Daily Archives: May 31, 2021

Starlink snag forces users to build idiotic contraptions to access Elon Musks space internet – The Independent

Posted: May 31, 2021 at 2:30 am

Elon Musks Starlink space internet is running into an unusual adversary: trees.

The SpaceX satellite internet service entered beta testing in June 2020 for areas in high latitudes such as Seattle, but some users have been experiencing issues.

We want to get Starlink but the sky above our house is almost completely covered with trees over 40 feet tall, one user posted on the r/Starlink subreddit. Is it possible to get Starlink to work in our area or are we just out of luck?

Another expressed similar issues, asking for advice about using mounts to get the Starlink antenna six to 10 feet higher to get signal above the nearby trees, but potential masts don't seem to appear to accommodate the dish. One beta tester managed to get above the trees via a tripod mounted to the top of their roof, something that they described as an idiotic contraption.

In order to set up a Starlink internet connection users require a 439 satellite dish and pay an 84 monthly fee, but also need a direct line of sight between the dish and the satellite, as well as a 100-degree cone with a 25 degree elevation minimum around the centre of the dish.

This means that trees, neighbouring buildings, and other obstacles provide a severe challenge - with one user installing his dish nearly five meters above his chimney.

If you could see the connection between a Starlink satellite and your Starlink, it would look like a single beam between the two objects. As the satellite moves, the beam also moves. The area within which this beam moves is the field of view, the Starlink website explains.

Some obstructions are worse than others. Obstructions low in the sky will cause more outages because satellites are in this area of the sky more frequently. The best guidance we can give is to install your Starlink at the highest elevation possible where it is safe to do so, with a clear view of the sky. Starlink also notes that a single tree can interrupt users service.

(SpaceX)

As early reviews have pointed out, Starlink provides an app to help users check for obstructions but the phone needs to be at knee height to operate counter to the high altitude that will actually get users the best service from the internet service. SpaceX did not respond to a request for comment from The Independent before time of publication.

Starlink, a service which remains in beta and is set to improve with the launch of more satellites, is not designed for urban environments due to interference from buildings; but in rural areas trees are likely to remain a bigger problem, Mark Jackson, the editor in chief of UK internet service provider website ISPreview, told The Independent.

Some people may be able to get around that by professionally mounting the dish higher up on their roof, although there have also been some questions about the kit's durability in high winds if you mount it high up, then you might need to take it down for a storm [which is] not ideal or safe.

Only time will tell whether they can truly resolve all of these issues, but they do stand a good chance of being able to overcome them. A bigger challenge will be in making the whole thing profitable, while also trying not to completely wreck observational science (astronomy) in the process.

Starlink satellites currently in orbit have disrupted astronomical observationsical

(Victoria Girgis/Lowell Observatory)

However for many users especially those in the United States Starlink will still be a compelling alternative over traditional internet providers due to long-running issues with service and competition.

Phone companies originally used existing wires to provide internet service, and were required by law to lease wires to competitors; but in 1996, the Telecommunications Act made it easier for cable companies to consolidate, and in 2005 that leasing requirement was removed. This meant that they were basically trading off areas so they wouldn't compete, according to University of Virginia media studies professor Christopher Ali.

Alongside policy issues, there are population problems with the internet experience in the United States.

I wouldn't characterise US internet as bad so much as I would characterise it as inconsistent, said Jamie Steven, Chief Innovation Officer at Speedtest creator Ookla. And while cities and populated areas have great access, this is lacking in rural and remote areas.

Astronomers-Satellite Pollution

(AP)

The USs lower population density is a big reason, especially in the West. It can be very expensive to run fiber optic networks for communities with only a few hundred residents. New satellite options such as Starlink provide a desirable alternative to the aging copper-based connectivity (DSL & cable) in those communities, Steven told The Independent.

Im a Starlink beta customer and live in a heavily wooded rural area. Ive had some minor problems with obstructions from the very tall trees in my yard, but overall the service is a significant and welcome improvement over the unreliable DSL service I had previously.

The rest is here:

Starlink snag forces users to build idiotic contraptions to access Elon Musks space internet - The Independent

Posted in Elon Musk | Comments Off on Starlink snag forces users to build idiotic contraptions to access Elon Musks space internet – The Independent

The Difference Between Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism

Posted: at 2:28 am

I recently wrote a well-received piece about the political positions of the Intellectual Dark Web (IDW), and a ferocious discussion erupted in the comments regarding Dave Rubins political philosophy.

To a modern liberal, Libertarian basically means someone who cares only about themselves.

Rubin calls himself a Classical Liberal, but it turns out that people on Twitter and Reddit arent sure exactly what that means. Rubin himself says hes undergone a Conservative Transformation lately, leading many liberals to claim hes simply become a Libertarian. Meanwhile, Libertarians are saying those are completely different things.

I was confused myself.

A cursory look at the definitions of Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism had them looking nearly identical. So I decided to do a deep dive on the differences. Heres what I found, combined with my analysis of the situation.

Classical liberalism is the philosophy of political liberty from the perspective of a vast history of thought. Libertarianism is the philosophy of liberty from the perspective of its modern revival from the late sixties-early seventies on.

Mario Rizzo

Over the last week or so I watched a ton of Dave Rubin videos, and what I found will likely upset readers both on the left and the right.

First, I dont think Rubin is being academically or politically accurate in branding himself as a Classical Liberal. And from what Ive seen, he isnt actually claiming this.

Dave is a bit confused right now, but you probably would be too if you were gay, Jewish, previously liberal, and were currently going through a conservative awakening.

Hes not a Conservative in the common use of the word, and he doesnt want to use the term Libertarian because it has negative connotations. So I think hes reached back into history for a loftier-sounding synonym that doesnt make him feel as uncomfortable.

I make an argument here that the IDW is basically a collection of upset liberals looking for honest conversation.

Thats the part that will upset readers on the right. The part that will upset readers on the left is that Ive yet to find evidence of actual hatred or malice in his videos. Yes, he gives props to Trumpwho I cannot standand yes, hes all over the place on healthcare and climate change. But to me he is behaving exactly like a liberal with a severe case of PTSDnot like an evil or hateful person. I see him as good-natured and wrong, which is much different than someone like Rush Limbaugh or Trump.

Rubin is using Classical Liberalism because it gives liberals a tiny moment of confusion before they attack, but its really just new packaging for his individualand very fluidbrand of Libertarianism.

In short, Classical Liberalism is being used by some on the right today as a somewhat pseudo-intellectual way of claiming that their unwillingness to use taxation and government programs to help the ailing and unfortunate masses is somehow a superior policy because 1), the phrase is old, and 2) because the liber in Classical Liberalism (insert Kung-fu here) means freedom.

(eagle sound)

So its not that theyre selfish or uncaringits just that they value freedom from government more than they value helping people they dont know (and who should be helping themselves anyway).

But dont call them Libertarians. Theyre Classical Liberals.

(wink)

Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism came from different times, and had different catalysts. The former was removing the oppression of theocracies, monarchies, and the very notion of it being permissible for a small group to rule over the masses, while the latter is addressing the overreaches of imperialism, bureaucracy, and progressivism.

The similarity is that both are movements to reduce the influence of powerful, centralized authorities over individualswhich is why both of them have freedom- (liber) at their center.

The issue is that not all centralized authorities are equally good or bad. While it might be great to be free of the King of England, thats not the same as desiring to be free of taxes to pay for public health and education.

Both terms are colored by perspective and context. Gaining freedom from something implies that its bad, but that judgment depends on who you ask. For some, taxation is a path to an ideal society, and for others its legalized government oppression.

Rubin is attempting to borrow the righteousness of the term Classical Liberalism to fight modern battles. They dont agree with how tax money is being spent in modern, 21st-century societies, and instead of calling themselves Libertarians (which makes them sound selfish), they prefer to be Classical Liberals.

Its as if the term will somehow remove the stain of selfishness, and replace it with the heroism of musketeers opposing the British.

Link:
The Difference Between Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism

Posted in Libertarianism | Comments Off on The Difference Between Classical Liberalism and Libertarianism

Bubba Horwitz: Crypto Is The Currency Of The Libertarian And Free Markets The Daily Dive – The Deep Dive

Posted: at 2:28 am

For the final episode of The Daily Dive for the trading week, we sit down with Todd Bubba Horwitz of BubbaTrading.com. Bubba joins us this afternoon to discuss the latest in the crypto space including recent comments by Elon Musk and the current regulatory risk as well as the topics of hot commodities and recent action or inaction by the Fed.

The founder and chief strategist of BubbaTrading.com, Todd has spent nearly four decades in the financial industry. An original market maker in the OEX Trading Pit at the Chicago Board of Options Exchange, he comes highly experienced in the world of trading. Now, Bubba looks to provide mentorship and education to all levels of traders and investors by teaching them the ins and outs of professional trading.

You can catch more of Bubba atBubbaTrading.com, where he provides daily market content, as well as on Twitter,@Bubba_Tradingand YouTube,@The Bubba Show.

The author has no securities or affiliations related to any organization mentioned. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

As the founder of The Deep Dive, Jay is focused on all aspects of the firm. This includes operations, as well as acting as the primary writer for The Deep Dives stock analysis. In addition to The Deep Dive, Jay performs freelance writing for a number of firms and has been published on Stockhouse.com and CannaInvestor Magazine among others.

Read more here:
Bubba Horwitz: Crypto Is The Currency Of The Libertarian And Free Markets The Daily Dive - The Deep Dive

Posted in Libertarianism | Comments Off on Bubba Horwitz: Crypto Is The Currency Of The Libertarian And Free Markets The Daily Dive – The Deep Dive

What ‘The Enduring Tension’ Can Teach Us about the Core Institutions of Our Civilization | Richard Morrison – Foundation for Economic Education

Posted: at 2:28 am

Don Devines ambitious new volume is that rare published work that delivers an even larger and broader message than its title promises. A focus on the practice, history, and ethics of capitalism would itself be enough for several volumes, but Devines work is nothing less than a history of Western civilization, including the origins of human society, religion, and morality itself. Readers looking for a digestible survey of business ethics or a mere guide to socially responsible investing will quickly find themselves in over their heads.

As the titles tensionand the covers bold half-orange, half-silver designsuggests, we are in for a study of dichotomies, in which twin opposing visions struggle for dominance. Starting his narrative in ancient times, Devine describes the early cosmological societies, like ancient Egypt, Mesopotamia, and Persia, in which religious belief and civic life were seamlessly combined. These societies were challenged by the rise of Christianity, which emphasized the importance of individual belief and acknowledged the distinction, and occasional antagonism, between religious and civil authority.

The Reformation presents another great dichotomy of religious and political legitimacy. Martin Luther launched a revolution against the authority of the Roman Catholic Church, but did not attempt to turn his theology into a systematic anti-Catholic movement. As Devine writes, some of Luthers followers wanted to go further than he, including in endorsing radical social and religious changes that horrified Luther himself. By analogy, Luther is more like Americas Founding Fathers, while the Anabaptists, who wanted to abolish private property, were more like the Jacobins of the French Revolution.

More familiar to students of American political theory is the dichotomy to which Devine pays the most attentionthat between John Locke and Edmund Burke on one side and Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Voltaire on the other. Locke and Burke, and their intellectual offspring, believed in a practical approach to morality and politics that encompasses both reasoned analysis and a respect for tradition, while the Rousseauians insisted on a rigidly rational system in which any competing source of legitimacy, including religion and tradition, must be attacked and excluded.

With this philosophical dichotomy established, most of modern political history can be fitted into one or the other side of the aisle, however imperfectly. The Lockeans are mostly conservatives and centrists, while the rationalists are mostly socialists, progressives, fascists, and most contemporary leftists. This framing is not unique to Devines work, even in recent conservative writing. Thomas Sowells A Conflict of Visions (1987, 2007) and The Vision of the Anointed (1995) are informed by a similar philosophical dichotomy, which Sowell refers to as an antagonism between the Lockean constrained vision of politics and the Voltaire-ish unconstrained vision. (Ironically, Steven Pinker, whom Devine criticizes as a materialist intellectual who undervalues religious faith, described a version of Sowells constrained vs. unconstrained tensionas tragic vs. utopianin his own 2002 book, The Blank Slate.)

Devines impressive career is on full display, as he makes several references to his tenure leading the Office of Personnel Management under Ronald Reagan and the almost-half century anniversary of his Nixon-era analysis The Political Culture of the United States: The Influence of Member Values on Regime Maintenance (1972). Devine moves confidently between the original texts of early modern and Enlightenment figures like Locke, Montesquieu, and Burke, to more recent writers like Leo Strauss, Eric Voegelin, and Friedrich Hayek, to contemporary political authors, including Jonah Goldberg, Charles C.W. Cooke, and Yuval Levin, connecting them, for the most part, to one of the two main sides of the political philosophy divide.

That said, Devines wide-ranging mastery of political theory and public policy may also be one of the books few drawbacks. The Enduring Tension jumps between discussions of the origins of social cooperation in prehistoric times and the metaphysical nature of the human soul to skeptical assessments of anti-discrimination statutes, civil service reform, and common core curriculum standards. Conservative and libertarian readers will likely experience few disagreements, but the rollercoaster of emphasis from the eternal and sublime to the recent and specific will likely cause some readers whiplash.

The citations also seem to cover everything that has crossed Devines desk in the last several decades, including much of his own published work. The index starts with Thomas Paines Age of Reason, Friedrich Nietzsches The Anti-Christ, and several references to Aristotle, but also includes plenty of works by modern pundits like Juan Williams and Fareed Zakaria, and even several of Devines own columns for Newsmax. This isnt a dissertation, of course, but the range of sources is certainly heterogeneous, to say the least.

Putting aside the authorsoccasionally fascinatingside excursions into topics from musical theory to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, however, his championing of the Lockean view of political theory is relatively straightforward. A free and prosperous society needs more of the things that made the nation great in the first place: limited government, free markets, and individual rightsand a belief in a creator that is the ultimate source of those rights.

There is a long list of ways in which attacks on those institutions have produced misery and failure. Devine covers many of them, but pays little attention to attacks on the market economy itselfa surprising lack of emphasis for a book with the word capitalism in the title. Progressive critics of markets have long sought to undermine the private control of capital and bring the alleged robber barons of the industrial world to heel under the guidance of enlightened expert opinion. But we dont hear about many of those developments.

From the New Deal to the birth of the corporate social responsibility movement in the 1950s to the rise of anti-capitalist environmentalism in the 1970s and the emergence of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) theory in the mid-2000s, shareholders rights of property, speech, and association have been under assault for some time. Those efforts, including new statutes, regulations, and guidelines from quasi-governmental institutions, have aimed at eroding the right to dispose of ones property and subjecting economic activity to supervision and approval by supposed expert officials.

Developments like these may be less grand in scope than our eroding national commitment to Enlightenment values in general, but they would arguably fit better in a book about the tension between capitalism and morality than some of the (admittedly persuasive) examples of economic and social policy failure that Devine includes.

The rationalistic progressive assumption that all will basically agree in the end is simply wrong.

Several other contemporary authors have written books more closely focused on defending the moral status of capitalism per se. The late economist David Henderson championed the traditional understanding of property against leftist bureaucracy in Misguided Virtue: False Notions of Corporate Social Responsibility (2001) and The Role of Business in the Modern World (2004). The University of Notre Dames James Otteson presented a traditional, Adam Smith-focused defense of modern capitalism in Honorable Business: A Framework for Business in a Just and Humane Society (2019). More recently (and more didactically), finance professional and political commentator Steve Soukup has taken on the socialization of corporate America in The Dictatorship of Woke Capital: How Political Correctness Captured Big Business (2021), covering some of the same intellectual developments as Devine, from Rousseau to Marx to Woodrow Wilson and the modern administrative state.

The Enduring Tension is fascinating, informative, substantive, and entertaining, though it covers so much territory that it is difficult to properly categorize. Yet, it is worth the price of admission for a few deep passages alone. For example, Devine strikes at the condescension of much leftist posturing when he writes, Americans disagree about moral values and governance. The rationalistic progressive assumption that all will basically agree in the end is simply wrong. He also gives a good summary of fusionism when he says, Something distinguishes both conservatives and libertarians from the progressive Left: they do not insist on telling people hundreds or thousands of miles away how to go about their lives.

Finally, though, it is his emphasis on the core institutions of our civilization that contains his most vital message: The moral assumptions of the Western traditional mythos, in which individuals have been created free and equal, are indispensable to legitimizing a pluralist, federalist, traditionalist, capitalist society with free markets and localized powers under a limited central statea society where liberty and order coexist in a creative tension. Our forefathers bequeathed this heritage to us. Lets hope, even at this late date, that we can keep it.

More:
What 'The Enduring Tension' Can Teach Us about the Core Institutions of Our Civilization | Richard Morrison - Foundation for Economic Education

Posted in Libertarianism | Comments Off on What ‘The Enduring Tension’ Can Teach Us about the Core Institutions of Our Civilization | Richard Morrison – Foundation for Economic Education

Could 3D Printing Drive Down the Cost of Space Exploration? – AZoM

Posted: at 2:27 am

Image Credit:Guitar photographer/Shutterstock.com

3D printing an additive manufacturing (AM) technique is increasingly used for large industrial purposes. It is often much cheaper than traditional industrial manufacturing methods, especially in bespoke or low-volume applications. Now, 3D printing is increasingly becoming adopted in the space sector.

NASA, the US space agency, is a pioneer in 3D printing exploration, providing funding for many new technologies. These projects are 3D printing objects and parts for space travel, putting 3D printers onto spacecraft for maintenance and research, and even growing habitats for life with 3D printing technology.

NASAs enthusiastic adoption of 3D printing is largely due to cost. Creating bespoke molds and formworks necessary to manufacture many parts of a spacecraft is incredibly costly and leads to slower iteration and development of engineering and design.

Modern 3D printing technology, on the other hand, is capable of building custom parts and objects on demand. It costs no more to print a completely different design on the next print job, and more complex designs do not result in higher manufacturing costs.

With the latest industrial 3D printers now capable of producing very large, lightweight, and strong objects with complex shapes, the benefits of 3D printing can apply to large-scale industrial and manufacturing projects.

This is what makes industrial 3D printing increasingly appealing to engineers at the space agency. It provides the low production volumes, high degrees of design freedom, and low cost that their missions require.

Astronauts benefit from 3D printing with devices aboard spacecraft and stations that help to sustain long missions in space between resupplying. Since 2014, the International Space Station has used a 3D printer to develop custom tools, spare parts, and new equipment for research at the cutting edge of space exploration.

The latest generation of 3D printers is increasingly versatile, with more methods appearing all the time. Now, more materials can be used to make more complex shapes and structures with more resolution than ever before.

However, 3D printers all require feedstock to print anything, and this is a space- and weight-consuming resource. One NASA project is researching a potential means to reduce the need for transporting feedstock to 3D printers in space. The Refabricator will repurpose materials from used objects and waste for new 3D printer feedstocks for the 3D printing system onboard the ISS.

The Refabricator can be used to repeatedly complete the recycling loop for objects on the ISS. Tools and parts can be returned to the system to be remade more than once, without significantly degrading the material quality of the part. It is also designed to be able to repurpose foam and plastic packaging material used for delivering supplies to the space station.

In the future, large-scale 3D printers may be used to create landing pads, launch sites, and entire habitats capable of supporting life in space. In construction, AM technology is already selected for extreme conditions, such as in environmental disaster relief. 3D printers can build shelter and other structures quickly, constructing round-the-clock, and without risking human life. These qualities make them excellent candidates to be the builders of future infrastructure projects in space.

How 3D Printing in Space Could Revolutionize ManufacturingPlay

Video Credit: Seeker/YouTube.com

3D printing is already disrupting many industrial, engineering, and construction industries. It is also already widely adopted by NASA engineers and astronauts in space. As it continues to develop and its capabilities increase, the cost savings of 3D printing technology will continue to help make space exploration less expensive.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.003

Betz, Eri (2021). Space is Expensive: Can 3D Printing and On-Orbit Construction Drive Down the Cost. Astronomy.com. [Online] https://astronomy.com/news/2021/05/can-3d-printing-and-on-orbit-construction-make-space-more-accessible

Goldstein, Phil (2018). NASA Turns to 3D Printing to Help Astronauts Aboard the International Space Station. FedTech. [Online] https://fedtechmagazine.com/article/2018/10/nasa-turns-3d-printing-help-astronauts-aboard-international-space-station.

Gress, Douglas R. and Ronald V. Kalafsky (2015). Geographies of Production in 3D: Theoretical and Research Implications Stemming from Additive Manufacturing. Geoforum. [Online] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.003.

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Read the rest here:

Could 3D Printing Drive Down the Cost of Space Exploration? - AZoM

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on Could 3D Printing Drive Down the Cost of Space Exploration? – AZoM

China Seen Expanding Military Capability in Space, but not Yet on Mars or the Moon – VOA Asia

Posted: at 2:27 am

TAIPEI, TAIWAN - Chinas military may be examining its decades-old space program for ways to improve data collection and disrupt the satellites of other countries if needed, analysts said this week following a Mars landing and a debris crash into the Indian Ocean.

Earlier this month China placed a rover on Mars, the official Xinhua News Agency reported, becoming the second nation after the United States to make the landing. A little more than two years ago, China sent its robotic spacecraft Change 4 to a basin on the far side of the moon. A Chinese orbital space biology lab is due for completion by 2025, the Beijing-based Global Times news website said in March.

China Lands Spacecraft on Mars

Plans call for rover to stay in lander for few days of diagnostic tests before rolling down ramp to explore icy area of Mars, Utopia Planitia

Along with its achievements, Chinas fast-growing space program has caused some alarm. Earlier this month, there was real concern about possible casualties as debris from one of its rockets fell to earth, landing in the Indian Ocean west of the Maldives and south of India.

Although none of Chinas space missions has an express military motive, analysts believe the Peoples Liberation Army is monitoring this ever-deeper exploration for opportunities, such as new ways to collect intelligence or blind satellites from other countries during any conflict.

Now that they have a very modern launch vehicle fleet, they want to probe as much as they can, and if theres something thats attractive for industry or for military purposes, then theyll proceed, said Marco Cceres, director of space studies with the market analysis firm Teal Group Corp. in the United States.

Decades of space exploration

China launched its first satellite in 1970 and put its first man in space in 2003, becoming the worlds third nation, after Russia and the United States, to do so. Chinese officials have said they are using space exploration peacefully and have spoken at the U.N. Conference on Disarmament against the militarization of earths outer atmosphere.

Some of its scores of satellites are for military or dual-purpose use, the SpaceRef industry news website says. Western countries believe two in particular to be for express military use, it says.

The U.S. Department of Defense has said in reports on the Chinese armed forces that the manned space launch could help China militarily and that the country may be developing a direct-ascent anti-satellite weapon to jam U.S. navigation satellite signals.

'Dazzle'and gather data

The Chinese military could be looking for ways now to use direct energy beams to dazzle or disrupt other countries gear operating in low orbits, said Derek Grossman, senior analyst with the U.S.-based Rand Corp. research organization.

Its satellites might eventually gather information in a way that protects that data from adversarial interference, he added.

To target a foreign satellite would mean mutually assured destruction, said Carl Thayer, an Asia-specialized emeritus professor from the University of New South Wales in Australia.

China is not capable of militarizing the moon or Mars, said Alexander Huang, a strategic studies professor at Taiwans Tamkang University in Taiwan.

China Space Agency: Lunar Probe Successfully Lands on Moon

Probe is expected to gather lunar soil and rock samples and return them to Earth

Showing strength on earth

But missions to the far reaches of space let China flex muscle on earth, Thayer said.

The larger [agenda]is demonstrating technological prowess, advanced technology to convince the rest of the world youre on a losing wicket if youre going to stick to the U.S., that Chinas growing more and more powerful, Thayer said. Many smaller Asian governments consider Washington to be a military ally as Chinas navy becomes stronger in the region.

Chinas space program is catching up to the United States, currently the worlds top space power in terms of resources, Grossman said. Few other countries have programs that come even close. Their space program is second in the world, he said. They are catching up to us rapidly and will probably overtake us if we dont invest in the coming years.

China is anxious to compete especially so it can impress its own citizens around events such as the 100-year anniversary this year of the Communist Partys founding, Huang said. Its looking at space for scientific knowledge too, he said.

China needs one or two leading programs that can give more No. 1 stickers to China when they celebrate the centennial and continue to celebrate whatsoever, Huang said.

Steady progress, no agenda

China still lacks a specific agenda save to expand its presence in space as other countries do, Caceres said. But all along, he said, Chinas military will have the biggest role of any government department, even in multi-use endeavors.

The country with the world's third strongest armed forces after the United States and Russia is exploring space in a methodical way, without the shifts that the U.S. space agency, NASA, experiences when new presidents take office in Washingtonton, he said.

But overall, he said, theyre just kind of seeing whats possible."

Read the rest here:

China Seen Expanding Military Capability in Space, but not Yet on Mars or the Moon - VOA Asia

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on China Seen Expanding Military Capability in Space, but not Yet on Mars or the Moon – VOA Asia

JFK, John Glenn and the Fight for Space for Peace – The Wall Street Journal

Posted: at 2:27 am

John F. Kennedy had not even taken the oath of office when the battle began. In December 1960, with the inauguration a month away, the U.S. Air Force launched a first strikenot against a foreign enemy but against NASA, the civilian space agency. In a letter to commanders, the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force expressed confidence that the president-elect understood the imperative of military supremacy in space and would, therefore, grant the Air Force the primary role. Making sure that Kennedy got the point, the Air Force leaked its letter.

Space Fight, cheered Aviation Week. Yet this was more than a turf war. At stake was the very purpose of the U.S. space program. Would the nation stay committed to space for peace, the policy of Dwight D. Eisenhower, the outgoing president? Or would the new administration see space as the Air Force did: an arena of the Cold War, a battlefront on which armed conflict might be inevitable? The decision was Kennedys to makethough it would come to depend, as events unfolded, on an astronaut named John Glenn.

To the Air Force top brass, the existence of NASA was an affront. The Space Act of 1958, which created NASA and gave it control over human spaceflight, was a rebuke to every military planner with fantasies of orbital fighter planes or space stations teeming with missiles. At a time when the Soviet Union was achieving one first after anotherthe first satellite, the first animal in orbit, the first unmanned craft to reach the lunar surfaceEisenhower held to his view that space exploration served no national security interest. As a concession, he allowed the Air Force to continue development of the X-20, a high-altitude bomber, but the man-in-space program, Project Mercury , was NASAs domain.

Kennedys election gave the generals cause for hope. If the Soviets control space, he had said during the campaign, they can control earth. In the eyes of the world, he argued, second in space meant second in science and technology, second in military power, second in the struggle between freedom and totalitarian rule. In late 1960, a classified U.S. Information Agency reportwhich caused a stir when it leakedrevealed that Soviet superiority in space was eroding global confidence in the U.S. Satellite pessimism, analysts called it. Pressure was building for a show of strength in space.

And NASA held a weakening hand. The astronauts were popular with the public, but the manned program was well behind schedule and marred by failure. Rockets exploded on the launchpad; payloads ended up in the sea. Rumors circulated that Kennedy would transfer Mercury to the military or cancel it altogethera course that his science adviser, Jerome Wiesner, preferred.

Follow this link:

JFK, John Glenn and the Fight for Space for Peace - The Wall Street Journal

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on JFK, John Glenn and the Fight for Space for Peace – The Wall Street Journal

NASA’s Bill Nelson shows how sausage making will take America back to the moon | TheHill – The Hill

Posted: at 2:27 am

Bill NelsonClarence (Bill) William NelsonDemings raises Democrats' hopes in uphill fight to defeat Rubio Stephanie Murphy won't run for Senate seat in Florida next year China fires back after NASA criticism of rocket debris reentry MORE, the administrator of NASA, attended a hearing of the House Appropriations Subcommittee for Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies on the subject of the space agencys fiscal 2022 budget recently. His testimony was a master class on how sausage making is going to take America back to the moon. It also demonstrated the wisdom of once again naming a politician as the chief of NASA.

German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck once famously said that one should not look too closely at how laws or sausages are made. However, a look at how the subcommittee hearings proceeded is a master class on the unseemly side of how laws, in this case NASA funding, are made.

Much of the hearings consisted of various members of the subcommittee complaining about how SpaceX got the sole contract for the lunar Human Landing System (HLS) that will take the first Americans to the lunar surface in over 50 years. The theory is that, just as with the Commercial Crew program, two providers are better for the redundancy they provide. Nelson, several times, had to explain that the reason NASA was not able to contract for two lunar landers was that the previous Congress was excessively stingy in funding the HLS, granting just $850 million for the current fiscal year instead of the $3.4 billion that NASA had requested.

Fortunately, as Space News reported, Nelson offered a way for Congress to correct its mistake. He noted that the Biden administration and Congress are debating the content and scope of an infrastructure bill, which Nelson and members of the committee were careful to call a jobs bill. The NASA chief suggested that it would be a good idea if Congress could give the space agency about $11.6 billion of that bill.

Over $5 billion would go for the follow-on selection for the lunar HLS, presumably giving companies such as Blue Origin a second shot at the prize. Another $5.4 billion would pay for repairs and infrastructure upgrades at various NASA centers. Two hundred million dollars would pay for developing new space suits for lunar explorers, and $585 million would help to develop a nuclear thermal rocket system to take astronauts to Mars. The money would presumably be paid out over several years.

Nelsons plan depends a lot on there being an infrastructure or a jobs bill. As Hot Air reports, the back-and-forth between the Biden administration and Senate Republicans over how much the bill will cost, how it will get paid for and what will be included is still ongoing as of this writing.

Nelson was also quick to show an image taken from the Chinese Zhurong rover of the surface of Mars. While he was careful to congratulate the Chinese for their space feat, he also took pains to note that it represented a burgeoning capability in space that could prove to be a challenge to the United States. The Chinese are planning to land their taikonauts on the moon, he stated. The implication was clear The United States had better get moving with the Artemis return to the moon program lest it get shown up by China.

Nelson did not spend much time going over the wonky arguments for funding NASA, the science, how it facilitates commerce, or even how it inspires Americas youth. He concentrated on two primal motivators that everyone, especially members of Congress, experience: greed and fear.

Funding NASA, even out of the grab bag infrastructure or, if one prefers, jobs bill, means money for campaign contributors and employment for voters. Failing to fund NASA might mean having to watch Chinese taikonauts on the moon doing the one small step and one giant leap routine on live streaming video with Americans nowhere to be seen. The humiliation would be exquisite. Politicians who let it happen might not be in office for very long.

Its all sausage making. NASA ought not to be a jobs program. NASA is supposed to be about exploring the universe. However, Nelson knows that the unseemly stuff like jobs in the district and not being shown up by one of the worlds least favorite countries motivates politicians more than the glories of pushing back the final frontier.

One can only hope that the unquestioned benefits of space exploration, the science, the commerce and the soft political power will follow resulting from all that money that Nelson seeks to extract from his fellow politicians and that not too much of it will be wasted.

Mark Whittington, who writes frequently about space and politics, has published a political study of space exploration entitled Why is It So Hard to Go Back to the Moon? as well as The Moon, Mars and Beyond, and, most recently, Why is America going back to the Moon. He blogs at Curmudgeons Corner. He is published in the Wall Street Journal, Forbes, The Hill, USA Today, the LA Times and the Washington Post, among other venues.

Continue reading here:

NASA's Bill Nelson shows how sausage making will take America back to the moon | TheHill - The Hill

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on NASA’s Bill Nelson shows how sausage making will take America back to the moon | TheHill – The Hill

Self-Driving Lunar Rovers for Astronaut Road Trips on the Moon – Universe Today

Posted: at 2:27 am

What happens when you cross one of the worlds largest defense contractors with one of the worlds largest automobile manufacturers? Apparently, you get an electrically powered autonomous lunar rover. At least that is the fruit of a new collaboration between Lockheed Martin (LM) and General Motors (GM).

Mobility is one of the major priorities of the Artemis program, which is set to send humans back to the moon, and provide a permanent human settlement there, by the end of the decade. Last year they released a call asking for innovative approaches to rovers. LM and GM have answered that call with a still conceptual rover that is electric, can drive itself, and can travel farther than the original lunar buggies launched with the Apollo missions in the 1970s.

That last metric is not a hard one to beat the Apollo rovers were only capable of traveling 4 miles at a max speed of 8 miles per house. Improving on those specifications should be no challenge for the combination of LMs space exploration nous and GMs mobility expertise. Achieving feats that engineers 40 years ago could never have dreamed of would be different challenge though.

Two of the most interesting features of the proposed rover lean heavily on developments in the automotive industry over the last 10 years. Electrification and autonomy are buzzwords in what is slowly being rebranded as the mobility industry. Each would have advantages for lunar exploration missions.

Electric drive trains would either allow rovers to recharge themselves using onboard solar panels or quickly stop by a recharging station at a landing site or base for a top up before venturing out for more exploration. Solar power is relatively abundant on the moon, at least for the month when a hemisphere is facing the sun. How to charge the rovers, and the rest of any permanent settlement, for the months that their hemisphere is not pointing to the sun is a question that has yet to be answered.

Autonomy, though it faces its own challenges, is potentially the more game-changing technology. Only 5% of the lunar surface has been explored directly, and, in the beginning at least, astronauts will not have significant amounts of time to dedicate to tramping around on the surface analyzing rocks. Autonomous rovers, however, could potentially serve that role nicely, leaving on research and sample collection sorties from a central hub without requiring any input from the astronauts that are trying to build a sustainable base.

Materials those rovers might find could prove to be key components to that base. However, there is also the risk that if an autonomous driving system fails, the astronauts would have to use valuable time to go and fetch the rover itself. Surely LM and GM know how bad such a failure would look under the national spotlight of an early stage moon mission.

They might not even get the chance to prove their chops however, as the rover is still theoretical. While the corporate duo plan to use it to pitch to the Artemis program, a final selection has not been made. This appears to be GMs first foray into space exploration, but LM hasnt been as successful as usual in pitching their programs to NASA, having recently been edged out by SpaceX to build the Artemis programs landing vehicle.

Surely GM and LM will not be the only options available for any such rover program either. But if the concepts contained in their proposed system do come to fruition, it would mean a giant leap in our ability to explore our closest neighbor.

Learn More:LM Lockheed Martin, General Motors Team to Further Lunar Exploration with Autonomous Moon RoverNBC GM, Lockheed Martin developing a next-generation lunar roverSpace.com Lockheed Martin, GM team up to build new astronaut moon buggyVerge Lockheed Martin and GM are working on an electric Moon buggy

Lead Image:Visualization of astronauts next to a new generation of lunar rover.Credit: Lockheed Martin

Like Loading...

More here:

Self-Driving Lunar Rovers for Astronaut Road Trips on the Moon - Universe Today

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on Self-Driving Lunar Rovers for Astronaut Road Trips on the Moon – Universe Today

Lost in Space Music: Records That Explore the Outer Limits – bandcamp.com

Posted: at 2:27 am

LISTS Lost in Space Music: Records That Explore the Outer Limits By George Grella May 28, 2021 Illustration by Jinhwa Jang

Space music, space rock, kosmische Musik: these are all well-known genres that share a cosmic aesthetica sense of expansiveness meant to capture feelings of awe, mirroring our deep connection with the universe that surrounds us, and the thrill of space exploration and science fiction narratives. Its music that offers fantasias of the final frontier.

But there is another kind of space music, and this type is not a genre, but a concept. This is music thats literally about outer space itself: its nature and substance, the experience of being in it, its effect on human beings, and the ways we interact with it. The stylistic range of this music is immense; it includes records made by Sun Ra as well as records made by NASA, which not only compiled music to be sent into space (the 1977 Voyager spacecrafts Golden Records), but also released the album Symphonies of the Planet, which features sounds captured by the Voyager probes. (Sounds in space? Yes, theyre there.)

Theres even more to explore on this list, which features music about the infinite breadth and depth of outer space, music about crossing almost incomprehensible interstellar distances, romantic narratives about space flight, the ominous power of the universe, and more.

Space is far from silenteven if we need special equipment to hear its sounds. Electromagnetic waves travel through the vacuum of outer space; this is the solar wind that collides with the Earths atmosphere and produces both lightthe Aurora borealis and Aurora australisand sound, in the form of low-frequency radio waves. For this deep and delicate project, Kim Cunio created piano accompaniment for the sounds of the atmosphere (generally called sferics)like the sound of lightning traveling through the atmosphere into space, as recorded by the Very Low Frequency receiver at the Halley Research Station in Antarctica. Collaborating with space weather research scientist Dr. Nigel Meredith and Cambridge-based artist-engineer Diana Scarborough, Cunio builds harmonies that rise and fall over individual still points, as the whispers and clicks and scrambles of the sferics dance around her.

Mysterious and almost impossibly ancient, gravity waves have been traveling through space since the beginning of time itself. The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) was built to detect these types of waves, and composer William Basinski used exclusive recordings of what LIGO captured as part of this commissioned work. More than just general gravity passing through the Earth, the waves incorporated into this album were produced by the merging of two massive black holes, 1.3 billion light years from here in time and space. Basinski produces ringing, flowing tones, underpinned by a regular, muffled, distant beat. The music sounds like gravity plucking a giant, planetary string, with the overtones rising and rippling out, back into the universe.

Steven Hawkings great breakthrough in cosmology came in 1974, when he determined that black holes werent empty voids from which no energy or information could escape, but that they emitted radiationwhat is now known as Hawking radiation. Jeremy Bibles four-hour opus is something of a metaphor for Hawking radiation taken one step further: What if black holes didnt just emit charged particles, but sound? Not such a strange idea, as both sound and radiation are types of waves. Music for Black Holes is the sound-poetry of these cosmicdeadends? Doorways? Warm swaths of tones gently glide above then sink below the threshold of hearing, and theres a meditative stillness evoking a surrender before vast and impersonal forces. Bible calls this, a map to guide one through the vacuum of space and time, and it can also be heard as the experience of passing through waves of Hawking radiation as one approaches the event horizon of Messier 31, never to return from an unfathomable destination.

This is space music as deep space music. If a black hole has infinite depths, the universe has practically infinite dimensions, expanding into the unknown every moment of existence. On this eight-hour album, S.E.T.I. (Andrew Lagowski) recognizes that one of the main challenges to interstellar travelers would be maintaining their sanity in the face of that endlessness. Here, he creates a hypnagogic environment for calming relaxation and sleep; a floating pool of sound to separate one from recycled air and the throb and hum of engine noise. Strange signals interrupt the music. Are they mangled communications from a distant and dying Earth? Alien civilizations trying to contact us? Listen deeply and find out.

Back at home, the human race has already established a history of actual space travel, though no human being has yet to make it past the Earths protective magnetic sphere. Yuri Gagarin was the first man to reach outer space, in 1961, and in the National Pools reimagining of the space race on this concept record, the Soviet Union continues to send cosmonauts ad astra. Psychological preparation is essential for the strange rigors of space travel, and this program was created by the Soviets to equip our cosmonaut comrades with these sounds. They intent [sic] for solo space travels, mind sharpening and concentration. An opening patriotic exhortation gives way to a sequence of music meant to focus on each task at hand, including the launch, while also steeling the nerves against nostalgia for home and country left behind, and the tragic and desperately lonely possibility that there will be no re-entry.

As of this year, only around 550 people have travelled into space (the number is approximate, because the determination of the boundary between Earth and space varies from country to country), with only two dozen having passed beyond earths orbit. But space travel narratives of science and technology have been in the human imagination for more than a century. Blak Saagans (Samuele Gottardello) debut album (and nom de plume) was inspired by Carl Sagans evocations of our place in the cosmos, kosmische Musik, and the psychedelic soundtracks of Italian science fiction and giallo films. On this Farfisa-based collection of original songs that emulate library music, Saagans vision of space is like Sagans: optimistic, joyous, more than a little playful, and eager to suspend all disbelief and indulge deeply in the most expansive possibilities of space exploration.

Darker legacies of the space age lie beneath the extensive shadow of triumph, possibilities, optimism, and progressive ideas for the future: the Cold War and militarization, detritus, disaster, death. Joel Giardinis concept records stand out both for his dark aesthetic and his emphasis on guitar-based textures. On The Age of Space, rocket and satellite debris circles the planet, threatening to spiral out of control into the atmosphere; launch stations sit abandoned, filled with puddles of water, the aroma of disintegrating paper, and overgrown with weeds; and cosmonauts, off course and drifting away, are lost in space. This is not Carl Sagans or Elon Musks concept of space exploration, but J.G. Ballards.

Kool Keith, Dan Emery, and Chad LEplattenier have an entirely different take on the space age: critical, funny, completely iconoclastic. Space Goretex begins with some kind of disaster on an alien spaceship: Im deep in the Milky Way/ Im headed toward the green planet/ My ships all fucked up. Kool Keith is here to tell us about space hallucinations, astronauts at the center of celebrity cults, robotic spaceships, sex in space, space suits and science fiction costumes as fetish objects. This is the space music concept a la Fritz the Cat, meant for a mature audience that looks at the multiple-entendre of a black hole from a funky and wise-ass angle.

Before there was space music in popular music genres, there was Gustav Holsts classical orchestral suite The Planets, which premiered in the fall of 1918. Christine Otts 2020 large-scale piece, Chimres, follows that classical lineage with a composition that imagines the cosmos realized through the nostalgic/futuristic sounds of early electronic musical instrument the ondes Martenot. Ott is an expert on the instrument, and a virtuosic thinker. She uses the 1920s-era electronic keyboard to blend tones that sound like both wordless singing and a lush string orchestra. Otts goal, in her own words, is to rub shoulders with electronic stars and caress incandescent planets. She floats through space, gazing on these orbs from a distance, their lights and colors turning the absolute zero of empty space into the burning cold of ice. This is a tour-de-force of instrumental playing and imagination.

Olaf Stapledons 1937 novel, Star Maker, is a science fiction classic. Narrated by a protagonist whose consciousness is projected throughout the expanse and duration of the universe, the book is Stapledons philosophical imaging of life in the cosmos. In this composition for chamber ensemble, Taylor Brook sets spoken excerpts from the novel above and against wordless vocalizations, skittering lyrical passages, crunchy timbres, electronic treatments, and field recordings. He draws an explicit connection to one of Stapledons most intriguing ideas, that spatial coordinates could be described via musical pitches. Brook represents both the out-of-body sensation and the survey of cosmological mysteries in his music, and theres a meaningful acknowledgement of the Lenape people and their landthe composer specifies the music was made in Lenapehoking, or the Mid-Atlantic region of the United Statesand touches of field recordings offer an intriguing look into Lenape cosmology, which connects the immediate experience of the land and nature to non-material higher universal plains, mediated through the soul.

Space is, finally, out there: it is everything beyond this planet, the universe itself. We may never reach it, but it reaches us, with waves and shudders and bursts that travel across the entire duration of the cosmos. The tracks on Pulse Emitters Voids evoke those celestial experiences near to EarthLunar Orbit/Lunar Surfaceand also that of distant, haunting objects like pulsars and quasars. The former is a pulsating star nearing the end of its billions-of-years life cycle, the latter a quasi-stellar radio sourcetheoretically the massive, hot, compressed energy at the core of a galaxy throbbing with radio wave radiation. Pulse Emitters sensual waves flow out of the speakers and spread out into the atmosphere and maybe out into space itself; eventually passing through the mindless waves of these cosmic phenomena, lasting until the heat death or compression of the universe, whichever may come first.

Read more from the original source:

Lost in Space Music: Records That Explore the Outer Limits - bandcamp.com

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on Lost in Space Music: Records That Explore the Outer Limits – bandcamp.com