Daily Archives: July 13, 2020

COVID-19: The lessons learned to date – Cosmos

Posted: July 13, 2020 at 5:16 pm

Part 2 of 3. Read Part 1.

Humanity has been on a very steep learning curve since, reacting to a 31 December 2019 report from the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission that they were seeing an atypical pneumonia of unknown cause, the World Health Organisation (WHO) published (5 January, 2020) the first Disease Outbreak Bulletin to alert the public health community and the global media to the disease we call COVID-19. From the outset, both the WHO and the local virologists were primed by the 2002/3 SARS-CoV-1 experience to think that a coronavirus might be involved.

That was confirmed when Chinese investigators isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19 on 7 January and made the gene sequence available globally a couple of days later. Knowing the viral RNA sequence enabled those who already had appropriate platform technologies to start right away with the job of making vaccines. It also allowed Mike Catton and Julian Druce of The Royal Melbourne Hospitals Victorian Infectious Disease Reference Laboratory (VIDRL) that is part of our Institute to add a sensitive PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test specific for SARS-CoV-2 to the more broadly reactive assay established earlier to detect the SARS-CoV-1 and MERS viruses, neither of which caused disease in Australia. Variants of the SARS-CoV-2 PCR are the tests that, as we all understand, have allowed the identification of currently infected individuals that facilitates targeted control strategies.

Arriving in Melbourne from China on 19 January, a returned resident very responsibly alerted authorities several days later to the fact that he was symptomatic and could be infected with this new virus. The diagnosis was immediately confirmed by PCR and, by Australia Day (26 January), Mike, Julian and teams had recovered infectious SARS-CoV-2 from him and announced that that the virus would be made available globally to legitimate laboratories. That was important: having fully infectious virus meant that researchers and diagnosticians could, for example, do virus neutralisation tests to measure protective antibodies in serum, screen chemical compounds (small molecules) for possible antiviral effects in tissue culture and challenge immunised animals to test for vaccine efficacy.

So, here are a couple of very big lessons that those of us who work in science understood but some in government and many in the broader community may not have fully appreciated.

The international co-operation that is essential for all science, and especially for public health science, functioned for COVID-19 from the outset and has, in fact, continued to work. The WHO did its job of alerting responsible individuals and agencies to the fact that there could be a problem, the Chinese gave out the gene sequence as soon as they had it, and our Institute was the first to provide the infectious virus globally for key laboratory tests. Locally, the communication mechanisms between public health professionals and elected officials proved fit for purpose. The Australian government was immediately aware of the potential threat and the Minister for Health, Greg Hunt, made a public announcement on 25 January that we had recorded our index case.

Additional to that, the very big lesson we should all take on board here is that modern science protects and serves us. Though everyone understood that the catastrophic influenza pandemic of 1918/19 was caused by a virus, diagnosis back then was all symptomatic, no human influenza virus was isolated until 1933 and it was only during World War 2 (1939-45) that the first, primitive influenza vaccines were rolled out to protect the troops against the possibility of a repeat pandemic that, thankfully, did not occur. When it comes to SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 we had a specific diagnostic test within days and, I will personally be very surprised if large-scale human vaccination is not in full swing by the second half of 2021.

Even so, the big lesson for the public is that, no matter how wonderful the laboratory science, actually getting products out there to protect people is a much more cumbersome process. Ensuring that a novel drug or vaccine is safe and efficacious takes time. Even though regulatory authorities have been comfortable with the idea that preliminary trials in animals and small numbers of human volunteers (Phase 1) can be conducted simultaneously, all that information must be evaluated before any product can be given to substantial numbers of people. Every possible effort is being made to ensure that all participants in large, closely monitored Phase 2 then Phase 3 trials will be protected, or at least safe, following community exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

Much of what had to be done over this first six months of the COVID-19 challenge was just plain hard work. An enormous effort was, for example, made within VIDRL to build testing capacity by helping other private and public laboratories get up to speed. And the Institute is still in the process of evaluating rapid person-side antibody tests that can be used for large-scale serological surveys. The obvious lesson here is that we are protected by having well-funded, high quality public laboratories and Institutions that can rapidly build capacity in the face of any pandemic threat. Next week, Ill finish my assessment of the lessons weve learned so far, to return to that six months from now.

This article is the latest in theSetting it Straightseries written by Laureate ProfessorPeter Dohertyfrom Australias University of Melbourne and Doherty Institute to explain aspects of the evolving COVID-19 pandemic. You can read them allhere.

Read the original post:
COVID-19: The lessons learned to date - Cosmos

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on COVID-19: The lessons learned to date – Cosmos

Ovid Therapeutics and Angelini Pharma Enter into Exclusive License Agreement to Develop, Manufacture and Commercialize OV101 for the Treatment of…

Posted: at 5:16 pm

NEW YORK and ROME, July 13, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Ovid Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: OVID, hereinafter Ovid), a biopharmaceutical company committed to developing medicines that transform the lives of people with rare neurological diseases, and Angelini Pharma S.p.A. (hereinafter Angelini Pharma), an Italian family-owned pharmaceutical company committed to helping patients with a constant and prevalent focus on Mental Health, Rare Diseases and Consumer Health, announced an agreement in which Angelini Pharma will be responsible to develop, manufacture and commercialize OV101 (gaboxadol) for the potential treatment of Angelman syndrome in the European Union and other countries in the European Economic Area (Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom) and Russia. Angelini Pharma will execute the agreement through its new affiliate Angelini Pharma Rare Diseases AG. OV101 is believed to be the only delta ()-selective GABAA receptor agonist in development and is currently being evaluated in the pivotal Phase 3 NEPTUNE trial in Angelman syndrome, with topline results expected in the fourth quarter of 2020.

Under the terms of the agreement, Ovid will receive an upfront payment of $20 million and is eligible to receive up to an additional $212.5 million in payments upon the achievement of development, manufacturing and sales milestones for the initial indication (Angelman syndrome), as well as double-digit royalties on net sales if OV101 is successfully commercialized. Ovid will retain all U.S. and rest-of-world commercial rights to OV101.

We are excited to enter into a strategic collaboration with Angelini Pharma with the goal of bringing OV101, if approved, to the Angelman community in Europe as quickly as possible. Angelini Pharma is an ideal partner for Europe as they have deep regional knowledge, an established infrastructure with a history of successful product launches, and a commitment to improving the quality of life of the patient communities they serve, said Jeremy Levin, DPhil, MB, BChir, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ovid Therapeutics. Finding the right partners to bring OV101 to the Angelman community as rapidly as possible is a core part of our global strategy. We believe this partnership with Angelini will help to maximize the potential commercial value of OV101 and achieve our strategic objectives in this important geography."

Today is a day that we will remember. Through our collaboration with Ovid Therapeutics, we are laying the foundation to developing innovative health solutions for rare diseases, in line with Angelini Pharmas new strategy, said Pierluigi Antonelli, Angelini Pharma CEO. The new business unit Angelini Pharma Rare Diseases AG will contribute to the development, registration, production and, if approved, commercialization in Europe of OV101, Ovid Therapeutics very promising drug being evaluated in a Phase 3 clinical trial for the treatment of Angelman syndrome. As of now, there is no effective treatment for this rare genetic disease, characterized by severe psychomotor disability, which manifests itself from childhood. Delivering on our commitment makes us proud both from a scientific and social impact perspectives.

"As shareholders and executives of Angelini Holding we continue to invest in the pharma area, which today represents half of our Group's turnover, commented the executive vice president Thea Paola Angelini and the CEO Sergio Marullo di Condojanni. Our global development and internationalization strategy focuses on business areas with high growth potential. Particularly, we look closely at all the opportunities that can open up, not only in healthcare, but also in the consumer and machinery sector."

Rothschild & Co acted as an advisor to Ovid on the collaboration agreement.

About Angelman Syndrome Angelman syndrome is a rare genetic condition that is characterized by a variety of signs and symptoms. Characteristic features of this condition include delayed development, intellectual disability, severe speech impairment, problems with movement and balance, seizures, sleep disorders and anxiety. The most common cause of Angelman syndrome is the loss of function of the gene that codes for ubiquitin protein ligase E3A (UBE3A), which plays a critical role in nerve cell communication, resulting in impaired tonic inhibition. Individuals with Angelman syndrome typically have normal lifespans but are unable to live independently. Therefore, they require constant support from a network of specialists and caregivers. Angelman syndrome affects approximately 1 in 12,000 to 1 in 20,000 people globally.

There are no approved therapies by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency or restof-world for Angelman syndrome, and treatment primarily consists of behavioral interventions and pharmacologic management of symptoms.

Angelman syndrome is associated with a reduction in tonic inhibition, a function of the delta ()-selective GABAA receptor that allows a human brain to decipher excitatory and inhibitory neurological signals correctly without being overloaded. If tonic inhibition is reduced, the brain becomes inundated with signals and loses the ability to separate background noise from critical information.

About OV101 (gaboxadol)OV101 is believed to be the only delta ()-selective GABAA receptor agonist in development and the first investigational drug to specifically target the disruption of tonic inhibition, a central physiological process of the brain that is thought to be the underlying cause of certain neurodevelopmental disorders. OV101 has demonstrated in laboratory studies and animal models to selectively activate the -subunit of GABAA receptors, which are found in the extrasynaptic space (outside of the synapse), and thereby impact neuronal activity through modulation of tonic inhibition.

Ovid is developing OV101 for the treatment of Angelman syndrome and Fragile X syndrome to potentially restore tonic inhibition and thereby address several core symptoms of these conditions. In both these syndromes, the underlying pathophysiology includes disruption of tonic inhibition modulated through the -subunit of GABAA receptors. In preclinical studies, it was observed that OV101 improved symptoms of Angelman syndrome and Fragile X syndrome. This compound has also previously been tested in more than 4,000 patients (more than 1,000 patient-years of exposure) and was observed to have favorable safety and bioavailability profiles. Ovid is conducting a pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial with OV101 in Angelman syndrome (NEPTUNE) and has completed a Phase 2 signal-finding clinical trial with OV101 in Fragile X syndrome (ROCKET).

OV101 has received Rare Pediatric Disease Designation from the FDA for the treatment of Angelman syndrome. The FDA has also granted Orphan Drug and Fast Track designations for OV101 for both the treatment of Angelman syndrome and Fragile X syndrome. In addition, the European Commission (EC) has granted orphan drug designation to OV101 for the treatment of Angelman syndrome. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has granted Ovid patents directed to methods of treating Angelman syndrome and Fragile X syndrome using OV101. The issued patents expire in 2035 without regulatory extensions.

Ovid Conference Call and Webcast InformationOvid Therapeutics will host a live conference call and webcast today at 8:15 a.m. Eastern Time. The live webcast can be accessed by visiting the Investors section of the Companys website at https://investors.ovidrx.com/news-events/presentations-events. Alternatively, please call 866-830-1640 (U.S.) or 210-874-7820 (international) to listen to the live conference call. The conference ID number for the live call is 5579257. A replay of the webcast will be available on the Companys website following the live conference call.

About Ovid TherapeuticsOvid Therapeutics Inc. is a New York-based biopharmaceutical company using its BoldMedicine approach to develop medicines that transform the lives of patients with rare neurological disorders. Ovid has a broad pipeline of potential first-in-class medicines. The Companys most advanced investigational medicine, OV101 (gaboxadol), is currently in clinical development for the treatment of Angelman syndrome and Fragile X syndrome. Ovid is also developing OV935 (soticlestat) in collaboration with Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited for the potential treatment of rare developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE). For more information on Ovid, please visit http://www.ovidrx.com.

About Angelini PharmaAngelini Pharma, owned by Angelini Holding, is a pharmaceutical Company committed to helping patients with a constant and prevalent focus on Mental Health, including Pain, Rare Diseases and Consumer Health. Angelini Pharma has an extensive and recognized R&D programs, "World Class" production plants and international commercialization activities of active ingredients and market-leading drugs. For further information, please visit http://www.angelinipharma.com

About Angelini HoldingAngelini Holding is the parent company of an international group operating in the pharmaceutical and consumer goods sectors. Founded in Italy in 1919, today Angelini group operates in 17 countries with a staff of 5,600 and a turnover of 1,7 billion. In addition to the Pharmaceutical sector, Angelini group operates in Personal and Home Care business area through Fater, a joint venture with Procter & Gamble, in the Machinery field, again in joint venture with P&G, with the group operating in automation and robotics for the consumer goods industry Fameccanica, in Perfumery and Skincare and Suncare with Angelini Beauty and in the Wine sector through Bertani Domains. Angelini Holding has recently entered the Baby food market as well through MadreNatura, a joint venture with Hero Group, which offers 100% organic baby food products.

Ovid Therapeutics Forward-Looking StatementsThis press release includes certain disclosures that contain forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, statements regarding: advancing development of and commercializing OV101, the potential benefits and value of OV101; the anticipated reporting schedule of clinical data for OV101; and the potential benefits and outcome from this collaboration. You can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as will, appears, believes and expects. Forward-looking statements are based on Ovids current expectations and assumptions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements, which are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include uncertainties in the development and regulatory approval processes, and the fact that initial data from clinical trials may not be indicative, and are not guarantees, of the final results of the clinical trials and are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and/or more patient data become available. Additional risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are set forth in Ovids filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the caption Risk Factors. Such risks may be amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential impact on Ovids business and the global economy. Ovid assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in expectations, even as new information becomes available.

Ovid Therapeutics Contacts

Investors and Media:Ovid Therapeutics Inc.Investor Relations & Public Relationsirpr@ovidrx.com

Or

Investors: Steve KlassBurns McClellan, Inc.sklass@burnsmc.com(212) 213-0006

Media:Katie Engleman1ABkatie@1abmedia.com

Angelini Pharma Contact:Daniela PoggioHead of Global Communications Angelini Pharma+39 348 6558882daniela.poggio@angelinipharma.com

Angelini Holding Contact:Institutional & External Relations Director Angelini Holding+39 348 6707240alessandra.favilli@angeliniholding.com

See original here:
Ovid Therapeutics and Angelini Pharma Enter into Exclusive License Agreement to Develop, Manufacture and Commercialize OV101 for the Treatment of...

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on Ovid Therapeutics and Angelini Pharma Enter into Exclusive License Agreement to Develop, Manufacture and Commercialize OV101 for the Treatment of…

DNA Read, Write And Edit Market Sales Volume, Status, Growth, Opportunities and World the COVID-19 – 3rd Watch News

Posted: at 5:16 pm

The global market for DNA read, write and edit applications should grow from $17.0 billion in 2019 to $43.1 billion by 2024 with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 20.5% during the period of 2019-2024.

Report Scope:

The scope of the report includes DNA read, write and edit technologies, applications, industries, initiatives, patents and companies. The markets for read, write and edit products and services are given for 2017, 2018, 2019 (estimated) and 2024 (forecast).

This report reviews the main read, write and edit technologies and explains why genetic variation is important in clinical testing and disease. It then discusses significant large-scale research initiatives that impact read, write and edit applications. Of particular interest is a discussion of population-scale sequencing projects throughout the world, and their likely impact. The main market driving forces for read, write and edit products and services are listed and discussed.

Request For Report sample @ https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/sample/12558

The report quantifies each of the main market segments. The read (sequencing) market is quantified by delivered format, including sequencing workflow products (sample preparation kits and reagents, sequencing instruments and consumables, and informatics) and sequencing services (clinical diagnostics and sequencing services to applied market customers).

The sequencing workflow products market is quantified by type, that is, DNA isolation and extraction; target enrichment; library preparation; and informatics/ecosystems. The sequencing instruments and consumables market is given by platform (Sanger, NGS and 3GS).

The sequencing services market is analyzed by end user application (applied, clinical, and R&D). Within sequencing services, the applied market is analyzed by end-user application (agriculture, biopharma, consumer, microbiology, population-scale genomics, synthetic biology and other).

Also within sequencing services, the clinical market is analyzed and quantified by disease category (cardiovascular, clinical microbiology and infectious diseases, Mendelian disorders, metabolic/immune disorders, neurology, oncology, reproductive health and transplant medicine).

The DNA write (synthesis) market is quantified by product type (oligonucleotides, synthetic biology parts, genes and RNA therapeutics). The oligonucleotide market is analyzed by application (gene editing, sequencing, PCR, FISH, microarray, gene synthesis and other). The gene market is quantified by gene type (standardized, value-added). Finally, the RNA therapeutics market is quantified by platform (RNA interference, antisense oligos, micro RNA modulation and mRNA) and by disease category (cancer, hematology, musculoskeletal, neurology and rare diseases).

The DNA edit (gene editing) market is quantified by application (agriculture, biopharma, diagnostics and therapeutics); editing platform (CRISPR, meganuclease, TALEN, ZFN). The gene editing agriculture market is analyzed by product type (crop/seeds, livestock). The gene editing biotechnology market is analyzed by product type (kits and reagents, cell line engineering, animal models and services). The gene editing therapeutics market is analyzed by disease category (eye and rare diseases).

Specific geographic markets discussed include North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the rest of the world (ROW).

Industry sectors analyzed include next-generation sequencing; long read sequencing; DNA synthesis; RNA therapies; and gene editing.

More than 320 companies in the read, write and edit industry are profiled in this report.

BCC Research also provides a summary of more than 180 of the main industry acquisitions and strategic alliances that took place from January 2018 through June 2019, including key alliance trends.

Report Includes:

28 data tables and 77 additional tables An overview of the global market for DNA read, write and edit technologies, applications, and industries Analyses of global market trends, with market data from 2017, 2018, estimates for 2019, and projections of compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) through 2024 Discussion on sequencing technologies, market applications, industry structure, and important clinical sequencing initiatives Information pertaining to several significant large-scale research initiatives that are contributing to sequencing services, write synthesis and gene editing technologies market development A look at the innovations in pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and research & development programs in stem cell-based therapies and gene therapies Coverage of significant patents and their allotments in each category, as well as major industry acquisitions and strategic alliances data Company profiles of over 320 major global players within the industry, including 3Billion Inc., 23Andme Inc., Bayer AG, Becton, Dickinson and Co. (BD), Bio-Rad Laboratories, Pacific Biosciences, Qiagen NV, Roche Holding AG and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.

Summary:

DNA (and RNA) read, write and editing includes the primary methods in which nucleic acids are analyzed (sequencing), created (synthesis) and modified (gene editing). It is becoming increasingly important in the life sciences industry to be expert in all aspects of nucleic acids in order to exploit significant opportunities within this industry. The end users for these technologies include any industry that works with biological systems, and even some that dont (e.g., DNA data storage).

The DNA read, write and edit industry is at the beginning stages of its growth story; penetration of the key markets is still at an early stage. For example, the cumulative number of human genomes sequenced reached REDACTED as of January 2019 (less than REDACTED of the global human population); we estimate that population-scale projects alone will increase that figure to more than REDACTED genomes sequenced during the next five years. The percentage of non-human species sequenced as of January 2019 was less than REDACTED of all species. These data indicate that there is significant future upside for sequencing across research, metagenomics, agriculture, synthetic biology and clinical applications,among others.

The situation is similar for DNA writing and editing technologies, with clinical therapeutic applications in particular providing an enormous total available future market that is yet to be significantly penetrated. Major successes in this industry include the adoption of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for noninvasive prenatal testing; enabling the roles of synthetic DNA oligonucleotides and genes in the rise of the synthetic biology industry; and rapid adoption of CRISPR gene editing by research institutions and biopharma industries.

There is increasing interplay among the three DNA technology platforms, giving rise to innovative corporate strategies. For example, Arbor Biotechnologies employs sequencing, gene synthesis and artificial intelligence to perform high-throughput discovery of biomolecules, including new CRISPR proteins.

More Info of Impact Covid19 @ https://www.trendsmarketresearch.com/report/covid-19-analysis/12558

More here:
DNA Read, Write And Edit Market Sales Volume, Status, Growth, Opportunities and World the COVID-19 - 3rd Watch News

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on DNA Read, Write And Edit Market Sales Volume, Status, Growth, Opportunities and World the COVID-19 – 3rd Watch News

Jacobs School researchers collecting COVID-19 data – UB Now: News and views for UB faculty and staff – University at Buffalo Reporter

Posted: at 5:16 pm

Researchers in the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciencescontinue to spearhead a number of projects related to the COVID-19 global health pandemic.

Peter L. Elkin, professor and chair of biomedical informatics, says several current studies are focused on data collection that can be used to better understand how to combat COVID-19.

Much of the work is being completed through the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) consortium, of which UB is a member. It is one of more than 50 medical research institutions across the nation currently receiving CTSA program funding from the National Institutes of Health.

One such project is the launch of the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C), a joint program between the National Center for Data to Health and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences.

Elkin says the projects aim is to build a warehouse of COVID-19 data for the entire CTSA consortium and for otherinterested contributing health care organizations.

This is intended to hold all patient data (inpatient and outpatient) on COVID-tested patients from all of the CTSA hubs, he says. It entails a cloud-based method for data collection on the COVID-19 pandemic.

We are working closely with N3C to see how this can be designed and implemented in astandardized and timely fashion.

The goal of developing a national-level COVID-19 database is to facilitate research and improve recruitment to clinical trials, he says.

N3C is looking to address the many difficult questions raised by the COVID-19 global emergency, such as:

UB is also a member of COMBATCOVID, a New York State initiative to save case report formson all hospital admissions for upper respiratory infections,including all patients tested for COVID-19 or patients who are suspected to have COVID-19.

The statewide consortium will collect and analyze the results from all the CTSA institutions in the state.

It is being run out of New York University, and I am participating from our site as our CTSA informatics core director, Elkin says. I am working on the design and data governance.

The data use agreements are being signed, and the database design and data definitions are being built, he adds. This larger row-level dataset will allow us to ask questions that would notbe possible at any one institution.

In UBs Department of Biomedical Informatics, Elkin and Frank D. LeHouillier, senior programmer and analyst, are involved in the project.

Clinical researchers in the Jacobs School who are involved include:

Researchers in the Department of Biomedical Informatics have also developed a validated microbiome platform that finds infected persons with COVID-19 whether symptomatic or not using deep sequencing of stool microbiome samples.

Elkin is working with postdoctoral associate Sapan Mandloi in using a National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database to collect and process metagenomics data for the organism classified as human gut metagenome.

The more than 300,000 samples are divided into 3,464 projects, according to Mandloi.

We are performing comparison of all samples raw sequences with SARS-Cov-2 genome using a NCBI SRA Taxonomy Analysis Tool (STAT), which utilizes precomputed k-mer dictionary databases and gene-specific profiling, Mandloi says. This allows us to perform geographic mapping of samples identified across the world.

Some 9,720 samples were identified as potential cases of colonization for COVID-19, which were mostly from the U.S., China, Australia and the U.K., he adds.

The ability to identify and track this trafficking of genetic material is vital as a public health topic, he says. As of now, this large pool of genetic data remains largely untapped for clinical surveillance using the combined strategy of gene-based profiling and k-mer-based classification on raw genomic data.

Read more:
Jacobs School researchers collecting COVID-19 data - UB Now: News and views for UB faculty and staff - University at Buffalo Reporter

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on Jacobs School researchers collecting COVID-19 data – UB Now: News and views for UB faculty and staff – University at Buffalo Reporter

Assembly passes 2nd amendment ‘sanctuary’ ordinance – kdll.org

Posted: at 5:13 pm

The assembly approved an ordinance Tuesday night that reaffirms its support for Americans right to bear arms.

The ordinance repeats some of the language from the Second Amendment to the federal Constitution, which protects Americans rights to keep and bear arms. Sponsored by borough mayor Charlie Pierce and assembly members Jesse Bjorkman, Norm Blakeley and Kenn Carpenter, the main change in the ordinance is to declare the Kenai Peninsula Borough a Second Amendment Sanctuary. That term comes from a national political movement by gun advocates pushing local governments to pass laws saying they wont enforce state or federal gun laws, which gained significant attention in Virginia earlier this year.

Bjorkman said he wanted to see the ordinance passed as it was because of threats to the Second Amendment in the state. He didnt specifically list any legislation, but one introduced in 2019House Bill 62would implement a red flag law in Alaska, allowing courts to issue temporary protective orders allowing firearms to be removed from individuals who pose a threat to themselves or others.

"There are bills being filed that people would like to be passed that would remove a bit of due process, that would remove some peoples rights," he said. "Thats a fact. As people see their second amendment rights being threatened, they want to take action, and they want folks to take action at all levels of government."

Assembly member Hal Smalley and assembly president Kelly Cooper both offered amendments hedging some of the vague language, particularly on what a second amendment sanctuary is. Smalleys amendment was defeated, but Coopers ultimately passed, clarifying that the borough does not have police powers nor authority over the cities police departments nor authority to regulate firearms, and defining that the sanctuary means what is specifically outlined in the ordinance.

Smalley said hes a lifelong hunter and supports the second amendment, but is bound to anyway as a public servant.

"I do not believe and I do not see see where my second amendment rights are under any attack," he said. "Our oath of office requires us to support and defend the second amendment rights. Its required. The definition or the issue of a sanctuary city and looking at that which was sent out to us, we are not allowed to defy federal and state laws."

Cooper said she is a gun owner as well but didnt like the vagueness of the language, especially in line with the boroughs existing powersthe other examples of local governments that have passed these sanctuary laws have been cities and counties, many of which have their own police departments.

"I just think that its important that we and its responsible of us to clarify what our authority is," she said. "Yes, we do support the second amendment. No, we do not have that authority. We need to make sure people in our communities understand that so we do not have misuse or misrepresentation of the language that we pass. So I would ask for your support, and I would also ask that we encourage firearm safety training."

Written public comments were split, but the majority of comments given during the meeting Tuesday opposed the ordinance, with concerns about what would happen if the borough saw an increase in gun violence and wanted to take action. As a second-class borough, the Kenai Peninsula doesnt have police powers. A vote could change that, but voters have rejected the borough establishing police services before, such as in Nikiski in 2015.

The amended ordinance states that the assembly will oppose any laws that would unconstitutionally restrict gun ownership and, within its powers, wont use its resources to unlawfully restrict the ability to bear arms. The ordinance is uncodified, which means its not within the boroughs regular code of laws like planning, roads, et cetera.

Alaska actually already has a law that exempts certain firearms and accessories from federal legislationthe Alaska Firearms Freedom Act, signed by former governor Sean Parnell in 2010 and updated in 2013. That law states that any firearms or accessories manufactured in the state and that stay in the state are exempt from federal regulation.

Reach Elizabeth Earl at eearl@kdll.org.

Read more from the original source:
Assembly passes 2nd amendment 'sanctuary' ordinance - kdll.org

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Assembly passes 2nd amendment ‘sanctuary’ ordinance – kdll.org

Courts Must Treat the Second Amendment as a Real Right, Not a Second-Class Right – AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

Posted: at 5:13 pm

The Supreme Court has, at least for now, kicked the Second Amendment can a bit farther down the legal road. How much longer can this continue? (Dave Workman photo)

U.S.A. -(AmmoLand.com)- Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) and Firearms Policy Foundation (FPF) announced the filing of an important amicus brief in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals case, Drummond v. Township of Robinson. The brief, joined by the Madison Society Foundation, is available online at FPCLegal.org.

The Greater Pittsburgh Gun Club (GPGC) started offering firearms sales and training on rural land outside of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania over 50 years ago. For many of those decades, Robinson Township has resolved to shut the club down. In the 1990s, Robinson Township brought a nuisance action against GPGC, but the court determined that GPGC was not a nuisance. Then, Robinson Township brought a licensing action against GPGC, but failed in court again. Now, Robinson Township has enacted an ordinance forbidding GPGC from operating for-profit, or from allowing center-fire rifle shooting on the propertybut only if it is operating as a gun club. The clubs owner, William Drummond, brought this action, alleging that the new ordinance violates the Second Amendment.

Too often people are bullied for engaging in constitutionally protected activity, so we filed this brief to explain why the court should step in and protect the exercise of Second Amendment rights, said FPC Director of Research and brief author, Joseph Greenlee. We are happy to help Mr. Drummond defend his rights and the rights of his clients against Robinson Townships relentless efforts to forcibly close his gun club.

Were hopeful that GPGC can soon get back to providing the public with goods and training protected by the Constitution, as it has for several decades, Greenlee concluded.

Background

About Firearms Policy Coalition

Firearms Policy Coalition (www.firearmspolicy.org) is a 501(c)4 grassroots nonprofit organization. FPCs mission is to protect and defend constitutional rightsespecially the right to keep and bear armsadvance individual liberty, and restore freedom.

About Firearms Policy Foundation

Firearms Policy Foundation (www.firearmsfoundation.org) is a grassroots 501(c)3 nonprofit public benefit organization. FPFs mission is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Peoples rights, privileges, and immunities deeply rooted in this Nations history and traditionespecially the inalienable, fundamental, and individual right to keep and bear arms.

Continue reading here:
Courts Must Treat the Second Amendment as a Real Right, Not a Second-Class Right - AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Courts Must Treat the Second Amendment as a Real Right, Not a Second-Class Right – AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

LETTER: Show loyalty to people, not NRA | Opinion – Evening News and Tribune

Posted: at 5:13 pm

Oh my goodness, here we go again! Local government, bowing to the big-money gun manufacturing lobby, is wasting time again recognizing the second amendment to the United States Constitution, when in reality, they are shirking their duty to abide by the Constitution and serve the people in a time of crisis.

Floyd County Commissioner Tim Kamer is the latest locally elected politician to act as a puppet on a string to gun corporation-induced hysteria. In the latest resolution handed to the commissioners, the gun lobby wants them to kneel before the thrown of corporate profits and squeal uncle, stating their inability to supersede existing laws and hierarchy. Meanwhile, there is a pandemic that continues to spiral out of control, an economic collapse that must be addressed, and protests in the streets with root causes aggravated by loose gun laws.

I am always puzzled how these futile, thinly veiled loyalty tests of the NRA are presented as support for the constitution. Question: On the first day of service for an elected official, what does every person have to do? Answer: They have to swear to uphold the Constitution. I would suggest that if they were in their job for a while, and suddenly realized that the Second Amendment is part of the Constitution and thought everyone else would be surprised of that fact as well, that maybe they should have read the Constitution before taking official actions.

Here is another surprise for some of those officials. Amendment X of the United States Constitution states that The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the People. This means that you, our dear elected leaders, have a right and a duty to pass ordinances to protect us, We the People.

So here is my suggestion for the alternative, sane universe. One of our major crises at the moment is in policing. Police departments have been militarized to deal with a flood of cheap guns in North America promulgated and encouraged by big gun corporations. When police officers and those who interact with them are all fearing for their lives with each transaction, the outcome can be predicted. Part of the solution to police reform must include sensible gun control legislation. A Quinnipiac poll in May of this year shows that 61 percent of Americans support more restrictions on guns like assault weapon bans, closing gun show loopholes, red flag laws, and common sense laws that prevent guns from falling into the wrong hands. When asked only about background checks, 94 percent of the people support them. Thats We the People who support responsible action.

Consequently, I am dumbfounded that our local officials are being duped into tying their own hands.

Therefore We the People are forming our own group called 10A. We are going to write an ordinance that the commissioners can pass citing their support for a higher authority, the People of Floyd County, Indiana. In addition it will require them to read the United States Constitution in its entirety. They only have to get through the Bill of Rights to realize that they have a duty, that they swore to uphold on day one of their occupation of office, to serve the People above profits and their own political benefit.

Most sincerely,

Randall T. Randy Stumler, Floyds Knobs

Visit link:
LETTER: Show loyalty to people, not NRA | Opinion - Evening News and Tribune

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on LETTER: Show loyalty to people, not NRA | Opinion – Evening News and Tribune

NAAGA President Philip Smith wants more Black people to legally own guns and doesnt care if white people get – REVOLT TV

Posted: at 5:13 pm

REVOLT.TV is home to exclusive interviews from rising stars to the biggest entertainers and public figures of today. Here is where you get the never-before-heard stories about whats really happening in the culture from the people who are pushing it forward.

Philip Smith, national president and founder of the National African American Gun Association (NAAGA), hopes to encourage more Black people to legally own guns with an understanding of history and the mechanics of firearms.

I think the toughest battle we have to go through on a daily basis is just getting that perception of African Americans and guns. When people hear those two words and put them together, theres usually a negative stereotype that pops in your head and thats within our own community, and especially outside of our community. Were constantly trying to strategize how we can combat that and what weve done is have a methodology in which we send out positive images of African-American men and women on our website, says Smith.

Created by Smith in 2015, NAAGAs official website describes the organization as a pro 2nd amendment organization focused on the preservation of our community through armed protection and community building. We are a hub and network for all African American firearm owners, organizations, gun clubs and outdoor enthusiasts. Membership is available for couples, singles, and families, providing access to like-minded community, gun training, self-defense classes, and other resources including Black-owned gun shops and ranges.

The Second Amendment explicitly states, A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. This highly debated portion of The Bill Of Rights guarantees citizens of the United States the authority to own firearms.

For Black people, those rights listed in the Constitution did not, and arguably still do not, equally apply. The history of gun rights in the United States is as racialized just as the right to vote. Philando Castile, for example, was fatally shot by police in front of his romantic partner and her small child while reaching for his wallet after disclosing his possession of a legally obtained and registered firearm.

Statistics on gun ownership uphold the historical bias of white men being majority gun holders. Pew Research Center reports while 36% of white people report that they are gun owners, only about a quarter of Black people (24%) answered the same across gender demographics. Among only men, 48% of white men own guns compared to 24% of non-white men.

REVOLT spoke with Smith about NAAGA, the importance of owning a firearm, the organization being compared to the NRA, Black women and gun ownership and more. Read below.

What are the main reasons that Black gun ownership is important?

I think it is the most important thing in our community right now and Ill be specific. Every other community in the United States, based on ethnicity, has guns and Ill be honest with you, the communities that have a lot of guns are probably the more secure ones. Why can we not have firearms to protect our families, our children, our wives, our loved ones? To me, thats probably the most insulting thing that you can tell me: Wait, why do Blacks need to have guns? We have families, we have investments. We should be able to protect ourselves and it should be nothing wrong with that. Thats what the Second Amendment is all about and thats what makes us different from any other country in the world... For me, when African Americans are viewed with firearms, theres a level of discomfort for some and we try to make other individuals who dont really know about us comfortable. But, bottom line, I want my folks comfortable.

Youre doing what is allowed in the country to protect yourself and quite honestly, not having guns in our community has really been the problem. Up until now, to me, because its allowed us to be victimized. Other groups, individuals, communities know that we dont have a lot of guns in our communities focusing on legal gun owners. So, when our folks are out jogging, when theyre out walking, when [they are] minding their business doing their daily going to Kmart or Walmart going to Macys, and they get attacked, people know that pretty much that we dont have firearms on us. And thats a bad thing when you know that youre aggressor and I use that term loosely is stalking you out in society.

Is it more difficult to convince women that we needed guns?

I think women, for the most part, are more open to new ideas. But, at the same time, our people, Black folks, have been socialized to look at guns in a negative format. Now, what we try to do, we try to take anyone in especially women and give them information, and I think the ladies you know you guys a little smarter than us so you guys read a little bit more, youre a little more detail, your thought processes a little more holistic. When I say holistic, youre looking at the big picture, long term as to something thats gonna be a value add, and we put all that together with the way we present it. The women have been joining in droves.

Based on what they see on our website, what they hear from us, their experiences on the gun range, they have all been very positive, I would say 99% of the folks that go to our meetings are very pleased if theyre a woman. They see women that look like them, they see professional women, they see women that are white-collar, blue-collar, gay, straight, Republican, Democrat you have a whole swell of different type of folks.

How do you think we should approach introducing firearms to children?

I think theres a different context [in] urban living versus country versus suburban [versus] city life [versus] rural versus the city version of living. I think you should, regardless of where youre at, introduce your child in the same process as early as possible to let him or her know what this instrument is and it is just a tool that can be used for specific reasons. Some people use it for self-defense, some people use it for hunting, some people use it for both. But, you have to make sure that your child knows what this is. And as soon as they are mentally mature enough focus on that mentally mature enough take them to the range, have them shoot, slowly train them with an instructor [on] how to shoot a gun, what to do, what not to do, understand that there is a serious consequence. If you dont use this correctly, it can kill you.

What are your thoughts on the NRA and what are some key differences between it and your organization?

Ive met members of the NRA. I will say this, I dont have any ill will against any organizations out there, NRA or otherwise. You do your thing, well do ours. My focus is on NAAGA and NAAGA only. I use the analogy of going to the weight room, and you see this really buff guy in the weight room, and theyre huge and youre like, man, how did he get that that cut up? Well, you can spend all day looking at them, get buffed while you sit in in the weight room, eating chips, or you can focus on yourself and get strong. And thats what I do. I focus on my organization.

My job is to make African Americans when they come to our website comfortable. Im not worried about making any other group comfortable. Now, anyone else is surely invited, and we have numbers that are increasing in other groups: white, Asian, Latino and thats great. But, you know, when you come to NAAGA, your focus the conversation. The emphasis is on Black folks and firearms, and we are unapologetic in that.

We make no apologies. We are Afrocentric in nature, our delivery of information, our history that we expose our members to from Crispus Attucks to Nat Turner to Harriet Tubman to the Buffalo Soldiers to Deacons of Defense all those rich African Americans who provided history for us, you learn about that in NAAGA, and thats the difference. In terms of what is our relationship with anyone, we dont have a relationship with any organization... The days of us trying to explain ourselves why were here are over. Now you can accept that, or just step out of the way. But, make no mistake about it were here to stay.

Do you think more progress, as far as how Black people with guns are seen, would be made if the education system was better at teaching those kinds of stories?

It would be huge. Youve touched on something that is probably one of the main issues. The history of African Americans in this country is a beautiful history. Its rich. The Buffalo Soldiers, Tuskegee Airmen, they fought all the racism, all the double standards, and they still went out and did a great job for the country. The 54th, the Harlem Hellfighters that were denied to fight with Americans here in America, but went over to France... and they became one the most awarded groups in the history of the war for France.

All [NAAGA] board members have to take this course. When you take this course, you have an opportunity to become aware that you are not the first Black person to grab a gun and in fact, youre one of many in a long list of African Americans that have been able to use a gun.

How could an organization like yours be seen after a mass shooting?

I think, obviously, Im very biased leading the largest African American firearms organization. I believe the lobby of gun control folks, and I dont like demonizing anybody. Were all American citizens, we all have different perspectives and at the end of the day, were all just trying to have a better America for everyone to live in. But, there are different ways to get to that point. I believe that having a man with a gun, a good guy with a gun youve heard this term is better than having no gun at all. Now, other folks believe that guns are the issue and they are the problem.

I get questions about, well, you look at South Central L.A. or look at the south side of Chicago or even here in Atlanta, you look at the Bankhead area where there are some severe poverty and strife. You see a lot of gun use and I submit this. Anytime you take a group of people, I dont care what color, put them in an educational system that is basically a pipeline to the prison system, they learn nothing. They get no skills. Give them a hostile relationship with the police, at best, and thats it best. Put them in an area where they get no skills, and by the way, make sure they have three or four felonies by the time theyre 24 and 25. You know whats going to happen. You have somebody that cannot living in the current economy they cant get a job. Theyre literally left on the outside, so you dont [know what] youre going to do... Theyre gonna do whatever it takes to survive.

When you have conversations like that, you know very, very quick its not the gun. So, when people talk taking away the guns, they dont want to look at the whole problem... because when you look at the whole problem, you understand that it is a big problem. Its just not guns, its education. Its opportunity. Its communities are under siege with drugs. Those are big problems. Its easy to sit back and say, Oh take the guns away. You still will have death and mayhem just in a different format. So, lets be grown up and look at the real problem. Guns are not the problem. People are the problem.

People have attended protests with firearms. Do you think that your organization is beneficial to organizing groups, as they continue to protest police brutality and racism?

I think that anytime you have open carry for an African American male and Im not saying they dont have the right to do that if someone has paid the taxes, theyre doing the right thing and they can legally qualify in that particular state to open carry or concealed carry. That is your right. Im not arguing that point. Im saying that it may not be the smartest thing to do based on the social climate in which we live because a lot of times, youre making yourself a target. Im not saying you dont have the right. If you want to carry an AR-15, like some of these other folks and other communities do and walk down the street, and go walk into Macys, you might have the right to do that. But, I just dont think its realistically a good move on your part male or female because it draws attention in a negative way that may put you in a situation where your life is in danger very, very quickly. Now, Im a big proponent of concealed carry. But, open carry, thats something totally different.

How do you see NAAGA growing within the next five years? Whats the future of NAAGA?

Our goal, and I put everything in five-year segments, is to reach anywhere from 100,000 to 250,000 [members]. I do think well get 100,000 members within the next two to three years. After that, the ultimate goal for me is 600,000. I think 600,000 would be 10% of African Americans in the country right now that have guns... So if we can get 10%, I think we will have done an admirable job.

For more information on NAAGA, visit http://www.naaga.co.

More here:
NAAGA President Philip Smith wants more Black people to legally own guns and doesnt care if white people get - REVOLT TV

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on NAAGA President Philip Smith wants more Black people to legally own guns and doesnt care if white people get – REVOLT TV

Ben Domenech pushes back on critics of armed Missouri couple: ‘The cops weren’t coming’ – Fox News

Posted: at 5:13 pm

The Federalists Ben Domenech on Monday defendedthe Missouri couple who received pushback for brandishingfirearms as protesters gathered outside their home.

They called the cops and the cops werent coming, Domenech told Fox & Friends," adding that the couple had a "fundamental right as Americans" to use legally owned firearms to defend against armed individuals near their home.

This is exactly the scenario when you own a firearm and youre prepared to defend what you have."

MISSOURI COUPLE WHO DEFENDED HOME HAVE RIFLE SEIZED DURING POLICE SEARCH: REPORT

Domenech's comments came after 12Republicanmembers of Congress wroteto Attorney GeneralWilliam Barr, arguing in defense of theSecond Amendmentrights of aMissouricouple whose rifle and handgun are now in the possession of local authorities.

Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who made national headlines in late June when they took up arms to defend their home from protesters who stormed into their gatedSt. Louisneighborhood, had their rifle seized Friday when local police executed a search warrant.

Then on Saturday, a lawyer -- who represented the couple until recently surrendered to police a handgun that Patricia McCloskey held during the June incident, FOX 2 of St. Louis reported.

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

Domenech recalled that New York Times' Nikole Hannah-Jones has claimed that property destruction does not qualify as "violence" within the context of rioting, but that the act of self-defensedoes constitute violence.

It is violence that is predicated on, in her view, white supremacy which is what she says the Second Amendment is founded on, Domenech said.

This is not just some reporter we are talking about. This is not just some biased media individual. This is someone who created the 1619 Project that is about to be taught in public schools across America, a falsehood about the founding of America and that is really what they come from in this perspective.

View post:
Ben Domenech pushes back on critics of armed Missouri couple: 'The cops weren't coming' - Fox News

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Ben Domenech pushes back on critics of armed Missouri couple: ‘The cops weren’t coming’ – Fox News

Below The Radar: Gun Owner Privacy Act – AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

Posted: at 5:13 pm

Take Action Time to Act

United States -(AmmoLand.com)-With a lot of anti-Second Amendment extremists trying to get firearms registration by various back-door methods involving records from the National Instant Check System, it is worth noting that they are not the only ones pushing legislation involving NICS. To paraphrase Gandalf, there are forces at work in the halls of Congress besides those that hate the Second Amendment.

One of the bills Second Amendment supporters can turn to is S 4040, the Gun Owner Privacy Act. This was introduced by Senator Kelly Loeffler (R-GA). Loeffler replaced Senator Johnny Isakson (R-GA), a Second Amendment champion who resigned due to Parkinsons Disease. For being in office less than seven months, Loefflers already marking herself as a strong supporter of Second Amendment rights with this legislation.

When you look at the text, it carries some very strong provisions when it comes to addressing privacy concerns about NICS, especially when compared to the current text of 18 USC 922(t). Now, the current text requires the destruction of all records of transactions that dont violate the law. The reason for that is clear: Those who are lawfully exercising constitutional rights should not have the government keeping records about said rights.

The Gun Owner Privacy Act adds a new section to 18 USC 922(t), which prohibits spending federal funds on any background check system that doesnt immediately destroy records of transactions that dont violate the law. This is huge it eliminates any wiggle room for creating a back-door registration system. In fact, it is the polar opposite of Carolyn Maloney's NICS Review Act.

But there is another benefit as well. Loefflers bill also prohibits charging any fee for the use of NICS. Again, we get down to a principle people shouldnt have to pay to be able to exercise a constitutional right. In a very real sense, this is akin to charging a poll tax so that people could vote. The poll tax was emphatically rejected with the 24th Amendment.

We should also note that the objections to ensuring the privacy of law-abiding gun owners are one of the biggest tells that you can get from anti-Second Amendment extremists, and objections to prohibiting a fee for using NICS run a close second as well. It isnt just that they want to ban so-called assault weapons, they dont think owning a firearm is a right at all.

When you look at some of the more ambitious proposals from Elizabeth Warren, Sheila Jackson Lee, Cory Booker, or even Tammy Duckworth (who teamed up with Bobby Rush), that attitude is palpable in the number of hoops they want law-abiding citizens to jump through. The high crime rates in Baltimore, Chicago, and elsewhere that already have strict laws show that their agenda isnt about safety.

Second Amendment supporters ought to contact their Senators and Representative to politely urge them to support passage of S 4040. The Gun Owner Privacy Act isnt perfect, but it makes things much better for those who exercise their Second Amendment rights.

About Harold Hutchison

Writer Harold Hutchison has more than a dozen years of experience covering military affairs, international events, U.S. politics and Second Amendment issues. Harold was consulting senior editor at Soldier of Fortune magazine and is the author of the novel Strike Group Reagan. He has also written for the Daily Caller, National Review, Patriot Post, Strategypage.com, and other national websites.

Read the original here:
Below The Radar: Gun Owner Privacy Act - AmmoLand Shooting Sports News

Posted in Second Amendment | Comments Off on Below The Radar: Gun Owner Privacy Act – AmmoLand Shooting Sports News