Daily Archives: June 4, 2021

The FBI Took Their Safe Deposit Box and Everything Inside It. Two Months Later, They’re Still Waiting for It To Be Returned. – Reason

Posted: June 4, 2021 at 3:24 pm

Inside the safe deposit box they rented at U.S. Private Vaults in Beverly Hills, California, Jennifer and Paul Snitko kept the sort of things that any law-abiding American might want to store securely: a will, backup copies of their home computer's hard drive, and some family heirlooms including jewelry, a fancy watch, and a class ring.

The Snitkos are not criminals. They've not been charged with any crimes. During his career as an aerospace engineer, Paul even held several security clearances.

But since March 22, they've been treated like criminals. The Snitkos' valuables have been in the possession of federal prosecutors following an FBI raid that resulted in hundreds of safe deposit boxes being seizeddespite the fact that the warrant authorizing the raid, as Reason previously reported, explicitly forbade federal agents from conducting "a criminal search or seizure of the contents of the safe-deposit boxes."

But the FBI did not merely seize the safe deposit boxes housed at U.S. Private Vaults. Federal agents then proceeded to search each box, even brazenly tearing open sealed envelopes and rummaging through the belongings found inside. More than two months after the raid at U.S. Private Vaults, the Snitkos and other innocent people who had their stuff taken have no idea when their valuables might be returned.

"When you've done nothing wrong, you shouldn't be subjected to an investigation," says Paul Snitko. "That the federal government broke open our safety deposit box was shocking and that we have no idea when we will get our property back is infuriating."

On Friday, just hours after the Snitkos filed a lawsuitwith help from the Institute for Justice (IJ), a libertarian law firmchallenging what they say was the FBI's unlawful seizure of their safe deposit box, they finally got some good news. Sort of. According to IJ, the couple received a phone call from the FBI informing them that they would have their property returned in "about two to three weeks from now."

As of Friday afternoon, two other clients represented in the same lawsuit have not received similar phone calls.

The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, joins several other legal actions already launched on behalf of anonymous individuals whose property was similarly caught up in the FBI raid of U.S. Private Vaults. Federal prosecutors have charged U.S. Private Vaults with several crimes including conspiracy to commit money laundering and, earlier this week, filed forfeiture motions against roughly 400 of the nearly 1,000 safe deposit boxes seized in the raid.

As Reason previously reported, the unsealed warrant authorizing the raid of U.S. Private Vaults granted the FBI permission to seize the business's computers, money counters, security cameras, and "nests" of safe deposit boxesthe large steel frames that effectively act as bookshelves for the boxes themselves. However, FBI procedure required federal agents to take the safe deposit boxes into custody as well.

What happened after that is what's truly enraging about the situation. Federal agents were supposed to identify the boxes' owners so property taken in the raid could be returned. In many cases, that was as easy as checking the documents that were taped to the tops of the boxesbut, instead, legal filings show that investigators brazenly rifled through the boxes.

Like other victims of the raid, the Snitkos also had identifying information attached to the lid of their safe deposit box. Opening the box, their lawsuit argues, is a clear violation of their Fourth Amendment rights, while the FBI's continued retention of their property represents both Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment violations.

"The government's dragnet search of innocent peoples' private security boxes is the most outrageous Fourth Amendment abuse that the Institute for Justice has ever seen," says Robert Frommer, a senior attorney with IJ. "It is like the government breaking into every apartment in a building because the landlord was dealing drugs in the lobby."

Read the original post:
The FBI Took Their Safe Deposit Box and Everything Inside It. Two Months Later, They're Still Waiting for It To Be Returned. - Reason

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on The FBI Took Their Safe Deposit Box and Everything Inside It. Two Months Later, They’re Still Waiting for It To Be Returned. – Reason

Citing privacy concerns, Huntsville wont explain why convicted officer is still employed – AL.com

Posted: at 3:24 pm

The city of Huntsville isnt explaining why it hasnt rescheduled a disciplinary hearing for the police officer convicted of murder more than three weeks ago.

To somebody who is familiar with the citys process its really astounding, said Eric Artrip, a Huntsville attorney who has more than a decade of experience representing city employees in disciplinary hearings.

Ive never seen a city employee afforded the opportunity to remain on the payroll and ride it out using their accrued leave, he said. That just hasnt happened in my experience.

Will Culver, who was a Huntsville city councilman for 12 years, said the city could have avoided this predicament if it had either fired Darby or put him on leave without pay after he was indicted. If Darby was acquitted at trial, Culver said, the city could have reinstated him and given him back pay.

If it had been an officer that the chief of police wanted to terminate who had been in a situation like that or who was not in good graces with the mayor, said Culver, that never would have happened like that.

He would have been terminated before he was indicted, if you want to know the truth, he said, because they wouldnt want to have that on the citys roll as one of their own indicted. They went above and beyond to protect this officer.

In a statement released almost two weeks after Officer William Ben Darbys conviction, the city said it had scheduled and then later indefinitely postponed a disciplinary hearing to consider whether to fire Darby.

The city said it canceled the hearing because Darby availed himself to certain rights under federal law and changed his status from leave with pay to accrued pay.

As a result, his formal hearing has been postponed and will be promptly rescheduled to a later date following a change in his leave status, the city said in the statement.

City Attorney Trey Riley in an interview with AL.com last week declined to cite which laws the city took into account when it indefinitely postponed Darbys disciplinary hearing. Riley said that identifying which laws are involved could be a violation of Darbys privacy.

Under federal law, attorneys told AL.com, Darby could be entitled to postponement of his hearing if he is on medical or sick leave.

Riley declined to comment further on Darbys leave status, but said Darby is not on vacation.

We are treating Mr. Darby the same as we would a similarly situated city employee, Riley told AL.com.

But some attorneys and employment law experts question whether Darby is getting preferential treatment from city officials who have defended him since he shot and killed Jeff Parker three years ago.

Its just a very curious result, given the facts of this particular case, said Artrip. Far less serious infractions have resulted in termination within days, without a look at accrued leave.

Attorneys representing Darby in his employment case declined to comment and referred all questions to the city attorneys office.

The city has faced criticism including from two former federal prosecutors for keeping Darby employed after his conviction.

This situation in Huntsville, Alabama, where an officer convicted of the murder of a suicidal man who called for help, is still employed by the PD is badly wrong, Joyce White Vance, a former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama wrote on Twitter. It will take a public spotlight to fix it, apparently a conviction wasnt enough.

Jay Town, Vances successor, also weighed in on Twitter.

Riley told AL.com the city did not pursue a disciplinary hearing after Darby was indicted because calling him to testify in the hearing would have violated his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent about the pending murder charge.

Peter Joffrion was the city attorney in Huntsville for 30 years until he retired in 2015. He explained how the disciplinary hearing process works.

At a disciplinary hearing, both the city and the employee can present arguments and witnesses to a hearing officer. Joffrion said the city has a roster of local attorneys who agree to serve as hearing officers.

The hearing officer decides the facts and sends a report to the employees department head. The department head in Darbys case thats police Chief Mark McMurray decides whether punishment is appropriate and what the punishment should be.

If the employee is fired, the city would have to pay them for their accrued benefits, like vacation days.

In Darbys disciplinary hearing, the city will have to show evidence proving he was convicted of a felony murder and stripped of his law enforcement certification.

The city hasnt yet rescheduled a disciplinary hearing.

Darby was found guilty of murder on May 7. Another officer testified against Darby, saying that she was trying to de-escalate the situation with Parker, a man who wanted to kill himself, before Darby showed up and killed him.

Mayor Tommy Battle and Chief McMurray have continued to support Darby, saying they disagreed with the jurys decision.

Meanwhile, Darby awaits sentencing for his murder conviction on Aug. 20 in Madison County Circuit Judge Donna Pates courtroom.

See the article here:
Citing privacy concerns, Huntsville wont explain why convicted officer is still employed - AL.com

Posted in Fifth Amendment | Comments Off on Citing privacy concerns, Huntsville wont explain why convicted officer is still employed – AL.com

Letter to the Editor: Second Amendment and Big Government – San Clemente Times

Posted: at 3:23 pm

SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISMThe article youre about to read is from our reporters doing their important work investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers businesses have been impacted. Thats why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insiders program here. Thank you.

JOIN NOW

JERRY DAVIS, San Clemente

The self-righteousand blatantly incorrect notions of those whothinkgovernment is intruding into our lives are laden with hypocrisyand little truth.

Lets start with guns. The NRA is hardly a credible source to quote. It is now bankrupt thanks to financial corruption by its leaders. Eighty percent of Americans when polled said they want sensible guncontrol,including background checks.

What are the laws recently passed to get rid of guns? None. In fact, many states, and most recently Texas, are set to pass laws allowing open carry without a permit.

Totalitarianism coming to our country due to gun regulation? That might come as a surprise to our EU allies, Australiaand Japan, all of which have strict gun regulation.

As for God and our Founding Fathers, many of our Founding Fathers were heavily influenced by deism. Deists valued reason over religious dogma. They believed in a higher power but not necessarily a supernatural deity.

They must have felt strongly enough about this that they included separation of church and state in the Constitution. The Founding Fathers may be spinning in their graves at the thought that God created this nation.

On the topic of government intrusion, there seems to be little concern about too much government when politicians try to pass laws to prevent people from loving and marrying whomever they choose, or telling women that they do not have the right to make their own decisions about their well-being. They have no problem eliminating anti-discrimination laws, or with laws making it harder to vote.

The hypocrisy is stunning.

Rather than quoting scripture and denying historical facts, or inventing divisive issues based on fear, our leaders might better serve us by focusing on realproblems based on accurate and historical facts.

Finally, resorting to name-calling and labeling using loaded language like Marxism and socialism are tactics used by those who are without ideas.

Related

BECOME AN INSIDER TODAYTrustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

CONTRIBUTE NOW

See the rest here:
Letter to the Editor: Second Amendment and Big Government - San Clemente Times

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Letter to the Editor: Second Amendment and Big Government – San Clemente Times

Letter to the Editor: Second Amendment Knoblock Letter – San Clemente Times

Posted: at 3:23 pm

SUPPORT THIS INDEPENDENT JOURNALISMThe article youre about to read is from our reporters doing their important work investigating, researching, and writing their stories. We want to provide informative and inspirational stories that connect you to the people, issues and opportunities within our community. Journalism requires lots of resources. Today, our business model has been interrupted by the pandemic; the vast majority of our advertisers businesses have been impacted. Thats why the SC Times is now turning to you for financial support. Learn more about our new Insiders program here. Thank you.

JOIN NOW

I knew it wouldnt be long before the other stalwart of the Guns, God, Gold, Greed, Gerrymandering and Gullible electorate political party would surface, and he didnt disappoint.

We are faced with an inane Second Amendment Sanctuary motion, and now the pivot to God. While reading his letter, I thought, for a moment, that I was at an evangelical revival session, when, in reality, it was just another letter with rather loose facts and strong religious bias.

He has about as good a grasp of history and facts as his close sidekick, Gene James. God did not establish this nationour Founding Fathers did. God will not protect us, not even from ourselves.

The stability of this country certainly does not stem from your Almighty God. In my opinion, church and state must be forever separateread a little history, if you will, and perhaps enlightenment will ensue.

Prayer in public schools is unnecessary and undesirable. Pray at home, in private, or at your church.

Mr. Knoblock alleges that our children and military are being indoctrinated with Marxism and socialism. Again, he has no facts to support that absurd claim. I do believe students need to be educated in those philosophies, so they can understand how capitalism differs.

Then, he launches into legalized abortion, equating that with murder, and makes other spurious statements. Given the makeup of the current Supreme Court, there is a good chance that Roe v. Wade will be rescinded or significantly modified.

As an older physician, I well remember the horror stories from my mentors about back-alley and illegal abortionthe sickness, infertility and death toll was large. This is the place to which the conservatives want us to return.

Mr. Knoblock, when you write another letter, please get your facts straight. Second, please spare us all your Bible-thumping; keep it private in your Bible class or in your church.

You may repent all you wish, but I certainly wont be joining you. I, among perhaps many others, dont appreciate all your religious pontificating.

Related

BECOME AN INSIDER TODAYTrustworthy, accurate and reliable local news stories are more important now than ever. Support our newsroom by making a contribution and becoming a subscribing member today.

CONTRIBUTE NOW

See the article here:
Letter to the Editor: Second Amendment Knoblock Letter - San Clemente Times

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Letter to the Editor: Second Amendment Knoblock Letter – San Clemente Times

LETTER: Time to amend the Second Amendment – Las Vegas Review-Journal

Posted: at 3:23 pm

"); var pScript = document.createElement("script"); pScript.type = 'text/javascript'; pScript.src = '//embed.sendtonews.com/player3/embedcode.js?fk=' + fkId + '&cid=5945&offsetx=0&offsety=0&floatwidth=400&floatposition=bottom-right'; pScript.async = true; pScript.setAttribute('data-type', 's2nScript'); //pScript['data-type'] = 's2nScript'; elem.append(pHtml); elem.append(pScript); }, insertVideoFuel: function(channelId) { var u = 'https://spreadsheets.google.com/feeds/list/1jVoUBFY2Xpt9g_eSOhoUipSA_OOh7hMbPDYAqYWx3nI/1/public/values?alt=json'; $.ajax({ type: 'GET', url: u, cache: true, dataType: 'json', success: function (response) { if ( typeof(response.feed) !== 'undefined' ) { var img_url = 'https://res.cloudinary.com/review-journal/image/upload/f_auto,q_auto,c_scale,w_1200/v1611081380/webdev/New7at7onGray.jpg'; //response.feed.entry[0]['gsx$imageurl']['$t']; var description = response.feed.entry[0]['gsx$description']['$t']; var elem = $('#stn-in-article-player'); var pHtml = $('',{'data-channel':channelId,'data-poster-image':img_url,'data-autoplay':'true','data-muted':'true','data-floating':'true'}); var click_url = '/7at7/?utm_campaign=7at7&utm_medium=insert_widget&utm_source=article_page'; var f_title = $('',{'class':'f-title'}).append( $('',{'href':click_url, 'alt':'7at7'}).append( $('',{'html':'Watch '}) ).append( $('',{'alt':'logo-7at7','src':'https://res.cloudinary.com/review-journal/image/upload/f_auto,q_auto,c_scale,w_50/v1611100661/webdev/seven2.png'}) ).append( $('',{'html':' now streaming'}) ) ); var f_desc = $('',{'class':'f-desc','html':description}) var pScript = document.createElement("script"); pScript.type = 'text/javascript'; pScript.src = 'https://fuel-streaming-prod01.fuelmedia.io/player/1.0/player.min.js'; pScript.async = true; pScript.setAttribute('id', 'fuel-player-script'); elem.addClass('rj-fuel-77'); elem.append(pHtml); elem.append(f_title); elem.append(f_desc); elem.append(pScript); } }, error: function (xhr, ajaxOptions, thrownError) { console.log('rj_xhr.status:' + xhr.status + '_error:' + thrownError); } }); }, videoIDs: { 'category-local': {'id': '7395798e-4c30-417b-8b1a-b3d7bad8ff98', 'provider':'fuel'}, 'tag-coronavirus': {'id': 'u37v495p'}, 'category-politics-and-government': {'id': 'kqRvD0a8'}, 'tag-mc-opinion': {'id': 'kqRvD0a8'}, 'tag-mc-crime': {'id': 'kqRvD0a8'}, 'tag-2020-election': {'id': 'kqRvD0a8'}, 'rj-main-category--science-and-technology': {'id': 'j88hQyle'}, 'tag-mc-news': {'id': 'pCyFtg5f'}, 'tag-mc-business': {'id': '31shkzyP'}, 'rj-main-category--raiders': {'id': 'bpswZwKM'}, 'tag-mc-sports': {'id': 'dbx2WkwF'}, 'rj-main-category--food': {'id': '3DQjoZb7'}, 'tag-mc-entertainment': {'id': 'YBuF2XdP'}, 'tag-mc-life': {'id': 'aaWqdJ5u'}, 'tag-mc-autos': {'id': 'kag2nBSV'}, 'tag-mc-homes': {'id': 'HPa6ehMQ'} }, getVideoId: function() { //var fkId = false, var vdo_k = false; for (var checkClass in stnInArticleVideo.videoIDs) { if (stnInArticleVideo.wrapper.hasClass(checkClass)) { //fkId = videoIDs[checkClass].id; vdo_k = checkClass; break; } } return vdo_k; //fkId; }, run: function() { stnInArticleVideo.wrapper = $('article.rj-story.rj-story-full'); if (stnInArticleVideo.wrapper && stnInArticleVideo.canInsertVideo()) { var vdo_k = stnInArticleVideo.getVideoId(); if (vdo_k) { if (stnInArticleVideo.videoIDs[vdo_k].hasOwnProperty('provider') && stnInArticleVideo.videoIDs[vdo_k].provider == 'fuel') { stnInArticleVideo.insertVideoFuel(stnInArticleVideo.videoIDs[vdo_k].id); } else { stnInArticleVideo.insertVideo(stnInArticleVideo.videoIDs[vdo_k].id); } } } } }; stnInArticleVideo.run(); });})(jQuery);

Go here to read the rest:
LETTER: Time to amend the Second Amendment - Las Vegas Review-Journal

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on LETTER: Time to amend the Second Amendment – Las Vegas Review-Journal

No ‘howevers’ or ‘buts’ with Second Amendment | News, Sports, Jobs – Alpena News

Posted: at 3:22 pm

The Friday, May 14 issue of The Alpena News contained a guest editorial by Jeffrey Brasie titled, On Americas Second Amendment.

Brasie states in the middle of the article I personally support the Second Amendment and the very next word he writes is However. You either support the 2A or you dont, no however or but.

The 2A was included in the Bill of Rights by our Founders specifically so that if faced with a tyrannical government or an outside threat the citizens could rise up and protect their freedom. There is no mention of hunting or sports use. The 2A states the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Check your copy of the Constitution and see how many times and how the word People is specifically used. The militia when the Constitution was written was every able-bodied citizen. Well-regulated meant that the citizens were supposed to supply themselves with adequate arms and supplies and be able to defend themselves and country. The citizens of that day owed arms equal to or better than many of the militaries of the time. It takes a lot of twisting to ignore the words shall not be infringed written in the 2A.

If you support what actions are being taken now to make the 2A an orphan Amendment as Justice Clarence Thomas calls it, lets look at voting. What ruckus would be raised if you were required to undergo a background check to vote; if you were required to attend and pass an educational program to vote; if you were required to undergo a mental examination to verify your fitness to vote; if your right to vote could be canceled simply on the word of a relative, neighbor, or acquaintance saying you werent fit to vote?

MIKE LOEW,

Rogers City

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

Read more from the original source:
No 'howevers' or 'buts' with Second Amendment | News, Sports, Jobs - Alpena News

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on No ‘howevers’ or ‘buts’ with Second Amendment | News, Sports, Jobs – Alpena News

SCOTUS asked to take up State v. Weber, Ohio case with Second Amendment implications – Buckeye Firearms Association

Posted: at 3:22 pm

A man whose conviction for holding an unloaded shotgun in his home while drunk was upheld by the Ohio Supreme Court is taking his case to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS).

The case is State v. Weber, which as has been noted on our site, "involves a situation where despite the defendants wife telling police there was no longer a problem, they pressed their way in. There they found her admittedly inebriated but nonthreatening husband who, while he did have a shotgun, told police it was not loaded, which they proved for themselves."

Weber was charged with violating R.C. 2923.15(A), which states: No person, while under the influence of alcohol or drugs of abuse, shall carry or use any firearm or dangerous ordnance.

After a bench trial, Weber was found guilty and sentenced to 10 days in jail with all 10 days suspended. He also was placed on community control for one year, ordered to complete eight hours of community service, and fined $100.

When the Twelfth District Court of Appeals court upheld his conviction, it ruled as follows:

Furthermore, R.C.2923.15 does not, as suggested by appellant, criminalize the mere presence of a firearm in the home of an intoxicated person. Nor does the statute, as suggested by appellant, prohibit a person from carrying or using a firearm after consuming alcoholic beverages. Rather, the statute only prohibits the use or carrying of a firearm by a person who has imbibed to the point of intoxication.

Mr. Weber appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court, and that body narrowly ruled against him as well.

In a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Sharon L. Kennedy and Judith L. French, Justice Patrick F. Fischer write that courts have been divided about the proper way to test the constitutionality of firearm laws since the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark District of Columbia v. Heller decision in 2008. He observed the Weber decision follows an interest-balancing test created by federal courts. He suggested Ohio adopt another approach that focuses on the text, history, and tradition of the Second Amendment to see if the challenged law or rule is consistent with the scope of the right as originally understood.

Justice Fischer also noted that state and federal courts would benefit from more clarity from SCOTUS on how to evaluate challenges to laws claiming to violate the Second Amendment. He wrote that instead of using the convoluted two-step approach, the Court should follow the Heller and McDonald decisions and look at the text, history, and tradition of the Second Amendment.

Justice Patrick DeWine concurred in the majority opinion, but also argued separately that the majority's analysis was not protective of Second Amendment rights because it "improperly applied an 'interest balancing' test rather than evaluate the challenged restriction based upon the original understanding of the Second Amendment," according to the court.

If Weber's petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court is granted, those calling for SCOTUS to provide clarity may get their wish. Weber is asking the court to determine the proper standard of constitutional review of a law that impacts the core value of the Second Amendment.

"The disagreement in the Ohio Supreme Court is emblematic of the confusion gripping the nation's lower courts," he wrote. "But confusion is not the only problem. The outcome of a wrongfully applied standard can significantly dilute the core protection of the Second Amendment."

As firearms rights advocate David Codrea wrote when covering this case for AmmoLand.com:

The point of intoxication, as defined by Ohios OVI laws is a Blood Alcohol Content of 0.08, or 0.02 if under 21. Significantly, a citizen old enough to serve in the military can reach that level after only one drink. And its fair to ask how many of us, especially with the holidays approaching, will be inclined to consume several adult beverages over the course of a family gathering. What if youre carrying, and not all blurry-eyed and speech-slurring like the hapless Mr. Weber was reported to be, but just right there at the legal limit for driving? Where is the compelling state interest to define that as the limit point?

...

"Still, this isnt a popular case for most 'gun rights' lobbying groups to make a big noise defendingwho wants to endure the optics of arguing guns for drunks? Regardless, the fact remains that there are already ways to deal with people who brandish, and who attack others with weapons. This isnt about public safety, its about another inroad to citizen disarmament. As for people who have proven they cant or wont control themselves, taking their tools but leaving them able to harm others is never the solution."

Chad D. Baus served as Buckeye Firearms Association Secretary from 2013-2019. He is co-founder of BFA-PAC, and served as its Vice Chairman for 15 years. He is the editor of BuckeyeFirearms.org, which received the Outdoor Writers of Ohio 2013 Supporting Member Award for Best Website, and is also an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

Related Articles:

Does Ohio Supreme Court ruling threaten right to bear arms in own home?

Gun and Alcohol Case Could Put Citizens at Risk in Their Own Homes

Link:
SCOTUS asked to take up State v. Weber, Ohio case with Second Amendment implications - Buckeye Firearms Association

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on SCOTUS asked to take up State v. Weber, Ohio case with Second Amendment implications – Buckeye Firearms Association

Stephen Tobolowsky has a Talmud story to tell you – Forward

Posted: at 3:22 pm

For over a decade Stephen Tobolowsky has been sharing stories. Have you heard the one about his Talmud collection?

The 70-year-old actor, known for his turns as a folksy insurance salesman in Groundhog Day and a hapless tech sociopath in Silicon Valley, has written two books, hosts a podcast and is now debuting an audio play chronicling his friendship with a Holocaust survivor and his own journey of grief. Produced by LA Theatre Works, its called A Good Day at Auschwitz, and is in fact unsparing when it comes to the many, many bad days. The show is just one part of a late onset spiritual development in a life whose arc he likens to the Five Books of Moses. In explaining it, he started with his own origins, or Genesis.

Photo by David Carlson

Stephen Tobolowsky

Tobolowsky grew up in the Oak Cliff neighborhood of Dallas. His grandfather was one of the founders of the citys Orthodox Congregation Tiferit Israel. But his religious observance didnt match that pedigree.

We werent even really Reform, Tobolowsky tells me from his home in Los Angeles. There were members of the Nazi party I mean the people who paid the dues, who took Stormtrooper magazine, who had a bust of Adolf Hitler in their den and German flags. There were more people like that in my community than there were Jews.

His parents were very wary of antisemitism, and so they kept a low profile when it came to outward shows of faith. When Tobolowsky moved to LA, he promised his mother hed go to shul. It wasnt until the 90s when he really made good on the promise what he calls a Leviticus moment of midcourse direction, urged on by fellow actor Larry Miller. Tobolowsky started learning from a rabbi operating out of a house in Studio City, studying the Torah scrolls letters on the bimah on days when there wasnt a minyan.

In 2007, catastrophe struck. Tobolowskys mother died and saying Kaddish became his daily ritual at Adat Ari El in North Hollywood. One morning an 80-something-year-old guy shuffled up to him. He guessed Tobolowsky was there for his mother just from the way he said Kaddish. That encounter grew to a years-long friendship between Tobolowsky and the man, Abe Sarna, who survived three years in Auschwitz and regularly plied Tobolowsky with early morning shots of Canadian Club and stories. The stories were often bawdy, sometimes chilling with their insight into human cruelty and surprising in their demonstrations of kindness in the midst of wholesale murder.

Photo by Stephen Tobolowsky

Abe Sarna was a regular at morning minyan and a killer card player who loved schnapps.

A Good Day at Auschwitz, which had a previous life on two episodes of Tobolowskys podcast and chapters in his 2017 book on faith, Adventures with God, follows Sarnas remembrances of the death camp and his youth in a small town in Poland. But while Sarnas life is remarkable and hes wonderfully rendered by veteran actor Alan Mandell casual fans of Tobolowsky might be struck by just how Jewish the play is. In it, the actor-writer, who portrays himself, unpacks the meaning of the word tzedakah and cites Barry Holtz of the Jewish Theological Seminary. When he came on my Zoom screen it all clicked.

Framed by huge, voiceover-grade headphones and a tad obscured by the windscreen of his microphone (a high mediocre audio setup), Tobolowsky was also backed by books. Dark-spined books that I suspected, and later confirmed, were books of Talmud and Midrash and chumashim. He started reading Talmud around 2008, after falling off a horse in a strong gust of wind near an active volcano in Iceland, causing what was referred to, quite ludicrously, by a doctor as a fatal injury, a neck broken in five places.

With his trademark zeal, propelled by gasps over the wonder of the box of jewels that is his heritage, he pulled out a volume of the Commentators Bible (the Readers Digest of Wisdom). Right now he loves an exegesis of Nachmanides on the first word in Exodus.

Its mind boggling, the inner stories of stories, Tobolowsky said, but you know, you wouldnt know it without a scorecard.

At times, it was hard to keep up with Tobolowskys own stories. Hed circle back and wonder how he got from point A to B, but seemed very excited to be picking up a Jewish theme. He loved telling me about his recently wrapped film, Stay@Home, a comedy by director and pop punk idol L.E. Staiman, who is Orthodox. Tobolowsky marveled at how the devout production staff started smoking doobies around lunchtime and kept a rare Shabbat-observant set.

That story of shomer production and kosher weed quickly careened into one in which Tobolowsky spoke of pulling a reverse Sandy Koufax, working on Yom Kippur to finish a complicated season finale of the rebooted One Day at a Time, a beloved sitcom that was regularly under threat of being cancelled. When he decided to come in to shoot, Norman Lear hugged him and they traded tales of Yom Kippurs past.

With Sarna, Tobolowsky was in the position of chronicler, taking notes as his drinking and poker buddy held forth about his the ghetto, the judenrat, the bastards who killed because they could and the unexpected love he found in the camp. For once Tobolowsky wasnt the biggest character in the room. In fact, for a time in their acquaintance he couldnt even speak due to a vocal cord injury that required surgery.

He loved it when I couldnt talk, Tobolowsky said. Then he had the full stage.

Photo by Ann Hearn Tobolowsky

Alan Mandell and Stephen Tobolowskyat the first (pre-pandemic) reading forA Good Day at Auschwitz.

Tobolowsky, referring to the Five Book-structure of our lives, locates Abes experience in the Book of Numbers, with love and loss. But in sharing it with the world, hes doing the work of Deuteronomy, sharing the story with the next generation and an act of remembrance.

While recording the play had its challenges he and Mandell werent even in the same room for audio considerations, not COVID ones collecting memories from Sarna was easy. Yet the ending only came to Tobolowsky after Sarna passed away in 2010.

During one of their first lunches together, Abe told a story about a tallis two men found in the woods and each argued over who should keep it based on who gave more money to the shul or who studied more Torah. He asked Tobolowsky if he knew who got it, not knowing it himself.

Over a year later, Tobolowsky would learn that Sarna first heard this story in cheder the day the Nazis invaded. His teacher rushed out and they never finished the lesson.

One day Tobolowksy found this exact story in the Talmud. He had his answer and his ending. And all of it came out of chance.

It is amazing, he said. And accidental! If it hadnt been for catastrophe, it wouldnt have happened.

More:

Stephen Tobolowsky has a Talmud story to tell you - Forward

Posted in Talmud | Comments Off on Stephen Tobolowsky has a Talmud story to tell you – Forward

Joe Manchins filibuster-sized Talmudic trolley problem and ours – Forward

Posted: at 3:22 pm

Last week, the GOP may have filibustered the future of American democracy. Senate Republicans used this parliamentary tactic to prevent the creation of an independent commission to investigate the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection. When the vote fell short of 60 the threshold needed to pass the measure the Democratic senator from West Virginia, Joe Manchin, told reporters he was very, very disappointed, very frustrated that politics has trumped literally and figuratively the good of the country.

But the vote did not trump Manchins adamant opposition to eliminating the practice of the filibuster. Im not willing to destroy our government, he declared in the same briefing with reporters. Q.E.D. Even extra-terrestrials now know that as Manchin goes, so goes the filibusters fate: In the evenly split Senate, this conservative Democrats vote is, in effect, the only vote that counts.

Inevitably, Manchins stance has caused lots of teeth gnashing among most anyone who cares about our nations fate. Unfortunately, it has caused little reflection over the legitimacy of Manchins reasons. A thought experiment might help. What if we were to imagine ourselves not in a nation hurtling towards disaster but instead on a trolley car hurtling towards a group of rail workers? Or, for that matter, standing between a group of people and an arrow hurtling towards them?

Thanks to the recent television series The Good Place, which managed to make viewers both chuckle over and chew on serious philosophical questions, trolleyology has become something of a thing. The term refers to an ethical dilemma posed by the philosopher Philippa Foot a half-century ago: You are standing near a track-changing lever when you see a runaway trolley car barreling towards five rail workers. By pulling the lever, you can divert the trolley to another track. But wait there, too, is a rail worker.

What do you do?

With great concision, Foot thus staged the clash between the consequential and deontological schools of moral philosophy. The former, which often goes by the name of utilitarianism, seeks the greatest good or happiness for the greatest number of people. The latter, on the other hand, insists that certain laws or rules must never be broken, even if this means the greatest number will get snookered or have their lives snuffed out.

Foot was the first to propose trolleys, but not the first to pose the moral dilemma. Stretching back as far as antiquity, various biblical passages, from Leviticus to Samuel, riff on the problem. More recently, the 20th century Talmudic scholar Avrohom Yeshaya Karelitz, known by the same name as his principal work, the Hazon Ish, explored the dilemma. In a work that predates Foots article, Hazon Ish offered the arrow dilemma, where a bystander sees an arrow speeding towards a large group of people. He can deflect it from its course only by redirecting it towards a smaller group.

While the arrow, unless shot by Hawkeye, could not pierce more than one bystander, we nevertheless find ourselves in the same spot as with the trolley: left with only bad choices. What strikes me as crucial is that both halakhic commentaries and philosophical arguments tend to come down squarely on both sides of the question. Take the Hazon Ish, who recognizes the power of the consequential claim We have to try to reduce the loss of Jewish life as much as possible while acknowledging the deontological primacy of the biblical command not to kill. At the end of the day, there is no endpoint to his commentary. It cuts both ways.

Similarly, moral philosophers have debated the trolley problem, along with its many fiendish variations, for the past half-century without reaching an endpoint. In fact, it has meant more than one philosopher reaching for their gun. When David Edmonds, author of Would You Kill the Fat Man: The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us About Right and Wrong, approached one famous ethicist with the problem, the latter growled: Sorry, I just dont do trolleys.

When it comes to the future of American democracy, though, we have no choice but to do trolleys or arrows. This applies to both consequentialists and deontologists. The first camp, which dominates the progressive wing of the Democratic Party, is eager to divert the careening trolley away from the many towards the single worker or, in this case, single rule. If the filibuster stands between efforts to repair the climate, strengthen voting rights and broaden Obamacare, it stands to reason to run it over. As New York Times columnist Ezra Klein notes, the fate of the filibuster looms over every other decision facing the Biden Administration.

Yet the deontologists those who insist on the sanctity of this institutional commandment are no less categorical. Their warning, in effect, is Thou shall not nuke this rule. It is, argues USA Today columnist James Robbins, the last vestige of doing the peoples business that was rooted in the norm of compromise. Once it is kaput, so too will be our political system.

At the end of the day, night always follows. But the difficulties posed by the darkness depend on how well we prepare for it. In the case of the filibuster, as in the case of the trolley, there is no single and right answer. It may well be that our democratic future balances on how closely we attend to and acknowledge the legitimacy of one anothers arguments.

Robert Zaretsky teaches at the University of Houston. His latest book is The Subversive Simone Weil: A Life in Five Ideas. He is a contributing culture columnist at the Forward.

See the original post here:

Joe Manchins filibuster-sized Talmudic trolley problem and ours - Forward

Posted in Talmud | Comments Off on Joe Manchins filibuster-sized Talmudic trolley problem and ours – Forward

The ancient magical amulet used to repel the evil eye was rediscovered 40 years later. – Eminetra

Posted: at 3:22 pm

A bronze amulet engraved with the name of God and a magical symbol that protects you from demons and curses. Malicious eyesWas handed over to authorities after being excavated in the north Israel 40 years ago.

The amulets that were once worn on necklaces are believed to date back about 1,500 years. Byzantine era, According to the Israeli Antiquities Agency (IAA). At that time, the area was governed by the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantine Empire was also called the Byzantine Empire after Byzantium. This was the name of the city at the time (by that time Byzantium was renamed Constantinople and is now Istanbul).

The amulets are engraved with Greek letters, which spell out the name of the Jewish god IAW , in the English alphabet Yahweh.

Archaeologists have discovered a bronze amulet about 3 inches (8 cm) long and 1.5 inches (4 cm) wide near the ancient Jewish synagogue in Abel, just west of the Sea of Galilee. According to IAA archaeologist Eitan Klein, the location and inscription suggest that the amulet may have been worn by Jews, despite its religious origin.

Relation: 30 of the worlds most precious treasures that are still missing

Scholars generally identify wearers of such amulets as Christians and Gnostics, but the fact that amulets were found in Jewish settlements, including synagogues, in the 5th and 6th centuries AD. Is [A.D.] Even the Jews of the time may have shown that they wore this type of amulet to protect themselves from the evil eye and the devil. Said in a statement..

This type of amulet was relatively common in the Galilee region at the time and in what is now Lebanon. They are sometimes known as a form of Solomons Mark named after the legendary King of Israel. On one side, a horse riding a sprinting horse is depicted, its head surrounded by a halo, and a spear piercing the figure of a woman lying on her back. The Greek inscription on the jockeys head says the only god to conquer evil, and the Greek letter IAW is engraved under the horses legs.

On the other side, an arrow-pierced eye and a bifurcated object are drawn. The eyes appear to be threatened by the appearance of two lions, one snake underneath, one scorpion, and one bird, above which the Greek letter meaning the only god The abbreviation is engraved.

Amulets may have been produced in the area to protect themselves from the magical curse known as the devil and the evil eye. This belief was retained in the ancient world at least until the 6th century BC. According to this belief, some sorcerers can level the curse with a malicious gaze, although the recipient may suffer injuries or misfortunes.

The rider is depicted as overcoming evil spirits. In this case, [Greek] The mythical figure Gello or Gillow, who threatens women and children and is associated with the evil eye, said Klein. The back eye is being attacked and defeated by various means. Identifiable. Therefore, the guard may have been used to protect the body from the evil eye, perhaps to protect women and children.

This amulet was discovered in the ancient Jewish settlement of Alber about 40 years ago by a founding member of nearby Moshav, a type of community farming community founded by Israeli pioneers in the 1920s.

The family of the discoverer, who is now dead, recently handed over the amulet to the Israeli Antiquities Department, and Klein advised people with similar treasures to do the same.

This amulet is believed to date back to the end of the Talmud era in Jewish history, formalizing traditional Jewish theology and law into a collection of works known as the Talmud. Klein said the Alber synagogue is often mentioned in historical sources from the Talmud era. There was a linen manufacturing industry, where many Jewish sages visited and taught.

Initially published in Live Science.

The ancient magical amulet used to repel the evil eye was rediscovered 40 years later.

Source link The ancient magical amulet used to repel the evil eye was rediscovered 40 years later.

Here is the original post:

The ancient magical amulet used to repel the evil eye was rediscovered 40 years later. - Eminetra

Posted in Talmud | Comments Off on The ancient magical amulet used to repel the evil eye was rediscovered 40 years later. – Eminetra