Daily Archives: February 7, 2017

Hard Drive Cloning Software Why You Need It Acronis

Posted: February 7, 2017 at 8:21 am

A clone is a duplicate copy. Sheep have been cloned and maybe someday even people will be cloned, but disk cloning (performed by the hard drive cloning software) is a vital tool used to manage and protect data.

Lets a closer look at what hard drive cloning software can do. Let's start with the basics.

Basically, disk cloning is the process of perfectly copying every bit of information from one computer hard drive to another disk. Often, the contents of the first disk are written to an image file as an intermediate step. The second disk is then created with the contents of the image.

Backup vs Disk Cloning Software Okay, so of course I want to protect my data. Isnt that what backup software is for?

Not entirely.

Full-image backup software and file and folder backup software are not the same as disk cloning software, though the reasons for using them may overlap. Here are some good guidelines about when to use each:

Use backup software when you want to:

Duplicate the configurations of multiple computers so that each machine is identically set up.

All that and simple to use too. Even computer novices can use the easy-to-follow wizards guide through the set-up process. Once initial set-up is complete, the drive-cloning software runs automatically, eliminating any further time or effort.

Disk-cloning software is the perfect way to protect and manage your precious data. Local and cloud full-image and file-level backup just makes sense. Whether you have one home computer or a small business with multiple computers, Acronis True Image 2017 protects all your data on all your systems with one solution.

Take advantage of Acronis True Image 2017 and rest easy knowing your computer(s) and data are fully protected.

Read more:

Hard Drive Cloning Software Why You Need It Acronis

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on Hard Drive Cloning Software Why You Need It Acronis

Don’t fall for this Facebook cloning scam | WDTN – WDTN

Posted: at 8:21 am


MYFOXZONE.com

Read more:

Don't fall for this Facebook cloning scam | WDTN - WDTN

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on Don’t fall for this Facebook cloning scam | WDTN – WDTN

Facebook cloning debunked – The i newspaper online iNews – iNews

Posted: at 8:21 am

Warnings about Facebook cloning have been circulating on the platform (Getty)

Facebook users may be seeing posts from their friends warning them about Facebook cloning. Some concerned account holders are urgingothers not to accept a second friend request from accounts purporting to belong to them.

The warning might look something like this:

Heads-up!! Almost every account is being cloned. Your picture and your name are used to create a new face book account (they dont need your password to do this this). They want your friends to add them to their Facebook account. Your friends will think that its you and accept your request. From that point on they can write what they want under your name. I have NO plans to open a new account. Please DO NOT accept a 2nd friend request from me. Copy this message on your wall.

Or this:

HEADS UP: I have been hacked. There is a new hack on Facebook. It includes trying to befriend you, asking for money, or wanting to give you money, and or hurtful phrase coming from you to one of your contacts. Its very dirty and it appears that you have written it. You do not see it but your friends do. This situation can create many misunderstandings. I would like to say to all my contacts that if something shocking appears, it absolutely does NOT come from me and I would be grateful if you let me know. Thank you very much! HEADS UP!!!! Almost every account is beingcloned. Your picture and your name are used to create a new face book account (they dont need your password to do this this). They want your friends to add them to their Facebook account. Your friends will think that its you and accept your request. From that point on they can write what they want under your name. I have NO plans to open a new account. Please DO NOT accept a 2nd friend request from me. Copy this message on your wall.

Some elements of the warnings are true. But some are false:

It is true that scammers can usepeoples names and profile pictures to create a second, fake account under the same name. This has been happening for a while.

It is true that the fake account can then send friend requests to your friends the scammers can see Friends lists if they are public who might accept.

It is true that the scammers behind the fake account could post, leading friends that have accepted the request to believe the posts are genuine.

It is not true thatFacebook cloning is a hack. The word hack implies that someone has gained unauthorised access to your account. Actually the scammersare just using information that is public to create the second account.

It is not true that almost all accounts are being affected. Facebooks1.79 billion monthly active users are unlikely to have all had their accounts cloned.

So what is happening?

Scammers are creatingfake accountsin existing users names. The more information that a user has madepublic, the more genuine the fake account can seem.

People who accept friend requests from the fake account, believing that it genuinely belongs to their friend, might be at risk.The Hoax-Slayer warns that scammers, using a more elaborate scam, might be able to draw money out of friends. Identity theft is also a possible consequence, the website says.

What canI do?

Make your Facebook account as private as possible. Using the privacy shortcuts button in the Facebook masthead, you can check what others can see.

You can also hide your Friends list to deny the scammers this information.

You can find out how to report a cloned account to Facebookhere.

If you want information about the timeline from the account that was impersonating you, check out Facebooks advice here.

If you receive a friend request from someone who you think you may already be friends with, double check before accepting it.

Facebook considers cloned accounts to be a violation of its policies. The site has experts focused on identifying fake profiles and is continuously building and updating tools to tackle the problem.

Read the original:

Facebook cloning debunked - The i newspaper online iNews - iNews

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on Facebook cloning debunked – The i newspaper online iNews – iNews

Beware of ‘Facebook Cloning’ – KSDK.com

Posted: at 8:21 am

Beware of "Facebook Cloning"

Patrick Wright, WFMY 9:29 AM. CST January 31, 2017

GREENSBORO, N.C. -- Most Facebook friend requests come from actual friends, but some are from anonymous people with ulterior motives. And, if you fall for their tricks, it could cost you.

Some hackers are using a tactic called "Facebook Cloning." They steal your Facebook name, add your friends and use your photos to clone your account. Then, they use the fake account to approach your friends and family online.

"Maybe theyre trying to get you to send them money," said Danielle Hatfield, owner of Experience Farm. "However, other scammers are trying to do something a little more nefarious, and thats steal your identity."

Hatfield says the clonersmight even check your statuses to learn to mimic your style of communication.

"When they finally get around to the scam of maybe asking for money, your friends and family will fall for it.," Hatfield said.

"I get upset because this is about the third time this has happened," Yvonne Allen said.

A fake account, made to look like Allen's, reached out to Patrick on Facebook Messenger. The user told him they'd received a $50 million grant from the government and wanted to share the news of how others could get their own.

"I didnt receive anything! If they want to send me $50 million, Ill take it," Allen laughed.

Hatfield says, if you come across an account you aren't sure is real, just search it on Facebook to see if you're already friends with that person. If they send you a questionable post or link, give them a call or text message and ask if it's really them. If the account is fake, report it to Facebook immediately.

If your account gets cloned, Hatfield says you should change your password, warn others, and then check your privacy settings to make sure only friends can view your profile.

( 2017 WFMY)

Go here to read the rest:

Beware of 'Facebook Cloning' - KSDK.com

Posted in Cloning | Comments Off on Beware of ‘Facebook Cloning’ – KSDK.com

The Queer Evolution of Kristen Stewart – Advocate.com

Posted: at 8:20 am

Donald Trump has been tweeting about Kristen Stewart since 2012, despite not knowing her. But now that he's president, Stewart, who isn't usually one to take political positions, addressed him directly in her Saturday Night Live monologue, saying that if he didn't like her seven years ago, then he will like her even less now, because, as she says, "I'm so gay, dude."

The Twilight actress hasn't always been so open about her sexuality. This is the first time she's publicly embraced any label. Queer rumors followed the actress back since she was dating her Twilight costar, Robert Pattinson, the actor who Stewart claims Trump is obsessed with. Stewart talked about her sexuality for the first time in 2015, when she appeared on the September cover of Nylon. She told the magazine, "Google me, I'm not hiding," when asked if she is queer. At the time, photos of her and her then-girlfriend, Alicia Cargile, were all over the internet.

That phrase, "Google me, I'm not hiding," took on special meaning for Stewart, who later admitted that she purposely wanted the paparazzi to take photos of her with Soko, a French pop star Stewart dated after she and Cargile broke up, because that was a way for her to be out without having to say it. "That's really important to me," she told Varietyabout having her young fans see her holding hands with or kissing another woman. "As much as I want to protect myself, it's not about hiding. As soon as you start throwing up so many walls, you cannot see over them yourself, so you just start isolating in a way that's not honest."

In the same interview with Variety in 2016, the actress opened up and said that when she was dating men, she never talked about her relationships to anyone. She said, at the time, that she felt the same about dating women. "I'm not hiding shit," she told the magazine. "I'm very obviously..." she said, before trailing off without saying the word "gay" or "queer."

But that changed months later, when she did an interview with T, the New York Times style magazine. She spoke about Cargile, with whom she had often been photographed. "Look how cute she is," she told the publication, while showing photos of the two together from a private Instagram account. "I love her so much," she said. Stewart got back together with Cargile after breaking up with Soko.

Stewart's position about not speaking publicly about her relationships changed when she began dating women because "it seemed like there was an opportunity to represent something really positive," Stewart told the Times. While the actress was known for usually keeping mum about her personal life, she didn't want to seem homophobic by not speaking about it. "I still want to protect my personal life, but I don't want to seem like I'm protecting the idea, so that does sort of feel like I owe something to people."

While promoting her movie Equals, Stewart was asked about the process of opening up the media about her relationships with women. "I've discovered a way to live my life and not feel like I'm hiding at all," she told the Los Angeles Times. "And I think that's pretty apparent for anyone who cares not that everyone does. But I think that if you had been tracking it in any way, it's more apparent that I'm more relaxed than I used to be."

Stewart's fans have definitely been tracking it. It's because when Stewart opens up about being queer, it lets her fans, especially her queer fans, know that there's no need to hide your sexuality, even when you have a president who reportedly isconsidering signing an anti-LGBT "religious freedom" order that would make it legal to discriminate against LGBT people.

Watch Stewart's Saturday Night Live monologue below.

Read the original post:

The Queer Evolution of Kristen Stewart - Advocate.com

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on The Queer Evolution of Kristen Stewart – Advocate.com

Convergent Evolution: Why Some Plants Became Carnivorous – Science 2.0

Posted: at 8:20 am

In Insectivorous Plants, Sir Charles Darwin pondered carnivorous plants.They live in habitats poor in nutrients, mostly on nitrogen and phosphorous, and have compensated this lack with the ability to digest animals such as insects and other arthropods.

Adapting and surviving with a carnivorous diet in nutrient-poor soils is an evolutionary process that some evolutionary unrelated species have been going through, repeatedly and independently, from the same set of genes and proteins, according to a new study in Nature Ecology&Evolution.

All plants are photosynthetic organisms, that is, they turn transform the inorganic matter of the environment into organic molecules (glucose). To complete the lack of nutrients of some soils, carnivorous plants can catch and absorb nutrients from a prey, thanks to an exclusively biological mechanism. Carnivorous plants are a clear example of convergent evolution, probably due the heavy biological restrictions imposed by extreme nutrient-poor ecosystems. That this convergence was accompanied by a parallel molecular evolution in digestive enzymes makes this system an interesting example from the perspective of the study of the evolutionary process.

According to this study, natural selection has taken similar evolutionary routes so that plants can feed from other animals to complete their diets. Credit: Universidad de Barcelona

The authors sequenced the genome of the pitcher plant (Cephalotus follicularis), an Australian species that can be identified for its insectivorous leaves pit-fall traps that catch insects - very different from the other leaves. The genome of this species, the second carnivorous plant with the complete genome sequenced after Utricularia gibba, is relatively large, and consists of 1.6 Gb, which is almost half of the human genome. The researchers have identified more than 36,000 genes.

According to the results, leaves that catch insects have gained new enzymatic functions: basic chitinase, which breaks down chitin (main component of insects exoskeleton), and purple acid phosphatase which releases phosphate groups from molecules, and it contributes to the mobilization of the preys phosphate, says professor Julio Rozas, who leads the Evolutionary Genomics and Bioinformatics research group at the University of Barcelona.

"In the study, we have stated that genes originally involved in the defence against certain diseases or the response to biotic and abiotic stress- have acquired new functions (co-option) related to the ability of feeding from animals. This is the case, for instance, of a specific set of proteins that evolved to act as digestive enzymes, said Pablo Librado, also from University of Barcelona. The results of co-option, regarding both the digestive enzymes and the amino acid changes seen in these enzymes, show that evolution has acted on a limited number of evolutionary routes in the adaptive transition to the carnivorous diet.

Citation: K. Fukushima, X. Fang, D. Alvarez-Ponce, H. Cai, L. Carretero-Paulet, C. Chen, T. Chang, K. M. Farr, T. Fujita, Y. Hiwatashi, Y. Hoshi, T. Imai, M. Kasahara, P. Librado, L. Mao, H. Mori, T. Nishiyama, M. Nozawa, G. Plfalvi, S. T. Pollard, J. Rozas, A. Snchez-Gracia, D. Sankoff, T. F. Shibata, S. Shigenobu, N. Sumikawa, T. Uzawa, M. Xie, C. Zheng, D. D. Pollock, V. A. Albert, S. Li, M. Hasebe, 'The pitcher plant Cephalotus genome reveals genetic changes associated with carnivory', Nature Ecology & Evolution, Feb 2017

Original post:

Convergent Evolution: Why Some Plants Became Carnivorous - Science 2.0

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on Convergent Evolution: Why Some Plants Became Carnivorous – Science 2.0

The Evolution of Accessible Travel: 5 Podcast Takeaways – Skift

Posted: at 8:20 am

For a recent episode of the Skift Podcast, we looked at the experiences of travelers with disabilities. For many companies, accommodating customers with disabilities is a legal obligation, but the companies that do more are better satisfying their customers and capturing this sizable market share according to the Open Doors Organization, adults with disabilities in the U.S. spend $17.3 billion a year on leisure and business travel.Over the two years before the study, 26 million adults with disabilities took 73 million trips.

Our guests includedPeter Slatin, founder and president of Slatin Group, which provides education and training to help businesses including many in travel improve interactions with clients who have disabilities. His program Elements of Service: Serving Guests with Disabilities also recently went online through the American Hotel and Lodging Educational Institute.

Also with us via Skype was Brett Heising, CEO of brettapproved.com, a travel and entertainment review site for users with physical disabilities or mobility impairment. Through a travel agency partnership, the site also provides bookings and trip coordination.

They joined Skift podcast host Hannah Sampson and reporter Andrew Sheivachman.

Here are five takeaways from the conversation:

Hotels and state tourism boards need to catch up to museums and theaters.

In Slatins view, entertainment businesses like museums and theaters have done a more comprehensive job of welcoming customers with disabilities than hotels and state tourism boards.

There is a lot of lip service. Oh yes, we want you to be our customer, but we dont really want to do anything other than what we were told we had to do and we really didnt like doing that because it costs us money, explained Slatin. That breeds a head-in-the-sand mentality thats going to eventually bite the industry in the wrong place.

Theres things being done at the state tourism level, but we do have a long way to go, added Heising.

Meetings and events are big business for this demographic.

There are many big gatherings around the country for people with disabilities, and when these events happen, hotels are often unprepared to serve a high number of customers with disabilities at once. That potentially translates to lost income.

I go every year to the largest organization of people with vision impairments. The National Federation of the Blind has its annual meeting sometime usually in July, said Slatin. You have 3,000 people, many of whom are wheelchair users, many of whom are hearing impaired or hard of hearing, as well as blind. There are a lot of dogs, there are a lot of people, and there are a lot of able-bodied people as well, but thats a big spend in that theyre renting a couple thousand rooms, theyre eating all over the place and thats just one group.

Travelers with disabilities may prefer to book direct.

Since logistical problems are likely to arise at some point during a trip, many travelers with disabilities prefer to cut out the middleman, i.e. the online travel agency, and book directly with the hotel. This way, if the room ends up not being accessible, the traveler can more easily address that issue with hotel management.

I always book directly with the hotel because if there is a problem, theyre going to be able to resolve it much quicker, as opposed to saying, Oh, you booked through OTA X, give them a call. Like all consumers, I want a speedy resolution to my challenge, said Heising.

Now, of course, I cant read those screens and those [OTA] sites are really not accessible, although the OTAs will say they are, said Slatin, who deals with vision impairment. [The OTAs] have phone numbers you can call, but those are sales people and they work really hard to sell you something you have to push back really hard. It becomes kind of an unpleasant interaction, so I then will turn to a sighted colleague or Ill just start calling some hotels.

Hoteliers should make Universal Design a higher priority for future properties.

First, a definition of this term: Universal Design, as I understand it, is just a physical design of something. It could be a hotel room or a can opener, that works for everybody. That has the masses in mind, explained Heising.

Disability takes many different forms, so moving forward, hotels might find that it pays off to take this wide-ranging look at how a room should function, to serve as many people as possible.

Why not make sure that they follow the seven tenets of Universal Design and make sure that everybody can use them? Heres a wacky idea: How about a hundred-room hotel with a hundred roll-in showers? Isnt that nuts? I mean, how cool would that be? said Heising.

I dont see any silver bullet. I dont see any earthquake. I see incremental change, but well get to the point where we will notice the separation less and less, said Slatin.

Disability is far more prevalent than many travel leaders realize.

Heising points out that while many travelers wont suffer from blindness in their younger years, for example, a person will probably develop some type of disability as they age and will require appropriate services.

You might not need brettapproved today, but if you live long enough, youre going to need brettapproved, or youre going to go someplace really cool and its not going to matter. Right? said Heising.

Start listening to The Skift Podcast, today. Subscribe viaiTunes,SoundcloudorRSS.

Go here to see the original:

The Evolution of Accessible Travel: 5 Podcast Takeaways - Skift

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on The Evolution of Accessible Travel: 5 Podcast Takeaways – Skift

Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin Feels Like an Evolution of Double Fine’s Adventure Game Roots – UploadVR

Posted: at 8:20 am

The original Psychonauts is the definition of a cult-classic. Tim Schafer spent over a decade at LucasArts making comedicadventure games like Grim Fandango, Day of the Tentacle, and The Secret of Monkey Island. Eventually, he left LucasArts to found his own game studio, Double Fine Productions, and their first game was a third-person platforming adventure about a secret society ofpsychic spies. Fans loved it, critics adored it, and as is the case sometimes, it just didnt sell well.

Fast forward severalyears after a handful of re-releases of the original and Psychonauts 2 is officially happeningfollowing the studios raise of over $3.8 million thanks to the democratic power of crowdfunding.Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin then, alternatively, is a VR-exclusive first-person adventure puzzle game in which you embark on a rescue mission for the leader of the Psychonauts himself. The entire 3-4 hour adventure begins right where the original game leaves off and leads directly into the numbered sequel set to release next year in 2018.

Last week I visited Double Fines San Francisco office and had the chance to play through the first 45 minutes of the game and chat with Project Lead,Chad Dawson. He explained that when Schafer had first theorized the idea for Psychonauts 2, this interim story we find here wasnt factored in at all. The plan before was to simply reference the mission you embark on with your team in the sequel, but just leave it as a quickly referenced unplayable flashback. The prospect ofSonys PlayStation VR (PSVR) quickly changed that.

After playing the game for an extended amount of time, I can see why. When I originally got my hands on an abbreviated demo at E3 and was pleased with the quality of the presentation and the appearance of Double Fines trademark humor, but was unsure how well it could translate to an entire adventure. Thankfully the mechanics seem more than capable.

Dawson explained that what I was playing was essentially a final build of the game thats already passed certification by Sony. After donning a PSVR headset, I selected the New Game option from the main menu and got loaded into the mind of Raz, the main character of the series and primary protagonist in each of the franchises games. As a psychic spy, he has a litany of special mind powers.

For starters, his clairvoyance allows him to jump into the minds of other people, seeing things through their eyes and reading their thoughts. Telekinesis lets him lift and move objects, he can push things too, and even set items on fire as well. The games opening moments serve as a tutorial of sorts, as it slowly introduces new powers and mechanics.

Eventually Im able to connect to the mind of the captured Psychonauts leader,Truman Zanotto, while he is being held captive in a secret enemy base. This is where the real game starts. In a traditional point and click adventure game, youd explore the environment and search for clues about what to do next, but in this new Psychonauts game, it feels like a more organic puzzle solving adventure. I can look around my surroundings using my actual head and leap into the minds of guards standing around.

After taking over the minds of others, I can see the room from new perspectives, looking for clues and items to help me figure out where the leaders being kept. All in all, thats what the game boils down to. Youll be placed in a tricky situation, tasked with finding out what to do next using your surroundings for clues, and listening to exposition and details explained through dialogue. And even though in real life I was sitting in a meeting room surrounded by other people while I played, I couldnt help but chuckle to myself at the jokes and witty humor throughout.

Dawson also explained the myriad challenges that a game like Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin presented. Since the team had never worked on a piece of VR content before, they started to realize that traditional movement caused some sickness in people, which is part of why the clairvoyance mechanic is used to teleport around levels by traveling through the minds of others. Since PSVR performs best as a 180-degree device, every time a player teleports there needs to be at least one other person in the line of sight directly in front of you so that you can move again.

This changed the way environments were designed and forced the studio to think about levels differently. An old-school adventure game or a modern interpretation of the genre like Double Fines Broken Age might simply display 2D illustrated scenes that you can move around and click on, but that doesnt work in VR.

Some games like Obduction [Review: 8/10] adapt immersive, puzzle-based adventure games into VR with little changes, but Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin feels like a more robust re-imagining of the genre. Its designed from the ground up with VR in mind and the mere presence of psychic puzzles truly make you feel like the headset is a portal into the minds of the games characters. Its about as clever and clean of a genre/platform combination you could hope for and feels right at home.

You wont have much longer to wait until you can get your hands on it either, asPsychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin is set to release for PSVR this February 21st. Currently there are no plans for a Rift or Vive version, although perhaps that will come at a later time.

Are you a Psychonauts fan? Do you plan on getting this when it releases in a couple of weeks? Let us know in the comments down below!

Tagged with: double fine, playstation, ps4, PSVR, Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin

See more here:

Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin Feels Like an Evolution of Double Fine's Adventure Game Roots - UploadVR

Posted in Evolution | Comments Off on Psychonauts in the Rhombus of Ruin Feels Like an Evolution of Double Fine’s Adventure Game Roots – UploadVR

Darwin Americanus – lareviewofbooks

Posted: at 8:19 am

FEBRUARY 5, 2017

SINCE THE SCOPES MONKEY TRIAL of 1925, Charles Darwin has gone to court at least 10 times. In 1987, the Supreme Court ruled against the teaching of creationism in public schools in Edwards v. Aguillard, and in 2005 federal courts ruled against intelligent design with Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover. In court, if not in the hearts of most Americans, Charles never loses.

But much of what is enthralling about Darwins life and work is lost when the public cheers or jeers in court. Complicated individuals become combatants. Sophisticated texts become ideological arenas. William Jennings Bryan versus Clarence Darrow, creation versus evolution, religion versus reason, the United States versus Modernity. Its all a rowdy tournament, noisy with cheerleaders. Last year, the ACLU celebrated the 10th anniversary of Kitzmiller et al. v. Dover with A Concert for Science and Reason featuring Canadian rapper Baba Brinkman at the Appalachian Brewing Company.

Darwins first American trial was far more interesting. On the Origin of Species quietly crossed the Atlantic as a single book, thistle-green and gilded with two golden pyramids. The author had mailed it to his Harvard colleague Asa Gray, the premier botanist of his age. Gray in turn lent the book to his cousin-in-law Charles Loring Brace, the father of modern foster care. Brace then passed the book among his transcendentalist friends in Concord, Massachusetts Amos Bronson Alcott, Franklin Sanborn, and Henry David Thoreau. These five men were among Darwins first American readers, and his book impacted each of them deeply and differently. Its American reception wasnt a trial at all, but a seed planted into varied brains and a shared historical atmosphere, sprouting into lovely and prickly varieties of colors and shapes.

This is the story Randall Fuller tells in The Book That Changed America: How Darwins Theory of Evolution Ignited a Nation. Fuller has long been attracted to the ways in which a single book, individual, or event affects a cluster of writers differently. His first book examined how critics from Van Wyck Brooks to Sacvan Bercovitch inherited Ralph Waldo Emerson, and his second book traced the divergent effects of the Civil War on writers of the era. Both were academic studies, making The Book That Changed America Fullers first trade book. But his methodology translates well for a broader audience as he dwells in the rich differences of individuality to produce complex and captivating characters, bound together in a shared story.

The common drama facing Gray, Brace, Thoreau, Alcott, and Sanborn did not solely reside between the covers of Darwins book, but lurked in the struggle with slavery that would soon explode into the Civil War. Grays copy of On the Origin of Species arrived in Boston Harbor in December 1859, mere weeks after John Brown was hanged in Virginia for his failed attempt to stage a slave insurrection at Harpers Ferry. All five of these men were against slavery many had met Brown and some had even funded his insurrection and all could not help but read Darwins new account of human origins with this conflict in mind. [M]any other Americans, Fuller notes, linked Darwins theories with the controversy over race and slavery then raging throughout the nation. By the end of On the Origin of Speciess first year in the United States, South Carolina would secede from the Union.

Darwin himself had inherited the intense abolitionist convictions of his family, solidified when he witnessed slavery firsthand in Brazil during the voyage of the Beagle. I thank God, I shall never again visit a slave-country, he reflected. But his theory also yielded ammunition for abolitionists. Given Darwins associations with social Darwinism, it might be surprising to discover that these American men found a powerful argument for human rights in On the Origin of Species. Before the book appeared, the still-emergent field of ethnology in the United States was dominated by the theory of polygenesis, the notion that the human races were separate species descended from different origins. This theory lent itself well to the racial hierarchies espoused by men like Louis Agassiz, the Swiss-born Harvard geologist who resisted Darwins theories for his entire life and felt disgust toward the African race.

By contrast, Darwin offered a viable argument for monogenesis, humanitys common origins. Natural selection challenged the polygenesists sense of races as separate, static, and hierarchical. Reviewers for the American popular press consistently understood Darwin as having provided a theory that showed that black and white people were related, Fuller explains, and antislavery newspapers praised the new book for its implicit attack on the popular ideas of Louis Agassiz and other ethnologists. Charles Loring Brace (the man who brought Grays copy of the Origin to the transcendentalists in Concord) wrote the first work of Darwinian ethnography, The Races of the Old World (1863), a book which aimed to disprove theories of black inferiority by presenting a definition of race as fluid. (Yet like many other antislavery Americans, Brace also believed that the black race could never be integrated into the United States. He reasoned that their race had long ago adapted to Africa, and that they had been too abruptly transplanted into the United States to ever thrive there.)

Brace devoured On the Origin of Species. He reportedly read the book 13 times. With the magic-mushroom quality of works that unlock a paradigm shift in a readers mind, it began to color and morph everything he saw. While a missionary to New York Citys swelling immigrant population, he deployed Darwin when he confronted the brutal poverty of its Five Points neighborhood. Natural selection confirmed his conclusion that impoverished environments like Five Points (or slavery) exerted a profound and harmful influence on their inhabitants moral development.

As Brace struggled to make sense of this mass suffering, he also turned to Darwin to redeem it. If morality was molded by nurture, perhaps it was also partially shaped by nature. Perhaps some individuals were born with more moral temperaments than others. Couldnt morality, then, also work according to natural selection? Inborn virtue, he reasoned, might be an adaptive advantage, one that would prevent humanitys long-term degeneration. Moral individuals would overtake the immoral, and with it, the environments that aggravated this immorality. Povertys sting could be eased with the balm of long-term progress.

Braces reading of Darwin was selective, contradictory, and potentially harmful. Undoubtedly he would have witnessed how brutality and ferocity could provide a far sharper edge in the slums than morality. And what of the growing class of capitalists who stood to make a profit from cheap immigrant labor? Hadnt morality proven here to be an adaptive disadvantage within the environment of capitalism? Further, long-term species-progress offered little respite to those currently trapped in a slum. In the face of intense suffering, Brace leaned on natural selection to provide more than it could: a law of progress, scientific confirmation of Gods providential hand. He needed a credible hope that poverty would eventually wash out of New York in what he took to be Darwins cleansing cosmos.

Franklin Sanborn, a latecomer to Thoreau and Alcotts transcendentalist Concord, found more than an abolitionist argument in Darwin. He seized upon a historical mood. Sanborns insatiable drive to be le premier provocateur sent him careening alternatively down ridiculous and revolutionary avenues. He once used his own sewage to fertilize his garden. (Neighbors complained of the stench; Sanborn complained of their parochialism.) But he was also one of the Secret Six who supplied John Brown with funds for weapons. The restless Sanborn was most taken with Darwins portrait of a world that evolved through incessant struggle, a landscape that seemed to describe perfectly the United Statess own political unrest. As the battle with slavery grew ever more volatile through the 1850s, Darwin gave Sanborn a reason to view the growing conflict with optimism. Sanborn in turn embraced Brown as a will that catalyzed moral progress through conflict.

Despite their good intentions, Brace and Sanborn were not good readers of Darwin. They made the common mistake of overstretching his theory in the realm of politics and culture. Natural selection was not a theory of progress, but simply of change. It offered an explanation for the emergence of increasingly complex organisms but gave no guarantee of increasingly civil, intelligent, or moral ones. Cultural values of this sort had little role in the theory unless as evolutionary biologists or pop psychologists will sometimes speculate these values could somehow aid survival.

But desire inevitably colors the uses to which science is put, and alongside many orthodox Christians, Brace and Sanborn embraced what they saw as Darwins proof for providence. Whether for social Darwinism or revolutionary abolitionism, Darwin provided an ordering principle for a society that seemed to grow more complex each year.

Asa Gray was a scientist, and he would make no such mistakes. When Darwin sent him the Origin, he was as careful with the green book as when describing, dissecting, analyzing, and categorizing his North American flora. He saw clearly the strict limits that the author had hedged around his theory. When Gray listened to his idealistic young cousin Brace gush about Darwin, he protested. When you unscientific people take up a scientific principle, he admonished, you are apt to make too much of it, to push it to conclusions beyond what is warranted by the facts. As New England thawed from winter into spring, Darwins book floated its way through a wider audience that read it as eagerly as Brace. Harpers, The North American Review, The New York Times, and many other journals reviewed the Origin. Many reviewers applied the theory to race, others celebrated what they saw as its proof for progress, while still others deemed it atheistical. None were written by scientists. In a three-part series for the newborn but popular Atlantic Monthly, Gray would set the record straight as Darwins American ambassador and a voice for science.

Grays articles for The Atlantic clarified Darwins theory for a popular audience with admirable precision and simplicity. They promoted an antiracist agenda by arguing unequivocally for humanitys monogenesis. But Gray wanted to do more. He wanted to suggest how the book seemed to bring the world to life, Fuller says, to make it pulse with meaning and significance. But the question for Gray, a devout Presbyterian, was the same one that gnawed at many Christians and idealists who saw nature as creation, the reflection of divine law: what kind of meaning could one draw from Darwins universe of aimless chance and amoral conflict? Gray admitted that Darwins theory made little room for the idealist vision of nature which had given his life so much meaning. Then Gray himself began to doubt. He wrote to Darwin. Might natural selection be Gods tool? Darwin was skeptical. Nature was too cruel to be the contrivance of a benevolent and omnipotent God.

Gray is Fullers second-best portrait, a man who worries that he has opened a Pandoras box out of motives at once noble, rational, and human. He wants to refute polygenesists racism, to honor good science, to head a great tradition of American botany. But it costs him. Once the Origin of Species gained admission inside a readers head, it began to compete with all sorts of dearly held convictions, Fuller writes in disturbing language, as if the theory was not a magic mushroom but a brain-burrowing parasite.

By his third article, Gray began to pull away from certain implications of the theory. He argued that natural selection left the issue of first causes (that is, God) where they were before. He emphasized that natural selection explained a how for human existence, not its why. Grays strategic hedging at times failed to meet his own standards for scientific inquiry, but the simple truth, Fuller concludes, was that he found it impossible to live in the world Darwin had imagined.

The famously ethereal transcendentalist Amos Bronson Alcott was, like Gray, a better reader of Darwin, and like Gray, it depressed him. He saw clearly the threat that Darwins universe posed to his own Platonic idealism. He was annoyed that so many friends once enlivened by idealism Emerson, Sanborn, and Thoreau foremost were so smitten with the theory. He felt that Darwin was but the latest and greatest instance of sciences proclivity for soul-souring empiricism, a vinegar that stripped nature and humanity of beauty and grandeur. Like all materialists, Darwin looked at existence through a telescope from the wrong end, missing the heavens for their gas and atoms. An idealist as much by temperament as metaphysics, Alcott set aside the book after reading it and went on his cheerful way. He preached the gospel of idealism long after the Civil War when, ironically, an audience seemed hungrier than ever for the meaning it offered in a postbellum, post-Darwin landscape.

Henry David Thoreau managed what the other four could not: he read Darwin both accurately and joyously. Besides perhaps Gray, no American read the Origin of Species with as much care and insight. After Thoreau first encountered Darwin in The Voyage of the Beagle in the early 1840s, he undertook his own voyage into Concord woods and filled thousands of pages with drawings and notes on its ecosystems, interspersed with transcendental meditations.

Fuller is best on Thoreau in part because he shades his portrait with its subjects own empirical delight in the heft and texture of experience. Consider how Fuller unfolds the pagan joy of the Concord notebooks: Thoreau admires the gossamer filaments that glisten in the sun when he tears apart a milkweed pod. He samples the bitter juice of unripe berries or amuses himself by measuring his strides as he slides across frozen rivers, Fuller describes. His interests branched apart, proliferated, carved new channels of thought. He delved into cartography and the magnetic variations of compasses. He studied geology, he continues, and

[b]y 1860, his third-story attic room had become a private natural history museum, stuffed with birds nests, arrowheads, and more than a thousand pressed plants. On shelves made from driftwood he had gathered at Cape Cod, he kept the skins of reptiles, assorted pelts, rocks and stones, lichens, moss, and the carcass of a Coopers hawk as well as its spotted bluish-white egg.

Fuller sketches Thoreau much as Thoreau sketched Concord.

But what kind of higher meaning could Thoreau draw from Darwins theory, if Gray had failed? It could never be one rooted wholly in idealist metaphysics, as Gray realized, a fact which sometimes bothered Thoreau. He often worried that his growing empiricism was the sign of an aging brain, cooling from the volcanic transcendentalism of his youth into the crusts of middle age. Until his final years, Thoreau oscillated uneasily between science and transcendentalism, materialism and idealism. He managed a tentative reconciliation by locating mystery and wonder within materialism [] a new kind of magic, a new source of awe.

Squeezing Darwins theory for each drop of awe it could provide, Thoreau accomplished what his mentor Emerson called creative reading, the process of growing an accurate interpretation into a transformative one. Darwin had his own visionary moments in which nature buzzed with lavish, marvelous fecundity. Thoreau amplified them, invigorating the material world with transcendental soul. We tend to think of Darwins theory as one of grim determinism, of pointless change and purposeless death, Fuller notes, but this misses Darwins deeper insight that lifes messy process, its extravagant creation and destruction, led to something worth celebrating. For Darwin as much as Thoreau, the emergence of human beings in all of their contradictions was cause for joy, and his depiction of life as a dynamic process of continual becoming was not far from what Emerson hit upon in extraordinary essays like Circles.

Fuller ends on Thoreaus young death from tuberculosis. Ironically, Darwins most creative reader would be the first to succumb to natures severity. Such an ending was saved from tragedy by Thoreaus pagan joy, firm until his final hours of peace and even mirth. When his aunt asked if he had made his peace with God, he replied: We never quarreled. When another asked if he was ready for the next world, his answer was even more characteristic: One world at a time.

Kenyon Gradert is a doctoral candidate in English at Washington University in St. Louis.

Originally posted here:

Darwin Americanus - lareviewofbooks

Posted in Darwinism | Comments Off on Darwin Americanus – lareviewofbooks

Toyota Industries Acquires Warehouse Robotics Developer – WSJ – Wall Street Journal

Posted: at 8:19 am


Wall Street Journal
Toyota Industries Acquires Warehouse Robotics Developer - WSJ
Wall Street Journal
Toyota Industries Corp. is acquiring Bastian Solutions LLC, an Indianapolis-based warehouse automation and robotics developer, as the Japanese ...

and more »

Here is the original post:

Toyota Industries Acquires Warehouse Robotics Developer - WSJ - Wall Street Journal

Posted in Robotics | Comments Off on Toyota Industries Acquires Warehouse Robotics Developer – WSJ – Wall Street Journal