The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: April 21, 2017
‘A Better Place’: Indie Cinema’s Libertarian Gumption – The Libertarian Republic
Posted: April 21, 2017 at 2:54 am
LISTEN TO TLRS LATEST PODCAST:
By Paul Meekin
The best scene in the low-budget indie film A Better Place involves a conversation in a chapel between an evil banker and an evil police officer. Together, they outline just how easy it would be for a bank or government to seize the assets including thehome, of someone they dont like, just by having a single officer willing to corrupt their code for their personal gain.
This scene is intelligent, knowledgeable about its subject, speaksdirectly to libertarian ideals of property rights and their notion of too much government control, and comes from a place of authority.
Whoever wrote this scene knew enough about itto perk me up which is saying something because after 45 minutes of being very, very, very, confused, I was about ready to bail.
Why? Because A Better Place isnt a very good movie.
The plot follows Jeremy, a man who is suddenly all alone in this world after his mother dies unexpectedly from a heart-attack. Jeremy has never been allowed outside. In fact he was homeschooled and rarely allowed to associate with anyone but his mom.
Why? He has superpowers, sort of.
Essentially, anytime a jerkhurts Jeremy, that force is transferred to the person that jerk loves most.Which is about as convoluted as youd think, but leads to a cute moment involving a character who is literally in love with herself.
Theres also the aforementioned asset forfeiture subplot, a drunk mother, a romance, an affair between a reverend and a trophy wife, a jock thats a bully, and a sort of weird and muddled Jesus metaphor toward the end.
This is a busy movie and the super-power stuff doesnt really slot in with the mystery vibe the flick is going for. The good stuff involving big businesscontrol and bullying and power dynamics exists to serve the sci-fi plot, when in reality theyd be better off on their own especially when you consider Jeremys powers are by-design reactionary which is NAP friendly I suppose, but makes for a weird hero.
Ultimately the problems lie in editing, script, lighting, and pacing. The asset forfeiture stuff doesnt kick in until about halfway through the picture. Most every character is one-dimensional and holds no surprise.
For example, Perry Thomas, playing Sheriff Bower, brings an intensity that is undermined by its obviousness. There are too many long gazes, deep stares, and snarls to take him as anything other than a cartoon character. Had he received notes on toning it down a little, there might have been a touch of mystery regarding his characters intentions.
Along those lines, the acting is mostly good, but sabotaged by scenes that languish too long, are over-the-top in their malice, or detour into the comically vulgar including scenes of nudity and oral fixation that seem to exist primarily to exist.
They say a sign of a bad porno is when you notice too many people walking through doors. The sign of a bad indie movie is when you notice too many scenes involving characters sitting at tables. Show, dont tell, as they say.
And thats the problem.This movie is flat. Like a TV pilot more than a film. Like a film-students college thesis more than a film. Theresnearly half-a-dozen fade to blacks, an on-the-nose musical number, flat angles, flat lighting and other amateur issues that could be rectified by a quality editor and some lighting to make things look a little lesscheap.
As a note to indie filmmakers; spend what limited budget you have on lighting, cinematography, and editing. Film is a visual medium and the human eye can and will immediately assume a movie ischeap if it doesnt look or feel like an actual release. If somethinglooks good, or at least unique, its easier to forgive quite a lot.
Look, Im not going to harp on the movie too much more other than to say if youre looking for an often-times unintentionally funny movie that also harbors some genuine Libertarian ideals, you could check it out even if I cant recommend it personally.
Besides, the ultimate message of A Better Place exists outside the movie; if you have gumption, drive, and willpower, you can literally literally do anything. Including making an well-intentioned but ultimately crummy movie.
The Director, producers, actors, funders, and promoters of this movie cared enough to get it made despite zero studio backing, a wonky plot, and very little name talent. This isnt a big-budget blunder, its an indie-film misfire that means well and misses the mark.
Say what you will about Hollywood, but filmmaking equipment, resources, and distribution channels are so abundant that if you have the actual capital and drive to make a movie, you can.
Entertainment Media is the free-market defined. Put your voice out there, and if people want to hear it, youll know. But you have to do it. Its the definition of libertarian gumption- Personal responsibility and drive.
Heck, even Director Dennis Hoshould take another crack at making a movie. Rumor has it hes really into energies and the third eye and things of that ilk. If he can write and direct a movie about that as well as he did the scenes involving the corporate scheming inthis movie, I think hell have a much better product on his hands at the end of the day and itmight actually teach you something, too.
But if theres one thing I know about making an indie film its nearly impossible to get everything you want. Mr. Ho may have been required to toss in the Sci-Fi stuff to get someone to fund him. May have run out of time. His lighting guy might have quit. Who knows.
I do know that on the relatively new Libertarian Republic Movie Rating System on a scale of Karl Marx to Ron Paul, A Better Place gets a rating of The Libertarian Partys Social Media Manager.
Like The Libertarian Party proper, A Better Place holds ideas and notions and thoughts that speak directly to a Libertarian mindset. Unfortunately all the confusing muck in between makes it almost impossible to recommend and mightjust put you off the good aspects entirely.
At the very leastA Better Place doesnt Hail Satan.
A Better PlaceDennis HoEntertainment Mediafree marketHollywoodLibertarian MoviesMovie Review
See more here:
'A Better Place': Indie Cinema's Libertarian Gumption - The Libertarian Republic
Posted in Libertarian
Comments Off on ‘A Better Place’: Indie Cinema’s Libertarian Gumption – The Libertarian Republic
City of Scottsdale hosts Golden Rule Breakfast – Jewish News of Greater Phoenix
Posted: at 2:53 am
Posted: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 10:00 am
City of Scottsdale hosts Golden Rule Breakfast
ervice organizations, clergy, police and community leaders will gather in Scottsdale on April 28 to affirm the communitys commitment to treating people the way they would like to be treated, to helping those in need, and to embracing the rich culture of all the people of Arizona and the southwest.
Scottsdales Golden Rule Breakfast begins at 7 a.m. Friday, April 28, on the north lawn of Scottsdale Center for the Performing Arts, 7380 E. Second St. The event will include a keynote address from Miss Scottsdale 2017, Laetitia Hua; children of different faiths reciting the Golden Rule; and a sounding of the shofar. The breakfast, in partnership with the Arizona Interfaith Movement, will conclude at 9 a.m. with a Golden Rule Tree planting ceremony.
Your current subscription does not provide access to this content. Please click the button below to manage your account.
kAm%96 6G6?E 😀 7C66[ 3FE C6D6CG2E:@?D 2C6 C6BF:C65] $62C49 7@C v@=56? #F=6 #$'! 2E k2 9C67lQ9EEAi^^$4@EED52=6p+]8@GQm$4@EED52=6p+]8@Gk^2m]k^Am
Your current subscription does not provide access to this content. Please click the button below to manage your account.
Posted in Valley View on Wednesday, April 19, 2017 10:00 am.
Read more:
City of Scottsdale hosts Golden Rule Breakfast - Jewish News of Greater Phoenix
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on City of Scottsdale hosts Golden Rule Breakfast – Jewish News of Greater Phoenix
A Top Recruiter Offers ‘Five Golden Rules’ for Career Advancement – Hunt Scanlon Media (press release)
Posted: at 2:53 am
In a candidate-driven job market, workers often look outside their current company for new opportunities. But this might not always be the best path forward. Here's some advice to advance your career from a veteran executive recruiter.
April 20, 2017 Ted Pryor,managing director withGreenwich Harbor Partners, recently took a phone call from a young professional seeking career advice.She works at a major private equity group for its chief of staff.She told the recruiter she works nights and most weekends and was having a difficult time meeting her career goals.
She seemingly had it all, thought Mr. Pryor. A great education, solid work history, and she had striking command of three languages, including speaking fluently in Chinese. What on earth could be holding someone like this back?
As the recruiter pushed for more information, he discovered this young woman was feeling trapped in a highly demanding job that lacked any clear career path forward.She was beginning to think about a job hunt and wanted Mr. Pryors advice.He ascertained that the private equity firm might support her in job hunting internally and he advised starting there.
Its always better to find an alternative job at your current company if you can, said Mr. Pryor.He suggested the following five golden rules of career advancement to the young woman, but they apply to just about everybody in the midst of considering a job or career transition.
Hunt Scanlon Media and Catapult Growth Partners are convening PEleaders and executive recruiters from across the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Dubai and India to explorehow search firms can fund theirgrowth and expansion plans, raise capital and prepare for an expansion or exit. Join us in NYC on May 16.Reserve Your Spot Today
Golden Rule No. 1:Get Close to Customers
If you are not selling or servicing customers, then you should be supporting people who are.If you are not selling or servicing in general, you should be marketing, measuring results, developing products or solving client problems. If you are notfacing customers or supporting people who are facing customers, then you are overhead and risk being expendable.A year or two working at headquarters or in the office of the chief of staff, as in this case, is great experience and can give a birds-eye view of the organization. But dont get locked in there, said Mr. Pryor. You should transition to a customer-facing function as soon as you can, he added.
If there was only one golden rule of career advancement, this would be it, he said. Progressive companies have 80 percent of their resources focused on serving customers or supporting the front line. Legacy companies are often inward-focused with lots of time spent crafting memos to go up the line,' he said. Ambitious professionals should work to be in customer-oriented functions.
Golden Rule No. 2:Become an Expert
The modern world pays for expertise. Someone who is well educated, well-traveled and speaks three languages has broad perspective, just like the young woman who phoned Mr. Pryor. But getting to be an expert, for example, on China, or Southern China or in an industry sector within China will make that same person invaluable.Get to be an expert in the politics, the people, the trends, the economic forces, and, most importantly, said Mr. Pryor, the culture.Read books on the subject.Attend lectures on the area. You may also be asked to work on other projects or client matters, but establish yourself as an expert in something relevant to your company.
This comes straight from Jeff Immelt, CEO of General Electric, who advises his team to get to be an expert,' said the recruiter. You may have many duties in many areas, but if you are expert in a couple of subjects, you will get pulled in when that knowledge is crucial. A young person who has control of the facts is extremely useful.
Parting Ways Is Getting Easier
The way companies and their employees part ways has completely changed. Although job-hopping is at an all-time high, employers today understand that loyalty doesnt necessarily go away when employees walk out the door. In fact, when an employee leaves an organization, it is important they feel that the company is there to supportand respectthem through the transition. The best way to do this, according to Keith Mullin, CEO of global outplacement and redeployment firm Mullin International, is with rapid outreach and engagement, strong one-on-one consultingand a robust set of research tools. The effect: companies now encourage the concept of re-hiring former employees .. Heres some further reading from Hunt Scanlon Media.
Why Boomerang Employees Might Be In Your Future Companies continue to review talent and lines of business focused on the greatest return on investment. As a result, employees may lose jobs and either get redeployed internally or are encouraged to seek new and exciting careers.
Golden Rule No. 3:Manage People
You want to be headed in a direction where you will eventually be managing a group or a team. Organizations can only growth if good people are recruited, nurtured, trained, developed, and motivated to become leaders and contributors. But the most valuable employees are the ones that do a great job and can train other people to follow in their footsteps. If you are a solo producer by nature, then get into a position where you can manage, mentor anddevelopother solo producers.There are plenty of player-coaches who manage a team and focus their own time on larger projects, larger clients and developing new channels of opportunity.
The point is not to empire-build, but to be fully committed to the future success of the company through developing people, said Mr. Pryor. Todays best leaders are first class mentors and this should be part of your skill set.
Golden Rule No. 4:Take On Tough Projects
Everyone always want to work on the most prestigious projects and the most prestigious clients, but that often means working in mature situations as the third, fourth or tenth person on the team.Many careers have been accelerated by taking on a product, division, geography or industry sector that noone else was eager to work on, that wasnt as prestigious, or needed a turnaround.Maybe it is redesigning the sales incentive system, looking for a new warehouse location or oversight of a handful of small accounts.
Taking a problem off your bosss desk and doing an excellent job with it is a good way to get noticed.You are likely to have more autonomy and freedom to try new things and pursue your own ideas.Theexperiencewill be much more powerful than documenting the ideas of your team leader on that prestigious project.Sometimes this golden rule is written as take risks, but that does not really provide much guidance when you are at a decision point.Taking on tough projects for your leaders is a much clearer lens.
It is sometimes counter intuitive, but solving a tough problem that noone else wants, or taking on a losing region, or working on a declining product will be more satisfying and give you more visibility than being part of a large team on projects that everyone else wants, said Mr. Pryor. Many careers have been accelerated by solving a tough problem in a niche area.
Golden Rule No. 5:Develop Your Personal Brand
It is said that a reputation takes a lifetime to build and only a few minutes to ruin. Your personal brand is built conversation-by-conversation, presentation-by-presentation, project-by-project, report-by-report.The amount of time your work is exposed to colleagues and superiors is surprisingly limited.
Your reputation is built on your personality, appearance and humor, your insights and results, but often these are measured in short bursts of exposure such as one-on-ones, group meetings, presentations and reports or analysis.You must obsess over your results, research, ideas and content, but for those few moments of exposure, you must also obsess over the quality of the presentation that may be the only thing your colleagues ever see. Re-read reports carefully and have someone proof-read them.Practice your presentations in front of the mirror or with a friend. Good content, poorly presented, loses almost all of its impact.
Even though you are visible every day at a company, your personalbrandand reputation are really made in a very limited number of touch points, including presentations and reports, so extra effort must be put into content, creativity, neatness and results for your highly visible work product, said Mr. Pryor.
Contributed by Dale M. Zupsansky, Managing Editor and Scott A. Scanlon, Editor-in-Chief Hunt Scanlon Media
Read more from the original source:
Posted in Golden Rule
Comments Off on A Top Recruiter Offers ‘Five Golden Rules’ for Career Advancement – Hunt Scanlon Media (press release)
The Liberal Rednecks, coming to Bethlehem, bridge divide between North and South – Allentown Morning Call
Posted: at 2:53 am
In 1993, stand-up comic Jeff Foxworthy began to gather millions of fans by hilariously defining what it means to be a redneck.
"If your kids take roadkill to show-and-tell, you might be a redneck," was the kind of joke Foxworthy told to illustrate what he described as the "glorious absence of sophistication" of many poor white Southerners.
Tennessee-born comic Trae Crowder works in the same redneck milieu, but in a different and edgier way.
Crowder is the self-described "Liberal Redneck," who began to get national attention a year ago after some of his "back porch rant" videos, with politically liberal viewpoints delivered with a Southern accent, went viral on the Internet.
On Monday night, Crowder and fellow "liberal redneck" comedians Drew Morgan and Corey Ryan Forrester will bring their show to the ArtsQuest Center at SteelStacks to support their best-selling book: "The Liberal Redneck Manifesto: Draggin' Dixie Outta the Dark."
Crowder describes it as their take on themed comedy shows, such as the Kings of Comedy, the Comedians of Comedy and, of course, Foxworthy's Redneck Comedy Tour.
As a strident critic of the majority politics of his home region, Crowder says he has found himself increasingly defending fellow rednecks from a prevailing stereotype.
"I was genuinely surprised to find out that to a great many people in this country part of the definition of the word redneck is racist, regressive, homophobic, hateful," Crowder says in a phone interview.
"Growing up, everyone around me self-identified as rednecks. That's just what we were." While his family was poor, they were not racist or homophobic, certainly not the father who raised him in rural Celina, Tenn., or his uncle, who is gay.
"I knew that a stereotype about rednecks was that a lot of them were racists," he says. "I didn't know that to a lot of people you're not even considered a redneck if you're not a racist hick. I didn't realize that was a thing. I've since come to find out that it definitely is."
Crowder gained fame posting videos ripping North Carolina's controversial public bathroom law, blasting then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and supporting the Black Lives Matter movement.
The New York Daily News subsequently hired him to do "Redneck Edition" videos as the newspaper's "hillbilly-in-chief." His videos have more than 60 million views. He also has appeared on "Nightline," "The View" and "Real Time with Bill Maher," among other television shows.
Crowder generally defines rednecks as "poor white people."
"That can run the gamut in terms of ideology," he says. "A lot of those people I'm talking about, they were trying to reclassify me, and say, 'OK, OK, I believe that you're a liberal and you agree with me politically, but you're not a redneck, Trae. You can't be a redneck.'
"That annoys me," says Crowder, who was the first in his family to graduate from college and has an MBA. "It annoys me, people trying to define what I am. My whole life growing up, it wasn't a matter of pride or a matter of choice. It was just what I was. It was what we all were and I don't feel like that necessarily changes because of how I feel about things."
He adds that his views are not as unique among fellow white Southerners as many from the Northeast and West Coast might believe.
"They say things to me like: 'You're like seeing a unicorn.' 'Before I saw your videos, I wouldn't have believed that someone like you could possibly exist,'" Crowder says.
Roughly 40 percent of Southerners typically vote Democratic in national elections, he says. In his home state of Tennessee, Hillary Clinton received 35 percent of the vote in November.
"If you take 40 percent of the entire South that's voting liberal every election, that's millions of people, you know what I mean," he says.
"We're in the minority, but it's not this 90-10 split or 95-5 like a lot of people think it is. There are plenty of progressive people in the South, especially in the cities."
Crowder feels a mix of pride and shame in his Southern heritage. Even the things he loves about it have "a dark side." The music and the food, for example, "are some of the best stuff culturally that this country has to offer."
At the same time, both "are very, very heavily influenced by African traditions. That has a lot of roots in slaves cooking and singing," he says.
"There's a real sense of family and community, which can manifest itself in bad ways when people use family values as a euphemism for hating other people," Crowder says.
"I also think that Southern hospitality is a real thing. I know that it is. Again, there's a dark side to all of these things. The problem with that is, people being real nice and sweet to your face and then talking sh-- the minute you turn your back that Southern passive-aggressiveness."
With his comedy, Crowder says, he is trying to bridge the divide between North and South, red and blue, liberal and conservative. But he admits he has had a lot more luck convincing Northeastern elites that not everybody from the South is a hateful racist than convincing many fellow rednecks to be more tolerant of transgendered people.
"I think that makes sense because with the other Southern progressives, I'm preaching to the choir with them," he says. "The only ones I am trying to convince of anything are the hardcore, ultra-conservative rednecks. It's almost impossible to get them to change their minds.
"Whereas people's perception of the South, that's just like a perspective. It is not a deeply held philosophical belief. It's not as hard to change somebody's perception about something like that, than it is to change somebody's perception about abortion or gay marriage."
At the same time, some Southerners are resistant to liberal arguments because they can sense that their twang prompts a condescending response, Crowder says.
"'They think they're better than me and they think I'm dumb.' That's a real thing. That's a real perception, and also living in California and touring all over the country, I can't say it's not entirely unfounded. There definitely is something to that and that plays into it for a lot of these people."
Crowder moved to California from Tennessee in January to develop a television show based on his comedy. Several networks have expressed interest in the show, which Crowder is writing and hopes to star in.
"Everything else I've got going on, I'm proud of and excited for all of it, but standup is what I really consider myself to be best at, and the same is true of Corey and Drew," Crowder says. "I think the best way to experience our whole thing is at a live show. So I hope a lot of people come out and see it."
Daryl Nerl is a freelance writer.
Jodi Duckett, editor
610-820-6704
The Liberal Rednecks: The WellRED Tour
What: Stand-up comedy show featuring Trae Crowder, Drew Morgan and Corey Ryan Forrester
When: 8 p.m. Monday
Where: Fowler Blast Furnace Room, ArtsQuest Center at SteelStacks, 101 Founders Way, Bethlehem
How much: $25
Info: steelstacks.org
View original post here:
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on The Liberal Rednecks, coming to Bethlehem, bridge divide between North and South – Allentown Morning Call
Liberal capitalism has rotted our souls. But its days might be … – The Guardian
Posted: at 2:53 am
Jeremy Corbyn and Theresa May. We have a moral problem in this country with something we used to be comfortable calling greed. Photograph: Getty Images
At the beginning of the 20th century, our political lords and masters dressed like theyd just come off a grouse moor. By the end of the century, they looked like they worked in an international hedge fund.
The left has sometimes been confused by this change. When the grouse moor lot were in power, the battle lines were clear. The class war had its recognisable uniforms, from tweeds to cloth caps. But this old war was made irrelevant bythe forward march of modern capitalism, with power leaking to those who were able to manipulate theworkings of the market, leaving a few harmless toffs deadheading their roses. Financial deregulation the liberalisation of the rules governing the City was a coup against the traditional vested interests of the pinstriped suits brigade. As the Essex boys took over, thepublic school traders were left chuntering into their golf club gins.
The liberal right of Keith Joseph and Margaret Thatcher was able to represent this change as one of democratisation. Money didnt have any sort of accent. Even the working class could own their own shares and thus stick their fingers in the cherry pie of economic growth and they could buy their own council house. As some on the left remained obsessed with fighting old battles against beaten enemies, power was being reconcentrated in the hands of the few. As Jeremy Corbyn has rightly put it, the system was being rigged. But tragically, under New Labour the progressive left decided that the best thing it could do was cheer along. Tony Blair differed from Thatcher only by a slightly more redistributive nudge of the tiller. The left had effectively surrendered.
And that is how many of us thought politics was going to last. But a chink of light has appeared, for this election pits against each other two leaders who have both broken from the Thatcher/Blair consensus. OK, Theresa May is not quite the politician of the old squirearchy, but she retains enough of its traditional values to despise the super-slick Blatcher poster-boy George Osborne and to understand the attraction of Brexit notwithstanding the fact that it may well make us slightly poorer as acountry. She is an old-fashioned politician who (quite rightly) wants to speak of our moral responsibilities and not just our legal rights.
And Jeremy Corbyn, intuitively a Brexiter, is the only political leader since Michael Foot to understand how the power of money comes to be concentrated in the hands of a few. To those who have, more will be given. To those who have little, even what they have will be taken away. This is the logic of modern capitalism.
Corbyn is right to call it out. He is going to do better in this election than the consensus-seeking pundits are all claiming at least, I hope so. So what that he isnt Mr Charisma? Because, contra glossy New Labour, there really is such a thing as being too rich. Ordinary people know it and Corbyn gets it. We have a moral problem in this country with something we used to be comfortable calling greed, which is both bad for the poor and, yes, bad for the rich, too. It rots people from the inside out Philip Green, Mike Ashley. And if you think you can detect a bit of my religion coming through here, you are damned right. A 70,000 annual salary equals being rich? Sounds near enough to me.
The problem with liberal capitalism of both the Thatcher and New Labour varieties is that it surrendered morality to the invisible hand. Adam Smith justified personal greed by making it out to be the driver of other peoples employment. This meant that even so-called progressives could worship the money god with a clean conscience. It will be a long road back from the Blair/Thatcher consensus that has stained our soul so deeply. But a start has been made with us leaving the European Union. Yes, Brexit threatens many vested interests, and the muscle of the City of London may derail it yet. But perhaps, just perhaps, the dismantling of Thatchers liberal legacy has finally begun.
Read more:
Liberal capitalism has rotted our souls. But its days might be ... - The Guardian
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on Liberal capitalism has rotted our souls. But its days might be … – The Guardian
Liberal Party to oppose impeachment raps vs Duterte, Robredo – Philippine Star
Posted: at 2:53 am
MANILA, Philippines Members of the Liberal Party, including those in the majority, will not be supporting impeachment complaints against President Rodrigo Duterte and Vice President Leni Robredo.
Deputy Speaker Romero "Miro" Quimbo said on Thursday that 15 members of the party recently met with Robredo to discuss party-related administrative matters, as well as the issue on impeachment. Robredo is the highest elected member of the Liberal Party and an emerging opposition leader.
"The LP House majority caucus members present categorically took a position that we will not support any of the impeachment complaints filed against the leaders of the land," Quimbo said in a statement.
In March, an impeachment complaint was filed by Magdalo party-list Gary Alejano against Duterte for possible violation of the Constitution in issues of maritime rights, engagement in bribery and "other high crimes."
In the same month, lawyer Oliver Lozano filed an impeachment complaint against Robredo for "betrayal of public trust" for sending a video message criticizing the president's war against drugs to the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs.
Quimbo said that for the lower chamber of Congress to take up any of the impeachment complaints will only be "divisive as well as polarizing."
Headlines ( Article MRec ), pagematch: 1, sectionmatch: 1
"It will only distract us from the many important matters that congress should be giving priority to," he added.
In March, Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman, one of the leaders of the Liberal Party-led minority in the House, expressed resentment over an earlier statement of Quimbo that the party as a whole will not support Duterte's impeachment.
"There has been no meeting called by the Liberal Party leadership among its members in the House and in the Senate on the Duterte impeachment complaint," Lagman said in a statement.
Lagman said Liberal Party members in the minority should have been consulted before the statement was released.
READ: House opposition divided on Duterte impeachment
Quimbo, meanwhile, reiterated an earlier remark that the party will continue its "strongest commitment" supporting Robredo.
He also said that party members who are out of town will be informed of the decision in subsequent meetings before Congress reopens in May.
Excerpt from:
Liberal Party to oppose impeachment raps vs Duterte, Robredo - Philippine Star
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on Liberal Party to oppose impeachment raps vs Duterte, Robredo – Philippine Star
The Stench of Liberal Hypocrisy – Heat Street
Posted: at 2:53 am
The departure of Fox News hostBill OReilly over allegations of inappropriate conduct has, predictably, caused a certain amount of exultation from liberal and left-leaning stars and commentators.
Cher tweeted that OReilly and Donald Trump have sexually harassed women 4 years without providing any concrete examples to back up this claim. Rosie ODonnell followed suit, calling Trump and OReilly sexual predators of a feather. (She also failed to expand on this extreme accusation). And Stephen King said Trump and OReilly are both members of the odious boys club where members feel they can abuse and humiliate women at will. Again, he did not produce a shred of evidence.
The question is, where were these sanctimoniousvoices when members of their own club were accused of what some might judge to be far more inappropriate behavior than the king of cable was? And why have they previously been content to see others who have been accused of alleged crimes and misdemeanors potentially elevated to positions of great authority, or watched them receive the most prestigious of awards?
Lets start with Bill Clinton. The former President has been accused of sexual misconduct by three women (one, Juanita Broaddrick has claimed he raped her) yet this apparently posed no problem for liberals last year. They would have been happy for the politico to re-enter the White House as First Gentleman, while his long-suffering wife would have been President.
And what about film director Roman Polanski? He was named Best Director at the Oscars in 2002 despite having fled America for Europe in 1978 after being arrested and charged in the US with engaging in unlawful sexual intercourse with a 13-year-old girl. Harrison Ford accepted the Oscar for Polanski and then presented it to him at the Deauville Film Festival in France five months later in a public ceremony.
Woody Allen has a long and deeply uncomfortable history of allegations against him after his ex-wife, Mia Farrow, claimed he sexually abused their adopted daughter. But, as with Polanski, the liberal establishment was prepared to repeatedly overlook these claims, even giving Allen the Best Screenplay Oscar in 2012 for his film Midnight in Paris.
In 2009, David Letterman was forced to admit he had indulged in extra marital affairs with staff including those vastly junior to him who worked on his CBSshow. This is not what many would expect of a public figure of some influence, but the liberal media didnt seem to regard it as a problem.
To this list we shouldnt forget to add the New York Times, which aggressively pushed its investigation of OReilly and on Wednesday exulted in, as its former media editor tweeted, claiming his scalp. As Heat Street has previously reported, the Timesis facingaccusations of racial discrimination and its top dog is dogged by shocking allegations of lying about and covering up the sexual abuse of children.
A civil law suit was launched last year against the papers CEO, British former BBC chief Mark Thompson, by two New York Times employees, Ernestine Grant and her colleague Marjorie Walker. They work in itsadvertising department and have accused their employer of engaging in deplorable discrimination that has remained largely off the record.
Papers submitted on their behalf by New York law firm Wigdor LLP explain: Beginning with the appointment of Defendant Mark Thompson to Chief Executive Officer (CEO) in 2012, the workplace at the Times has become an environment rife with discrimination based on age, race, and gender.
First, they say Thompsons appointment as Times CEO was riddled with controversy, given the numerous humiliations and indignities he presided over during his tumultuous tenure as the Director General of the BBC.
They go on:
Thompson was involved in a highly publicized BBC scandal regarding a decision to bury an expos of child sex abuse allegedly committed by one the BBCs most well-known personalities, Jimmy Savile. Not only was Mr. Thompson seemingly involved in attempting to conceal this important piece of journalism from the public, but he also later lied about his role in the affair, which was demonstrated through an irrefutable recording.
This recording is cited as a taped interview made in October 2012 by reporter Ben Webster of the London Times. The recording, which Heat Street has heard, was broadcast on UK website Guido Fawkes in March 2013 and circulated widely.
The papers go on:
Thompson initially denied any awareness of the underlying allegations or of the Newsnight cancelation while he was at the BBC. Later, however, reports indicated that he was aware of the Newsnight investigation, well before the cancelation. As a result, Mr. Thompson changed his story, acknowledging that he was told about an investigation, but maintained his lack of awareness of any details involving sexual abuse. However, this version of events was then undone by the surfacing of [The London Timess] audio recording in which he admitted awareness that the investigation involved sexual abuse of some kind.
Interestingly, an interview which Thompson gave to the BBC on September 11, 2016 three weeks after the court papers were filed dredged up this issue again. Presenter Andrew Marr asked Thompson about his knowledge of the Savile scandal. And Thompson did not deny as has been alleged many times, including to a committee of British MPs that he was told informally about the existence of the Savile investigation in 2011 by his BBC colleague Helen Boaden.
This is what he told Marr:
Thompson also discussed this issue at greater length in 2013, as Heat Street has noted.
So what does the liberal establishment have to say about the New York Timeschief having been involved (allegedly) in covering up a child abuse scandal? It would be fascinating to hear, but I wont hold my breath.
Here is the original post:
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on The Stench of Liberal Hypocrisy – Heat Street
Two pro-Remain Tories talking to Liberal Democrats about defection as ex-Labour MP Bob Marshall-Andrews switches – Mirror.co.uk
Posted: at 2:53 am
The Lib Dems have held talks with pro-Remain Tories about the possibility of defection.
Party insiders said they were confident of winning over Conservatives opposed to Theresa Mays Brexit plans.
A Lib Dem source said: There are at least two who could join us, hopefully some more.
It comes as former Labour MP Bob Marshall-Andrews announced he was defecting to the Lib Dems.
The party also said it had 8,000 new members since Theresa May called the election on Tuesday, taking the total to 95,000.
Mr Marshall-Andrews, the MP for Medway from 1997 to 2010, described his former party as a political basket case.
He said: At present there is manifestly a huge vacuum on the centre-left represented in substantial part by the 48% of the electorate who rejected Brexit and the lies on which it was based.
To many, including me, there was a forlorn hope that a reformed and radical Labour Party would rise to the historic occasion. It has not and shows no real sign of doing so.
Lib Dem MP Alistair Carmichael said: Jeremy Corbyn is never going to be Prime Minister. He cant lead his own party, let alone our country. The more people see him, the less they want to vote for him.
That is not just my view. It is the view of the 172 Labour MPs who just last year said they had no confidence in his leadership.
Thats why senior Labour figures such as Bob Marshall-Andrews are defecting to the Liberal Democrats .
Jeremy Corbyn s Labour has waved the white flag on Brexit, is failing as an opposition and has given Theresa May a blank cheque to pursue a divisive Hard Brexit.
A Labour spokesman said: Bob Marshall-Andrews has not been a member of the Labour Party for some years.
More:
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on Two pro-Remain Tories talking to Liberal Democrats about defection as ex-Labour MP Bob Marshall-Andrews switches – Mirror.co.uk
Why the election could make Theresa May more liberal – The Guardian
Posted: at 2:53 am
Theresa May: For someone who says, Politics is not a game, shes awfully good at it. Photograph: Daniel Leal-Olivas/AFP/Getty Images
This prime minister likes to surprise. Thought she was cautious? Cue this snap election. Thought she would just be Cameron continuity? Oh no: austerity slowed, the ban on grammar schools lifted. A reassuring remainer to handle Brexit? Nope. Shes become a full-throttle Brexiteer.
She has ascended in politics by pursuing a clever strategy: lying low, surfacing only at moments of significance, and not allowing herself to be easily defined. Endorsed, but not embraced, by nearly everyone in the Conservative party and now the wider public by not being too close or associated with anyone or anything. For someone who says, Politics is not a game, shes awfully good at it.
Indeed, come the summer, her majority in parliament is likely to increase significantly. What does this mean for her programme for Brexit and government? The speculation has started. But the truth is we dont really know.
Some say it will allow her to pursue a softer Brexit with more compromises, freed from a troublesome right wing on the backbenches, currently calling the shots thanks to a slim majority. But others argue that it will enable her to secure her plan for a hard Brexit, a cadre of Theresa Mays minions in the Commons obliging and a fresh mandate proving to the EU that there really is no turning back for the UK.
The Tory manifesto is likely to reveal little. Thats because the PM has framed this election narrowly, about giving her the endorsement to negotiate with the EU, the details of which she is reluctant to give in advance and provide a running commentary on. If we take her at face value that she only came to this election decision belatedly then there has been little time to think deeply about an original and radical programme of domestic reform.
Certainly, nearly a year into her government, the creativity and ambition of the policies proposed have not matched the welcome, rousing rhetoric of a new settlement for the state and those on modest incomes. And with the opposition so weak, there is little political incentive to be truly bold in the manifesto.
What is clearer is that, should Mays Tories win on 8 June, she would then be much more likely to get her own way which she would like, not being the most tolerant of disagreement, especially within her own ranks. Justifying the election, she lamented the division in Westminster, which others might regard as a necessary and healthy part of democracy. It was a little overblown too, considering a clear majority of parliamentarians voted to trigger article 50 only a month ago.
But it will not be such smooth sailing for her. After June, the bulk of Tory MPs will still be creatures of the Cameron era. Considering the abruptness of this election, many of the candidates especially those fighting safe seats will have been around when her predecessor was still in charge. There will be loyalty, but they will not be pushovers: conservatism is not known to attract those with a collectivist mindset.
Happily, it is likely that many candidates will be liberal conservatives too. Not just because of the Cameron connection or indeed their younger age. But also because of the electoral reality. Those extra parliamentary seats have to come from constituencies that are currently held by Labour, with a higher proportion of voters on more modest incomes and from black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds.
The threat to sitting Tory MPs comes from a revived and shamelessly pro-remain Liberal Democrats in southern England. Ukip, meanwhile, increasingly seems a divided, amateurish and redundant force. To win big, the Conservatives need to reassure the floating voters of liberal Britain.
In June, Mays power will probably be strengthened. Discreet and surprising, the prime ministers final destination on Brexit and domestic reform is uncertain. But it is likely that the composition of the future Conservative party in the Commons will push her to a and expose her own more liberal conservative positioning.
Read the original post:
Why the election could make Theresa May more liberal - The Guardian
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on Why the election could make Theresa May more liberal – The Guardian
Andrew Bragg firms as Liberals’ federal director – The Australian Financial Review
Posted: at 2:53 am
By Wednesday, the Liberal Party of Australia should have named a successor to federal director Tony Nutt. And barring a radical and unforeseen change of consensus amongst Malcolm Turnbull's leadership group, that person will be Menzies Research Centre policy director Andrew Bragg.
Bragg only joined the federal Liberals' think tank in November (from his gig alongside John Brogden at the Financial Services Council) but in that short time has noticeably raised its public profile. He was an unsuccessful Senate candidate in the NSW Liberals' original half-Senate preselection and in the Victorian seat of Murray in 2016 (which the Nationals ultimately took off the Libs on July 2). Andrew Robb, who co-authored the Liberals' review of last year's federal election campaign, launched Bragg's book on trade policy last month.
Bragg is likely to be first appointed in an acting capacity and given the opportunity to prove his credentials in the lead up to an election year. He hasn't run a political organisation before nor has he run a national campaign but is regarded assmart, a skilful organiser in the industrial sense of the word (a rare talent in a movement anathemic to collectivism), is close to Turnbull yet non-factional and well-regarded by conservatives. He is strongly backed in by Victorian Cabinet minister Josh Frydenberg and allies Alan Tudge and Dan Tehan, as well as Senate deputy leader and campaign spokesman Mathias Cormann. And aged 32, we bet he's heard of Big Data and the interweb thingy.
Ultimately the decision is one for federal executive, a parting prerogative of outgoing president Richard Alston, who has presided over an utter failure of succession planning, a rift over opaque spending that resulted in the Honorary Treasurer Phil Higginson resigning,the Victorian director Damien Mantach going to jail for stealing $1.5 million of party funds while Alston sat on its finance committee, and bequeaths a broke party, all while sitting on the board of CPA Australia. Enjoy your trip to Singapore, Dick!
Last week, Alston slipped the removal of Tom Harley from the chairmanship of the MRC (where Bragg now works) into the executive's resolutions, which passed without notice. We doubt he'd try that one again. But you just never know
The rest is here:
Andrew Bragg firms as Liberals' federal director - The Australian Financial Review
Posted in Liberal
Comments Off on Andrew Bragg firms as Liberals’ federal director – The Australian Financial Review