Daily Archives: January 21, 2021

Atopic Dermatitis vs. Eczema: Cause & Treatment for Dry Skin …

Posted: January 21, 2021 at 3:27 pm

What is the treatment for atopic dermatitis vs. eczema?

If the disease does not respond to mild local over-the-counter treatment then a physician is required. With proper treatment, most symptoms can be brought under control within three weeks.

Topical corticosteroid creams and ointments are the most frequently used treatment. Since many of these are quite potent it will be necessary to have frequent physician visits to assure that the treatment is successful.

Tacrolimus (Protopic) and pimecrolimus (Elidel) are non-steroid topical ointments that contain molecules that inhibit a substance called calcineurin which is important in inflammation. They rather expensive topical medicated creams that are used for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. They are particularly effective in when used on the faces of children since they seem less likely to produce atrophy. These new drugs are referred to as "immune modulators."

Crisaborole (Eucrisa), a recently approved topical treatment for children and adults with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis (AD) which seems to work by inhibiting a different portion of the inflammatory cascade in skin.

Dupilumab (Duxipent) was recently approved by the FDA for treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis in adults. It is an anti-IL-4 antibody that is given by injection twice a month and shows great promise in the control of severe atopic dermatitis.

A newer class of OTC (over the counter) creams have been recently developed which claim to repair and improve the skin's barrier function in both children and adults. They include Atopiclair, MimyX, and CeraVe. These creams may be used in combination with topical steroids and other emollients to help repair the overall dryness and broken skin function.

Additional available treatments may help to reduce specific symptoms of the disease.

Oral antibiotics to treat staphylococcal skin infections can be helpful in the face of pyoderma.

Certain antihistamines that cause drowsiness can reduce nighttime scratching and allow more restful sleep when taken at bedtime. This effect can be particularly helpful for patients whose nighttime scratching aggravates the disease.

If viral or fungal infections are present, the doctor may also prescribe medications to treat those infections.

Phototherapy is treatment with light that uses ultraviolet A or B light waves or a combination of both. This treatment can be an effective treatment for mild to moderate dermatitis in older children (over 12 years old) and adults. Photochemotherapy, a combination of ultraviolet light therapy and a drug called psoralen, can also be used in cases that are resistant to phototherapy alone. Possible long-term side effects of this treatment include premature skin aging and skin cancer. If the doctor thinks that phototherapy may be useful in treating the symptoms of atopic dermatitis, he or she will use the minimum exposure necessary and monitor the skin carefully.

When other treatments are not effective, the doctor may prescribe systemic corticosteroids, drugs that are taken by mouth or injected into muscle instead of being applied directly to the skin. An example of a commonly prescribed corticosteroid is prednisone. Typically, these medications are used only in resistant cases and are only given for short periods of time. The side effects of systemic corticosteroids can include skin damage, thinned or weakened bones, high blood pressure, high blood sugar, infections, and cataracts. It can be dangerous to suddenly stop taking corticosteroids, so it is very important that the doctor and patient work together in changing the corticosteroid dose.

In adults, immunosuppressive drugs, such as cyclosporine, are also used to treat severe cases of atopic dermatitis that have failed to respond to any other forms of therapy. Immunosuppressive drugs restrain the overactive immune system by blocking the production of some immune cells and curbing the action of others.

The side effects of cyclosporine can include high blood pressure, nausea, vomiting, kidney problems, headaches, tingling or numbness, and a possible increased risk of cancer and infections.

There is also a risk of relapse after the drug is discontinued. Because of their toxic side effects, systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs are used only in severe cases and then for as short a period of time as possible.

Patients requiring systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs should be referred to a dermatologist or an allergist specializing in the care of atopic dermatitis to help identify trigger factors and alternative therapies.

In extremely rare cases, when no other treatments have been successful, the patient may have to be hospitalized. A five- to seven-day hospital stay allows intensive skin care treatment and reduces the patient's exposure to irritants, allergens, and the stresses of day-to-day life. Under these conditions, the symptoms usually clear quickly if environmental factors play a role or if the patient is not able to carry out an adequate skin care program at home.

Each type of eczema requires a specific sort of therapy. The easiest eczemas to cure permanently are those caused by fungi and scabies. Allergic contact eczema can be cured if a specific allergenic substance can be identified and avoided.

The treatment of acute eczema where there is significant weeping and oozing requires repeated cycles of application of dilute solutions of vinegar or tap water often in the form of a compress followed by evaporation. This is most often conveniently performed by placing the affected body part in front of a fan after the compress. Once the acute weeping has diminished, then topical steroid (such as triamcinolone cream) applications can be an effective treatment. In extensive disease, systemic steroids may need to be utilized either orally or by an injection (shot).

Mild eczema may respond to compresses composed of tepid water followed by room air evaporation. Chronic eczema can be improved by applying water followed by an emollient (moisturizing cream or lotion). Mild eczema can be effectively treated with nonprescription 1% hydrocortisone cream.

See the article here:
Atopic Dermatitis vs. Eczema: Cause & Treatment for Dry Skin ...

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Atopic Dermatitis vs. Eczema: Cause & Treatment for Dry Skin …

Baby or Infant Eczema: Causes, Symptoms, Treatment | Everyday …

Posted: at 3:27 pm

While baby eczema is the result of immune-system dysfunction, likely from a genetic predisposition, studies have found a number of risk factors.

For example, a study published inFebruary 2018 in theInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healthsuggested that children have a higher risk of developing eczema if their mothers experienced high-stress situations during pregnancy. (4)

In a study published in May 2018 in theJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, researchers in the United Kingdom analyzed the sociodemographic characteristics of about 675,000 children in a primary-care database. They found that the children were more likely to be diagnosed with eczema if they fit one of the following descriptions:

Another study, published in May 2018 in theJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, looked at how the outdoor environment specifically air pollutants and meteorological conditions affected eczema risk in children of both sexes. The researchers concluded that high levels of carbon monoxide, ammonia, formaldehyde, lead, particulate matter, and ozone levels may all influence the development of infantile eczema. (6)

Other studies, though, have had contradictory findings. For example, one study of American children published in August 2016 in the journalPediatric Allergy and Immunologysuggested that a hot and sunny climate combined with high particulate matter and ozone levels actually appears to protect against eczema. (7)

A small Australia-based study, published in March 2019 in theJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, found an association between ultraviolet (UV) sunlight exposure in early infancy and lower incidence of eczema by 6 months of age.(8)

The scientists, though, caution against intentionally exposing babies to direct sunlight until researchers better understand this complicated issue.(9)

Read more from the original source:
Baby or Infant Eczema: Causes, Symptoms, Treatment | Everyday ...

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Baby or Infant Eczema: Causes, Symptoms, Treatment | Everyday …

Fungal Skin Infection vs. Eczema: Differences

Posted: at 3:27 pm

What Is the Treatment for a Fungal Skin Infection vs. Eczema?

A wide array of treatment options are available to treat candidiasis. Options include creams, lotions, ointments, tablets or capsules, troches (lozenges), and creams. Talk to a doctor to find the option that is right for you.

Medications used to treat yeast infections generally fall into two main categories.

Avoid scratching the affected area. Medical treatment includes prescription anti-inflammatory medications, and steroid creams. Antibiotics may have to be prescribed to clear the affected irritation. Anti-itch creams, especially those containing hydrocortisone, may be helpful, but many experts recommend avoiding topical diphenhydramine and topical anesthetics because of concern of becoming sensitized and developing a secondary allergic contact dermatitis in reaction to these medications. Anti-itch creams containing pramoxine and menthol may be safer in this regard.

Removing exacerbating factors is a good place to start when managing eczema at home. This may be as simple as changing the laundry detergent to one that is fragrance free or as difficult as moving to a new climate or changing jobs.

Long baths in soapy water or long hot showers may worsen eczema. On the other hand, soaking in warm, non-soapy water followed immediately by moisturizers to "seal in the moisture" is helpful. Prevent dry skin by taking short lukewarm showers or baths. Use a mild soap or body cleanser. Short contact of the skin with a shampoo is generally not a problem, but prolonged contact may worsen the rash on the neck and face. Prior to drying off, apply an effective emollient to wet skin. Emollients are substances that inhibit the evaporation of water. Generally, they are available in jars and have a "stiff" consistency. They do not flow and ought to leave a shine with a slightly greasy feel on the skin. Most good emollients contain petroleum jelly although certain solid vegetable shortenings do a more than creditable job. The thicker, the better, although patient preference is usually toward thinner lotions because of ease of application and avoidance of a greasy feel. Oatmeal baths (Aveeno and others) may be soothing to itchy, fissured skin although best outcomes will still result from applying moisturizers after rinsing off.

A patient with longstanding eczema may become sensitized to the products they are putting on the skin and develop allergic contact dermatitis that may be identical in clinical appearance. Skin allergy may develop to over-the-counter (OTC) products such as topical anesthetics, topical diphenhydramine (Benadryl), lanolin (an ingredient in Eucerin and other common moisturizers), coconut oil, and tea tree oil or even prescription medications such as topical steroid creams.

Avoid wearing tight-fitting, rough, or scratchy clothing.

Avoid scratching the rash. If it's not possible to stop scratching, cover the area with a dressing. Wear gloves at night to minimize skin damage from scratching.

Anything that causes sweating can irritate the rash. Avoid strenuous exercise during a flare.

An anti-inflammatory topical cream may be necessary to control a flare of atopic dermatitis.

The topical form may sensitize people and cause allergic contact dermatitis.

Avoid physical and mental stress. Eating right, light activity, and adequate sleep will help someone stay healthy, which can help prevent flares.

A variety of home remedies such as apple cider vinegar and tea tree oil are frequently touted as cures for eczema, but there is little or no scientific basis for these claims. Bleach baths, on the other hand, may help. The goal of bleach baths is to suppress colonization by Staphylococcus aureus bacteria with the resulting flare that may cause. Several formulas exist, but a cup of bleach for a full bathtub full of water (or cup for a half bath) is a good balance between getting the desired effect and generating an irritant dermatitis. A summer substitution for bleach baths would be regular use of overchlorinated community swimming pools.Do not expect a quick response. Atopic dermatitis is controllable but consistency in application of treatment products is necessary.

See more here:
Fungal Skin Infection vs. Eczema: Differences

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Fungal Skin Infection vs. Eczema: Differences

Winter skincare: How to spot eczema and treat it – The Indian Express

Posted: at 3:27 pm

The chilly season brings along a lot of troubles for our skin, and can even lead to eczema flares ups. One of the major reasons it worsens during the winter season is because the skin cant keep itself moisturised. Moreover, wearing too many layers of clothes along with the use of heaters can cause the skin to turn red and itchy, said Dr Aakriti Mehra, dermatologist, cosmetologist, and trichologist at Skingenius, Colaba.

Below, she explains the skin condition, its triggers, and also shares how one can treat the same. Read on to know more.

What is Eczema?

Eczema (dermatitis) is a rash that can appear anywhere on the body. It appears as inflamed, itchy, red, and very dry, explains Dr Mehra. This happens to be the most common type is atopic dermatitis, which is usually a lifelong condition present since childhood. It is more commonly found in individuals who have a family history of atopy. Moreover, it is seen most commonly in skin flexures and can be triggered by multiple internal or external factors, adds the dermatologist.

What are the causes?

The most common cause of atopic eczema is dry skin. People who suffer from this condition lack the ability to pull moisture into the upper layers of the skin and therefore various triggers can irritate the skin, in turn, exacerbating the condition, says Dr Mehra.

These triggers range from environmental factors such as dust, pollen, perfumes, or even food allergies such as nuts, vegetables, and even from seafood. However, stress happens to be a prominent reason along with sweating.

What are the signs and symptoms?

The major signs, as mentioned above, include dry, red, and itchy skin. However, it can also be associated with excessive sebum production, but according to Dr Mehra, the chances are rare.

How can it be treated?

The condition occurs because of a gene variation, and therefore there isnt any cure available. However, it can be managed symptomatically with topical and oral medication as well as a few lifestyle modifications, says the dermatologist. Other than that, one should ensure their skin is thoroughly moisturised, and avoid the triggers as much as possible. Here are other ways to avoid flaring up of the skincare issue.

For more lifestyle news, follow us: Twitter:lifestyle_ie|Facebook:IE Lifestyle| Instagram:ie_lifestyle

Follow this link:
Winter skincare: How to spot eczema and treat it - The Indian Express

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Winter skincare: How to spot eczema and treat it – The Indian Express

Red dots on skin: Pictures, causes, treatment, and when to seek help – Medical News Today

Posted: at 3:27 pm

A person may notice red dots on their skin for a number of reasons, ranging from allergic reactions to heat exposure.

Many causes of red dots on the skin are harmless and resolve on their own. Others may require at-home or over-the-counter (OTC) treatment.

In this article, we discuss some of the possible causes of red dots on the skin, their treatment options, and when to contact a doctor.

Skin rashes come in a variety of sizes, colors, and textures.

Not all rashes require emergency medical treatment. However, people should seek immediate medical attention if they have a rash and notice any of the following symptoms:

People should also seek immediate attention for any new rashes that are painful and that affect the eyes, inside of the mouth, or genitalia.

When in doubt, a person should seek the opinion of a primary care provider or board-certified dermatologist.

Heat rash, or miliaria, occurs when the sweat glands become blocked, trapping sweat in the deep layers of the skin.

While anyone can have heat rash, this condition is most common among infants and young children with immature sweat glands.

Symptoms of heat rash include:

Heat rash usually goes away within 24 hours.

Treatment typically involves using lotions to soothe the itching, irritation, and swelling.

People can also keep the skin cool and avoid tight-fitting clothing.

Learn more about the treatment options for heat rash here.

Keratosis pilaris (KP) is a common skin condition that causes tiny red, white, or flesh-colored bumps on the skin.

It most often affects the outer parts of the upper arms. It can also affect the forearms and upper back, but this is less common.

Symptoms of KP include:

People can treat the symptoms of KP with:

Learn more about home management for KP here.

Contact dermatitis occurs when a person comes into contact with a substance that irritates their skin or triggers an allergic reaction.

Contact dermatitis symptoms vary depending on the trigger and the severity of the reaction.

Symptoms of contact dermatitis include:

Learn more about contact dermatitis here.

Treatment for contact dermatitis depends on the cause and severity of a persons symptoms.

Mild to moderate symptoms improve when a person avoids contact with the irritant or allergen. If possible, people should:

If the dermatitis is limited to a small area, a person can apply 1% hydrocortisone cream.

A doctor can prescribe stronger topical or oral antihistamines for people who do not respond to OTC medication.

Atopic dermatitis, also known as eczema, is a chronic inflammatory skin condition.

There are many different types of eczema, including:

Alongside red bumps on the skin, eczema can cause:

People can manage atopic dermatitis symptoms and even prevent flare-ups with the following treatments:

For severe atopic dermatitis that does not respond to the above treatment options, a person should see a board-certified dermatologist.

Taking bleach baths, which require using half a cup of bleach per 40-gallon tub, 12 times per week may also help.

Learn more about the treatment options for eczema here.

Rosacea is a skin condition that causes skin irritation, redness, and small pimples.

Although anyone can develop rosacea at any point in their lives, this condition most often occurs among adults aged 3060 years, people with fair skin, and those going through menopause.

Symptoms of rosacea include:

People can treat rosacea with various strategies and medication. Some strategies that can help relieve rosacea include:

People should also avoid caffeinated products and spicy foods, as these can also trigger rosacea.

Medical treatments for rosacea include:

Learn more about the treatment options for rosacea here.

Certain infections can also lead to red dots on the skin.

If a person suspects an infection of the skin, they should consult a doctor.

Examples of these include:

The varicella-zoster virus causes these infections, which produce red, itchy, fluid-filled blisters that can appear anywhere on the body.

Chickenpox usually occurs in infants and young children. However, adolescents and adults can also develop chickenpox.

Shingles occurs in adults who have already had chickenpox. According to the National Institute on Aging, shingles usually affects one area on one side of the body.

This contagious viral infection causes a distinctive rash of small red or pink dots.

The rash usually starts on the face before spreading to the trunk, arms, and legs. Rubella infections also cause a fever, a headache, and swollen lymph nodes.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) note that rubella is a relatively rare infection in the United States due to the widespread use of the MMR vaccine. The vaccine is available for infants and children aged between 9 months and 6 years.

Meningitis is a medical emergency. It is the inflammation of the membranes that cover the spinal cord and brain. It typically occurs due to a bacterial or viral infection.

Symptoms of meningitis include:

A rash does not always appear. However, if it does, a person might notice small pink, red, brown, or purple pinpricks on the skin. Also, it will not fade when a person rolls a glass over it.

The CDC define Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) as a type of bacteria that is resistant to several antibiotics.

MRSA often infects the skin, leading to painful areas of inflamed skin. People may also experience pus drainage from the affected skin and fever.

Other bacterial infections of the skin may also cause painful and inflamed areas of the skin. If a person suspects that they are experiencing a skin infection, they should consult a doctor.

Streptococcus bacteria cause this infection.

These bacteria naturally inhabit the nose and throat. They cause a red rash on the neck, under the armpit, and on the groin. The rash consists of small red dots that are rough to the touch.

If a person suspects an infection of the skin, they should always consult a doctor.

People should also speak with a doctor if their rash does not improve despite using OTC or at-home treatments.

People should also seek medical attention if they have a skin rash accompanied by the following symptoms:

If a person suspects a skin infection, they should contact a healthcare professional before trying any home remedies.

To relieve and manage skin rashes, people can try the following home treatments:

There are several possible causes for red dots on the skin, including heat rash, KP, contact dermatitis, and atopic dermatitis.

Red dots on the skin may also occur due to more serious conditions, such as a viral or bacterial infection.

If people suspect that they have a skin infection, they should contact a doctor rather than use home remedies.

People can treat some skin rashes and their accompanying symptoms with home remedies and OTC treatments. These include avoiding the source of irritation and using OTC anti-itch ointments.

People can contact a doctor or dermatologist if their symptoms persist despite using at-home or OTC treatments. A doctor or dermatologist can diagnose the underlying cause and make appropriate treatment recommendations.

Go here to read the rest:
Red dots on skin: Pictures, causes, treatment, and when to seek help - Medical News Today

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Red dots on skin: Pictures, causes, treatment, and when to seek help – Medical News Today

Dry Skin on Your Eyelids? Here’s How to Heal It With a Product You Already Have at Home – POPSUGAR

Posted: at 3:27 pm

The only thing more persistent than dry skin in the winter is those 15-second insurance company ads at the beginning of YouTube videos you're not allowed to skip. You can try to avoid them (or it, if we're talking about dry skin) but they will undoubtedly pop up again.

While you might come to expect parched, flakey skin in winter, dryness on your eyelids is a different story. It's the kind of skin-care dilemma that makes you say to yourself in the bathroom mirror "Seriously?" as you assess the damage. Dry eyelid skin can be itchy and uncomfortable, can make achieving a smooth makeup application nearly impossible, and is hard to treat due to its less-than-ideal location. (Is it even safe to put a normal face moisturizer on your eyelids?!)

We're sharing how to heal dry patches on your eyelids and determine if it's just a regular case of the winter blues or due to a chronic condition like eczema.

Genetics, environmental factors, beauty products, and lifestyle factors can all contribute to dry skin on your eyelids flakey skin on your eyelids can be triggered by a number of things, just as dryness anywhere else on your body.

"Often in the winter, it is eyelid eczema or just common dry skin," Angela J. Lamb, MD, associate professor of dermatology at Mount Sinai, told POPSUGAR. "Often eczema is more chronic and doesn't respond as well to thicker moisturizers. Some of the most common symptoms of eczema include red and inflamed skin, an itchy rash, [and] dark-colored patches." If you're unsure, the best way to determine whether you have eczema or just regular dry skin is to see a dermatologist.

Dry skin on your eyelids is such a common issue, even those who usually have an oily or normal skin type can experience it. This is because the skin around your eyes is the thinnest on your entire body. "The eyelids are particularly vulnerable to the harsh weather conditions," said Dr. Lamb. "Particularly, the skin around this area is thin, so it's difficult to protect from the different elements."

So, what's the best way to treat it and what products can you put on eyelids? Dr. Lamb recommends applying cortisone (something you probably already have tucked away in your medicine cabinet) several times throughout the day for extreme cases and eczema. "Using a plain moisturizer [that's] fragrance-free, suitable for sensitive skin, and paraben-free is definitely something that you should opt for," she said. It also doesn't hurt to look for additional ways to add moisture into your routine, like by incorporating a hyaluronic acid serum and switching your cleanser out for a hydrating formula in the winter or whenever you're experiencing dryness. Try: La Roche-Posay Toleriane Ultra Eye Cream ($25), Aveeno Maximum Strength 1% Hydrocortisone Anti-Itch Cream ($10), or CeraVe Moisturizing Cream ($19).

Read more from the original source:
Dry Skin on Your Eyelids? Here's How to Heal It With a Product You Already Have at Home - POPSUGAR

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Dry Skin on Your Eyelids? Here’s How to Heal It With a Product You Already Have at Home – POPSUGAR

What Is Sea Buckthorn Oil and Should You Add It to Your Skin-Care Routine? – Yahoo Lifestyle

Posted: at 3:27 pm

sea buckthorn oil fb

Prostock-Studio/Getty

I know, I know you might be sick of hearing about skin-care oils. After all, there are approximately 10 billion of them (maybe I'm exaggerating, but you get the picture). That said, of all of the many oils you may have seen or heard of, there's one that flies somewhat under the radar, yet deserves some time in the spotlight. I'm talking about sea buckthorn oil, an oil that's truly unique among its counterparts, thanks to a laundry list of skin benefits.

Sea buckthorn oil is extracted from the berries, leaves, and seeds of the sea buckthorn plant, a small shrub that grows in the Himalayan region, explains board-certified dermatologist Corey L. Hartman, M.D., founder of Skin Wellness Dermatology in Birmingham, AL. "It's rich in many vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants and is referred to as a super fruit of skin care," he says. And because sea buckthorn oil can be either applied topically or ingested, it also has a litany of health benefits, including lowering blood pressure and reduced risk of heart disease and cancer, points out dermatologist Purvisha Patel, M.D., founder of Visha Skincare.

But back to the skin-care side of things. The oil is one of the only ones to contain all four types of omega fatty acids omega-3, omega-6, omega-7, and omega-9, notes Dr. Patel. "This makes it a good oil to help repair the skin barrier in inflammatory conditions such as psoriasis and eczema," she adds. It also makes it deeply hydrating, a choice pick for anyone dealing with extremely dehydrated skin. (Related: The Best Eczema Cream, According to Dermatologists)

That being said, pretty much anyone can benefit from incorporating sea buckthorn oil into their skin-care regimen; the vitamin, mineral, and antioxidant profile makes it ideal for improving the overall health (and appearance) of the skin, says Annie Gonzalez, M.D., a board-certified dermatologist at Riverchase Dermatology in Miami, FL. Those antioxidants, in particular, neutralize skin-damaging free radicals, reducing the signs of aging, she adds. The oil is packed with tons of them, but is especially high in vitamin C and vitamin E. In fact, the sea buckthorn plant berries contain ten times more vitamin C than an orange, and are the third highest source of vitamin E in the plant world, points out Dr. Hartman.

Story continues

So, what's the best way to work sea buckthorn oil into your routine? You can look for the oil in its purest form, in which case you should use it after or in lieu of a moisturizer. The point of a facial oil is to seal in moisture, and if you apply it before a water-based lotion or cream, the benefits of that moisturizer won't make it inside the oil layer, explains David Petrillo, cosmetic chemist and founder of Perfect Image. If you can't find pure sea buckthorn oil, you can most often spot it in lightweight serums, where it's combined with other hydrating ingredients, such as jojoba oil or hyaluronic acid, he notes. (Psst, serums can and should be applied under a moisturizer.) You also may want to save it for morning use. "Depending on which part of the plant it's extracted from, the oil can have a reddish, orange, or yellow color that can stain white bedding," cautions Dr. Patel. (It shouldn't have any tinting effect on your skin.)

Now for the million dollar question what if you have acne-prone skin? These experts point out that sea buckthorn oil isn't pore-clogging in and of itself; it's safe for all skin types, adds Dr. Gonzalez. That being said, it is sometimes used in thicker creams or lotions that can be problematic for those with oily or acne-prone skin. In that case, seek it out in a product that's labeled as non-comedogenic (translation: won't clog pores) if you do want to try it. (Related: The Best Drugstore Acne Products, According to Dermatologists)

Ready to get on board the sea buckthorn oil train? Ahead, eight products worth trying.

Both Dr. Patel and Petrillo recommend this completely pure, unadulterated version of the oil. "A little goes a long way," says Dr. Patel, who advises using just one drop for your full face after cleansing. Petrillo points out that, because this contains just the oil and nothing else, it's also a nice option to mix in with another oil or oil-based serum that you may like using to reap the benefits of both ingredients. Bonus points for the affordable price.

Buy It: The Ordinary 100% Organic Virgin Sea Buckthorn Fruit Oil, $15, skinstore.com

Sea buckthorn is one of several antioxidant-rich oils that come together in this protective and hydrating face oil that's great for any and all skin types. It's a top choice for Dr. Patel, who also lauds it for the dark, glass packaging and dropper dispenser that help prevent light and air from breaking down the oils and making them rancid. (And now you may be wondering if you need to store your products a certain way or if you need to invest in a skin-care fridge.)

Buy It: Grown Alchemist Antioxidant Facial Oil, $55, credobeauty.com

"This is an affordable option for all skin types. A hybrid between a facial oil and a serum, it nourishes the skin with sea buckthorn oil, camellia oil, and sodium hyaluronate," says Dr. Gonzalez of one of her picks. She adds that it's great for hydrating and helping strengthen the skin barrier, while also tamping down redness. (Credit the anti-inflammatory effects of the sea buckthorn oil.) Top tip: It's a dual-phase (or bi-phase) product, meaning the ingredients have distinct densities which make them separate and sit in layers. Give it a good shake to help combine the oil and serum before each use.

Buy It: Versed Sunday Morning Antioxidant Oil-Serum, $20, revolve.com

Hesitant to try oils on your face? Consider using them on the skin below your chin. Sea buckthorn oil is the star of the show here, combined in a sesame oil base to effectively hydrate even the driest spots on your body (think: ashy knees and cracked heels and elbows). It absorbs quickly without leaving behind any greasy residue, but does impart a gorgeous glow to the skin. With over 5,000 five-star ratings on Amazon, shoppers mentioned that it also seems to help reduce the appearance of cellulite on their butt and thighs.

Buy It: Weleda Hydrating Body and Beauty Oil, $24, was $26, amazon.com

Sea buckthorn oil has some anti-aging benefits on its own, but this oil is an especially great youth-booster. It combines sea buckthorn oil with rosehip oil, rich in anti-aging vitamin A, and bakuchiol, a plant-based alternative to retinol, says Petrillo. Nordstrom customers with sensitive skin say they love how it seriously hydrates sans irritation, while others raved about the oil's ability to plump skin and reduce fine lines.

Buy It: Omorovicza Miracle Facial Oil, $125, skinstore.com and nordstrom.com

For those dealing with extra-dry skin, adding hydration at every step in your skin-care routine is paramount, starting with cleansing. Enter this newbie, a supremely moisturizing cleanser that combines, you guessed it, sea buckthorn oil with soothing chamomile. The result? A formula that effectively removes all dirt and makeup, yet still leaves skin feeling lusciously soft and smooth. (Related: The 9 Best Pore Cleansers That Actually Remove Dirt, Oil, and Build-Up)

Buy It: 100% Pure Calendula Flower Cleansing Milk, $28, 100percentpure.com

This is another product that earns both Petrillo and Dr. Patel's seal of approval. They both appreciate the fact that there's sea buckthorn oil and soothing buckwheat honey in the mix, a nice option for calming irritated skin. It's also great if you're prone to breakouts, since it's not only lightweight and fast-absorbing, but also non-comedogenic, they say. One Amazon reviewer said they mix two drops of this facial oil with their moisturizer as opposed to applying it directly to their face and it makes their skin incredibly soft.

Buy It: Farmacy Honey Grail Ultra-Hydrating Facial Oil, $48, amazon.com

Can't get enough oils in your skin-care routine? This splurge-worthy option packs a ton of different ones, all with complimentary benefits, into one bottle. Along with all those benefits of sea buckthorn oil, there are plenty of other antioxidant-rich and skin-strengthening oils in the formula, such as tsubaki and pomegranate seed oils to name a few. There's also squalane, an oil-like substance that mimics the sebum naturally found in your skin, which contributes to the silky and fast-absorbing texture.

Buy It: Mutha Face Oil, $110, violetgrey.com

Read this article:
What Is Sea Buckthorn Oil and Should You Add It to Your Skin-Care Routine? - Yahoo Lifestyle

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on What Is Sea Buckthorn Oil and Should You Add It to Your Skin-Care Routine? – Yahoo Lifestyle

Dandruff/dry scalp treatments that work – Jamaica Observer

Posted: at 3:27 pm

'); } else { $(".fotorama-caption").addClass("remove_caption"); } }) .fotorama();

DANDRUFF is an itchy and persistent skin disorder that results in dry, flaky skin accumulating on the scalp. It's a problem that affects both males and females at any age, and can only be treated, not cured.

The fungus malassezia has been cited as the main cause of dandruff development, while hormones have also been said to contribute to its growth. Most people will get dandruff flakes at one point or the other, and will explore various methods, both prescribed and home-made, to try to treat what can be an irritating problem.

Here are some of the treatments that women say work for them.

Apple cider vinegar

Apple cider vinegar (ACV) is one of those heal-all products in this case, the vinegar's acidity causes the dead skin on the scalp to shed.

Apply undiluted ACV to the scalp after washing, but before conditioning, and leave on for 15 minutes, said hairdresser Debbie Wright. I've used this treatment for myself and all three of my teenagers, and it works better than the dandruff shampoos.

After washing out the vinegar, she advises that you condition as usual, and then use a sulphur-based oil on the scalp afterwards.

Sulphur ointment

Sold in stores, this formula will help keep dandruff flakes at bay, if only for as long as you use it.

You can now even get the liquid version that works for those who wear braids and other synthetic hair, said Merlene Scott-Roberts, a home economics teacher. Sulphur helps to kill the fungus and helps prevent build-up.

She said this treatment should follow a routine of regular hair washing.

Washing often

One of the surest ways to get your hair dandruff-free is to keep it clean. Wash your hair once a week, as when hair becomes dirty, there is product build-up, and then this leads to dandruff.

Even if you don't get to do a full wash, scrub the scalp with a wet washrag and shampoo, and don't allow dirt and grime to build up, says salon owner Mishka Brown.

She said for those wearing weaves and braids who may find it difficult to wash often, using a sulphur product to base the scalp before applying the hair will also help. This is also useful because some of the hair preparations can dry out the scalp.

The oil remedy

Not all oils are created equal there are some oils that will irritate the scalp and even lead to more dandruff, Wright says. You can't go wrong with tea tree, coconut or castor oil, as these will improve hydration and reduce dryness. But if you find that your scalp begins itching with the application of oil, you may be super sensitive and need to switch to another oil that suits you better.

Aloe vera

Aloe vera has antifungal properties that help to prevent and treat dandruff. Brown says using aloe vera as part of your beauty routine can help to prevent issues like flaking, while giving you softer, bouncier hair.

Apply the aloe vera gel directly to the hair and scalp, taking care to avoid the leaf area as this can irritate the skin, she said.

Build your immune system

A weakened immune system can exacerbate dandruff symptoms. Eat foods that are high in vitamins and minerals and Omega-3s foods like salmon, trout and mackerel. You can also take a fish oil supplement. These help to keep your skin supple, and build the immune system.

Baking soda

Baking soda acts as an exfoliant to remove dead skin cells, and may be useful for treating dandruff.

Make a paste with baking soda and water and apply it to the scalp, Scott-Roberts said. I haven't personally tried this one, but I have been told that it's worth a try.

...When to see a dermatologist

Not every flaky scalp condition is in fact dandruff, and there are some conditions that mimic dandruff, including scalp eczema, scalp ringworm and psoriasis vulgaris. With these conditions, a visit to the dermatologist will become necessary.

So how do you know when the condition you have isn't dandruff, and that you need to see a doctor?

Making a distinction between plain dandruff and other scalp issues like scalp eczema, dry scalp, scalp ringworm and psoriasis can be tricky, but what really helps to distinguish the conditions are the degree and kind of flaking.

Look out for these signs:

Scalp eczema

Scalp eczema presents with symptoms of irritation, redness and itchy skin on the scalp that causes the flakes. This condition may take vigorous treatment in order to bring it under control. The most common type of scalp eczema is known as seborrhoeic dermatitis, and its most unwelcome symptoms are itching, scalp discolouration, crusting and flaking. Other symptoms are greasy or waxy flakes, blisters, and flakes on other parts of the body like the ears and eyebrows.

Seborrhoeic dermatitis

Seborrhoeic dermatitis is said to be caused by an overproduction of sebum, the natural oils secreted by sebaceous glands in the scalp. This then causes the overgrowth of mallasezia. It is believed that changes in the weather, stress, and family history can all play a role.

Scalp ringworm

The signs and symptoms of ringworm of the scalp may vary, but it usually appears as itchy, scaly, bald patches on the head. Ringworm of the scalp is a highly contagious infection that is most common in toddlers and school-age children up to 12 years old. Most cases of scalp ringworm are transmitted from person to person through touching, sharing of combs, brushes, towels, etc.

Dry scalp

One commonly mistaken dandruff lookalike is dry scalp. This condition is said to be caused by the use of products like shampoos or soaps that may be too harsh for the scalp. Sulfate-based products usually cause dryness. Chemical treatments like relaxers, texturisers, or hair colouring tend to irritate and dry the scalp which results in flaky scalp.

Psoriasis vulgaris

Psoriasis vulgaris is a non-contagious disease characterised by inflamed lesions covered with silvery-white scabs of dead skin. Because the body is not able to shed old skin as rapidly as new cells are rising to the surface, raised patches of dead skin develop on the scalp as well as other parts of the body.

Now you can read the Jamaica Observer ePaper anytime, anywhere. The Jamaica Observer ePaper is available to you at home or at work, and is the same edition as the printed copy available at http://bit.ly/epaper-login

See the original post:
Dandruff/dry scalp treatments that work - Jamaica Observer

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Dandruff/dry scalp treatments that work – Jamaica Observer

Biological warfare experiment in India and the curious case of yellow fever mosquitoes – Frontline

Posted: at 3:25 pm

On July 17, 2020, the well-known civil rights activist and Supreme Court lawyer Nandita Haksar, in an article (Stranger than fiction: Did the CIA conduct secret mosquito experiments in India in the 1970s?), posed a question: Is scientific collaboration a battle between politics for profits and politics for the people? As the daughter of the late P.N. Haksar, a distinguished bureaucrat, Planning Commission member and Principal Secretary to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi , she was aware of the controversial closing down of the Genetic Control of Mosquitoes Unit (GCMU) under the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). She says: It was in this room that I heard many stories of covert operations. That day, a young journalist came by and told my father of a strange experiment with mosquitoes being conducted right near Palam airport, as Delhi airport was then called. The man said it was an experiment on yellow fever. But we dont have yellow fever in India, my father had exclaimed. The journalist said that this was exactly his point. He claimed it was a part of a biological warfare experiment. We all sat in shocked silence. The journalist, Chakravarthi Raghavan, went on to head the Press Trust of India (PTI). Dr K.S. Jayaraman, who did the investigations, was also no ordinary correspondent. With a PhD in nuclear physics from a university in the United States and journalism as an elective subject, he had resigned his government job as a scientist and joined PTI as its Chief Science Reporter.

The entire story of how the GCMU, established in 1970 by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to study the genetic control of mosquitoes, had to close down in 1975 is now forgotten. The guidelines issued by a committee of learned scientists such as Prof. M.S. Swaminathan and Prof. M.G.K. Menon in 1975 on international scientific collaboration have also been forgotten. As a scientist with the GCMU, and with fading memories today at 91, I would reminisce on what happened .

The funding of the GCMU project was entirely from the PL 480 Funds [Public Law 480 established for U.S. distribution of foreign aid] in rupees left with the U.S. Embassy; it was an all American funding managed by the WHO. It was a lopsided collaboration between the two, with the WHO administering through its representative (Dr R. Pal) all aspects of the project and the ICMR paying only the salaries of the Indian staff recruited. There was an agreement between the WHO and the ICMR, and a separate agreement between the WHO and the United States Public Health Service (USPHS); the ICMR was not even aware of it. Nor was the Health Ministry of India. The USPHS took all the policy decisions; a representative from Fort Detrick, the headquarters of the U.S biological warfare division, attended the scientific and technical meetings. The aim of the project, according to the agreement with the ICMR, was to investigate the possibilities of using genetic methods to control vectors of malaria and filariasis. But contrary to the spirit of the agreement, no work was done on Anopheles stephensi, the urban malaria vector prevalent in Delhi. Extensive studies, however, were carried out on the filariasis vector Culex quinquifasciatus although there was no filariasis in Delhi. There was also undue emphasis on the work on Aedes aegypti, the dangerous vector of yellow fever though the disease was not prevalent in India. Thus, right from the beginning, the policy was flawed.

First of all, why was Delhi, which was not endemic for either malaria or filariasis, selected for locating the GCMU. The late Dr N.G.S. Raghavan, an authority on filariasis and Director of the National Institute of Communicable Diseases (NICD), was quoted by the Public Accounts Committee of Parliament to have questioned the rationale for locating the centre in Delhi. Was it because of its proximity to the defence establishments? Obviously, the NICD was never consulted. This was surprising since the NICD, the successor to the Malaria Institute of India (MII), was a premier Central government research institute with branches all over India. Moreover, the WHO representative in the GCMU (Dr Pal) and person in charge of all operations was a Malaria Inspector at MII for many years before he joined the WHO even as he kept his lien on his position at the MII. (It may be noted that his lien for more than 10 years was against the rules and it was terminated only in 1975 while an inquiry was held on the GCMUs work.)

The GCMU carried out extensive studies by mass rearing, with automation, of millions of Culex quinquifasciatus (Cq) mosquitoes and chemosterilising supposed-to-be males using the drug thiotepa (and also irradiation). The unit developed a mechanical gadget for separation of males and females at the pupal stage itself. The males were then released in many villages around Delhi. The released males were to compete with indigenous males and mate with the wild females, which in due course would lay sterile eggs. But the ecologists in the project showed that (i) the released males were not competitive in many aspects with the wild males and therefore not able to induce 100 per cent sterility in the wild mosquito population. (ii) The separation of sexes at the pupal stage was not very effective, and the female contamination rate was about 3-5 per cent. That means, at every release, there were thousands of females among the released males, and which bit humans. This is because the sexual dimorphism in the size of the male and female pupae was not very distinct. (iii) Other methods like irradiation were adopted and cytoplasmically incompatible Cq mosquitoes were also released. The latter method developed by a German scientist, Hans Laven, was later found to be a flop as it was shown that the so-called incompatibility was due to the presence of a rickettsial infection and could be cured by treating the animals on which the mosquitoes are fed with tetracycline. (iv) There were, however, noteworthy and extensive field studies on the ecology, behaviour and population dynamics of the filarial mosquito, Culex. (v) Finally, undue emphasis and extensive work was done on Aedes aegypti.

Why were detailed studies undertaken on the yellow fever vector, Aedes aegypti, when India did not have yellow fever? An unclassified document from the United States Army Chemical Corps in 1960, describing its chemical and biological warfare efforts, revealed: In 1953, the Biological Warfare (BW) Laboratories in Fort Detrick established a program[me] to study the use of arthropods for spreading anti-personnel BW agents. The report cited the advantages of using insects and pointed out that they will remain alive for some time, keeping an area constantly dangerous. The programme studied the use of Aedes aegypti and the yellow fever virus. During the Cold War era, the obvious target was the Soviet Union. The report noted, Yellow fever has never occurred in some areas, including Asia, and therefore it is quite probable that the population of these areas would be quite susceptible to the disease.

Between April and November of 1956, the Corps released uninfected female mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti) in a residential area in Savannah, Georgia. It was learnt that within a day, the mosquitoes had travelled one to two miles and had bitten many people. A 1958 test in the same area confirmed that mosquitoes could be spread over areas of several miles by means of devices dropped from planes or set up on the ground. And while these tests were made with uninfected mosquitoes, it is a fairly safe assumption that infected mosquitoes could be spread equally well. Therefore it was significant to note that the GCMU had perfected mass production techniques and developed an automatic distribution of Aedes mosquitoes through a gadget mounted on a cycle rickshaw which could go into narrow lanes in a crowded city and release them in clusters.

But the seeds for a controversy were laid on February 11, 1972, less than two years after the GCMU started, when National Herald, a national daily from Delhi, published an article Science or Neo Imperialism authored by A scientific Worker. (It was later revealed that the article was written by a high-ranking defence scientist of Directors rank, who is now no more.) This created a flutter. The article highlighted that thiotepa, used by the GCMU for sterilisation of mosquitoes, was a carcinogen. Later, Blitz, a weekly tabloid from Bombay, splashed it in the headlines. Surprisingly, at about the same time, German News, a regular publication of the Embassy of Germany in Delhi, published an article by Prof. Hans Laven, who was with the GCMU, advocating the use of his strain of Cq with cytoplasmic incompatibility, supporting the views in National Herald. A panic button was pressed immediately, and it was reported that the Director General of ICMR requested C. Raghavan, the PTI Chief, to send someone to investigate the matter. That is how K.S. Jayaraman entered the scene. He made detailed investigations for 15 months and came out with a report in PTI on July 9, 1974, which was critical of the GCMUs functioning. Newspapers all over India carried it.

This created a sensation as it involved the WHO. Mainstream quoted Raghavan as saying, It took us nearly nineteen months of patient investigation, cross checking of all leads, and reading up a great deal of technical material, to understand the ramifications of various foreign-sponsored research activities in the country. Our main effort centred on the work of the Genetic Control of Mosquito Unit (GCMU), an outfit run by the World Health Organisation (WHO) under an agreement with the Health Ministry in the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), and financed by the United States out of PL-480 Funds. The report further quoted Raghavan as saying, While it took us fifteen months to put together the story and issue it, it took the Minister just twenty-four hours of reading up on mosquitoes to dub the report tendentious, unfair, and misleading.

The matter was raised in Parliament, which decided that the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) should investigate the matter. Raghavan said: It took nine more months of patient inquiry by the PAC before the PTI team was vindicated, and the Health Ministry indicted. In the process of digging up material to help the PACs investigation and present a picture of what goes on in this land of ours, we came across so much of material that perhaps would fill a book, and almost read like a thriller. The obstruction and non-cooperation of the bureaucracy in our attempts to get at the facts did not come as a surprise to us, though my colleague, Dr K.S. Jayaraman, who did all the legwork and reading and researching, was aghast, as a scientist, to find out that in the Health Ministry scientists and doctors could not freely discuss matters even on a scientific level without being afraid of action from the top. One of the top Indian scientists was also harassed for collaborating with Jayaramans inquiry.

For the first time in the parliamentary history of India, an adjournment motion was passed on a subject of biological warfare. As already stated, the PAC, headed by two brilliant parliamentarians, Prof. Hiren Mukerjee (167th Report) and Jyotirmay Basu (200th report), exposed many things going on under the auspices of the WHO and under the garb of international collaboration in India. They exposed the biological warfare angle of the U.S., camouflaged by the USPHS, in the GCMU and how contrary to the agreement between the WHO and the Government of India, work was done not on malaria but on filarial vector control in a place where the disease was not endemic. But the horror of it all was that there was intensive work on Aedes aegypti, the yellow fever and dengue vector, but not a vector of human malaria nor filariasis. Mass rearing of the mosquito, and a perfect mechanism for distribution of Aedes aegypti in every street of a busy city, Sonepat, Haryana, was developed for which a detailed map of every street was made. And just when the operations were about to be launched, the Indian Army moved in. There were many individuals and agencies involved in stopping the operations: Raghavan, Jayaraman, and an unknown entomologist were involved in the operation, with the active support of P.N. Haksar, Ashok Parthasarathy, the then scientific adviser to the Prime Minister, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) and the Army bigwigs (including the Chief of Staff). The Chairman of the PAC wrote to the Prime Minister on January 31, 1975 (PAC 225), asking her to set the best intelligence services at her disposal on this and other connected projects. The defence authorities also woke up to the articles in National Herald.

The Haryana government too intervened. On February 17, 1975, it reported to have physically caught hold of a GCMU official on the outskirts of Sonepat when she was there with the paraphernalia and was about to distribute Aedes aegypti in the streets. She was allowed to go only after extracting a promise that no experiments would be conducted in Sonepat without the Haryana governments specific approval. The Prime Minister then appeared to have intervened and instructed the Health Minister to abandon the project. The GCMU was wound up in June 1975.

Nearly five decades later, as one who was part of the GCMU, I thought it necessary to tell the story so that present-day policy planners and scientists are aware of what really happened, and the pitfalls of international collaboration in science and technology (Mosquito in the ointment, Frontline, January 28, 2018).

The PAC did an exhaustive job. It relied also on the reports of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). One former additional Director General of ICMR had also given many references to the PAC on biological warfare. The PAC said the WHO had been used as a cover for certain U.S. research projects in India having a bearing on biological warfare (PAC report 167 para 7.1.4). It upheld the substance of an earlier news report by PTI and charged that these and other connected projects had little utility to India but had biological warfare or other significance. It has been known since the beginning of the twentieth century that India is a country receptive for yellow fever. It has plenty of Aedes aegypti and monkeys which are excellent reservoirs for the yellow fever virus. Aedes aegypti and other species of mosquitoes present in India can spread the virus from monkey to man and from man to man. Despite these ideal conditions, yellow fever has not struck India. Indias vulnerability to a yellow fever biological warfare attack was known to the U.S. and Nazi Germany during the Second World War. Early in 1940 the Government of India had received confidential information from the U.S. that in the event of war breaking out in the Far East, there is the possibility of Japan resorting to biological warfare with the yellow fever virus (C.G. Pandit, Indian Journal of Medical Research, p. 1524). In the autumn of 1939 Goebbels, broadcasting from Munich, accused the British of attempting to introduce yellow fever into India by transporting infected mosquitoes from west Africa and liberating them from aeroplanes over Indian cities, the whole scheme being presided over by a high permanent official of the foreign office (British Medical Journal, Vol.1 (1947), pp.893-895). Shortly before the beginning of the war, an enemy agency actually did attempt to gain possession of a virulent strain of yellow fever virus (ibid). Viewed against this background and the tremendous progress made at Fort Detrick in the development of a biological warfare system, the experiments by USPHS experts in India gave a new dimension to GCMU activities on Aedes aegypti. Furthermore, the USPHS, which sponsored the GCMU, is well known to have maintained a close liaison with Fort Detrick and receives a few hundred thousand dollars for its efforts (Steven Ross, p.123).

The U.S. biological warfare laboratory at Fort Detrick had examined over 200 candidates, but the greatest biological warfare interest was attached to a few agents that included the yellow fever virus (SIPRI Vol.II, pp.37-38). Attention was also paid to an aerosolised yellow fever virus (Science, January 13, 1967). As early as 1960 the U.S. germ warfare programme had progressed from concept to feasibility and from basic research to development of a completely new and potentially most effective biological warfare weapon system. This apparently related to a combination of yellow fever virus and Aedes aegypti mosquito (SIPRI Vol.II, p.81). Techniques had been developed for infecting mosquitoes of this species with yellow fever virus and keeping them alive for a month. Research on entomological warfare was highly classified and none of the U.S. congressional briefings ever delved into entomology (Seymour Hersh, p.88).

In India the Director General of Health Services (DGHS) admitted that the knowledge gained by the genetic control experiment could certainly be used for putting virus into mosquitoes and starting a focus on a disease like yellow fever (PAC, p. 135-137). In international scientific circles the biological warfare allegations against the WHO-ICMR project produced mixed reactions. New Scientist (October 9, 1975, p. 102) said the allegations were far less ridiculous. It quoted a biological warfare expert as saying that the GCMU data would be useful if one intended a yellow fever attack on India. It said the Indian data might have been useful in finding out why yellow fever had not occurred even though the vectors and monkeys were present. But even the critics admit that the WHO-ICMR project concerned an area where there was an overlap of public health and biological warfare interest. But the biological warfare implications were either ignored (in India) or were not pointed out at all when the project was mooted and many of the scientists became aware of it only after the investigative news report in 1974 and the subsequent PAC report.

There are, however, some pointers suggesting that the project was conceived with biological warfare as the main aim. The Sonepat site for the release of Aedes aegypti was selected by the WHO and the USPHS even before the GCMU formally took shape. Despite objections on scientific grounds from the local institute of health (NICD), the site was not changed (PAC, p.191). The testing of foreign strains of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes for their potential virulence of yellow fever vectors was considered unnecessary by the USPHS and by the WHO virologist (Dr Paul Bres), who (coincidentally?) happened to be a former colonel of the French Army. This is strange in a scientific project like this, particularly when experts had warned that it might be extremely serious if yellow fever were ever introduced in Asia or the Pacific Islands where the disease had never occurred (Biological and Chemical Warfare policies of the U.S., p.411). Also of concern was the units reluctance to change the priority from mosquitoes carrying malaria (problem number one not only in India but throughout the Indian subcontinent and neighbouring areas) to its obsession with studies on Aedes aegypti. It is well known that this species may be playing a beneficial role in the tropics by spreading the flu-like dengue fever which, in turn, protects the population against yellow fever (Max Theiler and W.G. Downs, pp. 442-443; also C.G. Pandit, IJMR, p.1541).

Was the mosquito research in India part of a research programme in biological warfare which had been banned by world bodies but not from the minds of elite scientists and politicians? It is hard to say. But where the number of coincidences defies the law of averages they are not random occurrences, and probabilities must go the other way. Scientific espionage in developing countries is easy because scientists and scientific departments in these countries are starved of funds. Many of the key scientific figures have been trained in advanced nations which facilitates establishing contacts with would-be collaborators on a personal level. The inferiority complex and lack of suitable machinery to evaluate foreign-sponsored projects also expose the countries to evil designs of foreigners. Such an evaluation can be made by countries that are scientifically equal, but many developing countries are not in a position to make such an evaluation of foreign projects from security or economic angles, not even from the angle of utility to themselves.

The PAC, after considering the entire gamut of foreign financial or foreign collaborative research, recommended in its report (PAC, 1974, Nos. 167 and 200, pp. 209-210) thus:

Government should identify a set of scientific or operation areas in which investigations by foreigners or by foreign assisted programmes should be subjected to the most careful and comprehensive scrutiny on a case by case basis before approval is given for the initiation of the project. The scientific areas selected at a particular point of time would need to be defined in the context of the prevalent international situating and advances in science and technology.

To start with the committee would suggest the following areas: (a) Any and all aspects of oceanography and research related to ocean resources and our coastal areas; (b) any and all aspects relating to meteorology and weather, especially weather modification projects; (c) remote sensing by aircraft and satellites particularly for the assessment of natural resources; (d) areas in biology such as microbiology epidemiology, ecology and virology; (g) all aspects of toxicology of drugs, pesticides and other chemicals; (f) propagation of radio waves including studies aimed at collecting information about the ionosphere and other upper atmosphere layers over our country; (g) any and all scientific investigations in border areas such as Himalayan Geology.

The government should decide that all proposals for scientific investigations undertaken in these defined areas with the help of or in association with foreign organisations or with foreign monies from any source should be sent by the Ministry, agency laboratory or private institution concerned to a nodal point within the government for a comprehensive review and clearance. The nodal point should be a high-power committee of scientists headed by the scientific adviser to the Ministry of Defence but include and perhaps ought to include other high security agencies of the government. The committee desires that once this mechanism has been set up it would also review all existing projects or of the type mentioned in preceding paragraph. But as far as I know, there is no such nodal point in existence, and our various institutions are having, even now, many foreign collaborative projects.

The kind of mechanism suggested by the PAC could at best deal with security and defence angles. But it cannot really deal with internal haemorrhage issue. In any event, unlike India, many developing countries do not even have the necessary scientific talent to assess these issues. Perhaps a solution for Third World countries is to set up their own organisation secretariat or centre staffed by personnel selected for their integrity and ability and societal purpose and use its resources for looking at and advising Third World countries in projects and proposals in the fields of S&T. The United Nations and its specialised agencies could have been the proper places to set up a watchdog agency in liaison with the plans for transfer of S&T to help developing nations consult and assess foreign projects in scientific research. However the U.N. and its agencies like the WHO, structured as of now, are really controlled by the Big Powers.

Dr P.K. Rajagopalan is former Director, Vector Control Research Centre, Pondicherry, Indian Council of Medical Research.

References

1. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (1973): The Problem of Chemical and Biological Warfare, Vol. I: The Rise of CB Weapons, Vol. II: CB Weapons Today, Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.

2. Hersh, Seymour N. (1968): Chemical and Biological Warfare, London: McGibbon and Keet Ltd.

3. Public Accounts Committee (1974-75) Fifth Lok Sabha, 167th report, and 200th report, Foreign participation or collaboration in reserve projects in India, New Delhi: the Lok Sabha Secretariat.

4. Cookson, John and Judith Nottingham (1970): A Survey of Chemical and Biological Warfare, U.S. government publication, London: Sheed and Ward.

Original post:

Biological warfare experiment in India and the curious case of yellow fever mosquitoes - Frontline

Posted in Germ Warfare | Comments Off on Biological warfare experiment in India and the curious case of yellow fever mosquitoes – Frontline

How the KGB convinced the world that AIDS was a Pentagon invention – Russia Beyond

Posted: at 3:25 pm

In July 1983, an Indian newspaper in New Delhi published an article alleging U.S. experiments were the likely cause of a new mysterious disease dubbed AIDS. Five years later, CBS anchor Dan Rather announced to millions of concerned Americans allegations that their own military might have been behind the deadly virus.

CBS News anchorman and broadcast journalist Dan Rather.

On that very day, a few KGB operatives in the secret agencys Lubyanka headquarters in Moscow likely praised each other for a job well done.

The story about U.S. military experiments that might have produced AIDS caught up slowly but eventually started spreading on the African continent and beyond like a bushfire.

Yankee business, not monkey business, Experts slam silence over man-made AIDS, AIDS is germ warfare by the U.S. Govt against gays & blacks! were only a few of countless headlines that appeared in the press all over the world, including the London-based Daily Express, from 1983 to 1987, before it eventually gained TV coverage inside the U.S.

"The story about U.S. military experiments that might have produced AIDS caught up slowly but eventually started spreading on the African continent and beyond like a bushfire."

A Soviet military publication claims the virus that causes AIDS leaked from a U.S. army laboratory conducting experiments in biological warfare, announced CBS anchor Dan Rather on March 30, 1987, to millions of unwitting Americans, who had virtually no way of verifying the validity of the Soviet report.

At the crux of this brewing international scandal was a little known local publication in New Delhi, India, as it was the first to link the Pentagon to AIDS. In summer 1983, the Indian daily newspaper Patriot claimed that AIDS was believed to be the result of the Pentagons experiments to develop new and dangerous biological weapons. It also asserted that the disease mostly struck Haitian immigrants inside the U.S., as well as American drug addicts and homosexuals, an implicit allegation that the viruss creators purposefully targeted marginalized groups of people in their sinister and inhumane experiment.

As it turned out, the story in the Patriot newspaper had been planted by the KGB.

Various departments of the Second Main Directorate of the Soviet KGB, responsible for counterintelligence and established on March 18, 1954, were marked in various letters of the Cyrillic alphabet.

A view of the general office of the KGB building.

The first letter of the alphabet A was assigned to an analytical department with an unusual task: to prepare and conduct clandestine initiatives and campaigns to influence foreign governments and publics, as well to shape perceptions of individuals and groups hostile to Soviet interests.

The agents in department A used to set honey traps, plant false stories and oversee their development in a way favorable to the Motherland.

Deceased Ladislav Bittman, who in a later stage of his life went by the name of Lawrence Martin, had been a KGB operative in department A before he defected to the U.S. in 1968. Bittman participated in many of the KGBs clandestine operations.

Lawrence Martin-Bittman.

At the beginning of his career, he established a whore house in Germany to compromise politicians and planted fake Nazi documents at the bottom of a lake to stir up anti-German sentiments.

During one of his last interviews before his death in 2018 at the age of 87, Bittman, a fragile-looking old man, did not hesitate a bit before he provided a sharp definition of disinformation his lifelong occupation and expertise, also called the active measures in the KGB circles.

[It is] deliberately distorted information that is secretly leaked into the communication process in order to deceive and manipulate, said Bittman.

Yuri Bezmenov, Bittmans former colleague at the KGB, who also defected to the U.S. in 1970 and assumed the name of Tomas David Schuman, claimed that over 80 percent of the money the Soviet KGB spent abroad was used to fund ideological subversion, a process that destabilized economic, political and ideological systems of the country in question.

Yuri Bezmenov.

In the case of the AIDS story, the destabilizing effect for the U.S. was imminent.

In 1981, a few employees from the U.S. State Department, CIA, FBI, Department of Defense and other U.S. agencies formed what became known as Active Measures Working Group (aka The Truth Squad) an interagency team whose task it was to counter Soviet disinformation.

Everybody was working part-time on the issue. We all sat around the table once every week or two, those who could volunteer the time to come in did, Kathleen C. Bailey, Deputy Assistant Secretary at the Department of State and a member of the The Truth Squad at the time, described the strangely laid-back approach of the U.S. government to counter the Soviet disinformation efforts.

The U.S. State Department Building.

In the meantime, the AIDS story started hurting the U.S. interests abroad for real. The allegations that the U.S. military bases overseas had passed AIDS to a local population of host countries undermined prospects of extending lease contracts for the bases. U.S. military personnel were compromised in countries like Germany, South Korea, Nicaragua, Panama, Turkey, Kenya, Zaire and others.

"The allegations that the U.S. military bases overseas had passed AIDS to a local population of host countries undermined prospects of extending lease contracts for the bases."

I was so angry that they accused the U.S. of creating the AIDS virus, because I knew how effective that was going to be as a tool against us. It angered me deeply. For them to think that [the U.S. created AIDS] damages their view of the United States, not only as a culture, but it taints all our policies. Its in the backs of their minds every time they discuss anything with us, said Bailey in an interview she gave years later.

In 1987, Bailey hosted a press conference at the State Department where she presented a report detailing the KGBs efforts to spread the AIDS story and link it to the U.S. government. U.S. image abroad is damaged and U.S foreign policy is complicated by disinformation. The primary origin of disinformation about the U.S. abroad is the Soviet Union, said Bailey.

Surprisingly, Baileys efforts had also been unwittingly supported by the Soviet medical community. Soviet scientist Viktor M. Zhdanov, who headed the Ivanovsky Institute of Virology in Moscow for 26 years, attended international conferences and gave interviews to mass media where he always categorically denied AIDS was artificially created.

Soviet scientist Viktor M. Zhdanov categorically denied AIDS was artificially created.

In an interview with Soviet publication New Time, Zhdanov said: Indeed, the most diverse views are expressed. I must say with regret that these were mostly the views of non-specialists. The AIDS virus appeared naturally and seems to be undergoing rapid evolution.

If using any of Russia Beyond's content, partly or in full, always provide an active hyperlink to the original material.

') }, error: function() { $email.val(''); alert('An unknown error occurred. Try later.'); } }); } }); }; initFormSubmit(); $completeButton.on('click', function (evt) { evt.preventDefault(); evt.window.location.reload(); }); }());

Go here to see the original:

How the KGB convinced the world that AIDS was a Pentagon invention - Russia Beyond

Posted in Germ Warfare | Comments Off on How the KGB convinced the world that AIDS was a Pentagon invention – Russia Beyond