The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: July 29, 2017
Is crime going up or down in England and Wales? What crime … – The Conversation UK
Posted: July 29, 2017 at 7:38 pm
Crimes recorded by the police have jumped 10% overall in the 12 months to March 2017 the largest annual rise in a decade, according to new data recently released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
But in the same report, the ONS reported that the latest Crime Survey for England and Wales showed a 7% decrease in crime compared to the prior year.
How can both be true? Is there really a significant increase in crime in England and Wales, or has crime actually fallen?
The new ONS figures do show some alarming rises: violent crimes surged 18% in the 12 months to March 2017. The homicide rate jumped 26%, robberies were up by 16%, and sexual assaults by 15%. Offenders were more likely to use weapons, offences with knives or other sharp instruments climbed 20% in the year, and those involving firearms increased by 23%. Police recorded property crime rates also increased. Theft offences rose 7% over the year, while public order offences increased by a dramatic 39%.
Ministers should be concerned that the numbers suggest the country may be verging on a violent crime wave. Still, there is some evidence to the contrary, suggesting that crime should not be such a pressing concern.
The two methods of studying crime statistics a crime survey and police recorded crime simply measure it in different ways. And they count different types of offences.
Police recorded crimes only include offences that come to the attention of police officers and are entered as official statistics. In contrast, the Crime Survey numbers are generated after face-to-face questioning of as many as 35,000 households.
The Crime Survey results include crimes not reported to police that would not appear in the number of police recorded crimes. But the survey does not capture a lot of serious offences that are counted in police recorded crimes, such as homicide, weapons attacks, and sexual assault. Officials admit that the face-to-face method means people are sometimes not forthcoming when talking about private crimes such as sexual assault. The survey method also does not cover victimless crimes such as drug possession.
In addition, unlike the police reported statistics, the Crime Survey does not count crimes occurring in communal settings, such as college dorms, assisted care facilities, or prisons.
John Flatley, a statistician with the ONS acknowledges the seeming discrepancy. In the recent report, he attributes the rise in reported crime to ongoing improvements to recording practices. But he also concedes that there were actual increases in crimes in certain categories.
So, which is the better method for judging changes in crime rates over time? For most low-level property crimes, which are often not reported to police, the Crime Survey is the better option. But for violent and serious crimes, the Crime Survey does not cover many of them and police recorded crime data is more effective.
This means that for those most concerned about the resurgence of violent crime, the recent substantial increases in violent offending recorded by the police is alarming.
Opposition politicians have pointed out that while reported crime was rising, substantial cuts were made to policing resources nationwide. In the Conservatives bid to reduce spending, the number of police officers in England and Wales has declined in recent years. Overall, police personnel are down 14% since 2010.
Despite such criticism, there is no scientific evidence that can show these reductions actually caused any increase in crime. There are just too many other factors that might explain fluctuations in crime rates, such as unemployment, the availability of social services, and the level of drug use.
The substantial increases in crime from the ONS certainly achieve bigger headlines. Perhaps the more important observation is that the results are already providing political fodder to various sides in the debate about the state of crime and policing resources. Unfortunately, the divergence in statistics means politicians can simply pick the source or statistic that suits their interests.
This article was updated on July 28 to correct the figure for the number of households invited to take place in the Crime Survey for England and Wales. It is 35,000, not 500,000.
View original post here:
Is crime going up or down in England and Wales? What crime ... - The Conversation UK
Posted in Victimless Crimes
Comments Off on Is crime going up or down in England and Wales? What crime … – The Conversation UK
‘True equality took longer’: gay people on the Sexual Offences Act … – The Guardian
Posted: at 7:38 pm
I dont remember being overwhelmed with a feeling of liberation in 67, just that I felt at last a little justice had been done. In some respects at least, I was no longer regarded as a criminal.
Colin Livetts memory of 27 July 1967 when the Sexual Offences Act 1967 received royal assent, 50 years ago this week is indicative of the many responses we received from gay people who lived through the moment often described as the legalisation of homosexuality in the UK.
Guardian readers who responded to our callout said the act could never be described as anything other than a partial decriminalisation. Some described it as a time of joy and liberation, but said it was just a small landmark towards equality that would not truly exist until many years later.
I was 12 when I realised I was gay. It was Wednesday 7 June 1967 before the act was passed and I was sat with my parents, watching a BBC2 documentary preceeding it. It portrayed gay men as victims of a cruel twist of nature, with stories of suicide, physical assault and loneliness, but had no representations of happy gay people or relationships. At last I had a name for the sexual attraction I felt to an older boy at school, but this made me feel dreadfully embarrassed and shamed.
At the end of the programme, my mother said to my father: It must be dreadful to have a homosexual child. I didnt come out to them for another 16 years. When I did, they were supportive, although they urged me to be cautious about sharing my feelings.
The main shift in perception I think occurred in 1967 was that homosexual men were seen as victims of a probably incurable mental disability rather than as proselytising sinners or predatory, perverted criminals.
Its important to remember the act only partially decriminalised homosexuality. I had my first physical relationship with another man in 1974, when we were both 19. We had therefore committed criminal offences, in that we were below the age of consent and the places where we made love were not private as defined and required by the act.
At university, members of the Gay Soc, one of the first in the UK, were constantly scrutinised by college authorities and two gay men under 21 were sent down having been found in bed together. I believe this reinforced my sense of shame, culminating in problems with anxiety, depression and alcohol.
At times, the past 50 years of my life have been a struggle, but as part of my recovery I decided to focus my energies on campaigning vigorously for gay rights. Much has been achieved, especially in the new millennium in my view, equality was only achieved in 2014 when the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 officially came into force. So although the 1967 act did not provide liberation for gay men, it was a necessary milestone on the road to gay equality.
I rejoiced when the act was passed. Gay people like me felt elated at our new-found freedom to be ourselves. Although it had never inhibited my behaviour, the previous law penalised what were victimless crimes and was just plain nasty.
Gay life previously had been covert and potentially shameful in London, where I lived, there was wide acceptance of gay people, but of course there was still discrimination against us. It was difficult for a gay couple to rent a flat or get a mortgage, for example (we did, but lesbians were expected to find a guarantor and for us it still seemed necessary to find a gay-friendly solicitor). I can only remember one person who said he was gay but felt he couldnt have sex because it was illegal life just carried on but of course we all knew there was the risk of being found out.
So though it didnt change my day-to-day life, 1967 was a very important step towards equality during a period of liberation and hope.
True equality took longer. The age of consent was still 21, so sex with or between young people was still illegal and was indeed prosecuted avidly. For me the true public turning point wouldnt come until decades later, when Tony Blair appointed Chris Smith and four other openly gay people as cabinet ministers in 1997.
Things actually got a great deal worse in the two or three years after the act because of its restrictions fundamentally that although under extremely limited circumstances it was now legal to have sex with a lover, it was illegal to try to meet anyone, with convictions for such crimes as importuning for an immoral purpose. How dare they make judgment that my love was an immoral purpose?
I dont remember being overwhelmed with a feeling of liberation in 67, just that I felt at last a little justice had been done. In some respects at least, I was no longer regarded as a criminal.
But the police had a field day and became the enemy for many: there were incidents of gay bashing and blackmail. Convictions increased see the lyrics of Tom Robinsons Glad to Be Gay for details. [So sit back and watch as they close all our clubs / Arrest us for meeting and raid all our pubs / Make sure your boyfriends at least 21 / So only your friends and your brothers get done] Many other gay people and their families went on to suffer for decades the government should do more to apologise for the terrors imposed on them. To simply pardon people is an insult.
The 1967 act had deficiencies, then, but the many campaigning groups that these prompted have brought so many advances. We should celebrate the advances, but its been proved that you cannot partially make people equal. They will want more. We still do.
See the original post:
'True equality took longer': gay people on the Sexual Offences Act ... - The Guardian
Posted in Victimless Crimes
Comments Off on ‘True equality took longer’: gay people on the Sexual Offences Act … – The Guardian
Letter: Message to planet Ayn Rand – Arizona Daily Star
Posted: at 7:38 pm
Re: the July 28 column "What do we really have a 'right' to? Think principles, not entitlements."
Well, that is certainly a load of laughable pie in the sky. Message to planet Ayn Rand: Human beings live in complex societies. Human beings historically don't do too well on their own. There is a concept of civitas worth considering. Does the writer live in self-sustaining bubble out in the desert? Does he drive on the roads, does he have a library card, does he drink clean water out of a tap, does he take Social Security, does he avail himself of public services and Tucson Parks and Recreation?
There is give and take. Services are taken and payment is given. This applies morally as well. Principles are nice. But instead of citing Patrick Henry, the writer should adopt a roadway and pick up some trash. Be a citizen.
Disclaimer: As submitted to the Arizona Daily Star.
Go here to see the original:
Posted in Ayn Rand
Comments Off on Letter: Message to planet Ayn Rand – Arizona Daily Star
‘The Government Is Not Structured To Do Health Care,’ Says President Of Ayn Rand Institute – The Daily Caller
Posted: at 7:38 pm
The Republican plan to replace Obamacare did not go nearly far enough in repealing government intervention in the health care market, the president of the nonprofit Ayn Rand Institute, Yaron Brook, told The Daily Caller.
Brook argues that Republicansshould push to roll back the government restrictions that existed in the health care system even before the Affordable Care Act, so that we can really see how a free market health care system can work.
The replace would be very different from what I think the Republicans are proposing. Im against just repealing Obamacare because before Obamacare health care in the U.S. was heading in a bad direction. The cost was too high, too many people did not have insurance. But the solution to it is not more government, the solution is less government, he told TheDC.
Brook is the author of Equal is Unfair: Americas Misguided Fight Against Income Inequality, and a staunch advocate for the free market and capitalism. The Ayn Rand Institute pushes an objectivist political philosophy.
He is calling on Republicans to completely deregulate the insurance industry so that theres none of these requirements to cover pre-existing conditions or requirements to cover I dont know acupuncture and alternative health and all the nonsense that has to be covered in every single policy which makes it so expensive. Let there be a true, free market in insurance policies, let there be a true free market in doctors, in hospitals, let there be transparent pricing, real competition. I mean, so the replace should be more free market. I dont know why the assumption is that by replace, you have to replace it with more government programs. No, the replace should be to take all the pre-Obamacare government programs, eliminate them completely and establish a completely free market in health care, he told TheDC.
Brook went on to say that, I would prefer that we ban states from regulating the health insurance industries but I guess the Federalists among the Republicans would object to that. The state has no business regulating health Insurance. I, as the consumer, am in a far better position than any government bureaucrat to determine what kind of health insurance I should buy for myself. All of this is premised in the assumption that we are too stupid to know whats good for us and that a government bureaucrat is in a better position to know.
The government has been involved in the health care industry in the United States since World War II. Ever sincethen, the government has been largely unsuccessful in creating policies that drive prices down and improve the quality of health care. When asked why he thinks the government is unable to do health care well, he said, I ask audiences all the time, what do they think the iPhone would look like if the government designed it? Everybody always laughs because everybody knows its an absurd question because the iPhone wouldnt exist and if it existed it would be this monster, ugly, inefficient, unproductive instrument that nobody would want to use. And then I ask them OK, well if you dont trust the iPhone to government why are you willing to trust health care to government? The government is not structured to do health care, and it cannot be structured to do it because the essence of government is force.
The essence of government is a gun, its coercion, its compulsion. Coercion, compulsion and force have no place in health care. Health care, like all other goods and services, should be a product of voluntary trade between individuals. Theres no place for compulsion, theres not place for force, theres no place for the mindlessness, that is the essential characteristic of almost all government programs.
Last Friday Gov. John Kasich (R-OH) said that the Senate bill is still unacceptable and the Medicaid cuts are too deep. In the past, Kasich has asserted that it is his Evangelical duty to keep and expand Medicaid and to do otherwise would be immoral. Brook says that, I mean I agree with him from an Evangelical perspective that its immoral to cut medicaid. I think that until we get rid of the morality and moral code of Evangelicals, we will not get rid of Obamacare, we will not cut medicaid, we will not transition to free market health care. Free market health care requires a completely different, moral, ethical approach. It requires the morality of individualism. It is my moral responsibility to my family and self and then, if I choose to help other people, it has to be my voluntary choice and it has to be consistent with my values.
Free market capitalism in America requires an Ayn Rand moral code. It requires a moral code of rational self interest and thats the real challenge. That is the real barrier that prevents Republicans from truly repealing Obamacare.
In the event that Obamacare is completely repealed, Dr. Brook sympathizes with those who will lose their health insurance. Once you stop subsidizing as much as Obamacare does and take the mandate away, a lot of people will not buy health insurance. But part of the reason for that is that all the regulations that preexist in Obamacare make health insurance too expensive. So I sympathize with people who say I cant afford my health insurance, thats sad, its not a good thing. The solution to that is not more government intervention, the solution to that is less government intervention. More competitive insurance markets and more options in terms of types of insurance insurance companies should be able to sell. And if you do that, then there will be insurance policies cheap enough so that those 22 million people can get and will get coverage.
Even with the Senate, the House and the White House, Republicans are struggling to put forward a viable alternative to Obamacare. With #RepealObamacare trending on Twitter recently, many members of Trumps base are urgingthe GOP to repeal Obamacare completely. This week, President Trump reminded the Republicans that they must keep their promise to America and repeal Obamacare.
Follow Amanda on Twitter
See the rest here:
Posted in Ayn Rand
Comments Off on ‘The Government Is Not Structured To Do Health Care,’ Says President Of Ayn Rand Institute – The Daily Caller
Readers sound off on cellphones, Donald Trump and Ayn Rand – New York Daily News
Posted: at 7:37 pm
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Saturday, July 29, 2017, 3:00 AM
Brooklyn: In response to Voicer Candy Cipriani s request for people to look up from your phone, please, I am in total agreement. Everywhere I look there are people young and old alike casting their glance downward to check their phones.
As I am driving to work early in the morning, there are people crossing the streets, riding their bikes, running to catch a train or bus clutching tightly onto their phones. As hard as it is to believe, I even see joggers looking at their phones as they are running!
All of this is disturbing to witness because these people are so fixated on their devices, they are missing out on the amazing sites and sounds this world has to offer. The most disturbing is to see parents, guardians or nannies crossing the street with a child either walking beside them or pushing a child in a stroller all the while chatting away on their phone while the young child is left to trail next to them in danger sometimes because the adult they are with is more interested in their phone conversation than the safety of the young child they are with. I call these children CPOs Cell Phone Orphans.
Please wake up, parents, guardians and nannies these children are young for a precious short time. Dont you think they deserve your undivided attention? Engage with them while you can and make them feel more important than the caller you are neglecting them for. Margaret D. Mirailh
Far Rockaway: People keep talking about illegal immigration, what about so-called legal immigration? Im talking about all the Russians who arrived in NYC during Rudy Giulianis reign as mayor. The Russians arrived at JFK with Section 8 apartments, SSI, welfare and food stamps already in their hands. Thats what was happening in those compounds President Obama shut down. The Russians in those compounds had access to all social service, Social Security and all other government databases. They were hooking their people up and many resided in Trump Tower. In the meantime, Americans who were eligible and waiting for these benefits were put on long waiting lists. What about that? Sandra Smith
Salem, N.H.: Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski should have the courage to bring criminal extortion charges against President Trump! He has threatened her and Alaska, if she doesnt do what he says. I hope she seriously considers this! Shirley Kerman
North Arlington, N.J.: I think President Trump makes a valid point in citing the increased medical costs transgender people serving in the military bring. Lets say Robert, who is transgender, joins the Army. He then makes it known that he wishes to have a sex change operation. Upon completion of his/her surgery, and rehab, he enlists an attorney who informs the Army that he no longer wishes to serve. The reason being that Roberta never would have joined the Army. The taxpayers are stuck with the bill for the surgery, and a cottage industry is born. Armand Rose
Flushing: What next? Will President Trump dig up the graves of transgender soldiers and sailors who gave up their lives for their country and who are buried in Arlington Cemetery, in order to remove them? Saul Grossman
Seaford, L.I.: The author Ayn Rand has influenced many capitalists over the years. Donald Trump and members of his White House team are firmly in her camp. Rands philosophy of objectivism (individualism) can be summed up as Every man for himself. She promoted a form of free enterprise that leaves behind the poor, middle class, sick and aging. As we inch closer to The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, by putting ourselves before others, and disregarding the affect our actions have on others, our individual freedoms slowly start to slip away. This is not fiction, but real life. Moral questions abound. Socialism exists in our world because self-centeredness also does. The U.S. is not the first great civilization to travel down this egotistical road and will not be the last. At some point though, they all collapsed into moral poverty. We need to plot a different course. Our current GPS needs a new destination. Bob Bascelli
Brooklyn: I enlisted and served in the Air Force between 1965 and 1969. Those who criticize President Trump for being reluctant to serve in the military should be happy he didnt. Would you be comfortable having a coward covering your back? Anyone who volunteers and vows to serve and protect our country should be honored for their service. Back in the 1960s, and with the airmen I served with, Trump would be considered a Dirt Bag. I hope others who served will also write in to Voicers and tell their stories about how they were proud to wear their uniform and were loyal to their fellow brothers and sisters. Kenneth Ackermann
Kearny, N.J.: What is it with this guy, Trump? He goes before the Boy Scouts, curses (in violation of the Scout Oath to be clean in speech), attacks the media and the last President, and brags about his Electoral College victory and crowd size (get over yourself, dude, they were there for their Jamboree, not you). This man is the antithesis of a role model to the Scouts and the values they represent. Theyd have done just as well if theyd invited O.J. Simpson or R. Kelly to speak to them. John Woodmaska
Suffern, N.Y.: So many times, in tragedies such as the police killing of Justine Damond in Minneapolis, I return to my thinking when I was a police officer. I remember the apprehension, and concern when approaching a suspect in a situation that appeared to be dangerous. The point of this message has been offered before many many times. When a police officer gives a command, just do what the command dictates. If there is cooperation, the level of apprehension and concern diminishes and the issue can be resolved without unnecessary escalation. Just do what the cop says to do. Simple. Bob Gould
Lewes, Del.: The picture of the moving of the Kosciusko Bridge brought back memories. Growing up in the Marble Hill Houses we watched the old Broadway turnstile bridge at 225th St. being floated out and the new lift bridge that was built down at 207th St. floated in. For a 12-year-old, it was quite the sight. Kevin Bell
Manhattan: To Voicer Juanita M. Johnson: As a non-payer of rent going on 24 months, I was amused by your suggestion that the laws ought to be changed to allow for the expedited removal of people like me within 60 days. Have you never heard that justice is the firm and continuous desire to render to everyone that which is his due? Desires take time. You seem to believe the law confers upon couples with children some special advantage over other litigants in eviction matters. As a happy, loyal, repeat respondent in Manhattan Housing Court, I can assure you they do not. You say the judge in your brothers case made a mistake. Bad precedents? Maybe. But outright error? The burden to present the facts in arguments lies solely with plaintiffs and it beggars belief to insist your brother did just that and the judge was somehow misled and made a mistake anyway. I do not know whether justice ultimately triumphed in your case but I do know karma simply owed me one in mine. Aydin Torun
Bellerose: If private companies really want to help straphangers, let them pledge not to discipline their employees for documented transit delays. Why isnt Gov. Cuomo talking about that, instead of flowers and light shows? Robert Berger
Waco, Tex.: The closing of a burrito shop in Portland, Ore. owned by two white women over claims of cultural appropriation in The Portland Mercury newspaper is absurd. I dont have all the facts, but here in Texas, we have Mexican food on every corner. Most of the eateries are owned by Mexican-Americans, but many are owned by whites, so what is their point? Appears to be a typical narrow-minded opinion, or sensationalized journalism. David Rosen
Oak Ridge, N.J.: Are you kidding me? Todd Frazier hits into a triple play and theres barely a mention of it during the postgame; yea it was the Yanks that did it but come on man, how friggin often does it happen? Jim Heimbuch
Go here to read the rest:
Readers sound off on cellphones, Donald Trump and Ayn Rand - New York Daily News
Posted in Atlas Shrugged
Comments Off on Readers sound off on cellphones, Donald Trump and Ayn Rand – New York Daily News
Readers sound off on NYPD smears, Hillary Clinton and transgender service – New York Daily News
Posted: at 7:37 pm
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Friday, July 28, 2017, 7:00 PM
Manhattan: Attorney Damien Brown, representing Tymel Abrams, who was shot by police officers and arrested on gun charges last Friday night, was quoted as saying that Abrams is adamant that he was unarmed, and that we should look into the actions of the officers involved in the incident (Atty: Client shot by cops wasnt armed, July 23).
Its one thing for a lawyer to plead his clients innocence and quite another to impugn the integrity of police officers without factual basis. Actually, it is an outrage given the overwhelming evidence in this particular case. These brave officers responded to the sound of shots fired and saw Abrams pursuing another man while clearly armed with a handgun. They confronted him and ordered him to stop, and when he turned toward them, with the gun still in his hand, an officer fired, striking Abrams in the thigh. Abrams continued running and tossed the gun to the sidewalk, where it was immediately recovered by police. Much of this incident is captured on video, including the foot pursuit and Abrams discarding his pistol.
Has the reflexive disparagement and resulting distrust of our hardworking police gone so far that members of the public now casually question cops honesty simply because a criminal with a history of gun possession adamantly denies his current charges after being caught in the act?
This is precisely the behavior I spoke about earlier this month at the funeral of Detective Miosotis Familia, who was targeted, ambushed and assassinated by another criminal with clear disdain for our uniformed men and women, and our nations rule of law. This is how cops the very people who choose to step forward to protect our neighborhoods and everyone in them become vilified by the public: when unfounded, outlandish accusations lacking footholds in reality are offhandedly uttered at arraignments and repeated in the next days newspaper.
As I said two weeks ago in the Bronx: Hate has consequences. There is a distinct apathy among some of those we serve regarding the work and role of our dedicated police officers. Adding to a misguided narrative by smearing the honest efforts of societys greatest protectors is both disingenuous and contemptible.
Last Friday, these officers went directly toward the danger and possibly saved a life by interrupting Abrams actions. As far as the attorneys suggestion that someone should look into the actions of the officers, I certainly will, and very likely will commend them for taking another gun, and another dangerous, armed criminal, off the streets of New York City. Police Commissioner James P. ONeill
Brooksville, Fla.: Hillary Clinton ignored and insulted the basket of deplorables, and destroyed thousands of emails. Her shady pay-to-play as secretary of state is the only cause of her losing last Novembers election. She continues to exhibit bad judgment with another poor-me book that does not matter to anyone but her (Hillary Clintons election book titled What Happened, July 27). A cynical view is that she is doing it for the money. Apparently, no public service can go unexploited by her. Everyone knew she wanted it too much anyways. Why? She could not even serve out her secretary of state position. Maybe the joke is on the public either way, but most of us feel better off without her. Michael Connelly
Manhattan: I see squadrons of so-called traffic cops who do nothing but ticket parked cars. I get that it produces revenue, but if New York City cares little for human life as is evident in paltry failure-to-yield summonses and simultaneous green lights and walk signs for pedestrians in the most dangerous places in the city then perhaps they will be inspired to hire and assign more cops to enforce speeding and other traffic laws. Linda Reynolds
Utica, N.Y.: Sen. John McCain risked his fragile health to fly across the country, in order to cast his vote to take health care away from 25 million Americans (John McCain, A Man Of Supreme Honor, Op-Ed, July 25). I ask Richard Cohen: Is that the act of a wholly honorable man? No, it isn't. That would be the act of one of those drizzle of apparatchiks that you see in Washington, one of the coterie of sycophants who have gathered around President Trump. A truly honorable McCain would stand up to Trump and Sen. Mitch McConnell. He would, loudly and proudly, vote to allow those 25 million Americans the same health benefits that enable him to fight his terrible cancer! Time for McCain to act with supreme honor. Jeff Ganeles
Bronx: I remember when the last President Bush looked the nation in the eye during a State of the Union speech and said he supported the Federal Marriage Amendment, and I remember the super-conservative Attorney General John Ashcroft going out of his way to publicize his prosecution of an anti-gay double murder. It was easy to be proud to be an American with examples like them, even if I wasnt always happy. Now President Trump uses Twitter to stab his attorney general and transgender servicemembers his most loyal employees in the back, and pride doesnt come so easily. But I know that I want to see things get better, I know who I and the rest of us are, and I am an American. Jorge Sierra
Manhattan: Trumps senseless persecution of transgender Americans is cowardly and disgusting. His so-called justifications are fabrications and out-and-out lies. Who are these expert advisers? Let them come out of their closet for all to see. Can Trump go any lower than this? Time will tell. Dick Ziegenfuss
Houston: Former transgender Navy SEAL Kristin Beck says that being transgender does not affect military service. But transgender is not acceptable as normal by the majority of American society. There are only two genders. One should not force their beliefs on others, as the liberal agenda attempts to do. Joe Wojcik
Staten Island: The LGBTQ community should pull an Atlas Shrugged on the current administration by going on strike to protest President Trumps latest smack in the face to transgender Americans regarding service in our military. Let every one of us, working in every single type of business across all of the United States, stop working for several days. Perhaps then Mr. Trump will see how important, valuable and even vital LGBTQ people are to the success of the American way of life. Lillian Pennino
Marion, Ky.: Sex is the ultimate driving force of all species and many times it causes violence and death within a species. To argue otherwise is ignorant. Its hard enough to control straight folks within the military. Throw in transgenders. Now thats even more of a problem. Remove transgenders from the military by all means possible. Its just not the place for them. The only purpose it serves for transgenders is they get a free sex change. Bill Frazer
New Rochelle, N.Y.: Arthur Caplan argues that, sometimes, medicine must say no more (After Charlie Gard, learning tough truths, July 25). Medicine cant talk. Medicine cant think. Medicine cant act. People do so. Caplans sleight of hand substituting medicine for people is a good but dirty trick. He knows that it leaves no one responsible and makes the end of treatment easier. Tom McFarland
Manhattan: Football can be fun. Its fun to run and dodge, its fun to throw, catch, tackle and block. Whats not fun is running head-first into a brick wall at 30 mph. Thats the impact equivalent of a helmet hit that occurs over and over, until your brain is permanently damaged. Lets dump all the collision gear that has turned our players into crash-test dummies, and start playing the game again. John Van Couvering
Ridgewood, N.J.: An eye for an eye. Tow their cars, bar armed feds carrying weapons, check them at the door, from all city buildings. New Yorkers governing bodies should cut all special protections from federal buildings, and Trump properties. If feds want someone for immigration, make them get a judicial warrant, not just an ICE detainer. Peter J. Peirano
See more here:
Readers sound off on NYPD smears, Hillary Clinton and transgender service - New York Daily News
Posted in Atlas Shrugged
Comments Off on Readers sound off on NYPD smears, Hillary Clinton and transgender service – New York Daily News
The Fountainhead: Roark the Groucho – Patheos (blog)
Posted: at 7:37 pm
The Fountainhead, part 1, chapter 11
The second person to visit Roarks new office is Peter Keating, whos full of praise and congratulations for his old college pal. Roark is just as warm and gracious as youd expect:
He walked in, without warning, one noon, walked straight across the room and sat down on Roarks desk, smiling gaily, spreading his arms wide in a sweeping gesture: Well, Howard! he said. Well, fancy that! Your own office, your own name and everything! Already! Just imagine!
Who told you, Peter?
Oh, one hears things. You wouldnt expect me not to keep track of your career, now would you? You know what Ive always thought of you. And I dont have to tell you that I congratulate you and wish you the very best.
No, you dont have to.
Have you ever heard the word gratitude, Roark? Really, you should try it sometime. It wont hurt, I promise. Here, you can use this as a template: Thank you, Peter, thats a very nice thing for you to say.
As with Hank Rearden and his wife in Atlas Shrugged, when Roark has to talk to someone he doesnt like, he can only communicate in surly, mumbled monosyllables. This applies even when that person is trying to give him a compliment. Its a thoroughly passive-aggressive and, dare I say it, adolescent way of expressing his displeasure.
Keating points out that Roark has taken an awful chance by going into business for himself so early in his career with nothing to fall back on, and Roark shrugs it off:
Have you thought about getting your registration?
Ive applied for it.
Youve got no college degree, you know. Theyll make it difficult for you at the examination.
Probably.
What are you going to do if you dont get the license?
Ill get it.
Rand excels at putting fake obstacles in her heroes path, pseudo-problems they can overcome by sheer force of will. But as we saw last week, when Rand has a chance to script a realistic challenge, she brushes it off.
Most states and countries have strict professional requirements to be licensed as an architect (as well they should; you dont want someone to build a skyscraper that falls down). In almost every jurisdiction, one of those requirements is a degree in architecture which, oops, Roark doesnt have.
In New York States actual requirements, which seem the most relevant, you need a total of 12 credits to be licensed, which are derived from a combination of education and work experience. Completing a professional degree from a school accredited by the National Architectural Accrediting Board gives you 9, but again, Roark was expelled without getting his. Is it possible for him to get to 12 regardless?
If you dont have a degree, you can get 2 credits for each year of completed coursework at an NAAB-accredited school, up to a maximum of 7. Roark was expelled in 1922, after three years (he was a year behind Peter Keating, and was expelled at the same time Keating graduated), so that would be 6. Then you can get one additional credit for each year of work experience under a certified architect. Presumably, his time with Henry Cameron, Guy Francon and John Erik Snyte would all count towards this.
Problem: Roark worked for Cameron for less than three years. He was expelled in the summer of 1922, moved to New York and began work for Cameron soon thereafter, but Cameron retired in February 1925. Roark was scooped up by Guy Francon at Peter Keatings urging, but only lasted a few months before being fired. Then he was hired by John Erik Snyte, but he only worked there for five months before he met Austen Heller and quit. At most, hed have 3 credits of work experience.
No matter how you slice it, Roark cant get to 12 credits. Under current law, its impossible for him to be licensed to practice as an architect in New York State. And thats without even considering the requirement that an architect be of good moral character. He doesnt exactly have a lot of friends wholl write character references for him.
Rand apparently couldnt think of a way to overcome this problem, so she just handwaves it away. Neither the exam nor the license is ever mentioned again, so were left to wonder how (or whether!) Roark passed.
Keating says he assumes Roark will be joining the Architects Guild of America, slipping in a little self-deprecating humor:
Well, I guess Ill be seeing you now at the A.G.A., if you dont go high hat on me, because youll be a full-fledged member and Im only a junior.
Im not joining the A.G.A.
What do you mean, youre not joining? Youre eligible now.
Possibly.
Youll be invited to join.
Tell them not to bother.
What!
You know, Peter, we had a conversation just like this seven years ago, when you tried to talk me into joining your fraternity at Stanton. Dont start it again.
You wont join the A.G.A. when you have a chance to?
I wont join anything, Peter, at any time.
It appears that Roark is channeling the old Groucho Marx line about not joining any club that would have him as a member.
Its not that he doesnt know what hes doing. When Keating points out that hes making things harder for himself by refusing to join the AGA, Roark just agrees: I am. And when Keating cautions him that hell surely make enemies of other architects if he snubs their invitation, Roark says coolly, Ill make enemies of them anyway.
Its not clear what principle Roark is standing on, if any. Theres a difference between being an uncompromising individualist and being a deliberately standoffish misanthrope. Not wanting to follow current fashions in architecture is one thing, but refusing even to associate with other architects can only be seen as him broadcasting his contempt for the rest of the profession which of course, he is.
This is another example of how Ayn Rand had to go to the exact opposite extreme of any belief system she rejected. She disliked the idea that you could become successful by exploiting personal or professional connections, so she wrote a hero who refuses to form any connections at all. She hated the idea of being forced to join a collective, so her hero refuses to join any group for any reason. Someone who was merely an individualist would just want to do his own thing, but as far as Roark is concerned, its not enough to stand out from the crowd. You also have to make it crystal-clear that you consider everyone else beneath you.
Image credit: Hendrik Dacquin, released under CC BY 2.0 license
Other posts in this series:
Continue reading here:
Posted in Atlas Shrugged
Comments Off on The Fountainhead: Roark the Groucho – Patheos (blog)
Newly minted Libertarian feels GOP strayed from small government values – Lincoln Journal Star
Posted: at 7:37 pm
A day after the Fourth of July, Trevor Reilly sat at Granite City Food & Brewery crafting plans.
He was looking to make a name for the small, fringe party he adopted after feeling the GOP had turned its back on him.
The Lancaster Libertarian party, which Reilly heads, has started to meet theremonthly since January, looking for ways to grow a party seemingly overlooked in last year's election.
Reilly, a libertarian neophyte and newly ordained political activist, didn't see last year's presidential election as a two-dimensional, "pick-the-lesser-of-the-two-evils" fight between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton.
Instead, Reilly, a 25-year-old University of Nebraska-Lincoln student and Afghanistan veteran, took a third route campaigning for libertarian candidate Gary Johnson.
"It's like being part of the 'Bad News Bears,'" he said. "You're the underdog."
Being the underdog was a change of pace for Reilly.
Ever since he was eligible to vote, he had always been a staunch Republican, a direct outcome of growing up in a conservative household.
But as the election cycle picked up, Reilly saw himself drawn to the TV more and more watching everything from "Morning Joe" on MSNBC to Fox News.
That's how he found out about the Libertarian Party, eventually deciding to switch affiliations after he said the GOP abandoned the values he held dear like smaller government and fewer taxes.
"More Republicans were straying away from the values, like smaller government, that they used to hold," he said. "This year's election was just a culmination of that."
Reilly has been the head of the Lancaster Libertarian Party since October,spearheading activism previously unseen in the party in Lincoln.
From June 25 to July 2, the party held Freedom Week, devoted to discussing and highlighting libertarian ideals.
Such as smaller government, less taxation, legalization of more recreational drugs, and less bureaucratic meddling in people's lives.
In short, fiscally conservative but socially liberal, Reilly said.
The week culminated in the Rally for Liberty on the north steps of the Capitol, in which around 60 people gathered to discuss and celebrate the libertarian platform.
It's a platform that it is not totally new to Nebraska politics.
In June 2016, state Sen. Laura Ebke of District 32 pulled the same switch as Reilly, ditching the Republican Party for the Libertarians, citing frustration with Republican partisanship.
Reilly plans to organize more rallies not marches, he said to get the libertarian message out.
"Marches don't work to the same extent; they can devolve," he said. "Rallies stay centered on the message."
Concerning the latest uptick in activism in Lincoln and around the country, Reilly said he sees it as reaction to Trump just as the tea party reacted to Obama.
"It's just a side trying to get back at the other side," he said.
As far as his own future is concerned once he graduates?
"Who knows," Reilly said. "I might even run for office someday."
Excerpt from:
Newly minted Libertarian feels GOP strayed from small government values - Lincoln Journal Star
Posted in Libertarian
Comments Off on Newly minted Libertarian feels GOP strayed from small government values – Lincoln Journal Star
A PINCH OF SALT: Karma’s Golden Rule – Gazette Newspapers
Posted: at 7:36 pm
Do you believe in Karma?
If you are of a certain age (mine), Karma was the number one buzzword when it came to guiding life choices, particularly in our teens and 20s. It was a sort of hanger-on in the free love, do your own thing society, forlornly trying to convince otherwise self-absorbed pleasure seekers there was something else out there.
I think it hitchhiked to America along with Baba Ram Das and the rest of the Hindu spiritualist movement. Or maybe it came from further east I thought is was a component of Zen Buddhism. Or perhaps it was supposed to just come to you while you were transcendentally meditating.
I was predisposed to believing in Karma. I grew up playing baseball perhaps the most superstitious of all sports. Don't step on the baseline, complete the bat-tapping ritual before every pitch, don't change your socks if the team was winning sort of stuff. These days, they use superstition as an excuse to grow extravagant beards and long hair (I don't get that).
But even in baseball, there were elements of Karma. Catch a break on a safe/out call? You can bet it will go against you next time. Get hit by a pitch? Your pitcher will hit someone on their team in retaliation. Hit a line drive right at somebody? A weak popup will fall behind the second baseman for a single.
Karma took on a bit deeper meaning as we all transitioned through college into adulthood. None of my friends were overly concerned that by killing that bug they'd end up being a bug in the next life (the ultimate Karma trip), but they sure believed in doing a good deed in hopes someone would do a good deed to them in return.
Drop the Indian trappings, and Karma became a basic philosophical (and physics) rule. Philosophy: Actions have consequences; sometimes unintended consequences. Physics: For every action, there's an equal and opposite reaction.
But that's a bit too deep for most of us, particularly for daily use. It's easier to talk about someone having good Karma, or for bad Karma to come back and haunt us.
Notice how neither the scholarly approach nor the Karma approach promises exactly when this payback for actions taken is going to happen. That way, we have a whole lifetime to wait for the scales to balance. And, in a sort of feeble way, we can explain why bad things happen to good people, or vice versa.
There is, of course, another source that takes a slightly different look at this same deep-seated desire we humans have to do good. We call it the Golden Rule. And it comes from the Bible.
Everyone learns it as a child Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. Only there's no second verse saying those others are going to do good unto you. You're supposed to just do it.
It gets harder. In another place it says you're supposed to love not only your friends, but your enemies too. There's turn the other cheek, and if a man steals your coat, give them your shirt too.
True, there's also an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth. But we "enlightened" Christians today just push that away as Old Testament rubbish we've outgrown.
I long thought that if I could just be good enough, I'd win the big prize on the top shelf (that's a metaphor for heaven, folks). Or at least I would earn myself a little easier life down here.
But as I age, I've come to the conclusion that it doesn't do much good to keep score. I'm not visionary enough to see the cosmic Karma scales balance, and I've been convinced that God does things in his own time, in his own way.
I'll continue to strive to do the right thing, the compassionate thing, the just thing. I'll try to close the door on that little thought that I will be "paid back" for whatever it is I do.
But I am human. So if God wants to let me win the lottery, I won't turn that down either.
After all, I've been a very good boy (I think).
See original here:
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on A PINCH OF SALT: Karma’s Golden Rule – Gazette Newspapers
Venice Tackles Overtourism by Telling Visitors to Follow the Golden Rule – Skift
Posted: at 7:36 pm
Venices residents have fled the city en masseas too much tourism hastaken its toll on infrastructure and daily life. But the city finally thinks it has a winning strategy to bring it back from the breaking point: Tell tourists to live by the golden rule.
In short: Treat the city like you would want visitors to treat yours.
Earlier this month, the citys government and tourism board, Venezia Unica, launched the #EnjoyRespectVenezia campaign aimed at telling tourists how to behave when theyre exploring the city.
But this is far from a being adestination marketing campaign for the city.
Rather, the campaign is reinforcingrules and regulations that have been in place for years and telling tourists that theyll potentially face hefty fines of $29-$580 (25 to 500) if they dont follow them.
Sitting on the ground in iconic St. Marks Square or below theProcuratie Nuove, for example, is forbidden under city regulations. Its also forbidden to hinder circulation of traffic on bridges and alleys, according to the city.
Cycling in the city center and swimming in the citys canals are also forbidden and illustrated as such on the campaigns official signage that will be posted throughout Venice (see sign below).
Swimming, littering, wearing swimwear, giving or scattering food, cycling and camping are forbidden activities in Venice.
The campaign is also promoting good tourist behaviors such as discovering the citys hidden treasures, exploring nearby islands in Venices lagoon, or visiting a food market and sampling local produce.
Telling travelers to visit new places or hidden gems would only be a temporary relief, of course, if that message reaches most travelers andthey actually listen.
Eventually, the hidden gems will no longer be hidden either.
The city is also sharing a map of authorized accommodationsand a map of restaurants and public restrooms.
The tourism board has produced a few YouTube videos for #EnjoyRespectVenezia, albeit in Italian and without any particularly compelling messaging or creative.
Signs and posters, which will be displayed in 10 languages including English, Chinese, Arabic, and Korean, will be placed throughout the city center and main tourist zones. The city has also highlighted the campaign on some of its main attractions such as Saint Marks Belltower, pictured below.
Venices residents and city council have increasingly grown agitated with overtourismin the city center during the past few years. They havefought to keep larger cruise ships outand proposed other measures to limit or regulate tourism.
Its not clear how wide of a reach this campaign will have beyond the physical posters throughout the city and travelers who happen to stumble upon the social media hashtag.
Venice seems to understand that it wont be able to tell travelers to stop visiting its unique attractions and canals, but it is trying to tell them how to show respect and behave around those attractions when they are in the destination.
See full article
See more here:
Venice Tackles Overtourism by Telling Visitors to Follow the Golden Rule - Skift
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on Venice Tackles Overtourism by Telling Visitors to Follow the Golden Rule – Skift