Daily Archives: April 13, 2017

Health care compromise bill will pass soon, says Freedom Caucus leader – TheBlaze.com

Posted: April 13, 2017 at 11:41 pm

Rep. Dave Brat (R-Va.) says that a compromise health care bill will pass the House of Representatives in weeks because Republicans are afraid of the catastrophic results if it doesnt. He made the comments in an interview with Capital Download Wednesday.

Within a few weeks, I think D.C. is going to be a little bit shocked, Brat pronounced, Were going to get to yes.

The American Health Care Act failed to even go to a vote when the Freedom Caucus objected to it not offering conservative enough solutions to Obamacares failures. When the bill was changed to meet their objections, support dropped out of the other end with moderate Republicans, and the supporters of the legislation decided to pull the vote altogether. It was seen as an embarrassment for President Trump, who had backed the bill and promised to repeal Obamacare on the first day of his presidency.

Brat is one of the leaders of the Freedom Caucus, a group of House Republicans who are politically conservative and demand free market solutions to Heath Care.

The new guys on the block are showing up in an environment now where were having these town halls, and were getting just annihilated, right? Bratexplained.The Democrats are showing up: The Indivisible group, the Resist group. They said, Were upset. They said, We were asleep; we thought Hillary was going to get in. Were ticked off, so were going to take it out on you.

Brat believes the bill will also pass in the Senate.This isnt about Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, right, he said, and your community leaders. This is the big time, with trillions of dollars at stake. Theyll be a war; there always is. Somebody will get thrown under the bus usually people with principles. But this is a win-win, and the Senate, theres going to be pressure on the Senate, too.

Brat said the president will use his political power to get it passed.He wants to pass this thing, so hes putting a little heat on us, he explained. Hes fun that way.

Trump had blamed the Freedom Caucus and called them out by name on Twitter, but Brat makes it sound like they might be on the side of this bill this time and avoid such social media castigations.

See the rest here:

Health care compromise bill will pass soon, says Freedom Caucus leader - TheBlaze.com

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Health care compromise bill will pass soon, says Freedom Caucus leader – TheBlaze.com

Freedom Caucus member predicts healthcare passage in weeks – The Hill

Posted: at 11:41 pm

Rep. Dave Brat (R-Va.) believes that Congress will pass new healthcare legislation in weeks, even as the White House and GOP lawmakers struggle to coalesce around a deal to repeal and replace ObamaCare.

Within a few weeks, I think D.C. is going to be a little bit shocked, the conservative lawmaker said in an interview with Capital Download, which was reported by USA Todayon Wednesday.Were going to get to yes.

Brat, a member of the Freedom Caucus, which helped sink the last GOP healthcare plan, warned of a huge brawl if Republicans fail to act on their longtime promise to get rid of the Affordable Care Act.

The Freedom Caucus was one of the strongest factions opposing the House's healthcare bill last month, with several members arguing that it did too closely resembled ObamaCare.

President Trump recently signaled that he would still prefer to pass healthcare legislation before moving on to other policy areas.

"We are going to have a phenomenal tax reform, but I have to do healthcare first. I want to do it first to really get it right," Trump said in an interview with Fox Business Network.

Republican have reportedly been considering ways to allow individual states to opt out of parts of ObamaCare. That, in turn, would free insurers there from having to offer minimum benefits or charge the same price to customers who are the same age.

Brat said the matter should be decided at the state level.

"Thats the conservative principle, right? ... Fifty laboratories, 50 experiments going on simultaneously where you can see what works and what doesnt work, Brat said.

Visit link:

Freedom Caucus member predicts healthcare passage in weeks - The Hill

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Freedom Caucus member predicts healthcare passage in weeks – The Hill

Louisianans split on religious freedom laws for businesses – Greater Baton Rouge Business Report

Posted: at 11:41 pm

Louisianans overwhelmingly support protections that prohibit workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, but are split on whether businesses should be allowed to deny services to customers for religious reasons.

The latest and final installment of the 2017 Louisiana Survey explores public opinion on LGBT rights and concerns about religious freedoms and traditional values.

The survey of 1,012 respondents found that 47% of Louisianans support so-called religious-freedom laws that protect the liberty of business operators to conduct activities that align with their personal religious beliefs.

Another 49%, however, believe businesses should be required to provide services to allregardless of the customers sexual orientation.

The most widely cited examples of this practice involve individuals or businesses that provide wedding services but object to providing these services to same-sex couples, the report says. Opponents contend these laws would permit discrimination against LGBT individuals.

Unsurprisingly, the split among Louisianans falls along partisan lines, with 70% of Louisiana Republicans saying its acceptable for business owners to refuse services to same-sex couples on the basis of religion. Meanwhile, 73% of Louisiana Democrats say businesses should be required to serve same-sex couples as they would others.

Opinion in Louisiana is remarkably similar to opinion across the country, the report notes. Like the United States as a whole, Louisianans are split about evenly between those who think businesses should be allowed to refuse services to same-sex couples on religious grounds and those who believe these businesses should be required to provide their services.

Nationally, 71% of Republicans support business owners exercising their religious liberties and refusing services to same-sex couples, while 67% of Democrats dont.

Opinion in Louisiana tends to lean conservative, particularly in the area of transgender rights and bathroom usage. A majority of those surveyed56%think transgender people should use the public bathroom of the sex they are born into.

This is particularly true among Democrats. Nationally, a clear majority of Democrats (68 percent) think transgender people should be allowed to use the restroom of the gender with which they currently identify, but in Louisiana only about half of Democrats (51 percent) think so.

Todays release is the sixth report in a series on the publics views on state policy. Previous installments of the 2017 report include Louisianans opinions on the Affordable Care Act and the states Medicaid expansion; equal pay; their views on taxes and budget cuts; Louisianans outlook on the direction of the state; and on criminal justice reform.

The 2017 Louisiana Survey is produced by LSUs Reilly Center for Media & Public Affairs. The survey was conducted from Feb. 23 through March 23 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.1 percentage points.

Access the full sixth report.

Alexandria Burris

See the rest here:

Louisianans split on religious freedom laws for businesses - Greater Baton Rouge Business Report

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Louisianans split on religious freedom laws for businesses – Greater Baton Rouge Business Report

Callahan sparks 2-out, 9-run rally to send Freedom baseball past Wilson – lehighvalleylive.com

Posted: at 11:41 pm

The Wilson baseball team was four outs away from a win over Freedom, leading 6-1 in the bottom of the sixth inning and nobody on.

Warriors pitcher Alec Snyder had retired 10 of the 13 batters he faced since coming on in relief to start the third inning and the freshman looked to be well on his way to the win.

That all changed in the blink of an eye or however long it took Patriots senior first baseman Evan Callahan to race down the line and leg out a two-out single.

Im not known for my speed, Callahan grinned.

But he had enough to turn a chopper to shortstop into an infield single, and eventually, a 6-1 deficit into a four-run lead.

Freedom went on to stage a nine-run rally in the bottom of the sixth to fend off Wilson 10-6 Wednesday in non-league action.

This is definitely a big win for us, just proving to ourselves that we can do anything and theres no situation we cant overcome, said Callahan, who tore his MCL in a November football game and missed a bulk of the wrestling season because of it.

The Patriots (5-0) may have experienced some hangover effects from its 4-3 win over Easton on Tuesday through the first five and a half innings, but turned it around in time to pull out the win.

We were flat the entire game. It started in (batting practice), continued in and out and I had a completely different (postgame) speech going for them in the sixth inning with the way they were playing, Freedom coach Nick DAmico said. But some people stepped up today. Thats a quality, quality win by a team that wasnt playing well for six innings.

After Callahans single, pinch-hitter Tyler Cooper lined a single to left field. Designated hitter Alec Huertas came up next and roped a single to center field, then took second on a heads up play. The throw to nab him got away, allowing the junior to race around to home plate and complete the little league home run as the Patriots closed within 6-4.

David Smith then singled, stole second and scored on Thomas Bonillas single to left field. Bonilla followed that with a steal of his own, allowing him to score on a single from pinch-hitter Griffin Connelly to tie the game 6-6.

It was only a matter of time before Freedom grabbed the lead as Jonah Mateo walked, Jake Petro hit a squibber for an infield single, Tim Healy singled, Callahan was hit by a pitch and then Cooper finished off the wild sequence with another single that made it 10-6 all in an inning kept alive by Callahan busting it down the line.

Whenever you get a chance to extend an inning like that, you cant just be lazy and jog it out, Callahan said. I never thought it would happen I never thought I could say I hit an infield single but Im really happy about it."

Cain Cabrera then closed it out on the mound in the top of the seventh for the Patriots win.

You get some lucky hits, you get some solid hits, you get some errors thats how you hang a nine-spot up in one inning," Wilson coach Josh Hinkle said. "(They're) a team thats undefeated for a reason. ... We had a couple opportunities to get out of it and we just didnt make the routine plays there and some balls fell in.

The Warriors (4-3) had put together a two-out rally of their own earlier in the fourth inning to break a 1-1 tie, even after getting a runner thrown out at home.

With the bases loaded, catcher Nick Strehl cracked a single to left field, which got past Smith and allowed Wilson to clear the bases. Another Freedom error allowed Strehl to score and then Gabe Karslo (3-for-3) ripped an RBI double down the left field line to make it 6-1.

We tell them to play one out at a time, who cares who were playing, conference or non-conference, trying to make good contact and see what happens, Hinkle said. We had a big inning where we put up five runs and then they responded. When youre playing a quality team, thats what you expect to happen.

Brandon Miller, a St. Johns commit, went 1-for-1 with three walks for the Warriors in addition to making a highlight-reel diving grab in center field that robbed Callahan of extra bases in the second inning.

Callahan would find a way on when it mattered most, though, using some unheralded wheels to change the game.

I was trying to take the energy and turn it around all game, Callahan said. Earlier in the game, I was trying to get some kids up and going, but it doesnt always work like that. Sometimes you need effort on the field to get kids going. You gotta lead by example. Sometimes thats what it takes.

See the original post here:

Callahan sparks 2-out, 9-run rally to send Freedom baseball past Wilson - lehighvalleylive.com

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Callahan sparks 2-out, 9-run rally to send Freedom baseball past Wilson – lehighvalleylive.com

How ‘Defense of Marriage’ became ‘Freedom to Marry’ – UC Berkeley

Posted: at 11:41 pm

Freedom to Marry founder Evan Wolfson with the plaintiffs in Baehr v. Miike (Hawaii, 1996), the first same-sex marriage case brought to trial. Photo courtesy of Marilyn Humphries.

In 1996, the year Congress passed the federal Defense of Marriage Act which denied legally married same-sex couples the same protections and responsibilities afforded to different-sex couples Gallup asked Americans:Do you think marriages between same-sex couples should or should not be recognized as valid, with the same rights as traditional marriages?

Sixty-eight percent of those polled responded negatively, 37 percent responded positively and 5 percent had no opinion.

Twenty years, a landmark Supreme Court ruling and 37 states affirming the freedom to marry for same-sex couples later, Gallup found that the numbers had essentially flipped: 61 percent in the affirmative, 37 percent negative, 2 percent without an opinion.

Key to that vast cultural and legal shift was Freedom to Marry, the national coalition that pushed for marriage equality on all fronts. The stories of more than 20 people in and around Freedom to Marry are the subjects of the latest project from the Oral History Center at UC Berkeleys Bancroft Library. The oral histories document both the reversal in public opinion about marriage and the actions of the individuals and organizations that stoked those changes.

Details and nuances captured in the roughly 100 hours of recordings archived at the OHC are intended to keep the depth and color of the Freedom to Marry movement from fading over time.

What we got out of these interviews, says Oral History Center director Martin Meeker, is an amazing amount of detail that is really fine-grained. We have access to details of the campaigns and the internal debates that will slip away over time because people just wont remember them.

Interviewers from the OHC worked extensively with key figures in the Freedom to Marry movement, including movement founder Evan Wolfson; Kate Kendell, executive director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights; James Esseks, director of the ACLUs LGBT and HIV project; and Thalia Zepatos, Freedom to Marrys message guru.

Wolfson, who was interviewed for more than 10 hours, is a significant figure in the movement and is of particular interest for the OHCs project. Wolfson has been a leading thinker and strategist around the same-sex marriage cause. As a law student at Harvard in the 1980s, Wolfson produced a thesis advocating for same-sex marriage a cause position that was not popular in the LGBT community at the time.

In the 70s and early 80s, there were very few people, maybe only a handful, that were advocating extending marriage to same-sex couples including gay people, explains Meeker. Most gay people at the time were more in line with abolishing marriage rather than extending it. Marriage was viewed as a tool of the patriarchy, yet here was this young law school student producing a smart and interesting argument why same-sex marriage shouldnt just be on the agenda of the gay movement, but at the top of it.

The Freedom to Marry project chronicles the evolution of that idea and the many successes and setbacks along the way, including numerous legal and legislative challenges to same-sex marriage. Legal cases like the first-ever trial over same-sex marriage (HawaiisBaehr v. Lewin) and theU.S.Supreme Courts 2015 decision inObergefell v. Hodgesare put under a microscope by the people who worked closely on the cases. Legislative action and political maneuvering, such as the passage of Californias anti-same-sex-marriage Proposition 8 in 2008 and the role of congressional Republicans and the Tea Party movement of 2010, are also told in tremendous detail.

What an oral history project does, says Meeker, is it allows key individuals to speak in their own words about the work they did and reflect on the significance of that work. A lot of the interviews go into some of the more difficult or more personal moments of success or failure. These are things that arent spoken about publicly, but theyre a part of the history. Were documenting things that almost certainly wouldnt have been seen or heard otherwise.

The OHCs Freedom to Marry project is available now on the Bancroft Libraryswebsite, as areMeekers thoughtson how lessons of Freedom to Marry can be applied to similar movements arising in response to the election of President Trump.

Additionally, Meeker and the OHC will host a brown-bag lunchtime presentation on how narrative can be employed as a strategy for social change in Room 267 of the Bancroft Library on Monday, April 17.

Continued here:

How 'Defense of Marriage' became 'Freedom to Marry' - UC Berkeley

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on How ‘Defense of Marriage’ became ‘Freedom to Marry’ – UC Berkeley

Financial freedom through frugality – The Sydney Morning Herald

Posted: at 11:41 pm

"Badassity"is the philosophy of wildly popular personal finance blogger Mr Money Mustache,a frugal-living internet sensation uniting savers around the globe.

Canadian-born, US-based Peter Adeney is Mr Money Mustache, a hardcore saver who pulls no punches when it comes to the financial "badassity"it takes to retire early.

He says his goals areto make you rich so you can retire early,to make youhappyso you can properly enjoy your early retirement and to save the whole human race from destroying itself through overconsumption of its habitat.

The blog presents frugality as a lifestyle of liberation, not deprivation and chronicles Adeney's extreme saving methods and no holds barred opinions on how we waste our money.

While millions of others his age were "living ridiculously expensive lifestyles while thinking they were completely normal", Adeney and his wife were saving thousands to reach the goal of retiring in their 30s. Adeneyofficially retired from his "real job"in the tech industry in 2005 and later started the blog that has garnered attention from thousands of followers.

"If you're going to become rich, you need to either earn way more money than you spend, or spend way less money than you earn. This is the basic math of it, which even the worst complainypants cannot dispute." Mr Money Mustache.

Adeney took the "spend way less money than you earn"route to reach his goal of retiring at 30.

Here are a few tried and tested methods Adeney has for slashing household spending and socking away as much cash as possible for early retirement or a big savings goal.

It's obvious, but small daily expenses add up. Throughout the blog, Adeney's frugal examples pack a mathematical punch when he crunches the numbers for readers on what their daily expenditures amount to over time, challenging them to think of a recurring expense not on an individual basis but over a decade if they invested what they spent. A $100-a-week restaurant habit adds up to $67,454.00 over 10 years, including compound.

It's a pretty compelling method to change your mindset around daily expenditures. Punch the number of your daily expenses into the Money Smart Compound Interest calculator to see for yourself.

Adeney evades the expensive cost of car ownership by cyclingaround his hometown of Longmont, Colorado, where possible. Even if you do own a car, he advocates being judicious about where you take it. "Paying for parking is a sign from God that you're in an area not designed for a car," he says. "You are fighting the design of your city."

According to the 2016 Transport Affordability Index Report by the Australian Automotive Association, a typical two-car Sydney household faces weekly transport costs of $424 or $22,050 a yearahead of Brisbane and then Melbourne at $19,409 and $18,575 a year respectively. Think about improving your health and wealth by car pooling, using public transport, cycling or walking where possible.

The 2016 Rabo Direct Food and Farming report shows Victorians spent an average of $149 a week on their grocery bills and as nation, we scrape a staggering $10 billion of food waste off our plates and from our fridges into the rubbish. Wiser spending in the grocery aisle can shave hundreds of dollars a month from your food bill and minimise waste.

Adeney says the grocery store is the only shop he visits more than once a month, but he is vigilant about steering clear of convenience and pre-packaged food.

Reducing meat consumption, shopping your pantry first to avoid double purchasing and not being afraid to dabble in the "home brand"arena are simple ways to reduce grocery spend.

Adeney's methods can be extreme, but there is no arguing they are effective. With one son, Adeney and his wife describe themselves as having a life of abundance, but spending on average just $24,000 a year. He's on a mission to make you think about how you spend every dollar and achieve financial freedom through frugality. One DIY hair cut at a time.

Catherine Robson is an award-winning financial planner withAffinity Private.Twitter:@CatherineAtAff.

View post:

Financial freedom through frugality - The Sydney Morning Herald

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Financial freedom through frugality – The Sydney Morning Herald

My Voice: Freedom in SB 149 yours and mine – Sioux Falls Argus Leader

Posted: at 11:41 pm

Dale Bartscher 2:05 p.m. CT April 13, 2017

Last year, Target adopted a corporate policy allowing individuals the freedom to choose which restroom to use based on their self-perceived gender identity. As a result a man who identifies himself as a woman may use the same restroom as Little Maria or Grandma Emma. I think this is a terrible policy.

In 2015, Starbucks publicly announced its support for same-sex marriage. When some stockholders objected to the company taking a public stance on a divisive issue, CEO Howard Shultz told them that if they didnt like the companys position, You can sell your shares in Starbucks and buy shares in another company. I also think that was a wrong decision for the coffee company to take.

But Im also a staunch supporter of freedom. And freedom allows for differences of opinion. It means that people, organizations, and companies can espouse certain values and beliefs with which I disagree. It means that they can act consistent with those beliefs without fear of being thrown in jail or fined into oblivion by the government. So while I disagree with the positions taken by Target and Starbucks, I do not believe that the government should be able to tell them what to believe or whether they can operate their business consistent with their values.

Freedom is what Senate Bill 149 is all about. It ensures that adoption agencies across the state can operate consistent with their religious beliefs without fear of being shut down or punished by the government for doing so.

Some people are going to agree with the religious convictions held by some of the adoption agencies in the state; others will staunchly disagree with those beliefs. And that is okay. In fact, that is what makes America distinct from many other countries on earth. We can strongly disagree about beliefs and ideas and still peacefully live together.

The opponents of SB 149, do not simply disagree with the beliefs held by religious adoption agencies in S.D., they oppose giving adoption agencies the freedom to hold those beliefs. They want the government to have the authority to determine what organizations can believe and whether or not they can operate in accordance with those beliefs.

So if a local government, any government, disagrees with an adoption agencys belief regarding the importance of placing a child with a married mother and father, then opponents of SB 149 think the government should be able to shut down that agency.

That, my friends, is not freedom.

If SB 149s opponents are so upset that some adoption agencies may hold values they dont like, I have a suggestion for them: start your own adoption agency. Start a dozen of them. Set your own policies and incorporate your own beliefs into your agencies practices. If a local government, any government, disagrees with your agencies beliefs, maybe then you will see the wisdom of SB 149. Because in that moment, you will hopefully realize that SB 149 also protects your freedom to operate your adoption agencies consistent with your beliefs.

MY VOICE

Dale Bartscher, Rapid City, is executive director of the Family Heritage Alliance. My Voice columns should be 500 to 700 words. Submissions should include a portrait-type photograph of the author. Authors also should include their full name, age, occupation and relevant organizational memberships.

Send columns to Argus Leader, Box 5034, Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5034, fax them to 605-331-2294 or email them to letters@argusleader.com.

Read or Share this story: http://argusne.ws/2orLAL3

More:

My Voice: Freedom in SB 149 yours and mine - Sioux Falls Argus Leader

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on My Voice: Freedom in SB 149 yours and mine – Sioux Falls Argus Leader

Freedom: Grant provides veteran all-terrain vehicle – Miami News Record

Posted: at 11:41 pm

Kaylea M. Hutson-Miller news@miaminewsrecord.com

GROVE - As he gazed upon his new Action Trackchair, Woodrow Greenfeather summed up his feelings in one word.

Freedom.

"I'll be able to get back into the woods and go hunting and fishing, and do all kinds of stuff," Greenfeather said, as he watched Melanie and Dan Carlson unload his chair on Saturday, April 8. "This means freedom. It's awesome."

The chair, provided to Greenfeather by a grant from the Independence Fund, is an all-terrain wheelchair, outfitted with a 12-amp battery charger, tilt function, cushioned armrests, fixed footrest, Type 1 tracks, rear stability wheels, and independent flip arms.

The chair is designed to travel all forms of terrain including snow, ice, mud and water.

Greenfeather received the chair, worth more than $13,000 through Carlson Mobility, an Austin, Texas-based company, thanks to the funding provided by the Independence Fund.

The organization, supported by Bill O'Reilly, provides wounded veterans and their caregivers a way to take control of their lives.

Officials with the fund do this by providing resources and tools that enable veterans to work through physical, mental and emotional wounds in order to regain their independence.

"I love it," Greenfeather said, as he finished his initial test drive. "I'm almost in tears right now."

How it began

Greenfeather first learned of the Action Trackchair in February while attending the MidSouth Tackle, Hunting and Boat Show in Grove.

"I was looking at them from a distance," Greenfeather said. "I knew I couldn't afford a chair. Melanie called me over and asked me what happened. She told me 'I can get you a chair.'

"I had my doubts. That was two months ago, and now here it is. Melaine is awesome."

Melanie Carlson said she and her husband, Dan, often attend shows, not to sell chairs, but instead to provide information to veterans on the various programs available to fund chairs.

In this instance, the Carlsons worked with Greenfeather to apply for two different funding sources. When those did not materialize, Greenfeather said Melanie Carlson said kept looking.

"Melanie is a nurse. She likes to take care of people," Dan Carlson said. "She keeps track of all of the guys - especially ones like him [Greenfeather] who slip thru the cracks. It's just so much fun to help them out."

While Greenfeather did not qualify for a chair using the traditional route, the Carlsons were able to help him get a refurbished chair, returned by a veteran who could no longer use it.

"I like the fact that we're taking a perfectly good chair, and giving it to someone else," Dan Carlson said.

In this case, the Independence Fund was able to help rehab the chair - which Dan Carlson said was less than a year old - and outfit Greenfeather with several accessories, including a way to haul it with his car.

On Saturday, the Carlsons spent at least an hour on Saturday, helping Greenfeather learn about the features of his chair.

"It's pretty rewarding," Melanie Carlson said. "I'm very honored."

More about Greenfeather

Greenfeather received multiple injuries while serving with the 101st Airborne, during the initial invasion into Iraq. Because of this, he was medically discharged from the U.S. Army in 2007.

Those injuries were further exasperated in September 2013, when Greenfeather was involved in a motorcycle accident in southern Delaware county.

That incident, he said, left him without feeling in his legs from the calf down, as well as limited mobility in his arms and back.

Those injures not only meant he could no longer go hunting and fishing, it also forced him to step down from his role with the Hickory Grove Fire Department.

"This is going to let me go hunting again, and fish from the banks [of Grand Lake]," Greenfeather said. "All I can do now is fish from the docks."

About Carlson Mobility

Carlson Mobility is a distributor of Action Trackchairs. Based in Austin, Texas, the Carlsons' territory includes New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas and parts of Louisiana.

Action Trackchairs were developed by Dan Carlson's uncle, Tim Swenson, after his son, Jeff, was paralyzed in a car accident.

"He wanted to find ways to get my cousin back outdoors," Dan Carlson said. "We take all of this very personally. It's not just a job, but it's a family affair."

He added the couple are currently working with two other veterans, they met during the MidSouth show. If those veterans qualify for chairs, the Carlsons expect to return to Grove.

In addition to Greenfeather's chair, the pair made stops in Dallas, Woodward and El Reno, dropping chairs off with other veterans - all paid for through donations from the Independence Fund.

About the Independence Fund

Carrie Stead, care director for the Independence Fund, said the organization strives to get veterans back outdoors as a way to thank them.

"They gave their time in the service," Stead said. "The least we can do is give them back some of their independence."

While new chairs cost upwards of $13,000, Stead said refurbished chairs can cost approximately $5,000, depending upon what needs to be fixed for its new owner.

A physical therapist by trade, and the wife of a veteran wounded in 2009 in Afghanistan, Stead said watching veterans regain their freedom is priceless.

For more information about the Independence Fund, persons interested may visit http://independencefund.org. For more information about Action Trackchairs and Carlson Mobility, persons interested may visit http://www.trackchairsoutheast.com, http://www.facebook.com/carlsonmobility or 512-769-6376.

Go here to read the rest:

Freedom: Grant provides veteran all-terrain vehicle - Miami News Record

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Freedom: Grant provides veteran all-terrain vehicle – Miami News Record

Track how technology is transforming work – Nature.com

Posted: at 11:41 pm

Ko Sasaki/The New York Times/Redux/eyevine

Androids, such as this one directing shoppers in Tokyo, will replace humans in many service occupations in the next 1020 years.

Advances in technology pose huge challenges for jobs. Productivity levels have never been higher in the United States, for example, but income for the bottom 50% of earners has stagnated since 1999 (see 'Job shifts'). Most of the monetary gains have gone to a small group at the very top. Technology is not the only reason, but it is probably the most important one.

A report published on 13 April by the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine details the impacts of information technology on the workforce1. We co-chaired the report committee and learnt a great deal in the process including that, over the next 1020 years, technology will affect almost every occupation. For example, self-driving vehicles could slash the need for drivers of taxis and long-haul trucks, and online education could enrich options for retraining of displaced workers.

Most important, we learnt that policymakers are flying blind into what has been called the fourth industrial revolution or the second machine age. There is a remarkable lack of data available on basic questions, such as: what is the scope and rate of change of the key technologies, especially artificial intelligence (AI)? Which technologies are already eliminating, augmenting or transforming which types of jobs? What new work opportunities are emerging, and which policy options might create jobs in this context?

At best, this paucity of information will lead to missed opportunities. At worst, it could be disastrous. If we want to understand, prepare for and guide the unpredictable impacts of advancing technology, we must radically reinvent our ability to observe and track these changes and their drivers.

Fortunately, many of the components of a fit-for-purpose data infrastructure are already in place. Digital knowledge about the economy is proliferating and has unprecedented precision, detail and timeliness. The private sector is increasingly adopting different approaches to generating data and using them in decision-making, such as A/B testing to compare alternatives. And technologies that protect privacy while allowing statistical summaries of large amounts of data to be shared are increasingly available.

We call for the creation of an integrated information strategy to combine public and privately held data. This would provide policymakers and the public with ways to negotiate the evolving and unpredictable impacts of technology on the workforce. Building on this, we call for policymakers to adopt an evidence-based 'sense and respond' approach, as pioneered by the private sector.

These are big changes, but the stakes for workers and the economy are high.

Much of the data needed to spot, understand and adapt to workforce challenges are not gathered in a systematic way, or worse, do not exist. The irony of our information age is that despite the flood of online data, decision-makers all too often lack timely, relevant information.

For instance, although digital technologies underpin many consumer services, standard US government data sources such as the Current Population Survey conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics don't accurately capture the rise of the contingent or temporary workforce because they do not ask the right questions. Researchers and private-sector economists have tried to address this by commissioning their own surveys2, but these lack the scale, scope and credibility of government surveys. Government administrative data, such as tax forms, provide another potentially valuable data source, but these need to be integrated with government survey data to provide context and validation3.

Similarly lacking are metrics to track progress in the technologies and capabilities of AI. Moore's law (that microprocessor performance doubles every two years or so) captures advances in the underlying semiconductors, but it does not cover rapid improvements in areas such as computer vision, speech and problem solving. A comprehensive index of AI would provide objective data on the pace and breadth of developments. Mapping such an index to a taxonomy of skills and tasks in various occupations would help educators to design programmes for the workforce of the future. Non-governmental groups, such as the One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence at Stanford University in California, are taking useful steps, but much more can and should be done at the federal level.

Happily, we are in the middle of a digital data explosion. As companies have come to understand the power of machine learning, they have begun to capture new kinds of data to optimize their internal processes and interactions with customers and suppliers. Most large companies have adopted software and data infrastructures to standardize and, in many cases, to automate tasks from managing inventories and orders to handling staff holidays. Internet companies such as Amazon and Netflix routinely capture massive amounts of data to learn which products to show customers next, increasing sales and satisfaction. These lessons about real-time data collection and the data themselves can also be valuable to governments.

For example, websites for job-seekers contain data about millions of posts, the skills they require and where the jobs are. Universities have detailed information about how many students are taking which courses, when they will graduate and with which skills. Robotics companies have customer data showing demand for different types of automated assembly system. Technology-platform companies have data about how many freelance workers they employ, the hours they work and where. These sorts of information, if connected and made accessible in the right way, could give us a radically better picture of the current state of employment.

But hardly any such data are being shared now between organizations, and so we fail to capture their societal value. Reasons include the unwillingness of companies to divulge data that might be used by competitors. Privacy issues, cultural inertia and regulations against sharing are other obstacles.

Taking advantage of existing data needs a change in mindset4. Over the past decade, many corporations have moved from a 'predict and plan' approach to a 'sense and respond' one, which allows them to adapt quickly to a rapidly changing environment. By continuously collecting massive volumes of real-time data about customers, competitors, suppliers and their own operations, companies have learnt how to evolve their strategies, product offerings and profitability. The number of manufacturing firms adopting a data-driven approach to decision-making has more than tripled since 2005, reflecting the improvements it can bring to profitability and effectiveness5.

The most nimble firms run real-time experiments to test different policies and products. For example, Internet companies routinely run A/B tests: presenting customers with different interfaces, measuring which is most effective, then adopting the most successful. We discussed this approach with Sebastian Thrun, founder of the online education provider Udacity. In this way, the company learnt that it can dramatically improve retention of people on its courses by requiring students to apply for admission before beginning the course. Counter-intuitively, it also found that raising its prices in China tripled overall demand for its services.

John Phillips/Getty

A robot delivers takeaway food to customers in a trial in London.

Governments can and must learn the lessons of data-driven decision-making and experimentation. In the face of rapid and unpredictable changes that have unknown consequences, they need to be able to observe those changes in real time, and to quickly test policy responses to determine what works. For example, the best policy for retraining displaced workers could be decided after trialling several different policies for workers within one region. The policies' different impacts on employment could be observed for a year before moving forward with the one that produces the greatest re-employment. Authorities could continue to experiment to accommodate future changes.

One example of such an experiment was actually an accident. In 2008, the state of Oregon used a lottery process to randomize which of its citizens would be granted access to government health insurance (Medicaid), after an unexpected shortfall in state funding required funds to be rationed. The process provided invaluable information about the causal effects of the programme on health and well-being, and showed that Medicaid coverage led to an increase in preventive screening, such as for cholesterol6. There are many opportunities for more deliberate experimentation in government programmes. Because many are implemented in a phased process, some randomization can be done at little or no cost.

Digital data should not be treated as a substitute to information that is collected in more conventional ways by the government. It often makes government data more valuable, not less. Typically, the 'digital exhaust' data trail that is generated as a by-product of digitizing an organization's processes, goods and services does not fully capture or represent the underlying phenomena. For example, according to our analyses, Java programmers are well represented in databases of the employment-networking platform LinkedIn, but truck drivers are not. Not everyone has a smartphone, let alone a particular app. The use of digital payment tools, social networks or search engines varies across demographic categories and other variables of interest.

Although terabytes and exabytes of data are now available, they need to be calibrated and validated. The best way to do that is often through the kinds of systematic survey (such as a national census) and administrative data that the government collects. And, like industry, government should leverage more types of digital data that are collected as a by-product of its operations for instance, automatic toll collections or taxes.

Information is the ultimate public good.

Collecting truly representative data will at times require the force of law for compliance and anonymity. It might also require new modes of publicprivate partnerships including ways to incentivize the collection of data that are of great value to society but of little direct value to the private organization that is best positioned to collect them. This reflects the fact that information, which can often be shared at close to zero marginal cost, is the ultimate public good7. For example, job-placement websites might have little reason to publish statistics about which laid-off workers from one economic sector are getting new jobs of a certain type owing to skills obtained from a particular retraining programme. This holds true even if such trends are visible in their data, cost no money to share and are valuable to newly displaced workers.

We have spoken to leaders at private organizations including human-resource consultants Manpower in Milwaukee, Wisconsin; LinkedIn of Mountain View, California; and job-market analytics firm Burning Glass Technologies in Boston, Massachusetts. All have expressed an openness to such data sharing.

A rational public strategy for managing the jobs revolution calls for a clear and comprehensive picture of the changes. Obtaining that picture will require three things. First, we must find ways to collect data and statistical summaries from diverse sources, including private organizations. Second, a trusted broker is needed to protect data privacy, access, security, anonymity and other rights of data providers, and to provide summaries for the public (much as the US Census and other statistical agencies currently do). Third, we need ways to integrate data from sources that reflect different statistical sampling skews and biases, normalizing the data where possible and flagging any remaining biases.

This new information infrastructure should be integrated with existing core indexes that track key measures such as employment, earnings, recruitment, lay-offs, resignations and productivity and combined with powerful data sources from the private sector. This will enable statistics and analysis to shed light on standard key indicators of the economy in the context of ongoing change.

Perfection here is not a prerequisite for utility anything is better than flying blind. Investing in an infrastructure that enables continuous collection, storage, sharing and analysis of data about work is one of the most important and urgent steps any government can take.

Read this article:

Track how technology is transforming work - Nature.com

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on Track how technology is transforming work – Nature.com

New Technology May Help Self-Driving Cars See Better – Fortune

Posted: at 11:41 pm

Twenty-two year old Stanford dropout Austin Russell started working on self driving car technology before he was old enough to drive. Nearly seven years later, Russell believes that his creation, a small little black box the size of a car battery, may make self-driving cars a lot safer.

Russell's startup, Luminar, pulled back the curtain on its work Thursday after years of working in near secrecy. The company claims to have made a big advancement in LiDAR, one of the standard guidance systems used in self-driving cars and what keeps them from smashing into trees, buses, and pedestrians crossing the road.

LiDAR technology is at the center of the self driving car world because it helps cars navigate by letting them detect objects around them without human help. The technology emits laser beams around the car to create a highly accurate 3D map of what's around it.

LiDAR data will tell a car that a cyclist is crossing in front of it at a stop sign or that a pedestrian is walking nearby on a sidewalk. This laser map, plus cameras and software, provides the information that helps a car operate without a driver in control.

The challenge for self-driving cars is that LiDAR technology is expensive . In fact, it's among the most costly things in self-driving vehicles. A high-end LiDAR costs more than $75,000, according to Waymo, the self-driving car arm of Google's parent company, Alphabetand most autonomous cars need at least two LiDAR systems.

Russell's company would compete against rivals like Velodyne, which Waymo used for its LiDAR until 2012. Uber, Volkswagen, and Ford are also said to be Velodyne customers.

Waymo has since created its own LiDAR technology while trying to slash the cost . It's also suing Uber for allegedly stealing some of its self-driving car designs, signaling just how much of a flash point self-driving cars technology has become for the many companies trying to carve out a market in the nascent field.

Russell declined to reveal what Luminar charges for it LiDAR, which it plans to mass produce and sell to automakers. But he hinted that it doesn't come cheap, implying that cutting corners could lead to accidents.

"With price going down, performance will go down," Russell said. "We are focused on building the best performing technology."

Get Data Sheet , Fortunes technology newsletter.

Russell contends that competing LiDAR systems face another challenge: They're unable to process information fast enough for cars traveling at high speeds. He and co-founder Jason Eichenholz say that the best performing LiDAR systems can only see dark objects (which reflect less light) no more than 35 meters away.

That leaves only one second of reaction time for cars driving at highway speeds. It's simply not enough time to avoid collisions.

However, Russell says that Luminar's LiDAR can spot hard-to-see objects like black cars up to 200 meters away cars traveling at 75 mph seven seconds to change lanes or veer out of the way.

For more on self driving cars, watch:

But Russell declined to compare Luminar's performance to that of any other specific manufacturer. Nor would he say where he got the one second and 35 meter limits on LiDAR technology from other companies.

Russell was also vague about how his team managed to improve its LiDAR's performance. He would only say that that the company has built new sensors and chips using "exotic" materials such as gallium arcinide instead of relying on existing components from suppliers.

The company, which operates from a Silicon Valley mansion and has a Orlando, Fla. production facility, has raised $36 million in funding from Canvas Ventures, GVA Capital, and 1517 Fund. Luminar was reportedly looking to raise additional funds at $1 billion valuation last year, but the startup didn't comment about additional fundraising or the valuation of the company.

Russell declined to say which companies are using his startup's LiDAR, saying only that 100 units are being tested by a handful of partnersat least some of which are paying an undisclosed amount to do so. He added that the response has been "overwhelmingly positive" and that "some customers have been asking to buy every LiDAR sensor they produce for the next five years."

It's clear that Russell doesn't have ambitions to build autonomous vehicles that many believe will become the norm on city streets and highways. The big question that remains is whether Luminar will be the company that Ford, GM , and Uber use as a LiDAR supplier if and when they start selling their own autonomous vehicles.

Here is the original post:

New Technology May Help Self-Driving Cars See Better - Fortune

Posted in Technology | Comments Off on New Technology May Help Self-Driving Cars See Better – Fortune