The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: July 4, 2017
Summer series: Sports gambling Part I – Rantoul Press
Posted: July 4, 2017 at 8:47 am
The list drags on longer than the Kentucky Derbys 1 -mile race track at Churchill Downs.
Pete Rose. Tim Donaghy. Shoeless Joe Jackson. Michael Jordan. Charles Barkley. Wayne Gretzky. Floyd Mayweather. And on and on
They range from very good, to great, to transcendent in each of their individual crafts. And they each have another thing in common other than talent in sport.
Gambling controversy.
Rose, the greatest hitter in MLB history to many, is not in the Hall of Fame and is permanently banned from baseball because of betting on Reds games in which he was the manager.
Donaghy, an NBA official who spent years on the job and refereed many playoff games, was sent to prison after being found guilty of gambling and providing information to bookies on certain NBA players and teams.
Shoeless Joe, as those who grew up on Field of Dreams know, was banned from baseball after being at the center of the 1919 Black Sox scandal.
Jordan, the greatest basketball player of all-time (or maybe not, and dont you dare contact me about any Jordan vs. LeBron comparisons because I do not care), may or may not have had to retire from basketball for 18 months because of his gambling problems. There is still not much evidence to prove Jordan was handed a quiet ban by NBA commissioner David Stern, but it is one of the juicier sports conspiracy theories nonetheless.
Barkley, one of the best to never win a ring, isnt shy about his shortcomings in Las Vegas, saying he can afford to gamble, even though he admitted gambling cost him close to $10 million.
Gretzky, the worlds greatest hockey player, admitted to his involvement in a sports betting scandal.
And Mayweathers gambling sagas are often glorified, with numerous photos and articles on massive amounts of cash he won betting on various games.
Sports betting is one of the most intriguing and fascinating taboo subjects in American culture. It was such a dirty, grimy, touchy thing to talk about for so many years, starting with the inaugural 1875 Kentucky Derby race.
But not anymore. The numbers prove that out, and the national voices continue to speak up for its support.
Next week: Part II: Sports betting is becoming more commonplace and can no longer be considered taboo
Contact Zack Carpenter at zcarpenter@rantoulpress.com and on Twitter @ZCarp11.
More:
Posted in Gambling
Comments Off on Summer series: Sports gambling Part I – Rantoul Press
Dutch Doctors Killed 431 Without Request 2015 | National Review – National Review
Posted: at 8:46 am
Euthanasia pretends to be about choice, but it ends up being about killing as an answer to human sufferingask or not.
Since first permitted in the 1970s, theNetherlands has always had a problem with doctors killing patients who have not asked for euthanasia. Despite that being murder under the law, nothing substantial is ever done about it.
In 2015 doctors broke the euthanasia law continually. First, a huge chunk did not report their euthanasia killings.From the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition analysis:
According to theNetherlands 2015 official euthanasia reportthere were 5561 reported assisted deaths in 2015 and yet the data from the study indicates that there were 7254 assisted deaths in 2015.Therefore, there were1693 unreported assisted deaths (approximately 23%) in 2015.
That completely violates the vaunted strict [not] protective guidelines. But ho hum.
It gets worse. Doctors alsocommitted what is known astermination without request or consent with apparent impunity:
The 431 terminations of life without explicit request, was up from 310 in 2010.
This has been a problem in the supposedly open and transparent euthanasia practice of the Netherlands for decades.
Ditto the ongoing infanticide of terminally ill and seriously disabled babies, which is also against the law.
Heres the thing: Guidelines exist to give false assurance, not to really protect against abuse. Once a society accepts euthanasia consciousness, guidelines cease to matter.
View original post here:
Dutch Doctors Killed 431 Without Request 2015 | National Review - National Review
Posted in Euthanasia
Comments Off on Dutch Doctors Killed 431 Without Request 2015 | National Review – National Review
Letter: Euthanasia is preferable to endless days in a cage – Buffalo News
Posted: at 8:46 am
Euthanasia is preferable to endless days in a cage
No true animal lover wants to think of his pet suffering. Thats why we are given the option of euthanizing our pets to eliminate their endless enduring pain or discomfort as a result of an incurable ailment. Well, there is another type of animal suffering that most of us seldom consider, and that is the caging of animals for indefinite periods of time as a result of the SPCAs do not kill policy.
There are many animals that are just unadoptable. These animals are caged for very long periods of time. What about their suffering being confined in close quarters? Keeping unadoptable animals caged prevents these cages from being used by other animals that could very well be adoptable.
If the SPCA is filled to capacity, what options are left to our canine and feline friends if they are no longer wanted for whatever reason? Many are subjected to abuse, or just dropped off anywhere to fend for themselves, resulting in their unknown fate.
Having euthanasia as an available option for many of those unadoptable pets is more humane than indefinite incarceration in a confining enclosure. After a predetermined length of time, if an animal is still not adopted into a loving home, it should be humanely put to sleep with a simple injection. At that time, that pets confined suffering will end, leaving the caged home available to some other unwanted pet, who could very well be adopted rather than cast aside to whatever fate.
Ken LaDue
Lewiston
Read this article:
Letter: Euthanasia is preferable to endless days in a cage - Buffalo News
Posted in Euthanasia
Comments Off on Letter: Euthanasia is preferable to endless days in a cage – Buffalo News
Euthanasia for a completed life – Patheos (blog)
Posted: at 8:46 am
First euthanasia was supposed to be for people who were terminally ill. Then for those who weresuffering. First physically, but then mentally. But euthanasia wouldonly be for people who requested it. Then for those unable to request it. Including for children.
A new proposal in the Netherlands, the mecca of physician homicide, would allow euthanasia for any healthyperson over 75 on the grounds of having had a completed life.
But thats just the beginning. Euthanasia activists admit that this is only the first step. (Actually, there have been lots of prior steps.) The real goal is euthanasia for any adult who wants it. From Emma Elliott Freire,Netherlands Considers Euthanasia For Healthy People, The Federalist:
Politicians in the Netherlands are discussing the possibility of legalizing euthanasia for healthy people. The proposed Completed Life Bill would allow any person age 75 or over who decides their life is complete to receive euthanasia. It doesnt matter if they are otherwise perfectly healthy.
Under current Dutch law, a person only becomes eligible for euthanasia when they have a terminal illness and are suffering unbearably. Pia Dijkstra, an MP for Dutch political party D66, is preparing to introduce the Completed Life Bill. D66 spearheaded most of the groundbreaking socially progressive legislation for which the Netherlands is famous. They are historically a smaller partytheyve never had a Prime Ministerbut theyve proven themselves to be politically effective.
D66 would eventually like to legalize euthanasia for any adult who wishes to die. They openly admit that the Completed Life Bill is a step towards realizing that goal. In March, D66 leader Alexander Pechtold wasconfrontedon a political talk show by a 57-year-old man who said he wishes to die. He asked why the Completed Life Bill is only persons age 75 and older. I have to wait 18 more years. I dont feel like waiting 18 years. I want it now, he said.
Pechtold replied, Its my personal opinion that in our civilization dying is an individual consideration. You didnt ask to be brought into the world. He went on to explain that currently there is political support for legalizing euthanasia for healthy elderly persons. If we want to maintain that support and not disrupt the discussion then we have to take it step-by-step. In 2002 we passed the euthanasia law for unbearable suffering. In my view, Pia Dijkstra can now continue persuading parliament and the country toin my own words and personal opiniontake the next step for our civilization.
[Keep reading. . .]
Illustration from Pixabay, CC0, Public Domain
Go here to read the rest:
Posted in Euthanasia
Comments Off on Euthanasia for a completed life – Patheos (blog)
Waste crime: the multi-million pound swindle – The Conversation UK
Posted: at 8:45 am
In Britain and other developed countries, disposing of unwanted things is taken for granted. There is (lots of) legislation in place to ensure waste is collected, transported and treated safely without having an impact on either health or the environment. But waste management is a costly business, increasingly seen by organised criminals and opportunists alike as an easy way to make quick money.
Two recent instances of waste crime, in my local area, show how this can happen. In the first, a deserted factory, used for the illegal storage of 5,000 tonnes of partially treated waste was deliberately set alight using an accelerant. It contained combustible materials, such as plastics and decomposing food, making it particularly fire prone. The police investigation looking for the source of the waste, as well as the reason it was set alight, is ongoing.
Illegal waste dumps such as this are becoming an increasing problem, both in open countryside and hidden in rented buildings due to the potential income available from these crimes. Estimates from waste industry experts put illegal profits from this one operation somewhere between 400,000 to 500,000 for the cost of just two weeks rental on the building.
This kind of thing appears to be a victimless crime, but it isnt. The building owner in the case of the illegal storage fire (who appears not to have been involved) faces losses. And we are all victims: burning this illegally stored waste has polluting impacts on both local air quality and local watercourses. The incineration of waste is one of the most highly regulated waste management processes, and rightly so.
Fire services managed to control the fire, so estimate that only 10-15% of the waste present was burnt. This leaves the problem of moving what remains to proper treatment facilities who pays for this? Or the cost of the 65 fire service personnel it took to control the fire?
In the second incident, a large quantity of asbestos was dumped. Asbestos was widely used in the UK in buildings for insulation, flooring and roofing until it was discovered that it can cause serious lung conditions, including cancer, asbestosis and pleural disease. It is now banned in the UK, but is still present in buildings built before 2000.
The removal, transport and disposal of asbestos is highly dangerous, heavily regulated and consequently expensive. This makes it attractive to criminals. Charging high rates for removal and dumping for free generates an easy profit. Again, wider society is the victim: there are serious health implications for anyone coming into contact with this waste, including the people that dumped it.
The bill for clearing this incident will be paid by local council tax payers. Nationally, clearing fly-tipping (leaving waste on land that doesnt have a licence to accept it) costs tax-payers in excess of 200m a year. Clearance of fly-tipping on private land falls to the landowner, be that a private individual or charity such as the Woodland Trust, who report an annual clearance bill in excess of 350,000.
These waste crimes are taking place in plain sight. There are underlying causes to these crimes, which are allowing waste crime to flourish. Correct, legal waste disposal is expensive, with landfill and incineration charges now around 100 per tonne. This is why the profits of these crimes are high.
It seems that the traditional deterrents for these crimes, fines and prison sentences, are not working, or are not tough enough. It is too easy for criminals to obtain documentation that makes their operations appear compliant. For example, waste carriers registration and waste exemptions, can be easily and quickly obtained online. These make waste operations - on the surface - appear legal.
It is also too easy for criminals to gain access to waste. On a small scale scrap men informally remove white goods and other metal objects from housing estates across the country. They have the implied consent of the householder who leaves unwanted items out and does not report their disappearance as a crime. Parts of these items which dont have a resale value are often fly-tipped meaning the householder also, unknowingly, commits a crime themselves. There are more complaints to the local authority about the noise these collectors make with their bugles and loudspeaker appeals for any old iron than about the removal of items.
These informal or bogus collectors do not restrict themselves to scrap metal iron items. Used, unwanted textiles are worthwhile waste stream targets too because of the high prices they command in both secondhand markets and as a scrap.
Here, different tactics are employed, from the small-scale individual fishing for the contents of textile banks in car parks (with some fatalities) to the organised collection of bulk unwanted textiles from households. This is done either by the distribution of bogus collection bags to all households in a defined area, or the kerbside collection of bags distributed by a reputable charity before their own collection teams can retrieve them. Either way, it deprives honest charities of a much-needed funding source.
On a larger scale, the offer of cheap waste collections can be quite tempting. Waste is removed, the service paid for and then the waste is fly-tipped or stored at illegal, unregulated, waste sites leading to an immediate profit at a cost to us all. Assets of almost 1m have recently been recovered from one such waste crime through the Proceeds of Crime Act.
The Environment Agency and local councils respond to these crimes when they take place. They also work with other agencies, such as HM Revenue and Customs and the Vehicle and Operator Services Agency to disrupt waste crime. Householders should make use of local council waste collections and check their local councils website for information on the disposal of larger items. Bogus collections of textiles can be avoided by checking with your local councils trading standards team, or checking the charity register.
Across the UK illegal waste management practices are now a multi-million pound problem, with some serious underlying problems that need to be addressed. Apart from the associated criminality, fly-tipping damages the environment, poses risks to human health here and abroad, undermines legitimate businesses, reduces tax income so others have to pay more, and just looks really ugly. With the potential for easy, high profits - waste crime is joining the ranks of organised crime alongside drugs and human trafficking, cyber-crime and child exploitation and this has wider implications for society.
We must remember that many environmental regulations have been put in place as a response to serious incidents and resist the prospect of further deregulation. This may stand to cost us in terms of damage not only to the economy and environment but also to human and public health.
The rest is here:
Waste crime: the multi-million pound swindle - The Conversation UK
Posted in Victimless Crimes
Comments Off on Waste crime: the multi-million pound swindle – The Conversation UK
The Morning Rekrap: July 4, 2017 – Dirty South Soccer (registration) (blog)
Posted: at 8:45 am
I really want to beat the Earthquakes, I really do. Firing one of the most regressive coaches in MLS has tempered some of that but not by much. Anyway, lets get to know San Jose, or as the city is known, Americas AV Club.
The Earthquakes of San Jose have come to our barbecue for the Fourth of July. As a franchise the Quakes have the distinction of having their franchise move to a different city, win several championships, and then be re-started as a hapless shell of its former self searching in vain for the formula to find the success that it had before moving away. Essentially, they are the Cleveland Browns of MLS.
Aside from that the biggest highlight in the existence of the team in MLS is that they had Landon Donovan long enough for him to win them two championships and realize that getting wicked homesick and washing out in Germany was better than living in suburban San Francisco. Donovan went on to become the best American in MLS history and won four MLS Championships with the LA Galaxy.
As for this year, somehow the Quakes have managed to win 7 games by scoring just 20 goals through 18 matches. In attack they value fortunate bounces, defensive lapses, the ineptitude of Clement Diop, and playing against RSL to get results. This highlight exemplifies the San Jose plan in possession:
First, they line up behind the fullback and have their striker run the length of the field wearing sandals. When they get close enough to the goal, they execute a handoff, the halfback cuts past the keeper, and leaps into the goal. The key is the red card celebration which needs to be more emphatic than celebrating the goal itself. Side note* if Wondo had used his hands against Belgium he still would have found a way to miss that goal.
San Jose itself is an interesting place. It is home to eBay, PayPal, and Samsung and is the wealthiest city in the country. The city also has the largest wealth gap in the United States. It is a place filled with young men who have ideas they gleaned from Ayn Rand books which somehow inspired them to invent the Juicero, hold the #FyreFestival, and sue Gwaker.
In response to much of societys ills, these fellas are all eager to explain how an app theyve developed will address an issue like hunger or poverty somehow without actually facing the underlying social, political, and economic exploitation that perpetuate these issues - no, all you need is a smart phone with an app on it and have the ability to conflate economic freedom and civil liberties - poof, solved.
Anyway, - stick to sports - back to the soccer. The Earthquakes are so bad at scoring goals that Joey Chestnut will eat more hot dogs in 10 minutes this afternoon than the team will score goals in two MLS seasons. Whats more, its not that many hot dogs, it is only like 70 red hots. Chestnut has real skill and talent at what he does, plus that if I were from San Jose Id give eating myself to death a shot as a career as well.
All that aside, Chestnut is a real life American hero. If Chris Wondolowski entered the Nathans Hot Dog eating contest, he would get the last hot dog - dunk it in water to soften the bun - and then when he went to take a bite, he would inexplicably miss his mouth with it. He is no Joey Chestnut.
What Im trying to say is I hope Joey Chestnut is the only winner from San Jose today and Atlanta United hangs a whole bunch of goals on the Earthquakes.
Link:
The Morning Rekrap: July 4, 2017 - Dirty South Soccer (registration) (blog)
Posted in Ayn Rand
Comments Off on The Morning Rekrap: July 4, 2017 – Dirty South Soccer (registration) (blog)
Readers’ Vent: July 4, 2017 – Charleston Gazette-Mail (subscription)
Posted: at 8:45 am
I can think of few entities that Trump has not offended. His targets have been women, veterans (and true war heroes), the press (which is what makes us a free and open country), his own judges and lawmakers, many religions and cultures, world leaders, and by his actions, the poor. He signs executive orders like he is a dictator. He consults few and listens to none. Trump is not well-spoken, he is crass, and either unbalanced or not very intelligent. What has happened to my country?
We the people have elected our President, instead of picking between two selected by our ruling elite in D.C. This has been a start to reestablish our Republic. Term limits are necessary, because if politicians stay long in the swamp they love the rich life and never want to leave, they forget we the people.
All our distress over health care reform and Trumps tweets are simply distractions preventing us from recognizing Trumps actual agenda of enriching himself at our expense.
The First Amendment Establishment Clause was intended by our forefathers to prevent religious persecution from a tyrannical government, not to remove all references of God and Christianity from our schools and other public places.
Make America Great Again was nothing more than a fake promise. It was only to get people pepped up and to get votes, not help people keep their insurance or Medicaid.
Senator Joe Manchin, a Democrat, submitted a bill that would improve the Affordable Care Act, which is also known as Obamacare. However, because Republicans control the Senate, it is unlikely that Joes bill will ever be allowed to come up for a vote. The GOP is all about cutting taxes for the rich. They dont care about people like you and me.
Yes millions suddenly received health care with Obamacare. Nothing is free. Somebody is paying for it one way or another.
Speaks volumes. Prius with Hillary/COEXIST stickers on bumper. Loaded down with few hundred pounds of mulch bags. Broke down along the road.
Yes the budget cuts are going to hurt across the board. Everybody has a favorite program or department that it will be the end of the world. Heres a suggestion. Run for office. Get elected. Then use your genius IQ to pass a better plan.
There was a story in todays Gazette-Mail about a wrestler with the name Progressive Liberal. If Trump wanted a match he should challenge the guy. Then when the President loses he could wear the crybaby diaper. Appropriate.
We saw today that President Trump is re-working an old wrestling video to get his point across about the press. I cant wait to see how he re-works the Access Hollywood video with Billy Bush...I wonder what point he will be trying to make with it? Its hard to grab things with such small hands.
I like Ric Cavenders (Director of Charleston Main Streets) article espousing all of the efforts to improve Charleston with an eye on making it the NEXT Charleston. There are indeed good things happening and good plans for future improvements. What no one talks about, and what bothers me working in Charleston, is poor air quality. Much better than 30-40 years ago, but still very bad.
Great story about housing for the homeless in Sundays paper. Rep. Mooney didnt do his homework before signing a letter that would hurt homeless veterans and others.
Enough with the sky is falling comments from the unhinged left. If millions are going to die because of GOP repeal of Obamacare. Were they dying before Obamacare? Millions of deaths. Thats an epidemic. Genocide. Where were the news reports and warnings then?
George Will said before expensive modern medicine when someone got run over by a wagon they went home to be cared for by their family, and died quietly. Is he saying if you get run over by a bus and cant afford the bill its family time? Paul Ryan (via Ayn Rand) says it is more important to give big tax breaks to small business owners who live like millionaires and complain about paying minimum wage than to provide minimum wage earners with necessary medical care. That is the job of families.
The fascists in the White House need to understand this is a democracy (actually a federal republic), we dont want a dictator.
Readers Vent: July 3, 2017
Previous Story
Read more here:
Readers' Vent: July 4, 2017 - Charleston Gazette-Mail (subscription)
Posted in Ayn Rand
Comments Off on Readers’ Vent: July 4, 2017 – Charleston Gazette-Mail (subscription)
How low can taxes go? Outside Washington, Republicans find limits … – Buffalo News
Posted: at 8:45 am
By JEREMY W. PETERS
WASHINGTON --Something strange has been happening to taxes in Republican-dominated states: They are going up.
Conservative lawmakers in Kansas, South Carolina and Tennessee have agreed to significant tax increases in recent weeks to meet demands for more revenue. They are challenging what has become an almost dogmatic belief for their party, and sharply diverging from President Donald Trump as he pushes for what his administration has billed as the largest tax cut in at least a generation.
And now some Republicans say that what has played out in these states should serve as a cautionary tale in Washington, where their partys leaders are confronting a set of circumstances that looks strikingly similar.
Republicans, with control of Congress and the White House and a base that is growing impatient for tax reform, are trying to solve a difficult math problem: paying for critical programs like infrastructure, health care and education while honoring their promise to deliver lower taxes without exploding the deficit.
The debate promises to test the enduring relevance of one of the most fundamental principles of modern conservatism supply side economics, the idea that if you cut taxes far enough, the economy will expand to the point that it generates new tax revenue.
With the federal deficit growing and economic growth sputtering along in the low single digits, the Republican Party is facing questions from within over what many see as a blind faith in the theory that deep tax cuts are the shot of economic adrenaline a languid economy needs.
Tax cuts good. And thats about as much thinking that goes into it, said Chris Buskirk, a radio host and publisher of American Greatness, a conservative online journal. Now, he said, Republicans in Washington seem to be in an arms race to the lowest rates possible.
Everybody is trying to overbid each other, Buskirk said. How much more can we cut?
Outside Washington, Republicans are discovering there are limits.
In South Carolina, Republicans overrode their governors veto and blocked a filibuster to increase the gas tax. They also rejected a series of broader tax cuts on the grounds that they were too expensive and voted instead to create a smaller tax incentive for low-income families.
The Republican governor of Tennessee, Bill Haslam, signed into law the first increase in the states gas tax in almost three decades. He defied conservative groups that said a state with a $1.1 billion budget surplus had no business asking people to hand over more of their money.
And in the most striking rebuke of conservative tax policy in recent memory, Republicans in Kansas have undone much of the tax overhaul that Gov. Sam Brownback held up as a model for other states and the federal government to emulate.
A fantastic way to go, he said this year, urging Trump and Congress to follow suit with deep reductions to corporate and individual rates. But Republican lawmakers in Kansas decided that they could cut only so much without doing irreparable harm to vital services and voted to increase taxes by $1.2 billion last month. Brownback vetoed the plan, but Republicans overrode him.
Much of the devotion to tax cuts as an inviolable Republican principle stems from the success President Ronald Reagan and Congress had in 1981 when they agreed to an economic recovery package that included a rate cut of about 25 percent for individuals.
But at that time, the highest marginal tax rates approached 70 percent, leaving much more to cut and a much larger chunk of money to be injected back into the economy. At some point, economists said, tax policy that is too aggressive leaves too little money to inject to make a difference.
Bruce Bartlett, who advised Reagan on the 1981 tax cuts, chastised Republicans for what he described as their reflexive desire to drive rates lower.
The essence of what the supply-siders were trying to accomplish was accomplished by the end of the Reagan administration, Bartlett said.
Yet, he added, Republican policy still mimics what was done under Reagan. Theyve got to keep pressing ahead no matter what, he said.
The situation in Kansas was, for at least some conservatives, a jolting realization that tax cuts can be too blunt an economic instrument.
After Brownback took office in 2011, he pursued a plan that included cuts and, in some cases, an outright elimination of taxes for businesses and individuals to help invigorate the states underperforming economy. He described it as an experiment in conservative governance that could demonstrate what Republicans were capable of if they controlled legislative and executive branches across the country. (He is Kansas first Republican governor since 2003.)
The conservative movement got behind him. The plan was approved with the lobbying muscle of billionaire Koch brothers political network, which is overseen from Wichita, where one of the brothers, Charles G. Koch lives. It had the blessing of prominent conservative economists like Stephen Moore and Arthur Laffer, the Republican Partys foremost supply-side evangelist.
In urging the Kansas Legislature to act, Laffer and Moore said the cuts would have a near immediate positive impact on the economy. Brownback said the plan would pay for itself.
That is where the parallels with Washington start to trouble those who are critical of the plan the Trump administration has laid out. The plan would slash the rate paid by businesses to 15 percent and shrink the number of individual income tax brackets from seven to three 10, 25 and 35 percent.
Laffer and Moore, a Heritage Foundation economist, have both helped shape the presidents tax policy.
Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury secretary, said the Trump tax cuts would pay for themselves with the economic growth they would inevitably create.
In Kansas, the predicted economic bloom did not materialize. Employment and economic growth have lagged far behind the rest of the nation. The state Treasury had so little money to spread around that the Kansas Supreme Court found that the states spending on public education was unconstitutionally low.
If there were three words I could say to Congress right now, said Stephanie Clayton, a Republican state representative from a district in the Kansas City area, they would be, Dont do it.
She criticized what she said was a desire by her party to be more faithful to the principle than to the people Republicans were elected to help. Brownback and many conservatives, she said, overpromised on the tax cuts as a sort-of Ayn Rand utopia, a red-state model, citing the author whose works have influenced the American libertarian movement.
And I loved Ayn Rand when I was 18 before I had children and figured out how the world really works, Clayton added. Thats not how it works, as it turns out.
Trump and Republicans in Washington are undeterred. Kansas, they argue, is not an economic microcosm for the country, with its unique dependence on energy, agriculture and aircraft manufacturing. And lawmakers there never could reduce spending enough to correspond to the much lower level of tax revenue coming into the state treasury.
Many conservatives who support a tax overhaul said they anticipated considerable growth with a reduction in corporate rates, which are among the highest in the world. If those are lowered to 15 percent, down from the current 35 percent, businesses will not only reinvest in the United States but relocate here, they said.
At 15 percent, Swiss bankers will move here, said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform.
But restraining federal spending is still going to be a key part of the equation. What you need is not an explosion of spending, Norquist added. And you need the economy to grow faster than the size of the government.
In a world in which Trumps deconstruction of the administrative state reduces the size and cost of the government, the tax cuts make sense. But if lawmakers do not have the nerve to find savings somewhere, like in the social safety net for retirees, the outcome could end up resembling something close to Kansas failed experiment.
The question is whether you can put together some kind of revenue-neutral tax reform, said N. Gregory Mankiw, a professor of economics at Harvard and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush. I dont see the political will to do that right now. Certainly not in this environment.
More here:
How low can taxes go? Outside Washington, Republicans find limits ... - Buffalo News
Posted in Ayn Rand
Comments Off on How low can taxes go? Outside Washington, Republicans find limits … – Buffalo News
Why Republicans Don’t Care if Millions Lose Their Health Care – Care2.com
Posted: at 8:44 am
President Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans are currently scrambling to push through the American Health Care Act,or Trumpcare, despite resistance from Democrats.
Although the Senate is still struggling to find support for the bill, with votingpostponeduntil after the Fourth of July holiday, House Speaker Paul Ryan and Sen. Mitch McConnell remain committed to replacingthe Affordable Care Act.
Recently, the Congressional Budget Office released a report showing that, under the American Health Care Act, up to 15 million Americans will find themselves without health insurance next year. By 2026, that number will grow to 22 million.
Critics of the bill have not minced words, lambasting the proposed legislationfor how it would adversely affect low-income Americans. Former President Barack Obama has been among the outspoken, recently referring to the AHCA as a massive transfer of wealth aimed at benefiting moneyed Americans alone.
Polls are even showing that an overwhelming number of Americans do not approve of the health care overhaul; according to one pollster, a mere 12 percent back the bill.
Even President Trump has expressed some doubts about the AHCA, reportedly calling it mean.
Even still, Republicans like Paul Ryan are hellbent on repealingthe ACA, despite the strong opposition. In response to the CBOs damning report, Ryan claimed the numbers were misleading because those losing their health care would only be individualswho are no longer being force[d] to acquire insurance.
Though a weak counterargument on Ryans part, it might provide a window into understanding how he and other Republicans can rationalize dumping millions from their health care.
Ryanspublicly declared justifications for the AHCA areimpotent for a reason he doesnt believe them. In reality, Ryan and Trumps motivations are substantially more transparent: They simply do not believe anyone who is unable to afford health care should have it and claim that makingtaxpayers subsidize insurance is an inherent breach of personal freedoms.
While this observation may appear to be an oversimplification, a look at the personal philosophies of these men couldprove illuminating. More specifically, we should look to author and cod philosopher Ayn Rand a figure highly revered by Ryan, Trump and other Republicans.
Ayn Rand rose to prominence in the middle of the last century due to her popular works of fiction, including The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Trump has even said that of the few fictional novels he enjoys,The Fountainhead is among them, saying that it relates to everything.
Through her various novels and short stories, Rand espoused a strain of thought dubbed objectivism. This form of morality, unlike many others, sees value and worth as being developed wholly from within that is, individualism trumps all else.
Boiled down, Rand essentially argued that selfishness is the supreme virtue; everything else is ancillary, if not unnecessary. In fact, she argued that it was deeply immoral to ask an individual to help another if that help was not entirely voluntary.
Put in practical terms, Rand viewed taxes particularly their use to fund welfare programs like health care to be a severe violation of personal liberty.
This world view ended up being adopted by a number of conservatives in the United States, not the least of which include the most powerful politicians in the country Paul Ryan and Donald Trump.
For these individuals, Rands objectivist morality not only justifies the United States massive wealth inequality, but also celebrates it. And with regards to implementing the AHCA, the imperatives of objectivism make perfect sense.
So even though millions of Americans willlose health care they would not otherwise be able to afford, in Rands eyes - and Ryan and Trumps that is no ones fault but their own. And this is something that Republicansgenuinely believe.
Photo Credit: White House / Wikimedia Commons
Disclaimer: The views expressed above are solely those of the author and may not reflect those of Care2, Inc., its employees or advertisers.
Read the original here:
Why Republicans Don't Care if Millions Lose Their Health Care - Care2.com
Posted in Atlas Shrugged
Comments Off on Why Republicans Don’t Care if Millions Lose Their Health Care – Care2.com
Libertarian candidate enters Virginia gubernatorial fray – Loudoun Times-Mirror
Posted: at 8:44 am
A Libertarian Party candidate for governor has qualified to be on the ballot for November's general election in Virginia.
The Virginian-Pilot reports 34-year-old Cliff Hyra will join Democratic nominee Ralph Northam and Republican nominee Ed Gillespie on the Nov. 7 ballot. The Virginia Department of Elections confirmed Thursday that Hyra had qualified, following the submission of petitions bearing more than 10,000 signatures.
Hyra is a patent attorney from Hanover County and is running for elected office for the first time. He has a bachelor's degree in aerospace engineering from Virginia Tech and a law degree from George Mason University.
Libertarian Robert Sarvis collected less than 7 percent of the popular vote in the last Virginia gubernatorial contest.
Comments express only the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of this website or any associated person or entity. Any user who believes a message is objectionable can contact us at [emailprotected].
Go here to read the rest:
Libertarian candidate enters Virginia gubernatorial fray - Loudoun Times-Mirror
Posted in Libertarian
Comments Off on Libertarian candidate enters Virginia gubernatorial fray – Loudoun Times-Mirror