Daily Archives: February 9, 2017

Atopic eczema is like an ‘asthma of the skin’ – MSR News Online

Posted: February 9, 2017 at 5:47 am

Good news: New medicines coming out will greatly help in the treatment of atopic eczema Child with atopic eczema before (l) and after treatment

Eczema and dermatitis are both terms with the same meaning: inflammation, redness, and itching of the skin. Atopic eczema (a.k.a. atopic dermatitis) is a skin disease. The first sign of eczema tends to be patches of dry or red, itchy skin. Atopic eczema is controlled by a combination of genetic and environmental factors.

Unfortunately, because dermatitis can be so itchy, aggressive scratching can injure the skin and worsen the condition. Sometimes the itch can precede the rash. Some doctors say atopic eczema is the itch that rashes.

Atopic eczema usually begins very early in life as a condition affecting infants or young children, but it can occur at any age. It is most common in infants and young children, and most people who get eczema will have it before they turn five years old. It is rare for eczema to appear for the first time in adults.

Eczema can be more common and problematic in persons of color. In fact, 25 percent of all children of color (and large percentages of other children as well) can be affected by atopic eczema.

Eczema tends to come and go, often without warning. A treatment plan that includes skin care can reduce flare-ups and ease much of the discomfort.

The good news is that there are excellent new treatments for atopic eczema available now and coming out this summer. I will discuss those shortly.

What causes eczema?

Atopic eczema is a genetic condition. It is often seen in patients whose family members have it or other related conditions such as asthma, hay fever or allergic rhinitis. Some patients may have atopic eczema alone or with several or all of these other conditions.

There is emerging evidence that patients with atopic eczema may have a mild disability to repair their skin barrier. Also, excessive bacteria on the skin with bacterial enzymes (proteases) can make eczema worse. These are two important targets in controlling the disease.

Atopic eczema is not contagious. Dry skin, dry weather, perspiration and illness are several things that can cause atopic eczema to get worse.

How can I tell if my child has eczema?

Atopic eczema presents as red, flakey, itchy patches. In children, it commonly appears on the folds of the elbows and knees and on the scalp, forehead and cheeks, but it can be present anywhere. Atopic eczema itches so much that infants commonly rub their cheeks on bed linens or even carpeting for relief.

In extreme cases, a yellow fluid may even weep from the involved areas. Scratching over extended periods of time will cause the skin to become tough and thicken up. This is a common finding in patients with longstanding eczema that has not been completely controlled.

If you think that your child has atopic eczema, visit a board-certified dermatologist to make sure the diagnosis is correct. A dermatologist can often diagnose eczema by examining the patients skin, as well as by asking historically significant questions about a family history of similar skin rashes or asthma or hay fever.

How long will my child have eczema?

In most children, atopic eczema may get better over time, but their skin will always be more sensitive than those without atopic eczema, even as adults.

How is eczema treated?

A dermatologist will create a specific treatment for the patient with atopic eczema. Most treatment plans consist of:

There is no one treatment for atopic eczema. It is important to follow the treatment plan designed by your dermatologist, and the success in adequately managing atopic eczema depends on carefully following the treatment plan. Dermatologists will develop plans that are both safe and effective for long-term use.

In February of 2017, the FDA has approved a new ointment called Crisaborole (Eucrisa) for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. It is an ointment that is applied twice daily to the affected areas.Many patients are seeing remarkable improvements in just one or two weeks.

Over the past 10 years, there has been an explosion of medicines called biologic treatments for psoriasis. A promising new medication from this class is called Dupilumab. This medicine blocks a special protein receptor (interleukin-4) that controls regulatory proteins (interleukin-4 and interleukin-13) that control how certain white blood cells (type 2 helper T-cells)create inflammation in the skin, the hallmark of atopic eczema. This medicine, and others like it, may be available as soon as this summer.

What will the treatment plan include?

Why see a dermatologist?

When a child has atopic eczema, it is a condition that affects the entire family. It takes time away from other siblings and caregivers and can affect performance in school.

As a dermatologist, I like to tell parents atopic eczema is like having asthma of the skin. Just like asthma, it can wax and wane and have certain triggers. Just like asthma, it is a lifelong condition that needs attention but over time may improve.

With so much information out there, much of it misleading or downright inaccurate, it can be challenging for a parent to know exactly what to do. Dermatologists specialize in treating skin conditions and can help parents make the best-informed decisions for their children.

A dermatologist can develop a specific treatment plan for the atopic eczema patient. With new medicines being approved and released, in combination with the other classic treatments listed above, we will be able to treat atopic eczema better than ever before.

Research has shown that parents who develop a good relationship with their dermatologist and follow a designed treatment plan will have the most success in treating their childs atopic eczema over time.

Charles E. Crutchfield III, MD is a board certified dermatologist and Clinical Professor of Dermatology at the University of Minnesota Medical School.He also has a private practice in Eagan, MN.He received his M.D. and Masters Degree in Molecular Biology and Genomics from the Mayo Clinic. He has been selected as one of the top 10 dermatologists in the United States byBlack Enterprise magazine.Dr. Crutchfield was recognized by Minnesota Medicine as one of the 100 Most Influential Healthcare Leaders in Minnesota. He is the team dermatologist for the Minnesota Twins, Vikings, Timberwolves, Wild and Lynx. Dr. Crutchfield is an active member of both the American and National Medical Associations.

Originally posted here:
Atopic eczema is like an 'asthma of the skin' - MSR News Online

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Atopic eczema is like an ‘asthma of the skin’ – MSR News Online

Bionona sticks to online sales in launch of eczema treatment – The National Business Review

Posted: at 5:46 am

Bionona has launched its Atopis eczema cream treatment and will stick to online strategy as it chases "a couple of million" in sales in the first year.

The cream is the brainchild of chief executive Iona Weir, the biochemist who oversaw the development of the Phloe laxative and has taken four to five years to develop in her garage.

The research behind the cream came from her Marsden Fund-backed work on programmed cell death in plants known as apoptosis, and through that time attracted Callaghan Innovation support for its second clinical trial in New Zealand during 2015.

Ms Weir wants Atopis to be the number one eczema product in New Zealand and is also targeting sales in the US in a state-by-state roll-out, starting with Colorado.

"In the states, one in 10 people has eczema, so even if we get 1% of that market, then that's an incredible sized market," she said.

When asked what kind of sales volume target she wants to hit in the first 12 months, Ms Weir says she is aiming for "at least a couple of million".

When Vital Foods launched Phloe in 2007, Ms Weir says it sold out in the first morning and was targeting three million units in the first year.

The company chose to avoid wholesalers and distributors and stick to online sales after her experience with Phloe, which generated half of its sales through online channels.

"We discovered online seemed a much better option," she said. "Why would we lose all that money to wholesalers and distributors if we had a proper online marketing campaign?"

Bionona attracted the backing of former NPT executive chairman Paul Dallimore who used the cream on his own grandchildren and was so impressed that he put money into the first clinical testing in the US three years ago.

The company's New Zealand manufacturing will be done in an Onehunga factory, while Douglas Pharmaceuticals will cover its over the counter grade creams in the US.

Ms Weir says the company has the ability to scale up quickly, with Mr Dallimore "and some of his mates" putting money into the business, and expects to have about 18 months lead-time before "people try to copy us."

She shied away from raising money from the market after a previous experience with venture capitalists put her off, and decided "this time I'm going to take a slower path and do it all myself before bringing the money in."

"It's taken me three times as long, but it's been much more worthwhile," she says.

(BusinessDesk receives funding to help cover the commercialisation of innovation from Callaghan Innovation.)

(BusinessDesk)

Go here to see the original:
Bionona sticks to online sales in launch of eczema treatment - The National Business Review

Posted in Eczema | Comments Off on Bionona sticks to online sales in launch of eczema treatment – The National Business Review

Treatment has no sufficient effect in one of five psoriasis patients – Science Daily

Posted: at 5:46 am

Treatment has no sufficient effect in one of five psoriasis patients
Science Daily
A substantial part of people, one in five, undergoing systemic treatment for psoriasis (i.e. pills taken orally, injections or infusions) still have considerable problems with their disease. This is according to a study with 2,646 Swedish psoriasis ...

More:
Treatment has no sufficient effect in one of five psoriasis patients - Science Daily

Posted in Psoriasis | Comments Off on Treatment has no sufficient effect in one of five psoriasis patients – Science Daily

China Turns to Precision Medicine in Fight Against Cancer … – Bloomberg

Posted: at 5:45 am


Bloomberg
China Turns to Precision Medicine in Fight Against Cancer ...
Bloomberg
When Nisa Leung was pregnant with her first child in 2012, her doctor in Hong Kong offered her a choice. She could take a prenatal test that would require ...

and more »

Read more:
China Turns to Precision Medicine in Fight Against Cancer ... - Bloomberg

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on China Turns to Precision Medicine in Fight Against Cancer … – Bloomberg

Study of complex genetic region finds hidden role of NCF1 in … – Medical Xpress

Posted: at 5:45 am

February 8, 2017 Betty Pei-tie Tsao, Ph.D., is the Richard M. Silver Endowed Chair for Inflammation Research at the Medical University of South Carolina and senior author on the Nature Genetics article. Credit: Medical University of South Carolina

Investigators at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) report pre-clinical research showing that a genetic variant encoded in neutrophil cystolic factor 1 (NCF1) is associated with increased risk for autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis, and Sjgren's syndrome, in the January 2017 issue of Nature Genetics.

Data indicate that increased NCF1 protects against SLE while decreased NCF1 raises SLE risk and highlight the pathogenic role of reduced reactive oxygen species in autoimmune disease development.

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs - pronounced 'snips') are the most common type of human genetic variation; each one represents a small difference in a nucleotide - the building blocks of our DNA. The Immunochip for fine-mapping is an important tool for conducting genome-wide association studies of the genetic components of disease. Researchers use the Immunochip to investigate DNA samples from people with a particular disease for linkage disequilibrium (LD) signals that illuminate associations between specific SNPs and the disease.

Autoimmune diseases such as SLE are known to have a strong genetic component and, to date, dozens of SNPs associated with SLE have been identified and included on the Immunochip. The Achilles heel is, of course, that the Immunochip cannot identify associations with SNPs that it does not include.

When MUSC researchers genotyped DNA samples from Chinese, European-American, and African-American SLE patients, they found a strong signal in the Chinese sample at the rs73366469 locus in the GTF2IRD1-GTF2I intergenic region at 7q11.23. This was puzzling because that locus was not consistent with SLE loci identified by other genome-wide association studies. Furthermore, the very strong signal in the Chinese sample appeared as a modest signal in the European-American sample and did not appear at all in the African-American sample.

"A true risk gene should be the same in all populations," explained Betty Pei-tie Tsao, Ph.D., Richard M. Silver Endowed Chair for Inflammation Research at MUSC and senior author on the article. "And for such a strong signal, we wondered, 'why hasn't anyone else seen it?' We wanted to find out if what we were seeing was true and explain it."

The team confirmed their finding using a different genotyping platform in an independent Asian sample provided by Nan Shen, M.D., Ph.D., professor of medicine and director of the Shanghai Institute of Rheumatology at Shanghai Jiao Tong University's School of Medicine. But, because rs73366469 did not show LD with any SNPs in the Immunochip, the researchers hypothesized that the SNP containing the true underlying risk factor was not included in it.

"We came into the study from our Asian samples and then started looking for this signal in other populations," said Tsao. "Every ethnic group has a different ancestral background and different LD patterns. We used the LD signal strength as a guide to find our way to the true risk gene - the particular variant that actually caused the increased risk for lupus."

Because the SNP they were looking for was most likely not included in the Immunochip, the team turned to the 1000 Genomes Project dataset, where they found two SNPs that were not only not on the Immunochip, but also produced stronger LD signals with rs73366469 in Asian patients than European or African patients. One of these two, rs117026326 located on intron 9 of GTF2I, showed a stronger association with SLE than either the original or the other locus from the 1000 Genomes Project.

As the researchers focused in on rs117026326, they saw that the NCF1 gene was nearby. This was important because NCF1, which encodes a subunit of NOX2, is thought to be related to SLE due to its role in activating the phagocytic complex NOX2.

Preclinical studies have shown that non-functional NOX2 exacerbates lupus in mice. Furthermore, NCF2, which encodes another subunit of NOX2, is associated with SLE risk in European Americans.

The strong association of rs117026326 with SLE and the functional implications of nearby NCF1 took the team to their next hypothesis: that the rs117026326 SNP might tag causal variants of NCF1 that were not present in the 1000 Genomes Project database.

But unraveling this mystery was not going to be easy.

"This is a very complex genomic region," explained Tsao. "The NCF1 gene has two nearly identical twins - NCF1B and NCF1C - that are 98% the same. But they are non-functional pseudo-genes. This makes working in this region of the human genome very difficult. That's why the next-generation sequencing method that the 1000 Genomes Project has been doing doesn't pertain to this region."

The researchers believed that mapping techniques commonly used by the larger projects, while efficient, limited their ability to find unique sequences among all the copies and duplications in this region. So, they decided to set up their own, novel PCR assay.

"You can't easily sequence this region using the next-generation techniques," said Tsao. "So, we had to do it the old-fashioned way, which was very time consuming and labor intensive. To genotype the region correctly, we used PCR to selectively amplify the NCF1 copies and conduct copy number variation tests. Then we only used samples with no copy number variation to examine the NCF1 variant. This method ensured that what we identified as an NCF1 variant was truly a variant."

Using this strategy, the team identified 67 SNPs, four of which had a strong association with rs117026326. After conducting a long series of multiple tests in samples from various ethnic populations, they gradually eliminated three of the four SNPs and determined that the one called p.Arg90His was the likely genetic variant causing SLE susceptibility across all populations.

In addition, p.Arg90His was associated with increased risk for other autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis and Sjgren's syndrome.

The team also found that having only one copy of NCF1 was associated with a higher SLE risk, but having three or more NCF1 copies was associated with reduced SLE risk. Finally, while the underlying mechanism is unclear, the team found that having reduced NOX2-derived reactive oxygen species also raised the risk for these autoimmune diseases.

Tsao notes that perseverance was a critical component of this work. This work was started years ago when the team was at the University of California Los Angeles and was completed after moving to MUSC.

"We just stuck with it as a labor of love. Our lead author, Jian Zhao, devoted several years of his life to this project," explained Tsao." At the time we started, we didn't know it was going to be so complex. We just wanted to explain what we were seeing. It turned out to be quite a chase and very interesting and rewarding to finally bring this project to this point."

This work also points out an important unmet need in the field of genetic mapping.

"We need a more efficient platform to screen complex genome regions for variants. For a lot of diseases we've identified some, but not all, of the variants. There may be more variants hiding in these complex regions," said Tsao. "You have to sort it out like a puzzle. Autoimmune diseases share certain risk factors but also have unique genetic variants that drive the molecular pathogenesis of the disease. Each time you find a variant, you get more puzzle pieces and you can start to understand more about that disease and other autoimmune diseases as well."

Explore further: Genome study identifies risk genes in African Americans with inflammatory bowel disease

More information: Jian Zhao et al, A missense variant in NCF1 is associated with susceptibility to multiple autoimmune diseases, Nature Genetics (2017). DOI: 10.1038/ng.3782

In the first genome-wide association study (GWAS) of genetic risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease in African Americans, a research team has identified two regions of the genome (loci) associated with ulcerative colitis ...

Researchers from Boston University's Slone Epidemiology Center have found four new genetic variants in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) that confer a higher risk of systemic lupus erythemathosus ("lupus") in African ...

A person's DNA sequence can provide a lot of information about how genes are turned on and off, but new research out of Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine suggests the 3-D structure DNA forms as it crams into ...

Researchers have newly identified three genetic regions associated with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), the most common autoimmune liver disease, increasing the number of known regions associated with the disorder to 25.

A genetic study of Chinese patients reveals a prevalent risk factor for certain blood cancers not detected in European patients.

Investigators at the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) report pre-clinical research showing that a genetic variant encoded in neutrophil cystolic factor 1 (NCF1) is associated with increased risk for autoimmune ...

Geneticists from Trinity College Dublin have used our evolutionary history to shine light on a plethora of neurodevelopmental disorders and diseases. Their findings isolate a relatively short list of genes as candidates for ...

It's been more than 10 years since Japanese researchers Shinya Yamanaka, M.D., Ph.D., and his graduate student Kazutoshi Takahashi, Ph.D., developed the breakthrough technique to return any adult cell to its earliest stage ...

Two Princeton University studies are opening important new windows into understanding an untreatable group of common genetic disorders known as RASopathies that are characterized by distinct facial features, developmental ...

The world's biggest study into an individual's genetic make-up and the risk of developing lung disease could allow scientists to more accurately 'predict' - based on genes and smoking - your chance of developing COPD, a deadly ...

A poor diet during pregnancy can cause biological changes that last throughout life, according to research from Imperial College London.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

See the original post:
Study of complex genetic region finds hidden role of NCF1 in ... - Medical Xpress

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on Study of complex genetic region finds hidden role of NCF1 in … – Medical Xpress

Overcoming hurdles in CRISPR gene editing to improve treatment … – Science Daily

Posted: at 5:45 am


Science Daily
Overcoming hurdles in CRISPR gene editing to improve treatment ...
Science Daily
The new gene-editing tool CRISPR/Cas9 holds promise for new treatment of such genetic diseases as cystic fibrosis, muscular dystrophy and hemophilia. But to ...

and more »

See more here:
Overcoming hurdles in CRISPR gene editing to improve treatment ... - Science Daily

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on Overcoming hurdles in CRISPR gene editing to improve treatment … – Science Daily

Non-Medical Medical Decisions | Commentary by Dr. Gene Dorio – SCVNEWS.com

Posted: at 5:45 am

A pediatrician decides a struggling teen with mental illness needs hospitalization to neutralize psychologic demons impacting their personal and social life.

A workers compensation doctor requests a neck MRI in a powerline worker with growing right arm numbness and weakness to search for potential paralyzing nerve impingement.

An orthopedist orders special testing to determine if an elder patient with right hip pain which limits walking and driving might need surgery to improve her quality of life.

Physicians are rigorously trained to make decisions in the best interest of their patients. Even after medical school and residency, doctors must follow the challenges of evidence-based medicine, standard of care, peer review, and muster the time for continuing medical education and certification.

Doctors are not only held accountable by their peers, but also legally, as they could be subject to lawsuits. Additionally, state licensing agencies that oversee medical professionals can discipline them, should they not practice medicine up to the standards of quality medical decision-making.

However, what if the teens pediatrician feels hospitalization is acutely needed for mental illness, but it is denied by the insurance company? What if the workers comp physician orders an MRI for the powerline workers ailing right arm, but it is denied? Or, if special testing to evaluate grandmas worsening mobility and pain is turned down by the HMO? Who is held accountable?

To justify requests for specific patient care, physicians are forced to have peer-to-peer phone discussions with doctors employed by insurance companies, workers comp and HMOs. Frequently, these conversations result in denial of further care without medical justification.

A controversial question arises: Are denials by these company doctors considered medical decisions?

They are not. These decisions are considered utilization review. What does this mean? They are making decisions based on controlling costs, which is in the financial interest of the for-profit agencies they serve but not necessarily in the best interest of the patient.

Even though they are licensed doctors practicing medicine, their role in patient care is under the guise of utilization review and therefore not under the scrutiny of state licensing agencies.

What if these physicians deny care because they are incentivized to enhance personal bonuses? More so, what if some are making decisions outside the realm of their medical expertise (e.g., a urologist deciding about a diabetic)? Who holds these physicians accountable for moral transgressions or lack of judgement?

In California, we have a Medical Board that oversees licensing for all state physicians. If you report a licensed physician for making substandard medical decisions, an investigation ensues. If, though, the doctor is employed by an insurance company, workers comp or HMO and makes denial decisions on their behalf, it is considered utilization review, and they are not held accountable.

I do not pretend to understand every law and rule governing the Medical Board. But these companies have created legal barriers protecting doctors who might make substandard medical decisions.

Many physicians continue to fight for patient care rights despite frustration and helplessness of ongoing phone calls and paperwork they face. Yet substandard medical care will hamper their efforts as laws are manipulated and oversight is negligible.

Making medical decisions has never been easy. Assuring accountability makes it even harder.

Gene Uzawa Dorio, M.D., is a housecall geriatric physician and member of thePhysicians Organizing Committee atHenry Mayo Newhall Hospital. The views expressed in this column as his alone.

Read more here:
Non-Medical Medical Decisions | Commentary by Dr. Gene Dorio - SCVNEWS.com

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on Non-Medical Medical Decisions | Commentary by Dr. Gene Dorio – SCVNEWS.com

15 School of Medicine researchers named CZ Biohub investigators – Stanford Medical Center Report

Posted: at 5:45 am

Fifteen faculty members from the School of Medicine are among the 47 investigators announced today by the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub.

The CZ Biohub is an independent nonprofit medical research organization that has the goal of harnessing the power of science, technology and human capacity to cure, prevent or manage all disease. It is funded through a $600 million commitment by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, which was created by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan, MD.

The investigators were selected from the three institutions participating in the CZ Biohub: Stanford, UC-San Francisco and UC-Berkeley. Each of the investigators will be given a five-year appointment and up to $1.5 million for research in their respective areas of expertise. More than 700 researchers applied for the funding; the selections were made by an international panel of 60 scientists and engineers.

The investigators include both senior researchers and up-and-coming faculty.

The 47 CZ Biohub investigators were introducing today are quite literally inventing the future of life science research, said Stephen Quake, PhD, co-president of CZ Biohub and professor of bioengineering and applied physics at Stanford. The CZ Biohub is distinguished by our emphasis on technology and engineering, and our researchers are inventing tools to accelerate science for the good of humanity.

We are honored to have so many of our scientists selected to pursuetheirinnovative and ambitious projectsat the Chan Zuckerberg Biohub,said Lloyd Minor, MD, dean of the School of Medicine. If past is prologue, givingsuch inventivethinkersthe freedom to conduct fundamental research will result in trulyoutstanding discoveries, moving us toward a future wherewe can both cure and preventwhat today seems incurable and unpredictable.

The 15 medical school faculty members are:

See the original post:
15 School of Medicine researchers named CZ Biohub investigators - Stanford Medical Center Report

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on 15 School of Medicine researchers named CZ Biohub investigators – Stanford Medical Center Report

Would you take a new 1300 DNA test that could save your life? – Telegraph.co.uk

Posted: at 5:45 am

How much, though, can these results and their interpretations be trusted? My feelings are mixed, says Stephen Jones, emeritus professor of human genetics at University College London. There are certain cases where genetic tests are tremendously beneficial. Take hypercholesterolaemia. It is an inherited, genetic condition in which your body cannot break down bad cholesterol. If one person has it, you can test their family to assess who has the genetic risk, and give them advice that may be live-saving.

Using genetic tests as a first line of health investigation will eventually be the norm, but we do not have sufficient knowledge to do it yet, Jones adds. Dr Sharon Moalem, a geneticist and bestselling author of Survival of the Sickest (about how some illnesses confer an evolutionary advantage), agrees. I have a lot of hesitation, he tells me over the phone from New York. There are too many claims being made, too soon.

We know that identical twins, with the same genomes, have different health patterns. The epigenetics, the environment in which your genes function, are tremendously important, Moalem adds. He also points out the hazards of testing: If you take a genetic test and find you are at higher risk of something serious, an insurance company can discriminate. A client of mine found a certain gene variant which meant his whole family lost their medical insurance. While that would be concerning in the UK, it could mean disaster in the States.

To this end, Moalems new book The Gene Restart suggests simple tests that can be done at home as an insight into losing weight. If you chew a water biscuit, for some people the taste turns sweet. Those people have the genetic ability to break down carbohydrates and burn up their energy. If it doesnt turn sweet, you may be wise to lay off potatoes. After speaking to Moalem, I was mindful of writing this article and sharing my data. However, I had been lucky with my results. I am, though, taking them with a pinch of scepticism.

I put the recommendation for me to eat low-fat dairy and vegetable oils to Karen Alexander, a nutritional therapist at Wild Nutrition. This is archaic advice: corn oil can be very inflammatory and bad for the heart. Also, rather than low-fat milk, it would be far better to have a small amount of full fat. When I talked about the test with one friend, he told me he sent off for one because there is a lot of cancer in his family. When he got an apparent genetic All clear, he went back to smoking.

That is lethal, comments Jones. If he responds like that, the worst thing he ever did was to take that test. Worse still if he went for a test like 23andMes, whose accuracy is around 65 per cent, and which in 2013 was banned from giving patients health reports by the US Food and Drug Administration as the reports were deemed unreliable. This year, it relaunched in the States with wellness data, but not the genetic risk factors of its original UK test.

Writing this article has made me promise myself I will learn how to check my breasts, and be sure to read up on osteoporosis. The real revelation was not about me, but about where genetic medicine is heading. I ask Wallerstorfer about the future of genetic medicine. He jokes that he knows his own future: if he has children with his girlfriend, because of his ginger gene every second child will be strawberry blond.

More seriously, he adds that by 2050, I think we will test children at birth, you will be able to alter their risk of genetic diseases at that time and then bring them up with the ultimate nutrition and exercise programmes for their genes. For the moment, though, unless you have plenty of money to throw around, you may be better off taking regular exercise, drinking less, eating well and maybe investing 80p in some water biscuits.

The Pure Genetic Lifestyle test costs 450 for a fullPharma, Nutrition and Weighttest, and 1,365 for the book;puregeneticlifestyle.com .

Excerpt from:
Would you take a new 1300 DNA test that could save your life? - Telegraph.co.uk

Posted in Gene Medicine | Comments Off on Would you take a new 1300 DNA test that could save your life? – Telegraph.co.uk

Donald Trump: America’s Politically Correct President – The Atlantic – The Atlantic

Posted: at 5:44 am

During the 1990s and again over the last several years, the United States engaged in an intense, wide-ranging argument about the contested concept of political correctness. For its most incisive critics, political correctness was a problem insofar as it elevated deference to political sensibilities overstating or acting on the truth.

Last year, numerous supporters of Donald Trump declared over the course of the presidential election that they supported the billionaire in part because they were tired of political correctness, a phenomenon they associated with the political left. A small portion of those voters were itching to engage in hateful speech. In contrast, many others merely hoped that if elected, Trump would govern as a hard-headed businessman who spoke plain truths about problems that the United States faces. No longer would politically tinged falsehoods shape the presidents words or actions.

Alas, that isnt what happened.

Yes, President Trump is gleeful in offending the political sensibilities of his opponents on the left and right. Sometimes, as with his attacks on the Iraq War, his irreverence is even useful. But Trumps lodestar isnt truth. It is an alternative dogma shaped by his peculiar coalition. And it distorts his words and actions as much as any Washington politician. Rather than address the problems that face America, political correctness be damned, Trump constantly utters falsehoods to gain political advantage, coddles Vladamir Putin, and panders to the sensibilities of Breitbart News, the website formerly run by Steve Bannon, his chief strategist.

Since his political correctness is informed by different orthodoxies of thought, it is aimed in a different direction, but its most dangerous attribute is exactly the same: It is grounded in a refusal to deal with the world as it is. Whats more, complaints from across the political spectrum are long overdue, because Trumps political correctness is already causing him to fail at governing.

This may be most consequential in the realm of counterterrorism.

The United States ought to be on guard against acts of terrorism perpetrated by radical Islamists. And it ought to be on guard against terrorists with other motives, too. Given the scale of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, al-Qaedas ambition to top it, and the rise of ISIS, many intelligent observers have concluded that Islamist terrorism is the sort that poses the biggest threat to the West. If that judgment is correct, there is little doubt that the next biggest threat to the West, judged using the same standards, is the one posed by right-wing extremism.

The body count illustrates why that threat is not to be ignored.

The second most deadly terrorist attack in American history occurred on April 19, 1995, when Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols used a truck bomb to blow up an Oklahoma City federal building, killing 169 people and injuring hundreds more. A New America Foundation study released in June 2015 found that right-wing terrorists killed 48 people on U.S. soil in the period after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. For example, on June 17, 2015, the white supremacist Dylann Roof murdered nine people at a historically black church in Charleston, South Carolina. And Wade Michael Page, a 40-year-old with ties to neo-Nazi and white-supremacist groups, killed six and wounded four in a 2012 shooting attack on a Sikh temple.

In Europe, Anders Behring Breivik, an anti-Muslim and anti-feminist radical, killed eight people with a bomb in Oslo, Norway, then shot 69 people at a youth camp for future leaders of his nation, hoping to draw attention to his right-wing manifesto. After extensive study, the Terrorism Research Initiative attributed 303 deaths to right-wing extremist terrorism in Western Europe from 1990 to 2015.

Most recently, on January 29, Alexandre Bissonnette, a 27-year-old, allegedly burst into the Islamic Cultural Centre in Quebec City and killed six Muslims at prayer, The Economist reports. The victims included a university lecturer, a pharmacist and a halal butcher. More than a dozen other worshippers were wounded. A friend of Bissonnette said the killer was enthralled by a borderline racist nationalist movement.

During Barack Obamas presidency, critics repeatedly charged that Obama was unable to effectively keep America safe because he refused to use the term Islamic terrorism. They saw his reticence as political correctness run amuck. Obama retorted that he of course understood the nature of the threat, but that he chose his words carefully to avoid legitimating the religious claims of extremists or helping them to drive a wedge between moderate Muslims and the West. There is no doubt, and I've said repeatedly, where we see terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda or ISIL, they have perverted and distorted and tried to claim the mantle of Islam for an excuse for basically barbarism," Obama said. "What I have been careful about ... is to not lump these murderers into the billion Muslims that exist around the world, including in this country, who are peaceful who are fellow troops and police officers and fire fighters and teachers and neighbors and friends."

Obama ordered lethal action against terrorists inspired by a radical interpretation of Islam on hundreds of occasions. Drone strikes approved by his White House killed thousands of people suspected of ties to Al Qaeda or ISIS in majority Muslim countries (along with hundreds of innocent people in those same countries). Regardless, some Obama critics argued that to adequately protect America from a terrorist threat, a president had not only to act, but to name the threat explicitly.

Trump has yet to name right-wing extremism.

He said nothing about the attack in Quebec City. His press secretary, who did mention that attack, suggested that it showed the need for recent security measures taken by the Trump administration, though those measures were targeted narrowly and exclusively at stopping foreign threats from seven majority-Muslim countries. It was as if the press secretary could only conceive of Islamist terrorism.

That is the politically correct posture under Trump.

And Trump hasnt just failed the conservative call terrorism by its name litmus test. It appears his White House will act to reduce right-facing counterterrorism efforts.

The Trump administration wants to revamp and rename a U.S. government program designed to counter all violent ideologies so that it focuses solely on Islamist extremism, Reuters reports, citing five people briefed on the matter as sources. The program, Countering Violent Extremism, or CVE, would be changed to Countering Islamic Extremism or Countering Radical Islamic Extremism, the sources said, and would no longer target groups such as white supremacists who have also carried out bombings and shootings in the United States.

Those groups will nevertheless remain a threat.

Just three months ago, in fact, Patrick Stein, Gavin Wright and Curtis Allen were charged with conspiring to detonate a truck bomb in a Kansas apartment complex where more than 100 Somali immigrants lived, Nick Wing of Huffington Post notes. All three were members of a white supremacist group called The Crusaders. The group espoused sovereign citizen, anti-government, anti-Muslim, and anti-immigrant extremist beliefs, according to an FBI agents affidavit All pleaded not guilty.

Once one understands that Trump is inclined to pander to the Breitbart-loving wing of his base, in place of the progressives to whom Obama and Clinton tried to appeal, examples of political correctness within the Trump administration abound. Trumps executive order on travel into the United States didnt flow from a rigorous analysis of flaws in the existing system, or a diligent attempt to study, understand, and improve upon any shortcomings in consultation with people whove worked within the system and understand how it operatesrather, it was a rushed attempt to placate those who want a Muslim ban. While popular at Breitbart, it was executed in a manner so blind to opportunity costs that it likely made America less safe.

Trumps tweet, Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flagif they do, there must be consequencesperhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail! was not a response to an epidemic of flag burning. Indeed, it likely resulted in more American flags being burned than wouldve otherwise been the case. And given the First Amendment and relevant constitutional law, it did not articulate penalties that can realistically be imposed. It was, in other words, factually dubious but politically correct, given a coalition that includes nationalists with authoritarian inclinations.

With regard to Russia, Trump seems to be taking great care to avoid micro-aggressing against its leader. On the alt-right, Vladamir Putin is something of a hero. When confronted by Bill OReilly with the charge that Putin is a killer, a reference to attacks on his domestic political opponents, Trump bizarrely retorted that the United States is not so innocent and that America has lots of killers itself. In fact, domestic political opponents are not murdered in America. Trumps words made no sense as an attempt at clarity, but they make perfect sense if one understands the way Trump has tied his political fortunes to Putin. Rather than say what is true about Putin, Trump says what is politically correct.

In this case, a side-effect is moral nihilism.

Now consider the unusual White House statement on Holocaust Remembrance Day. Its failure to mention Jews, the group for whom the Final Solution was developed, struck many as incompetence until CNN asked if the omission was deliberate.

Hope Hicks, the White House Director of Strategic Communications, declared that despite what the media reports, we are an incredibly inclusive group and we took into account all of those who suffered. She then referenced all the non-Jews killed in the Holocaust, as if it wouldve been politically incorrect to explicitly mention Jewish victims. Politico later reported that the State Department drafted its own statement last month marking International Holocaust Remembrance Day that explicitly included a mention of Jewish victims, according to people familiar with the matter, but President Donald Trumps White House blocked its release.

The White Houses behavior doesnt make much sense if it prizes common sense over political correctness. But it makes perfect sense if a White House staffer wanted to maintain plausible deniability while catering to the sensibilities of the alt-right, a community where diminishing the relative suffering of Jews in the Holocaust is politically correcttransgressing against Holocaust norms gives them a special thrill. Or even if the original omission was inadvertent, but the White House didnt want to offend those sensibilities by changing the statement.

While Bannons project involves trying to foster white identity politics in countries across the West, Trump himself cares less about the alt-right than an even smaller constituency: himself. He often strays from facts in deference to his own sensibilities.

Prominent among them is vanity.

The plain truth is that Trump lost the popular vote by a wide margin. The politically correct fiction among Trump and his subordinates is that voter fraud cost him the popular vote. And Trump has called for a massive, nationwide investigation into the matter, though he won the election, the Republican Party won both the House and the Senate, and there is no evidence of significant fraud. Rather than adhere to facts, Trump grasps at conspiratorial fictions to coddle himself.

The plain truth is that Trumps inauguration was less well-attended than the inauguration of Barack Obama eight years prior. On the morning after Trumps inauguration, acting National Park Service director Michael Reynolds received an extraordinary summons, the Boston Globe reported. In a Saturday phone call, Trump personally ordered Reynolds to produce additional photographs of the previous days crowds on the National Mall, according to three individuals who have knowledge of the conversation. The president believed that they might prove that the media had lied in reporting that attendance had been no better than average. He pressured this underling to reach a false but politically correct finding.

Whats more, Trump also expressed anger over a retweet sent from the agencys account, in which side-by-side photographs showed far fewer people at his swearing-in than had shown up to see Barack Obamas inaugural. The tweet was factually accurate. The photos werent misleading. But they were incorrect, politically speaking.

I believe that a majority of Trump voters dont give a damn about Breitbart and its ideological project. And they dont care about Trumps vanity either.

They wanted a leader who acted on and spoke the plain truth.

But Trump cant handle the truth. He cannot squarely face the degree to which he is disliked. And Bannon or other advisors seem to have somehow persuaded the president that shamelessly pandering to the alt-right serves Trumps interests. In fact, it makes him more disliked.

A critic of political correctness who planned to vote Trump told me, months before the election, it's almost impossible to have polite or constructive political discussion. Disagreement gets you labeled fascist, racist, bigoted. It can provoke a reaction so intense that youre suddenly an unperson to an acquaintance or friend. Say things online and they'll try to find out who you are and even get you fired. Being anti-PC is not about saying, I want you to agree with me. It's about saying, Hey, I want to have a discussion and not get shouted down because I don't agree with what is considered to be politically correct.

Now that Trump is in power, it is almost impossible to have a constructive political disagreement with the president. Criticism gets one labeled a failing liar who peddles fake news, or a so-called judge. It provokes a reaction as intense as the public ire of the president. His surrogates are trying to get people fired for what they say about him. For Trump, its not about having a discussion, its about agreeing with him. As he admits, he says nice things about people who say nice things about him. And he reverses course not based on the truth, but on if others criticize him.

As if unaware of sounding like a parody of a catastrophizing college student, Trump even went so far as to complain that Mike Pence was criticized in a safe space:

He would have Americans believe that a 57-year-old man with a Secret Service detail was unsafe because cast members of a Broadway show made a statement criticizing him!

Trump displays all the flaws attributed to Social Justice Warriorsthin skinned, quick to take offense, a bullying presence on Twitter, aggressively disdainful of comedy that pokes fun at him, delighting in firing peoplejust without any attachment to social justice. On matters as grave as counterterrorism and as inconsequential as the size of crowds, Trump is more contemptuous of the truth, and as driven by what is politically correct, than any president of recent years. That shouldnt bother those who only complained about political correctness as a cover for bigotry. But everyone who complained on principle, knowing a country cannot thrive when disconnected from reality, should demand better.

Originally posted here:
Donald Trump: America's Politically Correct President - The Atlantic - The Atlantic

Posted in Politically Incorrect | Comments Off on Donald Trump: America’s Politically Correct President – The Atlantic – The Atlantic