Monthly Archives: July 2021

Are the walls closing in on cryptocurrency ads? – The Drum

Posted: July 29, 2021 at 8:43 pm

As celeb-fronted campaigns bring cryptocurrency into the mainstream, is it time for clearer regulation of ads?

A harsh spotlight was shone on cryptocurrency ads this month. The UKs ad regulator the ASA has said that it now will better police cryptocurrency content while TikTok has issued a warning to creators that it will not tolerate promotion of the divisive digital currency. At the same time, Google and Facebook appear to be opening the gate to more advertising from crypto companies having previously banned all ads. And even ads that do make it to air on the big screen have been quick to face criticism from the general public, wiser to the pitfalls of the crypto boom.

When Spike Lee the famed director behind films like Malcolm X appeared on screens last week extolling the benefits of why old money is out, new money is in in a campaign for crypto ATM operator Coin Cloud, he faced a swathe of criticism for failing to spot the hypocrisies.

Lauding Bitcoin et al as the digital rebellion against a financial system that systematically oppresses people of color and women, he marched through Wall Street denouncing archaic financial systems and encouraging the nation to cash in their dollars for cryptocurrency.

Do your research, Lee says between hyperbole. Is it a warning? If not, it should be.

According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 5.4% of US households do not have a bank account, with the primary reason being a lack of sufficient funds to open one.

Yet these 20 million Americans appear to be the exact target audience that Lee was encouraging to rush to a Coin Cloud ATM to exchange their old money for a new currency thats inclusive and fluid.

Critics were quick to highlight that this group, arguably more than any other, is susceptible to the promise of making a quick buck without proper consideration for the risks involved with investing in something as volatile as cryptocurrency.

According to Glassnode, between May 17 and May 24, Bitcoin holders realized net losses of $2.56bn. Glassnode says most of these sellers were new bitcoiners who had acquired and subsequently sold the currency within the past three to six months.

In a survey of UK consumers conducted by behavioral finance experts Oxford Risk, 36% cryptocurrency investors admit their understanding of the sector was poor or non-existent.

But emotional factors such as the fear of missing out are driving growth, with around 35% of adults saying they have read a lot about huge price rises while 15% say they have been encouraged to buy by friends or family.

Spike Lee isnt the only celebrity to lend his star-power to cryptocurrency ads.

In the past, crypto companies had been used to marketing their products on pockets of the internet Telegram groups, online chatrooms and invitation-only forums. But as Bitcoin hit headlines, large investors like Tesla and Square backed various Coins, and financial giants like BNY Mellon, Visa and Mastercard revised their policies to support crypto projects, the crypto sector began to experiment with mainstream advertising. And their marketing pockets are deep if the calibre of celebs they've signed on to front major ad campaigns is anything to go by.

Actor Neil Patrick Harris has bragged of the benefits of being an early Bitcoin investo for a CoinFlip campaign, Alec Baldwin has mocked those who think trading crypto on Etoro should be anything other that quick and easy, while Tom Brady and Gisele Bndchen have become brand ambassadors for FTX to encourage adoption of the digital currency.

These companies are also spending big on digital advertising, specifically with social media influencers.

Internet sensation Kim Kardashian West promoted Ethereummax a so-called alternative-coin, or alt-coin, to the more established Bitcoin to her 228 million Instagram followers last month.

Over on TikTok, young stars Charli and Dixie DAmelio turned their combined 169 million followers attentions to cryptocurrency exchange Gemini as part of a sponsored campaign. In fact, the use of influencers by crypto companies on TikTok was so widespread they were given the moniker Fintok advisors.

But concern has been mounting within the walls of advertising regulators over the lack of scrutiny given to cryptocurrency ads, especially those targeting a young and financially naive audience.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) in the UK recently said that it would be taking a more serious look at any crypto advertising. It came following the ban of an OOH campaign from UK-based exchange Luno, which ran a series of ads reading: If youre seeing Bitcoin on the Underground, its time to buy.

The watchdog said it plans to offer guidance for companies in the coming weeks, and is considering whether further action is needed around social media influencers promoting investments in the space without disclosing enough about the risks.

Further afield, the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) said this week that it was looking into the rise of crypto ads after identifying it as an emerging area of concern.

But its slow progress. Arguably too slow for the fast paced nature of this sector, where scams and fraud are all too common.

It is inevitable that digital asset investments and crypto currency ads in particular will face greater scrutiny and tighter regulation. Its really a case of slow regulators catching up with fast-developing technology and greater public awareness, says Rafe Blandford, chief product officer at Digitas UK .

Focus is sharper on this sector because of the associated consumer risk with any investment instrument, especially in what currently feels like a Wild West atmosphere. Because country by country legislation can be slow, we can expect to see ad networks enacting their own policies and self-regulation.

Atomic London is an advertising agency that counts Etoro a trading platform that lists numerous cryptocurrencies among its clients.

The agencys chief executive Jon Goulding said he is in no doubt that a clamp down in crypto advertising is coming. However, he raised concerns over how effective it would be when there remains no official regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), agreeing with Blandford that ultimately well see a network-level stance taken, rather than anything government mandated.

"With most crypto currencies not regulated by the FCA, how are consumers really going to be protected?, says Goulding. It comes down once again to whether digital and social media platforms will self-regulate and block crypto-advertisers from accessing their inventory and not simply whether there is an arbitrary warning, you could lose all of your money as a small print alongside advertising messages.

But rather than a move to stricter regulation of crypto advertising, it appears some digital and social platforms are slowly opening up to it.

Facebook which owns Instagram introduced a harsh crackdown back in 2018 with a blanket ban on crypto companies using its ad product. It has since lifted those restrictions to allow some adverts from pre-approved brands, and has no policy on its site in regards to influencers promoting crypto.

Like Facebook, Google had also previously taken a firm stance on crypto ads in an effort to clamp down on scams. But it appears to be loosening those restrictions for crypto exchanges and wallets, with reports emerging that it has invited potential advertisers to apply for commercial opportunities this month ahead of a change in policy in August.

Given the track record of those platforms I dont hold out much hope that theyll suddenly start clamping down on it, says Goulding. Ironically, when going on to digital publishers sites to look at articles relating to the ASA banning cryptocurrency advertising, the first pop up ad was for a cryptocurrency.

TikTok, however, is getting tougher. Earlier this month it updated its content policy to ban among other things influencers from promoting cryptocurrency.

Aside from the platform, the ability for crypto brands to market to the masses may also come down to the ethical values of the advertising agencies they want to employ.

Many agencies have committed to AdNetZero to help the industry tackle the climate change emergency. Spearheaded by the Advertising Association, its aiming to reduce the carbon impact of developing, producing and running UK advertising to real net zero by end 2030 and asking agencies to commit to make practical changes in the way they run their advertising operations.

The environmental impact of crypto currencies is significant. Between start of 2016 and mid-2018 its estimated that crypto mining was responsible for up to 15 tons of carbon dioxide emissions. The most prominent crypto currencies Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and Monero used more electricity in 2017 than Ireland or Hong Kong, says David Edwards, chief customer officer at AMV BBDO, suggesting that agencies may need to take a stand on bringing cryptocurrency brands on as clients.

Its estimated that for every $1 of Bitcoin value created it was responsible for creating $0.49 in health and climate change otherwise known, I think, as cryptodamages. It seems sensible that there should be tighter advertising regulation until cryptocurrencies are subject to proper global regulations with all the checks and balances in place regarding personal and environmental protections.

Go here to read the rest:
Are the walls closing in on cryptocurrency ads? - The Drum

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off on Are the walls closing in on cryptocurrency ads? – The Drum

iSchool to Host 1st Syracuse Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Research Workshop – iSchool | Syracuse University – Syracuse University News

Posted: at 8:43 pm

To continue its role as an educational leader in blockchain and cryptocurrency, the iSchool will host the First Syracuse Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Research Workshop from August 16-18. The workshop, hosted by Syracuse University professor Lee W. McKnight, will bring together and recognize ongoing diverse research on blockchain and cryptocurrency.

Theres daily media noise around the whole space of blockchain, cryptocurrency, and NFTs, explains McKnight. We want to ignore the noise and ensure theres real research substance to the event. Some may dismiss cryptocurrencies as fraud. And while there are cryptocurrency frauds around, there are also legitimate research questions and student employment opportunities.

The iSchool has positioned itself at the forefront of blockchain and cryptocurrency research and education in recent years by offering the first blockchain management course, which is now standardized as IST 408 for undergraduates, and offered online and in-person for masters students. Through this course, students participate in hands-on blockchain and cryptocurrency research projects of their own creation. Many students and faculty associated with WiTec, the Worldwide innovation Technology entrepreneurship club, and the newly formed Cryptocuse club have engaged in related research, which the workshop will highlight.

One workshop objective is getting an ongoing dialogue going between the academic community, the business community, and government about cryptocurrencies and blockchain innovation and policy, says McKnight. The various round tables will provide a way for dialogue, while research paper presentations and student blockchain project demos will be, for all of us, leading-edge learning opportunities and may help set the direction for further research.

Attendees will have the opportunity to learn from some of the biggest names in blockchain and cryptocurrency, includingCoinmint, which operates the largest digital currency data center in North America -operating sustainably on environmentally-friendly hydro-power provided by NYPA. They can also enjoy sessions on blockchaining cyber-physical communities, the cryptocurrency mining industry, and blockchain law, policy, and regulation research.

Confirmed keynote speakers include Professor Steve Lupien from the University of Wyoming Center of Blockchain Excellence, Professor Ian Taylor from the University of Notre Dame and SIMBA Chain, Dr. Naseem Naqvi, Founder of British Blockchain Association and University Professor Carl Schramm.

Workshop sponsors includeSimba,Coinmint,VMware, and theSyracuse University Renee Crown University Honors Program.

Registration for this event is free. Attendees can attend sessions in-person at 111 Hinds Hall or via Zoom. In-person capacity is limited. Visit theevent websitefor a complete schedule and a list of speakers.

Here is the original post:
iSchool to Host 1st Syracuse Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Research Workshop - iSchool | Syracuse University - Syracuse University News

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off on iSchool to Host 1st Syracuse Blockchain and Cryptocurrency Research Workshop – iSchool | Syracuse University – Syracuse University News

Mastercard Launches Global Program to Help Cryptocurrency Startups Scale Their Innovations Featured Bitcoin News – Bitcoin News

Posted: at 8:43 pm

Payments giant Mastercard has launched a new, global program for cryptocurrency startups. Seven crypto companies have already joined the program. Together with Mastercard, they will work to expand and accelerate innovation around digital asset technology and make it safer and easier for people and institutions to buy, spend and hold cryptocurrencies and digital assets.

As a leading technology player, we believe we can play a key role in digital assets, helping to shape the industry, and provide consumer protections and security. Part of our role is to forge the future of cryptocurrency, and were doing that by bridging mainstream financial principles with digital assets innovations.

What do you think about Mastercards new program for crypto startups? Let us know in the comments section below.

Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.

Excerpt from:
Mastercard Launches Global Program to Help Cryptocurrency Startups Scale Their Innovations Featured Bitcoin News - Bitcoin News

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off on Mastercard Launches Global Program to Help Cryptocurrency Startups Scale Their Innovations Featured Bitcoin News – Bitcoin News

Professor Craig on Theistic Hypotheses | Keith Parsons – Patheos

Posted: at 8:43 pm

In 2018 I posted on SO a review of Tim Cranes book The Meaning of Belief: Religion from an Atheists Point of View:

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/secularoutpost/2018/01/22/atheists-get-wrong-according-tim-crane/

Crane argues that atheists have largely misunderstood religion by regarding it as a sort of cosmological hypothesis, one that makes insupportable claims about the creation of the universe via the supernatural acts of a divine agent. By thus construing religion as a sort of spurious proto-scientific cosmology, atheists justify relegating it to the bin of irrelevance and irrationality. However, says Crane, religion should not be seen as any sort of hypothesis, but rather as consisting of the religious impulse and identification. The religious impulse is the drive to recognize a transcendent order that is both factual and normative. God is posited as real and his will is taken as defining right and wrong. Identification is the desire to belong to a community that defines itself in terms of a set of beliefs and practices and which understands the world in terms of those beliefs and practices. What unites these two elements is a shared experience of the sacred, which promotes a strong sense of identity. Atheists miss these points by dismissing religion as a crackpot cosmology and religious believers as superstitious.

In my comments on Cranes claims, I note that if atheists are mistaken in regarding theism as a quasi-scientific hypothesis, this is not a gratuitous error, but is due to the fact that leading religious apologists defend theism as such a hypothesis. Defenders of intelligent design theory such as William Dembski and Michael Behe present their concepts of specified complexity and irreducible complexity as scientifically legitimate concepts. In The Existence of God, Richard Swinburne employs Bayesian confirmation theory in defense of his theistic hypothesis and appeals largely to the criterion of simplicity, which, of course, is a standard of theory choice in the natural sciences. William Lane Craigs Kalaam cosmological argument is developed and defended in the context of physical cosmology. These considerations seem to justify the characterization of the theistic hypothesis as proto or quasi scientific.

However, such a designation is not really important. The important point is that theism is defended as a hypothesis. Whether that hypothesis is classified as scientific, quasi-scientific, or metaphysical is not of primary importance. In my review I make the point that, as John Hick argues in An Interpretation of Religion, the reasoning underlying religious belief is primarily interpretive and not hypothetical. Hick says that the universe is religiously ambiguous in the sense that there are no facts that compel a religious or a naturalistic interpretation. The arguments for and against the existence of God are not compelling, and their conclusions may be reasonably rejected. Perfectly reasonable people may therefore disagree about the existence of God.

If Hick is right, what follows? Perhaps both atheists and religious apologists should cease their efforts to devise polemical weapons to bludgeon the other side into submission since we should know by now that this will not work. We should instead seek a more nuanced and informed view of belief and unbelief. We might actually learn something from each other!

In a 2018 podcast of Reasonable Faith, Kevin Harris interviews Professor Craig about Cranes book and my review of it:

https://www.reasonablefaith.org/media/reasonable-faith-podcast/how-atheists-get-it-wrong-part-one/

Jeff Lowder drew my attention to this just recently, and I would like to respond to it here.

Professor Craig argues that, while theistic hypotheses are explanatory, it is tendentious and inaccurate to characterize them in general as semi-scientific or proto-scientific. Craig does admit that the ID theorists regard their hypothesis as scientific. However, they claim that their arguments for intelligent design are religiously neutral, so I err in identifying this hypothesis as a specifically religious or theistic hypothesis.

ID theory is religiously neutral? How can that be when it was developed and promoted explicitly as part of an aggressive apologetic program? Well, to avoid church/state entanglements, ID theorists note that the designer could be something other than the God of Christian theismsomething like Platos Demiurge, or the Q Continuum from Star Trek, maybe. This lawyerly ruse has no bearing on the philosophical issue, however. Could the designer be God? Of course. The most charitable reading of ID is therefore that it is an argument for a disjunction of mutually exclusive and exhaustive designer hypotheses, including the theistic hypothesis as one disjunct.

As for Swinburnes and his own hypothesis, Craig says that they are not scientific or quasi-scientific because they posit a personal cause rather than a naturalistic one. Scientific explanations are in terms of natural laws and initial conditions, but theistic hypotheses posit a personal agent who creates by acts of volition. However, it certainly seems that, in principle, there could be scientific confirmation of a personal cause. Suppose, for instance, that the famous Hubble image of the Eagle Nebulathe pillars of creationwere accompanied by glowing gas in the form of Hebrew letters, light years wide, proclaiming I, Yahweh, did this. In this case, we would have outstanding scientific evidence of a personal cause. So, as a general demarcation criterion, the personal/impersonal distinction does not work.

Craig and Harris then have this exchange:

KEVIN HARRIS:Just to be more specific, when he [me] mentions you here, again, he says, CraigsKalaam argument is specifically and explicitly a cosmological claim presented within the context of physical cosmology.

CRAIG:Right. And it doesnt appeal to a theistic cosmology or an alternative to contemporary cosmology. It appeals to the normal cosmological model that is affirmed by secular scientists. So it is not in any way positing God as a scientific or quasi-scientific hypothesis.

Craigs statement here is a non sequitur. A scientific theory need not be an alternative to another theory, but could subsume it. Theory T2 subsumes theory T1 when T2 provides a deeper and more inclusive explanatory framework that accounts for T1s empirical success within its domain while locating that domain within a larger one that T2 covers. Advances in science often occur when a new theory does not just replace an old one, but places the old theory in a broader and deeper explanatory context. Thus, Carnots theories were subsumed by the thermodynamics of Kelvin and Clausius. Craigs theistic hypothesis appears intended to provide a deeper and more inclusive explanation than physical cosmology. Physical cosmology is not falsified by Craigs theistic hypothesis, but rather is subsumed by it. Craigs theistic cosmology aims to go beyond physical cosmology and tell us why there is a universe at all. So, the fact that Craig does not present his hypothesis as an alternative to physical cosmology, but intends to provide a deeper context for it, does not disqualify it as quasi-scientific.

However, since nothing much really turns on it, lets concede the point for the sake of argument and say that Craigs hypothesis is a metaphysical hypothesis rather than a scientific or quasi-scientific one. The real problem identified by Crane is that religious belief is identified as any kind of hypothesis. Crane implies and Hick argues that the reasoning underlying religious belief is interpretive rather than hypothetical. That is, the reasoning supporting a religious worldview is more like understanding a text than confirming a hypothesis. We do not understand a text by confirming piecemeal hypotheses about its meaning. Rather, we seek a reading that will give us the most coherent understanding of the text as a whole. Likewise, for religious people, their faith is what, for them, makes the most coherent and comprehensive sense of their total experience. Nothing compels such a judgment; it is inevitably personal and subjective, but not unreasonable. Similarly for atheists. Nothing compelled me to become an atheist. Rather, a naturalistic worldview is the honest and authentic articulation of my total experience and knowledge.

Craig objects that if Crane is right, then he, Swinburne, Steve Meyer, William Dembski and other defenders of religious hypotheses must misunderstand religion, which he regards as implausible.

Craig does not reply to Hicks view directly, but chiefly expresses surprise that I have supposedly so softened my view of theism that I am now willing to endorse Hicks view that religious belief can be as rational as naturalism. (n.b., Actually, I have always regarded some religious belief as rational and some definitely not.) What, then, do I have against the apologetic enterprise that he represents? Why do I harshly characterize it as an attempt to bludgeon opponents into submission? After all, he is only trying to show that his belief is rational and not to show that atheists are irrational. Why do I persist in seeing the apologetic enterprise as coercive, i.e. as an effort to show not just that their belief is justified, but that mine is not? That is not his aim at all.

I honestly do not know what to make of Craigs claim here. Does he regard his Kalaam argument as a refutation of atheism? I cannot read his presentation and defense of that argument in any other way. In this case, the argument is not a modest claim about what he is justified in believing, but the much stronger and more aggressive claim that atheism is demonstrably false and groundless. In other words, he seems to be arguing that he is right and that atheists are dead wrong. Atheists, of course, have often argued that they are right and that Craig is wrong. The debate between apologists and atheists therefore does appear to have an oppositional and aggressive character; it is not about what one may believe but what others must believe. However, if I have been misreading Craig all these years, and his aim all along has only been to affirm the rationality of his view and not to debunk mine, then I would suggest that Hicks position provides a much better basis for such a softer and gentler apologetic.

Finally, Craig invites listeners to look at my debate with him on the existence of God to see if I did indeed effectively criticize his theistic arguments. I also would like to extend that invitation. (I think that Craig is referring to our debate at Indiana University in February 2002, not the earlier one at Prestonwood Baptist Church.).

Continued here:
Professor Craig on Theistic Hypotheses | Keith Parsons - Patheos

Posted in Atheism | Comments Off on Professor Craig on Theistic Hypotheses | Keith Parsons – Patheos

Kiszla: Why its best for Broncos and everybody who loves them for Bowlen family to get out of the football business – The Denver Post

Posted: at 8:42 pm

Mr. B has been dead and gone for two years now, and the way the Broncos were are misty, watercolor memories that arent coming back.

The NFL is no longer a mom-and-pop business. So when the Broncos look to the future, searching for a new owner, lets hope the team doesnt get mired in sentimentality for the past.

While it would be cool if Brittany Bowlen moved into her late fathers office and took over operation of the Broncos, whats probably best for this team and a town that adores it so much? New money. New ideas. New direction.

Sell the Broncos to Amazon mogul Jeff Bezos. Please.

As a team that has failed to make the NFL playoffs for five long years reconvenes for training camp, CEO Joe Ellis knows the Broncos simply cannot go on this way. The losing on the field must end, as well as hang-wringing over ownership.

Denver is not going to win the Super Bowl this season, regardless of whether Drew Lock or Teddy Bridgewater is the starting quarterback. The only real intrigue will be if the team can play well enough for coach Vic Fangio to retain his job. While frustrating to admit, it feels as if the Broncos are marking time, waiting for big changes in 2022, when the NFL has mandated a transition of power to a new proprietor of our civic treasure.

The bickering between the Bowlen kids has mercifully reached a ceasefire instead of escalating into an an all-out war in the courtroom. But its hard to conceive how Brittany can cobble together unanimous support from her siblings and take over day-to-day operation of a business thats been in the family since her late father Pat bought the team for $71 million way back in 1984.

The Broncos have grown too big for the Bowlen family. There are at least five billion reasons that it makes sense to sell them to Bezos, the business magnate and astronaut wannabe who was born in Albuquerque, on the outskirts of Broncos Country, in 1964.

Heres guessing Bezos would gladly pay $5 billion to add the Broncos to a portfolio that includes everything from an old-school newspaper to cutting-edge spacecraft.

While Ellis emphasized this week that the Broncos are currently not for sale, it would be the hottest property in Denvers sizzling real estate market. Heres betting the team would be gobbled up within two weeks after team trustees gave up on their dream of Brittany running the operation and opened the bidding process.

Selling the team to Bezos would be good for the Broncos and everybody who loves them. After divvying up a check for $5 billion, the bickering Bowlen kids could all buy private islands in the sun and go their separate ways. Raising the country-club fees for members of the NFL ownership fraternity to record heights would make everybody from Jerry Jones to Robert Kraft grin from ear to ear.

But, most important is how Bezos, the richest man who ever lived, could radically transform the team and the town.

While Bezos probably cant deliver quarterback Aaron Rodgers to Colorado in two days via Amazon Prime, we would never have to hear him cry poverty, the way Rockies owner Dick Monfort constantly does at 20th and Blake. Any football player or coach contemplating a possible move to Denver would be attracted by ownership with unlimited resources.

The football stadium Bowlen coerced taxpayers to build him opened in 2001, and has quickly aged in an era when sports facilities have become the centerpiece for entertainment districts and urban renewal. Want a dome that could attract a Super Bowl or Final Four to Colorado? Bezos could get that done as soon as he put his mind to it.

The next owner of the Broncos?

Sorry, Brittany. Times change. And its time for the Bowlen family to get out of the football business.

This is a decision that has to be made on the basis of big dollars and common sense.

Sell the team to Bezos. ASAP.

Here is the original post:

Kiszla: Why its best for Broncos and everybody who loves them for Bowlen family to get out of the football business - The Denver Post

Posted in Private Islands | Comments Off on Kiszla: Why its best for Broncos and everybody who loves them for Bowlen family to get out of the football business – The Denver Post

Away from it all: island hopping around Finlands Turku archipelago – The Guardian

Posted: at 8:42 pm

Finland has dealt with the pandemic much better than a lot of other countries. It still has one of the lowest rates of both confirmed cases (about 103,851 at time of writing) and coronavirus-related deaths (currently 982) in Europe, a feat many have attributed to a strategy of rapid lockdowns and stringent travel restrictions.

It did all this in typical Finnish style: without shouting about it. Perhaps this quiet demeanour is related to the countrys deep connection with the natural world, where shouting usually isnt necessary. More than 90% of Finland is either forest or water, and the countrys jokamiehenoikeus (right to roam) gives anyone living in or visiting Finland access to all that nature, including a lot of privately owned land.

It all makes for a place where it is very easy to escape people and everyday pressures, as I found on a visit in 2019.

Days into my trip I found myself cycling along a deserted road on a clunky old bike borrowed from my guesthouse, and the only living creatures I saw were a family of geese waddling through a field towards a thick pine forest. If I hadnt been sitting in a beach-side sauna 45 minutes beforehand, sweating noticeably more than the other two bathers, Id have sworn I had the island of Ini all to myself.

This was to become a familiar feeling during my trip around the Turku archipelago about 20,000 islands off Finlands south-west coast. Visiting all 20,000 seeming a little ambitious, I opted to roughly follow the 200km Archipelago Trail, a loop of road and ferry routes that begins and ends in Turku, Finlands oldest city and its former capital.

Turku mixes historic monuments and modern comforts well, and while theres not really a singular, show-stopping sight, theres plenty of mileage to be had from simply hopping between galleries and lively cafe-bars (many lining the River Aura), and delving into a rich restaurant scene. Favourites included Kuori, for creative and pretty vegetarian and vegan fare, and Tint, a buzzy bistro on the Aura that does gourmet pizzas with unusual toppings (asparagus, strawberry and vegan feta was an unlikely winner).

I began the trail by driving south towards Pargas, 25km away. This small towns headline attraction is Art Bank, which claims to be Scandinavias only viewable private Salvador Dal collection, though Dals surrealism seems pedestrian compared with eccentric owner Ted Wallin, who showed me around. I fall into a trance where I know that I am Salvador, he said, casually. Outside in Pargas, everyday life does not have much glamour, so people come to Art Bank for excitement.

I got my excitement by driving on to the tiny town of Nagu, in a landscape of flat, luscious green fields and pine forests punctuated by red wooden houses.

My base was the Lanterna Hotel (doubles from 100 B&B), close to the harbour, where restaurants include Najaden, a bar and pizzeria on an anchored steamboat. I checked out a red, wooden bell tower tucked away in a forest before hurrying back to the harbour for a ferry to Seili, a tiny island off the main trail with a chilling history.

Seili has a lot for nature-lovers: its home to various rare and unusual plants and I glimpsed wild hares, huge dragonflies and even what I thought was a wild mink. But it hides a more macabre past. In the 17th century Seili housed a large leprosy hospital, to which hundreds of people were shipped on a one-way journey. The hospital was later converted into a mental hospital for women. Although today the hospital is the Archipelago Research Institute, studying environment and wildlife around the Baltic, visitors can still wander the old buildings and cell-like rooms, some of which have been preserved to show the hospitals history.

The next morning in Lanternas antique-filled dining room, I breakfasted on rye bread with peanut and tamarind sauce, plus a lot of cucumber a Finnish staple. Afterwards I headed to the harbour for the (free) five-hour ferry journey to Ut, Finlands most southerly inhabited island, with a population of about 45.

Viewing Ut on Google Maps gives a dizzying sense of its isolation and its exactly this remoteness that appeals. Theres a hotel in former army barracks (the island is still used by the Finnish military), but I stayed at Hannas Horizon B&B (doubles with homemade breakfast from 77). Owner Hanna Kovanen is a fount of knowledge about Ut, having been born here, and also runs tours of the red-and-white lighthouse (Finlands oldest functioning example), which has a chapel on its third floor.

After the tour I clambered out to some rocks on the islands southern coast. Maybe it was the romantic filter my brain had devised for Ut, or maybe it was the (admittedly quite strong) Finnish IPA Id taken with me, but as I stared out towards a lot of glorious nothingness, I realised Id never been more detached from the rest of the world. It felt fantastic.

My next island stop was Korpo, home to the rural Hotel Nestor (doubles from 130 B&B), plus a lake and a sculpture walk in the forests.

Ini, four ferries and four hours away to the north, was my final stop. Its tiny main village has a pretty church, cafe and small harbour with sauna and beach, where I forced myself into the cold water. I warmed up in the sauna (traditionally, youre meant to sauna first, then dip into cold water), where I made the British mistake of wearing swimming trunks. After derisive glances from the other users, I left, shed the shorts and returned, acting as if nothing had happened.

Heading back to Turku, I stopped at several towns on the final section of the trail, now connected to the mainland, including Taivassalo and Naantali. Naantalis tourist-heavy harbour was a fine place to stroll, but nowhere has the gentle magic of the smaller islands or their wildlife. Id regularly seen bounding deer and stags, countless fluorescent caterpillars and colourful insects, plus more rare birds than my basic ornithologycould name.

My magical tour had touched on only about 20 of the archipelagos islands and I was very happy to reflect that that left me 19,980 others to explore on a return trip.

For more information see VisitFinland.com. Ferry timetables can be found at saaristolautat.fi

Excerpt from:

Away from it all: island hopping around Finlands Turku archipelago - The Guardian

Posted in Private Islands | Comments Off on Away from it all: island hopping around Finlands Turku archipelago – The Guardian

One of the most beautiful beaches in the world is only a 40 minute drive from Swansea – Wales Online

Posted: at 8:42 pm

A Welsh beach dubbed one of the most beautiful in the world is just a short drive away from Swansea.

With three miles of golden sand along a blue vision of a coastline, Rhossili Bay, situated at the western end of popular holiday destination of the Gower peninsula is a little taste of Europe in Wales.

Its exactly the kind of holiday people are flocking to when foreign holidays are so at risk this year.

Travelling to Rhossili Bay involves zero risk of quarantine, plus the top quality beach emulates one you might find in south France or even the Greek islands on the right day.

The beach is covered everyday by an incoming tide, meaning it is unspoilt and clean - perfect for families.

2Chill member Sofia Lewis went so far as to call it without a doubt, one of the most beautiful beaches in the world.

Rating it five stars, she continued, It's just a 40-minute drive from Swansea, but be aware it can take longer in the summer season depending on traffic.

The beach is three miles of sand, so there is always plenty of room to set up space on the beach itself.

When the tide is out, the beach expands far and wide and locals say there is always a free spot away from others - giving it the feeling of a private island somewhere slightly more tropical than Wales, dare we suggest.

Wondering where to eat, drink or visit for your next UK holiday? At 2Chill we help you decide where to go and stay next with hundreds of recommendations right on your doorstep.

Visit our brilliant new website 2chill.co.uk and start packing.

If you'd also like weekly inspiration and advice for your next trip, you can sign up to the Chill newsletter here.

For the latest must-have travel news follow us on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter.

With Sofias gushing review, it will come as no surprise to hear Rhossili Bay was not only voted Trip Advisors best beach in Britain, but also third best in Europe and ninth best in the world.

There is plenty to do if you dont fancy spending all day sunbathing or swimming though.

If you are interested in water sports, Sofia says, it is also incredible for surfing and there are plenty of local surf schools available for booking.

The beach is also dog friendly all year round if youd rather wander along the sand or the Welsh coastal path which takes you along the headland.

A 40 minute walk or half hour drive away is the quaint village Rhossili, home to a caf, restaurant, a National Trust shop and other visitor attractions.

From here, you can walk to Worms Head, an island off the Gower peninsula. Ensure you plan your journey ahead though, as you can only reach the island during low tide.

Getting there

Rhossili Bay is accessible via a National Trust carpark costing 6.50 for a whole day.

By public transport, you can get the 118 bus ending in at the Terminus stop, Rhossili, a 40 minute walk from the beach.

Have you visited Rhossili beach? Do you agree with this recommendation or is there another spot in Wales people must visit? Sign up and leave your recommendation at 2Chill .

Read the original:

One of the most beautiful beaches in the world is only a 40 minute drive from Swansea - Wales Online

Posted in Private Islands | Comments Off on One of the most beautiful beaches in the world is only a 40 minute drive from Swansea – Wales Online

Keeping British Virgin Islands Competitive In Wealth Planning – Wealth Briefing

Posted: at 8:42 pm

An offshore law firm examines recent developments in the British Virgin Islands and what is being done to keep the jurisdiction on the front foot.

The following article comes from partner Henry Mander and senior associate Matthew Howson of Harneys, the offshore law firm. They write about whats being done to ensure that the British Virgin Islands, a British Overseas Territory, remains competitive. With so much global pressure on firms to comply with disclosure of beneficial ownership and the move by the Group of 20 nations to set a floor for corporation tax, the role of offshore centres remains under focus. (This news service talked in December 2020 to BVI Finance about the beneficial ownership issue.)

The editors of this news service are pleased to share these views; the usual editorial disclaimers apply on views of guest contributors. To comment, email tom.burroughes@wealthbriefing.com and jackie.bennion@clearviewpublishing.com

Many readers will already be familiar with the BVI co, a company formed under the British Virgin Islands Business Companies Act 2004. These have been the mainstay of the BVIs success as an international finance centre, used around the world and, in some regions, ubiquitous. Flexible and easily comprehensible, they are used for corporate and private wealth purposes alike.

However, the BVI company is not the BVIs only contribution to the private wealth space. In particular, the BVIs trust regime is both innovative and within the mainstream of trust jurisdictions. Most BVI trusts are used in conjunction with BVI companies: this allows the client to liaise with only one set of lawyers and ensures that there will be no conflict between BVI corporate law and another jurisdictions trust law. Yet, because of this advantageous trust regime, BVI trusts are increasingly requested even where no BVI company is involved; at the time of writing, the authors are drafting two such trusts.

Now, new legislation has been developed in concert with London counsel and academics to ensure that the BVI trust offering remains at the top of its game. The changes are technical, but cutting through the legalese, what are the essentials for you and your client?

Firewalls My son is a beneficiary but his marriage is in trouble could his spouse attack the trust? We are commonly asked about the jurisdictions trust firewall legislation. This has historically defended BVI trusts against attacks over succession and forced heirship, and also from creditors, but increasingly attention has turned to attacks during beneficiaries divorce proceedings. The firewall has therefore been greatly strengthened and modernised. Now, claims and interests (including beneficial interests) are protected, and the defeated attacker may have a personal relationship with a beneficiary instead of the settlor. The definition of personal relationship itself has been expanded to include step-relationships and children born of surrogacy or artificial fertilisation.

As well as that, the questions that should be decided under BVI law (rather than some foreign law more advantageous to the attacker) have been confirmed to be virtually every question applicable to a trust.

Reserved powers The BVI is already famous for its VISTA legislation which essentially delegates the trustees powers and duties over the investment of the trust fund to the directors of an underlying BVI company within the trust (which can then hold other assets underneath); such directors are often the client and their advisors. Although most offshore jurisdictions permit reserved powers through bespoke drafting, only the BVIs VISTA grants the reassurance of statutory backing via a standalone piece of legislation. Thus an offshore trustee can hold potentially problematic assets such as cryptocurrency, industrial assets in difficult regions, and so on, with minimised risk, via a BVI company within a VISTA trust.

Although reserved power trusts, outside the VISTA regime, have long been popular in the BVI, they have historically relied on a relatively narrow section in the legislation. The more extensive statutory backing, long applicable to VISTA trusts, on the other hand has now been granted to reserved powers over other areas of the trust, such as distributions to beneficiaries. The new expanded legislation concerning reserved powers trust vigorously restates the powers that may be reserved to protectors, settlors or other persons, without questioning the validity of the trust. A person may have the power to:

1,Revoke a trust; 2,Change its terms or governing law; 3,Add or remove beneficiaries or trustees; or 4, Require trustee powers in general, including in order to implement a specific investment decision, to be exercisable only with the consent of, or at the direction of, of that person.

Rule in Hastings Bass - aka undoing a mistake This rule originally derived from a 1975 English case and has a long and controversial history around the trust world. Fortunately for non-trust lawyers, this history need not be discussed here. Essentially, the rule has now been enshrined in BVI statute. It allows the BVI Court to wholly or partially set aside an exercise of a fiduciary power, which will often mean in practice a trustees distribution to a beneficiary. The requirements are essentially that the power-holder, when exercising the power in question:

--took into account an irrelevant consideration (whether of fact, law or both) or did not take into account a relevant consideration; --when if they had (not) done so, they would not have exercised the power or would have exercised it on a different occasion or in a different manner.

It can be seen that this rule is very useful for salvaging distributions or transactions which were poorly discussed or investigated beforehand, and which turned out to have disastrous tax or other consequences. Without such statute, the common law remedy as it presently stands is that the beneficiary should sue the trustee or advisor for negligence. Clearly this is not an attractive course for any party.

Resealing Not all shares in BVI companies are held in well-drafted and considered BVI trusts. In fact, many shareholders simply hold the shares in their own name. This requires their families to obtain a BVI grant of probate or letters of administration on their death in order to be able to transfer the shares or to be able to exercise their voting rights. This can cause a period of limbo while the grant is obtained. However, the BVI Registry has greatly speeded up their procedures, and we have various methods available to further expedite the process. One of these is to reseal a foreign grant which requires a shorter process than where one is obtaining one from scratch. Now, grants from the Commonwealth, the US and Hong Kong can be resealed in the BVI.

Summary: horizon scanning With the increased focus that many high net worth families have had on their structures since the outbreak of last years global pandemic, many clients have taken the opportunity to look behind the simple BVI company and have become more aware of the sophisticated and bespoke structuring options available, which are being implemented regularly to assist from a succession planning and asset protection perspective.

With the changing landscapes of economic substance and beneficial ownership reporting, amongst other things, regular reviews of private wealth structures are taking place (or certainly should be if not) and such reviews allow for opportunities for restructurings to modernise matters, either to implement new BVI trusts or update existing BVI trusts to take advantage of the cutting-edge nature of the offerings in the jurisdictions private wealth space.

See original here:

Keeping British Virgin Islands Competitive In Wealth Planning - Wealth Briefing

Posted in Private Islands | Comments Off on Keeping British Virgin Islands Competitive In Wealth Planning – Wealth Briefing

Corrections: July 27, 2021 – The New York Times

Posted: at 8:42 pm

FRONT PAGE

A picture caption with an article on Monday about Toyotas resistance to electric vehicles, using information from a photo agency, misidentified a Toyota vehicle outfitted for the Tokyo Olympics. It is a Prius, not a Mirai.

An article on Friday about Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, the exiled Belarus opposition leader, misstated the action taken against the opposition politician Valery Tsepkalo before the election in Belarus last year. While he was barred from running, he was not jailed.

An article on Sunday about Big Oil in Nigeria misstated the surname of a spokesman for the Gbaramatu Kingdom. He is Godspower Gbenekama, not Benekama.

An article on Saturday about Dr. Joseph Mercola, an osteopathic physician, referred incorrectly to the outcome of regulatory actions against Dr. Mercola. He paid millions of dollars in refunds to customers as a result of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission; he was not fined millions of dollars by the Food and Drug Administration.

An article on Monday about fatal car crashes in the New York area misspelled the surname of two brothers killed in a collision on the Hamptons this weekend. They were Michael and James Farrell, not Farell.

An article on Saturday about the completion of the human genome misstated when scientists determined the correct number of human chromosomes. It was in the 1960s, not a century ago.

An article on Monday about Phil Valentine, a conservative radio host who contracted the coronavirus, misidentified the date when Mr. Valentine announced his Covid-19 diagnosis. It was July 11, not June 11.

An article on Monday about a declining interest in investment banking as a career choice among young professionals misidentified the class of a university student. Armen Panossian is a rising senior at Rutgers University, not a rising junior.

An obituary on July 17 about William H. Regnery II, a reclusive heir to a textile fortune who bankrolled a number of people and organizations behind the rise of the alt-right, referred incorrectly to four of his children. He adopted Robert and William T. Regnery, two of his wifes children; William F. and David Regnery are his sons from a previous marriage.

An obituary on July 3 about Gen. Tran Thien Khiem, who was second in command to President Nguyen Van Thieu of South Vietnam during the last six years of the Vietnam War, misstated when and where he died. He died on June 23 in the Irvine, Calif., area not on June 24 in Santa Ana.

Errors are corrected during the press run whenever possible, so some errors noted here may not have appeared in all editions.

To contact the newsroom regarding correction requests, please email nytnews@nytimes.com. To share feedback, please visit nytimes.com/readerfeedback.

Comments on opinion articles may be emailed to letters@nytimes.com.

For newspaper delivery questions: 1-800-NYTIMES (1-800-698-4637) or email customercare@nytimes.com.

Continued here:

Corrections: July 27, 2021 - The New York Times

Posted in Alt-right | Comments Off on Corrections: July 27, 2021 – The New York Times

My daughter no longer speaks to me or my husband, and mocked our family values. Do we cut her out of her $2 million inheritance? – MarketWatch

Posted: at 8:41 pm

My husband and I have three adult children whom we love very much, and wish for them to have healthy, productive, ethical and loving lives.

Like many siblings, even though they were raised in the same household, they have their own individual lives with disparate beliefs and views. We dont always agree with them, but respect them nonetheless as adults.

Even so, we do let them know how we feel as parents and remind them of how they were raised.And yes, there have been some heated discussions over the years, but ultimately we know that our relationships are more important than politics or religious beliefs.

However, sometimes the fruit rolls very far from the tree. We have a daughter who lives in a different state and has refused to communicate with us for over two years, and simply doesnt want us to know anything about her life.

Are we being vengeful or malicious to consider dropping her, or just realistic and practical?

She has criticized and mocked our familys values, and even accused us of things that never happened. She did this both on social media and in person.

She has told us that we are toxic parents, and she doesnt need the stress we create for her with our beliefs. OK. Thats how she feels. We are very hurt by her words and accusations, and her siblings are also perplexed and think that shell get over it.

We have tried to contact her, but we are ignored.She has made her point clear. She is married and has a good profession and, I assume, a happy life without our stress.

At times, I feel shes not my daughter anymore. At least, she doesnt want to be. My husband and I have even considered removing her from our will, but go back and forth, especially when we think of her as a young child.

But then we decide that she will always be our child regardless, and should inherit her portion, which will be about $2 million or more in todays value. Honestly, I dont think she would even care if we disinherited her.

Are we being vengeful or malicious to consider dropping her, or just realistic and practical? Should we give her the benefit of the doubt and demonstrate our love unconditionally, and leave her in our will?

My children have no idea of the value of their inheritance, as we have always been frugal. Nor have they any idea that we are considering dropping their sibling from our will.

Were in our early 60s and hopefully will be around for a couple of more decades, but you never know and we need to update our wills anyway, whether or not we decide to cut off our daughter.

The Giving Tree

You can email The Moneyist with any financial and ethical questions related to coronavirus at qfottrell@marketwatch.com, and follow Quentin Fottrell onTwitter.

Dear Giving,

Treat your children equally, in life and in death. The breakdown of a relationship is rarely, if ever, the responsibility of one party. Whether the conflict is political, ideological or personal, someone always believes theyre right.

If you cut her out of your will, you will leave acrimony and hurt feelings behind. It suggests or worse, confirms that your love has a gift tax. If your daughter is responsible, $2 million would make a huge difference to her.

Some apples should roll far from the tree. Children should make up their own minds about how they want to live their life. If you want your daughter to be happy and live life on her terms, resist the urge to punish her.

This research published in the European Journal of Ageing looked at 55 cases involving heirs, donors and professionals, attempting to understand peoples motivations and mistakes when carving up their estate among their heirs.

The researchers identified four reasons for leaving people an inheritance: altruism driven by family solidarity (it feels good to be nice), equity to maintain family unity, egoism, and reciprocity (I give you if you give me).

If you want your daughter to be happy and live life on her terms, resist the urge to punish her.

Altruistic motivation rests on family values (shared by heirs and donors), which aim to maintain family identity, therefore the inheritance of moral principles is valued in the absence of material inheritance, the authors wrote.

Equality oriented motivation lies in the maintenance of family ties avoidance of conflicts and recognizes individual needs, they added. In other words, equity and family cohesion are not mutually exclusive.

If you wanted to control your daughter in life and she rebelled, you are likely to use money to amplify that message in your will. You have another choice: let go of ill will and misunderstandings. Do it for her, and for yourself.

You write, There have been some heated discussions over the years, but ultimately we know that our relationships are more important than politics or religious beliefs. Sometimes, the answer is in the question.

Its easy to say that when its not my money. However, including her in your will is a statement regardless of your personal disagreements and differences in worldview that you loved her unconditionally.

By emailing your questions, you agree to having them published anonymously on MarketWatch.By submitting your story to Dow Jones & Company, the publisher of MarketWatch, you understand and agree that we may use your story, or versions of it, in all media and platforms, including via third parties.

Check outthe Moneyist private Facebook group, where we look for answers to lifes thorniest money issues. Readers write in to me with all sorts of dilemmas. Post your questions, tell me what you want to know more about, or weigh in on the latest Moneyist columns.

The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.

More from Quentin Fottrell:

Read the original:

My daughter no longer speaks to me or my husband, and mocked our family values. Do we cut her out of her $2 million inheritance? - MarketWatch

Posted in Ethical Egoism | Comments Off on My daughter no longer speaks to me or my husband, and mocked our family values. Do we cut her out of her $2 million inheritance? – MarketWatch