Daily Archives: April 2, 2021

Its hard to connect to the Torah as a trans Jew. Im trying anyway. – Forward

Posted: April 2, 2021 at 10:33 am

This essay originally appeared on Alma, 70 Faces Medias feminist Jewish culture site.

Had you asked me 20 years ago, 10 years ago, even last year (truthfully, last month) if Id ever quote the Torah in a piece I was writing, I probably would have (respectfully and nervously) laughed in your face.

The Torah makes me anxious because I know that it holds the potential to oppress me as a genderqueer trans Jew. And I know it informs so many Jews of their strongly held beliefs, and those beliefs directly oppress me and others.

They use the Torah to justify hate and bigotry. It emboldens some to actively and directly harm people. As Jewish as questioning and challenging everything is, I was never taught to actually do it. So when these particular Jews would weaponize different Torah verses and decide that their interpretation was the Word of God, that was it for me. Fin. I never questioned it. I just took it at face value.

Add the fact that Id never really seen myself reflected in any of the stories Id heard, and I never even saw the purpose of trying to connect to the Torah.

Still, I struggled. As I work at Keshet, a national nonprofit that works for the full equality for LGBTQ Jews and our families in Jewish life, I am constantly faced with the question of how relevant the Torah can be when I run workshops and teach about inclusion as a Jewish value. I point to our poster of Seven Jewish Values for an Inclusive Community and recite my spiel. I have to admit that when I first started teaching this four years ago, I dont know that I truly believed what I was teaching; I hadnt quite internalized it yet.

I was in the beginning of my healing journey with Judaism. Id felt so deeply rejected so much of my life that I didnt even know it was possible to connect again to Judaism in an authentic way as a queer and trans person.

One of the values from our poster that continuously stuck out to me and replayed over and over in my head was btzelem Elohim, the notion that we are made in the image of God or the divine, pulled directly from Genesis.

As the poster explains, if we see each person as created in the image of God, we can see the humanity and dignity in all people. True inclusion is built upon this foundation.

This made sense to me. Yet I still had a difficult time applying it to myself.

The questions kept coming: Do I even believe in God? If I was made in the image of God, then why do I need to change my body to relieve my dysphoria and see, be, and feel myself? Why do I even feel dysphoria? Was I a mistake? Am I broken? If God is real, why do humans suffer? And why do humans suffer at the hands of other Jews?

Over the last few years, Ive been training myself to think outside the binary in more ways than just gender. Ive been rewiring my brain to think in terms of both-and instead of either-or kind of way. The latter stops a conversation, while the former invites expansion and possibility.

If this is true, what else can be true? Is this the only truth? There must be more to the story. Can two things be true at once? Its a lot to hold, and its not always easy.

Ive never been interested in text studies. I didnt want to dig into Torah. It felt like Id be giving too much power and attention to this thing that I kept thinking was my oppressor.

Then one day I decided I needed and wanted to push myself.

I wanted to face the thing that scared me, as Id done with so many other aspects of my life.

So with my colleague Rabbi Micah Buck-Yael, a trans person who became a rabbi in part to challenge the patriarchy and help carve space for queer Jews, I started chatting Torah. And I pushed back on every single word they said. I asked they a million questions. Even questions like: What is the Talmud, really? What is midrash, really?

Then we started talking about the moment we are in now: on the precipice of rereading, reimagining and reinterpreting Torah and doing it through a queer lens. There are many queer and trans folks who have been queering the Torah for years, individually and through programs like Svara, while actively working to make queer Jews more visible.

Then it dawned on me: Id been approaching Torah all wrong. Its not an either-or, its a both-and. Its not either this verse is the law of the land or nothing; instead I get to decide what Torah means to me. I get to choose which meanings resonate with me. And if none do, I get to create my own.

If the sages and rabbis get to, why cant I?

Maybe the concept of btzelem Elohim needs an update for those of us who arent sure we believe in God. Because whether or not we believe doesnt change the fact that transness is holiness. I am divine. I find my strength from within and dont need any outside sources, God included, to be my own constant, my own divinity. I was made the way I am because its who I am meant to be. Every move or mistake Ive made, every lesson Ive learned, has made me who I am, and I wouldnt trade any of my experiences to be born any other way.

When Im in Jewish spaces where Im feeling on the fringes, or have moments when Im questioning if I really belong or if anyone really, truly sees me, I can dig within and remember that I exist, therefore I am visible even if only to myself. Ultimately, thats what matters most. I am btzelem Elohim, divine and holy. And the Torah gave me that.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward.

Here is the original post:

Its hard to connect to the Torah as a trans Jew. Im trying anyway. - Forward

Posted in Talmud | Comments Off on Its hard to connect to the Torah as a trans Jew. Im trying anyway. – Forward

Moving from the particular to the universal: The highest calling for the Jewish People? – St. Louis Jewish Light

Posted: at 10:33 am

Passover

This Shabbat, we find ourselves celebrating the 7th Day of the Festival of Pesach and preparing for this weeks special reading of the account of Kriat Yam Suf, the crossing of the Sea of Reeds, which tradition posits took place on this day. And yet, though we are knee-deep in our Passover celebrations, I find myself thinking back to the joy-filled holiday of Purim that we enjoyed just a few weeks back and to one of its primary heroes, Mordechai.

Now of course you are asking yourselves, why? What might Mordechai have to do with the Exodus and in particular with the miracle of the deliverance at the Sea?

According to Rabbinic tradition, Mordechai was a prophet and a member of the famed Jewish legal body known as the Sanhedrin which gathered in the Chamber of Hewn Stones, and whose members were so well-educated and worldly, that they knew all of the 70 languages extant at that time. In this respected capacity, Mordechai helped adjudicate difficult legal matters, and owing to his expertise as an accomplished linguist, he was able to uncover the plot to assassinate King Achashverosh found in the heart of the Purim tale. For this act of bravery and patriotism, Mordechai was ultimately commended by Achashverosh and chosen for a position of power and prominence in the court of the Persian monarch.

Rabbi Carnie Shalom Rose is the Rabbi Bernard Lipnick Senior Rabbinic Chair at Congregation Bnai Amoona. Rabbi Rose is a member of the St. Louis Rabbinical and Cantorial Association, which coordinates the dvar Torah for the Jewish Light.

However, there is one more little-known and intriguing tidbit about the life Mordechai that deserves our consideration. According to the Talmud (BT Megillah 16b), once Mordechai was elevated to serve as Viceroy in Achashveroshs government, many of his rabbinic colleagues determined that his involvement with civic affairs and, in particular, his focus away from the exclusive needs of his fellow Jews and Torah study, made him no longer a viable candidate for serving on the most elevated of Jewish legal bodies. Mordechais abiding concern for gentiles and pagans sullied his heretofore stellar reputation and many of his coreligionists therefore turned their backs on him and some even called for his removal from the Sanhedrin.

This Talmudic passage gnawed at me as I prepared to reread the tale of the deliverance of our people at the Red Sea; the biblical account that we recall and recount today, the 7th day of Passover. As you may remember, the Midrash posits that as the Israelites celebrated their victory over the Egyptians who had been swallowed up by the waters of the Sea of Reeds, a heavenly voice called out: My creations, my children, the work of My hands, are drowning and you are making merry and singing songs of salvation?! (BT Megillah 10b)

Passover is indeed a holiday of liberation. And yes, it is unabashedly the story of OUR (Jewish) deliverance. And yet, it would seem to me that as a people chosen by the Creator to serve as an Or Goyim - a light unto the nations (Isiah 42:6), our liberation and deliverance are incomplete until we do what we can to secure the release and emancipation of all those mired in servitude and oppression. And, in order to do this, we must reject the criticisms and chastisements of those who see our goal as myopically focused exclusively on Jewish survival and flourishing. This reorientation demands that we, like the hero of the Purim saga Mordechai, engage in the needs of the communities that reside beyond the limited boundaries of our own parochial needs. Not, heaven forbid, because we yearn to abandon our Jewish Tradition or neglect our responsibilities to our own people, but rather because we want to live-out the deepest and most profound manifestation of what our Holy Torah comes to teach us.

This Passover, as we retell the powerful story of our peoples freedom from the oppression of tyrants, let us pledge to also help hasten the arrival of the time we allude to thrice daily in our Aleynu prayer by actively working Letaken Olam BeMalchut Shaddai; Perfecting the entire world so that all of the earths inhabitants can experience the awesome power and unequalled beauty of the Almighty. May this era soon arrive speedily and in our day, Amen!

Visit link:

Moving from the particular to the universal: The highest calling for the Jewish People? - St. Louis Jewish Light

Posted in Talmud | Comments Off on Moving from the particular to the universal: The highest calling for the Jewish People? – St. Louis Jewish Light

Global Cryonics Technology Market Growth in the Forecast Period of 2020 to 2026 With Top Companies: , Buckeye Partners, Shell Pipeline, NuStar Energy,…

Posted: at 10:31 am

The recent report collected for the global Cryonics Technology market report gives information about the end customers, which combines the business theme subject matter experts, makers, retailers to pick the most recent things of market. The new report on the global Cryonics Technology market includes far reaching subtleties containing bits of knowledge archive in regards to the significant driving organizations along with offering the inside and out features about the business strategies utilized by the organizations just as ongoing industry refreshes. The market study contains the significant commitments of key areas such as manufacturing units and operating locations that affect the business improvement.

Get sample copy of this report at: https://www.orbisresearch.com/contacts/request-sample/5202640?utm_source=Govind-k

Cryonics Technology Market: Premier Players and their Examination

PraxairCellulisCryologicsCryothermKrioRusVWRThermo Fisher ScientificCustom Biogenic SystemsOregon CryonicsAlcor Life Extension FoundationOsiris CryonicsSigma-AldrichSouthern Cryonics

Type Analysis of the Cryonics Technology Market:

Slow freezingVitrificationUltra-rapidCryonics Technology

Application Analysis of the Cryonics Technology Market:

Animal husbandryFishery scienceMedical sciencePreservation of microbiology cultureConserving plant biodiversity

The record prescribes business methodologies to the organizations in the midst of troublesome occasions, for example, the Covid-19 pandemic and guarantees them solid net revenues in coming years, in order to understand its immediate and long term impact on the business space and make ways to ensure strong profits in the long run. The report contains reasonable gauge on the market development and gives affirmed figures relating to significant industry patterns, development rate conjectures, production designs and different subtleties.

The narrative further contains assessment of the business dependent a few segments including applications and delayed consequences of the business. The examination of the market report contains information, for example, thing strategy of the affiliations, their enlargement guides, which are through and through surveyed to understand the improvement of the global Cryonics Technology market. Further it gives more respect to the buyer needs and their moving propensities and the money related/political ordinary change.

Ask our expert if you have a query at: https://www.orbisresearch.com/contacts/enquiry-before-buying/5202640?utm_source=Govind-k

About Us:

Orbis Research (orbisresearch.com) is a single point aid for all your market research requirements. We have vast database of reports from the leading publishers and authors across the globe. We specialize in delivering customized reports as per the requirements of our clients. We have complete information about our publishers and hence are sure about the accuracy of the industries and verticals of their specialization. This helps our clients to map their needs and we produce the perfect required market research study for our clients.

Contact Us:

Hector Costello

Senior Manager Client Engagements

4144N Central Expressway,

Suite 600, Dallas,

Texas 75204, U.S.A.

Phone No.: +1 (972)-362-8199; +91 895 659 5155

Follow this link:

Global Cryonics Technology Market Growth in the Forecast Period of 2020 to 2026 With Top Companies: , Buckeye Partners, Shell Pipeline, NuStar Energy,...

Posted in Cryonics | Comments Off on Global Cryonics Technology Market Growth in the Forecast Period of 2020 to 2026 With Top Companies: , Buckeye Partners, Shell Pipeline, NuStar Energy,…

Elon Musk Ordered to Delete Union Tweet and Eliminate Policies – The National Law Review

Posted: at 10:29 am

In its March 25decision, the NLRB unanimously held that: (1) Tesla violated the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) after prohibiting employees from talking to the media; (2) Tesla didnotviolate the Act by calling employees into a meeting to discuss their potential unionization; and (3) Tesla must order CEO Elon Musk to delete his tweet about the employees attempt to unionize, as it was unlawfully coercive in violation of the Act.

In 2016, Tesla required its employees to sign a confidentiality agreement in response to leaks of confidential company information. As part of the agreement, Tesla reminded its employees that it is never OK to communicate with the media or someone closely related to the media about Tesla, unless [the employee has] been specifically authorized in writing to do so.

Here, the Administrative Law Judge found that the confidentiality agreement was lawful because considering that it was sent in response to leaks of confidential information, employees would reasonably interpret the agreement to apply only to proprietary information. Further, the Judge found that any potential interference with Section 7 rights was outweighed by Teslas interest in protecting such confidential information.

In 2017, the NLRB set a new standard for determining whether facially neutral work rules or policies would unlawfully interfere with, restrain, or coerce employees in violation of Section 7 of the NLRA. InBoeing Co., 365 NLRB No. 154 (2017), the Board held that: [W]hen evaluating a facially neutral policy, rule or handbook provision that, when reasonably interpreted, would potentially interfere with the exercise of NLRA rights, the Board will evaluate two things: (i) the nature and extent of the potential impact on NLRA rights,and(ii) legitimate justifications associated with the rule. In conducting this balancing test, the Board considers the rule or policy from the employees perspective. If the balance favors general employer interests, the rule or policy will be deemed lawful, but if the potential interference with Section 7 rights outweighs any possible employer justification, the rule will be deemed unlawful.

The Board applied theBoeingstandard for facially-neutral work rules and reversed the ALJ, and held that the provision in the agreement that prohibited employees from talking to the media without permission was unlawful in violation of Section 8(a)(1). The Board applied prior precedent and found that the language in the media-contact provision applied to information beyond what the confidentiality agreement defined to be confidential information, even if read in conjunction with the introduction explaining that the policy was created in response to leaked information.

The Board held that [t]hat general statement d[id] not change the meaning of the plain language of the media-contact provision, which employees would reasonably interpret to apply to communications with the media about any matter regarding [Tesla], including working conditions, labor disputes, or other terms and conditions of employment.

Additionally, because the provision did not include language limiting the restrictions to statements made to the mediaon behalfof Tesla, and required prior approval for any statements whatsoever, it clearly infringed on the employees Section 7 rights. Teslas justification for attempting such restriction did not outweigh the right of its employees to communicate with the media about labor disputes and their terms and conditions of employmenta concept central to the Actand, as such, Tesla violated Section 8(a)(1) by maintaining such a provision.

In 2017, a Tesla employee sent a petition to HR and to CEO Elon Musk, discussing the safety concerns of many employees and noting their intent to form a union in order to protect themselves and ensure their safety. Shortly after circulating the petition, HR brought the employee to a conference room with Musk, seeking to directly discuss the employees safety concerns. During the meeting, the employee noted that he thought a union would help give the employees a voice. Musk responded, [Y]ou dont really have a voice. The [Union] is a secondlike two-class system where [the Union] is the only one that has a voice and not the workers.

First,the Board found that the meeting with Musk didnotviolate Section 8(a)(1), as Tesla did not unlawfully solicit the employees safety concerns and impliedly promise to remedy them. The meeting was a result of the employees petition that had been sent directly to HR and Musk, and was an attempt to understandably learn more about the serious safety concerns alleged in the petition. Further, the petition did not detail any specific hazards and there was no explicit or implicit promise to remedy the safety concerns. As such, the meeting could not be categorized as an unlawful solicitation of grievances.

Second,the Board concluded that Musks statement was lawful because an employer may criticize, disparage, or denigrate a union without running afoul of Section 8(a)(1), as long as the employer does not threaten an employees Section 7 rights. Musk did not imply that Tesla would use unlawful means to ensure the employees were unable to unionize, and simply explained one effect of unionizationthat employees would take up any grievances with Teslathroughthe Union, who would speak on their behalf.

Even though the Board found that Tesla did not violate the act by calling an employee into a meeting to discuss unionization, the Board affirmed the ALJs finding that Musks subsequent tweet on May 20, 2018to approximately 22 million of his followerswas unlawfully coercive: Nothing stopping Tesla team at our car plant from voting union. Could do so tmrw if they wanted. But why pay union dues and give up stock options for nothing? Our safety record is 2X better than when plant was UAW & everybody already gets healthcare. The Board agreed that Musks commentary lost the protection of the Act because it amounted to a threat that employees would lose their stock options if they unionized; it was not a prediction carefully phrased based on objective fact[s] of what may occur as the result of good-faith collective bargaining. As part of its decision, the Board ordered Tesla to have Musk delete his unlawful tweet and take steps to ensure he complies.

This decision instructively highlights the pitfalls with public communications on social media by the employer and supervisors in response to unionization, reaffirming the principle that while employers have a right to free speech during an organizing campaign, that right must be exercised in a manner that is not overly coercive. The Board held that Musks tweet, to his 22 million followers, was unlawful principally because of the reference to the fact that Tesla employees would give up stock options for nothing. This was construed as a threatwhich is unlawfulrather than a potential consequence of good-faith collective bargaining negotiations if a Union were selected by the employees, which could have been lawful. A fine distinction can be drawn based on the manner in which the statement is phrased and the surrounding context.

In addition, this decision reinforces that employers may lawfully restrict employees from talking to the media about proprietary information, but such provisions must be carefully crafted to ensure that they do not infringe on employees Section 7 rights. Employers should take care in ensuring that they do not categorically restrict employees from talking to the media without prior authorization.

2020 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 91

Link:

Elon Musk Ordered to Delete Union Tweet and Eliminate Policies - The National Law Review

Posted in Elon Musk | Comments Off on Elon Musk Ordered to Delete Union Tweet and Eliminate Policies – The National Law Review

Elon Musk calls for engineers, workers to move to Texas for SpaceX – CNET

Posted: at 10:29 am

Starship prototype SN9 before its fateful launch in Texas earlier this year.

SpaceX founder Elon Musk has a vision for the company's presence in Texas where it's rapidly building (and rapidly exploding) Starship spacecraft prototypes. He sees the area, which he has unofficially named Starbase, growing by several thousand people over the next couple of years.

Now playing: Watch this: SpaceX's exploding Starship: Why this massive rocket...

8:55

Musk put out a plea on Tuesday for engineers, technicians and builders to relocate to Texas and join SpaceX. "Please consider moving to Starbase or greater Brownsville/South Padre area in Texas and encourage friends to do so!" Musk tweeted.

Musk called for "essential support personnel of all kinds." A quick scan of open positions for Brownsville shows SpaceX is looking to hire plenty of engineers, but also cooks, safety technicians, welders, security officers, managers and crane operators.

SpaceX didn't immediately respond to a request for comment.

From the lab to your inbox. Get the latest science stories from CNET every week.

Musk also said in a tweet Tuesdaythat he plans to donate $20 million to Cameron County schools and $10 million to nearby Brownsville to help revitalize the city's downtown. He promised more details next week.

The City of Brownsville Twitter account cheered the news, tweeting in response, "On the border, by the sea and beyond! Grateful for your support in making Brownsville a launching pad to Mars."

The series of tweets about hiring and donations came on the same daySpaceX's latest Starship prototype, SN11, exploded during a test flight. SpaceX is still trying to keep its test vehicles from blowing up during flight or shortly after landing. SN11's demise appeared to scatter debris across a wide area.

There have been plenty of indications that Musk and SpaceX intend to turn a chunk of Texas into a teaming hub of space activity. Besides development and test flights, the company seems to haveambitions for creating a "21st century Spaceport" resort in Texas.

If all goes as planned, SpaceX's Starbase might truly earn its sci-fi-inspired name.

FollowCNET's 2021 Space Calendarto stay up to date with all the latest space news this year. You can even add it to your own Google Calendar.

Go here to read the rest:

Elon Musk calls for engineers, workers to move to Texas for SpaceX - CNET

Posted in Elon Musk | Comments Off on Elon Musk calls for engineers, workers to move to Texas for SpaceX – CNET

Elon Musk on SpaceX SN11 Mars rocket prototype test: ‘At least the crater is in the right place!’ | NewsChannel 3-12 – KEYT

Posted: at 10:29 am

Money and Business

An experimental rocket that SpaceX launched at its South Texas facilities Tuesday appears to have exploded, but heavy fog at the landing site left even SpaceX uncertain about what had occurred.

At least the crater is in the right place! SpaceX CEO Elon Musk tweeted.

All three of SpaceXs previous prototypes crash landed or exploded shortly after landing.

SpaceX engineer John Insprucker, who hosted a webcast of the test launch, said SN11 had a normal ascent and all appeared to be well before on-board cameras lost signal and the vehicle was subsumed by fog moments before landing. Insprucker said the company will share updates on social media once SpaceX engineers are able to check out the landing site. The area surrounding the vehicle must be cleared before liftoff for safety reasons.

Insprucker said the company is not expecting to recover video footage. Dont wait for landing, he advised webcast viewers.

Independent video streamers that recorded the flight did not capture the last stretch of the flight either due to fog, but NASASpaceflight a media site reported that one of the news outlets cameras may have been struck by debris from the rocket. Footage of the launch pad showed SN11 was nowhere in sight after the rockets descent.

SN11 is an early iteration of Starship, the vehicle that Musk envisions will one day carry the first humans to Mars. Its also the fourth prototype that SpaceX has launched on a high-altitude test flight as the company works to hash out how the massive vehicle will safely land upright after returning to Earth.

SN10, the last prototype to fly, landed upright earlier this month but independent footage of the event showed the vehicle exploded about three minutes later.

Original post:

Elon Musk on SpaceX SN11 Mars rocket prototype test: 'At least the crater is in the right place!' | NewsChannel 3-12 - KEYT

Posted in Elon Musk | Comments Off on Elon Musk on SpaceX SN11 Mars rocket prototype test: ‘At least the crater is in the right place!’ | NewsChannel 3-12 – KEYT

William Shatner Wants Elon Musk to Save the Earth – Daily Beast – The Daily Beast

Posted: at 10:29 am

At the ripe age of 90, William Shatner has boldly gone where few nonagenarians have gone before: playing the lead in a romantic comedy film.

Yes, the Canadian acting icon, best known as Captain James Tiberius Kirk in the Star Trek television series and films, has traded in the Starship Enterprise for a vintage Porsche in Senior Moment, a sweet little movie that sees Shatners lifelong cad fall for a coffee shop owner (Jean Smart, lovely as always) in Palm Springs. Its the type of old school rom-com that has fast gone out of stylea harmless jaunt that allows the Rocket Man crooner with the inimitable delivery to exhibit his softer side.

And Shatner has kept incredibly busy during the pandemic. Hes been raising money for charity, manning his podcast, filming his History Channel series The UnXplained, recording a new spoken-word album, and trolling Star Wars fans on Twitter (as is his wont). Hes also sold tens of thousands of NFTs (non-fungible tokens, or digital collectible items on a blockchain) and dabbled in artificial intelligence.

The fact that you can say youre alive is very good, Shatner tells me over Zoom. Over the course of our nearly hour-long chat, we discussed everything from Star Trek and his thoughts on Elon Musk to his personal battle with anti-Semitism.

How have you been passing the time during all this craziness?

Oh, very actively. Ive got all kinds of things happening. I hate to say it because its so antithetical to what a lot of people are doing, but for me, Ive got a big house, Ive been able to move around, and Im seeing movies and all that. In addition to that, Im working on a lot of projects, including the new album. Were calling it Love, Death, and Horses.

Is that a spoken-word album?

Well, thats an interesting question and Im soliciting opinions, because what Im trying to do is find a middle road. Its not quite spoken and not quite sungits somewhere in between. But the label wants to release the album before the Grammys of next year in order to make it eligible for spoken-word album. My argument is: Theres so much music in what Im doing that its somewhere between a song and a spoken word, and Id rather get a Grammy for a song! [Laughs]

You created a new genre.

In a way it is! The tragedy is I cant sing, but I do have a sense of the rhythm, the meter, and the poetry of lyrics. So, thats where I stand. This is going to be an extraordinary album, Love, Death, and Horses. And then Ive got a wonderful show, The UnXplained, on The History Channel that was just picked up for a third season. I also just did something thats so unusual, and Im going to explain it to you. A technical groupIm now part of the companywe went to the studio, following SAG regulations, and they surrounded me with maybe a hundred cameras for 3D, then had an artificial-intelligence mechanism recording me, and I spent five days answering questions. The artificial-intelligence mechanism then processed it, and you can ask me questions, press a button, and the AI will have me speak the answer.

Is this for you to get out of doing future interviews?

It could be! But its also a legacy for children, a way of doing your will, or delivering a lecture.

Youre surprisingly tech-savvy. Most people probably dont know this, but you were onto NFTs before a lot of folks.

Coming up in April, theres a 6,000-person meeting about NFTs where Ill be occupying maybe an hour of the discussion. So yes, NFTs. Were about to release some more NFTs.

I read that you sold 125,000 NFTs in July.

The [Beeple] artwork sold for $69 million! Its incredible.

Given your involvement in NFTs, are you also heavily invested in crypto?

No, Im not. Although you got my telepathic message, apparently. Yesterday, I was talking it over with ethereum and theyve got their own coinage, and its dependent on bitcoin. If bitcoin goes up, the ether goes up or down, and as you know, the sway is just too much for people who dont want to gamble their money. It is a big gamble.

I should ask you about Senior Moment. Its a lovely little film.

A lovely film! Thats such a lovely word to say. The word lovely encompasses so much. A lovely film is like a flower. Its wonderful.

The film opens with your character talking dirty to his vintage Porsche while cleaning it. Now, Im curious what William Shatners policy is on talking dirty. Youve never done that to a vehicle yourself, have you?

Well, first of all, I dont call it talking dirty. The passion of sex, its losing your mind over the feeling you have, but talking dirty, Ive never understood it. Everyone says youre talking dirty, but what do they mean? But yes, to a number of peopleincluding mea mechanical thing, like a motorcycle or a car, can give you a sensual thrill, so you can talk dirty. Oh, you little... Im going to shine you up... And its more acknowledging the sensuality of a curve of metal.

Do you have a prized chariot of your own?

I have two Dobermans who are my best friends, and I dont want to go anywhere without them, so I have an SUV all jazzed up. Its a Mercedes what are those letters? AMG. So, its all AMGd up with a big five-liter motor and a particular suspension. The Dobermans, my wife, and I will go lots of places.

Theres a rather tender scene in the filma big bonding momentwhere your character and Jean Smarts are smoking a joint together. I heard that you use CBD to cure your own aches and pains?

Oh, Im part of a CBD company. Mike Tyson and I have been doing some fun commercials to publicize this CBD spray. Absolutely. The aches and pains, the miracleand I dont understand it, and need to have a doctor explain it to meis that the aches and pains go away almost instantaneously. To have the inflammation go down almost before youve finished wiping it off, I dont understand the mechanism!

Do you smoke weed as well or just dabble in the oils and ointments?

Just the oils and ointments. Well there was a time that I smoked weed a fair amount when Id go to a party. I wouldnt smoke it during the day, but sometimes to enhance whatever we were doing. I havent done it in quite a whileand I dont know why, because Im all for it. But the CBD thing and the legalization of marijuana is great, and Im a fan.

Theres another scene in Senior Moment where your character is dragged to a wild party out in the Palm Springs desert, and it begs the question: Youve been a celebrity for a hot minute, so whats the wildest Hollywood party youve ever been to?

Look at you, all grinning with expectation! I was at the wildest fucking party, you wont believe it No. Its not true. Ive never been to a wild party. Ive never seen anybody take a sniff of coke. Ive never seen anybody drunk on a soundstage. Ive never been to one of those parties, and I dont know why! I know they exist. But Im outdoors with dogs, and horses, and children, and Im asking, Can you let me into the party? I dont know anybody, Marlow. I dont know people in the business. To me, a party is like having a dinner and talking.

Thats probably why youre in such good shape at 90.

I work out in the pool as often as I canat least three times a week, sometimes more. I do all the resistant exercises. And I ride horses a lot. I try to make my business things in the afternoon, so four to five times a week I ride the horses in the morningcompetitively. Its not a walk in the part, literally or figuratively. It is a real, athletic exercise.

Id also read that youre a longtime karate practitioner.

I started judo and karate when I was younger, and I loved the sportand I love MMA. Ill watch anything MMA. But I dont compete or go to a dojo anymore.

I dont know what would have happened if Id gotten into a fight. Its just a question of whether my nose would be broken or not, so I try to control that impulse.

Have you ever had to use your karate moves on anyone?

You know, there was a girl that I knew [Laughs] No, Ive never had to use them. But I was driving on Ventura Boulevard and apparently, I cut somebody off while making a left turn, because now were side by side and racing down, and I look out at the guy and hes shaking his fist, and then I see a truck in the road unloading. He gets in front of me and stops, and Im thinking, Oh, you son of a bitch. I open the doorand this was last yearand Im ready. Im 89 years old, and I march up to him, and this guy is built like a stuntman. You know why he was built like a stuntman? He was a stuntman. And Im coming toward him and he says, Shatner? I stunted for you in such-and-such. We were both going at each other, and I started to laugh. I dont know what would have happened if Id gotten into a fight. Its just a question of whether my nose would be broken or not, so I try to control that impulse.

You know Ive gotta admit, I enjoy when you lightly troll Star Wars fans on Twitter.

Theyve gotta have a sense of humor about it! If they object to it thats their problem, and they do object. Get a life! Im on Twitter a lot, for several reasons. One is, Im keeping abreast of people in other shows. What that does is eventually Ill ask them for some object from their show that I can auction off for charity. Another reason is staying in touch with people and fans, and finding out what theyre interested in.

Can you explain to me why you feel Star Trek is the superior franchise? It always struck me as more of a vision of what America aspires to be.

Therein lies the reason for its popularity, in my opinion. Its what we aspire to. The fact that Star Trek exists four hundred years from now is why people watch, I think. Its the hope that well get ourselves out of this incredible situation of self-destructionand we will destroy ourselves. In a hundred years, your grandchild will not be able to live, or live under such terrible circumstances that they wont want to live. This pandemic is just the rehearsal. Its going to get far worse before it gets better. Were getting a sense of the emergency thats going to emerge. Through Biden, were seeing how America should work.

Im a Canadian, but I admire America through all the turgid goings-on, from McCarthy and the assassinations to 9/11, all the stuff thats happened to America, and people will be dying in a foreign land, and all of a suddenboomAmerica has brought the goods. The diversity of Star Trek and the diversity of this democratic government is the way America should work, and were seeing it. And were seeing competent people whose life is devoted to whatever their diverse thing is. The most brilliant thing that I think Gene Roddenberry did is to make this all-around grouping of people, of which billions exist, and which old white men in America dont want to look at.

On the other hand, this disease couldnt have chosen a better target than America. It hit a country thats so divided.

Hundreds of thousands of people died because it was such a bad response. Theres blood on some of those peoples hands, I think. But it also taught us a lesson that I hope weve learned, that will carry us through the next period of time: I think of America as that sleeping giant that was referred to in World War II. You awaken the sleeping giant, and America eventually comes through. I for one was waiting patiently for the country to organize itself to get this vaccine out, and of course they haveand will.

I know youre not the most political guy but are you at least a little bit happy that theres no longer a certain president tweeting nonsense all the time?

I have tried to stay out of politics. Im CanadianI have a green alien cardand I dont want to alienate certain people, but Im so glad to see how America is reacting now, with the foreign attachments as well as locally.

Im curious why youve never gotten your citizenship? Theyd probably just give you an honorary one at this point.

You know, Canada isI hate to use the word beacon, and its fallen short in these last few years, but Canada is like a clean canvas in many ways. It just seems less dirtied by the politics of the world, for some reason. I felt glad that I was a Canadian and I didnt want to sully it by going to another country, although as I said, I admire this countrywith all its faults.

Hundreds of thousands of people died because it was such a bad response. Theres blood on some of those peoples hands, I think.

As the singer of the definitive version of Rocket Man, Im curious what your thoughts are on Elon Musk, who I suppose is the modern-day Rocket Man.

He is, isnt he? Well, hes a brave soul and hes obviously a genius, and hes admirable in the way some of those old titans were who founded the railroads and all those things. I think that his idea of going to Mars in lieu of making the world green again is silly. Rather, he should, in my opinion, be devoting all those extraneous abilities to cleaning up the world.

Do you want to go to outer space? They might give you a free ticket.

My joke is, I want a contract assuring me Ill come back!

You tweeted something about Star Trek that I disagree with. You tweeted of Gene Roddenberry, His vision on Star Trek was socially progressive but he was no SJW. What did you mean by that?

Gene Roddenberry was a flawed man, like all of us. He had this great imagination and brought forth a concept, called Star Trek, and he had the sense to turn it over at a certain point to others who continued his vision and made it even better. So, although he did things that I didnt admire, his ability to put the diversity into the cast and hold fast on things like Spocks ears, which the network wanted to take off, his vision was so vivid that he said, No, were keeping the ears. And the ears were, of course, the thing that made Spock so different. It was a perfect vision. And he wasnt a saint, but he was no devil.

With the SJW thing, because thats a term youve tweeted about a lot, what does that mean to you? Why are you fixated on it?

A Jesus figureessentially, thats what I mean. The people who love Star Trek think of Roddenberry as some God-like figure and give him talents and aspects that I dont think he had, but like I say, the original vision was instrumental in putting all of this out there.

Im part Jewish and I wanted to ask you, as a Jew, how important was it for you to be in Judgement at Nuremberg? Thats a very important and powerful film.

It was very important for me. I was brought up in an Orthodox home, and this album that Ive written involves not listening to my father saying, Youll be a hanger-on, and I told the producer as weve listened to the words and the music, to make it more Jewishto have a rabbi chanting in the beginning and have klezmer music in it. It has affected me. I had fights almost every day about being Jewish in my grade school, and I think they punched me enough to hammer me into some kind of hardness that I wouldnt have had if I wasnt Jewish.

You were being bullied by anti-Semites?

Big-time.

What effect did that have on you?

It made me feel badly about myself. It took away my sense of worth, because many if not every Jew thinks, Are they right? Am I a dirty Jew? Its the age-old question, isnt it? I was in Lithuania a couple of years ago, and I did the horah with about seven or eight Hasidic Jews, apparently some of the last few Jews living in Lithuania, and the mayor of Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania, said on the stairs, This is the first time Jews danced at this square. Thirty feet away, there was a brick wall where the Jewish ghetto was bricked up, and where Jews were forced to go, and I was told that the word dirty Jew was literalthey didnt have much water, they didnt have much food, they were literally dirtyso when they said dirty Jew they meant a literal dirty Jew. Its possible thats where that phrase came from. So, all that as a youngster, being called a dirty Jew and getting beaten up and having to fight every day, all that made me ashamed of being a Jew for a long while.

Im going to leave things on a more lighthearted note: Are we going to see you return to the Star Trek universe anytime soon? Theres a fourth film set to be released, and the CBS series. Will we ever see you in the chair again?

If they were to write a really significant role, I would do it. Otherwise, I dont want to be just a gratuitous face in the crowd.

Read more here:

William Shatner Wants Elon Musk to Save the Earth - Daily Beast - The Daily Beast

Posted in Elon Musk | Comments Off on William Shatner Wants Elon Musk to Save the Earth – Daily Beast – The Daily Beast

Tenth Circuit Misses Opportunity to Affirm the First Amendment Right to Record the Police – EFF

Posted: at 10:27 am

We are disappointed that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit this week dodged a critical constitutional question: whether individuals have a First Amendment right to record on-duty police officers.

EFF had filed an amicus brief in the case, Frasier v. Evans, asking the court to affirm the existence of the right to record the police in the states under the courts jurisdiction (Colorado, Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico, Wyoming, and Utah, and those portions of the Yellowstone National Park extending into Montana and Idaho).

Frasier had used his tablet to record Denver police officers engaging in what he believed to be excessive force: the officers repeatedly punched a suspect in the face to get drugs out of his mouth as his head bounced off the pavement, and they tripped his pregnant girlfriend. Frasier filed a First Amendment retaliation claim against the officers for detaining and questioning him, searching his tablet, and attempting to delete the video.

In addition to refusing to affirmatively recognize the First Amendment right to record the police, the Tenth Circuit held that even if such a right did exist today, the police officers who sought to intimidate Frasier could not be held liable for violating his constitutional right because they had qualified immunitythat is, because the right to record the police wasnt clearly established in the Tenth Circuit at the time of the incident in August 2014.

The court held not only that the right had not been objectively established in federal case law, but also that it was irrelevant that the officers subjectively knew the right existed based on trainings they received from their own police department. Qualified immunity is a pernicious legal doctrine that often allows culpable government actors to avoid accountability for violations of constitutional rights.

Thus, the police officers who clearly retaliated against Frasier are off the hook, even though the Denver Police Department had been training its officers since February 2007 that individuals have a First Amendment right to record them, and that each of the officers in this case had testified unequivocally that, as of August 2014, they were aware that members of the public had the right to record them.

As we wrote last year in our guide to recording police officers, [r]ecordings of police officers, whether by witnesses to an incident with officers, individuals who are themselves interacting with officers, or by members of the press, are an invaluable tool in the fight for police accountability. Often, its the video alone that leads to disciplinary action, firing, or prosecution of an officer.

This is particularly true in the murder of George Floyd by former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin. Chauvins criminal trial began this week and that Chauvin is being prosecuted at all is in large part due to the brave bystanders who recorded the scene.

Notwithstanding the critical importance of recordings for police accountability, the First Amendment right to record police officers exercising their official duties in public has not been recognized by all federal jurisdictions. Federal appellate courts in the First, Third, Fifth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have directly upheld this right.

We had hoped that the Tenth Circuit would join this list. Instead, the court stated, because we ultimately determine that any First Amendment right that Mr. Frasier had to record the officers was not clearly established at the time he did so, we see no reason to risk the possibility of glibly announcing new constitutional rights that will have no effect whatsoever on the case.

This statement by the court is surprisingly dismissive given the important role courts play in upholding constitutional rights. Even with the courts holding that the police officers had qualified immunity against Frasiers First Amendment claim, if the court declared that the right to record the police, in fact, exists within the Tenth Circuit, this would unequivocally help to protect the millions of Americans who live within the courts jurisdiction from police misconduct.

But the Tenth Circuit refused to do so, leaving this critical question to another case and another appellate panel.

Although the Tenth Circuit refused to recognize that the right to record the police exists as a matter of constitutional law throughout its jurisdiction, it is comforting that the Colorado Legislature passed two statutes in the wake of the Frasier case.

The first law created a statutory right for civilians to record police officers (Colo. Rev. Stat. 16-3-311). The second created a civil cause of action against police officers who interfere with an individuals lawful attempt to record an incident involving a police officer, or who destroy, damage, or seize a recording or recording device (Colo. Rev. Stat. 13-21-128).

Additionally, the Denver Police Department revised its operations manual to prohibit punching a suspect to get drugs out of his mouth (Sec. 116.06(3)(b)), and to explicitly state that civilians have a right to record the police and that officers may not infringe on this right (Sec. 107.04(3)).

Read the original here:
Tenth Circuit Misses Opportunity to Affirm the First Amendment Right to Record the Police - EFF

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Tenth Circuit Misses Opportunity to Affirm the First Amendment Right to Record the Police – EFF

Is There a First Amendment Right to Tweet? – JSTOR Daily

Posted: at 10:27 am

Last month, TikTok user @nas.alive asked people to answer the question: Whats one thing that is normal in your country but weird for the rest of the world? It took off. Missing among the videos of bagged milk (Canada), nose-touching (UAE), live fish dwelling in bathtubs (Slovakia), and other global oddities was a primer on the First Amendment (US).

The First Amendment of the US Constitution limits the governmentnot private entitiesfrom restricting free expression. This is why companies like Facebook and Twitter can moderate contentand also why they could suspend then-President Trumps accounts during his last weeks in office. While many Americans applauded this move as an appropriate response to the violent Capitol insurrection, unexpected critics emerged in corners of the globe where the American version of free speech is considered, well, weird.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel criticized the move as problematic, saying that lawmakers, rather than social media CEOs, should regulate speechthe exact opposite of what the First Amendment allows. Despite her rocky history with Trump, the EU leader said that his free speech right can be intervened in, but according to the law and within the framework defined by legislatorsnot according to a decision by the management of social media platforms. Frances Finance Minister also said he was shocked by the decision, which he framed as social media oligarchy regulating speech. Leaders outside of Europe criticized the move as well.

The reaction is notable not only because it reflects an ideological difference in how the regions understand free expression, but also because it occurs during a pivotal moment of change for social media companies. The EU already has placed some regulations on digital platforms, and now it is pushing to broaden those regulations through the Digital Services Act. If First Amendment principles are to survive online, Americans must engage with changes abroad.

A bedrock of American historyand, correspondingly, American constitutional legal doctrineis distrust of the government. Anyone with a basic understanding of American historyor access to Hamiltoncan see why. By contrast, Europeans predominantly understand the role of government as a safety net against corrupt private sector interests. These differences are not merely speculative: Europeans report relatively higher levels of trust in the institutions of government, while Americans trust of government has been in more or less steady decline since 1958.

This may explain why the EU allows for more robust public regulation of the private sector. Take privacy law for example: in 2018, the EU implemented the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which places requirements on companies to protect European residents data. Private companies guilty of violating the GDPR, by, for example, implementing poor data security measures, face fines of up to 4% of their annual global turnover or 20 million Euros, whichever is greater.

The GDPR has had sweeping consequences on a global scale. Most US companies with a European presence have found it most efficient to apply the GDPR requirements across the board to their entire global operations. American internet users now find themselves clicking through cookie consent notices on nearly every website they visit. Scroll up on this very article and you will see a cookie banner; you can thank Europe.

By contrast, privacy laws in the US are piecemeal and industry- or information-specific. For example, HIPAA protects medical information, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act applies to data held by financial institutions. Unlike the GDPR, the text of these rules focuses on data security rather than abstract principles of individuals privacy rights.

When it comes to privacy, the US approach is to keep the government out of it as much as possible. The EU approach is to ask for government enforcement. In the end, the EU approach is winning: because it is easier for digital platforms to apply a uniform set of rules across their global operations, the strictest rules become the global norm.

While the GDPR imposes privacy rules, a different regulation, the e-Commerce Directive, creates rules for intermediary service providers that host third-party content, such as social media platforms. The 2000 e-Commerce Directive is old enough to drink even in America, so in December, the European Commission proposed an update via the Digital Services Act (DSA).

The proposed DSA is much lengthier than its predecessor, but it preserves key parts of the e-Commerce Directive by providing intermediary liability protection for user-generated content and prohibiting any laws that require platforms to monitor all content.

Its primary goal is to address illegal content, and it does so by laying out due diligence obligations, with the heaviest burdens on Very Large Platforms, those that reach at least 45 million average monthly users. The obligations include systems for reporting illegal content, including use of trusted flaggers, which are entities which have demonstrated particular expertise and competence, whose reports must take priority. Very Large Platforms must take mitigating measures at the organizational level to address illegal content. The DSA also allows users to challenge takedown decisions and encourages transparency about content moderation decisions.

The DSA does not define what is illegalfor that, platforms must look to national laws. Each Member State will create an independent authority called the Digital Services Coordinator to supervise compliance in their territory. Nations that identify a violation of their laws online can use the DSA procedures to send orders to platforms notifying them of the violation.

And although the takedown procedures only apply to illegal content, there are also measures in place to address merely harmful content, such as political disinformation, hoaxes and manipulation during pandemics, harms to vulnerable groups. Very Large Platforms must conduct risk assessments of their vulnerabilities to the spread of such harmful content, and those assessments will be subject to independent audits. Platforms are also encouraged to follow preexisting codes of conduct.

The proposed DSA is similar in some ways to the GDPR. Like the GDPR, it applies to all online platforms that offer their services in the EU, even if they are based in America, and requires non-EU platforms to appoint a legal representative. It also is enforced with fines set forth by each Member State, but the fines are potentially higher, capped at 6% (rather than 4%) of the global turnover of the digital platform. In extreme cases, a court can temporarily suspend the platform.

How would the decision to remove Trumps accounts fare in a world where the DSA is law?

Because the DSA allows Member States to enforce their own national laws on any platform operating anywhere in the EU, and it imposes the heaviest burdens on Very Large Platforms which are mostly US companies like Facebookthe strictest European nations laws could apply even to uniquely American social media controversies.

Germanys controversial NetzDG law is currently one of the most speech-restrictive laws in Europe. It requires that digital platforms censor hate speech and defamatory speech, as defined by the German Criminal Code, and it gives platforms a weekand, sometimes, just a dayto remove problematic content. This is a remarkable contrast to American law when one considers that it takes months or years for American courts trained in resolving legal disputes to determine whether speech is defamatory or notand hate speech is in fact protected under the First Amendment.

Even under NetzDG, the Trump tweets that led to his Twitter suspension may not have been illegal. And while the DSA mandates removal of illegal content, it leaves the question of what to do with merely harmful content up to the platforms. So, even if the DSA is passed, the EU would not require platforms to suspend Trumps account. Nor would it prohibit such a move.

But that could quickly change, as illustrated by a recent development in Poland. In response to the deactivation of Trumps social media accounts, Polish officials announced a new draft law that would make it illegal for platforms to take similar actions. The draft law states that social media companies cannot remove content that is not expressly illegal. Although the law purports to apply only to companies operating in Poland, under the DSA, the law would apply across Europe and, practically speaking, could extend into the US.

If laws like the Polish bill are implemented alongside the DSA, American First Amendment principles could come into direct conflict with the European model of free expression. European governments would not only tell companies what they must remove, but also what they must not remove.

Ask five Americans to explain to a European why the First Amendment is worth protecting, and youll get five different answers. This is not a design flaw, nor a failure of the US education system. Rather, the reasons for the First Amendment are, and have always been, varied and up for debate.

Among the many theories for the First Amendment is the idea of the marketplace of ideas the argument that ideas should be aired freely to allow the public to compare competing ideas, and the truth will prevail. Critics of this theory point out that powerful groupslike Very Large Platformswill have outsized influence in the marketplace. Another criticism of the marketplace theory is that, after 230 years of testing, it simply hasnt proven accurate: if anything, critics say, this model of free speech elevates salacious falsehoods and buries truth.

The European regulatory framework is perhaps a direct response to the perceived failure of the marketplace of ideas. Europeans think the truth needs a boost, and that boost should come from the government. An American may counter that there is no evidence that governments are better than platforms at leveling the playing field in a way that lets truth prevail.

Another theory of the First Amendment is that, in a democracy, government must stay out of speech decisions so that citizens can learn truthful information about their elected officials. Although the DSA is primarily focused on non-political speech, such as terrorist content and child sexual abuse material, it is theoretically problematic, because the rules are set by the very legislators that are under scrutiny.

Another theory is that self-expression has inherent value. Under this theory, the fulfillment of the selfartistically, spiritually, creativelyis only possible where the government is constrained. The DSA, and even the current regulatory framework, is problematic under this theory; these laws can be misapplied in ways that stifle expression. This risk is heightened by the DSAs cross-border reach, because expressive content, such as jokes and art, can take on vastly different meanings across cultures. The New York Times has already documented several instances where satirical content was censored under existing European laws. Because the DSA may result in nation-specific laws applied globally, platforms will have the unenviable job of determining whether a joke in Denmark is a crime in France, and which countrys interpretation prevails.

The challenge for platforms going forward will be complying with these evolving and demanding European regulations. The challenge for US and EU legislators will be harmonizing their free speech principles and addressing dangerous content without Balkanizing the internet. Although both regions value the fundamental right of free expression, European leaders comments on suspending Trumps social media accounts demonstrate that the EUs vision for the internet may be in tension with US First Amendment principles in unexpected ways.

Support JSTOR Daily! Join our new membership program on Patreon today.

See the original post:
Is There a First Amendment Right to Tweet? - JSTOR Daily

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Is There a First Amendment Right to Tweet? – JSTOR Daily

Is blocking a constituent on Twitter against the First Amendment? This DC resident thinks so | The Hill is Home – The Hillishome

Posted: at 10:27 am

Over the past year or so, ANC 6B10 commissioner Denise Krepp has tweeted updates on ANC business, as well as personal communications. She has also blocked constituents on the platform, as well as other DC residents and fellow ANC commissioners with whom she did not see eye to eye.

One of the residents she blocked, Mark Hecker, felt that it was inappropriate for an elected official to prevent her constituents from reaching her in an official capacity on social media. On Monday, his attorneys filed a complaint, which you can read here. Hecker announced the complaint via the following tweet, which links to a blog post by attorney Jason Harrow:

The complaint chronicles, in meticulous detail, not just the interactions between Hecker, a Kingman Park resident, and commissioner Krepp, but also explains the dynamics of Twitter and its role as a public forum.

Denise Krepp tells me that, as of Wednesday, she has not been served and has no comment. She added, Im going to continue to ask questions and Im going to continue being an ANC commissioner. Hecker said, My understanding is that it was filed Monday, but because of COVID some procedures seem to be happening very slowly. I reached out to Charlie Gerstein with this same question. He said, The court did not issue a summonsthe formal document acknowledging that the case has been properly fileduntil today. It usually takes two to three days for that to happen. We served the district this afternoon by email, and will serve Krepp tomorrow or the day after personally.

As of Wednesday afternoon, it appears that many of the people Krepp had originally blocked have now been unblocked. I asked Hecker if this changed anything in regards to the lawsuit and this is what he had to say: We plan to continue. Im not interested in making money, but I do think its important that the courts determine whether this behavior is a violation of the first amendment. We believe it is, and we look forward to the judges decision, even if Commissioner Krepp seems to now realize she was in the wrong.

Although only Hecker decided to engage a lawyer and sue Krepp for her alleged First Amendment violations, other people to whom I spoke for this post mentioned that they were also unhappy with Krepps behavior something that was shared widely on Twitter itself. One of the people to whom I spoke shared this sentiment anonymously: Hopefully this will garner attention that the focus should be on the harm that [Ms. Krepp] causes to Black and Brown residents in her ANC, not solely on whom she blocks on social media.

Read more:
Is blocking a constituent on Twitter against the First Amendment? This DC resident thinks so | The Hill is Home - The Hillishome

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Is blocking a constituent on Twitter against the First Amendment? This DC resident thinks so | The Hill is Home – The Hillishome