Daily Archives: March 12, 2017

Terms for states as N500b Paris Club refund is ready – The Nation Newspaper

Posted: March 12, 2017 at 8:44 pm

Presidency gets damning feedback on first tranche

Another London-Paris Club loan refund (about N500billion) is on the way for states with fresh hurdles for governors.

The Presidency has made it mandatory for all the states to account for the first tranche of the loan refunds in line with the agreement it reached with the Nigerian Governors Forum (NGF).

States implicated in the mismanagement of the first tranche may not get the fresh funds.

Some of the 36 governors are being investigated by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission(EFCC) for allegedly diverting the first tranche of the refund.

The governors (seven are involved in the scandal) engaged some curious consultants, who got part of their states share of the refund.

Part of the funds was allocated to some National Assembly leaders who had no business with the refund, it was learnt.

The Nation gathered that the Presidency was set to release fresh refund to states in line with President Muhammadu Buharis determination to rescue the 36 states from economic collapse.

A source, who spoke in confidence, said: The government is about to release another tranche of London-Paris Club loan refunds to states. It is about the same amount like the first tranche. Let us say about N500billion.

The refund is entirely the initiative of the Federal Government to improve the socio-economic situation in the 36 states. President Buhari was disturbed that many states were finding it difficult to pay workers salaries and pensions.

But the release of the second batch of refund will be based on some conditions as agreed upon by the Presidency and the Nigerian Governors Forum(NGF). President Buhari has said that he will not accept any excuse from any governor for diverting public funds.

Before the first tranche was released, the NGF had an agreement with President Buhari that about 25 per cent to 50 per cent will be used to offset outstanding salaries and pensions.

This time around, the Presidency has made up its mind that any state which breached the agreement will not be entitled to second tranche.

Asked how the Presidency will know, the source added: We have feedback from the states on how some of these governors have diverted and misused the first set of refunds. Some of them did not spend up to 15 per cent on salaries and pensions. The records are there to prove the breach.

We also got reports from security agencies, labour, pensioners, concerned leaders in various states and many whistle-blowers on how the governors spent the first tranche.

The source described security reports on some of the governors as damning.

Some governors were said to have converted the refund to personal use and the cash expended on wasteful projects.

In some instances, some projects executed have no bearing with the needs of some states. It is quite sad, the source said.

The investigation of the EFCC into the disbursement of the first refunds confirmed that some of the governors were involved in illegal deductions and remittances into NGF account. I think about seven of them were actively involved.

The position of the Presidency is that governors implicated in London-Paris Club fraud may forfeit refunds to their states. We will reveal the outcome of investigation on some of the governors for the people of their states to know why such a punitive measure is necessary.

Another top government source, who confirmed the moves to reimburse states, however, said: The second tranche will be released based on the compliance of states with Fiscal Sustainability Plan(FSP), which was endorsed by all the governors at a meeting of the National Economic Council (NEC) on May 19.

We have a benchmark which we mutually consented to. As a matter of fact, the governors agreed that further disbursements will be based on the states meeting agreed targets and will be subject to monitoring and evaluation by Independent Monitoring Agents. States which fail to meet the targets will be excluded from this refund.

According to the plan by the Federal Ministry of Finance, states will be required to:

The Federal Government has agreed to develop IPSAS compliant software for States to use, and to develop new Bond Issuance guidelines to ease access to the Capital Market for states wishing to fund developmental projects, the source said.

The Presidency has so far released N1, 266.44trillion to the states in the past one year including N713.70billion special intervention fund.

Following protests by states against over deductions for external debt service between 1995 and 2002, President Buhari approved the release of N522.74 billion(first tranche) to states as refunds pending reconciliation of records.

Each state was entitled to a cap of N14.5 billion, being 25 per cent of the amounts claimed.

Minister of Finance Mrs. Kemi Adeosun said the payment of the claims would enable states to offset outstanding salaries and pension, which had been causing considerable hardship.

The Presidency directed the states to devote a minimum of 50 per cent of any amount disbursed to address challenges associated with salaries and pensions.

Some governors are said to have failed to disclose the actual amount given to their states.

Some of the governors have devoted only 10 to 25 per cent of the funds to the payment of backlog of salaries.

Go here to see the original:

Terms for states as N500b Paris Club refund is ready - The Nation Newspaper

Posted in Socio-economic Collapse | Comments Off on Terms for states as N500b Paris Club refund is ready – The Nation Newspaper

US Navy Film Reveals Crazy Cold War Chemical Weapons Plans – The National Interest Online (blog)

Posted: at 8:44 pm

During the early years of the Cold War, the Pentagon heavily prepared to useand defend againstnew and improved poison and germ weapons.

Now we have detailed look at those plans from a newly declassified 1952 U.S. Navy training film. Earlier in October 2015, the independent website GovernmentAttic.org posted an electronic copy of the footage. A private individual had requested the footage 15 years ago via the Freedom of Information Act.

Biological and chemical warfare have two principle objectives, the films narrator says, to reduce food by destroying his crops and his food-producing farm animals and to incapacitate the enemys armed forces and that portion of his human population that directly supports them.

This clinical and disturbing description of wreaking chemical and biological death on an opponent is accompanied by images of fields, pigs and marching Soviet troops.

The U.S. Naval Photographic Center produced the film to explain how the military planned to deliver deadly chemicals and diseases, and protect its own sailors from similar attacks. The narrator describes the results of experiments thatif they had involved real chemical weaponswould have resulted in the deaths of thousands of people. The film also details equipment designed to spray toxic particles from airplanes, ships, submarines and more.

The Pentagon put the U.S. Army in charge of cooking up the specific agents and producing them in sufficient quantities, the narrator notes. Originally formed as the Chemical Warfare Service in 1918 during World War I, the Armys Chemical Corps researched dozens of possible payloads.

The ground combat branch already had decades of experience with gases like mustard and phosgene that burn the skin and attack the lungs. The United States and the Soviet Unionas well as other allied powers on both sidesappropriated work Nazi Germany had done on organophosphates that strike the central nervous system and prevent a persons brain from communicating properly with their vital organs.

The same year the Navy produced the film, scientists in the United Kingdom invented a new nerve agent codenamed Purple Possum. After learning of the weapon, the U.S. Army started producing the substance with its own moniker, VX. On top of that, the Chemical Corps explored the possibility of weaponizing various bacteria, viruses and toxins. Pentagon experiments included work on anthrax, bubonic plague, smallpox and ricin, among others.

Lastly, as alluded to in the Navy films introduction, the Army considered various chemical and biological agents that could specifically kill crops and livestock. As a result, the Pentagon had an advanced defoliation program well before it sprayed gallons of Agent Orange over Vietnamese jungles.

With the Army in charge of these terrifying chemicals, the Navy focused its efforts on the delivery systems. The film describes weapons dispersed from ships, dropped or sprayed from airplanes or released by submarines.

According to the narrator, the Navy conducted its first ship-borne tests two years earlier in 1950. A rather crude spraying system was installed on a mine layer, which secretly cruised off California and sprayed some 50 gallons of biological stimulant along a track two-to-five miles off shore, the narrator says.

The Pentagon regularly used non-threatening bacteria or spores to secretly test how far a real germ weapon would spread. In this experiment, as in the case with chemical and biological weapons in general, weather patterns and the terrain largely dictated where the particles went.

During the California test, technicians used special collectors to determine that the spray covered some 48 square miles of total area. Had an infectious agent been used in the spray, there might have been 210,000 casualties, the narrator says.

In April 1952, the minesweeper USS Tercel sprayed more simulated toxins along the coasts of North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia. The rather flat terrain would be favorable to wide dispersion of wind-borne particles, the narrator says in the film.

Tercel sprayed 250 pounds of zinc cadmium sulfide during an eight-hour voyage along some 100 miles of coastline. Evaluators later found evidence of the fluorescent material across 20,000 square miles spread over all three states.

But surface ships such as the Tercel would be vulnerable to attack during an actual war. Recognizing this vulnerability, the Navy planned to mount sprayers on submarines for actual operations.

After reaching periscope depth, the submarines wouldas the concept wentvent their deadly payloads into the atmosphere. If everything went according to plan, the vessels would then submerge and escape without anyone on land knowing the attack had even happened until it was too late.

The Navy also worked on underwater chemical and biological mines. A sub would lay these devices along the ocean floor and then leave the area. After a predetermined time had passed, the mine would float to the surface. A tube would then pop out of the top and release its gas or germs. Aircraft could carry the same weapons and drop them into lakes and rivers further inland.

Alternatively, an airplane with a giant spray tank could do the job. At the time, bombs loaded with noxious chemicals were hardly new, but spray tanks would be more effective and accurate for seeding large amounts of toxic agents.

Read the original:

US Navy Film Reveals Crazy Cold War Chemical Weapons Plans - The National Interest Online (blog)

Posted in Germ Warfare | Comments Off on US Navy Film Reveals Crazy Cold War Chemical Weapons Plans – The National Interest Online (blog)

It’s 1985 all over again: To me, the Reagan years were a time of death and Trump’s era feels eerily similar – Salon

Posted: at 8:43 pm

Since Novembers presidential election, I have had an uneasy feeling of dj vu. It took me a while to put my finger on exactly what I was remembering. Until I realized, its 1985. Now, just as then, we are living in a time when the presidents actions are leading to harm for marginalized people around the world.

My vantage point on 1985 is that I grew up in the 1980s in New York City in the midst of the AIDS epidemic. It was likely during the latter part of the decade that I acquired HIV.

I have lived with HIV for about 30 years, and yet this disclosure is a new one for me to offer in my professional life. I am a university president who has been out as a gay man across my career, but up until now, disclosure about my HIV status has been on a need-to-know basis.

Why am I making it public now? Because of the parallels between then and now. In 1985, the president not speaking one particular word caused us injury and death. In 2017, the president speaking many incendiary words is causing injury and death.

It is difficult to explain what 1985 was like for me, when todays prevailing narrative about the Reagan years and the 1980s is fond nostalgia. Fondly is not how I remember the 1980s. Sickness and death were everywhere around me.

I did not get tested when the HIV test became available in 1985, because no treatment was available and because I was scared. But I was sure I had acquired the virus that was revealing itself across my friendship and partner circles.

The government knew an epidemic was raging through marginalized communities, and public health strategies were available, but government policy reflected indifference and inaction. President Reagan did not say the word AIDS until 1985, after more than5,000 known AIDS deaths in the United States, and well after the scope of the coming pandemic was understood.

I was certain as were many gay men that few cared if we all died, because we heard those words often and from many. I believe the vitriol and volume of the hate speech of the 1980s has receded from most peoples memory. It has not receded from mine: I believed then that dying from AIDS was simply part of being gay.

Today, I wonder whether many immigrants and many people who might look like immigrants feel now how I felt in the 1980s. I cannot know the contemporary experience of many marginalized groups, but I can imagine that many people Muslims, women, people living with disabilities, people of color standing up against institutionalized racism, people at the intersection of these and many more identities feel as abandoned by the state as I felt then.

The parallels between then and now are why I am disclosing my HIV status publicly. My status and my story are what I have to offer. We saved our community from extinction in the face of government-sanctioned indifference, hatred and oppression. I not only survived the plague, but have achieved some level of success, as a university president, perhaps in part because of what I learned in surviving.

To be clear: We did not beat or cure AIDS in the 1980s. Many of us died across a protracted fight with society and the government. Our success was more for gay white men than it was for women, people of color and people living in poverty and prisons. And millions around the world continue to acquire, live with and die of AIDS in the shadow of indifference, hatred and oppression. But we secured a specific and significant success, and I am here to tell about it.

Others have documented how Gay Mens Health Crisis (GMHC) and ACT UP forced the government to respond to the public health crisis of HIV. My story is that I participated in that solution as a young person.

In 1985, I was 20. I expected to die within a few years. I felt powerless amidst sickness and death, anticipated symptoms and illness on any given morning, and yearned for an outlet for my sadness and anger. Fortunately there were wise elders to tell me what to do. I did not fully understand what I was doing when I volunteered or went to a protest. I was simply doing what those elders who led GMHC and ACT UP told us to do without appreciating the leadership, strategy and focus of our advocacy and political action.

The orchestrated posing of hundreds pretending to be dead in front of federal buildings, the relentless closing down of traffic and commerce, the messaging that straight people could not ignore I participated in these actions, gradually understanding them as a solution, and sometimes choosing them over less productive behaviors that a kid pursues if he believes hes living under a death sentence.

I find myself back in the 1980s as I listen to President Trump. But Im not a kid. I am instead the product of schooling by wise elders and by 30 years of HIV.

I do ask myself why I didnt disclose more publiclyuntil now. My list of answers is long and psychologically revealing: fear of repercussions (many real, some imagined), a desire not to be pitied or summed up by my status, a need to focus on others and to be useful, my own internalized heterosexism and homophobia, a need to remain private in a very public job.

Or, perhaps its that I was waiting to use this asset of mine when its most needed.

Students at my university a university thatis explicitly focused on social justice ask me what to do right now. Black and brown students ask how to stand up to hate and violence. Queer students ask what it means that the Department of Education is led by someone who has supported discrimination and conversion therapy. Students ask how to translate their passions into actions that will matter. I realize they think Im an elder who has answers, and I see theyre more ready than I was in the 1980s. I realize too I have some answers that Ive learned from the successes and failures of the 1980s lessons about leadership, strategy and focus of advocacy and political action. I know how to fight for my life and an oppressed community and how to win.

Recently, Larry Kramer, one of the founders of GMHC and ACT UP, offered observations similar to mine. He said, Its the early days of AIDS all over again. I didnt think this would ever happen. It makes you want to cry.

Ive cried too, Mr. Kramer. And Ive paid attention. My tears are dry, and Im ready. We have precedent and the credentials to secure social justice.

The rest is here:

It's 1985 all over again: To me, the Reagan years were a time of death and Trump's era feels eerily similar - Salon

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on It’s 1985 all over again: To me, the Reagan years were a time of death and Trump’s era feels eerily similar – Salon

Speaker Kecheng Fang Breaks Down Misconceptions of Chinese Media – The Catalyst

Posted: at 8:43 pm

On Thursday, March 2, Colorado College hosted Kecheng Fang, a former Chinese political reporter, who spoke about contemporary media in China. Fang is a doctoral candidate at the University of Pennsylvanias Annenberg School for Communication, and holds a bachelors and masters degree in journalism from Peking University in Beijing. Fang worked as a reporter for Chinas Southern Weeklythe Chinese equivalent of the New York Timesfrom 2010 to 2013, and his writing has been featured in publications like The New Yorker, The Atlantic, BBC, and Politico.

Fang intended to major in math but he changed courses after developing an interest in the way news shapes public opinion. Reading newspapers that were outspoken and invested in the world changed the direction of my life, said Fang. I believe they are key to achieving social justiceespecially in countries like China where people enjoy less freedom and there is less social justice because the government is not held as accountable. After graduating from university, Fang observed the complex relationship between Chinese media and the government as a reporter for Southern Weekly. His curiosity was not satisfied. Seeking a theoretical framework to help him understand the purpose and influence of media, Fang moved to the U.S. to pursue a PhD in philosophy.

Fangs primary focus was to debunk some of the common misconceptions surrounding Chinese media and move beyond the censorship, resistance, and dichotomy often associated with the Chinese government. People always want to know what it was like working as a journalist in China, said Fang. They think reporters are rebels and dissidents working against the government. But its not that simple.

Hoping to provide a more nuanced picture of Chinese media, Fang addressed three common misconceptions: freedom of the press, the labeling of reporters as dissidents, and the role of the internet in modern-day China. Even though there are no private forms of traditional Chinese media and none of the digital platforms can publish original work or hire their own journalists, Fang maintained that Chinese media has far more freedom than Western media indicates.

There is space for diverse opinions and investigative journalism in China, said Fang. It is the method of informing, the types of stories and information deemed appropriate for public consumption that differs from Western media. Reporters resent their portrayal by Western media as dissidents resisting the oppression of their government. Traditional publications are owned by the government to inform the public without violating the trust of those who grant them access. Access is not everything and does not guarantee good journalism, said Fang. Nevertheless, Fang argued that it is working for and with the Chinese government that enables them to do their jobs.

With regards to the internet, many social media sites are blocked within Chinas borders for the majority of citizens. The Chinese government knows the power held by that platform. While they encourage Chinese social media entrepreneurship within the country, government officials use social media to influence the way the world views China. Like many politicians in the U.S., social media acts as the Chinese governments direct line to the world, said Fang. They know how to use it.

Hosted by the Mosaic Club and attended primarily by students, Fangs presentation provided a unique look into a world removed from the United States. At the end of his presentation, Fang asked the audience to consider moving beyond the headline angle of censorship and resistance and instead concentrate on the tactical cooperation that is crucial to Chinese media.

Go here to read the rest:

Speaker Kecheng Fang Breaks Down Misconceptions of Chinese Media - The Catalyst

Posted in Government Oppression | Comments Off on Speaker Kecheng Fang Breaks Down Misconceptions of Chinese Media – The Catalyst

Hidden war on drugs – Sentinel & Enterprise

Posted: at 8:43 pm

Lancaster Police Lt. Everett Moody on Thursday shows off the hidden compartment police found in a vehicle after an recent arrest. The compartment was in the center console. SENTINEL & ENTERPRISE PHOTOS/JOHN LOVE

LANCASTER -- On the surface, it looked like any other Pontiac G6. Inside the car, CD cases and articles of clothing were strewn about, animal hair from an unknown pet clung to the carpet, a child's doll sat forgotten on the back seat.

But there was something else among the clutter that immediately caught Lancaster police Sgt. Patrick Mortimer's attention.

The black sticky glue leaking from the car's center console was the first clue.

"I saw that, and I knew right away that it wasn't from something factory installed," said Mortimer. "The other officer I was with thought I was crazy, but I kept telling him that I knew there was something in there."

After finding a motor hidden deep within the car's dashboard, the officers were able to activate an aftermarket option. Turning on that hidden motor caused the lower half of center console to suddenly swing out from beneath the radio, revealing a hidden compartment containing $7,000 in cash.

What began as a fairly routine vehicle stop and felony warrant arrest became the Lancaster Police Department's first encounter with an electronically controlled secret compartment in a suspect's car.

As the opioid epidemic has carried on, the technology drug sellers and smugglers have used to make their living has continued to evolve. As a result, departments throughout the state are getting their officers trained to spot the hidden compartments or "drug hides" that are continuously found in the vehicles of suspects.

"This was very professionally done.

Just two days before officers in Lancaster made their discovery, police in Nashua, found a similar electronic compartment inside the car of a Lawrence man who was hiding roughly 130 grams of cocaine.

A closeup of the console area. SENTINEL & ENTERPRISE PHOTOS/JOHN LOVE

And 10 days earlier, police in Ipswich arrested a Boston man after finding large quantities of cocaine and fentanyl in the hidden compartments of his car.

"It almost seems like the more law enforcement learns, the more the criminals learn," said James Bazzinotti, whose company PACE New England offers the training course used by officers in Lancaster. "Everything the officers are learning now, the criminal element learned a few years ago. ... We're always a little bit behind."

Over the course of the training, Bazzinotti said officers learn all the clues to finding drug hides that range from the low-tech oil cans with false bottoms to the professionally installed electronic systems that cost more than the cars they're installed in.

Though extra spaces, or voids, can be found inside of any vehicle, and are frequently used by lower-level drug sellers, more complex ways of hiding illicit substances continue to be developed.

In many cases, compartments aren't opened by simply flipping a switch but by initiating a sequence of settings within the car, Bazzinotti explained. A single button on a dashboard might open a secret compartment, but the car might have to be in neutral, the heat might have to be dialed to a specific setting, and a single seat belt might have to be buckled in before that button can actually work.

"It's usually an owner-operator type of mechanic who does this kind of work," Bazzinotti said. "They might work on cars but supplement their income by doing this."

There's no law in Massachusetts against having a hidden compartment in your car, and no law against installing them either. However, mechanics can be arrested on a conspiracy charge if it can be proven that they knew what the hidden compartment was going to be used for, Bazzinotti said.

States like Ohio, California, Georgia, Illinois and Oregon have adopted prohibitions on vehicle compartments and attempts to pass similar legislation have been made in Massachusetts as well.

In 2008, a bill was submitted to the state Legislature that would have made it illegal to own or install a hidden compartment in a vehicle, though it never made it to the House floor.

Fitchburg Mayor Stephen DiNatale, who had sponsored the petition while serving as a state representative of the 3rd Worcester District, said he was inspired to file the bill after hearing about the prevalence of hidden compartments from local law enforcement officials.

"From what they showed me, it was pretty elaborate devices and modifications that were being made to these vehicles," DiNatale said. "These detectives have to go through a great deal of effort and work to find these things and yet there's no requisite penalty for having them."

He also explained that the bill had failed to gain any traction among other legislators largely because some felt its inclusion of vehicles such as aircrafts or boats was too broad.

"They didn't want the legislation to be so far-reaching that it would affect law-abiding citizens," DiNatale said.

The bill was refiled by current Fitchburg state Rep. Stephan Hay in January.

There is no way of measuring how many of these secret compartments are actually found and how many go unnoticed, but Mortimer estimates that a large majority of them go undetected.

However, the officers in Lancaster are undeterred.

"When you find one of these things it gets really exciting because it's not every day that you find one of these," he said. "Now everybody in the department wants to get trained."

Follow Peter Jasinski on Twitter and Tout @PeterJasinski53

See the original post:

Hidden war on drugs - Sentinel & Enterprise

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Hidden war on drugs – Sentinel & Enterprise

Indonesia’s war on drugs takes deadly turn – Jakarta Post

Posted: at 8:43 pm

Rebuffing an outcry over the previous execution of 18 deathrow inmates, most of whom were drug convicts, President Joko Jokowi Widodo has instructed officers in relevant agencies to hunt, arrest and crush smalland big-time drug dealers.

If it [a shoot-on-sight policy] was allowed by law then I would order the National Police and the BNN [National Narcotics Agency] chief to do so, but luckily it is not, President Jokowi said in a speech to mark the International Day Against Drug Abuse and Illicit Trafficking last year.

Jokowis words appear to have inspired members of law enforcement agencies to get tough on drug traffickers.

BNN chief Comr. Gen. Budi Waseso may have taken cues not only from Jokowi, but also Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte.

Dutertes war on drugs, which has been condemned by human rights groups for violating human rights, has killed over 8,000 people, including more than 2,500 who died in shoot-outs during raids, since the campaign started eight months ago.

A man of controversy himself, Budi has frequently told BNN personnel not to hesitate to shoot drug traffickers, dealers and users who resist arrest. He once went further by saying the lives of drug dealers were worthless, which made media headlines last year.

To put his words into actions, the BNN has procured highly lethal weapons, imported from Germany, Russia, the United States and the Czech Republic. Budi claimed that one of the four new firearm types could penetrate a reinforced wall in a single shot.

As [drug mafias] are now using weapons, we will also use weapons to counter them. If they fight back [during arrest] we will not hesitate to shoot them. If they are killed [because they fight back], its their own fault, Budi said in a recent interview.

The National Police have also joined the fray, with police chief Gen. Tito Karnavian instructing personnel to use deadly force against suspected drug dealers if they resist arrest during raids.

Tito, however, has made it clear that officers can only fire when suspects use weapons or pose a threat to officers and other people during their arrest, as instructed by the Criminal Code and standard operating procedures (SOP) in the form of a National Police chief regulation (Perkap).

Rights groups, which are closely watching Jokowis stepped-up war on drugs, have been alarmed by the rising casualties.

The Commission for Missing Persons and Victims of Violence (Kontras) has revealed that the number of alleged drug dealers shot dead in raids is increasing.

Data from Kontras, which was collected through media monitoring only, revealed that since January 2016, 32 suspected drug dealers were reportedly shot dead in raids, both by police personnel following orders from the BNN and by officers working on regular operations.

The actual figure could be higher because this is only the data we compiled through media monitoring. We dont talk about arbitrary shootings that were not covered or reported to human rights watchdogs, Kontras deputy coordinator Puri Kencana Putri told The Jakarta Post.

Data from Kontras also revealed that August last year was the deadliest month on record, with nine fatalities reported by the media. While the period between Jan. 22 and Dec. 31 saw 14 deaths, the first three months of 2017 had over half that number of casualties.

Since Jan. 6, 18 suspected dealers have been shot dead in raids.

Both the BNN and the National Polices Criminal Investigation Department (Bareskrim) narcotics division declined to elaborate on the death toll from drug raids when the Post requested further details.

(Read also:BNN Central Java foils drug smuggling from Germany)

The BNNs eradication department head, Insp. Gen. Arman Depari, acknowledged that the number of suspected drug traders shot dead for resisting arrest was likely to have increased in recent years.

The Institute for Criminal Justice Reform (ICJR), which also monitors the issue, said there could be a link between the application of capital punishment and the increasing number of fatalities in raids.

Drug dealers know that the maximum sentence for them is the death penalty. Psychologically, they will put up a stronger fight because they know if they are arrested, they could be executed, ICJR executive director Supriyadi Widodo Eddyono told the Post.

Read more from the original source:

Indonesia's war on drugs takes deadly turn - Jakarta Post

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Indonesia’s war on drugs takes deadly turn – Jakarta Post

Is AG Jeff Sessions Quietly Waging a Second ‘War on Drugs’? – Atlanta Black Star

Posted: at 8:43 pm

As Washington continues to wade through health care and immigration legislation, theres another battle on the horizon, with those in favor of marijuana legalization demanding answers from the administration on where it stands.

At times, Trumps position has shifted, though, as of late, hes claimed to be in favor of medical marijuana, stopping short of endorsing the full legalization of the drug or revealing whether hell interfere with state rights to do so. Meanwhile, newly installed Attorney General Jeff Sessions has been crystal clear about his own stance, infamously stating, Good people dont smoke marijuana

Now, Massachusetts and Maine, the latest states to legalize the drug, are left in limbo. Whereas the Obama administration had remained largely hands-off, allowing states to make their own laws regarding marijuana legalization and reducing sentences for a number of small drug offenses, under Sessions, the Justice Department may be poised to reverse that trend.

Last month, White House press secretary Sean Spicer alluded to such, telling reporters, I do believe that youll see greater enforcement. Theres a big difference between the medical use and recreational use, which is something the Department of Justice will be further looking into.

Since declaring drug abuse as enemy No. 1, the United States has doggedly pursued the failed War on Drug crusade, often at the expense of its own citizens. Coined in June 1971,the Nixon administration struck hard, increasing federal drug agencies and implementing harsh tactics that included mandatory sentencing. By 2011, the Global Commission on Drug Policy would admit that the global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world.

They added, Political leaders and public figures should have the courage to articulate publicly what many of them acknowledge privately that the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that repressive strategies will not solve the drug problem and that the war on drugs has not, and cannot, be won.

But, of course, we already knew that.

Even more disheartening, much of the drug war was by design, as revealed by John Ehrlichman, former Nixon domestic-policy chief and a key figure during the Watergate scandal. Ehrlichman admitted in a 1994 interview that, The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and Black people.

He added, You understand what Im saying? We knew we couldnt make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but, by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course, we did.

The damage was devastating to the Black community. By disproportionately targeting Blacks and other minorities, prison rates exploded, each administration playing its own role. This includes President Clintonwho, despite being immensely popular, was directly responsible for increasing the prison population by over 673,000 during his presidency. Of that injustice, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker told ABCs This Week with George Stephanopoulos, We now have more African-Americans under criminal supervision than all the slaves back in the 1850s.

A study by the Justice Policy Institute revealed, Under President Bill Clinton, the number of prisoners under federal jurisdiction doubled and grew more than it did under the previous 12 years of Republican rule.

At just 12 percent of the U.S. population, African-American men are now 13 times more likely to be sent to prison for drug charges than their white counterparts. And, despite using illegal substances at roughly the same rate, studies show that African-Americans are still apt to receive longer sentences. Human Rights Watch says, The disparities are particularly tragic in individual states where Black men are sent to federal prison on drug charges at 57 times greater than White men.

As Ava DuVernays critically acclaimed 13th illustrates, though the 13th amendment formally abolished slavery and indentured servitude, the U.S. has continued to profit from free labor, now supplied via mass incarceration. By enacting stiff penalties for minor drug offenses, the United States prison population has soared, boosted by millions of Black and brown bodies.

Its a reality that entrepreneur Wanda James, widely credited as the first African-American to own a dispensary in Colorado, knows all too well. After being jailed for weed possession, her own brother was sentenced to 10 years in prison and forced to pick cotton in Texas.

It was then that James first likened the prison industry to a repackaged version of slavery, later explaining to Official Black Wall Street, Well, the whole Black and Latino thing is mind-boggling and to understand whats happening, you have to understand the prison system and the prison industrial complex. America was built on slave labor. It always has been.

She added to High Times, To have a Black man picking cotton seemed ridiculous. Where I went to school the University of Colorado my friends and I would sit out on the front stoop of the dorm and smoke weed. Cops would walk by and be like, Hey, put that away. Wed put it away, and I had never known that people were actually arrested for pot. I always thought it was a ticket.

Using her brothers story as inspiration, James opened a dispensary in Denver, joining just one percent of Black entrepreneurs in the cannabis industry. But with a shift in administration, she and others like her may now face roadblocks of their own, thanks in part to Sessions staunch anti-legalization ideology.

Making it clear that he will not bend, Sessions recently told reporters, I dont think America is going to be a better place when people of all ages, and particularly young people, are smoking pot. I believe its an unhealthy practice and current levels of THC in marijuana are very high compared to what they were a few years ago and were seeing real violence around that.

He added, States, they can pass the laws they choose. I would just say it does remain a violation of federal law to distribute marijuana throughout any place in the United States, whether a state legalizes it or not.

With neighboring states, including Nebraska, currently waging their own war against Colorados marijuana boom and with Sessions at the helm, it may become even harder for African-American entrepreneurs like James to prosper in the industry.

In truth, America does have a drug problem, but its not weed. Rather, its the opioid and heroin epidemic currently ravishing the nations heartland, suburbs and elsewhere. Much like marijuana was used as a scapegoat during Nixons time, under the Trump administration, it may once again become a catalyst for funneling more Black and brown bodies into private prisons across the nation.

Excerpt from:

Is AG Jeff Sessions Quietly Waging a Second 'War on Drugs'? - Atlanta Black Star

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Is AG Jeff Sessions Quietly Waging a Second ‘War on Drugs’? – Atlanta Black Star

Punjab poll promises: War on drugs, farm loan waiver – Business Standard

Posted: at 8:43 pm

Among the first things that the Congress chief ministerial candidate in Punjab, Amarinder Singh, has promised to do after he assumes power is to tackle the drug menace by choking the supply of such intoxicants in four weeks. Anybody involved in the drug scourge will be dealt in accordance with law, howsoever powerful he may be. I have said within four weeks we will tackle this drugs problem," Singh told a crowded press conference in Chandigarh on Saturday. The increasing number of drug-abuse cases has been one of the poll planks of both the Congress and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). The parties alleged that the drug menace and cases of drug abuse had seen a huge increase during the Akali regime under its patronage.

That apart, incidents of sacrilege, which hit several parts of the state, would also be investigated, he said.

Singh said his party had committed itself to providing good governance, besides focusing on health and education.

The Congress manifesto included the waiver of farm loans, a promise the new government will find tough to keep.

A farm debt waiver will have massive financial implications, particularly for an agrarian state like Punjab, and it will impact financial discipline, but given that in the last two years there has been a drought in North India, the new state government should consider such a relief but should keep it limited to small and marginal farmers, that is those who own less than two hectares, PK Joshi, South Asia director, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), told Business Standard.

Sanjeeb Mukherjee

http://bsmedia.business-standard.com/_media/bs/wap/images/bs_logo_amp.png 177 22

Read the original:

Punjab poll promises: War on drugs, farm loan waiver - Business Standard

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on Punjab poll promises: War on drugs, farm loan waiver – Business Standard

14 killed in PNP’s renewed war on drugs – The Manila Times Online – The Manila Times

Posted: at 8:43 pm

A promise that the governments renewed war on illegal drugs would be different from its forerunner appeared to be not true at all as 14 alleged drug dealers had been killed six days after the restart of the campaign.

Aside from the 14 suspects, some 467 others were arrested from March 6 to March 12 based on data from the Philippine National Police (PNP).

PNP Director General Ronald dela Rosa himself had told the media that the relaunch of the anti-illegal drugs campaign would be less bloody.

The first drug drive assigned to the PNP and the National Bureau of Investigation was stopped by President Rodrigo Duterte after some police officers of the two agencies were linked to the abduction and killing of South Korean businessman Jee Ick Joo last October 18.

Jee was killed inside Camp Crame, the PNPs main headquarters, in Quezon City despite the kidnappers managing to get P5 million in ransom from Jees wife last October 31.

The PNP leadership is yet to ascertain who got the P5 million.

Duterte ordered the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency under Director General Isidro Lapena to lead the new drug war of the government.

NELSON S. BADILLA

Read more:

14 killed in PNP's renewed war on drugs - The Manila Times Online - The Manila Times

Posted in War On Drugs | Comments Off on 14 killed in PNP’s renewed war on drugs – The Manila Times Online – The Manila Times

Gamblers ‘lost more than 10,000’ on fixed-odds betting terminals … – The Guardian

Posted: at 8:43 pm

GambleAware said one person had lost 13,777.90 in a marathon seven-and-a-half-hour session on an FOBT. Photograph: Alamy Stock Photo

Seven gamblers lost more than 10,000 in a day while using controversial fixed-odds betting terminals (FOBTs) during a 10-month period, it has emerged.

The losses, revealed in a submission to the governments gambling review by the GambleAware charity, has sparked renewed criticism of FOBTs.

The charity analysed data from betting sessions, including cases where punters bet the maximum allowable amount of 100, which can be staked every 20 seconds under existing regulations.

It found that in 5.4m sessions over 10 months, 3% of the total included at least one bet of 100, while those who staked the maximum typically did so more than once per session.

It also reported several extreme outliers, cases where gamblers lost huge amounts of money in a single session.

Seven sessions saw customers lose more than 10,000 within a few hours, with one gambler losing 13,777.90 more than half the UKs national average wage in a marathon seven-and-a-half-hour sitting.

Staff in bookmakers high street shops, which took 1.7bn in revenues from FOBTs last year, are meant to intervene if they are concerned about a customers losses or the source of their funds.

Social responsibility requirements mean all operators must interact with customers where they believe they could be at risk of problem gambling, but also where any transactions could be linked to crime, said the industry regulator, the Gambling Commission, which has signalled a tougher stance against firms that fail to prevent problem gambling.

Carolyn Harris MP, who chairs a cross-party group that has recommended slashing the maximum stake on FOBTs to 2, said examples of such large losses, though rare, were concerning.

Those are obscene losses, she said.

For me, if anybody can sit there for that long and lose that much money, theyre not being watched and there is no intervention.

She also questioned whether firms were implementing anti-money-laundering controls properly in the light of recent examples of criminals using FOBTs to launder the proceeds of crime.

She said it was unfair to put shop staff in the position of having to stop someone from betting when they were losing a lot of money.

Why should cashiers be forced to intervene? Its above their pay grade.

There has to be a better way, such as having specialist individuals to deal with problem gambling.

GambleAware said there was not sufficient evidence to suggest that problem gambling was being caused by FOBTs.

But it said it was irrefutable that gaming machines are associated with harms.

The charity also found that problem gamblers and the unemployed were more likely to place a 100 bet than other players, as were loyalty card holders.

It said the proportion of sessions including a 100 bet also doubled after 10pm, rising from 3% of sessions to 6%.

Go here to read the rest:

Gamblers 'lost more than 10,000' on fixed-odds betting terminals ... - The Guardian

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off on Gamblers ‘lost more than 10,000’ on fixed-odds betting terminals … – The Guardian