Daily Archives: March 1, 2017

Treadway: Talk to look at El Cerrito gambling era – East Bay Times

Posted: March 1, 2017 at 9:42 pm

Only oldtimers will recall that El Cerrito was once the headquarters of gambling and organized crime in the East Bay. It was an era that lasted almost 20 years, but had roots stretching back much farther.

One of the principal buildings related to that forgotten history will be the site of a talk on El Cerritos Gambling Past, a centennial program presented by the El Cerrito Historical Society and Bayview Fraternal Order of Eagles at 7 p.m. March 9. The Eagles Hall was once a club known as the Wagon Wheel, one of the most notorious gambling and vice locations in Northern California in the 1930s and 40s.

El Cerrito Journal editor Chris Treadway, who writes this column and is working on a book about the days when the city was a gambling and nightlife destination, will discuss the gambling halls, prizefighting, the dog racing track, and the El Cerrito gangs that tried to dominate gambling throughout Northern California.

The talk is free.

RICHMOND AND THE GREAT WAR: How World War I Changed Richmond is the focus of a new exhibit opening March 11 in the Seaver Gallery at the Richmond Museum of History, 400 Nevin Ave.

The exhibit will highlight dozens of artifacts related to the Great War with connections to Richmond in observance of the centennial of the entry of the United States in the conflict. It will also tell the stories of Richmond residents from all walks of life who were involved in World War I both at home and on the front.

Opening events will include a members-only preview from 3 to 6 p.m. March 10, a free public reception from 2 to 4 p.m. March 11.

Guest speaker Karen English, professor of English at San Jose State University will give a talk on American Poetry of World War I at 2 p.m. April 8; and guest speaker Susan Anderson, founder of Memory House, will give a presentation on World War I, Resistance and the New Negro at 2 p.m. June 3.

The exhibit runs through June 29. For more details visit http://www.richmondmuseum.org or contact Melinda McCrary at 510-235-7387 or melinda@richmondmuseum.org.

The exhibit is made possible by the ClaraBelle Hamilton Fund and the San Francisco Foundation.

MAYAS SPRING FESTIVAL: Youths and adults with developmental disabilities, most from Alameda and Contra Costa counties, will perform at the 28th annual Spring Music Festival hosted by Mayas Music Therapy Fund from 2 to 4:30 p.m. March 19 at the Richmond Recreation Complex, 3230 Macdonald Ave. in Richmond.

The theme of this years festival showcasing musical performances by program participants is Under the Sea.

The therapy program is named for Maya Cooper, a child who was severely disabled and nonverbal, but was able to use music to communicate with the world around her.

Her parents, Dr. Michael Cooper and Dr. Joanna Cooper, established the program after Mayas death in 1988 so that other disabled people might experience the life-enriching benefits of music therapy.

Music therapy has been found effective for people with such conditions as autism, cerebral palsy, Down syndrome, brain injury, hearing and vision impairment, ADHD, Rett Syndrome, and other developmental disabilities.

The public is invited to the festival, a fundraiser for the program, and tickets will be available at the door for $5 children and disabled, $10 adults. Food will be also be available for sale.

For information visit http://www.mayasmusic.org, contact info@mayasmusic.org, or telephone 510-232-9824

St. Marys High alumni news: UC Berkeley womens basketball standout Mikayla Cowling, a 2015 St. Marys grad, was named Scholar-Athlete of the Week for Jan. 23-27 by Cals Athletic Study Center.

Mike Gray, a 1974 grad, was recently named managing editor, enterprise, for the San Francisco Chronicle, and will appear on the papers masthead.

Buffalo Bills outside linebacker, Lorenzo Alexander, a 2001 grad, was named Defensive MVP of the NFL Pro Bowl, played Jan. 29. Alexander and his wife, Manjanique, have four children and founded the ACES Foundation, an Oakland-based youth mentoring program.

The rest is here:

Treadway: Talk to look at El Cerrito gambling era - East Bay Times

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off on Treadway: Talk to look at El Cerrito gambling era – East Bay Times

To make a gambling deal, Seminole Tribe and Florida have some work to do – Miami Herald

Posted: at 9:42 pm


Miami Herald
To make a gambling deal, Seminole Tribe and Florida have some work to do
Miami Herald
Although the Florida House and Senate are miles apart in how far they are willing to go to protect the Seminole Tribe's exclusive access to gambling in Florida, the Tribe announced this week it's not ready to deal on either of them. In a letter hand ...

and more »

Go here to read the rest:

To make a gambling deal, Seminole Tribe and Florida have some work to do - Miami Herald

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off on To make a gambling deal, Seminole Tribe and Florida have some work to do – Miami Herald

US Congressman Voices ‘Concern’ Over Skin Gambling, Says Out Of Date’ Gambling Laws Leave Public Vulnerable – Esports Betting Report

Posted: at 9:42 pm

Skin gambling has made it onto the radar of the federal government.

Thats after US Congressman Frank Pallone, Jr. (D-NJ) issued a statement voicing concern regarding unregulated online gambling and underage betting in which he specifically singled out esports gambling and skin gambling.

Get a primer on the market for skin betting here. Our estimates put the total annual handle for skin gambling sites at north of $5 billion.

Gambling is taking new formsfrom daily fantasy sports, to betting on e-sports, and even online casino games using virtual skins instead of cashthat attempt to bypass the law, Pallone said in the statement.

Pallone has been vocal on the issue of daily fantasy sports in the past, leading a Congressional hearing on the issue last May.

But todays statement marks what appears to be his initialinterest in skin gambling.

Current federal gambling laws are hopelessly out of date, leaving the American public vulnerable to unscrupulous behavior. No matter the form of the games, we must ensure integrity, accountability, and basic consumer protections, including appropriate age limits, are in place.

Pallones reference to out of date federal gambling laws is no accident. Its a direct link to the issue that is likely driving Pallones attention to daily fantasy sports and esports betting: regulated sports betting.

Currently, states are effectively prohibited from regulating sports betting due to a federal statute generally referred to as PASPA.

Background on PASPA here.

New Jersey has been waging a years-long battle with the federal government over the states right to introduce regulated sports betting, a battle that now sits before the Supreme Court.

There are regulated casinos in the state, along with regulated online casinos in New Jersey, but legislative attempts to introduce sports betting have been stymied by federal opposition.

Pallone has been an aggressive advocate for New Jersey on the issue, recently introducing legislation that would allow New Jersey to sidestep the PASPA prohibition.

Pallone may find skin gambling, a controversial subject that pushes a number of media buttons, an especially effective way to draw attention to his sports betting advocacy, meaning that additional statements and possibly even a hearing touching upon the topic are likely to follow.

Regardless of where Pallone heads next with the issue, the fact that skin gambling is now a part of the federal conversation may carry significant implications for any number of ongoing stories, including:

Read more here:

US Congressman Voices 'Concern' Over Skin Gambling, Says Out Of Date' Gambling Laws Leave Public Vulnerable - Esports Betting Report

Posted in Gambling | Comments Off on US Congressman Voices ‘Concern’ Over Skin Gambling, Says Out Of Date’ Gambling Laws Leave Public Vulnerable – Esports Betting Report

Paralysed Italian DJ takes own life in Swiss clinic after fruitless euthanasia campaign in his native country – The Independent

Posted: at 9:41 pm

A paralysed DJ ended his own life with the press of a button in Switzerland after a fruitless campaign for euthanasia in his native Italy.

Fabiano Antoniani died at a euthanasia facility in Forch after reportedly triggering the lethal substance.

The 40-year-old had campaigned for a change in the assisted suicide law in his homeland, but Italy's parliament had shelved the debate 11 times.

Former MEP and activist Marco Cappato, who travelled with Mr Antoniani to Switzerland, could face criminal charges after helping escort the musician to the facility.

Police have questioned him over the death, he said onTwitter.

Mr Antoniani was left blind and tetraplegic by car crash in 2014. The DJ dropped his phone while driving and smashed into the car in front of him as he tried to pick it up.

Also known as quadriplegia,Tetraplegia is paralysis caused by illness or injury that results in the partial or total loss of use of all four limbs and torso.

He appealed to Italy President Sergio Mattarella for the right to die, and shortly before his death, criticised the country for failing to pass laws allowing him to do so.

Finally I am in Switzerland and, unfortunately, I got here on my own and not with the help of my country, he said, in a message posted on social media shortly before his death.

Fabo died at 11.40am. He decided to pass away, respecting the rules of a country which is not his own, MrCappatowrote on Twitter, shortly after he died.

Roberto Saviano, an Italian journalist, who was a friend of DJ Fabo, also wrote: We distinctly heard you ask for a dignified death. There is no possible justification for the silence that youve achieved in response.

There is no possible justification for the lack of empathy, of attention, and humanity, from the European Parliament, and from the country, which by fate, you were born in.

In one of Mr Antonianis last Facebook posts, he wrote: F*** the boredom f*** the problems f*** the sickness.

Euthanasia is illegal in Italy, a traditionally Catholic country, but the law upholds a patients right to refuse care.

A bill to clarify assisted suicide law has been postponed in Italy three times, but according to La Stampa, will be debated by the Chamber of Deputies this week.

Hundreds have travelled to Zurich to end their lives since the Dignitas organisation was set up in 1998.

The number of assisted suicides in Switzerland, according to statistics from Dignitas and Exit, stood at 416 in 2011 but 1,004 in 2015.

In the UK, awoman suffering from Crohn's disease last month said she will pay 10,000 to end her life in Switzerland because of social care cuts.

Follow this link:

Paralysed Italian DJ takes own life in Swiss clinic after fruitless euthanasia campaign in his native country - The Independent

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Paralysed Italian DJ takes own life in Swiss clinic after fruitless euthanasia campaign in his native country – The Independent

Shared concerns unite all sides of the euthanasia debate | Peter … – The Guardian

Posted: at 9:41 pm

Research funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation found that people were united in compassion for those with terminal illnesses. Photograph: Greg White/Reuters

Brigit Forsyth, the actor best know as Thelma in Whatever Happened to the Likely Lads? is currently playing a terminally ill musician on stage. Her character in Killing Time says shes a prime candidate for a one-way trip to Switzerland. Forsyth has disclosed that her GP grandfather helped dying patients end their lives and that she is in favour of euthanasia. Her comments are the latest in a long line of opinions on legalised assisted dying reported in the press, which has a habit of oversimplifying the complex arguments for and against. And this seems to be damaging our ability to hold meaningful public debate on the subject.

With this in mind, a study funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation sought the views of people with strongly opposed opinions on the matter. Participants in both groups included people with palliative care backgrounds, older and disabled people, those from organisations concerned with care and support and individuals from academic, social work and policy backgrounds.

What emerged is a surprising amount of common ground. People with apparently polarised views on legalising the right to die often shared areas of interest and concern. It is these areas that should form the basis for further public discussion, argues the report, Assisted Dying: Developing the Debate, which is published on Wednesday by the Shaping Our Lives network of user-led groups, service users and disabled people.

Shared concerns included clear agreement that palliative care for terminally ill people is inadequate. Whether for or against assisted dying, participants showed a willingness to discuss quality of life for terminally ill people, the value placed on good-quality care, and how to invest in and provide access to this care in the face of economic inequality.

Participants recognised that the debate on legalising assisted dying was taking place in an unequal society: we often place lower social value on older, sick, and disabled people. The research identified a willingness to discuss prevailing societal values, including the concept of being a burden on society; the value society placed on social care and support work; and our social attitudes towards death and dying. How should assisted dying be funded?, Where should it be performed?, and What methods and means of self-administering a fatal dose should be used?, were just some of the common questions raised.

Despite disagreement about the extent to which detailed processes and safeguards should be included in assisted dying legislation, participants from across the spectrum of opinion generally agreed that the how questions were not being discussed in enough depth.

Areas of shared understanding also emerged when respondents discussed ethical and existential ideas around death and dying, including the psychological aspects of pain and suffering, both for individuals and their loved ones. All participants had a wish to find the best way forward with compassion for people who are terminally ill, regardless of being for or against legalising assisted dying, the report concludes.

The study shows that the issues are far more complex than much of the public debate has so far allowed. Death and dying is a core issue for human beings, and public debate must reflect this. It is time to embrace the personal, social, policy and ethical issues that participants have highlighted.

Back in the theatre, Forsyths dying musician is visited by a young carer (Zoe Mills) who feels it is her duty to help put older people out of their misery. According to the reviews, she comes to realise that life and death is more nuanced.

View original post here:

Shared concerns unite all sides of the euthanasia debate | Peter ... - The Guardian

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Shared concerns unite all sides of the euthanasia debate | Peter … – The Guardian

Jagged Vision Streaming "Euthanasia" – Metal Underground

Posted: at 9:41 pm

Jagged Vision Streaming "Euthanasia"
Metal Underground
Norwegian sludge noisemakers Jagged Vision will release second full-length album Death Is This World on March 10th and just recently unveiled another track from the album titled Euthanasia." Listen in below. The follow-up to 2014's debut album ...

More here:

Jagged Vision Streaming "Euthanasia" - Metal Underground

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Jagged Vision Streaming "Euthanasia" – Metal Underground

Evanger’s expands recall because dog food may contain euthanasia drug – The Seattle Times

Posted: at 9:41 pm

More dog food has been recalled because it may contain a deadly drug.

Evangers Dog and Cat Food announced Tuesday that it is expanding its recall of both Evangers and Against the Grain dog foods because the canned foods may be tainted with pentobarbital. The barbiturate is used to euthanize animals as well as in human executions and physician-assisted suicides.

The initial voluntary recall was announced earlier this month after five Washougal, Clark County, dogs became ill after eating Evangers Hunk of Beef products, and one died.

The expanded recall announced Tuesday includes:

Evangers Hunk of Beef; 12 ounce can; Item #776155

Evangers: Braised Beef; 12 ounce can; Item #776150

Against the Grain Pulled Beef; 12 ounce can; Item #776107

The three recalled products were made between December 2015 and January 2017, and have expiration dates of December 2019 through January 2021, according to Evangers. The products were distributed online and through independent pet stores nationwide.

How the deadly drug and horse meat got into the cans of dog food remains a mystery.

Evangers vice president has blamed his meat supplier for the problem. However, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspected the suppliers plant and found systems in place to keep euthanized animals out of the food stream, according to Food Safety News.

Evangers vice president Joel Sher told Petfoodindustry.com that along with pentobarbital, private laboratory results found horse DNA in samples of the Hunk of Beef dog food that were recalled Feb. 3. Against the Grain Pet Food recalled one lot of Against the Grain Pulled Beef with Gravy Dinner for Dogs on Feb. 14. Against the Grain is owned by members of the Sher family, according to Petfood Industry.

There is also an issue about the quality of meat Evangers used and the condition of its plants where the food is produced, according to the FDA.

FDA officials have said the Hunk of Beef meat did not come from a U.S. Department of Agriculture-approved supplier of human-grade meat, something that Evangers has claimed since 2003, according to Food Safety News.

And Petfood Industry says FDA inspectors also noted food-safety problems at Evangers Wheeling, Ill., plant where the dog foods are produced. Some of these issues included peeling paint and mold on the walls, lack of raw meat refrigeration, and an open sewer within 25 feet of food storage trailers, Petfood Industry says.

Sher has said he has contested those notes in a response to the FDA.

Original post:

Evanger's expands recall because dog food may contain euthanasia drug - The Seattle Times

Posted in Euthanasia | Comments Off on Evanger’s expands recall because dog food may contain euthanasia drug – The Seattle Times

John Klar: Scott plays both sides in marijuana debate – vtdigger.org

Posted: at 9:41 pm

Editors note: This commentary is by John Klar, a Vermont grass-fed beef and sheep farmer, and an attorney and pastor who lives in Irasburg.

In a June 22, 2016, VPR interview, Mr. Scott stated of marijuana legalization, We cant afford to make any mistakes here. So Im not saying never. Im saying its the timings not right. Its not now. In the recent Seven Days article, Gov. Scott is quoted as saying I didnt say, Never. I said, Not now. But the travesty of this position is manifest: not only is the governor leaving draconian laws in place which incarcerate citizens for victimless crimes, he is upping the ante by linking decriminalization to driving tests for cannabis.

To raise the false specter of pot-smoking motorists is to echo the Reefer Madness paranoia of a well-discredited past. Gov. Scott is suggesting that decriminalization will cause an increase in the number of stoned motorists on our roads, for which there is no evidence. A similar ignorance imbued the campaign by some to block the distribution of free needles to addicts in the midst of the AIDS epidemic: subsequent studies revealed that free needles did stem the spread of HIV, and did not increase the use of IV drugs.

Why should someone using cannabis brownies to fend off chemotherapy nausea, or battle chronic pain, have to be threatened with prison because someone else might drive stoned and the police dont yet have a test?

Our roads are threatened daily by drunken drivers, for whom we have a test. But if there is an accident, we have tests for cannabis also. But what Mr. Scott knows full well is that we have not established a legal limit for what amount of cannabinoids is dangerous. Without such a discussion, there can be no driving law and thus not now means, essentially never the opposite of what Mr. Scott states.

We must not tolerate such subterfuge. We have a horrific opioid epidemic in Vermont. I am personally seeing more and more people addicted to pharmaceuticals because of routine surgeries, and then transferred to methadone clinics. Does the governor have a routine test for methadone? If not, how can we allow it to be dispensed legally by the state?

There are numerous federal laws that protect people from discrimination if they are under medication-assisted treatment (see, e.g., Rights For Individuals on Medication-Assisted Treatment, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services). There is no legal protection for users of illegal drugs like cannabis just for the profitable drugs that are peddled by pharmaceutical companies and physicians to (supposedly) wean people off illegal narcotics.

So our governor is worse than disingenuous. Perhaps the energy he employs defying federal immigration laws should be invested in standing up forcefully for Vermonters clear and longstanding rights to bear arms, or to defy federal laws which incarcerate Vermonters for smoking pot in their own living rooms. Why should someone using cannabis brownies to fend off chemotherapy nausea, or battle chronic pain, have to be threatened with prison because someone else might drive stoned and the police dont yet have a test?

Vermont has a medical marijuana registry, regardless of the absence of a roadside test. But the relief from state criminalization for medical marijuana use does not protect our citizens from federal law, and our state appears to be providing the names of those on the marijuana registry to the federal government, so that they wont be able to buy guns they are on a federal list. Perhaps our governor will also demand a test to ensure gun owners arent stoned before he legalizes pot, to stigmatize both marijuana use and gun ownership simultaneously. (There is no restriction on alcoholics owning guns.)

The real issue here is whether or not we continue to threaten non-violent cannabis users with incarceration. Our government shields methadone and suboxone addicts from discrimination, while threatening recreational homebound pot smokers with prison or arrest because we dont have a test yet. What are they smoking in the Vermont Legislature? Do we have a test for them to take before enacting new laws, higher taxes, and increased fees? Not now. Maybe later. How do we know we are not under stoned governance?

Read the original post:

John Klar: Scott plays both sides in marijuana debate - vtdigger.org

Posted in Victimless Crimes | Comments Off on John Klar: Scott plays both sides in marijuana debate – vtdigger.org

How Much Ayn Rand Is There in Trump’s ‘America First’ Foreign … – American Spectator

Posted: at 9:40 pm

In Donald Trumps America first policy we can detect an unintended reincarnation of Ayn Rand, suggests Arnold Steinberg in The American Spectator.

Rands ideas may well have influenced Trump in some indirect way (the cultural impact of her philosophy is far-reaching). And I would welcome signs of such influence, having written two books that advocate for aligning our nations foreign policy with Rands morality of rational egoism. But when we look past Trumps rhetoric, how committed is he to the principle of putting the self-interest of Americans first?

Trump differs profoundly from Rands conception of American self-interest. Whereas Rands distinctive approach upholds Americas founding ideals of individualism and freedom, Trump exhibits an authoritarian and collectivist streak. We can see that by looking at Trumps approach with a wide-angle lens, one that includes aspects unaddressed in Mr. Steinbergs essay.

Lets start with the seeming echoes of Rands approach in Trumps rhetoric. For Mr. Steinberg and many others (myself included), Trumps rhetoric about firmly confronting enemies resonates with a bracingly self-assertive tone. Regarding alliances, Trump has pointedly and rightly asked, whats in it for us? Trump might do some good, if he sticks to that path. Mr. Steinberg aptly notes, however, that Trumps foreign policy is evolving, but reports that the president remains a critic of using American boots on the ground to build nations or to spread democracy. And he is unlikely to give foreign aid to socialist idiots.

These points call to mind Ayn Rands distinctive approach to foreign policy, which is predicated on her basic philosophic worldview. Rand was a thoroughgoing individualist, and her political views from her support for laissez-faire capitalism to her view that our foreign policy should be guided by the principle of rational egoism stem from that. Individualism regards every person as an independent, sovereign entity who possesses an inalienable right to his own life, a right derived from his nature as a rational being. Man, in Rands view, is capable of using reason to identify and pursue goals necessary for his own flourishing. Thus, for Rand, governments only proper function to protect the individual rights of its citizens domestically and in foreign policy.

Crucially, that rules out treating our citizens as cannon fodder (through a military draft and selfless missions, such as Vietnam and the nation-building in Iraq and Afghanistan), or disposing of their wealth by giving handouts to other countries (through foreign aid or international welfare schemes). For Rand, who vehemently opposed the Vietnam war as an instance of senseless, altruistic, self-sacrificial slaughter, the only moral justification for war is self-defense: the elimination of threats against American lives and freedom with decisive force.

But does the reality of Trumps actual foreign policy positions match his rhetoric? Consider two vital implications of a self-interested foreign policy: the paramount importance of moral judgment; and an uncompromising advocacy of free trade. From these positions, Trump diverges sharply.

Rational judgment is critical if we are to sort friend from foe (and everything in between), and act accordingly. Whats true for an individual is doubly true for a nations foreign policy. This entails a commitment to facts and judging other regimes by objective moral standards. We have much to gain from free nations, and a great deal to worry about from regimes that violate the rights of their own citizens, because these latter typically seek to do the same beyond their borders.

Consider Trumps startling assessment of the Russian tyrant Vladimir Putin. Trump fiercely admires Putin, whom he recently praised as a bright and very talented man. This is the same Putin who imprisons reporters, murders political opponents, and wages wars of conquest. Isnt Putin a killer? asked Bill OReilly in a recent interview. Trump responded: There are a lot of killers. Weve got a lot of killers. What do you think? Our countrys so innocent? To admire this killer and then stick up for him is horrendous. To denigrate America as somehow morally on par with an authoritarian regime like Russia: thats the last thing we would expect from a president who really believes American interests are worth defending.

A self-interested foreign policy also entails a commitment to (genuine) free trade without trade barriers, protective tariffs, or special privileges. It means, as Rand noted, the opening of the worlds trade routes to free international exchange and competition among the private citizens of all countries dealing directly with one another. Thats a logical expression of individualism applied to politics and economics. Rand observed that free trade in the 19th century liberated the world by undercutting statist regimes and led to the longest period of general peace in human history.

Consider Trumps vociferous opposition to globalization and international trade. Trumps chief strategist, Steve Bannon, pushes economic nationalism and by all accounts, the president agrees with him. Reflecting that collectivist mindset, Trump vilifies foreigners for stealing jobs and luring away our factories. He promises to solve these problems through protectionism and strongman tactics. Trump has openly threatened to punish American companies that leave the country. This is one more example of Trumps marked authoritarianism. The president emulates his Russian hero.

Trumps collectivist and authoritarian streak underscores his divergence from a genuinely self-interested approach, which rests on the American values of individualism and freedom. Based on those values, what constitutes our national self-interest? It is nothing more than the aggregate interest of each individual American to the protection of his or her rights: the freedom to enjoy life, liberty, and property unmolested by foreign aggressors.

The idea of American exceptionalism, in my view, captures the achievement of Americas political system a system predicated on the moral idea of protecting the individuals right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Thats a virtue that Ayn Rand, who recognized the evil of authoritarianism and collectivism in all their forms, admired in America. In Trumps statements we can sometimes hear a welcome pro-America motif, but the presidents signature positions dont live up to that ideal.

Originally posted here:

How Much Ayn Rand Is There in Trump's 'America First' Foreign ... - American Spectator

Posted in Ayn Rand | Comments Off on How Much Ayn Rand Is There in Trump’s ‘America First’ Foreign … – American Spectator

The Next Step for Liberty: Mark Sanford 2020 – Being Libertarian

Posted: at 9:39 pm


Being Libertarian
The Next Step for Liberty: Mark Sanford 2020
Being Libertarian
In 2016, the Libertarian Party put forward the most solid third-party ticket since Theodore Roosevelt's 1912 bid for a third term. It was the first ticket made up of two multi-term governors since Thomas Dewey and Earl Warren's 1948 bid for the Presidency.

See the rest here:

The Next Step for Liberty: Mark Sanford 2020 - Being Libertarian

Posted in Libertarian | Comments Off on The Next Step for Liberty: Mark Sanford 2020 – Being Libertarian