Daily Archives: September 8, 2021

Arizona’s GOP candidates for governor seem determined to hand the job to Democrats – The Arizona Republic

Posted: September 8, 2021 at 10:26 am

Opinion: Republicans appear dead set on losing the governor's race next year if they can't even acknowledge the reality that Joe Biden won Arizona in 2020.

With just over a year until Arizona chooses the next governor to steer our beloved state through whatever rocky, roiling waters await us, its somehow comforting to know that we are blessed with a Republican cast of stand-up candidates.

Pragmatic leaders who stand ready to embrace reality, who tell people not what they want to hear but what they need to know.

Genuine statesmen (and women) who set aside political gamesmanship and stand firm in their commitment to forthrightly deal with the issues that confront us, even when such honesty comes at a personal price.

People who possess the courage to …

Oh, who am I kidding?

Of the five Republicans running for governor, not even one of them will acknowledge that Joe Biden won Arizona last year.

Theyve all taken a swan dive down the rabbit hole though some more deeply than othersinto a curious and confusing world where down is up and black is white and everyone plays to the fantasy that a giant conspiracy robbed Trump of Arizonas vote.

Maybe. Probably. Or in the case of Kari Lake, absolutely.

Looking for the other side of the story? Subscribe today for access to even more opinions.

Were going to find out that the real winner was not called on electionnight, Lake said, during a recent interview with a conservative podcaster. And thatwere going to find outPresidentTrumpwas the real winner ofArizona.

Theres a reason why Lake is considered the Republican frontrunner in next years governors race. She plays to the houseand to heck with the long-term damage done in a state that once upon a time before Trumps loss was considered a model for how to conduct elections.

As for the other candidates, they refuse to answer this apparently difficult question posed by The Arizona Republics Stacey Barchenger, 10 months after the fact:

Who won the presidential election in Arizona?

State Treasurer Kimberly Yee: Declined to answer.

Former Rep. Matt Salmon: Declined to answer.

Businesswoman Karrin Taylor Robson: Declined to answer,

Businessman Steve Gaynor: Declined to answer, though he, at least, acknowledged that Joe Biden is president.

However, there is widespread belief that the outcome of the 2020 election was materially affected by fraud, he told Barchenger, in a statement. I share those concerns.

A widespread belief, maybe one shamelesslypromoted by people with obvious political and financial ambitions.But do you know whats not widespread?

Any actual evidence of a problem with Arizonas count.

Actual evidence indicates that moderate Republican and GOP-leaning independents who supported Trump in 2016 simply could not bring themselves to do so again in 2020.

Most, if not all, of the Republican candidates for governor know that. Yet every one of them has opted for the fine art of the political pander, telling conservativeswhat they want to heareither through their statements or their silence.

All but Salmon say they support the audit. (Salmon dodged the audit question, too.)

Apparently, none of themhas any concern about getting an unbiasedand accurate result from an audit beingrun for and by Trump supporters who have no elections experience but plenty of theories on how it was stolen.

I'm guessing these candidates wouldalso have no qualms about relying onoil companies to examine whether fossil fuel poses a problem to the environment orasking cotton farmers whether the state needs to cut back on water use.

I get it. Most Republican voters support the audit;therefore, the Republican candidates support the audit.

Everyone wants a Trump endorsement; therefore, no one is willing to tell the former emperor to put some damn pants on.

Political giants theyare, one and all.

Meanwhile, they ignore the thousands of moderately conservative Republican and GOP-leaning independents who elected Biden,not because they are becoming Democrats but because they simply could not vote for Donald Trump.

The ones who are waiting for sane leaders within the onceonce-Grand Old Party to reassert themselves now,before the party of the big tent becomes the party of the pup tent.

The ones who will, once again, likely decide next years election.

The one in November, that is.

Reach Roberts at laurie.roberts@arizonarepublic.com. Follow her on Twitter at @LaurieRoberts.

Support local journalism: Subscribe to azcentral.com today.

More:

Arizona's GOP candidates for governor seem determined to hand the job to Democrats - The Arizona Republic

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Arizona’s GOP candidates for governor seem determined to hand the job to Democrats – The Arizona Republic

Impeaching Biden is only one battlefield in Republicans’ total electoral war | TheHill – The Hill

Posted: at 10:26 am

While Democrats debate the fine points of how to engineer social change through legislation, Republicans have been waging a total electoral war to retake power. They just opened a new front the impeachment of President BidenJoe BidenTrump to offer commentary at heavyweight fight on 9/11 Manchin would support spending plan of at most .5T: report South Dakota governor issues executive order restricting access to abortion medicine MORE.Politics, as the saying goes,aint beanbag, and not all Republicans play by total war rules, which are no rules at all.But the Republican strategy, looked at in its totality, takes political warfare to a level suitable for military metaphors.

Like in many shooting wars, the firstcasualtyin the Republican war is truth, as in many Republicans belief thatthe 2020 election was stolen.Falsely claiming voter fraud or the risk of fraud, Republican state legislaturesenactedballot restrictions to weaponize election laws and oversight against Democrats.Arizona Republicans are running a deception operation in the form of anauditof the states 2020 election results that is akin to a Super Bowl loser asking one of its fans to review the referee calls on the game tape and declare the real winner.

Now, a remarkably broad range of Republicans, from extreme right wing Rep. Marjorie TaylorGreene(R-Ga.) to the partys authoritative foreign policy figure, Sen. LindseyGraham(R- S.C.), are turning the Constitutions impeachment clause into a negative branding howitzer aimed at the White House.

Under total war rules, its irrelevant that Biden did not commit an impeachable offense, unlike Trump, who committed two, first by pressuring a foreign ally to intervene in his favor in the 2020electionand then, when he lost, by incitingan insurrection to block confirmation of his opponents victory.Biden stands accused by Republican impeachment-mongers not of undermining the Constitution but of mismanaging a military engagement.

By that standard, quite a few Republican presidents should have been impeached.Ronald Reagan lost the lives of 241 U.S. Marines, Navy sailors and Army soldiers to a truck bomber by sending them on an ill-considered peacekeepingmissionto Lebanon in 1983, the worst single-day toll for the Marines since the Battle of Iwo Jima. On the basis of egregiously flawedintelligence(some say it was outright misrepresented), George W. Bush sent anAmerican army into Iraq in 2003, which suffered tens of thousands of casualties.Even Abraham Lincoln should have been impeached after the Uniondefeatsat the First Battle of Bull Run, Fredericksburg and Chancellorsvillesince he had obviously been derelict in his choice of generals.

Fighting a total war may be liberating for Republicans, especially when their only value is victory.If they retake the House of Representatives, distractions like constitutional impeachment standards and American history will be easily ignored in favor of appeasing the MAGA base by impeaching Biden. Having set their base in motion withImpeach Joe Biden demands, Republicans may have created an unstoppable dynamic.Republican congressional offices are already besieged withdemandsfor a Biden impeachment.By next spring,Republicansin primary fights may be booed off campaign stages unless they pledge to impeach Biden if the House changes hands.

Sure, SenateGOP Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellImpeaching Biden is only one battlefield in Republicans' total electoral war Democrats stare down nightmare September GOP hopes spending traps derail Biden agenda MORE (R-Ky.)said "there isnt going to be an impeachment, but this was thesameMcConnell who first denounced Trump as having beenpractically and morally responsible for the Jan. 6 insurrection and then pivoted to pledging to absolutely supportTrump if he is the 2024 Republican presidential nominee.

More and more, especially with Joe Bidens plummeting approval ratings, Democrats seem to be back on their heels.Part of their problem is that they do not play by total war rules, which is to their credit. But they probably wouldnt be very good at it if they tried.The Republicans ruthless intensity can be a force multiplier, and Democrats have yet to find their own intensity to match it.

Republicans have stood Clausewitzs famousdictum war is the continuation of politics by other means on its head.To them, politics is the continuation of war by other means.

Gregory J.Wallance is a writer in New York City and a federal prosecutor during the Carter and Reagan administrations, where he was a member of the ABSCAM prosecution team that convicted a U.S. senator and six U.S. representatives of bribery. He isa long time human rights activist andthe author of the historical novel,Two Men Before the Storm: Arba Cranes Recollection of Dred Scott and the Supreme Court Case That Started The Civil War.Follow him on Twitter @gregorywallance.

Here is the original post:

Impeaching Biden is only one battlefield in Republicans' total electoral war | TheHill - The Hill

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Impeaching Biden is only one battlefield in Republicans’ total electoral war | TheHill – The Hill

Democrats Hit the Road to Sell Big Spending Bills as Republicans Attack – The New York Times

Posted: at 10:26 am

LAWSON, Colo. Standing alongside Clear Creek, a popular white-water rafting destination in this gateway to the Rocky Mountains west of Denver, Senator Michael Bennet delivered his pitch for $60 billion in new spending to protect the states forests and watersheds against recurring fires and their widespread impact.

It sounds like a lot of money, conceded Mr. Bennet, Democrat of Colorado, as a group of officials and business leaders nodded in agreement. But it is what we spend in five years fighting forest fires.

While $60 billion is indeed a big price tag, $3.5 trillion is much bigger. That is the total cost of the budget blueprint Democrats muscled through the Senate and House last month, and hope to transform into a bill President Biden can sign in the coming weeks as they fight off Republican attacks on the size and scope of the measure and some sticker shock on their own side as well.

Calculating that voters might be more receptive if they understand the tangible benefits of the emerging measure, Democrats have embarked on an elaborate nationwide sales pitch for the expansive budget plan and a related $1 trillion bipartisan public works measure to win over their constituents and others around the nation.

Senator Bernie Sanders, an independent of Vermont overseeing the development of the economic package as chairman of the Budget Committee, spent three days traveling across the Midwest, explaining the policy ambitions of the Democratic majority before hundreds of people in Republican-leaning districts.

The Democratic National Committee just concluded a multistate Build Back Better bus tour. Participants extolled the virtues of Democratic governance, trying to show voters in places like Arizona, the Carolinas, Michigan, Nevada, Texas and Wisconsin the real-life ramifications of the bills yet to pass and measures already approved, such as the $1.9 trillion pandemic relief legislation enacted this year over unanimous Republican opposition. Other Democrats are making similar appeals and pushing the legislation on their social media accounts.

At the end of the day, these are real-world things that will have a huge impact on how people will live their lives in a way that we have not seen in policy from the federal government in a very long time, said Jaime Harrison, the chairman of the Democratic National Committee and a regular on the bus tour.

Understand the Infrastructure Bill

But Democrats are not going to have an open field to make their case. Congressional Republicans are solidly lined up against the budget proposal, which Democrats plan to push through unilaterally using a maneuver known as reconciliation. Together with conservative advocacy groups, they are already on the attack, using the plan as fund-raising fodder and airing ads in the states and districts of vulnerable Democrats in Congress, urging them to oppose a measure that will require complete Democratic unity to pass the evenly split Senate.

For instance, Senator Todd Young, an Indiana Republican up for re-election, noted in a fund-raising appeal that Mr. Sanders made a stop in Indiana to push a reckless liberal wish list budget and warned that the cost would hurt American families.

Republicans say the partisan nature of the bill, which is to be considered under special rules that exempt it from a filibuster, as well as the huge amount of spending and the inclusion of special interest provisions will turn off swing voters in the suburbs who propelled Mr. Biden to victory and helped Democrats hold the House and win the Senate in 2020.

They argue that potential backlash to the bill, combined with dissatisfaction with the Biden administrations handling of Afghanistan and the pandemic, is creating a receptive environment for Republicans campaigning to reclaim control of Congress in 2022.

The American people are not buying what they are selling, said Kevin McLaughlin, a veteran Republican campaign operative who is running a campaign against the budget bill through the Common Sense Leadership Fund. The group began airing ads last week aimed at Senators Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire and Mark Kelly of Arizona, two Democrats who face potentially tough re-election fights.

For Washington liberals, a $3 trillion power grab is their wildest fantasy come true, says the ad, which ends by urging viewers to call the senators to oppose the liberal pipe dream.

Democrats are determined to persuade voters to see it quite differently. In Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Mr. Sanders rattled through the highlights of the $1.9 trillion pandemic relief package and the provisions Democrats hope to build upon with the new bill, including continued monthly payments to families with children. Backed by testimonials from local officials and residents about needs the package could address, he pledged to fight for the inclusion of key liberal priorities, including lowering prescription drug pricing, providing free community college and funding programs to combat climate change.

I thought its important to bring the issues that were dealing with to the people of America, Mr. Sanders said in an interview.

In Mr. Bennets case, he is emphasizing the local benefits of the hulking bill. In particular, it calls for the Senate Agriculture Committee to allocate $135 billion for an array of federal efforts, including forestry programs to help reduce carbon emissions and prevent wildfires.

While Colorado has so far been spared a wildfire crisis this summer, last year was a disaster, with extensive losses both in destroyed homes and overall economic damage. This year, disruptive mudslides from the scars of the multiple fires and runoff in burned areas has turned segments of the Colorado River and other waterways black.

And though Colorado might not be experiencing many fires this summer, the smoke from blazes elsewhere in the West has obscured the mountain views that draw many to Colorado in the first place, leaving Denver with some of the worst air quality in the world at times.

Bidens 2022 Budget

The 2022 fiscal year for the federal government begins on October 1, and President Biden has revealed what hed like to spend, starting then. But any spending requires approval from both chambers of Congress. Heres what the plan includes:

Mr. Bennet, who is up for re-election next year, said that the $60 billion that was currently spent on firefighting covered only direct costs and did not include other aspects, such as the lost tourism and the effects of air pollution. He said understaffed and chronically underfunded agencies such as the U.S. Forest Service needed an infusion of money to take steps to lower the threat of fires, rather than just battle them as they occur.

Our entire state is affected by the lack of federal investment in our forests, he told his Clear Creek audience.

Local officials said that they recognized the magnitude of the spending bill but that the needs were huge, particularly considering the losses experienced with devastating fires, closed parks and disruptions like the mudslides that closed Interstate 70, the states main east-west highway, for parts of the summer.

The scale of the problem has become enormous, said Randall Wheelock, the chairman of the Clear Creek County Board of Commissioners, who said billions and billions of dollars of real estate was at risk from fires and climate change, along with the health of the states waterways and economy.

It is a big one, he said of the cost, but we have spent that kind of money before on things we care about.

Mr. Bennet also took his appeal to a more conservative part of the state in sprawling Grand County, straddling the Continental Divide. He met with ranchers experimenting with ways to better protect the suffering Colorado River, which is vital to local agriculture, and to more efficiently irrigate their pastures. The ranchers, while leery of Mr. Bennets political affiliation, welcomed his interest in the river.

If Democrats can demonstrate the concrete benefits of the budget plan to people like them, Mr. Bennet said, it could help them make inroads with conservatives.

Every single rancher downstream from these places will benefit from this, he said as he stood in a sunny hayfield along the Colorado River just outside the town of Kremmling. They may never vote for Joe Biden, but I do think it gives Joe Biden the opportunity to come to these communities and say, You were not invisible to me.

As for the overall cost, Mr. Bennet does not believe that is an insurmountable obstacle for voters who see major needs in their communities.

I think the normal person is a lot more interested in what the money is being spent on, he said. Weve had 20 years of two wars in the Middle East that cost $5.6 trillion. We have since 2001 cut taxes for the richest people in the country by almost $5 trillion. Now, finally, we are investing in the American people.

Emily Cochrane contributed reporting from Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

See original here:

Democrats Hit the Road to Sell Big Spending Bills as Republicans Attack - The New York Times

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Democrats Hit the Road to Sell Big Spending Bills as Republicans Attack – The New York Times

Ciattarellli: ‘I’m not the Sacrificial Lamb of the Republican Party’ – InsiderNJ

Posted: at 10:26 am

KENILWORTH Voting is a big deal for Republicans.

Ever since Donald Trump claimed, and, in fact, continues to claim that last years election was rigged, some Republicans all acrossthe land have been suspicious of voting itself.

And that popped up Tuesday evening when Jack Ciattarelli held a town hall at a veterans center in this Union County town.

A woman in the crowd of about 100 asked if the state uses Dominion voting machines.

Trump and his supporters have waged a sort of war againstDominion since last fall, The company is fighting backwith lawsuits.

This can be a troubling matter for Ciattarelli. If some Republicans trulybelieve the game is crooked, why bother voting?

You can see the problem. Democrats, who haveno concerns in this regard, are going to vote.

So, Ciattarelli did his best to put thisproblem to rest.

He said Dominion machines are used in Ocean County, which Trump won big last year.

He also pointed out that all 21 counties have boards of electionwithequal numbers of Democrats and Republicans. Ciattarelli said he trusts those board members to oversee an honest election.

His bottom line: Voters should not care about machines or who owns them, just go out and vote!

This seems to be a critical time for Ciattarelli.

Phil Murphy is travelling the state inspecting flood damage and trying to comfort and deliver aid to residents. On Tuesday, Murphy was with President Biden in Manville

Ciattarelli, who holds no office, cant by definition deliver anything of substance at the moment.

Still, hes trying to make a point, criticizing Murphy for waiting too long to declare a state of emergency.

One problem with that line of attack is that a state of emergency is really a

bureaucratic action that has no immediate impact. Its not as if a declaration from Trenton would have held back the rain.

No matter, this is a way for Ciattarelli to remain visible when his opponent is getting all the attention.

Other than voting and the storm, Ciattarelli stayed on familiar topics during his hour-long meeting with residents, all of whom seemed supportive.

He condemned Murphys liberal extremism and reiterated his support for the Second Amendment, pro-life measures and a revised school aid formula that he says would lower property taxes for many.

Asked specifically what executive orders of Murphy he would undo, Ciattarelli didnt directly answer, but he did say that the incumbent has abused his power by issuing far too many orders.

Public polls show Ciattarelli behind by double digits and Democrats in the state outnumber Republicans by more than a million.

This doesnt seem to trouble the GOP gubernatorial candidate.

Im not the sacrificial lamb of the Republican Party, he said. Im in it to win it.

(Visited 145 times, 145 visits today)

See original here:

Ciattarellli: 'I'm not the Sacrificial Lamb of the Republican Party' - InsiderNJ

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Ciattarellli: ‘I’m not the Sacrificial Lamb of the Republican Party’ – InsiderNJ

Top Pa. Senate Republican expects subpoenas will be necessary for election investigation – Pennsylvania Capital-Star

Posted: at 10:26 am

(*This story was updated at 4 p.m. on Tuesday, 9/7/21, to include comment from the Department of State.)

Saying hes doubtful the state agency responsible for election oversight will cooperate with a taxpayer-funded investigation into Pennsylvanias two most recent elections, the top Senate Republican expects subpoenas will be the next step.

Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman, R-Centre, isnt hopeful acting Secretary of State Veronica Degraffenreid will participate in the first hearing as part of a probe into the 2020 general and 2021 primary elections.

Currently scheduled for Thursday, the Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee meeting will focus on guidance issued by the Department of State to counties during the 2020 election.

My guess is she wont come, Corman said of Degraffenreid during a podcast interview with former Trump administration adviser Steve Bannon. If they do not come in and cooperate, then we will begin to issue subpoenas to get the information that were looking for from the Department of State.

A spokesperson for the Department of State told the Capital-Star that no one from the agency will participate in the hearing, saying that it directly relates to ongoing litigation filed against the department by members of the General Assembly.

Corman accused Degraffenreid, who took over after former Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar resigned in February, of intimidating county leaders since the review began, citing a July directive that bans third-party access to election equipment.

Corman, who has argued that there were election irregularities in 2020, tapped Sen. Cris Dush, R-Jefferson, to replace Sen. Doug Mastriano, R-Franklin, as the panels chairperson.

Dush invited the Department of State and local officials to testify. The 11-member panel also invited the public to submit any potential violations of election law or voting irregularities they have witnessed personally to an online form. The committee could ask those who submit information to sign an affidavit and testify under oath at a future hearing.

In an August statement, Dush said the purpose of the investigation is to uncover information for potential legislative action. His office has referred questions about the review to Corman, who said the review is not a recount.

Jason Thompson, a spokesperson for Corman, told the Capital-Star that the taxpayers will be paying for the probe. He added that the panel will also incorporate hearings conducted by the Senate State Government Committee, which began last month with testimony from the Department of State, as part of the investigation.

But if the Department of State fails to participate in Thursdays hearing, Corman said the Senate panel should quickly issue subpoenas to acquire election information.

I dont want to get too far in front of Cris Dush, but that would be my intention and my desire, Corman told Bannon. Again, I think we have to be prepared that theyre not going to cooperate.

Two post-election reviews a statistical sampling required by law and a risk-limiting audit were conducted after the 2020 election in Pennsylvania. Sixty-three out of the commonwealths 67 counties participated in the risk-limiting audit pilot, and neither assessment found evidence of fraud.

Certified results show that former President Donald Trump lost the 2020 election by 80,555 votes in Pennsylvania. In the same cycle, Republicans triumphed in state races maintaining their legislative majorities in Harrisburg.

The latest review also comes after the House State Government Committee hosted 10 hearings with 52 testifiers on the 2020 general election.

Sen. Dan Laughlin, R-Erie, is the only GOP senator to publicly oppose the review, which could resemble the controversial Republican-backed election investigation in Arizona.

In July, Senate Minority Leader Jay Costa, D-Allegheny, and Sen. Anthony Williams, D-Philadelphia, sent a letter to Corman and Senate Majority Leader Kim Ward, R-Westmoreland, urging them to stop the review. Costa and Williams sit on the committee responsible for the investigation. Gov. Tom Wolf called the investigation a disgrace to democracy, and Attorney General Josh Shapiro dubbed it a sham that will create chaos and promised to challenge the review legally.

The attorney general was on the ballot the last election as well, so he sort of has a conflict, Corman told Bannon. Our auditor general, a Republican who was elected, who we asked to do an audit, said he didnt feel that he could do it because he was on the ballot the last election.

Six lawmakers, who sit on the Senate committee, were elected during the 2020 general election, including Sens. Scott Hutchinson, R-Venango, David Argall, R-Schuylkill, Vincent Hughes, D-Philadelphia, Dush, Costa, and Mastriano.

Were going to invite county employees, county officials, who may have a story to tell about how things went down on Election Day, Corman said, noting that he isnt sure which counties the committee will focus on. Were not subpoenaing their information as of yet, but well probably get to that point soon.

He added: If we have to get emails, if we have to get communications, we want to know.

See the original post here:

Top Pa. Senate Republican expects subpoenas will be necessary for election investigation - Pennsylvania Capital-Star

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Top Pa. Senate Republican expects subpoenas will be necessary for election investigation – Pennsylvania Capital-Star

Trump backs opponent of Republican House member who voted to impeach him – Reuters

Posted: at 10:26 am

Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-WA) speaks at a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 4, 2020. Al Drago/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

WASHINGTON, Sept 1 (Reuters) - Former President Donald Trump on Wednesday endorsed Army veteran Joe Kent's bid to unseat Republican U.S. Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler of Washington state, who was among the few in her party who voted to impeach Trump in January.

Trump has promised to help Republicans win control of Congress in the November 2022 elections and is also working to replace his Republican critics in Congress with loyalists.

Herrera Beutler was among 10 Republican lawmakers who joined House Democrats in a January vote to impeach Trump on a charge of inciting insurrection in a fiery speech ahead of the deadly Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol by his supporters.

Trump in February endorsed a former aide who is challenging Republican Representative Anthony Gonzalez of Ohio, who also voted to impeach.

The former president has also backed a Republican challenging Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, who was among the seven Republicans in that chamber who voted with Democrats in a failed attempt to convict Trump.

Trump said in a statement that Herrera Beutler's impeachment vote was "against the Republican Party" and that Kent, if elected, would "be a warrior for the America First agenda."

Herrera Beutler's campaign manager, Parker Truax, brushed off Trump's comments, noting that the lawmaker outperformed Trump in her district in the 2016 and 2020 elections. In January, Herrera Beutler said "the president of the United States incited a riot" and that the evidence against him was "indisputable."

She has represented Washington's 3rd Congressional District since 2011 and won re-election in 2020 with 56% of the vote.

Herrera Beutler has also easily led the Republican field at campaign fundraising, ending June with over $1 million in the bank.

Kent, whose campaign website touts his allegiance to Trump, had just over $500,000, second to Herrera Beutler among the five Republican candidates who filed campaign finance disclosures for the period.

Reporting by Jason Lange; Editing by Scott Malone and Peter Cooney

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

See original here:

Trump backs opponent of Republican House member who voted to impeach him - Reuters

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on Trump backs opponent of Republican House member who voted to impeach him – Reuters

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Backs Republican in Green Springs – The Central Virginian

Posted: at 10:26 am

I am writing to ask you to join me in supporting Rachel Jones as a candidate for the Green Springs District Board of Supervisors position. I have known Rachel for 15 years. She is an individual of courage, compassion, and a passion for the future success of the County of Louisa.

Rachel has always impressed me with her seemingly endless energy. Rachel is a wife and mother. She understands the importance of family. Rachel has worked hard through her former church, Zion United Methodist, to provide children of Louisa support programs including basketball, Scouts, and camps. She was our grandsons first preschool teacher. She showed love and compassion while enriching his early learning years. I mentioned Rachels passion. She is a self-starter who does not waiver. Once she commits, she succeeds. Dont take my word for it, Rachel has received statewide recognition as an Allen and Allen Hometown Hero for her support of the community.

Rachel is also passionate in supporting the men and women of law enforcement. She is concerned about the defunding efforts of so many radical groups. Having served as a law officer locally and in Charlottesville, Rachel has first-hand experience in the daily challenges facing law enforcement. Rachel is committed to keeping Louisa a prosperous and peaceful community by supporting law enforcement through funding programs and board focus. She is aware of the ever-growing challenges being experienced by the brave individuals who serve our community.

Another area of passion involves our first responder and EMS personnel. A close cousin to law enforcement, Rachel recognizes the selfless, personal, and family sacrifices the men and women of EMS make to the citizens of Louisa. On the board, she will champion the needs of EMS in equipment, technology, and training. She will allow EMS to focus on patient care.

With two children in the Louisa school system, education and student viability is a big focal area for Rachel. She constantly speaks about how proud she is of the Louisa school system. She recognizes dedicated employees who serve to educate and grow our children. As a parent and longtime Louisa citizen, she is committed to a fair and equitable education system that serves the needs of ALL students without political agendas.

Rachel takes pride in Louisa County. She recently called out the problem of dumping and trash on the roadside in her district. This was not a campaign effort but a problem observation. Since that time, the attention she brought to the issue of trash and dumping has resulted in clean-up efforts. Rachel is a self-starter who will make a difference.

Rachel is courageous. Running for political office is hard work, but Rachel sees the need for improvement. Rachel is a fixer who when faced with a problem goes into action. She is tireless and strives for success. We need her focus, energy, and local perspective to make a difference in Louisa. So again, please join me in supporting Rachel in her quest to become our next board of supervisors representative for the Green Springs district. She will make a difference.

I encourage you to vote for Rachel Jones, Green Springs District Supervisor!

More here:

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Backs Republican in Green Springs - The Central Virginian

Posted in Republican | Comments Off on LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Backs Republican in Green Springs – The Central Virginian

Artificial Intelligence and the Humanization of Medicine InsideSources – InsideSources

Posted: at 10:25 am

If you want to imagine the future of healthcare, you can do no better than to read cardiologist and bestselling author Eric Topols trilogy on the subject: The Creative Destruction of Medicine, The Patient Will See You Now, and Deep Medicine.

Deep Medicine bears a paradoxical subtitle: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. The book describes the growing interaction of human and machine brains. Topol envisions a symbiosis, with people and machines working together to assist patients in ways that neither can do alone. In the process, healthcare providers will shed some of the mind-numbing rote tasks they endure today, giving them more time to focus on patients.

I recorded an interview with Topol in which we discuss his books. The podcast is titled Healthcares Reluctant Revolution because one of Topols themes is that healthcare is moving too slowly to integrate AI and machine learning (ML) into medicinea sluggishness that diminishes the quality and quantity of available care.

The first of Topols books, Creative Destruction, described how technology would transform medicine by digitizing data on individual human beings in great detail. In The Patient Will See You Now, he explored how this digital revolution can allow patients to take greater control over their own health and their own care. With this democratization of care, medicines ancient paternalism could fade. (In 2017, Topol and I co-authored an essay on Anatomy and Atrophy of Medical Paternalism.)

Deep Medicine is qualitatively different from the other two books. It has an almost-mystical quality. Intelligent machines engaging in AI and ML arrive at information in ways even their programmers can barely comprehend, if at all. Topol gives a striking example.

Take retinal scans of a large number of peoplethe sort of scans that your optometrist or ophthalmologist takes. Now, show the scans to the top ophthalmologists in the world and ask for each scan, Is this person a man or a woman? The doctors will answer correctly approximately 50 percent of the time. In other words, they have no idea and could do just as well by tossing a coin. Now, run those same scans through a deep neural network (a type of AI/ML system). The machine will answer correctly around 97 percent of the timefor no known reason.

Topol explains how such technologies can improve care. Today, radiologists spend their days intuitively searching for patterns in x-rays, CT scans, and MRIs. In the future, much of the pattern-searching will be automated (and more accurate), and radiologists (who seldom interact with patients today) will have much greater contact with patients.

Today, dermatologists are relatively few in number, so much of the earlier stages of skin care are done by primary care physicians, who have less ability to determine, say, whether a mole is potentially cancerous. The result can be misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, and the unnecessary use of dermatologists time. In the future, primary care doctors will likely screen patients using smart diagnostic tools, thereby wasting less of patients and dermatologists time and diagnosing more accurately.

In Deep Medicine, Topol tells the story of a newborn experiencing seizures that could lead to brain damage or death. Routine diagnostics and medications werent helping. Then, a blood sample was sent to a genomics institute that combed through a vast amount of data in a short time and identified a rare genetic disorder thats treatable through dietary restrictions and vitamins. The child went home, seizure-free, in 36 hours.

Unfortunately, healthcares adoption of such technologies is unduly slow. In our conversation, Topol noted that we have around 150 medical schools, some quite new, and yet they dont have any AI or genomics essentially in their curriculum.

Topol lists some hopes that observers invest in AI: Machines outperforming doctors at all tasks, diagnosing the undiagnosable, treating the untreatable, seeing the unseeable on scans, predicting the unpredictable, classifying the unclassifiable, eliminating workflow inefficiencies, eliminating patient harm, curing cancer, and more.

A realistic sort of optimist, Topol writes: Over time, AI will help propel us toward each of these objectives, but its going to be a marathon without a finish line.

See original here:

Artificial Intelligence and the Humanization of Medicine InsideSources - InsideSources

Posted in Ai | Comments Off on Artificial Intelligence and the Humanization of Medicine InsideSources – InsideSources

Why AI & ML must be part of diversity initiatives – The Drum

Posted: at 10:25 am

Marketers are embracing diversity, but are they overlooking a critical opportunity? Merkles Tracie Kambies discusses why many may be missing the mark when it comes to AI and ML, and what they must do about it.

Diversity, equity and inclusion are more important than ever in our dynamic world. Marketers and their digital agencies have embraced diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) with enthusiasm and care. They are building their teams to be diverse, changing their brands to be inclusive, and shaping their messages to be just and ethical. DEI rightly must inform every part of the business. This is especially true as more people and organizations realize the importance of DEI in our current moment in history. Rethinking our ethics when it comes to data privacy, personal information and fluid identities is in motion now. Marketers are on it.

But are they missing the mark when it comes to artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML)?

AI and ML are exciting tools for the modern marketer riding the bleeding edge of technology. AI and ML can be used to hyper-target customer segments, learn from ridiculously deep data sets, improve content, react to the behaviors of millions of consumers and predict how we learn, shop and buy. They are game changers. The best AI/ML experts have their hands full learning how to leverage the technology, keeping up with new developments and changing their business models to adapt to new applications. What hasnt always happened or been done well is considering the ethics of what they are building.

AI and ML have their own special challenges in encoding ethics into their artificial brains. The point of AI/ML in marketing is to create bias toward inciting consumer action, such as transacting. The models are built to learn on their own. The incentives are aligned toward marketing KPIs such as increasing sales or building loyalty and engagement. They are fed data sets filled with dimensions of past action, demographics, financials, channels and more. What they dont usually get is ethical instructions to guide their outputs. AI and ML, in their current forms, are ethically blind.

The ethically-blind AI presents openings for dangerous outcomes. It may produce segments or targets that have undesirable biases against race, gender, sexual preference, identity, age and a host of other discriminations we wouldnt tolerate in other aspects of life. The ethically-blind AI could reverse much of the positive impact we are achieving through our human-curated activities in our branding or our team-building practices. A modern, ethical organization simply cant afford to have a non-ethical actor so prominently directing the organizations marketing behavior.

While we dont know exactly what ethical AI/ML looks like, we can begin to rethink how we approach the discipline with an ethics-based mindset.

Firstly, we need to inject ethical thinking into our design of AI and ML. We need to be conscious of how ethics plays into our algorithms and examine the outputs for moral content. We need to bring a diverse and inclusive mindset to our AI teams, and the best way to ensure this is to build AI teams that are diverse and inclusive themselves.

We also need to change our incentives so that ethical behavior in AI/ML is encouraged, and that competing incentives dont impede our ability to act ethically. Marketers and their agencies need to start asking themselves some exploratory questions:

Are our DEI objectives clearly accounted for in our AI and ML programs? Are our ethics part of our design process and governance?

Do we have a way to measure the ethical impact of our AI and ML outputs? Can we track them before they go to market?

Do marketers incentives and KPIs need to be adjusted to accommodate ethical approaches to employing AI/ML?

Are we bringing a diverse and inclusive perspective to our AI and ML programs? More precisely, are our teams themselves diverse and inclusive in their composition?

So much of AI/ML is designed and performed by agencies and their holding companies, so it is essential for marketers and agencies to be leaders in bringing ethics to these disciplines. We in the industry take great pride in being innovators in this bright and brilliant field. We know its not only the future but the now. We must embed our ethics and our deeply-held desires for justice within it now. Its our duty.

Tracie Kambies is global analytics leader, Merkle.

For more, sign up for The Drums daily US newsletter here.

Follow this link:

Why AI & ML must be part of diversity initiatives - The Drum

Posted in Ai | Comments Off on Why AI & ML must be part of diversity initiatives – The Drum

Securing AI and ML at the Edge – Security Boulevard

Posted: at 10:25 am

Organizations are increasingly turning to AI and ML to enhance their cybersecurity operations. Having algorithms to do some of the most tedious but necessary tasks has taken a lot of stress off of overworked security teams.

But as AI/ML become more ubiquitous within organizations in many other areas, the technologies themselves are at risk of attack. The Harvard Kennedy Centers Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs recently released a report warning of a new type of cybersecurity attack called an artificial intelligence attack.

These attacks, the report said, are different from other types of cyberattacks. AI attacks are enabled by inherent limitations in the underlying AI algorithms that currently cannot be fixed. They present a bigger attack surface by weaponizing data and physical objects that rely on AI and ML.

Businesses rely on AI/ML because it is capable of extremely fast processing, though it also has been proven to create massive blind spots, according to Ben Pick, senior application security consultant at nVisium.

The decision tree algorithms used by AI/ML are based on assumptions and are frequently shown to have severe obstructions and oversights, Pick said in an email interview.

There is also the complexity of additional use cases and capabilities for AI/ML that dont necessarily overlap with security. AI/ML developers who are experts in that field are contributing to projects in addition to your normal team, which makes adding the security component to AI/ML more challenging.

These struggles to incorporate security into devices AI/ML functions falls perfectly in line with threat actors desire to find vulnerabilities through which to make their attacks. Because as much as AI/ML can assist in securing applications, it certainly cannot remove all risks.

A hackers main goal would be to corrupt the inputs to confuse the decision-making algorithms, said Pick. This could lead to a piece of duct tape over a speed limit signcausing an automated vehicle to speed up to an unsafe velocityor facial recognition incorrectly identifying a person.

AI/ML is often used to augment security by acting as a first line of defense against threats, but what about when AI/ML itself is on the front line and is first to be attacked?

Securing AI/ML at the edge could be the solution to mitigate risks to the technology and to the devices using it. Adding security at the edge increases confidence in the results/inferences derived from the models, explained Larry OConnell, VP of marketing for Sequitur Labs.

Also, having high security at the edge allows OEMs to use more sensitive/proprietary models by mitigating the risk of theft, OConnell said in an email interview.

With a strongly defined good baseline, any anomalies or threats can be more easily identified, building and adapting the security and algorithms used to protect devices.

The sheer volume of devices and inputs at and from the edge requires a vast system of inventory and maintenanceon top of securing each device, Pick pointed out. That means fine-tuning AI/ML will require a full understanding of the environments, as well as a large number of human analysts to adapt the AI training inputs.

Also, securing an embedded device requires specialized expertise, much the same way using AI properly does, McConnell added. Organizations should start projects with security included from the beginning.

Planning for security means defining your requirements, such as threat models, and quantifying risk, McConnell said. Security extends to the manufacturing, provisioning, deployment and update phases of the product life cycle. For AI specifically, the process to securely update models should be included as part of the update process.

Organizations will need to take on a greater responsibility to keep AI/ML secure on the edge, as it will be a large attack surface to monitor. This control offers a faster response to potential attacks and, as AI becomes a bigger target, faster response and mitigation will be key.

Recent Articles By Author

Read more here:

Securing AI and ML at the Edge - Security Boulevard

Posted in Ai | Comments Off on Securing AI and ML at the Edge – Security Boulevard