The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: February 8, 2021
Yahoo News/YouGov poll: More than two-thirds of Americans side with Biden on COVID relief and most support the rest of his agenda – Yahoo…
Posted: February 8, 2021 at 11:38 am
When asked about the 20 policies that define President Bidens agenda, more Americans support than oppose all 20 of them, according to a new Yahoo News/YouGov poll.
The margins are decisive. The majority of Bidens proposals garner at least twice as much support as opposition. Nearly half are favored by more than 60 percent of Americans.
The survey of 1,516 U.S. adults, which was conducted from Jan. 20 to Jan. 21, comes at a time when partisan divisions in Washington are driving a fierce debate over the size and scope of Bidens COVID-19 rescue package. On Monday, the president is set to meet with a group of 10 Republican senators who want to slash his $1.9 trillion plan to secure their backing in Congress.
But despite the distance between politicians on Capitol Hill, the Yahoo News/YouGov poll shows that ordinary Americans overwhelmingly favor most of Bidens agenda particularly his plan to end a pandemic that has killed more than 440,000.
Of all 20 policies covered by the poll, the two most popular were the ones at the center of Bidens current COVID proposal: $2,000 relief checks (74 percent favor vs. 13 percent oppose) and increased federal funding for vaccination (69 percent favor vs. 17 percent oppose). A full 58 percent of Americans also support raising the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour, another key element of Bidens COVID-19 rescue package. Thats almost twice the share of Americans (31 percent) who oppose a wage hike. Nearly identical numbers favor (57 percent) and oppose (32 percent) a national mask mandate.
In contrast, the $600 billion Republican plan floated Monday would shrink relief checks by $400 and deliver them to fewer Americans. It would also keep the federal minimum wage at $7.25 an hour.
A full 59 percent of Americans agree with the president that the pandemic should be his top priority. The next closest issue was the economic recovery, at 24 percent.
After calling in his inaugural address for an end to Americas uncivil war, Biden also appears to be finding common ground with his constituents on the economy, health care, climate change, immigration and criminal justice. Two-thirds of Americans (65 percent) favor more federal funding for research and development to assist domestic manufacturing and investing in renewable energy infrastructure, the core planks of Bidens separate COVID-19 recovery package, which he hopes to advance later this year. Opposition is negligible, at 13 percent and 17 percent, respectively.
Story continues
More than 60 percent of Americans the equivalent of a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate also support stopping family separation at the U.S.-Mexico border (64 percent to 20 percent); creating a pathway to citizenship for young immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children (61 percent to 23 percent); and enacting comprehensive criminal-justice reform (63 percent to 12 percent).
And half or more Americans favor cutting carbon emissions to zero by the year 2050 (54 percent to. 23 percent); rejoining the World Health Organization (57 percent to 28 percent); giving all Americans the option of buying Medicare-like public health insurance (57 percent to 22 percent); and providing more federal funding for community policing measures (51 percent to 21 percent); and reversing the recent tax cuts for Americans making more than $400,000 (50 percent to 30 percent).
Meanwhile, opposition to most of the rest of Bidens agenda stalls out below 35 percent, including rejoining the Paris Climate Accords (48 percent to 30 percent); reversing the recent tax cut for corporations (45 percent to 32 percent); and eliminating tuition at public colleges and universities for families making up to $125,000 (47 percent to 33 percent).
The only Biden policies that received nearly as much opposition as support were halting construction on the border wall with Mexico (45 percent to 42 percent) and ending the ban on travelers from Muslim-majority countries (42 percent to 35 percent) perhaps because they were also the two policies most closely identified with former President Donald Trump, triggering the usual partisan resistance.
In that sense, Americas divisions have hardly healed. By a better than two-to-one margin, more Americans believe Joe Biden won the 2020 election fair and square (57 percent) than believe the election was rigged and stolen from Trump (27 percent), with 16 percent unsure. Yet 68 percent of Trump voters still believe in the false notion that the election was stolen.
Similarly, Americans are united in revulsion toward the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, with 81 percent saying it was not justified, versus just 8 percent who say it was. More than 9 in 10 Americans said the attack made them feel angry, ashamed or fearful. The attack came after Trump headlined a nearby rally urging supporters to fight in the name of his false election fraud claims. Five people were killed, including a Capitol Police officer.
But when asked about Trumps responsibility for the attack or his upcoming Senate impeachment trial over the incident, Americans split roughly 50-40, suggesting that views about the former president remain as polarized as ever. Specifically:
In each case, Republicans and Democrats responded along party lines in their support or opposition to Trump though larger majorities endorsed Twitters decision to ban Trump (54 percent to 37 percent) as well as Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnells remark that the mob was provoked by the president (53 percent to 35 percent).
One silver lining, however and perhaps another patch of common ground is a widening sense of patriotism among the public. In a July Yahoo News/YouGov survey, just 61 percent of Americans described themselves as patriotic; today that number is up to 69 percent. And while only slightly fewer Republicans feel patriotic now (84 percent) than in July (88 percent), patriotism among Democrats has risen 12 percentage points (from 56 percent to 68 percent) in the wake of Bidens inauguration.
__________________
The Yahoo News survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample
of 1,516 U.S. adults interviewed online from Jan. 20 to 21, 2020. This sample was weighted according to gender, age, race and education based on the American Community Survey, conducted by the U.S. Bureau of the Census, as well as 2016 and 2020 Presidential votes (or non vote), registration status, geographic region and urbanicity. Respondents were selected from YouGovs opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S adults. The margin of error is approximately 2.7 percent.
____
Read more from Yahoo News:
Read more:
Posted in Yahoo
Comments Off on Yahoo News/YouGov poll: More than two-thirds of Americans side with Biden on COVID relief and most support the rest of his agenda – Yahoo…
Kevin Feige assures us there will never be a Marvel-‘Star Wars’ crossover movie – Yahoo Entertainment
Posted: at 11:38 am
You wouldnt think it would ever actually happen. But the moment it was announced that Kevin Feige the Marvel Studios chief whos engineered 23 movies, 13 years and three phases of straight hits with very few missteps was branching out from the Marvel Cinematic Universe and into Lucasfilms Star Wars universe, it was a thought that crossed all of our minds: Could Marvel and Star Wars someday cross streams in a movie? Its natural to wonder, given that with Marvel and Lucasfilm both under the Disney umbrella, the trucks, so to speak, are parked in the same garage.
If youd ask me if anything were talking about right now was in the realm of possibility 20 years ago, I wouldve said, I dont think so, Feige tells us during a recent interview promoting yet another one of his MCU coups, the Disney+ TV spinoff WandaVision.
But wait for the BUT.
But I really dont think so, he quickly adds. I dont think theres any reason for it.
Beyond Feige, we are already seeing some crossover behind the scenes. The super producer hired Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness and Loki writer Michael Waldron to pen the mysterious Star Wars film hes currently developing (and will say absolutely nothing about).
A crossover wouldnt be entirely unprecedented, at least in the wider canon of comic books. Marvel was the first publisher to release Star Wars comics in the late-70s and early 80s, a license the publisher re-acquired in 2015. Feige also admits to enjoying the Star Trek and X-Men crossover Planet X, which Marvel released in 1996. On the page, anyway.
As for any team-ups on the screen, Feige invites you to revisit Patton Oswalts hilarious pre-Force Awakens filibuster from a Season 5 episode of Parks and Recreation in which he imagines Thanos, Tony Stark, Spider-Man, the X-Men and Fantastic Four crashing Episode VII and linking the universes.
That, Feige says, is probably as close as well ever get.
UPDATE: Oswalt jokingly replied to Feiges comments on Twitter Thursday.
Story continues
Watch Elizabeth Olsen, Paul Bettany and Kevin Feige talk about WandaVision:
Videos produced by Jon San and edited by Jason Fitzpatrick
Read more on Yahoo Entertainment:
See the original post here:
Posted in Yahoo
Comments Off on Kevin Feige assures us there will never be a Marvel-‘Star Wars’ crossover movie – Yahoo Entertainment
Could The Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALDX) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful? – Yahoo Finance
Posted: at 11:38 am
A look at the shareholders of Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALDX) can tell us which group is most powerful. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.
With a market capitalization of US$588m, Aldeyra Therapeutics is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions are noticeable on the share registry. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about Aldeyra Therapeutics.
View our latest analysis for Aldeyra Therapeutics
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
We can see that Aldeyra Therapeutics does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Aldeyra Therapeutics' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
It looks like hedge funds own 19% of Aldeyra Therapeutics shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. The company's largest shareholder is Perceptive Advisors LLC, with ownership of 19%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 4.1% and 3.5% of the stock. Additionally, the company's CEO Todd Brady directly holds 0.8% of the total shares outstanding.
Story continues
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$588m, and insiders have US$7.6m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
The general public holds a 38% stake in Aldeyra Therapeutics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Aldeyra Therapeutics better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Aldeyra Therapeutics (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
Read the original here:
Posted in Yahoo
Comments Off on Could The Aldeyra Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALDX) Ownership Structure Tell Us Something Useful? – Yahoo Finance
New crypto VC fund attracts Wall Street billionaires and LL Cool J – Yahoo Money
Posted: at 11:38 am
The Daily Beast
Tami Chappell via ReutersStartling documents released Monday point to heavy-handed interference by top Trump administration officials last summer to downplay the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, through suppressed testing results and altered guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on reopening businesses and schools.The documents are the result of a House Oversight investigation launched in September into reports of efforts by Trump political appointees at the Department of Health and Human Services to interfere with guidance issued by CDC in order to keep businesses open, even though evidence proved it could cost American lives. The select subcommittee in charge of the investigation said Monday that it found that HHS officials sought to suppress accurate scientific information they felt could be use[d] against the president, according to the documents. They also found that Trump appointees with limited scientific experience attempted to alter or block at least 13 CDC reports related to the virus.Those altered reports are said to have produced a false sense of security pushed by the CDC that allowed businesses and some schools to open, made people feel secure in public places, and downplayed the importance of wearing a mask. According to one of the documents released, the Trump administration changed the guidance for the explicit purpose of reducing testing and allowing the virus to spread while quickly reopening the economy.On Sept. 11, 2020, for example, top Trump HHS adviser Paul Alexander emailed senior COVID Task Force adviser Scott Atlas about a forthcoming CDC report on deaths in young people, which Alexander claimed that, despite being true, was very duplicitous to damage the administration. He tried to engage Atlas to help craft an op-ed .. disputing the reporting for on face value, it is meant to mislead, according to the documents.In the email, which is part of the cache of documents released Monday, Alexander warned, The timing of this is meant to interfere with school re-opening and we need to get something out fast to preempt this in the next day or so and I can work with you on it. Alexander became the focus of public outrage in December when internal emails emerged showing he was pushing top Trump health officials to adopt a herd immunity strategy for the U.S. There is no other way, we need to establish herd, and it only comes about allowing the non-high risk groups expose themselves to the virus. PERIOD, his letter to Trump HHS public-affairs adviser Marc Caputo read. Infants, kids, teens, young people, young adults, middle aged with no conditions etc. have zero to little risk. so we use them to develop herd we want them infected. Alexander left HHS in mid-September after reports emerged about his attempts to alter the CDCs Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports.The new internal emails referred to Monday, according to Oversight Chairman James Clyburn (D-SC), show how the Trump administration took steps to end testing of asymptomatic infections in low-risk people because these tests were causing infected people to quarantine, which HHS Alexander complained was preventing the workforce from working and would not allow schools and colleges to optimally reopen.The documents show how Alexander pressured Food and Drug Administration officials to go so far as to quickly approve emergency use of convalescent plasma as treatment, even advising them to disregard concerns from National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Francis Collins and Allergy and Infectious Diseases chief Anthony Fauci, instead accusing the NIH of stepping out of their lane.Another email from the Select Subcommittee last summer to Vice President Pence and Secretary Azar into Trumps instruction to slow the testing down went unanswered. A short time later, the CDC issued guidance in direct contradiction to scientific evidence advising against testing of asymptomatic people who had been exposed to COVID-19 positive people. At the time, the subcommittee says it raised serious concerns about the change noting that it was reportedly pursuant to instructions coming from the top down.Still, Assistant Secretary for Health at HHS Brett Giroir flatly denied any political involvement in the decision, and claimed that the new guidelines are a CDC action. Read more at The Daily Beast.Get our top stories in your inbox every day. Sign up now!Daily Beast Membership: Beast Inside goes deeper on the stories that matter to you. Learn more.
Originally posted here:
New crypto VC fund attracts Wall Street billionaires and LL Cool J - Yahoo Money
Posted in Yahoo
Comments Off on New crypto VC fund attracts Wall Street billionaires and LL Cool J – Yahoo Money
‘What’s going on’: Indian teammates baffle fans with strange interaction – Yahoo Sport Australia
Posted: at 11:38 am
Mohammed Siraj (pictured right) grabbed Kuldeep Yadav (pictured middle) by the neck in a strange interaction caught on camera. (Image: Twitter)
The cricket world has been left baffled after a bizarre interaction between Indian bowlers Mohammed Siraj and Kuldeep Yadav.
India were chasing the game after England captain Joe Root became the first batsman to smash a double-hundred in his 100th Test, crafting a massive 218 runs to put his team in charge of the opening match in Chennai.
'OH MY GOODNESS': Cricket world stunned after BBL final 'debacle'
CLASSIC: Marnus Labuschagne responds to Justin Langer toastie furore
The 30-year-old registered his second double-century in three matches as England amassed 8-555 on a flat wicket at the MA Chidambaram Stadium on Saturday.
At the end of Day Two, Dom Bess was batting on 28 with Jack Leach on six at the other end.
But it was the unusual interaction, caught on broadcast, between reserve bowlers Siraj and Yadav that had many baffled.
During a break, cameras picked up Siraj grabbing Yadav by the next, which clearly startled Yadav.
Fans on social media questioned whether the interaction was just friendly banter or a serious action.
That Siraj and Yadav video doesn't look like it's for fun lol.
Zinara Rathnayake (@Zin10SantaFe) February 6, 2021
Friendly or serious? Mohammed Siraj grabs Kuldeep Yadav by his neck, WATCH - DNA India#farmers #farmersprotest
Shivinder Thakur (@ShivinderST) February 6, 2021
Many fans suggested the action was a joke between two friends.
Story continues
Either way, India will be looking for the whole team to unite after England stormed past 550 on Day 2.
Root was seen battling cramps in the final overs on Friday but returned to hound India's bowlers when England resumed on 3-263.
The right-hander looked typically solid against an Indian attack which could manage only a couple of half-hearted lbw appeals against him in the first two sessions.
Root was more than happy to let Ben Stokes dominate their 124-run collaboration for the fourth wicket as the boundaries flowed.
Playing his first test since August, Stokes smashed 10 boundaries and three sixes in a typically entertaining 82.
"I think we're in a very strong position as a team," Stokes, Test cricket's top-ranked all-rounder, told a video conference.
"No thoughts whatsoever of a declaration tonight because that would be stupid.
"If you won the toss and you're batting first, you just get as many runs as you can out here in India. If we can bat another hour tomorrow, we'd be very happy."
with AAP
Click here to sign up to our newsletter for all the latest and breaking stories from Australia and around the world.
Original post:
'What's going on': Indian teammates baffle fans with strange interaction - Yahoo Sport Australia
Posted in Yahoo
Comments Off on ‘What’s going on’: Indian teammates baffle fans with strange interaction – Yahoo Sport Australia
BIOLASE Regains Compliance With Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Requirement And Cancels Special Meeting Of Stockholders – Yahoo Finance
Posted: at 11:38 am
FOOTHILL RANCH, Calif., Feb. 4, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- BIOLASE, Inc. (NASDAQ: BIOL), a global leader in dental lasers, today received official notification from the Listing Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq Stock Market Inc. ("NASDAQ") that it has regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement set forth in Rule 5550(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules (the "Minimum Bid Price Requirement").
BIOLASE had previously received written notice from NASDAQ in December 2019 indicating that because the closing bid price per share had been below $1.00 for a period of 30 consecutive trading days, the Company did not meet the Minimum Price Bid Requirement. According to the recent notification letter, the staff of NASDAQ has determined that for the last ten consecutive business days, from January 21, 2021 to February 3, 2021, the closing bid price of the Company's common stock has been at $1.00 per share or greater, and the Company has regained compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement, and the matter is now closed.
The Company has canceled its Special Meeting of Stockholders scheduled for February 16, 2021. As a result of regaining compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement, the Company is no longer seeking stockholder approval to implement a reverse split of the Company's outstanding shares of Common Stock at this time.
About BIOLASE, Inc.
BIOLASE is a medical device company that develops, manufactures, markets, and sells laser systems in dentistry and medicine. BIOLASE's products advance the practice of dentistry and medicine for patients and healthcare professionals. BIOLASE's proprietary laser products incorporate approximately 271 patented and 40 patent-pending technologies designed to provide biologically and clinically superior performance with less pain and faster recovery times. BIOLASE's innovative products provide cutting-edge technology at competitive prices to deliver superior results for dentists and patients. BIOLASE's principal products are revolutionary dental laser systems that perform a broad range of dental procedures, including cosmetic and complex surgical applications. BIOLASE has sold over 41,200 laser systems to date in over 80 countries around the world. Laser products under development address BIOLASE's core dental market and other adjacent medical and consumer applications.
Story continues
For updates and information on Waterlase iPlus, Waterlase Express, and laser dentistry, find BIOLASE online at http://www.biolase.com, Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/biolase, Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/biolaseinc, Instagram at http://www.instagram.com/waterlase_laserdentistry, and LinkedIn at http://www.linkedin.com/company/biolase.
BIOLASE, Waterlase and Waterlase iPlus are registered trademarks of BIOLASE, Inc.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release contains forward-looking statements, as that term is defined in the Private Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that involve significant risks and uncertainties, including statements regarding anticipated fourth-quarter results. Forward-looking statements can be identified through the use of words such as "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks," "estimates," "may," "will," "should," and variations of these words or similar expressions. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect BIOLASE's current expectations and speak only as of the date of this release. Actual results may differ materially from BIOLASE's current expectations depending upon a number of factors. These factors include, among others, adverse changes in general economic and market conditions, competitive factors including but not limited to pricing pressures and new product introductions, uncertainty of customer acceptance of new product offerings and market changes, risks associated with managing the growth of the business, and those other risks and uncertainties that are described, from time-to-time, in the "Risk Factors" section of BIOLASE's annual reports filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, BIOLASE does not undertake any responsibility to revise or update any forward-looking statements.
View original content to download multimedia:http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/biolase-regains-compliance-with-nasdaq-minimum-bid-price-requirement-and-cancels-special-meeting-of-stockholders-301222706.html
SOURCE BIOLASE, Inc.
Read this article:
Posted in Yahoo
Comments Off on BIOLASE Regains Compliance With Nasdaq Minimum Bid Price Requirement And Cancels Special Meeting Of Stockholders – Yahoo Finance
Reckless act as hoons ‘kill 30 endangered birds’ in car park – Yahoo News Australia
Posted: at 11:38 am
WARNING - DISTURBING CONTENT: Dead shore birds have been found littered around a New Zealand car park the morning after three vehicles were filmed hooning around the area.
Extensive tyre marks and the bodies of around 30 protected red-billed gulls were found by a ranger, north of Dunedin on Saturday morning.
Fences and gates have been smashed, and empty beer bottles and a pair of tracksuit pants were also found discarded nearby.
Video shot at 8.00am on Saturday, shows the gravel surface of the Royal Albatross Centre car park and a nearby road scarred by vehicle tracks.
Birds lie lifeless along the road and gulls that survived the carnage can be seen flying around.
Otago Peninsula Trust ecotourism manager Hoani Langsbury told Yahoo News Australia that hoons were captured on CCTV driving around the area for three hours and this footage was handed to police.
The video shows a quad bike and two motor vehicles arrive at the colony at about 1am, Mr Langsbury said.
They proceeded to do donuts and generally hoon around until about 4.30 in the morning.
During their activities theyve managed to kill up to 30 red-billed gulls.
Staff worked to remove the gulls before tourists arrived that morning to enjoy the Waitangi Day long weekend.
Working to educate the public about the regions unique birdlife, the gulls deaths have left Mr Lansbury and many of his guides distressed and frustrated.
Their sadness was compounded on Sunday morning after eight more gull chicks were found dead on the rock face only 50 metres from the car park.
Were all part of nature and weve got to keep it in balance, Mr Lansbury said.
The planet is struggling enough, let alone idiots going out and making our job more difficult.
It is not the first time the area has been vandalised, with gates installed nearby to discourage visitors after dark wrecked once before.
The car park is a popular place for the young gulls to land each evening as it is the only large, level ground for them to congregate on.
Story continues
With penguins and albatross also known to live in the area, any cars driving through the area at night, no matter their motivation, are a threat to the diverse ecosystem of birds.
Describing the deaths as saddening Craig Wilson from the Department of Conservation confirmed authorities are investigating.
He said gulls, which are a threatened species, play an important role in the ecosystem.
Events like this are saddening and frustrating and show a lack of respect for te ao troa, the natural world, Mr Wilson said.
We will be looking into this to determine if a breach of the Wildlife Act has occurred and taking appropriate action.
New Zealands red-billed gulls appear similar to Australias silver gull, and are now considered a subspecies.
They can live between 12 and 30 years of age, mate for life, and return to the same breeding ground each year to raise their young.
While red-billed gulls are numerous, they are registered by New Zealand authorities as being nationally vulnerable as their numbers are decreasing at an alarming rate.
Scientists believe the drop in numbers is primarily due to changes in ocean currents affecting the availability of food sources like krill.
The gulls at Taiaroa Head, where the car park was located, are the countrys only colony to have increased in size, growing from 1800 pairs to 2800 in recent years.
Conservation work dates back to 1938, and there have been ongoing efforts to reduce the impact of feral species like possums.
Over the last nine years, 19,800 possums, which were introduced from Australia have been eradicated from the area.
Since conservation work began, increases in ground nesting birds have been registered across the region.
Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@yahoonews.com.
You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter and download the Yahoo News app from the App Store or Google Play.
Read this article:
Reckless act as hoons 'kill 30 endangered birds' in car park - Yahoo News Australia
Posted in Yahoo
Comments Off on Reckless act as hoons ‘kill 30 endangered birds’ in car park – Yahoo News Australia
Here are 10 reasons to appreciate Tom Brady as he makes his 10th Super Bowl appearance – Yahoo Sports
Posted: at 11:38 am
If accomplishments and resume matter most and its hard to figure out what would be more important then Tom Brady is clearly the greatest quarterback ever.
The problem is that many still dont want to give Brady his due. There are various weird reasons but all come back to some form of I hate Brady.
If you like and appreciate football, youre missing out on perhaps the greatest career in NFL history.
As Brady gets ready to play Super Bowl No. 10, here are 10 reasons to appreciate one of the all-time greats in any sport:
Most NFLs franchises dont even come close to Bradys Super Bowl history. This one stat sums it up:
The Denver Broncos, Pittsburgh Steelers and Dallas Cowboys are tied for second all-time with eight Super Bowl appearances. The only NFL franchise with more than 10 Super Bowl appearances is the Patriots, who have appeared in 11. Nine of them were with Brady.
What Brady is doing at age 43 should never be overlooked. Its not just that hes doing well at 43. Hes doing better than every 43-year-old quarterback in NFL history combined. And its not close.
Heres the list of QBs at least 43 in the NFL, before 2020 (via Stathead):
Vinny Testaverde: 96 for 175, 981 yards, 6 TDs, 6 INTsGeorge Blanda: 68 for 135, 955 yards, 12 TDs, 12 INTsSteve DeBerg: 30 of 59, 369 yards, 3 TDs, 1 INTWarren Moon: 16 of 37, 228 yards, 1 TD, 1 INTDoug Flutie: 5 of 10, 29 yards, 0 TDs, 0 INTs
All quarterbacks 43 or older, combined (before Brady): 215 for 416 (51.7%), 2,562 yards, 22 TDs, 22 INTs, 66.4 passer ratingBrady at age 43: 401 for 610 (65.7%), 4,633 yards, 40 TDs, 12 INTs, 102.2 passer rating
Story continues
According to Giants.com, Brady is the oldest player in Super Bowl history at 43 years, 192 days, and the other four in the top five are all kickers or punters:
Tom Brady, Tampa Bay (LV) - 43 years, 192 days
Matt Stover, Indianapolis (XLIV) - 42 years, 11 days
Jeff Feagles, New York Giants (XLII) - 41 years, 333 days
Matt Bryant, Atlanta (LI) - 41 years, 252 days
Mike Horan, St. Louis (XXXIV) - 40 years, 363 days
Usually when a player switches teams late in his career, it doesnt turn out well. Cue all the jokes about Johnny Unitas with the Chargers or Joe Namath with the Rams.
Its very rare for a quarterback to lead two different franchises to the Super Bowl. Only three have done it before Brady: Kurt Warner, Craig Morton and Peyton Manning. Only Manning started and won Super Bowls with two different teams. And the 2015 version of Manning, who struggled all season and was helped immensely by a great Broncos defense, is nowhere near this seasons version of Brady.
Whats more, if Brady wins Super Bowl LV, hell be the first player in the history of the NFL, MLB, NBA or NHL to win championships with two different teams past the age of 40.
Tom Brady has more Super Bowl rings than anyone else in NFL history, with a chance to add a seventh Sunday. He has few contemporaries in the history of American sports when it comes to titles and MVPs.
ESPN shared some trivia that puts in perspective how impressive Bradys career has been. In the histories of the NFL, NBA, MLB and NHL, only six athletes have seven championships and two MVPs: Bill Russell of the Boston Celtics, Jean Beliveau of the Montreal Canadiens, and Yogi Berra, Joe DiMaggio, Lou Gehrig and Mickey Mantle of the New York Yankees. Thats quite a group Brady could join.
Its hard to say what the most impressive Brady feat is, but putting together what amounts to two Hall of Fame careers is up there.
If you took Bradys career from 2001-2010, and then judged 2011-2020 on its own, both resumes would be good enough for the Hall.
That speaks to Bradys consistency and his longevity too.
Brady played so well at age 43 that theres no reason to believe he wont be playing next season at age 44. He said this week that he will definitely consider playing past age 45.
Brady is first in NFL history in passing touchdowns and second in yards, and hell pass Drew Brees in the latter category early next season if Brees retires. He can put those records far out of reach. When you add in Bradys postseason stats, you see the heights he can reach:
If Brady decides to play until after age 45, 100,000 passing yards (including postseason) isnt out of the question. Let that sink in.
Of course, Brady could retire at any time. Theres nothing left for him to prove. But he sounds like a player who wants to play as long as he can.
One of the best random facts about Brady is that Antoine Winfield Sr. once picked off Brady. One of Bradys teammates on this Buccaneers team is Antoine Winfield Jr.
You have probably heard that Patrick Mahomes was in kindergarten when Brady won his first Super Bowl.
There are nine Chiefs and 14 Buccaneers players who have turned 30 already. The rest of the players in Super Bowl LV are in their 20s, meaning they were in elementary school when Brady was drafted.
Josh Dubow of the Associated Press had a phenomenal fact about some Hall of Famers who started their careers after Brady and are already in the Hall of Fame following the five-year waiting period.
CBS list of players who have been out of the NFL for a while but are still younger than Brady is surprising too.
It seems accurate to say Bradys postseason records wont be topped.
Brady has 80 postseason touchdowns. Joe Montana and Aaron Rodgers are tied for second ... with 45.
Heres a stat from @MySportsUpdate: If you removed all the touchdown passes from Brady to Randy Moss, Rob Gronkowski, Deion Branch, Julian Edelman, Wes Welker, Chris Hogan and Danny Amendola, Brady would have 46 career postseason touchdowns. That would still be the record.
If you use the term greatest athlete, that changes the argument. Then we get bogged down in debating Bradys 40 time and his vertical leap.
If were talking about who has been the most accomplished player in any major American sport, its hard to argue Bradys resume doesnt stack up well with Michael Jordan, Wayne Gretzky, LeBron James, Babe Ruth, Serena Williams, Tiger Woods, Michael Phelps or anyone else in the argument. Brady plays the toughest position in sports and is doing things no other quarterback has come close to matching.
Well leave this debate on pause and revisit if Bradys Buccaneers can win on Sunday. Enjoy it, because Bradys run wont last forever.
More from Yahoo Sports:
See the article here:
Posted in Yahoo
Comments Off on Here are 10 reasons to appreciate Tom Brady as he makes his 10th Super Bowl appearance – Yahoo Sports
Spin Control: New Freedom Caucus: Conservative agenda but a problem with numbers – The Spokesman-Review
Posted: at 11:36 am
When people of like minds believe certain issues arent getting enough attention in the Legislature, they band together in a special group in an effort to push for them.
They form whats known as a caucus, and give it a name to signal whos in it or what they care about, like the LGBTQ Caucus or the Persons of Color Caucus.
Last week, the Senate got a new group, calling itself the Freedom Caucus, with four members who said they want to stand up for responsible budgets, no new taxes, gun rights and the value of life, which is to say, theyre opposed to abortion. Theyre also opposed to Gov. Jay Inslees continuation of emergency orders for the COVID-19 pandemic, want the entire state to go to Phase 2 and want schools to reopen.
Wait a minute, you might be saying. Isnt there already a caucus that supports all those things called the Senate Republican Caucus?
Well, yes. The four members of the Freedom Caucus are all Republicans, and would probably be described as four of the most conservative Republicans in the Senate.
It includes Sen. Mike Padden, of Spokane Valley, who summed up the caucuss concerns as life, liberty and prosperity values on which hardly anyone would take an opposing stance.
The caucus was formed last May, when Republican legislative leaders didnt push hard enough for a special session to have a say in the states emergency orders, said Sen. Phil Fortunato, of Auburn. He described Inslees approach to the pandemic as heavy-handed.
People should be able to make their own decisions, he said.
There may be a disconnect there, considering that some people could make personal decisions to ignore COVID precautions that could affect another persons life, liberty or prosperity. Thats not to suggest that Inslee has been right in all his decisions. But just as the freedom of one person to swing his fist stops at the end of another persons nose, there are problems in managing competing personal interests in a pandemic.
Sen. Doug Ericksen, of Ferndale, said the caucus is open to Republicans, moderate conservatives, fiscal conservatives, social conservatives, Libertarians (of which, for the record, there are none in the Legislature) and even Democrats presumably if they are sufficiently conservative on an issue like $30 car tabs or gun rights.
The difference between the Freedom Caucus and the rest of the Senate Republican Caucus is that they can take stronger stances on their key issues than the GOP leadership, which might have to take the views of members from more moderate districts into effect, Fortunato said.
They could, as Ericksen said, provide a voice for people around the state who share their views. The problem, however, is the strength in a specialized caucus lies in the ability of its members to swing a close vote on an issue of concern.
With Republicans at a seven-vote minority in the Senate and no Democrats currently flocking to the Freedom Caucus, its hard to see where they can affect legislation and debate any more than before. Padden, Fortunato and Ericksen are all sponsors of past legislation addressing the caucuss stated concerns, and some of the most enthusiastic debaters against Democratic legislation they view as opposing those principles.
A few years ago, the House had a small group of Republicans that called themselves the Liberty Caucus, which had as one of its main proponents Republican Rep. Matt Shea, also of Spokane Valley. That caucus had what it called the Freedom Agenda, which included a wide range of issues.
It had some successes, like expanding the access for ATVs to public roads. But on most of its big issues, such as splitting the state in half to create the 51st state of Liberty, it struck out.
The Freedom Caucus has an agenda that could generate support from more voters, but faces a similar problem with the math in passing or blocking legislation.
See the article here:
Posted in Fiscal Freedom
Comments Off on Spin Control: New Freedom Caucus: Conservative agenda but a problem with numbers – The Spokesman-Review
A new Regents policy on firing tenured faculty caught national blowback, and KU is in the crosshairs – The Topeka Capital-Journal
Posted: at 11:36 am
Rafael Garcia|Topeka Capital-Journal
Mabel Rice had already been dealing with a blizzard of documents in getting ready to teach spring semester child development classes at the University of Kansas when the Kansas Board of Regents approved a new policy document that could essentially strip her of any semblance of job security shed had.
The Regents in late January had voted to allow the six state universities the ability to implement policies to more easily trim down payroll. University leaders could more easily suspend, fire or dismiss any staff including tenured professors in light of the extreme financial pressures placed on the state universities because of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The distinguished professor a title conferred on some of the states most respected and senior faculty members, alongside the ultimate job protection of academic tenure had been focused much more on complying with demanding, but necessary, COVID-19 protocols and class adjustments.
The Regents decision, as well as the very idea universities were even considering the policy option, came as a shock to Rice and most faculty across the Regents six state universities.
Wed heard more about building security than we had heard about this possible, substantive change in policy, Rice said.
More: Washburn Regents take first look at new School of Law designs
In the wake of the Regents decision, the Kansas higher education governing body has drawn blunt criticism from not only faculty within the statebut also higher education groups across the country.
The American Association of University Professors condemned the Regents decision as abandoning the principle of academic freedom that tenure provides. While the Regents decision simply allows universities to adopt such policies through the end of 2022 and within frameworks subject to Regents approval, the AAUP said even temporary policies would be detrimental to Kansass universities.
While some regard tenure as an exalted faculty status separable from the due-process protections of the kind described here, tenure is inseparable from those due-process protections which in fact define it, the letter read. An institution that fails to afford those protections cannot protect academic freedom in service of the common good.
Out of the six state universities, leaders at all but one have announced they will not seek to implement such policies and instead defer to existing avenues, in consultation with campus leadership groups, to address any financial difficulties.
The University of Kansas the states largest and flagship university has declined to rule out eventually implementing a policy under the new Regents language.
KU provost and executive vice chancellor Barbara Bichelmeyer on Friday wrote to the campus community and said KU administrators would seek an extension from the Kansas Board of Regents to July 1 to continue discussions on whether the extreme measure is necessary.
"We value and want to protect tenure, while we also accept and respect our responsibility to serve the needs of our various constituencies," she said.
She earlier had said the university will continue to rely on other budget reduction measures, such as a voluntary separation program and policies clamping down on travel and extraneous expenses, that are expected to save several million dollars over the next year.
KU also hopes to build enrollment back up after higher education enrollment across the nation cratered in the wake of COVID-19, particularly at institutions like KU that had ambitious plans to bolster enrollment from international students. With travel restricted across the globe, many of those students did not return or never came to Kansas campuses.
Still, the university's statements havedonelittle to assure campus faculty, and 1,000 professors and staff signed a letter demanding University of Kansas chancellor Douglas A. Girod and KU join the other state universities in declining to pursue a policy under the framework.
For faculty that have spent many years teaching at KU, and who have been loyal to KU, I imagine there is deep disappointment that the university is considering a policy that would allow them to be dismissed with only 30 days notice, said Berl Oakley, a distinguished professor in KUs Department of Molecular Biosciences. For faculty who are leaders in their fields or young faculty who have recently received tenure and who are doing well in their research and scholarship, I imagine they will be looking around for better jobs.
KU has been hemorrhaging excellent faculty in recent years and this policy will certainly make KU less attractive, added Oakley, who is also the universitys AAUP representative. Departmental chairs and directors have already signed a letter indicating that this policy will make it more difficult to attract and retain excellent faculty.
More: KU football personnel will dictate approach on offense, new OC Mike DeBord says
As a policy making and implementing body, the Regents typically make decisions on a timeframe of months or even years, rather than days or weeks.
But in addressing COVID-19, the Kansas Board of Regents has moved at relative lightspeed to allow universities greater latitude in how they deal with any issues from the pandemic, such as in March 2020 when universities suddenly shut down for in-person operations.
And the speed at which the decision to allow policies latitude on firing or suspending employees came especially shocked faculty groups, since the proposal was only discussed the morning of the Regents January meeting and added to the boards agenda during the meeting itself.
That said, in the week before the meeting, the Regents and Kansass state university presidents were reacting to an analysis from the Kansas Legislative Research Department that showed that Gov. Laura Kellys proposed budget would amount to a $37.4 million reduction in state general funding for higher education.
Even then, faculty groups said universities have been dealing with the financial toll of COVID-19 since last March, and other existing financial mitigation measures already agreed to and accepted by administration, faculty and student leadership representatives have been available to universities.
One of those measures, if extreme, is for a university to declare a financial exigency. Per Regents definition, a financial exigency is an emergency state of operations when universities, having exhausted all other avenues of cost-reduction, may decide to not reappoint tenured faculty. To declare one, university administrators must notify the Regents of that intent.
A financial exigency, though, is a last-ditch measure that signals potentially insurmountable financial difficulties and a university on the verge of collapse. Such declarations also have further financial implications, since universities may face higher interest rates on bonds or other debt instruments. Few universities across the U.S. have declared financial exigencies, even in the wake of the pandemic.
Bichelmeyer on Friday said KU officials are not exploring declaring a financial exigency, especially since that measure would apply to the entire university system. Other austerity measures will take a priority over the next few months, she said.
"Because financial exigency applies to an entire institution, and our fiscal challenges are primarily on the Lawrence campus, this is not an option that we will pursue," she said.
The University of Kansas system, at the start of the school year, had $667 million in outstanding revenue bond debt and $30 million in capital leases and notes payable, although those numbers were down from $725 million and $44 million respectively.
Faculty critics have also said the university is looking to sidestep declaring a financial exigency because doing so would inevitably lead to an increase in the university's indebtedness from resulting hikes in interest rates.
Furthermore, KU faculty members are arguingthat the existing method of declaring a financial exigency at least requires university administrators to consult with other campus leaders and groups in deciding how to make any staffing cuts, and any policy under the Regents new language essentially does the same thing a financial exigency would do while circumventing that requirement for collaboration.
My understanding is that the existing policy, which is very well-described and laid out, nevertheless requires time to implement, said Rice, KU professor in child development. Somehow, the impression is that we no longer have time for anything that has deliberative judgment involved in it.
Any employee fired or suspended under a policy using the Regents' new language would have to be given 30 days of written notice, which could then be appealed through the Regents to the state's Office of Administrative Hearings. Faculty groups, though, say that any appeals under that system would likely be in vain.
Matt Keith, a Regents spokesperson, said declaring a financial exigency would require state university CEOs to first make "sweeping cutsto positions other than tenured faculty.
"This policy was adopted to give university CEOs flexibility to make staffing reductions that might be necessary because of pandemic-related budget constraints in a way that makes the most sense for their institutions and has the smallest possible impact on students and the universities missions," Keith said.
More: Facing $37M in funding cuts, Kansas colleges given broader latitude to fire employees
In the past two decades, Kansas universities' revenue from state funding and tuition, as proportions of their overall budgets, have essentially flipped, with universities now receiving a bigger chunk of their funding from rising tuition rates.
While all six state universities have dealt with dropped enrollment this year, KU leaders say they face a particularly unprecedented $74.6 million budget cut that will require the university to make drastic cuts and even eliminate programs and departments, reduce services, and implement furloughs and layoffs, Chancellor Girod previously told the campus.
Bichelmeyer, the provost, said one of the keys to the universitys recovery will be bolstering the number of prospective students and admissions to increase the universitys enrollment, as well as working on student retention and graduation rates.
Thats in addition to other measures that are bound to be less popular.
…And, unfortunately, it is likely that, in addition to all the other work we have before us, we will need to close some low-enrolled programs and programs that dont align with the core mission of the university and consolidate some administrative services, all of which will likely result in the need to let some people go, she wrote.
Under the Regents policy, KU or any other state university, if their presidents go back on their words has until March 6 to return to the Regents with a framework to enact any new policy subject to the boards approval. KU officials have said they'll ask the Regents for an extension to that deadline to further discuss the issue and have additional time to create such a framework.
Even though much of the criticism has been aimed at KU, a group of over 100 distinguished professors from across the state on Wednesday called on the Regents to repeal the policy language for all state universities.
To jettison best practices with this substitute policy not only reveals a lack of respect for each campus' system of shared governance, it threatens long-term damage to the missions of each institution, a letter from the group read. It undermines the purpose of tenure, which is to allow faculty to pursue their scholarship without fear of repercussions.
Keith said statewide faculty representatives were given the chance to respond to the new policy language at two different meetings, although both were on the same day. The first meeting was the Regents' governance subcommittee, which met before the second meeting, the Regents' regular meeting in which the board adopted the new language.
At both meetings, Aleks Sternfeld-Dunn, a Wichita State University professor representing the state universities' faculty senate presidents, said the faculty senate presidents had "grave concerns" over the policyand the potential trouble it could cause for Kansas's universities.
He warned the policy would attract national scrutiny, and by demonstrating a lack of collaboration with tenured faculty, Kansas universities would struggle to recruit new faculty.
More: Coronavirus could end history, math and chemistry majors at some universities in Kansas
Philip Nel, a Kansas State University distinguished professor in childrens literature who signed on to the letter, was more critical of the Regents. He said Januarys vote was the result of having well-intentioned business experts who nevertheless lacked higher education experience in charge of the states colleges and universities.
He said Kansas already had a mixed record on higher education in the nation, and the Regents decision only further tarnished the state as a place for academics to avoid.
This policy is currently only under consideration at the University of Kansas, but there is nothing to prevent it from applying to other places, he said.
Opponents of the policy have particularly honed in on the policy as inherently violating the principle of tenure, which is supposed to offer professors protection from retaliation for academic views, as controversial as they may be.
It is an academic freedom that has made U.S. public research universities the envy of the world, said Rice, the KU professor in child development.
They are a wonderful source of pride, but they run well under a common purpose and sense of trust, she said. Thats one of the most concerning elements that sense of trust and adherence to professional standards. Under the situation were in right now, theres concern about whether these standards as we know them will be honored.
While measures taken to mitigate financial losses could be understood, if not forgiven, the faculty groups said the potential policies were a bridge too far in providing university higher-ups with unchecked power to choose which staff or faculty to lay off.
It is tenure, then, that allows older faculty the ability to speak out when younger staff might be reluctant, Rice said.
As the group of distinguished professors, we are more senior and are in a position to reflect on the implications of this vote when some of our younger colleagues may not feel comfortable expressing their opinions, said Rice.
Bichelmeyer, in her Friday letter, said the university was doing what it could to balance professor tenure as a priority, but the university is also responsible to other stakeholders, like taxpayers, accrediting agencies and even the university itself.
"While we aspire to the twin goals of bringing our university back to fiscal health and to upholding the rights afforded through tenure for our faculty, it is critical we recognize that we secure the right to tenure by addressing the rights of our various constituents, investors, benefactors and advocates," she wrote."Ultimately, tenure means that we are accountable for monitoring, demonstrating and reporting our commitment and responsiveness to the common good."
And while Rice said she believed KU administration is erring in not yet ruling out implementing the policy, she said she understood the difficult position the administrators are in.
She said she hopes Chancellor Girod and other university leaders are willing to work with faculty, instead of against them.
Our chancellor and provost are very capable and very strong leaders who have had careers in this system as well, and I can only assume theyre trying to solve a difficult problem, she said. Almost all of us who signed that document did it from a spirting helping to solve these problems from the ways we know how. It isnt in a climate of hostility, its in a climate of caring.
More:
Posted in Fiscal Freedom
Comments Off on A new Regents policy on firing tenured faculty caught national blowback, and KU is in the crosshairs – The Topeka Capital-Journal