Daily Archives: July 31, 2020

Novartis Taps Sangamo Zinc Finger Tech for Gene Regulation Therapies – Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News

Posted: July 31, 2020 at 6:51 pm

Novartis has agreed to license Sangamo Therapeutics zinc finger protein transcription factors (ZFP-TFs) to develop gene regulation therapies for neurodevelopmental disorders that include autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disability, the companies said, through a collaboration that could generate more than $795 million for Sangamo.

Through Sangamos ZFP-TFs, the companies plan over three years to develop treatments addressing three target genes associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, by upregulating the expression of key genes that are inadequately expressed in individuals with certain neurodevelopmental disorders.

The goal is to create new gene regulation therapies that act at the genomic level, moving us beyond the symptom focused treatments of today and toward therapies that can address some of the most challenging neurodevelopmental disorders, Jay Bradner, president of the Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, said in a statement. This collaboration with Sangamo is part of our commitment to pioneering the next generation of neurodevelopmental treatments.

Sangamos ZFP-TF genome regulation technology, now delivered via adeno-associated viruses (AAVs), is designed to selectively repress or activate the expression of specific genes to achieve a desired therapeutic effect, at the DNA level.

While AAVs have many advantages that make them well-suited for gene therapy, Novartis says, they also have one disadvantage: They cant carry large genes. The collaboration is designed to enable the companies to target diseases caused by mutations in one copy of a large gene.

The gene for a ZFP-TF is small enough to fit inside an AAV, Ricardo Dolmetsch, head of neuroscience at the Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, explained in a post on the companys blog. We can use it to increase the production of a large gene in someone who still has one intact copy of the gene. This dramatically expands the range of diseases that we can potentially target with gene therapy because many diseases are caused by the loss of a single copy of a gene.

Each of Sangamos ZFP-TFs is engineered to bind to a target region of genomic DNA in a highly specific and selective manner. They can be designed to precisely modulate the expression of targeted genes to varying extents. After identifying its target, the ZFP-TF recruits other proteins that help switch genes on or off.

The zinc finger nuclease technology is remarkable, Macrae told GEN in January. Its one of the commonest transcripts in the body. Its natural and human, and its very, very adaptable. The individual units are modular, so one is always able to come up with a solution for any part of the genome.

For its part, Sangamo reasons that it can engineer zinc finger proteins to address virtually any genomic target.

We are building a broad pipeline of wholly owned and partnered programs with the goal to bring our genomic medicines to patients, stated Sangamo CEO Sandy Macrae. In the case of the central nervous system, there are potentially hundreds of neurological disease gene targets that may be addressable by our zinc finger platform.

For Sangamo, the collaboration with Novartis is the second signed this year that focuses on applying ZFP-TFs toward treating neurological disorders. In February, Sangamo launched a potentially more than $2.7 billion partnership to develop and commercialize Sangamo gene regulation therapies. The collaboration included ST-501 for tauopathies including Alzheimers disease, ST-502 for synucleinopathies including Parkinsons disease, a third treatment targeting an undisclosed neuromuscular disease target, and additional treatments for up to nine additional undisclosed neurological disease targets over five years.

In its latest partnership with Novartis, the Swiss pharma giant will have exclusive rights to ZFP-TFs targeting the genes, which are undisclosed, during the three-year collaboration period.

Novartis also has the option to license Sangamos AAVs. Sangamo has agreed to oversee specified research and associated manufacturing activities, all of which will be funded by Novartiswhile Novartis agreed to oversee additional research activities, investigational new drug-enabling studies, clinical development, related regulatory interactions, manufacturing, and global commercialization.

Novartis agreed to pay Sangamo a $75 million upfront license fee within 30 days, plus up to $720 million tied to achieving development and commercial milestonesconsisting of up to $420 million in development milestones and up to $300 million in commercial milestones.

Sangamo is also eligible to receive from Novartis tiered high single-digit to sub-teen double-digit royalties on potential net commercial sales of products arising from the collaboration.

Partnering Sangamos proprietary technology with Novartis deep experience in neuroscience drug development is a powerful combination which expands Sangamos pipeline and allows us to tackle challenging neurodevelopmental conditions, Macrae added.

More:
Novartis Taps Sangamo Zinc Finger Tech for Gene Regulation Therapies - Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Novartis Taps Sangamo Zinc Finger Tech for Gene Regulation Therapies – Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News

Texas Tech researchers involved in analyzing first reference-quality bat genomes – LubbockOnline.com

Posted: at 6:51 pm

For A-J Media

For the first time, the raw genetic material that codes for bats unique adaptations and superpowers such as the ability to fly, use sound to move effortlessly in complete darkness, survive and tolerate deadly diseases and resist aging and cancer has been fully revealed and published in Nature.

Bat1K, a global consortium of scientists dedicated to sequencing the genomes of every one of the 1,421 living bat species, has generated and analyzed six highly accurate bat genomes that are 10 times more complete than any bat genome published to date, in order to begin to uncover bats unique traits.

"Given these exquisite bat genomes, we can now better understand how bats tolerate viruses, slow down aging and have evolved flight and echolocation," said Emma Teeling of University College Dublin, co-founding director of Bat1K and senior author on the paper. "These genomes are the tools needed to identify the genetic solutions evolved in bats that ultimately could be harnessed to alleviate human aging and disease."

As part of the consortium, two researchers in Texas Tech Universitys Department of Biological Sciences, associate professor David A. Ray and doctoral candidate Kevin Sullivan, played a pivotal role in the genome analysis.

"Our lab was tasked with analyzing the portions of each genome that are made up of transposable elements, parts of the genome that can move around and potentially disrupt or alter function," Ray said. "We found that, unlike most other groups of mammals, bats have an exceptionally diverse transposable element repertoire. This suggests their genomes may have the ability to change and adapt to novel environments above and beyond what a typical mammal can do. This may explain what appears to be their increased ability to tolerate viruses and live longer, healthier lives than would be expected given their size."

Ray explained that a perfectly assembled genome would have the same number of pieces as there are chromosomes for that species. For example, humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes so a very good assembly would consist of 23 pieces of assembled DNA. In contrast, bad genome assemblies have thousands of pieces, meaning the assembly is very fragmented. Because these bat genomes have very few pieces, the researchers refer to them as "exquisite" genomes.

To generate these exquisite bat genomes, the Bat1K team used the newest technologies of the DRESDEN-concept Genome Center, a shared technology resource in Dresden, Germany, to sequence the bats DNA, and generated new methods to assemble these pieces into the correct order and to identify the genes present.

"Using the latest DNA sequencing technologies and new computing methods for such data, we have 96-99% of each bat genome in chromosome-level reconstructions an unprecedented quality akin to, for example, the current human genome reference, which is the result of over a decade of intensive finishing efforts," said senior author Eugene Myers, director of Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, and the Center for Systems Biology in Dresden. "As such, these bat genomes provide a superb foundation for experimentation and evolutionary studies of bats fascinating abilities and physiological properties."

The team compared these bat genomes against 42 other mammals to address the unresolved question of where bats are located within the mammalian tree of life. Using novel phylogenetic methods and comprehensive molecular data sets, the team found the strongest support for bats being most closely related to a group called Ferreungulata that consists of carnivores (which includes dogs, cats and seals, among other species), pangolins, whales and ungulates (hooved mammals).

To uncover genomic changes that contribute to the unique adaptations found in bats, the team systematically searched for gene differences between bats and other mammals, identifying regions of the genome that have evolved differently in bats and the loss and gain of genes that may drive bats unique traits.

"Our genome scans revealed changes in hearing genes that may contribute to echolocation, which bats use to hunt and navigate in complete darkness," said senior author Michael Hiller, research group leader in the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, the Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems and the Center for Systems Biology. "Furthermore, we found expansions of anti-viral genes, unique selection on immune genes, and loss of genes involved in inflammation in bats. These changes may contribute to bats exceptional immunity and points to their tolerance of coronaviruses."

The team also found evidence that bats ability to tolerate viruses is reflected in their genomes. The exquisite genomes revealed "fossilized viruses," evidence of surviving past viral infections, and showed that bat genomes contained a higher diversity than other species providing a genomic record of historical tolerance to viral infection.

Given the quality of the bat genomes, the team uniquely identified and experimentally validated several non-coding regulatory regions that may govern bats key evolutionary innovations.

"Having such complete genomes allowed us to identify regulatory regions that control gene expression that are unique to bats," said senior author Sonja Vernes of the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and co-founding director of Bat 1K. "Importantly, we were able to validate unique bat microRNAs in the lab to show their consequences for gene regulation. In the future we can use these genomes to understand how regulatory regions and epigenomics contributed to the extraordinary adaptations we see in bats."

This is just a beginning. The remaining approximately 1,400 living bat species exhibit an incredible diversity in ecology, longevity, sensory perception and immunology, and numerous questions remain regarding the genomic basis of these spectacular features. Bat1K will answer these questions as more and more exquisite bat genomes are sequenced, further uncovering the genetic basis of bats rare and wonderful superpowers.

This study was funded in part by the Max Planck Society, the European Research Council, the Irish Research Council and the Human Frontier Science Program.

See the original post:
Texas Tech researchers involved in analyzing first reference-quality bat genomes - LubbockOnline.com

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Texas Tech researchers involved in analyzing first reference-quality bat genomes – LubbockOnline.com

Genomes reveal the source of bat ‘superpowers’ – Futurity: Research News

Posted: at 6:51 pm

Share this Article

You are free to share this article under the Attribution 4.0 International license.

New research reveals the genetic material that codes for bat adaptations and superpowers.

Those bat powers include the ability to fly, to use sound to move effortlessly in complete darkness, to tolerate and survive potentially deadly viruses, and to resist aging and cancer.

The project, called Bat1K, sequenced the genome of six widely divergent living bat species.

Although other bat genomes have been published before, the Bat1K genomes are 10 times more complete than any bat genome published to date.

One aspect of the paper findings shows evolution through gene expansion and loss in a family of genes, APOBEC3, which is known to play an important role in immunity to viruses in other mammals. The details in the paper that explain this evolution set the groundwork for investigating how these genetic changes, found in bats but not in other mammals, could help prevent the worst outcomes of viral diseases in other mammals, including humans.

More and more, we find gene duplications and losses as important processes in the evolution of new features and functions across the Tree of Life, says Liliana M. Dvalos, an evolutionary biologist and professor in the department of ecology and evolution at Stony Brook University and coauthor of the paper in Nature.

But, determining when genes have duplicated is difficult if the genome is incomplete, and it is even harder to figure out if genes have been lost. At extremely high quality, the new bat genomes leave no doubts about changes in important gene families that could not be discovered otherwise with lower-quality genomes.

To generate the bat genomes, the team used the newest technologies of the DRESDEN-concept Genome Center, a shared technology resource in Dresden, Germany to sequence the bats DNA, and generated new methods to assemble these pieces into the correct order and to identify the genes present. While previous efforts had identified genes with the potential to influence the unique biology of bats, uncovering how gene duplications contributed to this unique biology was complicated by incomplete genomes.

The team compared these bat genomes against 42 other mammals to address the unresolved question of where bats are located within the mammalian tree of life. Using novel phylogenetic methods and comprehensive molecular data sets, the team found the strongest support for bats being most closely related to a group called Fereuungulata that consists of carnivorans (which includes dogs, cats, and seals, among other species), pangolins, whales, and ungulates (hooved mammals).

To uncover genomic changes that contribute to the unique adaptations found in bats, the team systematically searched for gene differences between bats and other mammals, identifying regions of the genome that have evolved differently in bats and the loss and gain of genes that may drive bats unique traits.

It is thanks to a series of sophisticated statistical analyses that we have started to uncover the genetics behind bats superpowers, including their strong apparent abilities to tolerate and overcome RNA viruses, says Dvalos.

The researchers found evidence the exquisite genomes revealed fossilized viruses, evidence of surviving past viral infections, and showed that bat genomes contained a higher diversity of these viral remnants than other species providing a genomic record of ancient historical interaction with viral infections. The genomes also revealed the signatures of many other genetic elements besides ancient viral insertions, including jumping genes or transposable elements.

Funding for the study came in part from the Max Planck Society, the European Research Council, the Irish Research Council, the Human Frontiers of Science Program, and the National Science Foundation.

Source: Stony Brook University

See the article here:
Genomes reveal the source of bat 'superpowers' - Futurity: Research News

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Genomes reveal the source of bat ‘superpowers’ – Futurity: Research News

Does coronavirus linger in the body? What we know about how viruses in general hang on in the brain and testicles – Huron Daily Tribune

Posted: at 6:51 pm

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)

William Petri, University of Virginia

(THE CONVERSATION) As millions of people are recovering from COVID-19, an unanswered question is the extent to which the virus can hide out in seemingly recovered individuals. If it does, could this explain some of the lingering symptoms of COVID-19 or pose a risk for transmission of infection to others even after recovery?

I am a physician-scientist of infectious diseases at the University of Virginia, where I care for patients with infections and conduct research on COVID-19. Here I will briefly review what is known today about chronic or persistent COVID-19.

What is a chronic or persistent viral infection?

A chronic or persistent infection continues for months or even years, during which time virus is being continually produced, albeit in many cases at low levels. Frequently these infections occur in a so-called immune privileged site.

What is an immune privileged site?

There are a few places in the body that are less accessible to the immune system and where it is difficult to eradicate all viral infections. These include the central nervous system, the testes and the eye. It is thought that the evolutionary advantage to having an immune privileged region is that it protects a site like the brain, for example, from being damaged by the inflammation that results when the immune system battles an infection.

An immune privileged site not only is difficult for the immune system to enter, it also limits proteins that increase inflammation. The reason is that while inflammation helps kill a pathogen, it can also damage an organ such as the eye, brain or testes. The result is an uneasy truce where inflammation is limited but infection continues to fester.

A latent infection versus a persistent viral infection

But there is another way that a virus can hide in the body and reemerge later.

A latent viral infection occurs when the virus is present within an infected cell but dormant and not multiplying. In a latent virus, the entire viral genome is present, and infectious virus can be produced if latency ends and the infections becomes active. The latent virus may integrate into the human genome as does HIV, for example or exist in the nucleus as a self-replicating piece of DNA called an episome.

A latent virus can reactivate and produce infectious viruses, and this can occur months to decades after the initial infection. Perhaps the best example of this is chickenpox, which although seemingly eradicated by the immune system can reactivate and cause herpes zoster decades later. Fortunately, chickenpox and zoster are now prevented by vaccination. To be infected with a virus capable of producing a latent infection is to be infected for the rest of your life.

How does a virus become a latent infection?

Herpes viruses are by far the most common viral infections that establish latency.

This is a large family of viruses whose genetic material, or genome, is encoded by DNA (and not RNA such as the new coronavirus). Herpes viruses include not only herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2 which cause oral and genital herpes but also chickenpox. Other herpes viruses, such as Epstein Barr virus, the cause of mononucleosis, and cytomegalovirus, which is a particular problem in immunodeficient individuals, can also emerge after latency.

Retroviruses are another common family of viruses that establish latency but by a different mechanism than the herpes viruses. Retroviruses such as HIV, which causes AIDS, can insert a copy of their genome into the human DNA that is part of the human genome. There the virus can exist in a latent state indefinitely in the infected human since the virus genome is copied every time DNA is replicated and a cell divides.

Viruses that establish latency in humans are difficult or impossible for the immune system to eradicate. That is because during latency there can be little or no viral protein production in the infected cell, making the infection invisible to the immune system. Fortunately coronaviruses do not establish a latent infection.

Could you catch SARS-CoV-2 from a male sexual partner who has recovered from COVID-19?

In one small study, the new coronavirus has been detected in semen in a quarter of patients during active infection and in a bit less than 10% of patients who apparently recovered. In this study, viral RNA was what was detected, and it is not yet known if this RNA was from still infectious or dead virus in the semen; and if alive whether the virus can be sexually transmitted. So many important questions remain unanswered.

Ebola is a very different virus from SARS-C0V-2 yet serves as an example of viral persistence in immune privileged sites. In some individuals, Ebola virus survives in immune privileged sites for months after resolution of the acute illness. Survivors of Ebola have been documented with persistent infections in the testes, eyes, placenta and central nervous system.

The WHO recommends for male Ebola survivors that semen be tested for virus every three months. They also suggest that couples abstain from sex for 12 months after recovery or until their semen tests negative for Ebola twice. As noted above, we need to learn more about persistent new coronavirus infections before similar recommendations can be considered.

Could persistent symptoms after COVID-19 be due to viral persistence?

Recovery from COVID-19 is delayed or incomplete in many individuals, with symptoms including cough, shortness of breath and fatigue. It seems unlikely that these constitutional symptoms are due to viral persistence as the symptoms are not coming from immune privileged sites.

Where else could the new coronavirus persist after recovery from COVID-19?

Other sites where coronavirus has been detected include the placenta, intestines, blood and of course the respiratory tract. In women who catch COVID-19 while pregnant, the placenta develops defects in the mothers blood vessels supplying the placenta. However, the significance of this on fetal health is yet to be determined.

[Deep knowledge, daily. Sign up for The Conversations newsletter.]

The new coronavirus can also infect the fetus via the placenta. Finally, the new coronavirus is also present in the blood and the nasal cavity and palate for up to a month or more after infection.

The mounting evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 can infect immune privileged sites and, from there, result in chronic persistent but not latent infections. It is too early to know the extent to which these persistent infections affect the health of an individual like the pregnant mother, for example, nor the extent to which they contribute to the spread of COVID-19.

Like many things in the pandemic, what is unknown today is known tomorrow, so stay tuned and be cautious so as not to catch the infection or, worse yet, spread it to someone else.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here: https://theconversation.com/does-coronavirus-linger-in-the-body-what-we-know-about-how-viruses-in-general-hang-on-in-the-brain-and-testicles-142878.

More:
Does coronavirus linger in the body? What we know about how viruses in general hang on in the brain and testicles - Huron Daily Tribune

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Does coronavirus linger in the body? What we know about how viruses in general hang on in the brain and testicles – Huron Daily Tribune

Nasha Fitter Elected to Board of Directors of the ACMG Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine – PRNewswire

Posted: at 6:51 pm

BETHESDA, Md., July 30, 2020 /PRNewswire/ --The ACMG Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine announced today that Nasha Fitter has been elected to its board of directors. The ACMG Foundation is a national nonprofit foundation dedicated to facilitating the integration of genetics and genomics into medical practice. The board members are active participants, serving as advocates for the ACMG Foundation and for advancing its policies and programs. Ms. Fitter was elected to a two-year term starting immediately.

ACMG Foundation President Bruce R. Korf, MD, PhD, FACMG said, "I am delighted to welcome Nasha Fitter to the ACMG Foundation board as a public member.Nasha has a passion for improving the lives of individuals who are affected with genetic conditions, and also has extraordinary skills in business, education and technology.She is superbly qualified to represent the interests of the public on the ACMG Foundation board."

Ms. Fitter has a background in healthcare and education. She currently serves as director of Rare and Neurological Diseases at Ciitizen, where she and her team generate regulatory-grade longitudinal data for natural history studies, synthetic control arm and post-approval studies for rare and neurological diseases. She is also co-founder, CEO, and head of research at FOXG1 Research Foundation, an organization she launched after her daughter was diagnosed with FOXG1 syndrome. The foundation is focused on finding a cure for this severe disease and is working to build global expertise on FOXG1 neurobiology and a repository of patient clinical outcomes. Previously, Ms. Fitter founded and served as CEO of Schoolie, a technology company that collected data on school performance across the US and shared actionable analysis with parents and policymakers. She also worked as director of the Global Schools Program at Microsoft Education, Microsoft's premier global program for K12 schools. Ms. Fitter earned a Bachelor of Science from the University of Southern California and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

About her election to the ACMG Foundation Board of Directors, Ms. Fitter said, "In the next few years we will see the immense power of genetic medicine in saving and transforming people's lives. I am thrilled to be joining an organization at the forefront of this incredible science and look forward to working with such a diverse and experienced board."

A complete roster of the ACMG Foundation board can be found at http://www.acmgfoundation.org.

About the ACMG Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine

The ACMG Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, is a community of supporters and contributors who understand the importance of medical genetics and genomics in healthcare. Established in 1992, the ACMG Foundation supports the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) mission to "translate genes into health." Through its work, the ACMG Foundation fosters charitable giving, promotes training opportunities to attract future medical geneticists and genetic counselors to the field, shares information about medical genetics and genomics, and sponsors important research. To learn more and support the ACMG Foundation mission to create "Better Health through Genetics" visit acmgfoundation.org.

Kathy Moran, MBA [emailprotected]

SOURCE American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

http://www.acmgfoundation.org

The rest is here:
Nasha Fitter Elected to Board of Directors of the ACMG Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine - PRNewswire

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Nasha Fitter Elected to Board of Directors of the ACMG Foundation for Genetic and Genomic Medicine – PRNewswire

132 Research Institutes and Associations Urge the EU to Reconsider Stance on Genome Editing – Seed World

Posted: at 6:51 pm

The European Sustainable Agriculture through Genome Editing (EU-SAGE) network and its members from 132 European research institutes and associations urge the European Council, European Parliament, and the European Commission to reconsider their stance ongenome editing, which is one of the tools needed to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. In an open statement, the EU-SAGE network said that developing new crop varieties need tools that are safe, easy, and fast, and the latest addition to these tools is precision breeding or genome editing.

The use of precision breeding techniques, however, has been halted in Europe on July 25, 2018, due to the ruling of the European Court of Justice which placed all crops developed through this technique under prohibitively strict GMO regulations, even if no foreign DNA was introduced in the crops.

The open statement strongly recommends the following to the European Council, the European Parliament, and the European Commission:

For more details, read thenews release from VIB. Read theopen statement here.

Source: ISAAA

Read more:
132 Research Institutes and Associations Urge the EU to Reconsider Stance on Genome Editing - Seed World

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on 132 Research Institutes and Associations Urge the EU to Reconsider Stance on Genome Editing – Seed World

Bats Can Survive Carrying Deadly Viruses, And We’re Starting to Figure Out How – ScienceAlert

Posted: at 6:50 pm

Our collective pandemic experience has made us keenly aware that bats have an uncanny ability to carry around deadly viruses, but somehow still survive.

There is a lot we don't yet know about this enviable virus resistance - along with other bat abilities, such as extreme longevity - but new highly-detailed genome sequences may provide some clues.

"Thanks to a series of sophisticated statistical analyses we have started to uncover the genetics behind bats' 'superpowers,' including their strong apparent abilities to tolerate and overcome RNA viruses," said Stony Brook University evolutionary and conservation biologist Liliana Dvalos.

By comparing the genomes of six bat species with other mammal genomes, the researchers have found evidence that the immune systems of bats functions in a unique way to other mammals. And better understanding exactly how they fight off viruses could help us do the same.

These virus resisting superpowers have allowed bats to thrive in many environments around the world. They now make up 20 percent of all living mammal species, with over 1,400 identified bat species.

And despite their ability to carry germs, they play vital roles in our ecosystems.At least 500 plant species depend on bat pollination (like bananas, mangos, and agave), other plants depend on their poop, and some species keep insects in check (including pesky mosquitoes) by devouring them.

Understanding their resistance and its unfortunate virus-incubating side effect, could help us co-exist more safely.

Dvalos and colleagues sequenced and compared the genomes of six very different bat species: insectivorousRhinolophus ferrumequinum,Molossus molossus,Pipistrellus kuhliiandMyotis myotis, frugivorousRousettus aegyptiacusand omnivorousPhyllostomus discolor.

They then compared these with 42 other mammal genomes, allowing them to find the parts that differ in bats, and therefore identify the genetic instructions that code for unique bat traits.

As well as a strong evolution on hearing-related genes - likely connected to their incredible echolocation abilities - the team found bats have lost a family of mammalian genes involved in our immune system. These include some immune-stimulating inflammation genes associated with autoimmune diseases in humans.

Changes in another group of immunity genes called APOBEC were also seen. These genes have been lost, expanded or duplicated across different bat species. They create enzymes involved in blocking a virus's ability to insert its genes into their host genome - a critical part of the virus's ability to replicate.

"More and more, we find gene duplications and losses as important processes in the evolution of new features and functions across the Tree of Life," explained Dvalos.

Within the bat genome the team also found what we might think of as fossilsed viruses - old bits of virus genes that were inserted into the bat genome and then passed on through generations.

Humans have these fossil viruses too and they provide a record of viral infections through our evolutionary history, like a genetic memory.

The bat genome had a higher diversity of these virus fossils, and they revealed bats have survived viruses that were previously thought to only infect birds.

Taken together, these findings support growing evidence that bats can tolerate and survive viral infections better than most mammals, because their immune system works differently.

"Our reference-quality bat genomes provide the resources required to uncover andvalidate the genomic basis of adaptations of bats, and stimulate new avenues ofresearch that are directly relevant to human health and disease," the researchers wrote in their paper.

Maybe bats can one day share their antivirus superpowers with us as well as their germs.

This research was published in Nature.

See the rest here:
Bats Can Survive Carrying Deadly Viruses, And We're Starting to Figure Out How - ScienceAlert

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on Bats Can Survive Carrying Deadly Viruses, And We’re Starting to Figure Out How – ScienceAlert

The relevance of coronavirus mutation – PHG Foundation

Posted: at 6:50 pm

Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind the COVID-19 pandemic, has been studied intensely since emerging in late 2019 so far, researchers have sequenced tens of thousands of SARS-CoV-2 genomes to learn about the genetic variation of the virus. Monitoring the viral genome for mutations can give important clues as to how the biology of the virus is changing and the potential impact on transmission rates and disease severity. From a policy point of view, this can have huge impacts on reinstating or relaxing lockdown and social distancing measures.

Genetic variation is caused by mutations (or errors) arising randomly in the genome as the virus spreads through populations. This process happens at different rates in different viruses and the biological consequences of these mutations vary greatly.

Coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-2 possess 'proof-reading'machinery that enables the virus to repair most mutations that occur in the genetic code. The genetic diversity of SARS-CoV-2 is therefore quite low and the virus mutates relatively slowly, accumulating around two mutations in its genome per month, around four times slower than the influenza virus.

The vast majority of mutations will be neutral, meaning that there will be no impact on the biology of the virus. Positive mutations could increase a viruss ability to infect host cells, to replicate within a host cell more rapidly, to evade the host immune response, or increase virus transmissibility. These are likely to support spread of the virus through the human population. Negative mutations, on the other hand, inhibit these capabilities, and are unlikely to prevail.

There are currently investigations and debates underway as to whether there are different strains of SARS-CoV-2 circulating in particular, there is a focus on whether a genetic mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 genome that emerged early in the pandemic rendered it more transmissible , which would allow the virus to spread to more people, more easily.

The interpretation of genomic data is still ongoing, but has important impacts for medical developments, public health and policy decisions. Recent analyses have suggested that a variant of the original virus isolated from patients in Wuhan, carrying a mutation in the viral spike protein, has dominated around the world.

The external shell of the virus is covered by the spike protein which enables the virus to attach to and enter host cells. This protein is of particular interest as it is one of the most likely targets for the immune system, and therefore, vaccines are being developed using the specific sequence of the spike protein.

A recent publication by Korber et al provided evidence that a specific mutation in the spike protein has dominated in viruses isolated from patients around the world i.e. the mutation has been repeatedly found to dominate in different locations where the original and the mutated version co-circulated suggesting that this mutation conferred a fitness advantage. They found that individuals infected with this variant of the virus had higher viral loads i.e. more virus particles in their upper respiratory tracts potentially meaning that they may be more effective at spreading the virus. In addition, laboratory tests in cells suggest that this variant could be better at entering human cells, though these tests cannot determine the impact on transmission within populations.

In addition to the Korber paper, the COVID Genomics UK (COG-UK) consortiums most recent report echoes the finding that viruses containing the spike protein mutation are prevailing. However, COG-UK have been somewhat more reserved in their interpretation of the analyses, stating that the full impact of this finding is not yet clear.

Whilst there is still uncertainty around the importance of these findings, importantly, both analyses confirmed that there is not yet any evidence that there is a link with this mutation and more severe disease.

Many factors have contributed to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. External factors such as densely populated, globally mobile communities have contributed to disease spread, but virus biology also contributes.

SARS-CoV-2 is highly transmissible with estimates that each infected person will infect two to four individuals as a comparison, those with seasonal influenza will infect one to two individuals. In humans, SARS-CoV-2 infection does not always cause symptoms or they can emerge up to two weeks after infection. Containing the spread of the disease is more difficult when individuals can be infected and pre- or asymptomatic, and pass on the virus without knowing it.

Changes to the viral genome that enable SARS-CoV-2 to infect individuals more efficiently and replicate faster but do not, for example, change the severity or timescale of symptoms could lead to more people being infected. Conversely, a mutation that leads to more people feeling ill could mean more people getting tested and either being advised to isolate or being hospitalised, thereby potentially reducing transmission.

From a policy point of view, changes to virus biology and our understanding of what is causing them can have huge impacts on reinstating or relaxing lockdown and social distancing measures.

In addition to impacting policy decisions, changes to the genome sequence can have consequences for other disease management initiatives. There are many efforts ongoing to develop diagnostics, vaccines and treatments, which rely on accurate genomic information. Should mutations arise in parts of the genome, such as the Spike protein gene, which are being targeted by these efforts, then this could undermine the development of vaccines or treatments based on a particular genetic sequence. For example, many groups are working on vaccines that use the specific structure of spike protein to evoke an immune response, bestowing immunity.

With only seven months worth of genetic data, gathered from only a small sample of the infected population, uncertainty is to be expected. The relative importance of mutations found so far in the SARS-CoV-2 genome is still unclear. But with what we know about the infectious disease genomics, the substantial sequencing efforts around the globe in response to the pandemic are clearly vital to reducing the spread of this disease and future pandemics.

Read more:
The relevance of coronavirus mutation - PHG Foundation

Posted in Genome | Comments Off on The relevance of coronavirus mutation – PHG Foundation

Doctors’ cries of censorship become part of their message – Poynter

Posted: at 6:48 pm

Factually is a newsletter about fact-checking and accountability journalism, from Poynters International Fact-Checking Network & the American Press Institutes Accountability Project. Sign up here

The major social media platforms arent always in lockstep on what content they moderate. But this week, Twitter, Facebook and YouTube were all on the same page in blocking a video of a group called Americas Frontline Doctors touting the anti-malaria drug hydroxychloroquine as a cure for COVID-19, contrary to scientific evidence. One of the doctors said you dont need masks to halt the spread of the virus.

By now, the story of the video is well known the retweets by President Donald Trump and his son, the fact-checks that followed, and the bizarre beliefs of one of the doctors involved, Stella Immanuel.

What happened in the days after that, though, is key in understanding the methods and tactics of people who push unproven cures and other falsehoods and then have their content blocked: The blocking itself and the claims of censorship that follow become part of the attempt to get attention.

The day after the video of their Washington press conference was removed, the white-coated doctors were out again talking about the same messages, but with an added angle: They were being silenced.

Were coming after you Big Tech, were coming after you, said Simone Gold, one of the doctors leading the effort. We wont be silenced,

The censorship message then took off among the doctors supporters on Twitter and other platforms.

This is a common tactic among groups that champion unconventional messages. The censorship claim becomes central to their efforts to control the narrative, said Aimee Rinehart, U.S. deputy director of the nonprofit organization First Draft, which fights disinformation.

Cries that Big Tech is censoring us! become part of the attention grab, she said, even though the platforms are clear that they will only remove content that spreads false information about the coronavirus or messages that suppress the vote.

The doctors events were also held the same week that the CEOs of Amazon, Google, Facebook and Apple (Twitter was not among them) were testifying before a House subcommittee, which is probing the power of the tech companies. So it was convenient timing for the doctors, since there was a good chance that the platforms decision to take down the video would come up in the hearing, and it did.

In short, the doctors were successful in inserting their cause into the hearing, in effect, using the platforms content moderation decision to extend what might otherwise have been written off as a one-news-cycle fringe event.

Susan Benkelman, API

This week, Brazillian fact-checking organizations Agncia Lupa and Aos Fatos debunked a claim that citrus fruit peels contain the same basic ingredients as chloroquine and ivermectin.

Chloroquine has been shown to be ineffective at treating COVID-19 according to studies by both the World Health Organization and U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ivermectin, a medicine used to treat heartworm in animals and roundworm in humans, has shown some promise in early studies to treat COVID-19, but has not been properly vetted and approved to treat the disease.

Both fact-checkers talked to experts who explained both chloroquine and ivermectin are created through combining other chemicals in laboratory settings. They do not exist in citrus fruit peels. Both also noted misinformation about using citrus to treat COVID-19 is not new, and put this latest hoax in that context.

What we liked: This is a unique fact-check that builds on the work fact-checkers have been doing throughout the infodemic. It reiterates the current scientific understanding about the efficacy of chloroquine, and recognizes the trope of citrus fruits being used to treat COVID-19. This falsehood is a combination of those two narratives, and Aos Fatos and Agncia Lupa unpack that for their readers.

Harrison Mantas, IFCN

Thats it for this week! Feel free to send feedback and suggestions to factually@poynter.org. And if this newsletter was forwarded to you, or if youre reading it on the web, you can subscribe here. Thanks for reading.

Susan and Harrison

Here is the original post:
Doctors' cries of censorship become part of their message - Poynter

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Doctors’ cries of censorship become part of their message – Poynter

Op-ed: Censorship and higher taxes won’t create more Apples, Amazons, Facebooks and Googles – CNBC

Posted: at 6:48 pm

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testifies before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial and Administrative Law on "Online Platforms and Market Power" in the Rayburn House office Building on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on July 29, 2020.

Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

The House Judiciary Committee held an antitrust hearing on Wednesday with the CEOs of four of the largest U.S. technology companies Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google to determine whether they have grown too large (i.e., are "too successful"), and therefore, should be broken up.

Democrats on the Committee suggested that these companies' success threatens the free market and even democracy itself. Numerous Republicans raised concerns about their alleged political bias as well as their size.

Meanwhile, in China, the government is taking an opposite course. Instead of attacking its "national champions," China is showering them with government subsidies and discriminating against "would-be" competitors to great effect.

Ten years ago, nearly all of the top technology companies and start-ups in the world were American. Now, China has nine of the top 20 technology companies and four of the top 10 start-ups. And this trend appears likely to continue.

China recently passed the United States in the number of global patent applications and is on track to eclipse U.S. research and development spending in the next two years, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

As policymakers on the Right and Left increasingly proclaim the importance of out-innovating China in critical technologies, their comments during yesterday's hearing raise an important question which companies will they actually let play that role?

Ten years ago, nearly all of the top technology companies and start-ups in the world were American. Now, China has nine of the top 20 technology companies and four of the top 10 start-ups. And this trend appears likely to continue.

Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google are not the only important U.S. technology companies, but they spend a disproportionate amount on research and development in key areas like artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and robotics. They are also leaders on privacy and security technology, an area where China poses a particular threat, and they provide communication alternatives to less secure Chinese competitors. Mere search engines and social networks they are not.

Moreover, all four companies are uniquely American. They were built from the ground up by hard-working middle-class entrepreneurs, they revolutionized their industries, and they provide platforms to expand American influence and ideals like free speech around the world.

So rather than tear down our most innovative and most American of companies, let's build them up and others like them to stay ahead of China. How to begin?

First, let's stop attacking success to score political points. Policymakers should always question potential monopolistic behavior and make sure that a diversity of opinions are allowed to thrive online, but much of Big Tech's recent scrutiny appears populist in nature either intended to bolster "anti-corporate" credentials or to admonish the political views of their CEOs and employees.

The consequences of this "loose talk" is real it threatens American jobs at these companies, discourages other would-be risk-takers from setting out on new ventures, and provides cover for other countries to target U.S. business. After all, if U.S. policymakers are attacking Big Tech, why shouldn't their counterparts in China and Europe do the same? Instead of needlessly hurting our most innovative companies, let's champion their ingenuity and encourage others to replicate it.

Second, let's use the size of these companies and the unique skill sets of their workers to the government's advantage. Let's harness their cross-cutting strengths through public-private partnerships and joint R&D programs in critical technologies so the United States (and the U.S. military) remains the global leader. When policymakers consider their options for a modern U.S. industrial policy, working with and further strengthening these American champions is exactly what they should be doing.

Third, let's tread carefully when it comes to circumscribing the activities of these and other U.S. companies abroad. There are areas where our companies should not be permitted to engage, such as helping China improve its military capability. But one of the best ways for America to stay ahead of its global competition is for our companies to sell more in markets like China so they can spend more on innovation in the United States.

Fourth, let's forcefully back these companies against unfair practices abroad, whether it be unacceptable pressure from China to censor their activities or opportunistic targeting from France for tax revenue. Such pressure is very difficult for companies to combat alone, and they shouldn't be criticized for trying. Rather, the U.S. government should stand by their side and help them to compete fairly in these crucial markets, not encourage them to disengage.

Finally, as we continue to push back against the unfair practices of others, let's not emulate them ourselves. Censorship and higher taxes are not the way to create more Apples, Amazons, Facebooks, and Googles. And using anti-trust tools for political purposes a trick right out of the Chinese playbook will certainly not help win the defining global competition of our time.

Clete Willems is a partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, the former Deputy Director of the National Economic Council (2018-2019), and proudly represents innovative U.S. tech companies.

More:
Op-ed: Censorship and higher taxes won't create more Apples, Amazons, Facebooks and Googles - CNBC

Posted in Censorship | Comments Off on Op-ed: Censorship and higher taxes won’t create more Apples, Amazons, Facebooks and Googles – CNBC