Daily Archives: October 9, 2021

Google Reader is still defunct, but its spirit lives on in a follow button for Chrome that Google first started experimenting with in May. The RSS tracking feature was limited to the experimental Canary versions of Chrome on Android, but today the company has started enabling it on stable versions of the browser, according to Adrienne Porter Felt, a director of engineering on Chrome.

You can follow a site through the browsers three-dot menu to subscribe to its RSS feed and have it update in your Chrome app. Sites youre following will appear in a tab called following, which sits along Googles for you tab of recommended articles. The feature isnt out yet on iOS, so Im not able to check it out on my phone, but Felt shared some screenshots of what it looks like on Android so you can get an idea.

Its not clear how many people already have access to the new feature by default, but you can enable it yourself by entering chrome://flags in your address bar and turning it on under web feed, Felt writes.

The Chrome follow button is currently a mobile-only feature (iOS and desktop versions are coming), which will surely disappoint some Google Reader power users. Still, its at least nice to see Google keeping the RSS fire alive in some fashion. It makes the Chrome app even more crowded in terms of features, but if you were looking for a free, low-fuss way to keep up with some of your favorite sites, it seems like Google is once again willing to be that option.

Originally posted here:

Google Reader is still defunct, but now you can follow RSS feeds in Chrome on Android - The Verge

Google has said it will provide 10,000 high-risk users with free hardware security keys, days after the company warned thousands of Gmail users that they were targeted by state-sponsored hackers.

The warning, sent by Googles Threat Analysis Group (TAG), alerted more than 14,000 Gmail users that they had been targeted in a state-sponsored phishing campaign from APT28, also known as Fancy Bear, said to be made up of operatives of Russias GRU intelligence agency. Fancy Bear has been active for more than a decade but its widely known for hacking into the Democratic National Committee and its disinformation and election influencing campaign in the run-up to the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

These warnings indicate targeting not compromise. If we are warning you theres a very high chance we blocked, Googles TAG director Shane Huntley wrote in a Twitter threadon Thursday. The increased numbers this month come from a small number of widely targeted campaigns which were blocked.

Huntley added that these warnings are normal for individuals such as activists, journalists and government officials because thats who government-backed entities target. If you are an activist/journalist/government official or work in [national security], this warning honestly shouldnt be a surprise. At some point some [government] backed entity probably will try to send you something, he said.

Google said in a blog post that it will send out the security keys throughout 2021 to encourage users to enroll in its Advanced Protection Program (APP), which safeguards users with high visibility and sensitive information who are at risk of targeted online attacks. Security keys make it harder for phishing attacks to work as security keys can only be used to unlock accounts on legitimate websites.

Additionally, Google also announced new and extended partnerships with theInternational Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES), UN Women and nonprofit Defending Digital Campaigns (DDC) in order to shore up security for its most at-risk users.

Through its collaboration with the latter, Google said it has already provided Titan Security Keys to more than 180 eligible federal campaigns during the 2020 U.S. election season, adding that it is now working with the organization to provide further protection for state-level campaigns and political parties, committees and related organizations including workshops and training on how to protect against cyberattacks.

Link:

Google to give security keys to high risk users targeted by government hackers - TechCrunch

Google Search now has a handy built-in tuner, letting you use the microphone on your phone or computer to tune a guitar, Android Police reports. To access the feature, which was added this week, just search for Google tuner. The interface is similar to the dozens of guitar tuning apps that are already available. You play a string on the guitar, and Google will detect the note youre aiming for, and tell you to tune up or tune down as required.

Like other guitar tuning apps, the effectiveness of Googles tuner seems to depend a lot on the hardware youre using it with. My iPhone 12 Pro (via Safari) or Windows desktop with a Blue Snowball USB microphone (via Edge) had no trouble hearing and helping me tune an unamplified electric guitar, but a more affordable Android device Im currently reviewing (with Chrome) couldnt pick it up at all. Your mileage may vary, basically.

Like most other guitar tuner apps, I dont think Google Searchs feature is going to kill off the market for dedicated hardware tuners from the likes of Korg or Boss. Its too reliant on the quality of the mic in your device, and theres no way to easily plug in an electric guitar to avoid having to worry about background noise. But if you need to tune up in a pinch, Google Search now has you covered.

Go here to see the original:

Google Search adds guitar tuner to its smorgasbord of built-in features - The Verge

Ireland said Thursday it would join an international agreement that sets taxes on profits for multinational corporations at a minimum rate of 15 percent. This is a major shift for the country that is the European headquarters for many large US pharmaceutical companies, as well as tech firms, including Google, Apple, and Facebook.

An increase from Irelands current 12.5 percent to 15 percent may not seem that large by itself. The so-called Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Inclusive Framework agreement, outlined in July, is actually a two-pillar plan aimed at helping end tax avoidance and making international tax rules fairer and more transparent. The OECD has estimated that a 15 percent tax rate would generate some $150 billion in global tax revenue annually and would help to stabilize the international tax system.

Ireland signed on to the deal ahead of a Friday meeting at the OECD among the 140 countries that have been negotiating its terms for several years. The plan calls for global companies to pay taxes in countries where their products or services are sold, even if they dont have a physical presence there, and would apply to multinational companies with revenues above 750 million (about $867 million). For companies with revenues below 750 million, the 12.5 percent rate would remain in effect in Ireland.

Over the past several decades, Ireland has served as a tax shelter for many large tech companies, thanks to its low corporate tax rate. Companies typically create Irish subsidiaries of their companies that license their intellectual property, on which the subsidiary pays royalties. Some 800 US companies have operations in Ireland, according to the American Chamber of Commerce Ireland, employing about 180,000 people. Apple opened its first plant in Ireland in 1980 and now employs some 6,000 people on its campus in the city of Cork. Facebook established its international headquarters in Dublin in 2008, and Google announced its European headquarters would be in Ireland in 2003.

Irish finance minister Paschal Donohoe said in a statement Thursday that the agreement will address the tax challenges of digitalisation. Donohoe added that he believes companies will still choose to locate their headquarters in Ireland.

I am confident that Ireland will remain competitive into the future, and we will remain an attractive location and best in class when multi-nationals look to investment locations, Donohoe said. These multinational enterprises support our economy with high value jobs, and at the same time, Ireland provides a stable platform and a long proven track record of success for MNEs choosing to invest here.

If the OECD agreement moves forward, its provisions are expected to take effect in 2023.

View original post here:

Irelands status as tax haven for tech firms like Google, Facebook, and Apple is ending - The Verge

Google traditionally holds an October hardware event to reveal its new Pixel phones. This year, it already announced them heres the Pixel 5A and the Pixel 6. But the company clearly hasnt said everything it wants to say publicly quite yet, because it just announced a virtual event for October 19th at 1PM ET / 10AM PT.

Google:

On October 19, were officially introducing you to Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Prothe completely reimagined Google phones. Powered by Tensor, Googles first custom mobile chip, theyre fast, smart and secure. And they adapt to you. #Pixel6Launch

And though Google got out ahead of some of the leaks this year with its early Pixel announcements, theres still a lot we dont know about the Pixel 6 and the Pixel 6 Pro. Were intrigued by what weve heard about the Pixel 6s Tensor processor, which undoubtedly deserves some sort of deep dive, and were still waiting to hear if Googles first folding-screen Pixel will see its rumored 2021 reveal.

Plus, of course, were still waiting for Google to formally announce when itll release Android 12. Weve already reviewed the update, of course, but Google was only willing to say that a push to Pixel devices will begin in the next few weeks.

Were having quite a run of big gadget events this fall, having just finished Apples September iPhone 13 and iPad event, Microsofts Surface Pro 8 and Laptop Studio event, and the Amazon fall hardware event last week.

Well have coverage of the Google event (according to the invite, we can expect a pre-recorded livestream) this October as well.

Googles Pixel 6 is a fresh start

Read the original here:

Google just announced its Pixel 6 event on October 19th - The Verge

The U.S. government is reportedly secretly issuing warrants for Google to provide user data on anyone typing in certain search terms, raising fears that innocent online users could get caught up in serious crime investigations at a greater frequency than previously thought.

In an attempt to track down criminals, federal investigators have started using new "keyword warrants" and used them to ask Google to provide them information on anyone who searched a victim's name or their address during a particular year, an accidentally unsealed court document that Forbes found shows.

GOOGLE'S METHODS FOR SPYING ON EMPLOYEES REVEALED IN REPORT

Google has to respond to thousands of warrant orders each year, but the keyword warrants are a relatively new strategy used by the government and are controversial.

Trawling through Googles search history database enables police to identify people merely based on what they might have been thinking about, for whatever reason, at some point in the past, Jennifer Granick, surveillance and cybersecurity counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union, told Forbes.

This never-before-possible technique threatens First Amendment interests and will inevitably sweep up innocent people, especially if the keyword terms are not unique and the time frame not precise. To make matters worse, police are currently doing this in secret, which insulates the practice from public debate and regulation, she added.

The government said that the scope of the warrants is limited to avoid implicating innocent people who happen to search for certain terms, but it's not publicly disclosed how many users' data are sent to the government and what the extent of the warrant requests are.

Google has defended its decision to respond to the warrants and said it protects users when doing so.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

As with all law enforcement requests, we have a rigorous process that is designed to protect the privacy of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement, a Google spokesperson said.

Story continues

Washington Examiner Videos

Tags: News, Policy, Surveillance, Google, Big Tech, Warrants, online commerce

Original Author: Nihal Krishan

Original Location: Government secretly orders Google to track anyone searching certain names, addresses, and phone numbers

Follow this link:

Government secretly orders Google to track anyone searching certain names, addresses, and phone numbers - Yahoo News

When Frances Haugen revealed she was the Facebook whistleblower who supplied internal documents to Congress and the Wall Street Journal, she joined a growing list of current and former Silicon Valley employees whove come forward to call out military contracts, racism, sexism, contributions to climate crisis, pay disparities and more in the industry.

In the past days, the Guardian spoke with five former employees of Amazon, Google, and Pinterest whove spoken out about their companies policies. The conversations revealed Haugens experience has been singular in some respects. Few of them received the international praise bestowed upon her. Some of them said they have faced termination, retaliation, harassment and prolonged litigation.

But Haugen is entering a community of whistleblowers that appears tighter than ever, with some working to make it easier for the employees to come forward, through legislation, solidarity funds, and resources.

Welcome to the party, Frances Haugen, one tweeted.

Chelsey Glasson left Google in August 2019, alleging pregnancy discrimination and retaliation. She filed a discrimination lawsuit against the company the following year, and her trial is scheduled for 10 January. Years of litigation against a multibillion dollar company have been like a part-time job, according to the mom of two.

After leaving Google, Glasson landed at Facebook. A few months into the new job, she was notified by Facebooks legal department that Google had subpoenaed her employee records, including payroll information, performance evaluations, any complaints she lodged while she was there, and any and all communications referencing Google.

In the time since then, Glasson said, she has had to give Googles legal team access to the most private corners of her life. Shes been through multiple rounds of discovery, depositions, and psychiatric analysis. Since Glasson is filing for emotional damages, Google has asked for her medical records including her notes from therapy sessions in which she has discussed her marriage and other personal issues.

People dont understand when you file a lawsuit as a plaintiff, it really is your whole life that becomes on display, she said. There are very few limits to what a corporation like Google can ask in discovery. Its very, very intrusive.

In the past year, Glasson, who left Facebook to join real-estate startup Compass, has lent her expertise and experience to Washington state senator Karen Keiser to help push through a bill that would extend the time someone could file a pregnancy discrimination claim from six months to a year after experiencing it.

I really want what I went through to have a purpose and to drive meaningful for others, she said.

Between the lawsuit, the bill and her advocacy work, Glasson said shes had little time to process the experiences of the past years. But its been clear from the get-go that in order for me to heal, I needed to know that I did everything that I could to fight this, and that my fight and my story needed to drive change and be used to hopefully help others, she said.

If I lose that makes me really scared because I think it sends such a strong signal to Google and other tech companies that fighting hard and aggressively and trying to exhaust plaintiffs like me is the path to go, she added.

Google declined to comment for this story.

Timnit Gebru wouldnt encourage anyone to be a whistleblower right now. Not with the few protections theyre afforded.

Gebru, a respected leader in AI ethics research, was ousted from Google after she refused to retract a research paper she co-authored about the downfalls of a type of AI software that powers the companys search engine.

For months after, she dealt with an onslaught of insults and harassment brimming with misogynoir, hatred aimed at Black women, she said.

She became the target of an online harassment campaign by a slew of anonymous accounts. Academics with large followings but no real ties to her or Google disparaged her and her work, saying she was creating a toxic environment and that her supporters were simply deranged activists. Googles head of research Jeff Dean called her paper subpar.

Being a Black woman, it was very different, Gebru said. Theres a specific strand of vitriol you deal with.

Gebru said she was exhausted and didnt eat or sleep much for months. After learning what happened to Glasson, she decided against seeking therapy in the months after she said she was fired. (Google maintains Gebru resigned from her position.)

I was afraid of [being subpoenaed], what were they going to try to say or use, she said. I dont want them to know anything.

But, she acknowledges shes one of the lucky ones. More than a thousand former colleagues and academics wrote an open letter demanding the company explain its actions. Gebru was also offered funding from foundations for her next endeavor.

Peoples reputations and careers are basically destroyed if they whistleblow like this, she said. Even if theyre not, then a lot of people cant spend all day fighting the companies because they have to figure out how to feed their families and get healthcare. I could take the time to recover a little bit, or try to recover, and deal with what was going on.

Since she first spoke up, there have been important moves toward creating more protections for whistleblowers, Gebru said. But much of it has been shouldered by whistleblowers themselves. Ifeoma Ozoma, a former Pinterest employee whotogether with Aerica Shimizu Banks, raised pay discrimination issues, helped launch a tech worker handbook. Ozoma and Banks also helped craft the Silenced No More Act, a bill that bars companies from imposing non-disclosure agreements when it comes to workplace or discrimination complaints. Gebru also cited the work Glasson has done in Washington.

Why do [we] have to be the one to take on the burden? Gebru asked.

Despite such recent wins for tech whistleblowers, Gebru maintains the payoff isnt worth the personal cost whistleblowers face. The best case scenario for [employees Google has fired] is theyre reinstated, she said. So why would Google just not do this over and over again? Youre actually telling them that this is the best case strategy for them because they tire you out. They can hide, they have piles of money to hire lawyers.

After speaking out publicly about gender and racial pay gaps at Pinterest, Aerica Shimizu Banks didnt think she would be able to get a job at a big tech company again. She doesnt think she wants to either.

Banks, along with Ozoma, quit the company in May 2020 after saying they were underpaid and alleged racial discrimination at the company. The company investigated their allegations and found no wrongdoing.

Like a handful of other tech whistleblowers, Banks has spent the year since she exposed her employer trying to make things easier for other people thinking about speaking up about workplace and discrimination. After she helped with the effort to craft the Silenced No More Act, Banks started Shiso, an equity and inclusion consulting company that creates frameworks and systems to help companies follow through on diversity and inclusion pledges.

Ive been saying its up to us to make meaning out of moments in our lives, Banks said. So its kind of funny now to be paid by companies to hold them accountable for their actions when before I was ostracized for it.

Though Banks is happy with the way things have turned out for her personally, shes frustrated that little has changed in the industry and at Pinterest. Just as there were many people who supported me and allowed me to come forward with what happened at Pinterest, there are also so many people who are responsible for the racism and sexism and retaliation I experienced there, she said. And very few, if none, of those people have faced any consequences.

In a statement, Pinterest spokesperson Crystal Espinosa said the company has taken a number of steps in the past year to make it a safe and equitable workplace including pay transparency and equity and increasing the percentage of women in leadership from 25% to 30%. Espinosa also said the company supported the Silenced No More Act and committed to implementing it regardless if it passed.

We want every employee to feel safe, championed and empowered to raise any concerns about their work experience, the statement read.

Still, Banks said shed encourage anyone who knew about something unethical happening in their workplace to come forward, albeit with a back-up plan and preparation.

The passing of the Silenced No More Act shows there is an understanding from policymakers that workers need protections to tell the truth and to not just tell their own story, but tell the truth that can protect other people, she said. The appetite for that is growing and the awareness around what our rights as workers really are is growing. I really hope that folks take advantage of this moment and speak out about injustices they see in the workplace.

But for those expecting to expose workplace issues, Banks said to come prepared with documentation, legal advice, and a community of people who have skills that they may not have.

It was a lot of pressure and it was a lot of anxiety, but despite all of that, it was incredibly worthwhile, Banks said.

Laurence Berland probably would not have spoken out against Google publicly if he wasnt thrust into the spotlight for being fired by the company after years of internal employee activism. I never wanted to be a public figure, Berland said.

For the type of internal organizing he was doing which included petitions against the companys contracts with the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (Ice) he didnt think it made strategic sense to attach his name to it publicly. In fact, Berland is worried about the message conveyed by becoming a public figure for whistleblower work.

I worry about what it looks like when people get the idea that whats required is heroics, he said. That one person is going to change all this in some radical way. I worry that people see someone makes this big public figure kind of move and they think of it as Well, that persons taken care of it.

Now that hes become a sort of involuntary whistleblower, Berland says hes starting to question whether he wants to continue to work in the tech industry.

Part of the issue is you can settle and get a non-disparagement clause and some cash, but it doesnt undo the experience. Even getting reinstated. Theres no trauma for the people who perpetrate this, but for those of us on the other side there is.

Berland was among a group known colloquially as the Thanksgiving Four, named for the holiday timing of their termination. Google says Berland and his colleagues Rebecca Rivers, Paul Duke, Sophie Waldman and later Kathryn Spiers were fired for violating company policies such as accessing and distributing documents they did not have permissions for. The now-former employees, who have been vocal either internally or externally about a host of ethical and workplace issues, say they were fired because of their years of activism.

Since then, the National Labor Relations Board has found validity in their complaints and accused Google of illegally spying on and then firing the workers. Over the last few weeks, the NLRB case has played out over open trial, where Google has argued that even if the ex-employees were fired for protesting against the companys work with the Ice, it would be within the companys right.

But for Berland, his part in the case is, at least formally, over. Google agreed to settle with Berland in July for an undisclosed amount and terms. Though he wouldnt go into details, Berland said the process did change his behavior and forced him to think twice about some of what he would do or write.

Berland, like many of those who spoke to the Guardian, acknowledges the privileged position he was in when he was fired. He already had a lawyer and through his activism work he had developed a community of people who seemed up to support him. Though he didnt set out to be a public whistleblower, that privilege certainly helps when assessing the risks of coming forward, he said.

The thing that I would say to people is try and judge your risk by what you can really tolerate, he said. In a practical sense, what I had that was most important was a savings account. If you cant afford to make rent next month without your paycheck, what pushes you over to taking that risk?

Thats part of why Berland has worked with a group of former and current Google workers to create the co-worker solidarity fund, a non-profit that offers financial, legal and strategic support to folks who want to fight for changes inside their companies.

Were trying to fundraise from workers, not from big money donors because [were] trying to show some solidarity across those kinds of income lines, he said.

Even though she was fired for it, Emily Cunningham would speak out to demand Amazon do more about climate crisis and stand with warehouse workers a million times over, she said.

Cunningham is one of two women terminated by Amazon in 2020 after they helped organize shareholder resolutions, sick outs and other acts of employee activism to force the company to reduce its impact on the climate. Cunningham, who is still working with the group, says the year or so since she was fired has been a transformative experience.

My heart is bigger. My imagination of whats possible when tech workers come together to push one of the largest corporations in the world [is bigger].

Cunninghams continued enthusiasm to take on Amazon is bolstered by her recent victory against the company. Cunningham who, along with Maren Costa, filed a complaint with the NLRB accusing Amazon of firing them in retaliation of their activism was preparing for a long and grueling battle against the company. But the emotionally draining process of a public trial she was warned about didnt come to fruition. Amazon settled with the duo, agreeing to pay them back wages and to post notices in offices and warehouses nationwide that say the company is not allowed to fire workers for organizing.

The legal system is set up to isolate you from other people, because youre not allowed to talk about certain things, said Cunningham. Maren and I werent even allowed to talk to each other about our own testimony. It was one of the hardest things Ive ever done. But it was so satisfying to win against Amazon, especially because winning against Amazon was a win for all workers.

Amazon spokesperson Jose Negrete said the company reached an agreement that resolves the legal issues in this case. The company also said it did not admit liability as part of the agreement.

Cunningham also credited the huge support system of people ready to organize climate actions alongside her. When she sent an emotional plea to Amazon employees asking them to sign on a shareholder resolution to require Amazon to release a climate plan, 8,700 obliged. When Cunningham and Costa were threatened with termination for speaking publicly about Amazon, 400 other workers spoke publicly about the companys role in the climate crisis in protest. When Cunningham and Costa were terminated, Tim Bray a respected engineer and the former vice-president of Amazons cloud computing group resigned in protest.

Read more:

Welcome to the party: five past tech whistleblowers on the pitfalls of speaking out - The Guardian