Daily Archives: February 7, 2017

Perfectionism Is Insanity And Impossible To Accomplish – Being Libertarian

Posted: February 7, 2017 at 10:53 pm

This Futile Goal Is Not What Our Founders Wanted For Us

Nothing, no matter what it is, will ever be perfect.

Herein lies the problem we have in America; we want everything to be perfect! However, this is not rational, and is quite frankly ridiculous, when it comes to realism and our individual freedoms.

Perfectionism requires the removal of individual freedoms to attain a societal goal of perfect peace, protection, and safety. This is, literally, impossible to accomplish, because every one of us is a unique individual.

The preamble of our Constitution should have been the last time the phrase to form a more perfect anything was ever used.

As a nation, we strive like hell in every effort to make our cities, our states, and our country more perfect. We do this by continuously passing an avalanche of city ordinances, state statutes, and federal laws all in the supposed name of public safety, to control every aspect of our individual lives.

It is a futile attempt, however, because it is based on control. You cannot, through government control or any other fashion, make anything or anyone perfectly safe and secure. In short, you cannot legislate morality for individuals.

Plato once said Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws. We have so many laws at the local, state, and federal levels, that no one can even keep up with all of them anymore. How is the average citizen supposed to know every single law in existence, when even judges and attorneys have to look them up?

To attempt to create such an environment of control over the citizenry equates to socialism or totalitarianism. It creates an invisible prison that most of the public dont even realize they are living in. This is quite the opposite of what our founders envisioned, and is why all victimless crimes quite frankly need to die in a fire.

Throughout history, whenever those in power sought to control the masses they eventually failed, no matter what means they used (except for North Korea because theyll just kill you instead). Any empire attempting to enforce perfection eventually crumbled, for various reasons.

One of the reasons why Rome fell was because it started more wars than it could afford, in an effort to control the world.

When are we going to learn from our own world history, this does not work? You cant have the level of freedom our founders meant for us to have, and at the same time, allow the government so much control over our personal lives that we dont know when we may be breaking the law in some idiotic, victimless crime. When will we learn that allowing people to be free in their pursuits, as our founders said, is the only way to perpetuate a long lasting and successful society and country?

We have the 2nd Amendment for a reason, and that is so individuals, not the government, can take care of ourselves.

The far right love the law, and those that enforce it, your rights be damned! I cannot tell you how many times one of my hard-core right wing friends would say f*ck their rights, or screw the 4th Amendment, I dont care when referencing a criminal act of another American; all while hypocritically claiming to love the Bill of Rights and be an avid 2nd Amendment supporter.

The far-left hate laws all together and want complete freedom with no rules at all. They then, hypocritically, want big government to take care of them in a never-ending system of welfare.

Neither of these systems can, or will, work long term; our founders understood this. To quote Thomas Jefferson The policy of the American government is to leave their citizens free, neither restraining, nor aiding them in their pursuits. I would argue that this same idea should be applied to the state and local governments as well today. I mean this sincerely.

I know its a lot of reading, but seriously, take the time to read what our founders wanted for us. Here are some links to the actual words they spoke, rather than random memes you read on social media.

Our country is in massive disarray. Not because of Trump (I mean hell I voted for him), but because of decades upon decades of policies and laws that were never meant to exist in the first place.

Rediscover what Liberty means again!

* Shane Foster has worked his entire career in military, law enforcement, corrections, and as a private investigator. He has a unique perspective into how law enforcement and our judicial system operates from within its ranks, as well as knowledge on our privacy laws, in which, every day, our individual freedoms and liberties are gradually taken away from us and our individual rights are abused.

The main BeingLibertarian.com account, used for editorials and guest author submissions. The views expressed here belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect our views and opinions. Contact the Editor at editor@beinglibertarian.email

Like Loading...

Read more:

Perfectionism Is Insanity And Impossible To Accomplish - Being Libertarian

Posted in Libertarian | Comments Off on Perfectionism Is Insanity And Impossible To Accomplish – Being Libertarian

Liberal Men Lash Out Against ‘Unqualified’ Woman Betsy DeVos – Daily Caller

Posted: at 10:53 pm

5467100

Liberal men spent Tuesday crying out that newly confirmed Education secretary Betsy DeVos is unqualified for the job.

Immediately after DeVoss confirmation, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer took to Twitter to slam the new cabinet member as unqualified.

Rolling Stone columnist Jesse Berneysimilarly tweeted, This is your drained swamp, America. A billionaire GOP donor gets a Cabinet job shes utterly unqualified for.

Betsy DeVos testifies before the Senate Health, Education and Labor Committee confirmation hearing to be next Secretary of Education on Capitol Hill in Washington, January 17, 2017. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler called DeVos fundamentally unqualified to lead the Department of Education.

Nadlers colleague, Mass Rep. Jim McGovern, said America has never had a cabinet nominee so unqualified as DeVos.

Democratic Sen. Al Franken said in a statement that he voted against Devos because she is the most incompetent cabinet-level nominee I have ever seen.

Shortly before DeVoss confirmation, Chad Griffin, president of the left-wing Human Rights Campaign, asked Republican senators to block this unqualified nominee.

Alex Morash, a researcher for left-wing nonprofit Media Matters, claimed DeVoss confirmation proves that its possible for anyone to be confirmed by the GOP Senate, anyone no matter how unqualified!

Some liberals have argued that men putting down women as unqualified is an instance of sexism in the workplace.

In his bookMicroaggressions in Everyday Life, Columbia University professor Derald Wing Sue concludes that many women now recognize the phrase I think the most qualified person should get the job as a gender microaggression that communicates women are not as qualified as men, so when a male candidate is selected, it has nothing to do with bias but concerns his qualifications.'

Similarly, after Bernie Sanders called Hillary Clinton unqualified last April, FiveThirtyEight ran an article portraying his remarks as sexist.

Sanderss remarks and their interpretation play into discussions of the subtle, pernicious forms of sexism that women in positions of power must deal with, authors Clare Malone and Julia Azari wrote. They titled the article, Thinking Theyre Unqualified Is A Big Reason More Women Dont Run For Office.

An article in Womens Agendalast October arguesthat Everyday sexism is perhaps best defined as the reminders women receive from other men and women, that they are unqualified or fragile.

Follow Hasson on Twitter @PeterJHasson

Here is the original post:

Liberal Men Lash Out Against 'Unqualified' Woman Betsy DeVos - Daily Caller

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Liberal Men Lash Out Against ‘Unqualified’ Woman Betsy DeVos – Daily Caller

Supreme Court Nominee Gorsuch Reportedly Goes To a Very Liberal Church – Mediaite

Posted: at 10:53 pm

A lot has been said aboutDonald Trump fulfilling his campaign promise to nominate a conservative Supreme Court judge for consideration by the Senate, but theDaily Mail has an exclusive running that tells a very different story than Neil Gorsuchsunearthed yearbooks.

From being cool with gay people to specific programs for Muslim outreach, hisreported church, St. Johns Episcopalin Boulder, Colorado, is extremely liberal. The head pastor even proudly attended an anti-Trump march.

Rev. Susan Springeris in favor of gay marriage and offers blessings to same-sex couples. Rev.Ted Howard put his name on a list of people concerned about the rhetoric being directed at Muslims right around the time Trump suggested a total and complete shutdownon Muslims entering the United States in December of 2015.

The church even has solar panels on the roof and officials cite climate change as the reason. Click here to see just how liberal the church reportedly is.

This may not sit well with those who were delighted over the appointment of someone they saw as a youngerAntonin Scalia.

[image: screengrab]

Lindsey: Twitter. Facebook.

Have a tip we should know? tips@mediaite.com

See original here:

Supreme Court Nominee Gorsuch Reportedly Goes To a Very Liberal Church - Mediaite

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Supreme Court Nominee Gorsuch Reportedly Goes To a Very Liberal Church – Mediaite

Liberal Hashtag #NotMySuperBowlChamps Protests Patriots’ Support of Trump – Fox News Insider

Posted: at 10:53 pm

It's been a recurring theme the past few months:

Liberals simply cannot accept the fact that Donald Trump is president and are doing everything in their power to depose him.

And now, the non-acceptance has turned to sports.

Following the New England Patriots' victory in Sunday's Super Bowl, the hashtag#NotMySuperBowlChampsshot to the top of Twitter's trending section.

MN Police Dept. Tweets Unique Punishment for Super Bowl Drunk Drivers

Google Home Super Bowl Commercial Sets Off Existing Customers' Devices

It Looks Like Tom Brady's Super Bowl Game Jersey Was STOLEN!

A play on #NotMyPresident, the hashtagwas used to slam the Patriots -- especiallyquarterback Tom Brady, head coach Bill Belichick and owner Robert Kraft -- for their friendships with Trump.

Not all Patriots are on the Trump train though. Tight end Martellus Bennett said last weekhe might skip the team's customary visit to the White House.

Thehashtag has since evolved into more of a joke targeting the refusal of liberals to accept the election results.

Breaking: Jill Stein announces demand for a re-match because Russia hacked the football. Send her lots of money. #NotMySuperBowlChamps

Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) February 6, 2017

#NotMySuperBowlChamps I just heard that Starbucks is hiring 10,000 Falcon fans. #safespace

Hillary Hates Me GWM (@pinepilot) February 6, 2017

Since the Falcons led for the most time, shouldn't they be the winners? #HIllaryLogic #NotMySuperBowlChamps

Joe Kelly (@JoeKelly1073) February 6, 2017

Where are all the protesters at for the Pats Super Bowl Parade?!? #NotMySuperBowlChamps

RP Walsh (@rp_walsh) February 7, 2017

I'm not gonna say Putin hacked the Superbowl, but I had never seen this ref before until last night. #NotMySuperBowlChamps pic.twitter.com/ZTypGrjXag

sqx (@nonsequitur20) February 6, 2017

"So, i'm going with your strategy to make it look like I have no chance, then win." #SuperBowl #SB51 #TomBrady #NotMySuperBowlChamps pic.twitter.com/oK7k7Z3i2v

Tea Party News (@tpartynews) February 6, 2017

#NotMySuperBowlChamps Not your President, Not your Country, Not your Constitution, Not your flag. Not your way, Why are you here?

Bill Periman (@BillPeriman) February 6, 2017

I hope liberals never, ever stop tweeting lol #NotMySuperBowlChamps "Election Night All Over Again"#SuperBowl Tom Brady pic.twitter.com/Q7fNVBdXqR

Tracy (@GigiTracyXO) February 6, 2017

Cry baby leftists are tweeting #NotMySuperBowlChamps & blaming "white supremacy" for the Patriots' Super Bowl win. Liberals are insane

Makada (@_Makada_) February 6, 2017

Winning against all odds is now a conservative thing, while Whining after losing is officially a liberal thing, #NotMySuperBowlChamps

Elijah Okon (@ElijahDbliss) February 6, 2017

Maybe an Atlanta federal judge will reverse the score. #NotMySuperBowlChamps

Ron Waltman (@avnsgm) February 6, 2017

VP Pence Takes Wounded Warriors to Super Bowl

President Trump Tweets Congratulations to Super Bowl Champion Patriots

O'Reilly Presses Trump on Travel Ban, Views on Putin in Super Bowl Interview

See the original post here:

Liberal Hashtag #NotMySuperBowlChamps Protests Patriots' Support of Trump - Fox News Insider

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Liberal Hashtag #NotMySuperBowlChamps Protests Patriots’ Support of Trump – Fox News Insider

‘What took you so long to man up?’: Cory Bernardi unable to explain why he’s quit the Liberals – The Sydney Morning Herald

Posted: at 10:53 pm

Countless interviews, a lengthy press conference, a resignation speech in the Senate and Cory Bernardi still can't convince some people why he quit the Liberal Party.

The newly minted independent clashed with Today host Karl Stefanovic on Wednesday, challenged over what took him so long to "man up" and announce his plans to form a new Australian Conservatives party.

Play Video Don't Play

Play Video Don't Play

Previous slide Next slide

The Senator has had a tough time on morning TV, grilled by Karl Stefanovic over his decision to quit the Liberal Party and start his own conservative party. Courtesy Today Show.

Play Video Don't Play

Malcolm Turnbull once led the push for Australia to become a Republic, but now as PM, he's praised the Queen, having to do it over jibes from the Labor Party.

Play Video Don't Play

A near neighbour of Malcolm Turnbull in one of Sydney's most exclusive suburbs expresses her shock at the sinkhole which has opened up near the PM's house.

Play Video Don't Play

Everyone has met one, but what does it really take to provide the perfect learning environment? We asked an expert.

Play Video Don't Play

Find out how the government's changes to childcare rebates, paid parental leave and family tax benefits affect you. Courtesy ABC News 24.

Play Video Don't Play

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull believes Australia Post CEO Ahmed Fahour is overpaid, saying his $5.6 million salary is "too high" for running the government-owned company. Courtesy ABC News 24.

Play Video Don't Play

Tony's tech talk looks at the latest gadgets and what's hip in tech lifestyles. This week he looks at keeping your iPad screen clean

The Senator has had a tough time on morning TV, grilled by Karl Stefanovic over his decision to quit the Liberal Party and start his own conservative party. Courtesy Today Show.

Stefanovic's questions echoed those of many in Canberra and Australia this week, as Senator Bernardi was unable to explain personality or policy differences that led him to leave the Liberal Party after 30 years, including 10 years in the Senate.

"I've come to the realisation that party politics, major party politics, is failing the Australian people and you just have to look at the evidence all around us," he said.

"We've got to do a better job. So I've come to the conclusion there's a better way and it's a way built around enduring principles that have stood us in good stead and will stand our children in good stead. We need to see more of it."

Stefanovic pushed back, challenging the South Australian to name a piece of government legislation he was opposed to.

"People were talking about this for months. Again, what took you so long to man up," the host demanded to know.

Senator Bernardi said he'd hoped to rebuild and strengthened the Liberal Party from within but had reached the conclusion it was on "a spiral downwards".

"I've been joined at the hip with the Liberal Party for 30 years. This is a very tough call for me, it's tough for my colleagues and my friends and supporters in the Liberal Party. I know that it's difficult."

After the new crossbencher nominated the government's dumped plans to consider of a market-based emissions reduction scheme in late-2016 and any increase in taxes, Stefanovic tried again, asking why he couldn't name a single policy he was opposed to and why the outspoken critic of Malcolm Turnbull wouldn't quit the Senate.

"Ideas matter in politics," Senator Bernardi said.

"What I have realised ultimately I've been battling within the party against the very forces that try and subdue the real principles.

"Why has it been left to me to say that tax rises are wrong? Big government spending programs are wrong? Against the philosophy of the party. I shouldn't have to go into battle against the very ideas that the Liberal Party was founded upon all the time. That's the real challenge."

Challenged over his dislike of Prime Minister, Senator Bernardi said he would not play "the personality game" or reveal details of his conversations with Mr Turnbull on Tuesday.

"I'm happy to work with anyone," he said.

"I understand full well the disappointment that many people feel in this space. I have got to do what is in the best interests of the nation in the long run."

For his part, Mr Turnbull called on his former colleague to quit the Senate and allow the seat to remain with the Liberals.

"The honourable thing for Cory todois to resign from the Senate and then run again at the next electionas an independent or under his new party," he said on Wednesday.

Emboldened by Donald Trump's stunning victory in last year's US presidential election,Senator Bernardihas confirmed he plans to recruit candidates to stand at the next federal election.

Just how much of a role ego and vision played in his long anticipated defectionis yet to be seenbut the South Australian is already positioning himself as outside the Canberraestablishment and political class.

He's outside the tent now, and a very complicated 2017 just got more difficultfor the Coalition.

Follow us on Twitter

Here is the original post:

'What took you so long to man up?': Cory Bernardi unable to explain why he's quit the Liberals - The Sydney Morning Herald

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on ‘What took you so long to man up?’: Cory Bernardi unable to explain why he’s quit the Liberals – The Sydney Morning Herald

LePage uses State of State to rip ‘liberal’ attack on Maine way of life – Bangor Daily News

Posted: at 10:53 pm

AUGUSTA, Maine Gov. Paul LePage tore into liberal political opponents in a State of the State address Tuesday that sought to delegitimize the Legislature and accuse special interest groups of preying on needy and elderly Mainers.

In one of the most aggressive speeches of his tenure, which lasted more than an hour, LePage spared none of his political opponents while turning up the volume on a conservative populist message based on his belief that hes the last line of defense for hardworking Mainers.

Our economy and our way of life are under attack, said LePage early in the speech. The taxes Mainers have paid all their lives fund the organizations that throw them on the street. It has to stop. We owe it to our elderly to protect them.

Many of the governors statements echoed comments hes been making for weeks: How his budget seeks to counteract the effects of two referendums that passed in November a minimum wage hike and a 3 percent surtax on income over $200,000 per year to benefit education.

Echoing a statement he made on the radio Tuesday morning, LePage took a swipe at outside groups making each and every one of you in the Legislature irrelevant by going straight to referendum, while calling for changes. He has already backed legislation to force signature gatherers to collect proportional numbers of signatures from both congressional districts.

As written, the law to raise the minimum wage will wreak havoc, LePage said.

It was the Republican governors first time in front of the Legislature since rolling out a January budget proposal that would shift Maine to a flat income tax by 2020, broaden the sales tax and expand on past welfare cuts to trim another 18,000 people from MaineCare and potentially 1,500 children from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program.

LePage also seeks to provide financial incentives and penalties designed to prompt school district consolidation and wants to trim at least 500 state government positions and launch a study of how to cut more.

But the budget must pass with a two-thirds majority a difficult threshold with Republicans and Democrats narrowly controlling the Senate and House of Representatives, respectively. LePages last two biennial budget proposals havent gone far, with the Legislature passing compromises over gubernatorial vetoes in 2013 and 2015.

That may well happen again by the time the next budget is finalized in June, with Democrats already taking stances against his tax proposals and countering his assertions that he wants to help older Mainers with criticism that he has not released a $15 million senior housing bond approved by voters in 2015.

On Tuesday, Democratic leaders said LePage told only half of the story and didnt address issues such as austere budgets that have put too much pressure on municipal property taxes, saying homeowners deserve a tax cut before upper-income earners.

Theyre the ones that lived here all their lives, said Senate Minority Leader Troy Jackson, D-Allagash, whom LePage mentioned several times as someone he has been working with this year. Theyre loggers, theyre fishermen, theyre farmers, and they feel like theyre going to lose their homes. An income tax cut for the wealthiest is not going to help them.

House Speaker Sara Gideon, D-Freeport, said LePage brought up several initiatives that lawmakers can agree on but that negativity tinged the speech.

The governor really did bring up a lot of issues based on that negative frame and based on a very partisan divide instead of really introducing conclusive ideas that would move us forward as a state, she said.

Republicans had a different interpretation. Senate President Mike Thibodeau of Winterport and Senate Majority Leader Garrett Mason of Lisbon said that despite a gruff tone, LePage succeeded in laying out accomplishments of his tenure.

But they were less sure about specifics in the budget: Mason said LePages budget will take time to consider, but that he appreciated the governors comprehensive vision.

This is a huge document. Were learning new things from it every day, he said. As for the governors vision tonight, it was nice to hear how positive he was about some of the work weve accomplished.

As LePages speech went on, he veered further off script, and his tone became at times more gentle and populist. He repeated a prior pledge to propose legislation that would prevent cities and towns from seizing elderly Mainers property for unpaid taxes, calling it unethical and immoral to take away a senior citizens home.

Yet he was also harsh. He said the Legislature should expect tough bills aimed at deadbeat dads. Rather than taking away drivers licenses, he said the state should monitor them to make sure they work and pay child support.

If they dont, he said, Lets bring them in to house them in our care for a couple of days, implying that they should be jailed.

The speech illustrated a conservative vision for Maine, but it also suggested that liberals which was a label he used many times would not support him or give him credit for his accomplishments.

He closed with one of his most common themes this year telling the Legislature do no harm to Maines economy. But its likely that theyll have a different definition than he does.

Read this article:

LePage uses State of State to rip 'liberal' attack on Maine way of life - Bangor Daily News

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on LePage uses State of State to rip ‘liberal’ attack on Maine way of life – Bangor Daily News

Dear Readers: Letter From an Anonymous Liberal Pastor in Trump Country – Religion Dispatches

Posted: at 10:53 pm

Dear RD Readers:

The last time I wrote to you, a little over a year ago, I was serving a small congregation trying to resettle a Syrian refugee family in the face of opposition from governors like Mike Pence. Ive since moved to another small congregation, about thirty-five miles from the old one. You know what they say, though: same stuff, different location. Were having problems with the government andimmigration.

More properly, some of our community is having trouble with visas. (I write anonymously not to protect my own reputation, but to give them privacy.)

A member of the congregation, born in the neighborhood and raised on her parents farm, married an Iranian man almost forty years ago. She was there for the tail end of the revolution and its aftermath, and says she was never treated poorly in Tehran, even in the days of mass street protests against the Great Satan. She and her husband have stayed married all this time, through all the ups and downs of Iranian-American relationships, splitting their time between Tehran and the small city near our church. Eventually, he applied for and received a green card, and they began to make plans to retire to the U.S.

You probably know where this is going. They were back in Iran for their yearly visit when the Trump administrations Muslim ban was handed down. Suddenly, they had no idea if or when the husband would be able to return.

This is not a theoretical concern. He has a job in the U.S., which can only be held for him so long. They set money aside to pay for the bills while they were gone, but no job, no more income. She could have returned without him, but she doesnt work, and splitting up would have put his immigration status in jeopardy. Worse yet, the Iranian government threatened to take retaliatory measures limiting the stay of American visitors. After all this time, having their marriage broken up by governments became a real possibility.

By Monday, the administration had backed off a bit, lifting the outright ban on green card holders from the affected nations. This still would have required the husband to undergo the extreme vetting. Since there is no American embassy in Iran, that would in turn mean setting up an appointment in another nation, then shelling out for airfare, food and housing, all the while hoping that he could be processed in whatever time he had available.

In the meantime, I got in touch with some of our elected officials. One of our senators staff took an interest in the situation, and graciously agreed to do what they could for the family. The office of our US Representative declined to intervene until the family tries to return to the country, but at least took our information and agreed to help if needed. The other senator? Never called back.

I told the congregation about the situation lastSunday. Id intended to talk about it during the prayers, but ended up using it to introduce the sermon. It was all about Gods foolishness confounding the wisdom of the wise, Jesus blessings on the poor and humble, and how we need to find hope and meaning not in our own successes, but in serving those same people Jesus blessed.

You could have heard a pin drop. On carpet.

Issues like this have to be approached carefully in a setting like this. Small churches dislike anything that seems even remotely divisive, which typically means checking your politics at the door. Small rural churches dont appreciate being lectured to about social justice or speaking truth to power. They tend to the conservative. I dont exactly do surveys, but the congregation is probably about two-thirds Trump voters, in line with the surrounding county. Theyre not necessarily fire-breathing radical right-wingersin fact, very few of them arebut they are reliable Republican voters. The Sunday before Election Day, a member expressed a concern during the prayers: For the first time ever, he said, we dont have an ethical candidate for president. My heart sank. They werent going to break against Trump.

The right play with a situation like this isnt to come in with guns blazing about the injustice of it all. A better call is to appeal to peoples natural instinct to help those in trouble and hope for an opportunity to suggest along the way that things didnt have to be this way. Our couples story makes a natural peg for that kind of approach, so I took it. With any luck, Ill get my chance to help my people see how many others were harmed by this cruel and absurd policy, and that there is something they can do about it.

But the main thing they pay pastors to do is to watch out for the members of the flock. So I asked, politely and hesitantly, if anyone would agree to come with me to see our member of Congress. Hes a bit behind on the subject of immigration, shall we say. He might need some convincing.

One or two people volunteered, which is about what youd expect from an open invitation. I resolved to ask a few people individually. So it goes.

But then, during the last hymn, the same guy who had denounced both candidates on the eve of the election came up front and motioned to speak to me. He wanted to say something before we all departed.

He spoke about his mother, who died last week, and her relationship with the mother of our woman in Tehran. Catholics ask their departed relatives to help them, he said with a catch in his throat. And we Protestants put that down. But if there was ever a time to ask my mother for some help, this is it. He paused, as if to return to his pew. But then he looked back at me and said, I will go with you to see the congressman.

Like many liberals since the election, I have been swinging between absolute terror and despair and bits of hopefulness among the flames. I was thrilled to hear the ban on green card holders had been lifted, and terrified to hear of the ill-treatment many were still receiving. I was lifted up when Sally Yates refused to defend the executive order in court, and crushed again almost immediately when she was fired.

Ive never doubted the hearts of my congregation, never regretted coming to a conservative setting. I do wonder sometimes if people like them will be able to stand up to the authoritarian drift of this administration. Or will they buy into the same politics of white resentment that got them hoodwinked into voting for Trump the first time? I dont know. I just know that like that time with the Syrians, the extremists running the show these days make it hard to live my faith sometimes. They make it hard to stand up for the right thing. Pretty ironic, considering all their rhetoric on religious freedom.

But it always seems like when Im in a truly black mood about the future of the American project, a bit grace drops in like a sunbeam to restore my confidence. Today it was a few dozen people gathered on the main corner of our little city to protest the executive order, waving signs saying MUSLIMS WELCOME and JESUS WAS A REFUGEE. The darkness can only last so long before the light comes again. Were going to be okay, I think.

But Im still going to call the ACLU and give them my congregants exact flight information. Just in case.

Read this article:

Dear Readers: Letter From an Anonymous Liberal Pastor in Trump Country - Religion Dispatches

Posted in Liberal | Comments Off on Dear Readers: Letter From an Anonymous Liberal Pastor in Trump Country – Religion Dispatches

Guest Article: Capitulation before the First Shots Are Fired – Somewhat Reasonable – Heartland Institute (blog)

Posted: at 10:52 pm

Billy Aouste Billy Aouste is the new media specialist for The Heartland Institute. He is responsible for many projects at Heartland, including producing and managing social media outreach; pitching op-eds to print and digital publications; producing Heartland's weekly email; editing Heartlands blog, the Freedom Pub; and tracking Heartland experts media hits.

Aouste is a graduate from DePaul University with a BA in Political Science. While studying he participated in the Fund for American Studies program in Washington D.C. Prior to joining Heartland in 2015, he was a staff intern on Bruce Rauners successful Illinois gubernatorial campaign. Aouste resides in Hainseville, Illinois.

By: Barry Poulson

For a half-century, conservatives have watched Congress incur deficits and accumulate debt, making ours one of the most indebted countries in the world. There is little doubt this debt is unsustainable or that the federal government must enact reforms to constrain spending, especially entitlement spending, which is one of the major sources of U.S. debt today.

Republicans in Congress promised to address our fiscal crisis with fundamental reform of entitlements and other programs. They promised to constrain spending, balance the budget, and reduce debt over the next decade. So far, they have not been able to do this, at first because of gridlock with Democrats in the Senate and then because of President Barack Obamas promise to veto any legislation introducing real reform. But with the election of Donald Trump and control of both houses of Congress, Republicans can finally break through the budget gridlock.

The most recent salvo in this budget battle is a continuing resolution for fiscal year 2017. This resolution proposes to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA) with no change in other parts of the budget. The resolution exempts future health care legislation replacing the ACA from certain budget rules meant to impose fiscal discipline.

It also requires committees with jurisdiction over spending and revenue in the ACA to craft new legislation achieving $1 billion in deficit reduction over the next 10 years and to report that to Congress. The expectation is these committees will repeal parts of the ACA with budgetary effects, which will allow the repeal legislation to be considered under special reconciliation procedures in Congress. This tactic will allow Republicans to enact the legislation with a majority vote, rather than the 60 votes required to prevent a filibuster.

The resolution also provides for two reserve funds to accommodate new legislation repealing ACA. Replacement legislation could use all but $2 billion of the net savings from ACA repeal for new spending or tax breaks for health care coverage. This is quite a shift from previous Republican proposals promising more than $2 trillion in savings, which was promised to go toward deficit reduction, from an ACA repeal. An analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) identifies a number of reforms in health care that could be enacted with significant cost savings. The savings proposed in this resolution to repeal ACA are a drop in the bucket compared to CBOs analysis of potential savings.

Replacement legislation that costs no more than the savings from ACA repeal, minus $2 billion, would be exempt from the Senate PAYGO rules and also from Senate point-of-order rules. The inclusion of these exemptions suggests the replacement legislation could exceed the savings from repeal by more than $10 billion in some years over the next decade and beyond.

With government expenditures for health care absorbing a larger share of the federal budget, this carve-out means less spending will be constrained by the statutory rules in place. Setting aside reserve funds to finance new health care legislation means more federal money will be off-budget and earmarked for specific spending programs. We should expect less congressional oversight for these funds, and if the new health care legislation is given special funding status, this will erode the opportunities for priority budgeting.

We will not know the full impact of policies to reform and replace ACA until Congress passes a resolution bill repealing ACA and additional legislation implementing replacement policies. But the first salvo in this budget battle is not promising, Republicans seem to have capitulated before the battle has begun. If there is any savings in an ACA repeal, most of those savings would be set aside in reserve funds to finance new spending or tax breaks for health care. The proposed budget reserves just $2 billion of the savings from an ACA repeal for deficit reduction.

Further, in the resolution, discretionary spending for fiscal year 2017 is set at the spending cap level for that year. All other spending and revenue is at baseline levels. Using baseline projections, total spending would increase from $3.2 trillion to $4.9 trillion over the next decade. This increase in spending would be accompanied by a doubling (roughly) of annual deficits to more than $1 trillion by the end of the decade.

Republicans can claim victory in this first budget battle in fiscal year 2017, without the Democrats firing a shot, but what a pyrrhic victory. Not only will this legislation fail to significantly reduce the growth in health care spending, it could lead to a higher trajectory of spending over the next decade and beyond. This legislation reveals Congress has no desire to fundamentally reform health care or other entitlements that would significantly reduce spending or debt linked to these programs.

Capitulation by Republicans in this budget battle reflects a more fundamental flaw in federal fiscal policies. Congress continues to pursue expansionary fiscal policies to stimulate output and employment in the short run, allowing deficits and debt to accumulate in the long run. For a half-century Congress has pursued Keynesian fiscal policies and abandoned the unwritten balanced budget rule that governed fiscal policy for two centuries.

With this most recent failure, conservatives must look to alternative solutions to the federal fiscal crisis. The most promising approach is to enact new fiscal rules, like those enacted in some other OECD countries, combining a balanced budget rule with expenditure limits.

We certainly cant sit back and watch the debt increase from $20 trillion to $29 trillion over the next decade the debt projected under this continuing resolution.

Barry W. Poulson (think@heartland.org) is a professor emeritus of economics at the University of Colorado-Boulder.

[Originally Published at American Thinker]

Guest Article: Capitulation before the First Shots Are Fired was last modified: February 6th, 2017 by Billy Aouste

See original here:

Guest Article: Capitulation before the First Shots Are Fired - Somewhat Reasonable - Heartland Institute (blog)

Posted in Fiscal Freedom | Comments Off on Guest Article: Capitulation before the First Shots Are Fired – Somewhat Reasonable – Heartland Institute (blog)

Making A FOIA Request Is About To Get Tougher At FBI – Daily Caller

Posted: at 10:52 pm

5466109

FBI officials are making it harder for Americans to request public records under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Beginning March 1, the FBI will no longer accept FOIA requests via email, according to FBI notifications to requesters, forcing the public to use more archaic methods like snail mail and fax. The change copies other agencies, like the IRS and CIA.

Its hard to see this move by the FBI as anything other than an attempt to make it more difficult for the public to access information about the agency, as is our legal right under the Freedom of Information Act, Elizabeth Hempowicz, policy counsel for the Project on Government Oversight (POGO), told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

The FBI will continue accepting requests through its online portal, but that method only allows users to submit one request per day, a limitation found nowhere in the text of the FOIA. Hempowicz said the change is curious because the FBI launched its web-based FOIA system in 2015 in the name of openness.

The agency points to it (the FOIA portal) as proof it cares about transparency and efficiency, but if the FBI were truly committed to improving public access to information, the last thing it would do is shut down email requests, Hempowicz added.

The FBI said the move will streamline its FOIA process. The FBI had 2,614 backlogged FOIA requests at the end of fiscal year 2015, according to the Department of Justices (DOJ) most recent annual report on agency FOIAs.

The FBIs eFOIA portal was designed and developed to be the FBIs primary means for receiving FOIA and Privacy Act requests, FBI spokeswoman Jillian Stickels told TheDCNF.

The portal provides the FBI with an automated process for the receipt and opening of requests, replacing the current manual process and substantially reducing the time it takes to receive and open each electronic request received. Given the FBIs high volume of requests, this will significantly increase efficiency.

Former President Barack Obama promised to have the most transparent administration in history, but his White House intercepted and vetted agency FOIA requestsand prompted a record number of FOIA lawsuits against a presidential administration.(RELATED: Agency Takes 5 Years To Respond To FOIA Request)

President Donald Trump has spoken little of government transparency and public access to records.

Congress passed, and then-President Lyndon Johnson signed, FOIA into law in 1966, making all government documents subject to public access except those covered by one or more of nine specific exemptions for considerations such as privacy, law enforcement and commercial secrets.

Follow Kathryn on Twitter

Send tips to katie@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Read the original here:

Making A FOIA Request Is About To Get Tougher At FBI - Daily Caller

Posted in Fiscal Freedom | Comments Off on Making A FOIA Request Is About To Get Tougher At FBI – Daily Caller

Most refugees who enter the US as religious minorities are Christians – Pew Research Center

Posted: at 10:52 pm

A little over a third of the refugees who were admitted into the United States in fiscal 2016 (37%) were religious minorities in their home countries. Of those, 61% were Christians, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of data from the State Departments Refugee Processing Center.

Muslims, the next largest group, made up 22% of the religious minority refugees who were admitted to the U.S. Other, smaller world religions and Hindus made up the bulk of the remaining religious minority refugees (9% and 6%, respectively).

The analysis comes as Donald Trumps administration has announced it will give priority to religious minorities who apply for refugee status in the U.S. Trump himself has said that Christians will be given preference.

The landscape is different when it comes to the two-thirds of refugees who entered the U.S. as religious majorities in fiscal 2016. Six-in-ten of these refugees (60%) were Muslim and 35% were Christian.Buddhists made up 6% of these refugees, coming mostly from Burma (Myanmar) and Bhutan.

The U.S. admitted 85,000 refugees in 2016. Almost all came from these 10 countries: the Democratic Republic of Congo (19%), Syria (15%), Burma (15%), Iraq (12%), Somalia (11%), Bhutan (7%), Iran (4%), Afghanistan (3%), Ukraine (3%) and Eritrea (2%).

Christians are a religious majority in three of these 10 countries. For example, the Democratic Republic of Congo from which the U.S. accepted the largest number of refugees (over 16,000) in 2016 is a predominantly Christian nation, split almost evenly between Roman Catholic and Protestant Christians. The vast majority (93%) of refugees accepted from that country were of these Christian denominations. Similarly, 61% of refugees coming to the U.S. from Eritrea in 2016 were Orthodox Christians, the majority religious group.

Christians are also not the only religious minority group in Muslim-majority countries. This is partly because many of the Muslim-majority countries from which the U.S.received the most refugees in 2016 Syria, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan and Somalia are nations where various sects of Islam are considered religious minorities as well. In Syria, for example, non-Sunni Muslim groups (including Shia Muslims, Alawites and Ismailis) are religious minorities. In Somalia, Shia Muslims are estimated to be less than 1% of the population and thus are also considered minorities.

Note: Data for estimations of countries religious group sizes came from the State Departments Report to Congress on International Religious Freedom in 2015. For detailed methodology, see here(PDF).

Topics: Christians and Christianity, Immigration, Immigration Trends, Migration, Muslims and Islam, Religion and Society, Religious Affiliation, Wars and International Conflicts

View original post here:

Most refugees who enter the US as religious minorities are Christians - Pew Research Center

Posted in Fiscal Freedom | Comments Off on Most refugees who enter the US as religious minorities are Christians – Pew Research Center