The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: February 12, 2021
For these tipped workers, $15 minimum wage is a matter of COVID-19 survival – USA TODAY
Posted: February 12, 2021 at 5:45 am
President Biden is pushing to raise the minimum wage to $15. Here's how that would affect the economy. USA TODAY
Many making subminimum wage don't earn enough to qualify for unemployment. During the pandemic, 6 million restaurant workers were left behind. Some tell their stories below.
Introduction by Saru Jayaraman
Last month, members of Congress introduced a bill proposing a $15-an-hour minimum wage, a proposition President Joe Biden included in his $1.9 trillion COVID-19 stimulus package.
Bidens initial decision (he has since said that the wage hike mightnot make it into the final package) demonstrates his understanding that the economy cannot recover after one of the most devastating pandemics in the nation's history unless millions of low-wage workers are able to recover.
Buried in the proposed legislation is a historic full phaseout of the subminimum wage for tipped workers. With the pandemic, this subminimum wage changed from being an issue primarily of racial, gender and economic injustice to one that is an even more drastic matter of survival.
Saru Jayaraman is the director of One Fair Wage.(Photo: Sekou Luke)
Tipped workers are being hit with new threats that make the already difficult task of eking out a living more precarious they have to enforce mask-wearing policies that anger the same customers they rely on for tips (adding to the decrease in earnings),and reports of harassment are up.
The subminimum wage for tipped workers, which exists in 43 states and at the federal level, is a legacy of slavery. Following emancipation, white restaurant owners sought to hire Black workers as bussers and servers without paying them, forcing them to live exclusively off tips. This was made law in 1938, when the United States enacted its first federal minimum wage lawyet continued to exempt restaurant workers, allowing them to be paid mostly in tips.
Today the federal subminimum wage is $2.13 an hour more than two-thirds less than the full minimum wage and hasnt gone up in a quarter of a century.
And while restaurant owners are supposed to make up the difference when tips fall short, the U.S. Department of Labor found that nearly84% of restaurants investigated have violated these rules.
Today, about 70% of tipped workers are women. In addition, tipped workers are nearly twice as likely to be poor.
According to a 2014 survey by theRestaurant Opportunities Centers United and Forward Together of 688 current and former restaurant workers, women in states that allow a subminimum wage report twice the rate of sexual harassment as women working in the seven states Alaska, California, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington that require the full minimum wage in addition to tips.
RELATED CONTENT: It's time to end subminimum wage for workers with disabilities, says Tom Ridge
Contrary to public disinformation campaigns, these seven states have higher restaurant industry sales, small business growth and job growth, and the same or higher rates of tipping as the 43 states with subminimum wages for tipped workers.
The survey also indicated that women who earn a subminimum wage are frequently forced to tolerate inappropriate customer behaviorto ensure they get good tips.
The pandemic exacerbated these issues. As of May, nearly 6 million restaurant workers had lost their jobs due to COVID-19. One Fair Wage, a national organization working to end the subminimum wage, and of which I am president, surveyed the 160,000 service workers who applied for the organization's emergency funds. Between March and May, 60% faced severe challenges accessing unemployment insurance because their wages were too low to qualify.
Those who returned to work were asked to do more for less working in restaurants that frequently had shorter hours and fewer customers for significantly less in tips.
Another survey on sexual harassment conducted by One Fair Wage, the UC Berkley Food Labor Research Center and the Barry Commoner Center for Health and the Environment in December found that 41% of restaurant workers reported an increase in sexual harassment, and hundreds of women reported what were calling #MASKualHarassment the horrifying phenomenon of female servers being asked by male customers to take off their masks so the men can judge their looks and decide how much to tip.
With the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reporting that adults have an increased risk of catching COVID-19 eating in restaurants, we rely on these workers to enforce social distancing and mask rules that are difficult to enforce on their current wage system.
Tipped restaurant workers are the only essential workers to not receive a minimum wage, and the only essential workers to be asked to remove their protective gear for a chance to earn their income.Restaurant workers, like those whose stories are featured below, are doing their best to help us survive this pandemic. And now, we need to help them.
Saru Jayaramanis the president ofOne Fair Wage, director of the Food Labor Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley, and author of several books on the restaurant industry, including "Forked, A New Standard for American Dining." She is also the former co-director of the Restaurant Opportunities Centers United. Follow her on Twitter: @SaruJayaraman.
Chantel St. Laurent; Lewiston, Maine
I love working in restaurants, but had to take on a second job as a substance use counselor during this pandemic. It has been a lifesaver.
Working in the pandemic is scary. I have an 83-year-old grandmother I see weekly. I worry about risking her health. And what happens if theres an outbreak at the restaurant? A lot of us live week to week. If we had to go into a 14-day quarantine, I personally dont know how many of us would survive financially.
Tips are down. Way down. The restaurant has limited capacity and limited hours due to CDCguidelines causing our in-person business to decrease dramatically. Maybe people dont know how it works, but those tips are what I live on. Did you know most servers do not get a paycheck? I get a check, every two weeks, but the subminimum wage is so low that when you take out taxes, a lot of times the paycheck literally says, This Is Not A Check. Now that I am bartending, its a little better, like the time I worked 15 hours and got a $64 paycheck. I count on tips, not my paychecks.
Chantel St. Laurent(Photo: Handout)
I got into the restaurant industry when I was 19, but I have stayed in the industry to try to support my family and to be able to afford to go back to college. Restaurant work is really great in that way you can make money while still having a flexible schedule. I just graduated with my associates degree, and now Im working on my bachelors in social and behavioral sciences.
I work at a wonderful local restaurant. The people who own it, and all the people who work there, are like family. When the pandemic hit, the restaurant closed briefly and the owners got a Payment Protection Program loan. They used it to help every single employee and get as many of us as possible back to work doing to-go orders when we were able. That was really great. The owners also pooled tips and shared them among all of us, even employees who werent able to work because they suddenly had their kids at home or had health issues. Its a really caring environment.
But that doesnt mean its not hard.
In the middle of a pandemic, its really frustrating that were front-line workers but were getting paid less than everyone else risking their lives to help feed and take care of people in this crisis. I really love working in the restaurant industry. I love people, I love seeing them come in and have fun.
Im a lifelong Mainer, born and raised and now raising my own children as Mainers. And Im proud to be helping our state get through this crisis. I just wish our state would help me, by simply making sure Im paid the same, full minimum wage as everyone else on weeks where I make less than minimum wage. That doesnt seem like too much to ask. In fact, it seems like a simple step toward fairness thats way overdue.
Alyson Martinez-Diaz; Charles Town, West Virginia
I was working at a hotel restaurant, as the assistant front of house and bar manager, when the first shutdowns happened in March. The owners were just as unsure as everyone else of what was going to happen from then on out, but, thankfully, they assured us they would help us out in any way they possibly could. Everything felt uncertain, and they had to lay off nearly the entire staff. The owners offered to help guide every worker in applying for unemployment insurance. West Virginias system is notoriously broken.
I was one of five people who kept working five of us suddenly trying to keep a restaurant, hotel (which had been partially shut down) and an adventure business (which stopped taking customers) managed. We were lucky because we had a resort liquor license so we could sell booze to hotel guests staying on property and taking to-go orders. That kept us in business.
But I was overworked, taking on jobs as assistant kitchen manager, bartender, housekeeper, front-desk agent, manager and full-time advertising agent. I am forever grateful that the owners paid above-average wages. I made $11 an hour during the pandemic, with a few tips on top even though business was down. But the insane amount of work during that period took its toll in stress and strain, and I couldnt take it anymore. Plus my kids and family needed more of my time during all the chaos, including my husband getting laid off.
Alyson Martinez-Diaz with her husband Francisco Martinez-Diaz.(Photo: Handout)
So I found another job, as a server at an Irish pub, making the subminimum wage of $2.13 an hour. Tips were always unpredictable, but the pandemic really pulled the rug out. Nine restaurant employees got COVID-19. The owners shut everything down for two weeks. The state couldnt keep up to really even do contact tracing. During that time, the staff got no pay. None. Nothing. The owners said we should apply for unemployment, but I hadalready been fighting that system from my last job, and my slow-to-come benefits were drying up. I thought we should get paid under the FamilyandMedical Leave Act, but the owners said they were exempt. Making ends meet was hard enough before. My family and I barely made it through those two weeks.
I tried to find another job. I applied to nine other restaurants, but so many mom-and-pop businesses are closing. Things are getting really rundown. The entire county that I live in is financially suffering. Some people might not feel its worth it to go back to work for $2.13 an hour, especially when tips are so low and the risk is so high. But I was glad when those two weeks were over and I could go back to work.
And the risks are getting higher not just in terms of getting the coronavirus, but also in terms of desperation. We put up with poor treatment from customers in ways that we wouldn't before. There are so many examples I could give. Just the other day, I was bartending and overheard a group of men betting about when my left boob would fall out of my jacket. Then they tried to pretend they were just joking. One of them said to me, Take your mask off, honey. Lets see that gorgeous smile.
Thats something I get a lot of. These guys know we need their tips, and theyll imply if you do what they ask, they'll throw us more money. Its wrong and its sickening. Living on tips and a subminimum wage (and on top of that having fewer options because of COVID-19) means putting up with it.
I dont think our lawmakers in West Virginia or anywhere in the country would want anyone they love being treated this way risking their lives only to be harassed and paid like garbage. I want to say to our lawmakers: Please have a soul and help fix this. One day your own children could be walking in my shoes.
John Michael Alvarez; Denver
I was unemployed until two weeks agoafter I quit my job as a restaurant server last year. I got into an altercation with a customer who wasnt wearing a mask. I hadbeen risking my health, for almost no pay and lower and lower tips, exposing myself to a deadly virus, just to help people get a little joy in this moment. But a customer refused to put on a mask, then yelled at me for doing my job when I asked him to wear one. I lost my temper. And when my manager sided with the customer, I left.
I finally found a job advocating for restaurant industry workers, pushing Congress to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2025.
John Michael Alvarez(Photo: Handout)
I feel like Ive been failed by the system in every way, even though I'm one of the lucky ones. I was able to collect unemployment during the three months I was out of work. A lot of restaurant workers who get their tips only in cash cant count those tips as wages for unemployment insurance. Lots of us are told we earn too little to even qualify for unemployment. The restaurant I worked at, our tips went on our paycheck. That ended up being a good thing in a moment like this. But still, the unemployment insurance system is at its breaking point. I havent gotten a check in over a month. Im living off of food banks now. Im a month behind on all of my bills. Im even using donated pet food. And I know Im not anywhere near the only person in this situation.
Working in restaurants for low wages and relying on fickle tips was hard even in the best of times. Maybe it makes sense in a few restaurants with big spenders, but in my restaurant we did tip pooling, so I didnt even take my tips home. They were divided up equally among all of us by the hours worked. Then, add in the pandemic, and tips were way down. We had to space the tables, which halved our capacity. So I was still working as many hours but taking home way less.
I dont think a lot of customers and a lot of policymakers realize how fortunate they are, and that the rest of us dont have a safety net of family or savings to catch us. Were on our own. We work hard to earn what little we have, and it can all be wiped away in a minute.
Regular folks are the people whose hard work, dedication and ambition make this country stronger. And we need to make sure our work is validated and compensated in a way that reflects the fact that we're essential. That should feel clearer now more than ever.
Haley Holland; Scottsdale, Arizona
I work as a hostess and server, and the amount of bullying that guests get away with is really unacceptable always, but especially now with being asked to wear masks. I try to be so gentle and nice about it, explaining the restaurant rules that if people are waiting inside and arent seated in the dining area, either they can wear a mask or they have to wait outside. We even have masks we offer them if they dont have their own. But I get the dirtiest looks, the rudest comments. Its abusive.
The other day, a woman came inside to pick up a to-go order. I asked her, very politely, if she could wear a mask. But she refused, because she said she had a health condition. Which is obviously completely her right, but I explained that in that case shed have to wait outside. When she made a fuss about it, my supervisor said the same thing. She knew that our policy was that customers didnt have to wear masks while eating in the dining room, so she went over to one of the dining tables and flopped herself down and just sat there, maskless, exuding hostility. Then when it came time to pay for her to-go order, she didnt tip. She didnt follow the rules rules meant to keep us and customers like her safe and Im the one who pays the price, in every sense. When she signed the bill, she literally threw it at me.
Haley Holland(Photo: Handout)
Two days later, she came back to complain about me. She said that I was rude and had embarrassed her. She lied and said that she hadbeen wearing a mask all along, but that I had made her feel like she had the plague. I was lucky. My manager apologized to her but I didnt get in trouble. But at another job, with a less supportive manager, theres no doubt I would have been penalized. On top of not getting paid, which is the biggest penalty of all.
I work is in a very affluent area. The tips can be really good. But the pandemic has not only subjected servers to routine harassment but also has ruined our tips. Ive worked in the restaurant industry my entire adult life and never, ever, had an employer make up the difference between the subminimum wage and the full minimum wage when tips fall short. I know thats what theyre supposed to do, but they never do.
Ive been very fortunate to work at some great local restaurants with managers who really seem to care about their workers. But lets be honest, at the end of the day, its always about the bottom line, and too many restaurant owners will do whatever they can to increase their profits. Restaurant workers are now public health workers, enforcing these lifesaving guidelines with customers, at the same time were forced to rely on those very customers to feed our families and pay our rent. Its just not fair, and it just doesnt work. And its restaurant workers like me who are paying the price.
Dominique Brown; Washington, D.C.
I worked for tipped wages in restaurants forabout seven years. I work as a concierge now. Its more relaxed, and I feel more respected.
I was born and raised in our nations capital, and after going to college in West Virginia, I came back to Washington, D.C., ready and excited to start working as an actress but realized I needed to make money. I started working in restaurants as a hostess and worked my way up to becoming a server and eventually trained as a bartender. Ive worked in some of the top restaurants in Washington. And I've also done some of the same work in New York City. I really love the industry. I love taking care of people. I love helping people come together through food. My love language is acts of service and communing over meals, meeting different people, talking about where we come from and sharing our stories I love that part of restaurant work.
But I dont like the instability and abuse. Ive had managers who expected us to do work off the clock and if we didnt, theyd take us off the schedule for the next week or move us to shifts with bad tips. I worked at one restaurant where there actually was a class action lawsuit for forcing us to do nontipped work on a tipped worker wage. In one case, I had to carry trays that were so heavy, I developed a cyst on my wrist. The manager didnt care. He just wanted me back at work. And when I returned to work against my doctors recommendations, after being pressured to do so by management, he had another manager write me up after I set a tray down while helping a guest. Restaurants can be a great environment to work when you have managers who care, but I feel like the subminimum wage gives some people permission to treat us like were subhuman.
Dominique Brown(Photo: Handout)
That goes for customers, too. Ive had customers who wanted to touch my hair. Ive had others, especially in Washingtonwhere a lot of businessmen come for conferences, who have been dismissive and disrespectful to Black and brown staff. This especially happened with a lot of white businessmen from the South. But were just supposed to laugh it off and take it so we can get our tips. Its a really problematic system.
It was bad enough putting up with all of this before the pandemic. But when the pandemic hit, it became clear how much the restaurant I was working at didnt care about any of us. They did some kind of GoFundMe for staff but didnt share the money with everyone. I didnt get a penny. And it turns out one of our co-workers died from COVID-19. I found out from a co-worker, not from management. Management didn't give what I thought was the proper amount of attention to staff after that happened. That's when it really hit me how little they valued our work and our lives. Plus, as much as I miss some of my regular customers, the ones I really made a connection with, I was tired of the customers who acted nasty and entitled, and didnt even have the decency to tip.
The restaurant I worked at in New York shut down in March, at the beginning of the pandemic. To add insult to injury, like so many other restaurant workers left jobless, I had trouble getting unemployment insurance and still havent received all the money Im due.
Now I work for a company that pays me a livable wage. I get benefits.
Id love to go back to working in restaurants someday, but things would need to change. My friends who are still working in restaurants are struggling more than ever to make ends meet. And it shouldnt be that way. These are hardworking professionals. Theyre worth more than that. Im worth more than that. And we need wage laws that respect our work and our worth.
Are you a tipped worker? What's your story? Tell us using letters@usatoday.com or #tellusatoday on Twitter.
Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2021/02/09/these-tipped-workers-15-minimum-wage-matter-covid-survival/4373275001/
The rest is here:
For these tipped workers, $15 minimum wage is a matter of COVID-19 survival - USA TODAY
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on For these tipped workers, $15 minimum wage is a matter of COVID-19 survival – USA TODAY
Letter: Give these workers raise | Letters To The Editor | kokomotribune.com – Kokomo Tribune
Posted: at 5:45 am
Many Hoosier voters dont know that Indianas minimum wage is really $2.13 per hour. That is what waiters and waitresses make at many restaurants in Indiana. That is how little I made as a waiter in 1996.
Tipped restaurant workers depend on tips. But when restaurants use the tipped workers to take and package orders for carry out or delivery, the servers make no tips. A waitress I know complained to me that her employer made her take and package 87 to-go orders in one shift. She made no tips. She was paid only $2.13 per hour. She could not live on that. So, she quit and went to a different restaurant to wait tables and get tips.
Indiana law outlaws slavery. But $2.13 per hour amounts to slave wages. It is time to help those who are being abused and mistreated by Indianas $2.13 per hour minimum wage. Tell the Legislature and the governor to GIVE THEM A RAISE.
Woodrow Wilcox, Dyer
We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.
More here:
Letter: Give these workers raise | Letters To The Editor | kokomotribune.com - Kokomo Tribune
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on Letter: Give these workers raise | Letters To The Editor | kokomotribune.com – Kokomo Tribune
Ending the Subminimum Tipped Wage Is a Step Towards Building Black Worker Power – Inequality.org
Posted: at 5:45 am
Eliminating the subminimum tipped wage would also eliminate a shameful relic of slavery. Tipping became prevalent in the United States after the Civil War, when restaurants and railway companies embraced the practice because it meant they didnt have to pay wages to recently freed slaves.
That past hangs heavily over many Black workers.
Lets face it, Wallace-Gobern told Inequality.org, 50 years after President Lyndon B. Johnson declared a war on poverty, Black people in the South still contend with economic hardships, persistent poverty, and the enduring legacy of slavery. We believe that in order for there to be justice for all workers, we must expand the capacity of Black workers, and for us that means that our work has to be concentrated in the South.
Currently based in Raleigh, North Carolina, Wallace-Gobern began her organizing work in Chicago as a student at Loyola University. Her work on a range of racial justice issues, from combatting racist stereotypes and attacks on Black students to fighting for Black professors to receive tenure, caught the eye of labor movement recruiters. When they offered her a job, she said she would only do it if she could organize Black people and Black women in particular.
Black workers are the canaries in the economic coalmine of our country, Wallace-Gobern told Inequality.org. When the canary died, that was a signal that the conditions were bad for the miners. Thats the role Black workers play. If you improve their working conditions, that will lift all workers.
She became the first executive director of National Black Worker Center Project three years ago, after stints with the Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union (a predecessor of UNITE HERE), the AFL-CIOs Historical Black College Recruitment program, and the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions.
One Fair Wage rally for a $15 minimum wage for all U.S. workers, Feb. 8, 2021. Credit: Rebekah Entralgo.
Wallace-Goberns aim now is to strengthen the capacity of Black worker centers to win progressive policies like minimum wage increases, build up a cadre of Civil Rights 2.0 organizers, and advance a Southern strategy on racial justice and democratic freedoms.
The challenges are many. Particularly in the south, worker advocates are up against anti-union right to work laws and pre-emption restrictions that block cities from improving labor protections at the local level.
But Wallace-Gobern is optimistic about the future.
Young people are not turning their back on the legacy of the civil rights movement, but they are ready to lead if we step aside and give them space, she remarked. I welcome the opportunity for them to stand on our shoulders and take us to heights that I and my grandparents could never imagine.
Read more:
Ending the Subminimum Tipped Wage Is a Step Towards Building Black Worker Power - Inequality.org
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on Ending the Subminimum Tipped Wage Is a Step Towards Building Black Worker Power – Inequality.org
Letter to the Editor – Beacon Hill Times
Posted: at 5:45 am
Rigor and Honesty
To the Editor,
The minimum wage debate is one economists and social scientists have grappled with for decades. It is ongoing, and the labor economists who lead the research charge continue to draw conclusions often at odds with one another. What is aligned, are the intentions of those doing this important work seek truth to motivate social policy.
In the Beacon Hill Times recent editorial Minimum Wage Should be $15, I was disappointedthat none of the deep and pertinentquestions on the matter were mentioned!
Might doubling the minimumwage lead firms to respond by reducing their workforce? I for one was disappointedto see the Whole Foods on Cambridge Street, last week, reconfigure their small-item check-out lines to self-check-out.
Should the minimum wage be $15 everywhere? $15 goes a lot further in Mobile AL thanBrookline MA. Might we expect employment effects to be exacerbatedin low COL regions?
Could such a sudden and sharp broad-stroke increase in minimum wage lead to inflationary effects that reduce the real wealth gain from those affected under the policy in question? What second-order policies might we consider invoking to avoid mere nominal gains, and ensure the benefit results in actual increased buying power?
Instead, the editorial piece reads like ideological fodder for a left-of-center audience who seeks local consensus with their own priors. It needlessly provokes divisive Trump-isms (Make America Great Again) that serve only to center policy discourse more around political performance and gesturing, and less around the productive activity of careful reasoning via conversation.
This sentence I took the greatest exception to: it is below the dignity of anyone to work for wages that amount to not much better than slave labor. This is exceptionally dismissive of how tortuous and devastating chattel slavery was in the United States. There remains much to be done to give black Americans greater access to economic opportunity, something I am actively involved with in the Bostonareabut to liken living on minimum wage in America to enslavement!? That is beyond. There remain 40 million people enslaved globally, and I assure you they would give arm and leg to live on minimum wage incomes in the US. Moreover, low-income Americans are better off than even most of the non-enslaved global population. Please, lets have this conversation, but can we do so with rigor and honesty?
Leo Hsia
More here:
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on Letter to the Editor – Beacon Hill Times
Economics professor faces criticism over op-ed titled "Three Myths About Poverty" – The Brown and White
Posted: at 5:45 am
Attack my data, attack my analysis, but attack me? You dont know me, said Frank Gunter, professor of Economics, regarding responses to his video, titled Kitchen Table Talks 3.
Every quarter, Gunter writes a 700 to 900 word op-ed. Lehigh Universitys College of Business asked him to turn his most recent op-ed,Three Myths About Poverty, into a short video, prompting the third table talk of Gunters video series.
The video, which was posted on YouTube by Lehigh University College of Business on Jan. 29, has since been taken down from the schools channel due to significant backlash.
Lehighs media relations director Lori Friedman said the video was taken down to allow time for the concerns to be reviewed and to invite those in the Lehigh academic community to participate in the conversation.
As an academic institution, we welcome public discourse and discussion. We affirm the right of the faculty, as well as other members of the community, to express their viewpoints and engage in a respectful and open exchange of ideas, Friedman said.
Since the video was posted, both Gunters op-ed and his character have received hundreds of critical comments, most of which have been posted in comment sections on student-run Instagram accounts such as @dearpwi, @lehighstudentsforblm, and @dearlehigh.
In his op-ed and the video, Gunter attempted to debunk three myths concerning povertythat poverty is mostly a matter of race, poverty is a generational curse, and the poor have no agency.
The general belief is that if youre born into a poor family, God help you, there is nothing that can be done. But it turns out the reality is different, Gunter said in an interview with The Brown and White. What I was hoping the average reader would read and say is that cant be right, look into it, then discover that the facts are true and the analysis I provided is plausible. Maybe it would change their thinking about these important issues.
Gunters first conclusion of the video was that poverty is not mostly a product of race.
In 1940, it was estimated that 87 percent of black families lived in poverty. In 2019 most Blacks were not poor. Only 18.8 percent of Blacks were below the poverty line. In other words, four-fifths, over 80 percent of African Americans were not poor. Secondly, most poor were not Black in 2019, only 24 percent. The reality is most Blacks are not poor and most poor are not Black, Gunter said in the video.
Sara Boyd, 22, took issue with his conclusion.
Boyd said the data Gutner provided said most poor people are not Black and most Black people are not poor, but that this does not imply that poverty and race are unrelated.
Its lazy economics. Its incomplete research, Boyd said.
Lehigh Students for BLM, @lehighstudentsforBLM on Instagram, posted an infographic to contextualize Gunters claims.
The post laid out a more in depth statistical analysis of the US population by race in attempts to better debunk Gunters claims.
In response, Gunter said he stands by his statement that poverty is not mostly a matter of race.
Are (Black people) disproportionately represented? Absolutely, but what if we looked at the 2019 data and the numbers were reversed? What if we found that 80 percent of Blacks were below the poverty line and three-fourths of the poor in America were African American, Gunter asked. What would be the policy implication? If that was what the data found, I would say we have a severe racial problem in this country that is as bad as it was during Jim Crow in the 1930s and 1940s, but what conclusions can be made with the information we have, that 18.8 percent of Blacks are poor and 24 percent of the poor are Black? There is probably a racial element there, but race cant be the whole answer because the majority of the poor are white.
Gunters next conclusion of the video was that poverty is not a generational curse. To dispel this myth, Gunter explained a study that divided America into quintiles of income and explained trends in their quintile mobility.
Even in a period of time as short as three years, 31 percent of the persons who were in the lowest quintile are in a higher quintile now. Escaped from poverty. Over 10 years58 percent have escaped from poverty, Gunter said in the video. 84 percent of Americans have a higher income than their parentsthe myth is not true. Poverty is not a generational trap.
The @lehighstudentsforblm post said The rate of absolute mobility for people born in 1940 was 90 percent. For people born in 1984, this figure has dropped to 50 percent, indicating absolute mobility in America is not what it used to be.
In response, Gunter said he thinks that is true, however he believes the degree of remaining mobility is still substantial and has policy implications.
In the video, Gunter explained that even if someone is born impoverished, there are three steps one can take to nearly eliminate their chances of being impoverished as an adult: graduate from high school, work full time even if you are earning minimum wage, and do not get married until 21 while also not having children until you are married.
If you follow these three rules, according to the Brookings institute, you only have a 2 percent chance of being poor as an adult, Gunter said in the video.
Kate Luther, 22, is concerned with Gunters points about poverty being escapable and the three choices because she said it makes being poor sound like a simple choice.
Luther said Gunters points do not consider the obstacles one can face in life.
You never know, Luther said. Sometimes kids have to drop out of high school because something happened to their family and then they have to work to take care of them.
However, Gunter explained that he meant this to be motivational.
I think a lot of kids growing up in poor families might say Really, all I have to do is struggle through graduation, even though school stinks, and start working at a job, even though it starts out minimum wage and the boss hates me, and I love the girl, but wont get married until 21 or have kids until we are married, then I will be able to avoid the poverty that I see around me? Gunter said. Some young people might find that an influential force.
Boyd discovered this video shortly after it was posted and her initial reaction was that the overall data was cherry picked.
Boyd said she feels Gunters views were responsible for the type of data he used in the video.
When you have a worldview and look for data that informs it, instead of looking for data to inform your worldview, youre not actually doing research, youre not doing critical thinking, youre cherry picking dataeven when its not in line with the facts, Boyd said. I could not get away with this in any of my classes.
Luther and Boyd found Gunters language throughout the video particularly insensitive.
His use of the word Blacks as a noun was pretty much in line with the datedness of the data he was citing, Boyd said. It was very clear both his views on poverty and race and how to engage in research are stuck in a previous century that have no place here now.
Meanwhile, Garret Anderson,21, secretary of Lehigh College Republicans, said Everyone was so concerned about his wording and not what he was trying to say, thats problematic to me.
Gunter said he has done his research on which terms to use.
If you search to find out what is the preferred reference to African Americans, its almost a tie among the African American community, whether they prefer to be referred to as African Americans or as Blacksone of the style references I use in my book writing treats the two as alternatives, Gunter said. I think it is a matter of courtesy you are to refer to someone in the way they wish to be referred.
Gunter expected normal criticism to his op-ed, but not criticism of his character.
He said he was surprised that people who didnt know him accused him of being racist.
That is an insult now, you only call a person racist if you know 102 percent that they are. You dont read one op-ed that they wrote and say this person says something I dont agree with Im not going to argue with their data, Im not going to argue with their analysis. Im just going to call them a name. Thats surprising, Gunter said.
@dearpwi on Instagram posted the slides from Gunters video with an attached slide at the end that read While I dont endorse slavery, economically, it is genius, suggesting it was said by Gunter.
Gunter said the attached statement associated with him led to a lot of disturbed people, as it should if it were true, but that it was a hoax.
Slavery along with genocide are probably some of the worst actions that can be committed but its also bad economics slavery has been a dead end in economic development. It has destroyed every society that adopted it, Gunter said.
Friedman affirmed the inaccuracies of these claims.
The quote has beenfalsely attributed to Professor Gunter. Professor Gunter denies having made such astatement, Friedman said. A 2019 inquiry by Lehighs Equal Opportunity Compliance Coordinator into the origin of the quote, which was posted to an Instagram account that same year, found no evidence supporting the claim that thestatementwas made by Professor Gunter.
Because of controversy, Lehigh College of Business issued a statement to explain the motive behind the video.
Despite this statement, Boyd does not think Lehigh truly cares about an intellectual discourse.
Boyd was specifically bothered by the College of Business choice to delete comments that criticized Gunter and highlighted inaccuracies in his statements.
Marietta Sisca, 23, vice president of the Lehigh College Republicans, believes the anger toward Gunter in these comment sections is unnecessary and will do harm.
The outrage and ad hominem attacks against Professor Gunter dont address the body of his argument specifically talking about poverty, Sisca said. We cant have a civil discussion about this important and interesting issue, including the aspect of race, by silencing an economics professor trying to bring more complex aspects of the topic to light.
Gunter emphasized that there should be a meaningful dialogue.
The purpose of a university is to have people look at old things in new ways or things that nobody has ever seen before. Are you going to upset people? Of course you are, Gunter said. The whole purpose of the university is to have some really great women and really great men looking at these things and saying the truth as they see it, even if the world is offended by the truth.
See the original post:
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on Economics professor faces criticism over op-ed titled "Three Myths About Poverty" – The Brown and White
OpinionThe thin blue line flag, a problematic symbol – North Wind Online
Posted: at 5:45 am
Displaying the thin blue line flag as a means of showing support for the police is under increased scrutiny due to the flags adoption by white supremacist groups, like those involved in the violent insurrection at the capitol on Jan. 6, and the related use of the flag as a statement of opposition to the Black Lives Matter movement.
I personally believe that events over the last four years have deeply and irrevocably connected the flag to racist bigotry and support for the use of state violence against racial minorities in the United States. In addition, I also believe that the iconography of the flag itself is deeply problematic. In other words, this flag is problematic both because of the beliefs of many groups that display it (e.g. The Proud Boys) and because of the history and attitudes referenced by the flags imagery.
Before the thin blue line was ever displayed on a flag, the idea was used as rhetoric by police departments in the United States to describe themselves as the only force that separates society from chaos. According to a 2020 narrative criminology article tracing the history of the thin blue line flag by Maurice Chammah and Cary Aspinwall of the Marshall Project, the idea of a thin blue line was first used to describe police in the United States in the 1920s and was popularized in the 1950s by Los Angeles Police Chief William H. Parker. It is worth noting that according to Chammah and Aspinwall, Parker was also notorious for making racist remarks. In summary, the origin of the thin blue line as a concept lies in the idea that the police separate ordered society from the chaos of a criminal element, and the idea was popularized by a police chief who was overtly racist. I believe it would be nave to assert that Parkers racism and his promotion of a policing philosophy that divides society into an us deserving protection and a them that does not, are unconnected.
Even without considering its racist origin, the thin blue line mentality is counterproductive to effective policing. Criminals do not exist as an element separate from society, they exist within it, and like all of us hold multifaceted identities. Reducing a human being to a label, to a criminal, makes it easier to wage war against them (or lock them away), but harder to recognize and address the forces within society that promotes criminal behavior. The thin blue line mentality makes law enforcement about punishing criminals, rather than promoting the wellbeing of society.
Of course, given the history of the United States, removing race from the equation is a mistake. When the us versus them of the thin blue line mentality is combined with the bigotry, racial bias and racist policies that have afflicted our nation in general, and our criminal justice system in particular, we get the broken system and tragedy of mass incarceration we see in the United States today. Furthermore, if we engage in an honest dialogue with our national conscience, we become all too aware that the us versus them of the thin blue line mentality was never entirely separate from the us versus them of slavery, the us versus them of Jim Crow or the us versus them of the modern for-profit prison system.
In recent years, the thin blue line flag has, rightly, become controversial because of its adoption by white supremacist groups, but I feel that more attention needs to be paid as to why white supremacists were drawn to the flag in the first place. Considering the full context of its history, the thin blue line on its namesake flag represents the U.S. divided along racial lines where the polices mission to protect and serve is applied to white people and their mission to enforce the law is applied to everyone else. Therefore, the thin blue line flag has no place in a society that claims to extoll the principles of liberty and justice for all.
Editors Note: The North Wind is committed to offering a free and open public forum of ideas, publishing a wide range of viewpoints to accurately represent the NMU student body. This piece is a guest column, written by a Northern Michigan University student, faculty member, or community member. It expresses the personal opinions of the individual writer and does not necessarily reflect the views of the North Wind. The North Wind reserves the right to avoid publishing columns that do not meet the North Winds publication standards. To submit a guest column contact the opinion editor at opinion.northwind@gmail.com with the subject North Wind Guest Column.
Excerpt from:
OpinionThe thin blue line flag, a problematic symbol - North Wind Online
Posted in Wage Slavery
Comments Off on OpinionThe thin blue line flag, a problematic symbol – North Wind Online
US Federalism: Definition and Background – The Great Courses Daily News
Posted: at 5:44 am
By Jennifer Nicoll Victor, Ph.D., George Mason UniversityFederalism was one of the compromises made by the framers of the US Constitution. (Image: Dennis Diatel/Shutterstock)Being an American Citizen
Have you ever noticed that sometimes it seems like youre a citizen of more than one entity? If youre an American citizen, youre a citizen of your state, and you may have a sense of identity, loyalty, or affinity toward the state where you live. And this sense of belonging to a particular state may make it seem distinct from other states, even the neighboring ones with which your state shares a border.
But youre also a citizen of the United States of America and there is a separate set of associations you may make when you think about your identity as an American.
If it seems like there are separate levels of government all around, its because there are. The American system of government is known as federalism.
This is a transcript from the video series Understanding the US Government. Watch it now, on The Great Courses Plus.
Federalism is a system of government where sovereign power is divided between the national government and some other more local governments.
In the case of the United States, this is relatively straightforward. There is the national government made up of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and there are 50 sub-national governments, one in each state.
Sometimes the language used to talk about federalism is confusing because the people use the term federal government when they are referring to components of the national government, like the president or Congress.
However, the term federalism refers to the division of sovereignty between the national government and the sub-governments.
Learn more about the major types of government.
When we say that a unit of government has sovereignty, what is meant is that that unit has the ultimate governing authority.
In a democracy, when we talk about a unit of government having authority, what we often mean is that the people have given their authority to this unit. This may just seem like semantics, but its important for understanding where the source of power comes from in politics.
In a democracy like the United States, the sovereignty comes from the people. There is no god or king who asserts authority by some intrinsic nature and creates laws. Rather, it is the people who develop institutions to which they give power.
In the United States, that power is given to different units. Some authority is given to the states, some to the national or federal government, and some powers are shared between them.
When one thinks about why federalism developed in the United States, it is important to remember the historical context under which the institutions were created.
There was considerable conflict in America at the time the Constitution was written. The framers of the Constitution were arguing over everything from how to select the president, to how to divide representation in Congress, to who would hold the power of taxation.
In almost every instance of conflict, the framers came to a compromise that allowed them to agree on that segment of the Constitution. Federalism was one of these compromises.
Learn more about the concept of civil liberties.
It is important to recognize that the framers did not resolve all of their conflicts. Nor did they come to successful compromises to settle all of their disagreements.
Most notably, the framers did not settle their differences regarding slavery. Instead, the compromises that were put in place to address slavery were done in such a way that the framers could support the Constitution, but without resolving slavery.
For example, to determine how many representatives each state would have in the House of Representatives, they agreed to the 3/5 Compromise which counted each slave as 3/5 of a person for the purposes of counting the population. In this way, this compromise reflects the attitude held by many at the time that slaves were sub-human and deserved no natural rights.
The framers failure to adequately resolve conflicts over slavery is deeply tied to the creation of the federal system that remains in place today.
Because the economies and legal structures of southern states were developed around the practice of slavery, prohibiting slavery at the national level would have significantly impacted those states. Therefore, in an effort to maintain their way of life, the representatives of slave-owning states argued for the necessity of state sovereignty.
The desire of some southerners to preserve the practice of slaveholding explains a great deal about why federalism was so valued.
In the end, to achieve the larger goal of ratifying the Constitution, the framers accepted compromises on slavery and states rights. This trade-off set in place the conditions of political inequality that would lead to the Civil War, nearly 80 years later.
Learn more about congressional elections.
However, the preservation of slavery was not the only reason the United States became a federal system.
There were two other important reasons why the federal system was adopted. One is that federalism allowed government to more readily protect individual liberties. The other is that federalism created a built-in check on the powers of government.
Since many of the early settlers were drawn to the American colonies in search of greater individual liberties, protecting those liberties was very important to the framers of the Constitution.
To ensure these liberties could not be infringed upon by government, the framers sought to formalize their protection, as outlined in the first 10 amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights. They describe all of the things that government cannot do to individuals.
The framers believed that when power is concentrated in a small group of people, it can threaten the liberties of everyone else. This is what the framers thought of as tyranny.
They believed tyranny could happen when a powerful person or small group of people have all of the control and authority, and they strip the rest of the people of their individual liberties.
In the framers minds, one way to prevent this from happening was to give two levels of government the ability to ensure and protect liberty. By setting up a sovereign authority at both the state and national levels, they created two places where government could act to ensure one was not becoming tyrannical over the other.
Federalism is a system of government where sovereign power is divided between the national government and some other more local governments.
To determine how many representatives each state would have in the House of Representatives, the framers of the US Constitution agreed to the 3/5 Compromise which counted each slave as 3/5 of a person for the purposes of counting the population.
The framers of the US Constitution set up a sovereign authority at both the state and national levels, and so created two places where government could act to ensure one did not become tyrannical over the other.
View post:
US Federalism: Definition and Background - The Great Courses Daily News
Posted in Federalism
Comments Off on US Federalism: Definition and Background – The Great Courses Daily News
Editorial: Federalism is the answer, after all Part 16 – Guardian
Posted: at 5:44 am
Hitherto, the service chiefs were Gen Abayomi Olonisakin, Chief of Defence Staff, General Tukur Buratai, Chief of Army Staff, Air Marshal Siddique Abubakar, Chief of Air Staff and Chief of Naval Staff, Rear Admiral Ibok Ekwe Ibas. They have now been replaced by Major-General Leo Irabor, Chief of Defence Staff; Major-General I Attahiru, Chief of Army Staff; Rear Admiral AZ Gambo, Chief of Naval Staff; and Air-Vice Marshal IO Amao, Chief of Air Staff.
The Presidents action led toheaving a sigh of relief. Replacement of the service chiefs sparked off a litany of clarion calls on the president for a long time by well meaning Nigerians. The agitation was that the president should change them due to growing insecurity in the land and the absence of a corresponding performance in terms of securing the country by the erstwhile service chiefs. Public sensibility was even offended when for example the army chief said that it would take more than two decades to tackle the security challenges in the land.
However, the replacement provided auspicious opportunity to instrumentalise governability by mainstreaming elements offederalism in the affairs of the country, in other words, manifesting representative bureaucracy in the composition of the armed forces of Nigeria. But the President, who has always evinced his predilection to clannishness by ignoring the countrys diversity, did the predictable: He shunned federal character, which nurtures the quintessence of federalism.This time, the Igbo ethnic nationality was not favoured in any of those prime positions and his media managers said reflecting federal character was not necessary, in the circumstances. This lacuna elicited the reaction ofthe former leader of Ohaneze Ndigbo, Chief John Nnia Nwodo, who bemoaned the omission. He alleged that the non-inclusion of an Igbo among the service chiefs as disdainful, and implicates the thinking in government circle that the Igbos are not considered fit enough for such service positions.
Federalism has proven to be a veritable tool for managing diversity, and the writers of our constitution are aware of this reality of our country. They engrossed the federal character principle in the constitution to assure every nationality about justice and equity in the running of the country.
This principle states in section 217(3) that, The composition of the officer corps and other ranks of the armed forces of the federation shall reflect the federal character of Nigeria. This must be brought into consideration by the president in the appointment of service chiefs as spelt out in section 218(1)(2) of the 1999 constitution as amended. Section 1 states: The powers of the President as the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federation shall include power to determine the use of the armed forces of the federation. Section (2) states, The powers conferred on the President by subsection (1) of this section shall include power to appoint the Chief of Defence Staff, the Chief of Army Staff, the Chief of Naval Staff and heads of any other branches of the armed forces of the federation as may be established by an Act of the National Assembly.
Constitutionally, it can be argued that the president erred by the non-abidance to clearly set out provisions of the constitution. Even if the constitution does not have express provisions, the craft of governance would dictate otherwise: in a plural society, inclusivity is to be cherished to clientelism and outright isolation. They are the ingredients for the unmaking of many a country. Beyond catering for inclusivity, equitable representation in the armed forces will also ensure responsiveness and accountability.
Security is a sensitive national issue. Countries with diversities, especially ethnic ones, have regional commands to guarantee the mutual security of all. Given the growing mistrust of the military and allegation of a partisan organisation lending support to herdsmen in their brutal killings across the country, it is high time the leadership of the country began to ensure what Chief Anthony Enahoro called equitocracy in the armed formation of the country. In a proper federation, this type of practice is an abnormality, and does not strengthen national integration. If the country must endure as single entity, a functional representative bureaucracy is the key to nurture national cohesion, which is being undermined by the current state of affairs.In the same vein, the recent signing of COVID-19 Health Protection Regulations 2021 as part of efforts to boost the COVID-19 response in the country looked good but the application isnt good for a vast country with the complex diversity we have been contextualising. It is the same way we have been mismanaging the omnibus anti-graft federal laws through three agencies that are based in the nations capital. Specifically, the EFCC and ICPC laws are applicable in all the states of the federation. Law officers attached to the three agencies including the Code of Conduct Tribunal have been picking up suspects from any of the 774 local councils in the country. This partly explains why anti-corruption prosecution has been largely unsuccessful. What should be ideal is encouraging each of the 36 states to enact their laws, which will be easier to manage in this complex federation of more than 200 million people.
In the same vein, the application of the COVID-19 Health Protection and Regulation 2021 should have taken a similar path: Governors should have been directed to sign their own regulations governing their states. In the main, governors should begin to exploit challenges of the moment as veritable opportunities to restructure the country the way Dr. Agbakoba too just prescribed that there should be intentional and legal devolution of powers to overcome crisis hampering the development of this country.
According to the former NBA President in a recent publication, regional autonomy, a critical element in federalism, would resolve the countrys diversity challenges. He said devolution of powers would allow subsidiarity to deliver public service at the base of the nation as it did in the Western Region under self-rule in 1951. Agbakobas is one more voice of reason and courage in support of what this newspaper has been harping on for the past 16 weeks. It is our hope and prayer that authorities in Abuja and the governing party would not continue to remain recalcitrant and even deaf to the voices of reason on federalism as the only way forward for the worlds most populous black nation.
Go here to read the rest:
Editorial: Federalism is the answer, after all Part 16 - Guardian
Posted in Federalism
Comments Off on Editorial: Federalism is the answer, after all Part 16 – Guardian
Towards competitive Federalism: MEA trains officers from different states to put `Boots on the Ground – The Financial Express
Posted: at 5:44 am
This programme has topics including Indias Foreign Policy, Connectivity issues like air, water & land, attracting foreign tourists to India, common areas of interest including Para-Diplomacy.
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has launched a special week long training programme which will help in equipping the States/UT officers in international engagements. This is the second such programme which has been organised by MEA at the Sushma Swaraj Institute of Foreign Service which started February 9, 2021.
Who is participating?
A batch of 17 officers from 7 States. These include, according to MEA, Haryana, Punjab, Gujarat, Karnataka, Odhisa, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh.
Addressing the 2nd batch of these officers from different states, Rahul Chhabra, Secretary (Economic Relations), MEA, talked about the initiative of the States Division of MEA that Such an initiative can put Boots on the Ground for States and UTs, through the network of Indian Missions and posts around the world.
This initiative of the MEA is in line with Prime Minister Narendra Modis vision of promoting cooperative/competitive federalism.
According to Mr Chhabra, This initiative is to promote Team spirit, making States an integral part of Team India in engaging the world.
External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar has earlier commended the new initiative undertaken by the MEA.
More about the programme
The whole programme has been carefully designed. And the content of the week long programme is aimed at inculcating among the State and UT officials, the knowledge, awareness and the skills to deal with the world.
This programme has topics including Indias Foreign Policy, Connectivity issues like air, water & land, attracting foreign tourists to India, common areas of interest including Para-Diplomacy.
Managing the global COVID pandemic and the role of States & UTs: Indias success story; also, the course will touch upon the consular & diaspora issues, issues faced by foreign businesses in states & UTs. Protocol matters- which will focus on the incoming & outgoing visits by foreign dignitaries.
This time there is a new dimension of the programme to reap multiplier effect: Training the Trainers they are from Haryana Institute of Public Administration on a pilot basis.
Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know markets Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.
Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.
Link:
Posted in Federalism
Comments Off on Towards competitive Federalism: MEA trains officers from different states to put `Boots on the Ground – The Financial Express
Revolution and counter-revolution – The Kathmandu Post
Posted: at 5:44 am
The coming February 13 marks the 25th year of the start of the Peoples War by the Maoists in Nepal. In 2012, I remember my daughter Manushi telling me, Mother, you are so lucky to be part of the history in making this country a republic. We may not have any contribution to make in our lifetime. I had said, Dont worry, a revolution is generally followed by a counter-revolution, and you may be required to fight against it. I am baffled to note how fast the counter-revolution has come in Nepal.
Before delving into revolution and counter-revolution, let us examine the positions of the political parties before the Maoist conflict started. Although all of them were working to weaken the monarchy, there were different tendencies. The Nepali Congress was known for fighting for democracy, but they could not go beyond multiparty democracy under the monarchy. Various brands of communist parties, particularly the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist) were fighting for a republic, but they could not go beyond abstract class issues. There were small parties such as the Janmukti Party and Sadbhawana Party that were campaigning for federalism, but they could not go beyond identity issues. There was only the Maoist Party that pursued a package programme of democracy, republicanism, federalism and secularism making it a holistic movement.
Synchronised leadership
It is interesting to note how the parties were functioning when the People's War was going on. Most of them, including the Nepali Congress and the CPN-UML, would condemn the Maoists as extremists when they were out of power; but when they were in government, they were keen to engage with the same Maoists. At the same time, the Maoist Party was spreading throughout the country because it not only addressed class issues but also nationalist, regional, gender, Dalit and other issues. There was also synchronised leadership during this period.
Pushpa Kamal Dahal played a pragmatic role in infusing power to the party while Baburam Bhattarai gave vision and direction, and Mohan Baidya made sure the party was not deviating from the path of classical revolution. A critical examination showed that Dahal represented a petty, bourgeois demagogue who named the partys ideology after himself, as Prachanda Path. Bhattarai represented an idealist leader who was more theoretical and was involved in developing Marxism in the present context. Baidya represented a dogmatist leader who liked to bask in the past.
Despite various lacunas, the People's War created a situation for launching the second People's Movement in cooperation with other parties, resulting in the promulgation of the constitution through a Constituent Assembly. However, after the promulgation of the new constitution, the structure of most of the political parties didnt change. They engaged in power-mongering instead of pursuing transformative action, and they are still hesitating to make their parties inclusive as demanded by the constitution. They still have a hangover of the feudal mindset whereby democratic norms are hardly practised within the party.
Ironically, the counter-revolution today is not being led by former king Gyanendra and his regressive forces, but by KP Oli, the so-called proletarian president of the Nepal Communist Party. Dahal, former Maoist leader and co-chairman of the Nepal Communist Party, is on the streets demanding the reinstatement of the dissolved Parliament. At the same time, many people are asking questions about the actions, or lack thereof, of the former Maoists in the Nepal Communist Party. How is it that the womens movement has taken a back seat?
The Dalits were much-empowered during the People's War, and were known for making and maintaining arms and ammunition for the Maoists. But the recent brutal killing of a Dalit youth and his friends by former Maoists in Rukum, once a hot spot of the People's War, shocked the nation. The young man had dared to love the daughter of a so-called upper caste Thakuri for which he lost his life. Even then the Dalit organisation of the Nepal Communist Party said not a word. Take the case of the Janajatis who had autonomous provinces based on identity during the People's War, but who kept their mouths shut when the provinces were formed without any regard to the spirit of identity and federalism. During the People's War, martyrs and disappeared persons were honoured by having landmarks named after them. But today the former Maoist leaders are in no hurry to conclude the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
Hunger for power
Why have the Maoists lost steam? How come their vision has become nearly void? This is mainly due to Prachandas hunger for power at the cost of principles and issues. There is a potential for conflict if ethnic and regional oppression is not addressed. If the Truth and Reconciliation Commission is not effectively implemented, renewed conflict may result. But KP Oli wants to turn the clock back by trying to replace the 2015 Constitution with the 1990 Constitution. No wonder dust is gathering in the streets for another storm, the third Jana Andolan!
In many ways, parallels can be drawn between Aung San Suu Kyi, who was hailed as the leader of democracy in Myanmar for fighting against the military junta, and Dahal, who was hailed as a leader who fought against the monarchy to make Nepal a federal republic. In course of time, Aung San Suu Kyi succumbed to the same military authority, disappointing those who had conferred the Nobel Prize on her. Recently, she has been stabbed in the back by the military that has imprisoned her. Similarly, Dahal succumbed to Oli who was against federalism and republicanism, disappointing those who stood for inclusive issues. Today, he is being stabbed in the back by Oli who has sent him to the streets. I wish he is not imprisoned like Aung San Suu Kyi in Myanmar!
Read more:
Posted in Federalism
Comments Off on Revolution and counter-revolution – The Kathmandu Post