Daily Archives: February 28, 2017

Anti-Trump Protester Yelling at Police Officer Appears Not to Understand First Amendment – Washington Free Beacon

Posted: February 28, 2017 at 7:49 pm

BY: Andrew Kugle February 28, 2017 2:00 pm

An anti-Donald Trump protester yelled at a police officer for not stopping supporters of the president from holding a small rally, according to a YouTube video uploaded on Feb. 19.

The video showed several Trump supporters and anti-Trump protestersyelling back and forth ateach other.

One Trump supporter on a megaphone called the anti-Trump protestersthe "most racist people that ever walked the face of the Earth."

Several police officers enteredthescene to create a barrier between the two sides. One anti-Trump protester took this as a sign that the police weresupporting the pro-Trump rally.

"So you are here to support their rally so they can do this and we can't," one female protestersaid.

The police officer tried to explain to the protester that all they were trying to do was create a buffer between the two sides as the pro-Trump man on the mega phone proceeded toyell, "You're the baby of an illegal alien."

The anti-Trump woman did not seem to understand the police officer. She went on to accuse the police officers of standing by the pro-Trump rally. The officer attempted to explain to the woman that both sides have a First Amendment right.

The video continued with shouting and yelling from both sides.

At one point, the man on the mega phone said to the protesters, "We are going to deport every each and one of you."

Go here to see the original:
Anti-Trump Protester Yelling at Police Officer Appears Not to Understand First Amendment - Washington Free Beacon

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Anti-Trump Protester Yelling at Police Officer Appears Not to Understand First Amendment – Washington Free Beacon

Goodwins’ fight against land grab and First Amendment violations gaining national attention – Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) (press release) (blog)

Posted: at 7:49 pm

The Goodwins

This weekend, Forbes carried an excellent story about PLFs fight on behalf of Edward and Delanie Goodwin. In July, PLF attorneys filed a First Amendment challenge to protect the Goodwins right to speak on their own private property. Walton County banned signs on privately owned beaches last year, hoping to allow the public to trespass on private beaches without having to pay for the use. County officials threatened the Goodwins with large fines for keeping two private property signs and one small sign saying If Walton County Wants My Property, It Must Pay For It U.S. Constitution.

In September, the County agreed to temporarily stop enforcing the sign ban. But then in October, it passed an ordinance declaring that the public has a right of custom to use private beaches across the entire county. PLF responded by challenging the Countys blatant land grab as a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Today, on National Review, George Leef shares more about the Goodwins case, stating,

I read about lots of cases of governmental villainy, but this one is among the worst.

National Reviews Roger Clegg also gave PLF a special shout-out for representing the Goodwins for free (as we do for all of our clients, thanks to our donors generosity). He said,

The generosity and inclusive spirit of PLF are underscored by the fact that, even though it is named after that West Coast ocean, it is happy to litigate on behalf of the owners of beachfront property in Northwest Florida.

Clegg is right. We have cases from coast to coast, with offices in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; Arlington, Virginia; Bellevue, Washington; Honolulu, Hawaii; and Sacramento, California. We have cases pending in many more states, because government poses threats to liberty across the nation. As Leef wrote this weekend,

At all levels, government poses constant threats to our rights and only through eternal vigilance, as Thomas Jefferson observed, can we protect them.

Read the rest of Leefs excellent Forbes article about the Goodwin casehere.

Original post:
Goodwins' fight against land grab and First Amendment violations gaining national attention - Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) (press release) (blog)

Posted in First Amendment | Comments Off on Goodwins’ fight against land grab and First Amendment violations gaining national attention – Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) (press release) (blog)

Deletable blockchain might make cryptocurrency more user-friendly – TNW

Posted: at 7:48 pm

Thanks to the amount of technical savviness one needs to posses to use them,many cryptocurrencies are rather inaccessible for average users. PascalCoin a new cryptocurrency is ready to change this with deletable blockchains.

The project has made considerable headway since releasing its first beta version in July last year.According to The Merkle, there is a lot of trading activity and buzz aroundthe new altcoin but as of yet there are no merchants or platforms accepting it as a payment option.

PascalCoin is therefore not going to oust bitcoin any time soon, but it does employ interesting new strategies to create a cryptocurrency. Instead of relying on transaction history in blockchains, like most other cryptocurrencies, PascalCoin uses safebox with a safebox hash.

The safebox feature makes it unnecessary for the end user to download a blockchain of historical operations, making PascalCoin the first cryptocurrency to do that. The balance is included in each block of the blockchain so the chain can be deleted without affecting the ability of making transactions.

By saving the balance of the account on each block, thenew altcoin hopes to simplify cryptocurrencies and become moreappealing to the general public. Instead of long hacker-esque series of random numbers and letters, PascalCoin features up to 10-digit account numbers that include the balance and make the experience more similar to regular bank accounts.

The safebox is also meant to avoid the issues that have been detected with bitcoin. One of those issues beingdouble spending, when people attempt to do two transactions with the same funds, which is aknown problem with bitcoins.

When discussing cryptocurrency, the issue of traceability often arises. Many worry that cryptocurrency can aid criminals in their illegal dealing, although that might be changing. Pascal Coin will not be any more untraceable than bitcoin, even though it allows you to delete the blockchain. Deleting the blockchain can make the transaction history more obscure but anybody that possesses the full block chain will be able see it.

Its way too early to tell whether PascalCoins take on cryptocurrency will change anything about the future of cryptocurrency. However, new additions to the world of digital currencies are always interesting, especially if they bring it closer the public.

PascalCoin Is A Cryptocurrency With a Deletable Blockchain on The Merkle

Read next: First Uber, now Tesla: Employee sues over sexism, inappropriate conduct

Read the original here:
Deletable blockchain might make cryptocurrency more user-friendly - TNW

Posted in Cryptocurrency | Comments Off on Deletable blockchain might make cryptocurrency more user-friendly – TNW

Bitcoin’s Top Rival Is Up 90% and Ready to Ditch Mining – Bloomberg

Posted: at 7:48 pm

Marco Strengs computer servers are what make Ethereum tick.

Thousands strong, they whir day and night, solving the complex math riddles that are essential to verifying transactions on the hottest new platform in the world of cryptocurrencies and blockchains. Without these machines, or those deployed by Strengs biggest rivals, there would be no Ethereum.

But mining, as the practice is called, is costly and inefficient and, frankly, a bit weird. And Ethereums developers have always envisioned a time in which the cumbersome process of brute-force computing would be replaced by a system that relies simply on collateral. That time, some four years after the network was first proposed, is now. The developers want to put this proof-of-stake model, called Casper, into place by year-end.

The stakes are high. If Ethereum is going to take advantage of the potential that companies like JPMorgan, Microsoft and IBM see in its underlying transaction technology, the blockchain, as the potential backbone that could reshape modern business and finance, it needs to gain wide adoption to become something of a de facto standard.

Without mining, Ethereum will be more usable, more secure and more scalable too, said Vlad Zamfir, whos been working on Casper since 2014.

The main draw of the blockchain is that its a cryptographically secured list of transactions that can be shared, which backers say could dramatically improve how financial services, supply-chain and health-care industries are run. (Think immediate settlement of bank transfers and securities trades, as well as near-real-time tracking of food products or research samples.) Ethereum also allows for the use of smart contracts, or pieces of computer code that make the terms of such agreements operate automatically.

Miners have been critical to the growth of Ethereum. The market for ether, the digital currency used to pay miners who support the network, has soared 90 percent this year alone. Its the second-most popular cryptocurrency behind bitcoin, which has gained 24 percent in the same span, setting records almost every day as investors look to hedge against potential global uncertainty and hope for a bitcoin-based exchange-traded fund to get regulatory approval.

Even before Ethereum was first released in 2015, developers had envisioned moving away from the mining-based model, known among tech geeks as proof-of-work.

As the network gets more popular, the computations the miners need to complete to validate transactions get harder and harder. Not only has this created the potential for bottlenecks, like those already plaguing bitcoin, but its also set off an environmentally taxing arms race among the biggest miners, which run server farms consuming vast amounts of electricity.

And to many techno-utopian enthusiasts, using all that computing power to continually solve what amounts to pointless problems is a big waste.

Thats where Casper comes in.

Rather than rewarding miners with the most computing power, the proof-of-stake model requires that users put up collateral if they want to collect fees for validating transactions. The more collateral you put up, the more money you can get paid for verifying transactions.

It would take power away from miners like Streng, who have to approve software changes, and make it easier to implement improvements on the fly. A handful of bitcoin miners in China have already hamstrungsome attempts to increase that cryptocurrencys capacity. (Miners cant vote against the switch.)

The move will make Ethereum more attractive in large-scale applications, said William Mougayar, author of The Business Blockchain.

Your cheat sheet on life, in one weekly email.

Get our weekly Game Plan newsletter.

Hyperledger, a blockchain venture with more than than 100 members including IBM, JPMorgan and American Express, could adopt Ethereums proof-of-stake model if its successful, according to Brian Behlendorf, the consortiums executive director. It could also help put the network in a league of our own, Andrew Keys, head of global business development at startup ConsenSys, the worlds largest Ethereum-centric blockchain software engineering company.

Making proof-of-stake work is hardly a foregone conclusion.

Caspers rollout has been delayed before. And the use of deposits potentially increases the risk of hacking. (While Zamfir said hes working to make sure hackers cant steal deposits, he couldnt rule out the possibility, however remote, that an attack could, in effect, delete the money.)

Streng, who stands to lose out if Casper is implemented, is wary.

Theres a lot of incentive for people to game the system, he said.

Trust in Ethereum was badly shaken last summer, when a hacker stole millions from a projectcalled the DAO. Developers had to rush to implement a software change, which ended up splitting the Ethereum community in two. Now, each operates its own, separate blockchain.

Zamfir says the benefits outweigh the risks. One of the biggest is transaction finality. Unlike most blockchain technologies, which require multiple verifications, settlement on Casper can occur much faster. With some enhancements, the feature could ultimately enable Ethereum to process more payments faster -- a key selling point for financial companies.

Mona El Isa, a formerGoldman Sachs trader who runs Melonport AG, which builds software for fund managers who invest in digital assets on Ethereum, is confident that developers can work out any kinks with Casper.

In these early stages of this new technology, you cant expect everything to go right, El Isa said.

If Casper ultimately happens, Streng says it wont be the end of the world. He can redeploy his servers to mine other cryptocurrencies or become a depositor on Ethereum instead. But he isnt holding his breath just yet. Implementing such a sweeping change isnt going to be easy and its still possible the plan could be scrapped altogether, he says.

The developers have very bright minds, he said. Nevertheless, they wouldnt risk the Ethereum network, in my opinion.

See original here:
Bitcoin's Top Rival Is Up 90% and Ready to Ditch Mining - Bloomberg

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on Bitcoin’s Top Rival Is Up 90% and Ready to Ditch Mining – Bloomberg

BTCC CEO Lee Pegs Bitcoin Price Between $5000 and $11000 by 2020 – CryptoCoinsNews

Posted: at 7:48 pm

Bobby Lee, BTCCs co-founder and CEO recently tweeted a bitcoin price prediction, which is between $5,000 and $11,000 by 2020, after the block reward halving. The entrepreneur, who regularly makes predictions, also stated the daily inflow would scale accordingly from the current $2 million a day level, up to $5-$10 million a day.

Bobby Lee also reminded his 5,600 Twitter followers his medium-term price target for bitcoin is of, well, $5,600. There was, however, no mention of how long it will take bitcoin to reach that value. Later on, Lee also said that a $5-$10 million daily inflow isnt a lot. He compared it to golds inflow of $340 million a day.

The CEOs enthusiastic bitcoin price prediction comes after BTCC, one of Chinas biggest bitcoin exchanges, suspended bitcoin and litecoin withdrawals until March 15, in order to introduce new security requirements and comply with requests from the Peoples Bank of China (PBOC). Recently, Chinas big 3 bitcoin exchanges enforced a suspension of cryptocurrency withdrawals, and in response, traders turned to peer-to-peer marketplace LocalBitcoins.

As reported by CryptoCoinsNews, LocalBitcoins recently recorded a global all-time high, as Chinas trading volume surged in response to the exchanges decision. Its worth mentioning LocalBitcoins is blocked in China, as it uses Googles reCAPTCHA system, so users need to use a VPN to access the platform.

In the past,the CEO has addressed bitcoinsfuture in a positive way, by urging to community to scale responsibly and to be patient, so as to focus on maintaining bitcoin as a reliable digital asset. His upbeat attitude hasnt changed with time, as tough times for bitcoin in China never seem to have bothered him that much. He also sees bitcoins low volatility as a sign of maturity, just alike a few other experts, as bitcoin needs low volatility in order to maintain its growth and stability

Positivity is always welcomed in the bitcoin community. PBOCs interference with bitcoin has taken a toll on the cryptocurrencys value in the past, as it even forced HaoBTC, a prominent bitcoin company, to shut down its exchange. Nevertheless, bitcoin recently bounced back and managed to go beyond its new all-time high.

Image from Shutterstock.

Read the original post:
BTCC CEO Lee Pegs Bitcoin Price Between $5000 and $11000 by 2020 - CryptoCoinsNews

Posted in Bitcoin | Comments Off on BTCC CEO Lee Pegs Bitcoin Price Between $5000 and $11000 by 2020 – CryptoCoinsNews

NASA buys two more seats to the International Space Station on … – The Verge

Posted: at 7:47 pm

NASA has agreed to fly at least two more astronauts on upcoming Russian Soyuz missions to the International Space Station, the space agency announced in a press release. The news comes in the wake of delays to NASAs Commercial Crew Program, an initiative where two American companies SpaceX and Boeing are being paid to create spacecraft that can ferry astronauts to the ISS. Those flights were originally supposed to happen this year, but are now estimated to take place no earlier than 2019.

The additional seats are being worked into an existing contract with Boeing, which helps operate the ISS. The agreement extension covers two seats on Soyuz flights this year and next year, and includes options for seats on three Soyuz flights in 2019. Boeing acquired theses seats from Russian aerospace company RSC Energia, and has been trying to sell them to NASA since January. The total cost of all five seats is $373.5 million, or $74.7 million per seat a touch short of the $81.7 million NASA has been paying Roscosmos.

Flights with SpaceX and Boeing should be cheaper than Russia when they happen

The US hasnt had the capability to send its own astronauts to space (or bring them back) since the Space Shuttle program was discontinued in 2011. Private US spaceflight companies were growing at a rapid pace then, so NASA decided to fund these companies so they could become a sort of space taxi service for American astronauts. The Commercial Crew Program was intended to give NASA a cheaper alternative to Russia, but the program has been hampered by delays and cost issues. The space agency is also planning to fly astronauts on its own Orion spacecraft and the Space Launch System (SLS) maybe as early as 2019, but that program has also been delayed.

In 2015, NASA spent $490 million on six more Soyuz seats as a hedge against the possibility that the SpaceX and Boeing spacecraft wouldnt be ready in time. Seats on the Soyuz are typically sorted out three years in advance when dealing directly with Roscosmos. (NASA was able to book the two new seats with less time since they had already been accounted for when they were bought by RSC Energia.)

It was a prescient move because Boeing delayed twice the first crewed flight of its spacecraft, Starliner, in 2016. And SpaceX followed suit at the end of the year, saying in December that the human-rated version of its Dragon spacecraft wouldnt fly with a crew until at least 2018.

This is not the first time NASA has extended the contract with Russia

Two weeks ago, the Government Accountability Office a federal agency that performs audits for Congress released a report that estimated SpaceX and Boeing wont be ready to fly humans to space until 2019. The GAO cited concerns about a particular defect in SpaceXs engine turbines, as well as Boeings reliance on Russian rocket engines as some of the reasons.

NASA addressed the GAO report implicitly in the press release about the contract extension with Russia. NASAs Commercial crew transportation providers Boeing and SpaceX have made significant progress toward returning crew launches to the US, but external review groups have recommended an option to protect for delays or problems in certification, the agency wrote.

The contract extension with Russia was actually announced a week ago, and it was first spotted by SpaceNews, which points out the curious nature of how NASA quietly published the news. The agency is currently in a transitional phase as it waits for President Donald Trump to name a new NASA administrator.

NASA is waiting for Trump to name a new administrator

Robert Lightfoot, who is serving as acting administrator, recently sent a memo to NASA employees explaining his interest in accelerating NASAs plans for human spaceflight. He asked for NASA and Lockheed Martin, which makes Orion and SLS, to evaluate whether it would be possible to put a crew on the first flight of that spaceship / rocket combination in 2018 instead of 2021. Its a bold idea for a space agency that is known for caution, but it aligns with what we know the Trump administration wants out of NASA: an increased emphasis on human spaceflight and space exploration in general.

President Trump said in his inaugural address that we will unlock the mysteries of space, Lightfoot wrote. The SLS and Orion missions, coupled with those promised from record levels of private investment in space, will help put NASA and America in a position to unlock those mysteries and to ensure this nations world preeminence in exploring the cosmos.

More here:
NASA buys two more seats to the International Space Station on ... - The Verge

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on NASA buys two more seats to the International Space Station on … – The Verge

Boeing partnership with Texas firm could triple number of satellites deployed from Space Station – Puget Sound Business Journal (Seattle)

Posted: at 7:47 pm


Puget Sound Business Journal (Seattle)
Boeing partnership with Texas firm could triple number of satellites deployed from Space Station
Puget Sound Business Journal (Seattle)
Boeing and Texas-based NanoRacks LLC have joined forces to develop the first privately funded commercial space airlock device for outer space. The companies hope their new module will enable the United States to potentially triple the number of small ...

Excerpt from:
Boeing partnership with Texas firm could triple number of satellites deployed from Space Station - Puget Sound Business Journal (Seattle)

Posted in Space Station | Comments Off on Boeing partnership with Texas firm could triple number of satellites deployed from Space Station – Puget Sound Business Journal (Seattle)

Will Mars Colonists Evolve Into This New Kind of Human? – NBCNews.com

Posted: at 7:47 pm

Artist's impression of how Mars colonists might look after thousands of years of life on the red planet. Joseph Ventura

In other words, becoming a multiplanet species might lead us to become multiple species.

"This

New species or not?

Six thousand years isn't long in evolutionary terms. After all, Homo sapiens has existed as

"Evolution to a new species by the classic definition of not being able to breed with humans would take a long time, probably thousands of generations and a hundred thousand years," University of Arizona astronomer Dr. Chris Impey told NBC News MACH in an email. On the other hand, he added, "changing enough to look physically distinct would be much quicker, tens or perhaps a hundred generations."

Dr. Philipp Mittercker, a theoretical biologist at the University of Vienna in Austria, said in an email to MACH that he, too, is dubious of rapid speciation.

"Speciation is a long-term process that usually requires reproductive isolation over millions of years," Mittercker said. "Some human populations had been isolated for thousands of years and are still far away from being a separate species. It is thus unlikely that humans who had colonized Mars [would] become a separate species."

Solomon acknowledged that the path of human evolution on Mars is speculative. But he told MACH in an email that "it follows from what we know about evolutionary biology" that Mars colonists might evolve faster than some think.

And the apparent absence of microbial life on Mars might play a key role.

Evidence suggests that Mars may be devoid of life, and that goes for pathogenic bacteria as well as other life forms. If humans were to establish and live within a germ-free Mars colony, Solomon said, the colonists' immune systems could eventually lose the ability to fight off infections that might be introduced to the colony by germ-carrying humans or animals visiting from Earth. That risk presumably would encourage the colonists to minimize contact including sexual contact with potentially infectious earthlings. That, in turn, could accelerate the pace at which the colonists' bodies would begin to adapt to their new world.

Surprising differences

How might these Martian people differ from their distant ancestors in other words, from us? Whether or not they evolved into a new species, they might have anatomical as well as immunological and other physiological differences. Solomon said they might have notably thicker bones (including the skull bones), which might give them a more robust appearance perhaps a bit like members of the extinct proto-human Paranthropus genus, including

Why would that be? Bones need to work against the force of gravity to stay strong.

Evolutionary pressure for beefier skeletons might be especially strong for female Mars colonists, Solomon said, given the risk of pelvic fractures during childbirth. Beefier skeletons or not, Solomon said, female colonists might come to opt for cesarean section over natural childbirth. And since the size of the human head is constrained in part by the dimensions of the birth canal, the heads of Mars colonists might become larger than what is seen in humans on Earth.

If that sounds far-fetched, consider this: recent research by Mittercker and others suggests that the rising popularity of C-sections may be allowing an

So Mars colonists might have beefy bones and big heads. Then there's the question of their eyes.

Related:

Mars is much farther from the sun than is the Earth, and the extra distance and the lower levels of sunlight on the Martian surface could cause changes in the colonists' eyes.

"During a good day, Mars looks like an overcast day on Earth," Dr. Nathalie Cabrol, a planetary scientist at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, Calif., told NBC News MACH in an email. "Our eyes are accustomed to a certain amount of light on Earth. If there has to be some adaptation to these new ambient conditions, then either our optical system and brain will have to develop new ways of collecting more light on the retina, or we will develop new retinas or bigger eyes."

The need to protect those bigger eyes might be another reason the colonists' skulls might become more robust, Cabrol said, adding that it wasn't clear whether the changes she envisions would be evidence of a new species or simply a version of Homo sapiens adapted for life in a different environment.

Of course, evolutionary changes in humans on Mars would occur only if humans were able to reproduce and successfully raise their children in the low-gravity Martian environment. Cabrol said the colonists might need some sort of "gravity chamber" in which to reproduce and in which their offspring could spend their early developmental years in conditions closer to those on Earth.

Peculiar pigmentation

Another potential change for the Mars colonists would be their skin pigmentation.

"Because of less light," Cabrol said, "I would say that it is possible that the skin of these humans will become ... pale over time, and their hair light-toned."

Solomon sees things differently.

The Martian atmosphere is thinner than Earth's, and the red planet has essentially no protective magnetic field. Thus people living on Mars would be exposed to high levels of cancer-causing radiation even if they spent most of their lives indoors. Pigmentation helps block the effects of radiation. The deeper the color, the better the protection. Thus Solomon figures Mars people might evolve to have darker skin than anyone on Earth.

On the other hand, Solomon said, life on Mars might yield people whose skin is pigmented by carotenoids rather than our usual pigment, melanin. (Something similar has been

Cultural and technological changes

Is Solomon right, generally speaking, about the changing appearance of Mars colonists? That's impossible to say. But no matter what, experts agree that Mars colonists would likely drift away culturally and technologically from their terrestrial ancestors.

As Impey told MACH, "They will probably be aggressive in genetic engineering and self-modification (body part and organ enhancement and replacement), to the extent of embedding various monitoring and repair devices, and taking a cyborg path. This will be a very technology-forward cohort, advancing far beyond the average terrestrial society."

Video:

Impey said it was hard to predict the psychological effects of living on Mars. But as the colonists "are removed from human affairs," he continued, "they will probably develop their own cultural norms and dialects, and start to feel very distinct or post-human."

If the colonists do change dramatically from their ancestors back on Earth, how would we view them? Would we consider them alien beings or just subtly different humans?

Solomon thinks the latter possibility is more likely.

"In the past, when there were multiple species of human around (i.e. Neanderthals, Denisovans, and Homo sapiens), we know they had sex with one another and had babies that survived," he said in an email. "That suggests to me that we view other humanlike species as being more human than animal."

Here's to good neighbors.

Follow NBC MACH on

Read more:
Will Mars Colonists Evolve Into This New Kind of Human? - NBCNews.com

Posted in Mars Colonization | Comments Off on Will Mars Colonists Evolve Into This New Kind of Human? – NBCNews.com

People Are Building a Museum on the Moon Because "Art" – Papermag

Posted: at 7:47 pm

Sick of gravity? Over Earth? Bored with "conventional" art in galleries where you can conveniently breathe oxygen without a mask when all you really want is the risk of death when consuming culture? Well, do I have some truly ideal news for you! People are now trying to build an art gallery on the moon to meet all your space art viewing needs! That's right, an art gallery!

The museum has already been established as 'The Museum of Contemporary Art on the Moon', or MoCAM. It represents, according to artists Julio Orto and Joey Cannizzaro, an "anti-capitalist future" necessary for authenticity in art to survive and thrive.

Because Orto and Cannizzaro believe colonization of the moon is "inevitable", they've already bought a 20 acre plot of land on everyone's favorite satellite. Cannizzaro explains the art gallery would be both an answer to the current political landscape and to oppose "governments and private entities are (who) working on tourism and colonization of the moon".

Cannizzaro writes in an essay that, "at the dawn of Trump's aggregate neoliberal-fascism... it's impossible for the creative community to dodge accountability for this lack of imaginative futures".

Why move to New Zealand to escape Trump's America when you can (likely very soon) move to the moon and look at art to your heart's content?

[h/t Dazed] Image via YouTube

Original post:
People Are Building a Museum on the Moon Because "Art" - Papermag

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on People Are Building a Museum on the Moon Because "Art" – Papermag

SpaceX Is Sending Two People On A Round Trip to the Moon, Hopefully – SnapMunk

Posted: at 7:47 pm

Sometimes around the SnapMunk offices, we like to place bets on whats going to make the news that week. Recently there are two people weve stopped taking bets on: one is Donald Trump and the other is Elon Musk. Recently the worlds favorite CEO made an announcement about his SpaceX program that turned a lot of heads: His latest plan is to launch two people around the moon.

Now before you mention how weve done this thing before, lets break it down.

SpaceX has a long list of successful launches under its belt to low-earth orbit, and weve already written about Musks intention to begin colonization of Mars last year. So at some point, his company would have to leave the low-earth orbit limit. To accomplish this, the next logical step would be a trip to the Moon if he wishes to reach his larger benchmarks of Mars colonization within the next ten years. For the record, the low-Earth limit hasnt been breached by man since the final Apollo mission in 1972.

The goal of the trip is to take two pilots in late 2018 on a round trip from Earth to the Moon and back without landing on the moons surface. During that voyage, the route that they will take will exceed previous milestones.Im guessing probably distance-wise probably 300,000 to 400,000 miles.According to Musk. This projection exceeds the current maximum distance humans have traveled from our planet as the current record sits at 248,655 milesheld by the crew of the Apollo 13. Yes, that Apollo 13.

Image courtesy williamdparker.com

We know little about the two people who intend to take the flight. We do know they are private citizens who approached Musk last year with interest to make the trip. Since then theyve begun taking extensive health and fitness tests. Also, he admitted that the two would pay for the flight but was quick to report they were not Hollywood celebrities. We arent sure why thats even a factor, but it helps us narrow it down. I think theyre going in with their eyes open, knowing that there is some risk here, Musk said. Were doing everything we can to minimize that risk, but its not zero.

Its also important to remember that the SpaceX program has yet to launch with humans actually inside it. In turn, the Falcon Heavy rocket intended for this journey has yet to fly. So at this time, the only part of this endeavor we know works is the launchpad, which is the same one used in the Apollo missions.

Musk has stated that if NASA wished to partner with SpaceX, he would allow it, insisting that the agency would have priority over the two passengers. Given the projected date and the current status of the project itself, were pretty sure theyll put a hard pass on this one.

SnapMunk is dedicated to providing readers with all things interesting, exciting and entertaining in the world of tech news, startup companies and startup culture. With a broad lens feeding a highly curated stream of content, SnapMunk offers thought-leading perspectives and unique insights into technology current events, new business ideas, cool new technology and exciting investment opportunities. It is our goal with SnapMunk to ensure that those who are interested in technology and startups are not only well-informed but intellectually inspired and thoroughly entertained.

More:
SpaceX Is Sending Two People On A Round Trip to the Moon, Hopefully - SnapMunk

Posted in Moon Colonization | Comments Off on SpaceX Is Sending Two People On A Round Trip to the Moon, Hopefully – SnapMunk