The Prometheus League
Breaking News and Updates
- Abolition Of Work
- Ai
- Alt-right
- Alternative Medicine
- Antifa
- Artificial General Intelligence
- Artificial Intelligence
- Artificial Super Intelligence
- Ascension
- Astronomy
- Atheism
- Atheist
- Atlas Shrugged
- Automation
- Ayn Rand
- Bahamas
- Bankruptcy
- Basic Income Guarantee
- Big Tech
- Bitcoin
- Black Lives Matter
- Blackjack
- Boca Chica Texas
- Brexit
- Caribbean
- Casino
- Casino Affiliate
- Cbd Oil
- Censorship
- Cf
- Chess Engines
- Childfree
- Cloning
- Cloud Computing
- Conscious Evolution
- Corona Virus
- Cosmic Heaven
- Covid-19
- Cryonics
- Cryptocurrency
- Cyberpunk
- Darwinism
- Democrat
- Designer Babies
- DNA
- Donald Trump
- Eczema
- Elon Musk
- Entheogens
- Ethical Egoism
- Eugenic Concepts
- Eugenics
- Euthanasia
- Evolution
- Extropian
- Extropianism
- Extropy
- Fake News
- Federalism
- Federalist
- Fifth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- Financial Independence
- First Amendment
- Fiscal Freedom
- Food Supplements
- Fourth Amendment
- Fourth Amendment
- Free Speech
- Freedom
- Freedom of Speech
- Futurism
- Futurist
- Gambling
- Gene Medicine
- Genetic Engineering
- Genome
- Germ Warfare
- Golden Rule
- Government Oppression
- Hedonism
- High Seas
- History
- Hubble Telescope
- Human Genetic Engineering
- Human Genetics
- Human Immortality
- Human Longevity
- Illuminati
- Immortality
- Immortality Medicine
- Intentional Communities
- Jacinda Ardern
- Jitsi
- Jordan Peterson
- Las Vegas
- Liberal
- Libertarian
- Libertarianism
- Liberty
- Life Extension
- Macau
- Marie Byrd Land
- Mars
- Mars Colonization
- Mars Colony
- Memetics
- Micronations
- Mind Uploading
- Minerva Reefs
- Modern Satanism
- Moon Colonization
- Nanotech
- National Vanguard
- NATO
- Neo-eugenics
- Neurohacking
- Neurotechnology
- New Utopia
- New Zealand
- Nihilism
- Nootropics
- NSA
- Oceania
- Offshore
- Olympics
- Online Casino
- Online Gambling
- Pantheism
- Personal Empowerment
- Poker
- Political Correctness
- Politically Incorrect
- Polygamy
- Populism
- Post Human
- Post Humanism
- Posthuman
- Posthumanism
- Private Islands
- Progress
- Proud Boys
- Psoriasis
- Psychedelics
- Putin
- Quantum Computing
- Quantum Physics
- Rationalism
- Republican
- Resource Based Economy
- Robotics
- Rockall
- Ron Paul
- Roulette
- Russia
- Sealand
- Seasteading
- Second Amendment
- Second Amendment
- Seychelles
- Singularitarianism
- Singularity
- Socio-economic Collapse
- Space Exploration
- Space Station
- Space Travel
- Spacex
- Sports Betting
- Sportsbook
- Superintelligence
- Survivalism
- Talmud
- Technology
- Teilhard De Charden
- Terraforming Mars
- The Singularity
- Tms
- Tor Browser
- Trance
- Transhuman
- Transhuman News
- Transhumanism
- Transhumanist
- Transtopian
- Transtopianism
- Ukraine
- Uncategorized
- Vaping
- Victimless Crimes
- Virtual Reality
- Wage Slavery
- War On Drugs
- Waveland
- Ww3
- Yahoo
- Zeitgeist Movement
-
Prometheism
-
Forbidden Fruit
-
The Evolutionary Perspective
Daily Archives: March 17, 2017
16000 Voices Kiwis say no to euthanasia – MercatorNet
Posted: March 17, 2017 at 7:49 am
MercatorNet | 16000 Voices Kiwis say no to euthanasia MercatorNet Shortly after, Labour MP Maryan Street and the Voluntary Euthanasia Society presented a petition to parliament for a law change to allow doctor-assisted suicide. The government responded to the petition signed by 8975 people with a public inquiry ... |
Follow this link:
Posted in Euthanasia
Comments Off on 16000 Voices Kiwis say no to euthanasia – MercatorNet
Greyhound racing: euthanasia of healthy dogs sparks call for … – The Guardian
Posted: at 7:49 am
The New South Wales Greens upper house member Mehreen Faruqi fears greyhounds are still being euthanised because of minor injuries, underperformance, or cost. Photograph: Dan Himbrechts/EPA
A New South Wales greyhound owner was able to put down six young, healthy dogs within three weeks of obtaining them, according to internal records.
The case, and others like it, have prompted a renewed push by the NSW Greens for a breeding cap and stronger penalties for vets and owners who euthanise healthy greyhounds.
NSWs upper house last year voted in favour of releasing thousands of pages of documents held by Greyhound Racing NSW, the body responsible for governing and regulating the industry.
The first set of documents was handed over late last year and a second volume is due to be released later this month, despite attempts by Greyhound Racing NSW to prevent disclosure.
The initial documents revealed a series of examples in which trainers attempted to put down dogs unnecessarily.
In one case in the states north-east, a former greyhound trainer euthanised six healthy dogs within three weeks of taking possession of them.
The man had the dogs put down despite an offer by their previous owners to take them back, according to internal records.
Greyhound Racing NSWs intelligence team was contacted by the original owners wife, who was said to be deeply distressed by the mans actions.
Intelligence was contacted by [redacted] on 23 June, 2016, who was deeply distressed by the fact that her healthy, young greyhounds had been put down, internal case notes said.
Stated that [redacted] was told if he couldnt keep them that he was to return them. [Redacted] stated they only gave dogs on request by a friend [redacted] who stated [redacted] wanted to get into the industry. [Redacted] had asked that they give some greyhounds to get him started.
Greyhound NSW took no action against the man, because he was no longer a registered trainer, and did not refer him to other authorities, because no crime had been committed.
The special inquiry into greyhound racing in NSW found that up to 68,000 dogs were killed as wastage in the past 12 years.
Stewards reports showed that dogs are still regularly being put down immediately after races in NSW.
Twenty-one greyhounds have been euthanised at tracks so far this year. Vastly more dogs were injured during racing but not immediately put down. Their fate after they left the track is unknown.
The NSW Greens MLC Mehreen Faruqi fears that greyhounds are still unnecessarily being euthanised, either due to minor injuries, underperformance, or cost.
Their whole business model relies on the overbreeding of greyhounds and the killing of dogs that arent fast enough, or are no longer profitable, Faruqi said.
The internal documents revealed another case last year, in which a steward was forced to intervene to stop a veterinarian euthanising a greyhound that had a swollen leg.
The dogs trainer approached the vet after a race in the Hunter, saying his dog had broken its hock and needed to be put down.
At the time [the trainer] seemed quite annoyed that I refused to allow his greyhound to be euthanised on track, the steward wrote in his report to Greyhound Racing NSW.
I find it disturbing that if I was not in the kennelling block that day a greyhound would have been euthanized unnecessarily. There is far too much going on throughout the day for the stewards to be everywhere and in control of every aspect of the meeting.
The dog was treated and later returned to racing.
The industry is still preparing for a suite of animal welfare reforms following the dramatic backflip on the greyhound ban last year.
Planned reforms to the industry will be shaped by the recommendations of the greyhound industry reform panel, which were delivered last month.
The panels key recommendation was for the creation of a new integrity commission to oversee the industry and the introduction of tougher penalties for live-baiting. It also recommended tighter controls on euthanasia.
The panel did not recommend a breeding cap or setting target dates to achieve zero euthanasia.
Faruqi said the panels failure to recommend a cap meant greyhounds would continue to be overbred and disposed of.
She called for specific penalties for veterinarians who allow healthy dogs to be put down, or for anyone who attempts to intimidate or harass vets into performing euthanasia unnecessarily.
Surely, the industry cant be allowed to go back to business-as-usual, putting down dogs when they are no longer financially viable, Faruqi said.
We need to break this culture of cruelty and ensure that veterinarians, who under the proposed recommendations are the only pathway to disposing of unwanted dogs, are not euthanising healthy dogs or being pressured to do so by the industry participants.
Greyhound Racing NSW said it had already introduced breeding restrictions in mid-2015. Those restrictions limit the number and frequency of litters for breeding females.
A spokesman said that had coincided with a 55% drop in pups born year-on-year until December last year.
It also introduced measures last year to force owners to seek written consent from Greyhound Racing NSW before euthanising healthy greyhounds.
The spokesman said a number of other initiatives were currently being considered, including forcing owners to take all reasonable steps to re-home greyhounds where appropriate, and increasing the fees for registering litters of pups.
GRNSW would be happy to meet with the Greens to discuss its proposals to reduce euthanasia and how they could be effectively implemented, he said.
This would be preferable rather than hearing them second-hand through an intermediary in the media.
The documents also suggest that Greyhound Racing NSW kept a watch list of vets with high euthanasia rates but the organisation has denied such a list exists.
Continue reading here:
Greyhound racing: euthanasia of healthy dogs sparks call for ... - The Guardian
Posted in Euthanasia
Comments Off on Greyhound racing: euthanasia of healthy dogs sparks call for … – The Guardian
Number of Euthanasia deaths increasing quickly in Qubec – National Right to Life News
Posted: at 7:49 am
By Alex Schadenberg , Executive Director Euthanasia Prevention Coalition
Earlier this week CBC news reported that the number of euthanasia deaths in Qubec significantly increased in the second half of 2016.
Moreover, the 6-month report indicated that 14% of the euthanasia deaths were non-compliant with the law.
According to the CBC news report:
A total of 461 patients were granted doctor-assisted death during the first year of Quebecs medical aid in dying law, according to data obtained by CBCs French-language service, Radio-Canada.
The number of requests increased significantly in the second half of 2016. From December 2015 to end of June 2016, 253 patients requested the procedure, and 166 of them underwent it.
Between June and December 2016, 468 people made requests for medically assisted dying, with 295 of them undergoing it.
The CBC news report explained that requests and rate of acceptance vary by region:
Five health services centres in Quebec saw substantial increases in the number of requests they were receiving, a rise of more than 200 per cent.
For example, the West Island Integrated University Health and Social Services Centre (CIUSSS) saw an increase of 266.7 per cent after the first six months.
Meanwhile, the data shows the rate of acceptance varies based on where the request is made.
Similar to other jurisdictions, euthanasia is introduced under the guise of a strictly regulated law whereby lethal injection will be presented as a final alternative, but over time, it becomes more accepted, promoted and common.
Editors note. This appeared on Mr. Schadenbergs blogand is reposted with permission.
View original post here:
Number of Euthanasia deaths increasing quickly in Qubec - National Right to Life News
Posted in Euthanasia
Comments Off on Number of Euthanasia deaths increasing quickly in Qubec – National Right to Life News
Types of Crimes – Overview and Discussion
Posted: at 7:48 am
A crime is defined as any act that is contrary to legal code or laws. There are many different types of crimes, from crimes against persons to victimless crimes and violent crimes to white collar crimes. The study of crime and deviance is a large subfield within sociology, with much attention paid to who commits which types of crimes and why.
Crimes against persons, also called personal crimes, include murder, aggravated assault, rape, and robbery.
Personal crimes are unevenly distributed in the United States, with young, urban, poor, and racial minorities arrested for these crimes more than others.
Property crimes involve theft of property without bodily harm, such as burglary, larceny, auto theft, and arson. Like personal crimes, young, urban, poor, and racial minorities are arrested for these crimes more than others.
Hate crimes are crimes against persons or property that are committed while invoking prejudices ofrace, gender or gender identity, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity. The rate of hate crimes in the U.S. remains fairly constant from year to year, but there have been a few events that have caused surges in hate crimes. In 2016, the election of Donald Trump to president was followed by ten days of hate crimes.
Crimes against morality are also called victimless crimes because there is not complainant, or victim.
Prostitution, illegal gambling, and illegal drug use are all examples of victimless crimes.
White-collar crimes are crimes committed by people of high social status who commit their crimes in the context of their occupation. This includes embezzling (stealing money from ones employer), insider trading, tax evasion, and other violations of income tax laws.
White-collar crimes generally generate less concern in the public mind than other types of crime, however in terms of total dollars, white-collar crimes are even more consequential for society. For example, the Great Recession can be understood as in part the result of a variety of white-collar crimes committed within the home mortgage industry. Nonetheless, these crimes are generally the least investigated and least prosecuted because they are protected by a combination of privileges of race, class, and gender.
Organized crime is committed by structured groups typically involving the distribution and sale of illegal goods and services. Many people think of the Mafia when they think of organized crime, but the term can refer to any group that exercises control over large illegal enterprises (such as the drug trade, illegal gambling, prostitution, weapons smuggling, or money laundering).
A key sociological concept in the study or organized crime is that these industries are organized along the same lines as legitimate businesses and take on a corporate form. There are typically senior partners who control profits, employees who manage and work for the business, and clients who buy the goods and services that the organization provides.
Arrest data show a clear pattern of arrests in terms of race, gender, and class. For instance, as mentioned above, young, urban, poor, and racial minorities are arrested and convicted more than others for personal and property crimes. To sociologists, the question posed by this data is whether this reflects actual differences in committing crimes among different groups, or whether this reflects differential treatment by the criminal justice system.
Studies show that the answer is both. Certain groups are in fact more likely to commit crimes than others because crime, often looked to as a survival strategy, is linked to patterns of inequality in the United States. However, the process of prosecution in the criminal justice system is also significantly related to patterns of race, class, and gender inequality.
We see this in the official arrest statistics, in treatment by the police, in sentencing patterns, and in studies of imprisonment.
Updated by Nicki Lisa Cole, Ph.D.
Read the original:
Posted in Victimless Crimes
Comments Off on Types of Crimes – Overview and Discussion
West Virginia improving on legal penalties for trafficking – News … – Shepherdstown Chronicle
Posted: at 7:48 am
West Virginia is trying to improve its grade on laws regarding human trafficking. According to the website, Shared Hope which provides grades of all 50 states relating to trafficking laws, West Virginia received a "D" in 2016.
Last week, however, the West Virginia Senate passed House Bill 2318, introduced by Delegate John Shott, R-Mercer, which creates felony offenses and penalties for using a person in forced labor, debt bondage and commercial sexual activity. It also creates a felony for patronizing a person to engage in commercial sexual activity and provides immunity from prosecution for minors who might otherwise be prosecuted for prostitution.
Shepherdstown Police Chief Mike King feels that stiffer penalties are appropriate to try to slow the problem.
"Does anybody think that things will change if we arrest a person for trafficking and he goes to court and gets a slap on the wrist and a fine? It's not going to change a thing. He's just going to pick up and move to a different location and open business again," said King.
In areas just outside of West Virginia, this problem is more common, but trafficking is on the rise, not only nationally, but globally as well.
Traffickers see this crime as low-risk, high reward due to the lack of prosecutions and even the low probability of being caught.
King admits that trafficking can be difficult to identify. "A problem with sex trafficking and prostitution is that the victims don't always see themselves as victims. They often refer to their trafficker as a 'boyfriend' and say that they are in a relationship." King continued, "It is coming to light, with the training that is happening now, that this is not a victimless crime. It was looked at as a victimless crime for many years. The law isn't blurry, but each case is.
King says that all of his officers have had training on identifying trafficking, and that the state now does require training. However, he's not sure prosecutions will see an increase just yet.
"Unfortunately, this is a crime right now that is relatively low on the list of things to do for investigative units because the drugs are so rampant right now with all of the overdoses we have. There's so much pressure for that kind of activity to be squashed," said King. "It's a pretty high probability that there are drugs involved wherever there is sex trafficking. "The drug problem is easier to identify and to make make arrests to shut it down."
With the spotlight on the opioid problem in our area and with budgetary constraints in the state, it remains to be seen if there will be dedicated investigators to address the issue of sex and labor trafficking in West Virginia. However, with awareness on the rise, law enforcement officials feel certain there will be more cases brought to light in the panhandle.
Sargent Will Garrett from the West Virginia State Police Crimes Against Children Division is one of three officers in that division who cover all seven counties in the panhandle.
Garrett said, "We are constantly getting cyber tips from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children on a monthly basis for possible child solicitation on the internet and possible child prostitution. Every now and then, we might get something for an alleged human trafficking event, but that's few and far between right now."
Garrett continued, "What we do has an impact, but it's just the tip of the iceburg."
According to Garrett, statewide in 2016, the West Virginia Crimes Against Children Division had over 900 cases.
His unit conducted a successful sting operation in Berkeley County for the Eastern Panhandle in 2016 as well, the largest one to date for the West Virginia State Police.
"We ended up getting about seven individuals who traveled or attempted to travel to bring themselves withing the presence of a minor for the purposes of having some sort of sexual interaction," said Garrett.
According to statistics from the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, one in six endangered runaways reported to NCMEC in 2016 were likely sex trafficking victims. A shocking 86 percent of these likely sex trafficking victims were in the care of social services or foster care when they went missing. Many of these children runaway to meet someone that they have engaged with online or are picked up, groomed for trafficking, then solicited.
"We are trying to make some headway," said King, "but we are starting down a long path that has no end in sight."
View original post here:
West Virginia improving on legal penalties for trafficking - News ... - Shepherdstown Chronicle
Posted in Victimless Crimes
Comments Off on West Virginia improving on legal penalties for trafficking – News … – Shepherdstown Chronicle
LETTERS: Another good investment; only time will tell | Colorado … – Colorado Springs Gazette
Posted: at 7:48 am
Thirteen new pickleball courts were opened in Monument Valley Park after a ribbon cutting ceremony Tuesday, August 26, 2014. Photo courtesy of Mike Hess
My husband and I play pickleball and appreciate the help the City Council provided to complete the 14 pickleball courts in Monument Valley Park. Like the U.S. Olympic Museum supporters, Pikes Peak Pickleball raised some of the money. Pickleball is a fast-growing nationwide sport. Tournaments will bring many tourist dollars into the local economy. It was part of the State Games last year.
Thank you, Colorado Springs City Council for your support. It was a good investment. Now, please extend that same wise support by giving LART funds for another very deserving group - The U.S. Olympic Museum. Our area and state will benefit 100 times over the investment of $500,000.
Janice E. Brewington
Colorado Springs
Misguided government policies
Lisa Butler's recent letter really resonated with me. From its contents, I am reasonably certain that we are close to the same generation, and assuredly of the same mindset. She perfectly and eloquently expressed the misgivings I am feeling. Our Congress must act strongly and swiftly to address the business of this country and put aside all thoughts of how their actions will affect their next campaign. The urgency to get the seeds of racism, misogyny, isolationism and violence weeded out of our society is now, and the desperate condition of our infrastructure calls for hard work and immediacy. It seems our recent leadership styles harken back to the days when "Nero fiddled while Rome burned."
Our children need and deserve every measure of education, health and protection we can give them or the future is lost. I do wonder how much money ICE spent arresting the two parents for deportation who recently made the news. Their victimless "crimes" don't begin to warrant their treatment - our law enforcement community should be using all their resources to track down, arrest and incarcerate or deport the vile criminals who do so much harm to our society with their drugs and murderous natures.
The children left behind in both instances are the true victims of the ICEs' misguided policy. I accept that the parents broke the law, but we should adjudicate with compassion instead of harshness, considering the impact these decisions make.
I used to identify myself as a Democrat but switched to the Republican Party midlife and now feel I have no choice at all. The absurdity of this administration and its fumbling, dishonest, self-serving behavior is absolutely beyond the pale and the last administration went too far in overreaching the powers given them, so I feel total antipathy for them both.
We, as citizens, have to shoulder the blame for the current state of affairs and do whatever is necessary to remedy it both at the ballot box and on the streets. Keep marching and protesting.
Carol Bishop
Colorado Springs
Just plain old hate speech
It took me a couple day's to gag down the diatribe that appeared on last Wednesday's OP/ED page, complements of Lisa Butler. It was kind of like that train wreck you don't really want to see, but can't help watching anyway.
The longer I thought about most of the assertions she made in her letter, it became clear to me that it was just plain old hate speech! Nothing more, nothing less! Our president is a "bigoted, misogynist who encourages discrimination?" "Thousands have taken his views as carte blanche to kill and burn places of worship?" "We now have over 100 recognized hate groups, up from 30 just a few years ago?" Unbelievable! All the civil rights, and gay rights talk really can't hide the fact that most of it was just hate speech. I wonder Ms. Butler's letter would have looked like had Hillary Clinton been elected?
Randy Pierce
Colorado Springs
Carrier passionate about his work
Several years ago we moved into the Kissing Camels neighborhood and I was introduced to a Gazette mail carrier by the name of Howard Pudder. After a short time, we found Howard to be a devoted and dedicated man who took pride in every aspect of his job. I witnessed over the years a man who through thick and thin quietly approached our home, got out of his vehicle and placed the paper against our front door.
I recall after moving into our home, having a concern that on many early morning flights my paper would not arrive before I had to leave to catch my plane. Howard quickly put that concern to rest as time and time again in the wee early morning hours I saw Howard's headlights coming up the drive. I never knew Howard personally, just an exchange of cards at Christmas time but I knew him as a man who was passionate about his work and someone who always did his very best at what he did. In a day and age where everyone fights over everything and seeks to gain an edge, I found Howard to be someone the rest of the world should try and emulate. Thank you for your dedicated service these last years and a job well done. Rest In Peace, Howard.
Ray McElhaney
Colorado Springs
Only time will tell
You may remember that I pointed out to you shortly after the last election that we had been snookered by 2C as the city was using road improvement funds to improve gutters and curbs (drainage improvements). While the city stopped displaying the signs touting how pleased they were that a particular improvement was part of 2C, they did in fact continue to misuse funds for drainage improvements, and to "blackwash" roads that needed no fixing at all, while totally ignoring the streets that truly needed fixing. Think of Pikes Peak between Union and downtown for instance.
At that time I also told you that I voted for keeping excess revenue and against new taxes. I have decided to again vote for the city to keep excess revenue. Had there been a tax increase request, I would have voted against it.
I want to believe that our most recent presidential election has impressed upon them the need to stop lying to us.
Only time will tell.
Kenneth Duncan
Colorado Springs
Read the original here:
LETTERS: Another good investment; only time will tell | Colorado ... - Colorado Springs Gazette
Posted in Victimless Crimes
Comments Off on LETTERS: Another good investment; only time will tell | Colorado … – Colorado Springs Gazette
Ayn Rand’s policies losing power – arkansasonline.com
Posted: at 7:48 am
Ayn Rand is dead. It's been 35 years since hundreds of mourners filed by her coffin (fittingly accompanied by a dollar-sign-shaped flower arrangement), but it has been only four months since she truly died as a force in American politics.
Yes, there was a flurry of articles identifying Rand lovers in the Trump administration, including Rex Tillerson and Mike Pompeo; yes, Ivanka Trump tweeted an inaccurate Rand quote in mid-February. But the effort to fix a recognizable right-wing ideology on President Donald Trump only obscures the more significant long-term trends that the election of 2016 laid bare. However much Trump seems like the Rand hero par excellence--a wealthy man with a fiery belief in, well, himself--his victory signals the exhaustion of the Republican Party's romance with Rand.
In electing Trump, the Republican base rejected laissez-faire economics in favor of economic nationalism. Full-fledged objectivism, the philosophy Rand invented, is an atheistic creed that calls for pure capitalism and a bare-bones government with no social spending on entitlement programs such as Social Security or Medicare. It's never appeared on the national political scene without significant dilution. But there was plenty of diluted Rand on offer throughout the primary season: Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Carly Fiorina and Ted Cruz all espoused traditional Republican nostrums about reducing the role of government to unleash American prosperity.
Yet none of this could match Trump's full-throated roar to build a wall or his protectionist plans for American trade. In the general election, Trump sought out new voters and independents using arguments traditionally associated with Democrats: deploying the power of the state to protect workers and guarantee their livelihoods, even at the cost of trade agreements and long-standing international alliances.
Trump's economic promises electrified rural working-class voters the same way Bernie Sanders excited urban socialists. Where Rand's influence has stood for years on the right for a hands-off approach to the economy, Trump's "America first" platform contradicts this premise by assuming that government policies can and should deliberately shape economic growth, up to and including punishing specific corporations. Likewise, his promise to craft trade policy in support of the American worker is the exact opposite of Rand's proclamation that "the essence of capitalism's foreign policy is free trade."
And there's little hope that Trump's closest confidants will reverse his decidedly anti-Randian course. The conservative Republicans who came to power with Trump in an almost accidental process may find they have to exchange certain ideals to stay close to him. True, Paul Ryan and Mike Pence have been able to breathe new life into Republican economic and social orthodoxies. For instance, in a nod to Pence's religious conservatism, Trump shows signs of reversing his earlier friendliness to gay rights. And his opposition to Obamacare dovetails with Ryan's long-held ambitions to shrink federal spending.
Even so, there is little evidence that either Pence or Ryan would have survived a Republican primary battle against Trump or fared well in a national election; their fortunes are dependent on Trump's. And the president won by showing that the Republican base and swing voters have moved on from the traditional conservatism of Reagan and Rand.
What is rising on the right is not Randian fear of government but something far darker. It used to be that bright young things like Stephen Miller, the controversial White House aide, came up on Rand. In the 1960s she inspired a rump movement of young conservatives determined to subvert the GOP establishment, drawing in future bigwigs such as Alan Greenspan. Her admirers were powerfully attracted to the insurgent presidential campaign of Barry Goldwater, whom Rand publicly supported. They swooned when she talked about the ethics of capitalism, delegitimizing programs like Medicare and Medicaid as immoral. They thrilled to her attack on the draft and other conservative pieties. At national conferences, they asked each other, "Who is John Galt?" (a reference to her novel Atlas Shrugged) and waved the black flag of anarchism, modified with a gold dollar sign.
Over time, most conservatives who stayed in politics outgrew these juvenile provocations or disavowed them. For example, Ryan moved swiftly to replace Rand with Thomas Aquinas when he was nominated in 2012 for vice president, claiming that the Catholic thinker was his primary inspiration (although it was copies of Atlas Shrugged, not Summa Theologiae, that he handed out to staffers). But former Randites retained her fiery hatred of government and planted it within the mainstream GOP. And it was Rand who had kindled their passions in the first place, making her the starting point for a generation of conservatives.
Now Rand is on the shelf, gathering dust with F.A. Hayek, Edmund Burke and other once-prominent conservative luminaries. It's no longer possible to provoke the elders by going on about John Galt. Indeed, many of the elders have by now used Randian references to name their yachts, investment companies and foundations.
Instead, young insurgent conservatives talk about "race realism," argue that manipulated crime statistics mask growing social disorder, and cast feminism as a plot against men. Instead of reading Rand, they take the "red pill," indulging in an emergent Internet counter-culture that reveals the principles of liberalism--rights, equality, tolerance--to be dangerous myths. Beyond Breitbart.com, ideological energy on the right now courses through tiny blogs and websites of the Dark Enlightenment, the latter-day equivalent of Rand's Objectivist Newsletter and the many libertarian 'zines she inspired.
Once upon a time, professors tut-tutted when Rand spoke to overflow crowds on college campuses, where she lambasted left and right alike and claimed, improbably, that big business was America's persecuted minority. She delighted in skewering liberal audience members and occasionally turned her scorn on questioners. But this was soft stuff compared with the insults handed out by Milo Yiannopoulos and the uproar that has greeted his appearances. Rand may have accused liberals of having a "lust for power," but she never would have called Holocaust humor a harmless search for "lulz," as Yiannopoulos gleefully does.
Indeed, the new ideas on the right have moved away from classical liberalism altogether. American conservatives have always had a mixed reaction to the Western philosophical tradition that emphasizes the sanctity of the individual. Religious conservatives in particular often struggle with Rand because her extreme embrace of individualism leaves little room for God, country, duty or faith. But Trump represents a victory for a form of conservatism that is openly illiberal and willing to junk entirely the traditional rhetoric of individualism and free markets for nationalism inflected with racism, misogyny and xenophobia.
Mixed in with Rand's vituperative attacks on government was a defense of the individual's rights in the face of a powerful state. This single-minded focus could yield surprising alignments, such as Rand's opposition to drug laws and her support of legal abortion. And although liberals have always loved to hate her, over the next four years, they may come to miss her defense of individual autonomy and liberty.
Ayn Rand is dead. Long live Ayn Rand!
Jennifer Burns is an associate professor of history at Stanford University and a research fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Editorial on 03/12/2017
Read the original here:
Posted in Ayn Rand
Comments Off on Ayn Rand’s policies losing power – arkansasonline.com
Paul Ryan channels his inner Ayn Rand: Health care is neither a right nor a privilege – Raw Story
Posted: at 7:48 am
Health care is neither a right nor a privilege provided by the government according to House Speaker Paul Ryan.
In a Thursday interview with MSNBCs Chuck Todd, the Wisconsin Congressman explained that he believes the government doesnt owe it to anyone to pay for health care. Doing so enables the government to decide for Americans where how and when we get health car, he said.
He went on to explain that doing so gives the government too much power over peoples lives. Notably, Ryan sang a different tune during the 2012 Vice Presidential debate when he told the audience that he didnt believe unelected judges should decide health care decisions, Congress should. That was about abortions, however.
Todd attempted to interrupt Ryan, but Ryan persisted asked that Todd not cut him off. I love you, were buddies, but ya know, Ryan told Todd. He went on to say that what health care is, however, is a need but that the answer is not Obamacare.
We will be able to offer a better system with more access and lower coverage costs including people with pre-existing conditions, he claimed.
Todd wondered if he was painting himself into a corner, much in the same way Obamas claim if you like your doctor you can keep him did.
When it comes to those who dont buy health care and simply go to the emergency room, Ryan said that those people will be handled by high-risk pool plans like what he had in Wisconsin. Their plan had government-provided insurance for about 21,000 people who had medical conditions that prevented them from getting insurance on the individual market, according to the Lacrosse Tribune.
While it provided care for many, the plan was too expensive for many people. More than 500,000 were left uninsured, according to health policy programs director at the Population Health Institute UW-Madison Donna Friedsam. The plan also had a lifetime cap of $2 million and a six-month waiting period for coverage of pre-existing conditions.
It worked well for 21,000 people, Friedsam said. But it did not solve the problem of getting most of the people in our state connected to affordable coverage.
Watch the full interview with Ryan below:
See the original post:
Paul Ryan channels his inner Ayn Rand: Health care is neither a right nor a privilege - Raw Story
Posted in Ayn Rand
Comments Off on Paul Ryan channels his inner Ayn Rand: Health care is neither a right nor a privilege – Raw Story
The Giving Tree: Bad Book or Worst Book? – Reason (blog)
Posted: at 7:47 am
Entertainment Weekly, RedditEntertainment Weekly reports on unseemly acts of eco-terrorism in Oakland, California: Somebody is chopping up perfectly good trees to mirror the selfless act of the titular character in Shel Silverstein's classic 1964 picture book, The Giving Tree.
Let's not mince words. Written by a Playboy mansion habitue and composer of "A Boy Named Sue," The Giving Tree is about a female tree that literally gives up every aspect of her existence to please a spoiled, uncaring boy. By the end of the volume, the tree is reduced to a stump where the boy, now an old man, can park his ass. Decades past the Sexual Revolution, it's damn nigh impossible to read The Giving Tree as anything other than sublimated male anxiety over the rising tide of unfettered feminine sexuality and freedom. Wouldn't it be great, the book effectively asks, if women on the cusp of societal emancipation, would sacrifice every aspect of their being for jerk guys?
You don't have to be an Ayn Rand fan to read the book this way (though it helps). In 2013, Reason interviewed novelist Arin Greenwood about her excellent YA title Save the Enemy, in which the teenage girl protagonist is searching for her kidnaped father, a weirdo with libertarian sensibilities.
From the book:
Your dad probably read you books like The Giving Tree when you were a kid. My dad did read me The Giving Treeonce, calling it "evil" in that it "promotes the immoral destruction of the self." (I was four.) He preferred Atlas Shrugged, which is basically about how rich people shouldn't pay taxes. He has explained to me a lot over the course of my seventeen years that taxes are "slavery."
Though no libertarian herself, Greenwood nonetheless told us, "Personally, I am a little creeped out by The Giving Tree."
As are we all, Ms. Greenwood, as are we all.
Watch The Giving Tree vs. Ayn Rand: YA Author Arin Greenwood on Save the Enemy:
Read more:
Posted in Atlas Shrugged
Comments Off on The Giving Tree: Bad Book or Worst Book? – Reason (blog)
The NEA works. Why does Trump want to destroy it? – Los Angeles Times
Posted: at 7:47 am
Yet another fight is shaping up over elimination of the National Endowment for the Arts, which on Thursday the Trump administration announced as part of its first federal budget proposal. The National Endowment for the Humanities, Institute of Museum and Library Services and the Corp. for Public Broadcasting, a chief revenue source for PBS and National Public Radio, would also get the ax.
How many times has this battle already been fought? Welcome to Groundhog Day.
Heres one big difference between the cultural life of today and of 1965, when the NEA was founded: Where once a public museum audience and a private commercial market for contemporary American art were tiny, now they are vast and international. Imagine where todays cultural life would be if the federal agency, born into an era of general indifference to the arts, had never existed.
Consider: During those 50 years, a modest but not insignificant number of artists have gotten exceedingly rich. Charitable foundations established by just four of them the late Mike Kelley in Los Angeles and Robert Rauschenberg, Cy Twombly and Andy Warhol in New York have combined assets in excess of $2.25 billion, according to their most recent tax filings.
The resources of those artist-created foundations vary, and they are put to different charitable ends. But theyre giving back. The Warhol is arguably the largest source of grants made to institutions that support artists, surpassing the federal government.
Our public investment is working. Pulling the plug is unwise. As with any other infrastructure, from bridges and roads to power supplies, an arts infrastructure requires maintenance.
The NEA was instrumental in creating an infrastructure for these artists popular success. Their numbers, however, remain modest, and popularity is not always the sole gauge of importance. Imagine what could happen if the battle-scarred agency, rather than limping along fighting opponents as it has for half its institutional life, was empowered to do its full share.
This is all you really need to know about the looming battle over the arts endowment:
Out of sight, out of mind. The NEA has not been popular among conservatives and the GOP since 1965, the year the federal agency was founded. Theyve been trying to kill it for half a century not because they hate art, but because they hate government.
The other day, the Center for Economic Policy and Research in Washington, D.C., overseen by a couple of Nobel laureates and other prominent economists, published a devastating bar graph. If you thought charts were dull, this one would snap your head around.
The design is sort of like Trump Tower looming over the Big Shot thrill ride at the Stratosphere hotel in Las Vegas, plus a neighborhood Taco Bell. It compares the annual federal allotment to the National Endowment for the Arts (just under $150 million) and the Corp. for Public Broadcasting ($445 million) to the estimated cost to taxpayers of Melania Trump choosing to live in New York City rather than in the White House (about $2 million daily). This means an annual government outlay of more than $700 million. The first ladys tall bar on the graph towers over the others.
Estimates that high have been disputed. But the Center for Economic Policy Research also notes correctly that the NEA, CPB and seven other relatively low-cost domestic programs are on the chopping block not for diligent reasons of fiscal restraint. The NEA gets 0.004% of the $4 trillion U.S. budget, or 0.014% of the $1.1 trillion in discretionary spending. Together those nine cuts would add up to a pittance. Elimination will have roughly zero effect on the federal deficit, which President Obama slashed by nearly two-thirds.
The point of the bar graph was to demonstrate that an expenditure benefiting a presidential whim dwarfs modest ones that benefit the nation as a whole. Like all good graphic design, it did its work well. Which is one reason it pains me to think that it wont much matter.
The hit list drafted by the White House budget office is ideologically driven. Whether its the diverse American cultural infrastructure or our collective duty to help the poor, federal assistance lies far outside a greedy worldview popularized by junk novelist Ayn Rand in her potboilers The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged. Those juvenile texts, comic books without the pictures, are beloved by GOP leadership.
In 1964, just at the moment legislation was being written to establish the NEA, Rand published The Virtue of Selfishness. The idea that the federal government should play an active role in arts support, common across affluent Western European democracies, had been percolating during the Eisenhower years. But selfishness did not drive the NEAs creation.
Tragedy did. Shocked sorrow at President Kennedys assassination dominated the national mood, which Lyndon Johnson leveraged into otherwise nearly impossible legislation the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act, 1965 Voting Rights Act and establishment of the NEA.
Not for nothing does the first photograph in the NEAs official history show John Fitzgerald and Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy with Catalonian cellist Pablo Casals, who famously performed at the White House in 1961. When Washingtons plans for a National Cultural Center, conceived during the Eisenhower years, finally opened a decade later, its new name was the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.
Johnson is the only American president to have worked in a New Deal agency. (He ran Franklin Roosevelts National Youth Administration in Texas during the Great Depression). His Great Society was crafted in the New Deals image.
Ever since, the NEA goes on the chopping block whenever Republican conservatives gain power in the nations capital. Yes, Richard Nixon famously upped the endowments budget more than any president, but thats because the Californian was notoriously insecure about being seen as an uncouth rube. He let his true feelings be known in a private 1970 memo to H.R. Haldeman, unsealed in 2010.
Describing Modern art as something the Kennedy-Shriver crowd believed in, Nixon arrived at the political calculation that those who are on the Modern art and music kick are 95 percent against us anyway. Traditional art was fine with him, but he quietly ordered Modern paintings and sculptures to be pulled from American embassies.
Since Ronald Reagan, the arts agency has been whittled away to a mere shadow of its former self. In inflation-adjusted terms, it spends $100 million less today than it did 20 years ago. But even in its financially straitened condition, it manages to help mostly small arts organizations across the country, either directly or through allocations to every state arts council.
Whenever the executioner mounts the platform, arts supporters fight back with the same litany. The arts are essential, not secondary. Smaller mid-American communities will be hardest hit. Jobs will be lost. Veterans programs will disappear. Quality of life will suffer. Arts education will vanish from more school curricula. Etc.
We are hearing this lucid inventory recited again for the umpteenth time. All of it is true.
Yet, given the players, expect it to fall on deaf ears this time. How many in the Trump administration cabinet were expressly chosen to dismantle the programs under their purview, whether civil rights or education, environmental protection or healthcare? Neoconservative writer Ronald Radosh explained that Stephen K. Bannon, the presidents chief strategist, once told him, I want to bring everything crashing down and destroy all of todays establishment.
Simple people who are puzzled by organized society, as writer Gore Vidal once described Randians and their anti-government ilk, now run the legislative and executive branches. This is their chance.
Because demolishing the little NEA is a metaphor for undoing the big New Deal, it is only right to give FDR the last word.
In a 1936 Madison Square Garden speech, deep into the Great Depression and just a week before elections, Roosevelt railed against what he called the hear-nothing, see-nothing, do-nothing government that let the 1920s roar and the 1930s collapse.
Powerful influences strive today to restore that kind of government, with its doctrine that that government is best which is most indifferent, he thundered. Roosevelt won re-election in a landslide.
Americans still believe him. Last year, Ipsos Public Affairs published a survey commissioned by Americans for the Arts, an advocacy group that favors federal funding, showing that, by a 2-1 ratio, Americans support doubling the NEA budget the opposite of penciling it out. Nonetheless, hear-nothing, see-nothing, do-nothing indifference to the arts is poised to become Trump-era doctrine.
christopher.knight@latimes.com
@KnightLAT
ALSO
These are the 19 agencies Trump would stop funding entirely
PBS and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting push back on Trump's proposal to defund
Trump budget would eliminate funding for National Endowment for the Arts, National Endowment for the Humanities
Read this article:
The NEA works. Why does Trump want to destroy it? - Los Angeles Times
Posted in Atlas Shrugged
Comments Off on The NEA works. Why does Trump want to destroy it? – Los Angeles Times