Daily Archives: May 7, 2021

Physicist and jazz pianist combines music and science at Rochester – University of Rochester

Posted: May 7, 2021 at 3:58 am

May 6, 2021

As an undergraduate and later graduate student at the University of Rochester, Philippe Lewalle 14, 21 (PhD) has played piano at the Colleges music and physics department commencement ceremonies.

This year will be different, though: he will also be the one graduatingwith a PhD in physicsduring spring commencement ceremonies, May 14 to 16 and 20 to 23.

Visit the Class of 2021 site for details about this years Commencement ceremonies and for a downloadable toolkit of materials to share your support on social media.

The child of parents who are both violinists and academics, Lewalle began playing piano at age 7 and was drawn to Rochester because the University offered the possibility to combine his love of music and interest in science, earning dual degrees in music and physics at the School of Arts & Sciences.

I came to Rochester in large part because it was feasible to double major in physics and music, he says. Even though I was working a lot of long days as an undergrad, it always felt refreshing having two very different types of homework on my platter. If I got tired of one, I could always switch to the other.

The summer after his sophomore year, Lewalle had the opportunity to work with Joseph Eberly, the Andrew Carnegie Professor of Physics, conducting research on quantum optics. The research would ultimately set the direction of his graduate work and PhD dissertation.

That summer definitely shaped the trajectory I took later, Lewalle says. The research I conducted as an undergrad ended up relating a lot to my PhD work.

As a graduate student, he worked with physics professor Andrew Jordan, where his specific research focus was on tracking quantum systems in real timea process that is intrinsically invasive to changing the system state itself as it is monitoredand the odd things that happen when such systems are disturbed. The research is important not only for better understanding fundamental quantum mechanics, but also for improving quantum technologies such as quantum computers.

Throughout his time at Rochester, Lewalle continued to play music with a variety of musicians at venues in the city and took advantage of the musical opportunities offered by the Rochester community.

The pool of talent that comes through Eastman is really motivating and inspiring, Lewalle says. I have benefited a lot from playing with so many talented musicians throughout my time here, in addition to attending a number of the great performances, whether at Jazz Fest, student recitals, or other concerts that are held on a regular basis at Eastman and venues around the city.

Lewalles own musical interests include contemporary jazz and its intersections with hip-hop and free improvisation. One project he played in, called Claude Benningtons Fever Dream, involved a synthesis of hip-hop and jazz that took a jazz rhythm section and instead of horn players, put rappers out front, he says. We were learning beats and treating them like jazz tunes, improvising on and around them and sometimes venturing freely away from the written material. Recordings from the project are available on Bandcamp and YouTube.

Although many of his music projects have stalled due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Lewalle has continued to work on his own compositions and record and play when possible and safe, even while finishing his physics PhD thesis.

Its been difficult during COVID because, especially with jazz improv, you really feed on the energy of the crowds and the immediate interactions between musicians, he says. Its not the same without that.

In July, Lewalle will start a new chapter as he travels across the country to California to begin a postdoctoral research appointment, studying quantum mechanics in the group of K. Birgitta Whaley at the University of California Berkeley.

Tags: Arts Sciences and Engineering, Class of 2021, commencement, COVID-19, Department of Physics and Astronomy, event, Satz Department of Music, School of Arts and Sciences

Category: Student Life

Continue reading here:

Physicist and jazz pianist combines music and science at Rochester - University of Rochester

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on Physicist and jazz pianist combines music and science at Rochester – University of Rochester

On the marvels of physics | symmetry magazine – Symmetry magazine

Posted: at 3:58 am

Clifford Johnson, a theoretical physicist at the University of Southern California, is an accomplished scientist working on ways to describe the origin and fabric of the universe.

He is also a multitalented science communicator and one of the rare scientists that can boast his own IMDb page.

Johnsons efforts to engage the public with science have spanned blogging, giving public lectures, appearing on television and web shows, writing and illustrating a graphic novel, and acting as a science advisor for television shows and blockbuster films including Star Trek: Discovery and Avengers: Endgame.

In the spirit of his 2017 popular science book The Dialogues, I hopped on a Zoom call with Johnson for a dialogue of my own. What follows is an edited version of our conversation about how and why he came to study quantum physics, why he decided to create a graphic novel about science, the ups and downs of Hollywood consulting, and why public engagement with science matters.

From a very early age, I was asking questions about how the world works and trying to figure out how things worked by tinkering with old radios and things. Then at some point, I learned that there's a career where you can make a living from that sort of curiositybeing a scientist.

And then some family friend asked me what kind of scientist I wanted to be. I didn't realize there were different kinds. So I found a dictionary and I went through page by page and read the definitions of chemist, biologist, all of the -ists and -ologists. And when I hit physicist, I thought, this is the one, because the entry said that physics underliesall the other scienceswhich appealed to me because I wanted to keep my options open.

I got interested in particle physics reading authors such as Paul Davies and Abraham Pais as a teenager. And then in my undergraduate studies at Imperial College, I began to learn about the issues of trying to quantize gravity, which led me to study string theory for my PhD at the University of Southampton. The universe really does seem to be fundamentally quantum mechanical. So, it's a real problem if we don't know quantum mechanically how to understand gravity, spacetime and where the universe comes from.

Ive been doing outreach in a way since I was 8 or 10 years old. I was that annoying kid who was always explaining things. In school, people would call me the professor. Everyone thought they were giving me a hard time, but secretly I thought it was an awesome nickname.

Outreach, for me, is a natural part of being a scientist. Research is all about the story of how things work and where they came from. And what's the point of knowing the story, if you can't also get other people excited about it? If someone wants to know, I'm going to tell them. I got reasonably good at explaining things in a coherent way. Word got around, and I started presenting on radio and TV.

Sometimes, people would get in touch from the media because of something they read on my blog. I co-founded a blog called Cosmic Variance with four other physicists in 2005, and also started a solo blog called Asymptotia in 2006. Id write about interesting ideas and what was going on in research, as well as my other interests and day-to-day life. Blogging created communities where people would engage in conversation and we'd have great discussions, and then that would encourage us to write more.

It is very frustrating to me that science is often portrayed as a special thing done by a special group of people. It is a special thing, but anyone can be involved, and everyone should be involved. I often say that science should be put back into the culture where it belongs.

Public outreach is important because a lot of people think they wouldnt understand scientific issues, and so they leave it to a small group of people to make decisions. And thats not democratic. We aren't a democracy if people aren't more familiar and comfortable with science and the people who do science.

I agonized over writing a book for the general public for a long time because I didnt think there was any urgency to write one of the standard kinds of books that get written by people in my field. Not that theres anything wrong with those books. But I thought that if we could break out of the narrow mold of how popular science books are supposed to be, we could reach so many more people.

Though I was a comic book fan from a young age, I essentially snuck up on the on the graphic-novel concept backwards. The ratio between prose and illustration changed as I began to conceptualize what I really wanted to be able to do with the book. The illustration aspect began to eat the prose aspect and became a narrative in its own right. And then I realized it was going to be a graphic novel. Writers often say that you try and create the book that you want to see in the worldso I did, and I even took the time out to teach myself to draw at the level needed to do it.

In all graphic novels, spacetime is created by the reader. When youre looking at a series of comic panels, your mind constructs how space and time come alive on the page. So what better medium to talk about physics, the subject that is about spacetime, than graphic novels? I could take advantage of the medium to illustrate ideas, like arranging panels to swirl into the interior of a black hole and mess up the order to convey how space and time get messed up there.

Yes. The plan is to do a new set of dialogues. Unfortunately, Im still working on the time machine in the basement so I can manufacture more hours in the day. Sooner or later, Ill get it to work.

Most of the work is not the glamorous, sitting-around-chatting-with-Spielberg kind of thing that people envision. Theres no industry standard for science consulting. The work can be anything from a writer getting in touch with me and asking if I'll take a look at a script, or if Ill talk with them about an idea they have. Or the directors call consultants in at the end and ask us to fix something before they start shooting, although by then its usually too late for a good conversation.

If the science is going to be part of the DNA of the story, then it's best if conversations happen early. The best stuff happens when theres an environment where science can be an inspiration at the writing stage. For the Avengers: Endgame and Infinity War movies, one of the smart things the filmmakers did is they got in touch early on and then we brainstormed ideas. They did this with other scientists, too, gathering a lot of good material to draw from.

Anywhere from zero to a hundred percent. I have no control over how much. When I give public talks, I talk about the trade-off between how much control you have and the size of the audience you can reach. I have complete control over the content of a public lecture to a few hundred people. I had zero control of what ended up in the final cut of Avengers, with an audience of many millions.

In a few projects I advised on, there are even scenes where I wrote most of the words. I either went over the script and revised the science talk, or the writers left a hole for me to tell them how to say something, and then they used my suggestions verbatim. Thats not common, but it happens sometimes.

Overall, the science is more likely to survive all the way to the screen if its for television, which is more of a writers medium. In television, the director works for the writers. In film, the writers work for the directors, who may or may not care about the science content.

Season two of the show Agent Carter is a great model of how things between TV writers and science consultants are supposed to work. Entire characters and storylines on the show were invented based on things we brainstormed together in the writers room. A few times, I sketched an idea about what a machine might look like and they just went away and built the machine for the set!

Another project where I was involved very early on was the first season of National Geographics series Genius, about the life and work of Einstein. Not only did I teach the writers a lot about relativity, but I helped pick pieces of science that they could unpack thematically for episodes and helped them write scenes so that the science could really be on show.

Maybe most importantly, they took seriously my encouragement to show that Einstein discussed his ideas with others around him, to help break that lone genius mythology that often drives people away from thinking they can be scientists.

Some people get hung up on getting all the facts right, but I'd rather focus on things like representing the scientific process correctly, as opposed to making it seem like magicrepresenting the thought processes and the people doing those thought processes.

I care about whether the scientists are portrayed like real people with narratives that help you relate to them and understand them. When I'm working with artists and media people creating images of scientists, I encourage them to make those people more real, make them more accessible, show that they're human beings.

I think the most important skill to learn is dealing with interruption and knowing how to put something on hold and then come back to it. I've gotten better at doing a lot of stuff in my head in preparation for that short time I'm going to have where I will be able to sit at my desk and do my physics.

I hope that I am helping to dispel the myth that if youre good at outreach, it means that youre not goodor not interestedin research at the highest level. Thats often used to discourage people from spending time on outreach and engagement, or as an excuse to dismiss people of color or women in the field. The fact that I have been very successful at research and teaching and also science outreach shows that it is possible to be a significant player in both realms.

See the article here:

On the marvels of physics | symmetry magazine - Symmetry magazine

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on On the marvels of physics | symmetry magazine – Symmetry magazine

What financial crises and quantum mechanisms have in common – The New Times

Posted: at 3:58 am

Often times, finance and physics are considered as mutually exclusive fields, with little or no correlation whatsoever. However, if you take a closer look, you can see the glaring similarities between them. For each of these, I will try to touch on some of the material issues that have generated significant interest in each field.

Financial crises

The world of finance is not short of overwhelming events that go beyond our wildest expectations, and catch even the best analysts off-guard. From the most recent financial crisis of 2008, to the fifteen-minute flash crash of 2010, to the most recent short-squeeze of video-game company Game Stop; the financial markets have proven that they cannot be mastered.

In my opinion, there is mainly one cause of uncertainty in the markets: the markets are fundamentally based on human behaviour and psychology, which is largely unpredictable, and cannot be sufficiently modelled.

Traditional finance is based on the assumption that all market participants are rational. However, the reverse is true. In many cases, people are driven more by psychological biases, than common sense itself. This has led to studies that combine neuro-biology with finance and economics neuro-economics. It focuses on how the human brain generates chemicals that influence decision-making, and hence is a constraint to fundamental economic theory.

Leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, banks were doing risk assessments that seemed sufficient at the time, had collateral that seemed sufficient, and were very optimistic about the future.

However, we were all living in a bubble, which was about to burst, but very few analysts could actually tell.

In hindsight, we realize that banks were not making enough provisions on bad debts, stress tests were not exhaustive enough, investment banks were converting low quality mortgages into high-quality bonds, and selling them to pension funds, etc.

Of course, at the time, these bonds seemed to be of high quality, since they were issued by government-backed agencies like Fannie Mae, and had significant collateral. However, these bonds high credit rating was all based on an incorrect assumption: property value can only increase, and besides, if any client defaulted, they could recover their money plus an abnormal profit. In addition, these were government-backed issuers, which could not default.

However, their models could not simulate all possibilities that could evolve from human behavior, to model them into risk & return scenarios. This was because these risks and returns were so intertwined like a cobweb throughout the entire industry.

Commercial banks sold relatively high-yield mortgages to Fannie Mae, and simultaneously invested in Fannie Mae bonds, which were secured by similar mortgages. These same bonds were securitised by an investment bank, and given a high credit rating by a credit rating agency which also invested in the same bonds. In addition, these bonds were insured by insurance companies through credit default swaps. Effectively, this enabled the biggest funds, which generally have a low risk appetite, to take a significant share of the high yields from mortgages, without having exposure to the default risk of these mortgages.

The relationship became so lucrative to the big funds, since they were receiving yields much higher than normal. However, their available capital outweighed by far, the eligible mortgage applicants, and yet their thirst for yield could not be quenched.

At the source of this relationship was the mortgage borrower. At this point, it was clear that the solution was to significantly increase mortgages even to applicants who were not eligible, in order to feed the entire chain.

Therefore, when mortgage borrowers started defaulting and the property values dropped, the entire chain of stakeholders were significantly affected, and the financial crisis started to unravel like a burning bush.

As the legendary boxer Mike Tyson put it, Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth."

Quantum mechanics

The world of physics is largely predictable and makes perfect sense, until you get to the micro-level of atoms. Quantum mechanics is the study of how atoms behave, and hence it explains how chemistry, biology and physics work. Put simply, it is the explanation to how everything in the universe operates.

Even some of the most mind-boggling discoveries like black-holes, the big bang theory, time-space continuum; are childs-play, when compared to how atoms operate.

At the level of atoms, the famous laws of physics no longer apply; things seem to operate on an almost-mystical or spiritual logic.

Albert Einstein died before he could figure out why things happen the way they do at that level the theory of everything as it is called. A few scientists thereafter tried to decode this theory, but with no success.

Therefore, both financial crises and quantum mechanics cannot be modelled. Nonetheless, an attempt may be made at the former, rather than the latter. In addition, the fundamental causes of both mysteries (financial crises and quantum mechanics) lie within the human being the human brain, and atoms.

editor@newtimesrwanda.com

Originally posted here:

What financial crises and quantum mechanisms have in common - The New Times

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on What financial crises and quantum mechanisms have in common – The New Times

MIT Researcher Says UFO Research Could Lead to New Laws of Physics – Futurism

Posted: at 3:58 am

The study of UFOs could potentially redefine "all of science."Breaking Physics

The US military has started to take reports of unidentified aerial objects more seriously in recent years, even setting up a taskforce to investigate strange sightings by its personnel.

Many of the reports include mysterious objects spotted by Navy pilots, traveling through the sky at astonishing speedsand seemingly defying the laws of physics.

Thats why, according to Rizwan Virk, an MIT graduate and founder of incubator Play Labs at MIT, it would be a huge mistake to not take these reports seriously going forward. In a recent opinion piece for NBC News, Virk argues that the profound lack of curiosity in UFOs resulted in a mess of taboos and biases amongst the ranks of academia.

To Virk, studying UFOs could potentially redefine all of science and lead to a new understanding of our place in the universe, and new advances in materials science, biology, quantum physics, cosmology and social sciences.

Is Virks a consensus view? Absolutely not. But his embrace of the concept does show that its a line of inquiry thats making inroads into traditionally buttoned-up institutions including MIT.

Rather than convincing people that UFOs do in fact exist, Virk is hoping to encourage academics and industry leaders to move beyond their biases into an open-minded investigation to figure out who or what created them, and how they work.

The rewards for those continuing the research into UFOs could pay off big, in Virks analysis.

In the long term, there could be multiple Nobel prizes, not to mention new laws of physics, for those who are willing to dive in and risk ridicule in the short term, he argued.

READ MORE: The U.S. military takes UFOs seriously. Why doesnt Silicon Valley or academia? [NBC News]

More on UFOs: This Theory Could Explain Many Military UFO Sightings

As a Futurism reader, we invite you join the Singularity Global Community, our parent companys forum to discuss futuristic science & technology with like-minded people from all over the world. Its free to join, sign up now!

See original here:

MIT Researcher Says UFO Research Could Lead to New Laws of Physics - Futurism

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on MIT Researcher Says UFO Research Could Lead to New Laws of Physics – Futurism

Collins Aerospace upgrades US Navy C-130 fleet with long-lasting wheels and carbon brakes – PRNewswire

Posted: at 3:58 am

Collins' C-130 brakes, which feature its proprietary DURACARB carbon heat sink material, can allow for 2,000 landings per overhaul compared to 250 landings per overhaul experienced by operators of the C-130's current system. That lifespan is eight times longer, significantly reducing maintenance time and cost. In addition, the brakes are capable of handling higher energy than the aircraft's existing equipment, which increases the safety margin when stopping heavily loaded C-130s.

The boltless wheels feature an innovative lock-ring design and higher fatigue life than the current C-130 system, also reducing maintenance times and costs for operators. Additionally, the combined wheel and brake assembly contains 17 percent fewer parts than the C-130's existing equipment, further simplifying maintenance and service.

"At Collins Aerospace, we're committed to keeping our warfighters safe while delivering the most efficient solutions to our customers to help keep their aircraft in the air. And that is exactly what our boltless wheels and carbon brakes will do for the U.S. Navy," said Ajay Mahajan, vice president, Landing Systems for Collins Aerospace.

Collins is a leading provider of wheels and brakes for military platforms, including the U.S. Air Force's F-15, F-16, C-5, C-130 and Global Hawk fleets. Recently, the company was selected by the U.S. Air Force to design and develop a new wheel and carbon brake for the B-52. Collins has also completed wheel and brake upgrades for several air forces around the globe. In total, the company provides wheels and brakes for more than half of all active C-130s worldwide.

About Collins Aerospace Collins Aerospace, a Raytheon Technologies Corp. (NYSE: RTX) business, is a leader in technologically advanced and intelligent solutions for the global aerospace and defense industry. Collins Aerospace has the extensive capabilities, comprehensive portfolio and broad expertise to solve customers' toughest challenges and to meet the demands of a rapidly evolving global market. For more information, visit CollinsAerospace.com.

About Raytheon TechnologiesRaytheon Technologies Corporation is an aerospace and defense company that provides advanced systems and services for commercial, military and government customers worldwide. With four industry-leading businesses Collins Aerospace, Pratt & Whitney, Raytheon Intelligence & Space and Raytheon Missiles & Defense the company delivers solutions that push the boundaries in avionics, cybersecurity, directed energy, electric propulsion, hypersonics, and quantum physics. The company, formed in 2020 through the combination of Raytheon Company and the United Technologies Corporation aerospace businesses, is headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts.

SOURCE Collins Aerospace

https://www.collinsaerospace.com

Link:

Collins Aerospace upgrades US Navy C-130 fleet with long-lasting wheels and carbon brakes - PRNewswire

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on Collins Aerospace upgrades US Navy C-130 fleet with long-lasting wheels and carbon brakes – PRNewswire

Rushs music taught me that I could grow, that I could change – The Globe and Mail

Posted: at 3:57 am

First Person is a daily personal piece submitted by readers. Have a story to tell? See our guidelines at tgam.ca/essayguide.

Illustration by Chelsea O'Byrne

Somewhere in a box, I have a handwritten letter from the late Rush drummer and lyricist Neil Peart. It was a response to a letter (and a book) I had sent him shortly after my younger brother died in an accident when I was 19. This tragedy was the latest in a series of events that had completely up-ended my life. In my pain, I reached out to a voice that had guided me through difficult moments before. And completely unexpectedly for the 19-year-old me, miraculously Neil Peart wrote back.

This was one of those moments from a really dark period that was of seminal importance to me, and so the letter stayed tucked away. I dont think Ive even talked about it until now, some 35 years later.

Story continues below advertisement

In early 2020, when I heard the news that Neil Peart died it affected me in ways that I would not have predicted. After all, I spent much of my adult life for reasons that I am only grappling with now hiding from the fact that this band, and especially Pearts literate and thought-provoking lyrics, were so central to my life. I regret not making it to at least one concert when their last tour kicked off in May, 2015.

Rush grew with me. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, nearly everyone in my suburban New Jersey town listened to more-or-less the same music. Some of this was outstandingly good musicbut mostly what we listened to was formulaic, insipid or just plain silly. Even at its best, it offered very little in the way of what could be called an intellectual horizon.

Not so for Rush.

Listening to this band, there was no contradiction between my blue-collar environment and my budding intellectual curiosity. Pearts lyrics introduced me to a world of literature I might otherwise never have been exposed to. The more I began to immerse myself in Rushs music which included playing in a garage band covering their songs the more I became curious about the many literary allusions in their songs. I began frequenting my local public library in search of the authors referenced: Ayn Rand, JRR Tolkien, Ernest Hemingway, Sherwood Anderson, William Faulkner and a host of others. I might have been a kid from a blue collar New Jersey town, but I was rarely without some book or other in my back pocket. It is difficult to overstate how important this was for the trajectory of my life. It is quite possible that I would not have gone to university to study English literature and then classics were it not for this period of my life.

Musically, Rush was different, too. They never disguised or apologized for their virtuosic musicianship. And yet they grew with the times. They were not stuck in the formulas that they had created for themselves and that had made them famous in the seventies. Their music stayed on the charts throughout the 1980s, and they never sounded dated the way comparable bands did. Part of this undoubtedly was because of their relative youth but also, no doubt, because the musicians were restless, curious and above all, thoughtful. They were not stuck in the Ayn Randian landscape so central to their youthful lyric writing, so their music wasnt stuck either. I can hardly think of a message more important to my teenage self: You can grow. You can change.

And yet, as an adult I have been extremely reticent to admit my affection really my love for this band. I am a high-school Latin teacher and I believe very strongly in using music in the classroom. I play music before and after class, while students are working independently and during extra help and office hours. I proudly and deliberately play music that crosses all musical genres: John Coltrane, Silvio Rodriguez, Anonymous 4, Ehud Banai, Sigur Ros and a plethora of other artists from across the globe can be heard in and a good distance from my classroom. But the music that was most influential to me as a young adult has always been conspicuously lacking: Neil Peart and Rush.

After Pearts death, I began to be bothered by the fact that I was so reluctant to play Rush in my classroom. Perhaps it was a kind of self-consciousness about my childhood and adolescence. I teach in a wealthy, high-performing high school. The public school I attended in New Jersey resembled something more of a reform school. My friends, colleagues and students are all seemingly from stable, loving families. I was raised in the turmoil of a struggling, blue collar family. My students are almost all heading to top-tier universities. I went to a community college and then a state university. So maybe my apparent embarrassment about Rush, was really an embarrassment about where I had come from. Maybe I subconsciously considered all the music of my youth no matter how unique, creative or inspired to be low brow.

Story continues below advertisement

The irony is that Rush should be the best example of how absurd this line of reasoning really is. Even a cursory familiarity with Pearts lyrics should make it patently clear that intellectual acumen and perspicacity crosses all backgrounds. It should also make it patently clear that being well-read and well informed, that having a searching and curious mind have nothing whatsoever to do with familial resources or blue-blood pedigrees.

On the bands first live album, All the Worlds a Stage, lead singer Geddy Lee introduces Peart with a phrase every Rush fan could repeat from heart: Ladies and gentlemen: the Professor on the drum kit. Most of us assumed he was referring to Pearts well-known musical skills. With hindsight, I think there was something more to it. His musicianship was professorial. But the nickname was also befitting because of his unquiet and searching mind, because his lyrics took us to places otherwise unavailable in our intellectually circumscribed world.

The treasure of a life / Is a measure of love and respect / The way you live, the gifts that you give, Peart writes in The Garden, the final song on the bands final studio album. In the life that he lived, in the gifts that he gave, Neil Peart has left us a treasurea treasure that should be shared.

Brian Beyer lives in Highland Park, N.J.

Sign up for the weekly Parenting & Relationships newsletter for news and advice to help you be a better parent, partner, friend, family member or colleague.

Read this article:

Rushs music taught me that I could grow, that I could change - The Globe and Mail

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Rushs music taught me that I could grow, that I could change – The Globe and Mail

These COVID-19 patients coped with isolation and anxiety in their own uplifting ways – The Hindu

Posted: at 3:57 am

Its a long road to recovery for people testing positive in this second wave of COVID-19. Trusty transistors, well-thumbed Harry Potter books, and family on constant video calls is what got them by

As I work with a hospital, I was busy even while I was admitted there after testing positive. I was constantly on the phone, replying to various queries on beds, vaccine and medication. When I was not able to talk, I was messaging.

Being on a hospital bed and battling the virus made me understand the plight of the people seeking help and I couldnt turn my back. This also helped me feel stronger and diverted my attention.

Sai Ram, marketing professional

The only driving forces that kept me strong were my mother, wife and sister. Every day as I felt weak and fatigued, Id tell myself, I have to be strong for them and fight it out. I wasnt in a frame of mind to read a new book, so I started re-readingthe Harry Potter series, followed by Ayn Rand and the Inheritance series. I also re-watched The Lord Of The Rings and The Hobbit. All this even though I knew that Sauron and Voldemort would be defeated, I just wanted to go back to those familiar scenes.

The other most important thing my family did was to be on video most of the time; it was our way of being connected. Since my wife and I both tested positive, it was my mother who kept a watch on us. She would keep the video on in the kitchen while she worked, so that was like our window to the world outside.

Mallik Thatipalli, content writer

I am 81 years old and am not a big fan of music, but I do have a transistor by my bedside right now just to listen to the political discussions. News is depressing. But since I like reading, I finished Ashwin Sanghis Chanakyas Chant. That book was gripping and made me forget my lethargy.

I read Sanghis The Rozabal Line too. I also call my daughters and friends to check on their well-being and also use the opportunity slyly to ask them if I sound feeble.

Dharma Kanta Sharma, retired teacher

After testing positive, I assured myself that I will be fine. I reminded myself of having the privilege of a safety net in the form of supportive friends even though I was away from my family. Staying connected with my wife and daughter through video calls kept me happy.

We also made a pact that as a family we would be honest with each other about our feelings and well being. My friends kept me engaged with jokes and chats, jumping in to help with whatever I needed. A strong support system is very important to keep you in the right frame of mind.

Sajan Pookkodan, communication professional

When my mother, brother and I tested positive we preferred home quarantine. We stayed in our respective rooms and decided to stay away from news bulletins. We also spoke to each other from our rooms instead of communicating through phone. I sailed through my isolation days with Vadivelu memes and jokes.

Seven days after we were allowed to mingle with each other, we played a lot of board games. As a household that survived COVID-19, my request to others is, be kind to those who are sick. That really lifts up their spirits. I am actively talking to my friends who have the virus now. I want to keep them motivated and do whatever cheers them up.

Bakiya Sri, analyst

Cal Newports book Deep Work was my companion at night when I couldnt sleep. During the day when I was not coughing, I was on call with my parents and niece. My husband and I both tested positive, so I had company in isolation.

I am also part of an NLP group that shared motivational speeches and conducted virtual community meetings. It gave me the push to get dressed, do my hair and wear my earrings, so I could feel like myself again. By the 12th day, I got onto social media to see how I could be of help to others.

Shilpa Nainani, emcee

When I was hospitalised, I kept myself focussed and positive to recover for my wife. COVID-19 hit her severely and I was only focussing on her recovery. For a week, we couldnt see each other even though we were in the same hospital. That was very frustrating.

To distract myself, I read Bahula by A Appala Naidu, a 500-page socio-historical fiction based in Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh.

Venugopal N, journalist

I spent many days in three different ICUs. Right now, I am home and recovering, but with limited limb function. While in the hospital my friends advised me to practise Vipasana, they sent me chants, verses from the Gita, and suggested meditative music. I tried them all and honestly, I found them depressing.

Instead, I found my mojo in popular Telugu film songs; their upbeat music made me feel alive I wanted to break into a dance even in my bed. I insisted on doing some basic exercise. Calming music and meditation didnt work for me. Everybody is different, so one should be allowed to listen and watch whatever gives them joy.

Vanaja C, journalist

All Illustrations by Satheesh Vellinezhi

Read more:

These COVID-19 patients coped with isolation and anxiety in their own uplifting ways - The Hindu

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on These COVID-19 patients coped with isolation and anxiety in their own uplifting ways – The Hindu

Climate targets must be realistic — and demand the impossible – The Harvell gazette

Posted: at 3:57 am

What will come of the array of ambitious (and not-so-ambitious) targets announced by world leaders at President Joe Bidens climate summit?

Its tempting to think, Not enough. Talk is cheap; actions are expensive. About a third of all the greenhouse emissions from human activities in history have happened since 1997, when world leaders adopted the Kyoto Protocol with an ambition of limiting such pollution. In the words of activist Greta Thunberg to a U.S. congressional committee recently, Were not so naive that we believe that things will be solved by countries and companies making vague, distant, insufficient targets.

Vague, distant and insufficient aren't the only way of setting targets, though. Indeed, theres ample evidence that the opposite type of goal-setting specific, time-constrained and challenging is remarkably effective. The bigger risk isnt that world leaders fall short of the objectives theyve set. Instead, its that they limit the scope of their ambitions out of a misplaced sense of self-doubt.

One way of expressing that idea is the slogan that leftist students scrawled on a Parisian wall during protests in May 1968: Soyez realistes, demandez limpossible, or Be realistic, demand the impossible. The more influential version was laid out at almost exactly the same time in a psychological paper by an American devotee of Ayn Rand, Edwin A. Locke, under the dry title, Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives.

Lockes key insight was that difficult targets dont make achievement less likely. Indeed, in contrast to earlier theorists who had concluded that achievement drops off when people are over-ambitious, Locke argued that the harder the goal, the higher the performance. Except in rare cases where an aim is physically impossible or motivation is weak, people are more likely to hit their goals when they push them to the limits than when they rein in for fear of failure.

That theory has spawned an entire literature in the field of management but it has less-discussed relevance to public policy, too. After all, setting goals that are specific, time-constrained and challenging is precisely what world leaders have been doing in relation to climate.

Its not always easy for politicians to make these sorts of credible commitments. Despite Bidens promise to cut emissions in 2030 to half of 2005s levels, the U.S. executive branch is notoriously constrained in its ability to bring about change.

Under the Obama administration, a bill to set up an emissions trading system similar to the one currently generating record carbon prices in Europe was passed by the House of Representatives but never brought to the Senate. The Clean Power Plan an attempt to regulate carbon pollution from electricity generation without going through Congress was blocked in a 5-4 Supreme Court vote.

There are similar institutional blocks in China, which overtook the U.S. as the worlds biggest emitter in 2005. For all the clarity of President Xi Jinpings promise to peak emissions this decade and reduce them to net zero by 2060, its not hard to discern the muffled sound of a struggle with lower-level provincial officials who remain addicted to a carbon-intensive development model.

In January, an audit body took the countrys National Energy Administration to task for failing to restrain planet-breaking coal power development plans. The crabwise progress of Xis own commitments finally agreeing to a formal reduction in coal consumption recently after months of soft-pedaling the renewables build-out needed to make it happen is another clue to the surprising limits on his personal power in this arena.

Still, the history of climate agreements suggests the world is ultimately more amenable to human goal-setting than we like to think. If the Kyoto Protocol was a failure, it wasnt because the 37 nations involved ignored their promises en masse. Indeed, they far outstripped their commitment to a modest 5% reduction in emissions from 1990 levels, reaching a 22.6% drop by 2012. The bigger problem was that numerous countries including many of the worlds biggest emitters didnt sign up in the first place.

The broader range of targets now being set suggests a more promising future. They have intrinsic value, too, because a declared ambition by its nature increases the scope of whats possible.

Were it not for the first wave of feed-in tariffs and renewable portfolio standards in the early 2000s encouraging more wind and solar generation policies that seemed unlikely to achieve much at the time its probable wed never have seen the headlong drops in prices that are now causing renewables to drive fossil fuels from the power sector. If a kooky tech investor in 2006 hadnt cast his small-volume electric sportscar as the first step in destroying the mine-and-burn hydrocarbon economy, would Volkswagen AG now be planning to stop developing petrol and diesel cars 20 years later?

The boldest ambitions arent always achieved, and the future of decarbonization may be as littered with broken promises and missed commitments as the past has been. Still, the only goal youre certain to miss is the one you never shoot for.

David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering commodities, as well as industrial and consumer companies. He has been a reporter for Bloomberg News, Dow Jones, the Wall Street Journal, the Financial Times and the Guardian.

Read more from the original source:

Climate targets must be realistic -- and demand the impossible - The Harvell gazette

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on Climate targets must be realistic — and demand the impossible – The Harvell gazette

Could Religious Liberty Help End the Culture War? | Opinion – Newsweek

Posted: at 3:56 am

Recently, Gallup released polling data indicating that fewer than half of Americans are members of churches, mosques or synagogues. In 1937, 73 percent of Americans claimed some form of religious membership. Today that figure is 47 percent. This decline plays into what sociologists call the "secularization thesis," the presumption that as modernity barrels onward, religiosity slowly gives way to rationalism and technocratic ways of devising meaning.

But before secularism claims complete victory over religiosity, note that the Gallup poll reveals an almost even split between the two. Religiosity and secularism are not going anywhere, even as they interact in troubling ways via the "culture war." As the chasm that separates these worldviews seems only to widen, there is all the more reason to find ways to coexist peaceablyand a return to religious freedom will be a necessary ingredient for a more tranquil future.

Everyone, religious and non-religious alike, has an interest in defending religious liberty if we hope to have a public square that accurately reflects American demography. Even if you are not religious, consider that the First Amendment protections that all Americans enjoy emanate from a religious milieu. The Framers recognized that, before individuals are citizens of the state, they are persons attempting to make meaning and bring order to their lives. Everyone desires to live in accordance with what they believe to be true about the world.

The architect of our Constitution, James Madison, expressed this sentiment in his Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments. "Before any man can be considered as a member of Civil Society," he wrote, "he must be considered as a subject of the Governour of the Universe." Madison argues that religion recognizes realities that impress truths upon individuals prior to the authority of the state. Whether someone is expressly religious or not, every conscience must reckon with what is true or false, and then seek to live accordingly. The presumption of liberty means that we grant such freedoms insofar as they pose no unmistakable threat to society.

As a conservative evangelical Christian, I have a stake in protecting the right of expression of views I disagree withas much as I would hope to persuade you to protect mine, too. I use my religious liberty to proclaim the gospel and its implications for all of lifejust as a non-Christian possesses the right to proclaim his or her worldview, persuade others of its conclusions and live according to its implications. Our rights are reciprocally bound with one another's. The political philosopher Leo Strauss captured the political tension we must all balance if we hope to maintain a habitable system in which people disagree: "the political question par excellence is how to reconcile order which is not oppression with freedom that is not license." That, in summary, is the delicate balancing act of liberal democracy.

If religious freedom is going to work, it will require virtues that are in short supply, such as empathy and goodwill. Religious freedom requires me to believe that, despite what I may assume, others' moral and religious arguments are being made in good faith. It forces me to reckon with our common humanity and shared desires. Religious liberty channels our better angels in that it appeals to magnanimity as a form of cultural currency and moral grammar.

To be sure, as a conservative evangelical, I hold to convictions about the exclusivity of Jesus Christ and the nature of gender and sexuality that would cause many readers to recoil. I'm not contending for religious liberty just to be left alone, but to advocate for truths that benefit the common good and human flourishing. A robust understanding of religious liberty requires a humble understanding that cultural orthodoxies will ebb and flow, because today's victors can easily fall out of fashion. The back-and-forth of cultural exchange allows freedom to prosper, better ideas to gain traction and dictatorships that rely on stifling orthodoxies to be rejected.

The decline of religious liberty is a major reason our culture wars are so brutal. By looking to the government to adjudicate our divisions, we've outsourced debate on what is true or false. We ask a central authority to declare one side the victor and the other side the loser. Government cannot be agnostic about everything, but the great thing about religious liberty is that, rather than looking to the government to decide every important question, it allows each person freedom of conscience to decide how to act. Perhaps our political culture would be healthier if questions of ultimate meaning were not on the ballot every four years or divined by Supreme Court justices, and instead, were worked out in institutions, local communities and ultimately, in individual consciences.

Secularization is ascendent today. But the branch of religious conservatism I represent is not going anywhere, and we have to find ways to live together. Deliberation and persuasion must rise to the surface of our public discourse to settle conflicts. I'm going to continue to exercise my religious liberty to point to the truths that I believe are necessary for human beings and societies to flourish. If you think I'm wrong, convince medon't banish me.

Andrew T. Walker is Associate Professor of Christian Ethics at The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and a Fellow with the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He is author of Liberty for All: Defending Everyone's Religious Freedom in a Pluralistic Age.

The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Read the rest here:

Could Religious Liberty Help End the Culture War? | Opinion - Newsweek

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on Could Religious Liberty Help End the Culture War? | Opinion – Newsweek

SMOKERS CORNER: THE HEGEMONY OF PASSIONS – DAWN.com

Posted: at 3:56 am

In a June 23, 2011 essay forThe New Republic, the American journalist Leon Wieseltier writes that the ability to reason has a long history of being hounded by the hegemony of passions.

According to Wieseltier, the general perception is that reason ever since it became one of the primary pillars of the Age of Enlightenmenthas been the dominant human faculty from the 19th century onwards. But to Wieseltier, reason has come under attack over and over again by those who find it to be cold, devoid of emotion and therefore amoral.

Political, economic and social modernity, of which the faculty of reason was a major contributor, has consistently faced an onslaught from various quarters.

The whole so-called post-modernist movement, which took off in certain influential European and American academic circles, attempted to prove that notions such as unreason, irrationalism and superstition should be treated as expressions of localised knowledge and not discarded just because they did not suit the ideas of reason and rationalism as defined by the philosophies of the European Enlightenment.

Post-modernism was an extension of 18th century romanticism that glorified subjectivity and emotion, and searched for wisdom and inspiration in mediaeval ethos. These were rejected by the Enlightenment and replaced with an emphasis on progress, driven by science, free enterprise and rational thought.

Those who believe they can continue to pragmatically pander to irrational passions in the country must keep in mind what happened to Z.A. Bhutto

Post-modernism which, ironically, used reason to critique the dominance of reason, generated detailed rationalisations for those who refused to let go of myths, rituals and mindsets rooted in an emotional and traditional understanding of society and faith. Many critics of post-modernism have blamed it for aiding the resurgence of irrational movements.

The American sociologist David Lyon, in his bookJesus in Disneyland, writes that postmodernism turned faith into a commodity, sold by religious outfits that are operated like companies selling spirituality. These can be the non-traditional New Age spiritualism movements or involve people and organisations running traditional institutions of faith as businesses.

For Lyon, the tradition of religious obligation has been turned into consumption. Modernity had pushed religious obligation into the personal/private sphere through secularism whereas, uncannily, postmodernism pushed it back into the public sphere, but by turning it into a commodity that can be advertised, bought and sold like a product or brand.

Wieseltiers idea of the hegemony of passions can also be understood as the proliferation of irrationalism as a creed designed by amoral operators exploiting religious emotions through variations of faith, to capture political power and economic influence. Their success in this context depends on retaining the hegemony of passions, within which they can most effectively operate, and with which they can disrupt or entirely eliminate reason, which is seen as an enemy.

In Pakistan, religious groups were quick to establish the hegemony of passions, especially after the acrimonious departure of East Pakistan in 1971. The departure was explained as a failure of modernity or of the rational interpretation of Islam advocated by the founders of the country. The modernist/rationalist project was criticised for being elitist and Westernised.

Indeed, the so-called Muslim modernists in the countrys pre-1971 state institutions and the intelligentsia were attempting to evolve an Islamic theology in the manner in which European Enlightenment philosophers had evolved Christian Protestantism into a rational creed, which complimented secularism and scientific progress. But it is also a fact that almost all Muslim modernists claimed to have been inspired by the 9th century Muslim rationalists called the Mutazila.

From the 19th century South Asian Muslim scholar and reformer Sir Syed Ahmad Khan to the 20th century Islamic scholar Fazlur Rahman Malik who was instrumental in aiding the states desire to institutionalise Islamic Modernism in the 1960s all referred to themselves as neo-Mutazila.

There is now very little available in the countrys textbooks about the Mutazila. This, despite the fact that Mutazila doctrines had become the dominant creed in the Islamic world in the 9th and 10th centuries, during what is known as the golden age of Islam. Patronised by the Abbasid rulers, the Mutazila advocated a rational understanding of Islams sacred texts. They encouraged open debate and the assimilation of Greek philosophies to enrich Islamic sciences, when European realms were plagued by superstition.

However, when the Abbasid Empire plunged into a cycle of succession crises, the caliphs began to distance themselves from the Mutazila, especially when the Mutazila doctrines were attacked by ulema who managed to gain popularity among the masses impacted by the crises.

In the 11th century, when the first Christian crusade was successful in capturing Jerusalem, the theologian Al-Ghazali dealt the final blow to the Mutazila doctrine by upholding the orthodoxy of the ulema. To the state of Pakistan, the fall of Dhaka in 1971 was what the fall of Jerusalem was to Ghazali. Rational theology was criticised as the source of disunity. Open debate came to be seen as a threat.

In 1974, the so-called left-liberal government of Z.A. Bhutto tried to co-opt the increasing interest in religiosity in post-1971 Pakistan by agreeing to allow the parliament to oust the Ahmadiyya from the fold of Islam. But this only strengthened the hegemony of passions. It expanded two-fold, especially from the 1980s onwards. Politicians and the state have tried to use it for entirely political purposes, despite the fact that this hegemony is not bothered by the irrationalism of marginalising religious minorities as well as Muslims opposed to it.

The irrationalism in this context is about how many among those marginalised were/are highly talented in the fields of economics, science, sports, arts, etc., and important to the health of the state and polity.

But this hegemony has also become a quagmire for the state and politicians. They have to pragmatically mouth the emotive declarations of this hegemony, as they did recently during a parliamentary debate on whether to send the French ambassador back because of the French regimes refusal to curb Islamophobia. The debate thus became a contest between the treasury benches and the opposition, both claiming they were better Muslims than the other.

Ironically, reason, in this case at least, was only applied by the otherwise populist centre-right PM Imran Khan when he tried to explain that, in a globalised economy, Pakistan cannot afford to cut off ties with any of its trading partners.

The truth is, those who believe they can continue to pragmatically navigate the countrys hegemony of passions must keep in mind what happened to Z.A. Bhutto. In 1974, he congratulated himself for doing just this but, three years later, the very forces he had appeased overthrew him. This hegemony has no room for even the pragmatic dimensions of reason.

Published in Dawn, EOS, May 2nd, 2021

Excerpt from:

SMOKERS CORNER: THE HEGEMONY OF PASSIONS - DAWN.com

Posted in Rationalism | Comments Off on SMOKERS CORNER: THE HEGEMONY OF PASSIONS – DAWN.com