Daily Archives: August 4, 2021

Realme has cloned Apple’s MagSafe and made it faster – PhoneArena

Posted: August 4, 2021 at 2:24 pm

The introduction of MagSafe on the iPhone 12 created a new ecosystem of accessories and tried to make wireless charging a more mainstream feature. Now, Oppo-owned brand Realme is cloning it.Realme has announced a MagSafe alternative for its Android smartphones that's marketed under the MagDart name and includes six products at launch: two chargers, a wallet, and a few other accessories.Kicking things off with the chargers, the standard 15W MagDart Charger resembles a slimmer version of Apple's MagSafe puck. As the name indicates, it supports 15W wireless charging, which Realme says is enough to fill a 4,500mAh battery in 90 minutes.

If that doesn't cut it, Realme has also unveiled a 50W MagDart Charger. It's much larger and bulkier than the mainstream option, thanks in part to the presence of a cooling fan. When plugged into Realme's 65W SuperDart wired charger, it can output 50W charging speeds, enough to fully charge a 4,500mAh battery in 54 minutes.

The final two accessories on offer include a MagDart Case and MagDart Beauty Light. The latter is powered by reverse MagDart charging and includes a ring light for selfies, while the former is a dedicated case with a layer of MagDart magnets and a full-function USB-C port.

Originally posted here:

Realme has cloned Apple's MagSafe and made it faster - PhoneArena

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on Realme has cloned Apple’s MagSafe and made it faster – PhoneArena

The Clone Wars improved the prequels, can The Mandalorian do the same for the sequels? – Dork Side of the Force

Posted: at 2:24 pm

Today, theStar Wars prequels are broadly appreciated amongst the fanbase, but its easy to forget that this was not always the case. When they were released, many took issue with the emphasis on worldbuilding as opposed to storytelling and the plot holes that occurred as a result. Since then, the prequels have steadily grown in popularity and I believe this is in large part due to the success ofStar Wars: The Clone Wars. The show provides important context and character development that makes the prequels even more emotional.

In TheRevenge of the Sith, we see Anakin Skywalkers tensions with the Jedi High Council reach a boiling point when he is asked to spy on Chancellor Palpatine. However, we never get a chance to really see any other conflict between the Jedi leadership and the hotheaded Chosen One.

InThe Clone Wars, we see Anakin clash with the Council time and time again. He is never truly recognized as a leader and tactician in his own right, always forced to defer to Master Obi-Wan Kenobi.Anakin often feels he could better accomplish his objectives and save lives, if only he were able allowed a little responsibility.

DuringThe Clone Wars season 4, Obi-Wan Kenobi actually fakes his own death in order to infiltrate a cadre of bounty hunters working with Count Dooku to kidnap Chancellor Palpatine. Upon hearing of his mentors death, Anakin is distraught. When he finally uncovers the truth about Obi-Wans whereabouts, he is understandably furious that the council and his own master would lie to him. This pivotal story arc laid bare the councils mistrust in Anakin that leads to the events ofThe Revenge of the Sith.

By far, the biggest conflict between Anakin and the council is in season 5s epic final episodes, in which we see Anakins padawan Ahsoka Tanoframed for a terrorist attack on the Jedi Temple. Ahsoka goes on the run and eventually, fellow Padawan Barriss Offee is revealed to be the culprit, clearing Ahsokas name. However, Ahsoka still leaves the Jedi Order, citing a lack of trust in the Council and the Orders goals.

ThroughoutThe Clone Wars, Ahsoka and Anakin grow extremely close. Witnessing this mistreatment of someone so meaningful to him would damage Anakins own relationship with his superiors, and makes his eventual betrayal of the Jedi Order far more believable.

The Clone Wars has time to dive deeper into how the Jedi Council failed Anakin, and TheRevenge of the Sithis all the better for it.

Prior to Fives revelation of the inhibitor chips inThe Clone Wars season 6, fans had a lot of questions regarding just how the soldiers could turn against their leaders on a dime, without any dissent whatsoever.

After seeing the relationships many clones had with their Jedi generals throughout the show, an explanation for the events ofThe Revenge of the Sithwas necessary.

AlthoughThe Bad Batch has recently raised questions regarding just how effective the chips are, they still make Order 66 more realistic and tragic. Seeing that these men had no control over their actions erases any blame for the Jedi purge from the clones, leaving us with only sympathy for them.

At the end ofAttack of the Clones, we see Anakin and Padme Amidalaclandestinely but happily married. In the opening sequence ofRevenge of the Sith, they are a loving couple expecting children. With only this context, Anakins actions on Mustafar resulting in Padmes death seem unrealistic, even with his recent switch to the Dark Side.

The Clone Wars improves this plot point greatly as we see Padme working with dubious ally and former romantic partner Rush Clovis.Throughout several story arcs, Rush makes advances on Padme, much to Anakins chagrin. At one point, Anakin almost physically assaults Clovis before Padme steps in.

This tension between Anakin and Padme contextualizes the emotional scene on Mustafar and casts doubt on their seemingly idyllic marriage.

Similar to the prequels, the sequel trilogy has been a point of contention for many Star Wars fans. Poor character development and plot holes are once again a sticking point for contemporary viewers. However, I believe that shows likeThe Mandalorian have the potential to remedy many of these ills and elevate the sequel trilogy significantly.

The Mandalorianhas already hinted at several key plot points from the sequels. Seeing Carson Teva, Cara Dune and other New Republic fighters, along with the Imperial remnants led byMoff Gideon, could lead into a full-fledged explanation as to how the First Order amassed so much power right under the New Republics noses.

The Empires interest in Grogu, presumably for cloning purposes, could explain how the Sith cultists on Exegol under Emperor Palpatine were able to create Snoke. The cloned monstrosities in season 2 episode 4 of the show further hint that well get to see Snokes origins inThe Mandalorian or a future show.

Finally, Luke Skywalkers groundbreaking appearance in the season 2 finale holds potential to fix one of the biggest grievances fans had with the sequel trilogy what happened to Luke? How did the powerful and wise Jedi Master become a decrepit hermit on the edges of the galaxy? The fact that Grogu is with Luke and will presumably become a member of his Jedi Order opens the door to a multitude of stories that could make this fall more believable and tragic.

One of the most highly anticipated upcoming Star Wars projects is theAhsoka show, starring Rosario Dawson. We already know fromThe Mandalorian season 2 that Ahsoka Tano is searching for Grand Admiral Thrawn and most likely Ezra Bridger. Both of these characters could conceivably impact the events of the sequels Thrawn would be a powerful ally for the Imperial remnants and/or burgeoning First Order, while a grown Ezra might assist with Lukes Jedi Temple.

Additionally, The Book of Boba Fett and future seasons of The Mandalorian will all take place leading up to the sequels. We could see a detailed look at the galaxys criminal underworld post-Imperial rule, the fate of Mandalore after Din Djarin claimed the Darksaber, or a broader look at galactic affairs as a backdrop to these individual stories. Any content within this era has the potential to contextualize and add depth to the sequel trilogy films, and given Dave Filoni and John Favreaus track record, I think we have a lot to look forward to.

Continued here:

The Clone Wars improved the prequels, can The Mandalorian do the same for the sequels? - Dork Side of the Force

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on The Clone Wars improved the prequels, can The Mandalorian do the same for the sequels? – Dork Side of the Force

Just How Long Is the Long Arm of U.S. Jurisdiction? – Bloomberg Law

Posted: at 2:24 pm

A wide range of federal statutes reach conduct overseas. When those statutes include private rights of action, Americans may find themselves with claims against defendants with fewif anyties to the U.S.

Since the U.S. Supreme Courts decision in Daimler v. Bauman cut back states authority to hale non-resident corporations into court for conduct unrelated to their activities in-state, many have assumed that these would-be plaintiffs are out of luck.

Now, in Douglass v. Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha, the Fifth Circuit has decided to take a second look at the question of whether and how that rule applies when federal courts hear federal-law claims against corporations based abroad.

Federal courts personal jurisdiction usually depends on the long-arm statutes of the states in which they sit. Those statutes are subject to the 14th Amendments Due Process Clause, which limits states jurisdiction over non-resident defendants to situations where the claims against them arise from, or relate to, their in-state conduct.

But federal law has its own long-arm provisions, governed by the Fifth Amendment, that are intended to fill in where state law leaves gaps.

Although the Fifth and 14th Amendments Due Process clauses are worded identically, the Supreme Court has gone out of its way, in cases like Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court, to leave open whether the clauses impose the same constraints. And the government has argued, most recently last term in Ford v. Montana Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct., that the U.S.s unique constitutional prerogatives and powers permit the exercise of federal judicial power in ways that have no analogue at the state level.

Yet most federal appellate courts, including the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Ninth, Tenth, Eleventh, Federal, and D.C. circuits, have assumed or held without much analysis that federal service-of-process provisions are subject to the same limits as their state-law counterparts. The only difference they have recognized is that litigants proceeding under federal service-of-process provisions can aggregate defendants contacts with the U.S. as a whole, instead of any single state.

Its worth asking why. After all, a central justification for the focus on forum contacts under the 14th Amendment is the need to protect interstate federalism. But federalism is beside the point when a federal court hears federal-law claims against, say, a foreign terrorist organization that injures Americans traveling abroad or a foreign company that traffics in overseas property confiscated from U.S. citizens. And its not clear how much the inconvenience that litigating here imposes on non-resident foreign defendants should weigh against the judgment of Congress that Americans should be able to bring claims based on foreign conduct.

These are among the questions the full Fifth Circuit will consider when it rehears Douglass.

The appeal arises from a collision in Japanese waters on June 17, 2017, between the U.S. Navy destroyer USS Fitzgerald and a cargo ship (MV ACX Crystal) chartered by a Japanese shipping company that left seven U.S. sailors dead and dozens injured. In consolidated cases, the victims and their survivors sued the company under the federal Death on the High Seas Act. They asserted personal jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(k)(2), which allows service of process in federal-law suits where the defendant is not subject to jurisdiction in any state.

Finding no connection between the accident and the shipping companys limited U.S. contacts, the district court dismissed the suits under Daimler. A panel of the Fifth Circuit grudgingly affirmed, devoting much of its per curiam opinion to casting doubt on circuit precedent that subjected Rule 4(k)(2) to the same 14th-Amendment standard as its state-law counterparts. The two active judges on the panel concurred, urging the full court to revisit the issue. It agreed to do so July 2.

With virtually no guidance from the Supreme Court, the case promises to take the predominantly conservative appeals court back to first principles. That could lead to interesting debates about federal power, sovereignty, and what it means to be faithful to the U.S. Constitutions text. And it could make the Fifth Circuit, which includes Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, the go-to forum for federal claims against non-resident foreign corporations.

Although its impossible to predict the outcome, it seems unlikely that the court took the case en banc just to confirm its prior precedent. The question is how far it will go.

The now-vacated panel decision gives one hint: It endorsed a compromise position suggested by an amicus brief from civil-procedure scholars that would read the Fifth Amendment to allow jurisdiction over foreign corporations for claims based on foreign conduct that is related to their U.S. operations. But the court could go further still and hold, as the governments brief in Ford suggested, that the Constitution imposes no territorial constraints on federal authority.

Whatever the result, the Supreme Court is sure to face calls to weigh in before long.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. or its owners.

Write for Us: Author Guidelines

Eugene Sokoloff is counsel at MoloLamken LLP where he focuses on critical motions and appeals.

Originally posted here:

Just How Long Is the Long Arm of U.S. Jurisdiction? - Bloomberg Law

Posted in Federalism | Comments Off on Just How Long Is the Long Arm of U.S. Jurisdiction? – Bloomberg Law

How Did Palpatine Survive After Return of the Jedi? – Gizmodo

Posted: at 2:23 pm

It wasnt Agatha, it was Sheev all along.Photo: Lucasfilm

The dead speak! On the official Star Wars website in fact! In a new blog post on the site today, Lucasfilm Story Group member Emily Shkoukani explained The Contingencythe canon name for exactly how Emperor Palpatine died, came back to life, and returned to power in Star Wars. A plan that was, according to the site, in place long before Darth Vader threw him down a shaft on the second Death Star.

If this all sounds sort of familiar, thats both a good thing and a bad thing. Its bad because, well, this is all crucial information that hasnt really been collected in one place (until now) that wouldve made the huge question of How did Palpatine come back? at the beginning of The Rise of Skywalker understandable. However, if it is familiar, maybe you read about it on this very website, where James Whitbrook had previously dug deep into Palpatines plansomething that was teased throughout multiple novels, TV shows, comics, video games, and more, culminating in his Episode IX return.

The whole story is told in the excellent column Star Wars Inside Intel, which you can and should read at this link. There you get the beat by beat breakdown of Palpatines Contingency. But well give you the TL:DR summary. As we know from the three movies where he rose to power and the three where he tried to keep and extend that power, Palpatine was always been a complicated planner with a penchant for evil. So that he had a plan for resurrection in the event of his death isnt really that much of a stretch. That plan involved his consciousness being transfered to a clone on Exegol, where hed long been doing cloning experiments when alive, and enlisting a few key people in the Empire to wipe out the old ways and bring in the new. Pieces like Operation: Cinder, which gets named-dropped all across modern Star Wars canon.

Meanwhile, as plans were being executed to wipe out the old Empire, Palpatine himselfin a weak clone body on Exegoldid a few things. First, he began to build a new army (the Final Order) and searched for a worthy vessel in which to be reborn. Eventually, he found one in his granddaughter, Rey. Her parents did their best to hide her but, eventually, she found herself drawn back into the story. It began with her grandfathers clone (Snoke)which, through Luke, Kylo Ren, etc., set the wheels in motion for a confrontation with her grandfather. (Its unclear if all of that was part of the plan or just the Force or something; this story isnt a Swiss watch.) Rey could have joined up with the Sith Lord, becoming the Dark Rey we glimpse in the movie and resulting in Palpatines return, but instead she uses the Force and the Jedi to kill him once and for all. End of Contingency.

Or so we think. This is an interesting story to be sure but it all feels very, very much like putting a square peg in a round hole. Like Lucasfilm had half the pieces to a puzzle and just glued them all together in a way that kind of makes sense, but kind of doesnt. Huge holes in the story remain unanswered including a brand new one: did Palpatines Contingency have its own Contingency? As it stands right now, the answer is probably no. But if another filmmaker comes up with an idea? Anything is possible. Bringing Palpatine back to life at all has taught us that.

G/O Media may get a commission

Again, for more, head over to the official Star Wars website and check our 2019 article too.

Correction, 8/3/2022,7:52pm ET: This post has been edited to note that Darth Vader is who threw Palpatine down a shaft on the second Death Star, not Luke Skywalkeran error we regret but which also gives us maybe the most io9 correction of all time.

Wondering where our RSS feed went? You can pick the new up one here.

Original post:

How Did Palpatine Survive After Return of the Jedi? - Gizmodo

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on How Did Palpatine Survive After Return of the Jedi? – Gizmodo

The Trump Administration Feuded With State and Local Leaders over Pandemic Response Now the Biden Administr – Governing

Posted: at 2:23 pm

As the U.S. recovers from the pandemic, the Biden administration is working to rebuild relationships across levels of government, from the top to the bottom, that were strained during the presidency of Donald Trump.

In November 2020, Biden offered urban leaders a seat at the table in coronavirus recovery efforts, promising to avoid partisanship. Addressing the National League of Cities in March 2021, Harris praised urban leadership on COVID-19 cities like Seattle and New York were among the first to respond to the pandemic, developing testing protocols, tracking new infections and supplying equipment for hospitals and highlighted the administrations plans to help pay for improvements to local infrastructure.

The COVID-19 crisis highlighted the importance of government leaders working together.

But with the onset of COVID-19 in early 2020, tensions in this shared system boiled over. Instead of collaborating, the federal government rebuffed state and local governments desperate for critical information and lifesaving supplies.

States and cities competed over medical equipment, testing capacity and supplies and other needs. Densely populated cities, many feuding with the federal government, were hardest hit.

Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser called successfully in 2016 for raising the districts minimum wage to $15, stepping in where the federal government had failed to act. AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

It has taken steps to give local policymakers more control over the allocation and distribution of COVID-19 vaccinations, while setting national policies to hasten the availability of vaccines.

Reasserting closer relationships between the federal government and state and local partners may signal a shift toward more collaboration in general.

The federal government can use its power and position to drive change at the local level. A more collaborative relationship can help the federal government understand communities needs, leading to new policies and priorities. Close partnership may also increase awareness of federal resources that are available, helping state and local governments identify programs to better support their residents.

But as our research shows, federal dominance can also be counterproductive.

But local governments deliver the most-used public services, including schools, transportation, parks and public health. As a result, local governments are perhaps the most important in peoples daily lives.

Local governments both make and implement policy. In areas where the federal and state governments are silent or inactive, local governments often innovate to address community needs. That freedom to innovate helps local governments generate policies that can work their way up and across the federal system.

For example, despite backlash from state and national leaders, various cities like Austin, Los Angeles, Virginia Beach and Washington, D.C. have led the way on social and environmental policies, adopting and advocating for higher minimum wages, fracking limitations, sanctuaries for Second Amendment rights and reducing law enforcement violence.

Scholars have noted changes in the dynamics of these relationships throughout history. During some eras, the federal government has more power over policymaking. At other times, state and local governments exert greater influence.

For example, President Lyndon B. Johnsons Great Society welfare programs Medicare, Medicaid and food stamps increased the federal governments influence on state and local governments. New federal requirements mandated spending on social programs, often requiring matching funds from state and local governments. And new state and local agencies had to be established to implement federal priorities.

Federal dollars shared with local governments to fight poverty came with strings attached. Examples include requirements to meet environmental standards and adopt nondiscrimination policies.

With the advent of welfare reform in the mid-1990s, the federal government relaxed some of these requirements. As a result, state and local governments were given more flexibility over policy and spending decisions.

Our recent research indicates the balance of power in the federal system affects government performance and the safety of Americans. During the COVID-19 response, the federal government failed to partner with state and local governments. As a result, there were problems finding and delivering crucial supplies like masks and ventilators, leading to needless deaths.

President Lyndon Johnson, shown here, expanded the authority of the federal government with his Great Society programs.AP Photo

Johnsons Great Society programs expanded the authority of the federal government. Federal agencies gained the power to create and manage the details of the effort to eradicate poverty, hunger and discrimination.

President Richard Nixons new federalism sent money in so-called block grants to state and local governments to carry out different federal initiatives. This allowed local governments some power over policy design and implementation.

President Ronald Reagans pragmatic federalism emphasized privatization using private-sector organizations to deliver services and decentralization. Reagan used markets to deliver government services through competitive contracts and grants.

In more recent years, scholars have accused Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama of returning to the more coercive federalism of Johnsons Great Society. To encourage state and local governments to adopt federal priorities, federal funds under these presidents again included strings, increasing tensions between these levels of government.

Under President Trump, these tensions reached an apex. Cities clashed with the federal government over immigration policy, law enforcement violence and health care and, ultimately, over how to handle the pandemic.

With the understanding that coordination among all levels of government helps address problems more effectively, one step Biden might take is to revive the U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. This commission operated from 1959 to 1996, offering presidents and federal agencies guidance on issues that spanned the federal systems layers. The commission helped address abuses of power in the federal system and strengthened partnerships between governments.

As scholars, we know that policy issues are rarely independent. Global climate change affects local transportation policies, while health care issues are often closely linked to education and agriculture.

Local governments are important players in the federal system. Over the next year, they will be critical in continued efforts to vaccinate the American public and prepare for disasters like hurricanes and wildfires.

Given the complexity of modern policy problems, renewed consideration of how all levels of government can approach such big issues could help solve them.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continued here:

The Trump Administration Feuded With State and Local Leaders over Pandemic Response Now the Biden Administr - Governing

Posted in Federalism | Comments Off on The Trump Administration Feuded With State and Local Leaders over Pandemic Response Now the Biden Administr – Governing

EPA, Army announce next steps for crafting definition of waters of the united states – Water Technology Online

Posted: at 2:23 pm

Mohammed Mohammed Ali | Dreamstime.com

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Department of the Army recently announced plans for upcoming community engagements to inform their efforts to revise the definition of waters of the United States (WOTUS) to better ensure clean and safe water for all. EPA and Army are committed to developing a reasonable, effective and durable definition of WOTUS that protects public health, the environment and downstream communities while supporting economic opportunity, agriculture, and other industries.

We are committed to crafting an enduring definition of WOTUS by listening to all sides so that we can build on an inclusive foundation, said EPA administrator Michael S. Regan. Uncertainty over the definition of WOTUS has harmed our waters and the stakeholders and communities that rely on them. I look forward to engaging all parties as we move forward to provide the certainty thats needed to protect our precious natural water resources.

Our nations water resources are critical to support all of our communities, said acting assistant secretary of the Army for Civil Works Jaime A. Pinkham. Like the EPA, the Department of the Army recognizes the importance of this effort and we are committed to meaningful engagement with Tribes, states, local governments, and stakeholders to ensure that a revised definition of WOTUS reflects the experiences of, and input received, from all communities.

The agencies intend to revise the definition of WOTUS following a process that includes two rulemakings. A forthcoming foundational rule would restore the regulations defining WOTUS that were in place for decades until 2015, with updates to be consistent with relevant Supreme Court decisions. A separate, second rulemaking process would refine this regulatory foundation and establish an updated and durable definition of waters of the United States.

A durable definition of WOTUS is essential to ensuring clean and safe water in all communitiessupporting human health, animal habitat, agriculture, watersheds, flood management, local economies, and industry. Todays announcement marks an important step in the agencies efforts to restore protections and write a rule to define WOTUS that is grounded in science and the law, emphasizes effective implementation, and prioritizes collaborative partnerships with states, Tribes, local governments, and stakeholders. To help ensure that EPA and Army hear from diverse perspectives, future engagement activities will be developed in coordination with the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

The EPA and Army announced a series of engagement opportunities, including an opportunity for stakeholders and the public to provide written recommendations and a series of public meetings in August to hear perspectives on both rules. In addition, the agencies will initiate Federalism and Tribal consultations for the foundational rule. The agencies also intend to host a series of dialogues with state and Tribal co-regulators this fall to discuss both rulemakings.

Additionally, the previous rulemaking efforts have highlighted the regional variability of water resources and the importance of close engagement with stakeholders to understand the specifics of how they experience regulation under varying definitions of waters of the United States. To honor our commitment to listening and learning from diverse perspectives, the agencies plan to convene ten regionally focused and inclusive roundtables during the upcoming fall and winter. These roundtables will allow a full range of stakeholders to engage and discuss their experience with definitions of WOTUSincluding what has worked and what has not within their geographic areas. The roundtables will provide opportunities to discuss geographic similarities and differences, particular water resources that are characteristic of or unique to each region, and site-specific feedback about implementation.

For more information on submitting written recommendations or to register for the public meetings, see http://www.epa.gov/wotus.

Background

Congress enacted the Clean Water Act in 1972 with the statutory objective to restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nations waters. One of the Acts principal tools in achieving that objective is a prohibition on the discharge of pollutants from a point source to navigable waters unless otherwise authorized under the Act. Navigable waters are defined in the Act as the waters of the United States, including the territorial seas. Thus, waters of the United States is a threshold term establishing the geographic scope of federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. The term waters of the United States is not defined by the Act but has been defined by EPA and the Army in regulations since the 1970s and jointly implemented in the agencies respective programmatic activities.

On June 9, 2021, EPA and the Department of the Army announced their intent to revise the definition of WOTUS to better protect our nations vital water resources that support public health, environmental protection, agricultural activity, and economic growth. Upon review of the Navigable Waters Protection Rule, the agencies determined that the rule is significantly reducing clean water protections.

Follow this link:

EPA, Army announce next steps for crafting definition of waters of the united states - Water Technology Online

Posted in Federalism | Comments Off on EPA, Army announce next steps for crafting definition of waters of the united states – Water Technology Online

EPA outlines plan to expand wetland protections – E&E News

Posted: at 2:23 pm

The Biden administration laid out plans today for scrapping and replacing a contentious Trump-era Clean Water Act rule that pulled back federal protections for millions of streams and wetlands.

EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers said they will follow a two-pronged approach to revoke the Trump administrations Navigable Waters Protection Rule while revising the definition of "Waters of the United States," or WOTUS, which defines which waters fall under federal protection.

The rules fate and how quickly it can be rewritten are politically explosive for President Biden. It has pitted environmental groups against developers and farmers for decades and sparked partisan fights on Capitol Hill.

EPA Administrator Michael Regan in a release said his agency is committed to crafting an "enduring" definition of WOTUS by listening to all sides, while Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said farmers and rural Americans must have a "seat at the table and a voice in this process so that the rule responds to concerns and realities on the ground."

The Trump administrations rule significantly narrowed the laws reach, pulling back what wetlands and streams were jurisdictional by about 51% and 18%, respectively (Greenwire, Jan. 23, 2020).

Conservationists have challenged the Trump rule in multiple courts across the country.

The Biden administration last month convinced judges to remand the Trump rule to EPA while it writes a new one, but not to throw it out in the interim (E&E News PM, July 15).

Sources expect EPA to issue a draft rule pulling back the Trump regulation by years end. At that time, the agency would revert to the 1986 definition of WOTUS and rely on 2008 guidance from the George W. Bush administration about how to apply that definition.

Although its not clear when EPA will issue a rule to redefine WOTUS, the agency today laid out a series of more than a half-dozen meetings for consultation and engagement from Aug. 5 to Sept. 2, including discussions about federalism and tribal consultation.

EPA and the Army Corps said the meetings would allow stakeholders and the public to provide written recommendations and weigh in on how to establish a regulatory foundation and build on that foundation to craft a "durable" definition of WOTUS.

The agencies said they also intend to host a series of talks with state and tribal co-regulators this fall to discuss both rulemakings.

More here:

EPA outlines plan to expand wetland protections - E&E News

Posted in Federalism | Comments Off on EPA outlines plan to expand wetland protections – E&E News

Cameras Roll On David Cronenberg Sci-Fi Crimes Of The Future With Viggo Mortensen, La Seydoux, Kristen Stewart; More Cast Join – Deadline

Posted: at 2:22 pm

Filming is underway in Europe on David Cronenbergs Crimes Of The Future, starring Viggo Mortensen, La Seydoux, Kristen Stewart and Scott Speedman.

Joining the cast are Tanaya Beatty (Yellowstone), Nadia Litz (Big Muddy), Yorgos Karamichos (The Durrells), and Yorgos Pirpassopoulos (Beckett). Also previously announced were Welket Bungu (Berlin Alexanderplatz), Don McKellar (Blindness), and Lihi Kornowski (Losing Alice).

The film shoots in Athens, Greece until September 2021.

The film takes a deep dive into the not-so-distant future where humankind is learning to adapt to its synthetic surroundings. The evolution moves humans beyond their natural state and into a metamorphosis, altering their biological makeup. While some embrace the limitless potential of transhumanism, others attempt to police it. Either way, Accelerated Evolution Syndrome, is spreading fast.

As we begin filming Crimes Of The Future, just two days into this new adventure with David Cronenberg, it feels like weve entered a story he collaborated on with Samuel Beckett and William Burroughs, if that were possible, said Mortensen. We are being pulled into a world that is not quite like this or any other, and yet is one that feels strangely familiar, immediate and quite credible. I cant wait to see where we end up.

Produced by Robert Lantos, the film reunites Cronenberg with three-time Oscar nominee Mortensen in their fourth collaboration. The movie marks Cronenbergs first original screenplay since eXistenZ in 1999. The film is also the fourth collaboration between Lantos and Cronenberg.

Panos Papahadzis is producer for Athens-based Argonauts Productions and Steve Solomos is co-producer. Executive producers include Joe Iacono, Thorsten Schumacher, Peter Touche, Christelle Conan, Aida Tannyan, Victor Loewy, and Victor Hadida. Bonnie Do and Laura Lanktree are associate producers.

Production designer is Carol Spier (Crash) and composer is Howard Shore (The Lord Of The Rings Trilogy). Douglas Koch (Funny Boy) is cinematographer, with Mayou Trikerioti (Pari) as costume designer, Dimitris Katsikis (Fugitive Pieces) as art director, and Stefanos Efthymiou is sound recordist.

Pic will be distributed worldwide by distributors including Neon (USA), MK2|Mile End (Canada), Metropolitan (France), Weltkino (Germany, Austria and Switzerland), The Searchers (Benelux), Argonauts Productions (Greece), Front Row (Middle East), Capella (CIS/ the Baltic States), and Moviecloud (Taiwan). Rocket Science is handling international sales.

The Canada-Greece co-production is produced in association with Ingenious Media, Coficine, Telefilm Canada, Bell Media, CBC, and the Harold Greenberg Fund, with the support of EKOME and the GFC.

More here:
Cameras Roll On David Cronenberg Sci-Fi Crimes Of The Future With Viggo Mortensen, La Seydoux, Kristen Stewart; More Cast Join - Deadline

Posted in Transhuman | Comments Off on Cameras Roll On David Cronenberg Sci-Fi Crimes Of The Future With Viggo Mortensen, La Seydoux, Kristen Stewart; More Cast Join – Deadline

12 Bytes by Jeanette Winterson review engaging history of technological progress – The Guardian

Posted: at 2:22 pm

Jeanette Winterson is not usually considered a science-fiction writer, yet her novels have always been concerned with alternative realities, and for more than two decades she has drawn on the imaginative possibilities offered by technological and digital advances. Her 2000 novel, The Powerbook, was an early exploration of the fluid identities and connections offered by virtual personae; The Stone Gods (2007) combined history with interplanetary dystopias and featured a relationship between a robot and a human. Her most recent fiction, Frankisstein, reworked Mary Shelleys story of an artificially created intelligence into a modern novel of ideas about the present and future limits of AI and the implications for art, love, sex and biology.

Now, in 12 Bytes, her first collection of essays since 1996s Art Objects, Winterson examines all these preoccupations without the mediation of fiction, though the narrative style is as conversational and erudite as youd expect from her, peppered with irreverent asides and mischievous flashes of wit (Dry as dust I dont do, she has said of the previous collection). The 12 essays here are grouped into four zones, loosely covering the past, the imagination, relationships and the future, and together offer an eclectic odyssey through the history of technological progress a history that for too long sidelined some of its most influential figures because they were inconveniently women or gay, and has only recently begun to restore their reputations. Winterson pays tribute here to the contributions of Ada Lovelace and Alan Turing, along with women such as Stephanie Shirley, the founder of all-female company Freelance Programmers, and the forgotten teams of female programmers during the second world war, their work unacknowledged for decades because it didnt suit a narrative of male expertise.

Winterson explains in her introduction that the essays are the product of a longstanding fascination with advances in machine intelligence, and that she approaches the subject as a storyteller with a modest aim: I want readers who imagine they are not much interested in AI, or bio-tech, or big tech, or data-tech, to find that the stories are engaging, sometimes frightening, always connected. Her primary interest is in what she calls the bigger picture: the metaphysical implications of our transhuman future, about which she appears surprisingly optimistic.

A hybrid form of human is certain, she asserts in the final essay, I Love, Therefore I Am. Homo sapiens might be on the way out And if that was to happen, how could we pass on the best of what we call human nature? How would we define it? This piece, in common with many of the others, is content to ask more questions than it answers; Winterson acknowledges the ambiguity inherent in so many of the ethical questions surrounding AI.

The technology to change the world for the better is the technology that is in place right now Its the best of times and the worst of times. Dystopia or utopia? Nothing could be simpler. Nothing could be harder.

But, while she argues for the primacy of the inner life the part of us that cant be fully known or monetised by Facebook algorithms in somewhat abstract terms, citing Larkins line What will survive of us is love, elsewhere she offers more practical solutions for an AI future that will serve the greater good. In the essay Jurassic Car Park she addresses the problem of the current white male dominance of tech and how this leads to ingrained bias (datasets are selective stories). As well as the obvious solution of more people of colour and women at the table, she writes: I would like to see established artists, and public intellectuals, automatically brought in to advise science, tech and government at every level, because the arts have always been an imaginative and emotional wrestle with reality a series of inventions and creations. Youd think this would be self-evident to the decision-makers, though it becomes harder to share her optimism, writing this on a day when further cuts to arts education have been announced.

For a relatively short book, the scope of its ambition is huge. Winterson whizzes through the history of the machine age, surveillance capitalism, Gnosticism, sex dolls and Greek philosophy, but she is at her most impassioned on the subjects that have been her recurring themes: gender, religion, art, feminism, love. She writes with a sense of urgency about this future that is already here, because the one thing she is insistent about is that we the storytellers, the artists, the readers who share her views on the inner life must not opt out and leave it in the hands of the tech bros: liberal resistance cant be anti-tech or anti-science. So much of it comes down to the old question of whose stories get to shape our reality. Shes right that aspects of this AI future are frightening, but for any non-scientists wanting to understand the challenges and possibilities of this brave new world, I cant think of a more engaging place to start.

12 Bytes: How We Got Here. Where We Might Go Next by Jeanette Winterson is published by Jonathan Cape (16.99). To support the Guardian and Observer order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply

See more here:
12 Bytes by Jeanette Winterson review engaging history of technological progress - The Guardian

Posted in Transhuman | Comments Off on 12 Bytes by Jeanette Winterson review engaging history of technological progress – The Guardian

Taking Control By Destroying Cash: Beware Cyber Polygon As Part Of The Elite Coup – Scoop.co.nz

Posted: at 2:22 pm

Monday, 2 August 2021, 10:11 amArticle: Robert J. Burrowes

For many people desperate to see a return to a life thatis more familiar, it is still easy to believe that theupheavals we have experienced since March 2020 and thechanges that have been wrought in their train aretemporary, even if they are starting to drag onsomewhat longer than hoped.

However, anyone who ispaying attention to what is taking place in the backgroundis well aware that the life we knew before 2020 has alreadyended and what is being systematically put in its place asthe World Economic Forum (WEF) implements its GreatReset will bear no comparison to any period prior to lastyear. See KillingDemocracy Once and for All: The Global Elites Coupdtat That Is Destroying Life as We KnowIt.

Of course, those of us who qualify asordinary people have had no say in the shape of whatis being implemented: that shaping has been the prerogativeof the criminal global elite which is now implementing aplan that has been decades in the making and built onhundreds of years of steady consolidation of elitepower.

Also, of course, there is nothing about thisshaping that is good for us. In simple terms, it isreshaping the human individual so that previouslyfundamental concepts such as human identity, human liberty,human rights (such as freedom of speech, assembly andmovement), human privacy and human volition are not justnotions of the past but are beyond the comprehension of thetypical transhuman. At the same time, the global eliteis restructuring human society into a technocratic dystopiawhich is a nightmarish cross between Brave New World,1984 and the Dark Age. See StrategicallyResisting the New Dark Age: The 7 Days Campaign to ResistThe Great Reset.

The only question remaining isthis: Can we mobilize adequatestrategic resistance that is,resistance that systematically undermines the power of theglobal elite to conduct this coup and restores power toordinary people to defeat this coup?

But beforeI answer that question, I wish to highlight just one elementof the elite coup that is taking place and outline theprofound changes that are being left in its wake unless westop them.

These changes are essentially related tothe capacities of computerized technologies to deprive us ofwhat little we have left of our financial autonomy,including because any notion of privacy is rapidlyvanishing.

One reason forhighlighting the issue of money is because while it is goodto see increasing critical attention being paid to theinjectables program, with its devastating consequencesfor humanity, far too little attention is being paid to theprofoundly important transformation being wrought undercover of the elite-driven narrative which has virtually allpeoples attention distracted from this deeper agenda. Andwhile this deeper agenda entails a great many aspects, onesubset of these is related to the way in which the globalfinancial system is being re-engineered to play its role infully controlling the human population.

In a series ofreports issued in early 2020, the Deutsche Bank claimed thatcash will be around for a long time. See the threereports accessible from Transitionto digital payments could rebalance global economicpower.

However, these reports arecontradicted by other research and the ongoing evidence thatcash is vanishing. Most importantly, there is no doubt aboutthe elite intention in this regard. They want cashgone.

The digitization of money has been occurring fordecades and it is now being accelerateddramatically.

Moreover, the World Economic Forum andother elite organizations have been actively working towardsachieving a cashless economy for years. To get a sense ofthis trend, see Whywe need a less-cash society and TheUS should get rid of cash and move to a digital currency,says this Nobel Laureate economist.

Notably, inthis respect, the BetterThan Cash Alliance has 78 members committed todigitizing payments. If you think that this is agrassroots initiative set up by people like you and me, youwill be surprised to read that the Bill & Melinda GatesFoundation is a Resource Partner to the initiativealong with some UN agencies, many national governments andcorporations such as Mastercard and Visa.

So while thetrend toward a cashless society has been progressingsteadily for some decades, with countries like Denmark,Norway and Sweden already virtually cashless and Indiarapidly moving in that direction see IndiasPM Modi defends cash ban, announces incentives the so-called Covid-19 pandemic was contrived partlyto provide a pretext for further accelerating the move fromcash to cards and apps, with increasing numbers of peopleusing the digital methods, even for small sums, partlybecause some people were scared into believing that thevirus could be transmitted by bills andcoins.

But there is more. In addition to measures notmentioned here, other plans include the use of a facial scanthat records your entry to a store and is linked toartificial intelligence that identifies you and your creditrating. This then enables, or otherwise, your ability to payfor goods and services based on this facialscan.

Does all of this matter, you might ask.Well the convenience of cards and apps has two significantcosts: your privacy and your freedom. You lose both simplybecause while paying with cash is anonymous, paying by cardor app leaves a digital trail that is as difficult to followas an elephant whose tail you are already holding. And thisdigital trail forms a vital part of the surveillance gridthat enables all of those who are tracking and documentingyour movement, your payments and your behaviour to do sowithout leaving the comfort of their chairs. For more detailon this, watch Cash or card will COVID-19 killcash? which is embedded in the article Cashor Card Will COVID-19 Kill Cash? Leaving a DigitalFootprint With Every Payment.

But it goesbeyond this. As touched on above in relation to privacy andexplained at some length by Whitney Webb, there is arelated push by WEF partners to tackle cybercrime thatseeks to end privacy and the potential for anonymity on theinternet in general, by linking government-issued IDs tointernet access. Such a policy would allow governments tosurveil every piece of online content accessed as well asevery post or comment authored by each citizen, supposedlyto ensure that no citizen can engage in criminalactivity online.

Notably, the WEF Partnershipagainst Cybercrime employs a very broad definition of whatconstitutes a cybercriminal as they apply this labelreadily to those who post or host content deemed to bedisinformation that represents a threat todemocratic governments. The WEFs interest incriminalizing and censoring online content has been madeevident by its recent creation of a new GlobalCoalition for Digital Safety to facilitate the increasedregulation of online speech by both the public and privatesectors. See EndingAnonymity: Why the WEFs Partnership Against CybercrimeThreatens the Future of Privacy.

But to getback to cash: Unfortunately for us, the global elite doesnot intend to leave the abolition of cash to ourpreference for the convenience of cards and othermoves to entice us to switch to digital payment. It fullyintends to force us to accept digital methods as the onlymeans of payment.

In part, this is because electronicpayments are extremely lucrative for banks and paymentservice providers, while the data broker industry is alsomaking huge revenues. See Cashor Card Will COVID-19 Kill Cash? Leaving a DigitalFootprint With Every Payment.

And in some ways,killing cash is simple. Two obvious ways of doing soare by removing ATMs (including from shopping centres) andclosing local bank branches so that cash is simplyunavailable. As has been happening for some time. See WhyAre ATMs Disappearing at an Alarming Rate after a Wave ofBranch Closures? and Australianbank branches and ATMs are vanishing.

But, inthis instance, even profitability is at the trivial end ofthe elite motivation spectrum.

Cash is being forcedout of existence because it undermines the elite agenda totake all power from ordinary people.

So, in parallelwith other regressions over the past 18 months as the elitecoup to take complete control of our lives has continued tounfold, there have been warnings from variousinstitutions including the World Economic Forum and theCarnegie Endowment for International Peace about thepossibility of an allegedly imminent cyber attack thatwill collapse the existing financialsystem.

Following a simulation in 2020, in whichthe World Economic Forum along with the Russian governmentand global banks conducted a high-profile cyberattacksimulation that targeted the financial industry, anothersimulation was held on 9 July 2021 involving the WorldEconomic Forum and the Russian government-owned Sberbank aswell as other key financial agents. See CyberPolygon and Cyber Polygon2021. In reality, of course, such a collapse of thefinancial system would constitute the final yet necessarystep to implement the World Economic Forums desiredoutcome of forcing a widespread shift to digital currencyand increased global governance of the internationaleconomy.

If this financial collapse happens, thesolution suggested by key agencies to unite thenational security apparatus and the finance industry first,and then use that as a model to do the same with othersectors of the economy will ensure that we lose whatlittle control is left in our lives, not just in relation toour financial resources but in all other domains as well.For a full explanation, see WEFWarns of Cyber Attack Leading to Systemic Collapse of theGlobal Financial System.

And for anotheraccount of the deeper agenda and its financial impactsalready, including its economic genocide, as well aswhat is yet to happen, watch this interview of CatherineAustin Fitts: GlobalistCentral Banking New World Order ResetPlan.

Beyond this, if you want some insightinto another key threat in the cybercrime realm, check outthis video by the Ice Age Farmer in relation to the cyberthreat to the power grid. See NextCrisis Bigger than COVID Power Grid/Finance Down WEFs Cyber Polygon.

Fortunately, there is some resistancealready.

In response to concerns in the United Statesthat businesses that refuse cash will disadvantagecommunities with poor access to traditional banking systems,there are signs that a national movement protectingconsumers ability to pay in cash may be emerging witha number of states and cities already outlawing cashlessoutlets. See Cashor Credit? State and City Bans on Cashless Retailers Are onthe Rise.

Realistically, however, given what isat stake, considerable elite pressure will be applied toreverse these decisions in time. So we need our defense tobe more rigorous and less reliant on agents who are unlikelyto be tough enough to defend our interests or will besidelined or killed for doing so, as at least two nationalpresidents who resisted the elite intention last year havesince been killed. See Coronavirusand Regime Change: Burundis Covid Coup and JohnMagufuli: Death of an African FreedomFighter.

Moreover, given the likelihood thatthe financial system will be deliberately crashed at somepoint and possibly soon we need to employ a varietyof tactics, that build resilience into our resistance, todefeat this initiative.

Hence, storing and paying withcash, moving your accounts to local community banks orcredit unions (and away from the large corporate banks) andmaking the effort to become more self-reliant, particularlyin food production, will increase your resilience, as willparticipating in local trading schemes, whether involvinglocal currencies or goods and services directly.

Aswith all elements of the defense we implement, it will needto be multi-layered and integrated into the overall defensestrategy. The elite intends to kill off many of us asthe depopulation measures within the coup, including thedestruction of the global economy throwing 500,000,000people out of work and killing millions as a result, as wellas the injectables program already killing tens ofthousands, make perfectly clear and enslave therest.

For an integrated strategy to defeat the elitecoup, see the We Are Human, WeAre Free campaign, which has 29 strategic goals fordefeating the coup including meaningful engagement withpolice and military forces to assist them to understand andresist, rather than support, the elite agenda.

But fora simpler presentation, see the 7Days Campaign to Resist The Great Reset. The Telegram groupis here.

One of the interestingchallenges about the current Covid-19 Crisis is thatit continues to very successfully distract most people fromawareness of the deeper agenda: the Global ElitesGreat Reset and related initiatives, such as thatdiscussed above in relation to money.

Hence, apartfrom the perennial problem of raising awareness andmobilizing resistance among those still believing theelite-driven propaganda, we face two key strategichazards.

The first hazard is a longstanding one: whilevirtually all people believe that elite agents in thiscase, governments are controlling events, muchresistance will focus on begging governments, throughsuch things as petitions and protest demonstrations, tofix it for us. The elite has long dissipated ourdissent by having us direct it at one or other of itsagents. This case is no different. And while we are notusing our occasional large rallies to inform people how toresist powerfully every day of their life, these rallies area waste of time whatever solidarity they build in the shortterm. History is categorically instructive on thatpoint.

A second strategic hazard we face is thatresistance to the vaccine and the vaccinepassport might be successful (in the sense thatconcerted actions stall some government implementation ofsome measures in relation to these two initiatives) andleave most people believing that they have won, whilethe deeper agenda remains in the shadows with virtuallyno-one resisting.

It is important, therefore, thatthose who are aware of the deeper agenda continue to provideopportunities for others to become aware of this too and thefundamental threat it poses to us all while also sharing howwe can resist its key dimensions in a way that makes adifference. It is not enough to complain about elite agents,such as governments, the medical and pharmaceuticalindustries, and the corporate media.

We muststrategically resist the elite coup itself with actions suchas those in the 7Days Campaign to Resist The Great Reset before we findourselves locked in a technocratic prison without thefree-willed minds necessary to analyze, critique, plan andact.

Biodata: Robert J. Burrowes has a lifetimecommitment to understanding and ending human violence. Hehas done extensive research since 1966 in an effort tounderstand why human beings are violent and has been anonviolent activist since 1981. He is the author of WhyViolence? His email address is flametree@riseup.netand his website is here.

Scoop Media

Become a member Find out more

More:
Taking Control By Destroying Cash: Beware Cyber Polygon As Part Of The Elite Coup - Scoop.co.nz

Posted in Transhuman | Comments Off on Taking Control By Destroying Cash: Beware Cyber Polygon As Part Of The Elite Coup – Scoop.co.nz