Daily Archives: March 10, 2017

A Trinity professor will play a big role in space exploration – thejournal.ie

Posted: March 10, 2017 at 3:23 am

Professor in Astrophysics at Trinity College Dublin, Peter Gallagher.

Image: Paul Sharp/SHARPPIX

Professor in Astrophysics at Trinity College Dublin, Peter Gallagher.

Image: Paul Sharp/SHARPPIX

A PROFESSOR IN Trinity College Dublin has been tapped to play a key role in space exploration over the next 10 years.

Professor Peter Gallagher has been appointed as an adviser to the Director of Science at the European Space Agency (ESA). In his role with the Space Science Advisory Committee (SSAC), Professor Gallagher will be charged with interpreting the views and needs of the European science communitys access to space experimentation and data exploitation in the mandatory science programmes.

The ESA is set to invest over 5 billion in space exploration in the coming decade.

Among ESAs flagship missions is Solar Orbiter, which Professor Gallagher is directly involved in. This spacecraft will be launched in 2019 and then take around three years to make its way inside the orbit of Mercury to study the sun and the inner solar system.

He said:

Solar Orbiter will enable us to study the sun in greater detail than ever before and to better understand solar activity and its effects on Earth. Due to the huge temperatures close to the sun, the spacecraft is protected by a heat shield, which has been coated by an innovative Irish company called EnBio.

Im delighted to now play a role in shaping the future of ESAs space exploration programme.

The SSACs tasks include advising and making recommendations on the needs of the scientific community for access to space for their research; formulating and updating medium and long-term space science policy in Europe; prioritising the needs of the scientific community in selecting future space science missions, and laying the foundations for future missions based on recommendations and new discoveries.

Along with the 11 other members of the SSAC, Professor Gallagher will also implement a number of space missions under the ESA Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 strategy.

Get breaking news from TheJournal.ie via Facebook. Just click Like.

Original post:

A Trinity professor will play a big role in space exploration - thejournal.ie

Posted in Space Exploration | Comments Off on A Trinity professor will play a big role in space exploration – thejournal.ie

IBM shrinks data storage to the atomic level in latest nanotech milestone – SiliconANGLE (blog)

Posted: at 3:23 am

Among the numerous inventions that IBM Corp. has racked up over its more than centurylong history are DRAM, the disk drive and several other foundational components of modern data storage. On Wednesday, the company added another breakthrough to the list by revealing that it has managed to encode information into a single atom.

The IBM Research team behindthe project (pictured) published the details of their effort in this weeks edition of the science journal Nature. For the storage medium, they used an atom of the rare earth element holmium, which is employed in a variety of scientific and industrial applications including nuclear reactors. It stands out for having the highest magnetic strength on the periodic table, a property that Big Blues researchers exploited to mimic the behavior of a bit.

The team placed their holmium atom on a surface made of magnesium oxide to produce magnetic bistability, a phenomenon wherein a particle has two potential magnetic states. They then used a customized scanning tunneling microscope, an invention that happen to have originated at IBM as well and earned its creators a Nobel prize, to run a 150-millivolt current through the atom. The jolt changed its magnetic field, an effect equivalent to flipping the value of a bit in a traditional data storage medium.

From there, IBMs researchers were able to read the contents of the holmium atom by placing an iron atom in the vicinity that reflected the magnetic change in its own behavior. Developing this sensing approach was an achievement of its own that the team shared in a companion paper published by Nature Nanotechnology.

According to an IBM spokesperson, the breakthrough may one day make it possible to store the more than 25 million songs in Apple Inc.s iTunes on a device the size of a credit card. But nothing is certain at such an early stage. To make the technology viable for commercial use, the company would likely have to spend years improving its implementation and manufacturing processes.

In the meantime, new alternatives to traditional storage media are already starting to hit the market. One of the most promising contenders is NRAM, a type of non-volatile memory based on carbon nanotubes that can read and write data 100 times faster than flash while providing superior density. Nantero Inc., the startup behind the technology, recently raised $21 million in funding to fuel its commercialization efforts.

Continue reading here:

IBM shrinks data storage to the atomic level in latest nanotech milestone - SiliconANGLE (blog)

Posted in Nanotech | Comments Off on IBM shrinks data storage to the atomic level in latest nanotech milestone – SiliconANGLE (blog)

What Psychedelics Really Do to Your Brain – Rolling Stone – RollingStone.com

Posted: at 3:22 am

Hallucinations. Vivid images. Intense sounds. Greater self-awareness.

Those are the hallmark effects associated with the world's four most popular psychedelic drugs. Ayahuasca, DMT, MDMA and psilocybin mushrooms can all take users through a wild mind-bending ride that can open up your senses and deepen your connection to the spirit world. Not all trips are created equal, though if you're sipping ayahuasca, your high could last a couple of hours. But if you're consuming DMT, that buzz will last under than 20 minutes.

How some doctors are risking everything to unleash the healing power of MDMA, ayahuasca and other hallucinogens

Still, no matter the length of the high, classic psychedelics are powerful. Brain imaging studies have shown that all four drugs have profound effects on neural activity. Brain function is less constrained while under the influence, which means you're better able to emotion. And the networks in your brain are far more connected, which allows for a higher state of consciousness and introspection.

These psychological benefits have led researchers to suggest that psychedelics could be effective therapeutic treatments. In fact, many studies have discovered that all four drugs, in one way or another, have the potential to treat depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, addiction and other mental health conditions. By opening up the mind, the theory goes, people under the influence of psychedelics can confront their painful pasts or self-destructive behavior without shame or fear. They're not emotionally numb; rather, they're far more objective.

Of course, these substances are not without their side effects. But current research at least suggests that ayahuasca, DMT, MDMA and psilocybin mushrooms have the potential to change the way doctors can treat mental illness particularly for those who are treatment-resistant. More in-depth studies are needed to understand their exact effects on the human brain, but what we know now is at least promising. Here, a look at how each drug affects your brain and how that's being used to our advantage.

AyahuascaAyahuasca is an ancient plant-based tea derived from a combination of the vine Banisteriopsis caapi and the leaves of the plant psychotria viridis. Shamans in the Amazon have long used ayahuasca to cure illness and tap into the spiritual world. Some religious groups in Brazil consume the hallucinogenic brew as religious sacrament. In recent years, regular folk have started to use ayahuasca for greater self-awareness.

That's because brain scans have shown that ayahuasca increases the neural activity in the brain's visual cortex, as well as its limbic system the region deep inside the medial temporal lobe that's responsible for processing memories and emotion. Ayahuasca can also quiet the brain's default mode network, which, when overactive, causes depression, anxiety and social phobia, according to a video released last year by YouTube channel AsapSCIENCE. Those who consume it end up in a meditative state.

"Ayahuasca induces an introspective state of awareness during which people have very personally meaningful experiences," says Dr. Jordi Riba, a leading ayahuasca researcher. "It's common to have emotionally-laden, autobiographic memories coming to the mind's eye in the form of visions, not unlike those we experience during sleep."

According to Riba, people who use ayahuasca experience a trip that can be "quite intense" depending on the dose consumed. The psychological effects come on after about 45 minutes and hit their peak within an hour or two; physically, the worst a person will feel is nausea and vomiting, Riba says. Unlike with LSD or psilocybin mushrooms, people high on ayahuasca are fully aware that they're hallucinating. It's this self-conscious tripping that has led people to use ayahuasca as a means to overcome addiction and face traumatic issues. Riba and his research group at Hospital do Sant Pau in Barcelona, Spain, have also begun "rigorous clinical trials" using ayahuasca for treating depression; so far, the plant-based drug has shown to reduce depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant patients, as well as produce "a very antidepressant effect that is maintained for weeks," says Riba, who has studied the drug with support from the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS), an American nonprofit founded in the mid-1980s.

His team is currently studying the post-acute stage of ayahuasca effects what they've dubbed the "after-glow." So far, they've found that, during this "after-glow" period, the regions of the brain associated with sense-of-self have a stronger connection to other areas that control autobiographic memories and emotion. According to Riba, it's during this time that the mind is more open to psychotherapeutic intervention, so the research team is working to incorporate a small number of ayahuasca sessions into mindfulness psychotherapy.

"These functional changes correlate with increased 'mindfulness' capacities," Riba says. "We believe that the synergy between the ayahuasca experience and the mindfulness training will boost the success rate of the psychotherapeutic intervention."

DMTAyahuasca and the compound N,N-Dimethyltryptamine or DMT are closely linked. DMT is present in the leaves of the plant psychotria viridis and is responsible for the hallucinations ayahuasca users experience. DMT is close in structure to melatonin and serotonin and has properties similar to the psychedelic compounds found in magic mushrooms and LSD.

If taken orally, DMT has no real effects on the body because stomach enzymes break down the compound immediately. But the Banisteriopsis caapi vines used in ayahuasca block those enzymes, causing DMT to enter your bloodstream and travel to your brain. DMT, like other classic psychedelic drugs, affect the brain's serotonin receptors, which research shows alters emotion, vision, and sense of bodily integrity. In other words: you're on one hell of a trip.

Much of what is known about DMT is thanks to Dr. Rick Strassman, who first published groundbreaking research on the psychedelic drug two decades ago. According to Strassman, DMT is one of the only compounds that can cross the blood-brain barrier the membrane wall separating circulating blood from the brain extracellular fluid in the central nervous system. DMT's ability to cross this divides means the compound "appears to be a necessary component of normal brain physiology," says Strassman, the author of two quintessential books on the psychedelic, DMT: The Spirit Molecule and DMT and the Soul of Prophecy.

"The brain only brings things into its confines using energy to get things across the blood-brain barrier for nutrients, which it can't make on its own things like blood sugar or glucose," he continued. "DMT is unique in that way, in that the brain expends energy to get it into its confines."

DMT actually naturally occurs in the human body, and is particularly present in the lungs. Strassman says it may also be found in the pineal gland the small part of the brain associated with the mind's "third eye." The effects of overly active DMT when ingested via ayahuasca can last for hours. But taken on its own that is, smoked or injected and your high lasts only a few minutes, according to Strassman.

Although short, the trip from DMT can be intense, more so than other psychedelics, Strassman says. Users on DMT have reported similar experiences to that of ayahuasca: A greater sense of self, vivid images and sounds and deeper introspection. In the past, Strassman has suggested DMT to be used as a therapy tool to treat depression, anxiety and other mental health conditions, as well as aid with self-improvement and discovery. But studies of DMT are actually scarce, so it's hard to know the full extent of its therapeutic benefits.

"There isn't much research with DMT and it ought to be studied more," Strassman says.

MDMAUnlike DMT, MDMA is not a naturally occurring psychedelic. The drug otherwise called molly or ecstasy is a synthetic concoction popular among ravers and club kids. People can pop MDMA as a capsule, tablet or pill. The drug (sometimes called ecstasy or molly) triggers the release of three key neurotransmitters: serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine. The synthetic drug also increases levels of the hormones oxytocin and prolactin, resulting in a feeling of euphoria and being uninhibited. The most significant effect of MDMA is the release of serotonin in large quantities, which drains the brain's supply which can mean days of depression after its use.

Brain imaging has also shown that MDMA causes a decrease in activity in the amygdala the brain's almond-shaped region that perceives threats and fear as well as an increase in the prefrontal cortex, which is considered the brain's higher processing center. Ongoing research on psychedelic drugs and the effects on various neural networks has also found that MDMA allows for more flexibility in brain function, which means people tripping on the drug can filter emotions and reactions without being "stuck in old ways of processing," according to Dr. Michael Mithoefer, who has studied MDMA extensively.

"People are less likely to be overwhelmed by anxiety and better able to process experience without being numb to emotion," he says.

Last year, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted researchers permission to move ahead with plans for a large-scale clinical trial to examine the effects of using MDMA as treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Mithoefer oversaw the phase-two trials, backed by MAPS, that informed the FDA's decision. During the study, people living with PTSD were able to address their trauma without withdrawing from their emotions while under the influence of MDMA because of the complex interaction between the amygdala and the prefrontal cortex. Since the phase two trials had strong results, Mithoefer told Rolling Stone in December that he expects the FDA to approve the phase three trial plans sometime early this year.

While research into MDMA's use for PTSD treatment is promising, Mithoefer cautions that the drug not be used outside of a therapeutic setting, as it raises blood pressure, body temperature and pulse, and causes nausea, muscle tension, increased appetite, sweating, chills and blurred vision. MDMA could also lead to dehydration, heart failure, kidney failure and an irregular heartbeat. If someone on MDMA doesn't drink enough water or has an underlying health condition, the side effects can be life threatening.

Psilocybin MushroomsMushrooms are another psychedelic with a long history of use in health and healing ceremonies, particularly in the Eastern world. People tripping on 'shrooms will experience vivid hallucinations within an hour of ingestion, thanks to the body's breakdown psilocybin, the naturally-occurring psychedelic ingredient found in more than 200 species of mushrooms.

Research out of the Imperial College London, published in 2014, found that psilocybin, a serotonin receptor, causes a stronger communication between the parts of the brain that are normally disconnected from each other. Scientists reviewing fMRI brain scans of people who've ingested psilocybin and people who've taken a placebo discovered that magic mushrooms trigger a different connectivity pattern in the brain that's only present in a hallucinogenic state. In this condition, the brain's functioning with less constraint and more intercommunication; according to researchers from Imperial College London, this type of psilocybin-induced brain activity is similar to what's seen with dreaming and enhanced emotional being.

"These stronger connections are responsible for creating a different state of consciousness," says Dr. Paul Expert, a methodologist and physicist who worked on the Imperial College London study. "Psychedelic drugs are a potentially very powerful way of understanding normal brain function."

Emerging research may prove magic mushrooms effective at treating depression and other mental health conditions. Much like ayahuasca, brain scans have shown that psilocybin can suppress activity in the brain's default mode network, and people tripping on 'shrooms have reported experiencing "a higher level of happiness and belonging to the world," according to Expert. To that end, a study published last year in the U.K. medical journal The Lancet discovered that a high dose of mushrooms reduced depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant patients.

That same study noted that psilocybin could potentially treat anxiety, addiction and obsessive-compulsive disorder because of its mood-elevating properties. And other research has found that psilocybin can reduce the fear response in mice, signaling the drug's potential as a treatment for PTSD.

Despite these positive findings, research on psychedelics is limited, and consuming magic mushrooms does comes with some risk. People tripping on psilocybin can experience paranoia or a complete loss of subjective self-identity, known as ego dissolution, according to Expert. Their response to the hallucinogenic drug will also depend on their physical and psychological environment. Magic mushrooms should be consumed with caution because the positive or negative effect on the user can be "profound (and uncontrolled) and long lasting," Expert says. "We don't really understand the mechanism behind the cognitive effect of psychedelics, and thus cannot 100 percent control the psychedelic experience."

Sign up for our newsletter to receive breaking news directly in your inbox.

The rest is here:

What Psychedelics Really Do to Your Brain - Rolling Stone - RollingStone.com

Posted in Psychedelics | Comments Off on What Psychedelics Really Do to Your Brain – Rolling Stone – RollingStone.com

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) at The Johns …

Posted: at 3:19 am

rTMS has been shown to be a safe and well-tolerated procedure that can be an effective treatment for patients with depression who have not benefitted from antidepressant medications or cannot tolerate antidepressant medications due to side-effects.

We are pleased to announce that the Johns Hopkins Brain Stimulation Program is now offering Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (dTMS) utilizing the H-coil, which is a novel rTMS tool that enables direct stimulation of deeper and larger brain volumes. This coil is designed to affect extensive neuronal pathways, including deeper cortical regions and fibers targeting subcortical regions, without a significant increase in the electric field induced in superficial cortical layers (Levkovitz et al., 2015).

In addition to dTMS, the Brain Stimulation program continues to offer conventional TMS using the figure-of-8 coil.

rTMS therapy is not appropriate for all patients. Before scheduling you for treatment, you must first be evaluated by one of our TMS psychiatrists to determine if rTMS would be safe and appropriate for you.

To be evaluated for outpatient rTMS treatment or to learn more please CONTACT US.

Sample TMS consent form Patient metal screening form

See the original post:

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) at The Johns ...

Posted in Tms | Comments Off on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) at The Johns …

Drilling Down Into CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF … – StockNewsJournal

Posted: at 3:17 am


StockNewsJournal
Drilling Down Into CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF ...
StockNewsJournal
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) is an interesting player in the Basic Materials space, with a focus on Agricultural Chemicals. The stock has been active on the ...
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CF) Closed the Last Trading Session with decrease of -1.92%The Newburgh Press
CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) Bond Prices Fall 1.6% - Chaffey ...Chaffey Breeze
Stock on Trader's Radar: CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CF)TopChronicle
Times Money -Petro Global News 24
all 50 news articles »

Continue reading here:

Drilling Down Into CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF ... - StockNewsJournal

Posted in Cf | Comments Off on Drilling Down Into CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF … – StockNewsJournal

George Will: Eugenics was a progressive cause – The Saratogian

Posted: at 3:16 am

The progressive mob that disrupted Charles Murrays appearance last week at Middlebury College was protesting a 1994 book read by few if any of the protesters. Some of them denounced eugenics, thereby demonstrating an interesting ignorance: Eugenics -- controlled breeding to improve the heritable traits of human beings -- was a progressive cause.

In The Bell Curve, Murray, a social scientist at the American Enterprise Institute, and his co-author, Harvard psychologist Richard J. Herrnstein, found worrisome evidence that American society was becoming cognitively stratified, with an increasingly affluent cognitive elite and a deteriorating quality of life for people at the bottom end of the cognitive ability distribution. They examined the consensus that, controlling for socioeconomic status and possible IQ test bias, cognitive ability is somewhat heritable, that the black/white differential had narrowed, and that millions of blacks have higher IQs than millions of whites. The authors were resolutely agnostic concerning the roles of genes and the social environment. They said that even if there developed unequivocal evidence that genetics are part of the story, there would be no reason to treat individuals differently or to permit government regulation of procreation.

Middleburys mob was probably as ignorant of this as of the following: Between 1875 and 1925, when eugenics had many advocates, not all advocates were progressives but advocates were disproportionately progressives because eugenics coincided with progressivisms premises and agenda.

Progressives rejected the Founders natural rights doctrine and conception of freedom. Progressives said freedom is not the natural capacity of individuals whose rights pre-exist government. Rather, freedom is something achieved, at different rates and to different degrees, by different races. Racialism was then seeking scientific validation, and Darwinian science had given rise to social Darwinism -- belief in the ascendance of the fittest in the ranking of races. The progressive theologian Walter Rauschenbusch argued that with modern science we can intelligently mold and guide the evolution in which we take part.

Advertisement

Progressivisms concept of freedom as something merely latent, and not equally latent, in human beings dictated rethinking the purpose and scope of government. Princeton University scholar Thomas C. Leonard, in his 2016 book Illiberal Reformers: Race, Eugenics & American Economics in the Progressive Era, says progressives believed that scientific experts should be in societys saddle, determining the human hierarchy and appropriate social policies, including eugenics.

Economist Richard T. Ely, a founder of the American Economic Association and whose students at Johns Hopkins included Woodrow Wilson, said God works through the state, which must be stern and not squeamish. Charles Van Hise, president of the University of Wisconsin, epicenter of intellectual progressivism, said: We know enough about eugenics so that if that knowledge were applied, the defective classes would disappear within a generation. Progress, said Ely, then at Wisconsin, depended on recognizing that there are certain human beings who are absolutely unfit, and who should be prevented from a continuation of their kind. The mentally and physically disabled were deemed defectives.

In 1902, when Wilson became Princetons president, the final volume of his A History of the American People contrasted the sturdy stocks of the north of Europe with southern and eastern Europeans who had neither skill nor energy nor any initiative of quick intelligence. In 1907, Indiana became the first of more than 30 states to enact forcible sterilization laws. In 1911, now-Gov. Wilson signed New Jerseys, which applied to the hopelessly defective and criminal classes. In 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Virginias law, with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes saying that in affirming the law requiring the sterilization of imbeciles he was getting near to the first principle of real reform.

At the urging of Robert Yerkes, president of the American Psychological Association, during World War I the Army did intelligence testing of conscripts so that the nation could inventory its human stock as it does livestock. The Armys findings influenced Congress postwar immigration restrictions and national quotas. Carl Brigham, a Princeton psychologist, said the Armys data demonstrated the intellectual superiority of our Nordic group over the Mediterranean, Alpine and Negro groups.

Progressives derided the Founders as unscientific for deriving natural rights from what progressives considered the fiction of a fixed human nature. But they asserted that races had fixed and importantly different natures calling for different social policies. Progressives resolved this contradiction when, like most Americans, they eschewed racialism -- the belief that the races are tidily distinct, each created independent of all others, each with fixed traits and capacities.Middleburys turbulent progressives should read Leonards book. After they have read Murrays.

George Wills email address is georgewill@washpost.com.

More:

George Will: Eugenics was a progressive cause - The Saratogian

Posted in Eugenics | Comments Off on George Will: Eugenics was a progressive cause – The Saratogian

Pokmon GO’s Gen 2 Evolution Items Are Flat-Out Broken – Forbes

Posted: at 3:15 am

Pokmon GO's Gen 2 Evolution Items Are Flat-Out Broken
Forbes
There's unlucky, and there's designing a system so poorly that it has the potential to break players' spirits and sap their interest in the game. For me, that's been how Pokmon GO has handled its evolution items with the release of Gen 2. I have ...

Read more from the original source:

Pokmon GO's Gen 2 Evolution Items Are Flat-Out Broken - Forbes

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on Pokmon GO’s Gen 2 Evolution Items Are Flat-Out Broken – Forbes

Synthetic yeast chromosomes help probe mysteries of evolution … – Nature.com

Posted: at 3:15 am

Dennis Kunkel Microscopy/Science Photo Library

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is used to make beer and bread.

Evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould once pondered what would happen if the cassette tape of life were rewound and played again. Synthetic biologists have tested one aspect of this notion by engineering chromosomes from scratch, sticking them into yeast and seeing whether the modified organisms can still function normally.

They do, according to seven papers published today in Science that describe the creation, testing and refining of five redesigned yeast chromosomes17. Together with a sixth previously synthesized chromosome8, they represent more than one-third of the genome of the bakers yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. An international consortium of more than 200 researchers that created the chromosomes expects to complete a fully synthetic yeast genome by the end of the year.

The work the team has already done could help to optimize the creation of microbes to pump out alcohol, drugs, fragrances and fuel. And it serves as a guide for future research on how genomes evolve and function.

The amazing thing here is that they are figuring out how to tweak the genome not just synthesize it through a design-build-test-learn cycle, says Jack Newman, co-founder of Amyris Biotechnologies in Emeryville, California. The approach is similar to one that computer scientists might take when trying to understand a computer code written a decade ago, he adds, although the task is much harder with genomes that have undergone millions of years of evolution. Yeast originated more than 50 million years ago, when the Saccharomyces lineage branched off from other fungi.

In 2010, geneticist Craig Venter and his team revealed9the first synthetic genome, a stripped-down version of the genetic code from a bacterial parasite, Mycoplasma mycoides. Four years later, a team led by Jef Boeke, a yeast geneticist at New York University Langone Medical Center in New York City, synthesized8 a chromosome from yeast, a more complex organism that is classified as a eukaryote a group that also includes plants, worms and people.

Venters goal was to realize the smallest genome needed to sustain life, but Boeke sought to explore fundamental questions about evolution, such as whether yeasts could have evolved through alternate routes. He turned the query into a hypothesis testable with synthetic biology: how much can you change a genome and still have a working organism?

To look for an answer, Boeke assigned each of S. cerevisiaes 16 chromosomes to teams of collaborators, spread across the United States, United Kingdom, China, Singapore and Australia. Each was to create a chromosome that was stable yet evolvable, and would keep yeast functioning as usual.

The teams used computer programs to design the codes of their respective chromosomes. They omitted some sequences found in naturally occurring yeast chromosomes, such as repetitive parts of the genome, in hopes of increasing the stability of the synthetic versions. And they endowed their creations with a mechanism that mimics the random variation that drives evolution. When this scrambling system is triggered, it can shuffle, duplicate and delete genes at random.

A team led by researchers at the Pasteur Institute in Paris documented2 dramatic structural changes in the nucleus of the synthetic yeast even as it continued to thrive, making proteins and reproducing. It seems like we can really kind of torture the genome in complicated ways and frequently the yeast shrugs its shoulders and grows like normal, Boeke says.

Some teams in the consortium invented techniques to rapidly identify errors in synthetic chromosomes3, 4. Another group, led researchers at Tianjin University in China, optimized techniques to remove bugs in the genetic sequences of the chromosomes, in one instance by using the gene-editing tool CRISPRCas95.

Considering that they synthesized 536,024 base pairs in that chromosome and only used CRISPR to mess around with 45 of them is kind of refreshing, says George Church, a geneticist at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts. It makes you feel like maybe this is the next big thing.

Genome synthesis is unlikely to displace tools such as CRISPR, which allow scientists to add or subtract a limited number of genes in an organism, he says. But it may become the favoured method for applications that require complicated genetic changes. This includes engineering yeast and other microbes to produce fragrances and other materials; manufacturers that rely on such microbes could use synthetic genomes to make those organisms more resilient to harmful viruses, for example.

If you took those [microbe] strains offline and reprogrammed their code, then put them back in, the viruses would be so far out of touch they couldnt come back, Church says. It would be like going back to the Middle Ages and giving one country hydrogen bombs.

Several groups have launched efforts to synthesize genomes from species such as the bacterium Escherichia coli and from people. Boeke is confident that his consortium will create a fully synthetic yeast genome by the years end. The team has already created several additional chromosomes, and is debugging and testing them.

The groups latest results will encourage others to dream big, Church says: Theyve been able to induce radical changes in the code, so it emboldens you to be even more radical.

Excerpt from:

Synthetic yeast chromosomes help probe mysteries of evolution ... - Nature.com

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on Synthetic yeast chromosomes help probe mysteries of evolution … – Nature.com

Emma Watson’s feminist evolution is more common than you think – Mashable

Posted: at 3:15 am


Mashable
Emma Watson's feminist evolution is more common than you think
Mashable
Emma Watson is not the first high profile feminist to demonstrate an evolved view on feminism. Far from it. Her feminist evolution is actually a pretty common and universal aspect to being a feminist. So, why are we so quick to call feminist activists ...

and more »

Excerpt from:

Emma Watson's feminist evolution is more common than you think - Mashable

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on Emma Watson’s feminist evolution is more common than you think – Mashable

Baltusrol bunkers on No. 7 provide proof of power game evolution – Golfweek.com

Posted: at 3:15 am

Sometimes the evolution of the power game stares you right in the face. That was the case during last summers PGA Championship at Baltusrol Golf Clubs Lower Course in Springfield, N.J., when players at the 505-yard, par-4 seventh hole confronted three bunkers down the inside of the dogleg right hole.

Here was a golf course designed by A.W. Tillinghast in 1922, toughened by Robert Trent Jones for the 1954 U.S. Open, and in recent years revised and refined by Rees Jones over more than two decades of enhancements.

And all the evidence one needed for this lineage could be found down the right side of the seventh in the form of three yawning fairway bunkers, each one placed where the fairway turns by an architect intent on challenging elite players of the era he occupied.

The bunkers on No. 7 at Baltusrol

The first bunker in the serial formation of three was placed by Tillinghast with a carry of 235 yards from the current back tee. The second bunker, by Trent Jones, demands a carry of 265 yards to cover. The third, by Rees Jones, is 300 yards to clear. Note two qualifying points about this example: Tillinghasts original back tee was considerably shorter than the one they used in the 2016 PGA, meaning that the bunker carry in his day was closer to 200 yards. And all three bunkers were rebuilt by Jones, though in this case left exactly in place.

We wanted to respect the tradition of architecture at Baltusrol, said Rees Jones. We could have eliminated it or moved it, but thought it important to recognize its place in the evolution of the golf course.

Distance evolves. Back in the 1920s, when Tillinghast and Donald Ross were at their most productive and creative, drives carrying 200 yards were considered prodigious. This was an era of wooden shafts and golf balls that were often off center in their rotation. And swings were more arms-oriented, with the focus on hitting the center of a driver whose head was about 175 cubic centimeters compared to todays drivers of 460 cubic centimeters.

At the 1920 U.S. Open at Inverness Club in Toledo, Ohio, long-hitting Ted Ray was considered a sensation for occasionally being able to fly the ball more than 275 yards and for driving the 320-yard, par-4 seventh hole twice during the U.S. Open. He birdied it all four rounds and won the title by one shot. He was the Jack Nicklaus of his day. Or John Daly. Or Tiger Woods.

Those pre-World War II turn points of 200 yards became 250 yards in the hands of Trent Jones who along the way lengthened and toughened such legendary championship layouts as Baltusrols Lower and Oakland

Hills Country Clubs South Course in Bloomfield Hills, Mich. At the same time he pushed fairway bunkers back and clustered them on the sides of the landing areas at lengths of 240-260 yards.

Pete Dye took those decisive points and in the 1980s pushed them back to 800 feet (267 yards). After watching Daly annihilate the turn points at Crooked Stick Golf Club in Carmel, Ind., during the 1991 PGA Championship, Dye went for 850 feet (283 yards). The whole industry followed, eventually adopting 300 yards.

Not that it proved enough for elite players. Today at Augusta (Ga.) National Golf Club, the set carry point for all fairway bunkers is 950 feet (317 yards) on level ground, adjusted a little shorter for uphill drives and a little longer for downhill drives.

All for good measure, as we know from PGA Tour statistics. Back in 1980, when the first comprehensive data set became available, the mean average measured drive on the PGA Tour was 256.7 yards and the longest driver (Dan Pohl) averaged 274.3 yards. In 2016, the mean average drive was 289.8 yards and the longest hitter (J.B. Holmes) averaged 314.5 yards.

Championship setups reflect this increase 12.9 percent on average drive and 14.7 percent on longest driver from 1980 to 2016. To take one example, the U.S. Open kept par 4s under 500 yards until 2006 at Winged Foots West Course in Mamaroneck, N.Y., when the ninth hole measured 514 yards. Since then, par 4s exceeding 500 yards have become standard at U.S. Opens.

A strong case can be made, however, that the growth of distance and power in the game is largely confined to elite players and that its not relevant to everyday golfers, whose skills vary widely if not wildly.

Thats essentially the view of architect Tom Doak, whose iconoclastic views on golf strategy and course setup the past 30 years as both a writer and a designer helped usher in a new, alternative perspective that emphasizes the ground game and shot-making, not sheer power.

Turn points are the most overrated discussion in golf course design, Doak said. We took down the poles when we were doing Pacific Dunes (at Bandon Dunes Golf Resort in Oregon). Were not building courses for touring pros, and when you watch people actually play golf, they are not there; they are 30 yards short or 20 yards right.

Besides, as he points out, even if you could get players from different tees to orient their drives to a common gathering point, theyre hitting very different clubs from there to the green. From 160 yards, its a 9-iron for a tour pro, a 5-iron for a mid-handicapper like myself and a 3-wood that wont even get there for the high-handicapper. So what you actually want to do is get the short hitter well past that point, not design from one point.

Doaks point is that simply designing for distance is self-defeating and only plays into the hands of the longest hitters. His own preference, one shared by a growing number of architects today, is to focus more on the short game, on angles and on interesting greens and surrounds.

Thats certainly been the case at recent U.S. Opens, such as Merion Golf Club, Pinehurst No. 2, Chambers Bay and Oakmont. For all the length of these courses, their main challenge has come in the form of diverse, sometimes maddening ground contours in and around the greens.

The rest is here:

Baltusrol bunkers on No. 7 provide proof of power game evolution - Golfweek.com

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on Baltusrol bunkers on No. 7 provide proof of power game evolution – Golfweek.com