with no other option than to buy a new one. While this makes it easier for the company as they can sell more devices, it creates a difficult situation for a consumer who might not be in a position to get a new device. Especially in the ongoing digital erawhere a majority of people are working from home, the need for digital devices is more than before.

As You Sow states in the press releasethat reparability will facilitate the minimization of resources that are required to manufacture and create new products. Quoting research conducted by World Economic Forum, the organization highlights that electronics are the fastest growing waste stream in the world. Another research by the Green Peace organization states that about 70% of the emissions associated with personal computing devices are produced while manufacturing. Hence, increasing the lifespan of electronic devices by increasing the availability of resources necessary for repair.

More:

Microsoft to take active measures for 'Right to Repair', first among tech giants - Republic World

Comments Off on Microsoft to take active measures for ‘Right to Repair’, first among tech giants – Republic World

Media Mention: Ken Gray Talks Vaccination Mandates with WRAL TechWire – Ward and Smith, PA

Posted: at 11:06 am

Recently the publication,which is dedicated to technology-specific news, interviewed labor and employment attorney Ken Gray about the growing trend of large employers requiring their workers to get vaccinated or face losing their jobs - at least temporarily. From the article:

Asked by WRAL TechWire if the IBM-Red Hat moves will serve as precedent for other companies to do the same, S. McKinley Gray III of law firm Ward and Smith, P.A. responded:

Yes, absolutely, we are certain that other companies will follow suit, particularly after OSHA issues its Emergency Temporary Standard, which could be any day now.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has been working on setting such regulations since President Biden called for mandatory vaccinations to combat the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in September.

Those anticipated federal regulations will force companies to decide whether they will bear the actual cost of testing unvaccinated employees or whether they will simply opt to require all workers to be vaccinated, Gray said.

Read more:

Media Mention: Ken Gray Talks Vaccination Mandates with WRAL TechWire - Ward and Smith, PA

Comments Off on Media Mention: Ken Gray Talks Vaccination Mandates with WRAL TechWire – Ward and Smith, PA

Maine philanthropist’s resignation shakes global reproductive rights charity founded by her father – Yahoo News

Posted: at 11:04 am

Oct. 10Julia "Judy" Kahrl, a lifelong reproductive rights champion and an heir to the Procter & Gamble fortune, has made a very public break with Pathfinder International, the global reproductive health charity founded by her father 64 years ago.

Kahrl, who lives in Arrowsic, and her brother Walter Gamble resigned from Pathfinder's board Sept. 27 over what they regard as its failure to fully disclose and reckon with the legacy of their father, Dr. Clarence Gamble, who promoted eugenics an early-20th-century movement that sought to prevent poor people, disabled people, racial minorities and others from reproducing as well as concerns about Pathfinder's management, which has presided over record turnover while paying out six-figure severance packages.

"We have lost faith in the organization's current leadership and are gravely concerned about the organization's lack of transparency," the two wrote in a letter to senior stakeholders. "We are withdrawing all financial support of Pathfinder and urging all Gamble family members to do the same."

Pathfinder has contested their description of events as "wholly inaccurate and unfounded," and board chair Roslyn Watson issued a statement Sept. 28 insinuating that Kahrl and Gamble had left because they were opposed to exposing their father's eugenicist legacy. When pressed in an interview, however, she conceded that the two had wanted greater exposure than the board believed prudent for the organization, whose reproductive rights work faces aggressive opponents at home and in many of the 20 countries it has permanent programs in.

"We do highly controversial work in countries that have strife, our abortion work was targeted by the Trump administration, and this kind of data (from our archives) could be used against our organization in ways that we cannot even imagine if it were freely available to anybody who would want it," Watson told the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram.

Story continues

LIFELONG COMMITMENT

The break is particularly dramatic given the 87-year old Kahrl's longstanding commitment to reproductive rights and Pathfinder.

Her parents were early activists for legalizing and destigmatizing contraception radical positions in the 1920s and family planning, birth control and reproductive health were commonplace dinner table conversations while she was growing up in the 1930s and '40s. Her father, physician Clarence Gamble, and mother, Sarah, were close allies of contraception pioneer Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, and helped her overturn federal laws preventing the mailing of birth control materials and literature. When they founded Pathfinder in 1957, Judy joined the board, and her eldest brother, Richard, ran the organization until stepping down in 1985.

The organization promotes access to reproductive health services for women across the developing world and today receives the majority of its funding from the U.S. Agency for International Development. In its public tax returns for 2019 it reported 177 employees, a budget of $121 million and a $2.4 million operating deficit for the year, primarily due to reduced grant revenues compared with 2018.

While traveling to see Pathfinder's work in low-income parts of Asia, Africa and the Middle East, she has said she saw how women were empowered to improve their lives and their families' prospects by having access to comprehensive reproductive health services. She later brought her own children and then grandchildren on these trips. Her son Ben Kahrl joined the Pathfinder board in 1988.

They have close ties to Maine. Kahrl has been summering in Arrowsic since 1952. The broader Gamble family has spent summers at a cottage in Georgetown since 1960, and in his final days in 1966, Clarence Gamble was transported by ambulance from his home in Milton, Massachusetts, so he could die there. Judy Kahrl, a counselor, moved to neighboring Arrowsic full-time in 1996, and, alarmed over the growing challenge to Roe v. Wade, founded the Maine-based national advocacy group Grandmothers for Reproductive Rights (or GRR!) in 2013.

But in recent years Kahrl said she had grown increasingly concerned about the leadership at Pathfinder. The organization has experienced a 100 percent turnover in U.S. personnel in the five years it has been led by CEO Lois Quam. Several senior staff members had departed with six-figure severance packages in exchange for signing nondisclosure agreements disallowing them from speaking to board members about the circumstances of their departure, including the chief human resources officer, who Kahrl says received $216,000 after just four years on the job.

When Kahrl and her son tried to access a comprehensive outside review of Quam's job performance, they were blocked by the board's executive committee, which also declined to share the reasoning or wording of the NDAs departing staff members had signed.

"All of these things raised red flags for us and yet getting more information was a nonstarter," Ben Kahrl said in an interview with the Press Herald. "So people say, 'Do you have any evidence of malfeasance,' and the answer is that we're not sure, because we can't get the information to do proper board oversight."

Cate Lane, a former Pathfinder employee who left without signing an NDA, and who served under Quam as a technical adviser for youth and adolescents from 2017 to 2019, told the Press Herald she left because of Quam's "toxic" leadership style. She said experienced people had been systematically driven out of the organization in favor of cheaper, less capable replacements, undermining capacity and morale. "Unless somebody takes Lois out, I think Pathfinder is on a slide to irrelevance," Lane said.

Then there was the issue of Judy's father.

AN UGLY PAST

Like Margaret Sanger, Clarence Gamble had been a devotee of the eugenics movement of the early 20th century, which sought to improve humanity's genetic stock by preventing people with allegedly undesirable qualities from reproducing, sometimes via forced sterilization. Undesirables typically included poor people, disabled people, those alleged to have low intelligence, and people of color. Adolf Hitler would become the most infamous of eugenicists, but prior to the Holocaust such views were broadly held among the white Anglo-Saxon Protestant elite of the U.S. and U.K., championed by Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill and funded by the Carnegie Institution and the Rockefeller Foundation.

Gamble co-founded the Human Betterment League of North Carolina in 1947 to promote eugenic sterilization under a now-notorious state law that allowed social workers to designate people as "defective" and encourage their sterilization at state expense. Of the 7,600 people sterilized under the state's program, 85 percent were female and 40 percent were minorities. The state later negotiated reparations for survivors.

"For a million years, Dame Nature found she could develop her people only by selecting for survival the most prolific, the toughest and smartest," Gamble and a co-author wrote in a 1950 pamphlet. "In our time, notwithstanding the rapidly mounting world-wide burdens of overpopulation which are increased by limiting epidemics and salvaging weaklings, our organized efforts toward fostering breeding for quality rather than quantity can show only three decades of active development."

Judy and Ben Kahrl told the Press Herald they were highly supportive of the Pathfinder board's decision, after the police killing of George Floyd last year, to hire independent researchers to exhume Clarence's legacy from the organization's archives, including any lasting imprint his eugenicist views may have left. But they became concerned when, one year later, the archives remained sealed from view by either the board or the public.

The outside consultant's reports which the Kahrls shared with the Press Herald provided surprisingly little new information on Gamble. At one point, instead of relying on the archives, it cites a report by an anti-abortion activist group, the Population Research Institute. At another point they attribute to Clarence Gamble a note on an office memo from 1972, six years after he'd died.

"It was embarrassing, a pretty bad report," Kahrl said. "I don't know a better word than 'junk.'" The reports were never discussed by the board, she said, and even after they were submitted they were told they could not see the company archives.

Judy's nephew, Jim Epstein a grandchild of Clarence Gamble who served on the Pathfinder board through the 1980s said he shared her disappointment. "There needs to be a full reckoning," he said. "That's an essential part of the process. Our sense is that the organization has been slow-walking it."

Ben Kahrl said he was voted off the board last month after he pushed for fuller disclosure of both the documents related to his grandfather and the internal review of CEO Quam's tenure. His removal was the final straw prompting his mother and uncle Walter the only other Gamble family members on the 19-person board to resign. "I pray that there will be healing, but I feel I had done all I could do from the inside," Judy Kahrl said.

DISCLOSURE AND TRANSPARENCY

Board chair Roslyn Watson, one of Boston's leading African-American businesswomen, initially responded to the resignations with a statement suggesting the Gambles had left because they were uncomfortable with wider disclosure of their ancestor's legacy. It noted their pride in their efforts to recruit a more diverse board and address Clarence's "racially biased and unscientific personal beliefs through an independent review free from family influence." She noted they had resigned in the wake of such efforts and said they sought to "distract us from fulfilling our mission," including "commitments to racial and gender equality."

When questioned by the Press Herald, Watson conceded that the Gambles had been pushing for greater disclosure than the board wanted, including the public release of 30 boxes of documents from the 1950s and 1960s locked in the company archives.

"We're not a research organization. We have an operating responsibility for over $100 million in programs each year, and we need to safeguard that and make sure that nothing gets in the way of providing those services," said Watson, a prominent investor in Boston and Paris real estate and past general manager of the powerful Massachusetts Port Authority, which runs Logan Airport. "Spending the majority of our time trying to protect ourselves from the raw materials out in the international sphere wouldn't serve the organization and its mission."

She said Pathfinder had to have "a forward-looking lens" and "not get stuck in a kind of rabbit warren hole of debating past behavior and what it means." She also expressed full confidence in Quam, the consultant's reports on the Gamble legacy and the state of the organization. Annual turnover is not unusually high for the international development nonprofit sector, employee satisfaction is good and fundraising is healthy, she said.

She also said the nonprofit's use of nondisclosures and severance packages is appropriate and that the Kahrls had been denied access to the independent review of Quam in accordance with board policies restricting access to the executive committee. Ben Kahrl, she said, had been voted off the board because "for two years he consistently behaved in a way that was inappropriate and undermined the board and CEO and organization." Examples, she said, included contacting country officers directly to push a personal agenda and implying to staff members that he disagreed with policy decisions made by the board and CEO.

She noted the organization is amid a strategic pivot to give more power and autonomy to individual country offices, which are staffed by people from those countries, and reduce the influence of Pathfinder's headquarters staff in Watertown, Massachusetts. She said Quam a former official at The Nature Conservancy who headed the Obama administration's Global Health Initiative had been "an exemplary leader."

Quam, whose 2018 compensation was $438,066, did not respond to an interview request made via Pathfinder's spokesperson. Pathfinder has a solid 86.7 out of 100 rating from the independent nonprofit rating service Charity Navigator, which reported 89.6 percent of Pathfinder's total expenses in 2019 went to programs.

Judy Kahrl said she's diverting her attention to other initiatives such as Grandmothers for Reproductive Rights and that Pathfinder is now in her past after more than six decades of board service.

"I resigned because I wanted more transparency," she said, "and I wanted to make a strong statement that we are absolutely opposed to eugenics and that board members need to be given the information they need to make responsible, accountable decisions."

Read the original here:

Maine philanthropist's resignation shakes global reproductive rights charity founded by her father - Yahoo News

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on Maine philanthropist’s resignation shakes global reproductive rights charity founded by her father – Yahoo News

PBS to Nationally Premiered Cured Profiling the Battle of Homosexuals To Define Themselves in Psychiatry – The Good Men Project

Posted: at 11:04 am

The histories of homosexuality, bisexuality, and gender diversity are filled with incredible pain and enormous pride, of overwhelming repression and victorious rejoicing, of stifling invisibility and dazzling illumination. Throughout the ages, same-sex love and relationships and gender non-conformity have been called many things: from sins, sicknesses, and crimes to orientations, identities, and even gifts from God.

From the Eugenics Movement of the mid-nineteenth century through the twentieth century CE and beyond, medical and psychological professions have often proposed and addressed, in starkly medical terms, the alleged deficiencies and mental diseases of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people.

During what has come to be known as the Eugenics movement in science (coined by Francis Galton in England in 1883 from the Greek word meaning well-born or of good origins or breeding in which the socially constructed hierarchical concept of race was codified), some members of the scientific community viewed people attracted to their own sex as constituting a distinct biological or racial type those who could be distinguished from normal people through anatomical markers.

For example, Dr. G. Frank Lydston, U. S. urologist, surgeon, and professor from Chicago, in 1889 delivered a lecture at the College of Physicians and Surgeons in Chicago in which he referred to homosexuals as sexual perverts who are physically abnormal.

the unfortunate class of individuals who are characterized by perverted sexuality have been viewed in the light of their moral responsibility rather than as the victims of a physical and incidentally of a mental defect.Even to the moralist, there should be much satisfaction in the thought that a large class of sexual perverts are physically abnormal rather than morally leprous.

Also, the American medical doctor, Allan McLane Hamilton, wrote in 1896 that the [female homosexual] is usually of a masculine type, or if she presented none of the characteristics of the male, was a subject of pelvic disorder, with scanty menstruation, and was more or less hysterical and insane.

Physician, Perry M. Lichtenstein, published in 1921 that: A physical examination of [female homosexuals] will in practically every instance disclose an abnormally prominent clitoris (p. 372).

And in 1857 in France, Ambroise Tardieu wrote that: This degeneracy is evidenced in men who engage in same-sex eroticism by their underdeveloped, tapered penis resembling that of a dog, and a naturally smooth anus lacking in radial folds.

In addition, rather than considering homosexuality, bisexuality, and gender diversity merely as emotional, gender, and sexual differences along a broad spectrum of human potential, some sectors of the medical and psychological communities forced pathologizing language onto people with same-sex and bisexual attractions, and those who cross traditional constructions of gender identities and expressions.

Dr. Sigmund Freud, for example, saw homosexuality as a developmental disorder, a fixation at one of the intermediate pregenital stages. He believed this was caused, at least in part, by an incomplete resolution in males of the Oedipal complex.

Freud wrote in a 1935 letter to a mother who had asked him to treat her sons homosexuality:

Homosexuality is assuredly no advantage, but it is nothing to be ashamed of, no vice, no degradation; it cannot be classified as an illness; we consider it to be a variation of the sexual function, produced by a certain arrest of sexual development (Freud in Lewes, 1988).

The Swiss physician, August Forel, wrote in 1905:

The [sexual] excesses of female inverts exceed those of the male,and this is their one thought night and day, almost without interruption. [Male inverts] feel the need for passive submissionand occupy themselves with feminine pursuits. Nearly all [female and male] inverts are in more or less marked degree psychopaths or neurotics.

Educational opportunities for primarily middle-class women improved somewhat during the mid-19th century in the United States. Often locked out of most institutions of higher learning, several womens colleges were founded, such as Mt. Holyoke College, Vassar, Smith College, Wellesley College, and Bryn Mawr.

There were, however, many conservative critics who attacked this new trend warning that educated women would be unfit to fill traditional roles in society, and others, like Dr. Edward Clarke, in 1873 warning that study would interfere with womens fertility, causing them chronic uterine disease.

And Dr. Havelock Ellis concluded that

Womens colleges are the great breeding ground of lesbianism. When young women are thrown together, they manifest an increasing affection by the usual tokens. They kiss each other fondly on every occasionThey learn the pleasure of direct contactand after this, the normal sex act fails to satisfy them (quoted in Faderman, 1991, p. 49).

Ellis posited that female homosexuality was increasing because of the rise of feminism, which taught women to be independent of men.

All of this has resulted in members of the medical professions committing lesbians, gay males, bisexuals, and those who transgress so-called normative gender identities and expressions (often against their will) to hospitals, mental institutions, jails, and penitentiaries, and forced pre-frontal lobotomies, electroshock, castration, and sterilization. We have been made to endure aversion therapy, reparative therapy, Christian counseling, hormonal castration, and genetic counseling.

Under this backdrop, the National Public Broadcasting (PBS) premieres for a national audience the documentary film Cured on Monday, October 11, 2021, at 10/9c (check local listings) on its Independent Lens series.

This film by Patrick Sammon and Bennett Singer profiles the development, expansion, and eventual victory of activists both outside and inside the ranks of the American Psychiatric Association to remove homosexuality from its manual of mental illnesses, its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, and the often-contentious debate surrounding the change.

The film begins from a context in which conservative religious denominations defined homosexuals as sinful, government prosecuted homosexuals as criminal, and the psychiatric profession judged them as sick.

Interviewing key eyewitnesses, including Charles Silverstein, Rev. Magora Kennedy, Kay Lahusen, and Frank Kameny, combined with rare archival footage, this important film unearthed the history of how a relatively small group of committed and fervent activists stood up to demand one of the central tenets of liberation: the freedom to define themselves.

One of the antagonists in this drama includes physician Irving Bieber who co-authored a study in 1962, Homosexuality: A Psychoanalytic Study of Male Homosexuals sponsored by the New York Society of Psychoanalysts, in which he concluded that homosexuality constituted a psychopathology that could be cured or prevented with psychoanalysis.

Bieber later was quoted in 1973 saying: A homosexual is a person whose heterosexual function is crippled, like the legs of a polio victim (Biebers 1973 quote from New York Times, August 28, 1991).

In addition, the psychiatrist Charles Socarides, founder of the National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality (NARTH), argued that homosexuality is an illness, a neurosis, possibly caused by an over-attachment to the mother, which he too argued could be treated. Bieber and Socrarides became the authoritative and often-referenced researchers in the area of causation and treatment of homosexuality.

Cured profiles the street activism including when I and my compatriots of the Gay Liberation Front and Gay May Day collective, friends from the Mattachine Society, and members of the newly-formed Gay Activists Alliance stormed the APA convention in May 1971 at the Shorham Hotel in Washington DC as Franklin Kameny of Mattachine DC leapt upon the stage and declared war on the psychiatric profession.

The year following, APA held its next annual conference in Dallas, Texas. Barbara Gittings and Franklin Kameny again presented their views and facilitated a workshop discussion, this time joined by Dr. H. Anonymous (a.k.a. psychiatrist Dr. John E. Fryer) wearing a costume mask to hide his identity who discussed his experiences as a gay psychiatrist and member of the APA.

By 1973, the American Psychiatric Association had finally changed its designation of homosexuality for those comfortable with their sexual orientation, now asserting that it does not constitute a disorder: [H]omosexuality per se implies no impairment in judgment, stability, reliability, or general social or vocational capabilities.

Two years later, in 1975, the American Psychological Association followed suit and urged mental health professionals to take the lead in removing the stigma of mental illness that has long been associated with homosexual orientations.

The American Psychiatric Association announced in its 2013 DSM-V that the diagnosis of gender identity disorder, which the manual has imposed upon transgender people since it published DSM-III in 1980, underwent what the APA subcommittee deciding on the change considered as a more neutral designation, gender dysphoria, which they saw as descriptive rather than diagnostic and pathologizing.

In the case of LGBTQ people, the scientific community has consistently deployed the medical model to investigate and pathologize the other. In so doing, heteronormativity and cissupremacy (oppression and colonization against trans people), therefore, become perceived as unremarkable or normal, unquestioned hegemonic norms against which all others are judged.

This medicalization of homosexuality, bisexuality, and gender non-conformity only served to strengthen oppression and heterosexual and cisgender privilege through its relative invisibility. Given this invisibility, issues of oppression and privilege were neither analyzed nor scrutinized, neither interrogated nor confronted by members of the dominant group.

Cured makes clear, however, the truth in Margaret Mead, the American cultural anthropologists statement: Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, its the only thing that ever has.

References

Bieber, I. (1973, Dec. 23). In The A.P.A. ruling on homosexuality. An interview with two psychiatrists, Dr. Robert L. Spitzer and Dr. Irving Bieber, The New York Times.

Ellis, H. (1939). Psychology of sex. London: William Heinemann

Faderman, L. (1991). Odd girls and twilight lovers: A history of lesbian life in twentieth-century America. New York: Penguin.

Forel, A. (1905). La Question sexuelle (traduit dans de nombreuses langues), rdit en 2012: La question sexuelle expose aux adultes cultivs, prface de Christophe Granger, diteur : AUTREMENT

Freud, S. (1986) The essentials of psycho-analysis: Selected by Anna Freud. NYC: Penguin Books.

Hamilton, A. M. (1896). The civil responsibility of sexual perverts. American Journal of

Insanity, 52:503-09.

Lewes, K. (1988), The psychoanalytic theory of male homosexuality, New York: New American Library.

Lichtenstein, P. (1921). The fairy and the lady lover. Medical Review of Reviews, 27.

Lydston, G. F. (1889, Sept. 7). Clinical Lecture: Sexual Perversion, Satyriasas, and Nymphomania. Medical and Surgical Reporter, LXI(10), 553-557.

Socarides, C. (1968). The overt homosexual. Lanham, MD: Jason Aronson, Inc.

Tardieu, A. (1857). Etude medico-lgale sur les attentats aux moeurs. Paris: J.-B. Baillire.

***

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

A $50 annual membership gives you an all access pass. You can be a part of every call, group, class and community.A $25 annual membership gives you access to one class, one Social Interest group and our online communities.A $12 annual membership gives you access to our Friday calls with the publisher, our online community.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

Photo credit: Shutterstock

Excerpt from:

PBS to Nationally Premiered Cured Profiling the Battle of Homosexuals To Define Themselves in Psychiatry - The Good Men Project

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on PBS to Nationally Premiered Cured Profiling the Battle of Homosexuals To Define Themselves in Psychiatry – The Good Men Project

What Wisconsin Democratics Think About Disabled Kids – Wisconsin Right Now

Posted: at 11:04 am

Never thought Id see a doctor testify in an Assembly hearing that we should limit abortion because too few kids are being born with down syndrome these days, but here we are -Justin Bielinski

Democratic state legislators and some of their top aides are revealing what they REALLY think about kids with disabilities as they push back against Assembly bills protecting them.

The Assembly is pushing a slew of bills, many against abortion. One bill would seem to be a no-brainer: It would ban sex-selective, disability-selective, and other selective abortions, meaning it would ban abortions being undertaken solely on the basis of gender, race or disability. Who would oppose that? Democrats oppose even that bill, which is essentially just banning eugenics.

Oh, by the way, October is Down Syndrome Awareness month.

The most odious Democratic reaction came from a top aide to a prominent Democratic state Senator, whose tweet indicated he doesnt value the lives of kids with Down Syndrome.

AB 594 would require doctors who do a test for a congenital condition to refer the patient to a website created by DHS that would connect them to support and accurate resources. Democrats dont like that, either. AB 595 would prohibit aborting a child based on any discriminatory characteristics including a congenital diagnosis and race.

Never thought Id see a doctor testify in an Assembly hearing that we should limit abortion because too few kids are being born with down syndrome these days, but here we are, tweeted Justin Bielinski, the director of Communications and campaign manager for Democratic state Sen. Chris Larson. Justin Bielinski, who previously worked for Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes, later deleted the tweet.

What a truly awful thought to have, let alone tweet out, wrote Republican State Sen. John Jagler.

Jagler shared photos of his daughter.

He wrote to Bielinski, I get that best case scenario you dont value her as a person. Worse case..you dont think she should have been born. But shes here. Shes thriving and is loved. I wonder. Does your boss, @SenChrisLarson, share your thoughts that the world would be a better place without Grace and people like her?

Rep. Lisa Subeck, a Democrat, held a media availability before the hearing complaining about all of the bills eroding womens health. She is a former executive director at abortion provider NARAL.

The efforts last week by Republicans in the Wisconsin Legislature included the following bills: AB 593, related to: informed consent regarding a certain abortion-inducing drug regimen and reporting requirements for induced abortions (Vos/Kapenga) [vetoed by Evers last session]; AB 539, related to: prohibiting discrimination in organ transplantation on the basis of disability (Born/Jagler); AB 36,related to: permitting pharmacists to prescribe certain contraceptives (Kitchens/Felzkowski) [passed through the Assembly last session but not taken up by the Senate before COVID hit]; AB 594 relating to: congenital condition education resources (Dittrich/Testin); AB 595, related to: sex-selective, disability-selective, and other selective abortions [vetoed by Evers last session]; AB 6, relating to requirements forchildren born alive following abortion or attempted abortion (Steineke/Roth) [vetoed by Evers last session]; AB 493, relating to: certification of abortion providers under the Medical Assistance program (Dittrich/Stroebel) [vetoed by Evers last session]; AB 262, relating to: induced abortion reporting (Wichgers/Jacque); AB 528, relating to certification of abortion providers under the Medical Assistance program (Brandtjen/Jacque).

The hearing included testimony from Tom Kulczewski, whose son, Malix, was later found to have a heart defect after being born with Down Syndrome. Kulzczewski was accompanied by his wife and four children and testified that his doctor told them that Malix would never be eligible for a heart transplant, despite exhausting so many attempts to repair his heart condition, because he has Down Syndrome.

Two other individuals with Down Syndrome and another with autism testified in support of AB 539, asserting their right to the necessary health treatment, regardless of their disability.

Those advocating for pro-life legislation were criticized by pro-abortion committee members Sara Rodriguez (D Brookfield), and Subeck (D Madison). Committee Chair, Rep. Joe Sanfelippo had to gavel down Rodriguez, demanding that committee members return to decorum rather than attacks on those testifying such as Micah Pearce of Wisconsin Family Action.

Mainstream media never reported these details of the committee. They focused onRep. Subeck and pro-abortion doctors, revealing bias towards promoting abortion.

The following bills are scheduled to be passed through an Executive Committee Hearingof the Assembly Committee on Health next Thursday, 10/14/21: AB 6, AB 36, AB 128, AB262, AB 493, AB 528, AB 539, AB 593, AB 594, and AB 595. Also scheduled to be passed through that same Executive Committee Hearing but not heard in the 10/7/21 hearing are AB 128, AB 281, AB 290, AB 295, AB 296, AB 337, and AB 358. All bills can beaccessed by typing in their number here.

Excerpt from:

What Wisconsin Democratics Think About Disabled Kids - Wisconsin Right Now

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on What Wisconsin Democratics Think About Disabled Kids – Wisconsin Right Now

In Vermont, just 17 of the 7,000 farms are Black-owned. A new grant seeks to expand access. – USA TODAY

Posted: at 11:04 am

Farm swaps cows for goats amid changing industry

Fluctuating milk prices and rising costs have driven some small family farms to either go big or leave the industry. Two brothers operating their familys dairy farm in Vermont made the drastic decision to give up hundreds of cows for goats. (July 20)

AP

BURLINGTON, Vt. Out of the nearly 7,000 farms in Vermont, only 17 are Black-owned, according to the 2017 U.S. agriculture census. A $2 million fundis seeking to expand access to farm land ownership in Vermont for people who have been historically denied land based on their race.

The design and governance of this "land sovereignty" fund will bedetermined byBlack, Indigenous, and other people of color. Itis part of a broader$6 million initiative by theHigh Meadows Fund, Vermont Community Foundation, and Vermont Land Trust to promote the economic viability, sustainability, and diversity of farming in Vermont.

"The historic Clemmons farm is one of the few Black-owned farms remaining in the state and nation.We look forward to joining hands with others to support the important work ahead," said Lydia Clemmons,executive director of the Clemmons Family Farm in Charlotte.

The Vermont Land Trust permanently restricts development of land using a legal tool called conservation easement. Since 1977, they have conserved 11% of the state's land, over 590,000 acres, most of which is actively farmed or managed for timber by private owners.

Nationally, Black land ownership has declined by nearly 90% over the last century, resulting in a total loss of36.7 million acres,according to Census of Agriculture data. Investigations by Mother Jones and The Atlantic attribute this decline toracist government policies,discriminatory lendingpractices, white vigilantism, and police violence.

Indigenous people have lost 1.5 billion acres of land since the founding of the U.S., according toUniversity of Georgia historian Claudio Saunt.

"Indigenous communities, once the sole stewards of Vermonts land, have been diminished and marginalized by centuries of displacement and discrimination, including the eugenics movement in Vermont in the early 20th century," the High Meadows Fund wrotein a press release about the new grant.

Contact April Fisher at amfisher@freepressmedia.com. Followher on Twitter: @AMFisherMedia

See more here:

In Vermont, just 17 of the 7,000 farms are Black-owned. A new grant seeks to expand access. - USA TODAY

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on In Vermont, just 17 of the 7,000 farms are Black-owned. A new grant seeks to expand access. – USA TODAY

My Experience with Conservative Atheism | Gene Veith – Patheos

Posted: at 11:02 am

Putting together yesterdays post brought to mind my own experience with right wing atheism, which turned out to be a significant catalyst in my own spiritual pilgrimage. I tell about that pilgrimage, in part, in the new third edition of Spirituality of the Cross, but I didnt tell about this. So I thought Id tell you about it.

When I was in high school in Oklahoma in the 1960s, my best friend was a fellow adolescent intellectual. We had lots in common, but at the time I was a liberala Kennedy/LBJ Democrat all in for civil rights and the Great Society programsand my friend was a conservative, a Goldwater Republican. We loved to argue politics. (You might think by todays standards that it is impossible for people who disagree with each other politically to be friends, let alone best friends, but trust me, this happened back in those days.)

The Vietnam War was going on, as was the draft. My friend and I were still in school and too young to be drafted, but this was hanging over us. At the time, I supported the warafter all, this was LBJs war, as started by Kennedy, so I was loyal to that legacyand, if called, I would have served. Although the anti-war movement had started up, most of our small town, both Democrats and the few Republicans, supported the war, as we saw it, against Communist expansion. (Back then, both political parties were in substantial agreement on foreign policy, particularly when it came to the Cold War against Communism.)

So our town was surprised when my friends older brother, a brilliant guy and a star basketball player, fled to Canada to avoid the draft.

I thought your family was all arch-conservative like you, I said to my friend. How did your draft-dodger brother get to be even further to the left than I was?

It wasnt like that, he explained. My brother isnt a pacifist. He doesnt have any moral problem with this particular war. He doesnt care about any of that stuff. He doesnt believe he should risk dying for any cause or any person. He believes in the virtue of selfishness. He has been reading Ayn Rand.

I had never heard of this person, so my friendwho was also distraught about what his brother didexplained her beliefs and even lent me some of her books. Basically, she taught that human beings should always follow their individual self-interests. This is how free market capitalism works, and this is how evolution works.

But altruism, the notion that we should do things for other people, to the point of sacrificing ourselves and our interests for others, is the source of all of our personal and social problems. And the great teacher of altruism, the person who introduced the seemingly attractive but really toxic notions of selflessness, charity, and love, is Jesus Christ. Whereas most thinkers, even those hostile to religion, pay at least some tribute to Jesushonoring Him, trying to co-opt Him to their position, insisting that His followers have understood Him, etc.Rand pulls no punches in denouncing Jesus, His ethical teachings, and His influence.

She was a rigorous atheist and materialist, who insisted that we must be governed by reason alone. She called her philosophy objectivism. She put the highest value on individualism and freedom. Politically, she championed laissez faire freemarket capitalism, a small non-interfering government, and no welfare or social programs of any kind. That gave her impeccable conservative credentials, though her thought has been most influential with libertarians.

Reading Rand was unsettling. I was a mainline liberal Protestant, but I had a general orientation to Christianity and appreciation for Jesus. And since my church mainly taught good works and the social gospel, her critique of moralityparticularly the impulse to help other people rather than oneselfwas especially disorienting.

My friend and I talked about her ideas, but while we both recoiled from what she was saying, to our eager but immature minds, it was hard to see why she was wrong.

Then one night, my friend told me that he had been born again. God is real. Ive experienced Him. And Jesus is not just an ethical teacher that you can agree or disagree with. He is the Savior. From that point on, he knew that Ayn Rand was wrong.

My friends conversion also helped settled the matter for me. I realized that if God actually exists, an argument, however logical, does not take away His existence. God can manifest Himself in different ways. He is not a philosophical abstraction but a person who can make Himself known, as He did to my friend.

But I couldnt relate to all this Baptist stuff from my friend. As a matter of fact, he went on to become a Baptist minister. But, mainline liberal Protestant that I was, his new religiosity was alien to me, though we still remained friends.

Later, though, I had my own epiphany. My friend and I pooled our money to buy J. R. R. Tolkiens Lord of the Rings trilogy. I was blown away by it. My reactions were well-expressed by one of the blurbs on the back of the paperback edition: here are beauties which pierce like swords or burn like cold iron. Exactly!, I thought. And I remembered the name of the person who said that: C. S. Lewis.

When I was browsing in a bookstore during a trip to Tulsa, I recognized the name on a book. I opened it up and saw that it was dedicated to J. R. R. Tolkien. The book was Screwtape Letters. When I read the introduction I recognized an intellect of the highest order who seemed to be taking concepts like the Devil and Christianity with total seriousness. And the book itself was a comical and artistic masterpiece. I had to read more from this C. S. Lewis.

What I appreciated from Mere Christianity is that Lewis shows that Christianity, contrary to what Rand said, is reasonable, that there is a rational case for Christianity. And Lewis was far more learned, far more humane, far more open to the vast range of life than the the narrow, harsh, and angry Rand. And Lewiss Abolition of Man, his defense of objective morality, completely demolished Rands dismissal of traditional ethics.

In the meantime, I also learned what Christianity is, something neither Rand nor my liberal church seemed to grasp. I learned that Jesus Christ is God in the flesh. And The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe taught me what it meant that Jesus died for my sins.

Thus started the long and winding road to Lutheran Christianity, which I tell about from that time forward in the third edition of Spirituality of the Cross.

But even Ayn Rand played a part in that.

As for how I became politically conservative, that is a story for another day.

Photo: Ayn Rand by Julius Jskelinen, CC BY 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons

See the article here:

My Experience with Conservative Atheism | Gene Veith - Patheos

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on My Experience with Conservative Atheism | Gene Veith – Patheos

Sajid Javid leaves people baffled with comments on who should be responsible for health and social care – indy100

Posted: at 11:02 am

Sajid Javid has left people incredibly confused after setting out his vision for healthcare in the UK - and spoiler alert he doesnt sound that happy about the states role in it.

Showing his unwavering love for Ayn Rand, the health secretary questioned why people go to the state when they have a health issue and said people have to take some responsibility for their health too.

The state was needed in this pandemic more than anytime in peacetime, he said. But government shouldnt own all risks and responsibilities in life.

We as citizens have to take some responsibility for our health too. We shouldnt always go first to the state. What kind of society would that be?

Health and social care it begins at home. It should be family first, then community, then the state.

Sign up to our free Indy100 weekly newsletter

If you do need support, we live in a compassionate, developed country that can afford to help with that. There are few higher callings than to care for another person.

Javid was speaking at the Conservative Party conference yesterday. During the speech, the minister also reminisced on his time volunteering in a care home - we hope not shouting at people to get their family to look after them instead - and said that he expected NHS waiting lists to get worse before they get better.

Javid said: My priorities are simple: Covid, recovery, reform. Covid: getting us, and keeping us, out of the pandemic. Recovery: tackling the huge backlog of appointments it has caused. And reform of our health and social care systems for the long term.

But it was his comments on personal responsibility that stuck out and left people confused.

Labour MP Sarah Jones called his idea a strange view of the world and the NHS.

While others similarly slammed the idea, pointing out that it was an odd thing to say after increasing national insurance taxes to pay for healthcare, and that the point of the NHS is to look after ill people:

So, next time you break your arm or something, get your family to put it in a sling first, then pop round to your neighbours to see if they can help, then if it really cant be sorted out with an ibuprofen and a rest then we guess you can go to the doctor.

Originally posted here:

Sajid Javid leaves people baffled with comments on who should be responsible for health and social care - indy100

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Sajid Javid leaves people baffled with comments on who should be responsible for health and social care – indy100