The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: September 22, 2021
Responsible Gaming Week: Have a Game Plan to reduce gambling-related harms – WWLP.com
Posted: September 22, 2021 at 3:08 am
BOSTON (WWLP) In their continued efforts to promote positive play and reduce gambling-related harms, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission (MGC) is supporting Responsible Gaming Education Week (RGEW), which runs from September 19 through September 25.
This years campaign them is Have a Game Plan
According to the MGC, a 2014 population survey conducted in Massachusetts found that2%or roughly110,000adult residentsmet the criteria for problem gambling, and8%or440,000were experiencing harm to a lesser degree.
The MGC realized the importance of offering options to support safe play, harm reduction, and abstinence and launched GameSense in 2015. The program is a player-focused responsible gaming program that encourages players to adopt behaviors and attitudes that reduce the risk of gambling-related harm. Operated by the Massachusetts Council on Gaming and Health, GameSense Info Centers are located at each casino property and staffed by trained advisors who give players and employees information, tips, and tools to keep gambling a safe and enjoyable experience.
Since the first casino opened in Massachusetts in 2015, more than 1,200 people enrolled in the MGCsVoluntary Self-Exclusion (VSE) program, supporting individuals who elect to abstain from casino gambling in Massachusetts.
RGEW was developed by the American Gaming Association in 1998 to prioritize responsible gaming as an integral part of the gaming industrys daily operations. The annual advocacy week also provides an opportunity to strengthen employee training, promote gaming literacy among casino guests, and further advance responsible gaming programs.
Read the rest here:
Responsible Gaming Week: Have a Game Plan to reduce gambling-related harms - WWLP.com
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on Responsible Gaming Week: Have a Game Plan to reduce gambling-related harms – WWLP.com
Revelation of Plaintiff’s Gambling Addiction Doesn’t Justify Pseudonymity or Sealing – Reason
Posted: at 3:08 am
Roe v. Skillz, Inc., decided earlier this month by a Ninth Circuit panel (Judges Morgan Christen and Danielle Forrest, and Sixth Circuit Judge Eugene Siler), held that "a district court's decision not to seal judicial records and its denial of leave to proceed anonymously" was not "an abuse of discretion":
"[W]e allow parties to use pseudonyms in the 'unusual case' when nondisclosure of the party's identity 'is necessary to protect a person from harassment, injury, ridicule or personal embarrassment.'" Because there is a presumption that parties' identities are public information, anonymity is only proper under "special circumstances when the party's need for anonymity outweighs prejudice to the opposing party and the public's interest in knowing the party's identity."
Roe maintains that special circumstances warrant her need for anonymity because her claims relate to her compulsive gambling and the impact on her mental health, her suicidal ideations, and personal harms she suffered. She generally states that disclosure could negatively affect her professional standing, as her employer is unaware of her struggles and her work requires interaction with the public who may "weaponize" it against her.
However, this court has made clear that use of a pseudonym should only be permitted occasionally and in "unusual" cases. Here, the magistrate judge did not find Roe's case to be unusual, noting that "in today's environment, a past gambling addiction with accompanying mental health problems is not so out of the norm as to constitute sensitive and highly personal in nature."
Roe has not presented medical evidence that supports the assertion that she will suffer substantial additional mental injury if her identity is disclosed. Instead, she states conclusory and general statements without explanation or support. Further, while there is no identifiable prejudice to Skillz should Roe remain anonymous, Roe failed to address and therefore show that the need for anonymity outweighs the public's interest in the proceedings.
See more here:
Revelation of Plaintiff's Gambling Addiction Doesn't Justify Pseudonymity or Sealing - Reason
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on Revelation of Plaintiff’s Gambling Addiction Doesn’t Justify Pseudonymity or Sealing – Reason
Nadine Dorries To Lead DCMS and UK Gambling Act Reform – CardsChat.com
Posted: at 3:08 am
September 21, 2021Law & Politics
The UK gambling industry may have found a friend in the new Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), Nadine Dorries.
The British MP took over from Oliver Dowden on Friday after a cabinet reshuffle by Prime Minister Boris Johnson. Dorries appointment comes at a time when the UKs Gambling Act is being updated to make it relevant in the digital age.
The news has been welcomed with a tinge of optimism by industry insiders. Indeed, the sometimes-outspoken politician has long been a fan of horse racing which has strong links with the gambling industry.
Although her views on gambling in general arent as clear, Dorries has been seen at a number of high-profile racing events, including Royal Ascot.
Shes also on record as saying that horses in the racing industry are the best looked after animals in the world. That may bode well not just for any forthcoming Gambling Act reforms but the industry in general.
Outside of gambling, Dorries could also be described as a member of the anti-woke movement. She tweeted in 2017 the left wing snowflakes are killing comedy.
Left wing snowflakes are killing comedy, tearing down historic statues, removing books from universities, dumbing down panto, removing Christ from Christmas and suppressing free speech. Sadly, it must be true, history does repeat itself. It will be music next.
Nadine Dorries (@NadineDorries) December 27, 2017
This pushback against cancel culture is backed by what some would describe as non-leftie views on the BBC, race, and religion.
Dorries also lost her job as Conservative Party whip when she took time away from Parliament to appear on the British TV show, Im a CelebrityGet Me Out of Here!
Unlike many of her colleagues, Dorries isnt from an upper-class background. She comes from a working-class home in Liverpool and trained as a nurse before moving into politics.
By those measures, shes more akin to the average gambler in the UK than many politicians. This may give her a better insight into the industrys positive and negative effects on communities. Whats clear, however, is that shell spearhead the Gambling Act reform in her new role as Secretary of State for the DCMS.
Very little has been said about the potential changes over the last nine months. Dorries predecessor, Oliver Dowden, had indicated that tighter controls were likely to be introduced, particularly with regards to deposit limits.
Beyond that, there has been talk of online betting limits being reduced so they match the changes made to FOBTs back in 2019.
The final list of rules will be the result of public and private consultations. However, Dorries will have the final say on what gets passed on for final approval from the Prime Minister.
Written by
Daniel Smyth
Dan Smyth is a poker media journeyman who politely reminds CardsChat readers that poker is played all around the world, not just America.
Share this story
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
Discuss all the latest poker news in theCardsChat forum
The rest is here:
Nadine Dorries To Lead DCMS and UK Gambling Act Reform - CardsChat.com
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on Nadine Dorries To Lead DCMS and UK Gambling Act Reform – CardsChat.com
Stoicism vs. Objectivism: Is Free Will Magic? – New Ideal
Posted: at 3:07 am
Both Stoicism and Ayn Rands philosophy, Objectivism, purport to offer guidance on the pursuit of values and the conduct and improvement of our lives. But, unlike Objectivism which upholds free will Stoicism embraces a deterministic worldview thats incompatible with moral guidance, or so I argue in my article The False Promise of Stoicism. For a philosophy to be useful as a guide, I wrote, it must at least acknowledge that we have some genuine, volitional control over our actions and choices actions and choices that make a difference to where we end up in life.
Massimo Pigliucci, a professor of philosophy at The City College of New York and a prominent voice in the contemporary Stoicism movement, disagrees. In his essay Epic Battles in Practical Ethics: Stoicism vs Objectivism, Pigliucci insists on a perspective held by many philosophers and scientists today namely, that to reject determinism, as Objectivism does, amounts to believing in magic.
Consider Pigliuccis argument for this position.
Determinism, writes Pigliucci, in its simplest and broadest definition means that things happen as a result of cause-effect, or because there are laws of nature.
If you accept that the cosmos works by cause-effect, then your attitude about human volition (free will) can fall into one of two categories: (a) You believe there is no such thing as volition, its an illusion (deterministic incompatibilism); or (b) You believe that volition is just another aspect of the lawful behavior of things in the universe, including human beings (compatibilism).
If you dont like either of the above two stances on volition, then your only remaining choice, (c) is to reject the premise of determinism and claim special status for human free will (contra-causal incompatibilism). The Stoics like most contemporary philosophers chose option(b). Smith, apparently, wants something like (c). Which, based on what we know of how the world works, amounts to believing in magic, just like many religious people do: its called contra-causal free will because the notion is that, somehow (but how??), human volition can transcend the laws of physics and biology.1
Observe that Pigliuccis argument relies on equating determinism with cause and effect and scientific lawfulness. This equation is of course not unique to Pigliucci. Daniel Dennett, one of the most influential philosophers in the contemporary free will debate, characterizes determinism similarly as the idea that every event has a cause, which has a cause, which has a cause, in a causal chain that goes back to the Big Bang, if you like, and that there are no events without causes undetermined events.2 (My emphasis)
The reason Pigliucci gets Rand wrong is that the Objectivist view offree will (and causality) doesnt fit the alternativesthat he and others consider viable contenders.
This equation which, as we will see, Objectivism rejects leads Pigliucci to narrowly frame our theoretical options as either: (i) accept the universality of cause and effect and scientific lawfulness (and therefore determinism) dismissing free will as either an illusion or a deterministic action or (ii) accept free will and therefore reject the universality of cause and effect and the laws of nature (i.e., determinism). Since Objectivism openly rejects determinism, Pigliucci assumes that Objectivism must endorse a non-causal (or contra-causal) theory of free will.
But it doesnt. Volition, according to Objectivism, is both causal (no need for magic) and free (non-deterministic). Perhaps the reason Pigliucci gets Rand wrong is that the Objectivist view offree will (and causality) doesnt fit the alternativesthat he and others consider viable contenders.
READ ALSO: Why Champions of Science and Reason Need Free Will
Consider just a few aspects of Rands account.
According to Objectivism, causality (or cause and effect) is not a principle relating antecedentevents to their necessary consequences (determinism), but one that relates an entitys identity (what it is) to its actions (what it does). Objectivism holds that since every entity has a specific identity, constituted by its specific set of characteristics, it can perform only those actions it has the capacity to perform; it cannot act apart from or in contradiction to its nature. As such, there can be no uncaused actions and no miracles. (There goes anything contra-causal.)
Objectivism accepts the universality of cause and effect. But it stresses that the principle of cause and effect by itself does not legislate that all cause-effect relations are deterministic (such that one and only one outcome is possible from and indeed necessitated by a given set of antecedent circumstances). Nor does the principle of causality tell us which specific actions an entity can take in a given context; it tells us only that an entity must act in accordance with its nature; it cannot act in contradiction to it.
Contrary to Pigliuccis assumptions, the Objectivist view of free will is not that volition magically transcends identity and causality as Gods volition is traditionally supposed to. Rather, Objectivism holds that volition is a form of causation.
Questions about what specific actions entities are capable of must be settled by reference to observed facts about the behavior of the relevant entities. And when it comes to human volition, the proper place to begin is with the data of introspection i.e., with what we can directly observe of the operations of our own consciousness. What we observe thereby is that we possess a certain kind of control over our consciousness. This observed control, this causal power to initiate and direct action, is what Rand calls free will.
As Rand puts it, what is fundamentally and directly under our control is the process of thinking:
To think is an act of choice. . . . Reason does not work automatically; thinking is not a mechanical process; the connections of logic are not made by instinct. The function of your stomach, lungs or heart is automatic; the function of your mind is not. In any hour and issue of your life, you are free to think or to evade that effort.4
To say that we have free will, in Objectivism, is to say that reason operates by choice. You can choose to think to exercise your cognitive faculties, to seek to know, to classify, to reach a wider and deeper understanding. Or, you can allow your mind to drift letting it glide on autopilot, guided only by undirected stimuli, emotions, and associations. Or, you can choose to deliberately throw your mind out of focus to refuse to know, to pretend facts are other than they are, turning your mind away from the goal of awareness, thereby subverting its functioning. You can also realize (clearly or dimly) that you are out of focus and choose to exert the effort that a state of goal-directed awareness requires an effort nature does not compel you to exert or sustain.
READ ALSO: Free Will vs. Science?
To say that a process of thought is caused by the actor, does not mean only that it is caused by factors that are internal to the actor rather than external, as many determinists would say. It means that the actor possesses the capacity to initiate action and chose to exercise that capacity.
It is only because we have free will that we need, and can make use of, a philosophic perspective to guide our choices toward a vision of what our lives and character could and ought to be.
If the deterministic framework that so many philosophers and scientifically minded people today accept doesnt allow for this directly observable form of causation, then that framework should be revised. The alternatives dismissing the observed fact of choice as an illusion (deterministic incompatibilism) or rewriting it to fit the prevailing theory as compatibilist accounts of volition like Pigliuccis attempt to do are unscientific.5
Pigliucci as someone offering advice on how to live and what to value seems to want to maintain some genuine notion of free will, presumably because he realizes that moral agency is impossible without it.
Our decisions are the result of external causes (other peoples opinions, events, etc.), combined with internal causes (our character, considered judgments, etc.) Human beings arent passive receivers of external influences . . . we are part and parcel of how the universe works. And the intriguing thing . . . is that volition, as an internal cause, can act on itself in a recursive fashion. A fancy way to say that we can reflect on our own judgments and change them. And the more we engage in cognitive and behavioral steps, the more we change our internal causality. If our changes are in the right direction we become better persons, the goal of Stoic practice.
This is as close as one gets to free will in a universe governed by laws and by relations of cause-effect.
Summarizing this perspective later in the essay, he writes:
Nothing is really ours, except the considered judgments we arrive at. Those are the ones on the basis of which we should be thought of as worthy or unworthy human beings. And lucky for us, those are under our control. Which means that the objective of living a life worth living is also under our control.6
But when Pigliucci says that our considered judgments are under our control and that we can reflect on our own judgments and change them, the essential question is: are both alternatives to consider or not consider, to reflect or not reflect, to think or not to think within our power to choose under the circumstances? Or is our act of reflecting or not reflecting itself necessitated by antecedent events? If we take determinism seriously, then whether we become a better or worse person today or tomorrow is not within our power to choose. It was determined for us long before we were born.
In his book Stoicism and the Art of Happiness, fellow modern Stoic Donald Robertson presents the Stoic position on determinism more accurately as the idea that absolutely everything in life necessarily happens as it does.
Your own thoughts and actions are necessitated as part of the whole string of causes that forms the universe . . . so that even if there are things in life that seem to require great effort on our part to achieve, whether or not we make the effort is fated along with the outcome . . .
What happens next will depend, in part, on what you choose to do next because you are a tiny but essential cog in the vast machinery of the universe. However, your choices themselves are the consequences of a massive string of causation set in motion countless billions of years before you were even born, at the beginning of the universe.7
The essential point here is that, for a cog whose every thought and action is necessitated by factors outside his control a philosophy of life is useless. It is only because we have free will that we need, and can make use of, a philosophic perspective to guide our choices toward a vision of what our lives and character could and ought to be.
If youre seeking a philosophic perspective on life according to which there genuinely are things that are up to you that you face genuine alternatives, such that if you make the right choices, you can become a better person and live a better life you need a philosophy that embraces free will, not one that gives you the illusion of freedom while insisting on a worldview that denies it.
If you value the ideas presented here, please become an ARI Member today.
Footnotes
More:
Posted in Ayn Rand
Comments Off on Stoicism vs. Objectivism: Is Free Will Magic? – New Ideal
Indias big business: A persecuted minority – The Times of India Blog
Posted: at 3:07 am
Sixty years ago, the great philosopher-novelist Ayn Rand delivered a famous lecture in which she called Americas big business as a persecuted minority. Evidently, she overlooked the situation in India, for the persecution of all businessbig and small, in services and manufacturing cutting across sectorswas infinitely more here than it was ever in the United States. Even 30 years after liberalization, which did away with some of the worst features of socialism, the captains of industry continue to be treated like second-class citizens. This is evident from the treatment meted out to the Infosys bosses, the Tata group, and the auto sector.
Not that micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) are treated any better. An Indian-American entrepreneur, Rakesh Nayak, recently exposed the governments big claims about the enhanced ease of doing business in India in a tweet: Unpopular opinion: After spending almost a month in India doing business, I have concluded one thingthe morons who gave me lectures on how India has developed digitally & become business-friendly recently are either jobless or never did any business or they are worth nothing.
It has got more than 19,700 likes and 500 replies since then. It has been retweeted over 4,200 times.
MSMEs, however, can find some solace in the fact that at least ministers, ruling party leaders, and other politicians dont badmouth them. Even communists, doctrinally and temperamentally opposed to anything private, favor support to MSMEs.
Big business, however, is a different ball game. Politicians, especially those leaning Leftwards, regularly portray corporate biggies as anti-poor, profit-obsessed monsters who ought to be kept on a tight leash. Even the incumbent ministers, supposedly representing a Rightwing government, routinely humiliate top magnates. Big businesspersons can be accused of being heartless towards the plight of their employees and fellow citizens, ruthless in the market, not nationalistic enough, and now even anti-national.
A minister slams India Inc focusing on profits rather than nation building and another one harangues the auto sector for not going electric. These verbal assaults are symptomatic of a severely statist attitude which, in turn, has real, painful consequences.
For, in policy terms, statism translates into tight controls over businesses. Not just regulatory mechanisms are made more stringent and compliances more cumbersome and agonizing; state intervention tends to enter into corporate decision making.
A few years ago, the government mandated that a certain amount of big companies profits should go towards corporate social responsibility (CSR) funding. Non-compliance could result in criminal liabilities. Thankfully, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced in August 2019 that the liabilities would be just civil and not criminal.
But the very idea of mandatory CSR is an abomination; it is indeed the epitome of illiberal welfarism, something no lover of human freedom can condone, let alone support. The first and foremost objection to the idea is that it represents the states brazen desire to control of one of the noblest of human instinctsphilanthropy. The urge to help fellow human beings is as old as mankind. Over two-and-a-half millennia ago, Prince Siddhartha Gautam, moved by the sufferings of men and women around him, sacrificed all the pleasures and privileges that his royal status could bring to him and became Lord Buddha. He was certainly not responding to some fiat by his father to do so.
Similarly, those countless Europeans who gave up comfortable lives to serve humanity as Christian missionaries in Africa and Asia did not do so because of some government diktat. In the last century, a large number of rich youngsters in the West as well as in India became communists and socialists in the mistaken belief that their ideologies would make the world a better place. Many American tycoons have donated huge amounts to set up foundations and charities. Indian business houses have also donated for society. So, why should our government force big industry to become philanthropic?
Mandatory CSR is egregious not just because it introduces a pointless state intervention where none is needed, but also, and more so, because it attempts to control all that is personal and private to any individualinstincts, sentiments, munificence, genuine, and spontaneous altruism. It enters the sacred space of the citizen, conscience, and defiles its sanctity. It is the colonization of conscience.
But Indias deep pink statecomprising statist policy and decision makers entrenched in the systemdoes not believe that corporations have any conscience. Since the institutionalized mindset is inveterately anti-business, the policy framework remains hostile to entrepreneurs. An obvious consequence is price control. The healthcare sector is the worst affected one; price caps on drugs and medical devices are a regular occurrence. The pretexts are well-knownaffordable healthcare, helping the poor, etc.
The powers that be, however, also meddle in other sectors to regulate prices. One of the most anti-business decisions the Narendra Modi government has taken so far was the setting up of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) in 2017. The objective was to ensure that the consumer benefited from the reduction in rate of the Central goods and services tax. The exercise militated against the spirit of liberalization, for every economist, barring the lal salaam-types, agrees that prices are best determined by the market; politicians and bureaucrats should have nothing to do with them.
The NAA was supposed given a two-year term. But then, as Milton Friedman said, nothing is so permanent as a temporary government programme. The NAA got another extension, of two years, in 2019.
But what now, as the extension ends in November? Will the fiend die its natural death? Well, not if our political masters have their way, for the Goods and Service Tax Council is still pondering over the great issue of keeping the NAA alive. A proposal doing the rounds is that it may be merged with the Competition Commission of India (CCI). Evil is vanquished only in fiction, not in reality.
The moral of the story is that some things dont change in India; anti-business attitude is one of them. Unsurprisingly, India Inc remains a persecuted minority.
Views expressed above are the author's own.
END OF ARTICLE
Continued here:
Indias big business: A persecuted minority - The Times of India Blog
Posted in Ayn Rand
Comments Off on Indias big business: A persecuted minority – The Times of India Blog
Paul Gibbs: Take no joy in the misery of the unvaccinated – Salt Lake Tribune
Posted: at 3:07 am
(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) Lindsay Brown prepares a dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine at a drive-thru event organized by the Utah County Health Department in Spanish Fork on Friday, Sept. 10, 2021.
By Paul Gibbs | Special to The Tribune
| Sep. 21, 2021, 7:00 p.m.
| Updated: 10:24 p.m.
This is the weapon of the enemy. We do not need it. We will not use it.
Batman, The Dark Knight Returns, by Frank Miller
Most who know me through my advocacy know that Batman is my activist alter ego. Im inspired by how he uses the fear and pain of his own trauma as motivation to turn fear and pain against themselves, and thats what I try to do by fighting to give others the access to health care that gave me the transplanted kidney that has kept me alive.
Batman obeys one rule which he believes separates him from his adversaries: he refuses to kill. The line I wont cross is rooting for or talking pleasure in anyones illness or death, and I allow no exceptions. These things are the enemy, and I will not use their weapons.
As the pandemic rages, I see many good people reacting without compassion to the deaths of unvaccinated people. They site the ready availability of vaccines and the politically motivated refusal of many as reasons these people deserve their fate.
I certainly understand and share the anger at those who spread vile anti-vaccine propaganda and deride a safe and simple measure which could save the lives of themselves and others. I would argue that Im in a position to feel this more than most, as my status as an immunocompromised kidney transplant patient has put me in virtual house arrest for most of the past year and a half.
But despite my anger at the anti-vaxxers, I cannot share the dismissive attitude toward their passing.
No ones vaccination choice truly impacts them alone. Unvaccinated people increase the spread of COVID-19 to others, and slow our chances of reaching herd immunity. As they die, so will others with them, whether they are unvaccinated or are immunocompromised or otherwise higher risk, even if vaccinated.
Far from all of those who fail to get vaccinated are angry, politically motivated anti-vaxxers. Many simply have not been able to sort the real information from the anti-vaccine propaganda and crackpot theories. And an inordinate number of them are in the Medicaid population. These are the same people so many of us in Utah fought long and hard to protect through Medicaid expansion. To care less about them now would blur the line us and those we accused of dismissing their health and lives because they disagreed with expanding Medicaid.
During the fights I joined in to expand Medicaid and protect the Affordable Care Act, I saw an astonishing lack of compassion. Whether it was the person who said they hoped my 1-year-old son and I got run over on our way to a rally, or politicians who echoed Ayn Rand rhetoric to complain about taking money from producers to help the uninsured, I saw people who had made a moral compromise to allow for the belief that some lives are less important than others.
I promised never to make the same compromise. Whether our reason is better than theirs is not the point; Any step toward separating those who deserve life and those who dont moves our society away from compassion when we need it more than ever.
If we are to be defenders of human life, we cannot do so by devaluing lives, however ridiculous or pernicious their beliefs and choices. We dont need the weapon of the enemy, and we must refuse to use it. Our words undermine our own efforts to extend compassion to others. To paraphrase my hero again, its not who we are underneath, but what we do that defines us.
Paul Gibbs is an independent filmmaker, health care activist and Batman fan. He has advocated for health care causes locally and nationally since receiving a kidney transplant, and is currently waiting out the pandemic in West Valley City with his wife and two sons, and teaching kindergarten at home to his 5-year-old.
See original here:
Paul Gibbs: Take no joy in the misery of the unvaccinated - Salt Lake Tribune
Posted in Ayn Rand
Comments Off on Paul Gibbs: Take no joy in the misery of the unvaccinated – Salt Lake Tribune
The Black Lives Matter Movement of the Summer of 2020 – The Hornet
Posted: at 3:06 am
Janae Spooner
Like a lit match to a pool of gas, a single murder sparked an explosion of outrage and change, furthering the Black Lives Matter Movement. Many people are probably familiar with the surge in support for the black lives matter movement. During the summer there were peaceful protests, rioting, violence, and a call for justice.
The murder of George Floyd broke the camels back and served as a catalyst of indignation. On May 25th, police officers took Floyd into custody and used excessive force in pinning him down, eventually leading to his murder. This murder was recorded and spread across the internet, leading to a strong resurgence of the Black Lives Matter movement. The social media presence of the movement exploded, spreading awareness to any listening individual. I asked Maya Spooner, a Black young adult fluent in social media about her experience with the movement on social media, I see the hashtag, I see all sorts of fundraisers related to BLM or black people in need regularly. I see discussions n what ppl would like BLM to do, I see discussions on what BLM has done, or what they dont do.
Although the recent surge in popularity is how many came to know about the black lives matter movement, BLM has a rich history of advocating against the oppression of black people in America. Starting as a simple hashtag, the growth of the BLM organization is definitely a sight to behold. Based mostly on social media, this organization relies on the internet to promote the black-centred political movement to the masses. Unfortunately, another act of violence was the motivation for the rudimentary beginnings of the movement.
In 2012, after the shootings of Trayvon Martin, the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter began to grow in popularity as a protest against the acts of police brutality towards black people in America. In 2013, three women, Alicia Garza, Patrisse Cullors, and Opal Tometi started the political movement called #BlackLivesMatter. Since then, the project has only risen in popularity across the nation, gaining recognition, working towards the liberation of black people- even queer and disabled- in Americas oppressive system. They are accepting donations and support at the link: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ms_blm_homepage_2019
A major moment in black liberation history was the murder of George Floyd at the hands of the Minneapolis police. On May 25th, Floyd was taken into custody by Minneapolis police under suspicion of using counterfeit money to buy a pack of cigarettes. The police ended up using excessive force in order to subdue Floyd; kneeling on his neck as he called out for help until his inevitable death from suffocation. This entire ordeal was filmed by onlookers hoping to use the evidence to hold the officers accountable. This incident spread like wildfire, with people rightfully getting upset at the obvious misuse of power by the police force. Melinda Aaron, a black woman old enough to experience racism at its height looks back on her reaction to the announcement: I remember the worst thing that I heard about George Floyds death was the length of time that policeman had his knee on his neck.
I cant breathe. Some of the last words of Floyd as he pleaded for his life; for mercy from the cop kneeling on his kneck. These words served to provoke the nation, effectively opening up their eyes to the atrocities acted upon black people by police. This lead to a series of several events as the masses attempted to get justice. I asked Brianna Cruz-Cortez what she remembered, a young adult who experienced this summer first-hand through social media, and she said: I think I found out [about George Floyds death] through social media probably like Instagram or one of twitters momentsand then I would see protests in posts
Much of the BLM movement was located on the internet, raising awareness through social media and the like. During the summer of discontent, fundraisers, infographic and petitions helped the cause by spreading information and allowing people to come together in a unified front. Cruz-Cortez recalls how she helped to spread awareness, a group of my peers and I would take turns to spread around petitions that were important, and wed try to educate each other on social issues that we thought were current to our time and where we could actively make changes by spreading this information. Many organizations for the movement have followed suit, using social media to reach out to the younger generation in the hopes of enlisting their help. Delaware State University has its own Instagram dedicated to diversity and acceptance on campus. At dsu_diversity on Instagram.
The aftermath after the surge in outrage in response to Floyds murder on May 25th was as follows: peaceful protests were observed all across America in an effort to bring attention to the injustice in the systemic oppression enforced by the police force. Similarly, violent riots broke out alongside these protests, adding an urgency to the matter, and pointing more attention to the cause. Cruz-Cortez Gives her opinion on the riots, I was all for the riots and even when they got violent I was still for them because I think it was their place to tear down the very infrastructure that was used to oppress them.
Now, the BLM movement is a well recognized and heavily supported movement by many across America. Although support seems to have waned, sadly, it is only a matter of time before another act of police brutality will incite more action. The cycle still remains that is actively oppressing black people in America with the use of the police force. We can only hope that eventually, change will come about to free black people in this nation. Until then, our actions and displays can serve as reminders for the people we have lost to this violence. We can all do our part for the better of the BLM Movement.
Like Loading...
View post:
The Black Lives Matter Movement of the Summer of 2020 - The Hornet
Posted in Black Lives Matter
Comments Off on The Black Lives Matter Movement of the Summer of 2020 – The Hornet
This Utah school district has banned LGBTQ pride and Black Lives Matter flags, saying they are ‘politically charged’ – Salt Lake Tribune
Posted: at 3:06 am
Editors note This story is available to Salt Lake Tribune subscribers only. Thank you for supporting local journalism.
A Utah school district has landed in the middle of the classroom culture war after explicitly banning LGBTQ pride flags and Black Lives Matter flags from being displayed in any of its buildings.
The spokesman for Davis School District in northern Utah says that administrators there believe the symbols have become too politically charged. And they want schools to remain neutral on all issues.
So no flags fly in our schools except for the flag of the United States of America, said spokesman Chris Williams. (He later clarified that some schools have flags from sports team or international countries that are unrelated to politics.)
The rule has emboldened conservative crusaders who, like Utah Board of Education member Natalie Cline, have suggested that classrooms are no place for identity politics. They see the decision as a win.
But it has touched off backlash from community activists, who say that flying the pride and BLM flags tells students from marginalized backgrounds that they are welcome. They argue that its about fostering belonging and community not displaying any political views.
And theyre worried that Black and Latino students or LGBTQ students will no longer feel like there are safe places they can easily spot in a school when they are the minority in the state.
These people who want to remove the flag, they dont understand what it means to us, said Amanda Darrow, the director of youth, family and education at the Utah Pride Center. That flag represents love and acceptance.
The rule in Davis School District, Williams said, has been in place for a few years. But it drew attention this month when it was sent out in an email reminder to teachers and administrators.
Screenshots swirled around on social media. One from North Layton Junior High said the rule on flags also extended to any other decorations, including stickers that a teacher might wear. No rainbow pins or pins listing pronouns, for instance, are allowed. It added: It does not matter what we have done in the past.
Williams said the district is just following state law.
Utah law doesnt specifically say anything about flags in the classroom. But it does instruct teachers to never mention their political or religious views. The ACLU of Utah also has said that an educators right to freedom of speech is limited in the classroom.
But interpreting those instructions and statutes has played out differently in different districts, when it comes to whats allowed to be pinned on the walls next to the ABCs or the periodic table. Some, like Davis, have taken a hard-line approach, casting a broad net over what they see as political.
Meanwhile, other districts let almost anything fly.
In Salt Lake City School District, Principal Nicole Palmer has probably 40 flags flying in the atrium of Rose Park Elementary where students first walk in each morning on their way to class.
She started with flags representing every country and nationality of the kids there; the population of the school on the west side of the state capital is 71% students of color. She thinks it would be even more important in most Utah schools where white students are the majority. Theres also a few Indigenous tribal flags that Palmer is working to get more of.
And at the very front are the rainbow stripes of the progress pride flag and the black polyester fabric of the Black Lives Matter flag.
You find yourself represented in one or more of the flags, Palmer said. Its intended to be comforting and reassuring and validating. I want students to see that they are wanted here and seen here for who they are every part of who they are.
(Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune) The atrium of Rose Park Elementary in Salt Lake City, where an LGBTQ Pride flag and a Black Lives Matter flag hang along with flags of the United States, other countries, and local tribes, in 2020.
Its personal for Palmer. But it also hasnt gone without some pushback, which boiled over last fall.
Palmer has had a standard rainbow pride flag flying at the elementary for a few years, ever since the principal met a transgender student at the school who was transitioning. She wanted the student to know that they were welcome and recognized; she also designated a gender neutral bathroom.
The whole intent of hanging the flags is to communicate through symbols, Palmer said. You cant just hang a flag, though. You have to be a welcoming school through actions, too.
Last November, the principal upgraded the flag to the progress pride flag, which is more representative of all identities in the LGBTQ community, including individuals of color.
At the same time, Palmer added the Black Lives Matter flag, feeling prompted to do so after a sixth grade student asked her about it in response to the nationwide protests against the mistreatment of individuals of color, including often at the hands of police.
Once they were up, she took a video and posted it to Instagram, tagging Rose Park Elementary. Palmer wrote: Welcome to our new flags.
The next morning, she was confronted with hundreds of angry calls and threatening emails.
Eric Moutsos, a prominent conservative activist in Utah, had shared the video on Facebook, calling on his followers to demand the school remove the flags, especially the Black Lives Matter one. In his own conversation with the principal, Palmer said, he told her that it was illegal to fly the flags in a school.
It caught me completely off guard, Palmer said.
She called the district to see if she had done something wrong. She had never hidden the flags. In fact, she had taken the superintendent on a tour around the school.
The superintendent called her back directly and said she had his support. Palmer let go of a breath she felt shed been holding in her chest.
Then-superintendent Larry Madden also followed up with an email to the district community, saying he was proud of the flags and hoped Palmer wouldnt take them down. He said the 3-foot-by-5-foot pieces of colorful cloth are not a political statement.
The decision to hang these flags is backed by policies in our district that bolster ALL students and specifically prohibit discrimination, Madden wrote. The flags show our students and families we love them and want them to succeed. Thats a goal I hope the entire community can support.
The new superintendent of the district, Timothy Gadson, told The Salt Lake Tribune that stance still stands under his administration, too.
Soon after, Palmer noticed that others were chiming into the comments on the Instagram post and sending her kind emails to counteract those protesting the flags. Some said they wished they had those flags up when they went to school. Others found the ones representing their counties and wrote things like, Go Kenya! Many in the LGBTQ community, specifically, thanked the principal; some said they believed the flags would save student lives.
Since then, more LGBTQ and Black Lives Matter flags have been popping up across the district. One administrator received a grant to buy more and distributed them to every school.
With Davis and Salt Lake City school districts at opposite ends of the issue, where does that leave other schools in the state? Which example can they or should they follow?
Mark Peterson, the spokesman for the Utah Board of Education, said it is up to each district or charter to set their own policy on flags.
There is no rule from the state board on flags outside of the American flag, which all schools are required to have. Schools are also instructed to have students recite the Pledge of Allegiance each morning (which parents can also choose to opt out of). But thats it, Peterson said.
(Al Hartmann | The Salt Lake Tribune) Students at Park Valley School say the Pledge of Allegiance in this file photo.
The Utah Legislature has not weighed in on the issue, so unless theres more clear direction there, districts have only to follow the fuzzy area of state law that prohibits educators from sharing their personal beliefs on religion or politics.
With that, it comes down to what school districts individually decide is too political. At Canyons School District, for instance, theyre trying to cut down the middle.
Teachers can only hang flags on their walls if its directly related to curriculum, said spokesman Jeff Haney, such as a Soviet era flag in a history class. But teachers can decorate their personal desk however they see fit including putting a pride flag or Black Lives Matter flag there.
If they want to put a statue of Buddha on their desk or a mug with rainbow there, then they can, Haney said.
He added that he believes districts are operating in an era where theres enhanced scrutiny of schools, with culture wars erupting over lessons about race and more students and parents filming things in the classroom. That has caused the district to try to be more cautious with its rules. Canyons, Haney said, wants to be neutral in both appearance and action.
His comments come after a Utah teacher left her job at Lehi High School this year after she was recorded sounding off to her students in a profane address that jumped from former President Donald Trump to the COVID-19 vaccine, climate change and the LGBTQ community. The prohibition on speech like that, though, is more clear cut in state law than flying a flag.
A video of the teachers talk was posted online by Moutsos, the same conservative leader who called the principal at Rose Park Elementary over the flags there.
And last year in Utah, one school came under fire for not doing enough to support the LGBTQ community after one student cut down a pride flag to cheers, while another school drew criticism for a teacher proudly wearing a Black Lives Matter T-shirt.
Its left many districts feeling afraid, Haney said, and like theyre stuck no matter what they do, open to the crossfire from both sides of the issue.
The Davis School District spokesman said the hope is that by having no flags, theyll avoid division and no child will feel alienated.
This direction is surely not something that slights anyone, he said. We have to be welcoming to every student that walks in the class. We cannot set up a situation where students walk in feel attacked or uncomfortable.
He added that all schools in the district have a gay straight alliance club; and students are still free to express themselves, wearing pride or BLM shirts if they want. And the police Thin Blue Line flag is also banned from being flown, he noted, suggesting theres no favoritism shown.
(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) Demonstrators honk their horns as they drive in downtown Salt Lake City, during a rally for justice for George Floyd, in solidarity with Minneapolis, as Derek Chauvin's trial starts on Monday, the rally was sponsored by Utah Against Police Brutality, on Saturday, March 6, 2021.
(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Supporters of law enforcement gathered at City Hall in Salt Lake City for a rally in support of police hosted by the Utah Business Revival on Saturday, June 20, 2020.
The Fraternal Order of Police union in Utah said it supports the decision. It put out a letter last year criticizing the teacher over the shirt for Black Lives Matter, suggesting that has become a political organization. Schools should be a neutral learning place, union President Brent Jex said.
Black Lives Matter, though, has said its group is not political, saying members want justice and fair treatment for people of color.
Some groups, including the Black Lives Matter chapter in Utah, have said they feel the American flag has become a political symbol. So where is the line drawn? And who gets to draw it? Can kindergarten classrooms not have rainbows on their walls now?
Darrow, with the Utah Pride Center, believes that as it stands, school administrators have too much power to choose what is or isnt considered political. And those decisions to not make some students feel uncomfortable, she said, prioritize those who dont come from marginalized backgrounds.
She said when she was in high school in Utah in the early 2000s, she had not yet come out as LGBTQ. She didnt feel safe.
Darrow remembers, though, a few teachers having a pride flag in their classroom then and instantly feeling like it signaled she was in a safe space. I was so afraid to be bullied for who I was, she said. But when I saw those flags, I would just smile.
Excerpt from:
Posted in Black Lives Matter
Comments Off on This Utah school district has banned LGBTQ pride and Black Lives Matter flags, saying they are ‘politically charged’ – Salt Lake Tribune
Ted Nugent Confronted at Rally Where He Called Black Lives Matter a Terrorist Organization: Watch – Consequence
Posted: at 3:06 am
Ted Nugent was challenged by a Black man during a political rally in Centreville, Michigan, where the guitarist called Black Lives Matter a terrorist organization.
Only around 100 people attended Nugents appearance on Friday (September 17th) as part of the Jack Coleman Presents Ted & Shemane Nugent Constitution Tour. Apparently, 600 attendees were expected.
Nevertheless, a camo-clad Nugent took the stage to pontificate his right-wing views to the mostly white crowd. At one point, Nugent touched on Black Lives Matter, even goading the audience to challenge his opinions regarding the movement.
Arent there any BLM punks who want to come up and harass me? Nugent asked, as reported by local news station WWMT.
At that point, a Black man named Jalen Brown approached the stage, asking for the mic from Nugent.
Bravely, Brown stood directly in front of the stage and proceeded to speak in support of Black Lives Matter, despite a chorus of boos from the mostly white crowd.
Nugent then resorted to personal insults, calling Brown a varmint and saying black lives dont give a sh*t about black lives before calling BLM a terrorist organization.
Prior to leaving the stage, Brown reminded the crowd that were not here by choice and black lives matter, too, but again, the crowd berated him with chants of U-S-A! and the ultimate cry of ignorance, all lives matter!
Later, Brown told WWMT, As soon as he said Black Lives Matter was a terrorist organization, I took that personally.
One can only admire Brown for standing up to Nugent, considering the latters track record for racist sentiments. Over the years, hes asserted that it would have been best had the South won the Civil War in a Washington Times column and once said blacks were not hard workers while repeatedly using racial slurs.
Watch Jalen Brown confront Ted Nugent at the Michigan rally below.
Read the original:
Posted in Black Lives Matter
Comments Off on Ted Nugent Confronted at Rally Where He Called Black Lives Matter a Terrorist Organization: Watch – Consequence
Grocery store workers have right to wear Black Lives Matter buttons – Mercer Island Reporter
Posted: at 3:06 am
QFC and Fred Meyer violated federal labor law when store officials prohibited workers from wearing union-sponsored Black Lives Matter buttons, according to a ruling by Region 19 of the National Labor Relations Board.
Seattle-based UFCW 21 announced in a Sept. 17 press release that the board informed the union of the ruling against both companies, which are owned by Kroger.
Specifically, Region 19 (Alaska, Montana, Oregon and Washington) found merit in UFCW 21s charges that Kroger violated the law by: 1) failing to bargain with the union over a change in workplace conditions in this case the practice of allowing the wearing of buttons at work; and 2) prohibiting workers from taking action together in this case, by wearing Black Lives Matter messages to protest racism in the workplace and in society, generally, according to the press release.
Seattle-based Region 19 will now seek a settlement agreement with Kroger, which would likely require a change to company policy, according to the union. If a settlement cannot be reached, Region 19 would typically issue a formal complaint and a trial would be held before an Administrative Law judge, whose ruling would be subject to an appeal to the NLRB in Washington D.C.
This is very uplifting, said Sam Dancy a front end supervisor at the Westwood Village QFC in West Seattle. When workers were trying to speak out through these buttons and collectively say Black Lives Matter and Kroger said to take the buttons off, that was an insult. This decision is welcome news in our work to bring attention to social and racial injustice in the workplace and in our neighborhoods.
A QFC spokesperson issued the following statement in a Sept. 17 email to the Kent Reporter.
We look forward to reviewing the proposed settlement agreement, according to the spokesperson. Our company is unequivocal in standing with our Black associates, deeply listening and taking action to advance more diverse, inclusive and equitable communities.
UFCW 21 President Faye Guenther released the following statement.
In the wake of this welcome action by the NLRB, we are calling on Kroger to respect workers rights and take meaningful steps to address racial inequities in Kroger workplaces, Guenther said. Among other things, Kroger needs to do a better job of hiring and promoting African Americans at every level of the company and making it clear that it will not tolerate racism from customers or employees.
After Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin killed George Floyd on May 25, 2020, many UFCW 21 members working in grocery and retail stores chose to express their opposition to racism by wearing face masks (otherwise worn for protection from COVID-19) or other items bearing the Black Lives Matter slogan.
Although Kroger issued public statements expressing sympathy with the Black Lives Matter movement, managers at Kroger-owned stores in Western Washington started ordering UFCW 21 members to remove Black Lives Matter masks in August 2020, according to the union press release.
UFCW 21 responded to the companys Black Lives Matter ban by collaborating with Fred Meyer and QFC workers to distribute union-sponsored Black Lives Matter buttons with the UFCW 21 logo. When managers banned the union buttons, UFCW 21 filed charges in September 2020 with the National Labor Relations Board.
UFCW 21 represents over 46,000 workers at grocery stores, retail, health care and other industry jobs.
In consideration of how we voice our opinions in the modern world, weve closed comments on our websites. We value the opinions of our readers and we encourage you to keep the conversation going.
Please feel free to share your story tips by emailing editor@mi-reporter.com.
To share your opinion for publication, submit a letter through our website https://www.mi-reporter.com/submit-letter/. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (Well only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 300 words or less, we wont ask you to shorten it.
See the original post:
Grocery store workers have right to wear Black Lives Matter buttons - Mercer Island Reporter
Posted in Black Lives Matter
Comments Off on Grocery store workers have right to wear Black Lives Matter buttons – Mercer Island Reporter