Daily Archives: May 9, 2021

Heres when Jeopardy!’ is expected to name Alex Trebek’s official successor – Yahoo Entertainment

Posted: May 9, 2021 at 11:31 am

The current season of Jeopardy! is still in full swing, but its not too soon to look ahead to the next season especially after the announcement the showrunner of the long-running game show just made.

According to executive producer (and recent guest host) Mike Richards, when filming for season 38 kicks off in late July or early August, it will do so with its next official host at the helm. That means fans will learn wholl get the chance to follow in the footsteps of the late Alex Trebek this summer.

But for now, that remains a mystery even to Richards.

Related: 'Jeopardy!' guest host and Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers kept some important reminders behind the podium during his time on the show.

Its going to come down to the heads of Sony (Entertainment) to make that decision, ultimately, and itll come down to testing, the 45-year-old told The Wall Street Journals podcast The Journal. Theyve been a part of it. They know whats going on in the studio. Theyre watching the feed, the tapings. Its very extensive. Its unlike anything Ive ever been a part of, as far as testing in its size and scope.

So no playing favorites or trusting fate with this casting call.

You want to make an informed decision, Richards continued. In the end, were a pretty cerebral group, the Jeopardy! team. We want to go at this with real analytics and real testing and not just go, Hey, how about this guy? which is kind of how a lot of these decisions have been made historically.

As for the audition process, audiences have been witnessing that for themselves ever since Trebeks final episodes aired in January, two months after the venerable host died following a battle with pancreatic cancer.

Week after week, familiar faces from broadcasting, entertainment, sports and more have stepped up to the podium to serve as guest hosts. And while not all of those whove taken the temporary gig are looking to fill it permanently, some, like NFL star Aaron Rodgers, have voiced an interest.

Story continues

Richards said that while he wouldnt rule anything out, he would be surprised if the job went to anyone who didnt serve as one of those guest hosts. That means fans who are tuning in and speaking out about the rotating lineup of talent will get a say in the process ... sort of.

Its definitely going to play into it, and I think theres different ways fan response can play into it, Richards explained. What we are working on, as far as really understanding what the fans are saying and whos saying it, is very important.

However, when youre talking about a show that can average, according to Richards, 70 million-plus viewers in a week, its not just a matter of listening to the loudest responses on social media. Its about listening to the ones that carry the spirit of the fans.

Whether the powers that be decide the gig should go to Rodgers or upcoming guest host Levar Burton or anyone else that has the support of the fanbase, Richards envisions it becoming that persons sole job.

I feel like it worked out pretty well for Alex as one job, he noted. Its not a side hustle to me, and weve been clear about that.

Related: The widow of the late "Jeopardy!" host also shared how much a specific moment on a 2019 episode meant to him.

On top of all of that, the candidate has to possess one important qualifier Trebek had credibility.

Do you believe in them when theyre making a ruling in the game? Richards mentioned. The host of Jeopardy! is the arbiter of the game. So do you buy them going, Yes, thats correct?

Trebek, who hosted the show for 36 years, really is the ultimate hard act to follow, with some longtime Jeopardy! viewers believing no one with the possible exception of Trebek-inspired A.I., which one Journal listener recommended could possibly fill his place.

I think one of the beautiful things, the blessings that came, if you can call it a blessing, is that he got to really see the outpouring of love and admiration that he gave to the world, Trebeks widow, Jean, recently told TODAYs Savannah Guthrie of the impact he had. Some people just, you know, you don't see that while you're still embodied, you don't get to really witness all the love that people feel for you. And I know that that was in and of itself a huge inspiration for Alex.

See original here:

Heres when Jeopardy!' is expected to name Alex Trebek's official successor - Yahoo Entertainment

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on Heres when Jeopardy!’ is expected to name Alex Trebek’s official successor – Yahoo Entertainment

Chinese rocket to tumble back to Earth in uncontrolled re-entry – Yahoo News Australia

Posted: at 11:31 am

A large segment of a Chinese rocket is expected to make an uncontrolled re-entry into the Earth's atmosphere early Sunday, but Beijing has downplayed fears of damage on the ground and said the risk is very low.

A Long March-5B rocket launched the first module of China's new space station into Earth's orbit on April 29.

Its 18-tonne main segment is now in freefall and experts have said it is difficult to say precisely where and when it will re-enter the atmosphere.

Space-Track, using US military data, tweeted that the projected re-entry was at 0211 GMT over the Mediterranean basin, with an uncertainty window of an hour either side of that estimate.

The US Space Force's 18th Space Control Squadron at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California "will not know the precise location until AFTER" the rocket has landed, Space-Track said in an earlier tweet.

Chinese authorities have said most of the rocket components will likely be destroyed as it descends.

"The probability of causing harm... on the ground is extremely low," Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin told reporters on Friday.

Although there has been fevered speculation over exactly where the rocket -- or parts of it -- will land, there is a good chance any debris that does not burn up will just splash down into the ocean, given that the planet is 70 percent water.

"We're hopeful that it will land in a place where it won't harm anyone," said Pentagon spokesman Mike Howard.

Howard said the United States was tracking the rocket segment but "its exact entry point into the Earth's atmosphere cannot be pinpointed until within hours of its re-entry".

Harvard-based astronomer Jonathan McDowell tweeted on Saturday: "New 18SPCS Space Force prediction narrows things down to one orbit: Costa Rica, Haiti, Iberia, Sardinia, Italy, Greece and Crete, Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Australia, New Zealand."

- No need for 'too much' worry -

Story continues

Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin has said the US military has no plans to shoot the rocket segment down, but suggested that China had been negligent in letting it fall out of orbit.

"Given the size of the object, there will necessarily be big pieces left over," said Florent Delefie, an astronomer at the Paris-PSL Observatory.

"The chances of debris landing on an inhabited zone are tiny, probably one in a million."

Last year, debris from another Long March rocket fell on villages in the Ivory Coast, causing structural damage but no injuries or deaths.

McDowell said that although there was no need to worry "too much", the rocket's design needed a re-think to stop such a scenario happening again.

"There is a real chance of damage to whatever it hits and the outside chance of a casualty," he said.

"Having a ton of metal shards flying into the Earth at hundreds of kilometres per hour is not good practice, and China should redesign the Long-March 5B missions to avoid this."

rox/sst/st/qan/rma

More here:

Chinese rocket to tumble back to Earth in uncontrolled re-entry - Yahoo News Australia

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on Chinese rocket to tumble back to Earth in uncontrolled re-entry – Yahoo News Australia

‘What the hell’: Tennis world in disbelief over Rafael Nadal drama – Yahoo Sport Australia

Posted: at 11:31 am

Rafael Nadal admits he took 'a step back' after a stunning straight sets defeat in an event he's won five times. Pic: Getty

Rafael Nadal admits his French Open preparations have taken a hit after the 20-time grand slam champion was stunned by Alexander Zverev in a straight sets quarter-final defeat at the Madrid Open.

The Spaniard admitted his 6-4, 6-4 loss to Germany's Zverev was a "step back" but insisted there were plenty of positives as he embarks on capturing a 14th Roland Garros title, later this month.

BRUTAL: Ash Barty's act of revenge as winning streak continues

'NEVER SEEN THAT': Ash Barty in bizarre incident in Madrid

'HELL OF A CHICK': Ash Barty's beautiful act for pregnant rival

The World No.2 has now fallen early in two clay-court Masters tournaments ahead of the Grand Slam in Paris, after going out in the Monte Carlo quarter-finals last month before winning in Barcelona.

Zverev had never beaten the 'King of Clay' on his favoured surface, but the 24-year-old was particularly impressive in the stunning upset.

Nadal's latest defeat on his favoured clay surface will surely serve as a blow to his quest for a record 21st grand slam singles title at the French Open - a tournament he's won an astonishing 13 times.

For Zverev it's now three straight wins against Nadal, with all three remarkably coming in straight sets.

Tennis world was understandably left gobsmacked the incredible turn of events.

"It's definitely one of the biggest wins of my career so far, especially on clay against Rafa," Zverev said.

"It is the toughest thing to do in our sport. Beating him in his house, in Spain, is incredible."

Zverev's impressive straights-set win at the Caja Magica earns him a meeting with Dominic Thiem in the semis, in what will be a repeat of last year's US Open final, which was won by Thiem.

After losing to world number eight Andrey Rublev in Monaco, Nadal was convincingly beaten by Zverev and the spotlight will be on the 34-year-old now in Rome next week, his last tournament before heading to Paris.

Story continues

Alexander Zverev celebrates his first ever victory over Rafael Nadal on clay. Pic: Getty

"I took steps forward, but when you go up a staircase, there are times when it happens that you take a step back, that's what happened today," said five-time Madrid champion Nadal.

"It's a week where there were a lot of positive things. I'm leaving Madrid with good feelings in general, and the bad one having played a match like today.

"Now, what is the goal before Roland Garros? Go to Rome (for next week's Italian Open) and win, that's all."

Nadal had been hoping to reach the semi-finals of a Masters event for the 75th time.

"I had the match under control at the beginning and was playing well for six games, probably playing better than him," said the Spaniard.

"Then at 4-2 serving for 5-2, I had a disaster."

It started well for Nadal when he broke Zverev to love to lead 4-2 in the first set, Zverev serving a double fault to give away the first advantage.

But the world number five immediately hit back and then pulled away, four straight games clinching him the set.

A whipping forehand down the line put Zverev up another break midway through the second and while Nadal resisted more pressure in the seventh game to hold, Zverev served out an impressive victory after an hour and 44 minutes.

Thiem had earlier come from a set down to beat 36-year-old John Isner of the United States 3-6, 6-3, 6-4 and reach the last four.

Norway's Casper Ruud reached the semi-finals of a claycourt Masters event for the third successive time by beating Alexander Bublik of Kazakhstan 7-5, 6-1.

Ruud, who knocked out world number five and Monte Carlo Masters champion Stefanos Tsitsipas in the previous round, will face Matteo Berrettini for a place in the final.

Italian world number 10 Berrettini defeated Chile's 25th-ranked Cristian Garin 5-7, 6-3, 6-0.

with AFP

Watch 'Mind Games', the new series from Yahoo Sport Australia exploring the often brutal mental toil elite athletes go through in pursuit of greatness:

Click here to sign up to our newsletter for all the latest and breaking stories from Australia and around the world.

Go here to see the original:

'What the hell': Tennis world in disbelief over Rafael Nadal drama - Yahoo Sport Australia

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on ‘What the hell’: Tennis world in disbelief over Rafael Nadal drama – Yahoo Sport Australia

DK Metcalf serious about making a run at the Olympics in the 100m – Yahoo Sports

Posted: at 11:31 am

The day after he sprinted more than 100 yards to deny Budda Bakers bid for a pick six, DK Metcalf received an invitation to prove that he was more than just football fast.

USA Track and Field sent a tongue-in-cheek tweet encouraging the Seattle Seahawks receiver to test himself against real speed at the upcoming Olympic Trials.

That jab must have stoked Metcalfs competitive fire and rekindled his dreams of representing the U.S. in the Olympics. Only days later, Metcalfs agent dialed USA Track and Fields Adam Schmenk and revealed his client was serious about training for the 100 meters.

DKs agent told us that he really wants to try to make the Olympics and asked what steps he needs to take, Schmenk told Yahoo Sports. We walked him through what the auto qualifying time was that he would have to run in a sanctioned USATF event and told him that we would help him find a lane if and when he wanted to do this.

How Metcalf compares against world-class sprinters will become clearer on Sunday when he dons track spikes in a meet for the first time since high school. Metcalf is one of 16 sprinters slated to run the 100 meters at the USATF Golden Games and Distance Open in Walnut, California.

DK Metcalf would need to run around a 10.2 in the 100m to qualify for the U.S. Track & Field Trials. (Mitchell Leff/Getty Images)

While Metcalf is undeniably one of the NFLs fastest players, his long-shot bid to qualify for the Olympic Trials is extremely ambitious. Hed likely need to break 10.2 seconds, no easy feat for a man who didnt compete in track and field in college and wasnt a flat sprinter in high school.

To automatically qualify for the Olympic Trials, Metcalf must run 10.05 seconds or faster with a legal tailwind of no more than two meters per second. Eight Americans have already achieved that time during the 2021 outdoor season, according to World Athletics.

The other spots in the 32-man field at the Olympic Trials will go to the fastest men who failed to surpass the automatic qualifying mark. In 2016, it took a time of 10.16 seconds to earn a place at Trials. It was 10.28 seconds in 2012.

Story continues

Oxford High School track and field coach Chris Bush told Yahoo Sports that Metcalf didnt flash quite that kind of speed as a teenager. Metcalf ran on Oxfords 4x100-meter relay and specialized in the hurdles and triple jump while leading the school to four consecutive state titles from 2013-16.

While Metcalf wasnt the chiseled 6-foot-4, 235-pound specimen of today in high school, Bush still recalls him as an intimidating force and a man amongst boys. Metcalf typically ran low-10 splits on his leg of the 4x100-meter relay and would often blow past lesser opponents coming around the curve.

The day of Mississippis 2016 state meet, Bush paced back and forth nervously before the start of the 4x100-meter relay. He knew Oxford had the talent to set a state record if his sprinters performed to their capability and didnt drop the baton.

DK walked up and said, Look Coach, we got this. Just sit back and watch, Bush recalled with a laugh. They went on to set the state record, which they still hold.

Thats the last track meet that Metcalf competed in, but he has demonstrated many times on the football field that he hasnt lost a step. At the 2019 NFL scouting combine, he ran a 4.33-second 40-yard dash a blazing time for any football player, let alone a man his size. He clocked a top speed of 22.64 miles per hour while chasing down Baker from behind after a Russell Wilson interception.

While theres a massive leap between that and making the Olympic Trials, Metcalf appears to be taking this opportunity seriously. His agent called Schmenk a second time the day after the Seahawks January playoff loss to let him know Metcalf had already shifted his focus to the 100 meters.

We provided them with coaches to reach out to if they wanted to and where some of the hotbeds in the country are for training, Schmenk said. It sounds like he went to Arizona, which is one of the places we suggested.

Metcalf is far from the first football player to give track and field a try. Former Chicago Bears receiver Willie Gault won a bronze medal in the 110 hurdles at the 1983 world championships and a gold medal as a member of the 4x100-meter relay. Former University of Florida running back Jeff Demps was a member of the 2012 U.S. 4x100-meter relay team at the London Olympics.

Whether Metcalf enjoys that kind of success or not, his decision to dabble in the 100 meters is a coup for USA Track and Field. If Metcalf thrives, hell bring star power to a sport lacking household names in this country. If Metcalf gets outclassed, it will serve as a reminder that the NFLs fastest men still cant keep up with the likes of Noah Lyles, Trayvon Bromell and Christian Coleman.

We know that these professional athletes can do superhuman things, but we also know that there is typically a difference between track speed and other speed, Schmenk said. We hope that DKs presence will encourage people to tune in to watch.

More from Yahoo Sports:

Read this article:

DK Metcalf serious about making a run at the Olympics in the 100m - Yahoo Sports

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on DK Metcalf serious about making a run at the Olympics in the 100m – Yahoo Sports

4 community cases including 2 fully-vaccinated among 25 new COVID infections in Singapore – Yahoo Singapore News

Posted: at 11:31 am

People wearing protective face masks exit a mall along the Orchard Road shopping belt in Singapore, on 10 April, 2020. (AP file photo)

SINGAPORE The Ministry of Health (MOH) on Friday (7 May) confirmed 25 new COVID-19 cases in Singapore, taking the country's total case count to 61,311.

Four are local cases in the community, of whom only one is linked to a previous case. Among the 21 imported cases, 15 are Singapore residents Singaporeans or permanent residents. Friday marks the 12th consecutive day with local cases reported.

"Amongst the new cases today, 20 are asymptomatic, and were detected from our proactive screening and surveillance, while five were symptomatic," said the MOH.

One of the community cases is a 58-year-old Singaporean man who is currently unemployed and the latest infection to be linked to Singapore's newest and 10th active COVID-19 cluster.

The man is a family member and household contact of two cases: a 59-year-old Singaporean man who works as a trailer truck driver at Brani Terminal and Pasir Panjang Terminal and a 22-year-old male PR who is a full-time national serviceman with the Singapore Armed Forces.

With the addition of the 58-year-old man, the cluster identified as the "Case 61822" cluster is now linked to six cases, of whom four work at Pasir Panjang Terminal.

As the man had been identified as a close contact of the trailer truck driver, he was placed on quarantine on 4 May. The next day, he developed chills at night, and reported his symptoms. He then developed a fever on 6 May, and was tested for COVID-19.

His test result came back positive on the same day, and he was conveyed in an ambulance to Khoo Teck Puat Hospital. His serology test result is negative, said the MOH.

One of the three unlinked community cases is a 48-year-old PR who works as a senior executive at IGWT at 8 Shenton Way but he has largely been working from home. His work entails boarding shipping vessels periodically, and he last boarded one on 1 March.

Story continues

He had been in Russia from 30 October last year to 30 January and served his stay-home notice at a dedicated facility until 13 February.

His test taken on 12 February was negative for COVID-19, said the MOH. The man is asymptomatic and was detected when he was tested on 5 May as part of testing protocol for shore-based personnel boarding vessels.

His test result came back positive the next day, and he was conveyed in an ambulance to Ng Teng Fong General Hospital. His serology test result is pending, added the ministry.

"His Ct value was very high, which is indicative of a low viral load and he could be shedding minute fragments of the virus RNA from a past infection which are no longer transmissible and infective to others. However given that we are not able to definitively conclude when he had been infected, we will take all the necessary public health actions as a precautionary measure," it said.

The 72-year-old Singaporean man was conveyed to Raffles Hospital on 5 May for a heart condition and was tested for COVID-19 the next day even though he is asymptomatic. The man's test result came back positive on 7 May.

He had received his first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine on 22 February and the second dose on 15 March.

"His Ct value was very high and his serology test result has come back positive. He could be shedding minute fragments of the virus RNA from a past infection which are no longer transmissible and infective to others but given that we are not able to definitively conclude when he had been infected, we will take all the necessary public health actions as a precautionary measure," said the MOH.

The ministry added that he routinely visits Tan Tock Seng Hospital (TTSH) Eye Centre for an eye condition, and his last visit was on 23 April.

"He had not been at any of the affected wards. Our investigations so far have found no evidence that he is linked to the Case 62541 (TTSH nurse) cluster. Epidemiological investigations are ongoing," said the MOH.

She is a 53-year-old Singaporean woman who works as a cleaner at Park Avenue Rochester at 31 Rochester Drive, which has been designated a stay-home notice facility.

The woman received her first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine on 24 January and the second dose on 16 February.

Her work does not entail interacting with the guests on the SHN at the hotel.

She developed a runny nose and sore throat at the end of her workday on 5 May, and fever the next day.

She sought medical treatment at a general practitioner clinic and was tested for COVID-19. Her test result came back positive on 7 May, and she was conveyed to Singapore General Hospital in an ambulance. Her earlier tests under the rostered routine testing regime the last being on 29 March were all negative for COVID-19. Her serological test result is pending, said the MOH.

The ministry noted that the number of new cases in the community has increased from 35 in the week before to 43 in the past week. The number of unlinked cases in the community has also increased from six in the week before to nine in the past week.

It added four more locations to the list of public places visited by infectious COVID-19 cases, including FairPrice Xtra at AMK Hub and three F&B places. They were visited from 23 April to 4 May. A visit to Yummy Food Link at 111 Woodlands Street 13, an existing place on the list, on the morning of 3 May was also added.

In a separate press statement on Friday, the Ministry of Education (MOE) said about 1,500 students, staff, and external vendors at Edgefield Secondary School had taken a mandatory COVID-19 swab test last weekend.

"All who had taken the swab tests have tested negative for COVID-19. Those who are on quarantine order have also tested negative for their swab test," added the ministry.

The school, which had shifted to full home-based learning from 4 to 7 May following the discovery of a COVID-19 case among its students, will resume physical lessons next Monday.

Singapore now has 10 active COVID-19 clusters, the largest being the TTSH cluster which to date has 40 infections linked to it.

Among the 21 imported cases, four are Singaporeans and 11 are PRs who returned from India.

Two cases are work pass holders who arrived from Germany and the Maldives.

Three others are work permit holders who arrived from Bangladesh, Myanmar, and the Philippines, of whom one is a foreign domestic worker.

The remaining case is a short-term visit pass holder who arrived from India for her upcoming marriage to her Singaporean fiance.

All 21 imported cases were placed on the stay-home notice upon their arrival here and were tested while serving their notice. "The arrivals from the Indian sub-continent had already come into Singapore before the restrictions on travel were imposed," said the MOH.

With effect from 11.59pm on 23 April, all long-term pass holders and short-term visitors with recent travel history to India are not allowed entry into or transit through Singapore, due to a surge in COVID-19 cases there.

The same border control measure has been extended to travellers with recent travel history to Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka with effect from 11.59pm on 1 May.

With 33 more patients discharged from hospitals or community isolation facilities on Friday, 60,906 cases or 99.3 per cent of the total have fully recovered from the infection.

Most of the 138 hospitalised cases are stable or improving, while two are in critical condition in the intensive care unit.

A total of 236 patients with mild symptoms or are clinically well but still test positive are isolated and cared for at community facilities.

Apart from the 31 patients who have died from COVID-19 complications, 15 others who tested positive for the virus were determined to have died from unrelated causes, including three whose deaths were attributed to a heart attack and another four, whose deaths were attributed to coronary heart disease.

Amongst the 166 confirmed cases reported from 1 to 7 May, 52 cases have tested positive for their serology tests, 82 have tested negative, and 32 serology test results are pending.

Stay in the know on-the-go: Join Yahoo Singapore's Telegram channel at http://t.me/YahooSingapore

More Singapore stories:

SPH CEO Ng Yat Chung 'takes umbrage' at reporter's 'editorial integrity' question

CAAS debunks video showing flight from South Asia to Changi Airport on 5 May

The Banana Leaf Apolo fined $10,000 for breaches of COVID-19 rules

Jailed: Woman who repeatedly injected son with insulin to give him 'peaceful death'

See the article here:

4 community cases including 2 fully-vaccinated among 25 new COVID infections in Singapore - Yahoo Singapore News

Posted in Yahoo | Comments Off on 4 community cases including 2 fully-vaccinated among 25 new COVID infections in Singapore – Yahoo Singapore News

What the Critics Get Wrong About Atlas Shrugged | Nate Russell – Foundation for Economic Education

Posted: at 11:30 am

Ive just begun to re-read Ayn Rands 1,200-page behemoth Atlas Shrugged. The book left such a positive impression on me six years ago when I read it for the first time that I vowed to re-read it every five years or so to keep picking up on new things.

In the meantime, I became a little curious to see what other people online had to say about the book. Ive long heard the rumor that Atlas critics give such undue hostility to the book that its plausible to imagine that most of them never read it in the first place!

Atlas Shrugged is a vast and complex forest but Hartmann is peering only at a couple of the trees.

Thom Hartmanns Distortions of Atlas

It didnt take long before I came across a couple of videos and articles from Thom Hartmann, a popular far left-wing commentator, and I knew my suspicions were justified. As youll see shortly, his descriptions of Rand's classic novelare so extremely caricatured and unfounded that you really have to doubt his claim that hes actually read the book.

(In fairness, he claims to have read the book in high school, which would have been more than 40 years ago. Perhaps the following is a fault of memory)

Atlas Shrugged Is about the Importance of CEOs

Hartmann: "Do you really think if all the CEOs went on strike that society would collapse? This is the basic premise of the book.

Yes, exactly! Atlas Shrugged: the tale of a societys downfall when its CEOs skip work for the golf course!

This, of course, isnt what the book is about. It is true that some of Rands protagonistsHank Rearden and Ellis Wyatt, for examplewere heads of large and important companies. And yes, these innovative corporate leaders did eventually go on strike, but it is also true that some of Rands villainsJames Taggart and Orren Boyle, for examplewere presidents of large and important companies as well.

So, what actually caused the strike and ensuing collapse in Atlas? Altruism.

Any conscientious reader would have observed at least somewhere between page 1 and 1,200 that had the latter, and not the former, gone on strike, society would never have collapsed. This explodes the idea that Atlas was some sort of apologia for CEOs in specific and the rich in general.

Atlas Shrugged Is about Billionaires Who Don't Want to Pay Taxes

Hartmann: "So, in Atlas Shrugged, when the billionaires, tired of paying taxes and complying with government regulation, go on strike, Ayn Rand writes that the American economy promptly collapsed.

Atlas Shrugged is such a vast and complex forest, yet Hartmann is peering like a hawk at only a couple of the trees. Taxation and regulation are both separate elements in the books periodic table, but together they are not enough to cause the explosion of society.

So, what actually caused the strike and ensuing collapse in Atlas? To answer this question is to get to the basic theme of the book, a theme that is present on every single page: altruism.

Its absurd to think Rand labeled anybody over a certain income threshold as a producer.

Atlas Shruggedhas to do with the differences between a society based on altruismin which the masses are told that their noblest deed is to sacrifice for othersand a society based on individualismwhere individuals are respected as ends in themselves and free to pursue their own interests.

Through policies such as the Equalization of Opportunity Act and the Anti-dog-eat-dog Rule, people who embody altruism treat the individualists as mere pieces on a chessboard, to be manipulated and harassed as the altruists please (since its in the name of others).

Eventually, a mysterious man named John Galt persuades the most innovative and oppressed individualists to simply go on strike. This puts society in the hands of the Altruists, who know nothing of how to produce wealth, only how to redistribute it and that is why society collapses.

As Galt lays out:

Weve heard so much about strikes, and about the dependence of the uncommon man upon the common. Weve heard it shouted that the industrialist is a parasite, that his workers support him, create his wealth, make his luxury possibleand what would happen to him if they walked out? Very well. I propose to show to the world who depends on whom, who supports whom, who is the source of wealth, who makes whose livelihood possible, and what happens to whom when who walks out.

Atlas Shrugged Is about the Rich Producers vs. The Poor Looters

Hartmann: "On one side are the billionaires and the industrialists. People like Dagny Taggart, a railroad tycoon, and Hank Rearden, a steel magnate On the other side are the looters, or everyone else who isnt as rich or privileged, or who believed in a democratic government to provide basic services, empower labor unions, and regulate the economy.

Once again, any detailed reading of the book would quickly reveal the sloth resting in this cartoonish summary. First of all, based on the fact that many of the villains in Atlas are wealthy, its absurd to think that Rand indiscriminately labeled anybody over a certain income threshold as a producer.

Secondly, Rand had nice words for the middle class, which she termed as the heart, the lifeblood, the energy source of a free, industrial economy So this idea that Rand would have considered you a moocher if you werent a rich industrialist is just plain old propaganda.

Conclusion

Hartmann and similar critics of AtlasShrugged seem to be so wrapped up in a class-conflict outlook that they struggle to comprehend an author who judged individuals with standards having nothing to do with their current economic status.

Atlas Shrugged is many pages long, but well worth the effort. All sorts of themes exist within its pages, just waiting to challenge the readers understanding of himself and the rest of the world.

Read the rest here:

What the Critics Get Wrong About Atlas Shrugged | Nate Russell - Foundation for Economic Education

Posted in Atlas Shrugged | Comments Off on What the Critics Get Wrong About Atlas Shrugged | Nate Russell – Foundation for Economic Education

Moral rationalism – Wikipedia

Posted: at 11:30 am

View that moral principles are knowable a priori, by reason alone

Moral rationalism, also called ethical rationalism, is a view in meta-ethics (specifically the epistemology of ethics) according to which moral principles are knowable a priori, by reason alone.[1] Some prominent figures in the history of philosophy who have defended moral rationalism are Plato and Immanuel Kant. Perhaps the most prominent figure in the history of philosophy who has rejected moral rationalism is David Hume. Recent philosophers who have defended moral rationalism include Richard Hare, Christine Korsgaard, Alan Gewirth, and Michael Smith.

Moral rationalism is similar to the rationalist version of ethical intuitionism; however, they are distinct views. Moral rationalism is neutral on whether basic moral beliefs are known via inference or not. A moral rationalist who believes that some moral beliefs are justified non-inferentially is a rationalist ethical intuitionist. So, rationalist ethical intuitionism implies moral rationalism, but the reverse does not hold.

There are two main forms of moral rationalism, associated with two major forms of reasoning. If moral reasoning is based on theoretical reason, and is hence analogous to discovering empirical or scientific truths about the world, a purely emotionless being could arrive at the truths of reason. Such a being wouldn't necessarily be motivated to act morally. Beings who are motivated to act morally can also arrive at moral truths, but needn't rely upon their emotions to do so.

Many moral rationalists believe that moral reasoning is based on practical reason, which involves choices about what to do or intend to do, including how to achieve one's goals and what goals one should have in the first place. In this view, moral reasoning always involves emotional states and hence is intrinsically motivating. Immanuel Kant expressed this view when he said that immoral actions do not involve a contradiction in belief, but a contradiction in the will, that is, in one's commitment to a principle which one intends to motivate actions. Christine Korsgaard's elaboration of Kantian reasoning tries to show that if ethics is actually based on practical reasoning, this shows that it can be objective and universal, without having to appeal to questionable metaphysical assumptions.

Moral sense theorists (or sentimentalists), such as David Hume, are the key opponents of moral rationalism. In Book 3 of A Treatise of Human Nature and in An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (EPM), Hume argues (among other things) that reason and emotions (or the "passions" as he often calls them) are quite distinct faculties and that the foundations of morality lie in sentiment, not reason. Hume takes it as a fact about human psychology and morality that moral judgments have an essentially emotional, sentimental, or otherwise non-rational or cognitive character to them. According to Hume, "...morality is determined by sentiment. It defines virtue to be whatever mental action or quality gives to a spectator the pleasing sentiment of approbation; and vice the contrary" (EPM, Appendix 1, 10).

Read the rest here:

Moral rationalism - Wikipedia

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on Moral rationalism – Wikipedia

Difference Between Empiricism and Rationalism | Compare …

Posted: at 11:30 am

August 5, 2011 Posted by koshal

Empiricism and rationalism are two schools of thoughts in philosophy that are characterized by different views, and hence, they should be understood regarding the differences between them. First let us define these two thoughts. Empiricism is an epistemological standpoint that states that experience and observation should be the means of gaining knowledge. On the other hand, Rationalism is a philosophical standpoint that believes that opinions and actions should be based on reason rather than on religious beliefs or emotions. The main difference between the two philosophical standpoints is as follows. While rationalism believes that pure reason is sufficient for the production of knowledge, empiricism believes that it is not so. According to empiricism, it should be created through observation and experience. Through this article let us examine the differences between the two philosophical thoughts while gaining a comprehensive understanding of each standpoint.

Empiricism is an epistemological standpoint that states that experience and observation should be the means of gaining knowledge. An empiricist would say that one cannot have the knowledge about God by reason. Empiricism believes that all kinds of knowledge related to existence can be derived only from experience. There is no place for the pure reason to get the knowledge about the world. In short, it can be said that empiricism is a mere negation of rationalism.

Empiricism teaches that we should not try to know substantive truths about God and the soul from reason. Instead, an empiricist would recommend two projects, namely, constructive and critical. Constructive project centers on commentaries of religious texts. Critical projects aim at the elimination of what is said to have been known by the metaphysicians. In fact, the elimination process is based on experience. Thus, it can be said that empiricism relies more on experience than pure reason.

David Hume was an empiricist

Rationalism is a philosophical standpoint that believes that opinions and actions should be based on reason rather than on religious beliefs or emotions. The rationalist would say that one can get the knowledge of God by mere reason. In other words, pure reason would suffice for one to have a thorough understanding of the Almighty.

Even when it comes to their acceptance of the sources of knowledge, these two standpoints are different from one another. Rationalism believes in intuition, whereas empiricism does not believe in intuition. It is important to know that we can be rationalists as far as the subject of mathematics is concerned, but can be empiricist as far as the other physical sciences are concerned. Intuition and deduction may hold good for mathematics, but they may not hold good for other physical sciences. These are the subtle differences between empiricism and rationalism.

Plato believed in rational insight

Empiricism is an epistemological standpoint that states that experience and observation should be the means of gaining knowledge.

Rationalism is a philosophical standpoint that believes that opinions and actions should be based on reason rather than on religious beliefs or emotions.

An empiricist would say that one cannot have the knowledge about God by reason. Empiricism believes that all kinds of knowledge related to existence can be derived only from experience.

The rationalist would say that one can get the knowledge of God by mere reason.

Empiricism is a mere negation of rationalism.

Empiricism teaches that we should not try to know substantive truths about God and the soul from reason.

An empiricist would recommend two projects, namely, constructive and critical.

Rationalism would ask to follow pure reason.

Empiricism does not believe in intuition.

Rationalism believes in intuition.

Images Courtesy:David Humeand Plato via Wikicommons (Public Domain)

Read more:

Difference Between Empiricism and Rationalism | Compare ...

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on Difference Between Empiricism and Rationalism | Compare …

Rationalism Vs. Mysticism The Biblical Museum of Natural …

Posted: at 11:30 am

Rationalism vs. Mysticism: Schisms in Traditional Jewish Thought

by Rabbi Dr. Natan Slifkin

Published and Distributed by The Torah and Nature Foundation/ Gefen Books

All proceeds from books sold on this website go directly to supporting the Biblical Museum of Natural History

576 pp. Hardcover. Please allow several weeks for delivery to US, Canada, and Europe. For Israel orders, we also offer the option of delivery to a pickup collection in your city. For orders from Australia and South Africa, please email [emailprotected].

KNOWLEDGE

Do we obtain reliable knowledge about the world from ongoing supernatural revelation, or from scientific investigation?

NATURE

Is it preferable to perceive God as working through nature, or through supernatural miracles?

SUPERNATURAL ENTITIES

Are we surrounded by all kinds of supernatural forces and entities, such as endless conscious angels, demons and the Evil Eye?

MITZVOT

Do the commandments function solely to change our thoughts and behavior, or primarily to manipulate mystical forces?

TORAH

Is Torah a Divine guide for life, or is it also a metaphysical blueprint for existence with all kinds of supernatural qualities?

Rationalism vs. Mysticism is a thorough study of how these questions were answered very differently by various rabbinic scholars over history, reflecting two fundamentally different views of the nature of Judaism. It will profoundly deepen your understanding of Judaism and many of the intellectual conflicts that have arisen in Jewish history.

* * *

Rabbi Dr Natan Slifkin has for years been a courageous, learned, and witty exponent of rationalist Judaism. This new book is a philosophically sophisticated analysis of some of the main elements of that vision of Torah. Rationalism vs. Mysticism: Schisms in Traditional Jewish Thought is exceptional in its learning, the clarity of its exposition, and the authors refusal to reject other traditional understandings of Judaism as illegitimate. Unlike many of his opponents, Rabbi Slifkin believes that these and these are the words of the living God. Anyone seeking a contemporary statement of Maimonides worldview need look no further. Menachem Kellner, Shalem College (Jerusalem) and University of Haifa (emeritus)

This vigorous, wide-ranging book makes an important contribution to Orthodox thought. This is not only because of the authors keen argumentation, multifaceted erudition, lucid style, and sensitivity to the social consequences of worldviews. It is also because of his systematically presented conviction that both his favored position (Jewish rationalism) and the opposing perspective (Jewish mysticism) have a rich tradition to draw on, and neither can be waved away. Beyond the many specifics of the issues he considers and the case he makes for rationalism, he provides an appealing model of how disagreements in Orthodoxy should proceed. David Shatz, Ronald P. Stanton University Professor of Philosophy, Ethics, And Religious Thought, Yeshiva University

Rabbi Natan Slifkin has emerged as a central figure in the ultra-Orthodox struggle to define the proper place of science within Judaism. The Wall Street Journal

View original post here:

Rationalism Vs. Mysticism The Biblical Museum of Natural ...

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on Rationalism Vs. Mysticism The Biblical Museum of Natural …

New Report Outlines 10-Year Plan to Conserve 30% of U.S. Lands and Waters – The Pew Charitable Trusts

Posted: at 11:29 am

As government and conservation leaders worldwide work to significantly increase the protection and conservation of the planet over the next decade, national leaders must do their part at home as well.

To that end, on May 6, 2021, the U.S. federal government released a report Conserving and Restoring America the Beautiful, detailing a 10-year, locally led approach to protect and conserve 30% of the nations lands and waters by 2030. The plan builds on decades of conservation efforts in the U.S. and adds to the nations legacy of conserving significant landscapes, ecosystems, and marine and freshwater areas, and helping all communities and economies that depend on nature. The plan is in line with the dedication to natural resource conservation that the United States has shown for more than a century.

The Pew Charitable Trusts also has a long record of working to protect the ocean and public lands in the U.S. and internationally. We are a recognized leader in the protection of U.S. public lands, and have been committed to a goal to protect at least 30% of the global ocean since the International Union for Conservation of Nature approved a Pew-backed resolution in 2016. Our conservation efforts are built on engagement with governments, Indigenous communities, and many private-sector stakeholders, such as working with partners in Connecticut to secure a National Estuarine Research Reserve, and a recent joint initiative aimed at conserving a 1 million-acre stretch of salt marsh that runs from northeast Florida to North Carolina and measures nearly the size of Grand Canyon National Park.

Children peer out at a marsh in Rocky Neck State Park, near the proposed site of Connecticuts first National Estuarine Research Reserve, which the Biden administration says it intends to finalize in January 2022. Heather Kordula for the Connecticut Audubon Society

Pew looks forward to continuing to work with U.S., Indigenous, and international leaders and a broad spectrum of interested parties on substantive collaboration for conserving critical land, ocean, coastal, and riparian ecosystems around the world. It is essential to take the time and effort for extensive, inclusive public engagement.

When President Joe Biden announced the 30% protection pledge in January, referred to as 30 by 30, he made the critical commitment to meaningful stakeholder engagement. We are pleased that his executive order supports a collaborative approach and directs the federal government to work alongside and with State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, agricultural and forest landowners, fishermen, and other key stakeholders.

Additionally, the Biden administration recognizes the sovereignty of American Indian and Alaska Native tribal nations. It will be critical to collaborate with tribal nations on the implementation of 30 by 30 to ensure its success. Indigenous peoples in the U.S. are the original stewards of the lands and waters here, and have nurtured relationships with them that include effective management, since time immemorial. Their traditional knowledge as well as sound research can inform 30 by 30 efforts, with priority placed on conserving and restoring ocean habitat, landscapes, wildlife corridors, and rivers that will have significant and durable benefits for nature and people who depend on these areas.

For example, protecting inland and coastal wetlands should be a high priority given that they are carbon-rich and essential to the survival of commercial and recreational fishing in the U.S. In fact, estimates suggest that more than 75% of our nations commercial catch and 80% to 90% of the recreational catch depend on these areas for food or habitat during some part of their lives. Further, coastal watershed counties account for more than $4.5 trillionor about halfof the nations gross domestic product. To help accomplish its conservation goals, the administration should prioritize the protection of core habitat and migratory corridors for fish and wildlife on the 430 million acres of public lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service.

Today, more than 70 countries are calling to protect at least 30% of the global ocean by 2030, and the momentum and support for this target continues to build. Given that two-thirds of the worlds ocean lies outside national jurisdictions, reaching this goal will demand international cooperation. Examples of how this target can be achieved include a treaty to protect areas of the high seas, and designating a network of marine protected areas around Antarcticas Southern Oceanan effort that the U.S. recently announced it will co-lead, and which Pew has worked toward for years.

To help move toward the global 30 by 30 target, Pew is also working with many public- and private-sector partners to deliver terrestrial and marine protections globally, increase sustained financing for conservation, and ensure that all stakeholders are engaged in planning, negotiating, and decision-making on conservation initiatives.

We protect nature for many reasons, from resilience to global climate change, and from boosting biological diversity to improving the quality of life for local communities. An inclusive and participatory approach will be the critical test for success in reaching a goal of sustaining life-supporting nature. The how and the who of conservation is as important as the what. Pew is dedicated to helping with this collaboration.

Tom Wathen is a vice president at The Pew Charitable Trusts, leading the organizations crosscutting environmental initiatives.

See the original post here:

New Report Outlines 10-Year Plan to Conserve 30% of U.S. Lands and Waters - The Pew Charitable Trusts

Posted in High Seas | Comments Off on New Report Outlines 10-Year Plan to Conserve 30% of U.S. Lands and Waters – The Pew Charitable Trusts