Daily Archives: January 9, 2021

What’s Next – The Sidney Sun-Telegraph – Sidney Sun Telegraph

Posted: January 9, 2021 at 3:29 pm

About a year ago, press conferences and news reports were grabbing everyones attention.

Politicians and health experts were lining up to explain a crisis. A new virus was detected. It was quickly defined as contagious and deadly. It was also defined as preventable by washing your hands, covering your mouth when coughing or sneezing and stay home when sick. The advice was simple. Remember what you were taught in kindergarten and you will be fine.

As time moved on, so did the restrictions. It became politically incorrect to call it a Chinese virus, even though it was first identified in China. And yes, there were reports of people using the virus as an excuse to display racial bias against people of Asian descent.

Along the way, many questions were left unanswered from the national level down. Worse yet, this has become the golden idol in a sense. There is an implied script that must be followed. Ask questions, but when the appointed person answers, that persons response is absolute truth (as redundant as the statement is. Truth is truth and truth cannot deny truth.). Anyone who questions the response is viewed with the shock of watching the one human with enough brass to smack God himself.

A point to consider: doesnt it seem odd that businesses are limited, or worse, and then when the workers, the people hustling to pay their rent and mortgage, the government debates how much to give them? Doesnt it seem like the response is out of balance? Take care of the sick people, but dont make people sick. Dont assume people are sick, unless that is an individuals best response in regard to his or her personal health.

This virus is more deadly to some than to others; the same as with pneumonia, the flu, strep, a bad cold The list goes on. It doesnt take a medical professional to understand that. Some people have internal challenges even they dont know about until a new player enters the environment. Do my health challenges mean someone else has to close or limit their business? Or for that matter, anyone else?

Many people accuse this COVID crusade of being a power play, a step at unveiling a socialist conversion of the U.S. I often laugh at the comments highlighting the person complaining about capitalism while checking social media on the latest smart phone costing more than his/her parents first car and drinking a $6 coffee drink. Is it socialism, or is it more of an oligarchy, a system where the real power and decisions belong to a few? Believe it or not, the American form of government was designed to keep the oligarchs at bay. But it only works if people stay involved in the system. It isnt easy, and sometimes it is abrasive, especially when confronting people who have developed a way to benefit by the system.

So now that were in 2021, stay home and take care of yourself when youre sick. Follow an alternate work schedule if you can. And above all, be one that doesnt let the nations political system catch an incurable virus.

We are still in an environment where fear can win, if we let it. Make the choice to live each day deliberately as Henry David Thoreau would say, regardless if you have a day or a century of life to enjoy.

Read more:
What's Next - The Sidney Sun-Telegraph - Sidney Sun Telegraph

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on What’s Next – The Sidney Sun-Telegraph – Sidney Sun Telegraph

Loss, despair marked 2020. Let healing be the hallmark of 2021 – The Times of India Blog

Posted: at 3:29 pm

In this brand-new year, lets pump up the positivity and raise a glass to a beautiful 2021. Beautiful, in every way. In a real way.While a pale pink pearly dawn breaks over the distant horizon, I find myself singing an old Hindi film song: Dekh tere sansar ki halat kya ho gayi BhagwanKitna badal gaya insaan Its an evergreen song from the 1954 film Nastik (The Atheist), a crime drama written and directed by the irrepressible I S Johar. We all asked god exactly this question in the year just gone we urged Him to take a good, hard look at the state of the earth, while we lamented on how mankind had changed. It has changed irrevocably, and one fervently hopes, for the better. Since most of us had no choice but to stay cold sober this New Years Eve, unless of course you were Bollywood love birdscelebrating in Ranthambore, our thoughts turned to ourselves.

By default, this has been a year designed for introspection. Given the universal state of despair and panic, as the pandemic raged on and on and on, people started on a journey that was entirely unplanned a long, tumultuous one within their own selves. They arrived at places they did not know existed. Speaking personally, it was one hell of a ride! What started off as a distraction to keep dark, morbid Covid thoughts at bay, turned into an adventure, an exploration scary and thrilling at the same time. Not sure how many of you experienced insignificance and smallness, but I did.

Compared to the scale of global mass devastation and so many deaths my life shrank and shrank in a good way. In the larger scheme of things, we all figured how very inconsequential our pedestrian concerns were. A heightened state of awareness generated mixed feelings anxiety on one hand, and liberation on the other. We were freed from the pettiness of our daily insecurities. We asked ourselves tough questions, and all those trivial preoccupations of the past slunk away guiltily, leaving us feeling that much lighter.

My biggest learning involved waste. Waste in a larger context. Time became the most precious commodity who knew how much time was left for each one of us? I became possessive and frugal about my waking hours. Figuring out how best to maximise the one resource (time) that cannot be either bought, borrowed or stretched, made me consciously cut, cut, cut. We all became great editors of our own narratives. We ruthlessly chopped non-essentials this included people. So many important but tricky decisions that had been kept on hold for decades became crystal clear as we pruned all the annoyances and irritations, the blocks and barriers. Time became an extravagance, a luxury beyond any other. Yes, there was loss so many of us dealt with the deaths of people we loved. Memories started playing games, as did a surfeit of information. How much more could we possibly absorb?

No matter who propounded which theory, the virus was one step ahead of us all. The French have a lovely expression, cest la vie. It is mandatory to shrug while uttering these words. It is true, life is what it is, what it has always been, what it will continue to be. We poor creatures will have to adapt and change. Why not? A hard lesson has been learnt by the world. The vaccine will be here shortly. It will provide just one of the answers for our survival, not all. We will certainly beat the virus, and any mutant that shows up. What is equally imperative is for us to change our wretched ways and think anew.

Enough has been said about the environment and how we have abused the very matter that sustains us and nurtures life. If we dont understand the meaning of the word respect now, we will have learnt absolutely nothing during the pandemic. But we are not that stupid, right? We are like cockroaches we survive! And like cockroaches, we crawl out of dark spaces when required to find food, find partners, mate, reproduce. We are hard to crush, even when a heavy boot lands on us. During these past months, when everything appeared pretty hopeless, I channelled my inner cockroach and scurried about in my restricted space, confident that I would make it to the other side. The tragedy being, so many didnt.

To all those who lost loved ones, and to all our courageous frontline workers, 2020 belongs to you. We are alive, thanks to you. Its a debt that can never be fully repaid. We shall go forth from this point onwards, stronger, wiser, healthier the journey has just begun. Heres to a gorgeous new year! I am singing Michael Jacksons immortal anthem as I write this: Heal the worldmake it a better placefor you and for me and the entire human race there are people dyingif you care enough for the living make it a better place for you and for me.

Views expressed above are the author's own.

END OF ARTICLE

Read more here:
Loss, despair marked 2020. Let healing be the hallmark of 2021 - The Times of India Blog

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on Loss, despair marked 2020. Let healing be the hallmark of 2021 – The Times of India Blog

Ice Cube melts away on ‘The Masked Dancer’ – etalk

Posted: at 3:29 pm

After a shockingly good premiere episode that saw Disco Ball unmasked as Ice-T, its time to see the next 5 celebrities that will be hitting the dance floor on The Masked Dancer (Wednesdays at 8 p.m. ET on CTV).

Given what happened in Washington on Wednesday, many of the judges chose to abstain from live-tweeting the episode.

The sloth kicked off the night by dancing to What I Like About You by The Romantics. In his intro video, we learned that the Sloth is anything but lazy and has worked hard to get where he is today. There were also references to a doctor, the number 13, a bad accident, and a Mickey Mouse operation. Sloth also used toothpaste marked GLEE. Immediately, we think it is likely someone who has ties to both Glee and Netflixs 13 Reasons Why?.

After a marginal performance, the performer offered his Word Up! clue (where the dancer is forced to say one word in their real voice) and chose broadway.

Paula picked up on the idea that the dancer made an L on his forehead using his fingers (used a lot on Glee) and this confirmed to her that the dancer was Matthew Morrison. Brian Austin Green focused on the doctors coat and the Mickey Mouse Club reference and thought it might be a pro dancer like Britney Spears ex, Kevin Federline. Ashley Tisdale seemed intrigued by the Broadway clue and thought it could be Jason Derulo who suffered an accident while filming Cats.

Next up was the lanky Ice Cube. We learn from his intro video that he lived a privileged life as a child and that while his mother worked at or with the White House. There were also a couple of unclear (at least to us) references to both corn and ballerina shoes which arent the first things we would consider pairing. The biggest clues were the numerous references to climate change and the periodic table, indicating that the star was likely some sort of activist.

Ice Cube decided to shake his groove thing by dancing to Postmodern Jukeboxs Bad Romance. Gotta say, he looked a little stiff and we immediately had flashbacks to Ice-Ts moves last week.

For his Word Up! choice, the dancer said that he was a 90s icon. Hmm. Ken immediately believed the dancer was Bill Nye, The Science Guy. Brian Austin Green mused that it could be a Guns N Roses band member like Axl Rose or Slash before finally settling on the host of Politically Incorrect, Bill Maher. Paula Abdul went with CNNs Anderson Cooper.

Zebra was up next and his intro video started with a slate that mentioned Oscar-winning director Bong Joon-ho. We also learned that Zebra has fallen out of the limelight and grew up in a rough neighborhood. The number 11 was featured along with a car that had the letters OS embossed on it. The Zebra also wore a medal around his neck in the video. Hmm. Your guess is as good as ours. The video also said that there was only one direction for him to go, that he was ready to become larger than life, and that the president knew his name (although, we arent entirely sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing).

Our initial thoughts were that he might be a member of a boy band like New Kids on the Block or the Backstreet Boys (Larger Than Life anyone?). That was before we heard the song choice of Magalenha by Sergio Mendes.

After a wild performance, Zebra said comeback as his Word Up! clue prompting Brian to believe that it might be Enrique Iglesias (remember him?!), Marc Anthony, or Ricky Martin. Ken was torn between Pitbull and Kevin Richardson from the Backstreet Boys.

[video_embed id='2113387']RELATED: JoJo Siwa Addresses Game Controversy [/video_embed]

Cotton Candy was up next and her demure presence was a sharp contrast to her rivals. Her intro video put an emphasis on breakfast and the idea that she was a perfectionist who moved in with a new family. Other clues included her feeling homesick along with cupcakes that had big lips on them. In a first, we also got to see some rehearsal footage where Cotton Candy fell from a hula hoop that was hung from the ceiling (an almost too obvious homage to P!nk). She seemed to pull her best Taylor Swift impression by shaking it off and moving forward.

When the music hit, our initial thought seemed to be bang on as Cotton Candy chose Glitter in the Air by P!nk as her track. We also appreciated her tenacity as she got back up on the hula hoop and twirled down to the stage before completing a majestic slow dance that confirmed the idea that she was a trained dancer of some kind. After offering up primetime as her Word Up! clue in a relatively high-pitched voice, the dancer waited for what the judges would say. Paula Abdul thought that it was Jenna Dewan. Brian stated the obvious and went with P!nk. Ken and Ashley both thought that it wasDancing With The Stars alum Julianne Hough.

The final performer of the evening was another tall dancer. Moth easily had the best costume of the night and her video was also the most interesting. The dancer behind the mask admitted that moths often dont seek out the spotlight and that it just happens to draw them in. She said that this was a metaphor for her life. There was a box of clothes featured as one of the main clues (Tidying Up With Marie Kondo anyone?) We then learn that the moth lived a regular life until she made headlines with the president and suffered through a traumatic experience. Come on, this one is too easy. It has to be Monica Lewinsky right? We also think that it could be Fox News host Megyn Kelly as well.

The dance itself had a very country flair which is to be expected when the song is Boot Scootin Boogie by Brooks and Dunn. The performance was good but its hardly fair to the Moth as she had to follow Cotton Candys breathtaking aerial display. And yes, that is a sentence we never thought we would ever write.

Moth chose inspired as her Word Up! clue and the judges agreed with our initial assessment. Ashley thought it was Megyn Kelly. Paula and Brian both went with Monica Lewinsky (a guess that the Moth didnt seem too happy about, indicating that the obvious choice might not be the right one). The Moths clear denial caused Paula to reassess her choice, choosing Donald Trumps ex, Marla Maples, instead.

While not as obvious as last weeks, Ice Cube was voted the audiences least favourite. The judges then made their final guesses but not before a few last minute clues.

Ice Cube confirmed that millions of people had seen him on TV, that he had a big social media following and that he had more than a speck of white hair.

Time for the final guesses with Ashley going for former Vice-President Al Gore. Ken suggested that the dollar bills could be a reference to the dancers first name and doubled down on his earlier guess of Bill Nye.

Paula decided to change her guess, switching from Anderson Cooper to Tim Dunn from Project Runway. Brian did not divert from his initial path and went all in on Bill Maher.

It turns out Ice Cube was Bill Nye, The Science Guy and that Ken was right all along! (And if youve seen any Masked Singer, you know thats a true rarity.)

WatchThe Masked DancerWednesdays at 8 p.m. ET on CTV.

[video_embed id='2112242']BEFORE YOU GO: Mom mocks brother's modelling poses with hilarious pictures of her son [/video_embed]

See more here:
Ice Cube melts away on 'The Masked Dancer' - etalk

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on Ice Cube melts away on ‘The Masked Dancer’ – etalk

7 times Tories cosied up to Donald Trump despite the warning signs – Mirror Online

Posted: at 3:29 pm

Donald Trump has fallen far from the President who enjoyed a lavish State Visit to the UK last year.

Fourteen days before he is booted from office, he reached a new low by telling Capitol rioters we love you.

The Presidents baseless claims the election was stolen from him earned a rebuke from the UK.

Priti Patel, the Home Secretary, said Trumps comments directly led to the violence by his supporters in Washington.

She told the BBC: So far hes failed to condemn that violence, and that is completely wrong.

Video Unavailable

Click to playTap to play

Play now

Ms Patels condemnation was notable partly because it is so rare.

In the past her fellow Tory ministers and backbenchers have cosied up to the President to win his favour - despite warnings at the time about his character.

Even on Wednesday night, when he condemned the violence via Twitter, Boris Johnson made no mention of Donald Trump.

Ms Patel insisted Britain should look forward, not backwards, as Joe Biden enters the White House.

The fact of the matter is they are now transitioning to a new President, she said.

This isnt about going back and reflecting on personal relationships.

But for the sake of argument, what would we find if we did? Here are seven times Tory MPs were more friendly than they needed to be to the US President.

The Prime Minister used to be blunt about Donald Trump.

In 2015 he accused him of stupefying ignorance for saying parts of London are so radicalised that the police are afraid for their own lives.

Perhaps for diplomatic reasons, Mr Johnson cooled off on the criticism when both men were in government. But critics say he went too far in trying to appease the President - who lavished praised on him and called him 'Britain Trump'.

As Foreign Secretary 2018 he even suggested Trump should win the Nobel Peace Prize.

He said: If he can fix North Korea and the Iran nuclear deal then I dont see why hes any less of a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize than Barack Obama, who got it before he even did anything.

The PM of course had history with Barack Obama - who he branded part-Kenyan and accused of an ancestral dislike of the British empire in 2016.

As he hoped for a post-Brexit trade deal with the EU, the PM repeatedly stopped short of criticising Trump directly, even in his worst controversies - and even when it was clear he had lost the 2020 election.

Needless to say, the much-hoped-for Brexit trade deal with the US hasnt materialised yet.

Michael Gove, rather than a full-time journalist, won the first UK interview with Trump after his election.

It later emerged Rupert Murdoch had sat in the room, amid claims the newspaper mogul had a hand in setting up the meeting.

The write-up in The Times praised the incoming Presidents intelligence, saying: Mr Trumps number-rich analysis of defence spending reflects a businessmans ability to cut through jargon to get to the essentials of a case.

Mr Gove also called Trump the master of the profit and loss accounts and a determined negotiator, and they talked about their shared Scottish heritage.

The interview asked Trump about his Muslim ban, which hed stood by weeks earlier, but the answer didnt make it into the final edit of Mr Goves write-up.

To cap it all, the Tory MP then posed with the President-elect with his thumbs up.

Unfortunately for him the friendly tactics didnt work - as when he ran for Tory leader two and half years later, Trump said: I dont know him.

Now Commons Leader, Jacob Rees-Mogg repeatedly sprang to Trumps defence as a backbencher.

Asked in 2016 if he would vote for Trump, he replied: I would almost certainly vote Republican if I were in America. That was nine months after the President demanded a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.

Two years later Mr Rees-Mogg urged MPs to lay out the reddest of red carpets for the President and treat him with the greatest respect and courtesy.

He also took up Trumps claim that he was Americas Mr Brexit.

In a 2018 article headlined President Trump will be our greatest ally after Brexit, Mr Rees-Mogg wrote: His election depended upon similar factors to those that led to Brexit.

He appealed to voters left behind by the metropolitan elite and he exudes confidence about his own nation and a determination not to be a manager of decline, which also inspires the Brexiteers.

The Tory MP for Romford gave fuel to Trumps baseless voter fraud claims with an image he tweeted the day after the US election.

The MPs account shared a crude meme showing Trump as the American Eagle, wrestling back the flag from Biden who was depicted in the form of communism rising from the dead.

It happened after Trump went on TV to demand legal votes stop being counted.

The Tory MP for Morley and Outwood didnt hold back in her enthusiasm for the US President.

When he was mooted for the Nobel Peace Prize she tweeted: "Surely even critics of @realDonaldTrump can recognise his good work in this area.

She shouted "you're welcome Mr President!" down from her office window at anti-Trump protesters while playing with a nodding-head toy of the President during his June 2019 visit to the UK.

"We should roll out the red carpet and welcome President Trump," she said at the time.

And she urged him to "win the election" after he was struck down with coronavirus.

Of course wishing his good health is what any sensible person would do. But urging him to win the election, two days after he refused to condemn white supremacists in a TV debate, is a little different.

Shipley MP Philip Davies is another backbencher who was enthusiastic about the US President in the past.

In 2016, after the President called for a ban on Muslims entering the US, MPs debated banning Trump from entering the UK in retaliation.

But Mr Davies insisted: "He is not a serious threat of harm to our society in any way. The uproar is largely because he is rich, white and politically incorrect, and that, to me, is really the crux of the issue."

He added: Lots of my constituents agree with what Donald Trump said, whether I like it or not. [Should they] be expelled from the country as a result of their views?

In the same year he added: I think that we should celebrate politicians who stand up and say things that are unpopular and controversial.

Theresa May was partly a prisoner of her office - she had to cosy up to Trump for the sake of diplomacy.

But no-one forced her to invite him for a State Visit just a week after his 2017 inauguration - a move that prompted furious protests and a petition that hit a million supporters within days.

World leaders are not automatically offered state visits. Barack Obama was afforded one in 2011 and George Bush had one in 2003, but no other US Presidents had one during the Queens reign.

Mrs May stood by her decision in the face of angry protests and the full State Visit eventually happened in 2019. But she may well have regretted it.

Donald Trump used another visit in 2018 to put a wrecking ball to her Brexit deal, calling her foolish and saying: I actually told Theresa May how to do it but she didnt agree, she didnt listen to me.

Follow this link:
7 times Tories cosied up to Donald Trump despite the warning signs - Mirror Online

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on 7 times Tories cosied up to Donald Trump despite the warning signs – Mirror Online

Comment: Help! There’s a zoo in my street – Gulf Digital News

Posted: at 3:29 pm

When we moved into our neighbourhood a decade ago, it was a quiet and elegant area with wide streets and gap-toothed by the occasional vacant lot that multiple car families and visitors could use to park their vehicles.

Over time, the children in the hood grew up and people moved in and out but the essence of the area remained unruffled.

However, in one aspect the surroundings have changed and Im going to put it out here at the risk of sounding politically incorrect.

We have seen a marked increase in animals and birds in the area pets as well as strays and the public endorsement of the practice of feeding strays means that there are feeding stations all over the place.

One household keeps out trays of stale bread pieces for pigeons and another puts up a regular banquet for the cats in the street all nine or 10 of them.

A couple of houses down the line, a kindly lady shares her pet dogs treats with a steadily increasing pack of stray dogs.

In between these feeding times, the animals romp around and hunt for snacks in the municipal garbage bins.

And then there are pet-owners who walk their dogs and have decided to ignore the October 2020 Capital Trustees Board suggestion that the dog-owners must scoop the poop and not be allowed to leave public places dirty and unhygienic.

It is a practice that is followed in some of the most fashionable places from Hyde Park to the Champs Elysees, so why not the parks and streets of Bahrain?

Now, I am not a pet owner and while not a passionate animal-lover, I do vigorously defend animal rights.

I fail to understand though, why my neighbourhood must pay the price for the animal-feeding instincts of people who themselves dont have so many pets. Those pigeon-feeders and cat-feeders are happily pet-free and the feeder of canines has just one happy dog to care for in her own space.

All these people inflict their need to feed these creatures on the neighbourhoods public space without taking responsibility for the animals. Want to feed 10 cats?

Sure, but do so in the privacy of your garden and not in the street in front of my house. And why not contribute to a neutering programme for these kitties so that they will not multiply every year and over-run the block?

As for pigeons, I think there must be a law against dumping stale food in public places for birds or any creatures for that matter.

The way some restaurants simply trash the small roundabouts and pavements nearby under the pretext of feeding the birds is bad for public health.

Who are they kidding when they throw away yesterdays smelly biryani leftovers and say the pigeons love the meal?

The menace of stray dogs is often over-exaggerated there is a difference between strays and feral packs but the line dividing them is thin indeed.

If I wanted to share my life with pets, I would have gotten myself one and I feel quite put upon that I have to now swerve my car or walk gingerly around prowling cats and dogs in a street that originally beguiled me with its monastic quiet.

Im seriously thinking of starting an awareness campaign against the irresponsibility of making your street a zoo without checks and balances.

Suggestions are welcome.

[emailprotected]

View original post here:
Comment: Help! There's a zoo in my street - Gulf Digital News

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on Comment: Help! There’s a zoo in my street – Gulf Digital News

New interactive website maps relationships between coastal and offshore permafrost – NNSL Media

Posted: at 3:28 pm

Much has been written about the precarious state of permafrost in the Arctic, but a new interactive scientific paper maps out the extent of permafrost both on the land and under the water.

Evolving out of the expertise at the Aurora Research Institute and Inuvialuit Innovation, Science and Climate Change, and funded by the United Nations Environmental Programme, the Coastal and Offshore Permafrost Rapid Response Study mapped out differences between parts of the Arctic, identifies knowledge gaps in current understanding of permafrost systems and makes numerous recommendations to help fill them.

Its a community of people who have come together to do this assessment, said Scott Dallimore of the Geological Survey of Canada. It was meant to be a circumarctic-type assessment. We considered the entire Beaufort coast, Alaska, Yukon, NWT and all aspects of Siberia. A lot of the lead researchers that were involved were Canadian and had worked in Inuvik, and all of us were basically out of the Aurora Research Institute.

Youll find a lot of the videos on the website are also Inuvialuit videos. Were using material that already existed and putting it front and centre on the website.

Dallimore explained that the western Arctic that includes the Beaufort Delta is unique in the fact there was little to no glaciation in the area during the last ice age, allowing average temperatures of -30C or lower to freeze the ground into permafrost. As the glaciers receded back into the mountains, ocean levels rose, covering much of the permafrost underwater where it remains today.

However, much like the permafrost on the land the submerged permafrost is being thawed out by warmer temperatures, though because most of the focus has been on surface permafrost scientists are still working out the extent and rate of deterioration.

Most people who live in the communities in the North dont realize the thickest permafrost accumulations in Canada are actually in the offshore, said Dallimore, who noted permafrost can be found as deep as 750 metres underground. You see all these stories about coastal erosion but really its the study and examination of how the coast and the offshore are responding together.

Its not just the erosion of Tuktoyaktuk, its the landscape behind Tuk, and the Inuvik-Tuktoyaktuk-Highway and the vegetation response and the lakes and what theyre doing, and also the near-shore environment where you had sea level rising and the coast has migrated 120 kilometres inland from where it used to be. Theres this fascinating environment which is really understudied and thats what were trying to draw attention to.

Also part of the interactive paper is a crowdsource map that readers can add their own observations of climate change and how it is affecting the landscape. Dallimore said having the map would help people direct the researchers where to look.

Most of the recommendations revolve around where to take research next, but also to expand the regional capacity for science and engineering by establishing more coastal science projects and increasing investment for education of youth in the Delta to help Gwichin and Inuvialuit become more involved in scientific research.

Read the entire report here. The crowdsource map can be accessed here.

The rest is here:

New interactive website maps relationships between coastal and offshore permafrost - NNSL Media

Posted in Offshore | Comments Off on New interactive website maps relationships between coastal and offshore permafrost – NNSL Media

The war between Silicon Valley and Washington takes a new turn – POLITICO

Posted: at 3:24 pm

The rat-tat-tat of takedowns was a striking display of the tech industrys power to shape the fate of even the president of the United States. And it comes after years of efforts by both Democrats and Republicans in Washington to cut Silicon Valley down to size including lawsuits that Trumps antitrust enforcers have filed in recent months against Facebook and Google, plus efforts on both the right and left to challenge Section 230, the provision in communications law that limits online platforms liability for what users post to them.

Those lawsuits, legislative efforts and a potential antitrust investigation of Apples App Store echo the complaint that, remarkably, Trump supporters, civil libertarians and some prominent Democrats are airing this weekend: No handful of companies should have this much unilateral authority.

[I]t should concern everyone when companies like Facebook and Twitter wield the unchecked power to remove people from platforms that have become indispensable for the speech of billions especially when political realities make those decisions easier, American Civil Liberties Union senior legislative counsel Kate Ruane said in a statement.

Of course, many on the left cheered Twitters takedown of Trump. Rashad Robinson, president of the advocacy group Color of Change which has long argued that Trump and his allies have used social media to stoke racism in the United States called the move in a statement overdue but monumental progress. Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, called himself relieved, and House Intelligence Chair Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) tweeted that social media companies have allowed this vile content to fester for too long, and need to do much more.

Democrats' anger at the tech industry remains real, however and their looming full control over Congress and the executive branch will give them the opportunity to try to tame Silicon Valley.

President-elect Joe Biden's administration is expected to continue pursuing the big-tech antitrust cases that Trump's agencies filed. Just this week Biden chose a prominent Facebook critic, civil rights attorney Vanita Gupta, to be the No. 3 official in his Justice Department. House Democrats have proposed a raft of major legislative changes over some Republicans' objections to make it easier to break up giant tech companies and keep them from getting bigger.

Conservatives' Trump-era grievances against Silicon Valley have focused largely on accusations of censorship and cancel culture. The left has a different critique: If powerful companies like Twitter and Facebook had more competition, theyd behave more responsibly even before that became the smart political move.

It took blood and glass in the halls of Congress and a change in the political winds for the most powerful tech companies in the world to recognize, at the last possible moment, the profound threat of Donald Trump, said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) in a statement. And tweeted Jennifer Palmieri, former communications director both in the Obama White House and the 2016 presidential campaign of Hillary Clinton, It has not escaped my attention that the day social media companies decided there actually IS more they could do to police Trumps destructive behavior was the same day they learned Democrats would chair all the congressional committees that oversee them.

As a long line of court cases points out, online platforms are private businesses that can host or kick out anyone they want. Still, for four long years, Silicon Valleys companies had tried to carve out paths through the Trump presidency that minimized the harm he could cause while skirting the idea that it was censoring the political free speech of Americans. All the while, they were under intense pressure from Democrats, many in the civil rights world, and others to simply turn off Trumps digital microphone.

So why did Silicon Valley decide it had had enough of Trump now, this week, after so many years of turmoil?

In retrospect, the arc of Trumps presidency and the course of recent events conspired to make what we're witnessing nearly inevitable.

Jump back to last winter. Twitter and others in Silicon Valley have said that their experience with tackling bad information circulating about Covid-19 in its early days was a powerful lesson: They could throttle information they thought threatened the public good and the sky wouldnt fall down.

Fast forward some months, and in November Trump became a lame duck and a much less scary political enemy.

Trumps loss also undercut one of the social media companies loudest arguments for keeping Trump on board: Voters should know what their elected leaders thinks so they can decide whether to vote for them. As of Nov. 3, that ship had sailed.

More recently, and most horrifically, was this weeks violence on Capitol Hill that left five people, including a Capitol police officer, dead. Tech companies had, in recent years, landed on the idea that they had to act when online rhetoric caused offline harm. The facts smacked them in the face: What Trump was saying online was fueling violence in the real world.

POLITICO NEWSLETTERS

Technology news from Washington and Silicon Valley weekday mornings, in your inbox.

And, they feared, the worst was yet to come. Inauguration Day is looming, less than two weeks away, and the companies worried that Trump and his supporters would use social media in their bid to cause havoc around Biden's swearing-in.

Then Trump, on Friday, tweeted that he wouldnt be attending the transfer of power, tweeting: "To all of those who have asked, I will not be going to the Inauguration on January 20th. (With Trumps account suspended, the tweet is no longer viewable.)

While a bland and fairly unsurprising statement of facts on its face, the post was interpreted inside Twitter as a potential signal to supporters that they should feel free to once again gather in D.C. and get violent.

Twitter said as much in its blog post announcing the Trump ban. Factoring into its decision, the company said, was that [p]lans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off-Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the US Capitol and state capitol buildings in the run-up to the inauguration.

Kicking Trump off right now solved both a long-term headache and immediate crisis for Twitter.

Also, importantly, it had the benefit of a bit of cover from Facebook. When it comes to politics, Silicon Valley companies have traditionally been extraordinarily reluctant to get ahead of others in their industry. Facebook opened the door with its short-term restriction on Trump, freeing Twitter to jump through it.

But as popular as Silicon Valleys moves were with many Democrats newly in power in Bidens Washington, it is at best a brief reprieve for the industry.

An overdue step, tweeted Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. But its important to remember, this is much bigger than one person. Its about an entire ecosystem that allows misinformation and hate to spread and fester unchecked.

Read the original here:
The war between Silicon Valley and Washington takes a new turn - POLITICO

Posted in Libertarianism | Comments Off on The war between Silicon Valley and Washington takes a new turn – POLITICO

Torben Pryds Pedersen: The Future of Cryptographic Security in the Age of Quantum – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Posted: at 3:24 pm

Modern cryptography is still a relatively young scientific discipline, but its history shows a significant pattern. Most developments are based on research that took place years or even decades before. Theres a good reason for this glacial pace of movement. Just as drugs and vaccines undergo years of rigorous testing before they reach the market, cryptography applications must be based on proven and thoroughly analyzed methods.

Blockchain is one such example of the development cycle in action. Satoshi Nakamotos work on Bitcoin was the application of principles first described by David Chaum in the early 1980s. Similarly, recent deployments of multiparty computation (MPC) for securing private keys or sealed-bid auctions make use of ideas developed around the same time. Now, as the threat of quantum machines looms over modern computers, the need for newer and stronger forms of cryptography has never been greater.

Torben Pryds Pedersen is chief technology officer of Concordium and was previously head of Cryptomathics R&D division.

Nobody knows precisely when or if quantum computers will prove capable of cracking todays encryption methods. However, the threat alone currently drives extensive work in developing alternatives that will prove robust enough to withstand a quantum attack.

A compressed timeline

Finding a replacement for existing encryption methods isnt a trivial task. For the past three years, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has worked to research and advance alternative algorithms, or the backbone of any cryptographic system. This July, it announced a shortlist of 15 proposals in an ongoing project looking for quantum-resistant encryption standards..

But many of these proposals are unattractive due to unworkable key sizes or overall efficiency.Whats more, these alternatives must undergo sufficient testing and scrutiny to ensure they withstand the test of time.

Im sure well see further developments in this area. However, the development of better cryptographic algorithms is only one piece of the puzzle. Once an alternative is defined, theres a much bigger job in ensuring that all existing applications get updated to the new standard. The scope of this is massive, covering virtually every use case on the entire internet, across all of finance and in blockchains.

Given the scale of the task, plans and measures to migrate existing data must be in place long before the quantum threat becomes a reality.

Digital signatures for self-sovereign data

Governments and banking institutions are not naive. According to the 2020 UN E-Government Survey, 65% of member governments are thinking seriously about governance in the digital age, according to the agencys own metrics. Personal data privacy is a growing concern, reflected by the inclusion of data protection mechanisms and methods for digital signatures on the development agenda for e-government applications.

The technology behind digital signatures is generally well-understood by governments. For example, in Europe, the eIDAS regulation puts a responsibility on organizations in member states to implement unified standards for electronic signatures, qualified digital certificates and other authentication mechanisms for electronic transactions. However, theres also a recognition on the part of the European Union that updates will be required to protect against the quantum computer threat.

It seems likely that future methods for protecting personal data will be steered by the principle that users own their own data. In the banking world PSD2, a payments directive for how financial institutions treat data, has been a catalyst for this principle. Once users hold the rights to share their own data, it becomes easier to facilitate data sharing across multiple banking institutions.

Cryptography plays a significant role in the principle of self-sovereign data today, but I believe we will see this concept become more prevalent in Web 3.0 applications. Ideally, users will control their data across any Web 3.0 application, providing full interoperability and ease of use.

Enhancing security and trustlessness with multi-party computation

Similar to the rise of digital signatures, there will be more applications of multiparty computation. From being a purely theoretic construction 30 years ago, we now see MPC applied in more real-world use cases. For example, several institutional-grade asset security platforms, including Unbound Tech, Sepior, Curv and Fireblocks, are already using variations of MPC to keep private keys secure.

Blockchains have yet to fulfill their true potential, evidenced by the lack of compelling use cases.

Due to the vast security potential of MPC, we will continue to see improvements in this technology. It also fits well with the principles of decentralizing trust, given it removes single points of attack and reduces dependency on single trusted entities. In the future, a single individuals private key could be stored in multiple decentralized locations, but still deployed instantly when the user demands.

Blockchains for individuals and enterprises

Blockchain technology is still in a low state of maturity. It theoretically offers significant promise to help individuals and enterprises gain control over their data. But the fact remains todays blockchains and related distributed ledger technologies have yet to fulfill their true potential, evidenced by the lack of compelling use cases.

However, in light of the evolution of other usages of cryptography, such as digital signatures and multiparty computation, its reasonable to expect blockchain technology will improve significantly, become more efficient and accessible and therefore gain more traction in the coming years.

The concept of blockchains is not in itself threatened by quantum computers. Blockchains are, first of all, used to securely register data (or digests of data) and we know already now how to secure the basic functionality of blockchains (immutability of registered data) with cryptographic primitives that are secure in the quantum era (hash functions and digital signature schemes).

But more work is required to handle more advanced protocols in an efficient way and more work is needed to continuously improve the security and efficiency of cryptographic primitives to make the blockchain more and more efficient.

In light of this, we will see a gradual improvement of distributed systems so that they remain secure. We will probably like to keep the smart and good properties of the current cryptographic algorithms and gradually update these as necessary. Planning of this process must be done very carefully as each update must be done well in advance before the current version becomes insecure.

Furthermore, blockchain-enabled payment systems, with robust post-quantum security, can play a significant role in the future of online retail.

Regardless of the use case for cryptography, the user experience will be a critical driver for adoption. A lack of usability has been a massive problem for most cryptography applications so far and this is also true for blockchains. Most platforms are simply infrastructural solutions and, as such, involve a high degree of friction for end users.

Ultimately, blockchain applications need to become as usable as the internet and smartphone applications are today. Usability and quantum-proof security are essential for the future of government, commerce and Web 3.0.

See the article here:

Torben Pryds Pedersen: The Future of Cryptographic Security in the Age of Quantum - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

Posted in Quantum Computing | Comments Off on Torben Pryds Pedersen: The Future of Cryptographic Security in the Age of Quantum – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Birds Have a Mysterious ‘Quantum Sense’. For The First Time, Scientists Saw It in Action – ScienceAlert

Posted: at 3:20 pm

Seeing our world through the eyes of a migratory bird would be a rather spooky experience. Something about their visual system allows them to 'see' our planet's magnetic field, a clever trick of quantum physics, and biochemistry that helps them navigate vast distances.

Now, for the first time ever, scientists from the University of Tokyo have directly observed a key reaction hypothesised to be behind birds', and many other creatures', talents for sensing the direction of the planet's poles.

Importantly, this is evidence of quantum physics directly affecting a biochemical reaction in a cell something we've long hypothesised but haven't seen in action before.

Using a tailor-made microscope sensitive to faint flashes of light, the team watched a culture of human cells containing a special light-sensitive material respond dynamically to changes in a magnetic field.

A cell's fluorescence dimming as a magnetic field passes over it. (Ikeya and Woodward, CC BY 4.0)

The change the researchers observed in the lab match just what would be expected if a quirky quantum effect was responsible for the illuminating reaction.

"We've not modified or added anything to these cells,"saysbiophysicist Jonathan Woodward.

"We think we have extremely strong evidence that we've observed a purely quantum mechanical process affecting chemical activity at the cellular level."

So how are cells, particularly human cells, capable of responding to magnetic fields?

While there are several hypotheses out there, many researchers think the ability is due to a unique quantum reaction involving photoreceptors called cryptochromes.

Cyrptochromes are found in the cells of many species and are involved in regulating circadian rhythms. In species of migratory birds, dogs, and other species, they're linked to the mysterious ability to sense magnetic fields.

In fact, while most of us can't see magnetic fields, our own cells definitelycontain cryptochromes.And there's evidence that even though it's not conscious, humans are actually still capable of detecting Earth's magnetism.

To see the reaction within cyrptochromes in action, the researchers bathed a culture of human cells containing cryptochromes in blue light caused them to fluoresce weakly. As they glowed, the team swept magnetic fields of various frequencies repeatedly over the cells.

They found that each time the magnetic field passed over the cells, their fluorescent dipped around 3.5 percent enough to show a direct reaction.

So how can a magnetic field affect a photoreceptor?

It all comes down to something called spin an innate property of electrons.

We already know that spin is significantly affected by magnetic fields. Arrange electrons in the right way around an atom, and collect enough of them together in one place, and the resulting mass of material can be made to move using nothing more than a weak magnetic field like the one that surrounds our planet.

This is all well and good if you want to make a needle for a navigational compass. But with no obvious signs of magnetically-sensitive chunks of material inside pigeon skulls, physicists have had to think smaller.

In 1975, a Max Planck Institute researcher named Klaus Schulten developed a theory on how magnetic fields could influence chemical reactions.

It involved something called a radical pair.

A garden-variety radical is an electron in the outer shell of an atom that isn't partnered with a second electron.

Sometimes these bachelor electrons can adopt a wingman in another atom to form a radical pair. The two stay unpaired but thanks to a shared history are considered entangled, which in quantum terms means their spins will eerily correspond no matter how far apart they are.

Since this correlation can't be explained by ongoing physical connections, it's purely a quantum activity, something even Albert Einstein considered 'spooky'.

In the hustle-bustle of a living cell, their entanglement will be fleeting. But even these briefly correlating spins should last just long enough to make a subtle difference in the way their respective parent atoms behave.

In this experiment, as the magnetic field passed over the cells, the corresponding dip in fluorescence suggests that the generation of radical pairs had been affected.

An interesting consequence of the research could be in how even weak magnetic fields could indirectly affect other biological processes. While evidence of magnetism affecting human health is weak, similar experiments as this could prove to be another avenue for investigation.

"The joyous thing about this research is to see that the relationship between the spins of two individual electrons can have a major effect on biology," says Woodward.

Of course, birds aren't the only animal to rely on our magnetosphere for direction. Species of fish, worms, insects, and even some mammals have a knack for it. We humans might even be cognitively affected by Earth's faint magnetic field.

Evolution of this ability could have delivered a number of vastlydifferent actionsbased on different physics.

Having evidence that at least one of them connects the weirdness of the quantum world with the behaviour of a living thing is enough to force us to wonder what other bits of biology arise from the spooky depths of fundamental physics.

This research was published in PNAS.

Read more here:

Birds Have a Mysterious 'Quantum Sense'. For The First Time, Scientists Saw It in Action - ScienceAlert

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on Birds Have a Mysterious ‘Quantum Sense’. For The First Time, Scientists Saw It in Action – ScienceAlert

How understanding light has led to a hundred years of bright ideas – The Economist

Posted: at 3:20 pm

Jan 7th 2021

ALBERT EINSTEIN won the 1921 Nobel prize for physics in 1922. The temporal anomaly embodied in that sentence was not, alas, one of the counterintuitive consequences of his theories of relativity, which distorted accustomed views of time and space. It was down to a stubborn Swedish ophthalmologistand the fact that Einsteins genius remade physics in more ways than one.

The eye doctor was Allvar Gullstrand, one of the five members of the Nobel Committee for Physics charged with providing an annual laureate for the Swedish Royal Academy of Sciences to approve. Gullstrand thought Einsteins work on relativity an affront to common sense (which it sort of was) and wrong (which it really wasnt). Every year from 1918 on, the committee received more nominations for Einstein than for any other candidate. And every year, Gullstrand said no.

By 1921 the rest of the committee had had enough of settling for lesser laureates: the only decision which could be made unanimously was not to award the prize at all. Amid great embarrassment the academy chose to delay the 1921 prize until the following year, when it would be awarded in tandem with that of 1922. This gave Carl Wilhelm Oseen, a Swedish physicist newly appointed to the committee, time for a cunning plan. He nominated Einstein not for relativity, but for his early work explaining lights ability to produce electric currents. Though Gullstrand was still peeved, this carried the day. In November 1922 Einstein was awarded the 1921 prize for his services to theoretical physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect.

This adroit bit of face-saving also seems, a century on, fully justified. Einsteins first paper on the nature of light, published in 1905, contained the only aspect of his work that he himself ever referred to as revolutionary. It did not explain a new experiment or discovery, nor fill a gap in established theory; physicists were quite happy treating light as waves in a luminiferous aether. It simply suggested that a new way of thinking about light might help science describe the world more consistently.

That quest for consistency led Einstein to ask whether the energy in a ray of light might usefully be thought of as divided into discrete packets; the amount of energy in each packet depended on the colour, or wavelength, of the light involved. Thus the law mentioned in his Nobel citation: the shorter the wavelength of a beam of light, the more energy is contained in each packet.

Eight years earlier, in 1897, experiments carried out by J.J. Thompson had convinced his fellow physicists that the cathode rays produced by electrodes in vacuum tubes were made up of fundamental particles which he called electrons. Over time, Einsteins energy packets came to be seen as photons. The electron showed that electric charge was concentrated into point-like particles; the photon was a way of seeing energy as being concentrated in just the same way. Work by Einstein and others showed that the two particles were intimately involved with each other. To get energy into an electron, you have to use a photon; and when an electron is induced to give up energy, the result is a photon. This mutualism is embodied in some of todays most pervasive technologies; solar cells, digital cameras, fibre-optic datalinks, LED lighting and lasers. It is used to measure the cosmos and probe the fabric of space and time. It could yet send space probes to the stars.

The settled view of light which provided a context for Einsteins work dated from 1864, when James Clerk Maxwell rolled everything physics knew about electric and magnetic forces into a theory of electromagnetic fields produced by objects carrying an electric charge. Stationary charged objects created electric fields; those moving at a constant speed created magnetic fields. Accelerating charged objects created waves composed of both fields at once: electromagnetic radiation. Light was a form of such radiation, Maxwell said. His equations suggested there could be others. In the late 1880s Heinrich Hertz showed that was true by creating radio waves in his laboratory. As well as proving Maxwell right, he added the possibility of wireless telegraphy to the range of electrical technologiesfrom streetlights to dynamos to transatlantic telegraph cablesthat were revolutionising the late 19th century.

Scientists have since detected and/or made use of electromagnetic waves at wavelengths which range from many times the diameter of Earth to a millionth the diameter of an atomic nucleus. The wavelengths of visible light380 nanometres (billionths of a metre) at the blue end of the spectrum, 700nm at the red endare special only because they are the ones to which human eyes are sensitive.

The reason Einstein found what he called Maxwells brilliant discovery incomplete was that Maxwells fields were described, mathematically, as continuous functions: the fields strength had a value at every point in space and could not jump in value from one point to the next. But the material world was not continuous. It was lumpy; its molecules, atoms and electrons were separate entities in space. Physics described the material world through statistical accounts of the behaviour of very large numbers of these microscopic lumps; heat, for example, depended on the speed with which they vibrated or bumped into each other. It was a mathematical approach quite unlike Maxwells treatment of electromagnetic fields.

Yet matter and electromagnetic radiation were intimately associated. Every object emits electromagnetic radiation just by dint of having a temperature; its temperature is a matter of the jiggling of its constituent particles, some of which are charged, and the jiggling of charged particles produces electromagnetic waves. The spread of the wavelengths seen in that radiationits spectrumis a function of the bodys temperature; the hotter the body, the shorter both the median and highest wavelengths it will emit. The reason the human eye is sensitive to wavelengths in the 380-700nm range is that those are the wavelengths that a body gives off most prolifically if it is heated to 5,500C, the temperature of the surface of the Sun. They are thus the wavelengths that dominate sunlight (see chart).

If wavelengths and temperature were so intimately involved, Einstein believed, it had to be possible to talk about them in the same mathematical language. So he invented a statistical approach to the way entropya tendency towards disordervaries when the volume of a cavity filled with electromagnetic radiation changes. He then asked, in effect, what sort of lumpiness his statistics might be explaining. The answer was lumps of energy inversely proportional to the wavelength of the light they represented.

In 1905 Einstein was willing to go only so far as suggesting that this light-as-lump point of view provided natural-seeming explanations of various phenomena. Over subsequent years he toughened his stance. His work on relativity showed that Maxwells luminiferous aether was not required for the propagation of electromagnetic fields; they existed in their own right. His work on light showed that the energy in those fields could be concentrated into the point-like particles in empty space. Light was promoted from what he called a manifestation of some hypothetical medium into an independent entity like matter.

This account was not fully satisfying, because light was now being treated as a continuous wave in some contextswhen being focused by lenses, sayand as something fundamentally lumpy in others. This was resolved by the development of quantum mechanics, in which matter and radiation are both taken to be at the same time particulate and wavy. Part of what it is to be an electron, or a photon, or anything else is to have a wave function; the probabilities calculated from these wave functions offer the only access to truth about the particles that physics can have.

Einstein was never reconciled to this. He rejected the idea that a theory which provided only probabilities could be truly fundamental. He wanted a better way for a photon to be both wave and a particle. He never found it. All these 50 years of conscious brooding, he wrote to a friend in 1951, have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, What are light quanta? Nowadays every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken.

Though Einstein was probably not thinking of him specifically, one of those Dicks was Richard Feynman, one of four physicists who, in the late 1940s, finished off the intellectual structure of which Einstein had laid the foundations: a complete theory of light and matter called quantum electrodynamics, or QED. It is a theory in which both matter and radiation are described in terms of fields of a fundamentally quantum nature. Particleswhether of light or matterare treated as excited states of those fields. No phenomenon has been found that QED should be able to explain and cannot; no measurement has been made that does not fit with its predictions.

Feynman was happy to forgo Einsteins brooding and straightforwardly assert that light is made of particles. His reasoning was pragmatic. All machines made to detect light will, when the light is turned down low enough, provide lumpy its-there-or-its-not readings rather than continuous ones. The nature of quantum mechanics and its wave functions mean that some of those readings will play havoc with conventional conceptions of what it is for a particle to be in a given place, or to exist as an independent entity. But that is just the way of the quantum, baby.

The precise manipulation of photons has shed much light on non-locality, decoherence and other strange quantum-mechanical phenomena. It is now making their application to practical problems, through quantum computation and quantum cryptography, increasingly plausible. But this Technology Quarterly is not about such quantum weirdness (for that, see our Technology Quarterly of January 2018). It is about how photons interactions with electrons have been used to change the world through the creation of systems that can turn light directly into electricity, and electricity directly into light.

That light and electricity were linked was known long before Einstein. In the 1880s Werner von Siemens, founder of the engineering firm that bears his name, attached the most far reaching importance to the mysterious photoelectric effect which led panels of selenium to produce trickles of current. Einsteins theory was taken seriously in part because it explained why a faint short-wavelength light could produce such a current when a bright longer-wavelength light could not: what mattered was the amount of energy in each photon, not the total number of photons.

Technology built on such ideas has since allowed light to be turned into electricity on a scale that would have boggled Siemenss mind. It lets billions of phone users make digital videos and send them to each other through an infrastructure woven from whiskers of glass. It lights rooms, erases tattoos, sculpts corneas and describes the world to driverless cars. Ingenuity and happy chance, government subsidies and the search for profit have created from Einsteins suggestion a golden age of lighta burst of innovation that, a century on, is not remotely over.

This article appeared in the Technology Quarterly section of the print edition under the headline "The liberation of light"

View post:

How understanding light has led to a hundred years of bright ideas - The Economist

Posted in Quantum Physics | Comments Off on How understanding light has led to a hundred years of bright ideas – The Economist