The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Monthly Archives: August 2021
Florida is the only state where more people are dying of COVID now than ever before. What went wrong? – Yahoo News
Posted: August 30, 2021 at 2:35 am
A few months ago, Gov. Ron DeSantis, Republican of Florida, declared his hands-off approach to COVID-19 a tremendous success. Politico announced that he had won the pandemic.
But then came the hypercontagious Delta variant, which continues to hit Florida harder than anywhere else in the country.
The result? DeSantis just added another, less flattering distinction to his rsum. When COVID first surged across the Sun Belt last summer, the average number of Floridians dying of the disease every 24 hours peaked at 185, according to the New York Timess state-by-state COVID database. The same was true over the winter.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Aug. 21 announcing the opening of a monoclonal antibody treatment site for COVID-19 patients in Lakeland, Fla. (Paul Hennessy/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
A few days ago, however, Floridas daily death rate cleared 200 for the first time, and today it stands at 228 an all-time high.
This makes DeSantis the first (and so far only) governor in the U.S. whose state is now recording more COVID-19 deaths each day long after free, safe and effective vaccines became widely available to all Americans age 12 or older than during any previous wave of the virus.
So what went wrong? California thinks it has the answer.
Since last spring, Florida and California two of Americas biggest and most influential states have been locked in a pitched battle over which kind of pandemic response makes the most sense: less or more. At times, the Sunshine State seemed to have the upper hand like when Florida avoided the worst of a nationwide winter surge that hit California particularly hard, all while refusing to require masks in public and keeping bars and restaurants fully open.
But Delta may have changed that.
Vaccines are working to prevent deaths in many other countries that have seen post vaccine spike in cases, and most other states in the U.S. as well. Florida is different, Dr. Vincent Rajkumar, a professor of medicine at the Mayo Clinic, recently explained on Twitter. Whats different in Florida is that, relative to the vaccination rate (~50%), the relaxation of distancing and masking was disproportionately high. Leaders expressed disdain for masks and mask mandates. The total number of people unvaccinated is high. And hospitals got overwhelmed.
Story continues
To be sure, comparing COVID numbers from two different states is always a fraught proposition; there are many factors the introduction of a new, more devious variant such as Delta; the weather; plain old bad luck that people and policymakers have little control over. And any declaration of victory (or failure) during such an unpredictable pandemic is likely to be premature. In theory, California could suffer more this winter.
But by looking at how California and Florida are doing this summer, post-vaccination, versus how they did last summer, pre-vaccination an approach that minimizes seasonal variables such as weather and indoor gathering you can get a rough sense of what is or isnt working.
The difference is stark.
Last summer, COVID surged in both Florida and California, just as it did across much of the rest of the Southern and Southwestern United States. California fared better. There, new daily cases peaked at 25 per every 100,000 residents; total hospitalizations peaked at 23 per every 100,000 residents; and new daily deaths peaked at 0.35 per every 100,000 residents.
In Florida, those numbers were more than twice as bad: 55 cases/100,000 residents, 56 hospitalizations/100,000 residents and 0.86 deaths/100,000 residents.
So something about Florida tourism? humidity? fewer restrictions, even last year? likely makes it more susceptible to summer spread.
Passengers prepare to board a cruise ship in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., on June 26. (Maria Alejandra Cardona/AFP via Getty Images)
The problem, though, is that while California is doing much better this summer than last, Florida, for some reason, is doing much worse.
In California, the current new daily rate case is somewhat higher (35 cases/100,000) than it was during its summer 2020 peak in part because California is now conducting twice as many tests per day (about 250,000). Yet despite that, and despite the fact that Delta is twice as transmissible as the initial strain of SARS-CoV-2 that was circulating in 2020, current hospitalizations in California (21/100,000) are still lower than last summers peak and deaths, the metric that matters most, remain twice as low (0.17/100,000).
Thats the kind of progress youd expect after vaccination.
Florida is the opposite. There, new daily cases appear to have topped out at 138 per every 100,000 residents more than two and a half times last summers peak. As a result, the states current hospitalization rate (80/100,000) is nearly one and a half times last summers peak; new daily deaths (1/100,000) are higher than ever. And theyre both still climbing.
In other words, Florida did roughly twice as badly as California last summer in terms of COVID cases, hospitalizations and deaths. This summer, however, Florida is doing roughly four times worse in terms of cases and hospitalizations and nearly six times worse in terms of deaths.
Medics transfer a patient at Coral Gables Hospital in Coral Gables, Fla., on Aug. 16. (Chandan Khanna/AFP via Getty Images)
Why has Florida moved in the wrong direction while California has gone the other way? Again, simple misfortune probably plays a part (as do other hard-to-quantify forces). But not every factor is beyond human control. Take vaccination. There are just five counties in California (of 58) where fewer than 35 percent of residents are fully inoculated. In Florida, that number is 23 (of 67). Its easier for Delta to get a foothold and spread in places where the vast majority of people are unprotected.
Still, vaccination doesnt explain everything: Statewide, Floridas full vaccination rate (52 percent) is the same as the national number and just 3 percentage points lower than Californias (55 percent). And Florida has fully vaccinated more of its seniors (82 percent) than California (79 percent).
So as Rajkumar explained, precautions are probably playing a big part as well and here too the difference between California and Florida couldnt be more pronounced.
When Delta took off, Los Angeles became the first county in the country to reinstate its public indoor mask mandate. The San Francisco Bay Area followed suit soon after, and nearly every large county in California that doesnt require masks indoors at least strongly recommends them. No lockdowns, no business closures, no official curbs on indoor drinking or dining just indoor mask requirements and recommendations.
In contrast, DeSantis doubled down on his opposition to mask mandates, prohibiting local governments and even local school districts from implementing such policies. Did we see areas like Los Angeles, with heavy masking, having reduced cases to a trickle? DeSantis once asked, mockingly. Such wisecracks were all part of the governors larger message: Now that vaccines are widely available, he argued, requiring additional precautions is not just unscientific and unnecessary its an infringement on your personal freedom.
Hillcrest Elementary school in Orlando, where masks are required for students unless the parents opt out by writing a note to school officials. (Paul Hennessy/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images)
At this point in the pandemic, its impossible to determine whether mask mandates actually trigger more caution or simply reflect existing attitudes in a particular community. Because the pandemic has become so politicized, people have already sorted themselves into their different camps, Voxs Dylan Scott wrote in June. By now, you are already either a mask-wearer or youre not. A government mandate probably isnt going to affect someones behavior in June 2021 as much as it would have a year ago, especially after enforcement has been nonexistent.
But either way, the behavior associated with mask mandates that is, universal indoor masking has been proved to work. In fact, according to a research summary by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, at least ten studies have confirmed the benefit of universal masking in community level analyses: in a unified hospital system, a German city, two U.S. states, a panel of 15 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., as well as both Canada and the U.S. nationally.
Each analysis demonstrated that, following directives from organizational and political leadership for universal masking, new infections fell significantly, the summary continues, adding that two of these studies and an additional analysis of data from 200 countries that included the U.S. also demonstrated reductions in mortality.
Meanwhile, another 10-site study showed reductions in hospitalization growth rates following mask mandate implementation, and a separate series of cross-sectional surveys in the U.S. suggested that a 10 percent increase in self-reported mask wearing tripled the likelihood of stopping community transmission.
Critical care workers insert an endotracheal tube into a COVID-19 patient at a hospital in Sarasota, Fla. (Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)
This isnt to say that if DeSantis had pulled a 180 and issued a statewide mask mandate, Florida would have dodged Delta (though it might not have hurt). Mostly, the damage is done. Behavior and thus vulnerability to new variants like Delta, which can transmit via vaccinated people is already baked in.
In mid-July, for instance, both vaccinated and unvaccinated Americans reported regularly wearing masks at exactly the same rate (43 percent), according to the Yahoo News/YouGov poll. But since then, mask wearing by the vaccinated has increased by 22 points (to 65 percent) while mask wearing by the unvaccinated has actually fallen (to 39 percent).
In short, the people who need the most protection from catching and spreading the virus are, paradoxically, masking up even less often now than they were before Delta took off. Instead, its the least vulnerable Americans those who are vaccinated who have been responsible for all of the recent uptick in regular masking.
A recent survey by the University of Southern California also found that unvaccinated Americans are more likely than their vaccinated peers to go to a bar or a friends house and less likely to avoid large gatherings.
Lack of mask measures, lack of worry about it, lack of vaccination are all kind of the syndrome, Kevin Malotte, an emeritus professor of epidemiology at California State University, Long Beach, recently told the New York Times. And I think thats what were seeing correlate with the high rates.
Camila Lapeyre, 12, gets a COVID vaccination shot at a Long Beach, Calif., clinic. (Francine Orr/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images)
And yet this divide wasnt preordained. Fate did not decree that Floridians would be more inclined than Californians to view wearing masks indoors for a few more weeks or gathering outdoors more often, or waiting a little longer to drink at the bar as violations of their personal liberty. Leaders have some power to encourage or discourage such attitudes, and some responsibility for the behaviors they help to normalize (or not).
The good news is that cases finally appear to be peaking in Florida; the states seven-day average has fallen by nearly 30 percent over the last week (though testing is down too).
But new cases may be leveling off in California as well, and at a much lower level. Both Los Angeles and San Francisco have registered promising declines over the last 14 days.
In the meantime, 228 people are dying of COVID in Florida each day more than three times the number dying each day in California, a state thats almost twice as populous.
And this time, nearly every one of their deaths was preventable.
____
Read more from Yahoo News:
Continued here:
Posted in Yahoo
Comments Off on Florida is the only state where more people are dying of COVID now than ever before. What went wrong? – Yahoo News
‘Buy it early!’ Bank of America warns of supply issues this holiday season – Yahoo Finance
Posted: at 2:35 am
People may be talking about pumpkin spiced lattes in August, but this year there may actually be a good reason to think about the Holiday Season earlier than usual.
A recent note by Bank of America analysts looked at the state of the current freight backlog at the Port of Los Angeles and found that availability of many goods may be pinched during the biggest shopping season. The takeaway? Buy it early! the bank wrote.
These issues come while previous bottlenecks have already created an inventory slump that is unprecedented outside of a recession.
Currently, goods destined for the U.S. that are in route now (or will be next month) should arrive by November which is good news of a sort.
That said, the bank continued, if a retailer is shipping in November, there is a big risk that product will not arrive on time.
The previous window of six weeks from order to delivery in the U.S. has expanded to as many as 10 weeks given the post-Covid logistical backlogs. Not only is that not ideal, but its also many times more expensive than it was last year.
A container ship makes it way toward the Port of New York and New Jersey in Elizabeth, N.J., June 30, 2021. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
Pricing is up to $20k/box (if you can get one) compared to $2.5k/box last year, the bank wrote, referring to the price of a standard shipping container.
According to BofA, the Port of LA believes that prices will continue to be expensive for as much as another six months.
The backlog, which began from demand shock thanks to reopening after supply shock from Covid closures, has worsened since early July because of a handful of factors: the Delta variant, labor shortages, container shortages, shortages of certain products, and a host of transportation issues have disrupted the normal flow of goods. Back-to-school supplies are getting hit by the same supply chain hurdles now.
Even after the end of the holiday season, the bank said the Port of LA expects demand to continue to be strong and supply levels to stay strained.
Already, the Association for Supply Chain Management has warned about rising prices stemming from supply chain complications and the need to start holiday shopping well before Black Friday.
Story continues
To deal with these constraints, expert elves are needed, Abe Eshkenazi, the associations CEO, quipped in early August.
As all of this has shown, you cant plan for everything. But we all know what season is coming.
Ethan Wolff-Mann is a writer at Yahoo Finance focusing on consumer issues, personal finance, retail, airlines, and more. Follow him on Twitter @ewolffmann.
Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn, YouTube, and reddit
Read the original:
'Buy it early!' Bank of America warns of supply issues this holiday season - Yahoo Finance
Posted in Yahoo
Comments Off on ‘Buy it early!’ Bank of America warns of supply issues this holiday season – Yahoo Finance
TAP Talks: I’m not always saving the world, and that’s okay – Jewish World Watch
Posted: at 2:34 am
To any activist that might need to hear this: if you have stopped advocating for a while or have been too busy helping yourself or your family to volunteer, and youre worried about being criticized for that if you come back, dont be. That was the position I was in with Jewish World Watch, and I couldnt have been more wrong about the reception I would receive when I returned. I might have sacrificed the chance to continue making an impact if I had listened to that misplaced fear.
There is a quote that hangs in the conference room at the JWW office, reading, You are not obligated to complete the work, but neither are you free to desist from it. It comes from Pirkei Avot, Ethics of our Fathers, a Talmudic text. The message is one of perseverance. JWW doesnt get to put number of genocides stopped this year in letters to donors, and there is no expectation of a time when the organization will have finished its mission and can shut its doors. However, not fixing the global issue does not mean that the lives of thousands of refugees cant be saved or that even preventing a hundred deaths out of millions isnt worth the fight.
The quote has also been a source of guilt for me. After participating in the Teen Ambassador Program throughout my senior year of high school and leading a team for the Walk to End Genocide, I was minimally involved with JWW until I returned for an internship this summer, just before my senior year of college.
I was nervous about the interview. I felt it wouldnt be unreasonable for my supervisors to ask me what Id done to support this cause during the last three years and to reject me based on the answer: not much. I have been trying to figure out so much in my life, and my commitments change each semester with a continued effort to balance school, career building, service, and just enjoying college. But what right did I have, in my position of privilege, not to stay fully committed to the work? Maybe I just shouldnt have reached out.
This was not the direction the interview took. The team was happy I wanted to come back, which made me happy to be back, and soon I was on board, fighting the good fight again. I gained so much from working with JWW, and I hope that in my time here, I paid some of that kindness, knowledge, and experience back to the organization and forward to the survivors we support.
At the end of this summer, Pirkei Avot is going to start ringing in my head again. I dont yet know how I will distribute my time in my final year of college, and it is going to gnaw at me that there is always more I could be doing to help those less fortunate than I am. I think that feeling is a good one to have, and I dont think it should ever go away, even for people who work full-time at organizations like JWW. It is a guiding compass. However, just as a real compass wont account for a gorge with no bridge to cross it, our moral compass cant predict the path of our lives.
There is another quote from the Talmud that I try to keep in mind at these times: Whoever destroys a single life is considered to have destroyed an entire world, and whoever saves a single life is considered to have saved an entire world. This echoes the imperative to keep advocating for a stranger on the other side of the world. Still, it also means that sometimes a situation with a family member or friend will demand more attention than a global crisis. It means sometimes the person you are in the best position to save is yourself. The Talmud teaches us that this is still fighting the good fight.
Research backs up this interpretation. In trying to figure out my next step after I graduate, Ive consulted the career advice arm of the Centre for Effective Altruism. This evidence-based organization evaluates charities and approaches to pressing world problems to help donors and volunteers maximize their positive impact. The Centres first recommendation for an altruistic career is to take care of your own mental and physical health because it will make you a more effective leader and helper in the long run.
So this is what I choose to commit to now, that I hope resonates with other activists my age. Ill stay on the mailing list, Ill contact my representatives with the scripts and forms provided, and Ill keep having conversations and telling the people in my life about these global issues. I believe in the power of small interventions, matchsticks that can keep a fire burning and sometimes ignite a new one. But I also know that it takes bigger, sustained actions to change the world. So Ill come back to JWW to give another large chunk of my time or money. If not in the next few months, then in August 2023. After all, postponing indefinitely can become postponing infinitely. But my worry about that donation not coming soon enough or being big enough isnt at all whats on the mind of the people receiving it. I have to let go of the guilt so that I dont shy away from future opportunities to give.
We will not desist from the work. And as long as we know that, no one gets to judge our pace, and no one is asking us to complete it.
Photo: Jonah Goldberg speaks at the 2018 Walk to End Genocide. Photo by Bill Sparks
Originally posted here:
TAP Talks: I'm not always saving the world, and that's okay - Jewish World Watch
Posted in Talmud
Comments Off on TAP Talks: I’m not always saving the world, and that’s okay – Jewish World Watch
Religions of the World will be Theme for Fall Term of the Masters Series at Pasadena Senior Center – Pasadena Now
Posted: at 2:34 am
Dr. Phyllis Herman. Photo courtesy Pasadena Senior Center
The fall term of The Masters Series, with the theme Religions of the World, will be onsite at the Pasadena Senior Center Tuesdays, Sept. 14 to Oct. 19, from 2 to 4 p.m.
Religion has always played a role in human society, from nonverbal prehistory to the prominent place of religion in contemporary life. Living in a multicultural society, it is important to understand what is sacred in religions and the central myths, rituals, texts and scriptures that shape ancient and modern expressions of these traditions.
Dr. Phyllis Herman, professor of religious studies at California State University, Northridge, will introduce participants in The Masters Series to archaic and tribal religious practices, Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
The cost for the six-week series is only $75 for members of the Pasadena Senior Center and $90 for nonmembers.
Sept. 14 The religious life of archaic and tribal traditions: examples from the Ngaju Dayak and the Hopi.
Sept. 21 Hinduism: from prehistoric finds to modern traditions.
Sept. 28 Buddhism: from its founders life to the many schools and countries that practice this religion.
Oct. 5 Judaism: the Hebrew Bible, the Talmud and the many forms of modern Judaism.
Oct. 12 Christianity: the life of Jesus and developments into and within this religion.
Oct. 19 Islam: from Muhammad to the world.
To register or for more information, visit http://www.pasadenaseniorcenter.org and click on Masters Series Lifelong Learning, call 626-795-4331 or email AnnieL@pasadenaseniorcenter.org. Everyone who registers will receive email instructions for joining each weeks Zoom class online.
Herman, who earned her PhD in the history of religion at UCLA, has been a professor of religious studies at CSUN for many years and served a term as chair of the Department of Religious Studies.
Her areas of concentration include world religions, Islam in India, South Asian religious traditions and women and religion. She has contributed chapters to several notable books and articles on nationalist and feminine theories, women and religion, and Hindu ideas of kingship. She also co-edited a book titled The Constant and Changing Face of the Goddess: Goddess Traditions in Asia that features essays written by established scholars.
Masks and social distancing are required for onsite activities. For more information about onsite as well as online activities and other programs and services of the Pasadena Senior Center, visit the website or call (626) 795-4331.
The center, at 85 E. Holly St., is an independent, donor-supported nonprofit organization that has been serving older adults for more than 60 years.
Post Views:399
See the original post:
Posted in Talmud
Comments Off on Religions of the World will be Theme for Fall Term of the Masters Series at Pasadena Senior Center – Pasadena Now
Ben Shapiro, Real Time, and Public Jewishness – Yahoo News
Posted: at 2:34 am
This month, something happened in American culture that was on its surface rather ordinary but was, on closer inspection, quite extraordinary: A religious Jew appeared on one of the most popular television shows visibly wearing the marker of his religious identity. I am referring to Ben Shapiros appearance on HBOs Real Time with Bill Maher. Shapiro, a conservative political commentator and an Orthodox Jew, was wearing a black kippah (also called a yarmulke), a skullcap traditionally worn by religious Jewish men. Although it blended in almost seamlessly with his jet-black hair, the kippah was nonetheless clearly discernible to any viewer.
Shapiro was on a panel with the left-wing political commentator Malcolm Nance, with whom he engaged in some heated debate about some of the most contentious political issues of the moment, interrupted only by intermittent applause and by Mahers comedic relief especially welcome, here, given the prickly and at times personal nature of Nances and Shapiros exchanges. All of this would have been rather unremarkable pundits go after each other on TV all the time were it not for the fact that Shapiro was appearing proudly on camera as an Orthodox Jew.
For a society that has been so accepting of multiculturalism and in which Jews have played a prominent role in almost all spheres of culture, from Groucho Marx and George Gershwin to Steven Spielberg and Larry David, there have been remarkably few Jewish celebrities who identify as religiously observant. There has been such a plethora of religiously observant Protestants, Catholics, and Muslims who have made notable contributions to American culture that to list even a decent portion of them would require an article in and of itself. By glaring contrast, the number of prominent religious Jews is so small that Orthodox parents trying to point out some of our successes to our children have been forced to fall back on fictional characters, such as Krusty the Clowns father Rabbi Hyman Krustofsky on The Simpsons and the famous convert-by-marriage Walter Sobchak in The Big Lebowski, who wont go bowling on Saturday because, as he memorably exclaims, I dont roll on Shabbos!
Story continues
I was in high school when Vice President Al Gore selected Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman as his running mate in the 2000 presidential election. At the time, my friends and I at Yeshiva University High School for Boys in Washington Heights paid far more attention to Talmud than to politics, but when we learned that not only was there a U.S. senator who was an Orthodox Jew but that he stood a good chance of becoming vice president of the United States, we were seized with the kind of excitement typical of fans of long-suffering sports franchises that finally come within sniffing distance of winning it all.
When we saw, however, that Lieberman did not wear a kippah in the Senate or on the campaign trail, we were crushed. How, we wondered, could a Jewish man identify as Orthodox and not wear his kippah in public? The old doubts began to creep back again. Why was it, for example, that Christian and Muslim athletes such as Mariano Rivera and Hakeem Olajuwon could be openly devout adherents of their respective faiths, but Sandy Koufax (held up as a hero by Reform Jews and Conservative Jews but not by Orthodox Jews), outside of one token observance of Yom Kippur, was utterly unobservant? Why was it that Stephen Colbert could reference his Catholicism on air but Jon Stewart limited expressions of his Jewishness to the satiric old Jewish man voice hed bring out from time to time? As a religious Jew, could you only participate meaningfully in American culture by checking your religious identity at the door?
Shapiros appearance on Real Time with Bill Maher wont entirely quell these doubts, especially for those on the Left who are uncomfortable with his politics, but it may go a long way toward making religious Jews feel more comfortable about our place in American culture. Shapiros turn on Real Time feels particularly significant at a time when, through TV series such as Netflixs Unorthodox and My Unorthodox Life, the culture seems to be celebrating American Jews who abandon their religion. This is an extremely bizarre and disturbing trend in American TV and culture. Would Netflix also be so heavily promoting shows about black or Hispanic or Muslim Americans leaving their communities?
In an era in which, for better or worse, identity has become paramount, we religious Jews may at long last be seeing that someone who looks and lives like us really can make it here. It is now up to purveyors and creators of American culture to bring us more Shapiro on Real Time and less Unorthodox and My Unorthodox Life to ensure that the visibility of people like him is not a one-off but a harbinger of a broader, and long overdue, acceptance of religious Jews in mainstream culture. Maybe, though, this episode is a sign that 2021 might finally be our year.
Daniel Ross Goodman is a postdoctoral fellow and research scholar at the University of Salzburg. He is the author of Somewhere Over the Rainbow: Wonder and Religion in American Cinema and the novel A Single Life.
Washington Examiner Videos
Tags: TV, Judaism, Religion
Original Author: Daniel Ross Goodman
Original Location: Ben Shapiro, Real Time, and Public Jewishness
More:
Posted in Talmud
Comments Off on Ben Shapiro, Real Time, and Public Jewishness – Yahoo News
Watch Highlights: The Return of Broadway at The New Yorker Live – The New Yorker
Posted: at 2:33 am
How we respond to this moment is what our grandkids are going to ask us about, the Tony Award-winning actor and director Ruben Santiago-Hudson said, on Tuesday, during the latest installment of The New Yorker Live, the magazines monthly event series for subscribers. Broadway is preparing to reopen next month, after the pandemic forced theatres to take a year-and-a-half-long hiatus, and the industry faces a changed world. Santiago-Hudson and David Byrne, the musician and producer best known as the front man of the Talking Heads, joined the New Yorker staff writer Vinson Cunningham to discuss how they hope to shape the contours of this age.
I will not allow Broadway, or any theatre, to assume that they can come back with the same attitudes that they had prior to the pandemic, and prior to the racial strife that tore this country apart, Santiago-Hudson said. His noted solo show Lackawanna Blues, an autobiographical, blues-inspired play about the woman who raised him, returns on September 14th. American cultural institutions are reckoning with racial injustice and looking for ways to address it, both in the substance of their work and in the way that their organizations operate. Santiago-Hudson said that he had called on the Manhattan Theatre Club, which is presenting his show, to rise to the challenges of the moment: Acknowledge the land youre on; acknowledge the labor that built this country. Look at your staff and revaluate the percentages in there. Revaluate the parity of men and women; look at the pay-scale differences. Look at what youre developing, where youre seeking your art from. What does your board look like? But, he added, One thing I know for certain: they want change as well.
Byrne said that the events of 2020 and 2021 have altered his perspective on his own show, the Tony-winning theatrical concert American Utopia, a performance based on Byrnes 2018 studio album of the same name. Adapted by Spike Lee into a film for HBO last year, the live show, which combines themes of protest with a tone of resilience and joy, reopens, at the St. James Theatre, on September 17th. Some of the things that I address in the showwhether its voting, race, immigration, all those thingsare, if anything, more relevant, more of the moment than they were then, he said. Which is kind of hard to believe.
The two also discussed the public-health challenges of reopening theatres while the Delta variant is spreading, and why the communal experience of live performance is irreplaceable. Both are eager for Broadway to returnsafely, of course, in accordance with the guidance of the Actors Equity union and the C.D.C., including mask wearing for audience members and special protocols for ticket taking. And yet the need that we have to be together is justits overwhelming, Byrne said. It really is part of who we are.
The clip above includes highlights from the New Yorker Live discussion, including how the Broadway community fared during the shutdown, how to speak the truth through songwriting, and why its important to make art that reflects what the country looks like. Subscribers to The New Yorker can watch the full conversation, as well as all previous installments of The New Yorker Live, at newyorker.com/live. Check the page in the weeks ahead for details about upcoming events, and subscribe to gain access.
Original post:
Watch Highlights: The Return of Broadway at The New Yorker Live - The New Yorker
Posted in New Utopia
Comments Off on Watch Highlights: The Return of Broadway at The New Yorker Live – The New Yorker
Backflap – The Tribune
Posted: at 2:33 am
In the winter of 2004, Akash Kapur and his wife Auralice moved to Auroville, not to look for something new, but to look into the past. Both of them had grown up in Auroville; the latter leaving after the sudden death of her parents, John Walker and Diane Maes, when she was 14. Like the rest of their community, they never really understood those deaths. This is the mystery Akash Kapur sets out to solve in Better to Have Gone and slowly they come to understand how the tragic individual fates of John and Diane intersected with the collective history of their town. This is a book about the human cost of our age-old quest for a more perfect world. It probes the under-explored yet universal idea of utopia, and portrays in vivid detail the daily life of one utopian community.
The ghats, sometimes buzzing with mortal activity, sometimes deathly calm, the lanes lined with wall in the hole shops promising nirvana, the many temples, the sadhus, the urban populace, the fleeting visitors... Banaras is a living landscape, with elements of antiquity, symbolism and built-in environments created and recreated by agencies that have made it the city that millions throng. In Banaras: Of Gods, Humans and Stories, author Nilosree Biswas and photographer Irfan Nabi discern the engaging narrative of a unique chromosome that makes Banaras. Written about so many times, the book is the authors attempt to understand a city that has intrigued her since childhood, so much so that she goes back to it again and again.
by Nilosree Biswas
& Irfan Nabi.
Niyogi Books.
Pages 240. Rs1,750
Published in 1972, this book is the last of Mahadevi Varmas prose works, and the most neglected as well. However, it is a work that demanded attention, for in the preface to the book she writes that all her prose stems from her writings about animals. The book, aptly titled Mera Parivaar, brings together her world of animals, her family. The relationship that began with saving a chick in her childhood persisted till the very end of her life. Animals were the only beings permitted beyond the living room of her house; Gillu the squirrel being the special one who ate off her plate, died clinging to her finger. This work sprang from the fount of Varmas feelings for animals. It has been translated into English for the first time by Ruth Vanita, a professor at the University of Montana.
by Mahadevi Varma.
Translated by Ruth Vanita.
Penguin Random House.
Pages 168. Rs399
With the political patterns beginning to worry, with the Muslim community being made to feel threatened for being the other, it was important for author Humra Quraishi to help people comprehend the ground realities of present times. Quraishi says she had never imagined that a day would come when she, an Indian Muslim, would be looked upon as a suspect just because she greeted with a loud and clear As-Salaam-Alaikum, or because she was critical of the government of the day. In the recent past, several Muslim scholars have tried to reason being a Muslim in India. This book is based on the authors writings of the last many years, including on the living conditions of Muslisms and the challenges they face in everyday life.
the Largest Minority Community in India
by Humra Quraishi.
Aakar Books.
Pages 292. Rs595
The rest is here:
Posted in New Utopia
Comments Off on Backflap – The Tribune
Land, caste, class and gender Gail Omvedts writings were united in their vision of utopia – Scroll.in
Posted: at 2:33 am
When she first came to India in 1963 to stay for a year, Gail Omvedt was 22 years old. Earlier, she had been a student at Carleton College, where that other great scholar of anti-caste movements, Eleanor Zelliot, was teaching. Her journey east presaged other such crossings, notably by seekers of various kinds, including musicians and music lovers.
For her part, she returned to university and enrolled for graduate study at the University of California at Berkeley, and did not come back to India until 1971 to begin work on her dissertation on the Non-Brahman Movement in that part of the country. This would go on to become a pioneering study in English, of Mahatma Phule and his movement: Cultural Revolt in a Colonial Society: The Non-Brahman Movement in Western India, 1873-1930.
But Omvedt did not only work at her research. The tumultuous politics of the times engrossed her attention and soon she found herself attending meetings held by trade unions, new Left formations and anti-caste groups in Maharashtra.
Having come of political age in the United States of the 1960s, she turned her attention to the most important contradictions that marked the social order in India: of caste and gender. And as she grappled with these divisions she realised that existing frameworks of analysis, Marxist or feminist, as she had known them, were not adequate to unravel the conundrum of inequality exemplified in the caste order, or indeed to the bewildering and complex operations of patriarchy in the Indian context.
In a note that she wrote to the Canadian feminist zine, Off Our Backs in 1985, she observed that the inadequacy of Left theorising was being increasingly felt in India, and not only in feminist circles but also amongst those engaged in peoples science and health movements, in environmental circles and those fighting religious chauvinism and casteism. As to what feminism could offer, she conceded, was not clear either, but it was a terrain worth exploring.
And explore she did, spending time with womens groups and movements, thinking along with others, fellow feminists, trade unionists, women labourers, domestic workers, students and this exploration is writ large in her 1979-80 publication, We shall Smash this Prison: Indian Women in Struggle.
Meanwhile, she raised a plethora of questions, impelled by the feminist politics that came to be, from the late 1970s, and was focused on womens sexual subordination, in the family and elsewhere. Women were sexually exploited and cultural oppressed, but not always in the same way. Lower caste, Dalit and working-class women were subject to what she termed social patriarchy, while women from the upper castes were subject to the punitive ethics of the family (see her remarkable Violence against Women: New Movements and New Theories in India, published in 1990).
She looked to the writings of the historian Sharad Patil to understand the making of a social structure that was shaped by caste hierarchies on the one hand, and conjugal and familial arrangements, on the other.
It was not that she agreed with him entirely, but his Dasa-Shudra Slavery opened up ways of thinking about family and caste, and as important to her, suggested how one might rework Engels theory of the origin of family, private property and the state.
Meanwhile, she remained a purveyor of anti-caste politics in the present, even as she wrote of its pasts, of Phule and Shahu Maharaj, and subsequently of Ambedkar: and called attention to the various ways in which it had come to permeate popular struggles, whether of the Bahujan Samaj Party, or the Bahujan Mahasangh, or of peasant organising.
This latter came to absorb her attention in the late 1980s and thereafter, when, along with her husband, Bharat Patankar, she was drawn to peasant protests. Sharad Joshis Shetkari Sanghatna appeared to her an interesting experiment in viable agrarian populism, and she was particularly admiring of how it mobilised women to its ranks and the manner in which the organisation addressed womens claims on land and their assertion of equality and dignity, within the home and the community.
She was watchful too of environmental struggles, but while she was taken with their logic, could not always abide by their reasoning. In the 1980s, along with many others, including her mother-in-law, Indutai Patankar, she co-founded the Shramik Mukti Dal, a toilers movement, which sought to address issues to do with drought, water use and the shrinking of the commons, on account of various development projects, including dams and power projects.
The practical work undertaken under the aegis of the movement, and the example set by other such efforts, supported by non-conventional Left groups, such as the Lal Nishan Party, led her to theorise issues to do with development, science and progress in two ways: in the circumstances given to the populace, and how they might work with these, without conceding the justness of their demands and also with regard to the greater common good that looked to the interests of small producers, the working poor and women, especially the most marginal amongst the latter, single, deserted and widowed individuals.
Through the 1980s and even after, she kept up with writings on peasant struggles, concerns and resistance: the pages of the Economic and Political Weekly and the Journal of Peasant Studies bear witness to her incessant commitment to justice for agrarian India. And here, she had to confront, parley with and fight back arguments that challenged her own: from Marxist theorists, fellow sociologists and other equally keen watchers of the Indian agrarian scene, such as the late K Balagopal.
The 1990s saw Omvedt look to a different sort of scholarship: while she continued to be interested in peoples movements, the lives of women and matters to do with the environment, the stubborn casteism of Indias elites, on full display during the Mandal-Masjid years, led her to focus on all matters that she had hitherto been concerned with, from the point of view of social justice.
Whether economic growth and distributive justice, democracy and freedom, sexual equality and emancipation from patriarchy: these were to be realised in and through measures that brought material relief, social uplift and cultural freedom to the Bahujan-Dalits of India. Her scholarship too came to be focused on these matters: Dalit Visions: the Anti-caste movement and Indian Cultural Identity, Dalits and the Democratic Revolution: Dr Ambedkar and The Dalit Movement in Colonial India and Ambedkar: Towards an Enlightened India were all products of these years.
An interesting transitional volume in this regard was Reinventing Revolution: New Social Movements, which signalled perhaps for the last time, her desire to retain dialogic engagement with the Left and various peoples movements.
But given that such dialogues as she envisaged, especially with the Left and with feminists, did not quite unfold in the manner she imagined they would, she crossed this threshold to move on to another way of political being and writing.
This period also saw her writing in the popular press the lively column she wrote for The Hindu in the late 1990s featured many valuable and at times contentious observations about faith, caste, social habit, belief and Hindu philosophy.
Meanwhile, she honed this manner of writing, creating, as she remarked, a hybrid genre that combined expert scholarship and activist journalism and which found its fulsome expression in two volumes, both published in the new millennium: Buddhism: Challenging Brahmanism and Caste and the fervently written, Seeking Begumpura: The Social Vision of Anticaste Intellectuals.
She also created a blog by the same name and kept it active until a few years ago. Subsequently, she wrote a pedagogic book, on caste through history, and her last work appears to have been translations of Tukaram.
Omvedt wrote and thought in context: her writing was situated and addressed particular realities. But she ensured that the present, whatever moment it was that she was addressing, was not folded into itself. She placed it in times unfolding, looking beyond and after: a fine instance of this manner of expounding the moment is to be had in an essay that examines the reasons for the Bahujan Samaj Party wanting to name the University of Kolhapur after Shahu Maharaj.
But rather than only focus on the politics of the hour, she uses the occasion to dwell on Shahu and his historical role (Economic and Political Weekly, August 13, 1994). Or consider her early essay on Maratha assertion in the 1980s: she takes us through the making of Maratha identity, and pulls in developments from the 19th century into her story, differentiates between identity markers in the past and present, points to the way such assertion looked to align with or keep away Dalits and through his remarkable sociological and historical journey she folds the present into an ongoing dialectic of caste and secularity (Economic and Political Weekly, February 6, 1982).
Her studies of Phule and his times, the non-brahmans in Bombay union politics, the relationship between Communists, nationalists and the Non Brahman Movement are very valuable for what they tell us about the emergence of a distinctive third sort of politics in late colonial India.
As much as nationalism and communism, the anti-caste assertion was a response to the times, and its adherents straddled several political traditions, seeking to align them along the plane of a common justice. Omvedt might be said to have rendered anti-casteism a formidable political and cultural tradition of dissent, and one that had its own vision for the India to be.
That meant that it could not be viewed only in terms of its relationship to colonialism: rather it had to be understood as offering a substantive critique of the internal logic of Indian society and by that token, pushing at the boundaries of words such as freedom and equality.
These words, Omvedts work makes clear, have to be understood in more expansive ways. Political liberty did not translate automatically into social emancipation: this latter had to be fought for and won on the terrain of the nation-to-be. Likewise, equality could not be construed only in terms of what was being denied to subject peoples: it was to be realised by the subject peoples in their relationship to each other as well.
Perhaps Omvedts most contentious writings have to do with the land, caste, class and gender questions: and while her gender politics is less contested, her arguments on Indias agrarian worlds have elicited sharp commentary and critique, chiefly from the Left. However, in order to understand her theorising of peasant worlds, as also her Marxism, as these were expressed in the 1980s, we need to also locate her in context: she examined Indian arguments within the broader context of an evolving Asian Socialism.
The contours of this latter had been sketched in briefly in independent Left circles in the United States in the 1960s, and amongst the many who argued for various sorts of socialisms was the Committee of Concerned Asian Scholars. This comprised a group of academics who came together to set themselves against US policy in Asia that was clearly anti-communist and which viewed Asian Studies as a discipline that ought to aid its cold war objectives.
These men and women eventually came to be found in the late 1960s, the Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars. Omvedt wrote for the Bulletin from the early 1970s, and well into the 1990s, and her views on Communism were shaped by the comparative histories of the present that its pages presented.
Developments in China, Indonesia, Vietnam and the Philippines pointed to the need to revalue socialist arguments that had emerged in European and Russian contexts, and Omvedt saw her own work as doing this for India. She made it clear that the view from the field cannot be adduced from theoretical claims or indeed from tidy socialist concepts.
And it was precisely on this score that she entered into lively debates with the Indian Left: that the actual details of the geography that they were concerned with ought to be heeded before any large theoretical claim could be made, about class attitudes or about exploitation (See her review essay, Marxism and the Analysis of South Asia, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 4:4, 1974).
This was evident not only in her essays on Maharashtras agrarian worlds but also in other terrains where Left intellectuals held on to broad conceptual arguments, without quite heeding the specificity of developments on the ground. Omvedt took critical measure of such an oversight, when she took on Amalendu Guhas views on the Assam agitation (Economic and Political Weekly, March 28, 1981).
And by the same token, she sought to underscore the limits of Left reasoning in the Sri Lankan context, in a short but densely argued essay on the Tamil problem. The right to self-determination, she noted, cannot be reduced to class politics merely, but had to be adduced in its relation to the totality that it sought to criticise and hold accountable (Economic and Political Weekly, October 23, 1982).
Her writings on peasant movements have been criticised and lauded: and in view of the current farmers agitations, her exchanges with Balagopal in Economic and Political Weekly acquire significance: Balagopal did not take kindly to her view of the peasant movement as capable of speaking for, and representing all those who made up the agrarian community.
Agricultural labourers, he held, could not be spoken for thus. And neither did he think that the caste divisions with agrarian society could be subsumed easily with the putative notion of a Bharat that was yet different from India. He did not also imagine that the peasantry might be viewed as such, and pointed to how it was stratified along class and caste lines (Economic and Political Weekly, September 10, 1988). Omvedts reasoning drew on arguments that partially, at least, have been made in the context of other peasant struggles, particularly by Swami Sahajanand and others in the 1940s.
But she also sought to make a case for the peasant producer in himself, as a deserving agency and right to mediate his world without interference from a domineering and elitist state and enter into a social market on his own terms. And this proved a difficult argument to sustain, given the nature of the market as Jairus Banaji (Journal of Peasant Studies, Volume 17) and Paresh Chattopadhyay (Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, Volume 27) pointed out.
Yet the questions she raised, of the elitist state, its casteist biases, and the parasitic plundering of agrarian resources, have remained with us. In addition, her clear-eyed sense of what land means to women, and the value of their labour are matters that have not been sufficiently addressed by the Left (See Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars, 29).
Also, it must be said that her view of the peasant universe was nuanced: her reviews of the published literature on agrarian issues in Tamil Nadu and Bihar are testimony to how closely she followed developments in these regions.
In this context, we need to acknowledge how her work features aspects of feminist political-economic thought, and here she shared common ground with others of her time, particularly Maria Mies and Bina Agarwal.
Feminist political economy in the Indian context needs to be valued for its unique insights, and this is something that we have been made aware of, this last decade, in and through Ranjana Padhis work on the widowed farmers of the Punjab, Those Who did not Die and Dolly Kikons Living with Oil.
Gail Omvedts journey in politics and thought was undertaken in and through several historical conjunctures, but she retained aspects of all her stopovers: in her view, these various sites of sojourn, whether feminist, Marxist, Phule-Ambedkarism, were united in their vision of utopia: a world that ought to be rendered real, in times to come, but for which one needs to labour in the present.
While reason and analysis were central to divining the nature of this world-to-be, it yet had to be desired, longed for and in this passionate wanting, lay the potential for political comradeship. And this is where the struggle against caste and patriarchy came together: for it was in the remaking of caste and gendered selves that the promise of utopia stood to be redeemed.
This article first appeared on RAIOT.
Read more from the original source:
Posted in New Utopia
Comments Off on Land, caste, class and gender Gail Omvedts writings were united in their vision of utopia – Scroll.in
Gov’t expansion through spending threatens our republic – The Daily Advance
Posted: at 2:33 am
The federal government of today would disturb our founding fathers. The federal government has grown uncontrollably over the last several decades at the expense of both the states and the people. Our nation has almost $30 trillion in debt but President Joe Bidens administration wants to add trillions of dollars in new spending.
The new social programs and government money in your pockets is a great enticement. The words of the socialists are alluring, even utopian. But this is not what has made us the envy of the world. There will be no upward mobility for the masses in socialism, as there is in our current capitalist system. America provides an opportunity to each individual to find their own utopia within themselves.
The American people must fight the expansion of the federal government and Marxism. If we give up on our founding principles, we will give up our liberty. If we give up our self-reliance to the government, we will lose our individualism. If we do not hold our government accountable, we will lose our republic. Benjamin Franklin once said, When people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.
Washington has a bad track record of spending our tax money. Why do we think that will change? The federal government must be reformed by reducing the administrative state. The consequences of not defeating government expansion and this Marxist insurrection are too high. Our liberty, our individualism and our republic are at risk.
Read more:
Gov't expansion through spending threatens our republic - The Daily Advance
Posted in New Utopia
Comments Off on Gov’t expansion through spending threatens our republic – The Daily Advance
New York theatre to see in September | NewYorkTheaterGuide.com – New York Theatre Guide
Posted: at 2:33 am
After an 18-month-long shutdown, the longest in theatres history, Broadway is returning in full swing this fall. New shows and classic favorites alike will open and reopen this month, ushering in a new era for Broadway. Beyond the Theatre District, numerous Off-Broadway theatres are celebrating the return to live performances with new in-person productions, and comedy shows, concerts, and more special events are also opening throughout the city. You can become part of the great return, too check out our top picks for New York theatre in September 2021.
Many of your favorite shows are back and brighter than ever. Long-running blockbusters, Disney classics, and recent hits are all returning to Broadway and are ready to welcome new and returning audiences alike.
Broadways never ever getting rid of Waitress! After a Tony-nominated four-year run at the Brooks Atkinson Theatre, Waitress is opening up once more at the Ethel Barrymore Theatre. Through October 17, Sara Bareilles will return as the savvy pie chef Jenna who bakes her way through a rocky pregnancy and an even rockier marriage.
Ethel Barrymore Theatre, from September 2.
Waitress tickets are on sale now.
Hadestown was livin it up on top in 2019 when it won 8 Tony Awards out of 14 nominations and became the most talked-about musical of the year. Anas Mitchells adaptation of the Orpheus and Eurydice myth, set in an industrial underworld with folk and jazz music, is ready to take audiences way down to Hadestown again. Original Broadway cast members Reeve Carney, Eva Noblezada, Patrick Page, Amber Gray, and Andr De Shields will all return to their fabled roles.
Walter Kerr Theatre, from September 2.
Retake your place in the circle of life at The Lion King. Its story of a young cub who aspires to lead his fathers animal kingdom one day has become a staple of the Disney canon. The musical adaptation features all the films most beloved songs including Hakuna Matata, Circle of Life, and I Just Cant Wait to Be King and is bound to delight audiences of all ages.
Minskoff Theatre, from September 14.
The Lion King tickets are on sale now.
Lin-Manuel Mirandas groundbreaking hip-hop history lesson Hamilton will return to Broadway September 14. Fans worldwide got to experience the modern retelling of the Founding Fathers story on Disney+ last summer and can now once again see it live. Still one of Broadways hottest tickets more than six years after its opening, Hamilton has cemented its own place in the history books.
Richard Rodgers Theatre, from September 14.
Get ready to defy gravity, as the ever-popular Wicked is back on Broadway. Dance through life, or at least through two and a half hours, with Elphaba and Glinda in this blockbuster prequel to The Wizard of Oz. Before they were known as the Good and Wicked Witches, The Tin Man, The Scarecrow and more, the citizens of Oz were friends and schoolmates, and their story has put a spell on audiences for nearly 20 years.
Gershwin Theatre, from September 14.
Wicked tickets are on sale now.
Broadways longest-running American musical is back with all that jazz. The reopening cast of Chicago includes Tony winner Lillias White as Matron Mama Morton, Ana Villafae as Roxie Hart, and Bianca Marroqun, a longtime Roxie, now debuting as Velma Kelly.
Ambassador Theatre, from September 14.
Chicago tickets are on sale now.
Talking Heads frontman David Byrne debuted his theatrical concert, American Utopia, on Broadway in 2019 for a limited run, and the production was filmed for streaming in 2020. Byrne and his 11-person ensemble now return to the New York stage for one more limited engagement through March 5, 2022. The group performs songs from Byrnes album of the same name along with hits from throughout his career.
St. James Theatre, from September 17.
David Byrnes American Utopia tickets are on sale now.
Come From Away is finally returning to Broadway, telling a story of personal connection that is just what the world needs after months of isolation. The musical tells the true account of a Newfoundland town that welcomed hundreds of people displaced by 9/11. The show has welcomed audiences from all over the world since 2017, and it is ready to welcome you back to the rock, too.
Gerald Schoenfeld Theatre, from September 21.
Bohemians, lovers, dreamers, muses, and artists welcome back to the Moulin Rouge! The glamorous musical adaptation of Baz Luhrmanns iconic film will take theatergoers into the glitzy and raucous Parisian club where the writer Christian becomes enchanted with the star performer, Satine. The shows score features more than 70 classic and contemporary pop songs to bring the 1900s to today.
Al Hirschfeld Theatre, from September 24.
Moulin Rouge! The Musical tickets are on sale now.
Take a magic carpet ride at the New Amsterdam Theatre with Aladdin on Broadway. The poor street-dweller Aladdin discovers a genie in a magic lamp, and Aladdin is given three wishes to get himself the noble life and the princess he desires. Audiences will recognize all the films hit songs like Friend Like Me and Prince Ali, but the live Broadway experience of the Disney tale is A Whole New World.
New Amsterdam Theatre, from September 28.
Aladdin tickets are on sale now.
A new theatre season is beginning, and many new shows are ready to make their premieres. From highly-anticipated West End transfers to original musicals to a special concert celebration, theres plenty of new Broadway and Off-Broadway theatre to discover for the first time.
Known for his work co-creating Chappelles Show and his own solo stand-up special 3 Mics, comedian Neal Brennan returns to the stage with a new theatrical comedy show, Neal Brennan: Unacceptable. With true stories from Brennans childhood through the present, he honestly yet humorously discusses feelings of loneliness in an attempt to understand them.
Cherry Lane Theatre, from August 25.
Neal Brennan: Unacceptable tickets are on sale now. Rush tickets are available on TodayTix.
Daniel J. Watts stars alongside the show's playwright, Ngozi Anyanwu, in a story about two people deciding whether to stay in a relationship or let go of the thing they love most, as painful as the goodbye may be.
Linda Gross Theater, from August 26.
The Last of the Love Letterstickets are on sale now.
Award-winning actor, playwright, and director Ruben Santiago-Hudson returns to Broadway with a new solo show. He plays more than 20 characters in the autobiographical story of Nanny, the woman who welcomed a young Santiago-Hudson into her upstate New York home and raised him. This tribute to Nannys compassion and Santiago-Hudsons youth also features original blues music by Bill Sims., Jr.
Samuel J. Friedman Theatre, from September 14.
Thirteen years after Second Stage Theater premiered Rajiv Josephs play Animals Out of Paper, the company is presenting its companion play, Letters of Suresh. Told through a series of letters between family members, friends, and strangers, the play is a story of people seeking connection and hope as a city they love is consumed by war.
Tony Kiser Theater, from September 14.
Letters of Suresh tickets are on sale now.
Curtain Up! is a three-day celebration of Broadways reopening that will include live concerts and performances, panels, and interactive experiences. The free outdoor festival will take place in Times Square from Friday, September 17 to Sunday, September 19 with a host of theatre talent.
Times Square, from September 17.
After enjoying a hit West End run, multiple tours across the globe, and multiple productions in America, the fast-rising phenomenon Six is finally opening on Broadway, 18 months after its original opening night was canceled by the shutdown only hours before curtain. Now, audiences can get down with the Queens, Henry VIIIs six wives, in their 80-minute pop song competition to determine who had it the worst as the kings bride.
Brooks Atkinson Theatre, from September 17.
The first new musical to premiere in New York since the Broadway shutdown is making a celestial debut off Broadway. Two commercial jingle writers dream of their big break, which comes when pop star Regina Comet taps them to write a jingle for her new perfume line. Ben Fankhauser and Alex Wyse wrote the musical and star as the hopeful songwriters alongside Bryonha Marie Parham as Regina Comet.
DR2 Theatre, from September 17.
A Commercial Jingle for Regina Comet tickets are on sale now.
This three-part saga, told as one theatrical piece, follows the rise and fall of the Lehman Brothers financial institution. Told over 164 years spanning multiple generations of a single immigrant family, the story highlights the businesss greatest successes and its eventual bankruptcy that inflamed the 2008 financial crisis. The production had an acclaimed run on the West End, and two actors from the production Simon Russell Beale and Adam Godley will reprise their roles, joining Adrian Lester in his Broadway debut.
Nederlander Theatre, from September 25.
View post:
New York theatre to see in September | NewYorkTheaterGuide.com - New York Theatre Guide
Posted in New Utopia
Comments Off on New York theatre to see in September | NewYorkTheaterGuide.com – New York Theatre Guide