Daily Archives: February 20, 2017

Ben Wray: Why both the right to work and the right not to work can set us free – CommonSpace

Posted: February 20, 2017 at 7:12 pm


CommonSpace
Ben Wray: Why both the right to work and the right not to work can set us free
CommonSpace
In a world where the idea of robots taking over our jobs is no longer in the realm of sci-fi, basic income is usually proposed as an alternative to the guarantee of employment. The logic of this is simple: the guarantee of an income replaces the ...

See the original post here:

Ben Wray: Why both the right to work and the right not to work can set us free - CommonSpace

Posted in Basic Income Guarantee | Comments Off on Ben Wray: Why both the right to work and the right not to work can set us free – CommonSpace

Robots Visit NY Toy Fair While Adults Worry About Automation … – Inverse

Posted: at 7:11 pm

The future of automated industries may be playing out in a New York toy fair. As adults worry about whether people will need a basic income to supplement lost earnings from robots taking over jobs, kids are putting together new machines and learning how to make them do their bidding. A new generation will grow up knowing how to make robots their masters.

The 114th North American International Toy Fair, a convention running from February 18th through to the 21st at New York Citys Javits Center, is a center point for new trends in toy technology. This year, 24 exhibitors mention robots in their description. It might sound like childs play, but the products on display show that manufacturers are considering how the robo-revolution will change the demands of future industries.

Its no secret that an economy shifting towards automation will require different sets of skills. The Obama administration produced a report in December looking at robot automation. The report concluded that the best way forward was to invest in artificial intelligence, rethinking the social safety net and, yes, educating Americans so they can take on the jobs needed in the future.

At the Toy Fair, several products are teaching kids how to build their own robots using simplified parts. One example of this is Tinkerbots, which uses simple rearrangeable building blocks, paired with a smartphone app, to create imaginative new designs:

Another product is Tami, a block building system created by Robotron. The blocks are interesting in that they come in both non-robotic and robotic forms. Kids can make simple designs using the basic Tami blocks, before moving onto simple and advanced Robotami kits, some of which use touch and infrared sensors to teach the basics of hardware creation and software programming.

Other toys focus more on the software side than on hardware. WowWee is the creator of Coji, a robot that teaches kids how to code using a smartphone app. The bot responds to input via the app, and its up to kids to work out how various emojis will string together to create commands. Similarly, Wonder Workshop are the makers of the Dash and Dot pair of robots, which interact with smartphone games that teach basic programming logic in an easy-to-understand interface.

The automation of kids toys cant come soon enough. Tesla CEO Elon Musk claims that automation is going to transform the workforce, and a universal basic income will be necessary within 20 years of the first autonomous car hitting the road, which could be as soon as this year. Familiarizing kids with the shifting robot landscape will be crucial to helping the next generation understand this new world of technology.

Photos via Tinkerbots

Continue reading here:

Robots Visit NY Toy Fair While Adults Worry About Automation ... - Inverse

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Robots Visit NY Toy Fair While Adults Worry About Automation … – Inverse

Bill Gates turns on technology, calls for ‘robot tax’ to slow automation – Washington Times

Posted: at 7:11 pm

Bill Gates wants the federal government to impose robot taxes in the future on companies that opt for technological labor over human hands.

The Microsoft co-founder made the statement to Quartz last week while discussing his advocacy of taxing companies profits as a means of funding job-training in other fields.

There will be taxes that relate to automation, Mr. Gatessaid Friday. Right now, the human worker who does, say, $50,000 worth of work in a factory, that income is taxed and you get income tax, Social Security tax, all those things. If a robot comes in to do the same thing, youd think that wed tax the robot at a similar level.

And what the world wants is to take this opportunity to make all the goods and services we have today, and free up labor, let us do a better job of reaching out to the elderly, having smaller class sizes, helping kids with special needs, he said. You know, all of those are things where human empathy and understanding are still very, very unique. And we still deal with an immense shortage of people to help out there.

He made the public policy prescription for companies that use artificial intelligence, though he himself was not taxed for job displacement as his products catapulted him to over $79 billion in net worth.

Mr. Gates said that taxing companies that use A.I. is a better alternative than banning them from using such technologies.

I dont think the robot companies are going to be outraged that there might be a tax. Its OK, he said.

The businessman rejected the idea that free-market solutions were sufficient for addressing societal changes created by A.I.

Well, business cant [adequately handle such problems]. If you want to do [something about] inequity, a lot of the excess labor is going to need to go help the people who have lower incomes, he said. And so it means that you can amp up social services for old people and handicapped people and you can take the education sector and put more labor in there. Yes, some of it will go to, Hey, well be richer and people will buy more things. But the inequity-solving part, absolutely governments got a big role to play there. The nice thing about taxation though, is that it really separates the issue: OK, so that gives you the resources, now how do you want to deploy it?

See original here:

Bill Gates turns on technology, calls for 'robot tax' to slow automation - Washington Times

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Bill Gates turns on technology, calls for ‘robot tax’ to slow automation – Washington Times

AI and automation are about to – The Outline

Posted: at 7:11 pm

It is difficult not to view Donald Trumps administration, regardless of its politics, as combative towards at least some portion of the American public. Unlike previous presidents who ultimately relied on messages that conveyed some attempt real or theatrical at national unity, Trumps team has decided to draw very clear lines between his supporters and everyone else. Whether it is the press, radical Islam, or the politically correct, Trumps style of leadership appears to rely on scapegoats. This bitter political ideology will likely be ineffective in guiding the country through the next decade of developments in the economy.

As artificial intelligence, robotics, and new forms of automation continue to flourish, the forms of work that millions of Americans rely on are at risk. The political solutions to navigating these changes are going to require broad public initiatives that havent been accomplished in decades, and everyone is going to have to be on board.

Before leaving the White House, President Obama commissioned a report titled Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and The Economy, that provides an in-depth look at the changes that will occur as automation becomes more sophisticated. Far from the doom and gloom projections of a workplace without humans, the report charts the subtle ways that, at scale, AI will have a tremendous impact on how our economy, and labor force, functions. Citing the current wave of AI, which the report describes as having begun around 2010, the study describes how the the types of jobs available in the economy are rapidly changing, and these changes are primarily impacting low income and less educated Americans.

According to the MIT Technology Review, 83 percent of jobs that pay less than $20 an hour are under threat from automation. Simply put, as technology makes things like ordering a cheeseburger, buying groceries, and shipping goods, require fewer human beings involved, the number of jobs available for poor Americans will shrink dramatically.

Ford, a company whose name is synonymous with the dream of American manufacturing jobs, recently announced goals to provide fully autonomous ridesharing by 2021, and earlier this month, allocated $1 billion for the autonomous vehicle startup Argo. Trumps former candidate for Labor Secretary, Andrew Puzder, wrote in the Wall Street Journal that, in areas like retail and foodservice, increases in minimum wage were to blame for the increase in automation. Of course, he also cites consumer preference as The major reason.

Lots of high-minded technological thinkers, particularly Elon Musk, have proposed a universal basic income, a form of wealth distribution that ensures every citizen receives a baseline income whether or not they are employed, as a likely solution to the problem of workforce automation. But the White House report takes a more somber approach, describing a basic income as giving up on the possibility of workers remaining employed. Instead, the report suggests a number of policy proposals (like Obamas national free community college initiative, and expanded unemployment benefits) as ways of actively facilitating the transition into a more AI driven economy.

In an interview with the MIT Technology Review, Mark Muro, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution calls for what he calls a universal basic adjustment benefit. Unlike a universal basic income, it would involve targeted benefits for those left out of the workforce, providing tools like wage insurance, job counseling, relocation subsidies, and other financial and career help.

The Future

A McKinsey report estimates that 59 percent of manufacturing jobs can be automated.

Uber has already made significant strides automating cars and delivery vehicles.

Manufacturing in the US has actually increased just not with the help of human workers.

Read More

LA Times

The White House report points out that the U.S. government spends roughly 0.1 percent of its GDP on programs to help people deal with changes in the workplace much less than similar developed nations. This funding has also declined over the past three decades.

This is where Trumps style of leadership appears, at worst, disastrously cynical, and at best, ignorantly short sighted. By invoking a bygone era of American manufacturing, Trump undoubtedly tapped into a significant form of anxiety present in a large portion of the country. But his solutions, a dramatic reduction in immigration and tax breaks for corporations who move sparse manufacturing jobs to the U.S., dont even take into account changes in technology.

The people left behind by the advances in automation have faced the steady creep of obsolescence, in the form of a shrinking number of available jobs, for the past decade, and Trump promised to rewind time, to a period before artificial intelligence. A post-election analysis from FiveThirtyEight found that one of the best predictors of whether or not a county voted for Trump wasnt unemployment or income, but its proportion of jobs that are considered routine, an economic term for jobs that are easily automated. Areas with a high percentage of routine jobs voted in significant numbers for Donald Trumps vision of an America stopped in time.

Republicans in the House and Senate, similarly, have no discernible plan for how to address technologys impact on the workforce. Theyve instead spent the past decade working single-mindedly on taking control of the government in order to enact an economic and moralistic vision frozen in the 1980s.

Im very worried that the next wave [of AI and automation] will hit and we wont have the supports in place, Lawrence Katz, an economist at Harvard told the MIT Technology Review. Katzs research is focused on how public spending on education in the 1900s helped America make the economic shift from agriculture to manufacturing. Theres plenty of reason to believe that, as Wireds Clive Thompson points out, the next blue collar job in America could be computer programming. An initiative to teach coding to the millions of Americans whose jobs will slowly phase out in the face of AI would take years to develop and enact, and it doesnt even appear to be on anyones mind.

The report from the final days of Obamas White House makes sure to point out that:

The next few years will find our government squabbling over a health care law that for the most part works, and passing dramatic forms of austerity that have never proven effective in the long term. The cost of attending college, a critical tool for finding a job in the new economy, will likely continue to rise unabated. All the while technology will continue to alter the way millions of Americans work, for better and for worse.

Read this article:

AI and automation are about to - The Outline

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on AI and automation are about to – The Outline

Huge growth opportunity for tech industry in Oakland County, says Automation Alley director – The Daily Tribune

Posted: at 7:11 pm

One of Michigans largest technology and manufacturing business associations has released its 2017 Technology Industry Report.

Automation Alley, based in Troy, recently conducted a nationwide survey of nearly 400 senior technology and manufacturing executives to determine their knowledge of Industry 4.0, and whether they are ready for the digitization of manufacturing within their company.

Industry 4.0, also known as the fourth industrial revolution, refers to the convergence of digital and physical technologies currently disrupting the manufacturing industry,

We believe that there is a huge opportunity for the technology industry to grow, both in Oakland County and across Southeast Michigan, said Automation Alley Executive Director Tom Kelly. (This can be done) by providing their products and services to the manufacturing industry, because the manufacturing industry is planning to spend a lot of money on new technological advancements.

Advertisement

According to the 2017 report, the top three technologies in which companies currently invest are the cloud, cybersecurity and big data/analytics.

Kelly said when it comes to Southeast Michigan and Oakland County, the majority of tech businesses plan to invest in one particular area.

Regionally, we found that manufacturers plan to invest in autonomous robots, said Kelly.

RELATED: Uber opening driverless vehicle research and tech center in Wixom

RELATED: County Executive L. Brooks Patterson says county premier location for advanced vehicle technology

The report highlights where communication gaps exist between technology and manufacturing executives, the lack of company resources dedicated to technological advancements and how Southeast Michigan is ahead of the curve when it comes to the development and adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies.

Kelly said, based on the report, that national manufacturers are not prepared for Industry 4.0,

They see the benefits of technological advancement, but they face many obstacles to adopting new technology, said Kelly. What did surprise us about the report was that the local manufacturing industry is more prepared for Industry 4.0 than their national counterparts.

Locally, within Southeast Michigan and Oakland County, the Industrial Internet of Things and simulation (42 percent of those surveyed), followed by autonomous robots, horizontal and vertical system integration, and the cloud (all at 33 percent of those surveyed) are a top priority for Automation Alley manufacturers

85 percent expect an increase in their companys budget for technological advancement in 2017 (nearly a third of them plan to increase their budgets by 10 percent to 15 percent)

88 percent believe technological advancements can be beneficial to their companys competitiveness

62 percent believe that technologies in the cloud will improve their companys competitiveness in 2017

54 percent said the biggest barrier in making technological advancement in their company is cost

76.7 percent said Industry 4.0 is currently not an initiative within their company

65 percent said Industry 4.0 will have very much, quite a bit or some impact on their company in 2017

Automation Alley publishes the Technology Industry Report to provide the technology business community with valuable insights into the future of the tech industry, both locally and nationally.

The organization helps to connect businesses with talent, resources and funding to accelerate innovation and fuel Southeast Michigans economy.

The non-profit includes nearly 1,000 tech-focused members in businesses in Southeast Michigan.

Excerpt from:

Huge growth opportunity for tech industry in Oakland County, says Automation Alley director - The Daily Tribune

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Huge growth opportunity for tech industry in Oakland County, says Automation Alley director – The Daily Tribune

Marketing Automation: What Your Business Needs to Know – Business 2 Community

Posted: at 7:11 pm

According to our recent survey, more than 2/3 of landscaping business owners are primarily responsible for their marketing.

This challenge has a solution, and its marketing automation.

Routine activities can be automated to free you from working in your business so that you can invest more time working on it.

While there is a learning curve with the technology, the true challenge is taking the time to design what can be automated.

In other words, if your business does not have a written process in place for activities like following up on leads or upselling current customers, then clearly, thats where it needs to start.

Start thinking in terms of triggers and actions.

The phone rings (trigger) and your team answers (action). The buyer asks for a quote (trigger) and your team dispatches a representative to learn more (action).

Automation Formulas: Trigger > Action > Trigger > Action

Webcast, February 21st: Supercharge Your 2017 Recurring Revenue with Channel Partners

Organize everything and automate what you can.

#1. List the actions

What are the actions you want your buyers to take from their first contact with your business? List them, step- by-step.

#2. Test the sequence

How many of your recent customers have followed those steps? Patterns outside of your ideal flow may suggest disallowing these actions in the future.

The other option is to create multiple pathways to success.

Its important to be clear about the process steps that are inflexible. Often this involves legal issues or payment terms, but it can include anything in the buyers journey.

#3. Automate what you can

Lets face it, nowadays a website visit is replacing the telephone call.

Clicks to your website are triggers. You can use marketing automation to take action on them to send relevant information. And you can tag that interest to segment prospective buyers into categories. As they move through your funnel they will trigger new actions.

Every successful action should trigger another.

Take the time to automate what you can, even if thats only one step in your process. After you nail that give yourself a pat on the back and celebrate.

Youve saved some time! Now look for more ways to automate.

Marketing automation gets a bad reputation when its used to interrupt people to sell to them. But theres nothing wrong with selling when its done right.

The key is finding ways to use marketing automation to personalize.

For example, a sales transaction could trigger an email that offers an automated booking calendar such as ScheduleOnce that the buyer can use to independently book a time to meet with your company representative to address whatever issues there may be.

And that personalization just may trigger new business!

Go here to see the original:

Marketing Automation: What Your Business Needs to Know - Business 2 Community

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on Marketing Automation: What Your Business Needs to Know – Business 2 Community

89% people want automation at workplace: Adobe – ETCIO.com

Posted: at 7:11 pm

NEW DELHI: Contrary to popular belief, 89 per cent of people are positive about the role robots can play in helping them in the workplace, rather than taking away jobs, says an Adobe study.

According to the Adobe Digital Insights Future of Work Report, people are open to man and machine collaboration for work benefits.

"The Future of Work looks promising, as robotics and automation gear up to enable employees to be more productive and creative in their roles," said Abdul Jaleel, Vice President, People Resources India, Adobe.

Despite some concern around the impact of automation in the workplace, people are demonstrating positive commentary around how automation can undertake mundane tasks, and allow them to focus on creative and strategic responsibilities that matter most to them and their careers.

Robotics holds promise especially when it comes to the automation of traditionally mundane tasks.

Jaleel noted that automating document and signature processes, for example, could open up new possibilities for people as the tech revolution advances. Faster transportation and self-driving cars could revolutionise local travel.

"Moreover, the virtual office has big potential in the Future of Work. Work environments should continue to improve as employees demand more from their space, especially with automation ruling the minds of people," he said.

The findings are based on over three million Future of Work -- a phrase covering broad group of topics around what work would look like in the future -- related social mentions across several digital platforms including Twitter, news, blogs and forums, between January 2016 to January 2017.

The study's social analysis features regions including the US, UK, India and Australia.

The research is based on the analysis of select, anonymous and aggregated data from more than 5,000 companies worldwide that use the Adobe Digital Marketing Cloud to obtain real-time data and analysis of activity on websites, social media and advertising.

Excerpt from:

89% people want automation at workplace: Adobe - ETCIO.com

Posted in Automation | Comments Off on 89% people want automation at workplace: Adobe – ETCIO.com

Westminster warned against benefits ‘claw back’ once ‘bedroom tax’ abolished in Scotland – Scottish Housing News

Posted: at 7:10 pm

Scottish ministers are to seek assurances from the UK government that it will not reduce the benefits of claimants in Scotland when the Scottish Government abolishes the bedroom tax.

Communities, social security and equalities secretary, Angela Constance, made the call for clarity ahead of a meeting with the Department of Work and Pensions in London today.

Ms Constance will stress the abolition of the bedroom tax cannot be counted as benefit income when it comes to the UK governments benefit cap as it will penalise people by having other UK benefit payments clawed back.

The principle of no claw back for Scottish Government benefits was agreed in the Smith Commission and the financial agreement covering the Scotland Act 2016, and ministers are concerned that when the bedroom tax is abolished in Scotland, the UK government will treat this as additional income for a household and impose the cap.

The Scottish Government will provide 47 million next year to mitigate the bedroom tax imposed by the UK government, ensuring no one needs to lose out because of it, and will seek to abolish it as soon as practically possible.

Ms Constance said: The bedroom tax is an abhorrent charge which makes the lives of those already struggling to make ends meet even harder theres no place for that in a modern Scotland. I make no secret of the fact we want to abolish it but what we also dont want to see is anyones benefits being reduced again because by abolishing bedroom tax they end up over threshold for the UK benefit cap.

It is not acceptable for the Scottish Government to give with one hand only for the UK Government to take away with the other when these powers were transferred to Scotland there was a commitment there would be no claw back of benefits as a result of payment or eligibility decisions made by the Scottish Government. We need cast iron commitments from the UK Government that they will abide by those principles and that people wont be penalised further.

This issue has been raised with UK ministers on a number of occasions and I look forward to discussing this further at Mondays meeting.

More than 70,000 households in Scotland benefit because the Scottish Government mitigates the bedroom tax. It is estimated that the new lower UK benefit cap affects 5000 households in Scotland, and more are likely to reach the cap when the bedroom tax is abolished.

Social security minister Jeane Freeman and employability minister Jamie Hepburn will also attend the meeting in London.

See more here:

Westminster warned against benefits 'claw back' once 'bedroom tax' abolished in Scotland - Scottish Housing News

Posted in Abolition Of Work | Comments Off on Westminster warned against benefits ‘claw back’ once ‘bedroom tax’ abolished in Scotland – Scottish Housing News

The redeeming chaos of a bull in the government china shop – Charleston Post Courier

Posted: at 7:10 pm

BY KIRKPATRICK SALE

It all depends on what you think of the china shop. If you believe it is a neat, ordered operation, providing beautiful and necessary things for discerning and deserving people, then you will like it and be fearful of any bull that might be sniffing at the door.

If on the other hand you regard it as a worn out, dated collection of obsolete knick-knacks that have long since lost their value and are merely gathering dust, then you wont mind what the bull will do or how clumsily he does it.

Washington the political establishment is that china shop. And you know who the bull is. The liberal-global, welfare-warfare arrangement that has been government for the last 70 years, since Americas triumph in World War II, has been based on three unquestioned premises:

1. The right of citizens to welfare entitlements from the federal government, in the form of Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and roughly 75 other means-tested welfare programs;

2. The creation and maintenance of a global empire based on military penetration (750 bases worldwide) providing cover and protection for economic (NAFTA, GATT) and political (NATO) penetration as well;

3. The unrestricted operation of the federal bureaucracy allowing the establishment consensus to prevail and run business as usual no matter which political party is in office.

And those premises have been enhanced and buttressed through the decades by the powerful liberal cultural forces of the American academy, which is the indoctrinatory home of the left and Marxist professoriate, the Hollywood film industry and its cavalcade of leftist stars-with-a-cause, and especially the modern media, slap-happy handmaidens of the establishment with no longer a pretense of objectivity in their fawning zeal for the Democratic party. With the Trump election, all that is challenged. Trump himself may not fully understand what he represents, but he is surrounded by people who do. In particular, his right-hand man and perhaps the power behind the throne, Stephen Bannon, who has been quoted as saying, with unusual clarity, I want to bring everything crashing down, and destroy all of todays establishment. An astonishing statement, but it is clear he will do his best to see that Trump carries this out.

It is likely not to be neat and orderly, since thats not the kind of man Trump is, and indeed the first few weeks have seen some scattershot decrees. But when you name a cabinet that is designed to thwart much of what the liberal consensus has been doing for 70 yearsa woman for Education who is against public education, a man for the Environmental Protection Agency who has tried to eviscerate it in the past, a doctor for Housing and Urban Development who has no comprehension of what the department does, a fossil-fuel executive to be the top diplomat, and a labor secretary who pays minimum wage to his restaurant employeesthen it is obvious that there is some design and purpose at work.

I for one welcome this fundamental restraint of the liberal orthodoxy and hope the Trump regime will operate swiftly and intelligently to reorder government as we know it. But I fear that at the moment it is far more reactive that purposeful, Trump operating more by instinct, particularly his instinct to respond to challenge, than by any sense of where exactly he would want to end up in four years. In aid of providing a more methodical approach to taking down the establishment, I propose the following program as the basis for action for the Trump administration for the next four years.

Abolition of the income tax, a foolish tax that punishes people just for making money, which is what the whole society is about anyway, when a proper government would tax behavior that is unwanted. And with it, of course, abolishing the IRS.

Dismantling the empire and withdrawal of troops from all overseas wars and bases, to be redeployed for border protection and the management of the Army Corps of Engineers in the task of infrastructure repair at home.

Sharply cutting welfare, particularly for the able-bodied, and insisting on strictly enforced work requirements (in Maine, this cut welfare caseloads by 80 percent), plus the abolition of all marriage penalties and policies that work against stable families.

Abolishing foreign aid, in entirety, including the Export-Import Bank, programs that chiefly benefit and Wall Street banksters that make the loans and American global corporations that get the contracts, and with it the elimination of payments to foreign treaty organizations.

Elimination of federal interference in private, family and religious affairs, allowing states to decide issues such as abortion, pornography, prostitution, prayer in schools, political speech in churches, religious symbols in public and similar matters.

Elimination or serious reduction of all cabinet departments created since 1947, including Education, Energy, Health, Housing, Homeland Security and Veterans Affairs, whose necessary functions, if any, could be decentralized to the states.

There: six simple, straightforward, effectual, and thoroughgoing ways to reform and restrain Washingtonian power and bring a few things crashing down. And easy enough for a bull to follow.

Kirkpatrick Sale, who lives in Mount Pleasant, is the author of 12 books.

Here is the original post:

The redeeming chaos of a bull in the government china shop - Charleston Post Courier

Posted in Abolition Of Work | Comments Off on The redeeming chaos of a bull in the government china shop – Charleston Post Courier

Taxing Religious Freedom – Daily Caller

Posted: at 7:10 pm

5492449

Is a threat to eliminate the tax exemption of churches that endorse candidates or political parties posed by a 1954 law called the Johnson Amendment a constitutional infringement on the rights of church leaders to freely express themselves from the pulpit?

At ColoradoPolitics.com, Deb Walker, executive director of Citizens Project writes, Government may not subsidize political endorsements through tax exemption, and that The Johnson Amendment ensures that citizens of all faith traditions (or no faith tradition) are not inadvertently financially supporting church-based politicking. There are two failures in reasoning here.

First, the reasons for exempting churches from taxation are distinguishable from those that apply to other types of charitable organizations. Whereas the law may exempt secular charities because it deems that the charitable purposes provide public benefits that outweigh the need to tax such activities, the principle of not taxing churches originates in the constitutional, philosophical and political foundations of our nation.

The Supreme Court examined this principle in Everson v. Board of Education, a 1947 case affirming the authority of a state to provide funding for school busses to transport children to Catholic schools in New Jersey writing, The centuries immediately before and contemporaneous with the colonization of America had been filled with turmoil, civil strife and persecutions, generated in large part by established sects determined to maintain their absolute political and religious supremacy. These practices of the old world began to thrive in the soil of the new AmericaCatholics found themselves hounded and proscribed because of their faithmen and women of varied faithswere persecuted. And all of these dissenters were compelled to pay tithes and taxes to support government-sponsored churches.

The people [of Virginia], as elsewhere, reached the conviction that individual religious liberty could be achieved best under a government which was stripped of all power to tax[in order to] interfere with the beliefs of any religious individual or group.

The establishment of religion clause of the First Amendment means at least thisno tax in any amount, large or small, can be levied to support any religious activities or institutions, whatever they may be called, or whatever form they may adopt to teach or practice religion.

This sounds as if the Court would hold that New Jersey has no authority to provide taxpayer-funded school busses for Catholic schoolchildren, but thats not case. What the Court pointed out in affirming that policy is that the amendment commands that New Jerseycannot exclude individual Catholics, Lutherans, Mohammedans, Baptists, Jews, Methodists, Nonbelievers, Presbyterians, or the members of any other faith, because of their faith, or lack of it, from receiving the benefits of public welfare legislation. (Emphasis in original)

The second error is that a tax exemption is not a subsidy. An exemption from a tax is not giving the person or group exempted something they dont already have. Neither a taxpayer not affiliated with a religious organization nor the government has something taken from them that goes to a church merely because the church doesnt pay a tax. Therefore, a tax exemption does not mean that the public is financially supporting church-based politicking, nor does it mean that the government is entangled in underwriting partisan political activity.

Where the Johnson Amendment and Walker go wrong is in failing to understand that when it comes to religion the taxing power of Congress has a constitutional hurdle it must overcome that doesnt apply to conventional non-religious charitable organizations.

The historic truths cited by the Supreme Court stand for the proposition that the government cannot tax religious institutions in ways that inhibit the free exercise of religion just as much as it does the proposition that it cannot tax anyone for the purposes of advancing religion.

Thus, when it comes to religious institutions its questionable whether or not the 501(c)(3) rules apply at all because it is the First Amendment itself that arguably prohibits the taxation of churches because religion-suppressing taxation has always been as formidable an enemy of religious freedom throughout history as religion-supporting taxation has, as the Supreme Court points out and as the Founders went to great pains to avoid.

Religiously motivated speech is a constitutionally protected aspect of religious liberty that cannot be suppressed by the threat of anti-religious, anti-free-speech government taxation. This includes the freedom of both ministers and others to preach in favor of or against any political party or candidate or any other matter that they believe would either threaten or support their rights to religious freedom.

Read the original:

Taxing Religious Freedom - Daily Caller

Posted in Freedom | Comments Off on Taxing Religious Freedom – Daily Caller